July 18, 2007
Posted: 10:23 AM ET

Elizabeth and John Edwards made a stop in New Orleans Monday.

WASHINGTON (CNN)Elizabeth Edwards sought to punch holes in the notion that New York Sen. Hillary Clinton is the women’s candidate in the 2008 race for the White House. For Edwards, that title falls to her husband, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, who is competing against Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination.

“She’s just not as vocal a women’s advocate as I want to see,” Elizabeth Edwards said in a wide ranging interview with the online magazine, Salon. “John is.”

Edwards particularly offered a sharp assessment of Clinton’s approach to providing healthcare to everyone.

“On the issues that are important to women, she has not … well, healthcare, that's enormously important to women, all the polls say, and what she says now is, we're going to have a national conversation about healthcare,” Edwards said in the Salon interview. “And then she describes some cost-saving things, which John also supports, but she acts like that's going to make healthcare affordable to everyone. And she knows it won't. She's not really talking about poverty, when the face of poverty is a woman's face, often a single mother.”

A Clinton spokesman declined to comment on Edwards’ remarks, while a spokesman for the Edwards presidential campaign would not speak directly about the Clinton comments other than to say Elizabeth Edwards was only talking up her husband's ability to offer solutions.

"What she did say is that she believes her husband is the best candidate for president,” the spokesman tells CNN. “And she thinks that her husband would be the best advocate on healthcare, on education, on women's issues and the fight to end poverty."

Elizabeth Edwards also spoke about her recent confrontation with conservative commentator Ann Coulter, the split with her husband on the issue of gay marriage and how she is handling her cancer treatments while campaigning on behalf of her husband.

Edwards announced earlier in the year that her bout with breast cancer had returned in a stronger form, but continues to take a highly visible role on the campaign trail this year.

TIME.com: Can Poverty Define John Edwards?

– CNN's Alexander Mooney contributed to this report

Filed under: Elizabeth Edwards • Hillary Clinton • John Edwards


GH, New York   July 18th, 2007 9:09 pm ET

With Elizabeth bashing Hillary now, there goes John Edwwards' chance to being picked as a presidential running mate with Hillary after the next democratic nomination.

Top Posts « WordPress.com   July 18th, 2007 7:58 pm ET

[...] Elizabeth Edwards offers sharp critique of Hillary [image] Elizabeth and John Edwards made a stop in New Orleans Monday. WASHINGTON (CNN) — Elizabeth Edwards […] [...]

Lisa P. Smith, Atlanta, Georgia   July 18th, 2007 6:49 pm ET

Elizabeth's comments were terrific!

Elizabeth wasn't bashing Hillary at all. In fact, all she said, basically, was “She’s just not as vocal a women’s advocate as I want to see…[but] John is.” (Which is true for me, too!)

Elizabeth's response was a natural (and accurate) thing to say. Why is anyone surprised?

Elizabeth Edwards is a very intelligent and compassionate woman. (I don't want another stupid, submissive Laura Bush-type.)

Hillary's plans for healthcare, poverty, and education, the environment, etc. are far too vague and conservative to create any REAL differences for most Americans–poor and middle classes.

Also, look at how much $$$ Hillary has received from the pharmaceutical companies. Enough said.

Edwards' plans are more aggressive, and he lays them out with greater detail (and more conviction!) than any of the other candidates.

John & Elizabeth ROCK!!! Edwards '08!!!

amanda fresno ca   July 18th, 2007 5:47 pm ET

Who even cares about a woman's advocate? I love my life like it is. And who knows whats important to me? My family, my husband, my kids. As long as they are taken care of I'm happy. Advocate for them…

Mike, HI   July 18th, 2007 4:29 pm ET

Steve, Brentwood CA:

"The far-left should stop trying to get their nose in every aspect of society… Marriage between a man and a woman ONLY should be in the constitution."

I'm sorry Steve, these two statements do not fit together.

Lin   July 18th, 2007 3:01 pm ET

what world are you living in? Hillary (& Bill) doing Anything – much less socializing with the Bushs'? Where do you get this stuff?

Susan Atlanta, Georgia   July 18th, 2007 2:01 pm ET

I think it is fun to see the Democrat Presidential Hopefuls bash on each other. Hillary is by no means a champion of the woman's cause. She is of course a champion on Hillary.

