June 12, 2007
Posted: 06:58 PM ET

Romney holds an eight percentage point lead over McCain and Giuliani in New Hampshire, according to a new CNN/WMUR poll.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has jumped to the head of the pack of 2008 Republican presidential contenders in New Hampshire, according to a CNN/WMUR poll out Tuesday.

Romney shot past former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Sen. John McCain of Arizona in the latest poll, conducted Wednesday through Monday by the University of New Hampshire. Former Tennessee senator and "Law and Order" star Fred Thompson runs fourth after taking his first steps toward a campaign, the survey found. (Read full poll results [PDF])

Pollsters interviewed 304 New Hampshire residents who say they will vote in January's Republican primary, the first in the nation. The survey had a sampling error of 5.5 percentage points.

Romney, who led New Hampshire's southern neighbor from 2003 to 2007, drew 28 percent support in the new poll. Giuliani and McCain were tied for second at 20 percent, while 11 percent backed Thompson, who set up a campaign fundraising committee June 1.

The remainder of the GOP's presidential contenders were in the low single digits. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who has said he will decide whether to run in the fall, scored 4 percent; Texas congressman Ron Paul, the lone voice of opposition to the war in Iraq among Republican candidates, came in at 3 percent; Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee were at 2 percent; and Colorado U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo rated less than 1 percent.

None of those polled chose California congressman Duncan Hunter, former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore or former Wisconsin governor and Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson.

The poll was conducted after last week's CNN-WMUR-New Hampshire Union Leader debate in Manchester. Fred Thompson did not take part in that face-off, the first among the GOP candidates in the state.

Romney trailed McCain and Giuliani by 11 percentage points in the last CNN/WMUR poll, conducted in late March and early April, and the current survey found the race remains highly fluid. Only 6 percent of Granite State Republicans said they had definitely decided on a candidate, while 57 percent said they had no idea who they will support.

Among the top three, 32 percent found Romney was the most likeable candidate. Giuliani came in second with 28 percent, while McCain was third at 12 percent. But 31 percent of those polled said Giuliani had the best chance of beating the eventual Democratic nominee, compared to 25 percent for Romney and 14 percent for McCain.

Respondents were closely split on the question of which candidate was the strongest leader, with Giuliani and McCain tied at 26 percent and Romney at 25 percent. But McCain was considered the most believable, with 27 percent to Romney's 19 and Giuliani's 21.

McCain — who during last week's debate was the sole defender of the controversial immigration bill that stalled in the Senate last week — also was rated the most willing to take an unpopular stand. Thirty-six percent of those polled gave that distinction to McCain, compared to 16 percent each for Romney and Giuliani.

While the immigration controversy dominated last week's debate, the new poll finds it running a distant second among Granite State GOP voters' priorities. The war in Iraq topped the list at 36 percent, while immigration came in at 11 percent, the economy at 9 percent and health care at 8 percent. Abortion trailed the list at 6 percent.

Filed under: New Hampshire • Polls


Leroy Maxwell Tampa Florida   June 12th, 2007 4:15 pm ET

Whats most interesting to me is that 47% of the responders didn't even watch the debate, and that Ron Paul has gone from 1% to 3%.

misa, columbus ohio   June 12th, 2007 4:22 pm ET

only 41% of the primary voters polled actually watched the debate, with only 13% watching it in entirety.
voters need to wake up and investigate each of the candidates issues and not rely on the media to sway their opinions!!

ron paul 2008!

Joseph Light, Provo, UT   June 12th, 2007 4:22 pm ET

Anyone read Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death? They all appeared on TV and viewers chose the guy with the most hair. How many bald presidents have we had? How many since the invention of TV?

Chris Pensacola, FL   June 12th, 2007 4:27 pm ET

Wow, 309 residents from New Hampshire. Now that's a sampling!!

Isn't New Hampshire a blue state?? So why does this poll matter?
Wait, I just saw this-

Romney losing edge in New Hampshire - Politics - MSNBC.com

We never know the truth anymore. :(

Rocko, Austin, TX   June 12th, 2007 4:28 pm ET

Romney is clearly the best candidate in the race. He will be our next president!

