August 6, 2007
Posted: 04:57 PM ET

Presidential hopeful John Edwards spoke about trade Monday in Iowa.

Cedar Rapids, IOWA (AP) — Democratic presidential contender John Edwards on Monday criticized former President Clinton, arguing that he allowed corporate insiders to shape the 1993 North American FreeTrade Agreement that has cost U.S. jobs.

Edwards' complaints about the former president beloved by voters in his own party was a defiant move meant to highlight rival Hillary Rodham Clinton's relationship with special interests. It comes two days after Clinton refused Edwards' challenge to stop taking campaign donations from lobbyists, saying many represent good causes.

"It's time that the president stood up and fought for American workers," Edwards told a crowd of about 300 people at a union hall in Cedar Rapids. "It's time to have a president that always puts he interests of the American people first."

While Edwards' speech did not mention the name Clinton, the object of his complaint was obvious. Edwards criticized the presidential leadership during the 1993 passage of NAFTA, which was started by President George H.W. Bush and pushed through by Clinton. He said the trade agreement between the United States, Mexico and Canada was "written by insiders in all three countries."

Edwards said the policies of President George W. Bush have devastated towns and communities all across America, but "this is not just his doing."

"For far too long, presidents from both parties have entered into trade agreements, agreements like NAFTA, promising that they would create millions of new jobs and enrich communities," he said. "Instead, too many of these agreements have cost jobs and devastated towns and communities across this country."

Edwards' remarks come a day before he will share a stage with Hillary Clinton and other Democratic candidates at an AFL-CIO forum in Chicago in which the White House hopefuls will make their appeal to labor.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Edwards said, "The people who are registered in Washington to rig the system, which is exactly what they do, that Democratic presidential candidates, and Democratic candidates, and for that matter all candidates, should just say we're not taking these peoples' money anymore because it's the way to take their power away from them, and it's the way to bring about the change that this country needs."

He added: "This is not specifically just about Senator Clinton or anybody else, it's about restoring the power of the government back to its people."

Responding to the criticism, Hillary Clinton's chief strategist, Mark Penn, issued a memo highlighting recent polls showing the New York senator leading the Democratic field and offering a ready answer to any rivals.

"She is the candidate of experience and change, a combination no other candidate can match. As a result we will likely see more attacks from her Democratic opponents, despite their claims to be practicing a new kind of politics or eschewing intraparty attacks," Penn wrote.

Edwards said the trade deal "did not serve the interests of regular workers. It included unprecedented rights for corporate investors, but no labor or environmental protections in the core text. And over the past 15 years, we have seen the growing inequality in the United States, and Mexico and in Canada."

Edwards used the campaign appearance to offer his trade proposals. The 2004 vice presidential nominee said the economy is growing and productivity is at an all-time high, but wages aren't keeping pace with the increased costs of education, health care and retirement. He blamed technological change and globalization, as well as outdated labor and workplace laws for a system that is benefiting the wealthiest and shortchanging workers.

"Trade has become a bad word for working Americans for a very simple reason — it's because our trade policies have been bad for working Americans," he said.

Edwards said his plan would:
  — Require pro-worker provisions in new deals.
  — Hold trade partners to their commitments.
  — Invest more in dislocated workers and communities.
  — Ensure that imports are safe

Filed under: Hillary Clinton • Iowa • John Edwards


Susan, Ajo, AZ   August 24th, 2007 2:20 am ET

This is not a nice thing to have to say but the fact is John Edwards is a fake.

First of all let's take NAFTA:
You cannot "fix" NAFTA. The trade agreement was written so that no amendments can be made to it. In order to include worker's rights, environmental protections, etc. you have to withdraw from NAFTA/WTO and have a new agreement written. Dennis Kucinich has said repeatedly he would withdraw from NAFTA and negotiate new agreements.

