<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton booed at Edwards rally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Santosh</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116953</link>
		<dc:creator>Santosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116953</guid>
		<description>If Hillary is really going to the center for the general election, I hope she also corrects herself on trade like Bill Clinton did and shows that she really does support the trade agreements with N. Korea, Peru, Panama and Columbia and stops criticizing NAFTA and CAFTA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hillary is really going to the center for the general election, I hope she also corrects herself on trade like Bill Clinton did and shows that she really does support the trade agreements with N. Korea, Peru, Panama and Columbia and stops criticizing NAFTA and CAFTA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116925</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116925</guid>
		<description>Those of you who say that John Edwards only can critisize hillary, clearly has not heard his speeches. I have watched him in many debates and speeches and he has a lot to say on every single issue possible. He has every right to distance himself from other oppenents. If hillary decided to make that desicion he is completely allowed to disagree with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who say that John Edwards only can critisize hillary, clearly has not heard his speeches. I have watched him in many debates and speeches and he has a lot to say on every single issue possible. He has every right to distance himself from other oppenents. If hillary decided to make that desicion he is completely allowed to disagree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave, Alpharetta GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116694</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave, Alpharetta GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116694</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;What will Edwards be doing once he loses in the primaries AGAIN?&lt;/b&gt;  Do you think he will finally just GO HOME and leave us alone already?

Sorry John, you are no RFK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>What will Edwards be doing once he loses in the primaries AGAIN?</b>  Do you think he will finally just GO HOME and leave us alone already?</p>
<p>Sorry John, you are no RFK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David, Brooklyn New York</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116637</link>
		<dc:creator>David, Brooklyn New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116637</guid>
		<description>OBAMA, WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!
DO YOU KNOW WHY??
DESPITE THE MEDIA&#039;S NEGATIVE PUSH ON OBAMA,
THE PEOPLE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF THE SAME &quot;GOOD OL BOY&quot; POLITICS. AND WILL COME OUT AND VOTE. I PERSONALLY KNOW MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT VOTED IN THE PAST AND NOW WILL VOTE FOR OBAMA.
HE SEEMS TO REPRESENT REAL POSITIVE CHANGE,AND WILL CHALLENGE THE WAYS OF THE WASHINGTON MACHINE.***MONEY WILL NO LONGER RULE**** THE PEOPLE WILL RULE**** AMEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBAMA, WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!<br />
DO YOU KNOW WHY??<br />
DESPITE THE MEDIA'S NEGATIVE PUSH ON OBAMA,<br />
THE PEOPLE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF THE SAME "GOOD OL BOY" POLITICS. AND WILL COME OUT AND VOTE. I PERSONALLY KNOW MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT VOTED IN THE PAST AND NOW WILL VOTE FOR OBAMA.<br />
HE SEEMS TO REPRESENT REAL POSITIVE CHANGE,AND WILL CHALLENGE THE WAYS OF THE WASHINGTON MACHINE.***MONEY WILL NO LONGER RULE**** THE PEOPLE WILL RULE**** AMEN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uriew, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116592</link>
		<dc:creator>Uriew, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116592</guid>
		<description>A DEMOCRAT,
Shows how foolish you are, to make such a statement about Obama. What, he is foolish coz he is challenging the Clintons something that needs GUTS? Is he foolish coz he is young and challenging the OLD politics? Is he foolish coz he is BLACK, Cmon just say it stop hiding your racist feelings! I would take it as a compliment if someone called me a dreamer, coz you know what DREAMS make the world progress. It is coz someone had a dream that it is possible for you to sit in front of your computer spewing all that BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A DEMOCRAT,<br />
Shows how foolish you are, to make such a statement about Obama. What, he is foolish coz he is challenging the Clintons something that needs GUTS? Is he foolish coz he is young and challenging the OLD politics? Is he foolish coz he is BLACK, Cmon just say it stop hiding your racist feelings! I would take it as a compliment if someone called me a dreamer, coz you know what DREAMS make the world progress. It is coz someone had a dream that it is possible for you to sit in front of your computer spewing all that BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleophus,  Birmingham, AL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116484</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleophus,  Birmingham, AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116484</guid>
		<description>We democrats need to get tough on Iran and thier threat to society. Clinton made the right vote.  Once Iran begins turns aggressive; and they will. We will have the means to militarily take out the nuclear threat before we are all blown away.  Go Clinton! Way to win the general election!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We democrats need to get tough on Iran and thier threat to society. Clinton made the right vote.  Once Iran begins turns aggressive; and they will. We will have the means to militarily take out the nuclear threat before we are all blown away.  Go Clinton! Way to win the general election!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk S., Fruitland, IA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116427</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk S., Fruitland, IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116427</guid>
		<description>Once again, the Democratic Party is going out of its way to lose an election.  If you think that the Republicans don&#039;t already have 3 or 4 scandals ready for page 1, and 6 or 7 girls who know Bill ready for Inside Edition, you are dumber than I think you are.  Not only that, look at the profiles of HRC and Rudy.  They are almost identical. (I&#039;m not talking about the knee-jerk proposals coming out now that she has no intention of implementing).  Rudy will scare women, HRC will scare men, and thr Republicans will win the White House and at least one house of congress. Hillary and Bill are the coattails the right-wingers need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, the Democratic Party is going out of its way to lose an election.  If you think that the Republicans don't already have 3 or 4 scandals ready for page 1, and 6 or 7 girls who know Bill ready for Inside Edition, you are dumber than I think you are.  Not only that, look at the profiles of HRC and Rudy.  They are almost identical. (I'm not talking about the knee-jerk proposals coming out now that she has no intention of implementing).  Rudy will scare women, HRC will scare men, and thr Republicans will win the White House and at least one house of congress. Hillary and Bill are the coattails the right-wingers need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A DEMOCRAT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116385</link>
		<dc:creator>A DEMOCRAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116385</guid>
		<description>Most Americans DO NOT care if we have a man or a woman in the white house as long as it is a Democrat. Let me remind you again, the DEMOCRATS are for all people, especially the common people. They will help us, not harm us. So Hillary is the most rational of all the Dem candidates. Obama is a dreamer and an opportunist. A very foolish man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Americans DO NOT care if we have a man or a woman in the white house as long as it is a Democrat. Let me remind you again, the DEMOCRATS are for all people, especially the common people. They will help us, not harm us. So Hillary is the most rational of all the Dem candidates. Obama is a dreamer and an opportunist. A very foolish man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ; Montpelier, VT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116377</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ; Montpelier, VT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116377</guid>
		<description>You mean people still go to Edwards rallys? Why do people waste their time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean people still go to Edwards rallys? Why do people waste their time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a reader</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116376</link>
		<dc:creator>a reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116376</guid>
		<description>It means that either Lorenz can&#039;t spell or he types to fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means that either Lorenz can't spell or he types to fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Thomas, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116370</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Thomas, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116370</guid>
		<description>John Edwards is a phoney.  

