<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions planted by Clinton campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Baca</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-344214</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Baca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-344214</guid>
		<description>Question:  Can President Clinton be appointed Secretary of State?
Can he be appointed to any cabinet position?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:  Can President Clinton be appointed Secretary of State?<br />
Can he be appointed to any cabinet position?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Toporek Warren, IN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-142096</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Toporek Warren, IN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-142096</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not as surprised to hear about planting a question as much as I am about her denial of the practice afterwards. The Presidency is about integrity and personal responsibility; two things Senator Clinton failed to demonstrate in her handling of the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not as surprised to hear about planting a question as much as I am about her denial of the practice afterwards. The Presidency is about integrity and personal responsibility; two things Senator Clinton failed to demonstrate in her handling of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric, from THE Republic of Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-139028</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric, from THE Republic of Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-139028</guid>
		<description>Hey maaaaaaaan, I bet CARL ROVE planted those questions, man.

Yeah, man, it was Bush and Cheney and Rove and (sound of a lighter and &quot;bong bubbles&quot;)... and... and, Rumsfeld, maaaaaan.  (sound of long exhale)  Yeah, THOSE DUDES planted the questions, not any of Hillary&#039;s campaign, maaaaaan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey maaaaaaaan, I bet CARL ROVE planted those questions, man.</p>
<p>Yeah, man, it was Bush and Cheney and Rove and (sound of a lighter and "bong bubbles")... and... and, Rumsfeld, maaaaaan.  (sound of long exhale)  Yeah, THOSE DUDES planted the questions, not any of Hillary's campaign, maaaaaan...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny, Miami, Fl</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-138538</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny, Miami, Fl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-138538</guid>
		<description>She seems to be reading from the podium to answer this planted question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She seems to be reading from the podium to answer this planted question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stew, Fairfax, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137781</link>
		<dc:creator>Stew, Fairfax, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137781</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;Open your eyes people and realize that your vote for President really does matter and really does make a difference in your life. For example, gas was $1.55 a gallon when Bush took office - I filled up last night at $3.22.&quot;

+++++++++++++++++++++++

WHAT?!!! So, what do you propose bombing the burgeoning economies of India and China to submission to quell their appetite for oil? Geezz…there should be a competency test to be able to vote!

+++++++++++++++++++++

You would think these &quot;thoughtful&quot; left wing loons would rejoice at rising fuel costs.  Don&#039;t they realize higher fuel costs is an effective means to conserve and to reduce greenhouse gases?  Nothing motivates the consumer to conserve when he gets smacked in the pocketbook.  Beats some bureaucrat legislating conservation using phoney life cycle analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>""Open your eyes people and realize that your vote for President really does matter and really does make a difference in your life. For example, gas was $1.55 a gallon when Bush took office &#8211; I filled up last night at $3.22."</p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>WHAT?!!! So, what do you propose bombing the burgeoning economies of India and China to submission to quell their appetite for oil? Geezz…there should be a competency test to be able to vote!</p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>You would think these "thoughtful" left wing loons would rejoice at rising fuel costs.  Don't they realize higher fuel costs is an effective means to conserve and to reduce greenhouse gases?  Nothing motivates the consumer to conserve when he gets smacked in the pocketbook.  Beats some bureaucrat legislating conservation using phoney life cycle analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous, Hickory, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137766</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous, Hickory, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137766</guid>
		<description>&quot;Open your eyes people and realize that your vote for President really does matter and really does make a difference in your life. For example, gas was $1.55 a gallon when Bush took office - I filled up last night at $3.22.&quot;

+++++++++++++++++++++++

WHAT?!!!  So, what do you propose bombing the burgeoning economies of India and China to submission to quell their appetite for oil?  Geezz...there should be a competency test to be able to vote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Open your eyes people and realize that your vote for President really does matter and really does make a difference in your life. For example, gas was $1.55 a gallon when Bush took office &#8211; I filled up last night at $3.22."</p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>WHAT?!!!  So, what do you propose bombing the burgeoning economies of India and China to submission to quell their appetite for oil?  Geezz...there should be a competency test to be able to vote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice, Seattle, WA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137747</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice, Seattle, WA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137747</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hillary is our best chance to come back in the world, and we all need to line up behind her when she wins the nomination, and then the POTUS election. Of course I expect the haters to spend the next 4 to 8 years after that demonizing her no matter the efforts or how they will benefit the nation and people long term. I hope they do benefit us all and she does very well for our country and children&#039;s sake!&quot;

*************************

...and that&#039;s exactly why Hillary should not be POTUS.  What goes around, comes around.  She and her Party have been engaged in destructive politics for the past 7 years.  One can only expect retaliation from their opponents.  If the Left wants any of their goals realized, don&#039;t nominate Hillary...she&#039;s polarizing and divisive.  Why is that not clear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Hillary is our best chance to come back in the world, and we all need to line up behind her when she wins the nomination, and then the POTUS election. Of course I expect the haters to spend the next 4 to 8 years after that demonizing her no matter the efforts or how they will benefit the nation and people long term. I hope they do benefit us all and she does very well for our country and children's sake!"</p>
<p>*************************</p>
<p>...and that's exactly why Hillary should not be POTUS.  What goes around, comes around.  She and her Party have been engaged in destructive politics for the past 7 years.  One can only expect retaliation from their opponents.  If the Left wants any of their goals realized, don't nominate Hillary...she's polarizing and divisive.  Why is that not clear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E., Newport News, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137723</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E., Newport News, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137723</guid>
		<description>&quot;Typical Democrat mindset : if you don&#039;t agree with me, you&#039;re stupid and ignorant. This is what has turned me off about the modern Democratic party and why they keep losing elections that should be a slam-dunk. The vast majority of Americans are tired of being called stupid and ignorant by the powers-that-be in the Democratic party.&quot;

++++++++++++

Couldn&#039;t agree more!  You forgot to mention calling their opponents bigoted, greedy, blood thirsty, immoral, thieves, filthy rich, and, of course, corrupt.  I don&#039;t think the Party, nor many of their supporters, see themselves in the mirror, nor realize that the hate and vile rhetoric they spew is counterproductive to improving the tone in Washington.  Their tactic is clear, personally attack and villainize to gain politically.  Oh, and they love to make reference to FOX News for some reason...it&#039;s a hot button&quot; for them....really silly.  God forbid, anyone have a different opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Typical Democrat mindset : if you don't agree with me, you're stupid and ignorant. This is what has turned me off about the modern Democratic party and why they keep losing elections that should be a slam-dunk. The vast majority of Americans are tired of being called stupid and ignorant by the powers-that-be in the Democratic party."</p>
<p>++++++++++++</p>
<p>Couldn't agree more!  You forgot to mention calling their opponents bigoted, greedy, blood thirsty, immoral, thieves, filthy rich, and, of course, corrupt.  I don't think the Party, nor many of their supporters, see themselves in the mirror, nor realize that the hate and vile rhetoric they spew is counterproductive to improving the tone in Washington.  Their tactic is clear, personally attack and villainize to gain politically.  Oh, and they love to make reference to FOX News for some reason...it's a hot button" for them....really silly.  God forbid, anyone have a different opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Argos, Raleigh NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137484</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Argos, Raleigh NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137484</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;From many of the comments it is pretty obvious most:

1) Have no grasp of politics or history

2) have never worked on a campaign

3) form their political allegiances and opinions based on myth and popular culture
&lt;/i&gt;

Typical Democrat mindset : if you don&#039;t agree with me, you&#039;re stupid and ignorant.  This is what has turned me off about the modern Democratic party and why they keep losing elections that should be a slam-dunk.  The vast majority of Americans are tired of being called stupid and ignorant by the powers-that-be in the Democratic party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>From many of the comments it is pretty obvious most:</p>
<p>1) Have no grasp of politics or history</p>
<p>2) have never worked on a campaign</p>
<p>3) form their political allegiances and opinions based on myth and popular culture<br />
</i></p>
<p>Typical Democrat mindset : if you don't agree with me, you're stupid and ignorant.  This is what has turned me off about the modern Democratic party and why they keep losing elections that should be a slam-dunk.  The vast majority of Americans are tired of being called stupid and ignorant by the powers-that-be in the Democratic party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Williams          Seattle, Washington</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137380</link>
		<dc:creator>John Williams          Seattle, Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137380</guid>
		<description>why do all hillary supporters always talk about Bush? Bush is not running. Not all Republicans are the same, meaning another Republican in the White House definately doesn&#039;t mean another George Bush. Putting someone like Hillary in the White House is like putting someone like George Bush back in, you all have said it yourself. You are always saying that Bush does it too, which is exactly why us Hillary &quot;haters&quot; don&#039;t want her SHE IS MORE OF THE SAME! arrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh Hillary supporters are just a lot of moronic lemmings try thinking for yourself. Also what is this experience she talks about, I don&#039;t remember what position she held in the Clinton administration. Could you please remind me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do all hillary supporters always talk about Bush? Bush is not running. Not all Republicans are the same, meaning another Republican in the White House definately doesn't mean another George Bush. Putting someone like Hillary in the White House is like putting someone like George Bush back in, you all have said it yourself. You are always saying that Bush does it too, which is exactly why us Hillary "haters" don't want her SHE IS MORE OF THE SAME! arrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh Hillary supporters are just a lot of moronic lemmings try thinking for yourself. Also what is this experience she talks about, I don't remember what position she held in the Clinton administration. Could you please remind me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael, Houston TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137025</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael, Houston TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-137025</guid>
		<description>Hillary, don&#039;t even respond this is more baloney and feigned surprise by your opponents. Although I would take a serious look at some of your amateur hour campaign management people, there is just no substitute for diligence and extreme attention to detail. Never take anything for granted right up to the last minute of the campaign, fight every day and take every opportunity as though your election depended on it, because it does. Get rid of those folks who are not rock solid on the message and in their diligence.

Folks grow up and support Hillary. This is the only chance we will really have to correct the mistakes of the past 8 years.

And for any of you idiots who wish to support a Nader or other fringe candidate, remember - you can have some of your goals met with Hillary or have none of them met when your fractured voting allows a Republicrite like Rudy to win. PLease do not allow the fringe groups to hijack the campaign, alienate the moderate majority and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again!

From many of the comments it is pretty obvious most:

1) Have no grasp of politics or history

2) have never worked on a campaign

3) form their political allegiances and opinions based on myth and popular culture

Hillary is our best chance to come back in the world, and we all need to line up behind her when she wins the nomination, and then the POTUS election. Of course I expect the haters to spend the next 4 to 8 years after that demonizing her no matter the efforts or how they will benefit the nation and people long term. I hope they do benefit us all and she does very well for our country and children&#039;s sake!

Bring us good fortune Hillary! Beleive me you have more supporters in other parties than you know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary, don't even respond this is more baloney and feigned surprise by your opponents. Although I would take a serious look at some of your amateur hour campaign management people, there is just no substitute for diligence and extreme attention to detail. Never take anything for granted right up to the last minute of the campaign, fight every day and take every opportunity as though your election depended on it, because it does. Get rid of those folks who are not rock solid on the message and in their diligence.</p>
<p>Folks grow up and support Hillary. This is the only chance we will really have to correct the mistakes of the past 8 years.</p>
<p>And for any of you idiots who wish to support a Nader or other fringe candidate, remember &#8211; you can have some of your goals met with Hillary or have none of them met when your fractured voting allows a Republicrite like Rudy to win. PLease do not allow the fringe groups to hijack the campaign, alienate the moderate majority and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again!</p>
<p>From many of the comments it is pretty obvious most:</p>
<p>1) Have no grasp of politics or history</p>
<p>2) have never worked on a campaign</p>
<p>3) form their political allegiances and opinions based on myth and popular culture</p>
<p>Hillary is our best chance to come back in the world, and we all need to line up behind her when she wins the nomination, and then the POTUS election. Of course I expect the haters to spend the next 4 to 8 years after that demonizing her no matter the efforts or how they will benefit the nation and people long term. I hope they do benefit us all and she does very well for our country and children's sake!</p>
<p>Bring us good fortune Hillary! Beleive me you have more supporters in other parties than you know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob, Roxboro, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136936</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob, Roxboro, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136936</guid>
		<description>If this doesn&#039;t stink like Bush, nothing does.

Denying knowledge of malfeasance works like a charm for Bush so why wouldn&#039;t Hillary try to employ the same hackneyed tactics.

Care to explain the difference from one politician to the next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this doesn't stink like Bush, nothing does.</p>
<p>Denying knowledge of malfeasance works like a charm for Bush so why wouldn't Hillary try to employ the same hackneyed tactics.</p>
<p>Care to explain the difference from one politician to the next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Indianapolis</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136761</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Indianapolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136761</guid>
		<description>What a DISGRACE...Are you proud of your girl Hillary supports...I thought the smartest woman in the world wouldnt need to do this?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a DISGRACE...Are you proud of your girl Hillary supports...I thought the smartest woman in the world wouldnt need to do this?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136738</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136738</guid>
		<description>One word for Hillary - transparency.

After the machinations of George Bush, I believe the nation is starving for honesty and transparency in their political leaders, and this sort of action is far short of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word for Hillary &#8211; transparency.</p>
<p>After the machinations of George Bush, I believe the nation is starving for honesty and transparency in their political leaders, and this sort of action is far short of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous, Yorktown, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136704</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous, Yorktown, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136704</guid>
		<description>Gene, very amusing?  What flavor cool aide do you recommend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene, very amusing?  What flavor cool aide do you recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben,  Ames, IA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136698</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben,  Ames, IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136698</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it amazing, both Clintons are touted by their supporters as these extremely intelligent and politically savvy figures, and yet despite being distrusted by at least 50% of the voters at the &quot;get go&quot;, they pull stunts like this.  I don&#039;t think they can help themselves.  Dishonestly is so engrained in them, it comes naturally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't it amazing, both Clintons are touted by their supporters as these extremely intelligent and politically savvy figures, and yet despite being distrusted by at least 50% of the voters at the "get go", they pull stunts like this.  I don't think they can help themselves.  Dishonestly is so engrained in them, it comes naturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene L.A. Ca</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136690</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene L.A. Ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136690</guid>
		<description>No big surprises from the Republicans petty comments here as they pull their little smear machine out of mothballs. The very thought of any polls suggesting Hillary may well beat any of their lying ilk in the election by a fairly comfortable margin makes their blood run cold with panic. The whiny foaming-at-the-mouth Clinton haters can be counted on to pull out all the stops in &#039;08 and use their bag of dirty tricks again that worked on Al Gore and John Kerry. They will stop at nothing to try to fool voters through the entire campaign in a desperate attempt to stay in the White House. Fortunately for us all, George the lying hypocrite Bush and his complete lack of competence and leadership ability has left a sizeable majority of voters more than a tiny bit apprehensive about allowing another person with an (R) next to their name anywhere near the White House for a long time to come. Maybe Bush really was on a mission from God afterall, Only that purpose is not what he would have us think it was! Maybe it was to show voters the true face of the party elite and what would happen to America when they were able to abuse their power long enough, thus the 6 awful years with Bush and his party controlling both houses. America was punished and Republicans proved they were a disaster in every possible way! When voters &quot;just say NO&quot; to ALL of them it will finally extinguish the far right goon squads strong influence from destroying what is left of Bushes sad disfunctional party. Proof= Take a look at most any large poll out there, Americans have had a belly full of this bunch and know how badly out of touch with reality they are and most want to keep them away from the reigns of power until such time they are no longer being controlled by dangerous neo-fascists and theocratic hypocrites like Rove, Cheney, Pat Robertson, Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, etc. The Republicans have gleefully taken marching orders from this sort since that sad day long ago when Trickie Dickie was inagurated and America lost a large part of it&#039;s soul and it&#039;s former integrity. Real Republicans like Teddy Roosevelt and much later Ike Eisenhower are nothing like Bush and couldn&#039;t run and win a nomination anymore. Eisenhower was perhaps the last decent Republican and it&#039;s sadly ironic an infamous crook like Nixon was his VP. Ruthless ideologues and fanatics with no mind of their own and only Dollar signs in their eyes like Bush are willing to do what they are told by their wealthy benefactors. Proof is in Bushes own insane actions. He has never cared what anyone said or thinks no matter how wrong he has been and continues to be on any given issue, no matter if most people disagree with him so much he would poll in the single digits. He truly believes he is a King and above the law. The same Bush supporters living in glass houses are now throwing stones at Hillary so I take any criticism from them with a very large grain of salt. I&#039;ll just bet the swift boat liars club will come outta the woodwork any day now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No big surprises from the Republicans petty comments here as they pull their little smear machine out of mothballs. The very thought of any polls suggesting Hillary may well beat any of their lying ilk in the election by a fairly comfortable margin makes their blood run cold with panic. The whiny foaming-at-the-mouth Clinton haters can be counted on to pull out all the stops in '08 and use their bag of dirty tricks again that worked on Al Gore and John Kerry. They will stop at nothing to try to fool voters through the entire campaign in a desperate attempt to stay in the White House. Fortunately for us all, George the lying hypocrite Bush and his complete lack of competence and leadership ability has left a sizeable majority of voters more than a tiny bit apprehensive about allowing another person with an (R) next to their name anywhere near the White House for a long time to come. Maybe Bush really was on a mission from God afterall, Only that purpose is not what he would have us think it was! Maybe it was to show voters the true face of the party elite and what would happen to America when they were able to abuse their power long enough, thus the 6 awful years with Bush and his party controlling both houses. America was punished and Republicans proved they were a disaster in every possible way! When voters "just say NO" to ALL of them it will finally extinguish the far right goon squads strong influence from destroying what is left of Bushes sad disfunctional party. Proof= Take a look at most any large poll out there, Americans have had a belly full of this bunch and know how badly out of touch with reality they are and most want to keep them away from the reigns of power until such time they are no longer being controlled by dangerous neo-fascists and theocratic hypocrites like Rove, Cheney, Pat Robertson, Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, etc. The Republicans have gleefully taken marching orders from this sort since that sad day long ago when Trickie Dickie was inagurated and America lost a large part of it's soul and it's former integrity. Real Republicans like Teddy Roosevelt and much later Ike Eisenhower are nothing like Bush and couldn't run and win a nomination anymore. Eisenhower was perhaps the last decent Republican and it's sadly ironic an infamous crook like Nixon was his VP. Ruthless ideologues and fanatics with no mind of their own and only Dollar signs in their eyes like Bush are willing to do what they are told by their wealthy benefactors. Proof is in Bushes own insane actions. He has never cared what anyone said or thinks no matter how wrong he has been and continues to be on any given issue, no matter if most people disagree with him so much he would poll in the single digits. He truly believes he is a King and above the law. The same Bush supporters living in glass houses are now throwing stones at Hillary so I take any criticism from them with a very large grain of salt. I'll just bet the swift boat liars club will come outta the woodwork any day now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth,Nashua,NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136647</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth,Nashua,NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136647</guid>
		<description>http://www.barackobama.com/2007/11/09/obama_picks_up_a_coveted_endor.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.barackobama.com/2007/11/09/obama_picks_up_a_coveted_endor.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.barackobama.com/2007/11/09/obama_picks_up_a_coveted_endor.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136636</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136636</guid>
		<description>cool. Hillary Clinton now has a direct tie to FEMA. so the current frontrunner is now as good as FEMA is....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool. Hillary Clinton now has a direct tie to FEMA. so the current frontrunner is now as good as FEMA is....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Anderson Charlotte, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136591</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Anderson Charlotte, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136591</guid>
		<description>Is it too much to ask a potential president and former first lady not to manipulate anyone else in order to show us how intelligent she is? Could we just have a &#039;little bit&#039; of honesty from this bunch for a change of pace? Or maybe we can&#039;t handle the truth… on second thought, if this is the best she can do i don&#039;t want to hear any more of it.
 R. Anderson Charlotte, NC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it too much to ask a potential president and former first lady not to manipulate anyone else in order to show us how intelligent she is? Could we just have a 'little bit' of honesty from this bunch for a change of pace? Or maybe we can't handle the truth… on second thought, if this is the best she can do i don't want to hear any more of it.<br />
 R. Anderson Charlotte, NC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMRN.Y.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136574</link>
		<dc:creator>RMRN.Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136574</guid>
		<description>Do you see what we mean when we say, Hillary is more of the same. They are old school political movers with sleaze up the sleeve. They only want to control what you hear from their dog eared political script. Nothing spontaneous or authentic so as to really know them.
Shadow people with contempt for the citizens of the United States - you the people are to be spoon fed their version of reality so you can be controlled and marched into the voting booth without even knowing who you just
voted for. Clintonistas - get it already, and awake from the sleep walk 
they have you doing. Snap out of it before it&#039;s too late!!!

WAKE UP !!!

Obama is the real deal - a leader with a heart for the people and a brain that really works - just imagine how great Barak&#039;s speech is going to be at the democratic convention. He will bring us together and effect real and meaningful change for us all.

Vote for the smartest person in the room - BARAK OBAMA !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you see what we mean when we say, Hillary is more of the same. They are old school political movers with sleaze up the sleeve. They only want to control what you hear from their dog eared political script. Nothing spontaneous or authentic so as to really know them.<br />
Shadow people with contempt for the citizens of the United States &#8211; you the people are to be spoon fed their version of reality so you can be controlled and marched into the voting booth without even knowing who you just<br />
voted for. Clintonistas &#8211; get it already, and awake from the sleep walk<br />
they have you doing. Snap out of it before it's too late!!!</p>
<p>WAKE UP !!!</p>
<p>Obama is the real deal &#8211; a leader with a heart for the people and a brain that really works &#8211; just imagine how great Barak's speech is going to be at the democratic convention. He will bring us together and effect real and meaningful change for us all.</p>
<p>Vote for the smartest person in the room &#8211; BARAK OBAMA !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron, Lake Forest, California</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136553</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron, Lake Forest, California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136553</guid>
		<description>Not quite as bad as Bush planting a communications back pack under his jacket and being fed answers. Hillary is smart enough to know that some questions will not be asked unless prompted. What&#039;s wrong with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite as bad as Bush planting a communications back pack under his jacket and being fed answers. Hillary is smart enough to know that some questions will not be asked unless prompted. What's wrong with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136550</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136550</guid>
		<description>Scott Brown, Florida. Did you know the story? Mitchell is a minister in Hamilton, he said &quot; I wanted to ask her why she voted for the Iraq war and why she didn&#039;t consider that a mistake&quot; Hillary answered clearly at first debate. Mitchell told Fox News he is an Obama supporter but can not participate in the Iowa caucus, then what is his purpose being there and make trouble? what kind of minister is he? I wouldn&#039;t go to his church, he needs help spiritually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Brown, Florida. Did you know the story? Mitchell is a minister in Hamilton, he said " I wanted to ask her why she voted for the Iraq war and why she didn't consider that a mistake" Hillary answered clearly at first debate. Mitchell told Fox News he is an Obama supporter but can not participate in the Iowa caucus, then what is his purpose being there and make trouble? what kind of minister is he? I wouldn't go to his church, he needs help spiritually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Columbus, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Columbus, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136512</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;This doesn&#039;t surprise me since it&#039;s coming from Hillary&#039;s campaign&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http:\\www.watchingHillary.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WatchingHillary.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This doesn't surprise me since it's coming from Hillary's campaign</b></p>
<p><a href="http:\\www.watchingHillary.com" rel="nofollow">WatchingHillary.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John  NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136505</link>
		<dc:creator>John  NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136505</guid>
		<description>Good Bye Hillary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Bye Hillary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyvron Jean</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136482</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyvron Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136482</guid>
		<description>WOW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Jones                   South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136477</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Jones                   South Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136477</guid>
		<description>Change? what change? the only change she is offering is Gender nothing more. Everything else is politics as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change? what change? the only change she is offering is Gender nothing more. Everything else is politics as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olivia san antonio texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136392</link>
		<dc:creator>olivia san antonio texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136392</guid>
		<description>We will see the first woman president in our country&#039;s history in 2008! Women of this country are ready for a change and that change is Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see the first woman president in our country's history in 2008! Women of this country are ready for a change and that change is Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry                 Houston, Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136350</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry                 Houston, Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136350</guid>
		<description>there are more accusations, of course you won&#039;t find that on CNN. Go to another website also this will be buried by Monday. I am sure they won&#039;t post this either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are more accusations, of course you won't find that on CNN. Go to another website also this will be buried by Monday. I am sure they won't post this either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Jarrell,  Washington DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136332</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Jarrell,  Washington DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136332</guid>
		<description>Is returning to Arkansas still an option?
If so the both of them should seriously considering going back there,  finding a little house somewhere in the woods and growing old together.  
All the while knowing how dishonest the two of them have been to the American People.  

The American people must put a stop to their move for her to become the next president.  She is not what this country needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is returning to Arkansas still an option?<br />
If so the both of them should seriously considering going back there,  finding a little house somewhere in the woods and growing old together.<br />
All the while knowing how dishonest the two of them have been to the American People.  </p>
<p>The American people must put a stop to their move for her to become the next president.  She is not what this country needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt Dagostino, Woodland park, CO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136321</link>
		<dc:creator>matt Dagostino, Woodland park, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136321</guid>
		<description>One more nail in the coffin for the socialist-thank God!  Maybe now we will abandon her socialism and embrace a capitalist.  This event only exposes the tip the &quot;ends justify the means&quot; argument used by the Clintons for years.  Bye bye socialism!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more nail in the coffin for the socialist-thank God!  Maybe now we will abandon her socialism and embrace a capitalist.  This event only exposes the tip the "ends justify the means" argument used by the Clintons for years.  Bye bye socialism!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGH, Virginia Beach, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136315</link>
		<dc:creator>DGH, Virginia Beach, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136315</guid>
		<description>This is typical of both Clintons and what we can expect, more deception, half-truths and outright lies.  What surprised me most about this story is that CNN posted it...maybe Hillary isn&#039;t the &#039;chosen one&#039; after all. However, I&#039;m certain CNN will return to its roots after the conventions and fall squarely behind the DNC...so, don&#039;t expect less than glowing stories about the DNC presidential candidate choice. That&#039;s my 2 cents, no change please :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is typical of both Clintons and what we can expect, more deception, half-truths and outright lies.  What surprised me most about this story is that CNN posted it...maybe Hillary isn't the 'chosen one' after all. However, I'm certain CNN will return to its roots after the conventions and fall squarely behind the DNC...so, don't expect less than glowing stories about the DNC presidential candidate choice. That's my 2 cents, no change please <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joan  niantic ct.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136314</link>
		<dc:creator>joan  niantic ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136314</guid>
		<description>Gee! What an idea for a new book.  I am going to title it Hill and the shill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee! What an idea for a new book.  I am going to title it Hill and the shill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enoch, Nashville TN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136301</link>
		<dc:creator>Enoch, Nashville TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136301</guid>
		<description>This is a got ya question........
Democrats beware, if you want to lose the next election then nominate Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a got ya question........<br />
Democrats beware, if you want to lose the next election then nominate Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous, Williamsburg, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136272</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous, Williamsburg, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136272</guid>
		<description>John Halverson New York:

Perhaps you&#039;re right about Huma Abedin, but I trust Billy will bring some babes into the Oval Office as well (after hours, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Halverson New York:</p>
<p>Perhaps you're right about Huma Abedin, but I trust Billy will bring some babes into the Oval Office as well (after hours, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC, Columbia, MD</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136265</link>
		<dc:creator>RC, Columbia, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136265</guid>
		<description>pam, Eugene, OR:

You are so right. This can&#039;t be emphasized enough.  We don&#039;t need another 4 years of disfunctional government.  Enough already with these Clintons and the scandal and resentment they will bring with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pam, Eugene, OR:</p>
<p>You are so right. This can't be emphasized enough.  We don't need another 4 years of disfunctional government.  Enough already with these Clintons and the scandal and resentment they will bring with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juanito, Washington, DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136263</link>
		<dc:creator>Juanito, Washington, DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136263</guid>
		<description>Planted questions? This is right out of Karl Rove&#039;s playbook.

Another example of a &quot;texbook campaign&quot;.

Obama 2008 for REAL change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Planted questions? This is right out of Karl Rove's playbook.</p>
<p>Another example of a "texbook campaign".</p>
<p>Obama 2008 for REAL change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Matuska, Crestline, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136262</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Matuska, Crestline, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136262</guid>
		<description>I have been voting since 1966 (the year I went to Vietnam).  If the system does not change for the better, 2008 will be the first time I have refused to vote out of protest.  I have listed the following reasons for my change in attitude:

1.  No third party candidates or independents stand a chance of getting on the ballots in all 50 states the way the system is rigged against them by the two parties (remember Ralph Nader’s bid for the presidency?).

2.  A person who does not have the finances to run for president cannot do so without the support from major corporations who are willing to bankroll his campaign.  Unfortunately, corporate CEO’s do this with the expectation that any legislation passed will be in their favor.

3.  People who are in favor of corporate profits over people’s rights are controlling the mainstream media, which has been consolidated and concentrated into fewer hands such as Rupert Murdock.  The mainstream “liberal” media no longer exists, and in its place are talking heads like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill O’Reilly, and Pat Robertson.  This same media does “polls” which are supposed to reflect the sentiment of the voting public.   Unfortunately, these polls have a tendency to make the voting public think that the candidate of their choice does not stand a chance, and therefore they should vote for the one the polls show to be the favorite (i.e. Hillary Clinton).  Independents such as myself, will vote against her by voting for whoever is on the Republican ticket (unless there is a serious independent contender).

4.  The convention system no longer elects a candidate for the party being represented.  The candidate is chosen beforehand, and the convention is nothing more than a show.  I remember as a kid watching the Democratic convention in 1956 selecting Adlai Stevenson as their candidate.  The states could throw their vote either way at the convention.  Now it amounts to nothing more than a mutual admiration society for the candidate who has been pre-selected by those in power.

5.  In the end, the two party system is flawed into being more like mirror images of each other, both of which represent corporate America, and not the voting public at large.  They have been in the pockets of the rich since day one as can be seen by the legislation passed that favors corporations over the people.  It seems that in order for any legislation to be passed that is beneficial to the public, the people must march and force the issue down the throats of a congress that is supposed to represent them.  Corporations in effect now have more rights than the average citizen, and in fact can even avoid paying taxes by re-locating off shore.  The CEOs of Enron, Worldcom, and Tyco have conducted business as if it was an organized criminal activity instead of a legitimate enterprise.  There is more “welfare” for corporations than for the people who are in desperate need of affordable medical care.  Instead, congress ends up passing prescription legislation that is favorable to drug companies.

6.  As can be seen by the 2000 election in Florida, and 2004 in Ohio, the system is flawed at the voting booth.  We all know that the Supreme Court decided the 2000 election in Bush’s favor.  Florida was riddled with voter fraud, and the “hanging chads” issue was nothing more than a diversion from the real issue of each vote being counted.  Minorities seemed to have been systematically turned away from the polling places, and votes not counted.  The Democrats won the popular vote, but the Republicans got George Bush elected because of the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, and the refusal of Al Gore to challenge the results and ask for a re-count!  LET US FINALLY DO AWAY WITH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, AND ALLOW THE POPULAR VOTE TO ELECT OUR CANDIDATES!  However, accountability and accurate records must be assured at the voting booth whether it is electronic or manual, for the process to have any validity!

7.  “Gerrymandering” is alive and well in most voting districts, with lines of demarcation drawn according to the party in power.  Look at what happened in Texas due to Tom Delay!  The Abramoff scandal showed that many of our elected representatives are corrupt.  And all this time we thought Tammany Hall and the Teapot Dome scandals of the past was over.  It is still graft, greed, and corruption that seems to be the dark underbelly of politics making it a dirty name.  Earmarks, and the throwing away of tax dollars paid to the government by the voting public indicates a total disregard for what the public thinks, wants, or expects from it’s “democratically elected government!”

8.  Even if the person I voted for gets “elected,” I doubt that person will represent me over corporations.  The fact is that a CEO of a major corporation gets my representative’s ear more often than I do in the form of lobbyists who ply the halls of congress.  The money our “representatives” receive from lobbyists and corporate contributors is nothing more than influence peddling which seems to permeate our government institutions.  Many in congress who voted for the prescription drug bill that benifited the drug companies ended up going to work for them later as lobbyist.  My opinion counts for nothing compared to the rich and powerful in this country.

9.  Finally, the media must allow equal airtime to those candidates who are independent and who are marginalized by the media and poll numbers.  A system must be established where money (with no strings attached) can be accessed by candidates who are not members of the rich elite, ensuring that they maintain their integrity.  The Line Item Veto must be given and used by the Executive branch. Earmarked “Pork Barrel” expenditures that have nothing to do with the bill they are attached to, must be done away with.  A third party must be introduced and accepted by congress to represent independent Americans who are more “Middle Of The Road” than those of the extreme Right or Left.  An Independent Convention should be held and publicized to elect an Independent candidate to appose the Democratic and Republican parties.  Major needed legislation fails to get past due to gridlock by the two party system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been voting since 1966 (the year I went to Vietnam).  If the system does not change for the better, 2008 will be the first time I have refused to vote out of protest.  I have listed the following reasons for my change in attitude:</p>
<p>1.  No third party candidates or independents stand a chance of getting on the ballots in all 50 states the way the system is rigged against them by the two parties (remember Ralph Nader’s bid for the presidency?).</p>
<p>2.  A person who does not have the finances to run for president cannot do so without the support from major corporations who are willing to bankroll his campaign.  Unfortunately, corporate CEO’s do this with the expectation that any legislation passed will be in their favor.</p>
<p>3.  People who are in favor of corporate profits over people’s rights are controlling the mainstream media, which has been consolidated and concentrated into fewer hands such as Rupert Murdock.  The mainstream “liberal” media no longer exists, and in its place are talking heads like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill O’Reilly, and Pat Robertson.  This same media does “polls” which are supposed to reflect the sentiment of the voting public.   Unfortunately, these polls have a tendency to make the voting public think that the candidate of their choice does not stand a chance, and therefore they should vote for the one the polls show to be the favorite (i.e. Hillary Clinton).  Independents such as myself, will vote against her by voting for whoever is on the Republican ticket (unless there is a serious independent contender).</p>
<p>4.  The convention system no longer elects a candidate for the party being represented.  The candidate is chosen beforehand, and the convention is nothing more than a show.  I remember as a kid watching the Democratic convention in 1956 selecting Adlai Stevenson as their candidate.  The states could throw their vote either way at the convention.  Now it amounts to nothing more than a mutual admiration society for the candidate who has been pre-selected by those in power.</p>
<p>5.  In the end, the two party system is flawed into being more like mirror images of each other, both of which represent corporate America, and not the voting public at large.  They have been in the pockets of the rich since day one as can be seen by the legislation passed that favors corporations over the people.  It seems that in order for any legislation to be passed that is beneficial to the public, the people must march and force the issue down the throats of a congress that is supposed to represent them.  Corporations in effect now have more rights than the average citizen, and in fact can even avoid paying taxes by re-locating off shore.  The CEOs of Enron, Worldcom, and Tyco have conducted business as if it was an organized criminal activity instead of a legitimate enterprise.  There is more “welfare” for corporations than for the people who are in desperate need of affordable medical care.  Instead, congress ends up passing prescription legislation that is favorable to drug companies.</p>
<p>6.  As can be seen by the 2000 election in Florida, and 2004 in Ohio, the system is flawed at the voting booth.  We all know that the Supreme Court decided the 2000 election in Bush’s favor.  Florida was riddled with voter fraud, and the “hanging chads” issue was nothing more than a diversion from the real issue of each vote being counted.  Minorities seemed to have been systematically turned away from the polling places, and votes not counted.  The Democrats won the popular vote, but the Republicans got George Bush elected because of the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, and the refusal of Al Gore to challenge the results and ask for a re-count!  LET US FINALLY DO AWAY WITH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, AND ALLOW THE POPULAR VOTE TO ELECT OUR CANDIDATES!  However, accountability and accurate records must be assured at the voting booth whether it is electronic or manual, for the process to have any validity!</p>
<p>7.  “Gerrymandering” is alive and well in most voting districts, with lines of demarcation drawn according to the party in power.  Look at what happened in Texas due to Tom Delay!  The Abramoff scandal showed that many of our elected representatives are corrupt.  And all this time we thought Tammany Hall and the Teapot Dome scandals of the past was over.  It is still graft, greed, and corruption that seems to be the dark underbelly of politics making it a dirty name.  Earmarks, and the throwing away of tax dollars paid to the government by the voting public indicates a total disregard for what the public thinks, wants, or expects from it’s “democratically elected government!”</p>
<p>8.  Even if the person I voted for gets “elected,” I doubt that person will represent me over corporations.  The fact is that a CEO of a major corporation gets my representative’s ear more often than I do in the form of lobbyists who ply the halls of congress.  The money our “representatives” receive from lobbyists and corporate contributors is nothing more than influence peddling which seems to permeate our government institutions.  Many in congress who voted for the prescription drug bill that benifited the drug companies ended up going to work for them later as lobbyist.  My opinion counts for nothing compared to the rich and powerful in this country.</p>
<p>9.  Finally, the media must allow equal airtime to those candidates who are independent and who are marginalized by the media and poll numbers.  A system must be established where money (with no strings attached) can be accessed by candidates who are not members of the rich elite, ensuring that they maintain their integrity.  The Line Item Veto must be given and used by the Executive branch. Earmarked “Pork Barrel” expenditures that have nothing to do with the bill they are attached to, must be done away with.  A third party must be introduced and accepted by congress to represent independent Americans who are more “Middle Of The Road” than those of the extreme Right or Left.  An Independent Convention should be held and publicized to elect an Independent candidate to appose the Democratic and Republican parties.  Major needed legislation fails to get past due to gridlock by the two party system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136258</link>
		<dc:creator>JL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136258</guid>
		<description>BOO--HISS-BOO WHAT AN EVIL PERSON!! IF SHE DOES GET ELECTED LOOK OUT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOO&#8211;HISS-BOO WHAT AN EVIL PERSON!! IF SHE DOES GET ELECTED LOOK OUT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Higby           Seattle Washington</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136248</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Higby           Seattle Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136248</guid>
		<description>Lets see if I understand this. Hillary uses Bush as a comparison to show how much better she is then him and how she would make a change and make the country better. Then when caught doing the same thing that Bush has done she says its okay because Bush does it?  great more of the same. Can anyone let her please know the definition of change? and also please let Bubba know the Definition of &quot;is&quot; I know it won&#039;t be posted, that is why I post on a news worthy web page as well, by the way. Why is this story buried? doesn&#039;t CNN report the news anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets see if I understand this. Hillary uses Bush as a comparison to show how much better she is then him and how she would make a change and make the country better. Then when caught doing the same thing that Bush has done she says its okay because Bush does it?  great more of the same. Can anyone let her please know the definition of change? and also please let Bubba know the Definition of "is" I know it won't be posted, that is why I post on a news worthy web page as well, by the way. Why is this story buried? doesn't CNN report the news anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Halverson     New York</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136236</link>
		<dc:creator>John Halverson     New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136236</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait until Hillary is President Huma Abedin will make a gorgeous First Lady!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't wait until Hillary is President Huma Abedin will make a gorgeous First Lady!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillarylover NY NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136231</link>
		<dc:creator>hillarylover NY NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136231</guid>
		<description>Why does everyone believe that this is not a common accepted political tactic.  It only comes off as a negative when everyone jumps on it and brings attention to it when it&#039;s not them in the media.  They all need to come clean, admit they do it, and move on.  The problem with Hillary is not Hillary herself.  The problem is people having unreasonable expections of Hillary.  She is human--she will make mistakes.  She is not a prophet sent from the heavens.  She is a politician--it&#039;s her job to try to appeal to all people.  

It&#039;s amazing that people want Hillary to make all these extreme stands on the issues but when it comes down to it--they won&#039;t support her at the polls.  Obama and Edwards have been getting a pass this whole election campaign.  Will someone please turn this high powered political microscope on someone else instead of taking a non-issue and blowing it up into a serious story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everyone believe that this is not a common accepted political tactic.  It only comes off as a negative when everyone jumps on it and brings attention to it when it's not them in the media.  They all need to come clean, admit they do it, and move on.  The problem with Hillary is not Hillary herself.  The problem is people having unreasonable expections of Hillary.  She is human&#8211;she will make mistakes.  She is not a prophet sent from the heavens.  She is a politician&#8211;it's her job to try to appeal to all people.  </p>
<p>It's amazing that people want Hillary to make all these extreme stands on the issues but when it comes down to it&#8211;they won't support her at the polls.  Obama and Edwards have been getting a pass this whole election campaign.  Will someone please turn this high powered political microscope on someone else instead of taking a non-issue and blowing it up into a serious story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pam, Eugene, OR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136224</link>
		<dc:creator>pam, Eugene, OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136224</guid>
		<description>Josie in San Diego,
It would be wonderful to have a female President. I hope I live to see it. However, not this female. I do not want a win for womankind at the expense of everything that I believe in. She is NOT moral, NOT honest, NOT truthful, and NOT what this country needs. Please Josie: look beyond the fact that she is a woman and look into her character. She is devoid, devisive, and will bring us 4 years of nothing but political scandals. Hopefully over the next 12 months you will be forced to see who she really is. You can only make so many excuses for her and maintain your blind support.
Obama or Ron Paul 08
Anyone BUT Hillary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josie in San Diego,<br />
It would be wonderful to have a female President. I hope I live to see it. However, not this female. I do not want a win for womankind at the expense of everything that I believe in. She is NOT moral, NOT honest, NOT truthful, and NOT what this country needs. Please Josie: look beyond the fact that she is a woman and look into her character. She is devoid, devisive, and will bring us 4 years of nothing but political scandals. Hopefully over the next 12 months you will be forced to see who she really is. You can only make so many excuses for her and maintain your blind support.<br />
Obama or Ron Paul 08<br />
Anyone BUT Hillary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric, from THE Republic of Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136222</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric, from THE Republic of Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136222</guid>
		<description>man o man... the plot thickens...

Is there no limit to the audacity of this couple?

I, like most Americans, have no problem voting for a woman... just not THIS woman.

Maggie Thatcher, where are you when a good nation needs you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man o man... the plot thickens...</p>
<p>Is there no limit to the audacity of this couple?</p>
<p>I, like most Americans, have no problem voting for a woman... just not THIS woman.</p>
<p>Maggie Thatcher, where are you when a good nation needs you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB Boston MA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136218</link>
		<dc:creator>JB Boston MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136218</guid>
		<description>Hey Mason Myatt and other Hillary fans-

This campaign IS NOT about Hillary vs Bush.  The argument does not work and will not work.  To say &quot;but Bush did it&quot; is a waste of space on this blog.  Or in Mason&#039;s case &quot;let&#039;s talk about Hillary&#039;s policies compared to Bush&#039;s&quot;

IRRELEVENT.  Bush is not running!  You are four years too late!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mason Myatt and other Hillary fans-</p>
<p>This campaign IS NOT about Hillary vs Bush.  The argument does not work and will not work.  To say "but Bush did it" is a waste of space on this blog.  Or in Mason's case "let's talk about Hillary's policies compared to Bush's"</p>
<p>IRRELEVENT.  Bush is not running!  You are four years too late!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB Boston MA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136216</link>
		<dc:creator>JB Boston MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136216</guid>
		<description>And now Hillary has recruited Geraldine Ferraro to play the gender card for her in the NY times

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/us/politics/05memo.html?ref=opinion

She also claimed to not know her husband was going to use the &quot;swift boat&quot; analogy.  BS- Hillary signs off on everything that happens, and, if she doesn&#039;t (which I highly doubt) then she is not very bright.  She is way to calculated.  She claims to not know because it didn&#039;t go over too well.

Geraldine Ferraro&#039;s argument is that they should treat her differently because she is a woman in the lead.  THAT IS SEXIST.

How not to run a campaign 101.  

Sing it with me-

Nah-Nah Nah Nah, Nah-Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Goodbye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now Hillary has recruited Geraldine Ferraro to play the gender card for her in the NY times</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/us/politics/05memo.html?ref=opinion" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/us/politics/05memo.html?ref=opinion</a></p>
<p>She also claimed to not know her husband was going to use the "swift boat" analogy.  BS- Hillary signs off on everything that happens, and, if she doesn't (which I highly doubt) then she is not very bright.  She is way to calculated.  She claims to not know because it didn't go over too well.</p>
<p>Geraldine Ferraro's argument is that they should treat her differently because she is a woman in the lead.  THAT IS SEXIST.</p>
<p>How not to run a campaign 101.  </p>
<p>Sing it with me-</p>
<p>Nah-Nah Nah Nah, Nah-Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Goodbye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott,Tupelo,MS</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136215</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott,Tupelo,MS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136215</guid>
		<description>Please CNN stop putting this hags picture up.  Her picture scares me everytime I have had to buy to knew laptops because her picture sscares so bad I throw my computer in the floor.  She has got to be the ugliest public offical with Condi running a close second.  VOTE RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please CNN stop putting this hags picture up.  Her picture scares me everytime I have had to buy to knew laptops because her picture sscares so bad I throw my computer in the floor.  She has got to be the ugliest public offical with Condi running a close second.  VOTE RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136213</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136213</guid>
		<description>Now Hillary stole a page out of the FEMA playbook.

Even the bad ideas are not her own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Hillary stole a page out of the FEMA playbook.</p>
<p>Even the bad ideas are not her own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd U.  Fort Worth, Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136211</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd U.  Fort Worth, Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136211</guid>
		<description>I had to dig to find this story on CNN, I couldn&#039;t find it anyware on MSN.  Fox is running as a top story, as IT SHOULD BE!

Lord Help us if this wretch gets in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to dig to find this story on CNN, I couldn't find it anyware on MSN.  Fox is running as a top story, as IT SHOULD BE!</p>
<p>Lord Help us if this wretch gets in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ossai, Bedford, NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136204</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ossai, Bedford, NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/10/questions-planted-by-clinton-campaign/#comment-136204</guid>
		<description>God!, this is pure fraud. How is she different from G.W, who used Jeff Gannon
that gay guy (fake reporter) to ask stupid questions during press briefings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God!, this is pure fraud. How is she different from G.W, who used Jeff Gannon<br />
that gay guy (fake reporter) to ask stupid questions during press briefings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
