It's sad to say, but it's true…she's right. But it's not necessarily true that Edwards will win the White House. The Rethuglicants will portray him as another Jimmy Carter. Face it, we dems lost the election once former VA governor Mark Warner announced he was not going to run. If he were running, the Dems might as well start planning the inaugural ball today.

Since she has so much to say, where was she when her husband got $400 haircuts and used campaign funds to pay for it. I don't seem to remember reading where she SPOKE loud and clearly against that.

Mrs. Edwards is still third place in the polls. She's gotta step up her game!

You know I used to John Edwards then not so much but still liked Elizabeth. Now I'm beginning to feel the same way about her. JE couldn't even carry his home state in the last election so why should I feel confident that he could win any better then Hillary?

Liberal attitudes go where the liberal media takes it. There is little to no individual, introspective leadership in the Democractic Party. Leading, individual thinkers abound in the Republican Party and that is what has caused the media to herd together. The liberal press is emboldened by the perceived 'togetherness' that their illegitimate press garners among their fellow 'herd' mates. It is 'all good' for the Republicans because no matter who the Democratic candidate is, the U.S. population at large will always respond the the 'individual thinker'. The candidate that has the 'guts' to say what he truly believes and believes what he says and is willing to back it up. There is no such person in the Democratic party. Giuliani-Huckabee will be virtually impossible to beat.

Clinton's strategy during the primary proves Elizabeth Edwards' point. She is running against George Bush with the belief that the rejection of that Republican icon is the best way to fire up the Democratic base. What then would be the best way to fire up the Republican base? Yep, the prospect of another Clinton in the White House.

I would like to see my country stop punishing itself with this kind of partisan garbage. Paul or Obama for me, please.

As a Florida Democrat, I'm dealing with the "Hatred" the Democratic Party's showing Florida Democrats.

Liz….ARE YOU STILL TALKING? Go home and leave the politics to John.

Well, well, once again we hear from Mrs. Edwards. John Edwards would only get elected by sympathy votes. Would he really be getting this much free air time if they had not gone public with this? What a crock! Let's see, he decides, again, to run for President (he failed miserably last time); she announces she has breast cancer; all of a sudden they are on every network and news magazine show. It's all about her cancer…not about what he can do as President (NOTHING!). God help this country if he wins.

BTW, I'm not impressed with Hillary Clinton either (too much Bill influence), but if the only choices were Hillary Clinton or John Edwards. I'd pick a strong women over a weak man who uses his wife's illness to try to get votes.

I totally agree with Elizabeth Edwards. I think John Edwards would very possibly be the strongest candidate the Democrats could put up. Bill Richardson would also be a very strong candidate.

I'm a Republican, and while my biggest wish is that SOMEONE better than the candidates on both sides were available, I can tell you I'd vote for Hillary way sooner than I'd vote for Edwards. Expensive haircuts, asking others to change their lifestyles when his 28,000 sq. ft. mansion is okay because "he's worked hard for it"? C'mon…if ANYONE is not electable on the Dem side, it's Edwards.

Although I am an Obama supporter, I absolutely agree with Elizabeth Edwards. Nominating Hillary Clinton will energize the Republican base. However, it is not a mistery to me as to why. Regardless of his personal challenges, Bill Clinton was a great president and the Replublicans will forever hate him for it.

I didn't see it. The title of this article on CNN's front page is: "Beware of Clinton Hatred". Who is she telling to beware? Where in this article did she say this? Your reporting is slacking as usual CNNers.

because the repubs don't like her we should just bow down and give them what they want. I don't think so. The anti-hillary movement was manufactured and wont stand up to a modern campaign. Case in point GWB had higher negatives at this time in 03.

I think Mrs Edwards meeds to get a life. Her reactions and statements regarding Hilary Clinton are because she knows that H Clinton is a better choice than her husband any day. She's scared, very scared…..

I also have to agree.

I think Hillary would make a good President but she's never going to get the chance because the Rabid Right will get every homophobic, anti-abortion fanatic to the polls with tales of how Bill Clinton will have orgies in the Oval Office and Bible burnings on the south lawn.

Her negatives are just too high. She's the one Democrat that could lose this unloseable election.

Can you imagine this woman as 1st lady? She is more angry than Mike Gravel!

Can you imagine this woman as 1st lady? She is more angry than Mike Gravel!

W. Artis: A candidate's haircuts and suits and transportation and all that is covered under campaign funds. So where's the problem?

I'm getting pretty sick of hearing Elizabeth Edwards cry foul because Edwards is not black or a woman. She's trying to turn a sign of real progress around by implying that the only reason people like Clinton or Obama is their minority status! What would people say if they cried foul that it looks bad to attack a cancer victim, so Elizabeth is free to do John's dirty work?

With Mommy Edwards keeps on talking, Johnny's polls going downhill from a distant 3rd to 4th soon.

There goes the chance of Johnny to be the running mate of Hillary, and also his last chance in federal politics.

Johnny mentioned days ago he would not do personal attacks to other candidates, he meant he would ask Mommy Edwards to do it for him.

This lady really needs to shut her mouth, she is six degrees past annoying. Will the real Presidential candidate in the Edwards family please stand up?

And Edwards has no shot to win the primary, and a worse shot to win the general election.

Maybe Mrs. Edwards should be at home, concentrating on her battle with CANCER, rather than out on the campaign trail damning her husband's chances.

I happen to admire Mrs. Edwards & have been seriously considering voting for John Edwards, but…..this latest statement she made that "hatred will energize the GOP" is outrageous. She had just fed the opposition with more fodder. I suggest she stay out of her husband's campaign & keep her comments to herself. Hillary has my vote.

I hope that Mrs. Edwards will focus on Katrina and poverty and One America…this week particularly is where John Edwards could shine with what he would do with Katrina victims and the greedy people exploiting the situation. Although what she says may have some truth, it makes John, in my humble opinion, look like he's the "underdog" - he needs to be fighting fighting fighting - not lambasting other candidates. Let that be for the Republican candidate when that time comes. Use Katrina - today - and the plight of those folks - you have a REAL opportunity here!!!!!!

Hillary will energise the republcans, and the supporters of other candidates with envy, jealousy and frustration.

To know her is to love her.

I just think Elizabeth Edwards ic completely irresponsible for this statement. What an insult to say suggest the lone reason for Obama's & Clinton's high fundraising is b/c one if black & the other is a woman. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense, b/c our society has a lot of historical evidence that shows being black and being a woman is an advantage. Give me a break!
Check out: http://myragmag.com/therag There is a column on the Edwards, that reminds us that Edwards with only 2 years in office was considered for VP!