He wears the same pair of worn jean in public speeches to show he is &quot;the champion of the poor&quot;, while wearing the same $400 hair cut at the same time.  What you don&#039;t see from him will scare you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Edwards is a phoney.  </p>
<p>He wears the same pair of worn jean in public speeches to show he is "the champion of the poor", while wearing the same $400 hair cut at the same time.  What you don't see from him will scare you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jw, canadian,ok</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116355</link>
		<dc:creator>jw, canadian,ok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116355</guid>
		<description>Is this just a bad picture or does it not look like his right front pocket has sweat and grime on it from three weeks of wearing the same pair of jeans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this just a bad picture or does it not look like his right front pocket has sweat and grime on it from three weeks of wearing the same pair of jeans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua, Omaha NE</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116318</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua, Omaha NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116318</guid>
		<description>I like him!  God made/changed him straight! Who cares if he wants to change his sexuality, or not! Just be who you are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like him!  God made/changed him straight! Who cares if he wants to change his sexuality, or not! Just be who you are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deroy  w. palm, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116307</link>
		<dc:creator>deroy  w. palm, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116307</guid>
		<description>the brilliant hillary couldn&#039;t pass the bar exam in DC.

source: her autobiography.

all the job offers for lawyer jobs was a hoax. she graduated from law school but did not pass the bar. she was not an attorney.

so she moved to arkansas withh will-yams. hitched on to his political wagon.

bar exam was easier in arkansas at the time you did not need a bachelor&#039;s  to be a teacher. an AA from a jr college would do.

fit right in with her smartest woamn in the world intellect. she worked on gov&#039;t cases as a part time lawyer for the rose law firm.

how did she get that job?

why was she on the board of directors of the NASTY wal-mart corp.

she shouod answer these questions.

the baby candidates edwrds&amp;obama should ask.

