<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When will Thompson jump in?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frankie, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52815</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52815</guid>
		<description>Who cares..??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares..??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skel, San Francisco, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52806</link>
		<dc:creator>Skel, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52806</guid>
		<description>Careful with that “jumping” Pops!
  
The only thing worse than an “old,  washed-up actor / non candidate – candidate”  is an “old,  washed- up actor / non candidate – candidate” with a broken hip.

Perhaps if you ever decide to actually enter the race, you should “Hoveround” in and not jump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful with that “jumping” Pops!</p>
<p>The only thing worse than an “old,  washed-up actor / non candidate – candidate”  is an “old,  washed- up actor / non candidate – candidate” with a broken hip.</p>
<p>Perhaps if you ever decide to actually enter the race, you should “Hoveround” in and not jump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous, Memphis, TN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52790</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous, Memphis, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52790</guid>
		<description>Republican economic policy was always very appealing to me and so I joined. After a cple of years I became more active in my states Republican party. However, when I found out how much the KKK influences the decsions of the party I had to change parties and am now an independant. I&#039;m going to vote for Ron Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican economic policy was always very appealing to me and so I joined. After a cple of years I became more active in my states Republican party. However, when I found out how much the KKK influences the decsions of the party I had to change parties and am now an independant. I'm going to vote for Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen, Tallahassee</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52766</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen, Tallahassee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52766</guid>
		<description>looks like today, ... very anti-climatic 

&quot;Fred Dalton Thompson will tell his supporters that he is running for president today in a 4 p.m. conference call with 800 to 1,000 elected and party officials from around the country, a source close to the campaign said today.&quot;

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/08/30/post_50.html?hpid=topnews

Future News Update: 9/30/07
Thompson drops out of the race, could not raise funds, voters forgot he was running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like today, ... very anti-climatic </p>
<p>"Fred Dalton Thompson will tell his supporters that he is running for president today in a 4 p.m. conference call with 800 to 1,000 elected and party officials from around the country, a source close to the campaign said today."</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/08/30/post_50.html?hpid=topnews" rel="nofollow">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/08/30/post_50.html?hpid=topnews</a></p>
<p>Future News Update: 9/30/07<br />
Thompson drops out of the race, could not raise funds, voters forgot he was running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry, El Paso, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52743</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry, El Paso, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52743</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t vote for him, but I expect Thompson to do very well once he gets in the race. He has that old Ronald Reagan magic: he&#039;s too dumb to understand the issues but his down-home, common sense rhetoric will persuade many voters. Business will support him with mega-bucks after he does well in a debate, sensing another windfall of tax cuts and deregulation from another practicioner of voodoo economics. Fundamentalists, deeply disappointed in Bush, will start singing &quot;Shall We Gather at the River&quot; as their preachers thunder in their support for him. Thompson&#039;s wife, what&#039;s-her-name, will play the Nancy Reagan role, guiding her sweetheart with her on version of tarot cards and tea leaves. 

It will be morning in America all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't vote for him, but I expect Thompson to do very well once he gets in the race. He has that old Ronald Reagan magic: he's too dumb to understand the issues but his down-home, common sense rhetoric will persuade many voters. Business will support him with mega-bucks after he does well in a debate, sensing another windfall of tax cuts and deregulation from another practicioner of voodoo economics. Fundamentalists, deeply disappointed in Bush, will start singing "Shall We Gather at the River" as their preachers thunder in their support for him. Thompson's wife, what's-her-name, will play the Nancy Reagan role, guiding her sweetheart with her on version of tarot cards and tea leaves. </p>
<p>It will be morning in America all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph, Spartanburg, SC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52643</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph, Spartanburg, SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52643</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the reincarnation of &quot;Ronnie&quot; and Republicans everyone are rejoicing because he&#039;s decided to enter the race!  Especially Republicans in South Carolina are happy.  Help us all if this clown is elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's the reincarnation of "Ronnie" and Republicans everyone are rejoicing because he's decided to enter the race!  Especially Republicans in South Carolina are happy.  Help us all if this clown is elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDW, Mobile, AL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52620</link>
		<dc:creator>TDW, Mobile, AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52620</guid>
		<description>Run Fred, Run.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Please!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Run Fred, Run.</p>
<p><b><i>Please!</i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John St. Louis, MO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52619</link>
		<dc:creator>John St. Louis, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52619</guid>
		<description>Never.

Two months ago I was all in favor, now I just wish he would go back to acting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never.</p>
<p>Two months ago I was all in favor, now I just wish he would go back to acting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron, Bondurant, IA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52610</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron, Bondurant, IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52610</guid>
		<description>In other news, who cares about Fred Thompson...?  I mean really, this guy isn&#039;t even a good actor, let alone a good leader...  Honestly though, if he wants in, and still decides to skip the New Hampshire debate, he&#039;s making a ridiculously dumb decision.  I&#039;d bet the voters of New Hampshire will remember that one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news, who cares about Fred Thompson...?  I mean really, this guy isn't even a good actor, let alone a good leader...  Honestly though, if he wants in, and still decides to skip the New Hampshire debate, he's making a ridiculously dumb decision.  I'd bet the voters of New Hampshire will remember that one...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52590</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52590</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s about time. He&#039;s got a lawsuit coming over his little &quot;Testing the Waters&quot; scheme. What he has done up to this point has been nothing but deceptive, cowardly, and against election rules. He avoids debates because he&#039;ll get destroyed. He avoids &quot;formally&quot; announcing because he wants to raise his funds in secret (even though its pretty obvious they&#039;re not &quot;testing the waters&quot; funds). He&#039;s going through staff almost as fast as McCain. How ANYONE could take Fred Thompson seriously, i&#039;ll never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's about time. He's got a lawsuit coming over his little "Testing the Waters" scheme. What he has done up to this point has been nothing but deceptive, cowardly, and against election rules. He avoids debates because he'll get destroyed. He avoids "formally" announcing because he wants to raise his funds in secret (even though its pretty obvious they're not "testing the waters" funds). He's going through staff almost as fast as McCain. How ANYONE could take Fred Thompson seriously, i'll never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52589</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52589</guid>
		<description>Fred who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Providence, RI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52582</link>
		<dc:creator>Providence, RI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52582</guid>
		<description>Thomsom will not be Republican&#039;s last resort!  Republicans are already losing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomsom will not be Republican's last resort!  Republicans are already losing...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. America</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52573</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52573</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really care when/if he jumps in. But you need to fix the head which says, &quot;When we Thompson jump in?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't really care when/if he jumps in. But you need to fix the head which says, "When we Thompson jump in?"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark, Princeton, NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52571</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark, Princeton, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/30/when-we-thompson-jump-in/#comment-52571</guid>
		<description>Thompson is become increasingly irrelevant. He can&#039;t even manage his campaign - why would anyone believe he&#039;d make a good President?

I used to like him, but I&#039;ve since switched to Mitt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thompson is become increasingly irrelevant. He can't even manage his campaign &#8211; why would anyone believe he'd make a good President?</p>
<p>I used to like him, but I've since switched to Mitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
