Wow, with this story it's true that CNN is the Clinton News Network!

Diamonds or pearls? Here we are at an all important debate regarding the future of the country, yet CNN has to waste time trying to be "cute." Please, stick with the issues, not the fluff.

She is wonderful!

If this was a test, Hillary would fail. I mean it is the simplest question to ask. Do you like diamonds…or perles? she did answer if she liked any of them, she turned around the question and answered I WANT both. When should we get a straight answer from her? besides "diamonds or perles" not major issues on Average Americans' mind.

I'm surprised the commentators didn't reprimand her for waffling.

I thought Obama won convincingly.

It's so predictable that the gooey-brained Gergen would syncophantically declare Hillary the winner, especially after Wolfie rescued her within the first 12 minutes, as he became the "cooler" on the rest of the debate. I guess Hillary will leave J.C. Watts' and Gergen's testicles in a box by the door for them to retrieve as they leave.

Why would they waste time with this ridiculous question when they could put an actual issue on the table - like global warming?

Talking about a SO OBVIOUS planted question. Diamonds or pearls? Puullleezz She made me want to hurl…

Yes, and the Hilary plant said, "YOu are the only diamond that sparkles on stage." What kind of political debate was this?? Out of control audience. All candidates interrupted or cut off EXCEPT Hilary, who while not playing the gender card said she was comfortable in the kitchen!! Barack Obama won this debate, even though he was insulted by Blitzer, who asked stupid, one demensional questions about multi-dimensional issues, trying to "get" him. He stayed Presidential, classy and strong, and wouldn't let Hilary distort the truth. It was a set-up, topped off by GERGEN and CARVILLE to analyze it. A disgrace. I will no longer watch CNN.

I never really believed it before… but after tonight I am sure… cnn is the clinton news network.

Once again I am reminded why the Lehrer report is the only credible news broadcast on TV. Your so called reporters wouldn't even let the audience have their questions, when they were asked for questions, your CNN "journalists" changed them to something else. Joe Biden (who I normally don't like) was brave enough to insist on answering the audience question. Get some integrity and quit trying to be FOX news for God's sake!

That question was clearly a plant and a lame one at that. It wasn't cute; it was dumb. CNN should be ashamed of itself for opting to conclude the debate on that note.

what an embarrassing question

CNN did a the political process a huge injustice tonite..What a joke. Worst debate I have ever seen. CNN wanted to start a fight instead of a real discussion on the issues. Terrible post debate coverage too, keep Anderson on his field trips around the world and out of the political scene

What kind of "debate" was that!? I don't know what was worse: the out-of-control croud that ruined half the responses or Wolf's inability to moderate and ask educated questions. Worse debate of the year thus far — hands down. Well done CNN, well done.

Listen the whole debate people, and then talk! This was a funny question and she gave a very smart answer. You perhaps didn't hear that the woman who asked the question also referred to her shining on the stage.

Biden was excellent, Richardson also!

Obama stumbled and couldn't answer the driver's license question, etc..

A silly question, but she handled it well, with humor. She is top level. I am looking forward to President Clinton in 2008.

It was a fluff question, who cares???
Boxers or briefs? UFO's?

Lighten up people

Does CNN think this is important? Apparently so. You insult the intelligence of Americans and the importance of this election. Shame on you! Of course Hillary still couldn't make a decision.

This question was not only a directionless waste of time, but further emphasizes how many women are voting for Sen. Clinton solely because she is a female. This is a very weak reason to vote for a president, and this gender biased question further emphasizes that many voters are focused on the gender issue and Clinton's overuse of this as her power card, and not on who would be the most competent president. This question had no place in a presidential debate-who we choose for president in 2008 is far too important.

OMG. Hillary says we know where she stands? I sure don't.

I am struggling very hard to comprehend how calling her on her waffling as being any kind of "personal" attack. What the heck are we supposed to judge her on? Her hair?
Instead of whining, she should be stating what her actual positions are. THAT would be a solid defense. But of course, she won't.

Come on Hillary. Put up or shut up. The last thing we need is another lying, divisive phony in the White House.

After that debate, she can have both. If she maintains the confidence she displayed tonight, she'll get the nomination without a doubt. She deserves it. Edwards' strategy is very irritating, and I think Obama took a hit tonight as well.

Brilliant answer in a blink second. And the student said it is the only thing shinning there–that's right, Hillary is the only one shinning on the stage.

By all means Hillary stood out again as the winner. Obama looked pitiful. Hillary rocks!!!!!

This debate was biased. But you can't expect anything else from CNN.

Nonetheless, Obama came out a clear winner

One simple question and Clinton couldnt answer it. The fact that she cant make up her mind is crazy!

My goodness, if you don't like the frontrunner then don't watch the debate and don't blame the moderators.

She did well, as did most. Now let's see if Sen. Obama gets as much grief about his waffling as Sen. Clinton.

They all did much better than most of us would have done in the same circumstances - but then we should expect that from a presidential candidate. Blaming the moderators belittles the efforts of all participants as well as your own comments.

if the candidates can promise 'humanitarianism' over "capitalism", i'll vote..if the country gets fed, if the "guns" that are not government approved are gone, if insurance is for all, and if the vets get their care, if the children get their education, if they addess global warming asap, if they spend more money on 'alternative fuels, if they put the needs of the people first, i don't care what they say; i'll vote for them..besides, they'll all be working for the same government after the election, so why not put them in the hot seat until we get our answers our way!

CNN should be ashamed of itself. Audience questions are vetted and for you to gove her softball questions like this or "what do you mean by the all boys club?" (Not to mention the former Clinton advisors acting as commentators) shows extreme bias and does a disservice to the American people.

Maybe World peace, instead of glorified gifts!How about an Aerobic pocket dictionary, to relate to other leaders!
It would help to understand a language, before confronting the leaders……

Special thanks to the UNLV student who set our gender back fifty years.

