October 23, 2007
Posted: 01:08 PM ET

Obama is taking heat for his link to Gospel singer Donnie McClurkin.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A gay rights group on Monday urged Barack Obama to cut ties with a gospel singer who it says spreads false information about homosexuality being a choice.

Donnie McClurkin is among several gospel singers scheduled to raise money for the Illinois senator and Democratic presidential candidate at a concert in South Carolina this weekend.

McClurkin has drawn attention from gay rights activists for his views on homosexuality.

"I don't believe that it is the intention of God," McClurkin said Monday in a telephone interview. "Sexuality, everything is a matter of choice."

McClurkin said he does not believe in discriminating against homosexuals. "What people do in their bedrooms and who they are as human beings are two different things," he said.

In a statement, Obama said he believes gays and lesbians are "our brothers and sisters" and should be afforded the same respect, dignity and rights granted all other citizens.

"I have consistently spoken directly to African-American religious leaders about the need to overcome the homophobia that persists in some parts our community so that we can confront issues like HIV/AIDS and broaden the reach of equal rights in this country," Obama said. "I strongly believe that African Americans and the LGBT community must stand together in the fight for equal rights. And so I strongly disagree with Reverend McClurkin's views and will continue to fight for these rights as president of the United States to ensure that America is a country that spreads tolerance instead of division."

The statement did not say whether McClurkin will still perform on the tour.

"We strongly urge Obama to part ways with this divisive preacher who is clearly singing a different tune than the stated message of the campaign," Wayne Besen, executive director of Truth Wins Out, said in a statement.

At a forum on gay issues in August, Obama argued that civil unions for same-sex couples wouldn't be a "lesser thing" than marriage. Obama belongs to the United Church of Christ, which supports gay marriage, but Obama has yet to go that far.

In a telephone interview Monday, Besen said he admired Obama, but wasn't ready to endorse him, especially considering McClurkin taking part in the campaign's "Embrace the Change" concert tour.

"I think he'd be a great president. But I think it's going to drive away support from people who are on the fence such as myself," Besen said.

McClurkin is a Grammy Award winner who performed at the Republican National Convention in 2004. He told AP Radio in an interview that September that he was "once involved with those desires and those thoughts," which he attributed to being raped at 8 and 13.

"That's what thrust me into it, and then God delivered me from that and gave me back who I really am and my true purpose," McClurkin said.

Filed under: Barack Obama • South Carolina


Fred, Reston VA   October 23rd, 2007 9:40 am ET

This gospel singer story is just another example of Obama pandering to zealots(or anyone else for that matter).

Obama will cause the dems to lose the election. If he cannot convince democrats that he is experianced enough he has no shot with repubs or independents. Any rational political follower can understand that the repubs will play the commander-in chief card and Obama just cannot answer that reasonably. A vote for Obama is just like a vote for Nader in 2000; all of that "change" and "principle" and "vote FOR something rather than against" crap did not do anything but put Bush in the white house to begin with. We need a winner, and that is Hillary. And if you choose to respond, do it with class, and don't use hackneyed phrases like "fired up" and "state legislative experiance," because all of that is crap too.

r sisk, nevada   October 23rd, 2007 9:40 am ET

Please tell me, how is this guy so sure that sexuality is a choice? I suppose if you wanted to be gay or celibate, that would be your choice.

I am surprised McClurkin isn't voting GOP.

Davis, NJ   October 23rd, 2007 9:52 am ET

THIS IS RIDICULOUS !!!
Why should Obama be held responsible for what anyone believes? Obama's policies and beliefs on gays and lesbians are crystal clear and have hitherto been consistent.
If a gay reverend believes that being gay is by choice, the Reverend certainly has the right to believe whatever he believes. It does not mean that he is "misinforming" anyone - he's simply stating what he believes as a gay man.
Why in the world should Obama be held to account for what anyone believes?
Rev. McClurkin is not the first and would certainly not be the last gay person to think that being gay is a choice. The fact that the majority of us think that it is by birth and a minority of Americans like McClurkin (who is gay) believe it is by choice does not mean the majority should railroad the minority into believing what something they are sceptical about.
This is America. Obama should not reprimand the Rev simply because they have different beliefs.

This is RIDICULOUS!!!

Mike R, FL   October 23rd, 2007 9:54 am ET

It's silly that some people think the candidates should be held responsible for every view of every person who supports them. Out of the millions and millions of people that support ANY candidate, there's virtually always -at least- one point the people may differ from the candidate on, and often several more. Everyone is entitled to their beliefs. It speaks to Barack Obama's ability to reach out to people that someone who disagrees with gay rights still supports Barack, who adamantly defends and promises to protect the rights of all people of any sexual orientation.

McClurkin may not have certain views on homosexuality. Who cares? Obama believes in freedom and equality for all people. Just remember, it is McClurkin who supports Obama. It is NOT Obama who supports McClurkin.

Bob Jones, Las Vegas, NV   October 23rd, 2007 10:01 am ET

It's a choice until they can find that gay gene. :)

Matt, Manchester, CT   October 23rd, 2007 10:07 am ET

Atta boy, the party that is very tolerant of the views of others strikes again.

runawayjim   October 23rd, 2007 10:07 am ET

While Obama claims to not believe in discriminating against homosexuals, he proposes doing just that with civil unions rather than supporting full marriage rights for the gay community. He strikes out on that one in my book.

AMERICA   October 23rd, 2007 10:08 am ET

All of this homosexuality has been in America since the beginning of time. It isn't going away. Learn to live with it, there are more important issues on the table.

Joel S. - Toccoa, GA   October 23rd, 2007 10:10 am ET

It is a choice, but, regarding this "issue" specifically, who cares? If his cousin's brother's neighbor was a KKK member, would he be disqualified too? This stuff is ridiuclous.

Stand up, stand out.

John ATL   October 23rd, 2007 10:14 am ET

First CNN is the best news center but, FYI CNN do your homework Donnie M. was gay. He is a reformed gay man. So he is speaking from experience.

EUNICE, MARYLAND, U.S.A.   October 23rd, 2007 10:14 am ET

Am not a Democrat but I think Congressman Rangel is correct. That is why the Republican Party has to make sure they avoid this now and eliminate Giuliani in the Primaries. I totally agree with him. If it is true that both Giuliani and his wife have been married three times then something is absolutely wrong. I doubt his judgment to rule this country in the right direction. For him to even come out to run for Presidency with that kind of record is a joke. The world will be laughing at America. Republicans beware!!!

I think Huckabee for what I have seen so far is a better candidate.

Angelia, Indiana   October 23rd, 2007 10:15 am ET

Should Mr. Obama also part ways with his wife for urging him to quit smoking? Why should he be held responsible for what someone else thinks? Did he agree with Mr. McClurkin?
Oh, and are people to hold the candidate that Chuck Norris is supporting accountable for being stupid? Don't get me started on Hillary. . .

Celia   October 23rd, 2007 10:18 am ET

I was going to vote for Barack, but after that "brother sister" comment…

David, San Antonio TX   October 23rd, 2007 10:19 am ET

Is it surprising that a "gospel" singer would say that homosexuality is a choice and is unnatural since that is what the Bible teaches? Can anyone say "viewpoint discrimination"?

Corey, Tulsa, OK/Lansing, MI   October 23rd, 2007 10:22 am ET

The article would be far more powerful if the writer included the fact that Pastor Donnie McClurkin once lived his life as a gay man. This is a quote from his book: "The abnormal use of my sexuality continued until I came to realize that I was broken and that homosexuality was not God's intention… for my masculinity." He then describes himself as going through a process by which he became "a saved and sanctified man".