I can't believe the Edwards have the audacity to complain when they've had a silver spoon for the past 7 years!

Elizabeth Edwards is a very strong woman, and I admire her willingness to state what is on her mind. I do believe there is some truth to what she says as the Republican Party simply cannot bear the thought of having a woman lead this country. We should all look beyond party and strive to do what is best for all the American people. That in itself is something the Republican Party will never be able to achieve, as it seems quite apparent they are a party of "haves" and not ashamed to boast about it!

I believe Mrs Edwards is misstating her husband's flaw, it is not that he is a white male. It is that he is a mediocre white male. No strong views, no decisive plans, nothing of real substance. Hilary and Obama will always outshine John Edwards simply for the fact they have a strong platform and sell it with compelling honesty.

Elizabeth Edwards is running her husband for President! He'd better not talk back, either. I think his campaign may have just jumped the shark.

Who wears the pants in this duo? I don't want a sissy-boy president who's wife has to fight his battles.

Why is it that Elizabeth Edwards' comments are receiving more press than what John Edwards says? I know that what she says is more sensational, but please give more attention to John Edwards' stances on particular issues.

You can do better CNN.

She is right. It is evident by some of the comments here that every thing but real issues are the basis for folks decisions on who to vote for. Hair cuts, wealth, illness, plane old hatred are all evident.

This is the reason we get the caliber of leadership we always get. We focus on everything except what is important.

Has anyone heard John speak? All I have been hearing are these "comments" from his wife. Whose running him or her?

IT'S A SHAME THAT MRS. EDWARDS CANNOT FACE THE FACT THAT HER HUSBAND IS NOT AS ATTRACTIVE AS A CANDIDATE AS THOSE SHE BASHES. IN MY OPINION, JOHN EDWARDS IS THE WORST OF THE LOT. HE NEEDS TO TAKE HIS MILLIONS AND INVEST IN HELPING PEOPLE PERSONALLY. HE IS JUST ONE MORE IN A LONG LINE OF PSEUDO COMPASSIONISTS, ONLY HEPLING IF HE IS ELECTED TO THE PRESIDENCY. I DO NOT BELIEVE HE HAS THE FORTITUDE, NOR THE CHARACTER TO CONVINCE A MAJORITY OF PEOPLE THAT HE IS SINCERE AND MRS. EDWARDS ONLY CONVINCES ME MORE THAT THEY ARE CARNIVAL ACT OF SORTS. I HEARD HER "DEBATE" WITH ANN COULTER AND WOULD LOVE TO SEE HER ATTEMPT A DEBATE THAT WAS PLANNED AND FACE TO FACE.

John Edwards said he would not do personal attacks other candidates. He asked his wife to do that for him!

Elizabeth Edwards needs to spend more time at home and less time trashing other Democratic presidential candidates. Her verbal darts are classless and clearly indicate her desperate attempts to move her husband to a higher level in the polls.

I agree with Mrs. Edeards comment that the "Hillary Hatred" will energize the Republican "hate base." I am so sick of those hateful Republicans. Bill Clinton was a great president dispite his personal problems. I think what Hillary needs to say is that dispite there problems they worked things out! I think Bill & Hillary have the "true family values" the Republicans claim to have.

Mrs. Edwards is hurting her husband more than she is helping him. I am a native Tar Heel who had just moved to western New York state when Hillary was running for the Senate. Although the rural areas of the state traditionally vote Republican, she still visited many small villages with one stoplight, a combination post office and general store, and rural depressed Southern Tier and upstate counties her opponent didn't think worthy of his time. It is true, the large metropolitan areas supported her overwhelmingly and gave her the votes to win. However, she never forgot the largely rural mid- and western counties of the state that are composed of dairy farms, wineries, recreational lakes, and industries, many of which are facing tough economic times. She visited often, and was well aware of problems in each area. Hillary Clinton cannot be worn down by Elizabeth Edward's mudslinging. She earned her stripes in New York as a senator of everyone, regardless of their economic status. Clinton is definitely capable of unifying a party that Elizabeth Edwards is trying to polarize. Perhaps Mrs. Edwards should do her homework a little more thoroughly before her next speech.

I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH MRS. EDWARDS STATEMENTS. BETWEEN CLINTON AND OBAMA, THEY HAVE THE ELECTORAL MACHINARY COMPLETELY SET UP. THE MEDIA HAS FALLEN INTO THEIR GAME.

AND YOU KNOW WHY? BECAUSE JOHN EDWARDS IS HONEST, HARDWORKING AND DOES NOT HAVE THE "CLINTON" NAME AND YES, THE OBAMA "AFRICAN-AMERICAN HERITAGE" THAT SEEMS TO BE ATTRACTING THE EYES OF THE AMERICANS, AND THAT IN ITSELF IS MISLEADING THE PEOPLE.

JOHN EDWARDS IS YOUNG, VIBRANT, HONEST, HARDWORKING….LET'S GIVE HIM AN OPPORTUNITY, IF WE REALLY WANT CHANGES.

OTHERWISE, JUST LIKE WITH BUSH, WE MIGHT HAVE MORE TERRORIST ATTACKS ONCE THEY HAVE BEEN ELECTED. HISTORY HAS SHOWN THIS TO BE A FACT.

"Hatred" is a tad strong, but as a lifelong Democrat, I won't vote for HRC because she is shrill, inauthentic, divisive, pandering, too inexperienced and unelectable.

Ms. Edwards is absolutely correct about a Clinton candidacy energizing the Republicans. She will be criticized for speaking publically again, but she's not the only one saying this.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0807/5515.html

I am more of an independent than anything, but I know for sure I will not be voting for any ticket that has Clinton on it and I know there are a lot of people taking this position

As for who the best alternative to Clinton would be, it certainly isn't John Edwards. Barack Obama is the best candidate.

If the Democratic party is foolish enough to send Hillary to the general election, I think Barack should seriously consider a run as an independent. He may not choose to do that, but I think he could win based on his appeal to so many different groups, including Republicans, independents and moderates of all stripes.

