If you track your on-line story's about Ron Paul you will notice massive hits. The name Ron Paul will only bring http://WWW.CNN.COM floods of traffic!

He's the most googled presdidential candidate....What's logic tell you? KEEP THE STORY'S COMING....IT'S WHAT AMERICA WANTS!!!!!!!

If Mexico were part of this country the regulations and controls that govern us would also apply to them. They wouldn't be clammoring across our borders because they would be governed by the same industrial and business regulations we enjoy in this nation. The isolationists and protectionists will disagree but personally I don't see how that could be a bad thing.

The reality is that the two nations will never combine so the premise is more of a jest. I knew it would get a knee jerk reaction from the conspiracy theorists out there so that was kind of fun.

For the person that asked about information regarding Ron Paul's earmarks just do a simple google search. You'll find the Wall Street Journal article dated August 6, 2007 I referenced. There are other sources that cover the same material but I prefer the WSJ.

For the wackjob that thinks I work for the government I have a quote for you off the Ron Paul 2008 Life and Liberty website:

"In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094."

"I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life. This is a practical, direct approach to ending federal court tyranny which threatens our constitutional republic and has caused the deaths of 45 million of the unborn."

So yes, Ron Paul is anti-abortion. In his own words he would allow state law to declare abortion illegal without federal interference.

I did get a bit of a chuckle from the Rockefeller comment. It's actually a compliment but I doubt the wackjob who made the comment really knows that. Take off your tinfoil hat and do some research on Nelson Rockefeller. We could use more republicans like him.

Let's get him out there!

As an Independent, he's got my vote

Speaking of youtube...youtube Ron Paul and Morton Downey Jr....not presidential but certainly entertaining and a more accurate description of Ron Paul and his cronies.

Really? You can't see how? Are you blind? Yikes!

you are obviously a GOVERNMENT neo-CONN or Dick Cheney in disguise , you are not an American, true Americans beleive in the Constitution , Bill of RIGHTs , the right to individual freedom of choice. Property rights , by the way , the fool who said , Dr. Ron Paul was against abortion. His personal veiw is no, having delivered over 4,000 thousand babies into the world, however he is not trying to end abortion, just the end of Federal Government paying for, which in your case( dick cheney) , an abortion would have been a plus, one which i would have picked up the tab personally.

To think that at one time we where the most respected, admirred and yes loved country.

GWB , has destroyed the purchasing strength of the Dollar, he has created more enemies , largest defficit ever, and above all, shredded the constituion, and Bill of Rights. Thats your president DAVD ,, by the way, is your last name ROCKEFELLER !!

"Besides, I can’t see how Mexico joining the United States could be a bad thing really. They would finally fall under industrial environmental guidelines, labor laws, and the war on drugs might actually have a resolution."

Frankly, there just isn't enough time to tear that statement apart, but I assume everyone reading this can imagine why we're better off leaving Mexico out of the US.

And yes, RP has earmarks. They're not for a bridge to nowhere or for the benefit of big contributors. My understanding is that he votes against them, but I don't know why that makes you question his voting record. If anything, it points towards his consistency.

I too am glad to see Ron Paul. I tell you other supporters something cool. The other day on the way to work there were a few road signs that said Ron Paul for President 2008. This is in NW Florida so it's nice to see them before the status quo signs. Sure it's all too soon to get bombarded with politics, but when you're fighting goliath and evil, we've got to plan it all out and fill the world with Ron Pauls name.

Please donate to his campaign. If we can get 1 mil supports to donate $100 each, it'll be a great campaign. $10 would be nice. Let's just hope the TV networks need money bad enough to accept his ads.

As far as Dr. Paul's earmarks the Wall Street Journal wrote an article on Ron Paul's stance on a balanced budget. When pressed on the subject of earmarks Paul admitted to requesting nearly $400 million worth of federal funding for programs in Paul's Texas District. To answer your question specifically the bills were not passed. Ron Paul voted against the bugdet that contain his own requested pork. That's what makes his voting record suspect.

Ron Paul accuses the WTO of conspiring with pharmaceutical companies to make supplements such as vitamins available by prescription only in the United States. This is posted on Dr. Paul's website. He uses examples of European countries that already have this restriction. The problem is that the data is from 2005. In the last two years no discussions have taken place to require supplements available by prescription only in the United States. He also makes the statement that altenative treatments could be banned in the United States. Now you might agree with his views but I call Dr. Paul's view alarmism. I can grow rose hips in my garden that have more vitamin C in them than I can buy in pill form anyway.