Scott from Freehold   October 23rd, 2007 10:23 am ET

Obama needs to stop with cowardly, political doublespeak. He says he disagrees, but does not say that homosexuality is not a choice, nor does he say his campaign will not work with a man who is either a fraud or confused.

Anacondo420   October 23rd, 2007 10:23 am ET

The Church is ant-gay.jesus is anti-gay,and God is anti-gay.What part of ABOMINATION don't you get?

William Tampa, FL   October 23rd, 2007 10:23 am ET

Obama risks losing millions of LGBT voters if he does not immediately cut ties with McClurkin. First, his support among African Americans wanes, and now he might lose the gay constituency? He ought to be careful.

Ray, Worcester MA   October 23rd, 2007 10:24 am ET

I'd like to ask reverend McClurkin a question - did you wake up one day and decide to be straight? I think not. Then why would it be a "choice" for the rest of us?

John, Dallas, TX   October 23rd, 2007 10:25 am ET

People who think sexuality is a "choice" are simply deluding themselves to support their belief system. Homosexuality is as much a "choice" as is heterosexuality - it's an orientation, not a preference.

Understanding that McClurkin is a straight man who at one time was warped by rape helps me to understand his viewpoint, but he needs to understand his is the exception, not the rule: none of the homosexuals I know (including myself) were ever raped or molested in any way, and we were gay from Day 1 - no choice involved.

Corey, Tulsa, OK/Lansing, MI   October 23rd, 2007 10:25 am ET

…. Or maybe I should have read the entire entry ;-) sorry, good work!

DMW, Roeland Park, KS   October 23rd, 2007 10:26 am ET

The problem with many religious people, is that they assume to know what GOD wants. And, they constantly turn to the bible to find a reason to hate and judge others. The God I know does not hate or punish anyone.

I do find it ironic that some black people are discriminatory toward others when they have been hated, enslaved, lynched, called all manner of things, and then they whine the loudest when they feel they are being discounted. So, blacks that discriminate are the biggest hypocrites and they are a disappointment to the rest of us.

The best thing to do in these situations are to turn away from the hatred.

God loves all of us and for all people who are hated (as I can recall many blacks are still hated and people want to kill them), continue to love yourself and do not take personally the hatred of others.

Those that hate, really hate themselves and can not have true love coming from their heart; otherwise, they would allow all of us to live the life fully and freely that GOD gave us by GOD's creation of us.

Jeremy, MARKHAM, ONTARIO   October 23rd, 2007 10:27 am ET

I support Rev. McClurkin's views on the matter. In this ever-increasing politically correct world, it's nice to see people not just going with what is popular thoughts. Hopefully Obama will recognize the need to associate himself with all people, which means people who may not hold politically correct should be given just as much consideration.

Scott Camden,Arkansas   October 23rd, 2007 10:27 am ET

why is it that everyone,except the Christian people have a right to their opinion. Is there no right or wrong anymore? Everyone is entitled to their oopinion,whether they believe it is diverse or perverse to glamorize the homosexual agenda. I agree with the latter……

aj in florida   October 23rd, 2007 10:28 am ET

As a white gay man who has always supported equal rights for blacks, I feel very betrayed by the black leadership in this country. They have tried to separate civil rights for gay people from their struggle.

Edain, New York, New York   October 23rd, 2007 10:31 am ET

First of all, the president of the United States has to represent many different demographs, and many different views. It would be foolish to think that all Democrats are going to agree on everything. You get conflicts when all you have are two major parties to represent you. Gay rights activists and Donnie McClurkin may easily have like interests in Obama.
Furthermore, I think McClurkin should re-evaluate his stance on Gay rights. If he thinks sexuality is a choice, and that somehow can deny one certain rights, he should remember that religion is necessarily as much a choice as sexuality, if not more so.

CL Relf Deltona Florida   October 23rd, 2007 10:32 am ET

This man is a child of God and some of these organizations are more judgemental than any christian will be. If he say God delivered that lifestyle from him then who are they to argue with ALMIGHTY GOD. If that is the only reason they are not endorsing Obama then they have more problems than they think.

A debout supporter of Donnie McClurkin, he has been spreading God's word for years so why should he stop now.

Kim, Sacramento, CA   October 23rd, 2007 10:34 am ET

Let's put the "real" spin on this. If Obama can find common ground with fundamentalist Christians and persuade them to vote for a progressive we are going to have a major shift in our country for the better. The President of the United States works FOR ALL people which means he has to be able to work WITH ALL people - whether he disagrees with part of or all of their belief system.

Thank you CNN for continuing to present balanced and fair reporting of the 2008 elections… (rolls eyes)

Oh yea, McClurkin has performed for the Clintons in the past too.

Wendy, Laurel Md.   October 23rd, 2007 10:36 am ET

Anyone who is familiar with Rev. Donnie McClurkin knows about his 20 yr. personal struggle with homosexuality, prior to his "deliverance?". It is unfortunate that he continues to take an intolerant stand toward a lifestyle that he is intimately familiar with. I appreciate Sen. Obama's willingness to continue articulating his views on the matter, which are much more in line with Christ's.

Deborah, Gastonia NC   October 23rd, 2007 10:36 am ET

Has Barak Obama gone mad? Does he realize by making that statement that he is appealing to every sexual deviate in this country, not to mention enforcing public immorality?
How in the name of God did this country get in such a state? Who in the name of God ever passed legislation for homosexuals? Was it the same sick minded citizens who are allowing middle school children to have birth control pills without parental consent? Wake up America, California is burning, hello….who's gonna be next?
America had better change it's tune regarding the issues concerning Homosexuality and take a step back in time. Once upon a time, laws were in place to deal with homosexuality and those that broke these laws landed in jail. The law was called "Crimes against nature".
What is it going to take for people to come to their senses….the entire country devastated?

Jim Anderson, Baltimore, MD   October 23rd, 2007 10:36 am ET

Rev. McClurkin is not allowed to have an opinion? Where's the evidence that being gay is not a choice? Does the gay minority have so much power then can influence who a presidential candidate is friends with? Does a president HAVE to have all pro-gay friends? This seems ridiculous and I lost respect for Obama for caving so easily.

Mowank Austin, Texas   October 23rd, 2007 10:37 am ET

So it seems he's a closet case. Figures.

David Knowles   October 23rd, 2007 10:38 am ET

Obama should be ashamed. So should Rudy for employing a pedophile priest.

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2007/10/23/giuliani-employs-accused-pedophile-priest/#cont

bob, melbourne, florida   October 23rd, 2007 10:39 am ET

since when is it wrong to express your opinion about your displeasure with someone else's lifestyle..? believe it or not, the majority of people are against homosexuality, and labeling them as being homophobic is simply absurd… being against the state of israel doesn't mean that you're anti-semitic, and being against affirmative action doesn't mean you're a racist or sexist either… they're an individuals personal opinion(s), and they're entitled to them…

Trease Brown Greenville SC   October 23rd, 2007 10:39 am ET

I would like to state that homosexuals.. it against the teaching of the Bible.. God made man and woman not man and man and not woman and woman… you will not make it to heaven unless ye repent.

Tracy,Atlanta,Georgia   October 23rd, 2007 10:40 am ET

Obama is on the LGBT community's side, yeah right. He doesn't believe they're really "equal" seeing how he's anti-same sex marriage.

How long will America stay blind to the fact this logic is bigoted ?

