November 5, 2007
Posted: 06:05 PM ET

Sen. Obama participated in the annual Steak Fry hosted by Iowa Senator Tom Harkin.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Sen. Barack Obama’s, D-Illinois, presidential campaign announced today that more than 300 former Republican voters from New Hampshire and Iowa are switching their party affiliation to actively support Obama, D-Illinois, in those crucial first two contests.

“I’ve been a Republican all my life, but the challenges we face are too great to choose a candidate based on his party—we need to the choose the candidate who can bring fundamental change to Washington and start getting things done again,” Jerry Spivak said. “Barack Obama is the only candidate who will be able to break the partisan logjam and inspire Americans to come together around real solutions.”

Obama's campaign sent out a list of 268 Iowa Republicans and 68 New Hampshire Republicans who changed their party registration and promised to vote for the Democratic presidential hopeful.

–CNN Associate Producer Lauren Kornreich

Filed under: Barack Obama • Iowa • New Hampshire


arlene j. flanagan   January 28th, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Please stop the so called mediators from trying to start personal comments being the topic of the deabates They waste everyones time. Instead of hearing about the candidates differences on how to run the country—they are are trying to boost ratings with getting two of the candidates arguing over petty things ands not hearing their views on important matters.This also shuts out other candidates. PLEASE ASK QUESTIONS THAT WILL ELICIT ANSWERS WE CARE ABOUT.

Please go back to a debate format and away from the backyard gossip session.

teri from texas   December 31st, 2007 3:33 pm ET

Hello, Obama will not be elected…..no worries…. and as far as hillary …well , she wont win either…..GO REPUBLICANS….besides….who wants a muslim in the white house when we are fighting them in iraq…HELLO….and yes this is truth……he enrolled in school as muslim.. this came out of his school teachers mouth. Besides all christians should vote for HUCKABEE…….GO HUCKABEE

David Summerly, Shawnee, KS   December 8th, 2007 9:31 pm ET

Changed to Republican Party to vote for Ron Paul in the Kansas Caucus.

Richard, Orlando, FL   December 7th, 2007 4:23 am ET

Change? I have one ANSWER for that RON PAUL! Vote for Ron Paul or pick a name out of the hat, there are all the same!

Rick Forestville Md.   November 7th, 2007 3:46 pm ET

There not really changing sides, just
candidates, Obama is just a Republican
in Democrat's clothing.
He need to get a job as a comedian, like the other night on SNL, he's such
a joke.

Doug, New Jersey   November 6th, 2007 6:12 pm ET

"Those people wouldn't vote democrat even if Jesus was the nominee."

And the people in the North East and left coast would vote for Osama Bin Laden in a minute if he had that little D next to his name.

Don't worry, Jesus would never rob hard working Americans and give everything they worked hard to earn to lazy entitlement class libs, so don't count on him ever being a demoncrat.

Howard, NY   November 6th, 2007 5:05 pm ET

How can anyone be so stupid to think that Republicans are afraid of Hillary? Maybe afraid to meet her in a dark alley, but they're salivating at the chance to face her in the general election. Having Hillary as the Democratic nominee would be the best get-out-the-vote strategy Republicans could imagine. No one else gets such knee-jerk hate from the right.

I'm ashamed to admit I voted for Bush in 2004, but this year I'm voting Democrat unless Hillary gets the nomination. I can only hope Obama gets the nomination. Trust me, he will get a lot more crossover votes than Hillary ever would.

A lot of Democrats are nostalgic about Bill Clinton after 8 years of Bush, but they seem to forget just how hated the Clintons are on the other side. Honestly, the only way the Republicans have a chance at winning is if Hillary is nominated.

Steve, Lyons, CO   November 6th, 2007 4:54 pm ET

This proves, no matter WHAT the Repub talking heads state, that Republicans are peeing in their pants at the prospect of facing Hillary in the general election.

I hate to say it, but they're supporting Obama, in my opinion, 'cause a black would be even harder to elect than a woman. Even some Dems who'd support a woman may not be enlightened enough yet to support a black.

Sad but I fear true.

Anon   November 6th, 2007 4:53 pm ET

I am a registered republican, but even today on primary day I voted many ballots on independent and democratic tickets. Far less than half my votes were party line.

I would easily vote Obama because I think he can bring the parties together and make some changes.
If democrats vote Hillary as their party official, I would be forced to vote against her with any candidate that could overtake her in a general election. She would cripple the country since she is so hated, no one from the senate or congress would work with her on any important issues.

If she is the democratic nominee, the dems lose again. If Obama makes the party line, he stands a great chance of winning.

Mat, Hancock MI   November 6th, 2007 4:40 pm ET

Anyone who wouldn't vote for Barack because he's black, wouldn't vote for Hillary because she's a woman. So to say you're going to vote for Hillary over Obama because the south won't vote for a black man is just dumb. Those people wouldn't vote democrat even if Jesus was the nominee.

RuthieM   November 6th, 2007 4:27 pm ET

My girlfriend was a Republican who voted for George Bush now she's voting for Obama! Go, Obama!!!!

David, Los Angeles, CA   November 6th, 2007 2:18 pm ET

"But, I don't think that all this fighting back and forth between the parties is what our country needs. We need to change politics, to work together."

And then we should buy everybody in China a teddy bear. Please.

The American people respect strength. Hillary is strong, and she will be the next President of this country. All the limp-wristed, mushy "can't we all just get along" might as well get used to it.

This is a democracy. America's strength is in it's divisions, diversity, and differences. For there to be progress, there must be a vigorous and contentious debate, with strong forceful advocates on each side. We're talking about people's lives and welfare here, not rainbows and candy corn.

DMW, Roeland Park, KS   November 6th, 2007 1:32 pm ET

All I will say is Joe Liberman…and we know how that turned out!

brandie r. tampa, fl   November 6th, 2007 12:58 pm ET

If Republicans change their party registration to support Obama, simply to get him on the Ballot & then change back in the final election…it just exemplifies Republican dishonesty & breaking promises. Actions such as that, only show fear that they are unable to win fairly. But what has happened to pride? Morality? It seems that our country has MUCH more going on behind the scenes than the general public knows. Being forced to collect money via campaigning only leads to bribery & "personal" debts owed. SOCIETY created this. DON'T YOU WANT TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY WHERE PEOPLE RESPECT EACH OTHER? WHERE PRODUCT PRICES DON'T INCREASE SO EXCESSIVELY THAT WAGES CAN never CATCH UP? What REALLY matters? Do we want a president that has to buy his or her way into the presidency? I want someone who cares about the general public…& in reality…EVERY American is a part of the general public–no matter how rich or poor they are.

Are we being forced into debt? If loan companies were responsible, would people be approved for mortgages that they cannot afford? Would there be places like "the projects" if there was a balance between wages and costs of goods & living? I've witnessed so many bad things being slung about ALL of the candidates. The big question is…does anyone ever look in the mirror & truly look at themselves before judging & tearing others apart? Things aren't even peaceful here…let alone in the Middle East.

It would be nice if comments that bring up important issues be posted, not just ones that sling mud at candidates who aren't available to defend themselves.

pam Eugene, OR   November 6th, 2007 12:54 pm ET

Please remember you folks that are saying 300 people mean nothing. That is roughly the number of people CNN uses to gather poll information. The last 2 polls were 300 and 307 and you are lapping up the data. I think it is the tip of the iceberg. Hillary is a divider and will tear this country apart. IF HRC gets the nomination I will find a tolorable Republican to vote for.
Anyone but Hillary
Obama/Edwards DREAM TICKET

brandie ragin tampa, fl   November 6th, 2007 12:26 pm ET

there were some comments about republicans saying they'll vote for Obama just so they won't have to face Hillary–then changing back to republican in the final election. It disgusts me that anyone would SERIOUSLY consider doing such a vile thing. I am ashamed to even HEAR such a thing. Hasn't our country suffered enough? It would be a tyranny. Further teaching our children that trickery is what makes the world go round. It would prove other countries views of our lack of morality. Obama deserves to be president. THIS COUNTRY deserves Obama as our president. It's just that many Americans can't fathem having an open & HONEST person leading our country.
He's not a normal, shady, dark suit. The reason he IS believable is because he is straight-forward & really believes in what he is saying.

Ike. Woodbridge, VA 22193.   November 6th, 2007 12:09 pm ET

I am an Afican American, a life long and card carrying democrat, but I will not vote for Obama. I live in the south and I know that there is no way Obama could possibly win in any state south of the Mason Dixon line. Thus, I believe very strongly that a vote for Obama is a wasted voted. Therefore, I will vote for Hillary because Republicans are afraid of her and they know that of all the Democrats seeking nomination, she is the only one with the organization, funds and capabilities of winning, and this is the reason why they are now doing whatever it takes, from smear tactics to scare mongering, to defeat her in the primaries. Put it this way, if Hillary Clinton's nomination is a sure defeat for democrats in 08, why are the Republicans so worried and afraid of her getting the Democratic nomination. Republicans know they could beat Obama in the general election and this is why they want him to win the Democratic nomination. GO HILLARY.

summus   November 6th, 2007 11:51 am ET

they are switching to try and keep Clinton from getting the nomination. Republicans are afraid of Clinton!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Doug, New Jersey   November 6th, 2007 11:38 am ET

Obama is just another lib that wants to rob hard working Americans and give their money to the paid to vote democrat entitlement class. Anyone who would support this form of socialism that is the Democratic party of today is not a good person anyway. One can only hope that fairness, kindness, and self responsibility will win again, otherwise those of us who work hard will be robbed under Obama, and probably put into "re-education" camps under Hillary.

Since most Americans know what Hillary is all about (we are going to take things from you for the common good), I hope she gets the Dem nomination so that we can be saved from socialism by the republicans once again. Obama could win, Hillary cannot.

Kate, Aurora CO   November 6th, 2007 11:37 am ET

Its sad because the Republicans in power today do not represent a true Republican. They are evangelical extremists who have placed their own personal faiths above the laws of our country. They see fit to completely dimiss our constitution to fit their own personal faith based agenda and its sick. A true Republican believes in little government interference as possible but this administration with its wire tapping and outing of CIA agents is nothing like a true Republican.

Salita   November 6th, 2007 11:17 am ET

For all of you who think these republicans are serious about voting for Obama in the general election…here is a thought….which do you think will be the easier win for the republicans….taking on Hillary on the issues(shades of Bill Clinton whipping republican back side in the debates) or using the "Southern strategy" on Obama? Maybe we should ask Henry Ford? Try to keep your eyes on the ball.

