<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gingrich: Good chance Clinton will win in &#039;08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sY sPERLING</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-201563</link>
		<dc:creator>sY sPERLING</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-201563</guid>
		<description>Why allow Bhutto to remain in Pakistan?  Why not immediately deport her upon her return?  Does or does not stability in Pakistan remain a top concern of the current regime?  The assassination did not promote stability.  I read this as:  LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT : &quot;In the event of my death, I reserve the right to assign blame on behalf of my supporters.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why allow Bhutto to remain in Pakistan?  Why not immediately deport her upon her return?  Does or does not stability in Pakistan remain a top concern of the current regime?  The assassination did not promote stability.  I read this as:  LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT : "In the event of my death, I reserve the right to assign blame on behalf of my supporters."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hamilton, Stockholm, Sweden</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-107073</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hamilton, Stockholm, Sweden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-107073</guid>
		<description>Hearing and seeing all this from another part of the world I am amazed how a lot of Americans still think they live in a country leading the future.
For me, a pro American, it is sad to see the American image going &quot;down the drain&quot; with a government like the present Bush administration. This administration has done a very thorough job in destroying the American, as well as the world economy. Last but not least provoked anti American feelings all over the world. The only hope for America is to get Hillary Clinton as the next president. The world outside the US is getting sick of the hypocrisy and the seemingly non-excisting knowledge how to lead the world into a better future.
Bill Clinton turned the economy to the best America had had in centuries. Hillary will do the same, to the benefit for all Americans and the whole world. Hillary will, as one person wrote before, clean up the mess the present administration has created. She will turn the anti American feelings in the world to pro American feelings. The US should be the example for all countries to follow, as it once was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearing and seeing all this from another part of the world I am amazed how a lot of Americans still think they live in a country leading the future.<br />
For me, a pro American, it is sad to see the American image going "down the drain" with a government like the present Bush administration. This administration has done a very thorough job in destroying the American, as well as the world economy. Last but not least provoked anti American feelings all over the world. The only hope for America is to get Hillary Clinton as the next president. The world outside the US is getting sick of the hypocrisy and the seemingly non-excisting knowledge how to lead the world into a better future.<br />
Bill Clinton turned the economy to the best America had had in centuries. Hillary will do the same, to the benefit for all Americans and the whole world. Hillary will, as one person wrote before, clean up the mess the present administration has created. She will turn the anti American feelings in the world to pro American feelings. The US should be the example for all countries to follow, as it once was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda - Albuquerque, New Mexico</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-84409</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda - Albuquerque, New Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-84409</guid>
		<description>Years ago, I was a loyal Limbaugh fan, but soon came to realize that he no longer is an objective host of a radio program.  Instead he has become an instigator of division in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, I was a loyal Limbaugh fan, but soon came to realize that he no longer is an objective host of a radio program.  Instead he has become an instigator of division in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin, Frankfurt, Germany</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82666</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin, Frankfurt, Germany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82666</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a stratagem.

The GOP says Sen. Clinton will win. So everybody says so. So she becomes the nominee. Then they slam her on Hillarycare 2.0 and other things they keep in the drawer right now. Then a Republican wins the White House (with a little help from Diebold etc.).

The only way to avoid it is to do something very unusual. I know what &lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt; would do, but i can&#039;t tell here or it won&#039;t work. Expect a surprise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a stratagem.</p>
<p>The GOP says Sen. Clinton will win. So everybody says so. So she becomes the nominee. Then they slam her on Hillarycare 2.0 and other things they keep in the drawer right now. Then a Republican wins the White House (with a little help from Diebold etc.).</p>
<p>The only way to avoid it is to do something very unusual. I know what <i>i</i> would do, but i can't tell here or it won't work. Expect a surprise...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Stewart, Portland, Oregon</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82561</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Stewart, Portland, Oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82561</guid>
		<description>This really just getting turned down the same dangerous routes it is always turned. Obama, I almost certain, could make an excellent president, but he needs more experience, such as coming from vice president to the ranks of president. You seem to think that our current president had any real skill at this job, seeing how he paid people to run Texas for him.  I know we need Obama but I also we need experience and that is with Senator Clinton. 

Hillary and Barak just get over yourselves and go together, thats the real change with still the needed experience.