Monte Brown, New York, NY   October 23rd, 2007 10:42 am ET

Donnie McClurkin and the rest of the gay hating hypocrites should learn that sometimes not saying anything at all goes a longer way than shooting his mealy chops and exposing his own insecurities. I didn't think McClurkin was ignorant until he opened his mouth and removed all doubt. Being gay is wonderful, and there are more gay people in this world than one thinks. No one should care about whether people are born gay or if homosexuality is nurtured if they are not gay, and gay people shouldn’t fear some made-up fictional place called hell. The people who wrote negatively in the Holy Books about gays were the biggest gays themselves. Moses was totally gay. Sodom and Gomorrah was a farce. Please don’t tell me that Jesus was not gay. Oh my Gosh. Jesus was totally gay. Deal with it. People who ponder so much about gayness should just come out and enjoy the life, and black men need to stop being so homophobic. Homophobes just look more and more gay. STOP HATING GAY PEOPLE. Please? You just make yourself look gayer. We already know that you are gay. Why is it so important for people who go to church to bash gays? The only candidate who truly believes that homosexuality is not immoral is Hillary Clinton. Obama just say stuff about homophobia in the black community for votes. Obama is playing games and he is not as sincere as Hillary. It is terrible that Obama would even associate with someone who is obviously trapped in the closet. Obama should just quit while he is ahead. Obama is obviously a Republican light to even associate with the likes of self-righteous indignant hypocrite like Donnie McClurkin. Why would Obama even go there? Obama and his team really do not understand much of anything. Hillary Clinton is the most qualified the most experienced candidate and she’s READY TO LEAD.

Bob, Winston-Salem, NC   October 23rd, 2007 10:42 am ET

It is a choice. Show me empirical evidence to the contrary, you can't…

Joanne Urish, Glasford, IL 61533   October 23rd, 2007 10:43 am ET

Why in the heaven's name can't we get beyond such issues as this "Gay" thing and get on with problems that truly need our attention? As for being Gay, Who Cares? I certainly don't! But I do care about the Iraq war and what is happening in that area of the country and my tax dollars being spent to support that war. I do care about Medical needs for Seniors and children, as well as all middle class citizens. How are we (I am 74) expected to pay for the high price of medicine without insurance? Only God can help those without insurance, because the government is doing nothing about it. We need Leadership in Washington and Obama can provide it.
Pleaase don't let this man slip through our fingers. We need him.

Peter   October 23rd, 2007 10:43 am ET

I hope McClurkin goes on with his performance. We are pleased with the Churchs stance as it is backed up by scripture. I am beginning to pay attention to the manner which OBama has been swaying back and forth.

Orange County, CA   October 23rd, 2007 10:43 am ET

'Homosexuals' BEG to be set apart, and love the attention it gives them. They are WHINERS. Whether they're given equal rights or not [which they should so they could SHUT UP and stop WHINING], it will just be another Black vs. White situation, Gay vs. Straight, a constant, ongoing battle throughout the rest of time that involves them complaining about everything.

J, Mobile, Alabama   October 23rd, 2007 10:44 am ET

LEVITICUS 18:22

Larry, Richmond, VA   October 23rd, 2007 10:44 am ET

Is this news? Not everybody in America is going to accept gays. Deal with it. I don't think that they should be any more ostracised than gay people should be.

kevin, crum lynn pa   October 23rd, 2007 10:45 am ET

This is just plain hypocritical. The repubicans openly court evangicals, who have publically stated their oposition to homosexuality in much more severe terms than ever uttered by donnie mcclurkin

Mike, Evansville In   October 23rd, 2007 10:50 am ET

I would not vote for Obama if he were the only one running. Gay is a choice! You are not born gay, just like you are not born fat. I am sorry to say that sooner or later we are going to stop saying I'm proud to be an American. This country is going to Hell! The presidential election this year almost sounds like a joke. We have a Islam, and a Female running for
president. If we as a country voted for Obama who is a Islam to be the president of the United States that would show how stupid we really are as a country. Hillary has already been our president once thru her husband and we know how that turned out. I love my wife and I respect women, but to put a woman incharge of the country would be the wrong thing to do.

DR, Birmingham AL   October 23rd, 2007 10:51 am ET

This is why America suffers moral unrest. We were a nation founded on Godly principles. Now we are a nation that constantly seek to dismiss God, but expect the benefit from God to continue.
If any presidential candidate wants to make a real statement and stand for right, according to the same principles on which this nation was founded, that candidate needs to make it clear: We as a nation must turn back to recognizing Jesus Christ and stop
demoralizing this country because of political and financial affiliations, gain, and recognition.
We need a God-fearing, Holy Bible recognizing, Jesus Christ accepting leader!

Signed:
A real Christian who is tired of this mess the leaders of America refuse to stand up against.

Kay, St. Louis, MO   October 23rd, 2007 10:54 am ET

I am supporting Sen. Obama and I love Mr. McClurkin and feel that he is an anointed individual of God. He is entitled to his opinion and Sen. Obama has stated how he feels about the issue. I don't see an issue, that’s what Sen. Obama's campaign is about stopping divisive issues such as these from us getting to the real issues. We can respectfully disagree AND work together to solve the issues of this country.

Jim, Albany, NY   October 23rd, 2007 10:54 am ET

Hilliary's media crew at work here!

Jim K Austin, TX   October 23rd, 2007 10:55 am ET

Let's see Mr McClurkin expresses his opinon and he's wrong.

The gays say so. Who made them God?

Let the man have his opinion, your constant whining is undermining any respect you may have wanted.

You earn respect, you don't demand it.

Steve, New York   October 23rd, 2007 10:55 am ET

The whole “choice” issue is old and people are seeing through it. All but the anti evolving fundamentalist Christians who’s minds are still in the dark ages. IF it was a choice these Christians must admit they have at lease thought about and contemplated serous thought behind engaging in homosexual acts and chose not to. Which as we all know you do not choose who you are attracted to, just like you can’t choose you’re more attracted to tall blonds and not short red heads. Christians need to stop hiding behind God to spew hate and discrimination. The whole “gay is a sin” is in the Old Testament. It is mentioned less times then adultery. If you are going to take the bible as the word of god YOU MUST take all of it as the word of god. NO PICKING AND CHOOSING what YOU feel God said. It is mentioned more times then homosexuality that you MUST STONE YOUR CHILDREN TO DEATH for misbehaving.

Doug, Portland Oregon   October 23rd, 2007 10:56 am ET

I know that the debates surrounding the GLBT community are strong but I also believe that people should not necessarily severe there connections with people simply because they do not agree on some things. I myself do not believe homosexuality is something you are born with. That disagreement doesn't prevent me from being friends with homosexual people. We may choose to disagree on some things but we learn to tolerate those difference and have a pleasant existence none the less.

I do not agree with Wayne Besen stating that Obama will have to sever his connections with McClurkin in order to win his vote. That in and of itself is a form of discrimination and intolerance. We already know that Obama supports the GLBT community, but he also needs his supporters in the relgious community as well. this makes for a sticky situation, but if we want to see Obama in office then we need to start looking at being more tolerant of differences in order to bring this man into office so he can lessen those things that divide us.

TC Minneapolis MN   October 23rd, 2007 10:56 am ET

Being homosexual isn't a "choice", but being sexually active is. If a person isn't comfortable with their sexuality and doesn't believe that being sexually active with a person of the same sex is "of God", they can choose not to have sex. But it's no different than pre-marital sex. You can make the decision that pre-marital sex is not "of God" either and simply choose not to do it. People just like to act as if homosexuality is the BIGGEST SIN, because it's the one they don't practice, but there are many, many, many sins of the world and none of us knows which one God deems worse than the other. SO be careful about judging. Be very careful.

Walter, Davenport, IA   October 23rd, 2007 10:56 am ET

I don't understand a lot of people. Politicians will never be able to satisfy 100% of the people all of the times, and I wish that they would stop trying. There is nothing wrong with politicians having their own set of values and beliefs. To me, just the fact that both Donnie McClurkin and Obama have seperate views on homosexuality and yet can meet on common grounds is momumentous to me. Too often our leaders are pressured and coerced to parting ways with friends and supporters for different beliefs. What we have to remember is that whoever is elected the next President of this Great Country, they are respresentative of all of the people and not just some. As a Christian, homosexuality goes against my beliefs, but that does not prevent me from treating EVERYONE that I meet with the respect that they deserve. God is the ultimate judge, not me.