they may be too scared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the brilliant hillary couldn't pass the bar exam in DC.</p>
<p>source: her autobiography.</p>
<p>all the job offers for lawyer jobs was a hoax. she graduated from law school but did not pass the bar. she was not an attorney.</p>
<p>so she moved to arkansas withh will-yams. hitched on to his political wagon.</p>
<p>bar exam was easier in arkansas at the time you did not need a bachelor's  to be a teacher. an AA from a jr college would do.</p>
<p>fit right in with her smartest woamn in the world intellect. she worked on gov't cases as a part time lawyer for the rose law firm.</p>
<p>how did she get that job?</p>
<p>why was she on the board of directors of the NASTY wal-mart corp.</p>
<p>she shouod answer these questions.</p>
<p>the baby candidates edwrds&amp;obama should ask.</p>
<p>they may be too scared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake, San Diego CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake, San Diego CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116297</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be happy with an Obama/Edwards ticket in 08. Either would be significantly better for this country than Hillary Clinton. Hopefully America wakes up and stops believing her lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd be happy with an Obama/Edwards ticket in 08. Either would be significantly better for this country than Hillary Clinton. Hopefully America wakes up and stops believing her lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116270</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116270</guid>
		<description>Hillary should be the President of the United States and her intelligence obviously shines through because of all the candidates trying to falsely criticize her all the time. God Bless Hillary and Bill and Chelsea and it will be fantastic to have Hillary as the President in 2008!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary should be the President of the United States and her intelligence obviously shines through because of all the candidates trying to falsely criticize her all the time. God Bless Hillary and Bill and Chelsea and it will be fantastic to have Hillary as the President in 2008!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yep</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116261</link>
		<dc:creator>yep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116261</guid>
		<description>Oh if hillary get the nomination,she we get defeated for another republican ,how do you know that,there is no votes casted, its a bunch of horse manuer,bull crap anyone believes that crap there phoney as hell to.John Edwards could NOT EVEN WIN HIS HOME STATE 
in 2004. He DID NOT RUN for the Senate for a 
2nd term, because he could NOT WIN. 
Why Edwards is even in this again, makes him a 
3-time loser. And he is and Obama are the 2 
biggest phonies running.bill clinton on her side uh she will win against any republican,he will give her the speech to defeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh if hillary get the nomination,she we get defeated for another republican ,how do you know that,there is no votes casted, its a bunch of horse manuer,bull crap anyone believes that crap there phoney as hell to.John Edwards could NOT EVEN WIN HIS HOME STATE<br />
in 2004. He DID NOT RUN for the Senate for a<br />
2nd term, because he could NOT WIN.<br />
Why Edwards is even in this again, makes him a<br />
3-time loser. And he is and Obama are the 2<br />
biggest phonies running.bill clinton on her side uh she will win against any republican,he will give her the speech to defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann ME</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116253</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116253</guid>
		<description>Now that must have scared her almost to death.  Someone has the nerve to boo her magesty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that must have scared her almost to death.  Someone has the nerve to boo her magesty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen, Naples, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116232</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen, Naples, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116232</guid>
		<description>Bill Clinton is stealing this election in front of your eyes and there are three reasons why. Firstly he is the only twice-elected Democrat President since Roosevelt and rich Democrats love a winning formula. Secondly, the majority of voters are too stupid to recognise the power of a slick political machine over a genuine candidacy. Thirdly, Bill wants the White House back so his ego can settle the score with the Congress who nailed him on his deceit thus depriving him of his status as a great American President (in his eyes). Wake up America, you&#039;re being screwed and this time it ain&#039;t a cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton is stealing this election in front of your eyes and there are three reasons why. Firstly he is the only twice-elected Democrat President since Roosevelt and rich Democrats love a winning formula. Secondly, the majority of voters are too stupid to recognise the power of a slick political machine over a genuine candidacy. Thirdly, Bill wants the White House back so his ego can settle the score with the Congress who nailed him on his deceit thus depriving him of his status as a great American President (in his eyes). Wake up America, you're being screwed and this time it ain't a cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete, Washington</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116217</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete, Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116217</guid>
		<description>People booing Hillary? Are you surprised? I&#039;m not. Maybe when she starts leveling with the us, and stop voting the way George Bush wants her to, maybe then, will the crowds  stop booing her. They probably still won&#039;t vote for her....but, at least, they will stop booing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People booing Hillary? Are you surprised? I'm not. Maybe when she starts leveling with the us, and stop voting the way George Bush wants her to, maybe then, will the crowds  stop booing her. They probably still won't vote for her....but, at least, they will stop booing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave, Cheverly, MD</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116214</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave, Cheverly, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116214</guid>
		<description>Not only Edwards but Hillary has NOT increased her lead Nationally. The Media, who is Campaigning for her, keeps reporting bogus polls of 300-999 LIKELY voters who do not have cell phones or computers to vote. Just old fashion home phone. Even with that, if you look at 2004. What ever the National poll numbers are around April of 2003 are what they stay at all until people vote. The media just plays numbers games I guess to make it interesting for them. Look it up and you will see that in 2003 Feb –April poll numbers were what the final numbers were for the winners in the Democratic Primary. Clinton is up in April Nationally about 15% and still is at 15%. The 30% 50% 100% NOSENCE reported by the media is just that NONSENCE.

Obama has been Rallying 24,000 to 2,000 folks at his Rallies across the US. With thousands of volunteers on the ground though out the US. Obama has just has raised 2.1 Million in 2 days. He has raised the most primary money than all candidates. Including Hillary. Obama does not need to go negative. When the time is right which is NOW. He will highlight the differences between them. The Media just wants Obama to play by their playbook, which is outdated. As far as the notion that Hillary must make a mistake to lose. No, she has already made enough mistakes in the last 20 years to lose. Obama just has to start pointing them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only Edwards but Hillary has NOT increased her lead Nationally. The Media, who is Campaigning for her, keeps reporting bogus polls of 300-999 LIKELY voters who do not have cell phones or computers to vote. Just old fashion home phone. Even with that, if you look at 2004. What ever the National poll numbers are around April of 2003 are what they stay at all until people vote. The media just plays numbers games I guess to make it interesting for them. Look it up and you will see that in 2003 Feb –April poll numbers were what the final numbers were for the winners in the Democratic Primary. Clinton is up in April Nationally about 15% and still is at 15%. The 30% 50% 100% NOSENCE reported by the media is just that NONSENCE.</p>
<p>Obama has been Rallying 24,000 to 2,000 folks at his Rallies across the US. With thousands of volunteers on the ground though out the US. Obama has just has raised 2.1 Million in 2 days. He has raised the most primary money than all candidates. Including Hillary. Obama does not need to go negative. When the time is right which is NOW. He will highlight the differences between them. The Media just wants Obama to play by their playbook, which is outdated. As far as the notion that Hillary must make a mistake to lose. No, she has already made enough mistakes in the last 20 years to lose. Obama just has to start pointing them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oneamerica Columbus, OH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116206</link>
		<dc:creator>oneamerica Columbus, OH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116206</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now, everybody talks about John Edwards&#039; energy and intellect and charisma. You know, I kind of resent him.

But the important thing is not what talents he has, but how he has used them. He chose -- he chose to use his talents to improve the lives of people like him who had to work for everything they&#039;ve got and to help people too often left out and left behind. And that&#039;s what he&#039;ll do as our vice president.&quot;

-Bill Clinton at the 2004 Democratic convention</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Now, everybody talks about John Edwards' energy and intellect and charisma. You know, I kind of resent him.</p>
<p>But the important thing is not what talents he has, but how he has used them. He chose - he chose to use his talents to improve the lives of people like him who had to work for everything they've got and to help people too often left out and left behind. And that's what he'll do as our vice president."</p>
<p>-Bill Clinton at the 2004 Democratic convention</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggdawg, Chicago, Illinois</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116189</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggdawg, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116189</guid>
		<description>&quot;Clinton booed at Edwards rally&quot;.  Give me a break.

