<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush predicts Clinton will win Dem nomination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-476727</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-476727</guid>
		<description>Obama has time to gain more experience before taking over the country.  Most people are tired of a republican run nation - putting a different republican in the White House won&#039;t be enough change.  It will take an enormous amount of experience and a great team to lead the change we need now!  Hillary has both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has time to gain more experience before taking over the country.  Most people are tired of a republican run nation &#8211; putting a different republican in the White House won't be enough change.  It will take an enormous amount of experience and a great team to lead the change we need now!  Hillary has both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan, Las Vegas, Nevada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-136960</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan, Las Vegas, Nevada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-136960</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton will be the next president.  It&#039;s time we put a Democrat back in the White House and who better than Fmr. President Clinton&#039;s wife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton will be the next president.  It's time we put a Democrat back in the White House and who better than Fmr. President Clinton's wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian,boston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-136040</link>
		<dc:creator>brian,boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-136040</guid>
		<description>a lot of you people are stuck in polor politics. bush wants hillary to win because she will conitinue their agenda. got nothing to do with rep/dem camps..republican  and democrat label names for those that can&#039;t think for themselves -wake the hell up..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot of you people are stuck in polor politics. bush wants hillary to win because she will conitinue their agenda. got nothing to do with rep/dem camps..republican  and democrat label names for those that can't think for themselves -wake the hell up..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liney San Francisco Ca.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-110752</link>
		<dc:creator>Liney San Francisco Ca.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-110752</guid>
		<description>In September I submitted the post of:

&lt;i&gt;So the president doesn&#039;t support Barrage Oboring?
I&#039;m not suprised, this is probably Oboring&#039;s best bet yet! That is if he doesn&#039;t put the voters to sleep in the voting boths.
The only thing that REALLY separates Barrage Oboring from the other candidates IS the color of his skin.
Posted By Lonnee Pasadena California : September 29, 2007 3:31 pm &lt;/i&gt;

And posted with the name of Lonnee. This is not my name and Lonnee is a very empassioned follower of Obama and does not share the views posted with her name.
To this, I publicly apologize for using her name in a slanderous and ingeniousness way.
Sorry Sis I love you and it was just a joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In September I submitted the post of:</p>
<p><i>So the president doesn't support Barrage Oboring?<br />
I'm not suprised, this is probably Oboring's best bet yet! That is if he doesn't put the voters to sleep in the voting boths.<br />
The only thing that REALLY separates Barrage Oboring from the other candidates IS the color of his skin.<br />
Posted By Lonnee Pasadena California : September 29, 2007 3:31 pm </i></p>
<p>And posted with the name of Lonnee. This is not my name and Lonnee is a very empassioned follower of Obama and does not share the views posted with her name.<br />
To this, I publicly apologize for using her name in a slanderous and ingeniousness way.<br />
Sorry Sis I love you and it was just a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonnee Pasadena California</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-80404</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonnee Pasadena California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-80404</guid>
		<description>So the president doesn&#039;t support Barrage Oboring?
I&#039;m not suprised, this is probably Oboring&#039;s best bet yet! That is if he doesn&#039;t put the voters to sleep in the voting boths.
The only thing that REALLY separates Barrage Oboring from the other candidates IS the color of his skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the president doesn't support Barrage Oboring?<br />
I'm not suprised, this is probably Oboring's best bet yet! That is if he doesn't put the voters to sleep in the voting boths.<br />
The only thing that REALLY separates Barrage Oboring from the other candidates IS the color of his skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-76154</link>
		<dc:creator>USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-76154</guid>
		<description>How would Bush know, unless he plans to pull off yet another voting shenanigan in Florida, for a third time, to ensure that Hillary gets that state&#039;s nominating votes, thereby helping her toward getting the overall Dem vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would Bush know, unless he plans to pull off yet another voting shenanigan in Florida, for a third time, to ensure that Hillary gets that state's nominating votes, thereby helping her toward getting the overall Dem vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RuthieM</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-75112</link>
		<dc:creator>RuthieM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-75112</guid>
		<description>Bush is the one who stated Obama is &#039;intellectually lazy&#039;, not any white house spokesperson.  He doesn&#039;t even have the intellectual guts to say it was his own comment.  Obama needs to sue Bush for slander, this is outrageous, defaming his character.  It is also a racist statement used by the slavemasters against the black slaves  -- lazy.  This whole thing also smells of Carl Roveism.  And so it looks like Carl Rove will be strong behind the scenes for the republicans even though he is &#039;invisible&#039;.  Remember, it was Rove who orchestrated Bush&#039;s entire campaign strategy straight through the end of 2000 election, by telling him to thump the Bible in front of all the Evangelical Christians, and that would get him into the white house, and as we all know -- the rest is -- history!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush is the one who stated Obama is 'intellectually lazy', not any white house spokesperson.  He doesn't even have the intellectual guts to say it was his own comment.  Obama needs to sue Bush for slander, this is outrageous, defaming his character.  It is also a racist statement used by the slavemasters against the black slaves  - lazy.  This whole thing also smells of Carl Roveism.  And so it looks like Carl Rove will be strong behind the scenes for the republicans even though he is 'invisible'.  Remember, it was Rove who orchestrated Bush's entire campaign strategy straight through the end of 2000 election, by telling him to thump the Bible in front of all the Evangelical Christians, and that would get him into the white house, and as we all know - the rest is - history!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c, Sacramento, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-75006</link>
		<dc:creator>c, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-75006</guid>
		<description>Never trust a Republican to handicap a Democratic race, and never trust a Democrat to handicap a Republican race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never trust a Republican to handicap a Democratic race, and never trust a Democrat to handicap a Republican race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn, Stillwater, MN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74754</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn, Stillwater, MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74754</guid>
		<description>Anyone who votes for Hillary is uneducated, blinded, and falling right into the trap the republicans are setting up for you.