I agree with Mrs. Edwards regarding animosity from voters about Hillary Clinton. Many people either like her or hate her from the time of the election of her husband, Bill Clinton. I feel that the best ticket is Edwards and Obama. That is the strongest ticket to combat Hillary Clinton and also the Republican forefront and wavering voters that do not like Hillary at all and will vote against her rather than for her. Unfortunately, I feel that the Clinton history works against her and it would be best for her to take a back seat from runnign for the presidency, despite her experience in foriegn affairs and health care. As far as folks feeling that both Edwards and Obama have no experience, then let me ask you how much experience George Bush had before becoming president? Look at where we are as a nation moving forward as a result of his ineptitude and lack of leadership, despite what folks have to say about the war on Iraq. He should be building up America's future, not bankrupting us to the tune of trillions of dollars trying to rebuild Iraq. With billions of dollars not being spent on our soldiers in Iraq or on their welfare when they return, as it should be or as we are told it will. They use that line to make citizens feel that if they are against the war then they are being unpatriotic and not supporting the troops. I am all for supporting the troops, but the fact is that the majority of that money is being wasted and going into the pockets of Halliburton and cronies of the administration, while America falters from lack of investment in infrastructure, lack of investment in health care, and lack of care PERIOD! It is a disgrace that Americans are going bankrupt and worrying about their future, worrying that they will be taken care of in the same way as those trying to rebuild their lives from Katrina are doing it, by themselves. If we do not elect into office someone that truly cares about us and spends some time, care, and money on rebuilding this country, we will have more of the same. There are those that are growing rich to rebuild the "global economy" while ours falls apart. It is time to remember that they are in office to work for the people and to make America strong in more ways than just spewing forth words and not showing it by their actions. America is tired of waiting for the trickle down economy to come to them.

hillary will make a good president now that she no longer gets menses, and is post menapausal.

So…is John Edwards a better candidate because he appeals to the Republican party more? Then maybe he should change parties.

John and Liz should be applauded for their efforts to lead this country forward. No other candidate makes any effort to provide details on making the US great again. They speak the truth, even though it is difficult to hear!

Her nomination will energize ANYONE who doesn't think a female should or could be the president of the United States of America….duh.

Edwards has a valid point and I am not at all happy about it. The frothing, irrational, and undeniable hatred for the Clinton family by Conservatives would once again gridlock the country if Senator Clinton were elected to the presidency. We would once again be shouting at each other about sex in the White House, Whitewater, etc. etc. etc. yadda yadda yadda. The USA, teetering as it is on the brink of so many potential disasters, must be able to focus on real problems. The baggage that Conservatives carry around in their minds regarding anything Clinton cannot be changed. Their passion is irrational.

Conservatives and Democrats (there are no Liberals in American government at this time) have to be able and willing to work together to prevent our standard of living, our freedoms, and our national security from deteriorating. Four or eight more years of our not-so-gifted leadership screaming applause lines at each other will be disastrous.

Only a candidate who is not now in the top tier of those being considered will be sufficiently unencumbered to appeal to both sides.

I hope a miracle candidate appears from nowhere and captures our imaginations. Otherwise, we will likely live through the end of the American era.

While we can't know for sure, I think that Mrs. Edwards is correct in this case. When I talk to people about politics, everyone seems to grumble about Hillary and conservatives really don't like her.

I hope the Democratic base is smart enough to pick someone who can attract support from both sides.
I would suggest Obama, but apparently my opinion doesn't really matter anymore because I'm a Floridian.

As a non-American observer I perceive Edwards as a nice guy, but weak. Maybe his wife should run! Clinton on the other hand is strong, intelligent with a grasp of international politics, and totally electable.

Republicans, particularly the conservatives, don't hate Hillary Clinton … they fear her.

I like the Edwards — perhaps I could even vote for them if I believe they have the most to offer our country. However, political rhetoric is still just that, and it seems that today no candidate can just simply say "I'm this, this is what I stand for, and I hope you, the voter will elect me because 'this' is good"; instead they seem to also have to say that here is what is "bad" about the other candidates. I want to stand behind a candidate that can offer things good 'for the country', not one who can only offer criticism about the others. What Mrs. Edwards said about the existing hatred is nothing more than another political scare tactic to attempt to sway the thinking of others.

Elizabeth,
We didn't want your husband for president four years ago and we still don't want him for president now. I would take Hillary any day over your ex trial lawyer husband.

It is very sad that Elizabeth Edwards is knocking Hillary Clinton down, rather then admiring her for running for president. I wonder what she would do if there was a Clinton/Edwards ticket? It is a long shot but she would have to "Open mouth and insert foot."

She does bring up some valid points as far as media. My order for the current nominee's are

Obama
Edwards
Clinton
Kucinsh

I don't think people give there money based on propaganda media reporting. I think its base on your message to the people. and so far OBAMA has respond to all his question genuinly just like EDwards have.

It's the Republicans who say that Sen. Clinton is divisive and unelectable because they don't believe they have a candidate that can win aginst her. Unfortunately, too many Democrats are falling for this line of thinking, which is what the Republicans want.

I'm a republican and I laugh every time I read about the democrats warning themselves against nominating Hillary. Don't nominate Hillary, not because she is the best choice, but because the republicans will become energized. Instead you should nominate the tier 3 candidate because he is…what exactly? Boring? A pretty boy?

Get a clue democrats. No matter who you nominate the republicans are going to become energized. We don't want a tax and spend cut and run president. So go ahead and nominate Edwards. We'll happily woop his behind instead.

I find it hilarious for Elizabeth Edwards to point fingers at Hillary Clinton dressed the way she was. She looked like she just crawled out of bed.

The more she speaks, the more I like Mrs. Edwards. I don't understand why people don't like her outspokenness. I prefer to hear people talking straight, and being passionate about their beliefs, regardless of whether I agree with those beliefs or not. The best first ladies were always the most outspoken.I am more convinced than ever that John Edwards would be an amazing and effective Attorney General. One that would go down in the history books as one of the greats. He's not afraid of big business and proving himself in the AG job will surely help his future presidential ambitions.

Frankly, I'm over Elizabeth Edwards and her commentary about Hillary and Obama. She needs to get over herself and the fact that her husband will never win the right to represent the Democratic Party as a candidate for President.

As for Hillary Clinton — she's been standing up about many of the issues she talks about WAY BEFORE she even threw her hat into the ring … is she the best candidate? I figure if the people of New York (state and city) put her back in Washington for a second time - she's doing something right.

I think a Clinton-Obama ticket sounds pretty strong against anyone the Republicans could put on the ballot. I'm just over Republicans in general –and I'm not even a liberal by any stretch of the imagination.