Please just do what is really best not what you want to it be the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really just getting turned down the same dangerous routes it is always turned. Obama, I almost certain, could make an excellent president, but he needs more experience, such as coming from vice president to the ranks of president. You seem to think that our current president had any real skill at this job, seeing how he paid people to run Texas for him.  I know we need Obama but I also we need experience and that is with Senator Clinton. </p>
<p>Hillary and Barak just get over yourselves and go together, thats the real change with still the needed experience.</p>
<p>Please just do what is really best not what you want to it be the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocco, Wellington, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82559</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocco, Wellington, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82559</guid>
		<description>What could be wrong with the next president of the United States of America being the spouse of a previous president? I admit as a Republican when Bill won the election over George H. I was sick.  However, If everyone can think back over the eight years of the Clinton Presidency it was a very good time for this nation.  I Myself sincerely believe we can have that again if we give Hillary a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What could be wrong with the next president of the United States of America being the spouse of a previous president? I admit as a Republican when Bill won the election over George H. I was sick.  However, If everyone can think back over the eight years of the Clinton Presidency it was a very good time for this nation.  I Myself sincerely believe we can have that again if we give Hillary a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Honolulu HI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82289</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Honolulu HI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82289</guid>
		<description>Newt   Newt   Newt

Who cares what you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt   Newt   Newt</p>
<p>Who cares what you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan S.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82194</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82194</guid>
		<description>Like many others who have commented here, I can&#039;t believe I actually agree with Newt about anything!  But one thing is becoming increasingly clear to the entire country -- Hillary Clinton is by far the brightest, most articulate and qualified candidate regardless of party affiliation.  She is an unstoppable force and as president she will help us all hold our heads high in the world as Americans again!  GO HILLARY!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many others who have commented here, I can't believe I actually agree with Newt about anything!  But one thing is becoming increasingly clear to the entire country - Hillary Clinton is by far the brightest, most articulate and qualified candidate regardless of party affiliation.  She is an unstoppable force and as president she will help us all hold our heads high in the world as Americans again!  GO HILLARY!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Thomas, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82129</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Thomas, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82129</guid>
		<description>The mantle of experience has been credited to Hillary.  

Polls show more than four in 10 voters nationwide - including Republicans and independents - give Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton the edge among the Democratic candidates on the issue of experience. 

It is Hillary’s life experience first lady in Arkansas and White House and her experience in the Senate.  To some extent, it&#039;s almost like she was the assistant to the governor and president for many years and she is now running to be the chief. 
She&#039;s met with foreign leaders, helped her husband on policy issues and supported him against political attacks. 

Hillary and her husband have been the focus of a right wing slander campaign, and they handled it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mantle of experience has been credited to Hillary.  </p>
<p>Polls show more than four in 10 voters nationwide &#8211; including Republicans and independents &#8211; give Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton the edge among the Democratic candidates on the issue of experience. </p>
<p>It is Hillary’s life experience first lady in Arkansas and White House and her experience in the Senate.  To some extent, it's almost like she was the assistant to the governor and president for many years and she is now running to be the chief.<br />
She's met with foreign leaders, helped her husband on policy issues and supported him against political attacks. </p>
<p>Hillary and her husband have been the focus of a right wing slander campaign, and they handled it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard, Ewing, NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82072</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard, Ewing, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-82072</guid>
		<description>A lot of people here are really uneducated.  They critized things they do not have the slightest idea.  Newt Gingrich is not a neocon.  Neither Rumsfeld or Cheney is neocon.  They are paleoconservative.  Neocons are idealist liberals who were unsatisfied with the Democratic Party especially during the LBJ Carter eras and joined the Republcan Party.  This is why they are called NEO-con.  Neocons believes they are the true liberals and they are the true heirs of FDR and Truman.  Their arguments are always from the left, not from the right.  For example, the democratic peace theory.  Bill Kristol and Richrd Perle are true neocons.  Bill Kristol&#039;s father Irving Kirstol is considered the godfather of Neoconservatism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people here are really uneducated.  They critized things they do not have the slightest idea.  Newt Gingrich is not a neocon.  Neither Rumsfeld or Cheney is neocon.  They are paleoconservative.  Neocons are idealist liberals who were unsatisfied with the Democratic Party especially during the LBJ Carter eras and joined the Republcan Party.  This is why they are called NEO-con.  Neocons believes they are the true liberals and they are the true heirs of FDR and Truman.  Their arguments are always from the left, not from the right.  For example, the democratic peace theory.  Bill Kristol and Richrd Perle are true neocons.  Bill Kristol's father Irving Kirstol is considered the godfather of Neoconservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coach Haughton NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81983</link>
		<dc:creator>Coach Haughton NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81983</guid>
		<description>Ask yourself these questions.

Is Lobbying a Problem in Washington?

Was the War wrong?

Didn&#039;t we as democrats know that the war was wrong before it started?

Didn&#039;t John kerry lose because of his war vote?

Is twelve years longer than six?

Does your spouses experience count for your own?

Is the best healthcare candidate one who has failed at it once already and who proposes that they can do it without raising taxes?

Is a woman who empowered her husband to commit adultery a good leader for women?

