<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giuliani advocates military build-up to counter Putin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher, Madison, WI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166912</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher, Madison, WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166912</guid>
		<description>Someone needs to get the military back up to it&#039;s former strength after Clinton took it apart.
Posted By KEITH JAMES LOUTTIT : November 30, 2007 10:47 pm

Tell me Keith, in all caps, which president just finished shutting down all military bases...holy crap it was your beloved warmongering draft dodger Bush!  BTW Giuliani also dodged the draft in 1968 with a letter from a judge stating that he was a law clerk.
Newsflash...1968 it was not on the list of acceptable reason not to draw a draft number.  Yet another dodger claiming to know what is best militarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to get the military back up to it's former strength after Clinton took it apart.<br />
Posted By KEITH JAMES LOUTTIT : November 30, 2007 10:47 pm</p>
<p>Tell me Keith, in all caps, which president just finished shutting down all military bases...holy crap it was your beloved warmongering draft dodger Bush!  BTW Giuliani also dodged the draft in 1968 with a letter from a judge stating that he was a law clerk.<br />
Newsflash...1968 it was not on the list of acceptable reason not to draw a draft number.  Yet another dodger claiming to know what is best militarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166703</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166703</guid>
		<description>Since I&#039;m a history teacher as well, I&#039;ll point out this ignorant statement also.
&quot;He justified his claim, explaining that a robust military was the primary reason behind the United States&#039; success in the Cold War. Giuliani said U.S. and European demilitarization after the two World Wars was a mistake that contributed to the growth of Nazism and communism, and he also criticized the post-Cold War peace dividend as &quot;way too big.&quot;&quot;

First of all, mutual deterrance was the only reason the US never came to real blows with Russia in the cold war because everyone&#039;s finger was on the button, knowing that a push of the button would bring on nuclear war, and the end of the world.  So spread that war mongering, expand the military garbage with your immigration cronies.. oh yea, 9/11.  

SEcond.
&quot;Giuliani said U.S. and European demilitarization after the two World Wars was a mistake that contributed to the growth of Nazism and communism&quot;

This statement is laughable; he really needs a history lesson.  How can we progress as a nation with uneducated morons repeating our mistakes from the past.  also, i would like to hear how he could explain that demilitarization of the army AFTER THE DEFEAT OF NAZISM contributed to the GROWTH of NAZISM?!  We just defeated the darn thing and all of a sudden we are contributing to it!?  No RUDY, your militaristic, absolutism is what is making us weak.  Communism grew because we allowed it to fester.  I&#039;m fairily certain we haven&#039;t seen nazis on a wide scale since we defeated the nazis though.  increasing the military without even thinking of democracy is only wracheting up the pressure and tension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I'm a history teacher as well, I'll point out this ignorant statement also.<br />
"He justified his claim, explaining that a robust military was the primary reason behind the United States' success in the Cold War. Giuliani said U.S. and European demilitarization after the two World Wars was a mistake that contributed to the growth of Nazism and communism, and he also criticized the post-Cold War peace dividend as "way too big.""</p>
<p>First of all, mutual deterrance was the only reason the US never came to real blows with Russia in the cold war because everyone's finger was on the button, knowing that a push of the button would bring on nuclear war, and the end of the world.  So spread that war mongering, expand the military garbage with your immigration cronies.. oh yea, 9/11.  </p>
<p>SEcond.<br />
"Giuliani said U.S. and European demilitarization after the two World Wars was a mistake that contributed to the growth of Nazism and communism"</p>
<p>This statement is laughable; he really needs a history lesson.  How can we progress as a nation with uneducated morons repeating our mistakes from the past.  also, i would like to hear how he could explain that demilitarization of the army AFTER THE DEFEAT OF NAZISM contributed to the GROWTH of NAZISM?!  We just defeated the darn thing and all of a sudden we are contributing to it!?  No RUDY, your militaristic, absolutism is what is making us weak.  Communism grew because we allowed it to fester.  I'm fairily certain we haven't seen nazis on a wide scale since we defeated the nazis though.  increasing the military without even thinking of democracy is only wracheting up the pressure and tension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom, Raleigh, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166624</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom, Raleigh, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166624</guid>
		<description>oh great, Rudy sucked into the sabre rattling of the military-industrial complex. so now all you Rudy backers can see who pulls the strings on this puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh great, Rudy sucked into the sabre rattling of the military-industrial complex. so now all you Rudy backers can see who pulls the strings on this puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon, Tampa, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166484</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon, Tampa, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-166484</guid>
		<description>Moments like these make me wonder why none of the good candidates get chosen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moments like these make me wonder why none of the good candidates get chosen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B, New York/Moscow</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165887</link>
		<dc:creator>B, New York/Moscow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165887</guid>
		<description>I am a U.S. citizen who has spent alot of time in Moscow over the past several years and I am frequently appalled by the resounding depth of my country&#039;s ignorance of both political and social life here in Russia. Even though Russia is not what the West wants it to be, namely a poor stepchild to us, the wannabe &#039;rulers of the world&#039;, the only thing that Russia really threatens as far as the U.S. is concerned is our absolute power. Considering the catastrophes wrought by the current administration, I see it as a positive when a force like Russia, like them or not, has the power and will to peaceably keep the dark (expansionist, military industrial complex) side of the American system in check. It pains me to say it, but in this sense, Putin, anti-democrat that he is, is doing more positive things for America than Bush has ever done.

Maybe you don&#039;t like Russia&#039;s government (though really, how is it that we&#039;re so concerned with Russian INTERNAL politics, when ours are so messed up, e.g. highly suspicious presidential elections; lobbyist influence through campaign contributions - really, do you suggest that American corruption is somehow &#039;better&#039; than Russian corruption?). But Russia&#039;s attitude to EXTERNAL affairs seems quite sensible to me. Imagine if Russia infiltrated politics in Mexico and Canada and turned those countries against the U.S. You can bet the U.S. might take it a bit personally and make a very strong response.

The U.S. needs to get its own house in order before it can serve as any kind of model for the rest of the world. We need to return to our core American values, winning over people with our ideas and our character, not with brute force and threat. We are in a quagmire in Iraq, not because our military is too small, but because our civilian leadership is too ignorant. We need new ideas, someone like Obama or Edwards, or if you&#039;re a Republican someone like Huckabee or maybe we can get Bloomberg to run our country like a business, without the scary &#039;end of times&#039; religious attitude, or maybe Gore will come save us all. At the very least we need a president who sincerely wants to create as much peace as possible in this world, not someone who is hell-bent on starting the next world war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a U.S. citizen who has spent alot of time in Moscow over the past several years and I am frequently appalled by the resounding depth of my country's ignorance of both political and social life here in Russia. Even though Russia is not what the West wants it to be, namely a poor stepchild to us, the wannabe 'rulers of the world', the only thing that Russia really threatens as far as the U.S. is concerned is our absolute power. Considering the catastrophes wrought by the current administration, I see it as a positive when a force like Russia, like them or not, has the power and will to peaceably keep the dark (expansionist, military industrial complex) side of the American system in check. It pains me to say it, but in this sense, Putin, anti-democrat that he is, is doing more positive things for America than Bush has ever done.</p>
<p>Maybe you don't like Russia's government (though really, how is it that we're so concerned with Russian INTERNAL politics, when ours are so messed up, e.g. highly suspicious presidential elections; lobbyist influence through campaign contributions &#8211; really, do you suggest that American corruption is somehow 'better' than Russian corruption?). But Russia's attitude to EXTERNAL affairs seems quite sensible to me. Imagine if Russia infiltrated politics in Mexico and Canada and turned those countries against the U.S. You can bet the U.S. might take it a bit personally and make a very strong response.</p>
<p>The U.S. needs to get its own house in order before it can serve as any kind of model for the rest of the world. We need to return to our core American values, winning over people with our ideas and our character, not with brute force and threat. We are in a quagmire in Iraq, not because our military is too small, but because our civilian leadership is too ignorant. We need new ideas, someone like Obama or Edwards, or if you're a Republican someone like Huckabee or maybe we can get Bloomberg to run our country like a business, without the scary 'end of times' religious attitude, or maybe Gore will come save us all. At the very least we need a president who sincerely wants to create as much peace as possible in this world, not someone who is hell-bent on starting the next world war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudy?  nah!   ny ny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165705</link>
		<dc:creator>rudy?  nah!   ny ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165705</guid>
		<description>To quote Abe Lincoln:
&quot;Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary... and you allow him to make war at pleasure.  

Need I say more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote Abe Lincoln:<br />
"Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary... and you allow him to make war at pleasure.  </p>
<p>Need I say more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David MTL Ca</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165671</link>
		<dc:creator>David MTL Ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165671</guid>
		<description>HE wants to borrow another  2 trillion from China to  invade them

HEy! jewliani your  the biggest nut case of all the candidates with Mccain bozo  as your running mate America will be  executed from within.

While kucinich and Ron Paul the only truely founding  fathers material in the race get laughed at by Americans
Little do the Americans  know that they are going to be told who is the next president the e machines will  let Americans know who will be president and it wont be anything that  is founding father material  I assure you it  will be evil and  ready for another round of dismemberment of America.
Piece by piece  they will rip America assunder  and all because Americans are too dumb and too lard arse to  riot like their forefathers
America  the cesspool of freedom
E machines and judeges saying which one is president  like  in 2000 how is that democracy
it would be  laughable if it were not so tragic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HE wants to borrow another  2 trillion from China to  invade them</p>
<p>HEy! jewliani your  the biggest nut case of all the candidates with Mccain bozo  as your running mate America will be  executed from within.</p>
<p>While kucinich and Ron Paul the only truely founding  fathers material in the race get laughed at by Americans<br />
Little do the Americans  know that they are going to be told who is the next president the e machines will  let Americans know who will be president and it wont be anything that  is founding father material  I assure you it  will be evil and  ready for another round of dismemberment of America.<br />
Piece by piece  they will rip America assunder  and all because Americans are too dumb and too lard arse to  riot like their forefathers<br />
America  the cesspool of freedom<br />
E machines and judeges saying which one is president  like  in 2000 how is that democracy<br />
it would be  laughable if it were not so tragic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David MTL Ca</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165651</link>
		<dc:creator>David MTL Ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165651</guid>
		<description>The man in drag is as dumb as it gets
no don&#039;t talk to the russians lets have  another arms race what an imbecile</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The man in drag is as dumb as it gets<br />
no don't talk to the russians lets have  another arms race what an imbecile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DON, new york, ny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165633</link>
		<dc:creator>DON, new york, ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165633</guid>
		<description>The tail wags the dog.

Giuliani uses this military build-up excuse to divert his personal extra-maritial expense issue hitting the news.  

Giuliani builds his campaign on his new york mayor record.  On 9/10, he was an unde-rachiever as a mayor, and be became a hero on 9/11. To many new yorkers, giuliani is no hero.  

To people unknown to him, Giuliani may look good from a distance.  But to people knowing him well, Giuliani disappoints them as husband, father, mayor or leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tail wags the dog.</p>
<p>Giuliani uses this military build-up excuse to divert his personal extra-maritial expense issue hitting the news.  </p>
<p>Giuliani builds his campaign on his new york mayor record.  On 9/10, he was an unde-rachiever as a mayor, and be became a hero on 9/11. To many new yorkers, giuliani is no hero.  </p>
<p>To people unknown to him, Giuliani may look good from a distance.  But to people knowing him well, Giuliani disappoints them as husband, father, mayor or leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surrealist, Fort Myers, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165587</link>
		<dc:creator>Surrealist, Fort Myers, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165587</guid>
		<description>Walt in TX Said: &quot;Since Clinton reduced the Federal government by 15 percent which reduced the military by 40 percent, while no one else was affected, this is a long time coming! Way to go, Rudy!!!!&quot;

I love it when Republicans spout their brainwashed statistics. Frankly, although Clinton did reduce some D.O.D. spending--quality of life issues spending went up.  The &quot;Advanced Tactical Fighter&quot; was finally funded...and truly most of the reductions in &quot;military facilities (not personnel) was due to Graham/Rudman base closures--which we all know was created, sponsored, and passed by a Repuclican congress.  In reality troop strenght remained static in all branches of the services--and the reductions were gained from improved efficiency in D.O.D. budgeting--thanks to Al Gore.  Get the facts right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt in TX Said: "Since Clinton reduced the Federal government by 15 percent which reduced the military by 40 percent, while no one else was affected, this is a long time coming! Way to go, Rudy!!!!"</p>
<p>I love it when Republicans spout their brainwashed statistics. Frankly, although Clinton did reduce some D.O.D. spending&#8211;quality of life issues spending went up.  The "Advanced Tactical Fighter" was finally funded...and truly most of the reductions in "military facilities (not personnel) was due to Graham/Rudman base closures&#8211;which we all know was created, sponsored, and passed by a Repuclican congress.  In reality troop strenght remained static in all branches of the services&#8211;and the reductions were gained from improved efficiency in D.O.D. budgeting&#8211;thanks to Al Gore.  Get the facts right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack - San Diego, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165528</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack - San Diego, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165528</guid>
		<description>What is peace? Really, everybody talks about defining the mission in Iraq, somebody please define &quot;peace&quot; to me. The absence of war? Kosovo, Bosnia, Haiti, Panama, Iran, Sierra Leonne, Rwanda, Mogadishu...all of this happened while we were at &quot;peace&quot;, so I&#039;m going to guess that that&#039;s not their definition. Low gas prices? Oh, and more US personel died in 1980 (when we were at &quot;peace&quot;) than have died in any year since Afghanistan or Iraq started. And except for three years, the 90s tied the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In each year we lost about 1,500 military personnel. The three years we didn&#039;t it was 800, 900, and 1,250. 

Also, about Russia enjoying watching and everything. So far, between the US and Russia, only one country&#039;s economy hasn&#039;t collapsed. That&#039;s right. Tuck your tail and go on back to the Kremlin like you did in 1990. 

In the end, and not really trying to sound macho, but just letting you know, let Putin have his &quot;justification&quot; and let him hit us. He&#039;ll learn the same lesson we taught the Germans, the Japanese, the Chinese, the Koreans, the Vietnamese, and what the insurgents are learning.

That lesson is, when you fight me and my Marines, a lot of you die.

---&quot;Iraq is loss. We should concentrate elsewhere, rebuild our forces, and prepare for the coming campagins&quot;
  - Osama bin Laden, 2005</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is peace? Really, everybody talks about defining the mission in Iraq, somebody please define "peace" to me. The absence of war? Kosovo, Bosnia, Haiti, Panama, Iran, Sierra Leonne, Rwanda, Mogadishu...all of this happened while we were at "peace", so I'm going to guess that that's not their definition. Low gas prices? Oh, and more US personel died in 1980 (when we were at "peace") than have died in any year since Afghanistan or Iraq started. And except for three years, the 90s tied the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In each year we lost about 1,500 military personnel. The three years we didn't it was 800, 900, and 1,250. </p>
<p>Also, about Russia enjoying watching and everything. So far, between the US and Russia, only one country's economy hasn't collapsed. That's right. Tuck your tail and go on back to the Kremlin like you did in 1990. </p>
<p>In the end, and not really trying to sound macho, but just letting you know, let Putin have his "justification" and let him hit us. He'll learn the same lesson we taught the Germans, the Japanese, the Chinese, the Koreans, the Vietnamese, and what the insurgents are learning.</p>
<p>That lesson is, when you fight me and my Marines, a lot of you die.</p>
<p>-"Iraq is loss. We should concentrate elsewhere, rebuild our forces, and prepare for the coming campagins"<br />
  &#8211; Osama bin Laden, 2005</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus - Paris, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165522</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus - Paris, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165522</guid>
		<description>1) He didn&#039;t say &quot;arms build-up&quot;. He said a build-up in military size. Iraq has already shown that we DO NOT have the military size to fight an engagement.

2) The Democratic Congress has ALREADY voted to expand the authorized size of the army and Marine Corps. The Marine Corps is authorized its highest strength since WWII. The army is expanding by over 60,000 by 2011. 

3) In the case that Russia does become belligerant, there will be no time to draft, train, equip, and assign forces. In both world wars it took us over a year to raise a military large enough to fight. But, back then we weren&#039;t Target #1, and we had two oceans surrounding us. Today, those oceans are A LOT smaller.

4) Whether Republican or Democrat, there&#039;s already going to be a lot of military spending to rebuild the forces from Iraq, and get enough recruits for the rotation. 

5) We have the SMALLEST (except for Britain) conventional, developed military force in the world. We have BARELY 1 million army and Marines. Divide by 7 and that&#039;s how many combat soldiers and Marines we have. It would take AT LEAST 5 million just to secure California.

6) Russia declared itself an adversary in 2004 and again in 2006. We must take them seriously. China has been closing ports of call to US warships (these are regular port calls too). 

7) He said nothing about &quot;fighting&quot; them. It&#039;s the same strategy Lincoln empolyed with the rebels. He is after all considered a &quot;great&quot; president. He raised 75,000 soldiers before he even took office as a reason for the South to negotiate instead of fight.

8) There is already more than a growing concern that Putin&#039;s party will use a landslide victory to change the constitution (if they receive 66% or more of the vote they will be able to do this) so that Putin could again run for president. Will they? Don&#039;t know. Would he? Don&#039;t know. But it&#039;s enough to warrant a close eye.

9) Most people are simpletons and view Iraq as purely a war for oil. That is how people are. Very few ever see what was actually happening until after it happened. It is stupid to think that in the middle of a war you think you know the causes, what&#039;s going on, and what&#039;s going to happen.

10) It doesn&#039;t matter who you vote for, this will happen. Your Democratic congress has already authorized it, Hillary has stopped her &quot;everyone out by 2009&quot; speeches, massive signing bonuses have been attatched to combat arms (infantry, cavalry, artilerry, armored). It doesn&#039;t take a genius to realize the the Pentagon (whom Bush and Rumsfeld ignored when they went to Iraq) see something and are trying to prepare (and this time they are listening, but the American people are not.)

11) It is always better to have the military and not need it, than to need it and not have it.

12) We always like to look to the Greek philosophers and talk about how smart they were. Let&#039;s look at what they told us. 

&quot;Provide in peace what is needed in war.&quot;

&quot;Arms keep peace.&quot;

&quot;Nobody enters into war uninformed, and those that think something can be gained from it will not be deterred by either caution or fear&quot;

&quot;Never trust an alliance with the powerful.&quot;

&quot;The strong did what they could, and the weak suffered what they must.&quot;

&quot;The few cannot contend with the many; the weak cannot contend with the strong.&quot;

13) A war has never started because a country was too strong. And strong or not, if any country thinks they will gain something by fighting us, there is no way to stop it.

14) If it does happen, we will probably only have time to react. Not time to build an army, train the army, equip the army, pay the army, and then react.

15) And finally, winning wars (and preventing them) is entirely about initiative. Gain the initiative, win the battle/war. Lose the initiative, lose the battle/war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) He didn't say "arms build-up". He said a build-up in military size. Iraq has already shown that we DO NOT have the military size to fight an engagement.</p>
<p>2) The Democratic Congress has ALREADY voted to expand the authorized size of the army and Marine Corps. The Marine Corps is authorized its highest strength since WWII. The army is expanding by over 60,000 by 2011. </p>
<p>3) In the case that Russia does become belligerant, there will be no time to draft, train, equip, and assign forces. In both world wars it took us over a year to raise a military large enough to fight. But, back then we weren't Target #1, and we had two oceans surrounding us. Today, those oceans are A LOT smaller.</p>
<p>4) Whether Republican or Democrat, there's already going to be a lot of military spending to rebuild the forces from Iraq, and get enough recruits for the rotation. </p>
<p>5) We have the SMALLEST (except for Britain) conventional, developed military force in the world. We have BARELY 1 million army and Marines. Divide by 7 and that's how many combat soldiers and Marines we have. It would take AT LEAST 5 million just to secure California.</p>
<p>6) Russia declared itself an adversary in 2004 and again in 2006. We must take them seriously. China has been closing ports of call to US warships (these are regular port calls too). </p>
<p>7) He said nothing about "fighting" them. It's the same strategy Lincoln empolyed with the rebels. He is after all considered a "great" president. He raised 75,000 soldiers before he even took office as a reason for the South to negotiate instead of fight.</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> There is already more than a growing concern that Putin's party will use a landslide victory to change the constitution (if they receive 66% or more of the vote they will be able to do this) so that Putin could again run for president. Will they? Don't know. Would he? Don't know. But it's enough to warrant a close eye.</p>
<p>9) Most people are simpletons and view Iraq as purely a war for oil. That is how people are. Very few ever see what was actually happening until after it happened. It is stupid to think that in the middle of a war you think you know the causes, what's going on, and what's going to happen.</p>
<p>10) It doesn't matter who you vote for, this will happen. Your Democratic congress has already authorized it, Hillary has stopped her "everyone out by 2009&#034; speeches, massive signing bonuses have been attatched to combat arms (infantry, cavalry, artilerry, armored). It doesn't take a genius to realize the the Pentagon (whom Bush and Rumsfeld ignored when they went to Iraq) see something and are trying to prepare (and this time they are listening, but the American people are not.)</p>
<p>11) It is always better to have the military and not need it, than to need it and not have it.</p>
<p>12) We always like to look to the Greek philosophers and talk about how smart they were. Let's look at what they told us. </p>
<p>"Provide in peace what is needed in war."</p>
<p>"Arms keep peace."</p>
<p>"Nobody enters into war uninformed, and those that think something can be gained from it will not be deterred by either caution or fear"</p>
<p>"Never trust an alliance with the powerful."</p>
<p>"The strong did what they could, and the weak suffered what they must."</p>
<p>"The few cannot contend with the many; the weak cannot contend with the strong."</p>
<p>13) A war has never started because a country was too strong. And strong or not, if any country thinks they will gain something by fighting us, there is no way to stop it.</p>
<p>14) If it does happen, we will probably only have time to react. Not time to build an army, train the army, equip the army, pay the army, and then react.</p>
<p>15) And finally, winning wars (and preventing them) is entirely about initiative. Gain the initiative, win the battle/war. Lose the initiative, lose the battle/war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Chirico - NYC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165516</link>
		<dc:creator>James Chirico - NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 10:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165516</guid>
		<description>Giuliani and McCain are both correct in building up our ground forces. Both are wrong for seeing Iran as a threat to this country. With Chinese supplied missle technology Iran can hit Israel. Does anyone in this country believe Israel will allow Iran nuclear weapons? Sell them a few B2 bombers to allow them strategic superiority. The troop build up should allow quicker rotation and less time in country. If we increase strength enough we may consider saving the millions being killed in Africa (Sudan, Congo, Somalia). We save lives, we get friends for life, we destroy lives, Iraq war on the cheap, the world hates us. Rudy after getting in bed with Bush&#039;s oil people through his security firm has not said one word about Saudi terrorism since handing back the sheik his 100 million dollar check. He will never get my vote since oil interests have become more important than US security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giuliani and McCain are both correct in building up our ground forces. Both are wrong for seeing Iran as a threat to this country. With Chinese supplied missle technology Iran can hit Israel. Does anyone in this country believe Israel will allow Iran nuclear weapons? Sell them a few B2 bombers to allow them strategic superiority. The troop build up should allow quicker rotation and less time in country. If we increase strength enough we may consider saving the millions being killed in Africa (Sudan, Congo, Somalia). We save lives, we get friends for life, we destroy lives, Iraq war on the cheap, the world hates us. Rudy after getting in bed with Bush's oil people through his security firm has not said one word about Saudi terrorism since handing back the sheik his 100 million dollar check. He will never get my vote since oil interests have become more important than US security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew, Austin TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165510</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew, Austin TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165510</guid>
		<description>Yes, let&#039;s build up our military, rather than fixing the problems we have back home.  How can anybody seriously consider this guy?  Thanks for screwing over your children, generation spend-who-cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, let's build up our military, rather than fixing the problems we have back home.  How can anybody seriously consider this guy?  Thanks for screwing over your children, generation spend-who-cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe  Mahma</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165502</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe  Mahma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165502</guid>
		<description>oh-my-god</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh-my-god</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165475</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 07:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165475</guid>
		<description>Major shake-up in the GOP race tonight, as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/early-state-news-iowa-trendlines.html &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just released Iowa poll&lt;/a&gt; gives Mike Huckabee his biggest lead over Mitt Romney of yet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major shake-up in the GOP race tonight, as a <a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/early-state-news-iowa-trendlines.html " rel="nofollow">just released Iowa poll</a> gives Mike Huckabee his biggest lead over Mitt Romney of yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheridan, Grand Rapids, MI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165470</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheridan, Grand Rapids, MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 07:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165470</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yes…we need to ignore Russia and China….just because China is using all the money we send to them to either invest in their military….or buy American businesses - is no reason to be concerned…yes Democrats….we don&#039;t need a military….at all….what a smart bunch….
Posted By Chris, Middletown, CT : December 1, 2007 10:38 pm&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t see many people calling for us to ignore Russia and China, and very few (if any) are advocating that we don&#039;t need any sort of military. Your straw man is just a little obvious, don&#039;t you think?

You bring up an interesting point, though. We&#039;re buying more and more stuff from China, sending them more and more of our money - which they then use to buy up the debt instruments needed to fund the GOP&#039;s reckless &quot;borrow and spend&quot; fiscal policy. How would going even deeper in debt to build up our military do anything at all to alleviate this problem?  Regardless of the size of our &quot;big stick&quot;, China won&#039;t attack us when they can just keep lending us the money that we spend on their stuff, eventually allowing them to buy us lock, stock and barrel. What are we going to do - threaten to bomb them if they stop selling Wal*Mart their cheap tat, or (even more ridiculously) if they decide not to buy our T-bills?

We have the world&#039;s strongest military force already, more than large enough to protect the physical security of our actual territory. It has become apparent, however, that it isn&#039;t sufficient to fulfill that mission, provide occupying forces in half the countries of the globe AND try to put down an insurgency in a medium-sized country all at the same time. That isn&#039;t a good argument for increasing the size of our military, though; rather, it is proof that we have a Cold War &quot;persistence of vision&quot; problem in which every challenge to any aspect of our alleged &quot;superiority&quot; is seen as an existential threat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes…we need to ignore Russia and China….just because China is using all the money we send to them to either invest in their military….or buy American businesses &#8211; is no reason to be concerned…yes Democrats….we don't need a military….at all….what a smart bunch….<br />
Posted By Chris, Middletown, CT : December 1, 2007 10:38 pm</i></p>
<p>I don't see many people calling for us to ignore Russia and China, and very few (if any) are advocating that we don't need any sort of military. Your straw man is just a little obvious, don't you think?</p>
<p>You bring up an interesting point, though. We're buying more and more stuff from China, sending them more and more of our money &#8211; which they then use to buy up the debt instruments needed to fund the GOP's reckless "borrow and spend" fiscal policy. How would going even deeper in debt to build up our military do anything at all to alleviate this problem?  Regardless of the size of our "big stick", China won't attack us when they can just keep lending us the money that we spend on their stuff, eventually allowing them to buy us lock, stock and barrel. What are we going to do &#8211; threaten to bomb them if they stop selling Wal*Mart their cheap tat, or (even more ridiculously) if they decide not to buy our T-bills?</p>
<p>We have the world's strongest military force already, more than large enough to protect the physical security of our actual territory. It has become apparent, however, that it isn't sufficient to fulfill that mission, provide occupying forces in half the countries of the globe AND try to put down an insurgency in a medium-sized country all at the same time. That isn't a good argument for increasing the size of our military, though; rather, it is proof that we have a Cold War "persistence of vision" problem in which every challenge to any aspect of our alleged "superiority" is seen as an existential threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy is an idiot.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165440</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy is an idiot.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 06:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165440</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most stupid things I&#039;ve ever seen a candidate on either side do. Arms build-up WAS the Cold War and the reason that the Soviets were our opposition back then. If the USA got more weapons than the Soviets, the Soviets got more weapons to compensate. Then the USA got more weapons to assert superiority, etc until Gorbachev ended it. Neither side had planned global domination, only the protection of their own interests at home.

I sincerely hope that Rudy supporters read this and realize what he is. He is a war hawk and is entirely unfit to assume the single most powerful position in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most stupid things I've ever seen a candidate on either side do. Arms build-up WAS the Cold War and the reason that the Soviets were our opposition back then. If the USA got more weapons than the Soviets, the Soviets got more weapons to compensate. Then the USA got more weapons to assert superiority, etc until Gorbachev ended it. Neither side had planned global domination, only the protection of their own interests at home.</p>
<p>I sincerely hope that Rudy supporters read this and realize what he is. He is a war hawk and is entirely unfit to assume the single most powerful position in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Pittsburgh, PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165424</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165424</guid>
		<description>Rudy is right-on with his assesment of the Putin situation and how to &quot;manage&quot; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy is right-on with his assesment of the Putin situation and how to "manage" it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Tim, Lodi, WI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165410</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Tim, Lodi, WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165410</guid>
		<description>Just what the world needs--another Cold War started by Rambo Rudy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what the world needs&#8211;another Cold War started by Rambo Rudy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc, chicago, illinois</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165399</link>
		<dc:creator>jc, chicago, illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165399</guid>
		<description>kiddo
you cant even spell hussein right
and adding to the geopolitical nightmare in russia by making OUR military even bigger is sensationalist, rediculous, and cant POSSIBLY be a step toward peace, which leaves it as a step towards war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kiddo<br />
you cant even spell hussein right<br />
and adding to the geopolitical nightmare in russia by making OUR military even bigger is sensationalist, rediculous, and cant POSSIBLY be a step toward peace, which leaves it as a step towards war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d, baltimore, md</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165366</link>
		<dc:creator>d, baltimore, md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165366</guid>
		<description>I hope to see this end his campaign...he is a very scary, hateful little man who is trying to win by frightening americans...and he would run international relations like a prosecuting attorney, not the bridge builder the world needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope to see this end his campaign...he is a very scary, hateful little man who is trying to win by frightening americans...and he would run international relations like a prosecuting attorney, not the bridge builder the world needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Wright</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165361</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165361</guid>
		<description>If a country disarms itself, or fails to keep up, it doubles the armament of its enemies.

Standard maxim throughout all of history.  It&#039;s too bad that too many in this topic are little more that a bunch of Neville Chamberlains waiving their precious paper treaties in the air.

Paper burns, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a country disarms itself, or fails to keep up, it doubles the armament of its enemies.</p>
<p>Standard maxim throughout all of history.  It's too bad that too many in this topic are little more that a bunch of Neville Chamberlains waiving their precious paper treaties in the air.</p>
<p>Paper burns, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris, Middletown, CT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165339</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris, Middletown, CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165339</guid>
		<description>Yes...we need to ignore Russia and China....just because China is using all the money we send to them to either invest in their military....or buy American businesses - is no reason to be concerned...yes Democrats....we don&#039;t need a military....at all....what a smart bunch....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes...we need to ignore Russia and China....just because China is using all the money we send to them to either invest in their military....or buy American businesses &#8211; is no reason to be concerned...yes Democrats....we don't need a military....at all....what a smart bunch....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Michael Harman</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165321</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Michael Harman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165321</guid>
		<description>In an attempt to discredit the record of his abusive spending, Rudy recently accused his fellow Americans of staging a &#039;hit job&#039; when they reported on his waste of taxpayer money - which was spent on luxurious travel accomodations, and other countless excesses. Now he wants to state an obvious military strategy, match or exceed the enemy, as a rallying point so you&#039;ll think he&#039;s some visionary or competant leader. The brilliant media minds have their work cut out for them if they are to make up for Giuliani&#039;s intellectual deficiencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an attempt to discredit the record of his abusive spending, Rudy recently accused his fellow Americans of staging a 'hit job' when they reported on his waste of taxpayer money &#8211; which was spent on luxurious travel accomodations, and other countless excesses. Now he wants to state an obvious military strategy, match or exceed the enemy, as a rallying point so you'll think he's some visionary or competant leader. The brilliant media minds have their work cut out for them if they are to make up for Giuliani's intellectual deficiencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy, New York, New York</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165315</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy, New York, New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165315</guid>
		<description>This is so powerful! Giuliani, like Dubya, knows what time of day it is! It&#039;s all about defense! We&#039;re either pro-active military power brokers or  sidelined spectators! Russia, China, Iran and Venezuela are not playing! We can&#039;t either! With a socialist-friendly Hillary Clinton in the White House, America&#039;s superpower status with a strong military becomes suspect, much like it was under her husband, Bill. If Bill had balanced our economy with our military we won&#039;t be facing as much opposition today from communists, terrorists and opportunists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so powerful! Giuliani, like Dubya, knows what time of day it is! It's all about defense! We're either pro-active military power brokers or  sidelined spectators! Russia, China, Iran and Venezuela are not playing! We can't either! With a socialist-friendly Hillary Clinton in the White House, America's superpower status with a strong military becomes suspect, much like it was under her husband, Bill. If Bill had balanced our economy with our military we won't be facing as much opposition today from communists, terrorists and opportunists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan, Elgin, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165310</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan, Elgin, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165310</guid>
		<description>Giuliani...not even president and he&#039;s rattling the sabre towards Russia.  Building up the military, necessarily or not, sends one clear message, &quot;We&#039;re looking for a fight!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giuliani...not even president and he's rattling the sabre towards Russia.  Building up the military, necessarily or not, sends one clear message, "We're looking for a fight!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance, Waldorf MD</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165301</link>
		<dc:creator>Chance, Waldorf MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165301</guid>
		<description>Okay, as a die hard liberal I&#039;m not planning on voting republican anyway, but at least Rudy seemed fairly moderate on several issues important to me.  However, this comment freaks me out.  I&#039;d rather have an ultraconservative in the White House than a candidate who wants to restart the cold war.  Imagine how bad Iraq would be if the Russians decided to covertly supply the insurgents.  That&#039;s how cold wars are fought Rudy.  Keep this psycho out of the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, as a die hard liberal I'm not planning on voting republican anyway, but at least Rudy seemed fairly moderate on several issues important to me.  However, this comment freaks me out.  I'd rather have an ultraconservative in the White House than a candidate who wants to restart the cold war.  Imagine how bad Iraq would be if the Russians decided to covertly supply the insurgents.  That's how cold wars are fought Rudy.  Keep this psycho out of the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty D.   Bristol, PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165300</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty D.   Bristol, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165300</guid>
		<description>Unbelievable! But hey, Rudy&#039;s got good ole Pat Robertson on his side! I can&#039;t understand how these buffoons became the faces of the Republican party. I pray a democrat wins. If not the middle class is doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable! But hey, Rudy's got good ole Pat Robertson on his side! I can't understand how these buffoons became the faces of the Republican party. I pray a democrat wins. If not the middle class is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Jodell, Minneapolis, MN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Jodell, Minneapolis, MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165296</guid>
		<description>I would be scared to death at the thought of this unqualified Bush clone in control of our military and foreign policy. God help us if this self-centered egomaniac politician gets the GOP nomination and wins the election---it will be the downfall of this great country once and for all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be scared to death at the thought of this unqualified Bush clone in control of our military and foreign policy. God help us if this self-centered egomaniac politician gets the GOP nomination and wins the election-it will be the downfall of this great country once and for all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Marquette, MI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165295</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Marquette, MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165295</guid>
		<description>It seems that, psychologically, Giuliani is one of the guys like the kids in high school who walks around with a swagger and shoulders anyone out of his way.  

There is an arrested adolescence to this man - a lust for confrontation - that is so utterly dangerous at this national and global moment.  

God help us all if this man is elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that, psychologically, Giuliani is one of the guys like the kids in high school who walks around with a swagger and shoulders anyone out of his way.  </p>
<p>There is an arrested adolescence to this man &#8211; a lust for confrontation &#8211; that is so utterly dangerous at this national and global moment.  </p>
<p>God help us all if this man is elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeeve</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165282</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165282</guid>
		<description>Please do! Putin will watch and enjoy, because now Putin will have a legitimate target to point to telling everybody that HE, Putin, was right all along. And then later on you, people, in US will be very surprised(yet again) why yet another country doesn&#039;t want to deal with you. 

Please, do!. Meanwhile Russia will sit and watch growing US national debt and  falling dollar and together with Russia China and many others will watch and enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do! Putin will watch and enjoy, because now Putin will have a legitimate target to point to telling everybody that HE, Putin, was right all along. And then later on you, people, in US will be very surprised(yet again) why yet another country doesn't want to deal with you. </p>
<p>Please, do!. Meanwhile Russia will sit and watch growing US national debt and  falling dollar and together with Russia China and many others will watch and enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165279</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165279</guid>
		<description>This man is scary. If elected, a Gulliani administraion,in comparison, will make Bush&#039;s administration appear as peace-makers. I&#039;m from NYC and I would never vote for this power-hungry facist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This man is scary. If elected, a Gulliani administraion,in comparison, will make Bush's administration appear as peace-makers. I'm from NYC and I would never vote for this power-hungry facist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165275</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165275</guid>
		<description>I think we should grow our Military by 30%, but we need to pay our soldiers better.  That will provide better troop rotations and send a message to our Enemies.  Strength is a mighty deterent and I pay taxes for three reasons.  Strong Military, good roads, and the best education.  I think it&#039;s time we step it up a notch, our enemies will bow their heads and know that this SuperPower is bigger and badder than ever.  Ten years ago we barely had any soldiers and officers with combat experience.  Now we&#039;re lined with experienced troops, and we have a 300,000 person Iraqi Army at our side.  Stick with it folks, and  respect our Military, it is the most powerful force in the world.  Let them win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should grow our Military by 30%, but we need to pay our soldiers better.  That will provide better troop rotations and send a message to our Enemies.  Strength is a mighty deterent and I pay taxes for three reasons.  Strong Military, good roads, and the best education.  I think it's time we step it up a notch, our enemies will bow their heads and know that this SuperPower is bigger and badder than ever.  Ten years ago we barely had any soldiers and officers with combat experience.  Now we're lined with experienced troops, and we have a 300,000 person Iraqi Army at our side.  Stick with it folks, and  respect our Military, it is the most powerful force in the world.  Let them win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth C, Largo Maryland</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165273</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth C, Largo Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165273</guid>
		<description>Why wonder how we&#039;ll finance Armageddon, we’ll borrow the money from the Chinese and use it to fight everyone else. After all when the dust settles, there won’t be tomorrow. Considering that Rudy evaded the wars of his generation, he must seek to fight his from a secure bunker. Hail Caesar!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wonder how we'll finance Armageddon, we’ll borrow the money from the Chinese and use it to fight everyone else. After all when the dust settles, there won’t be tomorrow. Considering that Rudy evaded the wars of his generation, he must seek to fight his from a secure bunker. Hail Caesar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Wheeler, Miami, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165271</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Wheeler, Miami, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165271</guid>
		<description>Military strength is actually an important element in negotiating with Russia and China.  Even if a democrat is elected in 2008, they will still see this as an essential component of the overall &#039;negotiation mix&#039; that is used by our govt.  Interestingly, Kucinich would even have to accept the inevitability of dealing with Putin and China with the support of America&#039;s military component.  You can&#039;t ignore it -- you can down play it, but it is part of foreign policy.  In reality no war will occur between the US, Russia, or China given the reality of today, nukes, economics, etc.  What Giuliani said is refreshing, given Putin&#039;s sensitivity to military prowess.  Bush thinks he can just take Putin to his families compound and he will be irrevocably charmed -- that is shortsighted.  Putin needs to feel threatened, otherwise he continues unabated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Military strength is actually an important element in negotiating with Russia and China.  Even if a democrat is elected in 2008, they will still see this as an essential component of the overall 'negotiation mix' that is used by our govt.  Interestingly, Kucinich would even have to accept the inevitability of dealing with Putin and China with the support of America's military component.  You can't ignore it - you can down play it, but it is part of foreign policy.  In reality no war will occur between the US, Russia, or China given the reality of today, nukes, economics, etc.  What Giuliani said is refreshing, given Putin's sensitivity to military prowess.  Bush thinks he can just take Putin to his families compound and he will be irrevocably charmed - that is shortsighted.  Putin needs to feel threatened, otherwise he continues unabated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt, Belton, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165269</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt, Belton, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165269</guid>
		<description>Dear John from America,
Without a strong military you could be sucking something not of your own choosing.   Its&#039; pretty easy to tell someone who hasn&#039;t served his country, and I mean in a military uniform.  Pretty obvious you&#039;ve got a lot of similar company on this forum.  Good luck to you all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John from America,<br />
Without a strong military you could be sucking something not of your own choosing.   Its' pretty easy to tell someone who hasn't served his country, and I mean in a military uniform.  Pretty obvious you've got a lot of similar company on this forum.  Good luck to you all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U WEAK LA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165261</link>
		<dc:creator>U WEAK LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165261</guid>
		<description>WHAT A WEAK BUNCH OF HOLIDAY FRUIT CAKES IN HERE. WHO DO YOU WANT TO PROTECT YOUR GRANDKIDS? ME? OMG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT A WEAK BUNCH OF HOLIDAY FRUIT CAKES IN HERE. WHO DO YOU WANT TO PROTECT YOUR GRANDKIDS? ME? OMG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butch Dillon</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165231</link>
		<dc:creator>Butch Dillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165231</guid>
		<description>Rudy, our all American 9/11 hero, is beginning to sound and look like a drugged out refuge from reality. He, Willard Mitt and Freddie will end up in the same home for lost politicians. What a group of trash they are. Make way for Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy, our all American 9/11 hero, is beginning to sound and look like a drugged out refuge from reality. He, Willard Mitt and Freddie will end up in the same home for lost politicians. What a group of trash they are. Make way for Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Elliott, Orlando, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165222</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Elliott, Orlando, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165222</guid>
		<description>The man is the least knowledgeable of the entrie cast of failure. But the dummies picked W, right? And trashed McCain to do it. So he has a good chance to win. Hope someone asks baldy whose taxes he will raise to pay for it? Answer will be to borrow more against the next few generations, same as we have now. Not enough guts to actually do the job, but maybe has the few it takes to start a war he will never fight in. Rudi - a vote for more of the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The man is the least knowledgeable of the entrie cast of failure. But the dummies picked W, right? And trashed McCain to do it. So he has a good chance to win. Hope someone asks baldy whose taxes he will raise to pay for it? Answer will be to borrow more against the next few generations, same as we have now. Not enough guts to actually do the job, but maybe has the few it takes to start a war he will never fight in. Rudi &#8211; a vote for more of the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert  Ottawa, Canada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165208</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert  Ottawa, Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165208</guid>
		<description>where are the Americans going to get the money from?  Daaaaaaaa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where are the Americans going to get the money from?  Daaaaaaaa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John from America</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165206</link>
		<dc:creator>John from America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165206</guid>
		<description>Bill from Austin says;

The Lowest form of Stupidity is Weakness in the face of the enemy. It seems that the majority of the commentary here is exemplary of this stupidity. Authoritarian strongmen like Putin respect only strength.

Well Bill the only Authoritarian strongman I&#039;ve seen lately has come the &quot;Great Republic of Texas&quot; as some of your fellow posters like to call their home.

Funny how those sucking off defense jobs always think more military hardware is a great idea!  Well, put your pea brain in gear and think about diplomacy!  China one of our former great authoritarian led enemy is not our number one trading partner would you like to provoke them also?

We are the greatest military power on the planet right now and you want to keep throwing money for new war gadgets?  

When the military/industrial complex war mentality causes the next depression perhaps you&#039;ll take your head out of the sand and ask - how did we get here? 

Placing a missile defense ring on Russia&#039;s border prods the Russian paranoid mentality after all they almost were extinguished as a nation in WW2.  So we have a fatally flawed missile defense system being deployed even though it doesn&#039;t work and we get all excited about Putin.

All you defense contractors on here need to find a &quot;productive job&quot; and stop sucking off my tax dollars!
  
Manufacturing goods creates wealth not war disposables, you Rudy supporters need a lesson in economics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill from Austin says;</p>
<p>The Lowest form of Stupidity is Weakness in the face of the enemy. It seems that the majority of the commentary here is exemplary of this stupidity. Authoritarian strongmen like Putin respect only strength.</p>
<p>Well Bill the only Authoritarian strongman I've seen lately has come the "Great Republic of Texas" as some of your fellow posters like to call their home.</p>
<p>Funny how those sucking off defense jobs always think more military hardware is a great idea!  Well, put your pea brain in gear and think about diplomacy!  China one of our former great authoritarian led enemy is not our number one trading partner would you like to provoke them also?</p>
<p>We are the greatest military power on the planet right now and you want to keep throwing money for new war gadgets?  </p>
<p>When the military/industrial complex war mentality causes the next depression perhaps you'll take your head out of the sand and ask &#8211; how did we get here? </p>
<p>Placing a missile defense ring on Russia's border prods the Russian paranoid mentality after all they almost were extinguished as a nation in WW2.  So we have a fatally flawed missile defense system being deployed even though it doesn't work and we get all excited about Putin.</p>
<p>All you defense contractors on here need to find a "productive job" and stop sucking off my tax dollars!</p>
<p>Manufacturing goods creates wealth not war disposables, you Rudy supporters need a lesson in economics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Austin, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165108</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Austin, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165108</guid>
		<description>The Lowest form of Stupidity is Weakness in the face of the enemy. It seems that the majority of the commentary here is exemplary of this stupidity. Authoritarian strongmen like Putin respect only strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lowest form of Stupidity is Weakness in the face of the enemy. It seems that the majority of the commentary here is exemplary of this stupidity. Authoritarian strongmen like Putin respect only strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew, Haslett, MI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165041</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew, Haslett, MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165041</guid>
		<description>Great idea, Rudy!  That&#039;s just what we need, MORE military spending.  When are you going to get it through your thick head that expanding the empire is what got us into trouble in the first place?  Strong national defense is one thing, but an arms race is quite another.  Perhaps if you also bring home all the troops stationed in foreign countries where they have no business or reason for being, it would make more sense to strength our national defense force, but there&#039;s no good reason for purposely antagonizing sovreign nations just because you don&#039;t like what they&#039;ve done with their country!  For heavens&#039; sake, I&#039;d be more worried about Venezuela cutting off our oil than Russia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea, Rudy!  That's just what we need, MORE military spending.  When are you going to get it through your thick head that expanding the empire is what got us into trouble in the first place?  Strong national defense is one thing, but an arms race is quite another.  Perhaps if you also bring home all the troops stationed in foreign countries where they have no business or reason for being, it would make more sense to strength our national defense force, but there's no good reason for purposely antagonizing sovreign nations just because you don't like what they've done with their country!  For heavens' sake, I'd be more worried about Venezuela cutting off our oil than Russia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surrealist, Fort Myers, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165029</link>
		<dc:creator>Surrealist, Fort Myers, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165029</guid>
		<description>Great move.  Now we&#039;ve got something to continue spendng levels for D.O.D. after we pull out of Iraq. Instead of changing our economic dependence on being a military industrial state--we just sustain it by creating a new cold war.  Way to go Rudy. Put us back 20 years.  Sounds like he&#039;s got the same crappy neo-con advisor&#039;s Bush had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great move.  Now we've got something to continue spendng levels for D.O.D. after we pull out of Iraq. Instead of changing our economic dependence on being a military industrial state&#8211;we just sustain it by creating a new cold war.  Way to go Rudy. Put us back 20 years.  Sounds like he's got the same crappy neo-con advisor's Bush had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD  Rugby ND</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165028</link>
		<dc:creator>JD  Rugby ND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165028</guid>
		<description>Wake up Republicans.  See this man for the right-wing nut-job extremist he is.  This guy is not good for the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up Republicans.  See this man for the right-wing nut-job extremist he is.  This guy is not good for the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac, Atlanta, GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165023</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165023</guid>
		<description>A Cold War style arms race? I know Republicans love Reagan, but this is nuts! Why throw money at a solution for a problem solved 20 years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Cold War style arms race? I know Republicans love Reagan, but this is nuts! Why throw money at a solution for a problem solved 20 years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis, NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165021</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165021</guid>
		<description>LOL.  Rudy should stick to local government.  Now here&#039;s a guy whose lack of foreign policy experience can be dangerous to the future of this country, if he&#039;s ever elected President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  Rudy should stick to local government.  Now here's a guy whose lack of foreign policy experience can be dangerous to the future of this country, if he's ever elected President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob, Roxboro, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165012</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob, Roxboro, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165012</guid>
		<description>Be careful Rudy,,
With our manufacturing capability now being the property of the Chinese, how ya gonna wage war without their permission?
The lust for money has undermined America&#039;s ability to even make threats. 
 No one takes us seriously anymore,,especially when some little cave dweller in Afghanistan gives us the finger and our response is the &quot;Patriot Act.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful Rudy,,<br />
With our manufacturing capability now being the property of the Chinese, how ya gonna wage war without their permission?<br />
The lust for money has undermined America's ability to even make threats.<br />
 No one takes us seriously anymore,,especially when some little cave dweller in Afghanistan gives us the finger and our response is the "Patriot Act."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent in IA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/01/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165008</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent in IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/30/giuliani-advocates-military-build-up-to-counter-putin/#comment-165008</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised Numbnuts hasn&#039;t yet threatened Hugo Chavez...or maybe he just hasn&#039;t figured out how to appropriate the oil. He wants to attack everyone, it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm surprised Numbnuts hasn't yet threatened Hugo Chavez...or maybe he just hasn't figured out how to appropriate the oil. He wants to attack everyone, it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