Io not even going to begin with how ppor of a candidate Hillary is on her own merits which should make anyone who has had there eyes and ears open in the last 20 years vote for ANYONE other than Hillary Clinton.  Besides all of that, LOOK AROUND THE MEDIA!!!!  How much is everyone Democrats and Republicans trying to push and assume Hillary as the nomination.  It is because the Clintons have bought out the left media, and Republicans know that they can crush her in the presidential race.  Anyone can see that, cant they.  Think about how much ammunition the right would have on her, she talks out of both sides of her mouth on nearly every issue...she will have to defend Bill&#039;s 8 years which have gotten us to 9/11 in the first place.  Republicans want to keep the keys to the White House they want a candidate they can beat.  How can any reasonable person vote for Hillary anyways, she is a joke.  She is EVERYTHING that is wrong with America...I just pray that you idiots figure that out...OBAMA 08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who votes for Hillary is uneducated, blinded, and falling right into the trap the republicans are setting up for you.</p>
<p>Io not even going to begin with how ppor of a candidate Hillary is on her own merits which should make anyone who has had there eyes and ears open in the last 20 years vote for ANYONE other than Hillary Clinton.  Besides all of that, LOOK AROUND THE MEDIA!!!!  How much is everyone Democrats and Republicans trying to push and assume Hillary as the nomination.  It is because the Clintons have bought out the left media, and Republicans know that they can crush her in the presidential race.  Anyone can see that, cant they.  Think about how much ammunition the right would have on her, she talks out of both sides of her mouth on nearly every issue...she will have to defend Bill's 8 years which have gotten us to 9/11 in the first place.  Republicans want to keep the keys to the White House they want a candidate they can beat.  How can any reasonable person vote for Hillary anyways, she is a joke.  She is EVERYTHING that is wrong with America...I just pray that you idiots figure that out...OBAMA 08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice Newman    Center Harbor NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74685</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice Newman    Center Harbor NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74685</guid>
		<description>am an independent. If Hillary wins the primary, I will vote for the Republican.
Posted By Jen, Gainesville, FL : September 24, 2007 9:51 am  

   There&#039;s intellectual laziness at its best!  Not surprising the the current president recognizes the intellectual laziness - he likes it so much - he bought the country ... I mean company</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am an independent. If Hillary wins the primary, I will vote for the Republican.<br />
Posted By Jen, Gainesville, FL : September 24, 2007 9:51 am  </p>
<p>   There's intellectual laziness at its best!  Not surprising the the current president recognizes the intellectual laziness &#8211; he likes it so much &#8211; he bought the country ... I mean company</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapera, Toronto</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74584</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapera, Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74584</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sherry for stating what the real problem is. There are far worse threats to American people. From what I see on these blogs, most American people don&#039;t do their research. You would think that with all the available information resources  they would know better. Reminds me of under-informed people in third world countries only that those people have no source of information. Please people open up your minds it doesn&#039;t hurt to think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sherry for stating what the real problem is. There are far worse threats to American people. From what I see on these blogs, most American people don't do their research. You would think that with all the available information resources  they would know better. Reminds me of under-informed people in third world countries only that those people have no source of information. Please people open up your minds it doesn't hurt to think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene, Park Ridge IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74573</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene, Park Ridge IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74573</guid>
		<description>Remind me why we care what this selfish egomaniac thinks about anything. He is better than most at making money.  Good for him.  He has all the divorce lawyers he can afford.  But aside from being a successful, albeit morally challenged, speculator, Donald Trump has done nothing to make the world take his opinions seriously.  If he is talking about how to make money in real estate, it might be worth listening.  If he is talking about anything else, it probably means he is lonely (new wifey must be asking for pro rata compensation for getting naked) or he has some real estate venture to pimp.  Either way, SHUT UP YOU WALKING COMB-OVER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remind me why we care what this selfish egomaniac thinks about anything. He is better than most at making money.  Good for him.  He has all the divorce lawyers he can afford.  But aside from being a successful, albeit morally challenged, speculator, Donald Trump has done nothing to make the world take his opinions seriously.  If he is talking about how to make money in real estate, it might be worth listening.  If he is talking about anything else, it probably means he is lonely (new wifey must be asking for pro rata compensation for getting naked) or he has some real estate venture to pimp.  Either way, SHUT UP YOU WALKING COMB-OVER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a. thomas, new york, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74425</link>
		<dc:creator>a. thomas, new york, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74425</guid>
		<description>George Bush, as Donald Trump just said, the best you can help your republican party in the next election, is to stay away and hide in the corner.  Have you not noticed that nearly all republican candidates have put a distance between you and them, and try not to mention your name in their speeches?