Is it good to for americans to see a loving commited family with a moral father and an independantly accomplished mother in the whitehouse?

Is it good for america to prove that we can elect a president without corprorate baggage?

Is it good for america to know that the president we are electing truly shares their belief that the war was wrong from day one?

Is it good for america to elect the mind over the machine?

Who is the best candidate for president of the United States of America?

That one is the easiest.

Barack Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask yourself these questions.</p>
<p>Is Lobbying a Problem in Washington?</p>
<p>Was the War wrong?</p>
<p>Didn't we as democrats know that the war was wrong before it started?</p>
<p>Didn't John kerry lose because of his war vote?</p>
<p>Is twelve years longer than six?</p>
<p>Does your spouses experience count for your own?</p>
<p>Is the best healthcare candidate one who has failed at it once already and who proposes that they can do it without raising taxes?</p>
<p>Is a woman who empowered her husband to commit adultery a good leader for women?</p>
<p>Is it good to for americans to see a loving commited family with a moral father and an independantly accomplished mother in the whitehouse?</p>
<p>Is it good for america to prove that we can elect a president without corprorate baggage?</p>
<p>Is it good for america to know that the president we are electing truly shares their belief that the war was wrong from day one?</p>
<p>Is it good for america to elect the mind over the machine?</p>
<p>Who is the best candidate for president of the United States of America?</p>
<p>That one is the easiest.</p>
<p>Barack Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coach Haughton</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81894</link>
		<dc:creator>Coach Haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81894</guid>
		<description>The master of spin back to save the Neo-con&#039;s.

Anybody believe that Gingritch is intentionally making a statement to play up hillary&#039;s strength?

Clearly the smartest, most dangerous republican strategist alive believes that the republicans best chance at winning is rudy vs. hillary.

so push her forward, bash McCain.  

Knowing how politcally effective this guy can be it might work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The master of spin back to save the Neo-con's.</p>
<p>Anybody believe that Gingritch is intentionally making a statement to play up hillary's strength?</p>
<p>Clearly the smartest, most dangerous republican strategist alive believes that the republicans best chance at winning is rudy vs. hillary.</p>
<p>so push her forward, bash McCain.  </p>
<p>Knowing how politcally effective this guy can be it might work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los Angeles ca</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81726</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Angeles ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81726</guid>
		<description>I agreed with Newt for the first time. Hillary is going to be our next president. We need someone to unite the country, A house divided can never stand. Lets not dwell on her husbands past. He who has no sin cast the first stone.It is now obvious that the republicans are not saints either. Lets forgive and move on to a better day. Good luck Hillary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreed with Newt for the first time. Hillary is going to be our next president. We need someone to unite the country, A house divided can never stand. Lets not dwell on her husbands past. He who has no sin cast the first stone.It is now obvious that the republicans are not saints either. Lets forgive and move on to a better day. Good luck Hillary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul  TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81511</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul  TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81511</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Newt,  Hillary will make a phenominal president.  She&#039;s the right person to fix the Bush mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're right Newt,  Hillary will make a phenominal president.  She's the right person to fix the Bush mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonny c. v.p.,la.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81415</link>
		<dc:creator>sonny c. v.p.,la.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81415</guid>
		<description>Dear Raj: I noticed you didn&#039;t capitalize Hillary&#039;s name in your entry.  Just the kind of childish mentality we need in these tough times.  It might have been appropriate during the 90&#039;s when the major concern of the Republicans was Bill&#039;s zipper, but in these days of unilateral Domestic Governace &amp; Foreign Policy, don&#039;t you think the Right should at least try to play nice given the mess they&#039;ve managed to create all on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Raj: I noticed you didn't capitalize Hillary's name in your entry.  Just the kind of childish mentality we need in these tough times.  It might have been appropriate during the 90's when the major concern of the Republicans was Bill's zipper, but in these days of unilateral Domestic Governace &amp; Foreign Policy, don't you think the Right should at least try to play nice given the mess they've managed to create all on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81364</link>
		<dc:creator>John NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81364</guid>
		<description>Gingrich should go bury his head in the sand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gingrich should go bury his head in the sand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81189</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81189</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/09/arg-polls-early-states-shocks-political.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new ARG poll&lt;/a&gt; with Romney on top in South Carolina is truly shocking news!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/09/arg-polls-early-states-shocks-political.html" rel="nofollow">new ARG poll</a> with Romney on top in South Carolina is truly shocking news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark R. Fort Lauderdale FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81168</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark R. Fort Lauderdale FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81168</guid>
		<description>Every once in a while Newt gets it right.  I agree that Hillary is going to be our next president, and I&#039;m relieved for our country.  Newt believes he has the best chance against Clinton, but isn&#039;t willing to give up his PAC to run.  Guess we know what&#039;s most important to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while Newt gets it right.  I agree that Hillary is going to be our next president, and I'm relieved for our country.  Newt believes he has the best chance against Clinton, but isn't willing to give up his PAC to run.  Guess we know what's most important to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron             Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81144</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron             Nebraska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81144</guid>
		<description>Chris T..........HUH!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris T..........HUH!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria, Houston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81129</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria, Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81129</guid>
		<description>Q.Christian and all Hillary&#039;s supporters:

Could you please tell me, what has Hillary Cinton accomplished, that qualifies her to be our future president. Please, refer to SPECIFIC accomplishments. I truly want to know and I&#039;d appreciate it if any of you respond with a list of references. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q.Christian and all Hillary's supporters:</p>
<p>Could you please tell me, what has Hillary Cinton accomplished, that qualifies her to be our future president. Please, refer to SPECIFIC accomplishments. I truly want to know and I'd appreciate it if any of you respond with a list of references. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris T, Los Angeles CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81128</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris T, Los Angeles CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81128</guid>
		<description>Hillary will certainly not be the next American President when the Voice o&#039; Justice has been running the show since Its revealing in June &#039;06 (think about that you loyal c-span2 watchers) and what did it look like? - a graveyard-shift baggy-eyed eleventh-hour hopeful-rambler, like the Glassjaw Boxer we see truckin&#039; on some other planet vowing to return home and fix things for The Family, and it certainly doesn&#039;t look like any Clinton is his endorsed candidate. Who is this Rolling Stone man with his mask and jumper-cables attached to that book he&#039;s read best?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary will certainly not be the next American President when the Voice o' Justice has been running the show since Its revealing in June '06 (think about that you loyal c-span2 watchers) and what did it look like? &#8211; a graveyard-shift baggy-eyed eleventh-hour hopeful-rambler, like the Glassjaw Boxer we see truckin' on some other planet vowing to return home and fix things for The Family, and it certainly doesn't look like any Clinton is his endorsed candidate. Who is this Rolling Stone man with his mask and jumper-cables attached to that book he's read best?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sybil+</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81112</link>
		<dc:creator>Sybil+</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81112</guid>
		<description>Newt, what kind of a name is that. Sounds like some sort of reptile, lizard..whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt, what kind of a name is that. Sounds like some sort of reptile, lizard..whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penelope Snow South Portland Maine</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81042</link>
		<dc:creator>Penelope Snow South Portland Maine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81042</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s a smart man and he is right in his predictions because she is &quot;the right man for the job!&quot;  She&#039;s not perfect, but she is an EXCELLENT choice for president.  Anyone who has really educated themselves on the Clinton investigations knows that they cost taxpayers tens of million dollars and came up with NOTHING that was truly meaningful.  For 70 plus million dollars what we got was the reassurance that Hillary is not at all &quot;crooked&quot;-because if something was there they would&#039;ve found it and exposed it.  Anyone who dislikes Hillary should take the time to go and see her speak in person-I promise you will meet someone very different than the media often portrays- she is kind but tough, extremely knowledgable on the issues in a very detailed way, and composed.  She&#039;ll be a fabulous president who really works for Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's a smart man and he is right in his predictions because she is "the right man for the job!"  She's not perfect, but she is an EXCELLENT choice for president.  Anyone who has really educated themselves on the Clinton investigations knows that they cost taxpayers tens of million dollars and came up with NOTHING that was truly meaningful.  For 70 plus million dollars what we got was the reassurance that Hillary is not at all "crooked"-because if something was there they would've found it and exposed it.  Anyone who dislikes Hillary should take the time to go and see her speak in person-I promise you will meet someone very different than the media often portrays- she is kind but tough, extremely knowledgable on the issues in a very detailed way, and composed.  She'll be a fabulous president who really works for Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81039</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-81039</guid>
		<description>Newt just needs to shut his pot hole and go away he is irrealvant. Just another neocon who really don&#039;t give a crap about you or me just money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt just needs to shut his pot hole and go away he is irrealvant. Just another neocon who really don't give a crap about you or me just money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Graham   Longview, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80979</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Graham   Longview, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80979</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe I am agreeing with Gingrich on something! Our country needs HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mike
Longview, TX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe I am agreeing with Gingrich on something! Our country needs HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Mike<br />
Longview, TX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EB Rideout</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80976</link>
		<dc:creator>EB Rideout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80976</guid>
		<description>This shameless loser is just stirring the kettle to drum up support from the fringe right.  

He wants them to draft him in &#039;08 and bury him in cash.

He never had any sense of decency, anyway.