Jay, Kenosha, WI   November 6th, 2007 11:07 am ET

Once you get beyond Obama saying he's new and different you find that he looks very much like the other Democrat candidates. The last person to say he was something new was George W. Bush in 2000. Just what "issue" has resonated with Repubilcans that would cause a switch?

Perhaps these "Republicans" are the kind of folks who shop and buy based on pretty packaging and not the contents. I expect them to switch back once they see Mitt Romney's hair.

Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR   November 6th, 2007 11:02 am ET

I disagreed with the importance of this article and did so in a non-abrasive manner and my comment was deleted. That is truly pathetic. Lauren, are opposing views not OK on your thread?

Troy, LV, NV   November 6th, 2007 10:54 am ET

Why change the party, Vote for Ron Paul. All the canidates do is attack one another and make promises that are basically the same as everyone else. Ron Paul is the only one that has clear and direct ways to bring change to the country. Too bad the MSM is too afraid to give the guy a chance.

b-rocks New York, NY   November 6th, 2007 10:25 am ET

Wow, Karen from NY- I've heard Hillary supporters say some pretty hateful things about the man who could deny Hillary the nomination- but you're the first person to call him "evil."

What next, Hillaryland? Are you going to accuse him of murder? We'll just wait and see…

Dean, Pittsburgh, PA   November 6th, 2007 10:22 am ET

David from Los Angeles, you have reinforced my belief in the change we need. You have stated the bull-headed foolishness that has left our country in the dire need for change. Obama does not appeal to Republicans. He appeals to intelligent people. This country needs someone willing to think and respond in earnest, not play to party politics.

Further, how would a "fighter who is willing to be unpopular" be any different than Bush? It would be the same song with a different tune.

Finally, I am registered as an Independent, and plan to register as a Democrat to vote for Senator Obama. I think people underestimate how strong Obama's multi-partisan support has become.

Ryan Indianapolis   November 6th, 2007 10:16 am ET

Straight hard cash will make anyone change parties. These people obvoiusly were not die hard republicans , cause no TRUE republican would vote for a Socialist…..Not buying it.

Michael, Carbondale, KS   November 6th, 2007 10:08 am ET

Obama will make a good president, someday. Clinton-Obama ticket. Landslide victory for the dems.

JC, Topeka, Kansas   November 6th, 2007 9:53 am ET

Sure Republican cross overs will vote for Obama, hes their best bet at having a Republican victory in the election out of the top three Democratic canidates.

Moz, Oville, PA   November 6th, 2007 9:13 am ET

I hope Hillary wins the nomination because I truly believe she is the agent for change we need. If you look at the years she and Bill were in the White House they fixed social security, got national health care, secured our country against terrorism, and set new standards for ethics in an administration. (Pardon me while I gag). Go Obama!!

AJ; Montpelier, VT   November 6th, 2007 8:55 am ET

Oh please, what a pack of liars. Its obvious that the reason they a switching parties is to try and push Sen. Clinton off of her mark. These people would vote in Democratic primaries and then turn around and vote Republican in the general election. Has Karl Rove been sturring th pot again. What an incredibly dishonest way to try and interfere with an election. Typical Republicans, corruption and prevarication (in other words liars and cheaters.)

Dave, Cheverly, MD   November 6th, 2007 8:26 am ET

I usually don’t comment on what things should be taken off of here. But this two-week-old joke is about one day short of a FortNight (two weeks) worth of REDICULASNESS. There by fully deserve to be taken off forever. Its REDICULAS and I have less respect for Colbert

freetobeme, Rochester, PA   November 6th, 2007 8:23 am ET

We don't need to "start getting things done again," Jerry Spivak. We need to restore our Republic.

Vermont   November 6th, 2007 8:05 am ET

I am an advid supporter of Barack Obama, however, if Hillary is the nominee I will vote Republican.

Anonymous, VA   November 6th, 2007 7:54 am ET

Pam of Long Beach,

"This administration has ensured that I will NEVER and I mean NEVER vote for another republican".

That's just BRILLIANT Pam! Let me get this straight. Every candidate, no matter if they're Dem or Rep, has the same leadership skills and character asof other member of their party? Get real!! If that's the case why would anyone vote Democrat after Jimmy Carter? For those old enough to remember, the Carter years were truly very painful. How does an 18% fixed, 30 year home loan sound, Pam?

Arthur. Orlando (expat)   November 6th, 2007 6:24 am ET

As a republican I am cheering for Clinton. I just can't see her beating anyone in a straightoff national election.

If there were someone who could abolish the bipartisan politics-game it would be McCain. Obama might be a good man but I just can't see him making any friends from the rightwing republicans.

Coyne, Fallujah, Iraq   November 6th, 2007 5:58 am ET

I'm from IL, I changed my affiliation as well to vote for Obama in the primaries. He has proven he has the intelligence, foresight, and sense to lead this country.

Jonathan Turner, Tampa, Florida   November 6th, 2007 5:08 am ET

As some other's have stated in previous comments… there are far more people jumping ship to support Ron Paul than any other party affiliations. I am one of them myself. I was going to vote Democrat, but after hearing Ron Paul, I am supporting him entirely and actively. He is a real rarity in Washington! Honest, doesn't waffle, and wants to abide by the constituition! I know, what a crazy idea… if you haven't looked at him, check him out and I promise you that you will be supporting him!

Ivan, Chicago, Illinois   November 6th, 2007 2:12 am ET

The Republicans are so afraid of Hillary that they are having republicans cross over to vote against her. And they want anyone but Hillary.
You don't see the republicans attacking any other democrat.

John, Euless, TX   November 6th, 2007 2:11 am ET

Gee…I changed also to support Obama…WHATEVER!! How much do they pay you people to get on here and sound so helpless. Obama has been preaching politics of change but has only been showing us politics as usual. He resorts to mud slinging and personal attacks to get his name in the news. Same old politics as usual with OBAMA. Edwards has been slinging mud since day one. Support the one candidate who is strong enough to lead this nation. Support the one candidate who can be respected across the world and give the world a reason to respect our country again. That candidate would be Hillary Clinton HANDS DOWN! There is no question that she will do a grat job not only as President but also as the first female President of the USA. She has shown us that she can rise above the mud slinging and run a very positive and drama free campaign. GO HILLARY GO!

Bryan Stice, Merced, California   November 6th, 2007 1:59 am ET

As a life-long Republican, I've become disgusted with the current direction of the Party. But rather jump on the band wagon of Obama & his polical party, I am jumping on that wagon of Ron Paul …the only Republican candidate who wants to bring the troops home, to preserve/restore our quickly-fading civil liberties, and to place the people before corporations (or unions in the case of democrats).

I've never been as enthusiastic or supportive of any candidate as I am after reading about Ron Paul. Now that he's raking in the campaign contributions in record fashion (more one-day contributions/$s than any other republican candidate in history) he should start receiving the widespread national attention he's so certainly deserves.

A. Harrison Atlanta, GA   November 6th, 2007 1:45 am ET

Is there any comment that should be placed for this. Everyone sees what this set up is…Get rid of the "electable" by supporting their opponent..then proceed to vote for who you really want (go figure).

Less than 2 months to go.

Howard, Huntington, NY   November 6th, 2007 1:39 am ET

Unfortunately, New York's absurdly early party change deadline prevented me from changing my party affiliation to Democrat. Otherwise I would be voting for Obama in the primary. As it is, I hope I have a chance to vote for him in the general election. Otherwise, I'll be voting third party.

Jason Bohdan Sywak   November 6th, 2007 1:38 am ET

These people shouldn't be changing their party to vote for Obama, they should be preparing to vote for Ron Paul.

Unlike Barack Obama, Ron Paul actually attends voting sessions (such as the recent vote regarding Iran's military), and votes to no to war with Iraq, no to unbalanced budgets, no to the usa patriot act, no to the military commissions act, no to big fed'l government…

Don't switch parties. Switch candidates.

Patrick, Tulsa Oklahoma   November 6th, 2007 12:33 am ET

As an independent who has liberal leanings on some issues and conservative leanings on other issues I can tell you that if Obama is the democratic nominee I would likely for him. On the republican side McCain is who I would like to vote for. Ron Paul is the wild card, I believe he would draw a lot of democratic support but also repel a lot of republican support who would be more likely to go with a moderate democrat than a constitutional structuralist who would elminate far more programs than what most republicans would actually go along with. Those three candidates I believe have the most cross-over appeal. I personally like all three of them.

Muthoni,boston,ma   November 6th, 2007 12:17 am ET

Does CNN really thing the change in party affiliation of 300 voters is worthy of a front page link?
Are we supposed to believe this is the iceberg tip of a trend?
Perhaps these 300 will send him over the top to victory.
This wasn't even blog worthy much less news worthy.

Posted By Ken Consaul, Yucaipa, Ca 92399 : November 5, 2007 6:10 pm

So clinton news network have started to acknowlegde we as voters or Americans have brains……….
This is real political news… and
For you Ken, up there, It is our turn and
Ukuigua uguo!!!!
Go figure what that means,

sally,portsmouth,NH   November 6th, 2007 12:07 am ET

As an independent in California…I say, ANYONE but a republican! This administration has ensured that I will NEVER and I mean NEVER vote for another republican. I've learned my lesson! Hilary, Barack, John Edwards…anyone but a repub!

Posted By Pam, Long Beach, California : November 5, 2007 6:18 pm
I am with you all the way….
I am an Indepedent who votes republican if I like the candidate but lessons learned the last 8years is so huge for me to consider them anymore. I will NEVER, and I said, NEVER vote republican……..I have closed my ears for this president to get out of the office. I feel robbed and I will not consider Ron Paul or HIllary or anything close to that……I rather vote for Dodd,Obama or John edwards!!!

Linda, Edmond, OK   November 6th, 2007 12:00 am ET

go obama! if hillary gets the DEM nomination, i will vote for the republican. OBAMA 2008!!!!!!

ryan carol stream illinois   November 5th, 2007 11:55 pm ET

Hardly news worthy. 300 people over 2 states? Come on.. Im glad to see CNN is giving spotlight to Ron Paul, which he deserves. We dont need bi-partisan politics!! We need the constitution!! End of story!

Taylor, Oxford, OH   November 5th, 2007 11:45 pm ET

Republican leaning independent from Ohio… will be voting in the Democratic Primary for Obamam and encourage others to register and do the same.