Your thought that a republican nomine will win in the next election is wrong, because you have put the republican party and its presidential candidates into shame.  As Alan Greenspan said, you are not fiscally irresponsible in your administration and is NOT one of the smart presidents in the many presidents he had served as the federal reserve chairman.   The polls show that most american voters will vote for a democratic party nominee as president next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush, as Donald Trump just said, the best you can help your republican party in the next election, is to stay away and hide in the corner.  Have you not noticed that nearly all republican candidates have put a distance between you and them, and try not to mention your name in their speeches?</p>
<p>Your thought that a republican nomine will win in the next election is wrong, because you have put the republican party and its presidential candidates into shame.  As Alan Greenspan said, you are not fiscally irresponsible in your administration and is NOT one of the smart presidents in the many presidents he had served as the federal reserve chairman.   The polls show that most american voters will vote for a democratic party nominee as president next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank, Palm Springs, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74400</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank, Palm Springs, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74400</guid>
		<description>As always, Bush is half right ... Hillary will get the nomination ... and she will be our next President ... no doubt about it ... there is not one GOP candidate that can beat her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, Bush is half right ... Hillary will get the nomination ... and she will be our next President ... no doubt about it ... there is not one GOP candidate that can beat her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74389</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74389</guid>
		<description>The most corrupt, myopic, reactionary, idiotic White House is trying to challenge Obama&#039;s intellect? That is hilarious! Thanks Karl Rove for that fantastic commentary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most corrupt, myopic, reactionary, idiotic White House is trying to challenge Obama's intellect? That is hilarious! Thanks Karl Rove for that fantastic commentary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Milwaukee, WI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74336</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Milwaukee, WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74336</guid>
		<description>Republicans are funny! Do you all not know that Hillary&#039;s crew as we speak are matching up a blitz of ads that link George Bush to the GOP candidates.....

GEORGE BUSH

The man whom only 28% of the country approves of. 

the GOP are running like Hell from him but it will be pretty damn hard come election season.

Like it or not, The republicans will NOT hold on to the white house in 2008. As painful as that is for you guys...deal with it. But dont blame Sen. Clinton....blame George Bush!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are funny! Do you all not know that Hillary's crew as we speak are matching up a blitz of ads that link George Bush to the GOP candidates.....</p>
<p>GEORGE BUSH</p>
<p>The man whom only 28% of the country approves of. </p>
<p>the GOP are running like Hell from him but it will be pretty damn hard come election season.</p>
<p>Like it or not, The republicans will NOT hold on to the white house in 2008. As painful as that is for you guys...deal with it. But dont blame Sen. Clinton....blame George Bush!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricia M Charlottetown PEI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74331</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricia M Charlottetown PEI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74331</guid>
		<description>Bush predicts Clinton will win Dem nomination:

SCRITCH??????   SCRATCH?????????

I&#039;m trying to discern why there are any comments on this blog site?????
Given the title is BUSH PREDICTS~!

WHEN did Bush ever predict anything that had any truth or substance? 
My advice would be &quot;Stay The Course&quot; 
&quot;Inform Yourselves&quot; - or &quot;Call a Psychic&quot; ...

Either of the last two choices would have more ceedence than a BUSH PREDICTION! 
&quot;We are making Progress in Iraq&quot;

