November 9, 2007
Posted: 11:55 AM ET

Bill Clinton said he should take the blame for Hillary Clinton's failed health care effort in the 1990's.

GLENWOOD, Iowa (AP) – Former President Clinton said Thursday that he is to blame for his administration's failed health care plan, not his wife, who spearheaded the effort.

Clinton was asked about the plan during a campaign event, where he spoke to about 600 people crowded into a YMCA gymnasium. The health care effort was led by then-first lady Hillary Clinton, now a New York senator and candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.

"She has taken the rap for some of the problems we had with health care the last time that were far more my fault than hers," the former president said.

He said part of the problem was a lack of money to finance the health care expansion. Money could be available this time to pay for expanded health care, such as the universal health care plan Hillary Clinton has proposed.

"This time, when you let the tax cuts for upper-income people expire, it'll create a pool of money that wasn't there last time," Bill Clinton said. "We told her she had to get to universal coverage and there would be no new money. She had to figure out how to do it."

Clinton added that his wife's plan faced opposition in Congress, in part, because they had an attitude of "just say no to Bill Clinton."

When asked by a reporter about the former president's comments, Sen. Barack Obama, a rival for the presidential nomination, said Hillary Clinton shouldn't tout her experience and then not take responsibility for the failures.

"If part of your basis for experience is the work you did on health care, then presumably when it didn't work out, that's part of the experience as well," Obama said during a brief stop outside a convenience store and gas station in Albia.

"We're focused on trying to deliver a message of the kind of president I would be and why I think I would be the best nominee for the Democratic Party," Obama said. "My understanding is that President Clinton is not on the ballot."

Filed under: Barack Obama • Bill Clinton • Hillary Clinton • Iowa


Elaine, Fresno, CA   November 9th, 2007 9:47 am ET

Aw… poor wifey needs has-been hubbie to take the blame for her mistakes. Yeah, just the type of person we need in the White House.

Ron, TX   November 9th, 2007 9:49 am ET

Clinton added that his wife's plan faced opposition in Congress, in part, because they had an attitude of "just say no to Bill Clinton."— From the article

And tell us Bill, do you think Congress is going to be in a "just say yes to everything Hillary wants" attitude? I doubt it. You and I both know her negative numbers are the highest of any candidate in recorded history. 85% of Republicans will NEVER vote for her. A large percentage of democrats say the same thing. We could use a woman president, but she's not "one strong woman." She's just "The Wrong Woman"…

Virtually any of the other candidates have a better chance of getting things done. TOO MANY people just absolutely hate and despise Hillary- between her scandals and her waffling, her failure to take a stand on issues, how is she EVER going to actually -lead-? Leaders require trust, honesty, and breaking down partisan division. Hillary has shown NONE of those three things?

LinnieFB, Corona, CA   November 9th, 2007 9:50 am ET

Im sorry…but husbands and wives should not be running 'together' to govern our country. This isn't working for me…we get both of them again! I would like to see a woman as president one day, but one that runs on her own accord.

The Clinton's want to take over the country….I don't think this is good for America to have this husband and wife in office.

T.C Minneapolis Minnesota   November 9th, 2007 9:50 am ET

Look Slick Willy, you and your wife are not to be trusted — no matter what. I'm sure you're ok people, but you change your agenda daily according to what's popular. No one trusts people with no loyalty. The only truly honest and consistent candidate running is Dr. Ron Paul. Check it out and vote for change, while there's still hope for America:http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

Ellen, Denver, CO   November 9th, 2007 9:52 am ET

"Billary" is to blame. The 2 cannot be separated so easily. Another shameless attempt to deflect criticism from Hill by Bill. They/She should just accept responsibility and moveon.org it. lol

therealist   November 9th, 2007 9:52 am ET

"This time, when you let the tax cuts for upper-income people expire, it'll create a pool of money that wasn't there last time,"

Ole Bill just can't help but shoot off his mouth about spending more and more of our tax dollars. Meanwhile, Hillary and Congress have yet to write any of this years, budget busting, appropriation bills. Is this suppose to be helping??

Noah, Chicago, IL   November 9th, 2007 9:54 am ET

This sounds pretty much like: "I'll say anything to get my wife (and me) back into the white house, including trying to take the blame that has long been upon my wife's head."

Politics of power and ambition at it's finest.

I'm done with the aristocratic families of the US and washingtonian politics. I want something different.

ano to   November 9th, 2007 9:55 am ET

Bill with you running her campaign pointing out all Hillary's failures she's sure to get less votes every time you open your mouth and your going to be first man what a joke!

Gitahi, Dallas TX   November 9th, 2007 9:56 am ET

This is total nonsense. Is this what we can expect from a Clinton White House? Bill will be taking the fall for everything? What does he mean by we did not have money then but we have money now? Did the Bush tax cuts start when he was President? Is he now going to say it is his fault for the Hillary vote for war in Iraq. This is getting ridiculous. Why is Bill fighting her battles if she is a strong President to be? We can not have this. Bill cannot be allowed to be “in office” four more years.

Disgusted in San Diego   November 9th, 2007 9:56 am ET

Actually, in his typical mealy mouth fashion, he says he is to blame but only becaues Congress was against him. He is a proven liar, and both him and the former first lady will say anything to win an election. God help this country if she wins.

Craig, Carlsbad CA   November 9th, 2007 9:58 am ET

After reminding us why we liked the Clintons they are now reminding us why we dont. Either Hillary had a great deal of experience and learned a lot on as First Lady working on health care or its Bills fault. Like the Drivers license issue its rather simple we understand it could live with it either way but taking both sides insults us.

More importantly this campaign is not simply about who wins but why they win. Running on clear cut issues means that when you win you have a greater chance of actually implementing them. Remind me again what was that outstanding legacy of the Clintons democrats are so proud of? Balancing the budget (only to have the republicans spend it) reforming welfare? NAFTA? All of Bills big achievements came from the republican side of the ledger.

This time we need a Bobby Kennedy moving the nation ahead not a 'Parser in Chief". Edwards for President

Nuggie   November 9th, 2007 10:01 am ET

How about we just take all the Clinton's money to pay for universal health care. And then we can take all of Owl Gore's money to pay for the consequences of global warming.

A. Thomas, New York, NY   November 9th, 2007 10:01 am ET

As far as the health care plan is concerned, Hillary has the better judgment and experience, while Obama has neither. Hillary has become a more experienced and stronger person as being the first lady of Arkansa and USA, although being constantly bashed by the republicans in her 16 yrs in DC.

It is always better to try and miss, than not to have tred at all. Youth and inexperience will get you lost whether in plane or politics.

"Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment." - Mark Twain

Seam, Philly PA   November 9th, 2007 10:06 am ET

Funny how Hillary claims to have all this experience; yet, when things didn't go well under the Clinton watch, she gets a pass.

Brendan, Seattle   November 9th, 2007 10:08 am ET

Thats interesting. I would have thought it was the hundreds of thousands of dollars she received from prescription drug companies that was to blame for the failed/dropped health care plan.

AN, Fairfax, VA   November 9th, 2007 10:10 am ET

"Remind me again what was that outstanding legacy of the Clintons democrats are so proud of? Balancing the budget (only to have the republicans spend it) reforming welfare? NAFTA? All of Bills big achievements came from the republican side of the ledger."

Craig, you are absolutely correct! The achievements the Clintons constantly cite are those that were initiatives of the Republican Congress at the time. Then they proceded to villainize the Republican leadership, setting over the extreme polarization we see in Washington today. Please, Republican and Democrat supporters let's get past this Bush/Clinton obsession. WE NEED NEW BLOOD IN WASHINGTON!!!!!!!!!!

Robin, Montpelier, VT   November 9th, 2007 10:11 am ET

Barack Obama couldn't be more right. Hillary's claim is that the Health Care Issue in the 90's was her baby and she took responsibility for it and she learned from her mistakes on it, now here comes Bill again to rescue her. How is Hillary or her campaign people going to explain this one. I just don't want to hear any more excuses. If they cannot control Bill's mouth and what he says, what does this say about if Hillary becomes President? This is very concerning. As I watched the video of Bill asking for immunity for Hillary, some just looked at him as "you got to be kidding me".

donna seatte   November 9th, 2007 10:12 am ET

So Bill is rewriting history again. Is he saying that universal healthcare is more possible now with a 9.5 TRILLION dollar deficit? Either there was enough money to do it then as there is now — or there NEVER IS enough money to do it. The Clinton's managed to drop their central campaign promise last time for political expediancy and it will happen again — because the promise to enact universal healthcare to them is just a way to get elected. The real goal is power.

Bob, Donora, PA   November 9th, 2007 10:14 am ET

Can Hillary talk for herself? Why can't she ever explain anything? Why? Because she doesn't know anything. People better look out. Bush 4 years, Clinton 8 years, Bush 8 years. We don't need another Clinton. We need someone fresh

Farrell, Houston, Tx   November 9th, 2007 10:18 am ET

Bill Clinton, I like you and Hillary a lot but Hillary spoke loud and publically clear on those failed health care issues.

Ken, Austin TX   November 9th, 2007 10:19 am ET

The quoted comment from Barack Obama was the best way to sum it up!

"If part of your basis for experience is the work you did on health care, then presumably when it didn't work out, that's part of the experience as well"
Hillary/Bill are so fake. They make whatever statements they think are necessary in order to move a crowd. They are nothing but entertainers in my book.

E. C., Houston, Texas   November 9th, 2007 10:22 am ET

Clinton can take ALl the Blame for his AMORAL behavior in OUR White House. Together, they are Disgusting and Sick. Hillary is an hormonal, powermad, dishonest person to her core, who is NOT intelligent enough to be President. And WHO in his right mind would want her husband back in OUR White House? NOT ME…PLUS a Multitude of Voters.

Steve Blaine Washington   November 9th, 2007 10:22 am ET

Bill has shown many times in this campaign that he is his wife's worst enemy.

Tom, ALBUQUERQUE, NM   November 9th, 2007 10:24 am ET

Bill Clinton once again is showing why he is the maestro of American politics. Bill is a huge asset to his wife's presidential presidential aspiration. With him in her corner Hillary has an insurmountable advantage over her fellow contenders. He is showing why he was twice elected President and was able to beat the republicans at their own game. BRAVO, MR PRESIDENT, BRAVO.

Tommy   November 9th, 2007 10:24 am ET

We Love You, Hillary!!! Keep Marching On… so those Republicans who have been ruining our Country for the past 8-12 years can just go jump off the Roof…. :-)

paul, grandrapids, michigan   November 9th, 2007 10:27 am ET

you people need to get over your Clinton-hating selves. Whether you like to admit it or not, Bill was a good president who did a lot for the country, and, face it, his wife is the smartest and most capable candidate out there for either party.

Obama is just another flash-in-the-pan politician. Deal with it.

Bill, Streamwood, IL   November 9th, 2007 10:30 am ET

Bill Clinton illustrates the big difference between Democrats and Republicans.

Democrats admit when they've screwed up.

When Republicans screw up, they blame Democrats.

joseph, austin, tx   November 9th, 2007 10:31 am ET

slick willey sounds pretty despirate to be around all those hot young interns again. get your stogies and blue dresses ready.

Len, Fallbrook, CA   November 9th, 2007 10:32 am ET

At least he is not pointing and wagging his finger at us…………yet.

""This time, when you let the tax cuts for upper-income people expire, it'll create a pool of money that wasn't there last time," Bill Clinton said. "We told her she had to get to universal coverage and there would be no new money. She had to figure out how to do it.""

Just another Socialist pig looking to redistribute weath (but not his) to all those voters in need for their votes.

Delfin, LA, CA   November 9th, 2007 10:34 am ET

blah, blah, blah…I will say whatever to get my wife elected…blah, blah, blah.

Randy Gardner Lockport NY   November 9th, 2007 10:35 am ET

I think its time to a lady President am a Republican and am embrassed on what Republicans are doing. they can't even override a vote on health care for children. That most of U.S. want. I will not be voting for any Republicans next year.

Mike,Panama City, FL   November 9th, 2007 10:37 am ET

To quote the first poster , 98 percent Republicans will never vote for Clinton .
Well that has sure changed this week . 1. This weeks poll release that its the economy stupid article and no 2 . Pat Robertson supporting Rudy. 3. Rudy's poor decision making , RUDY - KERIK saga !

Youmy friend are part of the anit Clinton everything ,even if CLinton was the greatest president in US history , he is very close behind our forefathers ,You would still not rallly behind him.

Some people should just stay under the rock they have been living under the bush years

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL   November 9th, 2007 10:37 am ET

No Matter what Pres. Clinton says about his administrations failures (which at least he is taking some responsibility - unlike the current president) the hillary-haters will continue the attacks… it is just that kind of race… the thing that really ticks me off is that WE WERE ALL BETTER OFF during his presidency and yet now Obama is attacking him too… we sure are doing a good job in giving the white house back to the republicans!

Joe Ossai, Bedford, NH   November 9th, 2007 10:39 am ET

I have always been a big supporter of Bill Clinton, but he is pissing me off now BIGTIME. Shut the hell up, your little girl told us not long ago that she can handle herself.

Hilary is not ready to run the country and your complaining is not helping.

It's like, stop picking on Hilary she is just a girl. GIVE ME A BREAK

Jim Austin, TX   November 9th, 2007 10:41 am ET

I thought Hillary-Care failed to go through congress in 1993 when the democrats still had the majority. I think it was the American people and no the congress who "just said no" to Universal Health care. And, does he really think the rich are going to pay for everything? The dirty little seceret is the rich cannot afford to pay for everyone's health care and the burden will be placed on the middle class.

Wade Calagary ,Alberta   November 9th, 2007 10:41 am ET

President Mitt Romney is the man. Wanna be Hillary with Bill taking the blame on health care is a joke the HillBillary won't do it for Ameica.

Chris White, Germantown MD   November 9th, 2007 10:47 am ET

The former president is not helping, he is hurting her. We need some fresh faces and ideas in Washington. Hers is neither.

Allen, Harrisburg   November 9th, 2007 10:48 am ET

Convenient. Why does he wait until now to take responsibility for the failure? hmmmm, I wonder

Joan, New York.   November 9th, 2007 10:49 am ET

Do The Clintons think that the American People are THAT stupid? His effort, on behalf of his wife's campaign, is down right INSULTING. It makes me dislike her and what "they both" stand for…even more. STOP PANDERING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Greg, Phoenix, AZ   November 9th, 2007 10:52 am ET

HILARIOUS

I suppose it's his fault that she tanked at the debate last week as well.

These people have NO shame.

Ethel, New York, NY   November 9th, 2007 10:53 am ET

BRING BACK AL GORE! HE IS THE ONLY DEMOCRAT THAT CAN LIFT OUR COUNTRY'S SPIRIT AND REPAIR THE DAMAGE DOMESTICALLY AND AROUND THE WORLD.

Dem to Repub   November 9th, 2007 10:54 am ET

I have voted Democrat for the last 40 years. In 2008, Guiliani will get my vote. I won't vote for Hillary just because I voted for Bill. If anything, just by his actions he doesn't even want to be around her. Why would we elect her?

P. Bishop, Portland, Oregon   November 9th, 2007 10:57 am ET

Well, at least former President Clinton can take responsibility for things that happened while he was president.

Our current President can't take responsibility for anything that's happened on his watch.

Drexel Bexley, OH   November 9th, 2007 11:00 am ET

A. Thomas, I liked your quote form Mark Twain, but I don't really agree with you.

Barack Obama is a self-made man who has been a public official for a longer time. He won a US Senate seat without Air Force One to chauffer him around.

He was well-respected by Republicans in the Illinois Senate- one of them even appeared in an Obama commercial in Iowa.

Please don't listen to ignorant people who say "He has no experience, he's dumb, he's never accomplished anything."

Just go to his website to find out his credentials and accomplishments, or if you want a more impartial source, google his name.

If you're voting for Hillary, fine- just don't smear her opponents. They have a right to vigourously challenge her for the nomination- it's called democracy.

ChuckNorris, Tucson, AZ   November 9th, 2007 11:02 am ET

""Youmy friend are part of the anit Clinton everything ,even if CLinton was the greatest president in US history , he is very close behind our forefathers ,You would still not rallly behind him.""

Greatest? What? I guess that whole impeachment thing can be ignored when you are so narrowsighted and ignorant.

People also have to quit caring about Bill's record. He's not the one supposed to be running.

This is whole concept of Bill running again through his wife makes me feel ill.

WE THE PEOPLE U.S.A.   November 9th, 2007 11:02 am ET

THE HEALTHCARE ISSUE CAN BE MADE READILY POSSIBLE TO ALL AMERICANS , AS IT IS IN COUNTRIES LIKE BREAT BRITAIN, FRANCE,CANDA,GERMANY. THEIR CITIZENS PAY ZERO FOR THEIR HEALTHCARE. THAT'S RIGHT -ZERO DOLLARS! THESE COUNTRIES ARE ALSO DEMOCRACIES AND CAPITALIST SOCIETIES, SO THERE IS NO ROOM FOR EXCUSES FROM OUR ADMINISTRATION OR OTHERS FOR THAT FACT,AS TO WHY WE CAN'T HAVE AND PROVIDE WHAT CITIZENS IN OTHER COUNTRIES CURRENTLY ENJOY. FREE COLLEGE EDUCATION? FREE HEALTHCARE? REDUCED DAYCARE FOR PARENTS? FREE OR LOW-COST PRESCRIPTIONS? THESE ARE ALL THINGS OTHER CITIZENS ENJOY IN THESE COUNTRIES.THIS ONLY SEEMS LIKE A DREAM TO THE PEOPLE LIKE MYSELF AND AMERICANS. bUT, IT IS A DRREAM THAT CAN BE A REALITY. A REALITY WHICH OTHER GOV'TS SUPPLY FOR THEIR CITIZENS. AMERICANS ARE THE HARDEST WORKING PEOPLE IN THE WORLD, AND DESERVE A NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYTSEM AS WELL AS THE OTHER BENEFITS OF LIVING IN THE "BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD".I WOULD LIKE YOU ALL TO WATCH MICHAEL MOORE'S DOCUMENTARY "SICKO" AND SEE FOR YOURSELVES WHAT A REAL GOV'T THAT CARES ABOUT THE HEALTH,WELL-BEING AND WELFARE OF IT'S TAX-PAYING CITIZENS SHOULD- THATS RIGHT, SHOULD!!– BE TREATED. ANOTHER POINT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IS EVEN IN CUBA- THATS RIGHT - THE CUBA WE WERE ALL BORN TO HATE AND DEPISE, EVEN PROVIDES A NATIONAL HEALTHCRAE FOR IT'S CITIZENS. THIS IS NOT ONLY UNNACCEPTABLE BY THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA, BUT IT IS A SHAM ON HOW OUR GOVT. OFFICIALS ARE BOWING DOWN TO CORPORATE ELITES IN OUR SOCIETY, AND HOW THE "PEOPLE" ARE BEING FLEECED INTO A LIFE-LONG SUBMISSION OF DEBT CONCERNING HEALTHCARE, EDUCATION,DAYCARE COSTS. AMERICA IS A GREAT COUNTRY AS WELL AS THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN IT. IT IS OUR LEADERSHIP WHO IS THE PROBLEM. WE NEED TO CLEAN HOUSE IN OUR GOVT. WE ALL CANT FORGET THAT OUR CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN FOR " WE THE PEOPLE- FOR THE PEOPLE-BY THE PEOPLE". WITHOUT A STRONG SOCIETY WE HAVE NO FOUNDATION TO BASE OUR VALUES WE SO DEARLY IMPOSE TO OTHERS, BUT RARELY USE THEM UPON OURSELVES. AMERICA IS A GREAT NATION, BUT IT IS THE TOP TIERS OF OUR REPRESENTATIVE GOVT, WHO IS LEADING THE PEOPLE DOWN THE WRONG PATH. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN- WILL OUR GOVT. OFFICIALS LISTEN? WE BROKE APART FORM BRITAIN AND FORMED OUR 13 ORIGINAL COLONIES BECAUSE WE WANTED OUR DUE LIBERTIES AS HUMAN BEINGS AND MEMBERS OF A NATION WHICH IS NOW CALLED AMERICA. WE CAN MAKE CHANGES BEFORE HISTORY HAS CHANCE TO REPEAT ITSELF. IF YOU DONT STAND FOR SOMETHING - YOU WILL FALL FOR ANYTHING

Claude, Mesa AZ   November 9th, 2007 11:02 am ET

To Danny in Boca Rotton Florida. Spare me…read the facts jack….terrorist infiltration, Nafta, etc has screwed this country up. This crap happened during Bill's admin. We are worse off as a result of this….poor judgement!

Osama   November 9th, 2007 11:05 am ET

I'd vote for Osama before Hillary.

Shawn, Ellicott City, MD   November 9th, 2007 11:05 am ET

Someone said husband and wife should not be president and run the country. However I guess it is OK for father and son, both lead by the same bunch of stupid bullheader advisors who dont want to see anything that does not support their views

Jim Cleveland ohio   November 9th, 2007 11:10 am ET

Hillary and Bill are two crooks with no morals or character. Hillary wants to print money and give it away.

Go back in ther past they are both crooks

Megha, San Antonio, TX   November 9th, 2007 11:13 am ET

Hypocrite preachers andinexperienced newbies like Obama are meant to preach in the church, not to run the country.

HILLARY '08. The good old times of the Clintons need to get back, wow those times of prosperity and wealth for everyone!

John NC   November 9th, 2007 11:14 am ET

Neither of the Clinton's is to be trusted.

BCNU purple state, usa   November 9th, 2007 11:14 am ET

The other day he admonishes the other Democrats for providing fodder for "swiftboat" type ads, then turns around and serves up a doozy!

Bryan, Firestone, CO   November 9th, 2007 11:16 am ET

I thought the Clinton administration is credited for having the most robust economy in recent past. So how could there be no money? We had all these surpluses, and Billy Boy is saying there was no money? Go figure.

And if Hillary can't take the blame, then what experience is she running on for her own candidacy? What a joke. Please people. I'm voting Republican, but all you Democrats, please don't put this lady and her husband on the ticket. Please

Nag, Parlin NJ   November 9th, 2007 11:17 am ET

When Father/Son can rule the country who are always behind wars to spend tax payers money, whats wrong with husband / wife, infact evry one earth knows that USA ecnomy was at its best during Bill's presidency and he had so much cash reserve in the tresauary, Father/son regime spent this money and bankrupted the country.

Its crystal clear how good the ecnomy was during Bill's period and still ppl …….
God Please save america

Richard Blank, Columbia, Maryland   November 9th, 2007 11:18 am ET

You are all so right about the hypocrisy, the phonyness, the blame-someone-else. But as bad as that is, if Hillary is nominated, I will vote for her. Why? Because nothing, nothing is worse then these phony Republicans. Even the nutty religious right conservatives realize that they have been had. They were used. Big time. So were all Americans. Bush is a big,big failure. Need I remind you: Iraq; Never vetoed any spending; Harriot Meyers; Iraq; Katrina; Iraq; Chaney; Gonzales; Larry Craig; $9,000,000,000,000 debt. You all like that? Shame,shame,shame.

A.Bruno - Memphis Tn   November 9th, 2007 11:19 am ET

Does this mean every time something goes wrong with what Ms Clinton has said that Bill will take the blame. Will this happen if she is President? He did not take responsibility when he was President and it looks like Ms Clinton won't either.

Sean, Detroit, MI   November 9th, 2007 11:22 am ET

Danny G., nominating Hillary is essentially giving the White House back to the Republicans.

Though I do think of the Bill Clinton presidency as a much happier time for our country, Hillary is simply unelectable. She is entirely too divisive and her personality rubs far too many people the wrong way on a national scale.

Oh and I'm also getting really sick of team "Billary". They're almost as obnoxioius as "Bennifer" a few years back.

Marie VanDyke Royal Oak Michigan   November 9th, 2007 11:23 am ET

We were in much better shape when clinton was president..the voters let bush in to screw us royally for 8 yrs why dont you just vote for another republican and go back to the depression where we are almost in now.thanks to bush.or better yet vote for obama so he can take us down the wrong road with his muslims beliefs so american women can take the backseat to men..all you people teaming up on hillary and bill who really helped us when he was in office…like my grandmother said..dont help me help the bear..america wake up

Julie - Albuquerque, NM   November 9th, 2007 11:25 am ET

It's no longer the question "do politicians lie", but "who is lying the least". The positive side of Hillary's previous health plan is that she tried doing something - I never heard of Obama then.

A. Thomas, New York, NY   November 9th, 2007 11:29 am ET

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has neutralized the political fallout from some of the most difficult moments of her eight years as first lady, with Democratic voters looking favorably on her failed effort to revamp healthcare in the 1990’s, a new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll shows.

The Times/Bloomberg poll found, nearly two-thirds of Democrats and nearly half of all voters say Hillary Clinton's famously unsuccessful effort in the 1990s to provide health coverage for all Americans makes her better able now to deal with healthcare as president.

She had a formidable lead over her rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination. Clinton leads the No. 2 contender, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, 48% to 17%.

The Hillary Clinton of 2007 is a wiser, shrewder and more realistic politician than the first lady who tried and failed to pass her husband's health plan in 1993 and 1994.

John the Great State of New York   November 9th, 2007 11:32 am ET

Let me get this straight. It was a co-presidency and Hillary is involved in the "successes" but it wasn't a co-presidency and she wasn't involved in the failures? well that's convienent.

Bob, Seattle   November 9th, 2007 11:32 am ET

Yeah, sure Bubba. Keep on talking. The more you talk and try to run 'block' for Hilliary, the more entrenched people become against her. Just reinforces the opinion that she can't stand on her own two feet. Seems like 'ol Bill senses things slipping away and for the first time, this time around, he really feeling like he's goint to miss being back in his old stomping grounds.

Bill, Reston, VA   November 9th, 2007 11:33 am ET

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL, do you just expect Obama to roll over and give Hillary the election? I think Obama has been very professional and fair in his criticism of Hillary. Hillary is a mudslinger, perhaps this is why her favorable and unfavorable ratings are nearly equal.

Oregon   November 9th, 2007 11:34 am ET

Barack Obama gets it right again.

MJB suprise, Az   November 9th, 2007 11:34 am ET

Oh! Bill, take up for Hillary. I cannot afford to pay anymore for others Healthcare. Unless you use sin taxes. Like alcolol and cigarettes, etc. Our taxes are so high now its unbelievable. AND, many people that say they cannot afford Healthcare have 3 TV, DVDs, cellphones for everyone in the house, New cars and the list goes on. Many people do not feel their health is a priority. I've been in the medical field for 30 years. Most only care when they get sick or have an emergency.

George, Virginia Beach, VA   November 9th, 2007 11:35 am ET

I seem to remember the Clintons proudly proclaiming that when he was elected President that she would be an integral part of the administration, that America got a 2-for-1 deal by electing him. So why now isn't she at least partly to blame for the failed health care scheme of the 90s? They tipped their hand this time when Bill said let tax breaks expire to pay for the program, in other words, expect a tax increase.

Hank, Fort Myers, FL   November 9th, 2007 11:38 am ET

I'm much more interested in hearing what Hillary is saying in Iowa..than hre hubby. Isn't there somewhere his foundation can send him for a few months?
He was my commander-in-chief who had a relationship w/ a subordinate: the Uniform Code Of Military Justice would have been very harsh on an Officer or NCO who admitted to his "relations with that woman". "That woman..was a subordinate, under the employ of the US Govt. and under his supervision.
Hillary, on the other hand…has some things worth listening to. And I wish he would step aside and let her say them.
From: Retired USAF who is STILL not forgetting.

Eric, Walnut Creek, CA   November 9th, 2007 11:40 am ET

WHY WOULD ANYONE LISTEN to Bill or Hillary…they are just opportunists.

Their marriage is just a FRAUD and Bill just wants all the perks again (Air Force One, White House living, etc).

He keeps pushing Hillary on the American people, and we DON"T WANT HER (or you again).

The democrats can do better for a candidate. America needs some fresh faces in politics.

Boogie   November 9th, 2007 11:41 am ET

Obama is getting increasingly more bitter…doesn't hurt my feelings personally…but, it just shows that his intergrity is only genuine when everybody loves him.
But, now that he see's he's losing, those "play nice" speeches will be corrupted.
Just like a polotician.

Lee, syracuse, NY   November 9th, 2007 11:44 am ET

Voters in California strongly believe former President Bill Clinton should play an active role in his wife's bid for the White House and also think he would be an asset in a Hillary Clinton administration, a new Field Poll revealed.

More than seven in 10 voters – 72 percent – said Bill Clinton's participation in his wife's presidential campaign would help her either "a lot" or "somewhat."

Even Republicans said the former president would help her White House run, with 28 percent saying he would help "a lot" and 37 percent "somewhat."

jt thomas, Beverly Hills, CA   November 9th, 2007 11:44 am ET

I'm a life-long democrat and I will NEVER VOTE FOR CLINTON - HILLARY and/or BILL - they are two-faced con artists… I'm switching parties just to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries - the only one who can save this country from itself…

JIM DAYTON ,OHIO   November 9th, 2007 11:45 am ET

IN YEAR'S TO COME YOU WILL SEE THAT THE LAST EIGHT YEARS WITH BUSH WILL MAKE BILL LOOK LIKE HE WAS AN ANGEL!!!

Julian Jackson, Kansas City, Missouri   November 9th, 2007 11:47 am ET

hmm that sounds so familiar blame somebody else for the problems you started…where have i heard that before…I did not recall making mistakes…but being a supportive husband is something foreign in politics that doesn't involve mudslinging…let's see a good economy at the time of his administration, taking responsibilty for his actions, and being supportive of his wife… layoff the man Republicans have taken their opporunity to undue everything President Clinton has done to help the country, let someone fix their mess…no one would do better than Mrs.Clinton…leave partison politics out of responsible benefits this country needs it.

Tere, FL   November 9th, 2007 11:50 am ET

Of all the posts here only 9% have naything postive about Bill and Hillary. Could this be a trend emerging. Where are the a. thomases, Monte Brown's, TheInsiders, who have often defended Hillary and Bill no matter what?
Obama 08

Mary, NYC   November 9th, 2007 11:58 am ET

This is just lovely! Now what am I gonna do with all those Go Hillary stickers I just purchased? They BETTER give me a refund because I'm not supporting this crap!

Billary will NOT get my vote!

Cody Harding, Kinsley, KS.   November 9th, 2007 11:59 am ET

I see a lot of negativity towards Hillary Clinton, and to her husband, the former president. I am not saying that she is perfect. But look at the alternatives, people, and it becomes fairly clear that although she has some very large faults, she is a godsend compared to some of the other candidates to the presidency. Would you rather have a man who elects corrupt officials and promotes McCarthy type scare tactics? Or a person who wants to pull us from the U.N. and abolish free trade? Maybe we should be giving her advice on how to change, instead of simply bashing her for being wrong.

My Advice to Ms. Clinton: Find your morals, and stay tough to them. Don't cry about gender bias, don't try to build a roof over your voters. Do what you, and only you, believe is right for your country. That in itself will remove the argument from most of your detractors.

George, Virginia   November 9th, 2007 12:00 pm ET

Obama is right, President Clinton is not on the ballot this time. So maybe he and the other Democrats can explain why they are all running against President Bush? Last time I checked, his name isn't on the ballot either.

Karen, NYC   November 9th, 2007 12:04 pm ET

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL …

A tear is rolling down my cheek…. not because you invoked sympathy but because your comments were so funny!!!

Keep them coming!

Sebastian Oregon   November 9th, 2007 12:06 pm ET

Hillary must be on a downward slide for Bill to say something like that and I thought she was doing well. One question I have, if it is and was so important then why did she stop pushing it back in '94? why such a long "vacation" on Health Care?

Ed, Washington DC   November 9th, 2007 12:07 pm ET

If Mr. Clinton is to take the blame for the health care debacle during his administration why not open up the records at his presidential library?

Bill, Bloomington IL   November 9th, 2007 12:08 pm ET

Is this what we are in for if Hillary is elected? I had enough of Bill saying he was sorry.

AN, Fairfax, VA   November 9th, 2007 12:09 pm ET

"IN YEAR'S TO COME YOU WILL SEE THAT THE LAST EIGHT YEARS WITH BUSH WILL MAKE BILL LOOK LIKE HE WAS AN ANGEL!!!"

With something like a 29% approval rating upon leaving office, they probably said the same thing about Harry Truman. Now, look at South Korea. Was it worth a war. The South Koreans probably think so.

Richard Tabuteau, Atlanta, GA   November 9th, 2007 12:10 pm ET

What's most refreshing here is Obama's willingness to take on Bill Clinton. This stands in contrast to the rest of the Democratic party who slavishly follow every word Bill utters. In the last three exchanges between the two campaigns, Obama has decisively checked Bill's defenses for Hillary. Obama has expanded the conversation now to what exactly is Bill Clinton's role, a question more people should be asking considering Hillary's pathological inability to answer a question or defend herself by herself.

Steve in SC   November 9th, 2007 12:12 pm ET

Sorry! It was her baby, it was ugly and it is her fault! You allowed to to run with it, she failed, game over!

Oliva - San Antonio - Texas   November 9th, 2007 12:15 pm ET

Clinton 2008! We will make history. We will have the first woman president. It will be Clinton!

Babulal Banthia, Indianapolis, IN   November 9th, 2007 12:17 pm ET

I have an idea about Universal health care, one to cover all US citizens without much cost to Govt. It is implementable across all political parties. But I don't know who to talk to about my idea. How do I talk to Mrs Clinton's campaign people?

BDMinnick@Verizon.net   November 9th, 2007 12:19 pm ET

Why are we even discussing the election
of a former husband & wife to the highest office in the USA who have poor
morals and set a shameful example for our youth. Many youth blame the spread of oral sex on Bill Clinton. As a married couple both Clinton's need
to be responible for failing and ask public forgiveness. No one with the
Clinton's character should be allowed to hold this office.
Bruce Tampa, FL

Mike, IL   November 9th, 2007 12:29 pm ET

I am ready to defend Bill Clinton any time because this country was proud for its name in the 90s. Just go now abroad once in a while to see the looks on people's face when they hear you are American… the ones who elected GWB twice.

It is true that Bill has to stay out of Hillary's campaign because there are too many haters and stupid people who will use his words against her no matter what (Obama, who is a disappointment, being one of them). However, many of us still want to hear what the PRESIDENT has to say about the past, the present and the future. You don't like him, go chanting and dancing with Obama.

Terri Tacoma, Wa   November 9th, 2007 12:31 pm ET

Wow - the Clintons are self-destructing before our very eyes.

I hope Democrats are seeing the overwhelming cynicism against anything Bill does/says and how Hillary expects to win without answering ANY direct questions.

If you think that is a winning combination - Vote for Hillary. The Republicans MUCH rather face those two clowns than any other. Obama - by far - would be the fiercest opponent.

sophia, oakland   November 9th, 2007 12:33 pm ET

The most irritating argument laid out by the hilary supporters is this notion that a vote for any other candiate besides clinton is a vote for the expansion of the bush years/ republicans! I refused to be bulllied by you pyscho clintonistas and accept the establishment. We have choices, viable and refreshing choices, that on any given day are 10 times better than the republican options who are a bunch of confused bafoons. So please, democrats, do not be lead to believe the hype that hillary is predestined to win and you have no better options.

Oh, and to those who tout her "experience" as her shining star, the experience of being such a ferociously dividing force in this nation is not something I would be so proud of. All of that, and she never stood by her beliefs and held her ground in the face of opposition and she is always just to proud to admit fault and apologize. So much for experience.

M.D.   November 9th, 2007 12:33 pm ET

You know this is really getting pathetic will someone please put him back on his leash and muzzle. i can not stress enough that every time (and it will be frequent) HIllary screws up from total incompetence Willie will try and take the blame (like we are to stupid to see who is resonsible)..they are counting on the american peoples supposed lack of intelligence to get her elected in the first place… they think we are all to ignorant to think for ourselves. so we will all vote for her (sorry not gonna happen here).i sure hope you are all watching this sickeninig pittiful display. it really is SAD…. just look at it this way this is only the begginig and he has slready done it 2 times.

Will, Birmingham, AL   November 9th, 2007 12:44 pm ET

For better and for worse, Hillary and Bill have stayed married. Lots of folks respect her intellect, her determination, her wisdom won the hard way and her ability to stay in the most brutal of games, politics. And she will win.

Seattle   November 9th, 2007 12:45 pm ET

At least the country HAD some healthcare during the Clinton years!
What are we left with now? That's not either of the Clinton's faults!

James Withheld   November 9th, 2007 12:49 pm ET

"This time, when you let the tax cuts for upper-income people expire, it'll create a pool of money that wasn't there last time,"

May I remind everyone here, that "pool" of money was there the first time around. We were taxing "upper-income" Americans at the pre-tax cut rate at the time Hillary Care was first being bandied about in the early nineties.

This is just more proof that a Clinton election in 2008 is going to mean a lot of hands in all of our pockets.

Mary - Greensboro   November 9th, 2007 12:50 pm ET

Hillary's health care plan is a for-profit health plan - it keeps the insurance companies involved. She will want to keep them involved because they have contributed toward her campaign. We need a not-for-profit health care system which will allow everyone to have health care and will allow the doctors to do what they went to school to do—-to take care of people. There is only one candidate that supports this kind of universal health care - Dennis Kucinich.

Phil Chicago, Ill   November 9th, 2007 12:51 pm ET

Wow - it really is amazing to see…

Bill and Hillary are going down in flames - and the Clinton-apologists (Danny ~ Fl, Oliva ~ Tx, etc) have only their tired mantra, "Clinton 2008″.

Isn't it reminiscent of when Charles Manson was being convicted of brutal killings and his female "followers" came to court - "We love you Charles".

Birds of a feather…..

Brandie R. Tampa FL   November 9th, 2007 12:52 pm ET

Anything can happen in this world. Different circumstances heed different results.

I appreciate Obama's comments at the end which were respectful & honest. Each mistake is a lesson learned. It is how each and every one of us has attained knowledge & experience.

I don't believe Bill's involvement in this issue is going to help Hillary at all.

It's like John Edwards wife making an off the cuff, "It's not John's fault that he's not a woman or black…" in reference to the forerunners getting more attention. It's true, we don't want to hear what the candidates spouses have to say. They are not in the running.

There's a difference between spousal support & getting in the way of their campaign.

His intentions are good, but he needs to let her prove herself & deal with the issues on her own if she is to lead our country.

Marge, Bloomington MN   November 9th, 2007 12:54 pm ET

Jeepers, do you people text message each other to jump online and bash Hillary every time there is some mention of her name?

Hillary Clinton will make a great President. She is strong, experienced, firm in her beliefs, and cares deeply about our country.

I can't understand why the bashers hate the idea that her spouse supports her. Wouldn't you expect the same if you were running for office?

Michelle Brownstein Atlanta, Georgia   November 9th, 2007 12:54 pm ET

Bill Clinton disgraced the highest office in the land by his constant womanizing. This will not change if his wife wins the presidency. Any woman who doesn't have a problem with Bill Clinton cannot claim to be a feminist or concerned about equal treatment of women. Clinton debased women with his
lifelong philandering and I for one, a lifelong Democrat, believe it is a terrible mistake to have this amoral man back in the White House again, no matter what role he might play.

jim, seattle   November 9th, 2007 12:55 pm ET

yup - 100% her fault when he is in charge, and 100% his fault now that she's in charge. that's convenient. that's the kind of political and moral clarity i think we all want in the WH! isn't there a constitutional ban on double jeopardy? i hope we're spared.

Pete, Washington   November 9th, 2007 1:04 pm ET

How sad. First he claimed his wife was 'swiftboated', and now he takes the 'blame' for her failure with HillaryCare. This is typical Clinton baloney. They both will say anything and do anything to get elected. Bill, your credibilty is in question again. Didn't you once tell us on national television that…."I did not have sexual relations with that woman"?
Most former president mellow with age. You continue to remind us of how you brought shame to the presidency. This present display of 'half-truths' of yours, is unbecoming and disgraceful of a former president.

Jacksonville, FL   November 9th, 2007 1:04 pm ET

Everyone can say what they want, but we need a big change in this country. Let's face it this country has went to hell in a hand basket due to the republicans who are in office. The next president WILL NOT be a republican, americans can not trust them. And a woman, democrat will be voted into office, long before a black man will! We can't fault Hillary on things that might have not worked out, thats politics! Every president we have had in office from the beginning of time has promised us something at the beginning and never came through with it.

JB Boston MA   November 9th, 2007 1:07 pm ET

First of all, THIS IS A COMPLETE LIE.

Read ANY book about this period in history and EVERYONE agrees that it was Hillary's inability to compromise that caused this thing to fail. In fact, her new Health Care plan is more along the lines of what other politicians said may stand a better chance of passing. She was too hard headed to work with others. True story!

Anyone on the Hillary bandwagon better jump off. It is going over the cliff. Find someone else who has similiar positions and jump on, otherwise the R's will be back in the White House.

Look at the number of negative posts. I also have a gut feeling that several repeat posters who are positive about Hillary are in fact the same people.

JFK , Pluto   November 9th, 2007 1:07 pm ET

Just another example of how this couples will say anything to get elected even if it is not truthful.

But why do they think they can always deceive the Americcan public?

Answer: Because most Americans are going fatter and dummer ( Mike Gavel)

Bill, Terrace, BC   November 9th, 2007 1:14 pm ET

Apart from some of the anti-Clinton nonsense that is usual, Bill is right to say that passing healthcare will be easier now that the tax cut money will be restored. He is wrong to try to absolve Hillary of all responsibility for the program's failure back then. Even Bill Bradley, a Democrat and a very reasonable guy, has faulted her attitude as being partly responsible for the program's failure. I guess an honest and objective assessment of anything related to the Clintons is problematic.

David, Dallas Tx   November 9th, 2007 1:24 pm ET

It seems like we're seeing as much Bill as Hillary in the headlines these days.

Maybe her campaign should focus a little more on her, and a little less on him. She's the candidate, after all. Can't she stand on her own?

Hdwag, NY, NY   November 9th, 2007 1:24 pm ET

I remember a time when Hillary said she was running on her own merits.

Then all of a sudden, Bill Clinton began defending everything she has done on her record.

We need something different. Hilllary is just more of the usual.

Patti, Oneonta, NY   November 9th, 2007 1:25 pm ET

Bill will say ANYTHING to get his butt back in the White House. That's the price he is paying for having her tolerate his womanizing all these years….and the reason she stayed with him. A pair of true phonies!!!!

mary, Lake Orion, Michigan   November 9th, 2007 1:25 pm ET

I would rather see someone who cares about the socio-economic welfare of the country be our next president. It's better to have tried to exact a positive change than to talk about it and do nothing.
The current state of affairs on the world stage seems to be the smoke and mirrors the Bush admin. needs to ignore the plight of the lower class and our healthcare woes. Does anyone remember New Orleans? I remember it was Bill Clinton who raised money for the ravaged area. The Clintons, not flawless people, are at least public officals with clear compassion, not empty rhetoric.

We need strong democratic leadership in the Whitehouse in 2008!

Steve, Lyons, CO   November 9th, 2007 1:26 pm ET

Obama is turning into a fool. I can now say I'd never support him.

Speaking in the same vein, Obama shouldn't have sent his wife out to attack Clinton when he wouldn't do it himself. Talk about not taking responsibility.

Hey, Obama: what are you going to do about illegal-gained executive powers by Bush? What are you going to do about the Patriot Act? How are you going to turn around this economy, currently set up for the rich and corporate?

I'm still deciding on Clinton, but Mr. Inexperience himself, Obama, has to become more than a slavering attack dog.

Mark, B'ham, Al.   November 9th, 2007 1:26 pm ET

We do not need another Co-Presidency again. Bill needs to retire and be an ex-President and Hillary is not the woman we need to be President as she is more partisan than any President we have ever had. You can see her partisanship in her votes and proposals while her hubbie was in office. As far as Universal Health Care goes look at the "HMO" the Armed Forces and the Retirees' are under. Do you think the all civilian population would want to be under it. 3-4 months to see an orthopedic surgeon, Walter Reed conditions for the enlisted patients, and my own experience of only able to get 4 of the 15 drugs my family of 4 was taking at the time from the local base pharmacy. I want the "Free Medical for Life" I was promised when I enlisted if I made the military a career which I did only to get shafted by the Clinton Administration on that promise.

Joanne, Menasha Wisconsin   November 9th, 2007 1:26 pm ET

The bulk of the comments here are based strictly on personal animosity that is without basis. Let me ask all of you Clinton haters: did you have a secure job in the 90's? Was your home increasing in value? Was your retirement account gaining or losing value? Could you afford to save and spend on a few luxuries? Did you have access to basic health care without taking out a loan? Were your teenage children being recruited into the military to fight a war for oil? Did you ever even think about terrorism during an average month? Were you afraid all the time? Were you worried all the time about how much it would cost to gas your car?

What on earth are you thinking now? The time for this childish nonsense is well past. Before you open your mouths to state an opinion, please turn off the political crap shows and inform yourselves. Use the public library if your community can still afford to keep it open. At least learn the difference between political rhetoric and statements of policy or principle.

When Hillary Clinton wins the nomination, her Democratic opponents will unit behind her and do everything in their power to support her all the way to the White House. You don't believe me? Just look at John McCain in relation to Bush.

Radicalized citizens will certainly vote for Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich in the primaries, and that's fine. But on election day less than a year from today, you will have two choices at the poll. That's the big picture, and you need to think about that starting right now.

Tom - Dedham, Mass   November 9th, 2007 1:28 pm ET

I thought this lying serial adulterer left us with so much money (after gutting the military), would we not have been able to use all that money to get this done?

Whoops can't use that lie.

Hilary uses this as one of her strengths and lessons learned, but now it is Bill's fault.

So even though we can't look at how this effort was made (papers are under lock and key), it is no longer her fault.

Can't use this lie.

Let's go with an oldie but a goodie, it is the fault of "vast right-wing conpiracy".

All set sheep, start bleating this latest nuanced distortion.

This will sit out there for a day or two and if it gets negative feedback, she will go on camera saying "that my husband doesn't speak for me".

Anyone willing to disagree with me on that?

So how is this going to work for the next year CNN, Bill opens his mouth and it will automatically become news, while other pieces of news such as Kathleen Willey's book (whether you agree or disagree with it) will be ignored?

Nickname is totally deserved.

wag, Maine   November 9th, 2007 1:29 pm ET

man, what passion… how can you really dislike the Clintons soooo much. Clinton may have lied, but no body died (yes, that was taken from a sticker). It's going to be 2008, lets change things for hopefully the better. Hillary is not trying anything deceptive, sure she is running for a job. She and ALL the others will say just about anything to get it. But… who has more qualifications? Seriously, she is totally qualified. Bring on Hillary and Bill!

JFK   November 9th, 2007 1:37 pm ET

Shame on you guys. You are sensoring freedom of speech on your website just to favour HIllary Clinton. Shame on CNN.

My post have not been appearing. Shame on CNN. I will spread the news.

Thomas, St. Petersburg, FL   November 9th, 2007 1:38 pm ET

Great, President Clinton takes blame for health care plan failure; better late than never, I suppose.

(1) 02/1993 - World Trade Center bombing; on Clinton's watch;

(2) 08/1998 - 2 American embassies in Africa are bombed - on Clinton's watch;

(3) 10/2000 - USS Cole is bombed in Yemen, killing 17 U.S. sailors - on Clinton's watch.

As a result of the aforementioned attacks on Americans globally by the followers of the "peaceful" religion of Islam, President George W. Bush INHERITED the War on Terror from his predecessor.

It would be SO NICE if President Clinton took blame for that as well.

JFK   November 9th, 2007 1:39 pm ET

Bye bye CNN

Audry M Amarillo, Tx   November 9th, 2007 1:49 pm ET

Come on, folks. Do you want to continue paying taxes to help the wealthy folks get richer? With their tax breaks, they get to INVEST what they didn't pay. I would NEVER vote Republican. Hillary, the numbers of people supporting you are endless. We love you and Bill.

JV, Seattle, WA   November 9th, 2007 1:49 pm ET

"man, what passion… how can you really dislike the Clintons soooo much. Clinton may have lied, but no body died (yes, that was taken from a sticker). It's going to be 2008, lets change things for hopefully the better. Hillary is not trying anything deceptive, sure she is running for a job. She and ALL the others will say just about anything to get it. But… who has more qualifications? Seriously, she is totally qualified. Bring on Hillary and Bill!

Since when can one spouse put the other's "accomplishments" on their resume? Doing so often results in a firing once the truth is revealed. So, other than Bill's accomplishments, what's left on Hillary's resume to make her more qualified than the rest of the field?

Alan, Bonita Springs, FL   November 9th, 2007 1:55 pm ET

I just can't get over the way Republicans continue to refer to "tax-and-spend" Democrats when they seem to forget Bush was literally handed a history-making SURPLUS of cash when he took office, blew through all of it in a hartbeat, and has now borrowed against our grandchildren's future to the tune of trillians to support an oil war that currently appears to only be helping out his family's best oil barron friends.

I guess, if Democrats are "Tax and Spend" you have to add "and save" and, for Republicans, we'd have to say "Borrow against our nation's future and spend."

Finally, I would far prefer living in the so-called Democratic socialistic state Republicans are always referring to (giving the People's tax dollars BACK to the people) than under further Republican robber-barron rule.

Lucy, boston,ma   November 9th, 2007 2:05 pm ET

This sounds pretty much like: "I'll say anything to get my wife (and me) back into the white house, including trying to take the blame that has long been upon my wife's head."

Politics of power and ambition at it's finest.

I'm done with the aristocratic families of the US and washingtonian politics. I want something different.

Posted By Noah, Chicago, IL : November 9, 2007 9:54 am
I am with you on that……These guys are saying anything just to get elected and that part is putting me off… No politics as usual people…. Want something differen!

Derek, Keene NH   November 9th, 2007 2:08 pm ET

The reality of the situation is that it's not just the Clinton's who can't be trusted - it's politicians in general. I find it funny that people point fingers at some politicians, but not others. In the end it's just politics, one big game where people skew their actual opinions/values to fall in line with what they believe voters what to hear. And in this case, Bill to the rescue wasn't it. But that doesn't mean they represent what is wrong with politics more than any other candidate. And their experience still reigns superior above all other candidates…and when the big issues come up…that's what I'd like a leader to have.

Sean, Detroit, MI   November 9th, 2007 2:12 pm ET

When Clinton lied, nobody died
…except Kathleen Willey's husband

Where are the articles about her new book, CNN?

Amy Georgia   November 9th, 2007 2:16 pm ET

It would be nice to have a discussion about the presidential candidacy where everyone involved talks about the issues, and stays focused on the issues. We have bigger problems in our country than Bill Clintons relationships with his interns..I hear much more talk about that then how the hell we are gonna get out of Iraq, or how we are going to solve our economic, and foreign relations problems. Im sick or Democrats attacking Clinton, and Republicans attacking Democrats, I think we could use our time and energy on bigger things. Give us the facts, and the solutions to our problems, let the people decide.

paul dallas tx   November 9th, 2007 2:16 pm ET

The bulk of the comments here are based strictly on personal animosity that is without basis. Let me ask all of you Clinton haters: did you have a secure job in the 90's? Was your home increasing in value? Was your retirement account gaining or losing value? Could you afford to save and spend on a few luxuries? Did you have access to basic health care without taking out a loan? Were your teenage children being recruited into the military to fight a war for oil? Did you ever even think about terrorism during an average month? Were you afraid all the time? Were you worried all the time about how much it would cost to gas your car?

What on earth are you thinking now? The time for this childish nonsense is well past. Before you open your mouths to state an opinion, please turn off the political crap shows and inform yourselves. Use the public library if your community can still afford to keep it open. At least learn the difference between political rhetoric and statements of policy or principle.

When Hillary Clinton wins the nomination, her Democratic opponents will unit behind her and do everything in their power to support her all the way to the White House. You don't believe me? Just look at John McCain in relation to Bush.

Radicalized citizens will certainly vote for Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich in the primaries, and that's fine. But on election day less than a year from today, you will have two choices at the poll. That's the big picture, and you need to think about that starting right now.

Posted By Joanne, Menasha Wisconsin : November 9, 2007 1:26 pm

Less than a year from now I am thinking how Obama will become my president and that is what I am thinking right now…Keep the big picture in your head and start getting used to it!

Bob Sakimano   November 9th, 2007 2:29 pm ET

As far as the health care plan is concerned, Hillary has the better judgment and experience, while Obama has neither. Hillary has become a more experienced and stronger person as being the first lady of Arkansa and USA, although being constantly bashed by the republicans in her 16 yrs in DC.

It is always better to try and miss, than not to have tred at all. Youth and inexperience will get you lost whether in plane or politics.

Seriously is this a joke. Being a first lady during a FAILED health care plan is good experience? How is this experience? Should Chelsea get the nod since she has been first daughter?

Ryan Indianapolis   November 9th, 2007 2:37 pm ET

Sorry Bill nobody believes you, we all know that Hillary was calling the shots in the Whitehouse and that failure was Her FAILURE

Jenny Chicago   November 9th, 2007 2:44 pm ET

Bill Clinton once again is showing why he is the maestro of American politics. Bill is a huge asset to his wife's presidential presidential aspiration. With him in her corner Hillary has an insurmountable advantage over her fellow contenders. He is showing why he was twice elected President and was able to beat the republicans at their own game. BRAVO, MR PRESIDENT, BRAVO.

Posted By Tom, ALBUQUERQUE, NM : November 9, 2007 10:24 am

What kind of Kool-aid do you drink in New Mexico. Tom please go get some help everyone of your posts are always the same with the same unbelievably thoughtless replies. Sir you are either incredible stupid or gullible or probably BOTH

DH, Seattle, WA   November 9th, 2007 2:45 pm ET

"Finally, I would far prefer living in the so-called Democratic socialistic state Republicans are always referring to (giving the People's tax dollars BACK to the people) than under further Republican robber-barron rule.

It's not that Republicans are die-hard Bush supports, in fact, many, including myself, are let down and disappointed the GOP strayed from core principles. But we realize the alternative (Democrats) has the potential (socialism) to be much worse.

"Finally, I would far prefer living in the so-called Democratic socialistic state Republicans are always referring to (giving the People's tax dollars BACK to the people) than under further Republican robber-barron rule."

Suggest you take a look at the economic success in Ireland before you make such a statement. Google: Ireland Economic Boom. While Ireland's economy is not perfect, it is the envy of the EU.

John, Los Angeles, CA   November 9th, 2007 2:55 pm ET

The country would be lucky to get the Clintons back in office. Seven years of failed leadership under George W. Bush has led to record deficits and atrocious foreign policy, destroying any goodwill and respect we once had in the world community. By contrast, Bill Clinton governed during a period of peace and economic prosperity, and left office with the highest job approval rating of any president leaving office in US history.

joseph, austin, tx   November 9th, 2007 3:08 pm ET

WE THE PEOPLE U.S.A

just because they dont write a check for insurance premiums, they lose about 45-55% of their paycheck that they work for to pay for all the stuff you wanted govt to give you. why do you feel as if everything should be handed to you. Im poor and I have healthins. of course I dont have a good DVD collection or the latest and hottest clothes. If people prioratized then they wouldnt have as many problems as they do. Im glad you want "free" health ins. but guess what I DONT WANT TO PAY FOR YOUR INSURANCE, I work to many hours to lose 50% of my paycheck. If you dont have health ins look at all the other stuff you have and ask your self "was that a need based buy, or did just want it" have some priorities and buy health ins instead of that new outfit you just have to have. If I wanted a more european america, I would just move to europe.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   November 9th, 2007 3:28 pm ET

Bill, keep your mouth shut, there will probably be more things of importance to apologize for. So pick and choose your apology battles carefully.

Ghetto, Lowell, MA   November 9th, 2007 3:54 pm ET

YOU SELFISH RICH REPUBLICANS DON'T WANNA SHARE SOME OF YOUR MONEY WITH US THE POOR. WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT WHEN MADAM PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON GET TO THE WHITE HOUSE WILL REDISTRIBUTE ALL THAT MONEY LYING AROUND. I CAN'T WAIT - LONG LIVE CLINTON!

Seam, Philly PA   November 9th, 2007 4:06 pm ET

Do people realize that Republicans controlled Washington during the Clinton days? Republicans are responsible for much of the good that happened during his presidency. The Clintons do not deserve the praise they are receiving. I am no Republican, but I give credit where credit is due.

Sensible Man Dallas, Texas   November 9th, 2007 4:10 pm ET

Who gives a darn about the Clintons anymore.

More and more, I see Ron Paul as the candidate to lead our diverse and divided society. We need a candidate who represents freedom, and we do not need the Clintons and their arrogant teenage shenagigans.

Steve, Landing, NJ   November 9th, 2007 4:11 pm ET

Joseph in Austin–

You're right, people have no sense of financial responsibility. As a result, they should die. That's justice for you.

Why is it that everyone is A-OK with the government taking their money to battle people, but they draw the line at battling disease?

Ella   November 9th, 2007 4:18 pm ET

HILLARY AND BILL HAVE EVERY MINORITY BELIEVING THAT THEY ARE BEHIND THEM. LET'S RECOUNT EXACTLY WHAT BILL DID FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS AND LATINOS DURING HIS ADMINISTRATION… ARE THESE TWO MINORIIES BETTER OFF TODAY BECAUSE OF THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION? NO. THEY ARE JUST LOOKING FOR VOTES AND EXPLOITING MINORITIES WHILE DOING SO…ITS SHAMEFUL!

ronnie knoxville ,tn.   November 9th, 2007 4:20 pm ET

why is BJ even on the news this much , chiming in on almost every Hillary news story? BJ is not ont he ballot, Hillary is…

winnie kandolin, sandy, utah, November 9, 2007   November 9th, 2007 4:52 pm ET

The country was not ready to admit that we needed an overhaul of the health care system. We need to embrace Hillary's plan this time around as she has made some modifications that should address the needs of all. Our country is in a crisis and lets support a strong leader, like Mrs. Clinton- and a wonderful partner- Bill Clinton who has gotten a bad rap from the Republicans for decades!

Colin742   November 9th, 2007 5:00 pm ET

Posted By WE THE PEOPLE U.S.A. : Nov 9
Your message typed all in CAPITALS is difficult to read. Canadian Health care is not "free". About 2/3rd is paid by User/Employer premiums and copays and 1/3rd from general taxes. To some extent payments are based on income or ability to pay. Medical bills do not bankrupt anyone.
It would be a complex massive job to replace what you have now with a Canadian style single system but you would cut admin costs and get more for your money if you could change. I understand the US health care is rated 37th in the world. Canada is 7th.

Bill W, Coatesville, PA   November 9th, 2007 5:10 pm ET

Joanne - I did have a good job in the 90's. And I don't now. Know why? OUTSOURCING. Know who started that?
BILL CLINTON. Know who supports it now? HILLARY CLINTON - the woman who brought the #1 outsourcer of US jobs to India - TATA CONSULTING - LOOK IT UP - into New York. They made over $11 billion last year on outsourced US jobs. They employ 10 people in New York.

Colin742   November 9th, 2007 5:10 pm ET

Hillary and Bill are two crooks with no morals or character. Hillary wants to print money and give it away.
Go back in ther past they are both crooks
Jim Cleveland ohio :Nov 9, 07 11:10 am

Internationally Bill and Hillary are the most admired and respected Americans in the world. Millions wasted on investigations produced nothing except consensual sex. Now, Bill's foundation is saving thousands of lives. He has raised billions for third world projects. Without doubt in time Bill will get a NOBEL prize.

MacKenzie, NY, NY   November 9th, 2007 6:19 pm ET

Hillary is not going to win because people don't like her. PERIOD. She is trying to "buy" the Presidency and it will fail. It will fail like her health plan, like her wonderful marriage and like her moral compass.

Chuckles, Sacramento, Calif.   November 9th, 2007 6:28 pm ET

Hey A. Thomas from New York … Hillary has sound judgment? Yeah, she used it on the Iraq and Iran votes huh? Experience? What is her experience? Six years as senator? What meaningful legislation has been passed that she alone authored? Do you know that Obama has almost twice as much elected legislative experience? Do you know that he passed his bar exam on the first try? Since when is being first lady qualification for being president? So you think Laura Bush is qualified to run in 2012? My wife is an oncologist, has been for 20 years, and I've traveled the world with her to symposiums and conferernces. I've met a lot of interesting people from many different cultures. Does that mean I now have the experience to practice medicine? Of course not. I'd love to look into Hillary's claims of all this experience but the evidence seems to be locked up until 2009 at the earliest. Darn, I guess I'll just have to vote for Obama. And to the people who think Obama is attacking Hillary. Get a freakin' clue! Has he called her inexperienced and naive? He's explaining the differences in their styles and policies. He has never attacked her personally.

JB Boston MA   November 9th, 2007 6:54 pm ET

Think about it this way-

Look how divided and angry the people are in regards to the political environment. Hillary has greater negatives than Bush does. If she is elected it will be even angrier and more divided. I am not sure our country can take that.