But, as a Floridian, I'm wondering if I should even vote in the Democratic Primary — why bother - my vote apparently won't matter because of the absurd actions of the DNC. Whether they want to believe it or not - Florida is a crucial state when it comes to electing a president.

Mrs Edwards is getting out of control. Her sharp critique of other candidates is enough to keep me from voting for John Edsards. I am sick of dirty politics.

ONCE AGAIN SAME GROUP OF PEOPLE BLOGING HATE. You Republicans are so scared, I love it.

GO HILLARY!!!

I am not American. I cannot vote. Today I will do a bit of spinning.

It is obvious by now to all those who read my comments on this blog that I am all for the spouses to accompany the candidates on the trail. I could almost elevate that to the level of duty.

But today Ms Edwards blew it. Her message–too much support for the frontrunners will stir up the voters and cause them to go out and vote. Spin it: presidential elections in the US attract about 50% of voters. Compare this to Europe's 95% or higher. What is wrong with more voters partecipating in the fundamental processes of democracy? Ms Edwards says: that higher partecipation is be from the other party and our party will be defeated.

The spun conclusion: Ms Edwards is advising the candidates not to expose critical issues, otherwise too many voters might be fired up and decide to go out and vote.

Democrats should pick the candidate we want to represent our party and do all we can to help them win. Living our lives in fear of Karl Rove's machinations is the surest way to lose. The Republicans didn't worry for a second about picking a draft-dodging candidate from the hardest part of the hard right who couldn't finish a simple, English sentence without saying something ridiculous. They didn't ask us what we thought about that and we shouldn't worry about their hatred. Shame on Mrs. Edwards for suggesting that we kowtow to their irrationality.

Wow, I can't believe some of the comments…

She should spend more time at home? How backwards.

Re. the $400 haircuts…he paid the campaign back for those, because it was never his intention to use supporters money for his own haircuts (unlike, say, Mitt Romney & his makeup). But either way, who cares? The candidates would get bashed if they looked bad on T.V., I don't blame them. But, get your facts straight - the campaign was paid back, and haircuts before and after those two were not & have not been charged to the campaign.

Mrs. Edwards never said that HRC being a woman and BHO being black were the "lone" reasons they were able to raise money.

And re. living in the nice house while asking everybody else to change their lifestyle? That would be hypocritical, if that were true. It's not.

He's advocating for a more level playing field, for more opportunites for people who are working class, or poor.

I realize that the posters here aren't reporters, but the twisting of facts to suit eveyone's agenda is disturbing. I feel like I'm listening to Fox News! I guess the message doesn't really matter, since everybody seems to hear only what they want to hear.

Oh, and about all the comments saying that Mrs. Edwards is making all the tough comments because nobody will attack a lady with cancer…I'd say the comments on here prove otherwise.

And I'd bet she's just fine with that.

Mrs. Edwards is correct in what she is saying. Those who think that the Republican's are behind the Hillary bashing are incorrect. The Republican's want Hillary for their opposition in '08. Hillary is not electable.

True, True, True. I'm glad this ladyhas the guts to say what everyone else thinks, but won't say.

Hillary will energize ME to vote Republican - and I'm a Democrat.

The vast majority of people who support Hillary think they are voting for Bill. Aren't they in for a rude awakening?

What Mrs. Edwards said is true in that her husband doesn't get the extra attention because he's not obviously unique. However, he has gotten the attention for the unfortunate cancer that plagues his wife. We all use the martyrdom or victim or sympathy and yes even uniqueness to our advantaege.

I would like to hear from John Edwards for a change rather than from his wife. I'm not sure why she feels the need to speak up at every opportunity, but I don't think she is really doing her husband any favors with her attacks on Obama and Clinton.

I can't help but wonder if she's his wife or his mother… Why doesn't she shut up and let him speak?

Mr. Bush has VP Cheney as his attack dog and Mr. Edwards has his wife as his attack dog.

I commented before but will add another one, or rather a question. In a country this size, why can't we have better candidates. It seems that anyone nowadays who appears bi-partisan gets demonized by their own party members. I'm a Republican, but I like Lieberman as well as McCain, because I believe they decide based on their conscience, NOT their desire to be President. And is there anyone else out there who thinks that if Colin Powell decided to run, he would be by far the most electable of all candidates?? Please, Mr. Powell…reconsider! The country needs you.

I agree that it is sad, but I also believe Mrs. Edwards is correct about Hillary. As the lone Democrat in a southern Republican family, all I have to do to get my family angry is mention the Clinton name. Their eyes become red slits and venom spews from their mouths. And that is when I mention Bill. Hillary is that times ten.

Maybe this election Indepedant & Moderate Repulicans will put aside base human emotions & weigh each candidate with their brain rather than their gut or other body part & America will not repeat the mistakes of the past electons. And maybe the Israelis & Palestinians will make peace & maybe the Chicago Cubs will win the World Series.

We don't think Hillary could be hated nearly as much as we hate Bush/Cheney, the true "AXIS of EVIL" that cares more about their pocketbook than innocent people's lives. Hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis killed every day plus our troops. What could be more despicable than that and the incompetency that has put America in this desparate situation??????

She's correct on this one. The Democratic party will lose is Billary is nominated. I'm an independent, but will vote Republican to keep Billary's non sense out of the white house.

If he wins, guess who'll be running the White House?

If Edwards could not carry his own state of North Carolina for Kerry during the last Presidential election, why is he even running. His wife needs to back off and not give the Republicans ammunition for the general election. Edwards campaign has been reduced to his wife launching bombs as he stands by as a concerned listener. Time to read the polls and drop out to save face.

I agree with Edwards on this and I really should wish for Hillary to be the candidate on 2008.

But, It will be the ugliest campaign in the history of campaigns and it will be because of the amount of material that we have to work with and my personal thoughts are she is wrong for the country.

This will further divide the country and I would be more than willing to have ANY Democrat other than her be the nominee and if they win a fair and media balanced race, so be it.

I find it humorous from my side of things that many who call Hillary strong even though she stayed with Bill through numerous dalliances (that we know of), are hammering Edwards who is fighting cancer, lost a son, speaking her OWN mind and is not afraid of appearing to be politically incorrect to make a point.

For the record, I don't care for her hubby one bit, it is just strange what some people consider "being strong" as Liz Edwards certainly would not take a back seat to ANYONE in that regard and certainly not Hillary.