Jack Rollason, Youngstown, Ohio   October 23rd, 2007 10:57 am ET

I find it disturbing that CNN offers no unbiased journalistic counter to the gay lobby's assertion that the choice of having sexual relations with a member of your same sex is "false information".

ElcubanitoKC, Kansas City MO   October 23rd, 2007 10:59 am ET

What I think is really hypocritical is that you are willing to give these two a pass on the "issue" because they are both (apparently) Democrats and African Americans.

L Evans   October 23rd, 2007 10:59 am ET

Donnie needs to just stop. He was and still is gay!

Ryan Indianapolis   October 23rd, 2007 10:59 am ET

I am a republican and will not vote for Obama but I will have more respect for the man if he holds his ground against these Gay activists groups. These people want to push all their believes onto others and somebody needs to break it to them although their choices will be respected it will not be crammed down the other 90% percent of americans that are str8 and dont believe it is a choice. Obama stand strong and you will get more respect instead of wilting to these activists like Hillary would.

Tom, NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:00 am ET

While I don't agee with the Rev's views the group opposing him needs to CHILL out. The man is not there to preach or talk policy.

Rev Harold Mayberry who preaches against homosexuality endorsed Hillary does that make her agree with his views?

Sometimes they can be as intolerant as the people they oppose

joseph austin tx   October 23rd, 2007 11:00 am ET

im just glad that a liberal is having to defend himself about this stupid issue. Gay people shut up, there is no law saying that people have to like you or even accept you, dont buy this guys next album. Im not going to vote for barack, but even I realize that he cant control what people who support him are saying. GET OVER YOURSELVES, I love how people cant even say what they want any more without having to explain it to some special interest group.

Fred, Walnut Creek, CA   October 23rd, 2007 11:01 am ET

I believe most people would agree that what an adult does in their bedrooms is nobody's business….but what I DO OBJECT to is that when our children were in California public schools, they were taught there was nothing wrong with homosexuality…it was just an alternative lifestyle. They have NO RIGHT teaching that in public schools.

Sister Toldja-Brooklyn, NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:01 am ET

Donnie Mcclurkin is a textbook closet queen. But it's ridiculous that Obama's "ties" to him are being criticized, given that Obama has made his views quite clear. And the person quoted in the article saying that this could cost him on-the-fence votes is a real piece of work. That's absurd.

Obama 2008   October 23rd, 2007 11:03 am ET

Barack Obama's Official Statement On This Matter:

Statement on Rev. McClurkin
"I have clearly stated my belief that gays and lesbians are our brothers and sisters and should be provided the respect, dignity, and rights of all other citizens. I have consistently spoken directly to African-American religious leaders about the need to overcome the homophobia that persists in some parts of our community so that we can confront issues like HIV/AIDS and broaden the reach of equal rights in this country.

I strongly believe that African Americans and the LGBT community must stand together in the fight for equal rights. And so I strongly disagree with Reverend McClurkin's views and will continue to fight for these rights as President of the United States to ensure that America is a country that spreads tolerance instead of division."
~ Barack Obama
10/22/07

Dave, Cheverly, MD   October 23rd, 2007 11:03 am ET

Obama has said he will not make changes in the Concerts line up and I agree with him. Obama has stated that he will talk with people who disagree with him as well as those who agree with him. What Donnie McClurkins personnel beliefs are on Homosexuality are just that his beliefs. It has nothing to do with McClurkins purpose for the concert event. Which is to entertain those attending. NOT to solve the centuries old human debate on homosexuality. It is one thing I do admire about Bush. How he does not throw out a staff or support person every time someone or the media disagrees with them. Now I also believe Bush holds on way too long to some that clearly needed to go. Bill Clinton was guilty of throwing out staff or supporters at the first sign of someone disagreeing with them. Obama is correct in keeping McClurkin.

Dave H., Fairfax, VA   October 23rd, 2007 11:04 am ET

Obama / Edwards / Hillary

I have never, ever seen such a pathetic, laughable bunch of candidates in my life. Two one-term senators that have no accomplishments of any kind, and a crazy, shrill, divisive woman.

Face it, Dems, Republicans will keep the White House in 2008. Our candidates aren't perfect, but my goodness look at yours! Maybe next time you won't nominate such moronic candidates.

Matt, Kennesaw, GA   October 23rd, 2007 11:04 am ET

Since when it is wrong for someone to be friends with someone who has viewpoints that you disagree with?

Bob Larsen   October 23rd, 2007 11:04 am ET

Since when is saying that there is an element of choice in homosexuality a biased notion. Just because someone beleives there is an element in the choice in the matter does not make them homophobic or even biased. It does not suggest the utter absence of genetic pedisposition, nor does it suggest that homosexual individuals should be treated any different than anyone else.

That gay rights group is engaging in simple bigotry: the are equating "bias" with having any opinion other than their own.

troy, seattle, wa   October 23rd, 2007 11:04 am ET

this is a spiritual battle - it won't be won by political means. does it surprise people that the enemy uses every means at his disposal to push the gay agenda?

Erik   October 23rd, 2007 11:05 am ET

Obama should not drop Donnie Mcclurkin. I have friends who are gay and go to church. Obama can not let any group show kind of a reverse in tolerance themselves. This does not bring the country together. Instead of complaining about Mcclurkin the gay groups should come to the concert, show their presents, sit with him and talk out the issues. This will heal the nation instead of this back and forth of different groups jockeying for power. Some gays have to know that there are people who go to church who don't gay bash. We believe in love thy neighbor. The real question is are the gay groups complaining going to just demand or get involved and work together for change.

Scott, Knoxville, TN   October 23rd, 2007 11:05 am ET

This is all tired rhetoric. Not everyone will always agree on this issue as long as there is religion. I laugh & cry at the same time when I hear someone say that this country was founded on Godly priniciples. I don't need a religion to tell me that killing is wrong, lying is wrong, sleeping with my brother's wife is wrong, or any other number of "Godly principles." This country was founded on the idea that ALL religions are protected under the Constitution. This is NOT a Christian country. This IS a country with a huge Christian lobby. Quit blaspheming your own religion by preaching intolerence.

James Akron, Ohio   October 23rd, 2007 11:05 am ET

I think he (Barack) should pray about it…it's a really sticky issue, all things, even situations like this, have a purpose, there probably is a bigger issue that needs to be discovered…once God is consulted.

Richard Tabuteau, Atlanta, GA   October 23rd, 2007 11:06 am ET

As I've said before, Democrats have a pathological inability to win presidential elections however. The Black evangelical vote is significant in South Carolina. Obama is trailing Clinton by a significant margin there. Appearing with beloved gospel singers may attract more Black support to his campaign. I bet his pollsters and advisors crunched the numbers and realized that this is a great opportunity. Does that mean Obama supports the homophobic sentiments of one of the performers? No. Obama has been a consistent and longtime supporter of gay rights. If he wants to make gains in South Carolina, he will not cancel. I hope Democrats can focus on winning for once.

Rex, Toledo, Ohio   October 23rd, 2007 11:06 am ET

"We need a God-fearing, Holy Bible recognizing, Jesus Christ accepting leader!"

Last I checked we already have one of those.

Dan Blathers, Dublin CA   October 23rd, 2007 11:07 am ET

Sexuality is a choice, and not just for homosexuals. You can always choose whether or not you want to have sex…whether thats with a man, a woman, a child, or anybody/anything else.