Hillary, bring in a bunch of plants like Edwards did so that you can get the same headline.  What a load of bull&amp;@%#!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Clinton booed at Edwards rally".  Give me a break.</p>
<p>Hillary, bring in a bunch of plants like Edwards did so that you can get the same headline.  What a load of bull&amp;@%#!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116188</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116188</guid>
		<description>Edwards esta un idiota... meee meee I share your opinion, mee mee meew ...what a load of bull hockey...

Why can&#039;t the candidates keep this on an intelegent level? These juvinile stances are so elementary.  Where are the complete thoughts, the identity establishing speaches like we use to get from real presidential material. It&#039;s like the &quot;reality show&quot; two brain cell mentality of nothingness. Why don&#039;t the public demand more from their candidates than this juvinile squabling over pointless differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards esta un idiota... meee meee I share your opinion, mee mee meew ...what a load of bull hockey...</p>
<p>Why can't the candidates keep this on an intelegent level? These juvinile stances are so elementary.  Where are the complete thoughts, the identity establishing speaches like we use to get from real presidential material. It's like the "reality show" two brain cell mentality of nothingness. Why don't the public demand more from their candidates than this juvinile squabling over pointless differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean, West Des Moines, Iowa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116186</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean, West Des Moines, Iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116186</guid>
		<description>Just because Hillary is a woman, and Obama is black; does not mean that they need to be the next person making serious decisions for this great country.

It is good Edwards called out Hillary. Is there anything holding her back from saying negative things about Edwards? Mmm...No. She just can&#039;t think of anything negative to say about him.

Edwards rules, republicans are tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because Hillary is a woman, and Obama is black; does not mean that they need to be the next person making serious decisions for this great country.</p>
<p>It is good Edwards called out Hillary. Is there anything holding her back from saying negative things about Edwards? Mmm...No. She just can't think of anything negative to say about him.</p>
<p>Edwards rules, republicans are tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy, Chesapeake,VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116182</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy, Chesapeake,VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116182</guid>
		<description>Edwards &amp; Clinton are turds floating in a punch bowel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards &amp; Clinton are turds floating in a punch bowel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse, Burnsville, MN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse, Burnsville, MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116179</guid>
		<description>Wynter,

Instead of wasting our time by telling us how you see it, why don&#039;t you do some research first.  Edwards has released many position papers.  Maybe you should read some of them.  Also, learn the difference from &quot;going negative&quot; and explaining to people what your differences are with another candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wynter,</p>
<p>Instead of wasting our time by telling us how you see it, why don't you do some research first.  Edwards has released many position papers.  Maybe you should read some of them.  Also, learn the difference from "going negative" and explaining to people what your differences are with another candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEE, Nashville, TN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116168</link>
		<dc:creator>DEE, Nashville, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116168</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not for booing anyone, but I honestly can&#039;t believe that people really want another Clinton in the White House. 
People, they have had their turn. Both of them! It is time to move on! I for one am so tired of the bickering, fighting and the spliting between parties and Americans. And if Hillary gets in, things will continue to be splintered.
We need a new beginning. Who can lead us to give us as a nation a fresh start? I have my own opinion, however, I just ask that people consider this - We have to move our country  beyond the Bush, Clinton, Bush years! It is time for a change, OUR country&#039;s future depends on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not for booing anyone, but I honestly can't believe that people really want another Clinton in the White House.<br />
People, they have had their turn. Both of them! It is time to move on! I for one am so tired of the bickering, fighting and the spliting between parties and Americans. And if Hillary gets in, things will continue to be splintered.<br />
We need a new beginning. Who can lead us to give us as a nation a fresh start? I have my own opinion, however, I just ask that people consider this &#8211; We have to move our country  beyond the Bush, Clinton, Bush years! It is time for a change, OUR country's future depends on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deroy w, palm , FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116157</link>
		<dc:creator>deroy w, palm , FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116157</guid>
		<description>very dangerous people.

constant harping about lealthcare and education.

the issues are terrorism, security and size of military.

th eed &amp; health won&#039;t mean anything without security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very dangerous people.</p>
<p>constant harping about lealthcare and education.</p>
<p>the issues are terrorism, security and size of military.</p>
<p>th eed &amp; health won't mean anything without security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex, Toledo, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116153</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex, Toledo, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116153</guid>
		<description>&quot;It really doesn&#039;t matter.

Hillary will be the next President of the United States.

Why?

The media.

