<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton pulling away from Obama in New Hampshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nancee</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-223442</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-223442</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clear that Clinton has more experience than Obama. Should this matter? I can&#039;t imagine electing someone to a top gov. position that doesn&#039;t have a vast array of experiences. Unthinkable. The country is such desperate need of repair-what happens if he is elected and his experience is not sufficient?? Scary-the economy, war, healthcare is at stake. Massive change is needed. Who can deliver?? Obama is a risk. Can we afford to risk his lack of experience at this point in time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's clear that Clinton has more experience than Obama. Should this matter? I can't imagine electing someone to a top gov. position that doesn't have a vast array of experiences. Unthinkable. The country is such desperate need of repair-what happens if he is elected and his experience is not sufficient?? Scary-the economy, war, healthcare is at stake. Massive change is needed. Who can deliver?? Obama is a risk. Can we afford to risk his lack of experience at this point in time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76697</link>
		<dc:creator>South Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76697</guid>
		<description>Its NOT a gender issue for me. Sen. Feinstein, Speaker Pelosi, Gov. Napolitano, or Gov. Minner would make a GREAT president.

Its just that HILLARY is a republican-lite. She would be only slightly better than any of the repubs running.

Edwards is the MOST electable Democratic candidate, a simple fact.

I am a die-hard anti-republican, but I certainly won&#039;t vote for Clinton if she wins the nomination. I&#039;ll vote with the GREENS, if Hillary is chosen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its NOT a gender issue for me. Sen. Feinstein, Speaker Pelosi, Gov. Napolitano, or Gov. Minner would make a GREAT president.</p>
<p>Its just that HILLARY is a republican-lite. She would be only slightly better than any of the repubs running.</p>
<p>Edwards is the MOST electable Democratic candidate, a simple fact.</p>
<p>I am a die-hard anti-republican, but I certainly won't vote for Clinton if she wins the nomination. I'll vote with the GREENS, if Hillary is chosen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ossai, Bedford, NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76660</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ossai, Bedford, NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76660</guid>
		<description>I make my home in New Hampshire and I consider myself an average American voter, but I will never vote for Hillary...Period.

It&#039;s unbelievable how we democrats always find a way to lose elections. Given the current political climate, we are in such a sweet spot to caputre the White House and increase our numbers in both houses, yet we are trying very hard to blow it.

GOD PLEASE HELP US</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make my home in New Hampshire and I consider myself an average American voter, but I will never vote for Hillary...Period.</p>
<p>It's unbelievable how we democrats always find a way to lose elections. Given the current political climate, we are in such a sweet spot to caputre the White House and increase our numbers in both houses, yet we are trying very hard to blow it.</p>
<p>GOD PLEASE HELP US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76545</link>
		<dc:creator>Lan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76545</guid>
		<description>I just learned something interesting about this poll on another site when I actually saw the poll. Something like 70 percent of NH voters are STILL UNDECIDED. That means that when CNN says Hillary&#039;s pulling away, they&#039;re talking about a tiny percentage of voters. Most of the people are still considering and the reason for that is Obama is actually forcing them to think about the race instead of just repeating soundbites like what this article would have you believe.

The more they investigate Obama, the more they will like him. Come back in three months and tell me she&#039;s pulling ahead. It ain&#039;t gonna happen. There&#039;s no way she can win. Hands down, Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just learned something interesting about this poll on another site when I actually saw the poll. Something like 70 percent of NH voters are STILL UNDECIDED. That means that when CNN says Hillary's pulling away, they're talking about a tiny percentage of voters. Most of the people are still considering and the reason for that is Obama is actually forcing them to think about the race instead of just repeating soundbites like what this article would have you believe.</p>
<p>The more they investigate Obama, the more they will like him. Come back in three months and tell me she's pulling ahead. It ain't gonna happen. There's no way she can win. Hands down, Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry  Tucker, Ga</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76429</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry  Tucker, Ga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76429</guid>
		<description>Ed, Ellenville NY

You wrote, &quot;Wow,Henry Tucker must be a fake name.FBI material there.Hey Tom isn&#039;t it past your bedtime?You youngin&#039;s are so silly.&quot;


Actually Ed, it&#039;s Henry and I live in Tucker, Ga - not too far from Atlanta.  Tom (I assume you&#039;re refering to Tom /Needham, Ma?) and I share some similar ideology - but we aren&#039;t the same person.  I wouldn&#039;t vote for Obama, but Tom finds some of Obama&#039;s views and centurist ideas appealing.  Nothing wrong with a healthy debate.

You, Ed - or is it Vanrueter?, consistently post Bush-bashing Moveon.Org rhetoric.  It&#039;s fun entertainment but does little to inspire constructive dialogue.