The point is, should we make an attempt to foster good morals in this country or should we not. Apparently those on the political left say because nobody is perfect we should not, else we might hurt their feelings.

Yes nobody is perfect, but that doesn't mean we should just give up and do whatever we want. Countless scientific studies have shown that leads to a variety of social/economic problems.

Zack, NJ   October 23rd, 2007 11:08 am ET

Why is this news. I'm sure Hillary's got other anti-gay supporters. Besides, McClurkin, a hypocrite himself (come on, he's an "ex-gay". Puh-leeze), is just one of the performers. He's not there to preach his views. Now if he goes on stage and sings anti-gay rhetoric and it was planned by the campaign that's another story.

This is just another lame attempt to smear Obama. What about those shady Chinatown deals the Hillary campaign involved in?

If anything this is a great attempt by the Obama camp to include everyone with different viewpoints. Perhaps McClurkin will get some real enlightenment one day.

Dan, Seattle, WA   October 23rd, 2007 11:09 am ET

Thank God the likes of Mike isn't running for political office! And Mike, somebody who practices Islam is not "a Islam" but rather a Muslim. Oh, and Obama converted to Christianity years ago.

Get your facts straight before you start opening your mouth. Or you can keep on talking and look like a total idiot.

Angela, Alexandria, VA   October 23rd, 2007 11:11 am ET

"We have a Islam, and a Female running for president." -MIKE Evansville In

What does,"we have a islam" mean? Do you mean we have a MUSLIM?? That's like saying…we have a Christianity. First off, Obama is not Muslim, secondly, so what if he was? THIRD…go back to the 5th grade.

Richard Tabuteau, Atlanta, GA   October 23rd, 2007 11:11 am ET

Another thing. People who keep saying "he lost my vote" over this and that should consider this: If you're not a registered voter in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Florida, or Nevada, his campaign and the others don't really care.

Matt Happeard, NY, New York   October 23rd, 2007 11:12 am ET

People who write idiotic things like the Bible says to "stone your kids to death" show they haven't read the Bible and do not understand the difference between the Old and New Testaments. Go to church for awhilw before you write something so stupid. And—Are the gays now saying that anyone who feels homosexuality is a choice is now "antigay"?

W. Blacklick, Ohio   October 23rd, 2007 11:12 am ET

Barack Obama does not practice Islam.

Atlanta, GA   October 23rd, 2007 11:12 am ET

Wow- all this hate coming from supposedly compassionate Christians. This kind of rethoric is disgusting, this was NOT a Christian Nation it was a religiously free nation, the founding fathers founded the nation based on Slavery too, and women being 2nd class citezins, should we get back to those 'fundamental' beliefs as well?

Shut up and go back to you close minded, hate mongering, and narrow minded view of the world somewhere else.

Angry Democrat, Gaithersburg, MD   October 23rd, 2007 11:12 am ET

This is the second blunder in the gay rights arena for this campaign. The first being the CNN/Youtube debate, where Obama, an African American attorney, endorsed a "Seperate but equal" status for gay marriages.

Shame, Mr. Obama. You were my hope early on, I even donated $25 to the exploratory committee, before noon Eastern from Arizona, on the day it was formed. You and the rest of the Democratic Party continue to dissapoint me, a former Congressional staffer and attorney.

Greg, Waverly, NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:14 am ET

Homosexuality is a sin. Sin is a choice. Why do special interest groups that promote gay and lesbian sex have any say in our political process? Shame on the left wing liberal media for giving these idiots a platform to promote a sinful adgenda.

Steve, Montgomery, AL   October 23rd, 2007 11:14 am ET

Mike, people like you are the reason why there should be an IQ test to determine elgibility to vote. Your comments are blatantly ignorant and symbolize everything thats wrong with this country. They're on Obama's case because Mr McClurkin said that gay was a choice. So come up with another excuse for why you wont vote for Obama.

On to the topic at hand, I really dont understand the problem that gays have with McClurkins comments. He said that homosexuality is a matter of choice. Well he's just stating his opinion, he didnt bash them, and he didnt condemn them to hell like some of these so called "religious right" hypo…I mean people.

J. Benson, Tampa FL   October 23rd, 2007 11:16 am ET

Why is a gospel artist supporting a candidate who openly states he will pursue creating constitutional rights for people based on who they want to have sex with?

People who believe the laws of this country should be based on Godly principles deserve the same respect as those who want the laws to be based on no principles at all.

AJ; Montpelier, VT   October 23rd, 2007 11:17 am ET

Most of the comments on this subject are just plain stupid. The hatred and bigotry should give everyone some clue as to the writers character. I'm sure these nazi like people would just as soon see all gays rounded up and exterminated. What good "Christians" you all are.

out for barack   October 23rd, 2007 11:17 am ET

Wayne Besen, if you read these comments, you will realize that you are just hurting your own cause.

People who are on the fence about gay rights are going to see what you are doing and think that the gay community is a bunch of cry-baby whiners.

Kate, Aurora CO   October 23rd, 2007 11:17 am ET

While I agree in equal rights for all I am personally tired of the candidates being asked, no rather demanded, to curtail and curtsey to every single group in America. It is ridiculous. This man is not preaching hate or intolerance. He is simply stating an opinion. So what if his opinion differs from many? As long as he does not advocate violence or intollerance of homosexuals than seriously what is the big deal? I'm sorry Gay people but you are not the most important issue right now. We have a war going on that is taking the lives of our young men & women, we have out of control spending and debt, we have a government relying heavily on China for goods, Iran, threat of nuclear war…etc etc…take a seat and relax. You are no more important than the rest of us and again this guy is not promoting violence or advocating intollorance.

Steve, Lewisville TX   October 23rd, 2007 11:17 am ET

I totally agree with Mr. McClurkin…I can choose to or not to have sex (period). Why do liberals (generally) believe in a solo Darwinist philosophy, but throw it out the window when it comes to sexuality. There is no place for homosexuality in a truly evolutionary ideology (Darwinism), yet the hypocritical nature of this premise (i.e. being born homosexual-contradicting Darwinisim) goes unchallenged. Amazing!

Bill, Terrace, BC   October 23rd, 2007 11:18 am ET

Obama will lose far more votes by caving to the gay activist agenda than by not. The Reverend's comments were not homophobic. He doesn't hate gays. He simply believes sexuality is a choice. To the extent that we respond in a way we choose to tendencies stemming from genetics and the environment, he is right.

Nick, Bellingham, WA   October 23rd, 2007 11:18 am ET

Mike from Evansville,

Its exactly those kind of ignorant, hateful comments that will send this country to hell. In that one short paragraph, you managed to spew hatred about women, gays, and muslims. What exactly is "a islam"? I don't know if you actually read they article above, but Obama belongs to the United Church of Christ.

You are the type of person that would make me embarassed to be an American; not gays, not women, not muslims.

I know I am not going to change your mind about anything, but maybe next time you can keep your bigotry to yourself.

TOM   October 23rd, 2007 11:20 am ET

Obama should cut his ties to this "christian" jerk. Jesus taught LOVE not redneck ignorance! … and for those who declare that being gay is a "choice", THEY must be GAY to know! Spare me your hypocrisy!

eric Lakeville, MN   October 23rd, 2007 11:21 am ET

If Obama were to be the first person to stand up to these extremely small radical groups who want to choose with whom he is affiliated I would definitely vote for him.

I'm tired of the outspoken groups being seen as the voice of the American people. Polls show that the majority of people in this country do not accept homosexuality as being normal.

This country was founded on the word of God. To allow a small group of individuals, however outspoken they are, to change the direction and moral compass of this country is criminal.