Lynn, Washington State   July 18th, 2007 1:58 pm ET

Go cats go … cat fights are always fun to watch, especially when one of the cats is that commie, Hillary Clinton!

Beth, Charlotte NC   July 18th, 2007 12:29 pm ET

John Edwards was a do-nothing senator for North Carolina. Those of us who voted him into office soon learned that he had no intentions of serving his home state.

Brigid, Woodside, NY   July 18th, 2007 11:42 am ET

What is so comical is that Mrs. Edwards speaks on a topic she has no expertise on and I am not suggesting that the politicians are any kind of experts, the healthcare issue is a highly complicated topic. But, as far as Mrs. Clinton, I don't agree with everyone of her views on various topics, but I highly admire her. She is a women of power, leadership, high intelligence, integrity and prefers to stand her own ground in front of her husband instead of behind him and does not pretend to be something she is not. Let's face the truth, this country is not ready for a women president and that is sad and pathetic, and it's even more pathetic that our country who considers itself to be democratic and modern is still buried in the idea that because society says and does so, it is still basically a world where the opposite sex dominates. Kudos to Mrs. Clinton for having the guts to run for the presidency against all MALE candidates. Mrs. Edwards might not want to confront it, but that is what this is all about, the bottom line, the battle of the sexes!

Barabas   July 18th, 2007 11:28 am ET

Yes, yes, yes….let her tear down Hillary, because Edwards will never win. This just lays out the red carpet for the republicans to go ahead. Go Elizabeth!

rae, lisle, il   July 18th, 2007 11:27 am ET

john edwards was my candidate until his $400 haircut. the subsequent $1200 haircut took him completely off my list. of all the dem candidates hillary clinton is the most capable, however, i'm concerned about her lack of grace. nothing to do with her fashion sense. it's her defensive response to any criticism. one needs to aknowledge past mistakes, let people know one's learned the lesson, and move on. being defensive and the issues never go away.
so i thought i'd vote for john edwards. no longer. mr. edwards gets fancy haircuts and my vote goes to hillary clinton.

dhiraj, lutherville, md   July 18th, 2007 11:20 am ET

One should never make her husband better by knocking the other candidate. If Elizabeth wants to make Edward look better then only talk the issues, do not put others down. It will never work.
Did she say she is christian? Is this what they teach in church?
Elizabeth is immature. How can she or husband get elected?

Jessica,   July 18th, 2007 11:02 am ET

Everyone seems to complain about the Bush Administration regarding the war. However, didn’t our country vote him back in office?

As far as John Edwards, he was a jerk last time while running for office and now, he appears weak because his wife is fighting his battles. As others have stated, the Clintons were very king and supportive when they learned Mrs. Edwards was battling cancer again. Yet this is the “thank you” she responds with.

If our country thinks Bush is horrible, imagine how corrupt our country would be if Edwards were in office – I think I would move to another country.

Stevie SLC Utah   July 18th, 2007 10:54 am ET

While I like both the Edwards and Clintons I think I can be pretty fair minded about Mrs. Edwards remarks. She is campaigning for her husband just like Mrs. Clinton did for her husband when Bill was running for office. I voted for Bill Clinton, Hillary was 50% of the reason I voted for Bill. And that is probably how I will vote in the future, if I pick up on something in the spouse that I don't feel comfortable with, I will not vote for that candidate.

Evan, Chicago, IL   July 18th, 2007 10:44 am ET

Does anyone know what the "split on gay marriage" is between them? Which believes which?

G   July 18th, 2007 10:24 am ET

Didn't John Edwards make his millions of dollars suing Doctors? He has an anwer for the health system for this country? How about supporting hard working doctors and not suing them! Politics…politicians…all BS! Most of them are very rich, living in very big houses that are not "green" and only mingle with the public when they want our votes around election time. We should cut out the big campaign spending, limit the campaign commercials and negetive jargon, and encourage good and honest men and woman to go into politics "for the people." God Bless America…it's still the best and most generous country. Ps. Thank you Doctors for all of your hard work!

Bubba, Swainsboro GA   July 18th, 2007 10:09 am ET

She's got a right to her opinion, but it isn't the wisest and most well-thought-out remark I've ever heard. Yes, a man would be a better advocate for women's rights than a mere woman, wouldn't he? See if that sounds better after a million repeats on YouTube . .