I've read in a number of places how Edwards talks about "honesty" being important, and yet just a short time ago I watched him on YouTube saying that he was very proud to be the only candidate who has a Universal healthcare plan. Well, excuse me Mr. Edwards but that is a flat out lie.
Dennis Kucinich is a co-sponsor of a bill along with Rep. Conyers for Not-for-Profit Universal Healthcare and Edwards is perfectly aware of this.

Next, I saw an article today where Edwards was calling for ending the "establishment elite" takeover of our government. Excuse me again, Mr. Edwards; I saw a photo of you over at The Council on Foreign Relations website in which the caption stated you were participating in one of their Roundtable Sessions. Mr. Edwards has also given speeches at the council on a number of occasions. The Council on Foreign Relations membership is made up of mostly white, wealthy, males whose core mission is to merge the United States like Kinkos with FedEx into a one world government.
Other members in the CFR along with Edwards includes: Dick Cheney, Wolfowitz, Clinton, (and Bill) Biden, Obama, Richardson, Dodd, Texaco, Exxon, Mobile, Al Gore, Ford, General Motors, and the list goes on and on.
Now if that is not the "establishment elite" I don't know what is.

If you've been wondering why Edwards (and the other Democratic candidates for Prez, except Kucinich) refuses to support impeaching Dick Cheney, well I just gave you the answer.

Thomas Henson, Atlanta GA   August 9th, 2007 3:46 pm ET

Woohoo! It's about darn time! NAFTA has been raping America's job market since it went into use. The power of the government DOES need to return to the people from whom this just power is derived(read the Declaration of Independence). It's also true that every time a candidate accepts money from a special interest they are SELLING peices of America. When you watch senate or house votes, or when you see a president push or defy a bill, think about whose money bought that decision… and think about the fact that the answer to that question is never the taxpayers or the working man that keeps this country alive.. the people to whom these candidates are supposed to be held responsible to at all times. Instead we get bankruptcy laws written by credit card companies.

Anonymous   August 9th, 2007 11:30 am ET

Guys, John Edwards and Clinton get along. It's all part of the plan. As members of the CFR, their job is to make you all think there is a choice. Until you understand how politics works and who REALLY controls your government, you won't get it. I can say without doubt if Hiliary does get the nomination, Edwards WILL be her mate.

Another thing you should be cautious about is this new thing the elitist are doing to your choices for president. They know the internet is shredding their hold onto you. They see the power that simple people have and the REAL candiates that are coming out with great numbers. YOU GUYS NEED TO LOOK IN YOUR HEARTS AND QUESTION WHY THE STATES ARE MOVING UP THEIR PRIMARIES.

They say it's to have a bigger voice in choosing the nominee. That's true, because they(elitists) want to get the nominee THEY want. They know if things go as normal with the primaries, the greater the chance for the small guy to increase his candidacy. They want their guy to get the nominee while they're on top.

You're all being run into the ground and don't even realize it yet. Better yet, you won't do anything about it either because you're all trained sheep that obey your master government.

TJ, Chicago, IL   August 8th, 2007 9:20 am ET

Good for Edwards. We don't need another "traditional" democrat who sucks up to lobby groups. This shows that Edwards is at least thinking about what is best for his constituency. And hopefully, unlike Obama, he knows who to talk to about trade agreements in Canada…

James, NY, NY   August 7th, 2007 5:20 pm ET

Nice to see a politician pointing out what a piece of trash NAFTA is. Not to mention the fact that most of our trade agreements are trash. Politicians are elected to protect the interests of the American people, however we continue to import more then what we import.

If other countries aren't going to live up to their end of trade agreements the trade agreement should be thrown back in the trash. If they want certain trade benefits they should be expected to maintain their end of the bargain.

Companies that move large parts of their businsessss outside of the US to avoid taxes should be penalized, not rewarded

Jon, Mooresville, NC   August 7th, 2007 11:59 am ET

Don't believe this slick lawyer for one second. I will always remember this guy when he was our senator. he is a CFR cronie through and through so he doesn't even mean what he says.