The United States is on a precipace and is facing a situation not unlike the fall of Rome. God-fearing people in this country need to stand up and be heard. Stop giving audience to the radical groups who target our moral beliefs.

Herb Conner, White Plains, MD   October 23rd, 2007 11:21 am ET

I get really (really) tired of the continued misuse of the word "homophobia." A phobia is an irrational fear of something. Having a different opinion on what homosexuality is does not constitute fear. It also does not constitute intolerance. What the homosexual community does by continuing to brand those with differing opinions "homophobic" is, by it's nature, intolerant.

Wayne, Greenville TX   October 23rd, 2007 11:21 am ET

I would not vote for Obama if he were the only one running. Gay is a choice! You are not born gay, just like you are not born fat. I am sorry to say that sooner or later we are going to stop saying I'm proud to be an American. This country is going to Hell! The presidential election this year almost sounds like a joke. We have a Islam, and a Female running for
president. If we as a country voted for Obama who is a Islam to be the president of the United States that would show how stupid we really are as a country. Hillary has already been our president once thru her husband and we know how that turned out. I love my wife and I respect women, but to put a woman incharge of the country would be the wrong thing to do.

Posted By Mike, Evansville In : October 23, 2007 10:50 am

We're all born totally ignorant. And people like Mike here keep that ignorance all their lives.

FYI, Mike, followers of Islam are called "Muslims". It's amazing how foolish that one post makes you look…..

thehypocrit   October 23rd, 2007 11:21 am ET

WE CAN NOT TOLERATE ANYONE THAT DOES NOT ACCEPT GAY RIGHTS!

Shane - Atlanta Ga   October 23rd, 2007 11:22 am ET

I would rather have a outed gay president then a child molesting/perverted republican anyday..

Richard Simmons for PRESIDENT 2008…

Does your church have a ATM yet? What next DIRECT DEPOSIT? Watch ZEITGEISST.COM

Terry, El Paso, TX   October 23rd, 2007 11:23 am ET

What is the controversy here? McClurkin, a gospel singer and presumably faithful Christian, believes that sexuality is a choice and that people can choose to be hetero rather than homo. Most gay rights folks believe that sexuality is programmed into a person by genetics.

Which of the two positions is correct? Probably both of them. I had the opportunity to observe a younger relative grow up gay, and I believe she was gay from the womb. Her siblings are all straight arrows and their upbringing was substantially the same.

On the other hand, I have friends who find members of either gender to be sexually attractive, and they choose same-sex or opposite-sex partners with indifference as to gender.

I have other friends and relatives who grew up straight, never varied as near as I can tell, and remain straight in old age.

So what? Let us say that sexuality is a matter of taste. I like broccoli but I don't like carrots. Does that mean I have to stay hidden in the broccoli closet all my life? I like girls for sex but I'm not so fond of boys. With a name like Terry, that could mean that I'm straight or gay. Does that make my comment any smarter or any stupider?

If McClurkin is a gospel singer, I presume he is pretty serious about Christianity. There are some theological problems that can be avoided IF he believes as he does that sexuality is a choice rather than a sentence imposed by God on a newborn child. Most of us choose to believe things that do not contradict other things that we believe.

Reginald Wynn, Phoenix, AZ   October 23rd, 2007 11:23 am ET

Let us have a moment of clarity. Every Christian should share McClurkin's views as they were stated, "I don't believe in discriminating against homosexuals and It's not what God intended". This is not homophobic, nor does he state to shun gays. I am actually disappointed in Obama's response to this for he assumed that McClurkin is not for equal rights and tolerance. His response was the rapid news bite that simple unintelligent people desired to initiate controversy. This should not have been a story at all unless specific details have been omitted to change the facts presented.

Melissa, Texas   October 23rd, 2007 11:23 am ET

Since when is he not entitled to his own opinion. Each has a right to their beliefs, whether or not we agree with them. As long as they're not hate-filled rhetoric inciting violence. He's stating what he believes but that what people do is their own business. Since when is this wrong?

Buzz Daly, Monterey Bay, California   October 23rd, 2007 11:23 am ET

Leviticus is an ABOMINATION, and, those who use it as a guide condone murder. You are sick folks. Also, there is no evidence whatsoever, anywhere, anytime, in any age that any "godfigure" exists. Therefore, you are basing your life on a myth, which is fine, but, please stop trying to foist your ignorant ideas on others–especially when they condone murdering a fellow human. This is not a christian country. The Constitution mentions religion ONCE, and, that is to forbid it as a test for public office. You folks need to grow up and quit playing make-believe and take responsibility for your addled ideas that effect the lives of others.

Peter Smythe Phoenix, AZ   October 23rd, 2007 11:24 am ET

I'm a gay guy. Been so since I don't know when — before I can remember. Choice or genetics? Who knows.
What I can say is if someone offered me a blue pill to make me straight and a red pill to keep me the way I am; I'd choose the blue pill in a second.

'Nuff said. I applaud McClurkin though; there's more to running this country than Guns, God, Gays, Gynecology and Gestation. Its because we've been obsessed with the 5G's that we have the leadership crisis we are in today. I'm refreshed that McGurkin can see beyond these issues to endorse a non-RR candidate.

Lance, Nashville, TN   October 23rd, 2007 11:24 am ET

"I have consistently spoken directly to African-American religious leaders about the need to overcome the homophobia that persists…"

Ah, so now Obama begins to show his true heart. Although since he claims to be a member of the United Church of Christ (which prides itself on being an "open and affirming denomination") I am not a bit surprised.

Unfortunately (for Obama), his beliefs are are clearly contrary to the word of God as we read about in such verses as Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:18, Romans 1:26, I Corinthians 6:9, and others. I suppose you can label me as "homophobic" — as I am truly afraid for the souls of the homosexuals who do not heed God's commands.

The question remains for Obama and millions of other individuals who claim with their mouths to be Christians: Are you going to submit to the will of God or are you trying to make the will of God submit to your own life?

It is evident that Barack Hussein Obama has chosen the latter.

Mike, Cleveland, OH   October 23rd, 2007 11:25 am ET

I find it laughable that those who say homosexuality is 'choice' aren't gay themselves. If you are gay and you believe that you were 'born' gay then nothing any one says can take that belief away. Marriage is an institution that has historical ties with religion. I don't know of any religion that allows gay marriages. But most governments in the world allow Civil Marriages. Many people choose to be married in a secular ceremony for various reasons.
If you are against gay marriage for religious reasons, fine by me. However, most people don't conduct their lives so devout and piously. I think we need to make religion a private matter for all people. Stop trying to convert people. Think of how few wars would be fought and how many people would be alive if religion didn't play such a big role in our lives.

All of the gay people that I know have stated that they were born that way. To my knowledge, there is no conclusive proof of a biological factor that makes a person gay or straight. Regardless, I see no reason for why the same rights conferred upon to straight couples cannot also be applied to gay couples in a civil marriage. I do not see gay marriage as a new right. As long as two people love each other, they should be allowed to marry monogamously in a civil union.

What about documented acts of homosexuality in the animal kingdom?
How do we treat the animals who are
'Wrong'? Who are you to decide what is right or wrong?

People who quote the Bible to make points, keep forgetting that the Bible doesn't govern the country, the constitution does.

Frankie, Eureka California   October 23rd, 2007 11:26 am ET

Personally, I think for some individuals homosexuality is a choice, and for others, homosexuality is not a choice. As for McClurkin, I don't see how he can be viewed or labeled as being "anti-gay" if he supports the equal treatment of homosexuals.

Nina, Atlanta, GA   October 23rd, 2007 11:28 am ET

I loved Obama before I found out that he stated same-sex union is equal to marriage. That is sad and unGodly to try to cater to gay groups just for votes. God made Adam/Eve, NOT Adam & Steve. Obama has LOST MY VOTE with this…He has no backbone to stand up to gay activists and speak the truth.Why does he have to strongly disagree with Donnie. Obama should have defended Donnie's or anyone's right to have their own opinion. I am a AA woman that was so strongly behind Obama, I am sad to have to part with him.