If he doesn't win I will vote Republican unless the candidate is Fred Thompson

jacob,baltimore,md   November 5th, 2007 11:44 pm ET

Does CNN really thing the change in party affiliation of 300 voters is worthy of a front page link?
Are we supposed to believe this is the iceberg tip of a trend?
Perhaps these 300 will send him over the top to victory.
This wasn't even blog worthy much less news worthy.

Posted By Ken Consaul, Yucaipa, Ca 92399 : November 5, 2007 6:10 pm

when Hillary was flashing herself around and blocking questions, Obama was busy building his grassroot network. Now the reality is sinking because CNN(clinton news network) was all reporting about her but have realized no body have been watching television lately and guess what, American people are ver smart, they filter in what they want and leave the mouthful media people to make noise….I wonder if they take any Tilenol at the end of 8 hour programs…..

Daniel, Ronan MT   November 5th, 2007 11:43 pm ET

As an AMERICAN I would vote for the "true" Republican named Ron Paul. Obama does not have what it takes for a real change in america.

Borios Dallas TX   November 5th, 2007 11:39 pm ET

Yea, I hear 99 County Commissioners changed parties to vote for Edwards. And Ahmoudinegad switched parties to vote for BamaO. And Hitler News Network deletes it all. We got quite the campaign going dont we ?

Olin   November 5th, 2007 11:34 pm ET

I think this country needs CHANGE! and it needs it NOW! The only authentic candidate that we can trust regardless of what party or past voting record you've had is SENATOR JOHN McCAIN.

He is the only on who supports FREE TRADE without political reservations and also supports a GUEST-WORKER PROGRAM FOR IMMIGRANTS who'd initially come in illegally, understanding that forgiveness is sometimes the most productive solution, especially when you're dealing with people who mean well and have worked hard.

Probably President Bush has tried to bring change over the last 8 years-both in foreign policy and domestic policy but because he is inarticulate and it's hard for him to capture that same moral authority that a POW like McCain has and that the Pres. was pretty much a novice politically, he had a hard time implementing his otherwise good ideas.

Please support McCain-he has the same convictions as President Bush but a greater savvy for maneuvering it through Congress and ability to articulate the reasoning behind his policies. In many ways he is like Tony Blair; supports the same foreign policy as President Bush but is able to present his vision and philosophy with articulation.

Please say NO TO DIRTY POLITICS this time. Support the only authentic and unequivocally courageous candidate: JOHN McCAIN!!!

Henry Miller, Cary, NC   November 5th, 2007 11:25 pm ET

To all you disaffected Republicans:

Check out Ron Paul. Seriously. And check out the previous Political Ticker article on Paul's November 5th fundraising drive: $3.5 million in less than 24 hours, and still climbing. (I used to be a Repub myself, but gave that up when the authoritarian-thug neocons stole the party name.)

To all you disaffected Democrats:

Check out Ron Paul. Seriously. Depends on your priorities, I suppose, but Paul is even more against foreign warmongering than any of the Democrats lining up for President seem to be.

To everyone who says Paul hasn't a chance:

If everyone who ever said that actually votes for Paul, they'd disprove themselves. :-)

Baris Los Angeles CA   November 5th, 2007 11:21 pm ET

So what about the 450 Democrats that changed Parties, so they could vote for Guilani. Hey, now, Hitler News Network, you got to be fair.

Columbus, Olivette, MO   November 5th, 2007 11:20 pm ET

He is inspirational, pragmatic, and honest. I would hate to see this great Republic embrace dynastic rule. I can't withstand a whole generation of Bush (4), Clinton (8), Bush (8) and another Clinton (8) again! I mean this would be a disaster for this country and the beginning of the end. I will definitely for Obama in the primary, and for any Democrat, other than Hillary, in the General election. But if Hillary is the nominee, I will have to vote Republican to save this country from Dynastic rule. This is a fundamental issue that should transcend party affiliation. Go Barack!

Bava Chicago IL   November 5th, 2007 11:20 pm ET

Probably about the number of Hitler News Network moderator, who felt bad about deleting the 300 worthwhile posts.

suzzy,concord,NH   November 5th, 2007 11:19 pm ET

I can not be happier than I am for those 300 voters and many more!!! I have been hearing this around here in Newhemshire and I hope all goes well for Obama…

Boris Moscow Russia   November 5th, 2007 11:18 pm ET

Wow, that should be worth a Carter and Dukakis Endorsement. Amazing Obama. Your campaign might tank earlier than expected.

Gichel Chicago IL   November 5th, 2007 11:16 pm ET

So what? Is this another report of fictious numbers, by Hitler News Network, in there Iranistic efforts to control the news and election? Face up to it, goofy moderators.

Robert, Shelton, CT   November 5th, 2007 11:16 pm ET

I don't think he can stop the war chest and steam roller of Clinton's campaign…a few people switching parties doesn't mean they'll vote for you in the general, it just means they want to keep Clinton off the ballot; which will fail.

Micheker Chicago IL   November 5th, 2007 11:11 pm ET

WOW ! WOW ! WOW ! 300 Voters, that is Absolutely Amazing. At 99 cents a vote ? I see Obama and Edwards been plotting strategy. I like those high numbers. Should do it. Good job there Bama.

itstrue chicago,ill   November 5th, 2007 11:06 pm ET

I doubt if its true.im so glad hilary keeps her stance.

Someone needs to unmask Obama for the nickel/dime charlatan he is.. Someone needs to find those tenants he let freeze over that cold Chicago winter. Have them testify to his ignoring their cries for help..while he filled his pockets with Rezko money for financing his campaign.

A. Thomas, New York, NY   November 5th, 2007 10:59 pm ET

Hey Obama, don't trust these repub people supporting you now. In the unlikely happening that you get nominated by the dems (you won't), these people will give you up and vote for their republican nominee in the general election!

Reason? YOu are simply un-electable. You can be easily defeated by the repub nominee, while Hillary can't!

Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky   November 5th, 2007 10:58 pm ET

I don't trust Republicans and Obama supporters, they just raise a disturbance,let Obama nominate and destroy Hillary, because Republican can beat Obama easily in General election but no way to beat Hillary, that's why they want Obama wins in Primary. Obama supporters are very low like Obama, they pretend as Republican and shake voter's mind. Obama supporters are wobblers. Those Republicans will vote GOP in General Election, they have no chance to win White House so they play dirty trick already. I don't trust Republicans and Obama supporters.

jo, ATL GA   November 5th, 2007 10:57 pm ET

You are kidding me right? This is the low of the low.

Obama you think they will vote for you? My God he is really naive? 300 votes?

Michale Chicago IL   November 5th, 2007 10:57 pm ET

Why don't you say, the Dumb Republicans, and drop the 'early states part?

George Fendham, Yorktown, VA   November 5th, 2007 10:56 pm ET

It's not just those 300 people. My entire family, who religiously votes Republican, are supporting Obama's campaign with donations. He is inspiring, we all love his message, and I am certain Iowa will be his trophy.

DJ, Los Angeles, CA   November 5th, 2007 10:53 pm ET

This is very encouraging news and a telltale sign just how appealing Obama is to conservative voters.

Obama has experience focusing on bridging the gap between conservative and liberal voters and to get past all the tired rhethoric.

Hillary is hated by most Republican voters and she will probably not win any Red states that voted for Bush in the last election.

Jeff Edwards, New Orleans, LA   November 5th, 2007 10:51 pm ET

Republicans for Obama? I guess the Grand Old Party of homophobes found someone in Obama who proved recently that he actually would represent them best. I'm shocked.

Chaliburto Chicago IL   November 5th, 2007 10:51 pm ET

and the Texas Rangers won the World Series

Heydn, Nashville, TN   November 5th, 2007 10:41 pm ET

He obviously appeals to Republicans for the same exact reason Kerry had appeal in 2004. Kerry was simply not Bush and Obama is not Clinton. We all know how much Republicans hate Hillary Clinton.

Michael, Los Angeles   November 5th, 2007 10:41 pm ET

Of course NH republicans will vote for Obama in the primaries-they want to keep the white house and know he can never win the general election. As far as bringing the country together, it won't happen, just more of Obama's naivety that has now become rhetoric.

Rose Hann New London, CT   November 5th, 2007 10:34 pm ET

Second time I am posting a comment. Though Obama gained a little traction listening to pundants who say "he has to attack Clinton' if he wants to get ahead. This display is a temporary fix for a long term problem. Hillary stays above the frey and thats whats gotten her where she is-The Front Runner. I have no doubt she will get the nomination and she will get it without being nasty. We'll leave the nasty to Edwards. His ego is terribly brused. It brought out the ugly on the guy with the $425.00 hair cuts. He lied about how many he had. Two Americas he says. He's right, the one he lives in, and the one the rest of us lives in. He's clueless.

Dora, Michigan   November 5th, 2007 10:31 pm ET

As a woman who voted for Goldwater many years ago, I like what I hear about Barack Obama. Many of my neighbors and friends think that he can bring this country together and get some things done. It would be nice to have a woman as our president, but I just can't believe how she evades questions, which makes me wonder if she is telling us the truth. That really bothers me. Mr. Obama has character and honesty, that I think is more important than having a woman, just because she is a woman, in the White House. God knows, we have so many problems, but not enough good people to move our country forward. I think that Obama will make a great president.

Mark, Minneapolis, MN   November 5th, 2007 10:12 pm ET

Be careful fellow Democrats! They might be trying to interfere in order to nominate the candidate they perceive as easiest to beat.

Rose Hann New London CT   November 5th, 2007 10:11 pm ET

Obama's numbers seem to poject the intellegence of the voting public. His ack of experience stifles any chance to win the nomination. He was dubbed "The rising star" of the Democratic party when he won his seat to the US Senate, but he's hardly had Senate experience. He's missed more votes then all the contenders. I would be frightened to have him as president. His time will come, just not now.

E. Moore, Georgetown Texas   November 5th, 2007 9:50 pm ET

People so biased towards Hillary. I can see why, most people believe she isn't fit for presidency. But let's see YOU go and start a campaign and still come out with a smile. I'm all for Obama but don't hate her, at least she is trying.

Gayle, Ozark, Arkansas   November 5th, 2007 9:49 pm ET

I saw a picture of Obama, Hilary and Romney standing in front of a United States flag where they were saying The Pledge of Allegiance. All had thier hands over their hearts except Obama and he refused to say the pledge. Do we really want someone like him to be our president? I don't think so!

Chris, Cambridge, MA   November 5th, 2007 9:49 pm ET

I've been a Democrat all my life, but I'm switching to Republican because I believe strongly that only Ron Paul can save this country from economic disaster. There are hundreds like me — Why doesn't that make the CNN Ticker?