He&#039;ll win up back in the trashheap before long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shameless loser is just stirring the kettle to drum up support from the fringe right.  </p>
<p>He wants them to draft him in '08 and bury him in cash.</p>
<p>He never had any sense of decency, anyway.</p>
<p>He'll win up back in the trashheap before long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron   Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80957</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron   Nebraska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80957</guid>
		<description>Does anyone but me wonder why all these republicans, from Bush to Rove to Gingrich are saying Mrs. Clinton is the one to beat? I suspect, like all things republican, it has more to do with manipulating the ignorant than anything approaching truth or honesty. So the point is, don&#039;t buy it! Barack Obama is who we need at this point in our history to set us on the road to sanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone but me wonder why all these republicans, from Bush to Rove to Gingrich are saying Mrs. Clinton is the one to beat? I suspect, like all things republican, it has more to do with manipulating the ignorant than anything approaching truth or honesty. So the point is, don't buy it! Barack Obama is who we need at this point in our history to set us on the road to sanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond, El Paso TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80952</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond, El Paso TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;And I think unless the Republicans can find a way to represent real change for the current situation in Washington, unless they can convince the American people they represent fundamental change, I think they&#039;ll have a very hard time.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Since it was the Republicans that created the current situation and given that they&#039;re apparently quite happy with the status quo, a Democrat will certainly be the next president. However, it&#039;s not necessarily going to be Hillary. Polls can say whatever the heck they want, we haven&#039;t voted yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"And I think unless the Republicans can find a way to represent real change for the current situation in Washington, unless they can convince the American people they represent fundamental change, I think they'll have a very hard time."</i></p>
<p>Since it was the Republicans that created the current situation and given that they're apparently quite happy with the status quo, a Democrat will certainly be the next president. However, it's not necessarily going to be Hillary. Polls can say whatever the heck they want, we haven't voted yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP, Cola SC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80947</link>
		<dc:creator>BP, Cola SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80947</guid>
		<description>Dear John Braeger from Wrightstown, Wisconsin,

You wrote, that Gingrich said only that Clinton would win the nomination; that he said nothing about the presidency. You then accused CNN (and MSNBC for some reason) of &quot;twisting words and reporting out of context&quot; so as to &quot;steer democratic election support.&quot; You then demanded fairness and lack of bias in CNN&#039;s reporting.

Did you bother to read this sentence from Gingrich, which was located RIGHT BEFORE he said Clinton would get the nomination:

&quot;I think the odds are 80 per cent that Sen. Clinton is the next president.&quot;

CNN&#039;s headline was more than appropriate. Gingrich &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; say Clinton is likely to become president.