Julian, Stamford, CT   October 23rd, 2007 11:28 am ET

If you looked at every donor of every candidate they would probably have one that is homophobic. And compared to some of the evangelical talk coming from Republicans, MccClurkin is tame. ANd Mike(from Evansville),that was probably the most disgusting comment posted. I do oppose Hilary a bit, but it has NOTHING to do with her gender. And Obama isn't Islamic, and i don't care about his religous beliefs as long as he keeps them to himself

Dave, Cheverly, MD   October 23rd, 2007 11:28 am ET

I am Not condoning the Gay issue. But, why don’t Besen and all Gays just go to the Concert? Since Besen is on the Fence about who to vote for and Gays believe they would not enjoy the event and some churchgoers believe they may feel uncomfortable in the presents of Gays and Donnie McClurkin just wants to entertain. Just ALL go and you ALL may come away enlightened. UNITY NOT DIVISION PEOPLE!

Harold, Los Angeles, CA   October 23rd, 2007 11:30 am ET

When will the Gay lobby show some tolerance for the belief's of others?

This is diveristy in action. The Gay & Lesbian lobby should be celebrating the diverse views of others.

markus, Boston MA   October 23rd, 2007 11:31 am ET

I can't believe what I'm reading in these comments!

I don't know what was funnier, the guy who commented that "Obama is Islam", and that it would be wrong for a woman to run the country, and that gay is as much a choice as being fat…OR the guy who laughed at the Democrat candidates and called them moronic (be cause the GOP candidates are looking SOOOO good right now! LOL)

and they say the media is liberal-slanted???

What really scares me is the gross extent of how OUT-OF-TOUCH Conservatives are!

Straight but not narrow. Franklin Lakes NJ   October 23rd, 2007 11:31 am ET

So homosexuality is a choice? So there must be heterosexual people who wake up one day and say "I think I'll be gay so I can be treated as a second class citizen and if I'm really lucky, maybe someone will tie me to a fence and beat the life out of me. Wow! What a great idea".

The people who believe homosexuality is a choice are, I would guess, not gay. So how would they know if it's a choice or not? The American Psychiatric Assoc. says it's not a choice and I sure they've researched it beyond what it supposedly says in the bible.

It seems all these gay-bashers need a life. Maybe you need to pray and ask why you're so afraid of gays. And besides, someone's sexual preference is no one else's business.

M.D. In   October 23rd, 2007 11:32 am ET

WOW Hussein must have forgoten what party he's with… imagine a democrate with a moral conscience…OHHHH my ALA what is happening to the party quick someone GET SENATOR KENNEDY TO TAKE THIS GUY OUT DRINKIN SO WE DONT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ANY MORE OF THESE MORAL THINGS.. in case anyone has forgotten being GAY is still morally wrong no matter how you try to justify it…thats why Democrates support it and abortion and anything else thats wrong to GOD… so you people reap what ya sow. and quit complaining Fools

DR, Birmingham AL   October 23rd, 2007 11:33 am ET

Someone define "Gay". The last time I looked, the word meant "happy". Now we have a "new definition", the socially accepted version.

Let me state plainly: Jesus Christ loves everybody Regardless, and just because he loves everybody, it does NOT mean everything everyone does is acceptable. We as people seem to look for "loop-holes" in God's plan for man-kind. But be informed, there are no loop-holes

All-in-all, the issue and article is not really about people proclaiming "gay-dom". This issue is one that overwhelmingly affects every single person in America, because we are subject to the decisions of this countrys' decision makers.

Quote:
"It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of an angry God"

Gideon, St.Paul, Minnesota   October 23rd, 2007 11:33 am ET

CNN get a life and start reporting on some real issues

Monte Brown, New York, NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:34 am ET

No one is going to hell because some trapped-in-the-closet, homophobes says so. I am not surprised that Obama would align himself with haters and homophobes. Gay people and all rational minded free thinkers should just vote for Hillary Clinton. She is way more qualified than Obama. Obama is just aiding and abetting the Republicans. Hillary Clinton was the only candidate to publicly say that homosexuality is not immoral.

Laura, Chicago, IL   October 23rd, 2007 11:34 am ET

Mike's uneducated post is made more ignorant by his last statement.

David, Arlington, VA   October 23rd, 2007 11:34 am ET

Ok, before I even get to the point of this post, I need to respond to some of the bigotry and misinformation that others here have shared with us. First, J in Mobile mentions Leviticus, which preaches against homosexuality. Of course, it also preaches against a host of other things, such as touching the skin of a pig, so I trust J is also morally opposed to football (you know, so he's not a blatant hypocrit). Mike in Evansville, being gay is NOT a choice. Personally, if it were, I would choose to be gay because it's who I am, it's how I was born, and I've accepted myself and love who I am. Homosexuality, like heterosexuality, is a genetic trait that we're born with. More and more scientists say so, so if you're a scientist, please offer your reasons for dissent. If not, then I don't see how you're qualified to say it's a choice. After all, I don't think you chose to be attracted to women; you just were. Also, the term isn't "a Islam," it's Muslim, but that's a moot point because Obama is Christian. You have to be pretty ignorant to assume he's Muslim just because of his name. And you have to be just plain stupid to think that a Muslim or a woman would be unqualified to be president because of their religion or gender. DR in Birmingham, I'm not sure what you mean by "Godly principles," but we were founded as a secular nation (you know, that whole separation of church and state, First Amendment thing). And last I checked, our current "God-fearing, Holy Bible recognizing, Jesus Christ accepting" leader has been one of the worst presidents in our country's history.

In regards to the actual point of this post, while, as a gay man, Mr. McClurkin's views make me uncomfortable, he certainly has a right to them. As long as he does not preach hate and intolerance, seeks to bring people together, and believes in equal rights, then there should be room for common ground, which Sen. Obama seems to have found. At the end of the day, equal rights for ALL Americans are what we should be focusing on.

Kalia   October 23rd, 2007 11:35 am ET

Grow up……..quite a few people in my circle do not agree with the life styles or opinions of others, but that does not mean that I am going to stop liking or associating with them because of it. After all this is AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!

Carol, Petersburg, IL   October 23rd, 2007 11:35 am ET

I'm guessing some measure of free speech still exists in this county and Obama obviously supports a voter's right to it. How or why should McClurkin's "choice vs. birth" aspect of homosexuality be seen as a poor reflection on Obama? It's tolerance in action.

Matthew   October 23rd, 2007 11:35 am ET

Also see Romans 1:24-27
This world is so afriad of offending the gay community. Jesus be with us.

Dave, Portland, OR   October 23rd, 2007 11:35 am ET

Being queer is a choice. What happened to our free speach?

robert, rochester NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:36 am ET

"gay is a choice!"
"you are not born fat"
"to put a woman in charge would be the wrong thing to do"

It is hard to believe that in the 21st century, in one of the most advanced nations in the world, this sort of ignorance still exists.

Maybe he's right…being gay or fat is nothing more than a life choice, women and minorities should not be given power (respect them but don't give them any power), and we need white Christian men running the country. Everyone else should move to Canada or learn their place.

Eric, San Francisco, CA   October 23rd, 2007 11:38 am ET

For those of you that insist that being gay is a "choice". I assure you that it's not. If you're straight, do you recall making a conscious choice to be that way? I didn't wake up one day and choose to be gay, just like you didn't wake up one day and choose to be straight.