Barbara Benson, Leesburg, VA   July 18th, 2007 10:07 am ET

I feel it is inappropriate for Mrs. Edwards to make comments to and pass judgement on Mrs. Clinton's campaign addresses and issues. Mrs. Edwards is not running for President of the United States therefore should not behave as if she were.

Dave, New York, NY   July 18th, 2007 10:06 am ET

Who's running for president, Elizabeth Edwards or John Edwards? I've heard more news coverage about her opinions than coverage on what her husband is actually saying. Of course, we all need to remember that her husband is a candidate and that she is going to criticize other candidates in favor of her husband.
Hillary is a strong candidate, Obama is a strong candidate, John Edwards is not.

Jeff, Houston, Texas   July 18th, 2007 9:55 am ET

Well, NONE of the democratic candidates are putting the issues out there the way I would like to see them aired. That is why i am still undecided. But on the other hand, I sort of understand the reluctance to speak out. Progressives that call something exactly what they are are labled as un-American.

And Hillary? If she went to far on women's issues, the far right would start foaming at the mouth.

I miss free speech for our candidates…I long for a time when candidates can say EXACTLY what is on their minds without worrying about the hyprotical and distorted sensibilities of a few uneducated people.

Providence, RI   July 18th, 2007 9:11 am ET

Elizabeth is desparately seeking for her husband's nomination, but Liz forgot Hillary's records speak for herself. I feel sorry for both Liz and Eddy! They lost in 2004, and they still do not want to give up! That is why I like Shakespeare'a "Macbeth." It is ruthless ambition. They are fake, phony, and cons. They live in 28,000 sq feet mansion, and fights poverty! What a practical joke. If Eddy really cares about poors, like Mother Therese, then Eddy should give uo his mansion to build an orphanage or homeless shelter!!!! I WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR THIS PHONIES!!!!

Sharane, Baltimore, MD.   July 18th, 2007 8:53 am ET

Good for Elizabeth! Hilary is all soundbite and no substance. Obama and Edwards are the real advocates for women!

Barbara, China Grove, NC   July 18th, 2007 8:50 am ET

The only relevant thing about this story is contrary to popular belief women do not automatically support other women. If anything, it is a much tougher sell.

J.R. Grossman Mt. Laurel, NJ   July 18th, 2007 8:41 am ET

Did anyone think to just muzzle Elizabeth Edwards..whoever would run against her husband would be no good in her eyes!

Al, San Francisco, CA   July 18th, 2007 8:27 am ET

I can sympathise mommy emlizabeth's personal cancer illness and frustration with Johnny boy's falling in polls in his 2nd bid for president. Instead of bad mouthing the front runner, she has to realise that Johnny boy does not have the right stuff to be the president. Johnny boy is so bad now, even Bill Richardson is ahead of him in New Hampshire.

PT   July 18th, 2007 8:12 am ET

When she starts knocking a fellow democratic competitor, you know that she and her husband have realised that they are losing the presidential race and desperate. That also shows that JOhn Edward is not a presidential or leadership material.

Adam, Boston MA   July 18th, 2007 8:11 am ET

For the '08 election, rather than lend support to a GOP candidate, I will be focusing my attention on keeping 'Billary' from getting elected at all costs- so hooray Elizabeth! Take as many shots as possible cause it can only hurt Clinton as Edwards is still polling a distant third and needs as much interaction w/ her and Barack as possible to try and win public appeal from some confrontations.

S, KC, MO   July 18th, 2007 7:33 am ET

I am confused about my opinion, but I believe that the Edwards are having issues that are serious enough that family should come first. I admire the determination. However, it seems to me that they need to spend time working through serious family issues. I don't want anyone to misconstrue my admiration for John Edwards. I would vote for him in a NY minute. But family must come first. Right now, Elizabeth must be his priority. Otherwise, it will appear that he is insensitive to his own.

Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA   July 18th, 2007 7:03 am ET

My anecdotal experience is that while some women like HRC for her "toughness", many more say they will not vote for her under any circumstances. I won't either, and I've never voted for a Repellican President.

Tricia Charlottetown PEI   July 18th, 2007 6:47 am ET

John and Elizabeth should both be home taking care of their Children's Mom.
Children are a Parent's first Priority.

