Comments on: Paul reports more campaign cash than McCain

By: Trevor, Vancouver WA

Trevor, Vancouver WA — Sun, 05 Aug 2007 03:39:16 +0000

I discovered Ron Paul by watching the debates and found him to stand out as a candidate with intellectual honesty. He looks and the facts, stands upon principle, and doesn't bend to big money and special interests. He's truly someone capable of leading and uniting us and HAS MY VOTE!

By: Darrell, Foxboro, MA

Darrell, Foxboro, MA — Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:47:37 +0000

To Mike: I do agree that Governors can and do force change to their constituencies, even when they do not like it. However, other than the Governor of Texas forcing young girls to get the anti-cancer vaccine recently, I only see liberal governors making these decisions to advance human rights. I live in Massachusetts, and despite his current spin machine, Gov. Romney was a liberal while here, so his decision to enforce a universal health care system does not apply. If Ron Paul were somehow elected (which we may as well all agree is not going to happen), conservative governors would be able to violate human rights left and right just to pander to fundamentalist, reactionary, constituents. I do suppose those of us with an education and respect for other people can always just avoid those states. If only California bordered the northeast, we could have a much simpler solution: secession number 2!

By: Eric Johnson, Midlothian, TX

Eric Johnson, Midlothian, TX — Tue, 10 Jul 2007 03:41:58 +0000

I would like to see a poll of approx. 500 voters, with an equal split of Republicans and Democrats, which asks…

“Which of the 18 declared candidates would you vote for in the primary?”
(Names listed alphabetically)

This would dramatically change the perception you hope to propagate.

A large portion of Ron Paul’s supporters would count themselves as Democrats and would not be included in the “standard” poll of Republican candidates. And, we should not forget that a recent poll shows a majority of Americans would consider voting for a third party (this might upset the accuracy that you wish existed within these polls). And let us not forget that the Constitution Party may not run a candidate and thrust their support on Dr. Paul. How many dollars will that bring in?

$2.4 million is enough for now. Much more is on the way.

By: Mike, HI

Mike, HI — Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:16:46 +0000

"Sometimes a leader must force change even when the people do not want it." A leader like, perhaps, a governor? Is anyone else disgusted with the LA Times' article about the fundraising results summarized in the political ticker? It mentions McCain as only having 2 million on hand, and then simply says that all other GOP candidates are living off "the equivalent of pocket change." Either reporters are extremely lazy these days, or they really don't want Dr. Paul getting anywhere in the polls. You'd think a political 'nobody becomes a somebody' story would be more engaging and sell more papers than a 'the rich get richer!' story.

By: Daniel, Tn

Daniel, Tn — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:05:06 +0000

For anyone who votes other than Mr. Paul, I pitty you. Thanks CNN for actually giving Ron Paul some exposure every once in a while. While Im not a fan of corporate controlled media i.e: mainstream propagenda, I do thanks you. Im very young, soon to be 24 years old. I see through all the other politicians b.s, Dr. Paul is the real mccoy. Im neither Rep or Dem, but I like his message and his honesty and totally support him. Thompson is a joke as are everyone else. Go Ron Go.

By: John, Columbus, OH

John, Columbus, OH — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:50:08 +0000

To Darrell (July 8, 2007 7:25 pm),
Ron Paul is not saying: "I don’t want to deal with it, let the states decide."
He’s saying: “The Constitution doesn’t authorize it, let the states decide.” Blame the Founding Fathers of the country you live in. (see 10th Amendment)

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." - George Washington

The Constitution is the fireplace! It contains the fire. We send politicians to Washington, D.C. to watch the fire! When the fire starts up the drapes, it’s high time for action. Presidents take an oath to uphold the Constitution (to keep the fire in the fireplace). Yet now most politicians come back to their constituents bragging about how much bigger they made the fire!
"I set fire to the bedroom!"
"I set fire to the kitchen!"
"Vote for me; I’ll set the den on fire."
At best, they don’t even know their own jobs!
The Constitution was written by men who knew the dark side of government.

By: Jeff from Welch, WV.

Jeff from Welch, WV. — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:49:40 +0000

$2.4 million is pretty awesome for a candidate that does take money from special interests.