CNN, that was despicable. Did Clinton's threats get to you, Wolf? It would have been nice if the debate were fair to all candidates and not just Clinton. Blitzer never interrupted Clinton, but he interrupted the other candidates on a regular basis (including a very rude and slanted moment with Obama). Also, the crowd's disrespect for any candidate who provided quality counter-arguments to Clinton showed a lack of class. Not just for Nevada, but for CNN as well. I hope CNN loses debate privileges. That was a waste of 2 hours.

Everyone Knows Diamonds are a womens best friend!! But throw pearls in there, and you just can't Choose.

The reason Hillary flip flops and follows polls is because her true beliefs and intentions are detested. Hillary wants socialized everything. She is a politcal machine. She will raise taxes, grant amnesty to illegal aliens, weaken our military. Hillary Clinton will divide this country and ruin our economy.

How incredibly sexist. Did they ask male candidates whether they preferred boxers or briefs? How does this relate to our expectations of an executive chief?

I came here for a quick summary of tonight's debate, and what do I find? Diamonds or pearls. For now on, I'll be counting on other news magazines–they are less likely to waste my time with this kind of drivel. Save this kind of crap for your coverage of Paris Hilton, not political debates.

I am sure she gets plenty of both from Bill (gifts of apology) with as many women he has been caught with!

Pearls are for paupers. Diamonds are forever and they are a girls best friend. Moving on…

flip flop tick tock there goes the same old sock.

How sick is this! This commentary is sexist, referring to the old adage "diamonds are a girl's best friend." This is an inappropriate comment to make to a run by a woman for the President of the US and it is just plain WRONG.

This is a sexist position and should be called exactly that - sexist! No one says "younger women are an old man's best friend" in regard to Guiliani - who clearly lives by that adage, do they???? Nor do they say 'women aren't allowed in the inner sanctum of the Mormon Tabernacle' in regard to Romney- and this is the truth with gender issues in Mormonism……

So this commentary referring to women and jewelry should be STRUCK from the record - it is unacceptable.

Hillary Clinton will divide this country and ruin our economy.

Sorry, but G. W. Bush and the Republican party did that far better than anyone else will in the future.

Oh, and the last question asked Clinton is not as bad as some of the lame softball, nonsense questions asked of the Republicans at Fox News debates. Now those are 100% scripted peices of garbage.

CNN is lucky that question was the last one in the debate, because if it hadn't been I would have turned the channel. My head still hurts from slamming it into my open palm.

Diamonds or Pearls? You gotta be kidding me. The entire debate was a joke. Except for Biden and Kucinich, all the other candidates seemed to have attention deficit disorder and couldn't provide a direct answer to the questions at hand. Geesh, if I wanted to see grandstanding, I'd watch the Republican debates! CNN needs to quit focusing so much of their time on the mudslinging between Clinton, Edwards and Obama, and give some meaningful airtime to the others like Biden, Kucinich, and Dodd. The country deserves the best candidate for President, not the one that gets CNN the greatest ratings share!

Good Lord she's obnoxious. I can hardly stand to look at her when she sits there with that smug, arrogant look on her face. What happened to those guys who used to run up and throw pies at people? We need them now! I can't wait to see her expression change when she loses.
But enough personal opinions, back to the point: I recently returned from a trip abroad. We had an English speaking tour guide who tried to break the ice with her American charges with a few jokes. All of the jokes were about Bill and Hillary - nothing about Bush or anyone else. Do we really want people in the White House that the world looks upon as comedy material?

What a great question! CNN is a joke.

I am an "independent" voter and this was the third democratic debate I have watched.

Wolf did an absolutely terrible job and the entire debate looked like it favored Hillary Clinton. She did well personally, but the questions directed at Obama forced him into negativity rather than addressing issues as he does so well.

Even Wolf's responses to Obama vs. Clinton's comments, the audience reactions, and the timing and direction of the questions clearly favored Clinton.

I will not watch CNN for my political coverage anymore.

Initially, I also thought it was a ridiculous and probably planted question; However, I think Sen Clinton's response, "I want both" was actually very revealing. She wants to remain in bed (no pun intended) with corporate America; the lobbyist, who are making heavy donations to her campaign; the wealthy elite; not to mention the neocons (otherwise she wouldn't have voted for the Lieberman bill re: Iran) while pandering to the rapidly disappearing middle class, the backbone of this country who are being forced into poverty by the very people financially supporting Sen. Clinton.

She denies playing the gender and victim cards but tonight, Sen. Clinton she continued to demonstrate just how adroit she is at playing both.

Shame on you CNN for all but ignoring Kucinich. Unlike Sen. Clinton, Rep. Dennis Kucinich is candid and articulate and actually answers the questions asks so we know exactly where he stands on the issues. Many of us wanted to hear him speak tonight but you didn't give him a chance.

I hope this is the last time CNN moderates the debates. Where was Tim Russert when we so desperately needed him tonight?

The question itself was inherently sexist! And the fact that a woman asked it makes it even more frustrating. As a man, I hope that we all (men and women alike) stop playing into archaic stereotypes.

ok, so because I criticized CNN (see above at 11:09) they won't post my comments. I see that a lot of other comments are posted after mine and they have already been "moderated" and posted. You only prove my point.

sometimes you cant have both

Wolf Blitzer once again proved why CNN is losing its audience. He was pathetic tonite.

This is fun to watch from 7000 miles away. As an American abroad, it is excellent to see our grand political process held under such high regard. Not only do we reduce our potential next president to Diamonds or Pearls (I can't wait for someone to ask Rudy - BOXERS or BRIEFS), but we can also have special blog entries that drill into the detail with tons of Americans (including myself) taking the time to analyze in detail how much this question means to modern society… WELL DONE

I am a 28-year-old female. I watched tonights debate, and am completely disgusted with what I heard tonight. Can we as the American public get some truth out of our politians. I'm tired of the "mud-throwing" as well as the empty promises of "When I become President". Lets hear some real answers to some real questions! There is no doubt that changes need to be made, but can we focus on those changes instead of cutting one another down and playing this game of one-upmanship?

THIS WAS A VERY STUPID QUESTION . ARE YOU KIDDING ME ? EXACTLY HOW RELEVANT IS THAT ? What was even more interesting about this DUMB question is that even on this, Senator Clinton could not state a clear position: Which one do you prefer -Diamonds or Pearls - She said BOTH! … WOW…

I work for a New York-based company that manufactures and distributes the finest man-made pearls in the world and it would be my great pleasure to send some to the next president of the United States!!!
HILLARY'08
PS She rocked the house tonite!

We deserve what ever we get. We elected Bush twice and we act surprised and angry? It's time to make another choice. I do not what to hear any compliants after 4 years. So get your common sense hats on and choose correctly.

when cnn takes to being hillarys media machine they undermine our democracy, they stylishly help sell hillary to us instead of just throwing the facts at us and letting voters decide, cnn its not too late, you are still the best just be fair to all the candidates, obama even with the decidedly biased and calculated questions thrown at him did great under fire!!! obama 08!!!

Some of you people need to lighten up!! It was meant to be a funny question. I really hope some of you small minded people don't have voter registration cards. It is scary that you are so full of hate. Take a deep breath and discuss the real issues.
Aren't all the questions from the audience considered planted questions considering the questions were known prior to being asked?

"Diamonds or Pearls?" question asked. "I want both" replies Clinton. The softball question of the night meant to humanize Clinton. Ironically, Clinton chose "both" which must be a flaw related to the fact she takes two sides to every issue.

I was disappointed tonight. I expected more of CNN and of Wolf Blitzer. Instead, the Clinton News Network came through for Hillary in true fashion. Softball questions - I especially loved Cambell Brown's question about whether or not Hillary has played the gender card. They also gave Hillary free reign to speak out of turn and gave very limited time for Edwards to speak, who was the most effective at characterizing Clinton's weaknesses in the previous debate. If you think Clinton is going to possibly be a uniter, think again. When asked how she would unite the country, she sounded similar to Bush. "I will listen" but then went on how to say that she would do whatever she wanted to do. Bush said the same thing and who can argue whether or not he has listened. I would venture he has listened. Her supporters did a great job packing the auditorium and disrupting debate.

I despise the media for promoting such a circus atmosphere. You media types always want to build a story because of your focus on ratings. God forbid we ask the candidates where they stand on issues and allow for equal time. Instead, the debates have become like game shows, with sound bites having the most impact. Last debate, you wanted Hillary brought down a notch. This time you wanted to show she could fight back by taking it easy on Hillary and going after the #2 and #3 candidates with tougher questions. CNN wasted too much time with meaningless banter at the beginning.

We learned nothing new about the candidates and where they stand on the issues. Clinton continues to evade specifics on any issue. Obama continues to be focused on trying to reshape the political landscape. Edwards continues to be a populist. The rest of the field is just trying to make it to the first caucus. I thought Richardson did the best he has done in a debate, along with Biden's straight forward ansers - whom I support by the way. What's funny is that Biden has the best experience to take on the challenges we face in the next four years, but the media gets caught up in the story, as does America. Admit it media, you want Hillary in the White House. While you want a story of a close race, you can't help yourself. You want to keep America divided by promoting a divisive candidate. Otherwise, I think you worry that people will stop watching stories about politics. We really need a candidate that can unite our country and I don't think any candidate on either side has made that case, yet.

I think the REAL STORY of this past debate was the fact it was just like Hillary's planted questions - more of the same calculated politics. CNN is in Hillary's back pocket and I really don't think the performance can be judged fairly. It is no secret that James Carville advises Clinton and that he works at CNN…. Hmmm.. CNN the FoxNews of a Clinton Presidency…? We'll see.

"Do you prefer diamonds or pearls?" Thank you for wasting 10 seconds of my life, CNN. That 10 seconds would have been far better used allowing someone besides Hillary Clinton to finish what he had to say.

Hey CNN, if you're going to have the questions put forth by Dan Senor's wife and all of the pundits be Bill Clinton's old cronies, can you at least do the country a favor and disclose it beforehand or at least pretend you don't think debates and votes are a complete joke?

Are you kidding me? As is is this really matters in a Democratic debate. Cam we get serious here? Clinton News Network is such a joke.

Yet another example of a Hillaryism that I could do without. The validity of the question aside, this situation highlights the growing pattern of bias in these debates. The one chance that candidates have on a supposedly level playing field is interrupted by an attempt at envoking a cute response from Hillary. Apparently it is overly-idealistic to hope for a professionally-done, appropriate debate. Lets get serious, get to the issues, and stop trying to give Hillary more opportunities to embarass herself with her visscitude and pompous demeanor.

Isn't decision making and "sticking with it" exactly what we don't want our leaders to do, as Bush did/continues to do? What if the decisions they make are bad? Should they continue to "stay the course" and "stick with it"?

I like Hillary, but how could she like Diamonds?!? Did she watch "Blood Diamond?" People should boycott gold, diamonds and everything else that destructs the environment, kills people etc. We don't need them, especially when they have done so much to hurt the world.

I don't think that CNN was heavily biased toward Clinton in this debate. Nor do I blame the moderators for the debate performance of my choice for the democratic nominee. What I do think is irresponsible is for the MEDIA to judge and spin on who the winner of such debates are. Clinton won this debate because CNN says that she won this debate. Just like Sen. Obama, Sen. Edwards, or any other candidate would have won had CNN declared them winner of the debate. I think the person I feel worst for is Rep. Kucinich. I don't think he has a chance in winning the nomination but it is ridiculous to give him less time so that Hillary Clinton or Bill Richardson the VP hopefull more time. Overall this was a good debate for Hillary, Sen. Obama, and Chris Dodd. Everyone else did alright except John Edwards who was beat up by all the Hillary supporters in the audience but hey what are you going to do when a network is so biased to one candidate.

Must we trivialize this important debate with such a stupid question? DOES THE HEADLINE HAVE TO BE ON TOP OF THE CNN HOMEPAGE? (The "TICKER" Should read: Former NY Mayor LOVES both his wife and mistresses!

Sweet Jimny Christmas.

That was arguably the biggest stinking pile of a debate I've ever seen. A horrible format, a moderator who couldn't control the candidates or the crowd, just crap all around.

Why do candidates have to be asked this during a stupid question? Why does the "TICKER" have to display that Senator Clinton, wants both diamond and pearls.

The Ticker Should INSTEAD Write: FORMER NY MAYOR LOVES BOTH his WIFE AND MISTRESSES!!

This question actually has a lot of merit. It is traditionally used to test one's personal character and demeanor. Hillary failed the test miserably.

Answer:
Pearls are modest and symbolize purity from within.
Diamonds attract too much attention, jagged and they cut.

She's running for President of the United States, not a fashion show or some beauty pageant. I am truly disgusted.

Vote for Liberty - Ron Paul 2008!

You do the math. 2 Former Clintonites; James Carville and David Gergan. A female reporter barely able to hide her glee every time she was able to squeeze in another "Hillary Clinton clearly demonstrated…"

That's the "team" you have pretending to analyze the debate? What an absolute joke. Now I know why I haven't watched CNN in years. They are the single most scared network in history. Must preserve status quo, must preserve status quo…

Ted Turner must be rolling over in his grave. Oh wait, he's not dead, it's just his once-proud "news" network that has wilted away.

Go back and look at the tone of the questions Edward's was asked. John Anderson's fake tan couldn't even conceal his rage when he played "Devil's Advocate" by asking Edwards about "flip-flopping"–a term Edwards has NEVER used when talking about Hillary.

I love how Anderson Cooper tries to wimpily squeeze in a "…our audience should know that Mr. Carville and Mr. Gergan served as advisors to President Clinton."

By the time he finished saying "Clinton" his head was clearly pointed at the floor. He was ashamed of himself–as he should have been.

Oh yea. That was at 10:38–a good 20 minutes into their "expert" analysis. What a pathetic joke CNN has become!

Oh, lighten up!!! It was the last question of the night and it was a young girl who asked it. Besides, she does seem to like both as she's usually wearing diamonds (like tonight) or large pearl necklaces.

1. Yankees or Red Sox? "Iwill alternate"

2. Diamonds or Pearls? "both"

This is sickness. This is pathologic. This is not normal.

I'd like diamonds, pearls and Condi in office.

CNN continues it's downward spiral from news titan to 'Hard Copy' clone.

Such a shame.

THATS THE BEST QUESTION OF THE NIGHT OF THE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, SOME LAUGHTER WHEN THE LADY ASKED HILLARY "WHAT SHE PREFERS DIAMONDS OR PEARLS?" THAT WAS HILARIOUS AND I LOVE IT, JUST LIKE WHEN BILL WAS ASKED "BOXER OR BRIEF?" HEHEHE!

I suppose I'm one of a few who heard the lady speak into the microphone after they answered the question. She said:

"The diamonds are the only thing shining on that stage."

Quite true. I was earnestly impressed with some of Joe Biden's answers, though. He seemed to handle himself well with the questions he was given.

CNN should never be allowed to host another debate ever. What's the deal with one of the moderators fawning all over Hillary Clinton, that was very unproffessional.

Did SkyMall sponsor this debate or Zales? Bang up job once again CNN; glad you're here to ask the relevant questions. Who needs MTV for inisghtful political debate when we have CNN?

Diamonds or perls? Boxers or briefs? Those are the only questions Clintons can answer honestly…

This debate was a staged circus performance. Audience allowed to boo and heckle the candidates and the moderator did NOTHING about it? Post debate objective "analysis" by James Carville? Hehehe.

The looser: Blitzer. The winner: Russert. Congrats CNN, you'accomplished impossible : You've made Fox look like a serious network.

CNN is concentrating WAY too much on Hilary. The other candidates need more attention. I would figure CNN wouldn't be the news where I would see such slanted news.

What a sexist and absurd way to end a Presidental Primary debate!

This was not a "meet cute" moment. This moment was CNN proving that they would give venue for a question of a nature that would never be allowed for one of "the boys". Just one of those occasional obstacles intended to demean and diminish just as much as the B-word reference made by one of Rudolf's supporters.

This was a question intended to bury the Senator. Her good natured response to this question will come back to bite her as viewers who have seen "Blood Diamond" remember how many children have lost limbs due to the brutality of diamond mining. Yet had Senator Hillary Clinton addressed this question in a serious manner, she would be critizized, as women often are, when they fail to laugh off inappropriate questioning in a professional setting that thier male counterparts never have to face.

Had she looked the young woman in the eye and said “You have an opportunity to ask a Presidential candidate a question and you ask this? Shame on you!” Half of America (guess which half), and most of the media would have reacted by calling her “too serious” and “a bit cold”… euphanisms for the B-word.

I am not the Senators strongest supporter; I’m not happy with her voting record; I am furious about her support for Bush’s blank check and her failure to demand that this administration be held responsible for both their incompetence and their crimes. They are among the reasons I am supporting another candidate in the primary. But this kind of insidious sexism makes me wonder how many women will be ticked off enough to set aside their policy differences and support the Senator as a backlash against this kind of “occasional obstacle”.

Seriously CNN!? This would be a stupid story anywhere but on YOUR "political ticker" it's a disgrace. There's really no more important political news that could fill this space?!

This was a stupid question.

Now to something more substantive. I was glad that Sen. Clinton pointed out the utter hypocrisy in the Edwards campaign, I say this not as a Clinton supporter, I'm not, but rather as a citizen who is tired of the politicians who flip flop from election to election and expect to fool enough people to be elected. Former Sen. Edwards ran to the right of Sen. Kerry last time around, now he is running to the left of everyone except Rep. Kucinich.

How can CNN possibly call this a debate. How lame. It should be the Hillary Clinton soft ball, planted questions hour. Maybe I'll vote independent.

I have to agree with some of the others that I thought this was a softball plant to play up her gender in an "entertaining" fashion, as well as allow her to make a joke about not being able to make decisions (real talent there).

I found it very lame and really hope that dumb twit who asked it is proud of herself.

Overall, I thought Biden did very well again (as he has in other debates I've seen). I think this partially comes from not having to deal with the 3way mud slinging battle and being able to focus on policy.

I didn't know CNN was in the business of asking vetted questions designed to soften a specific candidates image.

I thought the debate was overall handled pretty well but that question was horrible and designed for only one purpose. No wrong answer but make hillary look friendly and human. Something she otherwise struggles to do.

I am so disappointed with CNN. Can CNN talk about any of the candidates but Clinton? I mean everything is in relation to Clinton. This is so biased it is disgusting. I expected better, especially with Anderson Cooper leading the commentary afterwards. The coverage has been a big let down.

I cannot believe the Hillary Clinton supporters are still on her bandwagon. This woman said nothing of substance tonight. In fact, she has stolen many of Barack Obama's approaches and lines. It's sickening to watch. This woman will not get my vote. She cannot be trusted on issues. Obama & Edwards are clearly the ones that will change this country for the better. They stick to their messages and don't change like a shifting shadow. Wolf Blitzer did a horrendous job of moderating this debate. He was obviously biased towards supporting Hillary along with the after debate CNN critique staff. In fact Durbin had already endorsed Clinton earlier and Carville verbally endorsed her 3 weeks ago. Why would you use biased people to critique your debate…Clinton News Network.

This debate was a CNN production of the Hillary Clinton Show. I watched the scenes over and over on the DVR to catch their methods. My God - Look into that last question!

"MUDSLINGING!!!" ????

How so? Calling people out (especially those that may be COMMANDER IN CHIEF) constitutes mudslinging? Holding them accountable consitutes mudslinging?

Yeah, nice question about diamonds and pearls btw. HAHAHAHA!!! NOT! Is that the everyone gets a laugh moment from the candidate that has been elected by the media?

CNN's election coverage is pathetic. Someone after the debate said that Obama didn't give credit to the Bush administration for the surge??! Are you joking? Get some better foreign policy analysts because the surge and the reduction of violence in Iraq is spurious. Iran is the reason violence has decreased. It's called a CONCESSION to show the US how much power they have in the region. They can turn it on and off like a valve.

Don't want to get too off topic though. Why people like Hillary Clinton is beyond me. The woman is a complete phony. She has zero convictions to anyone but herself. Why doesn't she want to raise taxes on the top percent of our country to pay for healthcare? Because those are her biggest campaign contributors! Why isn't she transparent about her record while her husband was president? Why wait til the campaign is over? WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO HIDE HILLARY?

Stop supporting a phony CNN! Our country is more important than YOU!

Diamonds or pearls? What the hell is wrong with people? This is just embarrasing. And Clinton's answer further demonstrates that when it comes to making decisions, she cannot make up her mind. She is like a flag that flaps in the direction of the wind. She bases her stances on what's popular.

I don't want to hear only what I want to hear, though. I also want to hear what I need to hear. That's why Obama has got my vote.

What kind of mysogenistic question is that??? None of the male candidates would ever be asked if they preferred a Rolex or a Cartier watch.

Guess she never saw the movie DiCaprio movie about blood diamonds

Hillary is cautious, no doubt about it, and I don't blame her for taking her time while answering questions, always being careful in what she projects. In this day and age, we all need to be careful in what we say and do … or it can be used against you in the worst way.

I cannot emphasize enough in how strong Hillary Clinton is and, although she chooses her words carefully and doesn't jump to say things, she absolutely has my vote. I have total faith that this woman can run this country and pull us out of this horrible mess our country is in.

How was this a dumb question? She gave an answer that explains herself to a "T"
Diamonds or pearls? Drivers licenses for illegals or no drivers licenses for illegals. She wants both. Usually you have to wait a few days to hear her flip flop. Tonight she just let you know right up front

And she wants to be President? What exactly does she mean she is the one ready toolead from day one? This person can not even make a simple decision on, has a unenviable track record of flip-flopping, and has a history of failing to acheive consensus when it was required most.

I couldn't think of anyone worse to be President at this crucial juncture of American history.

She gave a quick, humorous and smart answer to a simple but silly question.

She did well in the debate tonite, and should solidify her lead to win the nomination.

To those who think CNN is biased towards Hillary, why are you still here? Heard about Fox News? I just love it when the not so smart get lost in cyberspace and end up where they shouldn't have. Just watch that green thing oozing…Ha! Ha!

First of all, why is CNN using 2 former Clinton aides to comment on Clinton? One in particular, Carville, is a Clinton partisan.

Two, please, LESS of Wolf Blitzer - he is an Israeli partisan - used to work for AIPAC.

Three, will someone tell Wolf and CNN to STOP telling us every five minutes that they have "THE BEST POLITICAL TEAM ON TELEVISION". So tired of the self-serving crap. They DO NOT have the best political team on TV. Even Jack Cafferty is tired of them saying that. BTW, I would have appreciated Jack Cafferty moderating the debate instead of the ever-present Wolf.

I am sick of the way CNN promotes Clinton. Obama '08!

CNN is Clinton's best friend.

Wolf Blitzer was easily the worst questioner in any of the debates to date. He set up poor premises that confined answers from the candidates on very complex issues. And his insistence on "yes" or "no" answers made answers superfluous. There are serious issues that require complex answers that Blitzer's questions fought against. As it was, all the CNN staff was particularly inept. Malveaux tossed softballs at Sen.Clinton. Thank goodness there were some "real" people with good questions or the debate would have been useless in informing the public.

Isn't it ridiculous that the most innane question is getting the most press?!

Disgusting that CNN would pass on a question that stupid. This whole election is a joke. CNN softballs newstainment or FOX blatant propaghanda, those are our choices, and thats even more of a sad joke.

As usual Biden wins if he gets any questions.Obama flip-flopped worse than Clinton on Illegal invaders Drivers License,but Hillary won back front runner status.Blitzer was great,unlike Hillary hating Russert.The man is a disgrace as an unbiased moderator.(By the way the Diamond question was a joke.O.K.?)

I really don't see what the big deal is. It was the last question of the debate, and let's be honest with one another - we already know where these knuckle heads already stand. I do think Hillary was not being completely forthcoming however. We all know her husband loves to give women pearl necklaces! Sure she has a few. Maybe not.

I fail to see how the ordinary US citizen can relate to the choice Hillary Clinton must make between wearing diamonds or pearls. Our politicians are leading a fantasy life few real people ever have a hope of achieving.

So thats your final answer. Both as in both ways and the same problem keeps coming up. Your so nuerotic for the votes you can't even take a personal stand on the "I like issues". We need someone who is committed to answering with directness. Your the exact opposite of what this country needs right now and unfortunately as unlucky and gullibly stupid we are, you will probably be the next President. May god help us all, as I'm sure you won't.

Why can't people see that Joe Biden actually gives real answers to the questions asked? Even when it's about jewelry, folks! Get a clue and stop letting the media crown these candidates before a single vote is cast. Let's start talking about who is most qualified for the job.

The whole debate was a fraud! That is just what I have to say….

The correct answer to diamond or pearls is PEACE!

Clinton's answer proves her heart is totally elitist and dangerously irrelevant.

I actually watched the debate. The Q came at the very end from a young female student; it sort of caught Hillary off guard, but she answered in a funny way and my wife and I laughed.
We may or may not vote for her, but she clearly is fast on her feet and quick witted.
Also, throughout the debate she showed she knows the issues and I think she would be one tough president!

I wasn't going to watch the debate. The last debate made me sick to my stomach. But, I couldn't resist! I am so happy I watched! Clinton was amazing. The others guys didn't even come close except Biden. Great guy!

I see nothing wrong with Hillary saying she wants it all! All of us want all we can get. Isn't that the American dream. Why does a person have to choose one or the other.

Go Hillary! We love you!

When this is asked of a woman in a political debate I would expect more than an answer of which she would want. I am very surprised she did not mention the issues diamonds- something many women like her lust for- are attached to funding people in situations we should not be funding. I am not sure if the situation is the same for pearls, but I do know of some we are able to find in secure areas with less need of illegal funds. I am surprised this was not brought up when she is handed a question which make her out to be a dumb blonde.

My little addition to the blog.
Maybe it is time that we look to choose a leader who will be a global leader instead of a global conquistador. Perhaps we should all ask ourselves one question. Which of the candidates has the ability to lead America back to the forefront of being a country that is looked up to rather than sneered at? Maybe we should all look around and remember that our country was founded on "We the people"…not Me the people which seems to be so true today. Our individualism will be our demise. There are pleanty of other nations that have a woman as a leader but rather than judge leadership based on gender perhaps we should choose a leader that will bring our nation back to where it once was.
One Vote…One Voice. If you don't vote you have no right to complain.
Good Day

If you actually WATCHED the debate you would have known that this question only came after an intense 2 hour debate. It was just a little closing joke.

You people are ridiculous. Just accept that Obama didn't do that well and move on.

Blitzer and CNN seemed biased towards Clinton and went out of their way to make Obama look not ready for prime time.

Of course she wants both! AND, she wants you and I to pay fo it.

CNN blew this one by not instructing the audience to please hold their boos, jeers, cheers and cat calls.

Not like we neede to listen to her. I don't know how many time I've heard that tired old line about I've been fighting for people for 35 years, 90 year old ladies want me to be president etc, etc. It's like watching reruns, must be a writer's strike or something.

This question was extremely insulting to women.

The fact that it was asked by a WOMAN makes it even MORE insulting.

This is obviously a planned question. Debates, and all other televisd events follow a cycle of tension…start out smooth, wrench up w/ tougher questions, and closing with something smooth, mellow. This was just something tossed in to try to end the debate segment in a light note. The only reason Hillary got the last question–is because she is the popular leader she rec'd the first and last question. There is no more meaning to this dumb question than that. What knuckleheads would possible think this shows favoritism by CNN? Anyhow–Hillary still showed greater presence, deportment, calmness under fire, and "executiveness" than all the others.

our kids are off at wat and we care if she wants diamonds or pearls? more reason to vote for guiliani

Daniel from Virginia beach… what is an AEROBIC dictionary?

CNN Needs to Learn how to run a debate, They wasted 10 minutes in the beginning, then they had a good, solid and equal debate for about 15 minutes and the rest of the debate was literal crap. The Audience there was obviously full of Clinton Supporters and the other candidates couldn't even speak about their differences with her without being boo'd. They gave Hilary way too much speaking time as well. It felt like Hilary was hosting the debate! I used to watch CNN all the time but I'm going to MSNBC now, they know how to host equal debates.

"Hillary Clinton will divide this country and ruin our economy."

I think the horse has already left the barn on those issues.

This is not news. This is just dumb.

The woman in South Carolina hit it on the spot. Hillary is an indecisive whiner, loves to attack opponents, whether thay are in the same party or not, but cannot stand the heat. I left the Republican Party after thirty years and became an Independent due to my dissatisifaction with the party. Hillary is acting as bad as those that I chose to abandon.

This is just stupid.

What a ridiculous question. Do you think she was asked this because she was a woman? Of course she was. I don't see the men candidates being asked which fast car they prefer.

Are you kidding me? THIS is news? With all the issues this country and world face, THIS is what CNN decides to run as "Lastest news"? I thought you were a news organization and not E!

Clinton Nomination Network - why in the world did you allow such a shallow question? Aren't you ashamed?!

The difference between Obama and Hillary's answer to driver's lisences: Obama has always said he was in favor of it, but that it would NOT be a presidential policy he tries to push. There was no waffling going on. Obama is straight as an arrow on EVERY question he answers. He just wanted to make clear that while he did think it is a good policy, it isn't something he would ever push as president. Blitzer was too busy trying to give Hillary a foot message to realize that. Hillary, on the other hand, took two weeks of public polling to decide that she wanted to change her mind and just flat out oppose it.

Great journalism folks…. NOT!!! If this is the best you can ask of our presidential candidates, then we will continue to have uninformed citizens on the real issues. DO YOUR JOB!!!

Katherine of San Diego, you are absolutely right. The question was downright insulting.

When I hear of a female candidate being asked "Diamonds or pearls?" or hear that a candidate's wife attended a tea party, was part of a "First Ladies Tour," or is asked whether she bakes cookies, it makes me want to cringe. How can we say with a straight face that we, as a nation, are mature enough to have a woman in the White House when we still have these outdated conceptions about what piques the "little lady's" interest?

No, we are not ready for any woman to enter the White House. Shallow questions of this nature prove it, and I am deeply ashamed.

What Hillary really means: Do as I say, not as I do …or else.

She should have said neither and really shown her leadership skills by not conforming to that stupid cliche "diamonds are a womans best friend".
I concurr…lighten up people!

Any questions whether CNN is part of the Hillary's News Network along with the rest of the liberal media? How come they used Wolf Blitzer, was Larry King taking a nap?

I can't believe anyone is analyzing Hillary's response the diamonds vs pearls question. I believe the question was simply a way to end the dabate on a light note. It's no wonder that Hillary has to be carefull with all of her responses, when every word she utters is criticized, every comment she makes is dissected, and some "journalists" are even claiming to know what she is thinking.

She is tough, she will continue to shine, and I honestly believe she will make a difference.

Another softball question by the CNN minions to make their darling Mrs. Bill Clinton the favorite and like able. What do you expect from the Clinton News Network.

Ha Ha! Indeed, after I got over my initial disgust at "Diamonds or Pearls?" Tee Hee, Tee Hee, Blink, Blink. I thought..well, okay..just for fun..which one? And Sen. Clinton still didn't answer straight! I threw my hands up and walked away. "On that note.." says Wolf. Don't waste my time like that again CNN.

Also CNN, do me a favor and actually allot enough time during your debates for the candidates to really answer their questions.

Yes or No answers are quite simply not sufficient. Not when there are so many different intertwining issues.

And when the CNN "Council" of journalists asks questions, I'd appreciate straightforward ones. "What are your plans to resolve…"

Not this, Well you said this, but then you did that…etc. etc. "Gotcha!" Come on. You can do that any time. You do do that anytime you want. And don't hijack the audience questions anymore…Suzanne.

Clinton is the biggest flip flopper in the field. What a professional politican. We need a straight shooter for President.
Wolf has got to be the worst moderator of all. Quit interrupting folks and let them finish. Let all candidates respond not just the front runners.

I think Biden will gain from this debate. No one dared to come back at him over his remarks. I'm totally impressed by this person. It seemed to me he's got a lot of respect from the others and they know, he should be the person for the Job! Kudos to Biden tonight and God help America in this crucial decision. A Republican in disguise. Too confident, too cocky. America needs a definate look, feel, and sense, like Mr. Biden, Obama. But with CNN's bias coverage, Clinton is a sure bet. Wow, history repeats itself. Scary stuff to watch.

Hillary was OUTSTANDING last night! and will the next PRESIDENT!!

Edwards was too angry and obama just wasnt making an sense? he fumbles when he talks, not making sense…the reason he does well alone is because he isnt next to the others who are very much more experienced and it shows in the debates

CNN, I'm finding it easy now to quit you. The funny thing is, I don't think you all understand that your blatant favoritism towards Hillary actually pushes people away from her and supports the storyline that she is orchestrating, manipulative, and has CNN in her pantsuit pocket. This election cycle may have done/be doing irreparable damage to CNN's image.
I might have to agree with the previous poster: "Once again I am reminded why the Lehrer report is the only credible news broadcast on TV"

remember that the diamond and pearl question supposedly came from an undecided voter.

Then came the "cute" comment and the "only thing sparkling on stage comment".

What an inane, stupid question.

Instead of focusing on the fact that all of Hillary's votes in the Senate basically enable Bush-Cheney, we are talking about diamonds and pearls.

What a joke.

The question was presented just to lighten up the tension.
Kinda like starting a presentation with a joke or funny story.
Everyone is taking it too seriously.
All the canidates did very well, I am very proud of all of them.
Obama took a slight hit, but presented himself quite well over all.

WHAT A SHAME. WITH THE PROBLEMS THAT OUR NATION FACES THAT WE WOULD EVEN CHOOSE TO TALK ABOUT WHAT TYPE OF JEWERLY MRS CLINTON PREFERS.

Typical Clinton answer, give me everything, I deserve it, I'm a Clinton. Like all of her responses last night, she again demonstrates that she won't be candid about her position on any topic that can jeopardize her lead and rightful place as president. All of the candidates last night demonstrated just how dangerous the liberal agenda really is. The fate of our country and all free nations around the globe rests with critical decisions made by the next administration. If licenses and social programs for illegal's are more important than the war against terrorism and our commitment to defend America and allies against the threats by other nations regardless of cost and human loss than we are destine to experience a fate far greater than that of 9-11. Lastly, consider for a moment the combined cost for freedom in WWII, 73 million military and civilian losses, 3.7% of the world population at that time and how our lives would have been changed should the outcome of the war and our commitment been that of democrats today as we face the real potential of a WWIII.

Watched the debate last night. Was looking forward to see what they had to say about my candidate, and folks if you looking for experience better take a look at Joe Biden, and if you don't support him I want to know why. The entire hour of post debate coverage Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinto, Obama, Clinton, Clinton, Edwards, Clinton. I almost throw up in my mouth. Now, as the details are coming out the Fox Noise owns Rudy (thank you for the THAT story Keith), I'm beginning to believe CNN had THEIR endorosement. For the Hillary supporters I have to ask "what is it?". Is it because Bill would be back in the WH, is it because she is a woman? What IS it? You know "IF" she gets the nom it will put the GOP in the race, without her we clean up. CNN you should be ashamed! There were other candidates to talk about, where was THAT coverage. Biden won the debate hands DOWN!

Boo on Blitzer for not allowing equal time to the candidates.

This debate was just appeared to be an attack on Hillary Clinton. I was very disappointed that the first question set the stage for the tone of the debate. Some of the questions posed to the candidates could have been best presented in another venue other than a debate. This includes the first question.

In my opinion, it was not a debate at all, but it was not a total waste of my time. I know now to avoid any press-sponsored debates. I'll get my information about the candidates via other sources and make decision for whom to vote. I think the press is more interested in entertaining than informing.

CNN pre-screens these questions and to have eveyone go home happy, throws Hillary a softball and she couldn't even answer it DIRECTLY.

Maybe she didn't want to anger the diamond or the pearl lobby by choosing one.

I think I will have "waffles" for breakfast.

I would have applauded her if she said "I prefer everyone having the ability to buy both diamonds and pearls".

A college student can't come up with anything more relevent than this?

Doesn't give you a warm fuzzy for our future does it?

I usually do not watch political debates, but I watched this one to learn what was going on. I am still fascinated by Senator Biden, but our next President of the United States will be Hillary Clinton. She seems the most charismatic, experienced, and the person we want at The White House. And, I just adored her honesty about admitting that she wants diamonds and pearls!

Looks to me like it was a planted question, however, Hillary managed to blow it by being unable to decide which one she likes best. I bet she'll make up her mind in two weeks once she runs a few polls.

omg people get a life! it was supposed to be a silly question!!!

I thought the debate was good, and then you had to go and ruin it with the Diamond/Pearls question. What a waste of time, especially since the candidates who are not the front runners (Dennis Kucinich) did not get nearly enough time to make their positions clear.

Kudos to Joe Biden (another non-front runner that I would have liked to hear more from) for choosing 'diamonds', and making the question the joke it was.

I guess you'll be asking the Republican men in the next debate if they prefer boxers or briefs? And why was this question not asked of the Democratic men?

People have been posting that this is the 'Clinton News Network' and I'm starting to think they are right.

I used to respect CNN, but you lost me last night by allowing that audience question. Shame on you!

This was supposed to be an undecided voter asking a tough question to the field trying to determine who to vote.

THAT was her tough question?!

CNN shouldn't have let that question through…she's obviously not undecided and i HOPE she's not using that question to decide who to vote for!

So two weeks ago when I brought up the fact that Obama was accusing Hillary of not being able to answer the immigration question but he himself was not taking a stand, people thought it to be almost incredible. Now you see? Wolfe gave him three chances to respond and he still could not give a straight answer. That is the tragedy, the candidate who is accusing politicians playing dirty is doing it himself without even accepting it. So he is different because he says he's different? Seriously, i have not seen him follow anything that he said in his book or any of the principles that he is claiming to run his campaign on. The only thing worse than taking money from special interests is taking money from them and then denying it and accusing others for taking money. And that is Mr. Obama, Ladies and Gentlemen! He is no different just because he claims to be different, people wake up he's just like everyone, only more susceptible to the Republican attack, so if you want a democrat in the WH, Hillary is your best bet. Obama could probably do it in 8 years from now, but definitely not now. Republicans will butcher him.

SHE WANTS BOTH. That's a safe answer. Then you get the diamond lovers as well as the pearl lovers on your side. Like that's a big deal, but you see they asked this question because they know there are a lot of women in this country who really only care about such issues; the Hollywood people and their groupies the people who look at the appearance of things. That's why she appeals to too many. So she'll have their vote, the illegal aliens vote (when the Democrats figure a way to get them voting rights), the abortion supporters vote, and the vote of the people who don't/won't get their own healthcare if they can have someone else pay for it. Come on America wake up to reality. Hillary will bring the country down further. Terrorists hate all the things the liberals love and Hillary is a true liberal know matter how hard she tries to conceal it.

I think her straight answer…. she wants BOTH. Why not? if an average American is asked cheese burger or Fries, I am sure he/she would say BOTH…. I don't see that as non-decisive, rather Hillary is decisive, without a thought, she wants BOTH…. Good for you, girl!!!! Now go make the boys jealous….

I used to think the whole ‘Clinton News Network’ joke was a figment of Hillary’s opponent’s imaginations but lately I’ve been seeing that it’s actually true. CNN is to Hillary Clinton as Fox News is to Rudy Guliani.

The debate format last night and CNN’s execution of it was pathetic. The first 15 minutes were more like an episode of Jerry Springer with Wolf Blitzer playing the role of the host and egging on Obama and Edwards to attack her in front of a crowd that amounted to a Clinton rally. That seemed to open the door for the crowd to start acting like they were at a WWF event. Campbell Brown absolutely gushed as she asked Senator Clinton softball questions. Blitzer was clearly more aggressive trying to pin down and trap all the other candidates. And I would really like to see a breakdown of the number of questions asked each candidate and the amount of time they were each given. Were I part of the Kucinich, Edwards, Dodd, Biden or Richardson campaigns I would