Fair,Washington, DC   November 5th, 2007 9:42 pm ET

I'm not questioning anyones choice of who they cast their vote for but I'm voting for Hillary in the primary and whoever gets the Dem nod in the general election. Thats where my concern lies…if you wanna believe these Dems that say anybody but Hillary it seems they don't know how to support the Dem candidate that they think is best without tearing down a fellow dem who might actually get the nod. I'm not voting for the other Dems in the primary but you can bet I will vote for whoever is the democratic candidate in the general election. So anybody but Hillary, does that mean you vote Republican or don't vote at all…just curious.

Tom, Chicago, IL   November 5th, 2007 9:40 pm ET

I am no prophet, but I predicted something exactly like this would happen! I told everyone that if the Republicans do not nominate Ron Paul, then the Democrats will win! So if you do not support Ron Paul, your only chance to stop Hilary would be to register Democratic and vote for Obama (or some other top tier Democrat). A vote for any Republican other than Dr. Paul is a vote for Hilary. Seeing that, GOP people who aren't backing Paul are trying to prevent Hilarity Clinton from getting the nomination.

Ben, Columbus, OH   November 5th, 2007 9:37 pm ET

I am an African American and I really wish Obama (and Edwards) would get out of the "WAY". These "in the way t…..s " just might make the Democrats loose the White House, again. Why any Democrat Presidential candidate would divide the Democrats this time around, I just can't understand? Tell Barack to stay off of SNL and run a better campaign.

slc   November 5th, 2007 9:35 pm ET

Obama should become a Republican, he is acting just like them.

Go Hillary!

DP, Mountain View, CA   November 5th, 2007 9:30 pm ET

First, it'll be easy to say that someone used to vote for Republicans as easy as for me to say that I used to vote for Democrats but now change my mind to vote for Republicans. Who will know if this true or not? No one!

Second, what's the deal with just 300 voters among 57 millions people who voted for Bush in 2004 election? Nothing! It's just 0.000005%!

Third, I just want to remind all the Democrats voters to be careful about illegal immigrant and muslim issues. The more you are too nice to illegal immigrants, the more will they take everything from you including your money and treasures. Same thing applies to muslim world. The more we give them the more will they ask for everything including your head.

Candice, FL   November 5th, 2007 9:29 pm ET

I could personally give the names of 20 or so IND and DEM voters that I know who have changed their affiliation to REP to vote for Ron Paul in my state because of the closed primary. I would venture to say the number of converts is positively huge, way higher than these numbers for Obama.

Cynda, Middletown, CT   November 5th, 2007 9:27 pm ET

There have been numerous reports of republican women crossing over to vote for Hillary. Not sure if they are any more true/newsworthy than this. I suppose we'll see…

CAREN   November 5th, 2007 9:20 pm ET

Did you know that at least three of the Neo-Cons who were part of the group leading the charge for us to go to war in Iraq are on Obama's Foreign Affairs Advisory commitee? Yep, kool-aid drinkers Mr. Hypocrite who villifies Hillary has Neo-Cons (can you get more right wing) advising him. Also the man who sold the world on WMDs (Colin Powell) is also one of his advisors. You guys need to detox, Obama is using you & your hatred of Hillary is blinding you.

Hawk,Texas   November 5th, 2007 9:18 pm ET

Sounds like there are a lot of obamas people trying to say they were republicans. what i do not like about him is that he said he would run a clean campagn.what does he do? starts slinging mud at the democrats. he asked hillary to release her papers when he wont release his. at least hillary votes on the issues. obama has missed 80 percent of the votes. then he trys to blame hillary for voting.wake up people obama is a charlatin.hillary can bring this country together.obama was even dowing bill clinton the best president this country has had since rosevelt. with the bunch of nuts running things now i do not see how anyone could even consider a republican.i have been around for a while. 69 years and am a disabled veteran. wake up america. we are in peril.

william, oklahoma city, ok   November 5th, 2007 9:14 pm ET

Obviously these people weren't even Republicans to begin with if they are going to vote for a anti-gun, pro-choice, pro socialized medicine program, anti-american globalist who's also pro-illegal aliens. Good riddance to fake Republicans. I'd rather them get out now than screw up our primary elections voting for Rudy.

Stop the Bush/Clinton Dynasty   November 5th, 2007 9:11 pm ET

I'm certified by my local Board of Elections to register people to vote.

This story is just the tip of the iceberg for Senator Obama. Republicans are unhappy with their own pool of candidates and are switching parties in support of Senator Obama. They say they are doing so because they know he will hear their voice too.

If you would like to switch your party affiliation in order to vote for Senator Obama, contact your local Board of Elections. You just need to fill out a new voter registration card, identifying the party change. Some States require it be done 6 weeks in advance of the primary election.

Since rules vary by State, it is best to check with your local Board of Elections.

After the primary, you can switch back to Republican or Unaffiliated, if you wish, and vote in the general election.

Dave M. Philadelphia, Pa.   November 5th, 2007 9:07 pm ET

Pam in long beach said.."As an independent in California…I say, ANYONE but a republican! This administration has ensured that I will NEVER and I mean NEVER vote for another republican. ""

Funny, I say the same thing about Democrats. One Democrat president actually locked up and imprisoned a whole lot of ethnic US citizens against their will, Can you believe it? I'm shocked. (FDR and the Japanese Americans).

And another Democrat President actually dropped not one, but TWO nuclear bombs on innocent civilians. Can you imagine? What a horror! After I learned these facts, I vowed never to vote for a Democrat again.

Jen, Gainesville, FL   November 5th, 2007 8:59 pm ET

This is only the beginning. My husband, who has voted for Republicans all his life so far, told me that he will vote for Obama if Obama is the Democratic party nominee, but will still vote for the Republican nominee if Hillary is chosen.

KB, voting for Obama   November 5th, 2007 8:57 pm ET

Amen! I am one of them!!

Bill , Covington,LA   November 5th, 2007 8:55 pm ET

It pleases me that people like Jerry Spivak would leave the party for a Barack Obama. And when the time comes that Obamha is Not the demo nominee,and that time will come, I would hope we do not wish to have them return to the Republican party, we don't need those types.

Josh Pedaline, Columbus Ohio   November 5th, 2007 8:51 pm ET

I am an Ohio Republican an I am supporting Barack Obama. I have not decided if I am going to change my party affiliation to vote for Mr. Obama in the Primary yet, but the thought has crossed my mind. It's good to see that there are others just like me.

Josh Pedaline

http://www.republicansforobama.org

Clinton, MS   November 5th, 2007 8:50 pm ET

Count me in! I'm a long-time Republican who will vote for Obama. The Republicans (that I supported)squandered their time in power, and Hillary will do nothing to unite the country. She is very smart, but she has so much baggage and isn't very trustworthy. I'll roll the dice with a new guy with vision and hope.

Rob D, Redmond WA   November 5th, 2007 8:48 pm ET

Republicans won't switch to vote for Hillary, because they have Giuliani supporting all of the same positions.

Good luck to Obama, but at some point people will have to take the lack of experience seriously.

Dave M. Philadelphia, Pa.   November 5th, 2007 8:46 pm ET

Obama’s positions on the issues are startling. Here’s a CBS news article listing his votes in the past.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml

Some highlights…”He voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses who survive.”

Wow! I guess he wants universal healthcare for children but just not very young children.

“Voted against letting people argue self-defense in court if charged with violating local weapons bans by using a gun in their home. (2004)”

This would be for using a gun to defend against intruders. That’s a stunning position for Obama to take.

“Obama occasionally supported higher taxes, joining other Democrats in pushing to raise more than 300 taxes and fees on businesses in 2004 to help solve a budget deficit. The increases passed the Senate 30-28. ”

That’s a sure way to kill job creation. Instead of cutting spending, he votes to raise taxes on struggling job-creating entrepreneurs to fix the deficit.

“Helped pass a 5 percent earned-income tax credit for low-income working families in 2000; made the credit permanent in 2003.”

Made that permanent but wouldn’t vote to make this next one permanent…

“Voted against making permanent the repeal of the state’s 5 percent sales tax on gasoline. (2000)”

“Successfully sponsored the Health Care Justice Act, a study of ways to implement a universal health care system statewide. (2004)”

Never mind that socialized health care systems in Canada and England are failing and going private, despite what Michael Moore says. Government health care as in Walter Reed Army hospital type healthcare? No thanks!

“Voted against restrictions on public funding of abortion. (2000) ”

So we the people have to pay for an abortion of a wild, partying teenager or a welfare queen mother? Where’s the so called “Obama unity” in that?

“Voted against making gang members eligible for the death penalty if they kill someone to help their gang. (2001)”

Oh my! That should really help to quash gang violence.

” Unsuccessfully co-sponsored ban on discrimination based on sexual orientation. The measure became law after Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate. (2003)”

But Obama thinks that dicriminating on race is still OK via affirmative action. The two positions don’t jive.

“Voted against giving tax credits to parents who send their children to private school. (1999)”

Obama is just another liberal who thinks that abortion should be a choice but school choice is not to be a choice. The bleeding heart of liberals sure is selective, isn’t it?

Markie Bee   November 5th, 2007 8:44 pm ET

Obama has always been about inclusion. No matter what we Democrats think, the Republicans aren't going away. There will still be plenty of them in congress and to be able to reach across the aisle to affect change is perhaps Obama's greatest attribute as a politician. Hillary can't say that. As one respondere said, she is automatically leary of a Dem appealing to a Republican…what nonsense. The vast majority of Americans are in the center politically – as is Obama. Obama will help stop the pendulum swinging so far to the right in governing (as it does now) but, as importantly, he'll stop it from swinging too far to the left. As he said in 2004, "We are not a collection of red states and blue states. We are the United States."

08ama08!

Dave M. Pa. conservative   November 5th, 2007 8:44 pm ET

Let’s examine a few facts about Obama, first as a person and then on his positions on the issues. When I’m done, it will be clear why Obama is one of the worst candidates for president. First of all, as a supposed champion of the poor, Obama and his wife give little to charity. In 2005, he and his wife made $1.67 million in income and only gave $77,315 to charity for a rate of less than 5%. Contrast this to George and Laura Bush who consistently give over 10% of their income to charity.
Second, he and his wife are ardent supporters of the hideous medical procedure of partial birth abortion, aka infanticide. This gruesome act involves, well, you better find out for yourself, it’s too disgusting for me to detail. In fact, Michelle Obama sent out a fund raising letter in February 2004, saying it was a “legitimate medical procedure”. That is a shocking statement indeed.

