October 3, 2007
Posted: 08:45 AM ET

Would you pay additional taxes to fund the Iraq war? Watch Dana Bash's report.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — "If you don't like the cost, then shut down the war," is how Rep. David Obey, D-Wisconsin, justified his proposal to impose a surtax in order to fund U.S. military operations in Iraq.    CNN's Dana Bash has the story from Capitol Hill.

More: Top Democrats propose war surtax

Filed under: House • Iraq


laurinda,ny   October 4th, 2007 8:58 am ET

MARIA FROM HOUSTON.. You really should put on your thinking cap. Of course you have heard of Bush before we did. He owns that sprawling ranch in Crawford with all those oil wells. Do you work on his ranch?

Maria, Houston   October 4th, 2007 12:36 am ET

Sybil,
FYI: I voted for Clinton, Gore AND Kerry, because some of us in Texas opposed George Bush before you've even heard of him. I raised three good kids without any help from Democrats or Republicans, put them through school and work hard all my life. But I'm no left wing nut who thinks that all Republicans are evil and I will not vote for another Clinton either. Spare me your silly comments. Good Day.

Hilary, Roch NY   October 4th, 2007 12:30 am ET

This is an oversight proposal, not a fiscal proposal, so don't get your panties in the bunch about mean Democrats who raise your taxes. The intent isn't to pass the tax–it's to demonstrate the financial impact of the war in terms that will resonate with people who can't see past their own wallets.

Budgeting practices that exclude war costs from the regular tab have left the taxpayer cost of this war a bit murky. For many people, the only thing that resonates is the figure that will be docked from their personal income, and the surest way to get them to oppose something is to show them how much they will have to pay for it. Seeing that number on paper is going to come as quite a shock to a lot of people who were quite happy to spend astronomical sums on the war when it was pretend money.

Brian, Syracuse NY   October 3rd, 2007 9:51 pm ET

Yeah, let's make poor people poorer. It's been done before. So has the draft. Let's bring that back too. That was really popular. It sounds to me like a few Democrats in Congress are setting the stage for a Lyndon Johnson-sized failure when Shrillary wins the election.

Brad, Stockton, CA   October 3rd, 2007 8:09 pm ET

Seems to me that a half trillion dollars has already been wasted in that dump. Hmm, does this mean that Congress feels we have not paid our share yet?

pam Eugene OR   October 3rd, 2007 7:53 pm ET

This is Pam. So sorry this one really got my blood boiling. I know, use spell check!
It is just the outrage this brings out in me.

pam Eugene OR   October 3rd, 2007 7:30 pm ET

Would the peop;e how lost a son, father, husband, mother or brother ot sister there be excempt from this tax? Or, o you really want an arm and a leg?
This is madness!

christian, selden, ny   October 3rd, 2007 6:57 pm ET

Dan (Columbia, MD

what do you know about al qaeda??? have you read about them? do you know where they originate from? or do you see them as just the "bad guys". you believe what you are told i assume… al Qeada is like the empire in star wars right???? we are not fighting much of al queda in iraq. they might be training there operatives for combat experience over there but we are figthing iraqi's. i wish we could get out of that country it is a stupid war. and unfortunately the only way for americans to take notice of anything besides themselves is for something to DIRECTLY affect them for example during 9/11 we lost 3000 people. it is an aweful thing. but saddam hussain killed 100,000 kurds in the 80's and we didnt attack for 30 years over some riduculous idea that this non-wealthy country had something to do with 9/11 and they had WMDs. well now we should raise people taxes so it does affect more then just the people that are dying over there. maybe more people would care if it affected their income…..actually i know it would

Sybil   October 3rd, 2007 6:45 pm ET

Maria from Houston, you are such a tall tale teller. You've said before that you are a good Republican. Stop putting doubts in peoples minds.

Reggie , Anaheim, Ca.   October 3rd, 2007 6:28 pm ET

Connie, Sarah you girls are on point!
Congress raised the Debt ceiling to
10 Trillon or we can't pay our bills!
Let one of my less wealthy Americans run into the same problem and see what happens to them. The credit card companies try to raise our debt as well
and if you are not educated enough with money you are punished. The Federal Government isn't they keep borrowing and borrowing for someone else to pay! The is not American!

Leslie, Tallahassee, FL   October 3rd, 2007 6:15 pm ET

I haven't been so angry in a very long time. I'm a liberal democrat who really doesn't mind paying her taxes, but I was opposed to this war from the beginning. And now the congress wants to increase my taxes to pay for it instead of standing firm and refusing to send Bush legislation to fund it. I've voted democrat my entire life, but I'm beginning to think independent may be the way to go…

Frank Virginina Beach   October 3rd, 2007 6:03 pm ET

These people are immature, irresponsible, has-beens. Campaign now for their ouster next election.

spinstopper   October 3rd, 2007 5:25 pm ET

*There are 16 wounded for every fatality, according to one study based on government data. The ratio was fewer than 3-to-1 for Korea and Vietnam. -Ken

That in fact, is a WONDERFUL statistic that reflects the attention we pay to our troops battlefield medical care. Otherwise we would have lost a lot of those casualties. This is also highlighted by the fact that there were 54,000 and 58,000 KIA in Korea and Vietnam.., respectively. 5 yrs with less than 4000 KIA is historically low for the creation of a new democracy..

Maria, Houston   October 3rd, 2007 5:18 pm ET

No thank you, my government is already getting big chunk of my money. They're using it to make those planes that cannot fly in the rain…

Ken Roland   October 3rd, 2007 4:40 pm ET

What Price Patriotism?

Although I have heard all the candidates speak of ending the war, time frames for bringing our troops home and the billions of dollars this war is costing, but I have yet to hear any of them address the proper and adequate funding for the care of our loved ones in the military who have fallen in this terrible war.

