We have,she has done nothing but say what she thinks voters want to hear so she can be elected.
How about we look at her track record?
Oh we did, that actually took less time than to read your post. She is a do nothing, say anything to get what she wants.
It's always the same thing from her, take credit when it is good even if it wasn't her work, lay blame on someone else if it is bad and let them take the fall.

Ie. Hillary Care, thats her experience, till it is brought up that it failed miserably. Then Bubba takes the fall for its failure.

Anyone who says a vote for Obama puts republicans in the white house, is as big a plant as this girl was for Hillary's question.

In all polls to date, if HRC runs against the top 5 republicans she loses by 5 – 25%.
If Obama runs against them he WINS by 5 – 25%.

According to Hillary, she has been fighting the republicans for the past 15 years. Obama says he tries to compromise and work solutions out.

what do we want America?

Hillary fighting or Obama Uniting?

First of all, I disagree with you that Obama used this young woman.

Secondly, even if that were true, remember, Hillary used her first, so what does that make her.

We need obama.. or actually any of the non clinton candidates on the dem side. They are the only ones that will take us off this ruinous course that we've been on for the last 7 years.

Posted By Jeffery Atell IOWA : December 5, 2007 7:03 am

All candidates miss a lot of votes at election time. Senators are elected to do a lot more than vote. The votes he has missed were decided by a wide margin anyway. Better to stand up and fight for the American people than to sit in washington and vote with Bush.

You think Senator Obama is not in Hillary Clinton's league so obviously you never considered voting for him in the first place.

Obama 2008

yea...

What's all the ruckus about?

In what world do Giuliani and Romney have "experience" to a greater extent than Obama–or anyone else? Romney was a one-term governor in a state that would never re-elect him and Giuliani has never been involved with the Federal government on any level. Neither has a drip of foreign policy experience, and neither has connections or relationships in Congress. You can criticize Obama's experience against Biden's, Richardson's, McCain's, or even Huckabee's, but Giuliani and Romney? Come on!

Posted By Aidyn, NY, NY : December 5, 2007 7:21 pm

nice how about telling the truth for once? people just might start listning

I totally agree with you. Democrats will regret the next 4 years if they elect Obama against Guliani or Romney. These 2 Republicans have resumes that only Clinton's and all other Democratic candidates except Obama's can withstand. Guiliani and Romney will will hit Obama with a type of experience that he will not resist.

Some Democrats simply want to see Obama beat Clinton for the wrong reasons. But let them wait for an Obama slap by Guliani or Romney. Republican know they can get back the Whitehouse if any of the 2 candidates stood against Obama because Obama has nothing to show for experience which will be the cornerstone of Republican assault. Then Democrats will be biting their fingers after thinking the next Prez will be Democrat by hook or crook.

He's kicking Hillary's butt and I'm so grateful that we'll finally have a great man in office.

Obama 08.

That's why I'm voting for this man. That's unscripted, real and 100% right. We have to work together to defeat the common enemies: Terrorism, poverty, injustice and slumping economy. Republicans are not the enemy, they are Americans who disagree with us. There is a difference. Obama knows this, Hillary does not.

Posted By Will, NYC : December 5, 2007 10:21 am

You can't say it any better than this. It's not about beating the republicans. I wonde how long it will take for people to realise this

His whole method of 'passive aggressiveness' is making me sick, man it up man, either attack her the way you're supposed to, or shut up, just don't try to act all innocent when you do it.

'Different kind of politics'...yeah sure.

Wish Al Gore would run to be honest.

Iowa (Zogby poll) – 3 pts
New Hampshire (Zogby poll ) – 11 pts
South Carolina (ARG poll) – 24 pts

National poll (LA Times/Bloomberg) – 24 pts

Hillary 08!

Good God some of you are as illogical as Republicans that blame Bill Clinton for all of Bush's problems.

Do you not understand irony?

You Clinton supporters need to realize that your attacks like the ones that we're seeing in this thread are the reasons that Obama's campaign is gaining in polls while Hillary's is falling. It's funny that so many jumped on his willingness to compromise, because Hillary is by far the most compromised candidate on the Democratic side.

