<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A candidate&#039;s best friend?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marsha, Portland, OR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-147532</link>
		<dc:creator>Marsha, Portland, OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-147532</guid>
		<description>Wow...I can&#039;t believe people are criticizing this comment are this story. People like to know personal things about their candidates. And a lot of women like diamonds and pearls!! No waffling there -  ya like both. That&#039;s a straight answer. People on these blogs need to relax on simple issues like this. Jeez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow...I can't believe people are criticizing this comment are this story. People like to know personal things about their candidates. And a lot of women like diamonds and pearls!! No waffling there &#8211;  ya like both. That's a straight answer. People on these blogs need to relax on simple issues like this. Jeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: from Europe</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-147107</link>
		<dc:creator>from Europe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-147107</guid>
		<description>For God&#039;s sake, it was a 30 sec question to end the debate with a laugh.. they were out of time anyway so CNN couldn&#039;t start another round of &#039;serious&#039; questioning. 

What is so wrong with you Americans??? you are jumping from one extreme to another. Keep some balance in judging. To read all these comments is really scary for an outsider, are you the ones who want to lead the World?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For God's sake, it was a 30 sec question to end the debate with a laugh.. they were out of time anyway so CNN couldn't start another round of 'serious' questioning. </p>
<p>What is so wrong with you Americans??? you are jumping from one extreme to another. Keep some balance in judging. To read all these comments is really scary for an outsider, are you the ones who want to lead the World?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry / Covington, Louisiana</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146912</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry / Covington, Louisiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146912</guid>
		<description>If anyone wants to see how far we have fallen, try to find a replay of the Kennedy/Nixon debates back in the 60&#039;s.  I heard them at the time, and I saw a replay a few years ago on one of the cable channels.  You would be amazed at the hard and specific questions asked of both candidates, and of their precise answers.  Granted, Kennedy won the debates more because of his demeanor and style, but both men answered all questions well.

It is an indictment of all of us that our time can be bought so cheaply.  The problem is not one random silly question - we can tolerate that.  The problem is unfortunately much more serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone wants to see how far we have fallen, try to find a replay of the Kennedy/Nixon debates back in the 60's.  I heard them at the time, and I saw a replay a few years ago on one of the cable channels.  You would be amazed at the hard and specific questions asked of both candidates, and of their precise answers.  Granted, Kennedy won the debates more because of his demeanor and style, but both men answered all questions well.</p>
<p>It is an indictment of all of us that our time can be bought so cheaply.  The problem is not one random silly question &#8211; we can tolerate that.  The problem is unfortunately much more serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El, Ottawa, Ontario</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146839</link>
		<dc:creator>El, Ottawa, Ontario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146839</guid>
		<description>Now, in the next republican debate, CNN should ask Giuliani which he prefers:  wife or mistress. 

Giuliani is known to have mistresses in his two prior marriages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, in the next republican debate, CNN should ask Giuliani which he prefers:  wife or mistress. </p>
<p>Giuliani is known to have mistresses in his two prior marriages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost Faith                                     San Diego</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146822</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Faith                                     San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146822</guid>
		<description>that is so awsome that at a time when 1 in 8 home owners are losing their homes in California and several are losing them in the country that Hillary wants both diamonds and pearls. what a greedy bit@#!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is so awsome that at a time when 1 in 8 home owners are losing their homes in California and several are losing them in the country that Hillary wants both diamonds and pearls. what a greedy bit@#!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael, Houston, Tx</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146670</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael, Houston, Tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 03:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146670</guid>
		<description>So what folks?

An attempt at levity, big deal, get over it....and for the folks who say, how can they joke about this when people don&#039;t have health coverage.

Well, you all need to turn to that village idiot in the white house, who is more interested in protecting his big biz buddies in the health industry than in helping the common man and woman. THis is the same guy who vetoed SCHIP for his buddies, and screwed children all over the country, with the only advice given as &quot;try again&quot; to lawmakers, nice job George. Turn to the real villains - the folks who have had total control for 6 of the last 7 years - the republicrites!

And to the folks who can&#039;t take a joke, have a nice day :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what folks?</p>
<p>An attempt at levity, big deal, get over it....and for the folks who say, how can they joke about this when people don't have health coverage.</p>
<p>Well, you all need to turn to that village idiot in the white house, who is more interested in protecting his big biz buddies in the health industry than in helping the common man and woman. THis is the same guy who vetoed SCHIP for his buddies, and screwed children all over the country, with the only advice given as "try again" to lawmakers, nice job George. Turn to the real villains &#8211; the folks who have had total control for 6 of the last 7 years &#8211; the republicrites!</p>
<p>And to the folks who can't take a joke, have a nice day <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B, Dallas Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146629</link>
		<dc:creator>B, Dallas Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146629</guid>
		<description>Disappointed my Anti Hillary comment last night did not make the postings.  ha.  No surprise!
Good night America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointed my Anti Hillary comment last night did not make the postings.  ha.  No surprise!<br />
Good night America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john williams  san diego, ca.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146614</link>
		<dc:creator>john williams  san diego, ca.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146614</guid>
		<description>hillary did not plant that question, according to &#039;you tube&#039;, it was planted by none other than C N N..go figure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hillary did not plant that question, according to 'you tube', it was planted by none other than C N N..go figure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie, Dallas TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146521</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie, Dallas TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146521</guid>
		<description>Superficial if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superficial if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary, Hillard, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146500</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary, Hillard, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146500</guid>
		<description>Well...looks like this diamond question was forced by CNN.  Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http:\\www.watchingHillary.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Diamonds&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well...looks like this diamond question was forced by CNN.  Check out <a href="http:\\www.watchingHillary.com" rel="nofollow">Diamonds</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj huntington ny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146496</link>
		<dc:creator>aj huntington ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146496</guid>
		<description>Hilary seems like a cool lady to go out have beer with when she lets her hair down. Too bad her husband treated like crap for pretty much their whole marriage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary seems like a cool lady to go out have beer with when she lets her hair down. Too bad her husband treated like crap for pretty much their whole marriage...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Boughner, LaGrange, KY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146446</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Boughner, LaGrange, KY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146446</guid>
		<description>I simply cannot believe that whether or not Senator Clinton prefers diamonds or pearls was even allowed into this debate, let alone reported on the website as the #2 story under the breaking news headline.  Isn&#039;t CNN supposed to be the more moderate news organization?  Diamonds or pearls while people are starving here and dying abroad?  Are you sure you&#039;re not TMZ in disguise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply cannot believe that whether or not Senator Clinton prefers diamonds or pearls was even allowed into this debate, let alone reported on the website as the #2 story under the breaking news headline.  Isn't CNN supposed to be the more moderate news organization?  Diamonds or pearls while people are starving here and dying abroad?  Are you sure you're not TMZ in disguise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris, Pensacola FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146380</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris, Pensacola FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146380</guid>
		<description>Whatever, you guys that have no problem with this question are probably delusional from a life of ignorance or a voter for Clinton.

Either way, it&#039;s an embarassment to our country and to those who are attempting to decide on a candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever, you guys that have no problem with this question are probably delusional from a life of ignorance or a voter for Clinton.</p>
<p>Either way, it's an embarassment to our country and to those who are attempting to decide on a candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy, Seattle, WA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146209</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy, Seattle, WA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146209</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m sure that the folks who can&#039;t afford medical coverage and people losing their homes due to forclosure are just thrilled to know that Hillary wants both diamonds and pearls.

Posted By Maryann - Orlando&quot;

Maryann, rich or poor, all women have some pieces of jewellery they like to wear. It was nothing offensive about the question or the answer, and lets be serious it had nothing to do about choosing either diamonds or pearls. And I loved that Biden, who had an excellent performance at the debate, replied to the funny question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I'm sure that the folks who can't afford medical coverage and people losing their homes due to forclosure are just thrilled to know that Hillary wants both diamonds and pearls.</p>
<p>Posted By Maryann &#8211; Orlando"</p>
<p>Maryann, rich or poor, all women have some pieces of jewellery they like to wear. It was nothing offensive about the question or the answer, and lets be serious it had nothing to do about choosing either diamonds or pearls. And I loved that Biden, who had an excellent performance at the debate, replied to the funny question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146196</link>
		<dc:creator>John, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146196</guid>
		<description>Hillary dances around the questions to keep from losing votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary dances around the questions to keep from losing votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j-man, chicago Illinois</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146119</link>
		<dc:creator>j-man, chicago Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-146119</guid>
		<description>I laugh at the people that say Hillary is intelligent and dignified.  More like mindless, abrasive, and aloof to the needs and cares of the American people.  

Please, learn how to take off your foggy goggles and properly discern and distinguish people for who they are.  You&#039;re talking about a woman who touts at campaign rallies how inspired she was seeing a waitress work and how she really wants to help her have a better life while she and her campaign ate a restaurant this woman worked at.  THEY DIDN&#039;T EVEN TIP HER!!!  Go out and FIND REAL news.  Please, do some ACTUAL research.  

This woman is neither dignified or intelligent.  She is a self serving ego machine that is tied to the same corporate entities that Bush is.  She is divisive and will be, in my opinion, worse than Bush (YES-IT CAN GET WORSE!).  

Please, don&#039;t do it just for your own awareness, do it for the sake of the country.  America needs a new direction and she is dead end central!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I laugh at the people that say Hillary is intelligent and dignified.  More like mindless, abrasive, and aloof to the needs and cares of the American people.  </p>
<p>Please, learn how to take off your foggy goggles and properly discern and distinguish people for who they are.  You're talking about a woman who touts at campaign rallies how inspired she was seeing a waitress work and how she really wants to help her have a better life while she and her campaign ate a restaurant this woman worked at.  THEY DIDN'T EVEN TIP HER!!!  Go out and FIND REAL news.  Please, do some ACTUAL research.  </p>
<p>This woman is neither dignified or intelligent.  She is a self serving ego machine that is tied to the same corporate entities that Bush is.  She is divisive and will be, in my opinion, worse than Bush (YES-IT CAN GET WORSE!).  </p>
<p>Please, don't do it just for your own awareness, do it for the sake of the country.  America needs a new direction and she is dead end central!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryann - Orlando, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145773</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryann - Orlando, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145773</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that the folks who can&#039;t afford medical coverage and people losing their homes due to forclosure are just thrilled to know that Hillary wants both diamonds and pearls.

Sorry, Bea, but the anger for this question is justified in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sure that the folks who can't afford medical coverage and people losing their homes due to forclosure are just thrilled to know that Hillary wants both diamonds and pearls.</p>
<p>Sorry, Bea, but the anger for this question is justified in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike MD.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145768</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike MD.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145768</guid>
		<description>With all of the problems America is facing today,why is that every time I hear these canidates say that when elected President they will have the answers.As members of Congress who bring legistration to make changes,why is it that non of these members of Congress have not submitted any bills.They claim to have the answer to Health Care Reform yet I haven&#039;t seen one bill from any of them.Biden claimed last night he had a bill to end the war in Iraq with 75 Republican supporters.How many more men &amp; woman have to give their lives before we hear this great solution? I guess America must wait and suffer.It seems to me that if these people cared about the American people,they would be trying to submitt this legistration to show people that they have the leadership ability to lead this country.But I guess their only objective is to say I am running for the chance to make a difference instead of making one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all of the problems America is facing today,why is that every time I hear these canidates say that when elected President they will have the answers.As members of Congress who bring legistration to make changes,why is it that non of these members of Congress have not submitted any bills.They claim to have the answer to Health Care Reform yet I haven't seen one bill from any of them.Biden claimed last night he had a bill to end the war in Iraq with 75 Republican supporters.How many more men &amp; woman have to give their lives before we hear this great solution? I guess America must wait and suffer.It seems to me that if these people cared about the American people,they would be trying to submitt this legistration to show people that they have the leadership ability to lead this country.But I guess their only objective is to say I am running for the chance to make a difference instead of making one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bea, Hoboken, NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145693</link>
		<dc:creator>Bea, Hoboken, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145693</guid>
		<description>Come on ladies, admit it, most of you probably would have given the same answer. I too love pearls and diamonds, and saphires, and rubies, and......

It was a silly question, but it was the last one of the night and it sure as heck doesn&#039;t warrant so many angry responses. Lighten up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on ladies, admit it, most of you probably would have given the same answer. I too love pearls and diamonds, and saphires, and rubies, and......</p>
<p>It was a silly question, but it was the last one of the night and it sure as heck doesn't warrant so many angry responses. Lighten up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T, Omaha, NE</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145662</link>
		<dc:creator>John T, Omaha, NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145662</guid>
		<description>Come on! Why lob such a softball of a question? If it was for the sake of levity, save it. This was supposed to be a serious political debate. Mrs. Clinton herself has said that her gender is irrelevant in the race for the White House, but this type of question just seems to stereotypically focus in on that fact. Concerning her ability to make a decision and stick to, this is valid in a political debate. But couldn&#039;t CNN have chosen a more important issue to illustrate the point then this bit of frivolity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on! Why lob such a softball of a question? If it was for the sake of levity, save it. This was supposed to be a serious political debate. Mrs. Clinton herself has said that her gender is irrelevant in the race for the White House, but this type of question just seems to stereotypically focus in on that fact. Concerning her ability to make a decision and stick to, this is valid in a political debate. But couldn't CNN have chosen a more important issue to illustrate the point then this bit of frivolity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. L, Albany, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. L, Albany, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145652</guid>
		<description>&quot;Answer:
Pearls are modest and symbolize purity from within.
Diamonds attract too much attention, jagged and they cut.&quot;
Is THAT what that symbolizes? Well, I like both and I don&#039;t see what&#039;s wrong with anyone else feeling that way. If they wanted Hillary to stick with a decision, they should have asked her to make a RELEVANT decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Answer:<br />
Pearls are modest and symbolize purity from within.<br />
Diamonds attract too much attention, jagged and they cut."<br />
Is THAT what that symbolizes? Well, I like both and I don't see what's wrong with anyone else feeling that way. If they wanted Hillary to stick with a decision, they should have asked her to make a RELEVANT decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max, NYC NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145610</link>
		<dc:creator>Max, NYC NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad a few precious moments of airtime were set aside to discuss this essential matter. By not discussing less-interesting items -- such as corruption, the debacle in Iraq, national security, the loss of manufacturing jobs, the erosion of long-valued rights like due process and habeas corpus, our broken military, the abysmal treatment of our nations veterans, the looming recession, product safety -- we might have all been left without the sense of enlightenment we got from Senator Clinton&#039;s answer. Or at least, the enlightenment we &lt;i&gt;might have gotten&lt;/i&gt; - if only she&#039;d answered the question.
(/sarc)

This question, like the rest of last night&#039;s debate and today&#039;s coverage of it, was a complete waste of time. What utterly worthless fluff. I don&#039;t think this sort of nonsense helps our country in any way. CNN should be ashamed of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad a few precious moments of airtime were set aside to discuss this essential matter. By not discussing less-interesting items - such as corruption, the debacle in Iraq, national security, the loss of manufacturing jobs, the erosion of long-valued rights like due process and habeas corpus, our broken military, the abysmal treatment of our nations veterans, the looming recession, product safety - we might have all been left without the sense of enlightenment we got from Senator Clinton's answer. Or at least, the enlightenment we <i>might have gotten</i> &#8211; if only she'd answered the question.<br />
(/sarc)</p>
<p>This question, like the rest of last night's debate and today's coverage of it, was a complete waste of time. What utterly worthless fluff. I don't think this sort of nonsense helps our country in any way. CNN should be ashamed of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy, Cooper City Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145548</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy, Cooper City Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145548</guid>
		<description>I was undecided until last night. Joe Biden was the only straight talking, confident candidate on that stage that could kick some serious republican ass!Why has the media already made our minds up for us with Hillary. There is no way she will win general election, I don&#039;t care what the polls say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was undecided until last night. Joe Biden was the only straight talking, confident candidate on that stage that could kick some serious republican ass!Why has the media already made our minds up for us with Hillary. There is no way she will win general election, I don't care what the polls say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb, New York</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145545</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb, New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145545</guid>
		<description>Diamonds or pearls?  Puhleeze.  Let&#039;s leave the softball questions to Fox News, okay?  The next President of the United States shouldn&#039;t be elected based on their preference in sports teams, jewelry, beer, underwear, etc.  The next president shouldn&#039;t be elected because they look good, tell jokes, have charisma, are young enough, are old enough, etc.  The next president shouldn&#039;t be elected because of what gender they are, what religion they believe in, who they marry, what their nationality is or what party they belong to. 

The next president should be elected based on their record, based on their intelligence, based on their strengths, based on their ideas and based on their ability to lead.  Debate questions—whether they&#039;re at the start, middle or end of a debate—should probe those characteristics, not the petty nuances of every candidate.

Diamonds or pearls?  Save that stuff for the Barbara Walters special or Larry King Live, not a debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diamonds or pearls?  Puhleeze.  Let's leave the softball questions to Fox News, okay?  The next President of the United States shouldn't be elected based on their preference in sports teams, jewelry, beer, underwear, etc.  The next president shouldn't be elected because they look good, tell jokes, have charisma, are young enough, are old enough, etc.  The next president shouldn't be elected because of what gender they are, what religion they believe in, who they marry, what their nationality is or what party they belong to. </p>
<p>The next president should be elected based on their record, based on their intelligence, based on their strengths, based on their ideas and based on their ability to lead.  Debate questions—whether they're at the start, middle or end of a debate—should probe those characteristics, not the petty nuances of every candidate.</p>
<p>Diamonds or pearls?  Save that stuff for the Barbara Walters special or Larry King Live, not a debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake, Lexington Ky</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145511</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake, Lexington Ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145511</guid>
		<description>Well I can&#039;t say that I&#039;m surprised by the coverage of the debate. Corporate news rallies behind corporate Clinton. It is ridiculous that in all the post-debate coverage I did not see any reference to Hillary calling Obama&#039;s social security plan a tax on the middle class. His plan would affect the richest 6%. I would think the Democratic nominee should at least know what the middle class is. It looks like CNN will help secure Hillary Clinton the nomination despite her discrepancies (she hardly stands for Democratic values) and its no wonder why. Most American&#039;s take away only sound bites from the debate and &quot;expert analysis.&quot; Well I found it laughable that James Carville, who owes his career to Bill Clinton, was the &quot;left leaning&quot; analyst. Of course Carville and the other stooges gave the win to Clinton, despite Clinton being the most right wing candidate running for the nomination whose policies hardly reflect the values of Democratic voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I can't say that I'm surprised by the coverage of the debate. Corporate news rallies behind corporate Clinton. It is ridiculous that in all the post-debate coverage I did not see any reference to Hillary calling Obama's social security plan a tax on the middle class. His plan would affect the richest 6%. I would think the Democratic nominee should at least know what the middle class is. It looks like CNN will help secure Hillary Clinton the nomination despite her discrepancies (she hardly stands for Democratic values) and its no wonder why. Most American's take away only sound bites from the debate and "expert analysis." Well I found it laughable that James Carville, who owes his career to Bill Clinton, was the "left leaning" analyst. Of course Carville and the other stooges gave the win to Clinton, despite Clinton being the most right wing candidate running for the nomination whose policies hardly reflect the values of Democratic voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diane l. machesney park, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145449</link>
		<dc:creator>diane l. machesney park, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145449</guid>
		<description>What a shameful way for CNN to live up to it&#039;s nickname:  clinton news network.
The audience was clearly stacked with clinton&#039;s backers and their people.
and from the softball questions for Hillary to the planted audience questions to having clinton advisors doing the post debate, could you be any more obvious. 
Just like the Opinion Research, own by one of Clinton&#039;s biggest backers, doing CNN&#039;s polling, last night&#039;s debate was set for stopping the bleeding of the clinton campaign.
The winner of this debate was not only the highly intelligent and non programed Obama but, Tim Russert who was found to be the best moderator after the joke of last night, and MSNBC who will find alot more viewers who are  protesting CNN being in the pocket of the clintons.
The loser was Clinton for her inability to rise to occassion and stuff the audience with sympathizers to make sure no one could challenge her very much.
And the snake Carville and his croney Gergen who made no attempt for any kind of real analysis.
And CNN for proving once and for all that the once great network is just a stooge for the Clinton campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shameful way for CNN to live up to it's nickname:  clinton news network.<br />
The audience was clearly stacked with clinton's backers and their people.<br />
and from the softball questions for Hillary to the planted audience questions to having clinton advisors doing the post debate, could you be any more obvious.<br />
Just like the Opinion Research, own by one of Clinton's biggest backers, doing CNN's polling, last night's debate was set for stopping the bleeding of the clinton campaign.<br />
The winner of this debate was not only the highly intelligent and non programed Obama but, Tim Russert who was found to be the best moderator after the joke of last night, and MSNBC who will find alot more viewers who are  protesting CNN being in the pocket of the clintons.<br />
The loser was Clinton for her inability to rise to occassion and stuff the audience with sympathizers to make sure no one could challenge her very much.<br />
And the snake Carville and his croney Gergen who made no attempt for any kind of real analysis.<br />
And CNN for proving once and for all that the once great network is just a stooge for the Clinton campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, Phoenix AZ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145427</link>
		<dc:creator>James, Phoenix AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145427</guid>
		<description>THIS QUESTION WAS PERFECT!

It was a fitting end to a horribly moderated and seemingly &quot;stacked&quot; crowd.  When John Edwards or Barack attempted to articulate the differences between themselves and Hillary - people booed???

Good lord... they were telling the TRUTH - using FACTS.  

And this last girl... what a ridiculous question.  One must genuinely wonder if CNN and/or Hillary planted that young college student.

Oh wait... Hillary would NEVER do that, right??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS QUESTION WAS PERFECT!</p>
<p>It was a fitting end to a horribly moderated and seemingly "stacked" crowd.  When John Edwards or Barack attempted to articulate the differences between themselves and Hillary &#8211; people booed???</p>
<p>Good lord... they were telling the TRUTH &#8211; using FACTS.  </p>
<p>And this last girl... what a ridiculous question.  One must genuinely wonder if CNN and/or Hillary planted that young college student.</p>
<p>Oh wait... Hillary would NEVER do that, right??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me, Omaha NE</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145426</link>
		<dc:creator>Me, Omaha NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145426</guid>
		<description>The problem was that she didnt have time to run a poll on gemstones during the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem was that she didnt have time to run a poll on gemstones during the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J - Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145336</link>
		<dc:creator>J - Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145336</guid>
		<description>Newsweek gave Clinton favorable results. &quot;Fireproofed--and Firing Away&quot; Great job CLINTON. 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newsweek gave Clinton favorable results. "Fireproofed&#8211;and Firing Away" Great job CLINTON. 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt, Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145331</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt, Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145331</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad that in America we have no choice in our media outlets. We have CNN that panders to the loony left and is bought and paid for by corrupt politicians and mega corporations, and Fox News that is controlled by fear mongering racist homophobes. 

Where is there an impartial news network? And why should something as ridiculous and superficial as this be newsworthy, let alone be asked during such an important debate? This type of question is more in tune for something like a beauty pageant or a high school forum, not a debate between the candidates up for election for President of the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm so glad that in America we have no choice in our media outlets. We have CNN that panders to the loony left and is bought and paid for by corrupt politicians and mega corporations, and Fox News that is controlled by fear mongering racist homophobes. </p>
<p>Where is there an impartial news network? And why should something as ridiculous and superficial as this be newsworthy, let alone be asked during such an important debate? This type of question is more in tune for something like a beauty pageant or a high school forum, not a debate between the candidates up for election for President of the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary, Beaver, PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145328</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary, Beaver, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145328</guid>
		<description>I do not watch political debates, and I certainly wouldn&#039;t watch one sponsored by CNN any more than I would watch one sponsored by Fox. CNN is clearly the Clinton News Network, just as Fox is the shill of neo-conservatism. 

Shame on you, shame on Fox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not watch political debates, and I certainly wouldn't watch one sponsored by CNN any more than I would watch one sponsored by Fox. CNN is clearly the Clinton News Network, just as Fox is the shill of neo-conservatism. </p>
<p>Shame on you, shame on Fox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex Mex, NYC, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145309</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex Mex, NYC, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145309</guid>
		<description>Blitzer is clearly pro-Clinton and anti-Obama. Both his tone and demeanor when questioning Obama is uncalled for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blitzer is clearly pro-Clinton and anti-Obama. Both his tone and demeanor when questioning Obama is uncalled for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex Mex, NYC, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145307</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex Mex, NYC, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145307</guid>
		<description>Blitzer is clearly pro-Clinton and anti-Obama. Both his tone and demeanor when questioning Obama is uncalled for. I though better of CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blitzer is clearly pro-Clinton and anti-Obama. Both his tone and demeanor when questioning Obama is uncalled for. I though better of CNN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew, Baltimore, MD</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145287</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew, Baltimore, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145287</guid>
		<description>Since when does the media get to decide who wins these debates?  The minute it was over, the post debate coverage did nothing more than talk about how Hillary fought back following her slip up in Philly.  CNN even had a former adviser to President Clinton participate in the post-debate commentary!  What ever happened to letting the voters decide for themselves??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when does the media get to decide who wins these debates?  The minute it was over, the post debate coverage did nothing more than talk about how Hillary fought back following her slip up in Philly.  CNN even had a former adviser to President Clinton participate in the post-debate commentary!  What ever happened to letting the voters decide for themselves??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat huntington ny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145279</link>
		<dc:creator>pat huntington ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145279</guid>
		<description>Oh my lord! It&#039;s not even 10am yet and this article has the most posts! That&#039;s pathetic! And everyone who&#039;s written a negative post needs to lighten up! It was a fluff question, having nothing to do with politics! And if you ask any woman with power and conviction and career ambition, they would answer the question the same way! Why settle for just diamonds or pearls when you can and want both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my lord! It's not even 10am yet and this article has the most posts! That's pathetic! And everyone who's written a negative post needs to lighten up! It was a fluff question, having nothing to do with politics! And if you ask any woman with power and conviction and career ambition, they would answer the question the same way! Why settle for just diamonds or pearls when you can and want both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightyTighty</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145275</link>
		<dc:creator>RightyTighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145275</guid>
		<description>Diamonds, pearls, a house, expensive gifts, WH furniture... Hillary is a high maintence gal and you better bring her something home or you&#039;ll surely get nothing. 

Is there any doubt this applies to the American people too??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diamonds, pearls, a house, expensive gifts, WH furniture... Hillary is a high maintence gal and you better bring her something home or you'll surely get nothing. </p>
<p>Is there any doubt this applies to the American people too??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tired of Corruption LV</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tired of Corruption LV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145257</guid>
		<description>&quot;A candidates best friend&quot;.  Obviously for Hillary Clinton, it&#039;s CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"A candidates best friend".  Obviously for Hillary Clinton, it's CNN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC at LV</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145254</link>
		<dc:creator>TC at LV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145254</guid>
		<description>Without props and plants in the audience, Hillary Clinton has proven she is not a leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without props and plants in the audience, Hillary Clinton has proven she is not a leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave, Evergreen CO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145215</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave, Evergreen CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145215</guid>
		<description>I used to think the whole ‘Clinton News Network’ joke was a figment of Hillary’s opponent’s imaginations but lately I’ve been seeing that it’s actually true.  CNN is to Hillary Clinton as Fox News is to Rudy Guliani.  

The debate format last night and CNN’s execution of it was pathetic.  The first 15 minutes were more like an episode of Jerry Springer with Wolf Blitzer playing the role of the host and egging on Obama and Edwards to attack her in front of a crowd that amounted to a Clinton rally.  That seemed to open the door for the crowd to start acting like they were at a WWF event.  Campbell Brown absolutely gushed as she asked Senator Clinton softball questions.  Blitzer was clearly more aggressive trying to pin down and trap all the other candidates.  And I would really like to see a breakdown of the number of questions asked each candidate and the amount of time they were each given.  Were I part of the Kucinich, Edwards, Dodd, Biden or Richardson campaigns I would be livid.

After the debate all the analysts came on to say how well she did.  What were they watching?  And then they post this story to the ticker?  Come on CNN.  

Nobody won this debate but CNN was clearly the looser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think the whole ‘Clinton News Network’ joke was a figment of Hillary’s opponent’s imaginations but lately I’ve been seeing that it’s actually true.  CNN is to Hillary Clinton as Fox News is to Rudy Guliani.  </p>
<p>The debate format last night and CNN’s execution of it was pathetic.  The first 15 minutes were more like an episode of Jerry Springer with Wolf Blitzer playing the role of the host and egging on Obama and Edwards to attack her in front of a crowd that amounted to a Clinton rally.  That seemed to open the door for the crowd to start acting like they were at a WWF event.  Campbell Brown absolutely gushed as she asked Senator Clinton softball questions.  Blitzer was clearly more aggressive trying to pin down and trap all the other candidates.  And I would really like to see a breakdown of the number of questions asked each candidate and the amount of time they were each given.  Were I part of the Kucinich, Edwards, Dodd, Biden or Richardson campaigns I would be livid.</p>
<p>After the debate all the analysts came on to say how well she did.  What were they watching?  And then they post this story to the ticker?  Come on CNN.  </p>
<p>Nobody won this debate but CNN was clearly the looser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145201</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145201</guid>
		<description>I think her straight answer.... she wants BOTH. Why not? if an average American is asked cheese burger or Fries, I am sure he/she would say BOTH.... I don&#039;t see that as non-decisive, rather Hillary is decisive, without a thought, she wants BOTH.... Good for you, girl!!!! Now go make the boys jealous....  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think her straight answer.... she wants BOTH. Why not? if an average American is asked cheese burger or Fries, I am sure he/she would say BOTH.... I don't see that as non-decisive, rather Hillary is decisive, without a thought, she wants BOTH.... Good for you, girl!!!! Now go make the boys jealous....  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: See the Reality</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145182</link>
		<dc:creator>See the Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145182</guid>
		<description>SHE WANTS BOTH. That&#039;s a safe answer. Then you get the diamond lovers as well as the pearl lovers on your side. Like that&#039;s a big deal, but you see they asked this question because they know there are a lot of women in this country who really only care about such issues; the Hollywood people and their groupies the people who look at the appearance of things. That&#039;s why she appeals to too many. So she&#039;ll have their vote, the illegal aliens vote (when the Democrats figure a way to get them voting rights), the abortion supporters vote, and the vote of the people who don&#039;t/won&#039;t get their own healthcare if they can have someone else pay for it. Come on America wake up to reality. Hillary will bring the country down further. Terrorists hate all the things the liberals love and Hillary is a true liberal know matter how hard she tries to conceal it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHE WANTS BOTH. That's a safe answer. Then you get the diamond lovers as well as the pearl lovers on your side. Like that's a big deal, but you see they asked this question because they know there are a lot of women in this country who really only care about such issues; the Hollywood people and their groupies the people who look at the appearance of things. That's why she appeals to too many. So she'll have their vote, the illegal aliens vote (when the Democrats figure a way to get them voting rights), the abortion supporters vote, and the vote of the people who don't/won't get their own healthcare if they can have someone else pay for it. Come on America wake up to reality. Hillary will bring the country down further. Terrorists hate all the things the liberals love and Hillary is a true liberal know matter how hard she tries to conceal it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megha, San Antonio, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145179</link>
		<dc:creator>Megha, San Antonio, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145179</guid>
		<description>So two weeks ago when I brought up the fact that Obama was accusing Hillary of not being able to answer the immigration question but he himself was not taking a stand, people thought it to be almost incredible. Now you see? Wolfe gave him three chances to respond and he still could not give a straight answer. That is the tragedy, the candidate who is accusing politicians playing dirty is doing it himself without even accepting it. So he is different because he says he&#039;s different? Seriously, i have not seen him follow anything that he said in his book or any of the principles that he is claiming to run his campaign on. The only thing worse than taking money from special interests is taking money from them and then denying it and accusing others for taking money. And that is Mr. Obama, Ladies and Gentlemen! He is no different just because he claims to be different, people wake up he&#039;s just like everyone, only more susceptible to the Republican attack, so if you want a democrat in the WH, Hillary is your best bet. Obama could probably do it in 8 years from now, but definitely not now. Republicans will butcher him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So two weeks ago when I brought up the fact that Obama was accusing Hillary of not being able to answer the immigration question but he himself was not taking a stand, people thought it to be almost incredible. Now you see? Wolfe gave him three chances to respond and he still could not give a straight answer. That is the tragedy, the candidate who is accusing politicians playing dirty is doing it himself without even accepting it. So he is different because he says he's different? Seriously, i have not seen him follow anything that he said in his book or any of the principles that he is claiming to run his campaign on. The only thing worse than taking money from special interests is taking money from them and then denying it and accusing others for taking money. And that is Mr. Obama, Ladies and Gentlemen! He is no different just because he claims to be different, people wake up he's just like everyone, only more susceptible to the Republican attack, so if you want a democrat in the WH, Hillary is your best bet. Obama could probably do it in 8 years from now, but definitely not now. Republicans will butcher him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron, New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron, New Jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145167</guid>
		<description>This was supposed to be an undecided voter asking a tough question to the field trying to determine who to vote.

THAT was her tough question?!

CNN shouldn&#039;t have let that question through...she&#039;s obviously not undecided and i HOPE she&#039;s not using that question to decide who to vote for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was supposed to be an undecided voter asking a tough question to the field trying to determine who to vote.</p>
<p>THAT was her tough question?!</p>
<p>CNN shouldn't have let that question through...she's obviously not undecided and i HOPE she's not using that question to decide who to vote for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryann - Orlando, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145156</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryann - Orlando, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145156</guid>
		<description>I thought the debate was good, and then you had to go and ruin it with the Diamond/Pearls question.  What a waste of time, especially since the candidates who are not the front runners (Dennis Kucinich) did not get nearly enough time to make their positions clear.  

Kudos to Joe Biden (another non-front runner that I would have liked to hear more from) for choosing &#039;diamonds&#039;, and making the question the joke it was.  

I guess you&#039;ll be asking the Republican men in the next debate if they prefer boxers or briefs?  And why was this question not asked of the Democratic men?

People have been posting that this is the &#039;Clinton News Network&#039; and I&#039;m starting to think they are right.

I used to respect CNN, but you lost me last night by allowing that audience question.  Shame on you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the debate was good, and then you had to go and ruin it with the Diamond/Pearls question.  What a waste of time, especially since the candidates who are not the front runners (Dennis Kucinich) did not get nearly enough time to make their positions clear.  </p>
<p>Kudos to Joe Biden (another non-front runner that I would have liked to hear more from) for choosing 'diamonds', and making the question the joke it was.  </p>
<p>I guess you'll be asking the Republican men in the next debate if they prefer boxers or briefs?  And why was this question not asked of the Democratic men?</p>
<p>People have been posting that this is the 'Clinton News Network' and I'm starting to think they are right.</p>
<p>I used to respect CNN, but you lost me last night by allowing that audience question.  Shame on you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela, alex, va</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145145</link>
		<dc:creator>angela, alex, va</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145145</guid>
		<description>omg people get a life!  it was supposed to be a silly question!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg people get a life!  it was supposed to be a silly question!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtina Chicago IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145137</link>
		<dc:creator>xtina Chicago IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145137</guid>
		<description>Looks to me like it was a planted question, however, Hillary managed to blow it by being unable to decide which one she likes best. I bet she&#039;ll make up her mind in two weeks once she runs a few polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks to me like it was a planted question, however, Hillary managed to blow it by being unable to decide which one she likes best. I bet she'll make up her mind in two weeks once she runs a few polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maru Angarita, Bethesda, Maryland</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145135</link>
		<dc:creator>Maru Angarita, Bethesda, Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145135</guid>
		<description>I usually do not watch political debates, but I watched this one to learn what was going on.  I am still fascinated by Senator Biden, but our next President of the United States will be Hillary Clinton.  She seems the most charismatic, experienced, and the person we want at The White House.  And, I just adored her honesty about admitting that she wants diamonds and pearls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually do not watch political debates, but I watched this one to learn what was going on.  I am still fascinated by Senator Biden, but our next President of the United States will be Hillary Clinton.  She seems the most charismatic, experienced, and the person we want at The White House.  And, I just adored her honesty about admitting that she wants diamonds and pearls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom - Dedham, Mass</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145133</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom - Dedham, Mass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145133</guid>
		<description>CNN pre-screens these questions and to have eveyone go home happy, throws Hillary a softball and she couldn&#039;t even answer it DIRECTLY. 

Maybe she didn&#039;t want to anger the diamond or the pearl lobby by choosing one. 

I think I will have &quot;waffles&quot; for breakfast.

I would have applauded her if she said &quot;I prefer everyone having the ability to buy  both diamonds and pearls&quot;.   

A college student can&#039;t come up with anything more relevent than this? 

Doesn&#039;t give you a warm fuzzy for our future does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN pre-screens these questions and to have eveyone go home happy, throws Hillary a softball and she couldn't even answer it DIRECTLY. </p>
<p>Maybe she didn't want to anger the diamond or the pearl lobby by choosing one. </p>
<p>I think I will have "waffles" for breakfast.</p>
<p>I would have applauded her if she said "I prefer everyone having the ability to buy  both diamonds and pearls".   </p>
<p>A college student can't come up with anything more relevent than this? </p>
<p>Doesn't give you a warm fuzzy for our future does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Griffin, Plymouth, Michigan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145119</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Griffin, Plymouth, Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145119</guid>
		<description>This debate was just appeared to be an attack on Hillary Clinton.  I was very disappointed that the first question set the stage for the tone of the debate.  Some of the questions posed to the candidates could have been best presented in another venue other than a debate.  This includes the first question.

In my opinion, it was not a debate at all, but it was not a total waste of my time.  I know now to avoid any press-sponsored debates.  I&#039;ll get my information about the candidates via other sources and make decision for whom to vote.  I think the press is more interested in entertaining than informing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This debate was just appeared to be an attack on Hillary Clinton.  I was very disappointed that the first question set the stage for the tone of the debate.  Some of the questions posed to the candidates could have been best presented in another venue other than a debate.  This includes the first question.</p>
<p>In my opinion, it was not a debate at all, but it was not a total waste of my time.  I know now to avoid any press-sponsored debates.  I'll get my information about the candidates via other sources and make decision for whom to vote.  I think the press is more interested in entertaining than informing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm, Villas, NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/16/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145114</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm, Villas, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/15/a-candidates-best-friend/#comment-145114</guid>
		<description>Boo on Blitzer for not allowing equal time to the candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo on Blitzer for not allowing equal time to the candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