Ron Paul opposes every international trade agreement that exists. I'm not a great fan of NAFTA but Dr. Paul's idea of withdrawing from any organization and trade deal the infringes on the freedom of the United States is extreme. Ron Paul justifies his argument with NAFTA's supposed superhighway through the United States from Mexico to Canada. The reality of Mexican truckers on U.S. roads is that they must comply with U.S. drug and alcohol requirements. The Mexican drivers must follow the same driving hour restrictions U.S. truckers comply with and must maintain driving logs. The Mexican trucks must also undergo a safety audit by the FMCSA. Dr. Paul's argument that NAFTA infriges on United States abiltiy to enforce its laws is as suspect as his voting record.

Besides, I can't see how Mexico joining the United States could be a bad thing really. They would finally fall under industrial environmental guidelines, labor laws, and the war on drugs might actually have a resolution.

The guy has some good points but he has some very extreme opinions that puts him of the edge of becoming a wingnut. You vote the way you want. I'll vote for what I think is best for the nation. Paul is best at doing what he is doing now. President of the United States is beyond his scope of qualifications.

As you pointed out, if you want a president that’s satisfied with how our current government operates then Ron Paul is not your man.

If you think our government is too bloated, secretive, invasive, irresponsible, etc... and you want to restore our constitutional democracy, then Ron Paul is your only choice.

Loaded the budget with pork? Please quote the bills that he passed that were loaded with pork for Texas or anywhere else.

His views on the WTO aren't alarmism. They are economic and sovereign. He wants us out for the benefit of the economy and the sovereignty of the U.S.

Won't work with other countries? He is for extensive trade and peaceful relations with all countries.

I think you are referring to a different candidate. You certainly aren't referring to Rep. Paul.

Ron Paul has some very positive aspects to his campaign. He is anti-lobbyist, which is refreshing. He is staunchly pro-life to the extent of proposing legislation to over turn Roe v Wade, which doesn't bother me one bit. And Senator Paul advocates a stronge border patrol, which anyone with at least half a brain can't argue against. Strong border protection was the loud outcry of U.S. citizens during the immigration reform debates.

What worries me about Senator Paul is his views on the world as a whole. Dr. Paul has made vocal assumptions about the United States orchestrating some type of "event" that could be used as an excuse to attack Iran. That's giving Dubya WAY more credit than the man deserves. The volume of secret plans necessary to pull something like that off is astronomical. The administration can't even keep their surveillance programs secret. Ron Paul's views on this topic worry me. I would not want this man as Commander in Chief of the U.S. military.

Ron Paul has voted against extreme budget spending. What is not publicized is that Ron Paul help load up the budget with earmarks for his own district in Texas. He then makes a public vote against the budget he helped load with pork. This action makes his voting record on government spending a bit suspect.

Dr. Paul also has pretty extreme views on the WTO which I'd invite anyone interested to explore. Some may agree with his accertions. I find his views to be knee jerk alarmism.

I applaud Senator Paul for his convictions. He has some very strong points but I don't think he would make a very good president. The President of the United States has to have the ability to work within the government of the United States. The President also has to have the ability to work with the governments of other countries. We have already seen the results of a President who is not able to work well with others. We can't afford to have another one.

I believe Dr. Paul has already found his calling. He serves the people of the Unites States well as a Senator. It suits him. I feel comfortable having him in this role. I wouldn't feel comfortable having him as President.

Well, here's the deal. While Dr. Paul takes a pro-life stance when asked, he considers abortion law to be an issue for the STATE to decide. This means, when he is president, his view on the issue will be irrelevant.

Some candidates make this issue their top issue because it's divisive. Ron Paul knows this country has much bigger problems than abortion law and I can't imagine his administration will be side tracked by it.

I, for one, am pro-choice and an Atheist to boot, but I support Ron Paul because he understands our nations real illness and has the medicine we need.

More Ron Paul news please! He's certainly the candidate the founding fathers would have voted for.

"Earth to Susan!

It’s unfortunate to see that you believe corruption is a partisan issue, only to emerge recently. Corruption will always be around when people have the power to make influential decisions. It’s been around for thousands of years and will continue to remain as long as government remains all-powerful. It’s quite a simple concept, really. Enough of your partisanship. Democrat or Republican, corruption will exist unless we reduce the power that these people have.

Oh yeah, and I hope you realize that the military industrial complex includes BIG GOVERNMENT being influenced by BIG BUSINESS.

You’re breaking up, Susan! Earth to Sus………"

But you had to use a faded picture. Ooh, how painful it is to accept the obvious.

Regarding advertising Ron Paul on the ticker, my friend, he is being advertised everywhere. The revolution has started. Soon, you will get tired of seeing his name and his progress.
Please get used to it!

Now all you Ron Paul supporters can shut up at stop advertising for him in every ticker article.

I wish that the media would give him more time.