George, Crawford, Texas   July 18th, 2007 6:00 am ET

Why did Mrs. Edwards only comment on Hillary Clinton? Because she is the only woman on the ticket, and about the only real competition John Edwards has. Barrack Obama may be up there in the polls, but anyone with a serious grasp on rality knows that he will never be elected President. There are far too many racists in this country to ever allow that to happen. The rest of the candidates don't have much hope of winning either. That leaves the Hill and Billery Show.

Amanda (Greenwich)   July 18th, 2007 2:49 am ET

I cannot take any person who claims that her husband's "face lit up" when speaking about poverty issues and so she quote-unquote-told-him "why shouldn't he do something about it?" Let's admit that Edwards's face lit up when he/she thought about all the struggling people in America who would be voting. So they strategetized their campaign accordingly. It would have been more than enough to say that it's an issue her husband cares deeply about, nothing too specific or asinine. What did Edwards do ever in his life before running for president to address this issue that he so cares about now? Do we all seem like simpletons who gobble up everything the candidates say? Maybe the country has become so dynamic that we welcome couples to be active participants in cmapaigns. Fine and good. But let's not take seriously this woman who tells idiotic lies.

Miranda, Edmonds, WA   July 18th, 2007 2:17 am ET

I find it slightly hypocritical that Elizabeth Edwards chooses to criticize Hillary Clinton's approach to healthcare when John Edwards made a lot of his money being a personal injury lawyer. Suing doctors doesn't exactly help his position on universal health care.

Jennifer, Houston, TX   July 18th, 2007 1:42 am ET

Oh please…some "attack." So, she talked up her husband's plans and criticized the plans of another candidate. What is this world coming to?

Glenda, McEwen, TN   July 18th, 2007 1:32 am ET

I don't believe Mrs. Edwards just helped her husband's campaign. He is running for President, and she needs to be campaigning for him yes. But we can do without attacking the other democratic opponents. If she feels her husband is the best, prove it. Hillary has my families vote in 08.

Leah   July 18th, 2007 12:22 am ET

Too bad Elizabeth Edwards has cancer as it sounds like she's a better candidate than her husband or Hillary.

tonyd grapevine, texas   July 18th, 2007 12:22 am ET

Elizabeth Edwards sure does a lot of talking for her husband, but can he walk the walk? At lease he's not lying by opening his mouth. Oh yeah, how does she justify his $400 haircuts?

wsblount, NY, NY   July 18th, 2007 12:04 am ET

She is absolutely correct.

Mrs. America   July 17th, 2007 11:59 pm ET

Mrs. Edwards should be careful how she talks. Her opinions could affect who runs as veep with Sen. Clinton.

Jay, Tampa Florida   July 17th, 2007 11:40 pm ET

I agree with Liz, I think John truly is the best woman candidate.

Mark from Harbor City, CA   July 17th, 2007 11:31 pm ET

Mrs. Edwards knocking Hillary is an example of the desperation of John Edwards campaign. He is un-trustworthy millionaire lawyer who earned his money off the backs of taxpayers. The Clintons have dedicated their LIVES to politics and making things better. In fact the ego-centric Edwards have just caused me to reach into my wallet…to donate to Team Hillary!!! At least she has the courage, dedication, conviction to FIGHT for this country. Edwards is just looking to further legal loopholes for his millionaire lawyer geezers… He will NEVER be President!

Barbara Childers, Balsam, North Carolina   July 17th, 2007 10:58 pm ET

I admire and will fully support John Edwards…his wife is the true meaning of a southern belle…she is a true lady in every since of the word…
Blessing to the entire Edwards family

Chris G, Fort Worth, Texas   July 17th, 2007 10:52 pm ET

Read THE CLINTON CRACK-UP and you'll never, ever vote for ANYONE with the last name of Clinton.

C - Seattle, WA   July 17th, 2007 10:40 pm ET

Anyone know how Edwards made all his money? Mal practice lawyer. His wife needs to pick her battles a little more carefully. John Edwards has done little to fix healthcare in this country, so far he has only hurt the system and make millions for himself.

James Gilson Valley, AL 36854   July 17th, 2007 10:24 pm ET

If John Edwards want to win or place in the elections, he has to come off the poverty kick. It will not work. He needs to get with the issues. Work on immigration reform, Medicare, etc.
Don't feed me more of this two America stuff.

Brad, Columbia, SC   July 17th, 2007 10:17 pm ET

Too often we confuse "attack" with "difference of opinion."

