is anyone falling for this anymore?

Bush did make a mistake with his focus on terrorism. I will NEVER believe that Iraq was anything more than an oil profit for corporate interests; specifically Haliburton. It's a shame that our country's resources so needed for the REAL mission were diverted to Iraq. Pakistan has always been a hot bed associated with terrorism, but we need them for the pipeline project with Afghanistan. Is this really a war for terrorism? Or is it a war for control of the world's natural resources. I suggest reading PNAC and drawing your own conclusion.

Hillary will make no positive changes that our country desperately needs. She is flakey when it comes to answering questions, never having a straight answer. I am really tired of this type of politician.

Obama for Change!!

Did you attend University? Do you know how foolish you look by citing Wikipedia? Respectable people won't respect you if you cite Wikipedia.

Everyone knows that! But, all the republican hopefuls are following Bush's policy 100% which is a total failure on all the fronts. And since she never supported Bush, she has to critisize his failure the same way all the republicans bash Hillary and Bill for everything including 9/11.

Last week a bunch of dimwits attacked my home city of San Francisco instead of actually addressing my arguments...the day after Bill O'Reiley foamed and raged over our beautiful city.
Figures, huh?

Keep reading those talking points, folks. They don't call you "ditto heads" for nothin'!

You'd like to think CNN would be more reliable than Wikipedia, wouldn't you?

But if you actually read the Wiki article....

Granted, the focus of CNN's article wasn't Pakistani history, it was Clinton's comments. But if 10 minutes of net research shows how little Clinton understands Pakistani politics, she has a poor understanding indeed. Maybe CNN should do a brief story surveying recent Pakistani history, to educate its readers.

Of course, I couldn't help but notice CNN's top story at the moment is Bush’s comments regarding Pakistan. They’re as ignorant as Clinton’s. In fact, they say the same thing, which is another reason I won’t vote for Clinton—her foreign policy is too much like Bush’s.

All this underscores the importance of being an informed American. You're defenseless otherwise. So again I say, thank you TransparentTrollup.

Yes I did. Cheap trick huh..., but I still did a better job than CNN's reporters who continuely give Hillary free passes..

Bad Bush, blah blah, health Care!, blame bush, blah blah, free stuff!, blah blah, ihatebush, blah blah, imawoman, blah blah.

Great Politician =/= good president.

YEEEEEHAAWWWW, lock and load boys,
we've just be given the green light by the "anti-war" left..

Next thing you know the headlines will blare "Pangeaea breaks apart! Clinton says it is Bush's failed policies!!"

The basic cause of unrest in Pakistan falls to religious extremists and the governments inabilty to deal with them.

We may have to accept a non-democratic Pakistan for time being. You want bin Laden or you want the Islamic State of Pakistan, I think Musharraf is a little more concerned with a weak hamstrung central government moving to the right than he is a democratic society right now.

Did you really just slam the investigative reporting of CNN, then cite Wikipedia? You should be ashamed of yourself.

Hillary makes a good point here. We attacked a country who had nothing to do with 9/11 and ignored the people who did. That's a problem

Now they complain when there isn't a Democracy.

Get a story and Stick to it!

She needs to realize Bush isn't running!!

Don't you think that Hillary is correct to criticize Bush's policy toward Pakistan? Isn't it true that this administration has supported Musharraf? with your money!

That's what they want you to do.

Larry and Curly called, they want their stooge back.

We deserve better.

Hillary: Favorable (50%), Unfavorable (46%)

Obama: Favorable (51%), Unfavorable (36%)

Edwards: Favorable (49%), Unfavorable (35%)

Come on fellow Democrats, open your eyes. Not only is Hillary not electable in the general election, she does not even espouse the general vision of the Democratic Party. You want true progressive change, vote

Edwards/Obama '08

Please Hillary, JUST SHUT UP!!!!!

I might call President Bush the devil on Monday to get all the attention off me too!

Gee Hillary – up to this point you haven't discussed Pakistan or our relationship with Musharraf. But because they are now having political unrest – you see it as an opportunity to blame Bush??

LOL – I think the only person left in our country thinking you run a "clean" campaign in Mondale – and by the looks of him – he's been living off a morphine drip.

I do love how you're driving your campaign down Howard Dean blvd.

Are you sure she wasn't commenting on her answers given in last Tuesday's debate?

She's one to talk. I guess totally negative attacks (which could send signals around the world, something she once decried in an earlier debate that candidates should not do) are OK as long as they aren't directoed toward her or other Dems?

At least her hubby was somewhat consistent in his foreign policy.

1st WTC attack – do nothing
Embassies in Africa – do nothing
USS Cole – do nothing
Sudanese offer up Bin Laden – do nothing
Launch heat seeker in the Oval Office – launch heat seeker toward Iraqi Apirin factory

Now the Hillegal Alien balmes everything on Bush while she stands by as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Keep that Kool Aid comin'

Let the whole world know....

AP News Story: Hillary has flatulence, blames Bush.

The reason we have no choice but to tolerate Musharaaf is because since we have moved all our troops into Iraq, and all our resources are there, we rely heavily on Pakistan to keep Bin Laden and the Taliban in check. So we can't bite the hand that feeds us.

The irony here is in order to be able to place our troops in Iraq and depose one dicator (Sadaam) who has no WMD, we have had to support another dicator Musharaaf, who actually does have nuclear weapons.