Joseph   October 23rd, 2007 11:38 am ET

Okay I have something to say but I'm straying from the political argument. When every gay/lesbian says that homosexuality is not a choice, but just how we end up… and every straight opposed of the gay life says that it is a choice… there's a problem. Who would know better? The straight or the gay?

Who would be able to give an honest answer… an answer from experience? Geez

Greg, NY, NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:38 am ET

If we as a country voted for Obama who is a Islam to be the president of the United States that would show how stupid we really are as a country.

Posted By Mike, Evansville In : October 23, 2007 10:50 am

Mike, this one sentence shows how stupid you really are as a person.

First of all, it would be a Muslim, not a Islam. Second, Obama isn't even a Muslim, he is a Christian. Research…

Joe, UNK   October 23rd, 2007 11:38 am ET

Homosexuality was considered deviant behavior by the APA before the 70s, until the liberals forced their socialist agenda on most of academia. Now, it suddenly became recognized as an acceptable alternative lifestyle. If it's acceptable to push your gay beliefs off on society, where is everyone else's right to free speech condemning immoral and disgusting behavior?

CAMERON, ROANOKE, VA   October 23rd, 2007 11:39 am ET

HMMM. I WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THE GENTLEMEN NAMED RYAN FROM INDIANAPOLIS. NOBODY IS PUSHING "ANYTHING" DOWN YOUR THROAT. AND I AM PRETTY SURE 90% OF OUR POPULATION ISN'T STR8. NOBODY NEEDS TO BREAK ANYTHING TO ANYONE OTHER THEN TO TELL PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO GET A LIFE. IF YOU AREN'T AFFECTED BY IT, LEAVE IT ALONE. IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO HIDE, LEAVE IT ALONE. THIS HAS GONE ON FOR WAY TOO LONG AND IT'S PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO KEEP THIS MESS GOING.

Jack, Austin, TX   October 23rd, 2007 11:39 am ET

This isn't just Obama trying to include everyone, McClurkin has declared "war" on gay people and he has some pretty nasty quotes.

It doesn't help Obama to completly allienate gay people like this, and he doesn't need such a distraction from his message of tollerance up there representing him. Obama demands that intellerant people in other's camps are fired but yet imbraces this one because he can maybe get a little mileage and money out of him.

Hope may be audacious, but this behaviour is mindboggling. Also for all the Republicans saying "yea, stand up to the gay agenda!" that strategy doesn't work for a Democratic candidate. we are a very vocal part of the base that he himself helped construct.

Brenda, Annapolis MD   October 23rd, 2007 11:39 am ET

This is what I truly like about America–the FREEDOM to hold different opinions, thoughts, values, ideals, customs, etc. However, others insist that their way is right. Who made this so?

Mike from Evansville, IN and DR from Birmingham, AL are both steadfast in their convictions. While both seem to KNOW they're right, they aren't right to everyone. For instance, I disagree with Mike that we have to maintain our infatuation with white supremacy. I believe that things change, and we shouldn't put these "conditions" on the position of president that only fit a fraction of the populace. Isn't that prejudice? As for DR, I disagree that we are a nation founded on "Godly principles"–we are a nation whose foundation can be attributed to (mostly) intolerance. Not to mention, the founding fathers had enough foresight to seperate church and state for a reason. There were a number of different religions seeking refuge in this country; how can you tell them they all have to spiritually believe the same thing? Don't we all have our own souls/spirits? Personal beliefs are just that–personal.

I will never agree with these two as I'm sure they will never agree with me. I have factual evidence to support my opinions as I hope they have factual evidence to support their's (all GOOD opinions are supported by fact rather than by heresay). We can all agree to disagree, and we all have that right. THAT is what is truly wrong with this country; not the lack of religious values or the sex/race of those running for office. We all need to accept others for their differences because that is the only true way to prevent this country from "going to Hell". Being intolerant of those who are intolerable does not make you tolerant.

Academic, Cape Town, South Africa   October 23rd, 2007 11:41 am ET

I still think its laughable that the U.S. is still floundering around in the stone age with its indoctrinated perspective of biblical law. Why is it so difficult to accept and embrace diversity?

I grew up in rural Indiana and during that time I was spoonfed lies disguised as nationalist pride depicting the U.S. as the greatest nation on earth. Now you are leaderless and struggling in the shadow of economic power-house's like
the European Union and China.

Acceptance of diversity is one of the first steps towards social modernity…

Matt H. Nash-vegas or Naville Tn   October 23rd, 2007 11:41 am ET

Who cares?… Not me, gay people are gay who cares whether its a choice or not? It's simply a matter of opinion it can't be solved so drop it.It's a waste of time, and if Obama is smart he wouldn't let this get into his campaining because it will show that he stands firm on his decisions and is willing to deal with the consequences. Something our present President lacks as a quality.

Fitz, Chicago, IL   October 23rd, 2007 11:42 am ET

Obama, YIKES! What were you thinking to attach yourself to something or someone like this??!! I am a young college educated gay professional & taxpayer living in Obama's homecity and being black has always been the hardest part of being gay. Black communities (of which Ive never felt a part) have this overwhelming notion that gay people are evil, or morally corrupt. It's ironic how many black Americans can take a stand against homosexuality, but wont make a real unified stand on the educationally unprepared black youth in our communities, or on cleaning up untidy, unsafe, gang-infested neighborhoods.
As a religious figure, McClurkin should've never been given a platform of this magnitude. As far as I'm concerned he is irrelevant. It would be like Britney Spears being taken seriously if she were to make comments on our relationship with Iran. Religion has clouded politics for years. Obama needs to be CLEAR on his stance on several important pressing issues (i.e. healthcare access & delivery, our growing deficit) in order for me to vote for him. Until black America "gets it" and stops blaming "other" people for our lingering problems, HIV/AIDS, gun violence, poverty, and the like will continue to be our undoing.

Rafi Mittlefehldt, New York, NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:42 am ET

Mike from Evansville: I think you should use the Google to do a bit more research on a Islam.

LM, Somerset, NJ   October 23rd, 2007 11:43 am ET

Let's see:

Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient - Romans 1:24-28

Seems like Donnie has a good grasp on scripture (or a bad grasp on the scripture revisionist philosophy of many contemporary "churches") $.02

mark, lanham, maryland   October 23rd, 2007 11:43 am ET

Why is it that gay people are so afraid when someone speak out against their lifestyle? Homophobia??? Fear of what? How can you say that I am afraid of your lifestyle? The bottom line is that two men sleeping together and two women sleeping together is wrong ! it is nasty, nasty, nasty. No I will not apologize, so don't ask…..

Seam, Philly PA   October 23rd, 2007 11:44 am ET

First of all, we all have links to people that have different views. Not everyone will share the same views, no matter what. This is a non-issue.

Shaylor Branch, Rockwall, Texas   October 23rd, 2007 11:44 am ET

Anyone who clearly lives a sinful life and is comfortable in that sin is against the truth. For God created male and female as one. Sexuality is not a rightful choice, if that choice is not the order of our ALMIGHTY GOD.
God forbid.

We can love all but we do not approve of one another’s wrongful life style.

Love your sister-in-Christ

Shaylor

Tony, Rochester NY   October 23rd, 2007 11:46 am ET

The entire debate about it being a choice or not is counterproductive, because it implies were it a choice it would be the wrong one. Quite frankly it does not matter if it is wrong or not, the country was founded on live and let live principles. As long as what you are doing is not harming me or others, I do not care what you choose to do. Once we get back to that, we can stop letting politicians use stupid wedge issues like homosexuality, abortion, and "socialized" whatever to detract from the fact that they are all lying politicians at the end of the day.

Matt R   October 23rd, 2007 11:46 am ET

Lest we forget who is the one actually running to be the presidential candidate:
Obama is for equal rights