++++++++++++++

Classic Clinton. Say it enough times and it becomes believeable...at least to them.

The Clintons are the D.C. establishment that doesn't know much about the American people so she will not answer voters' questions. I am afraid she answers the lobbyists' questions much faster than we know. Why did the New Yorkers even elect her? She is not a New Yorker. Her true home state is D.C. so she really wants to go home to the White House. She is not really interested in representing New Yorkers. But thanks for her patience to do it as long!

*********************

I assure you, NO CLINTON is going to get near MY *ss!!!"

Uh, personally, I don't care to hear one peep out of ANY of their spouses, conservative or liberal candidates alike. It's not out of bigotry or s*xism... it's just that I don't care about the spouses, period.

We're sizing up potential candidates for the job of Commander in Chief; THE Chief Executive of the free world, not playing a round of Milton Bradley's Mystery Date.

I don't give a tiny rat's rear end about ANYTHING the spouses have to say, because the spouses are not on the ballot... or in the Clintons' case, the spouses SHOULDN'T be on the ballot.

I'm certain the Founding Fathers would have severely disapproved of this Clintonian Co-Presidency thing.

If Hillary wants to run for the office, fine. Great. Dandy. In fact, I'm all for it. Bill, you've had your turn already... sit down and shut up.

I did not vote for Bush in either election. That is precisely why I am not voting for Hillary. The failed policies of the Bush administration must not bother you too much as you seem to be a Hillary fan. Her rhetoric resembles Bush's more than any of the other Democratic candidates.

*********************

...BUT,they are in "LOOOOOVVVE"! At least that's what they told us. I don't know about you people, but if I pulled the multiple infidelities this clown pulled (and, in his case, front-and-center on the world stage), my wife would have done more than just divorce me. These two suck!!! I can't think of more disingenuine politicians (I know, an oxymoron).

Posted By Jim Topeka, Kansas : November 13, 2007 9:28 am"

Hey, Jim from Topeka! Bush was the governor of Texas. Remember. Actually was responsible for "governing". Where the frick do you think most of the recent presidents have come from – governships. Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bush. They had to solve actual problems in their states, and know how to run a state within a budget. Every one of them had to learn foreign policy on the fly. Unless you were a VP running, you can't really get the foreign policy stuff down until you get in office. (No, flying around "visiting" countries like Hillary did doesn't really count. That's called a vacation, not making foreign policy)

Her Royal Thighness has NEVER governed or been responsible for anything, well, uh, unless you want to count controlling all the bimbo eruptions from her faithful hubby.

Why not, people were stupid enough to vote for Bush twice.

Stop being tough with my wife BOY!, now don't get mad that's what Bill said

Watch again the debate that sounds like: "teacher, teacher, look.. she said yes, she said yes.. you said yes to illegal immigrants" and Hillary explaining "no, I said I recognize the problem faced by NY governor".

How would you qualify the noise they made and their childish behavior? If they didn't understand that question couldn't be answered by yes/no, they are irresponsible as future leaders. If they understood but enjoyed their act, calling them 'boys' is .. the best they could get.

I lived in New York for thirteen years and four of those she was my Senator. And I still can't think of one thing she did.

I mean if you want to talk about all the good she has done for New York then name one.

You can say she is better than Bush but well.... Bush is not running and she supported everything he did.

America derves female President.

Bill, you just take your whole "boy" self home now and do more writing or sitting on the porch watching whatever it is you want to watch. I agree with the other bloggers, Bill you are negatively affecting your 'wifes' campaign. Oh, so then keep up the talking, speeches, etc. We understand Bill, you are truly running this campaign secretly, for yourself. Because if Hilary wins, the U.S. will have two Presidents in the White House, two Clintons. Yikes.

Hillary has disappointed real working women across this great country for she isn't standing on her own two feet with pride and integrity. She isn't speaking from a place of true compassion, nor honesty. Let us move on without them.

Posted By Caleb, Santa Fe : November 12, 2007 10:50 pm

I've seen and read several news stories about the leading Democratic candidates' wives and noticed they haven't been shy about expressing their views and opinions or standing up for their husbands ...and getting slammed for it I might add. I guess it's no different now that a husband is doing the same.

However, I do find interesting what the leading Republican candidates' spouses have to say. Rudy's wife made the media because she called during that NRA speech. Of course I doubt he'd want his other wives to say anything at all. After reading about Ann Romney, I think I like her more than Mitt. At least she has personality and speaks about MS but of course she did give those $150 to that abortion-rights group, big no, no! I saw Fred's wife on TV but I didn't hear her say much of anything, then again, she is an attorney so she should know what to say and what not to. Don't know much about Fred's first wife. McCain's ...oops, that was his mother, but come to think of it, she's the only Republican female that hasn't been afraid to voice her opinions ...right or wrong.

Is it just that dang left-wing liberal media, just a family values thing, be seen but not heard, or what is it exactly? Yes I know, we're looking for a president but I also think a spouse says a lot about a candidate.

Hillary has disappointed real working women across this great country for she isn't standing on her own two feet with pride and integrity. She isn't speaking from a place of true compassion, nor honesty. Let us move on without them.

Attacking Bush doesn't help. We all know Bush did a horrible job. What we want is answers – and presumable, those who run for president have a strategy on how to move this country forward.

The slogan 'Turn Up the Heat' from Hillary doesn't help. That strategy will perpetuate the divisiveness in this country. It may work in the past, but it doesn't work now. The country needs to heal.

That's primarily why Obama's message has the greatest appeal to me. He understand the sentiment of the country. We are tired of the infighting among us. Obama's message is the least offensive.

People are feeling insecure about their jobs, their health, their retirement, their large debt (from education/house). Do we do something about it, and if we do, how do we fund it ... or do we let each fend for themselves. Which direction do we want to go?

I am mainly a democrat. I don't mind pitching in (through taxes, if needed) in order to see the less fortunate taken care of. Some people say that the government cannot do this and the tax should be left in people's hand. Of course, if the government cannot do this, then I would like to keep my money, but if the government can do this, then I don't mind pitching in to see the less fortunate taken care of. I, however, do not want to pitch in to fund this war. I do not like to have my tax dollars wasted. I wish I can have a box so I can indicate how I want my tax money to be used, which program do they go to, and I want to see a report on it – what kind of results they get from it from the money they received. Perhaps in the Internet age, it is possible to see this kind of results, and perhaps, with this kind of reporting and transparency, it will reduce the waste in government, because people are keeping an eye on it.

If it's the government that serves the people, then I don't mind pitching in, but if it's the government that imposes rules/regulations, constricting my freedom, then I'm not crazy about it.

It seems the Republican message is to let people fend for themselves. Let private organizations deal with it. It's not a governmental problem. I would prefer a strong government, a government that serves the people, offering good services to the people, from young to old, and we all pitch it for that.

After all, to build a strong country/community, it needs a little sacrifice from each of us. We are at a crossroad – this country is falling apart, and we need to rebuild it, and that requires a little sacrifice from each of us.

After all, hes been called a boy before. He's been called a "dirty , naughty , nasty little boy. A bad BAD BAD little naughty boy"

ROFLMAO

So,he should know what it's like to be called a boy.

What next, guys? Gonna double-dog-dare Clinton to "arm rassle ya"?

Why don't you try to put a little intellectual depth into your comments instead of only reguritating the Republican slops you've been sucking down?

Posted By Maeve : November 12, 2007 5:46 pm

Just a simple minded male here Maeve, if you think it is just men and Republicans that are hammering Hillary, you have drank the kool-aid very successfully.

I was so simple-minded I volunteered and proudly served giving sheep like you the right to support who you want and to say what you want.

But since you called "boys" out "Honey", I challenge you to post some actual reasons why we should all vote for Hillary and why we should just dismiss her not answering questions, or half answering questions, sending Bill out and Geraldine Ferraro to defend her, planting questions (a SENIOR level Clintonista did this) among other misdeeds.

Dismissing someones views because they are men and then demeaning those thoughts and the sex of the speaker by calling them "boys" is not only simple-minded, but typical of the Clinton apologists.

I await your surely insightful responses and reasoning for the simple fact that you are a brillaint woman.

Please enlighten us "boys", I double dare you.

A second chair will be needed for the Oval Office if she is elected. Who will sit where? The Clintons will definitely mess up the chain of command with two ambitious people, one of which claimed to be a little girl. This is U.S. presidential election. Either you do or you don't have the qualifications for the job. Please stop being cute and take the voters seriously. Bill is irritating and Hillary can't talk for herself. I want to be open-minded, but my patience is running out.

What has she done as a Senator?

Please let me know.