Third, despite Barack’s criticism of our current healthcare system, he and his wife cash in on it handsomely. She is a hospital administrator who made the princely sum of $312,962 in 2005. And her background is in law, not hospital management. When the progressives complain about the problems of the current health care system, they usually mention exorbitant executive salaries. Well, they now only have to look in their own back yard for one of the sources of the problem.
BTW, here’s the link for evidence of my claims.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/72374,CST-NWS-obama26.article

PM Oldsmar,FL   November 5th, 2007 8:33 pm ET

For you Obama supporters, can you list for us doubters tangible accomplishments for this man that have prepared hiom for the presidency? Other than give a lot of warmy, fuzzy stump speeches, I DO NOT see where he is qualified to lead this nation. Please no slamming of other candidates or our curernt President, just his qualifications and accomplishements.

Adam, Pittsburgh   November 5th, 2007 8:30 pm ET

I know so many reasonable Republicans who want him to win so they can vote for him. Most of them are former McCain supporters, which kind of freaks me out, but I like the idea of a president winning with more than 51% of the country behind him/her. It's nothing to be afraid of – rather, it's something to embrace.

C. Meyer, Covington, KY   November 5th, 2007 8:27 pm ET

A vote for Obama is a vote for Islam and everything anti-US. THis is a man who won't cover his heart during the national anthem, refuses to block Social Security to illegals, and has absolutely ZERO experience that would qualify him to be president. If 300 Republicans changed parties, so what? He's got a lot bigger problems….

Sarah, Columbus, OH   November 5th, 2007 8:22 pm ET

Dear David, from Los Angelos:
I just want to tell you that it was due to a post very similar to yours that I read a few months ago, that I decided I would definitely NOT be voting to Hillary Clinton.

The blogger wrote about how it was "our turn" and since we have a chance at winning back the WH, why on earth would we want to elect someone who Republicans can actually get along with. I AM extremely upset about the direction our country has taken in the last few years, and very concerned about the future. But, I don't think that all this fighting back and forth between the parties is what our country needs. We need to change politics, to work together.

BUTCH OPSEY RAEFORD,N.C. 28376   November 5th, 2007 8:19 pm ET

OBAMA DOESN'T EVEN SUPPORT THE PLEDGE OF ALLIGENCE. WHAT WILL THIS NUT DO IF HE WOULD WIN. THIS OLE WORLD IS IN SOME DEEP DODO

CAROLE ALLENDALE NEW JERSEY   November 5th, 2007 8:19 pm ET

i hope everyone sees the real person in obama .. a man that can unite this country not divide.. it has been a long time coming but i see that people are starting to finally see hillary for the person she really is.. her days of deciving and calculating and conniving are coming to a halt.. we need a leader now.. that can unite the world.. hillary has an agenda to get back at all the republicans and people that imeached her husband.. and almost cost her the ability to run for a senate seat(a junior senate seat) somethng everyone seems to have forgotten.. run obama run…!!!!!

Coach Haughton NH   November 5th, 2007 8:18 pm ET

If hillary wins, I wonder how many democrats will vote republican

Liberal Chic   November 5th, 2007 8:17 pm ET

Hey, y'all. I've got my own version of anyone-but-Hillary. If by some chance Obama becomes the nominee, I do believe I will vote for Giuliani. I could vote for Edwards if not Clinton, but I don't think that chance will come. Giuliani is a nasty person, but is left on most social issues and at least he's been around.

Obama is just a johnny-come-lately. I think it would be a huge, giant mistake to let someone with so little experience (and apparent ego) run the country. Just look at how the current Bush has done. If anyone is a Bush-Cheney-Lite, it's Obama as is evident by the supposed support of Republican constituents.

I wonder if anyone else would support Giuliani instead of Obama.

Bob, Seattle, WA   November 5th, 2007 8:14 pm ET

The real story is how many registered democrats are going to vote for Mike Huckabee.

Vernon Loyd Rockledge, FL   November 5th, 2007 8:09 pm ET

Hard core Republican Clinton haters will say and do anything to try to defeat the Clintons. Hillary is by far the most qualified person to become President. Beware of anyone who these right wing republican nuts support. GO HILLARY!!

Kim, Dallas, TX   November 5th, 2007 8:07 pm ET

This is just awesome that people are finally seeing the light. Obama is one of the only candidates that could potentially unite parties. I know we have many prejudiced people in our country and others that are just plain ignorant (those that constantly bring up his name and then decide he is Islamic due to a name-ignorant for sure). I hope that ignorance and prejudice do not win out in this election. We have too much at stake. I have always voted Democrat, but I would not vote for Hillary. There is too much controversy behind her and simply no way that she would unite the masses. She is way too polarizing and would only assure corporate America as the ruling party. We need someone that can get us out of the mess this administration has created. Nearly all of the Republican candidates are jumping on the fear bandwagon to win votes again. I am just plain tired of that platform and the need to go to war with every country we have a difference with. I never voted for Bush, never supported his ideology. HE is an evil man, not Obama. I cannot imagine how someone could think Obama is evil. Can you please explain yourself to me Karen in NY?

Here you have a guy that has been seen internationally as someone that can be a positive changing force for the world as a whole. He has so many success stories behind him. In 2005 a British Journal New Statesman listed Obama as one of ten people who could change the world. Time magazine named him one of the world's most influential people in both 2006 and 2007. It's time the public as a whole wakes up to the potential that lies within this man. He is a born leader.

Cliff, Philly, PA   November 5th, 2007 8:04 pm ET

Count another one here in PA. Everyone in my family is a die-hard Republican, and I've just registered Democrat (from being Independent) just so I can vote for Barack in the Primary. Now, to work on my parents and sister to do the same…

Jackson, Morongo Valley, CA   November 5th, 2007 7:58 pm ET

"I can't think of a better reason to pick Sen. Obama over Sen Hillary Clinton. He's the only candidate to really get republican crossover votes. ………… HE'S THE ONLY ONE THAT ADMITTED TO GETTING ONLY 300!!! Be careful about what you read … it is very seldom the whole story.

Lindsay, Cottage Grove Oregon   November 5th, 2007 7:54 pm ET

I've never thought there was a difference between the two parties so never voted. I have, however, registered as a Republican so I can vote for Ron Paul. He's the only one with a voting record that matches what he says plus he's always voted NO on any legislation that is unconstitutional! It's time to vote for the PERSON, and Ron Paul is running for the people of this country, NOT the party or special interests. http://www.ronpaul2008.com

I will DEFINITELY not vote for someone who is a member of the CFR (look up Council on Foreign Relations), and sadly, your Barack Obama is a member.

Lance in Monrovia CA   November 5th, 2007 7:53 pm ET

To the person above who touts the article questioning Obama's transparency…

Obama has BY FAR been the most transparent of all the candidates either Repub or Dem. He has released his single earmark and is the only candidate to voluntarily release his tax returns.

He's also been single handedly accomplishing ethics reform in Washington, passing the first ethics reform in a generation and not accepting federal lobby money. That's about as transparent as one can get.

He's known as the go to guy for ethics, and the bill he passed recently will put information about every politician on line for all to see who is voting for what.

As for Republicans supporting Obama, the ones I've met are not part of some Rove inspired plot. They are genuinely fed up with the partisan divide and politics as usual. They recognize that Hillary is the most divisive figure in politics and that her election will lead to more gridlock.

Obama is far, far away from being a Republican. His ideas are decidedly liberal compared to Hillary.

These Republican folks simply want a government that works, instead of the disaster that it has become.

Just because you're a Republican doesn't mean you're a complete robot. The Republican party has moved so far away from it's original intent that who can blame people for craving something more sane and different.

Obama 08

Gary Goldberg Boca Raton FL   November 5th, 2007 7:53 pm ET

I also changed my party so that I can support Obama. If anyone is interested, my name is Gary Goldberg from the state of Florida and my email is goldbergwi@yahoo.com. I hope it helps you!

Mike, Modesto, CA   November 5th, 2007 7:53 pm ET

Pam the "Independent" wrote: As an independent in California…I say, ANYONE but a republican! This administration has ensured that I will NEVER and I mean NEVER vote for another republican. I've learned my lesson! Hilary, Barack, John Edwards…anyone but a repub!

Posted By Pam, Long Beach, California : November 5, 2007 6:18 pm

PAMELA DEAR, YOU JUST SPEWED FORTH AN ADMISSION THAT YOU'RE ANYTHING BUT "INDEPENDENT".

Curtis, Bloomington, Indiana   November 5th, 2007 7:53 pm ET

Me and my family are all moderate Republicans. We have decided we are still voting red in the next election unless Obama is the nominee, and I know several other Republicans with the same position. If I'm going to vote for a candidate that patronizes and polarizes I mine as well make it my own party. I've been following the campaign very closely and one thing I've noticed is that red or blue, Senator Obama is something very different. In a time of divided government, its the smallness of our politics not the size of our issues that needs attending to.

Bonnie Fraire   November 5th, 2007 7:51 pm ET

I can not vote for someone who will not salute the American Flag. I have never voted by party and I won't now, but for the Leader of our country to not salute my flag is dispicable.

Ranger19   November 5th, 2007 7:51 pm ET

Any Republican who would support Obama is a RINO and good riddance.
We don't want you in the party anyway.
Don't come back.

Eric, Carol Stream, IL   November 5th, 2007 7:51 pm ET

Such absolute fools these people are. Obama has really pulled the wool over their eyes. If they truly payed attention, they would see he's just as much a part of the partisan establishment and the rest of them. If these people had half a brain, they'd have voted for Ron Paul for change in Washington.
You want change? Wake up, folks!
Vote Ron Paul for President in 2008.

hillarylover NY NY   November 5th, 2007 7:51 pm ET

This really should make Obama feel bad. People are not supporting him because they like him and his policies, they are supporting him because he is what is perceived to be the opposite of Hillary. I wouldn't want that vote if I were him.

Steve, Campbell, CA   November 5th, 2007 7:48 pm ET

I look forward to the report on those who registered Republican to support Ron Paul, the numbers are much bigger.

Lance in Monrovia CA   November 5th, 2007 7:46 pm ET

I am an Obama volunteer in Monrovia, CA. I have personally met five different Republicans at volunteer meetings here since I started holding meetings. We actually have one tonight at the Coffee Bean in Monrovia at Myrtle and Foothill if anyone would like to attend.

I've also spoken to a handful of Republicans at the street festival here that support Obama. But the five I mentioned are those that have actually shown up to volunteer on his behalf.