It's also pretty awesome that Ron Paul has practially won all the post-debate online polls (although he finish a close 2nd to Romney in the Fox News Text Messaging Poll).

Only 2%?

I don't believe that for a second!

By: Patriots Everytown, USA

Patriots Everytown, USA — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 02:35:18 +0000

We love you Ron!
Go get 'em!
We're here with you till the end. Don't forget that!!!

By: Darrell, Foxboro MA

Darrell, Foxboro MA — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:27:43 +0000

Oops, I meant his rejection of a rejection of the Dubai Ports Deal. Sorry!

By: Darrell, Foxboro MA

Darrell, Foxboro MA — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:25:29 +0000

In my opinion, it is a fine thing for people to be personally libertarian about their political views. However, for a politician to be so implies that things are ok when left to "natural processes." As if a free market was fair. As if our educational system does not absolutely pander to wealthy towns by using property taxes (!) to determine which schools get money. As if there was not racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. in our country. For Ron Paul to argue for letting states make decisions on these issues will lead to every state pushing to the extremes: conservative states would outlaw all abortions, put pressure on homosexuals, reinstitute segregation; liberal states would legalize drugs and gay marriage and would become welfare states. And I am a bleeding heart liberal saying this. Sometimes a leader must force change even when the people do not want it. If someone like Ron Paul is elected, there will be even more of a disconnect between the Northeastern states plus the West Coast on one side and the Midwest and Deep South on the other. As much as I dislike President Bush's policies, I actually admire that he bucks the opinion trend on many issues. If Iraq was built on a foundation of truth (as Afghanistan was), more people might support him. I admire his support for an immigration bill, I admire his rejection of the Dubai Ports deal, and I even admire his stance on stem cell research (though I don't agree with him on any of these issues). We need someone with more leadership qualities, but who is willing to compromise and build consensus, not someone who is going to say "I don't want to deal with it, let the states decide."

By: Frustrated Austinite, Austin, TX

Frustrated Austinite, Austin, TX — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:17:48 +0000

Ron Paul can be frugal because he has a HUGE following on the internet and is the only candidate with active supporters going out and spending their own money on promoting him. What other candidate can say that? None! How much money does this save Ron Paul? Millions! Other candidates have to higher people to write blogs and comments on the web! What does that tell Americans? hm.

By: Jim Queens N.Y.

Jim Queens N.Y. — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:33:47 +0000

Ron Paul is the only contender not spinning himself. What you see is what you get with The Honorable Dr. Paul, and that, in a nut shell explins his appeal to the masses.

I've contributed to Ron Paul 2008 and will continue to do so as his momentum grows.

America knows how important it is to break the chain of servitude towards the owners of the media as well as the military industrial complex. We need a President that is not beholden to outside ( one world order – - CFR ) interests.

By: chris, san antonio, Tx

chris, san antonio, Tx — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:22:05 +0000

"He even claims on his website that NAFTA will lead to a “North American Union” that would make Canada, the US and Mexico one nation! With radically protectionist views like this, I don’t think he should be considered a serious candidate by anyone."
Dr. Paul is for OPENING up our markets to foreign competition. this is the opposite position a so called "protectionist" would take. A protectionist would advocate increased tariffs (to protect domestic business at expense of the consumer) and increased govt. regulations. Oh wait, these among other protectionist policies have been implemented for decades now.
Oh yea, and that North American Union you spoke about. It is not so unrealistic as you suppose. In fact the latest immigration bill had provisions in it to further advance it. I believe Cnn's Lou Dobbs even spoke about it as well some time back.

By: chris, san antonio, Tx

chris, san antonio, Tx — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:12:19 +0000

a response to Hojo r. paul has not lied he has made it clear that the reason he is running on the republican ticket is because his views would not be exposed to the audience numbers if he ran on a third party ticket, and would be just about guaranteed excluded from any debates.
he does not propose to legalize drugs. he desires many issues (including drugs) to be returned to the States to decide, this is not advocating legalization of drugs.
Reguarding foreign policy,Dr. Paul is a non-interventionist, this is not the same as an isolationist as is commonly charged.
A final note, I am a life long Republican voter and have no problem voting for a libertarian, if that person also happens to be the best canidate, which I believe Dr. Paul is.