I Vote to VETO THAT! 
Signed: George Vetoing Bush.
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush predicts Clinton will win Dem nomination:</p>
<p>SCRITCH??????   SCRATCH?????????</p>
<p>I'm trying to discern why there are any comments on this blog site?????<br />
Given the title is BUSH PREDICTS~!</p>
<p>WHEN did Bush ever predict anything that had any truth or substance?<br />
My advice would be "Stay The Course"<br />
"Inform Yourselves" &#8211; or "Call a Psychic" ...</p>
<p>Either of the last two choices would have more ceedence than a BUSH PREDICTION!<br />
"We are making Progress in Iraq"</p>
<p>I Vote to VETO THAT!<br />
Signed: George Vetoing Bush.<br />
 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George, Irmo South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74315</link>
		<dc:creator>George, Irmo South Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74315</guid>
		<description>How very Bill Maheresque of democrats to automatically gainsay anything the President says.  As a Republican and avowed disliker of Hillary, I can say that when you watch her in a debate with Barack, you are watching a well-coached, sharp candidate vs Barack, who usually changes the question because he hasn&#039;t studied for it. Barack is obviously ill-prepared for this.  Hillary did her homework. Barack sounds like Adam Sandler at the end of Billy Madison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How very Bill Maheresque of democrats to automatically gainsay anything the President says.  As a Republican and avowed disliker of Hillary, I can say that when you watch her in a debate with Barack, you are watching a well-coached, sharp candidate vs Barack, who usually changes the question because he hasn't studied for it. Barack is obviously ill-prepared for this.  Hillary did her homework. Barack sounds like Adam Sandler at the end of Billy Madison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas, Fremont, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74294</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas, Fremont, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74294</guid>
		<description>Bush has been involved in politics his whole life which explains why he is such a good liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush has been involved in politics his whole life which explains why he is such a good liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uma, mpls, MN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74286</link>
		<dc:creator>Uma, mpls, MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74286</guid>
		<description>I request all democrate, independent and republicans (who have moral in side  out) to rally behind Hillary Clinton and give an opportunity to be the president and this country and do good things.
She has right experience, intelligent and zeal to take this country in right direction than any candidates running for president in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I request all democrate, independent and republicans (who have moral in side  out) to rally behind Hillary Clinton and give an opportunity to be the president and this country and do good things.<br />
She has right experience, intelligent and zeal to take this country in right direction than any candidates running for president in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, Olaya Street, Riyadh</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74265</link>
		<dc:creator>James, Olaya Street, Riyadh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74265</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks Sherry. Forget Osama, the biggest threat to my security turns out to be a peanut. I never knew that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks Sherry. Forget Osama, the biggest threat to my security turns out to be a peanut. I never knew that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Holley , Rush Ky</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74260</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Holley , Rush Ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74260</guid>
		<description>Once again we see the republicans trying to manipulate the democratic nomination. John Edwards leads big in the Iowa and New Hampshire caucus&#039; and independant media show big leads for Edwards. The corporate media blackout of John Edwards is a disgrace to democracy and a direct insult to the American people. If only we had addressed the notion of a vote paper trail maybe Americans could vote with confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again we see the republicans trying to manipulate the democratic nomination. John Edwards leads big in the Iowa and New Hampshire caucus' and independant media show big leads for Edwards. The corporate media blackout of John Edwards is a disgrace to democracy and a direct insult to the American people. If only we had addressed the notion of a vote paper trail maybe Americans could vote with confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen, Naples, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74253</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen, Naples, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74253</guid>
		<description>After observation and analysis, I can find very little in these correspondences that &quot;agrees with reason&quot; and certainly nothing that could be considered of benefit of others. Instead I read vitriolic outbursts of abuse, the denial of historical fact, endlessly repeated lies and dogma, obviously in the expectation that if something is repeated often enough, it becomes an accepted truth. And excruciatingly bad English, implying, let&#039;s face it, a total absence of any formal education. So, on the evidence of these rants, it is hard to escape the conclusion that yes, the majority is incapable of judging the facts as they present themselves today. God Bless America. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After observation and analysis, I can find very little in these correspondences that "agrees with reason" and certainly nothing that could be considered of benefit of others. Instead I read vitriolic outbursts of abuse, the denial of historical fact, endlessly repeated lies and dogma, obviously in the expectation that if something is repeated often enough, it becomes an accepted truth. And excruciatingly bad English, implying, let's face it, a total absence of any formal education. So, on the evidence of these rants, it is hard to escape the conclusion that yes, the majority is incapable of judging the facts as they present themselves today. God Bless America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris, Middletown, CT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74231</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris, Middletown, CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74231</guid>
		<description>As a Republican....I need Bush to support a Hillary presidential bid....then I want to hear the excuses from the &quot;HILLRAISERS&quot; as to why Bush&#039;s endorsement is a good thing....maybe he could say &quot;we&#039;ve had both Democrats and Republicans in office - why not try a socialist&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Republican....I need Bush to support a Hillary presidential bid....then I want to hear the excuses from the "HILLRAISERS" as to why Bush's endorsement is a good thing....maybe he could say "we've had both Democrats and Republicans in office &#8211; why not try a socialist"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian, Tampa FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74221</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian, Tampa FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74221</guid>
		<description>How could anyone in the Bush administration say that Obama has &quot;intellectual laziness?&quot; 

That&#039;s the most hypocritical, and false, statement I&#039;ve heard in a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could anyone in the Bush administration say that Obama has "intellectual laziness?" </p>
<p>That's the most hypocritical, and false, statement I've heard in a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve T</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74190</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74190</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, a senior White House official tells Sammon that Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, Clinton&#039;s chief competitor for the nomination, is &quot;capable&quot; of winning the White House, but has shown an &quot;intellectual laziness.&quot;

Considering the mental midget occupying the White House at this time, I&#039;d say this is a true example of hubris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, a senior White House official tells Sammon that Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, Clinton's chief competitor for the nomination, is "capable" of winning the White House, but has shown an "intellectual laziness."</p>
<p>Considering the mental midget occupying the White House at this time, I'd say this is a true example of hubris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, Philadelphia PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74117</link>
		<dc:creator>John, Philadelphia PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74117</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how it would be possible for a Democrat not to win. I mean a good percentage of the voters won&#039;t understand what they are voting for. They blame the White House cover boy Bush and will thus blame the Reps and vot a Dem in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't see how it would be possible for a Democrat not to win. I mean a good percentage of the voters won't understand what they are voting for. They blame the White House cover boy Bush and will thus blame the Reps and vot a Dem in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo ATL, GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74107</link>
		<dc:creator>jo ATL, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74107</guid>
		<description>hahaha…

As a black man, I know the whites in this country will NEVER vote a black guy for president.  

Here is why they are afraid of Hillary:
Single Mothers,
Mothers (without Health Care)
Fathers with Daugthers only (They want to give their child a chance too to one day rule the country)

There are not enough GOP votes in the country to beat this voting block and GOP knows that. That why they don&#039;t want to face Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha…</p>
<p>As a black man, I know the whites in this country will NEVER vote a black guy for president.  </p>
<p>Here is why they are afraid of Hillary:<br />
Single Mothers,<br />
Mothers (without Health Care)<br />
Fathers with Daugthers only (They want to give their child a chance too to one day rule the country)</p>
<p>There are not enough GOP votes in the country to beat this voting block and GOP knows that. That why they don't want to face Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry AllOver Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74103</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry AllOver Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74103</guid>
		<description>George Bush is simply using scare tactics AGAIN, just like he did to get elected in 2004 when he convinced the American public that the global war on terrorism was the biggest challenge facing this country. Nothing could be further from the truth.