Lastly, gotta love how the racists love to jump on Obama. I think I counted at least 3 comments regarding his "Muslim background/Hussein." He's not Muslim, but regardless, way to show that this country's tolerant nature. It's pretty bad when you can't attack a candidate over policy or even their personal lives, but instead on aspects that he received at birth.

Which are you?

Let's stop being so partisan and look for the individual who can make the best decisions for ALL Americans. Like Bill Clinton said, I'll vote for good judgment over lots of experience ANY day!!!

2) He lost out to Hillary on various political issues, on experience, and on electability. Therefore, he plays dirty tricks, including push polling and spreading rumours against Hillary.

Wow, where to start?
1) Read "Dreams of My Father" and you will see a young man who was conflicted about his heritage, his racial mix. I'm sure he still struggles with it at times. It goes back to the whole "is he black enough crap."

2) Give your evidence of Obama's push polling and spreading of rumors on Hillary and you won't come off so bad. EVIDENCE, not Patti Solis-Doyle increasingly rabid responses. Do you find it curious or ironic that a day after Solis-Doyle accuses Obama's campaign of dirty tricks (one phone call from a volunteer in which a woman claims she was bullied by the Obama supporter during a 30-minute conversation) the Hillary campiagn is forced to fire an Iowa staffer for sending out the "Obama is a Muslim" e-mail. Check it out. It's all over the Internet but curiously missing from the Clinton CNews Network site right here. HMMMM....

The "would-a, could-a, should-a" candidate in 2008....

"Would-a kept the United States out of Iraq had she known the truth about WMD's"

"Could-a voted against the Patriot Act and defended the Bill of Rights and The United States Constitution but didn't."

"Should-a seen through the administrations falsehoods, lies, and war mongering about Iran but voted in support of it."

Hillary Clinton...would-a, could-a, should-a....but didn't in 2008!

Vote INFORMED!

As for the whole planted-question incident, some Hillary for President campaign staffer asked an audience member to pose a surprisingly fair, non-leading question (it was an inquiry about Hillary's environmental agenda, not some clearly biased attack on Bush or any presidential candidate). To call the staffer's request evidence of Hillary's vicious plot to restore Faciscm (or similar evils) seems, frankly, beyond absurd.

We can only hope that such self-righteous and inflated individuals as the Hillary student-victim don't comprise the majority of caucus-goers in Iowa.

Hey, guess what? We're on the same side as Democrats. Demonstrate some of that experience and leadership your candidate claims to have.

How do you go to the next level to determine where those feelings come from and if they are justified? You read, and something besides the CNN Ticker which only gives a blurb on stories they think are interesting.

If you want to know about a candidate got to their site and read their policies. Go to websites to see how they vote. Keep in mind every one running for president is missing votes and that is why they make statements, they can't always get back to the senate on time.

Lastly, to like Hillary doesn't mean you have to hate Obama or put him down, the same for any Republican. These terrible attitudes is the exact reason we need someone like Barack who is willing to work with everyone, ask his peers from the predominantely Republican IL Senate. The Republicans had the majority but they worked with Democrats. Don't you get that is the ONLY way government will work for the people!

GO OBAMA 08!

Like so many others have said, a "conspiracy theory" on this is down-right ridiculous. CNN ran their show by a script for timing purposes. She had some very good questions dealing with real concerns she wanted to ask. Because of time-limits, she was asked to ask her pearls/diamonds question. Mr. Obama's turn comes to campaign and she got to ask a few questions afterward that meant something to her, got a good answer, declared that she's "officialy" still undecided and just wants to move on with life.

Don't torture the forced-media-star-college-student and let her move on. Finding every chance possible to call foul or claim anything negative towards your campaign of choice as a conspiracy theory immediately discounts your opinion in most people's minds.

I respect this college student for not abusing this "media opportunity" and for wanting to just move on with student life. I'd want the same thing. I thought her questions for Mr. Obama were great. I'd give her an A in my class.

I LOVE HIS RESPONSE!
Obama '08

OBAMA '08!!!

"Clinton News Network" MY FOOT. The placement of these stories is an unfair way to literally bury good news about Sen. Clinton and paint Barack Obama in a positive light, while not questioning his record one bit.