By: Shawn Hyde, Rochester Minnesota

Shawn Hyde, Rochester Minnesota — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 03:12:18 +0000

Vote Ron Paul for American Freedom in the primaries and in the 2008 election!

Ron Paul for a free America! I'm gonna go make a donation right now!

By: Hopeful Rochester, MN

Hopeful Rochester, MN — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:37:26 +0000

I am thrilled to finally have a presidential candidate who really understands the duty of protecting the freedoms of the American People; and as sappy as it may sound, it brings tears of joy to my eyes to see that there is hope for the voices of "We the People" to not only be heard, but resound from coast to coast.

By: Kimmy, Vancouver Wa

Kimmy, Vancouver Wa — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 22:26:03 +0000

His message of freedom and liberty rock. The American people are waking up! Ron Paul gives America hope once again:)

By: akidabroad

akidabroad — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:39:31 +0000

Ron Paul would like us to pull out of the World Trade Organization and NAFTA because he believes they threaten US sovereignty. He even claims on his website that NAFTA will lead to a "North American Union" that would make Canada, the US and Mexico one nation! With radically protectionist views like this, I don't think he should be considered a serious candidate by anyone.

By: Chris, Prairie Grove AR

Chris, Prairie Grove AR — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:58:58 +0000

I agree with Matt from Texas. From the people's stand point, we are waiting eagerly to see the media give Ron Paul the time and exposure he deserves, but I suppose that would pose a problem to too many intrest groups. I do believe he like many have said, is one of the last true politicians for the people. It is kinda sad that, that commitment is met with nothing but contempt.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:52:45 +0000

Isolationism would allow the US taxes and spending to shrink dramatically.

The military-industrial complex and oil robber-barons are out of control turning the USA into a fascist police state.

I hope Ron wins but the Republicans don't seem to be interested and are brainwashed into supported Bush policy no matter what the human and financial costs.

By: rich, hatfield,pa

rich, hatfield,pa — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:42:57 +0000

Let's see:
Ron Paul has taken in less money than the other top tier Republican candidates.(this can be likened to LESS TAXATION ALA GOODBYE IRS, ETC) He has spent far less in the same quarter.
The kicker is in the results:
He has improved his support and recognition at least four-fold.
He accomplished more with much less.
He has thousands of supporters that actually do work on his behalf without pay. He never had the groups organized or funded-they organized spontaneously from his TRUE grass roots support. He doesn't have to hire and buss in supporters. I heard he has only 11 paid campaign workers. He will probably add more in key areas to compliment his
grassroots supporters' skills.
What a way to campaign...
what a way to govern...

By: brandon walker

brandon walker — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:43:54 +0000

ive got bad news for the reporters and funders over at cnn. giuliani nor mccain will be the president of the United States.

'sad sad day for america' just like the insane immigration bill not passing.

By: Stuart Lockhart, Vancouver, WA

Stuart Lockhart, Vancouver, WA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:37:43 +0000

In a few more months even the Rudy McRomney supporters will see the writing on the wall. Ron Paul WILL BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT! The American people will finally win for a change too.

By: Eye of Modok » Finally, a man I’d like to seen in office.

Eye of Modok » Finally, a man I’d like to seen in office. — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:32:42 +0000

[...] party, and while considered a long shot, has raised over $2.2 million for his campaign. He has more cash on hand than John McCain. I'd really like to see a Libertarian in office, and this seems like the first realistic [...]

By: Jason, Cola, SC

Jason, Cola, SC — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:49:03 +0000

I find myself intrigued by Ron Paul ever since his showdown with Giuliani at one of the debates. Of all the candidates from both parties he is still not my first choice, but his being elected would not fill me with the same sense of dread and hopelessness as any of the other Republicans either running now or "considering" a run. I wish him all the success, because his is a message many so-called conservatives need to hear.

By: Mark, Harrisburg PA

Mark, Harrisburg PA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:44:47 +0000

Great story!! That's why I want the man to be president. He raised 2.4 Million and guess what? He still has 2.4 Million. I trust this man with my tax money!