I don't think she's angry - I think she's honest. Although I can't yet support any candidate who voted for the Iraqi War, I'm leaning towards Edwards because of his integrity and the fact that he is less of a politican, and has more integrity, than Hilary (watch the polls and compromise your values) Clinton.

I want to be emphatic to you, Elizabeth… but it just seems you and your husband is using your misfortune of having recurrent breast cancer to get symphathy. I think your husband's campagne is getting pathetic.

Well, here we go again…Doesn’t she ever shut up?

”It's hard for John to talk about, but it's the reality,"….Hmmmm- that’s funny, I don’t hear John talking!

Elizabeth Edwards is delusional. She seems to think when she runs her mouth, that it is actually her husband speaking.

The “reality” of the situation is that Hillary Clinton worries the GOP because she is a viable candidate. John Edwards does not worry the GOP because he is not a viable candidate.

Let’s face it; John Edwards and his mouthpiece are unelectable. Period. But it would be nice if Elizabeth would stick a cork in it, and let John speak for himself…for a change… He won’t have much more opportunity.

I think that Mrs. Edwards is taking this campaign to a new low. She can't seem to stay out of the gutter with her Clinton comments, especially her latest "hatred" remarks. Maybe she needs to understand that there are many more realities that can also be a factor in who wins the nomination. One of those realities is Mrs. Edwards health. I wish her a long life, however, the reality is that if she cannot beat this bout with cancer, her husband will be left with two small children to raise. Is he then in a position to be running this country, without a mother, wife and first lady?. Mrs. Edwards truly needs to "check her mouth" and her comments. It would be nice to have a campaign where people explain their positons on various matters and not continually take personal swipes at other candidates. I hope Mrs. Edwards will cease her "toilet tactics".

Is Mrs. Edwards running for President? Go home Mrs. Edwards and keep your trap shut, your husband is the candidate, not you! For God's sake, give Hilary a chance. She is strong, decisive and while she makes the odd gaff, I have heard much worse from the men (in and out of the men's room). The ONLY reason Repukelicans will run away from her is because they are sexist and prejudiced. Hilary will take the day and power to her. Hilary is a little bag of dynomite, if everyone can get past the fact that she is female. Women are much stronger and more thoughtful then men when it comes to confrontation. A woman would think long and hard before even considering sending their children and grandchildren to war. Men don't give a flying hoot whose children they send to their deaths. Time for change. Hilary and Obama.

When John Edwards looks back to account for the many reasons he was never electable in the first place, he'll secretly note Elizabeth as his most polarizing liability.

..and to say Hillary will energize the other side and lose the election for the Dems is naive. This woman hasn't made it THIS far without staying aware of everything she's doing, every morning she wakes up…

Wake up kids! There's a new woman in town, and she's ready to move back onto Pennsylvania Drive. This time, she's driving the U-Haul.

I am a moderate Democrat in California. All of my Democratic friends support Senator Clinton. I have been registering young democrats at a local college and they are supportive of her as well. Those who dislike Ms. Clinton are Republicans, and in my opinion, they wouldn't vote for Edwards either!

I do not agree with Ms. Edwards at all!

Joyce Valencia, CA 91355

Ms Edwards is making her husband unelectable. Her comments reflect her own hatered. If Clinton/Obama/etc are the best demo..do we care if the rep like/dislike them? Muzzle her John…Muzzle her soon.

Elizabeth is just telling the truth.

The MSM loves "narrative" They want "stories to tell." This is why Roone Arledge eventually got the job as the head of News at ABC; because he invented the "up close and personal" puff piece concept for the Olympics and it's now the basic template for all news.

And yes, clearly everyone knows that Hillary is a lightning rod. The ultimate question is whether she can energize the Democrats more than she does the GOP voters.

The risk for both John Edwards and his wife at this point is that, the more she speaks out, the more wussy he appears to many…

Mrs. Edwards is exactly right just as she was when she made the observation regarding Hillary being a woman and Barrak being an African-American. While I like the fact that we have diversity in our choices this time around, Edwards truly is the electable candidate and he's got my vote. He should have been on the front of the ticket in 2004, we could have all been spared this huge headache known as the Bush Administration!

Mrs. Edwards ought to get a life. She's demonstrating that she is worst than Hillary by running her husband's campaign. Is Mrs. Edwards running or her husband?

Senator Hillary got where she is by not riding her husband's coat tails.

Senator Hillary has earned the right to be the next president.

I vote based on experience and what's in for me. Not who is more popular or the most hated person.

Toni

I CAN SAY ITS CLINTON YEARS-2007-2008-THIS IS PHSYCHIC LADY CPOMMNENTS; ALSO THE CLINTON THEN AND THE CLINTON NW- WHO RULE THIS COUNTEY SO GOOD- BARE IN MIND THAT WE HAD A PEACEFULPROSPERITY THEN THE CLINTON.OTHER STILL JELAOUS THE CONTON- UWANT REPUBLICAN GO AHEAD MAKE MY DAY- U REGRET FOR THE THIRD TIME AGIN- THINK TWICE BEFORE YOU VOTE REPUBLICAN A MESSY ONE.

Edward's wife is a truth teller. The RNC should do whatever it takes to keep Edwards in the race. We need her voice.

Thomas A. Mayer
Bismarck, ND 58501

I like Liz, but she just needs to zip up sometimes. It doesn't look good that John has his wife doing the dirty work, is he not 'man' enough? Just 'cause Hillary is a woman? That's ridiculous.

John Edwards isn't necessarily loved by GOP, he couldn't carry his home state!

I think there is Hillary hatred, but i think she can overcome it if her campaign keeps going the way it is in primaries.

Elizabeth Edwards needs to shut up. If nothing else I'm voting for Hillary because she hasn't stooped to attacking the other Democratic Candidates, nor has her spouse. Elizabeth could learn something from Bill here. SHUT UP!

it's not only that the Republican's based will be energize. But also all those attack ads featuring Hillary to use the Lincoln bedroom like a Motel 6 for donars, Are there any interns with stained dresses, etc. If people think the swiftboating of John Kerry and Harold Ford was bad, then go ahead and nominate Hillary and see us lose again. Democrats don't love Hillary like they do Bill. Even her huge polls numbers are soft. There are more republican voters than democrats and I don't see a huge number of independents voting for Hillary. And by the way didn't Bill also have an expense haircut in airforce one which had traffic control freaking out because planes couldn't land or take off until Bill's haircut was finished. A vote for Hillary is a vote for the Republicans, plain and simple.

ya elizabeth… thats why Hillary is the only democrat that defeats all republicans in state like pennsylvania. Her lead in states like california and florida are remarkable– 30 points ahead of all other democrats.

if she can't win in 2008. no democrat can.