&quot;If western governments were really trying to win the &quot;war on terror&quot; they wouldn&#039;t give terrorists so much credit&quot;.-Paul Joseph Watson

 This statement is 100% correct. Did you know that since 1960 the number of Americans killed by terrorists is actually LOWER than the number of Americans killed by an allergic reaction to peanuts? It&#039;s true. It&#039;s also lower than the number of Americans killed by hitting a deer while driving or being hit by lightning. Then WHY is it that we are being force fed into believing that terrorism is the biggest threat to American society? Dating back to the beginning of this country how many Americans have died as a direct result of terrorism? Seven thousand? Ten Thousand?... Guess how many Americans died JUST LAST YEAR as a result of cigarette smoke? 435,000!!!! Add in alcohol attributed deaths, that&#039;s another 85,000 dead. That&#039;s 520,000 Americans dead EACH YEAR from Cigarettes and alcohol alone!!!!!! And yet you still believe that terrorism is our greatest problem? The definition of terrorism is: The systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion. With their repeated attempts to scare Americans into voting Republican under the flimsy guise that they will be &quot;safer&quot; under Republican rule, it&#039;s quite clear to me that Republican politicians are the biggest terrorists on the planet! 
Instead of voting like partisan sheep, do your research. Find out which candidate is best suited to tackle the REAL issues that effect YOUR life- like the Economy, Education, Illegal Immigrants, Healthcare, Social Security or the fact that China &amp; Russia now own 63% of our national debt. Don&#039;t let propaganda and rhetoric cast your vote for you!! Educate yourself and the truth WILL set us ALL free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush is simply using scare tactics AGAIN, just like he did to get elected in 2004 when he convinced the American public that the global war on terrorism was the biggest challenge facing this country. Nothing could be further from the truth.</p>
<p>"If western governments were really trying to win the "war on terror" they wouldn't give terrorists so much credit".-Paul Joseph Watson</p>
<p> This statement is 100% correct. Did you know that since 1960 the number of Americans killed by terrorists is actually LOWER than the number of Americans killed by an allergic reaction to peanuts? It's true. It's also lower than the number of Americans killed by hitting a deer while driving or being hit by lightning. Then WHY is it that we are being force fed into believing that terrorism is the biggest threat to American society? Dating back to the beginning of this country how many Americans have died as a direct result of terrorism? Seven thousand? Ten Thousand?... Guess how many Americans died JUST LAST YEAR as a result of cigarette smoke? 435,000!!!! Add in alcohol attributed deaths, that's another 85,000 dead. That's 520,000 Americans dead EACH YEAR from Cigarettes and alcohol alone!!!!!! And yet you still believe that terrorism is our greatest problem? The definition of terrorism is: The systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion. With their repeated attempts to scare Americans into voting Republican under the flimsy guise that they will be "safer" under Republican rule, it's quite clear to me that Republican politicians are the biggest terrorists on the planet!<br />
Instead of voting like partisan sheep, do your research. Find out which candidate is best suited to tackle the REAL issues that effect YOUR life- like the Economy, Education, Illegal Immigrants, Healthcare, Social Security or the fact that China &amp; Russia now own 63% of our national debt. Don't let propaganda and rhetoric cast your vote for you!! Educate yourself and the truth WILL set us ALL free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, Phoenix AZ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74094</link>
		<dc:creator>James, Phoenix AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74094</guid>
		<description>Scott - Madison,

Critical thinking is the ability to dispell propaganda, find facts, and come to an intelligent conclusion.

You suggest Bush gets an &quot;F&quot; (and your evidence is because the majority of the country has a negative opinion).  Wow - is all your critical thinking a result of polling?

You then qualify your opinion of Bush as a pathological liar, ego-centric maniac with messianic tendencies.

Can you provide the FACTS to support your statement?  Again - not rumor, speculation, or theory... but FACTS.

Like it or not - the FACTS are:

1. President Bush won the majority of electorial votes in 2000 and legally won the election.

2. In 2001, the overwhelming evidence of intelligence (world wide: France, Germany, Russia, US - including President Clinton) was that Saddam had WMDs, wasn&#039;t afraid to use them, and posed a larger threat in light of terrorists wanting to attack any and all nations.  Call is a collosal failure on the part of the intelligence community - but saying &quot;Bush lied&quot; is ignoring the facts.  Was intent on removing Saddam? Yes - and used the intelligence information to support his case.

3. Dick Cheney divested himself of all Halliburton stock prior to taking office.  Prior to President Bush awarding any contracts to Halliburton, it was BILL CLINTON that awarded the LOGCAP contract to Halliburton even though there was a lower bidder.

Those are the traditionally spouted rumors.  But I gladly await your evidence to support your statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; Madison,</p>
<p>Critical thinking is the ability to dispell propaganda, find facts, and come to an intelligent conclusion.</p>
<p>You suggest Bush gets an "F" (and your evidence is because the majority of the country has a negative opinion).  Wow &#8211; is all your critical thinking a result of polling?</p>
<p>You then qualify your opinion of Bush as a pathological liar, ego-centric maniac with messianic tendencies.</p>
<p>Can you provide the FACTS to support your statement?  Again &#8211; not rumor, speculation, or theory... but FACTS.</p>
<p>Like it or not &#8211; the FACTS are:</p>
<p>1. President Bush won the majority of electorial votes in 2000 and legally won the election.</p>
<p>2. In 2001, the overwhelming evidence of intelligence (world wide: France, Germany, Russia, US &#8211; including President Clinton) was that Saddam had WMDs, wasn't afraid to use them, and posed a larger threat in light of terrorists wanting to attack any and all nations.  Call is a collosal failure on the part of the intelligence community &#8211; but saying "Bush lied" is ignoring the facts.  Was intent on removing Saddam? Yes &#8211; and used the intelligence information to support his case.</p>
<p>3. Dick Cheney divested himself of all Halliburton stock prior to taking office.  Prior to President Bush awarding any contracts to Halliburton, it was BILL CLINTON that awarded the LOGCAP contract to Halliburton even though there was a lower bidder.</p>
<p>Those are the traditionally spouted rumors.  But I gladly await your evidence to support your statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo ATL, GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74079</link>
		<dc:creator>jo ATL, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74079</guid>
		<description>hahaha...

As a black man, I know where you GOP Single Mothers,
Mothers  (without Health Care)
Fathers with Daugthers only (They want to give their child a chance too to one day rule the country)

There are not enough GOP votes in the country to beat that and the GOP knows that. That why they don&#039;t want to face Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha...</p>
<p>As a black man, I know where you GOP Single Mothers,<br />
Mothers  (without Health Care)<br />
Fathers with Daugthers only (They want to give their child a chance too to one day rule the country)</p>
<p>There are not enough GOP votes in the country to beat that and the GOP knows that. That why they don't want to face Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Fasano, Brooklyn, New York</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74043</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Fasano, Brooklyn, New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74043</guid>
		<description>Bush is FINALLY RIGHT about ONE thing!!  HILLARY WILL WIN THE NOMINATION!!  But he is WRONG in thinking the Republicans will keep the White House in 2008!  Hillary will win all the way!!  It takes a Clinton to Clean up a BUSH&#039;S MESS!!!  It did the last time and more than ever, it will happen this time!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush is FINALLY RIGHT about ONE thing!!  HILLARY WILL WIN THE NOMINATION!!  But he is WRONG in thinking the Republicans will keep the White House in 2008!  Hillary will win all the way!!  It takes a Clinton to Clean up a BUSH'S MESS!!!  It did the last time and more than ever, it will happen this time!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: househead_415; SF, Cal.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74041</link>
		<dc:creator>househead_415; SF, Cal.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-74041</guid>
		<description>*LOL*  I love how a &quot;senior White House official&quot; accuses Barack Obama of showing &quot;intellectual laziness.&quot;  Best joke I&#039;ve heard so far today!

Of course, anyone working in the Bush White House for 7 long years &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; forget the true meaning of &quot;intellectual laziness.&quot;  Stand in a pile of garbage for long enough, eventually you won&#039;t smell it anymore.

Whoever becomes the next president, I don&#039;t envy him or her at all.  They&#039;ve got a LOT of trash to clean up inside that house!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*LOL*  I love how a "senior White House official" accuses Barack Obama of showing "intellectual laziness."  Best joke I've heard so far today!</p>
<p>Of course, anyone working in the Bush White House for 7 long years <i>would</i> forget the true meaning of "intellectual laziness."  Stand in a pile of garbage for long enough, eventually you won't smell it anymore.</p>
<p>Whoever becomes the next president, I don't envy him or her at all.  They've got a LOT of trash to clean up inside that house!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard, Scotch Plains NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73982</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard, Scotch Plains NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73982</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I think the idiot Bush is right for a chance, if Hillary wins the nomination, the Rethugs will win, be smart Democrats. Vote Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I think the idiot Bush is right for a chance, if Hillary wins the nomination, the Rethugs will win, be smart Democrats. Vote Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott, Madison, WI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73981</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott, Madison, WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73981</guid>
		<description>James, Phoenix and Stephen, Naples:

Critical thinking is a set of cognitive skills, intellectual standards and traits of mind.  Critical thinking is the ability and intellectual commitment to use those structures to improve thinking and guide behavior.

So, according to a majority of this country - at least that&#039;s the viscious rumor in town - Georgie-Boy gets a big, fat F.  That is of course, unless the majority (including a respectable share of his own party)is incapable of
judging the facts as they present themselves today.

Here&#039;s a little something to think about: Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do  not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.

Again, Georgie-Boy gets an F.  Did I say, idiot?  I meant pathological liar and ego-centric/-maniac with messianic tendencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, Phoenix and Stephen, Naples:</p>
<p>Critical thinking is a set of cognitive skills, intellectual standards and traits of mind.  Critical thinking is the ability and intellectual commitment to use those structures to improve thinking and guide behavior.</p>
<p>So, according to a majority of this country &#8211; at least that's the viscious rumor in town &#8211; Georgie-Boy gets a big, fat F.  That is of course, unless the majority (including a respectable share of his own party)is incapable of<br />
judging the facts as they present themselves today.</p>
<p>Here's a little something to think about: Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do  not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.</p>
<p>Again, Georgie-Boy gets an F.  Did I say, idiot?  I meant pathological liar and ego-centric/-maniac with messianic tendencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denny Lyon Baton Rouge, LA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73979</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny Lyon Baton Rouge, LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73979</guid>
		<description>Hypnotizing the Voter Crawfish: Partners Bush and Hillary


H&#039;s camp decided the GOP strategy of crowning H as the inevitable is to their advantage and are using it, &quot;to hypnotize the crawfish,&quot; in this case Dem voters.  That backfires because Dems like to make their own decisions; only Reps like to be spun, taking away the decision.  It&#039;s how they perceive &quot;real&quot; leaders; “they tell us what to do.”

 

Both Obama and Hillary appeal to young voters who have a bad habit of not turning out to vote.  Hillary is despised by women in her age group and comparable education level, with a large enough population to cancel out the young vote, no matter how many actually do vote.  

 

Edwards appeals to men and women, as well as Independents who are determined to vote in the Dem primaries.  Edwards will end up the nominee, much to the shock of the media who are the idiot “know it alls.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypnotizing the Voter Crawfish: Partners Bush and Hillary</p>
<p>H's camp decided the GOP strategy of crowning H as the inevitable is to their advantage and are using it, "to hypnotize the crawfish," in this case Dem voters.  That backfires because Dems like to make their own decisions; only Reps like to be spun, taking away the decision.  It's how they perceive "real" leaders; “they tell us what to do.”</p>
<p>Both Obama and Hillary appeal to young voters who have a bad habit of not turning out to vote.  Hillary is despised by women in her age group and comparable education level, with a large enough population to cancel out the young vote, no matter how many actually do vote.  </p>
<p>Edwards appeals to men and women, as well as Independents who are determined to vote in the Dem primaries.  Edwards will end up the nominee, much to the shock of the media who are the idiot “know it alls.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba, Swainsboro GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73967</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba, Swainsboro GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73967</guid>
		<description>James from Phoenix: most people think his dad&#039;s money bought him the degree, and he left the Air Guard early because he was scared of jets. Dad&#039;s CIA friends and Karl Rove&#039;s &quot;Lies for Jesus Sake&quot; got him the rest, with the help of Diebold voting machines. 
See, the things you admire about him are the things that trouble us. I&#039;m not trying to be nasty here, just stating facts. 


It&#039;s un-American to accuse each other of gloating over war deaths, or 9-11 deaths. Anyone who believes that stuff is a little child - can you ALL spell naive? Both parties have extremists, but they don&#039;t represent the mainstream.

I&#039;d like to hope that we can all one day stop throwing filth at each other and remember what this country is about. You know, our core values: hanging Osama bin Laden as the SuperBowl Halftime Show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James from Phoenix: most people think his dad's money bought him the degree, and he left the Air Guard early because he was scared of jets. Dad's CIA friends and Karl Rove's "Lies for Jesus Sake" got him the rest, with the help of Diebold voting machines.<br />
See, the things you admire about him are the things that trouble us. I'm not trying to be nasty here, just stating facts. </p>
<p>It's un-American to accuse each other of gloating over war deaths, or 9-11 deaths. Anyone who believes that stuff is a little child &#8211; can you ALL spell naive? Both parties have extremists, but they don't represent the mainstream.</p>
<p>I'd like to hope that we can all one day stop throwing filth at each other and remember what this country is about. You know, our core values: hanging Osama bin Laden as the SuperBowl Halftime Show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen, Naples, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73930</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen, Naples, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73930</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Scott (Madison). You managed to spell naive correctly. Maybe you are becoming a Republican!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Scott (Madison). You managed to spell naive correctly. Maybe you are becoming a Republican!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinay</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73929</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73929</guid>
		<description>Waht??????? Obama is intellectually weak?

Hey Bush, u moron watch this video of obama.. he is the one who exactly predicted the outcome of the war in 2002 and warned u not to go for the war. 

This stupid president can&#039;t understand that even in 2007.. now who is intellectually incompetent?

Donald Trump said it right.. go hide in a corner shameless fellow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waht??????? Obama is intellectually weak?</p>
<p>Hey Bush, u moron watch this video of obama.. he is the one who exactly predicted the outcome of the war in 2002 and warned u not to go for the war. </p>
<p>This stupid president can't understand that even in 2007.. now who is intellectually incompetent?</p>
<p>Donald Trump said it right.. go hide in a corner shameless fellow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeakOutAmerica</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73927</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeakOutAmerica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73927</guid>
		<description>To Carrol Ann of Maine who wrote:
&quot;I will work to see to it that a Republican wins and therefore don&#039;t accept the premise that a Democrat will win. I truly think the Republicans will hold the White House.&quot;

PAPERLESS VOTING MACHINES?

You and all who contibute to a republican will have to answer why your hands are full of the blood of our men and women in our Armed Forces, think of that and have a good night sleep if you can.

CNN, please do not censure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Carrol Ann of Maine who wrote:<br />
"I will work to see to it that a Republican wins and therefore don't accept the premise that a Democrat will win. I truly think the Republicans will hold the White House."</p>
<p>PAPERLESS VOTING MACHINES?</p>
<p>You and all who contibute to a republican will have to answer why your hands are full of the blood of our men and women in our Armed Forces, think of that and have a good night sleep if you can.</p>
<p>CNN, please do not censure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windrider, Columbus OH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73926</link>
		<dc:creator>windrider, Columbus OH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73926</guid>
		<description>&quot;I will work to see to it that a Republican wins&quot;

Yeah right, using rigged voting machines, caging, voter intimidation ... by any means necessary, that&#039;s Bush&#039;s motto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I will work to see to it that a Republican wins"</p>
<p>Yeah right, using rigged voting machines, caging, voter intimidation ... by any means necessary, that's Bush's motto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba the Conspiracy Nut, Swainsboro GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73920</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba the Conspiracy Nut, Swainsboro GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73920</guid>
		<description>Eunice, good heavens, you sound like you get all your facts from Herb down at the bait store. You can&#039;t blame Clinton for 9-11, even though you might have heard Herb say it was his fault; the terrorists hit us because we&#039;d just failed to elect a president and had to appoint one. Either Gore or Bush would have been our shakiest president ever - they never had a better chance. We haven&#039;t been hit again because the president did what any president would have done! Maybe where you&#039;re from torture is routine; if America has ever stooped that low before we hid it in shame. 

But at least you&#039;ve come out and said what&#039;s on your mind: you hate and fear all Muslims, and to you every Muslim is a 9-11 terrorist, and that&#039;s why you sound like all your information comes from Herb or Mert or your hairdresser Betty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eunice, good heavens, you sound like you get all your facts from Herb down at the bait store. You can't blame Clinton for 9-11, even though you might have heard Herb say it was his fault; the terrorists hit us because we'd just failed to elect a president and had to appoint one. Either Gore or Bush would have been our shakiest president ever &#8211; they never had a better chance. We haven't been hit again because the president did what any president would have done! Maybe where you're from torture is routine; if America has ever stooped that low before we hid it in shame. </p>
<p>But at least you've come out and said what's on your mind: you hate and fear all Muslims, and to you every Muslim is a 9-11 terrorist, and that's why you sound like all your information comes from Herb or Mert or your hairdresser Betty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Chicago, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73908</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Chicago, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73908</guid>
		<description>Democrat or Republican, I don&#039;t care.  I will vote for the person that&#039;s going to do the best for the country, and that&#039;s how everyone should vote.  This silly Democrat/Republican schism is killing the country, no wonder Washington was against political parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrat or Republican, I don't care.  I will vote for the person that's going to do the best for the country, and that's how everyone should vote.  This silly Democrat/Republican schism is killing the country, no wonder Washington was against political parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, Olaya Street, Riyadh</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73904</link>
		<dc:creator>James, Olaya Street, Riyadh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73904</guid>
		<description>Ironic that all these people villifying the &quot;intellectually lazy&quot; quote cannot even construct an argument without resorting to personal abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic that all these people villifying the "intellectually lazy" quote cannot even construct an argument without resorting to personal abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, Phoenix AZ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73903</link>
		<dc:creator>James, Phoenix AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73903</guid>
		<description>Scott - Madison, Wi

You wrote, &quot;Du yu reely beleave that inteligents had anyting to do with all that? You really are naive!
Try some critical thinking, dude.&quot;


Scott - let&#039;s &quot;du&quot; some critical thinking.  You (basically) think Bush is an idiot and I&#039;m being naive.  I guess ANY idiot could:

1. Graduate from Yale
2. Fighter Pilot with Air National Guard
3. MBA from Harvard
4. Defeated popular Texas Governor Ann Richards in 1994 to become Texas Govenor
5. Re-elected Governor in 1998
6. Defeated Al Gore in 2000 Presidential Election
7. Re-elected President in 2004


ANY idiot could do that!  (eyes rolling)

Scott, the naive one on this blog is the person who continues the &quot;Bush stole the election&quot; mantra.... but don&#039;t let facts get in your way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; Madison, Wi</p>
<p>You wrote, "Du yu reely beleave that inteligents had anyting to do with all that? You really are naive!<br />
Try some critical thinking, dude."</p>
<p>Scott &#8211; let's "du" some critical thinking.  You (basically) think Bush is an idiot and I'm being naive.  I guess ANY idiot could:</p>
<p>1. Graduate from Yale<br />
2. Fighter Pilot with Air National Guard<br />
3. MBA from Harvard<br />
4. Defeated popular Texas Governor Ann Richards in 1994 to become Texas Govenor<br />
5. Re-elected Governor in 1998<br />
6. Defeated Al Gore in 2000 Presidential Election<br />
7. Re-elected President in 2004</p>
<p>ANY idiot could do that!  (eyes rolling)</p>
<p>Scott, the naive one on this blog is the person who continues the "Bush stole the election" mantra.... but don't let facts get in your way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick - Burlington, Vermont</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73872</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick - Burlington, Vermont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73872</guid>
		<description>The Fundamental Religious Right (Bush included), Rush, Hannity, etc media spokespeople are all trying to rally a focused attack on Hillary as part of their attempt to maintain their End-of-Time agenda. Scary group, all of &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fundamental Religious Right (Bush included), Rush, Hannity, etc media spokespeople are all trying to rally a focused attack on Hillary as part of their attempt to maintain their End-of-Time agenda. Scary group, all of 'em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p.w.,millington md</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73869</link>
		<dc:creator>p.w.,millington md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73869</guid>
		<description>He hopes Clinton wins the Dem Nom so PNAC&#039;s bases will be covered either way.
I will not vote for a Republican, &quot;Democrat&quot; or otherwise, if Kucinich doesn&#039;t get it I&#039;ll write his name in.

I wonder how Bush will &quot;help&quot; the Rethugs win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He hopes Clinton wins the Dem Nom so PNAC's bases will be covered either way.<br />
I will not vote for a Republican, "Democrat" or otherwise, if Kucinich doesn't get it I'll write his name in.</p>
<p>I wonder how Bush will "help" the Rethugs win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BettyD, USA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73864</link>
		<dc:creator>BettyD, USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73864</guid>
		<description>Time for recess :)

Georgie Porgie
Pudding and pie
Kissed the Hill and made her cry
When the boys came out to play
Georgie Porgie ran away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for recess <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Georgie Porgie<br />
Pudding and pie<br />
Kissed the Hill and made her cry<br />
When the boys came out to play<br />
Georgie Porgie ran away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy, Charlotte, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73862</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73862</guid>
		<description>Forget Clinton...The only honest, intelligent person fit to be the president in &#039;08 is Ron Paul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget Clinton...The only honest, intelligent person fit to be the president in '08 is Ron Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73859</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/24/bush-predicts-clinton-will-win-dem-nomination-lose-to-republican/#comment-73859</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with Leigh S. Cambridge, MA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with Leigh S. Cambridge, MA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