By: Darrell, Foxboro MA

Darrell, Foxboro MA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:44:18 +0000

The problem with voting for Ron Paul is that, while many Americans probably would define themselves as "libertarian" (if it hadn't been made a bad word by politicians and media for years), people do not necessarily want a libertarian running the country. Ron Paul has some very novel ideas, but mixed in with his platform of "if it doesn't hurt others, it should be legal" is: abolition of the Education Department, an end to federal loans for college students, an isolationist foreign policy, and the absolute unfettered dominance of the Free Market. As a liberal, the last thing I want is a hands-off president. I want more wealth redistribution, higher taxes for the wealthiest Americans, and a foreign policy built on collaboration. Hopefully Ron Paul continues to be the only "exciting" Republican.

By: Daniel SLC,UT

Daniel SLC,UT — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:18:55 +0000

This is the only Republican that truly cares about America. This is the only Republican I would EVER vote for. I have a huge amount of disgust for all Republicans. Republicans never ask questions they are fools and should all move to Iraq.

By: Borg Blog » Ron Paul Pulls Ahead of John McCain

Borg Blog » Ron Paul Pulls Ahead of John McCain — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:41:40 +0000

[...] by Eric F. Langborgh on 07 Jul 2007 at 08:41 am | Tagged as: 2008 Election CNN reports that GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul now has more money on hand than the once-front running [...]

By: Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR

Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:05:19 +0000

It is in the liberal media's best interest to promote Ron Paul. He could never win the general election. He only raised 2.4 million. Less than a fourth of what McCain raised. The article is misleading as they are only referring to cash on hand, and since Ron Paul doesn't spend it, he still has it. Not an indication of winning or "rising".

By: Manuel, woodbridge, VA

Manuel, woodbridge, VA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 11:55:18 +0000

This is tremendous news! My friends and family are becoming more and more interested in Ron Paul. He has my vote.

By: DK Harrisburg, PA

DK Harrisburg, PA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 11:39:51 +0000

a guy in Philly says he's voting for Ron Paul............ that's funny, by the time the primaries make it to PA there will only be one candidate on each side left. Most of the country might as well stop believing thier primary votes means a damn thing until the system is revamped so that we all get a voice. Again next year it'll be decided by 4 or 5 states. The rest of us may as well sleep until then..........

By: Holly, Houston, TX

Holly, Houston, TX — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 10:12:48 +0000

Frudy McRompson is the past, Ron Paul is the future. We are tired of the corrupt special interest politicians, we want principled politicians that work for the people! America is a democracy. Wake up!

By: J. Medica Phoenix, AZ

J. Medica Phoenix, AZ — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:20:10 +0000

Thank you for this article. I look forward to seeing more coverage of our next president in the future.

By: Michael, Buffalo, New York

Michael, Buffalo, New York — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:31:44 +0000

RUDY AND MITT DON'T HAVE NEAR AS MUCH CASH......AT LEAST IF YOU INCLUDE THEIR DEBT,,,,,

RON PAUL HAS NO DEBT.....

YELL ME, WHICH CANDIDATE WILL BE MOST FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE.....

WE ALL KNOW IT IS RON PAUL!!!!

By: Mike, Corpus Christi Texas

Mike, Corpus Christi Texas — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:30:57 +0000

Paul is little known and simply will not be in the first tier of the Repubs. Ironically he almost sounds Democratic on many of the issues. But, people by and large don't know him. The repub front runner will be Giuiliani....

By: Alan D. Price, Ph.D.

Alan D. Price, Ph.D. — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:21:17 +0000

In another article on CNN.com, I read the "exhilarating" news that Tommy Thompson was reporting an increase of about $145,000 (44%) over the money he raised in the first quarter, which was approximately $330,000. Yet, there was no mention of Ron Paul's quadrupling his first quarter results, as mentioned in this article. Ron Paul's 400% increase blows away Tommy Thompson's self-described "strong growth" of 44%. Or, is my math wrong? A better question is who really cares about this Thompson? And, as for his ghostly reflection, the apparitional, Fred (Flintstone) Thompson, apparently he cannot even raise enough money to compete with Ron Paul. My, what is this world coming to when grassroots support can outdo a corporate-funded candidate like McCain and incorporeal, fantasized candidate like Fred Thompson?