To Bill W. in Coatesville - are you crazy?

" Hillary will energize ME to vote Republican - and I'm a Democrat.

The vast majority of people who support Hillary think they are voting for Bill. Aren't they in for a rude awakening?"

Hillary is her own person and her politics are right in the mainstream with progressive thinking Americans. Not that Bill's weren't.

Enough already with the "she can't win" comments. If we think she will make the best president, we should work like hell to get her elected. The Democrats have to be more energized than the Republicans this time around. Thank you GW and DC !

If the Democrats haven't been working hard in battleground states to "stack the votes" in their favor, shame on them. Republicans have supressed the vote in those states 2 national elections in a row. It's time to play as rough and tough as they do. Just don't get caught ! The Republicans have managed that so ?

Joyce, fortunately the entire country is not like California…thank God…cause we can do that here in Texas. But seriously, the woman is right on. Hillary Clinton is not a 2-for-1 deal. Who wants the horrible 90's back again? Who wants ANOTHER NAFTA agreement that puts American jobs in Mexico. Who wants another half-done bombing of Iraq and leave it up to another generation to deal with the underlying problems?

Hillary isn't just the worst Democratic option…she's the worst presidential option. The woman is a sound board of sound bites and no meaning. She offers NO plans to fix the downturning economy, NO plans to fix healthcare or social security that are fiscally viable, NO plans on defense, she's done NOTHING as a Senator.

I'm a swing voter, but generally vote Republican because I like lower taxes; I would happily vote Democrat this coming election if the option is anyone other than a Clinton.

The Republican Base and Democrat Base doesn't win an election…the swing voters in swing states DO.

I'm so sorry, but in my opinion, Elizabeth's courses of drugs have made her a bit delusional. The things she have said have been polarizing, hateful, hurtful, outrageous, and yes - delusional. No disrespect to a woman fighting for her life in a battle that I wish no one would ever have to wage, but perhaps her precious inner resources should be better spent on waging that battle, since she seems to be needing to focus so much of herself there and JE isn't going to go from third to first with or without her half-baked chemo-cocktail induced commentaries. Sorry Elizabeth, and I wish you well in the fight of your life. Perhaps it's time to conserve some of your resources now.

Wow, I knew a Republican victory over HRC would be a breeze, but I had no idea that John Edwards would be such a puff ball, too.

Let's be honest, folks… if he's too afraid to stand up to his own opponents in a stinkin' PRIMARY election that he needs his ailing, cancer-afflicted WIFE to do it for him, exactly how effective is this guy going to be against radical Islamists.

I can see it now… "Don't attack us Mr. Terrorist, or I'll get my wife to say bad things about you in the media."

This is looking more and more like a Republican victory with each passing day.

I agree that Clinton will get the republican base motivated but so will any other democratic candidate. That is the strength of the republican party is their get out the vote campaigns. I don't think she was attacking the Clinton campaign but she is not helping her husband at all with the current rhetoric.
Jim of Atlanta and some others comments however were inappropriate. To tag the republican party in such a negative way for no reason other then to share your views is rude and inappropriate, and I am a democrat. And it should go without saying that the haircut, the woman's place rhetoric, and other negative comments have no role and are not necessary nor relevant.

John Edwards didn't carry his home state because he wasn't the front runner on the ticket in 2004 people. The exhausting, overly boring, as interesting as watching paint dry, John Kerry was. The two actually fared pretty well in his home state despite it being a Republican stronghold and having Kerry on the front of the ticket and you're fooling yourself if you think that Hillary and Barrak aren't getting extra attention because of their race and gender.

Oh geez, not again. Can't someone in the Edwards campaign make her shut up? She is NOT helping him out. She is just making him look impotent.

Personally, I like John Edwards. He has some good ideas and makes good points.

However, taking a page out of the Republican playbook doesn't bode well with me. Remember that tactic? If Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the Democrats take over, it's the end of America. Well, we know what happened in that election.

It's his campaign and he can do whatever he wants but I can assure ALL the candidates, I'm going with the person I think will get us out of the mess we're in. Please, give us substance and put aside petty issues!

Elizabeth is right—I will vote for a Republican candidate before voting for Hillary.

ADVICE FOR JOHN EDWARDS:

SHAVE YOUR DAMN HEAD - ELIMINATE THE "HAIRCUT ISSUE"!

How in the world do you respect a man whose wife is doing all the talking for him? And what a hypocrite she is - she who attacked Ann Coulter for supposedly being hateful. Yet she has no problem playing the game herself.

Mrs Edwards seems to be so politically tone deaf that it's spooky. Here's another example of the catty, almost non-sensical comments for which she has become famous. She is not helping her husband, who seems content to passively fade away in the political limelight as his wife continues to present herself as an inexperienced political wife. THINK before you speak, Elizabeth.

QUOTE:

“I don't know where it comes from. I don't begin to understand it. But you can't pretend it doesn't exist, and it will energize the Republican base," Mrs. Edwards said"

Funny Mrs Edwards doesn't know where it comes from yet just less than a week ago John was swiping Bill & Hill about the US knowing "the Lincoln Bedroom is NOT for sale".

Are you being HONEST Mrs Edwards?

All I have to say is that John Edwards better learn quickly how to muzzle his foul-mouthed wife. She is the Democrat who seems to be imitating the Republicans in vitriol. Get off it, Elizabeth baby!

She needs to quit spouting off. Her husband is already at the bottom of the polls.

I started out in this campaign an Edwards supporter. However, I've change my mind because he is to liberal to win the presidential election. Most people in America is somewhere in the middle. Being on the far side of either party is very selfish. When I think of Ameirica I think of sharing with your neighbors. However, that's almost impossible if you're to far out there on either side,right or left. I truly understand that I can't have everything my way. Therefore I am willing to let the other side win sometime.. I think Hillary would make a fine President. I also think Rudy would come back to his Moderate roots if he is elected. I still favor Hillary over Him. I was just putting that out there..

Elizabeth is right. Of the three top-tier Dems, Hillary is the least electable in the general election. Mrs. Edwards is speaking truth, and we Dems better realize that, lest we have President Rudy.