There is no democracy in this country. There is only the illusion of democracy. As long as corporations dictate the politics in this country, the people will continue to be dragged along by whomever the corporations choose to be the next president.&quot;
Posted By Sam, Lutz, FL : October 28, 2007 4:14 pm 

Exactly Sam, and the sheep that cheer for Clinton like a bunch of dumbfounded preteen girls will be the first ones wringing their hands when she further sends our county into the abyss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It really doesn't matter.</p>
<p>Hillary will be the next President of the United States.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>The media.</p>
<p>There is no democracy in this country. There is only the illusion of democracy. As long as corporations dictate the politics in this country, the people will continue to be dragged along by whomever the corporations choose to be the next president."<br />
Posted By Sam, Lutz, FL : October 28, 2007 4:14 pm </p>
<p>Exactly Sam, and the sheep that cheer for Clinton like a bunch of dumbfounded preteen girls will be the first ones wringing their hands when she further sends our county into the abyss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacksforhillary</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116149</link>
		<dc:creator>blacksforhillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116149</guid>
		<description>Isnt Obama on a gay hashing tour tonight or a gospel event,its all over the news.talk about contradiction OF 
H O P E.Looser he cant stand gays,you don&#039;t belong in America Either.Land of the F R E E.he goes against that.John you havent told us anything new you dont like gays either,it makes you uncomfortable,think if we have a war again or disaster again he will be uncomfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isnt Obama on a gay hashing tour tonight or a gospel event,its all over the news.talk about contradiction OF<br />
H O P E.Looser he cant stand gays,you don't belong in America Either.Land of the F R E E.he goes against that.John you havent told us anything new you dont like gays either,it makes you uncomfortable,think if we have a war again or disaster again he will be uncomfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116146</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116146</guid>
		<description>Why are liberals such cowards? They mask it as best they can but the only fight they ever seem to feel up for is against their own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are liberals such cowards? They mask it as best they can but the only fight they ever seem to feel up for is against their own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey, Manchester, NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116145</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey, Manchester, NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116145</guid>
		<description>The Democratic Party began with the philosophy that even the little guy should have the same oppurtunities as the biggest guy. 
Instead of calling each other names and constant criticisms of party members we should remember that the common goal is regaining the White House and bringing America back to what it can potentially be - the lighthouse to the rest of the world. I am an Edwards supporter but think that every candidate this time has great potential as our leader. It&#039;s about American people and the future of this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party began with the philosophy that even the little guy should have the same oppurtunities as the biggest guy.<br />
Instead of calling each other names and constant criticisms of party members we should remember that the common goal is regaining the White House and bringing America back to what it can potentially be &#8211; the lighthouse to the rest of the world. I am an Edwards supporter but think that every candidate this time has great potential as our leader. It's about American people and the future of this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara           West Des Moines, Iowa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116140</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara           West Des Moines, Iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116140</guid>
		<description>I was a precint captain for Edwards in 2004 and will be so again in 2008. I was at the rally last night in Des Moines and I honestly believe that John Edwards is the best man for the White House. When you see him and hear him in person, and you look into his eyes, you can see the conviction he has, his intelligence to lead the country back to dignity, and the passion to make this county work again for everyone (not just the wealthy).  He was correct in calling Hillary out and I applaud him for it. I am a woman but I won&#039;t vote for just any woman because it&#039;s &quot;time for a woman in the White House.&quot;  Although Bill Clinton is my hero, I cannot and will not vote for Hillary. And I think if she gets the nomination, we can all resign ourselves to yet another Republican in the White House.  Let&#039;s not give every illiterate nut in the country the opportunity to come out and vote against Hillary, thereby handing the White House to the Republicans.   Go, John Edwards!  Obama for VP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a precint captain for Edwards in 2004 and will be so again in 2008. I was at the rally last night in Des Moines and I honestly believe that John Edwards is the best man for the White House. When you see him and hear him in person, and you look into his eyes, you can see the conviction he has, his intelligence to lead the country back to dignity, and the passion to make this county work again for everyone (not just the wealthy).  He was correct in calling Hillary out and I applaud him for it. I am a woman but I won't vote for just any woman because it's "time for a woman in the White House."  Although Bill Clinton is my hero, I cannot and will not vote for Hillary. And I think if she gets the nomination, we can all resign ourselves to yet another Republican in the White House.  Let's not give every illiterate nut in the country the opportunity to come out and vote against Hillary, thereby handing the White House to the Republicans.   Go, John Edwards!  Obama for VP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wynter, Loudon, NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116136</link>
		<dc:creator>Wynter, Loudon, NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116136</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, did Edwards say something new? Seems that he is simply &quot;lip-syncing&quot; his rallys. 

Let&#039;s not go negative Edwards, it only makes you look bad and gives the democratic nominee a tougher time in the general election.

It&#039;s time to give specifics on what &quot;you&quot; will do different than others would do. Not to complain about the positions of others over and over again. It&#039;s counterproductive.

