<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Democratic Party sanctions CNN debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-404781</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-404781</guid>
		<description>Did I hear Wolf say we could vote for questions to be asked? Where can we do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I hear Wolf say we could vote for questions to be asked? Where can we do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vickie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-400595</link>
		<dc:creator>Vickie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-400595</guid>
		<description>hi wolf  i saw that obamma got his home for 300000 dollars less than the value and  rescoes wife paid full value for the place next door and sold a strip of the property to obamma.did he pay full value for this property.i just wonder if he ends up with the nomintion we will have a justice dept.investigation during the primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi wolf  i saw that obamma got his home for 300000 dollars less than the value and  rescoes wife paid full value for the place next door and sold a strip of the property to obamma.did he pay full value for this property.i just wonder if he ends up with the nomintion we will have a justice dept.investigation during the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C.  Dwankowski</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-357889</link>
		<dc:creator>John C.  Dwankowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-357889</guid>
		<description>As a special education teacher of thirty years,  what do the democratic candidates propose doing about the two failed educational programs of &quot;No Child Left Behind&quot; ans the &quot;Idea&quot; programs.  These two programs have failed to improve the educational systems in California and for all the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a special education teacher of thirty years,  what do the democratic candidates propose doing about the two failed educational programs of "No Child Left Behind" ans the "Idea" programs.  These two programs have failed to improve the educational systems in California and for all the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevefallon</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-180083</link>
		<dc:creator>stevefallon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-180083</guid>
		<description>I would prefer to see a panel of journalists moderate this debate.  I think Judy Woodruff did a great job and I would like to see her on the panel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer to see a panel of journalists moderate this debate.  I think Judy Woodruff did a great job and I would like to see her on the panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Dedham, Mass</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-168621</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dedham, Mass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-168621</guid>
		<description>Maybe Curt Schilling can toss the softballs during the next Republican debate. 

That&#039;s right CNN, they only get hand picked GOTCHA questions from plants.

My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Curt Schilling can toss the softballs during the next Republican debate. </p>
<p>That's right CNN, they only get hand picked GOTCHA questions from plants.</p>
<p>My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich P. in Princeton, NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-168568</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich P. in Princeton, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-168568</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s not fair! Shouldn&#039;t Campbell &quot;My Husband Is Former Coalition Provisional Authority Spokesman and Now Romney Activist and Bush War Policy Shill Dan Senor&quot; Brown be asking the questions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that's not fair! Shouldn't Campbell "My Husband Is Former Coalition Provisional Authority Spokesman and Now Romney Activist and Bush War Policy Shill Dan Senor" Brown be asking the questions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon G. Paris, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167957</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon G. Paris, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167957</guid>
		<description>Is this some kind of joke? CNN must be pro-torture because they make the candidates sit through Wolf Blitzer. Please don&#039;t make the same mistake twice, you actually want people to tune in, right?

Guess Anderson was on assignment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this some kind of joke? CNN must be pro-torture because they make the candidates sit through Wolf Blitzer. Please don't make the same mistake twice, you actually want people to tune in, right?</p>
<p>Guess Anderson was on assignment...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167948</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167948</guid>
		<description>&quot;Staging another debate? I gues theyre betting the writer&#039;s strike will be over by then.&quot;

Who needs writters when CNN stages the questions from a liberals point of view??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Staging another debate? I gues theyre betting the writer's strike will be over by then."</p>
<p>Who needs writters when CNN stages the questions from a liberals point of view??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam  Los Angeles, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167723</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam  Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167723</guid>
		<description>Wolf is a biased, unfair moderator!  He had his shot and blew it!

We need to hear more from Dennis Kucinich!  It&#039;s only fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolf is a biased, unfair moderator!  He had his shot and blew it!</p>
<p>We need to hear more from Dennis Kucinich!  It's only fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTubeHAH!, Denver, CO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167633</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTubeHAH!, Denver, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167633</guid>
		<description>SOFTBALLS! Get yer CNN softballs here. Be the first to lob one of these beauties to the candidates at the debate courtesy of CNN. SOFTBALLS! Get yer softballs here. Don&#039;t worry, lady, y&#039;can&#039;t hurt nobody by lobbing someting with so little substance - they&#039;re also teflon coated so nothing sticks to &#039;em neither.
SOFTBALLS! Get yer CNN softballs here. 

&lt;b&gt; Second repost&lt;/b&gt;  Guess you guys and gals can&#039;t take the heat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOFTBALLS! Get yer CNN softballs here. Be the first to lob one of these beauties to the candidates at the debate courtesy of CNN. SOFTBALLS! Get yer softballs here. Don't worry, lady, y'can't hurt nobody by lobbing someting with so little substance &#8211; they're also teflon coated so nothing sticks to 'em neither.<br />
SOFTBALLS! Get yer CNN softballs here. </p>
<p><b> Second repost</b>  Guess you guys and gals can't take the heat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy, Chesapeake, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167622</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy, Chesapeake, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167622</guid>
		<description>Softball question tossed by ole Wolfie Boy the democrats ace pitcher. Heck who needs to plant questions when CNN sets up the playing field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Softball question tossed by ole Wolfie Boy the democrats ace pitcher. Heck who needs to plant questions when CNN sets up the playing field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa, PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167619</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167619</guid>
		<description>Say it ain&#039;t so. I figured the DNC would have learned from the last debate.

CNN should be forever banned from hosting debates. Wolf Blitzer, again? AAAAGGGHHHH!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say it ain't so. I figured the DNC would have learned from the last debate.</p>
<p>CNN should be forever banned from hosting debates. Wolf Blitzer, again? AAAAGGGHHHH!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demwit</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167603</link>
		<dc:creator>demwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167603</guid>
		<description>CNN’s answer to getting creamed in the ratings by its competitor’s fair and balanced news coverage is to setup political debates in which only liberals are asking the questions. It’s like a modern day version of a liberal Patrick Henry. Give me my progressive agenda or give me death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN’s answer to getting creamed in the ratings by its competitor’s fair and balanced news coverage is to setup political debates in which only liberals are asking the questions. It’s like a modern day version of a liberal Patrick Henry. Give me my progressive agenda or give me death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Dedham, Mass</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167578</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dedham, Mass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167578</guid>
		<description>Why is it that they can only appear on CNN? 

After the debacles, plants, Clinton mouthpieces posing as impartial politico&#039;s and outright biased coverage that have all been seen and proven, can&#039;t we use another forum?  

What has this network done to deserve even more debates, is it because they lie about being the most &quot;trusted name in news&quot;.

Can&#039;t wait for the next SCANDAL to come out of this &quot;debate&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that they can only appear on CNN? </p>
<p>After the debacles, plants, Clinton mouthpieces posing as impartial politico's and outright biased coverage that have all been seen and proven, can't we use another forum?  </p>
<p>What has this network done to deserve even more debates, is it because they lie about being the most "trusted name in news".</p>
<p>Can't wait for the next SCANDAL to come out of this "debate".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Urish, Glasford, IL 61533</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167532</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Urish, Glasford, IL 61533</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167532</guid>
		<description>The debates are not impressing me one
little bit, especially if Wolf Blitzer
is involved.  He has to have been the
worst moderator I&#039;ve ever seen.  If Barack doesn&#039;t win in Iowa, the whole
thing is over as far as I&#039;m concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debates are not impressing me one<br />
little bit, especially if Wolf Blitzer<br />
is involved.  He has to have been the<br />
worst moderator I've ever seen.  If Barack doesn't win in Iowa, the whole<br />
thing is over as far as I'm concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK Ashburn, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167380</link>
		<dc:creator>JK Ashburn, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167380</guid>
		<description>Not surprising the CalDems were quick to buddy up with CNN.  They can expect a bunch of softball questions and no intelligent follow-up.  It also gives the Dems an excuse as to why Tim Russert is not having another crack at them with some meaty questions they won&#039;t answer.  I doubt Hillary would have shown up for another night with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprising the CalDems were quick to buddy up with CNN.  They can expect a bunch of softball questions and no intelligent follow-up.  It also gives the Dems an excuse as to why Tim Russert is not having another crack at them with some meaty questions they won't answer.  I doubt Hillary would have shown up for another night with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Irmo, SC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Irmo, SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167363</guid>
		<description>I know that you guys at CNN don&#039;t get swayed by posts here, but, please, Blitzer has way too much negative baggage from the last debate. You guys might want to consider someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that you guys at CNN don't get swayed by posts here, but, please, Blitzer has way too much negative baggage from the last debate. You guys might want to consider someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacksonville, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167362</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacksonville, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167362</guid>
		<description>Will CNN have Dem. ask questions liked that of the Rep debate. Anderson was shown to have lied about his knowledge of Gen. Kerr. It has been proven that Anderson had prior knowledge who Kerr was and his politics. Anderson crediability has went to zero.
I think we should have solid questions just make them fair to both parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will CNN have Dem. ask questions liked that of the Rep debate. Anderson was shown to have lied about his knowledge of Gen. Kerr. It has been proven that Anderson had prior knowledge who Kerr was and his politics. Anderson crediability has went to zero.<br />
I think we should have solid questions just make them fair to both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen nj</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167315</link>
		<dc:creator>karen nj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167315</guid>
		<description>NOOOOOOOO! Please , get Anderson , not Wolf. c&#039;mon everybody with me  &#039; &quot;We want Anderson  We want Anderson &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOOOOOOOO! Please , get Anderson , not Wolf. c'mon everybody with me  ' "We want Anderson  We want Anderson "</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne, Silver Spring</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167311</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne, Silver Spring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167311</guid>
		<description>how can we make sure that CNN doesnt plant any question or everyone debating will get a fair share?

CNN=CLINTON NEWS NETWORK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can we make sure that CNN doesnt plant any question or everyone debating will get a fair share?</p>
<p>CNN=CLINTON NEWS NETWORK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, Orlando, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167291</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, Orlando, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167291</guid>
		<description>Like it matters!  The Media and political parties have already decided that 3 small and insignificant states will crown our next president.  One would think these 3 states should pay all of the federal taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it matters!  The Media and political parties have already decided that 3 small and insignificant states will crown our next president.  One would think these 3 states should pay all of the federal taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCNU  purple state, usa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167190</link>
		<dc:creator>BCNU  purple state, usa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167190</guid>
		<description>Staging another debate?  I gues theyre betting the writer&#039;s strike will be over by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staging another debate?  I gues theyre betting the writer's strike will be over by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy,iowa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167147</link>
		<dc:creator>cathy,iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167147</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t need that debate if it&#039;s wolf blitzer moderating. Have had enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't need that debate if it's wolf blitzer moderating. Have had enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy, Miami, Florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167132</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy, Miami, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167132</guid>
		<description>Noo! not Wolf! Can&#039;t CNN get anyone other than Wolf Blitzer to moderate. He&#039;s horrible, the candidates know it, we know it, and CNN knows it. 

&quot;Raise your hand if you agree&quot;
::::disaster ensues::::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noo! not Wolf! Can't CNN get anyone other than Wolf Blitzer to moderate. He's horrible, the candidates know it, we know it, and CNN knows it. </p>
<p>"Raise your hand if you agree"<br />
::::disaster ensues::::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zak,iowa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167119</link>
		<dc:creator>zak,iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167119</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t need to watch it if it is wolf. But the good news here is that I shall have known who has won the nomination by the third of january...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't need to watch it if it is wolf. But the good news here is that I shall have known who has won the nomination by the third of january...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol,vegas,nevada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167084</link>
		<dc:creator>carol,vegas,nevada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167084</guid>
		<description>By january 3rd I shall have known my position. So california debate is irrelevant. I must say this has been taking so long and I can not wait to put it into rest!
To give your a clue if Obama looses in Iowa what else will be left for me to pay attention to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By january 3rd I shall have known my position. So california debate is irrelevant. I must say this has been taking so long and I can not wait to put it into rest!<br />
To give your a clue if Obama looses in Iowa what else will be left for me to pay attention to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Houston, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167070</link>
		<dc:creator>J Houston, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/03/california-democratic-party-sanctions-cnn-debate/#comment-167070</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt; feature questions from Los Angeles Times and POLITICO journalists&lt;/b&gt;

Oh cool they&#039;re gonna limbo! How low can you go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> feature questions from Los Angeles Times and POLITICO journalists</b></p>
<p>Oh cool they're gonna limbo! How low can you go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