Who wants to elect a pansy who is more concerned about his hair than the fact that his cancer-afflicted wife does all the talking for him? And not very well– she comes off as rude, boorish and reactionary. Not to mention that she is a hypocrite for attacking Ann Coulter, then engaging in the same kinds of comments herself.

I love Elizabeth Edward but I wish she'd just be quiet and let her husband do the talking. He is the one running for President. Stop emasculating your husband.

I can't believe she bought into that 'double talk' from Karl Rove. Rove and his people know this for sure: Hillary is the one candidate that will give them a run for their money. She won't let herself be defined by the Republican machine as John Kerry did. I can never comprehend how a decorated War veteran like Kerry lost the election to a draft dodging silver spoon fed dummy like Bush. There is no way you can go through the Republican attack machine for 8 years in the White House like Hillary and not come out with high negatives. But as people get to know Hillary they get to change their minds about those Republican manufactured perceptions. Her negatives have been decreasing since she declared her candidacy.

Every other candidate has so many huddles to overcome. Rather than let Karl Rove deceive you about Hillary energizing the GOP, I would hope the democrats would energize their base to rally around their nominee. This is the democrats election to win.

Hillary/Obama or Hillary/Richardson will make a great team.

Elizabeth is correct. At least I hope so. This simply means the parties that rally against Clinton will be exposed. This exposure should uncover even more targets at the grass roots level for the Democratic Party to seek and destroy and take home more than just the White House. In my opinion, it's been the lack of a candidate to energize anyone that has enabled the current administration to maintain it's corruption.

I hear this all the time that Hillary is not electable and more people hate than love her! But, they are not telling why they dislike her. Just because she is strong, smart, and experienced? Or, these republicans want women just to take care of baking, greeting guests, and taking care of irrelevant photo-op volantary jobs just like Nancy, Barabara, and Laura did for their husbands. In short, these right wingers have created a propaganda that Hillary is not electable without any valid reasons. Unfortunately, Elizabeth is falling for the same trap and loosing all sympathy by creating the fights amongst democrats. Even if her husband wins the nomination, does she expect all thees republicans to vote for her husband? Not in thousand years! Because they are the same stupid folks who voted Bush twice knowing fully well his incompetany. They would rather vote a person like Larry Craig, Tom Delay, or Jimmy Haggard than any of the democrats.

Hate to say it, but she's actually right for once. Hilary is too polarizing. Obama all the way.

Why doesn't Mr. Edwards use his own money to fund his campaign? He made a significant amount of money and aided in the worsening of our healthcare system. I have no respect for a man that earned millions suing physicians that performed natural births due to a possibly link that a lack of oxygen from natural births might cause cerebral palsy. Why not sue god for creating the process of natural birth? If he could, he probably would. What was the result of his work as a trial lawyer? Increased liability insurance for the physician and increased health insurance rates for the average American. It also resulted in an increase in c-sections over natural birth. What did not change was the rate of occurrence of newborn infants with cerebral palsy even with a decrease in natural births. I am a moderate liberal, and it scares me to see this man in office in any form. I am happy to see him currently out of office as a Senator (good job North Carolina!). You cannot trust John Edwards because he is selfish. He only cares about himself. He was not standing up for "the little guy." He was standing up to fatten his wallet. It makes me wonder if Mr. Edwards is for healthcare reform given the only reason for his success in politics was fueled by questionable healthcare litigation. If believes we need to address excessive and questionable litigation of medical malpractice lawsuits, then he confirms what I already believe that he is a hypocrite and dirty politician. The reason why the media does not care about Edwards is not because he is not a female or African-American; the reason is the majority of Americans (Democrat or Republican) do not care for him. He is a recreant.

The Republicans hate the Clintons because they could never measure up to them and it angered them to the point of madness! Remember how Newt Gingrich and the other Gop hot heads got Kennith Starr to go after Bill Clinton-do whatever it would take to destroy him!! The Republicans love power and will stop at nothing to get,keep it, retain it!! The 1990s was the best decade in the history of the U.S! We had peace,prosperity,jobs, safety and security. And non of our kids were killed in a war to stop Osama Bin ladin!! One more thing… Obama Bin -Ladin is still alive out there..waiting..How many of our troops are dead???
Edwards is really desperate attacking one of his own kind instead of the real enemies!!

I think we all know who wears the pants in the Edwards family. Do we really want to elect a man who kowtows to his wife at every turn and basically is his mouthpiece???

Who is Jimmy Haggard? Trying checking your facts before you attack people.

People, people, people. . . . There are some Hillary haters that hate because she is a woman. And then there are others because she is a raging $%^&^$. No not because she is a strong woman, but because she has come off that way for 25+ years. Anyone behind the scenes that has had to deal with her says the same. Why aren't women appalled she stayed with Bill? The guy has been cheating on her since day one. This just increases the look of weakness. How is that moving womens equality forward? Staying with a man so she has a shot at power? And by the way, when has John Edwards "used" his wife's "illness" (it's cancer by the way)? Democratic in fighting will get you know where. What Mrs. Edwards says is true, you can't argue it. The GOP is salivating at the opportunity to run against Hillary. And when she loses, I am sure people will blame the religious right, when they should be blaming themselves for puting her up!

The photo associated with this article says it all…

"Get a clue democrats. No matter who you nominate the republicans are going to become energized. We don't want a tax and spend cut and run president. So go ahead and nominate Edwards. We'll happily woop his behind instead. Posted By David, Gilbert Arizona"

LOL, I had to respond. It's the Republicans that are tripping all over themselves cutting and running out of Washington or have you not been paying attention. As far as tax and spend, I suppose you prefer we continue giving all our money to Halliburton. In fact it's the Republicans that are bankrupting America with this idiotic war.

I love Elizabeth Edward but I wish she'd just be quiet and let her husband do the talking. Stop emasculating your husband.

I can't believe she bought into that 'double talk' from Karl Rove. Rove and his people know this for sure: Hillary is the one candidate that will give them a run for their money. She won't let herself be defined by the Republican machine as John Kerry did. I can never comprehend how a decorated War veteran like Kerry lost the election to a draft dodging silver spoon fed dummy like Bush. There is no way you can go through the Republican attack machine for 8 years in the White House like Hillary and not come out with high negatives. But as people get to know Hillary they get to change their minds about those Republican manufactured perceptions. Her negatives have been decreasing since she declared her candidacy.

Every other candidate has so many huddles to overcome. Rather than let Karl Rove deceive you about Hillary energizing the GOP, I would hope the democrats would energize their base to rally around their nominee.