Gary, Boston MA   June 12th, 2007 4:44 pm ET

Don't trust polls.. that is unless they are based on a large and widely distributed sample. A restricted sample of 300, or even 1000 is NOT believable. What it is.. is propaganda. Give me a nationwide distributed poll consisting of tens of thousands+, and maybe you will have my attention.

Frank Choctaw, OK   June 12th, 2007 4:46 pm ET

Ah, New Hampshire residents…The Budge Deficit should be your #1 concern. As the saying goes, "it's the economy stupid". However, I'd seriously doubt that you'll like 15% inflation.

Please don't vote if you don't know or do the research. You're just ruining America by blind voting.

Harry Smith Cleveland Ohio   June 12th, 2007 4:49 pm ET

Go Romney!!!

Thompson was a key supporter of McCain-Feingold and he was a heavy McCain supporter.

Trent Hill, Denham Springs, Louisiana   June 12th, 2007 4:49 pm ET

The true story here is that Ron Paul is at 3%.

Russ Hackensack NJ   June 12th, 2007 5:06 pm ET

"Romney surges ahead in New Hampshire"
WoW a Whole 304 Peeps, Now That is Science
Thanks CNN
One of the Questions the 304 where asked.
24. (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS ONLY :) As you may know, the Republican presidential
candidates debated on TV this past Tuesday night. Did you watch or listen to all of that debate,
most of that debate, some of that debate, only a few minutes of that debate, or did you not watch
or listen to any part of that debate?
June
2007
All of it 13%
Most of it 9%
Some of it 19%
Only a few minutes of it 12%
Did not watch debate 47%
No opinion *
47% of clueless people participated.

S. Richard, Olathe, KS   June 12th, 2007 5:28 pm ET

Keep up the good work, Mitt.
Mr. Romney is extremely clever to keep focused on the early primary states, which are crucial to the nomination. Seeking higher national numbers is tempting, but ultimately irrelevant to the primary process in which nominees are decided. This is the problem which will face Fred Thompson like a brick wall- high national numbers, but trailing heavily in the primary states (outside the South).
Mitt's playing it just right.

Patrick, Cincinnati,OH   June 12th, 2007 5:29 pm ET

I'd sooner live under Saddam Husseins rule than have Mitt Romney as president.

Philip, Monrovia, IN   June 12th, 2007 5:40 pm ET

Mitt Romney is clear, concise, and oozes competence. I wouldn't care if he was a Druid and was raised on Mars, I'll support him. Imagine what he could do for Social Security and the deficit after he rescued the 2002 Olympics!

President Mitt Romney has a nice ring to it!

Adam, San Mateo, CA   June 12th, 2007 5:42 pm ET

"I’d sooner live under Saddam Hussein's rule than have Mitt Romney as president. Posted By Patrick, Cincinnati,OH"

Why, Patrick?

Aaron, Mesa AZ   June 12th, 2007 5:48 pm ET

I'd like to hear from the Romney supporters what their favorite policy is of their chosen candidate. What's most important that causes you to say, "Romney is clearly the best candidate"?

Also, what is your opinion on the eradication of personal freedoms in the Patriot Act, and what is your opinion of preventive nuclear strikes?

I want a candidate that will turn back the Patriot Act and swear off preventive nuclear attacks.

Tuan, Lakeville, MN   June 12th, 2007 6:01 pm ET

Whoever doing the polling is as corrupted as the TV stations that are doing the debates. If anyone cared to watch the debate, it was clear who won. How can someone vote for Thompson if you have no fricken idea what the man stands for. This whole polling thing is a sham.

John. Gothenburg Sweden   June 12th, 2007 6:06 pm ET

I'd like a candidate who would get rid of the IRS, end the drug war, get us out of Iraq immediately (like 80% of americans want) and cut the federal government waaaaay back. There's only one Republican and 0 democrats who will do any of these things.

Aaron, Boston MA   June 12th, 2007 6:09 pm ET

Mitt Romney was running for president the moment he became governor of Massachusetts. He hit the campaign trail less than a year in office, and left behind him a deteriorated infrastructure, a broken education system, and higher taxes than ever before. In four years, how many jobs did the self-proclaimed magnet for business growth draw to the state? 5200. 5200 jobs in 4 years! Just imagine what he'll do for the country.

