<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney leading in latest Iowa poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl Tevis, Granville, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-35954</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl Tevis, Granville, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-35954</guid>
		<description>&quot;Romney is intelligent, professional, successful, articulate, strong, focused and dedicated.&quot; Yes, but that is not enough. Ron Paul is all of those too.  I challenge you to look past the impressive facade of all the candidates to hear what they are really saying. What is the candidate articulate about? Does what he says make sense in light of the constitution, which Ron Paul aptly states is the only document the President promises to uphold? I would also challenge everyone to look at each candidate&#039;s voting record and source of campaign funds. Ron Paul is in favor of the constitutional principle of greater power for the state and individuals rather than federal government. He is in favor of conservative spending, not interfering in affairs of other countries, not engaging in preemptive war, not going to war without declaration of war by the congress (ie. Iraq), eliminating taxes, etc. He has an extremely consistent voting record and is backed by a grass-roots following.  The bottom line is: what he says makes sense in light of the foundations of our country, and he sticks to what he says. Thomas Jefferson said, &quot;Every generation needs a new revolution.&quot; Here is our chance. Check out the Ron Paul message at ronpaul2008.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Romney is intelligent, professional, successful, articulate, strong, focused and dedicated." Yes, but that is not enough. Ron Paul is all of those too.  I challenge you to look past the impressive facade of all the candidates to hear what they are really saying. What is the candidate articulate about? Does what he says make sense in light of the constitution, which Ron Paul aptly states is the only document the President promises to uphold? I would also challenge everyone to look at each candidate's voting record and source of campaign funds. Ron Paul is in favor of the constitutional principle of greater power for the state and individuals rather than federal government. He is in favor of conservative spending, not interfering in affairs of other countries, not engaging in preemptive war, not going to war without declaration of war by the congress (ie. Iraq), eliminating taxes, etc. He has an extremely consistent voting record and is backed by a grass-roots following.  The bottom line is: what he says makes sense in light of the foundations of our country, and he sticks to what he says. Thomas Jefferson said, "Every generation needs a new revolution." Here is our chance. Check out the Ron Paul message at ronpaul2008.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-32473</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-32473</guid>
		<description>Romney is intelligent, professional, successful, articulate, strong, focused and dedicated.

He’s got my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney is intelligent, professional, successful, articulate, strong, focused and dedicated.</p>
<p>He’s got my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juanito, Washington, DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-32393</link>
		<dc:creator>Juanito, Washington, DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-32393</guid>
		<description>Where is the &quot;Obama leading in latest Iowa poll&quot; headline? Oh...that&#039;s right, this is CNN...the Clinton News network, so since Hillary is trailing Obama in the latest Iowa poll, CNN did not bother to report THAT headline.
Thanks for showing your true colors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the "Obama leading in latest Iowa poll" headline? Oh...that's right, this is CNN...the Clinton News network, so since Hillary is trailing Obama in the latest Iowa poll, CNN did not bother to report THAT headline.<br />
Thanks for showing your true colors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juanito, Washington, DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-32239</link>
		<dc:creator>Juanito, Washington, DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/05/romney-leading-in-latest-iowa-poll/#comment-32239</guid>
		<description>Hello...CNN??? The same Iowa poll shows Obama leading in the Dem category...why isn&#039;t THAT a headline as well? Care to explain? I&#039;m pretty sure if Hillary was leading in Iowa, it would be a headline, but Obama leading....no headline for that.

So typical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello...CNN??? The same Iowa poll shows Obama leading in the Dem category...why isn't THAT a headline as well? Care to explain? I'm pretty sure if Hillary was leading in Iowa, it would be a headline, but Obama leading....no headline for that.</p>
<p>So typical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