Telling it like I see it,
Wynter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sorry, did Edwards say something new? Seems that he is simply "lip-syncing" his rallys. </p>
<p>Let's not go negative Edwards, it only makes you look bad and gives the democratic nominee a tougher time in the general election.</p>
<p>It's time to give specifics on what "you" will do different than others would do. Not to complain about the positions of others over and over again. It's counterproductive.</p>
<p>Telling it like I see it,<br />
Wynter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauline</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116133</link>
		<dc:creator>pauline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116133</guid>
		<description>yes good ole edwards,he does not understand america,and obama there more like little kids yeah if we get attacked these  2 babys,distort in what they say.hillary wa right in voting for it that tell she is smart,its assumptions as a terroist organization the rev garud,not to go to war,Edawrds and obama man they will be dangerous i dont want to be laying in the ground somewhere..and scrro ron paul hes a nut of a doctor,he doesnt know politics whatsoever.obambi and edwards yeah you go ahead bash Hillary i hope people wake up how edwards and Obambi distort and mess your head all twisted up.they dont understand the bill Kyle/l act...the best palce of where that vote is explain is from mark penn its on hillary site 1st page 
scroll down go more and it should be there it explains,read before you make assumptions friend of mine is in politics it does  explain it very well,he told me to go read it before i went on edwards twisted facts,and Obamas.he told me people were messed up on it.those are the facts the real facts he told me, and someone in iowa should be smart enough to contradict both of them  on it...that they are not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes good ole edwards,he does not understand america,and obama there more like little kids yeah if we get attacked these  2 babys,distort in what they say.hillary wa right in voting for it that tell she is smart,its assumptions as a terroist organization the rev garud,not to go to war,Edawrds and obama man they will be dangerous i dont want to be laying in the ground somewhere..and scrro ron paul hes a nut of a doctor,he doesnt know politics whatsoever.obambi and edwards yeah you go ahead bash Hillary i hope people wake up how edwards and Obambi distort and mess your head all twisted up.they dont understand the bill Kyle/l act...the best palce of where that vote is explain is from mark penn its on hillary site 1st page<br />
scroll down go more and it should be there it explains,read before you make assumptions friend of mine is in politics it does  explain it very well,he told me to go read it before i went on edwards twisted facts,and Obamas.he told me people were messed up on it.those are the facts the real facts he told me, and someone in iowa should be smart enough to contradict both of them  on it...that they are not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VJ1976 Atlanta GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116129</link>
		<dc:creator>VJ1976 Atlanta GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116129</guid>
		<description>Its surprising to read how stupid some of  the remarks here are. Even if the US wanted to open another front with Iran, it couldn&#039;t do it. Our military might is over-stretched in Iraq and Afghanistan. Diplomacy is the way forward for Iran. Remember, even a termite is good enough to bring down the house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its surprising to read how stupid some of  the remarks here are. Even if the US wanted to open another front with Iran, it couldn't do it. Our military might is over-stretched in Iraq and Afghanistan. Diplomacy is the way forward for Iran. Remember, even a termite is good enough to bring down the house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Chicago IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116119</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Chicago IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116119</guid>
		<description>Neither Edwards or Hillary are related to Dick Cheney. So both are wasting their time.  Obama already has the nomination locked up !  Go Obama !! We need another President like Cheney !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither Edwards or Hillary are related to Dick Cheney. So both are wasting their time.  Obama already has the nomination locked up !  Go Obama !! We need another President like Cheney !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri, Plantation, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116089</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri, Plantation, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116089</guid>
		<description>The Kyl-Lieberman bill specifically removed a clause that specified it did not give the president authorization for military action.   Read the language of the bill.

Hillary didn&#039;t try to re-write history by then going for the Webb amendment to add the language back in until after she caught such political heat for her vote. 

Her campaign has tried to smear Obama on this by saying he co-sponsored S970 which said the same thing.  But this is an out and out lie.  S970 spoke of economic sanctions only and specifically reads:

&quot;(8) Nothing in this Act should be construed as giving the President the authority to use military force against Iran.&quot;

Kyl-Lieberman&#039;s language gives the president all the wiggle-room he needs to attack Iran..the same way she gave him the wiggle room in Iraq.  This woman lies and triangulates and most people are too lazy to check out the language of the bills and trace her many positions and maneuverings.

Edwards is right to call her out for what she is.  He may have voted for the IWR but he&#039;s publicly stated he was wrong.  That&#039;s called integrity.  Hillary has dodged and weaved and never given the same reasoning twice for her vote then and refuses to admit she was wrong.  In fact, she parroted the president&#039;s &#039;stay the course&#039; line years into the war.

Her vote on Iraq is NOT old news..it is relevent because she&#039;s doing the same exact thing now with Iran.  She can try to re-write history all she likes, but some of us are paying attention. 

Good for you, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kyl-Lieberman bill specifically removed a clause that specified it did not give the president authorization for military action.   Read the language of the bill.</p>
<p>Hillary didn't try to re-write history by then going for the Webb amendment to add the language back in until after she caught such political heat for her vote. </p>
<p>Her campaign has tried to smear Obama on this by saying he co-sponsored S970 which said the same thing.  But this is an out and out lie.  S970 spoke of economic sanctions only and specifically reads:</p>
<p>"(8) Nothing in this Act should be construed as giving the President the authority to use military force against Iran."</p>
<p>Kyl-Lieberman's language gives the president all the wiggle-room he needs to attack Iran..the same way she gave him the wiggle room in Iraq.  This woman lies and triangulates and most people are too lazy to check out the language of the bills and trace her many positions and maneuverings.</p>
<p>Edwards is right to call her out for what she is.  He may have voted for the IWR but he's publicly stated he was wrong.  That's called integrity.  Hillary has dodged and weaved and never given the same reasoning twice for her vote then and refuses to admit she was wrong.  In fact, she parroted the president's 'stay the course' line years into the war.</p>
<p>Her vote on Iraq is NOT old news..it is relevent because she's doing the same exact thing now with Iran.  She can try to re-write history all she likes, but some of us are paying attention. </p>
<p>Good for you, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura - Tulsa, OK</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116077</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura - Tulsa, OK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116077</guid>
		<description>These Democratic candidates are so busy pontificating about how great they are; I wish they&#039;d start telling voters what makes them qualified to be President. Oh wait--- Edwards doesn&#039;t have any executive experience or record that relates to running any organization .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Democratic candidates are so busy pontificating about how great they are; I wish they'd start telling voters what makes them qualified to be President. Oh wait- Edwards doesn't have any executive experience or record that relates to running any organization .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave, Cheverly, MD</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116073</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave, Cheverly, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116073</guid>
		<description>To Fair Wash, DC
U wrote;
“And then what? I&#039;ll give you that…Obama can win the Democratic primary..anything can happen as we&#039;ve seen in the last two elections…but after he beats Hillary in the Primary he&#039;s still got to win the general election …”