Might I remind all the Bush-haters of Congress' approval rating? As of Aug. 22, a new Gallup Poll shows that Congress' approval rating is just 18 percent, the lowest since Gallup started tracking it in 1974.

How are you going to pin that one on George?

Mrs Edwards, you just relax ! Whether or not your husband will win, it's up to your husband's performance. If you speak more, it won't help your husband for the bid of president 2008.

Mrs Clinton's saying is not serious as your saying ! I don't think that it is all her meaning. Please don't mix up.

Mrs Hillary Clinton and Mr. John Edwards could be very good together for the presidents for our American 2008.

I read the Time article on the Edwards'. John Edwards discussing healthcare reform is a joke. He help create the problem, and he expects Americans to believe he can remedy it. I guess he got his piece of the malpractice pie and is ready to jump on the bandwagon of healthcare reform to get elected. I highly doubt is looking out for the "little guy." Mr. Edwards, why not start by apologizing for aiding in the inflation of our healthcare costs from your sketchy malpractice lawsuits. Then you can start discussing healthcare reform.

I don't think it is that John is not speaking, it is more the media can hype, spin, or get a rise out of the audience with more of Elizabeth's comments.

Elizabeth is a lawyer, as is John. She is an effective speaker, but often more abrasive in tone than John, hence John's remarkable success as a litigator. It is also the reason the media can "do more/sell more" with some of her statements.

Any spouse that would prefer to sit at home, or chill on the sidelines, while the other is on the campaign trail opens the door to another media spin….marital problems.

If she weren't on the road with John, giving the support she has, John would be lambasted with questions regarding his priorities for not sitting alongside his wife during her ordeal with battling cancer.

Chill out America, this is a strong showing of family values, and you're missing it because you'd rather focus on "out of context" negatives without conclusive proof.

Take each candidate and make your decisions on who's values are more akin to yours.

Basing a presidential vote merely on race, gender, or party affiliation is outdated and we're slowly learning/evolving to a society that bases their votes on a personal level.

We have the Bush administration to thank for this. They have shown us that basing your vote, merely on political affiliation, is quite ignorant.

Fool me once, shame on you…Fool me twice, we'll give you a second term.

I think America's been shown by the issues in Iraq, the rampant lust for page's, and bathroom escapades that the anti-(place what will get them elected, i.e. homosexuality, abortions, etc) stances of the current Republican electorate is a farce to get them elected.

I do not claim any party affiliation, I claim my morals and values and see who fits MY bill on election day.

I'm confused do we have two female candidates for presidents.

What happen to John Edwards?

Elizabeth is doing all of the campaigning and stump speeches while Johnny boy is seating back playing with his hair

You GO Girl !!

Finally someone who speaks the TRUTH !!

Edwards is the ONLY potential nominee that can beat the repubes. I just wish more Americans would wake up and see that.

Thank you Elizabeth, for trying to make something, that SHOULD be obvious, easier to understand.

Keep it up, and you'll be in the WhiteHouse before you know it.

Go EDWARDS/OBAMA !!

She's on the money - Elizabeth is not affraid to speak the truth - we all need to start listening to both she and John - They obviously have fresh and real ideas! GO E!

Is John Edwards ever going to start speaking out of his own mouth, or stop prefacing every sentence with "my wife Elizabeth says?".

How about Elizabeth Edwards for president? She can have John as her VP.

I was torn between voting for Edwards and Clinton BUT with the STING and HATRED Mrs. Edwards has for Hilary I really do not think Edwards is right for the job. He was doing fine UNTIL SHE opened her mouth(Mrs. Edwards). I feel sorry for her because of the cancer but I think it has made her ugly and full of hatred and it is coming out in Edwards campaign. She should go back home NOW! He might still have a chance to win. HE is a LOVING and GOOD man.
Thank you,

I consider this tactic to be sleezy and unbecoming a presidential candidate. I don't care if Edwards actually said it or not. It came from his campaign and he is responsible.

First of all, I am a diehard democrat who understands, like 70%, of the country we need change. We need real change, specifically getting a democrat in the White House. I truly believe John is the best candidate to win the general election - hands down. For those of you not in political science or do not truly pay attention, Republicans would love Hillary to be the candidate (e.g. such Rove, Giuliani, etc.). They did the same thing in 2004 with Kerry - I wish democrats would smarten up and see this and not allow the Repubs to fool them again. I also could care less if John gets a $400 haircut once in a while - I am sure we all spend more money than we should on things at times…the fact is he has devoted his life, particularly the past years, to helping those less fortunate and continuously talks about it, which goes much further than a charitable contribution here and there for tax purposes or recognition. It is a weak argument; he has worked hard and become very successful but does not live like a King by any means. Whoever says Elizabeth is running her mouth too much or basically running herself is just not paying attention at all and showing ignorance. CNN just has chosen to oftentimes highlight her words more than John's. He also does not run on her cancer and think it is despicable someone believes that - right up there with the ranks of Coulter. On the whole many democrats have lost their way and letting the far left run the show - it is time to wise up and look at overall electability, which I believe is very slowly starting to happen (whoever said his poll numbers keep going down is also not paying attention). Depending on which poll you choose to look at he is leading in Iowa and closing in very quickly to Obama overall (see Rasmussen Reports). I think Hillary, who is really a moderate and very pro-business and anti-labor, would be a better fit as secretary of state or even our next Supreme Court Judge. I admire someone who speaks their mind and with passion - Elizabeth truly cares about people and believes her husband will be the best person to lead this country out the deep whole we have been lead into. I also admire John for not dictating to his wife what she can and cannot say (within reason). I was originally for HRC but after doing more research and following the campaigns (reading speeches, policies, debates, etc), it seems a no-brainer to me that John is the best candidate to have on the ticket. Why not even Edwards-Obama?!

To those who attack Edwards because of his wealth and big house:

As one who is a seventy-eight year old I thank God that we once had a very rich president who lived in a big house. He fought for the common people of this nation.

His big house was called Hyde Park and his name was Franklin Roosevelt.

One of the best presidents this nation has ever had.

It's the truth. And it's not just that Clinton will energize the Republican base- it's that moderate republicans are fed up with their party, and many will vote democrat as long as it's not Hillary. Meanwhile, Clinton doesn't inspire anyone to vote democrat- people would just be voting for a democrat to not have a Republican. That's the same useless idea that democrats tried to use last time- Anyone but Bush! And Kerry lost.

She just can inspire people. How many tens of thousands show up to