Actually, he won, remember? The majority of Americans voted for him – there is no question about that. Bush was appointed in 2000, not elected, and if you are even going to take the time to post on this board you should know your facts, otherwise you just look like an ill-informed redneck. Oh wait, you're from Texas...

For everyone's sake, especially your own, please re-read the facts surrounding the 2000 presidential election. I think you'll find that Al Gore didn't lose the election because "everyone thought he was a dry dork".

In fact, you'll find he didn't lose the election at all.

"Most Americans are sick of this fascist admin. Sad to see you're one of those anti-Constitutional "Americans" who wouldn't understand a disappearing civil right from a reality TV show. That's you, James. Wake up, or start practicing saying, "mein Bush."

-

If there ever was such a thing as blog-rage, you've got to be the example Steve. Mind you, I can understand how you would be upset watching (you call "idiot") President Bush being elected TWICE. And when it comes to the next election the DNC is doing everthing possible to throw away it's chance at victory (Hillary Clinton is a joke ... Obama too nice to run a REAL campaign against her).

I'm actually HAPPY to see you so bent about everything. It tells me us conservatives are winning.

Hey – how is that whole "void the Michigan & Florida" thing going for you dems? Or how about the little two-step Hillary is pulling over on you guys (Yes we should not campaign in Michigan/Florida... No I'm not going to take my name off the ballot like you other fools).

Quite Hillaryous.

Um, James, there won't be a Republican president for quite a while. Every one of the liars has continued supporting our Worst. President. Ever.

Most Americans are sick of this fascist admin. Sad to see you're one of those anti-Constitutional "Americans" who wouldn't understand a disappearing civil right from a reality TV show. That's you, James. Wake up, or start practicing saying, "mein Bush."

Actually, a self-confessed plagiarist – also called a liar – like Biden has as much chance as Mike Huckabee of winning the presidency, or even his party's nomination.

Oh, please, you sound like a child. Al Gore won in 2000; Katherine Harris, Jeb Bush and the Supreme Court conspired to throw the election to Bush Everyone knows that, even Republicans.

The election is just a year away and it is time to get to work. Stop wasting time on non-causes and lost causes and focus on a brighter future for America.

"Global Warming Naysayers = Earth Revolves Around Sun Naysayers"

Hmmm kind of like the popular belief that the Earth was flat. That popular belief was proved wrong just like many of the popular beliefs of Global Warming.

Even if Gore had ended up as President, we still would have had 9/11. The big difference is that we would have been attacked several more times since then. I am not a fan of GW, but he was certainly better than who he was facing.

Gore lost the 2000 election to the guy who would become the Worst President Ever. I think we've had enough and it is time to move on.

Al, put this idea in a lockbox,throw away the key, and keep talking about the climate disaster about which the government is doing nothing.

He's distorting science, and he's raising an issue that does not threaten us scientifically, yet he continues to suggest we take away our current standards of living from our children and grandchildren.

Just this week, NASA released a study indicating that the receding of the Arctic sea ice has nothing to do with global warming and has to do with wind patterns. I trust NASA over the Natural Resources Defense Council anyday..

Indeed, a survey of more than 500 climate scientists internationally were posed the question: Do you believe that the science is settled enough to turn the issue over to policymakers? A majority said no. Indeed, barely more than half believed that humans are primarily responsible for the moderate warming that's occurring. And of that, of course, more than half say that our current warming is not a crisis and does not likely tend to be so.

Poor Al, still looking for his glory in all the wrong places..

Quote from jospeh, austin, tx: "he lost because everyone thought he was a dry, dork, with no personality."

Have you looked at the White House during the last 6 years???

This is ridiculous. Polls actually say that Hilary is leading, and Gore is only at distant 4th after Obama & Edwards.

Gore is a political history. He will not get nomination this time, even if he runs. He should have won in 2000, but he blew it and many dems never forgive him. Besides, with 3 months to go, he has not raised money.

Hardly.

> because everyone thought he was a dry, dork, with no personality.

True, he never did get that across.

> I thought he discovered the internet shouldnt he have already won a nobel prize for that? I mean if that staement was true of course.

The internet wasn't discovered. It was developed through a series of government programs, many of which he supported. Politicians don't understand the value of the internet today. Gore understood the value of the internet in the 1980s.

> This guy is an idiot
he was never popular but now he found something he can exploit that is also making him popular, way to go Al

Winning the popular vote kind of flies in the face of your argument that he was never popular. In fact, I think it means the exact opposite.

Also, he's been raising alarms about the climate crisis since he was in Congress (1980s). He first wrote about it in detail in a 1992 book called Earth in the Balance.

So, "joseph"; will you stop to ask yourself why everything you think you know is wrong? Or does this not concern you in the slightest?

GO GORE!!

Stop wasting your energy on non-stories and focus on really matters.

I think Gore is really the only candidate I could vote for with a clear conscience. I signed the petition, made a donation to help fund the NY Times ad, and I hope he runs.

Insofar as anyone in governmental policy helped "create" the internet, Gore's funding for DARPA and the ARPANet (the precursor to the internet) was a major contribution.

Vint Cerf, one of the key engineers involved in the establishment of the internet as we know it today, said as much.

There is an overwhelming scientific consensus that climate change is real and ongoing. To aforementioned posters: read the IPCC report, listen to the arguments of scientists who work in the field and have devoted years of their lives to the study of this subject, and then try and make informed comments.
Even the current EPA's website cites an excerpt:
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has stated "Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations"

Can you please share with us what you're smoking? You must be on something to be that high.

Your country awaits you.
We, the people have your back.

Vote for Solution
Vote for Al Gore