Who is being dishonest here, John: you or CNN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John Braeger from Wrightstown, Wisconsin,</p>
<p>You wrote, that Gingrich said only that Clinton would win the nomination; that he said nothing about the presidency. You then accused CNN (and MSNBC for some reason) of "twisting words and reporting out of context" so as to "steer democratic election support." You then demanded fairness and lack of bias in CNN's reporting.</p>
<p>Did you bother to read this sentence from Gingrich, which was located RIGHT BEFORE he said Clinton would get the nomination:</p>
<p>"I think the odds are 80 per cent that Sen. Clinton is the next president."</p>
<p>CNN's headline was more than appropriate. Gingrich <i>did</i> say Clinton is likely to become president.</p>
<p>Who is being dishonest here, John: you or CNN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q.  Christian Atlanta GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80936</link>
		<dc:creator>Q.  Christian Atlanta GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80936</guid>
		<description>The one question I ask of all the people who want Barack Obama to be President is why?  What does Obama represent?  He has consistently said he has been against the war, yet he funded it each time it came up for a vote until he realized he was running for President.  He makes very DANGEROUS foreign policy statements which shows his naievity when it comes to world affairs.  Do you really think it would be a good idea to go into Pakistan our only muslim &quot;ally&quot; in the war on terror guns blazing????  Heck no! I think people need to realize what they are getting with Senator Clinton.  The one thing I can say is we know where she stands.  She has a proven record that we can criticize or look to to prove her worthiness in seeking the Presidency.  Mr. Obama doesn&#039;t have that.  I find it amusing that Mr. Obama can criticize someone for voting for a war that he wasn&#039;t even a member of the senate to vote on.  In fact if it weren&#039;t for his Republican opponent getting embroiled in a sex scandal there would be no Sen Barack Obama from Illinois.  In these perilous times that America faces I really don&#039;t think we need a person that completely lacks the experience and leadership America needs to restore our moral authority and credibility as the worlds leading power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one question I ask of all the people who want Barack Obama to be President is why?  What does Obama represent?  He has consistently said he has been against the war, yet he funded it each time it came up for a vote until he realized he was running for President.  He makes very DANGEROUS foreign policy statements which shows his naievity when it comes to world affairs.  Do you really think it would be a good idea to go into Pakistan our only muslim "ally" in the war on terror guns blazing????  Heck no! I think people need to realize what they are getting with Senator Clinton.  The one thing I can say is we know where she stands.  She has a proven record that we can criticize or look to to prove her worthiness in seeking the Presidency.  Mr. Obama doesn't have that.  I find it amusing that Mr. Obama can criticize someone for voting for a war that he wasn't even a member of the senate to vote on.  In fact if it weren't for his Republican opponent getting embroiled in a sex scandal there would be no Sen Barack Obama from Illinois.  In these perilous times that America faces I really don't think we need a person that completely lacks the experience and leadership America needs to restore our moral authority and credibility as the worlds leading power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Jay Shields, Melbourne, Fl.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80931</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Jay Shields, Melbourne, Fl.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80931</guid>
		<description>Newt IS CORRECT!!  Unfortunately, when Concervative politicians forget their principles, the dem&#039;s WIN! The ONLY way we win is by STICKING to our PRINCIPLES!!  Lets face it! People ALWAYS do the WRONG thing UNLESS they are SHOWN the RIGHT WAY!!  So far, there is NO LEADER that has broken away from the pack! There is NO ONE who has REAL solutions to the problems we face. So, the dem&#039;s are there to scoop-up all the discarded voters. They will replace REAL problems/REAL solutions for PHONY problems/PHONY solutions!!  We are about to be BLOWN-UP by our ENEMIES!! BUT, WE WILL ALL HAVE FREE HEALTHCARE!!!  WHOOOPPIE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt IS CORRECT!!  Unfortunately, when Concervative politicians forget their principles, the dem's WIN! The ONLY way we win is by STICKING to our PRINCIPLES!!  Lets face it! People ALWAYS do the WRONG thing UNLESS they are SHOWN the RIGHT WAY!!  So far, there is NO LEADER that has broken away from the pack! There is NO ONE who has REAL solutions to the problems we face. So, the dem's are there to scoop-up all the discarded voters. They will replace REAL problems/REAL solutions for PHONY problems/PHONY solutions!!  We are about to be BLOWN-UP by our ENEMIES!! BUT, WE WILL ALL HAVE FREE HEALTHCARE!!!  WHOOOPPIE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian, San Diego, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80930</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian, San Diego, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80930</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s just so fascinating to read what people are writing about Hilary. &quot;She is the only candidate who will change America&quot;, &quot;She has all the experience we need in a president&quot; &quot;She will end the war in Iraq&quot;. Ladies and Gentlemen, you are being dooped. This is the result of political maneuvering and ambiguous statements that are so vague, people will interpret what they want to hear. For those who know how to critically think, Hillary is not a candidate with new with bold new ideas; instead, what she represents is exactly the same product wrapped up in a new package, that happens to be a woman (wow, it&#039;s a woman! Let&#039;s elect someone who looks different, then things will be different too, right?). 