Jim, Columbus OH   June 12th, 2007 6:18 pm ET

It's unfortunate the media is driving this election. Neither of the 'front runners' in either party currently present the best vision for our country. Unfortunately the candidates with the best plans (Ron Paul in particular) get little press. And lets face it, unless the sheep see their faces often, they will not get the votes.

Mike,San Antonio TX   June 12th, 2007 6:28 pm ET

I will not be voting for anyone who wants to double the size of a prison is to hold people ilegally without charging them. Like Mitt says "some people say we oughta get rid of Guantanamo, I say we oughta double Guantanamo". If that doesn't scream Neocon what does?

Donald Brown Chicago IL   June 12th, 2007 6:33 pm ET

Romney will win the election!!

Governors win elections not Senators.

John, Cincinnati, Ohio   June 12th, 2007 6:34 pm ET

Mitt Romney - our next Warren Harding?

David, Gilbert Arizona   June 12th, 2007 6:37 pm ET

47% of the people polled formed their opinion based on a 15 second sound byte. That's what passes these days as an educated voter.

I watched both debates. I would not vote for Mitt Romney. He waffles on many issues. After a while I get the impression he has no real opinion about anything. He only says what he thinks voters want to hear.

Bob, Orem, UT   June 12th, 2007 6:47 pm ET

Re: Chris Pensacola's comment:

The MSNBC article you reference is from three months ago! The point is Romney was small then and he's big now in New Hampshire.

Dave, Milan, MI   June 12th, 2007 6:55 pm ET

Why is this surprising at all? NH is right next to MA. These kind of results make me appreciate the way Florida is moving its primary up so that NH and Iowa aren't so important. Unfortunately, posting results from smaller states still does influence other states' perceptions.

Mike Tagger / Wareham, Ma.   June 12th, 2007 7:00 pm ET

304 people polled? Thats is not indicative of much at all.

Trying to make someone look like a winner sometimes works but not for me.

Dave Charlotte, NC   June 12th, 2007 7:06 pm ET

For those Mitt fans who failed to watch the debate…Mitt has an itchy finger for the nuke button against Iran.

In the 2nd debate (that was in South Carolina on FoxNews, for the uninformed), he endorsed torture of prisoners.

In the 1st debate (Simi, California on MSNBC), he told us how he was for abortion, but miraculously in time for his run for the Republican nomination, it was explained to him so that he 'saw the light'.

BTW, Ron Paul won the first and third denate polls by wide margins and came in second in the SC debate. He's the only Repub candidate who was 'outreaged' (his words) at the public consensus amongst the other candidates to leave nuclear attack against Iran (a third world country) on the table and to continue the Iraq war.

Dave

Enoch, Los Angeles CA   June 12th, 2007 7:07 pm ET

The only thing Romney believes in concretely is that a feller by the name of Joseph Smith found golden plates with the word of god that only he could read and be shown, and that also magically dissappeared. That's what Romney believes. And come on CNN, publishing results from a poll of 304 people, are you guys for real? Please review the basics of scientific methodology. How stupid do you think we are?

L. Kline, Chattanooga, TN   June 12th, 2007 7:10 pm ET

Why does a survey of 304 New Hampshire residents even warrent a story on CNN. How was the list of callers generated? What database of callers was used? I'm sure I could call 304 voters to reflect any number of possible winners. Next time if you are going to write a story give the details. How were the callers chosen for the survey/poll? Another CNN story handpicked to reflect CNN's bias.

Chris Pensacola, FL   June 12th, 2007 7:11 pm ET

You're right it is old. I suspect my point was showing how different media outlets "hooks up" their own people with the power of wording. ;)

Cheers

Mike, San Antonio, TX   June 12th, 2007 7:12 pm ET

What has Romney done as a politician that's conservative? The answer is nothing. He's not a conservative in the true sense, he's not trying to stop the IRS or stop illegal immigration as it should be stopped. You are watching a more polished Bush pt. II. Don't be fooled again. Vote for a candidate who is against nation building over-seas, wants to protect our borders, and actually cares about catching Osama Bin Laden.

Rebecca, Pittsfield, MA   June 12th, 2007 7:13 pm ET

Romney is an empty suit. He left Massachusetts in shambles by cutting local aid. It currently costs $300/yr per child to ride the school bus, $250/yr/child per activity. My town had money to pay these things before he showed up. He may talk about cutting taxes, but he jacked up the price of living.

Trust me, you don't want the guy running the country.

Bayla M Boston, MA   June 12th, 2007 7:14 pm ET

Warning- Romney was a "no show" Govenour in Massacusetts, he used "fees " instead of "taxes" but that caused a huge deficit in the Massachusetts State budget.

Our roads and infrastructure are a mess, because there was not enough money to pay for repairs.

He is supposed to be "the expert" on business but during his tenure Massachusetts lost a record 250,000 jobs or more. He never knew the states biggest employer, Gillette, was being bought by Proctor and Gamble. Layoffs ensued , causing more job loss.

Education has suffered state wide, There are not enough funds for it. He sphiphoned off money and sent it through the Bush re-election campaign. He hid all the campaign money he has been colecting, through some "loophole".

He was barely in Massachusetts the last year he was Govenour. He never took responsibility for anything bad that happened due to state goverment, but he would run in and do a press conference if something positive happened, even if he had nothing to do with it.

If Al Gore was the "annoying know it all" in 2000, then Romney is the annoying squeeky clean "tattletale" who Brown noses his way through life.

Remember people- "Good hair" does not make a good president. He's phony and he hides behind an agenda that would put women back into "the kitchen barefoot and pregnant".

He does not know Constitutional Law, which should be a requirement for all Presidential Candidates.

Do not vote for him. Our State is a mess now and the new Gov elect has a lot of work , just fixing all that Romney , broke, busted and stole.

Greg, Queen Creek AZ   June 12th, 2007 8:09 pm ET

Mitt,
has the most knowledge and depth of ANY candidate running. He's what our country needs when it comes to resolving the issues facing us today such as terrorism, social security, immigration, healthcare, keeping taxes low. Contrary to what some have said here on this site he is the ONLY one that has accomplished anything outside of DC worth noting. He's not a DC Beltway guy and will surround himself with competent people in his administration that get's things done. He has a track record in his personal life you can verify against.

Sally, North Dakota   June 12th, 2007 9:35 pm ET

The only thing Romney offers is a presidential "appearance." If anyone closely followed the issues, they would see that Ron Paul is the most conservative and honest candidate. The idea offered by the neocons that we can nation build is derrived from some sort of utopian, liberal view point. We need to return to the republic, and stop trying to nation build.

Sister Toldjah » McCain: Pandering in San Fran   June 12th, 2007 11:14 pm ET

[...] related Republican presidential candidate news, Mitt Romney continues an upward climb, and is now polling ahead in New Hampshire, while Rudy announced his "12 Commitments to the American People" today (not to be [...]

Ian, Eastham MA   June 13th, 2007 1:06 pm ET

CNN thinks you're stupid.

Of 304 people polled, 57% said they have no idea who they'd vote for.

Forget what CNN says, read the survey for yourself. The real story is that 57% of the voters are up for grabs!

Nathan LaHue, Concord NH   June 14th, 2007 12:33 am ET

I swear, I feel stupid having to watch CNN/WMUR, and I LIVE IN CONCORD New Hampshire. At the 3rd Debate, I was there at St. Anselm College. We had over 200 Ron Paul supporters. There were maybe 50 each from the "top-tier" NeoCons. Ron Paul's support will only grow, and the sheeple of America will see the light. Will they see it in time? 47%…….wow. 309 people? Yeah, very scientific CNN.

Frank, Lowell, MA   June 14th, 2007 9:39 am ET

Don't listen to the folks who flunked statistics and complain about this sample size.

Statistically speaking, you can approximate a normal distribution of an infinitely large population with fewer than 40 randomly sampled data points.

The difference between larger and smaller sample sizes is the +-error percentage. You can see in this poll the error is +-5.5% which is slightly higher than the 3% we are used to but hardly enough to call it a bogus poll. All it means is the folks who are impressed buy 1-2% swings in minor candidates are wasteing their focus.

As a frame of reference national polls usually have a sample size of less than 2000. Thankfully we don't have national elections so don’t waste your time reading national polls either. Go Romney! Let’s see a Romney-Giuliani ticket!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com