Warmest Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, Ellenville NY</p>
<p>You wrote, "Wow,Henry Tucker must be a fake name.FBI material there.Hey Tom isn't it past your bedtime?You youngin's are so silly."</p>
<p>Actually Ed, it's Henry and I live in Tucker, Ga &#8211; not too far from Atlanta.  Tom (I assume you're refering to Tom /Needham, Ma?) and I share some similar ideology &#8211; but we aren't the same person.  I wouldn't vote for Obama, but Tom finds some of Obama's views and centurist ideas appealing.  Nothing wrong with a healthy debate.</p>
<p>You, Ed &#8211; or is it Vanrueter?, consistently post Bush-bashing Moveon.Org rhetoric.  It's fun entertainment but does little to inspire constructive dialogue.</p>
<p>Warmest Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Pray  Tijeras, New Mexico</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76330</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Pray  Tijeras, New Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76330</guid>
		<description>I hope that Hillary does not get the presidency. If she get&#039;s it, we are in big trouble. Does America forget what her husband did when he was in office? You might as well vote for him because he will be helping Hillary run the show. All it will take is for Hillary to have a bad day, or go through menopause or something like that to screw our country up. I don&#039;t want her to get in.She has no business being President. We need somebody who has balls enough to stand up and do what&#039;s right for our country. and Hillary is not that person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that Hillary does not get the presidency. If she get's it, we are in big trouble. Does America forget what her husband did when he was in office? You might as well vote for him because he will be helping Hillary run the show. All it will take is for Hillary to have a bad day, or go through menopause or something like that to screw our country up. I don't want her to get in.She has no business being President. We need somebody who has balls enough to stand up and do what's right for our country. and Hillary is not that person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne, Washington, Dc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76098</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne, Washington, Dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76098</guid>
		<description>&quot;By the way, to all those who say the polls are meaningless, you clearly don&#039;t know squat about statistics.&quot;

Posted By Joe, Florida : September 26, 2007 8:50 am 

Joe, buddy. Have you looked at the actual document and not the spin that&#039;s posted here.

Read question 34! It clearly says 83% of the sample is still undecided. 

Do you now see how these polls are meaningless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"By the way, to all those who say the polls are meaningless, you clearly don't know squat about statistics."</p>
<p>Posted By Joe, Florida : September 26, 2007 8:50 am </p>
<p>Joe, buddy. Have you looked at the actual document and not the spin that's posted here.</p>
<p>Read question 34! It clearly says 83% of the sample is still undecided. </p>
<p>Do you now see how these polls are meaningless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76040</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76040</guid>
		<description>By the way, to all those who say the polls are meaningless, you clearly don&#039;t know squat about statistics.

Have you ever questioned why state polls usually have a sample size in the hundreds? There&#039;s a reason for it.  Results from samples have always proven to be more accurate and better representatives of the whole picture than a general population poll.  Again, be conservative WITH numbers.  It&#039;s Math guys, don&#039;t argue.  Don&#039;t believe me, just ask a Statistics teacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, to all those who say the polls are meaningless, you clearly don't know squat about statistics.</p>
<p>Have you ever questioned why state polls usually have a sample size in the hundreds? There's a reason for it.  Results from samples have always proven to be more accurate and better representatives of the whole picture than a general population poll.  Again, be conservative WITH numbers.  It's Math guys, don't argue.  Don't believe me, just ask a Statistics teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76037</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76037</guid>
		<description>Get ready to rumble guys.

Hillary Clinton Will BE the next President of The United States.

Love her or hate her, she&#039;s the best candidate in this election, everyone knows and realizes that.  This is why, along with many other reasons, the American People will make her President in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get ready to rumble guys.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton Will BE the next President of The United States.</p>
<p>Love her or hate her, she's the best candidate in this election, everyone knows and realizes that.  This is why, along with many other reasons, the American People will make her President in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen, Gainesville, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76033</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen, Gainesville, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76033</guid>
		<description>Polls at this point do not have much meaning. The Clintons are too corrupted and dishonest. I belive that the country has better candidates (i.e. Obama) than Hillary. If you read Obama&#039;s books, you can not helping admiring his intelligence, vision, wisdom, and leadership. In fact, he has more public service experience than both Hillary and Edwards. And we know he has better judgment than them, too, shown on the Iraqi issue back in 2002. Obama is not afraid to say what he thinks is right for the country, while others say what people want to hear to get the votes - traditional politicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polls at this point do not have much meaning. The Clintons are too corrupted and dishonest. I belive that the country has better candidates (i.e. Obama) than Hillary. If you read Obama's books, you can not helping admiring his intelligence, vision, wisdom, and leadership. In fact, he has more public service experience than both Hillary and Edwards. And we know he has better judgment than them, too, shown on the Iraqi issue back in 2002. Obama is not afraid to say what he thinks is right for the country, while others say what people want to hear to get the votes &#8211; traditional politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne, Washington, DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76010</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne, Washington, DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-76010</guid>
		<description>I think the PDF document tells another story.

If you ready question 34, it says 83% of the people who were sampled in this poll are undecided!