I feel sorry for America. If the majority of its citizens could actually think independently, we wouldn&#039;t be in the mess we are in now, and we wouldn&#039;t be beginning to delve ourselves even deeper into these quagmires by choosing Hillary in 08. Rip Van Winkle is applicable again: Wake up, you sleepy-head Americans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it's just so fascinating to read what people are writing about Hilary. "She is the only candidate who will change America", "She has all the experience we need in a president" "She will end the war in Iraq". Ladies and Gentlemen, you are being dooped. This is the result of political maneuvering and ambiguous statements that are so vague, people will interpret what they want to hear. For those who know how to critically think, Hillary is not a candidate with new with bold new ideas; instead, what she represents is exactly the same product wrapped up in a new package, that happens to be a woman (wow, it's a woman! Let's elect someone who looks different, then things will be different too, right?). </p>
<p>I feel sorry for America. If the majority of its citizens could actually think independently, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in now, and we wouldn't be beginning to delve ourselves even deeper into these quagmires by choosing Hillary in 08. Rip Van Winkle is applicable again: Wake up, you sleepy-head Americans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80926</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80926</guid>
		<description>Check out these newly updated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/senaterankings&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Senate Rankings&lt;/a&gt;. Almost everything breaks for Dems in September...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out these newly updated <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/senaterankings" rel="nofollow">Senate Rankings</a>. Almost everything breaks for Dems in September...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimberly  Pensacola   fl</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80917</link>
		<dc:creator>kimberly  Pensacola   fl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80917</guid>
		<description>Mrs.  Clinton    reminds  me    of  the  kinda  women I hate    ,  you  know  the  woman  that  say   she  will  help  out   the  poor,  but  spits on then  as  she walks  by them.      she  will say nice thing  to  your  face  then  stabs   you  in the  back ! If  you think   Bush  is   bad  (  I have  no  personal  opinoin  on  him )    just  imagin    what  this  country will be   like  if  she  is   pres.   !  (scary thought  huh )      my  vote is  for  barack.!!!! just &#039;  remember  it  isnt      november  yet  !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrs.  Clinton    reminds  me    of  the  kinda  women I hate    ,  you  know  the  woman  that  say   she  will  help  out   the  poor,  but  spits on then  as  she walks  by them.      she  will say nice thing  to  your  face  then  stabs   you  in the  back ! If  you think   Bush  is   bad  (  I have  no  personal  opinoin  on  him )    just  imagin    what  this  country will be   like  if  she  is   pres.   !  (scary thought  huh )      my  vote is  for  barack.!!!! just '  remember  it  isnt      november  yet  !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80916</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80916</guid>
		<description>Who is Newt Gindrich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is Newt Gindrich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP, New York City, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80914</link>
		<dc:creator>AP, New York City, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80914</guid>
		<description>This is an obvious ploy to rally the Republican base. Clinton is not the &quot;inevitable&quot; candidate that she wants people to think she is. Obama has a lot of support from non-traditional voters that doesn&#039;t show up in the polls and he is winning in Iowa already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an obvious ploy to rally the Republican base. Clinton is not the "inevitable" candidate that she wants people to think she is. Obama has a lot of support from non-traditional voters that doesn't show up in the polls and he is winning in Iowa already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noboby, Irvine CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80911</link>
		<dc:creator>Noboby, Irvine CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80911</guid>
		<description>CNN must be joyful to hear that Gingrich thinks that Nurse Hillary will win Presidential election in 2008.  That is so  typical for CNN. CNN alway been favorite/supportive of Liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN must be joyful to hear that Gingrich thinks that Nurse Hillary will win Presidential election in 2008.  That is so  typical for CNN. CNN alway been favorite/supportive of Liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Beatty, South Glens Falls, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80908</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Beatty, South Glens Falls, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80908</guid>
		<description>I wish the media would stop hanging on every prediction that Hillary is going to win this nomination!  We have not begun to vote and mine is going to Barack Obama!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the media would stop hanging on every prediction that Hillary is going to win this nomination!  We have not begun to vote and mine is going to Barack Obama!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80903</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80903</guid>
		<description>She has got to win the primary first ... Go Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She has got to win the primary first ... Go Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We must win in 08</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80900</link>
		<dc:creator>We must win in 08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80900</guid>
		<description>Ultimately, this was a Three Prong Approach...
1. Call McCain out and build support to remove it.
2. Generate a fire in the core neo-con &amp; republican base.
3. and look willing to make sacrifice for the betterment of the country.

Remember:  This is the man who divorced one of his ex-wives while she was on her death bed, had an affair on the second one with a much younger employee, and left congress before the scandal hit.....Not to mention used his power in Congress to get Connie Chung removed from CBS....This man is pure evil....a wolf in lambs skin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately, this was a Three Prong Approach...<br />
1. Call McCain out and build support to remove it.<br />
2. Generate a fire in the core neo-con &amp; republican base.<br />
3. and look willing to make sacrifice for the betterment of the country.</p>
<p>Remember:  This is the man who divorced one of his ex-wives while she was on her death bed, had an affair on the second one with a much younger employee, and left congress before the scandal hit.....Not to mention used his power in Congress to get Connie Chung removed from CBS....This man is pure evil....a wolf in lambs skin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila, Nashville, TN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80898</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila, Nashville, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80898</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt that Gingrich&#039;s prediction in terms of Clinton winning in 2008 is a ploy to wake up the GOP.  Obama will be the the candidate to get vote across party lines.  He is the future president of the Unites States and will unite Americans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that Gingrich's prediction in terms of Clinton winning in 2008 is a ploy to wake up the GOP.  Obama will be the the candidate to get vote across party lines.  He is the future president of the Unites States and will unite Americans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rice Houston Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80895</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rice Houston Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80895</guid>
		<description>Newt&#039;s explanation that he just found out yesterday that the McCain-Feingold law prevents him from running is silly.  The implications of this law concerning the conflict with American solutions had to be obvious to him for a long time -- we are not talking about rocket science concepts.  It is not clear what his real reason for not running is.