Even the faulty poll numbers gave Obama vs. ALL Republican Candidates a win of 47% to 41% etc. That’s just polling homes with phones.  That’s is without Obama adding a Vice President pick to further add to his ticket. Such as Al Gore or Barbara Boxer. If you think Obama is not aware the Republicans are going to play the Black Race card, The Muslim Hussein Card, The Fear him card. Then you most be living in a Fairytale. 
Obama is an African American who has and always knows he must work 10 times as hard to get what he want in the US. He will be ready for the “Right Wing Conspiracy”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Fair Wash, DC<br />
U wrote;<br />
“And then what? I'll give you that…Obama can win the Democratic primary..anything can happen as we've seen in the last two elections…but after he beats Hillary in the Primary he's still got to win the general election …”</p>
<p>Even the faulty poll numbers gave Obama vs. ALL Republican Candidates a win of 47% to 41% etc. That’s just polling homes with phones.  That’s is without Obama adding a Vice President pick to further add to his ticket. Such as Al Gore or Barbara Boxer. If you think Obama is not aware the Republicans are going to play the Black Race card, The Muslim Hussein Card, The Fear him card. Then you most be living in a Fairytale.<br />
Obama is an African American who has and always knows he must work 10 times as hard to get what he want in the US. He will be ready for the “Right Wing Conspiracy”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116070</link>
		<dc:creator>PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116070</guid>
		<description>Hillary should be booed every time she walks down the street.

Obama &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary should be booed every time she walks down the street.</p>
<p>Obama '08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula, Santa Monica CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116067</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula, Santa Monica CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116067</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with John from Overland Park. Hill and Billary will be in jail within two years of returning to the White House. One for treason, the other for sexual assault. Flip a coin as to which will do which.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with John from Overland Park. Hill and Billary will be in jail within two years of returning to the White House. One for treason, the other for sexual assault. Flip a coin as to which will do which.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith, Glendale, AZ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116065</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith, Glendale, AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116065</guid>
		<description>Vote RON PAUL...Edwards voted for the war in OCT 2002.

Voted NO on Iraq War
Voted NO on Patriot Act
Voted NO on regulating the Internet
Voted NO on NAFTA and CAFTA
Voted NO on Real ID Act

Has NEVER voted to raise taxes
Has NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget
Has NEVER voted for federal gun restriction
Has NEVER voted to raise congressional pay
Has NEVER taken a government-paid trip

Against a military draft
Against the UN, WTO, GATT

Opts out of lucrative congress pension

To preserve the Constitution
To cut government spending
To lower healthcare costs
To end the war on drugs
To secure our borders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote RON PAUL...Edwards voted for the war in OCT 2002.</p>
<p>Voted NO on Iraq War<br />
Voted NO on Patriot Act<br />
Voted NO on regulating the Internet<br />
Voted NO on NAFTA and CAFTA<br />
Voted NO on Real ID Act</p>
<p>Has NEVER voted to raise taxes<br />
Has NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget<br />
Has NEVER voted for federal gun restriction<br />
Has NEVER voted to raise congressional pay<br />
Has NEVER taken a government-paid trip</p>
<p>Against a military draft<br />
Against the UN, WTO, GATT</p>
<p>Opts out of lucrative congress pension</p>
<p>To preserve the Constitution<br />
To cut government spending<br />
To lower healthcare costs<br />
To end the war on drugs<br />
To secure our borders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack jett</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116061</link>
		<dc:creator>jack jett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116061</guid>
		<description>I love John Edwards, but he might as well hang it up while he still has a bit of mojo.  

Chaotic Modulation
www.YabbaDabbaHubbaDo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love John Edwards, but he might as well hang it up while he still has a bit of mojo.  </p>
<p>Chaotic Modulation<br />
<a href="http://www.YabbaDabbaHubbaDo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.YabbaDabbaHubbaDo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad, Durham, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116059</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad, Durham, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116059</guid>
		<description>The Clinton campaign says she voted yes because she is going from primary mode to general election mode? So she&#039;s giving Bush another blank check for her own political gain? She doesn&#039;t represent the people of NY or this country - only herself. When are people going to pay attention? Why aren&#039;t the candidates pointing this out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clinton campaign says she voted yes because she is going from primary mode to general election mode? So she's giving Bush another blank check for her own political gain? She doesn't represent the people of NY or this country &#8211; only herself. When are people going to pay attention? Why aren't the candidates pointing this out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116052</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116052</guid>
		<description>The fact is, that if people took the time to review Clinton, Edwards, and Obama&#039;s positions and speeches by going to their web pages and actually educating themselves we wouldn&#039;t have to do all this arguing. If you went to the campaign sites and asked questions on the campaign blog sites, or looked at the issues being discussed on those campaign blogs you&#039;d get a better feel for what the candidate views are.