I hear the same story every time. A few have been veterans who voted for Reagan and can't stomach Bush or any of the Repub candidates. They all feel that Obama has a great head on his shoulders and is the most sincere candidate with the best ideas and ability to end the troublesome gridlock in Washington.

I know one of the Republican volunteers I met recently was having a tee shirt printed up so that he can be honest when he goes out canvassing. His tee shirt printing was going to read, "Republicans For Obama."

Its not just Democrats that are fed up and ready for real change, its Republicans too and Obama appeals to them greatly.

Obama 08. Stop the Hate. Change Our Fate. Don't be Late.

Matt, Coral Gables, FL   November 5th, 2007 7:46 pm ET

If you want real change in Washington, then you need to support Ron Paul, and not Barack Obama.

For all the Republicans out there who are sick of the current administration's Neo-conservative agenda, you wouldn't even need to change your voter registration for the primaries. Don't confuse the wrong direction we are currently headed in with your party, and realize that it is the Neo-conservatives who have hijacked it.

Support the real conservative Republican from Texas who is fundamentally different from that other guy from there whom we call our president.

We need to get Bush and Cheney out of the White House, restore the Constitution and Habeas Corpus, bring our troops home, close Guantanamo, and end Big Government spending!

michael s., sacramento ca   November 5th, 2007 7:43 pm ET

Question for CNN – Where's the story about people who have broken party lines to support Ron Paul?

Colin742   November 5th, 2007 7:42 pm ET

It is likely that some Black Republicans will vote for Obama and that some female Republicans will vote for Hillary. It also possible that a few disillusioned Republicans of any stripe will vote for a Democrat. None are likely to have a significant affect on Primary results.

Walt, Belton, TX   November 5th, 2007 7:40 pm ET

Well, I reckon he'd be a hindsight better than ole Hillarity Clinton!

Maddoxx, NY, NY.   November 5th, 2007 7:39 pm ET

I don't trust the Republican support. Their votes are for a reason: to vote down the people they hate. Remember how we ended up with Liberman. He won because of Republicans. The question is: if you win by vitues of vengeful republican votes, do you think you are still a genuine and honorable Democrat? Republican will just do a Lieberman on Democrats for the wrong reason: Hatred.

My vote is firm: For Hillary.

Karen, NYC   November 5th, 2007 7:39 pm ET

We Republicans are united and will select the BEST candidate regardless of party. I am one of those who will switch parties to support Senator Barack Obama. This is a very critical time in our nation’s history and we need to put our differences aside and vote for the best candidate that has the vision and 'can do' attitude to get things done in Washington. Besides, it’s not about what you call yourself but more importantly who has what it takes to turn the page on everyday politics in Washington. Senator Barack Obama is careful with his words but strong on his desire not only to take the lead but to place the right staff in the right place to bring back dignity and respect to our nation.

Brandie R. Tampa, Fl   November 5th, 2007 7:38 pm ET

Obama is a great PERSON. Black, white, puerto rican, asian or any other race. The only RACE intelligent people should care about is the presidency. Fools voted Bush in & tore apart this country. It's time to get a humane and sensible person into office & Senator Obama is just that. Someone commented that white guys wouldn't vote him in. Ignorant white guys from the south are pointless in existence & just jealous because they are pale and pathetic. They can't stand that a black man is better than them. Wake up idiots!!! It's almost 2008!!!! It's "threatened" white guys like that who hang nooses—IN 2008— I know. They can't help that they're losers & have to try to put innocent black people down. I have had ENOUGH!!! I am sick of race being an issue in this country!!! We can't get along HERE—& we wonder why terrorists hate us! American's have lost their morals and ethics(a LARGE portion anyway!). Anyone who doesn't vote for Obama because he's a man of color is a moron who shouldn't have the right to vote in the first place. One should have to be intelligent to have the right to vote. How 'bout that one? For one, the man's mom was a sweet white lady…just like the redneck racist white guys in the south. It's pathetic when all you have in life is being white.

This coming from a white WOMAN!!!!

Anyone with a brain should know it's not about the party affiliation, it's about the candidate. Any successful human being can also see it's not about color.

Sophia, Oakland, CA   November 5th, 2007 7:32 pm ET

Well, I don't care for Obama and I will not vote for him. As a Democrat I think that this is ridiculous. I can't believe that this is happening. Obama is an evil man! They already had one of those Harkin's Annual Steak Fry. How many of those are they going to have.
Posted By Karen,ny : November 5, 2007 6:15 pm

Care to explain what make Obama "evil" ? What is with Hilary supporters being so hateful? Please someone, anyone, tell me what makes this women so great?????

Republicans going to support Obama is a great feat in these days of political divisivness and racial tension.

I am proud that after a disaster like Bush, the nation has a person like Obama that inspires people on grounds other than partisanship.

STOP
THINK
VOTE
OBAMA 08

matt   November 5th, 2007 7:30 pm ET

This is very interesting – if it's actually true. Kind of like Hillary's claim that GOP women are eagerly waiting to switch tickets in the general and vote Democratic just because of HRC. Yeah…

http://www.political-buzz.com/

Ron, TX   November 5th, 2007 7:28 pm ET

Republicans are sick of Bush and his devisiveness. Hillary Clinton is Bush-lite. She is both devisive and an old-style Washington politician. It's no surprise that Republicans ready for change think Barack Obama is the better person for the job.

And then it's also no surprise that strictly conservative Republicans dislike Hillary Clinton. She's still a socialist in their eyes. This makes perfect sense. She is playing the conservative war hawk card on foreign policy, while playing the liberal card on social policy. Strict conservatives don't want to play games with liberal social policy, and they will simply NEVER back any democrat.

Republicans willing to switch sides would naturally be more inclined to vote for a uniter, not a divider. After all, Bush was a great divider. And Hillary Clinton promises to continue that trend, and divide the nation. Her negatives are a consistent 45%. That's a very important number, and a very bad number for the Hillary camp come election day.

Maurice Washington, Richmond, VA   November 5th, 2007 7:28 pm ET

I can't trust these republicans. The same people would Rudy if Obama wins the nomination. I don't care whether Obama or Hillary wins the nomination, but considering trend of the republicans, they would never vote a black person in the general election.

Erik   November 5th, 2007 7:25 pm ET

Go Obama!

Crystal, NYC, NY   November 5th, 2007 7:25 pm ET

The country has had it with Bush the "Decider"
The last thing we need is eight more years with Hilary the "Divider" and Bill the "Womanizer."
Let's the country support Obama the "Uniter."

Obama '08!

Archie Kearney Ne.   November 5th, 2007 7:22 pm ET

Trusting a statement from CNN reporting on a statement from Obama's campaign; wow I fell for that one CNN!

Providence, RI   November 5th, 2007 7:21 pm ET

I will NEVER,NEVER, NEVER vote for Obama or Edwards-he is not qualified to be U.S. President, because he lacks experience in foreign policy, and he is too weak on national security…They also demonstrated disrespect toward a woman and the former first lady, by attacking her viciously on the last debate. He said in 2004-"I will never run for White House," which was a flip flop.

a j cora belmont ma.   November 5th, 2007 7:17 pm ET

republican beliefs have nothing in common with Opama's politics or values. Republicans supporting for Obama would be like Ted Kennedy endorsing Mitt Romney.

Kim, Sacramento, CA   November 5th, 2007 7:16 pm ET

This is happening all over the country, not just in two states and it is happening for two reasons. 1) There isn't a decent option in the Republican field and 2) Obama has the ability to unite people – appeal to all, a trait that a President should have.

Patricia you said it well and it is worth repeating, "This is precisely why I support Senator Obama. His message resonates with AMERICANS, not just Democrats or Republicans."

Lynn Ensley McCaysville Ga.   November 5th, 2007 7:13 pm ET

I can see why Republicans would vote for Obama so readily, after electing George Bush they would look smart with anyone. The trick won't work suckers, get used to it. Hillary will be the one and Ken Starr don't have any more ammo. Remember what the only half-smart Republican supposedly said, "Fool all the people some of the time.some of the people all the time," piss on the fire and call the dogs guys, we gotta take our country back.

Paul, New Orleans, LA   November 5th, 2007 7:11 pm ET

It doesn't matter, I like Obama, but Ron Paul attracts from the whole spectrum who want limited govt in their lives and want to pay NO Income taxes!

steve irvine ky   November 5th, 2007 7:10 pm ET

You have to be kidding ha ha ha ha liberals you are funny now keep on wishing though.The last time i checked obama makes liberals look conservitive you guys have to remember your polls and news has no influence on us anymore your utopia is over.

Daniel, NY   November 5th, 2007 7:08 pm ET

New polls have Obama dramatically cutting into Clinton's support, though Clinton stays up with clear leads. Also, a new general election poll has Clinton crushing Giuliani.

Ken, Denver CO   November 5th, 2007 7:07 pm ET

As an independent in x-California-x Colorado (who also normally votes Republican) I will be be changing to support Obama.

Anyone but Hillary!

Alice Newman Center Harbor NH   November 5th, 2007 7:03 pm ET

Republicans who state they will vote Democratic make me nervous. What is their real plan? Most of the Republicans I've met are so rabid that they consider any Republican married to a Democrat has a "mixed marriage" and have wondered how anyone could sleep with a Democrat.

The "anybody but Hillary" crowd donates to her campaign fund – guessing if she is the candidate – any GOP hack can bear her on hatred alone.

Is there really hope that some are putting the good of the country ahead of their politics?

john, NY,NY   November 5th, 2007 7:03 pm ET

I am not sure what plans Obama has for america. Ok Bush brought up the prices and US dollar nosedive. Obama's main strategy take jabs at Hillary and try to get votes of people who dislike clintons. There are plenty of dumb people in america who would fall for this.
Obama..please don't make fool of yourself by singing same song everywhere…hilary this and hillary that. One it comes to producing results I am sure you will make even bigger mess than Bush did. May be americans will be trying to immigration to China for jobs and may be vessels of illegal americans will be showing up at chinese seashore seeking shelter.

Johnny Bravo, Knoxville, TN   November 5th, 2007 7:01 pm ET

For MANY MANY years throughout the south, Republicans pretended to be Democrats (Richard Shelby of Alabama, for example) in order to get elected. During the 80's, Republican voters would vote in the Democratic primaries to try and influence who the opponent would be. Not because they supported the person they were voting for but because they wanted their candidate to have a better chance of winning.