Hundreds of millions of dollars have been paid to the survivors and the victim's families of the 9/11 tragedy, where their possible deaths or injury were basically unforeseen. What financial reparation then should be paid to the almost 4,000 dead and over 60,000* wounded and maimed young American men and women in the military, and to their families, who accepted their fate as a real possibility and yet still chose to serve their country?

*There are 16 wounded for every fatality, according to one study based on government data. The ratio was fewer than 3-to-1 for Korea and Vietnam.

Paul C. Palmetto Bay, FL   October 3rd, 2007 4:14 pm ET

An excellent idea that I fully support.
If the right wing war hawks think the war is worth fight then they should be willing to pay for it and not pass the cost to their children. After all, the children will have to pay for their health care.
It is criminal and cowardly to prosecute a war that you are not willing to pay for. The right wing wants to fight the war on a credit card using mercenaries at $1,000 per day. There idea of how to wage a war is to put a "we support the troops" bumper sticker on their car and feel smug.
If we are truly in a global war then we should have a draft and taxes to pay for it.

Ryan, NY, NY   October 3rd, 2007 4:09 pm ET

The Democrats know this has no chance in Hades of passing. This is just another lame attempt to undermine the war effort and give Al Qaeda one for the win column.

It's really simple. Congress has control of the purse. If the Democrats in charge are REALLY serious about ending the war just cut the funding and quit the whining.

Posted By Dan (Columbia, MD) : October 3, 2007 2:34 pm

You have to be a liberal posing as a conservative in order to show "how dumb conservatives are" in an effort to sway anyone on the borderline.

If not, please explain how calling for Americans to fund our own war is going to "undermine the war effort and give Al Qaeda one for the win column?"

spinstopper   October 3rd, 2007 4:05 pm ET

Our NATIONAL DEBT is less than our yearly GDP and our BUDGET DEFICIT has been less than inflation for 2 yrs now.
Can you say that about your finances?

Ryan, New York, NY   October 3rd, 2007 4:01 pm ET

James, do you and your Republican ilk think that this war is paying for itself? You might have a reason to complain about them spending on measures that benefit social welfare, but this is just them having the fiscal responsibility that your party is used to so proudly proclaim that it had.

For all the complaining about the Clinton-Hsu connection and how the Chinese are trying to buy their way into the White House through them, I'd expect Republicans to be more for paying the bill for this war ourselves than indebting ourselves to China like we have been.

Colony 14 author, Mount Prospect, Illinois   October 3rd, 2007 3:59 pm ET

Now if only they follow the same plan for future spending:

1. Would you pay additional taxes to Fund Hillary's plan to give every newborn $5,000?

2. Would you pay additional taxes to give everyone "free" health care?

If you asked the American taxpayer if they would be willing to pay for SPECIFIC spending proposals, most ideas would be shot down in a hurry. I like the idea!

Sarah, Kansas City, MO   October 3rd, 2007 3:56 pm ET

This is a great idea. I have always said that if the war on terrorism and the Iraq war are so important, then where is the shared sacrifice (such as existed in WW2). After 9/11 Bush asked everyone to go shopping and this was the most of a sacrifice that was asked for. Oh yes, and the tax cuts for the wealthy. Now that was some sacrifice.

For those remaining people who still believe in Bush's war, they should be happy to pay for their share of it. This is way that they can contribute. Somehow I do not think they will agree. These are the same folks who believe in sacrifice but only if someone else is doing it.

Again, if combatting terrorism is so important what are you willing to sacrifice in support of the cause? I do not support the war, never did, but I think it is time to pay for it. Instead we are passing the debt on to our children.

Connie, Tn.   October 3rd, 2007 3:51 pm ET

Before any new taxes, we should look for all the missing money that has been sent to Iraq along with the missing weapons. Somebody is going to have to pay for this war. This country is so far in debt now. We are owned by the Chinese.

Anonymous   October 3rd, 2007 3:49 pm ET

I have always said, 'if Bush is serious about the war on terrorism, then he needs to ask Americans to sacrifice'. This is a good idea.

For those remaining people who still believe in Bush's war, they should be happy to pay for their share of it. This is way that they can contribute. Somehow I do not think they will agree. These are the same folks who believe in sacrifice but only if someone else is doing it.

laurinda,ny   October 3rd, 2007 3:38 pm ET

Now you see what I mean everybody. We have to have younger people in office. When you start getting old…your mind isn't as sharp as it once was. Sad…but…True

Ramu Ramaswami,Allentown,PA   October 3rd, 2007 3:24 pm ET

That is a good idea. That will make people on the street to stop the war in no time. Democratic leaders have no guts to pursue this.

Zoe, Corpus Christi Tx   October 3rd, 2007 3:19 pm ET

If the Democrats would have just said no to further funding this unnecessary war when they had the opportunity… there would be no need for stunt politics. I am through with both parties.

Larry   October 3rd, 2007 3:15 pm ET

Taxes the middle class and the so called poor. Good Idea Democrats.

Dan (Columbia, MD)   October 3rd, 2007 2:34 pm ET

The Democrats know this has no chance in Hades of passing. This is just another lame attempt to undermine the war effort and give Al Qaeda one for the win column.

It's really simple. Congress has control of the purse. If the Democrats in charge are REALLY serious about ending the war just cut the funding and quit the whining.

therealist   October 3rd, 2007 2:32 pm ET

Sounds good to me.., as long as we also get rebate checks when the Iraqi democracy pays off their war debt like England. But that's not the way Obey is thinking now is he..

James, Phoenix AZ   October 3rd, 2007 2:26 pm ET

Another tax - from a democrat??

What next? A Hollywood Producer endorsing Hillary Clinton??

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com