Comparing Max Cleland with Bin Laden is an attack. Suggesting John Edwards is a "fag" is an attack. But endorsing your husband's positions over another candidate's is not an attack… it's called campaigning.

Let's not be the boy who cried wolf here. Let's save our outrage over "attacks" for the real cases where someone needs to be called out for such irresponsibility.

H, NY, NY   July 17th, 2007 10:13 pm ET

Way to go Mrs Edwards!

I wonder if Hillary will talk to Obama about "removing your husband" from the next debate after your pointed, right on critique.

Hillary is not an advocate for anyone. She tells "you" how its going to be.

Martina, Germany   July 17th, 2007 9:43 pm ET

I admire Hillary Clinton and believe to be outspoken is not the way to go. Marketing has decided most of the elections in the USA and it is good to have someone more laid back and think before speaking out loud.

She is able to raise funds, hands on and loves her family.

Steve, Brentwood CA   July 17th, 2007 9:37 pm ET

The far-left should stop trying to get their nose in every aspect of society, for some reason it's okay to approve of gay marriage , but if you disagree, you are homophobic….I call those of us who do not agree with gay marriage as saviors of the moral decay that is eating away at our GREAT country. I applaud those try to stop this decay.

Marriage between a man and a woman ONLY should be in the constitution.
We need to STOP political correctness & save ourselves.

Greg , ashburn VA   July 17th, 2007 9:19 pm ET

WOULD EDWARDS take VP spot?

Is There A Cat Fight A Brewin : Simply Conservative   July 17th, 2007 8:50 pm ET

[...] Elizabeth Edwards offers sharp critique of Hillary [...]

Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky   July 17th, 2007 8:30 pm ET

Elizabeth raves against her sickness and husband's incapacity. She has no right to attack other candidate, why only Hillary? Because Hillary is the frontrunner consistantly and jealous of Hillary's grand performance. The Clintons were very nice to them when she found breast cancer. Elizabeth forgot her position and rode the high horse. Elizabeth said she is happier than Hillary(John apologized to Hillary), how stupid and low BMW she is. Elizabeth, keep going on, your husband's poll will goes down and Hillary's is going up, it is a kind of free campaign for Hillary. WH is the cake in the picture for you so wake up.

Tierra DelFuego, Boise, ID   July 17th, 2007 8:27 pm ET

That's a "sharp assessment"? A "sharp critique"? Nice adjectives, CNN….nothing like a little hype-building, hunh?

jack jett, Dallas   July 17th, 2007 8:23 pm ET

One of the great things about having a life threating disease, is that you say what you want, you get to the point and you don't beat around a Bush.

Life is too short to have any Bush in your lifel…or any form of bigotry.

Elizabeth Rocks

Jack Jett
http://www.jackejett.com

Micki Santa Clarita, CA   July 17th, 2007 8:08 pm ET

Anyone who can shed the light on what Hillary Clinton is really about is welcome! Heaven forbid that she is actually seen by the Democratic party as a viable candidate!! This country needs a change and I'm not sure who that person would be right now but I definitely know it's not Mrs. Clinton.

L.B. Marts, McKinney, TX   July 17th, 2007 7:47 pm ET

It amazes me that any of these candidates even think they can relate to the improverished of this country. They don't have a clue…..none of them. I'm also tired of hearing from all the "women in power" that as a female in this country my life apparently sucks. My life is fine and when I want more out of life I go for it. Also, the next time I hear HRC bad-mouth the Bush Administration and say that she voted for the Iraq War based on bad info from the Bush Admin…then I think she needs to remember that it was her Husband's Admin that passed on information to the Bush Admin about Iraq, Al Quaid, terrorism, Osama, etc…..she probably thought she new it all…..now she is caught with her hand in the cookie jar and wants to point at someone else for the blame. That is not the type of person I want for my next president….nor is it someone I'm proud to call a fellow-female.

Edwards Attacks Clinton « A Politico   July 17th, 2007 7:32 pm ET

[...] Attacks Clinton Elizabeth Edwards, wife of the presidential hopeful John Edwards, has offered her insightful commentary on Hillary Clinton in a Salon [...]

Ken Cory, San Francisco, CA.   July 17th, 2007 7:20 pm ET

Kudos to Elizabeth Edwards for being so candid and staying true to herself. I'm so glad she stood up to Ann C. and called out her poisonous rhetoric for what it is.