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt's explanation that he just found out yesterday that the McCain-Feingold law prevents him from running is silly.  The implications of this law concerning the conflict with American solutions had to be obvious to him for a long time - we are not talking about rocket science concepts.  It is not clear what his real reason for not running is.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Braeger, Wrightstown, Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80894</link>
		<dc:creator>John Braeger, Wrightstown, Wisconsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80894</guid>
		<description>CNN headline reads, &quot;Gingrich: Good chance Clinton will win in &#039;08.&quot; Really?! Gingrich said, &quot;I think she is almost certainly going to win the Democratic NOMINATION&quot;. He did not say &quot;presidency&quot; as the headline implies.

Twisting words and reporting out of context appears to be CNN&#039;s and MSNBC&#039;s pitiful attempt to steer democratic election support. 

CNN - give us fair, unbiased, equal reporting. What you’re doing is painfully obvious and could backfire.

John
Wrightstown, WI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN headline reads, "Gingrich: Good chance Clinton will win in '08." Really?! Gingrich said, "I think she is almost certainly going to win the Democratic NOMINATION". He did not say "presidency" as the headline implies.</p>
<p>Twisting words and reporting out of context appears to be CNN's and MSNBC's pitiful attempt to steer democratic election support. </p>
<p>CNN &#8211; give us fair, unbiased, equal reporting. What you’re doing is painfully obvious and could backfire.</p>
<p>John<br />
Wrightstown, WI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80893</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80893</guid>
		<description>This race is still wide open.  People were surprised that Senator Kerry won his party&#039;s nomination in the 2004 race.  He gained momentum late in the race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This race is still wide open.  People were surprised that Senator Kerry won his party's nomination in the 2004 race.  He gained momentum late in the race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG, Poquoson, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80892</link>
		<dc:creator>JG, Poquoson, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80892</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton is the most qualified presidential candidate on either side of the fence, so I imagine that Newt is correct in assuming she will be our next president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton is the most qualified presidential candidate on either side of the fence, so I imagine that Newt is correct in assuming she will be our next president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Callan, Palo Cedro, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80889</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Callan, Palo Cedro, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80889</guid>
		<description>Gingrich and the Republicans are hoping to run against Hillary Clinton for obvious reasons.  John Edwards is the candidate the Republicans fear the most--he has the most courage of any of the canidates in taking on corruption in Washington, AND he is the most electable Democrat in general election match-ups against all the Republican contenders (Rasmussen Reports).  He brings new states into play for the Democrats in the Midwest and South.  He is the Republican&#039;s worst nightmare.  Go, Edwards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gingrich and the Republicans are hoping to run against Hillary Clinton for obvious reasons.  John Edwards is the candidate the Republicans fear the most&#8211;he has the most courage of any of the canidates in taking on corruption in Washington, AND he is the most electable Democrat in general election match-ups against all the Republican contenders (Rasmussen Reports).  He brings new states into play for the Democrats in the Midwest and South.  He is the Republican's worst nightmare.  Go, Edwards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick, Basking Ridge, NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80888</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick, Basking Ridge, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80888</guid>
		<description>The only hope the GOP has is to nominate Ron Paul.  That&#039;s the only possible change.

I would also rather see Obama than Clinton running the white house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only hope the GOP has is to nominate Ron Paul.  That's the only possible change.</p>
<p>I would also rather see Obama than Clinton running the white house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal, Los Angeles CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80887</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal, Los Angeles CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80887</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Bush endorse Hillary last week, saying she would beat Obama? Now Gingrich is endorsing her. I think the neo-cons would love to have her in office.

If people think she&#039;s an anti-war candidate, then they need to wake up. She&#039;s voted for funding the war 100% of the time, and now wants it to expand into Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn't Bush endorse Hillary last week, saying she would beat Obama? Now Gingrich is endorsing her. I think the neo-cons would love to have her in office.</p>
<p>If people think she's an anti-war candidate, then they need to wake up. She's voted for funding the war 100% of the time, and now wants it to expand into Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice, Washington, DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80885</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice, Washington, DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80885</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think I will ever agree with Newt. I cringe just thinking I agree with Newt Gingrich. But he is right on the money, Hillary will win her party&#039;s nomination and the general elections. All Hillary haters can get a one way ticket to space and stay for the next 8 years. Go Hillary!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't think I will ever agree with Newt. I cringe just thinking I agree with Newt Gingrich. But he is right on the money, Hillary will win her party's nomination and the general elections. All Hillary haters can get a one way ticket to space and stay for the next 8 years. Go Hillary!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark  Kansas City, Missouri</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80884</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark  Kansas City, Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/09/30/gingrich-good-chance-clinton-will-win-in-08/#comment-80884</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about the money.  The more he say&#039;s Clinton will win the more conservatives send money.  Clinton is the best fund raising tool the GOP has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's all about the money.  The more he say's Clinton will win the more conservatives send money.  Clinton is the best fund raising tool the GOP has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
