<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still undecided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike  Westport, CT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-165852</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike  Westport, CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-165852</guid>
		<description>Between Giuliani and his current wife Judith Nathan there are at least six marriages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between Giuliani and his current wife Judith Nathan there are at least six marriages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SANDY   WHITE HOUSE, TN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-164485</link>
		<dc:creator>SANDY   WHITE HOUSE, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-164485</guid>
		<description>I WAS DISAPPOINTED IN THE WEDNESDAY DEBATE, A FEW BIG MOUTHS GOT ALL THE AIR TIME AND EVEN WHEN THEIR TIME WAS UP THEY REFUSED TO SHUT UP, WHILE A COUPLE, I MEAN TOM TANCRENDO AND DUNCAN HUNTER, MEN THAT I RESPECT AND WANTED TO HEAR FROM, BARELY GOT A CHANCE TO OPEN THEIR MOUTHS AND THEY WERE TOO POLITE TO BUTT IN LIKE THE BIG MOUTHS, MITT, RUDY, MCCAIN. THEY SAY THE SAME THINGS, IF I HAVE TO HEAR ONE MORE TIME ABOUT MCCAINS POW STATUS OR RUDY TALK ABOUT 9/11 OR MITT  TALK ABOUT MASS I WILL THROW UP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WAS DISAPPOINTED IN THE WEDNESDAY DEBATE, A FEW BIG MOUTHS GOT ALL THE AIR TIME AND EVEN WHEN THEIR TIME WAS UP THEY REFUSED TO SHUT UP, WHILE A COUPLE, I MEAN TOM TANCRENDO AND DUNCAN HUNTER, MEN THAT I RESPECT AND WANTED TO HEAR FROM, BARELY GOT A CHANCE TO OPEN THEIR MOUTHS AND THEY WERE TOO POLITE TO BUTT IN LIKE THE BIG MOUTHS, MITT, RUDY, MCCAIN. THEY SAY THE SAME THINGS, IF I HAVE TO HEAR ONE MORE TIME ABOUT MCCAINS POW STATUS OR RUDY TALK ABOUT 9/11 OR MITT  TALK ABOUT MASS I WILL THROW UP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Ames IA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Ames IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163753</guid>
		<description>Thanks for introducing a tool to show what Democrate plants think about Republican candidates.  In case CNN hasn&#039;t figured it out the PRIMARY process is for republicans to pick their candidate - not for Dems to pick it for them.  CNN is now off at my house.  Most trusted network - what a joke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for introducing a tool to show what Democrate plants think about Republican candidates.  In case CNN hasn't figured it out the PRIMARY process is for republicans to pick their candidate &#8211; not for Dems to pick it for them.  CNN is now off at my house.  Most trusted network &#8211; what a joke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob in Greer SC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163666</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob in Greer SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163666</guid>
		<description>I notice that these comments are moderated by CNN.  Wish you did a better job of making the debates actually meaningful and not cartoonish.  Seems the &quot;moderators&quot; for the Republicans are not the same ones used for the Democrats.
Your political leanings are so obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that these comments are moderated by CNN.  Wish you did a better job of making the debates actually meaningful and not cartoonish.  Seems the "moderators" for the Republicans are not the same ones used for the Democrats.<br />
Your political leanings are so obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba, Swainsboro GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163479</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba, Swainsboro GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163479</guid>
		<description>I intend to vote for whoever is endorsed by the most wrestlers, clowns, and has-been actors, so Huckleberry&#039;s looking very presidential now. But I&#039;m still waiting to find out how the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles are leaning before I make my final decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I intend to vote for whoever is endorsed by the most wrestlers, clowns, and has-been actors, so Huckleberry's looking very presidential now. But I'm still waiting to find out how the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles are leaning before I make my final decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice Newman    Center Harbor NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163440</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice Newman    Center Harbor NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163440</guid>
		<description>From the NY Times:
In almost every appearance as he campaigns for the Republican presidential nomination, Rudolph W. Giuliani cites a fusillade of statistics and facts to make his arguments about his successes in running New York City and the merits of his views.

Most of his statements are incomplete, exaggerated or just plain wrong. And while, to be sure, all candidates use misleading statistics from time to time, Mr. Giuliani has made statistics a central part of his candidacy as he campaigns on his record.&quot;

 Just FYI:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the NY Times:<br />
In almost every appearance as he campaigns for the Republican presidential nomination, Rudolph W. Giuliani cites a fusillade of statistics and facts to make his arguments about his successes in running New York City and the merits of his views.</p>
<p>Most of his statements are incomplete, exaggerated or just plain wrong. And while, to be sure, all candidates use misleading statistics from time to time, Mr. Giuliani has made statistics a central part of his candidacy as he campaigns on his record."</p>
<p> Just FYI:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163437</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163437</guid>
		<description>CNN group of Undecided Republicans probably had Paul Begala , Al Sharpton and some other Dems .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN group of Undecided Republicans probably had Paul Begala , Al Sharpton and some other Dems .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark wilkes barre pa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163410</link>
		<dc:creator>mark wilkes barre pa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163410</guid>
		<description>What a gimmick,, People meters !! I saw this on another channel and thought it was silly too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a gimmick,, People meters !! I saw this on another channel and thought it was silly too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Cook, Moore OK</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163281</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Cook, Moore OK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163281</guid>
		<description>CNN and all the other controlled media are so pathetically sad.  Everyone in the real world is talking about Ron Paul, while the propaganders totally ignore him or run fluff stories about cross-dressing Julie or flip-fopping Hillary.  Good God, if people can&#039;t see how the the next two presidential, puppet contenders have already been chosen, I&#039;ll lend them a brain cell so they can figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN and all the other controlled media are so pathetically sad.  Everyone in the real world is talking about Ron Paul, while the propaganders totally ignore him or run fluff stories about cross-dressing Julie or flip-fopping Hillary.  Good God, if people can't see how the the next two presidential, puppet contenders have already been chosen, I'll lend them a brain cell so they can figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nameless,NH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163278</link>
		<dc:creator>nameless,NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163278</guid>
		<description>Nobody is wasting their time deciding on this guy anyway.  He still doesn&#039;t tell me what he did in New york apart from 9/11! He has alot of baggage with many wives thing too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody is wasting their time deciding on this guy anyway.  He still doesn't tell me what he did in New york apart from 9/11! He has alot of baggage with many wives thing too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bankston, San Antonio, Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163255</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bankston, San Antonio, Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163255</guid>
		<description>The technology used to create this &quot;graph&quot; is very inaccurate.  &quot;Peoplemeters&quot; are really Fleetwood&#039;s Reply Worldwide keypads, a great product, but this is not it&#039;s intended use. The way these devices &quot;poll&quot; has a delay built into the system, so that the responses are not timed to the video accurately.   Also, the system is flawed in the way it averages the results.  This system was not built to create the &quot;moment by moment&quot; graph that CNN is attempting to create.  Can it do it?  To a degree.  Is it accurate?  Not a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The technology used to create this "graph" is very inaccurate.  "Peoplemeters" are really Fleetwood's Reply Worldwide keypads, a great product, but this is not it's intended use. The way these devices "poll" has a delay built into the system, so that the responses are not timed to the video accurately.   Also, the system is flawed in the way it averages the results.  This system was not built to create the "moment by moment" graph that CNN is attempting to create.  Can it do it?  To a degree.  Is it accurate?  Not a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtina chicago, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163153</link>
		<dc:creator>xtina chicago, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163153</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t CNN have another Youtube debate for Democrats starring conservative &quot;undecided&quot; voters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn't CNN have another Youtube debate for Democrats starring conservative "undecided" voters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j .west - winona, mn.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163128</link>
		<dc:creator>j .west - winona, mn.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/29/still-undecided/#comment-163128</guid>
		<description>This is a joke! Where did CNN find these people ?! The first woman appearing with Erica Hill said she was &quot;undecided&quot;, but when questioned which candidate she preferred, she replied that SHE DIDN&#039;T KNOW WHO WAS RUNNING ! Then she said she really was leaning towards John Edwards ! Why was there no one on July 23 during the Democratic debate appearing on camera saying they favored Mitt Romney? Is CNN censoring people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a joke! Where did CNN find these people ?! The first woman appearing with Erica Hill said she was "undecided", but when questioned which candidate she preferred, she replied that SHE DIDN'T KNOW WHO WAS RUNNING ! Then she said she really was leaning towards John Edwards ! Why was there no one on July 23 during the Democratic debate appearing on camera saying they favored Mitt Romney? Is CNN censoring people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