Why isnt this highlighted in the article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the PDF document tells another story.</p>
<p>If you ready question 34, it says 83% of the people who were sampled in this poll are undecided!</p>
<p>Why isnt this highlighted in the article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ; Montpelier, VT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75995</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ; Montpelier, VT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75995</guid>
		<description>Of course. Folks in New Hampshire are not stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course. Folks in New Hampshire are not stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex, Tenafly NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75975</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex, Tenafly NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75975</guid>
		<description>&quot;But just as I have been saying: Mr Obama should position himself for a place on the ticket and wait until 2016 for his turn&quot;

wait his TURN?

oh im sorry, i thought this was a democracy. i forgot that we don&#039;t pick the president; its picked based on seniority. 

idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"But just as I have been saying: Mr Obama should position himself for a place on the ticket and wait until 2016 for his turn"</p>
<p>wait his TURN?</p>
<p>oh im sorry, i thought this was a democracy. i forgot that we don't pick the president; its picked based on seniority. </p>
<p>idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliff jones, honolulu hi</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75923</link>
		<dc:creator>cliff jones, honolulu hi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75923</guid>
		<description>First of all, the sample size of 307 is not large enough to get good results. However, the glaring problem with this non random survey is the sample error margin; 5.5 is way too high for this size of samples. In other words, this poll is worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, the sample size of 307 is not large enough to get good results. However, the glaring problem with this non random survey is the sample error margin; 5.5 is way too high for this size of samples. In other words, this poll is worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Emling</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75901</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Emling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75901</guid>
		<description>Wow!  That Hillary sure has a big ol&#039; booty and some thick thighs.  I sure would like to see her in a dress.  She wears those long jackets to try to hide those thick thighs and big butt!  Sadly to say, I don&#039;t think we have  very many good candidates.   I would like to see someone not connected  to the &quot;Good Ol&#039; Boy&quot; network.  Tancrendo is my choice, but doesn&#039;t stand a chance.  Ron Paul would be my second choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  That Hillary sure has a big ol' booty and some thick thighs.  I sure would like to see her in a dress.  She wears those long jackets to try to hide those thick thighs and big butt!  Sadly to say, I don't think we have  very many good candidates.   I would like to see someone not connected  to the "Good Ol' Boy" network.  Tancrendo is my choice, but doesn't stand a chance.  Ron Paul would be my second choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.James</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75899</link>
		<dc:creator>R.James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75899</guid>
		<description>Hillary........Definately an Idiot...No Doubt.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary........Definately an Idiot...No Doubt.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75830</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75830</guid>
		<description>I feel a bad beat coming for the Democrats if Hillary wins the nomination.  HAving said that,I will support her and work for her if she gets the nomination, but deep down I am afraid this country will not let her win.  Too much baggage and hate among republicans, even if not deserved.  If we blow it this time Dems, we have only ourselves to blame.  Wake up people, Joe Biden can beat any Republican contender.  Think long and hard about this (not that my vote in FL will count in the primary).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel a bad beat coming for the Democrats if Hillary wins the nomination.  HAving said that,I will support her and work for her if she gets the nomination, but deep down I am afraid this country will not let her win.  Too much baggage and hate among republicans, even if not deserved.  If we blow it this time Dems, we have only ourselves to blame.  Wake up people, Joe Biden can beat any Republican contender.  Think long and hard about this (not that my vote in FL will count in the primary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.F. Pinkerton, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75822</link>
		<dc:creator>B.F. Pinkerton, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75822</guid>
		<description>&quot;The seven-point change for both candidates is within the poll&#039;s sampling error, but may indicate growing support for Clinton as the primary approaches...&quot;

If a result is within the margin of error, it carries absolutely no statistical weight. Come on CNN, you can do better than this. A basic statistics course would teach you otherwise. How about you say, &quot;Clinton&#039;s lead is within the margin of error, so for all we know, Obama could be ahead.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The seven-point change for both candidates is within the poll's sampling error, but may indicate growing support for Clinton as the primary approaches..."</p>
<p>If a result is within the margin of error, it carries absolutely no statistical weight. Come on CNN, you can do better than this. A basic statistics course would teach you otherwise. How about you say, "Clinton's lead is within the margin of error, so for all we know, Obama could be ahead."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Esteves, Boca Raton, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75808</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Esteves, Boca Raton, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75808</guid>
		<description>Fred thats fine that you want your candidate to get elected...but to bash fellow democrats the way you do is distasteful at best...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred thats fine that you want your candidate to get elected...but to bash fellow democrats the way you do is distasteful at best...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Co;in742            Vancouver, Canada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75802</link>
		<dc:creator>Co;in742            Vancouver, Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75802</guid>
		<description>Adam, Plano, TX
I am sorry you were upset by Hillary&#039;s sign: the improper use of capitalization and the illitaracy it shows. Did you vote for BUSH ????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, Plano, TX<br />
I am sorry you were upset by Hillary's sign: the improper use of capitalization and the illitaracy it shows. Did you vote for BUSH ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn, Stillwater MN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75797</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn, Stillwater MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75797</guid>
		<description>Who are you idiots saying you are going to vote for Hillary?  How can you live with yourselves?  Hillary was and is part of the problem, HOW CAN SHE BE THE SOLUTION TOO??!!  Bill is the president most responsible for 9-11, he should have captured Osama Bin Laden, she voted to go to Iraq and then condemns Bush for being there.  By the way, all of that is just the obvious stuff.  Nevermind Hillary&#039;s failed health care program, or Bill overstretching and drastically underfunding our military to the point where it couldnt actually afford ammunition.  Then Bill and Hill bragged about a &quot;balanced budget&quot; What a joke!!! So are you; those of you who vote for her, because the fact of the matter is - you would have voted for her then and now and it doesnt matter what you (choose) to hear or read (if ever or at all) because you will vote for her anyways!  I just wish somehow that only those of you that vote for her would have to suffer through that nightmare, spare the rest of us!  