Karyl, Asheville, NC   July 17th, 2007 7:10 pm ET

Elizabeth Edwards has opened a subject that heretofore has be tightly sealed and off-limits. The subject is the conditions that women are subjected to across the board in job pay, advancement, health care, food stamps, section 8 housing, social security retirement payments that do not give credit to time spent rearing children rather than returning to the work force. Mothers are not protected but instead they are penalized in every aspect of daily life.

I feel sad that some women believe that Hillary Clinton is a woman's advocate. She is not. She is bought and paid for by big corporations. In my opinion her ruler is the almighty dollar in her pocket and power.

Clinton and her husband cozy up to the Bush family, with the Cheney family, with the Rumsfield family even though they know that President Bush and VP Cheney authorized the torture and humiliation of the prisoners in Abu Grab. How can they associate with the instigators of murder, torture and shame provoking behavior? Because, I feel that they do not care what is done in the name of the United States under this Republican administration.

I feel that Hillary Clinton is morally vacant about the well-being of helpless humans period. She has no compassion for the weak, ill, disadvantaged, poor, and least of all women. She has had years to lift her voice in defense of women. She has said nothing.

Joseph/ Va.   July 17th, 2007 7:03 pm ET

Johnny edwards needs mommy elizabeth edwards to step back. All is does is attack people for her weak husband. this really makes him look bad her big mouth over shadow johnny he has no backbone

Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA   July 17th, 2007 6:43 pm ET

HRC is a mediocre lawyer from a half-arsed Southern state who tolerates Bubba's fooling around in the Oval Office because he's the only hope she has to satisfy _her_ urges– for power she is not worthy of wielding on behalf of women or men. He rnomination would be a death wish for the Dems, and her campaign funds can't buy her the street cred she needs, or my vote under any circumstances.

Ike   July 17th, 2007 6:41 pm ET

Which Edwards is running for president? You couldn't go wrong with either one. She will be a positive influence in administration.

South Carolina   July 17th, 2007 6:31 pm ET

You GO girl !!!

Tell them like it is !

Iconoclast, Houston, TX   July 17th, 2007 6:21 pm ET

Hilary and Obama will eventually team up, she as presidential candidate, he as potential vp. Edwards will be offered a prime cabinet spot.

Watch.

Vanessa Roacho, El Paso, Texas   July 17th, 2007 6:20 pm ET

Mrs.Edwards is only boasting about her husband because that is her husband. If John Edwards wasn't her husband, and was just some random person, she would probably have a different perspective of Hillary Clinton. Also, Edwards continues to speak of how her husband is a great candidate for the presidential seat, her husband can help fight poverty, etc. But she doesn't explain how her husbands plans will make the difference. How will Edwards fight poverty? Present his plans. At least Mrs. Clinton is providing somewhat of a brainstorm solution.

Pamela   July 17th, 2007 6:14 pm ET

Elizabeth Edwards should do a little more thinking than speaking. Neither of the Clinton's have gone after her husband and they both were very kind to her when they learned of her illness.

Her statements say more about her (and not in a good way)than they do Hillary. Bill Clinton always goes out of his way to say good things about all the candidates. She should remember her husband is very vunerable on a lot of issues that someone could take him on about.

Time for her to find a seat in a corner and sit down While she's there she should watch Obama's wife. She campaigns for him, speaks up for him but never makes attacks on other candidates (it's called class). Elizabeth Edwards should try and do likewise.

Ed Stein, LA, CA   July 17th, 2007 6:03 pm ET

Mrs. Edwards should stay out of politics. After all she is not running for office nor is she an expert on the issues she refers to in her opinion.

Anonymous   July 17th, 2007 5:51 pm ET

I like how John gets his wife to do the fighting against women. She faces off against Clinton and Coulter alike.

Meanwhile she is still battling cancer.
Gotta love her spirit…taking on both those tyrants.

Mike Smith, New Orleans   July 17th, 2007 5:49 pm ET

Too many people associate national healthcare with welfare or medicare. Its not going to happen. The real help will come when we confront the pharmaceutical companies over obscene profits and deceptive practices.

Stephen   July 17th, 2007 5:30 pm ET

Which Edwards is running for President??? the same can go for which Clinton is running for President?

Glenn,B'ham,Al   July 17th, 2007 5:29 pm ET

Hillary Wallace no longer pretends that a national health care system is possible.Wish we could find a someone to vote on that belived in it!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP