CNN

Anyone interested in what Huckabee is really like face to face should try this funny (but it actually happened) column:
http://goupstate.us/index.php/lanefiller/2007/11/02/title_14

I don't see any particular bias on the part of CNN towards Paul. They of all the networks have given him the most coverage.
As a Paul supporter I am excited about his rise in many media outlets. Yes, he is still attacked heavily. Yes, there will always be a level of favortism and it requires that much more work to get a candidate elected.
I know that Paul's message rings to true for many people who very frustrated with the way things are set up and many will also be frustrated with the kind of reporting or lack of it. But, instead of attacking people in the press as some do to Paul, we need to focus on the job at hand and stick to the issues. We definitly need
someone now more that ever who can make changes and I mean big changes.
We don't have the time to mess around with our pet peeves with the press.

However, you have to be smart. Paul himself doesn't waste his time answering attacks. He pushes his message. We should all take a lesson from that playbook. We need to pour on the coals with his signage, talking to friends and family etc. These are the components of his success so far. They certainly and have never included alienating reporters or the media. It is a common theme with some of Paul's supporters but has never led to more coverage, NEVER. It has usually led to more intense criticism of Paul through those statements.

@Nick from Louisville,

Welcome to the bias of the Clinton News Network, CNN are just like Fox News. Hardly balanced and clearly have an agenda.

They'll do anything to prevent you from knowing about a candidate who will make you really think for once, instead of regurgitating the same line we've heard every 4 years.

To whoever is moderating this, I hope you're really happy with how much your superiors censor Ron Paul, you must sleep well at night. The joke will be on you when Ron Paul wins New Hampshire and then the nomination.

Why is it that Ron Paul may have more signs posted at the private expense of his supporters and it is not the lead of the story? Other campaigns hand out signs for free.