What is it about that Clintons that anyone could find appealing.  Do people just stick to &quot;Well, Bill was the President during our countries most successfull decade.&quot;  There must be more than that.  If that is it, and anyone out there justifies a vote for Hillary with that reasoning, I implore to do 10 minutes of research for the opposition.  You will find more than enough contradiction.  You will find that Bill was pretty much a useless President, who did little to nothing meaningful, while many extraordinarily damaging things such as some the things I mentioned previously.  I guess now you want more of the same, and you don&#039;t even know it, because you probably didnt read this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are you idiots saying you are going to vote for Hillary?  How can you live with yourselves?  Hillary was and is part of the problem, HOW CAN SHE BE THE SOLUTION TOO??!!  Bill is the president most responsible for 9-11, he should have captured Osama Bin Laden, she voted to go to Iraq and then condemns Bush for being there.  By the way, all of that is just the obvious stuff.  Nevermind Hillary's failed health care program, or Bill overstretching and drastically underfunding our military to the point where it couldnt actually afford ammunition.  Then Bill and Hill bragged about a "balanced budget" What a joke!!! So are you; those of you who vote for her, because the fact of the matter is &#8211; you would have voted for her then and now and it doesnt matter what you (choose) to hear or read (if ever or at all) because you will vote for her anyways!  I just wish somehow that only those of you that vote for her would have to suffer through that nightmare, spare the rest of us!  </p>
<p>What is it about that Clintons that anyone could find appealing.  Do people just stick to "Well, Bill was the President during our countries most successfull decade."  There must be more than that.  If that is it, and anyone out there justifies a vote for Hillary with that reasoning, I implore to do 10 minutes of research for the opposition.  You will find more than enough contradiction.  You will find that Bill was pretty much a useless President, who did little to nothing meaningful, while many extraordinarily damaging things such as some the things I mentioned previously.  I guess now you want more of the same, and you don't even know it, because you probably didnt read this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Washington, DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75787</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Washington, DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75787</guid>
		<description>I think CNN should&#039;ve highlighted the important question of the poll; questions 34.

34. (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY VOTERS ONLY:) Have you definitely decided who you will vote for in the New Hampshire primary, are you leaning toward someone, or do have you considered some candidates but are still trying to decide?

Definitely decided 17%
Leaning toward someone 28%
Still trying to decide 55%

That&#039;s a whopping 83% of the whole primary goers did not decide who to choose for! This idea of HRC&#039;s inevitability is laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CNN should've highlighted the important question of the poll; questions 34.</p>
<p>34. (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY VOTERS ONLY:) Have you definitely decided who you will vote for in the New Hampshire primary, are you leaning toward someone, or do have you considered some candidates but are still trying to decide?</p>
<p>Definitely decided 17%<br />
Leaning toward someone 28%<br />
Still trying to decide 55%</p>
<p>That's a whopping 83% of the whole primary goers did not decide who to choose for! This idea of HRC's inevitability is laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert, Shelton CT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75777</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert, Shelton CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75777</guid>
		<description>She can win, some southerners who tend to vote republican don&#039;t think she can, but I sense a repeat with the Democrats again winning New Mexico, Colorado and Arkansas; yes the Democrats have someone that can compete....unlike a Thompson who won&#039;t win one Northern state or maybe not even the purple ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She can win, some southerners who tend to vote republican don't think she can, but I sense a repeat with the Democrats again winning New Mexico, Colorado and Arkansas; yes the Democrats have someone that can compete....unlike a Thompson who won't win one Northern state or maybe not even the purple ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth Teller</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75774</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75774</guid>
		<description>With 40% of New Hampshire voters registered as Independent (and able to vote either way in the primary), as well as the large number of undecided voters, this story doesn&#039;t mean much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 40% of New Hampshire voters registered as Independent (and able to vote either way in the primary), as well as the large number of undecided voters, this story doesn't mean much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny, Canada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75715</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny, Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75715</guid>
		<description>the primary system of electing nominees is very undemocratic. How can a member of either party who lives in Texas for example, have a say on who is the nominee&gt; Its stuid that new Hampshire and Iowa have so much power in this regard. Oh and by the way, New Hampshire and Iowa do not represent a good cross section of Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the primary system of electing nominees is very undemocratic. How can a member of either party who lives in Texas for example, have a say on who is the nominee&gt; Its stuid that new Hampshire and Iowa have so much power in this regard. Oh and by the way, New Hampshire and Iowa do not represent a good cross section of Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75698</link>
		<dc:creator>James, New Hampshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75698</guid>
		<description>Who cares about these stupid, meaningless polls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about these stupid, meaningless polls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed,Ellenville,New York</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75689</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed,Ellenville,New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75689</guid>
		<description>Wow,Henry Tucker must be a fake name.FBI material there.Hey Tom isn&#039;t it past your bedtime?You youngin&#039;s are so silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow,Henry Tucker must be a fake name.FBI material there.Hey Tom isn't it past your bedtime?You youngin's are so silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen, Naples, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75687</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen, Naples, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75687</guid>
		<description>Who cares what Democrats in New Hampshire think. They haven&#039;t selected a successful challenger since Jimmy Carter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares what Democrats in New Hampshire think. They haven't selected a successful challenger since Jimmy Carter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph, The Colony, Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75654</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph, The Colony, Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75654</guid>
		<description>Hillary is pulling away as Barack switches gears and looks to the VP slot. 

I find it hard to understand any other reason for his inexplicable absences from events all the other Dem candidates are attending. 

This poll in and of itself doesn&#039;t mean much but many polls taken over time and banded together signal Hillary with a sizable lead that is growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is pulling away as Barack switches gears and looks to the VP slot. </p>
<p>I find it hard to understand any other reason for his inexplicable absences from events all the other Dem candidates are attending. </p>
<p>This poll in and of itself doesn't mean much but many polls taken over time and banded together signal Hillary with a sizable lead that is growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Clark, Millis, MA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75652</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Clark, Millis, MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75652</guid>
		<description>I canvassed for Obama in N.H. last weekend and everyone I talked to was undecided. Every single person! Everyone said it was too early for them to focus on the primary and all were eager to get information on Obama (and probably other candidates).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I canvassed for Obama in N.H. last weekend and everyone I talked to was undecided. Every single person! Everyone said it was too early for them to focus on the primary and all were eager to get information on Obama (and probably other candidates).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Dedham, Mass</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75651</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dedham, Mass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75651</guid>
		<description>Hey CNN, is Romney still winning in NH? 

Oh, I am sorry, my bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey CNN, is Romney still winning in NH? </p>
<p>Oh, I am sorry, my bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HILLARY DEMOCRAT IN NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75644</link>
		<dc:creator>HILLARY DEMOCRAT IN NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75644</guid>
		<description>I believe in Obama, about as much as I believe in the tooth fairy, santa clause and the easter bunny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in Obama, about as much as I believe in the tooth fairy, santa clause and the easter bunny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam, Plano, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75643</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam, Plano, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75643</guid>
		<description>Mews flash Hillary, you capitalized all the wrong words in your sign, and didn&#039;t capitalize the one word that needed it, &quot;The&quot;. If the change we need is improper use of capitalization and illiteracy, count me out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mews flash Hillary, you capitalized all the wrong words in your sign, and didn't capitalize the one word that needed it, "The". If the change we need is improper use of capitalization and illiteracy, count me out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni Reno,Nevada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75625</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni Reno,Nevada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75625</guid>
		<description>Ijust wanna know since when does 307 polled represent the whole state.That&#039;s why these polls should not be taken seriously.They always just poll several hundred people here and there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ijust wanna know since when does 307 polled represent the whole state.That's why these polls should not be taken seriously.They always just poll several hundred people here and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude, Mesa AZ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75621</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude, Mesa AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75621</guid>
		<description>Thanks CNN for you Hillary Pub, but my vote is still for Barack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks CNN for you Hillary Pub, but my vote is still for Barack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike NY, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75609</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike NY, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75609</guid>
		<description>I think McCain won NH in 2000 (over GWB).

For the Obama supporters, don&#039;t lose too much sleep over this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think McCain won NH in 2000 (over GWB).</p>
<p>For the Obama supporters, don't lose too much sleep over this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Palo Alto, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Palo Alto, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75607</guid>
		<description>Hillary is indeed qualified, smart, and able ... and it would be good to elect a woman president.  Unfortunately, her negatives remain at approximately 50% and the Republicans see her as their best shot at winning.  We can&#039;t let the Republicans be in a position to &#039;finish&#039; the war or appoint the next two or three Supreme Court justices.  
My choice will remain someone good, with the best chance of winning in 2008.  Edwards and Biden are the candidates who have offered the most substance, and both are articulate and would make great standard bearers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is indeed qualified, smart, and able ... and it would be good to elect a woman president.  Unfortunately, her negatives remain at approximately 50% and the Republicans see her as their best shot at winning.  We can't let the Republicans be in a position to 'finish' the war or appoint the next two or three Supreme Court justices.<br />
My choice will remain someone good, with the best chance of winning in 2008.  Edwards and Biden are the candidates who have offered the most substance, and both are articulate and would make great standard bearers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance in Monrovia CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75604</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance in Monrovia CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75604</guid>
		<description>And I personally spent last weekend canvassing in Nevada for Obama. Never done a thing like it before. There were over 200 volunteers gathered in a Vegas Union Hall in 100 degree heat. When the organizer asked if anyone had canvassed before, barely a dozen hands went up.

That says everything about Obama and who he&#039;s inspiring. 

I personally, PERSONALLY talked to maybe 200 indie or registered Democratic voters in Vegas over the weekend. I found ONE hardcore Hillary supporter and many, many that hated her guts. Again and again I found people very interested in or completely supporting Obama.

The question of who is electable is moot to me. Hands down, it&#039;s Obama.

Don&#039;t let the media fool you again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I personally spent last weekend canvassing in Nevada for Obama. Never done a thing like it before. There were over 200 volunteers gathered in a Vegas Union Hall in 100 degree heat. When the organizer asked if anyone had canvassed before, barely a dozen hands went up.</p>
<p>That says everything about Obama and who he's inspiring. </p>
<p>I personally, PERSONALLY talked to maybe 200 indie or registered Democratic voters in Vegas over the weekend. I found ONE hardcore Hillary supporter and many, many that hated her guts. Again and again I found people very interested in or completely supporting Obama.</p>
<p>The question of who is electable is moot to me. Hands down, it's Obama.</p>
<p>Don't let the media fool you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria, Houston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75602</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria, Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75602</guid>
		<description>In last two weeks I&#039;ve done my own random polling asking 50 people whom they would vote for. I made a point of asking completly different individuals, friends, co-workers, clients,even few chatty strangers.
19 said Obama or leaning towards Obama, 8 Edwards, 23 Republicans (combined Giuliani or Thompson).
There was not one person for Hillary Clinton. Nobody.  But than - what do I know, I don&#039;t work for CNN... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In last two weeks I've done my own random polling asking 50 people whom they would vote for. I made a point of asking completly different individuals, friends, co-workers, clients,even few chatty strangers.<br />
19 said Obama or leaning towards Obama, 8 Edwards, 23 Republicans (combined Giuliani or Thompson).<br />
There was not one person for Hillary Clinton. Nobody.  But than &#8211; what do I know, I don't work for CNN... <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Taylor  Greenville, Al</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75601</link>
		<dc:creator>J Taylor  Greenville, Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75601</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton HSU, whonder what she will sell to China for campaign money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton HSU, whonder what she will sell to China for campaign money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Titor, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75599</link>
		<dc:creator>John Titor, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75599</guid>
		<description>I am from the future.  Obama makes a surprise showing in the primaries and wins the nomination.  I know it sounds silly but it&#039;s true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am from the future.  Obama makes a surprise showing in the primaries and wins the nomination.  I know it sounds silly but it's true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney    Dallas TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75595</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney    Dallas TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75595</guid>
		<description>You people just can&#039;t stand that Hillary is doing so well.   She IS going to be your next president.  Might as well get used to it.  History has shown that any time a war is occuring during a presidential election,  it always changes sides.  Repubs are now in office,  Dems will take over in 08.  History always repeats itself.   People say that the United States is the most powerful country in the world.  Well Greece used to be,  there Rome ruled the world,  England ruled the world,  Russia ruled the world.  What do all these countries have it common?  They have all fallen.  The US will rule the world for many centuries but will not hold the power status forever.  Especially when you have people like Bush running the country.  Hillary will make us strong again.  Get some of our allies back on our side.   I went to Paris on vacation and I couldn&#039;t believe how rude some of the French people were to American&#039;s.   I&#039;m proud to say that I did not vote for Bush,  I did not vote for either my my Senators who currently control the voting in Texas.  I&#039;m proud to be an independent in Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people just can't stand that Hillary is doing so well.   She IS going to be your next president.  Might as well get used to it.  History has shown that any time a war is occuring during a presidential election,  it always changes sides.  Repubs are now in office,  Dems will take over in 08.  History always repeats itself.   People say that the United States is the most powerful country in the world.  Well Greece used to be,  there Rome ruled the world,  England ruled the world,  Russia ruled the world.  What do all these countries have it common?  They have all fallen.  The US will rule the world for many centuries but will not hold the power status forever.  Especially when you have people like Bush running the country.  Hillary will make us strong again.  Get some of our allies back on our side.   I went to Paris on vacation and I couldn't believe how rude some of the French people were to American's.   I'm proud to say that I did not vote for Bush,  I did not vote for either my my Senators who currently control the voting in Texas.  I'm proud to be an independent in Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoHillary   Dallas, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75593</link>
		<dc:creator>GoHillary   Dallas, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75593</guid>
		<description>If NObama is not even holding his own now, how in the world would he beat out the best GOP candidate, be it Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson or Rudy Giuliani?  He is not just failing to gain support, he is LOSING support.  If by some improbable stretch NObama becomes the Dem candidate, a lot of Dems will take a reality check and throw their support behind a capable GOP candidate.  I sure will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If NObama is not even holding his own now, how in the world would he beat out the best GOP candidate, be it Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson or Rudy Giuliani?  He is not just failing to gain support, he is LOSING support.  If by some improbable stretch NObama becomes the Dem candidate, a lot of Dems will take a reality check and throw their support behind a capable GOP candidate.  I sure will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diamond, Bradenton, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75588</link>
		<dc:creator>Diamond, Bradenton, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75588</guid>
		<description>If Hillary&#039;s support was nearly as high as the polls suggest, if she had even half the support Obama has, she would not have a problem with maxing out. If after three quarters, her supporters (who&#039;re pledging to vote for her as per the polls) haven&#039;t turned up in huge numbers to de-throne Obama&#039;s fundraising numbers, then she&#039;s not the front-runner she&#039;d like people to think she is and the polls are not what people think they are.