If these folks really support Obama, then it is good for his candidacy and for democracy, if this is an attempt to influence who the Democratic party selects as it's nominee, then it is an underhanded and shameful practice.

Mike Longview, TX   November 5th, 2007 7:01 pm ET

What a ploy this is! The GOP voters who "cross over" to Obama in the primary will still vote for Rudy in the general election. They just think Obama would be easier to beat than Senator Clinton. This is so transparent.

Robert M., TX   November 5th, 2007 7:00 pm ET

Real Republicans, who are understandably disgusted with what has transpired over the past seven years, should be turning to Ron Paul. He is the candidate representing revolutionary change, the kind of change that is historically proven: peace, free trade, and individual liberty.

monica, rochester new york   November 5th, 2007 6:58 pm ET

Obama's appeal to a wide range of Americans is an incredible and unique strength, we shouldn't squander this opportunity. I hope more voters put aside their fear of change and give this new direction a chance. I want to be a country where we're all one America again instead of divided by party, or anything else. The whole world would be impressed with our choice, and we could recover from the embarrasment of having elected Bush twice. Thank you to those republicans who stand for what they think is right instead of some arbitrary party loyalties. They've shown they care a lot about the future of this country.

TJFRMLA   November 5th, 2007 6:57 pm ET

Congratulations to all you americans who put the country before Party. You are what real Patriots are made of. You are setting an example for other Americans (yes Democrats) who someday may find a Republican candidate the best choiCe for the AMERICAN PEOPLE and look back to your courage and candor.
Thank you All!!!
Barack Obama '08
*This time we'll get a smart President!

Derek, Phoenix AZ   November 5th, 2007 6:56 pm ET

300 people changed parties… and this is news? In a country of 300 million people that number is less than irrelavent.

Ron Paul, on the other hand, has raised 2.7 million dollars in the past 24 hours. Why aren't we hearing about him CNN?

Shawnie - Grants Pass, OR   November 5th, 2007 6:55 pm ET

Be still my beating heart. 350 you say? What a shallow story!

Gabe Peterson, Houston TX   November 5th, 2007 6:55 pm ET

They are doing this in hopes that Obama is gets the nomination. Wake up! He can't beat the Republicans. This is there little ploy to mess in the Democratic primaries. Obama should be trying to win Democrats. Has he seen his latest poll numbers?

Kdavidruguez, Cherry Hill, NJ   November 5th, 2007 6:54 pm ET

really! are the democrats really this stupid to fall in to a republican tactic like this..wake up people do you really think the south and the bible belt would vote for a black man let alone a woman. this is not a a time to be naive. be smart. if not hand it over to the republicans in a silver platter.

Wayne, Silver Spring, MD   November 5th, 2007 6:53 pm ET

This is what has been happening all along, had CNN and the other media listen.

The reality on the ground is far from the meaningless national polls you are releasing.

The truth is always what prevails.. and this time it is no different.

Dee Anna Roberts   November 5th, 2007 6:52 pm ET

Well, now I know Barack Obama will have no problem in the General. He's the polar opposite of the ….POLARIZING Hillary!

Ha Ha Ha

Russ Schultz, Springfield MO   November 5th, 2007 6:51 pm ET

I'm 47 and have voted Republican my entire life. I am supporting Barack Obama in this year's elections as well.

David S., Chicago, IL   November 5th, 2007 6:50 pm ET

Go Obama! As an independent (that means I don't fully affiliate myself with the Democrat or Republican parties), Obama represents real change – I'd really prefer a Gore/Obama ticket but that is just dreaming. Hillary is going to be a mistake – I have respect for her and for women who seek the office of President but do not feel she is going to unite the Country – and she represents the status quo. We all have the same needs!

Priorties:

1. Stop Funding the War – Invest in OUR COUNTRY!
2. Spend money on Universal Preventative Healthcare
3. Invest INVEST in Public Primary/Secondary Education and Higher Education!
4. REAL NATIONAL SECURITY: Invest and Innovate in alternative energies! Protect the environment!
5. Improve our standing in the world!
6. Reform immigration! Make citizenship a privledge – contribute to the well-being of our country!

..::Eddie::.. Atlanta, GA   November 5th, 2007 6:50 pm ET

While some are not impressed with 300 Republicans switching sides, the dynamic of these early-voting states should be taken in account.

The Iowa Caucus operates as an evening discussion of candidate supporters. If there are hundreds of Republicans in the Democratic Caucus arguing on behalf of the uniting power of Obama, the impact will be huge. Supporters for second-tier candidates will take notice and increase Obama's numbers throughout the evening. This could be noted as a deciding factor come Jan 3.

Now, if the NH Primary follows the Iowa "Bi-Partisan" victory for Obama, his support will have grown amongst both parties for another vital win.

Alas, this race is very fluid, and anything can happen. I advise every caring voter to engage in research on the candidates' policies and platforms. If our decisions are based on media rhetoric, we'll do a disservice to ourselves and our nation as a whole.

Dan, Saint Louis, MO   November 5th, 2007 6:50 pm ET

As an Illinois native and longtime tracker of Obama, I'm shocked at the idiocy of all you people jumping on the bandwagon of this media-made myth that is Obama. HOW CAN YOU SAY HE BRINGS PEOPLE TOGETHER? Because he says so? Because liberal outlets like CNN report ridiculous stories like this? Based on his voting record, the only objective measure, he's the most extreme candidate of either party. That means he never finds a way to find common ground with the other party. Please open up your eyes. No experience, no substance, empty rhetoric, trying to hide his extremist voting record. Obama is a sham.

Mike, Lansing, MI   November 5th, 2007 6:49 pm ET

The Republicans might vote for Barack to throw off the possibilty of having to face Clinton. In the Main Election they would simply vote Republican again if Barack won. This old political trick never gets enough people to do it to make it work though, but it does fool the press for while :)

jw, canadian,ok   November 5th, 2007 6:48 pm ET

Holy Liberal, I feel a landslide!

Ca Native   November 5th, 2007 6:47 pm ET

As an independent in California…I say, ANYONE but a republican! This administration has ensured that I will NEVER and I mean NEVER vote for another republican. I've learned my lesson! Hilary, Barack, John Edwards…anyone but a repub!

Posted By Pam, Long Beach, California : November 5, 2007 6:18 pm

———-

Pam, interesting you have such a staunch opposition to Republicans. Locally speaking, Arnold's doing a pretty good job. Gray Davis couldn't carry Arnold's political water.

Just curious – are you a teacher?

Farrell, Houston, Tx   November 5th, 2007 6:46 pm ET

As a democrat, I will continue to listen to all candidates regardless of the party each represent. Change is not an option for this great country. I pray we get it right this time.

Jesse, Burnsville, MN   November 5th, 2007 6:46 pm ET

Karen from NY, you say you are a Democrat and consider Obama an evil person?!?! Let me tell you, you are NOT a Democrat in my book!

Todd, Hermosa Beach   November 5th, 2007 6:45 pm ET

There you have it. The same people who support George Bush support Barak Obama. guess some voters just like inexperience!

Pete, NY   November 5th, 2007 6:41 pm ET

I have also switched parties from Republican to Democrat to support Obama in the primaries. I think he can be a great consensus candidate, and will bring people together.

JJ Lovithal, Dallas, TX   November 5th, 2007 6:39 pm ET

Same story here — was a diehard Republican. The last 8 years have left a bad taste in my mouth. At this point, I just think that we're at a place where this country needs fundamental change. The only truly transformative figure I see out there is Obama. He seems to aspire to greatness, which I believe is the same quality this country should aspire to as well.

Armando, Los Angeles, CA   November 5th, 2007 6:38 pm ET

As a former registered Republican for seven years before my switch to the Democratic side in 1994, this makes perfect sense. A lot of GOP folk who felt that their principles were compromised by GWB are looking at Obama, but for more than just being the anti-Hillary option. I hope that this trend continues in the early states, as it will mean that Barack will score some serious momentum. GOBAMA!

Becky, Arcadia, CA   November 5th, 2007 6:35 pm ET

As a Democrat, I'm going to switch to vote for Ron Paul.

Dan, NJ   November 5th, 2007 6:35 pm ET

I put myself in the opposite category. I prefer Obama but would vote for Edwards, Biden, Richardson, etc. if nominated. However, I could not vote for Clinton because I see her as a left leaning Bush when it comes to divisiveness.

James Claremont, CA   November 5th, 2007 6:29 pm ET

Doesn't Ron Paul get 300 Dems to switch everyday? He's the only wanting to end our military entanglements.

andy, Seattle, WA   November 5th, 2007 6:28 pm ET

Can these Republicans change back the party after, lets assume, they push Obama as the Democratic Party candidate? why not? he would be an easier target in the final presidential election when the debate will be (hopefully) more on issues than 'character' as everybody tries to suggest now.

Sorry Obama, your talk is good! it reminds us of communist ideals, sharing the pizza, hoping for better life.. but it will finally make us all poor. I thought America was the land of opportunities for hardworking people with great spirits, who are taking risks to reach goals. What risks do you take to tell us something debatable? All you do is catch Hillary's words .. maybe, maybe its something to trash there. Is this the American spirit? I will not vote for you!

Monte Brown, New York, NY   November 5th, 2007 6:27 pm ET

No surprise here. Some Republicans are plain haters and they think that supporting another hater (Obama) will knock off Hillary, the sure fire winner. They need to stop the hating. Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate, the most experienced candidate and she's READY TO LEAD.

Chris B. Greenville, SC   November 5th, 2007 6:26 pm ET

Is this really newsworthy or just more pro-Democrat propaganda from CNN? 268 Iowa Republicans changing their party registration out of how many registered? 574,000 from what I can find. That's a whopping .047%! Certainly more newsworthy than the improving economy, low unemployment and progress in Iraq.

Nick, Eden Praire MN   November 5th, 2007 6:26 pm ET

And democrats are changing parties to vote for Ron Paul, so many in fact inquired about it that it when registration was still open they had links describing how to go about doing this right on the top of his main page, but that apparently that doesn't warrant mention. Neither does the fact that Ron Paul's supporters have raised about 3 million dollars and counting just today. Oh well, I'd rather they help push Obama than any other democrat. Obama vs Paul would be a dream race.

Jesse, Burnsville, MN   November 5th, 2007 6:22 pm ET

David from L.A.,

By thinking that way, YOU are a part of the problem. Just because the independents fell for Bush and the Republicans let him do what they want, does not mean that we as Democrats should be revengeful. It is time for reconciliation and we can be the better party about this. By including Republicans who are sick of the antics of their own party, we are opening ourselves up for others to realize what Democratic values truly are.

David, Dallas Tx   November 5th, 2007 6:22 pm ET

And the Republicans were hoping Giuliani would be the candidate who would have cross-party/independent appeal to win swing states….

He probably will be, if Dems put Clinton in the race.

Joe, DC   November 5th, 2007 6:21 pm ET

Three hundred voters. Guess how many people voted in the 2004 Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary: 100,000 in Iowa and 218,000 in New Hampshire. Three hundred voters out of 318,000. And this is news? What a ridiculous joke. Yeah, this will really swing the tide to Obama. Can you say DESPERATION?

enock kebati, Rosemount, Minnessota   November 5th, 2007 6:20 pm ET

Republicans are sure for a landslide victory if Obama is the Demo candidate. No experience, ties with Muslims, no substance massage in campain trail. Obama will loss big time

John, Texas   November 5th, 2007 6:19 pm ET

I wouldn’t say I’m a Republican, but I’m pushing 50 years old and have never voted Democrat for President, Governor, or Senator. But, If Obama gets the nod for the Democrats, I’ll jump on that bandwagon

Patricia Wilson-Smith   November 5th, 2007 6:19 pm ET

This is precisely why I support Senator Obama. His message resonates with AMERICANS, not just Democrats or Republicans. Senator Obama will be the next President of the United States.

Aaron Kinney, Sherman Oaks CA   November 5th, 2007 6:18 pm ET

What about all the Democratic voters who have switched parties to vote for Ron Paul?

There are far more "Dems 4 Ron Paul" type groups than there are "Repubs 4 Obama" groups out there.

Pam, Long Beach, California   November 5th, 2007 6:18 pm ET

As an independent in California…I say, ANYONE but a republican! This administration has ensured that I will NEVER and I mean NEVER vote for another republican. I've learned my lesson! Hilary, Barack, John Edwards…anyone but a repub!

JT in TN   November 5th, 2007 6:17 pm ET

What's the point of switching parties in New Hampshire? They have open primaries. Also, how many of these people are long time Republicans and didn't switch to Republican just to switch back? These numbers are hardly meaningful at all whatsoever.

Former Republican   November 5th, 2007 6:16 pm ET

I changed my party in CA from Republican to Democrat to support Obama as well.

Karen,ny   November 5th, 2007 6:15 pm ET

Well, I don't care for Obama and I will not vote for him. As a Democrat I think that this is ridiculous. I can't believe that this is happening. Obama is an evil man! They already had one of those Harkin's Annual Steak Fry. How many of those are they going to have.

Andrew, Decatur IL   November 5th, 2007 6:15 pm ET

I would disagree with Mr. Spivak guy.

Ron Paul will bring a fundamental change and he is already uniting Americans.

Tom, ALBUQUERQUE, NM   November 5th, 2007 6:15 pm ET

The connivance and tricks of the GOP have no bounds. I theorize that the republican party would want Sen. Obama to win the nomination, knowing that many white voters in the general election would not vote for a black man for president, particularly in the southern states. This stinks like the chicanery of Rovean machination.

Rodak - Sacremento, CA   November 5th, 2007 6:14 pm ET

Wow, 300 new former Republican supporters. That is huge, great news story.

I wonder though how many former democratic supporters will switch to the dark side when they realize that Hillary may actually be the next President? I would imagine it would be quite larger than 300. But I don't think you will see that story covered on Commie News Network

Banko   November 5th, 2007 6:14 pm ET

As a Republican, I'm voting for Obama.
We need real change. Republicans and Democrats must come together to confront our major challenges. This is the only way to break the current gridlock.

Chip Celina OH   November 5th, 2007 6:14 pm ET

Ca Native,

I'm along your lines. Been a Repub forever and am really liking what I hear from Obama. He's definitely on the short list!

This is a stark contrast to the number of Dems that say they won't vote for Hillary no matter what.

He brings the Republicans in, she runs the Democrats off. Both are agents of change, one positively charged, one negatively.

Sort of like basic chemistry!

Jason, Silver Spring, MD   November 5th, 2007 6:14 pm ET

I can't think of a better reason to pick Sen. Obama over Sen Hillary Clinton. He's the only candidate to really get republican crossover votes.

Dwayne Mesa AZ   November 5th, 2007 6:13 pm ET

ANYONE BUT HILLARY!!!

Jesse, Burnsville, MN   November 5th, 2007 6:13 pm ET

Gee, a politician that can bring together people from different backgrounds (Obama), or one that will continue to tear this country apart (Clinton).

Gitahi, Dallas TX   November 5th, 2007 6:12 pm ET

Now this is when you know that the country is moving away from partisan politics. Obama is the only politician who is capable of healing the divide that exists in this country. He has a secret weapon that the media is not picking up. Wait while he picks up the conservatives/evangelical vote in IA and NH. Boy..oh boy. People do not want to accept it but Obama is the only one in the democratic race that can win the general elctions comfortably. I am waiting for Obama haters like Theinsider, Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky, Jeff Spangler, Monte Brown, New York, NY, Daniel, NY, sevens7777 Frisco, Tx and the other uninformed to spill bile over this. Get over it guys. Hillary invincibility is an illusion created by the media. Do I hear Howard Dean all over again? I am telling you.

RD   November 5th, 2007 6:12 pm ET

I agree with anyone but Hillary but still leaning toward John Edwards. Stands for real american values but willing to be fair to everyone and admit when he is wrong. The only canidate I know that has said they were wrong. make me respect him.
John Edwards 08′

Mike, Cleveland, OH   November 5th, 2007 6:11 pm ET

I wonder how many Republicans would switch to vote for Hillary…I'm guessing not too many. Yet another reason why nominating Hillary will likely bring more gridlock in Washington.

Kendall, Memphis, TN   November 5th, 2007 6:10 pm ET

Go Obama! Woohoo! Looks like Hillary's "lock" on the nomination isn't so secure after all! This is great news for an avid Obama supporter.

Ken Consaul, Yucaipa, Ca 92399   November 5th, 2007 6:10 pm ET

Does CNN really thing the change in party affiliation of 300 voters is worthy of a front page link?
Are we supposed to believe this is the iceberg tip of a trend?
Perhaps these 300 will send him over the top to victory.
This wasn't even blog worthy much less news worthy.

David, Los Angeles, CA   November 5th, 2007 6:09 pm ET

Hmmm…as a committed Democrat, I have to be suspicious of any candidate who appeals so strongly to Republicans. I have always believe that your character is shown as much by your enemies as your friends. It's easy to please everyone when you're an empty suit who speaks in empty platitudes about "hope" and "unity." I prefer a fighter who is willing to be unpopular.

I have my reservations about Hillary, but since the party who elected George W. Bush seems to hate her so much, I know she must be doing something right!

Tony, Mount Vernon, NY   November 5th, 2007 6:08 pm ET

Who knows if this is true or not. Thought I'd share this article on Obama published in the Chicago Sun Times:

Living in a glass house

POLITICS | Obama's push for Clinton to disclose her first lady papers raises questions about his own transparency

November 5, 2007
BY LYNN SWEET Sun-Times Columnist
WASHINGTON — White House hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who is making government transparency a centerpiece of the latest phase of his campaign, does not always practice what he preaches when it comes to his own business.

Obama is accusing chief rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) of being secretive and slowing down the release of her official first lady papers in the Clinton Library, documents that could help buttress — or erode — her claim of presidential experience.

Since last Tuesday's Democratic debate in Philadelphia, Obama has been stepping up his criticism of Clinton on the matter of transparency, which makes it timely to look at his own record.

Obama deserves credit for pushing for a law, signed last year, creating a searchable database containing federal contracts. He also has been a champion of new Senate ethics rules to force more disclosure about bundlers who help raise campaign cash. He has pushed for the creation of a Congressional Ethics Enforcement Commission, to make it easier for the public to pursue ethics complaints.

Sometimes Obama has come late to the game. He did not stop taking rides on subsidized corporate jets until the week he was tapped to be the Democrats' chief spokesman on ethics in January 2006. In 2005, Obama took 23 such private aircraft flights, some to attend fund-raisers he headlined. In 2006, Obama led the fight to ban lawmakers from taking cut-rate private air travel.

On other fronts, the Obama transparency record is lacking.

• • An Obama spokesman, Ben Labolt, last week declined to say where Obama's records from his years in the Illinois State Senate are located. There is no law mandating the state to archive the records. The records from Obama's office — if he kept them — would potentially show appointments with lobbyists, policy memos, meetings, etc.

• • Obama has supported more earmark disclosure to bolster government transparency. Last June, Obama disclosed the earmarks he requested for Illinois and national interests. However, his office, after repeated requests since June, has yet to disclose earmarks Obama sought in 2006, before he was running for president.

• • Obama does list the names of hundreds of bundlers — people committed to raising at least $50,000 for the campaign — on his Web site. He brags about the disclosure on the stump.

But that's literally all Obama does, list a name. No cities or states, information that is available to his campaign. Some names are well known because the bundlers are celebrities or longtime activists. But it's a big country, and there are more than one Bob Clark and Lou Cohen. Just listing a name does lip service to meaningful disclosure.

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe, in a memo sent last week after the debate, said Obama is "setting a new standard of openness in campaign fund-raising." That's because the bar is very low.

• • Obama's campaign has refused to identify the biggest bundlers, people who are raising at least $200,000 for him and are given membership in his National Finance Council. Obama, as all major candidates, declines most of the time to disclose details about most fund-raising events.

• • During a town hall meeting last month in Dover, N.H., Obama pledged that he would post all meetings he would hold as president on the Internet. As a senator, Obama has never done that.

• • Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) routinely releases a detailed schedule of his Washington, D.C., meetings — with international leaders, Illinois state and local officials, constituents and lobbyists.

Carol, MD   November 5th, 2007 6:08 pm ET

This is awesome! They're crossing party lines. That's right! Go to the light, baby, go to the light! Hee, hee.

Ga Voter   November 5th, 2007 6:01 pm ET

I too will be switching this year to vote for Obama…, anyone but Hillary!!

Anonymous, VA   November 5th, 2007 6:00 pm ET

As a Republican, I would promise to vote for Obama in the general election with the assurance Hillary would not get the Democrat nomination. I very much believe her election to the WH is just too dangerous and would be an extension, no, an escalation of the partisan bickering we have experienced the last 15 years, or so.

Ca Native   November 5th, 2007 5:57 pm ET

As an independent in California (normally votes Republican) I will be be changing to support Obama.

Anyone but Hillary!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP