Comments on: Nader: Bloomberg won’t affect '08 decision

By: michael ferrara, austin, tx

michael ferrara, austin, tx — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:10:58 +0000

Nader didn't cost Al Gore the election...all of the idiots who voted for George Bush cost him the election. Not to mention the fiasco in Florida

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:44:44 +0000

Nader is in principle a good man and did a lot in his past to promote consumer rights and help the average man.

He did what he thought needed to be done...but he is no dictator.

Bloomberg however is a dictator.

By: Andrew Rivera Portland, Oregon

Andrew Rivera Portland, Oregon — Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:26:46 +0000

Nader and Bloomberg are self absorbed individuals. Through their eyes they have all the answer on how we should live. Nader is a traitor period. If it were not for his presidential efforts in 2000 the world would be a much better place. Bloomberg is so arrogant with his money and power. We as a nation must prevent these dictators from getting into power. We cannot continue to fail as we have in the past.

By: Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA

Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA — Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:45:17 +0000

If Nader runs he will guarantee that the Democrats' very good chance for winning the White House is shot to hell, and we'll get one of the GOP's political dwarves vying for the office. He must be stopped by any means necessary (legal, of course).

By: Fred

Fred — Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:03:47 +0000

Fred Thompson will be the next president of the United States; so all this talk of Nader, Bloomberg or even Hillary/Obama are just the flapping of gums. President Thompson will lead this great country to new heights, secure our borders, lower taxes, and fight for what is right.

By: Anthony, Toronto, Canada

Anthony, Toronto, Canada — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:57:59 +0000

I can't understand why so many people blame Ralph Nader for George Bush being elected president. Why not blame the people who voted for President Bush instead? Also, it has been suggested that Nixon probably beat Kennedy back in 1960. The Democrats probably cheated then, and now, more recently, the Republicans probably cheated. By my reckoning that makes it even.

By: Kristen - SLC, UT

Kristen - SLC, UT — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:58:31 +0000

No, the 'washed up has-been' who owes the U.S. an apology is George W. Bush.

By: D.Thoms, NYC, US

D.Thoms, NYC, US — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:05:21 +0000

That son-of-brat Nader BETTER NOT RUN AGAIN. He's the reason we have our current MORON-IN-CHIEF.

If Nader didn't split the vote, there'd be 3,000 more US SOLDIERS ALIVE TODAY.

Anyone who votes for Nader should join him in the political coffin in which he should already reside.

YOU'RE A WASHED UP HAS-BEEN, Ralph Nader!! And you owe this nation an APOLOGY, not any further "service".

By: Connie, Louisville, Tn.

Connie, Louisville, Tn. — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:57:48 +0000

Whether Nader had run or not, the Republicians would still have stolen the election. Just like they did in 2004. As long as every vote is not being counted, we can never have a true democracy.

By: Marc, Wilton Manors, Fl

Marc, Wilton Manors, Fl — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:47:27 +0000

Nader – Go Away!!!!!!

By: Los Angeles, CA

Los Angeles, CA — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:13:57 +0000

Run in '08 Ralph Nader, the Country needs you!

By: bill callahan, delaware

bill callahan, delaware — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:57:37 +0000

Ralph Nader is delusional. He alone cost Gore the election. If his ego wasn't so huge, he would realize and admit this well known fact. Bill in DE