While no one has cast an actual vote yet, the only true test of campaign strength so far, remains as true today as it was 6 months ago when everyone said no candidate could outraise the most powerful political machine in modern history. I thought some people said white America couldn&#039;t be this commited about a black candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hillary's support was nearly as high as the polls suggest, if she had even half the support Obama has, she would not have a problem with maxing out. If after three quarters, her supporters (who're pledging to vote for her as per the polls) haven't turned up in huge numbers to de-throne Obama's fundraising numbers, then she's not the front-runner she'd like people to think she is and the polls are not what people think they are.</p>
<p>While no one has cast an actual vote yet, the only true test of campaign strength so far, remains as true today as it was 6 months ago when everyone said no candidate could outraise the most powerful political machine in modern history. I thought some people said white America couldn't be this commited about a black candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg , ashburn VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75583</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg , ashburn VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75583</guid>
		<description>with the 3rd quarter $$$ goals are due this sunday will does anyone see johnedwards having to step down out of 2008 race?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with the 3rd quarter $$$ goals are due this sunday will does anyone see johnedwards having to step down out of 2008 race?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbaram NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75582</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbaram NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75582</guid>
		<description>Barack has no experience &amp; exposure at all. It is better for him to be president of Columbia University so that he could get to meet Ahmedinezad. Hillary does not look presidential unless she gives her chair to bill. Democratic presidential candidates are in the wonderland and media including CNN is giving them too much exposure so that the audience is unawar eof reality. Wake up guys, they do not have credentials to be the president of greatest nation on earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack has no experience &amp; exposure at all. It is better for him to be president of Columbia University so that he could get to meet Ahmedinezad. Hillary does not look presidential unless she gives her chair to bill. Democratic presidential candidates are in the wonderland and media including CNN is giving them too much exposure so that the audience is unawar eof reality. Wake up guys, they do not have credentials to be the president of greatest nation on earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel SLC, UT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75579</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel SLC, UT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75579</guid>
		<description>I love all the crazy people on here!  You people are so hateful.  If you&#039;d shut up and listen to her, you might like her.  My vote is for Hillary Clinton.  Republicans only bring perverts and war criminals to America. 

GO HILLARY!!!  AMERICAN LOVES YOU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love all the crazy people on here!  You people are so hateful.  If you'd shut up and listen to her, you might like her.  My vote is for Hillary Clinton.  Republicans only bring perverts and war criminals to America. </p>
<p>GO HILLARY!!!  AMERICAN LOVES YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony G</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75576</guid>
		<description>For those who are pointing to the polls and smiling, drooling over the fact that HRC is &quot;pulling away&quot; from Obama, here is something to ponder about. Let&#039;s just say...food for thought.This article was published on September 30, 2003. Its now September 30,2007. Ring..ring..ring..

http://archive.seacoastonline.com/2003news/hampton/09302003/news/52855.htm



Dean still leading Kerry in Granite State 

By Shir Haberman
shaberman@seacoastonline.com 

 
Seacoastonline.com 
Classified Market Place 
www.seacoastclassifiedads.com 
 
Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean is sporting a double-digit lead over U.S. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts among New Hampshire Democratic voters, a poll reported last Thursday. 

The poll, conducted by the Institute for Public Opinion at Marist College, showed that 36 percent of Democratic voters favored Dean; 24 percent for Kerry; and 8 percent for former Army Gen. Wesley Clark, who entered the race just last week. The seven other candidates trailed further behind. 

When independents who have expressed an interest in voting in the Democratic primary - which is permitted in the Granite State - are included in the mix, Dean leads the field at 35 percent, followed by Kerry at 22 percent and Clark at 11 percent. None of the other contenders broke into the double digits. 

&quot;It’s clearly a two-person race at the moment in New Hampshire, but Clark has established a presence there and is a force to be reckoned with,&quot; said Lee Miringoff, head of the Poughkeepsie, N.Y.-based institute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who are pointing to the polls and smiling, drooling over the fact that HRC is "pulling away" from Obama, here is something to ponder about. Let's just say...food for thought.This article was published on September 30, 2003. Its now September 30,2007. Ring..ring..ring..</p>
<p><a href="http://archive.seacoastonline.com/2003news/hampton/09302003/news/52855.htm" rel="nofollow">http://archive.seacoastonline.com/2003news/hampton/09302003/news/52855.htm</a></p>
<p>Dean still leading Kerry in Granite State </p>
<p>By Shir Haberman<br />
<a href="mailto:shaberman@seacoastonline.com">shaberman@seacoastonline.com</a> </p>
<p>Seacoastonline.com<br />
Classified Market Place<br />
<a href="http://www.seacoastclassifiedads.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.seacoastclassifiedads.com</a> </p>
<p>Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean is sporting a double-digit lead over U.S. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts among New Hampshire Democratic voters, a poll reported last Thursday. </p>
<p>The poll, conducted by the Institute for Public Opinion at Marist College, showed that 36 percent of Democratic voters favored Dean; 24 percent for Kerry; and 8 percent for former Army Gen. Wesley Clark, who entered the race just last week. The seven other candidates trailed further behind. </p>
<p>When independents who have expressed an interest in voting in the Democratic primary &#8211; which is permitted in the Granite State &#8211; are included in the mix, Dean leads the field at 35 percent, followed by Kerry at 22 percent and Clark at 11 percent. None of the other contenders broke into the double digits. </p>
<p>"It’s clearly a two-person race at the moment in New Hampshire, but Clark has established a presence there and is a force to be reckoned with," said Lee Miringoff, head of the Poughkeepsie, N.Y.-based institute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colony 14 author, Mount Prospect, Illinois</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75573</link>
		<dc:creator>Colony 14 author, Mount Prospect, Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75573</guid>
		<description>Hold on, I thought it was the Republicans who were suposed to be racists?  Now it turns out that the always-politically-correct Dems are likely to nominate Hillary and not Obama?  Does that make Democrats racist?

My long-held opinion has been that the first woman or black President or Vice President will likely be a Republican.  Why?  Because a Democrat is more likely to vote on the basis of gender or race, while a Republican is more likely to vote on the basis of principle.  Have a black woman on the Republican ticket in 2008 and she will win on the basis of conservative principles.  Have a black woman on the Democrat ticket in 2008 and she will lose - on the basis of socialist principles.

Don&#039;t call me racist or sexist because I won&#039;t vote for a black woman socialist... call me opposed to socialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on, I thought it was the Republicans who were suposed to be racists?  Now it turns out that the always-politically-correct Dems are likely to nominate Hillary and not Obama?  Does that make Democrats racist?</p>
<p>My long-held opinion has been that the first woman or black President or Vice President will likely be a Republican.  Why?  Because a Democrat is more likely to vote on the basis of gender or race, while a Republican is more likely to vote on the basis of principle.  Have a black woman on the Republican ticket in 2008 and she will win on the basis of conservative principles.  Have a black woman on the Democrat ticket in 2008 and she will lose &#8211; on the basis of socialist principles.</p>
<p>Don't call me racist or sexist because I won't vote for a black woman socialist... call me opposed to socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75563</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/25/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-new-hampshire/#comment-75563</guid>
		<description>It was the American people who voted for Bush/Cheney. It will be the American people who vote for Clinton, again... Then the whole cycle starts again. In all honesty the American people are responsible for the mess this country is in. We are to blame. We love to vote for bad candidates then complain about them when things go bad. Americans need only to fault ourselves if this two family cycle starts again. We are WHINNY HYPOCRITES and until we wake up things will never change! 

Mock these words this election will go two ways if the polls truly reflect the American opinion. 

1. Clinton will be voted back in and the petty fighting will start agian and won&#039;t end until after 2012 when the whole congress is Republican again. By then Jeb Bush will run against the Democrats for the presidency. After he&#039;s done with his 8 years here come Chelsea Clinton... a never ending cycle.

2. If Clinton is the nominee all of the Obama/Edwards supporters will stay home because they are frustrated with the way things are going. Clinton will try desperately to push anyone’s better than Bush.  She&#039;ll get a few to cross over but not enough. The race will be extremely close because the Republicans hate her and will see an opening. They will win by any means necessary. 

The ones who lose are the ones who have the power to vote in these people who only do what we want them to. What is that you say? By the way and who we vote in office the American people only want anger, mismanagement, divisiveness and hate. This country was built on hate of other and will fall because of it too. 

Obama message is to good for America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the American people who voted for Bush/Cheney. It will be the American people who vote for Clinton, again... Then the whole cycle starts again. In all honesty the American people are responsible for the mess this country is in. We are to blame. We love to vote for bad candidates then complain about them when things go bad. Americans need only to fault ourselves if this two family cycle starts again. We are WHINNY HYPOCRITES and until we wake up things will never change! </p>
<p>Mock these words this election will go two ways if the polls truly reflect the American opinion. </p>
<p>1. Clinton will be voted back in and the petty fighting will start agian and won't end until after 2012 when the whole congress is Republican again. By then Jeb Bush will run against the Democrats for the presidency. After he's done with his 8 years here come Chelsea Clinton... a never ending cycle.</p>
<p>2. If Clinton is the nominee all of the Obama/Edwards supporters will stay home because they are frustrated with the way things are going. Clinton will try desperately to push anyone’s better than Bush.  She'll get a few to cross over but not enough. The race will be extremely close because the Republicans hate her and will see an opening. They will win by any means necessary. </p>
<p>The ones who lose are the ones who have the power to vote in these people who only do what we want them to. What is that you say? By the way and who we vote in office the American people only want anger, mismanagement, divisiveness and hate. This country was built on hate of other and will fall because of it too. </p>
<p>Obama message is to good for America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