Having done this, it is quite clear that Clinton would be last candidate on the democrat side worthy of support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, that if people took the time to review Clinton, Edwards, and Obama's positions and speeches by going to their web pages and actually educating themselves we wouldn't have to do all this arguing. If you went to the campaign sites and asked questions on the campaign blog sites, or looked at the issues being discussed on those campaign blogs you'd get a better feel for what the candidate views are.</p>
<p>Having done this, it is quite clear that Clinton would be last candidate on the democrat side worthy of support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ross, Chattanooga, TN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116050</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ross, Chattanooga, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116050</guid>
		<description>The cesspool is beginning to grow. Be it the Billary, Obama Yomama, or the Breck girl. They are dangerous people.  Give diplomacy a chance ? If my neighbor has raped my wife and set fire to my house I don&#039;t negotiate. These Dems are a pack of fools and many Americans are following them don&#039;t a Stalinist path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cesspool is beginning to grow. Be it the Billary, Obama Yomama, or the Breck girl. They are dangerous people.  Give diplomacy a chance ? If my neighbor has raped my wife and set fire to my house I don't negotiate. These Dems are a pack of fools and many Americans are following them don't a Stalinist path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin, Kansas City MO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116047</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin, Kansas City MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116047</guid>
		<description>The amazing thing was that  John Edwards could reprimand Hillary for her recent Iran vote with a straight face. As if he had himself never cast a vote (not that he casted many during his six years in the Senate) for political reasons. Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amazing thing was that  John Edwards could reprimand Hillary for her recent Iran vote with a straight face. As if he had himself never cast a vote (not that he casted many during his six years in the Senate) for political reasons. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linda, bella vista, ar</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/28/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116043</link>
		<dc:creator>linda, bella vista, ar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/27/clinton-booed-at-edwards-rally/#comment-116043</guid>
		<description>Love the comments from those who have never been to IA and feel free to discuss how IA dresses. Also, I love the discussion of how IA and NH are too small to be &#039;first&#039;. If sheeple wish to be lead by IA/NH instead of making up their own minds, so be it. The coasties will get their share of the $3B in &#039;campaign-527 ads&#039; shortly along with more of the MSM mush. 

I would also gather by the comments that few have ever been to &#039;rallies&#039; or done the grass roots thing like caucuses, committees, platforms, and conventions. 

Gotta say that I haven&#039;t picked a candidate yet, but Hil is not on my fav list. The latest &#039;how phoney&#039; was, &quot;I got it from a survey of focus groups, lobbyists and bundlers, let me hop on the fence and triangulate again&quot; was her statement to &#039;sorta support Dodd&#039;s filibuster&#039; of immunity for all those who broke federal law with &#039;warrantless wiretapping&#039;. Yes, the &#039;Iran&#039; vote did matter as did the Iran sanctions and missles in the Warsaw Pact countries. 

As a strong supporter of the Military and Defense, I see Hil as a total &#039;nothing&#039; on the AS Comm. and on the floor. Just more on the cheap. Since she declared for Pres., she does make herself noticed but seems to have no efficacy.

Her Birthday Bash really gave me the creepy crawlies. Miss Goldwater Girl playing the &#039;Happy B-day Mrs. Pres.&#039; card was so wrong in so many ways. First, as Thompson is no Reagan she is no JFK. And she obviously didn&#039;t relate to him &#039;back in the days&#039;, either. Also, the Marilyn Monroe thing relates to &#039;not the best of the Kennedy meme&#039;. Personally, I found that a little bit more than tasteless.

I didn&#039;t support the invasion of Iraq and I want out of there yesterday. But I am also a realist. No one can promise us that they will be out by a date certain, but Hil does promise us &#039;permanent bases&#039; there. NOT

I will say this about Edwards, he has been ahead of the &#039;gang&#039; in statements of policy throughout the campaign. Others have followed. Obama sits on the Veteran&#039;s Affairs Comm. and has been very disappointingly lax on that committee. However, on the plus side after some consideration he has decided to support Dodd&#039;s promise to filibuster.

I will definitely be watching the &#039;confirmation&#039; of Mukasey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the comments from those who have never been to IA and feel free to discuss how IA dresses. Also, I love the discussion of how IA and NH are too small to be 'first'. If sheeple wish to be lead by IA/NH instead of making up their own minds, so be it. The coasties will get their share of the $3B in 'campaign-527 ads' shortly along with more of the MSM mush. </p>
<p>I would also gather by the comments that few have ever been to 'rallies' or done the grass roots thing like caucuses, committees, platforms, and conventions. </p>
<p>Gotta say that I haven't picked a candidate yet, but Hil is not on my fav list. The latest 'how phoney' was, "I got it from a survey of focus groups, lobbyists and bundlers, let me hop on the fence and triangulate again" was her statement to 'sorta support Dodd's filibuster' of immunity for all those who broke federal law with 'warrantless wiretapping'. Yes, the 'Iran' vote did matter as did the Iran sanctions and missles in the Warsaw Pact countries. </p>
<p>As a strong supporter of the Military and Defense, I see Hil as a total 'nothing' on the AS Comm. and on the floor. Just more on the cheap. Since she declared for Pres., she does make herself noticed but seems to have no efficacy.</p>
<p>Her Birthday Bash really gave me the creepy crawlies. Miss Goldwater Girl playing the 'Happy B-day Mrs. Pres.' card was so wrong in so many ways. First, as Thompson is no Reagan she is no JFK. And she obviously didn't relate to him 'back in the days', either. Also, the Marilyn Monroe thing relates to 'not the best of the Kennedy meme'. Personally, I found that a little bit more than tasteless.</p>
<p>I didn't support the invasion of Iraq and I want out of there yesterday. But I am also a realist. No one can promise us that they will be out by a date certain, but Hil does promise us 'permanent bases' there. NOT</p>
<p>I will say this about Edwards, he has been ahead of the 'gang' in statements of policy throughout the campaign. Others have followed. Obama sits on the Veteran's Affairs Comm. and has been very disappointingly lax on that committee. However, on the plus side after some consideration he has decided to support Dodd's promise to filibuster.</p>
<p>I will definitely be watching the 'confirmation' of Mukasey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