William--Detroit, Michigan   August 7th, 2007 11:52 am ET

Bringing out differences among the Democratic candidates is a good thing,it is not trashing. Will you vote for any Democrat? Are people that mindless? I hope not. I don't know about the rest of you, but I want to hear a real debate among those running. As for Hillary not trashing anyone, how do you feel about her calling Obama "naive" based really on nothing?

James--Richmond, Virginia   August 7th, 2007 11:34 am ET

Good for Edwards, standing up for the working man and woman! And, good for him for bringing out the differences between the Democratic candidates. If there are no differences, they why debate?

A. Thomas, New York, NY   August 6th, 2007 10:59 pm ET

I wish that the democratic party can throw out John Edwards as a democratic candidates His recent comments on other candidates including Hillary, only hurt the democrats chance of getting into the white house.

In my view, his bad mouthing of other candidates show that he is not a presidential or leadership material. With falling polls for him, and decling donations, this former senator has become desperate.

The recent comments of him and his wife have defintely raised eyebrow in this election.

He has been a failure in many aspects. He has failed in the last election as JOhn Kerry's ruuning mate, and also opted not to run for another term in the senate because of the writing on the wall that he would not be re-elected as a senator. He is becoming irrelevant every day.

Simon, Richmond, VA   August 6th, 2007 10:00 pm ET

Dennis Kucinich says he will cancel NAFTA his first day in office. Is Edwards willing to make such a pledge? He can talk about the problems of the system, but I would like to hear what he plans to do to change it

AT, San Francisco, CA   August 6th, 2007 8:42 pm ET

With his repeated criticism of Hillary, JOhn is out as running mate for Hillary.

When a candidate trashing a leading candidate, the trasher is generally in desperate situation, and falling in polls. JOhn EDwards' action only hurts himself and the democratic party chance of winning the election.
a
In general, I thought that Hillary has run a positive campaign, praising her democratic contenders during the debates and the democratic party over the republicans candidate.

Anon, Needham, MA   August 6th, 2007 7:59 pm ET

I might not have read the article carefully enough, but does Edwards actually call for something to be done about NAFTA here?

It's a nice position to take (criticizing NAFTA without calling for its outright dissolution), but Dennis Kucinich is the only Democratic candidate who has called for its removal.

VanReuter NY NY   August 6th, 2007 7:13 pm ET

Zero comments.
Emblematic of the general interest in the Edwards candidacy. Sad.

Van

Kevin Norton, Long Beach, Ca.   August 6th, 2007 7:00 pm ET

I think John Edwards 'nailed it' when he said, “too many of these agreements have cost jobs and devastated towns and communities across this country.”
I can't stand when democratic "centrists" defend these failed policies as inevitable. They became inevitable because our government sold out the middle class to nation less corporations. These agreements have permanently harmed our country by outsourcing millions of good jobs and devastated industrial cities and towns all across this country. I just hope that he can get his message out to the folks that this would resonate with most. Unfortunately some people fixate on haircuts more than failed policies.

Will Affleck-Asch, Seattle WA   August 6th, 2007 6:11 pm ET

It's about time someone woke up and smelled the outsourcing.

Kathy Callan   August 6th, 2007 6:02 pm ET

John Edwards is right-on. Unfortunately, American workers were not top priority in NAFTA and other trade agreements. It's a shame that Senator Clinton and her husband have looked out for big money over the rights of the American worker. From her choice of advisors, to her agreements with wealthy foreign outsourcers, Senator Clinton has looked out for her war chest instead of her principles. John Edwards has a long history of looking out for working families, marching on 80+ picket lines, and helping to pass minimum wage increases in six states. He won the Paul Wellstone Award for his work with unions and will be a president who truly looks out for the American worker while having a smart trade policy.

Scott Austin, TX   August 6th, 2007 5:23 pm ET

Atta' boy, Edwards! You've got my vote!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com