By: BZ SMITH, COLUMBUS, OH

BZ SMITH, COLUMBUS, OH — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:59:36 +0000

Good stuff. I'm glad to see Ron Paul getting all this support! After all, he deserves it! To All you nay-sayers and doubters, Don't belittle Ron Paul's accomplishment of 2.4 million cash on hand. It's a great accomplishment for a so called "bottom tier" candidate. He's now in 3rd place. The Ron Paul blitz has just begun. Prepare yourself.

By: James W., TX

James W., TX — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:52:30 +0000

The article didn't mention Ron Paul's 17,000+ grassroots volunteers who are out spreading his message in various ways every day. No other candidate has such dedicated supporters and you can't put a price on that.

By: Adam, Seattle WA

Adam, Seattle WA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:51:26 +0000

Thank you CNN for reporting this. I am still puzzled as to why the first sentence in all of your stories says he's a "long shot" or a "fringe candidate" That's not very fair reporting. Keep in mind that most of the other candidates have a several months to nearly a year head start on Dr. Paul and in the 3-months he's been a candidate, he's gone viral. Also, he has a very energized grassroots movement of people donating their energy, time and money into his campaign. Something most of the other Republican and Democrat candidates don't really have. They must pay staff and people to do the things Ron Paul is able to do for free.

By: Michael and Katja, Vancouver, Wa

Michael and Katja, Vancouver, Wa — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:03:41 +0000

Ron Paul has a track record of not being corrupt. That is amazing in a politician. That also might explain why he hasn't spent his money yet.

By: Matt, Anchorage, AK

Matt, Anchorage, AK — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:01:25 +0000

Nice to see some coverage of Ron Paul's candidacy. His message is what America wants to hear and He is what America needs. He is every American's candidate.

By: Proud American, Sarasota, FL

Proud American, Sarasota, FL — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:46:47 +0000

Help the doctor!
Join a meetup.
Register as Republican.
Get signs, t-shirts, bumperstickers,etc.
DONATE! He needs more money!
Ron Paul will be the NEXT President of the United States!

By: Lee, Tupelo, MS

Lee, Tupelo, MS — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:43:47 +0000

Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that can beat Hillary.

A majority of American voters will NOT vote for a Pro-War candidate.

Paul is the GOP's only hope.

By: Jim, Huntington Beach, CA

Jim, Huntington Beach, CA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:21:41 +0000

Thank you for the post on Ron Paul. Glad to see him getting some coverage he deserves. Whether you agree with him or disagree with him, he gets the politics flowing and makes you think.

By: Michael, Republic, MO

Michael, Republic, MO — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:07:26 +0000

It is imperative that we abolish the bogus banking, and Ron Paul is the man to do it.

By: Sharree, Gold Canyon, AZ

Sharree, Gold Canyon, AZ — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:56:54 +0000

Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate running for president who is a true conservative and who believes in a constitutional government. He has never compromised his ethics or values. He has worked to try to keep us out of the mess we are in economically and militarily, understands what needs to be done to turn it around, and is the only candidate, regardless of party, that is willing to do it. Check him out for yourself on http://www.ronpaul2008.com.

By: Robert Pylant, Austin, Tx

Robert Pylant, Austin, Tx — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:53:47 +0000

WAY TO GO RON PAUL... guess all of us spammers just kept sending you *fake* money. I am a democrat and I support you both economically and politically – as a Constitutionalist you are SUPERMAN....

By: walter,fredericksburg VA

walter,fredericksburg VA — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:41:23 +0000

So this quarter I`ll be throwing good money after bad?ha i love it!since i have a cash position in Dr Paul, I will continue to watch closely.

By: Kyle Sanders

Kyle Sanders — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:31:41 +0000

Nice to see CNN at least respects the voice of the people when it's backed up by a couple million bucks. I'm gonna go donate another $50 to http://www.RonPaul2008.com and keep the momentum on the up-slope.

Cheers from Oregon Veterans!

Supporting Ron Paul is supporting the troops!