December 9, 2007
Posted: 04:25 PM ET

WASHINGTON (CNN) – New Mason-Dixon polls released Sunday show the primary picture growing more, not less, uncertain with the first presidential voting less than a month away.

No Democrat in Iowa, New Hampshire or South Carolina has a lead safely outside the margin of error.

On the Republican side, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee appears to have a double-digit edge in Iowa, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney an 8-point margin in New Hampshire – but South Carolina remains up for grabs, with five candidates registering in double digits.

In the Hawkeye State – where a Newsweek poll released Friday appeared to show Huckabee with a stunning 22 point lead – the Republican contest seems to be a three-person race, with Huckabee at 32 percent, Romney at 20 percent, former Tennesse Sen. Fred Thompson at 11 percent and no other candidate registering higher than single digits.

"All Iowa polls done in late November and early December showed Huckabee and Romney in a virtual tie," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Now we we now have two polls showing Huckabee with a statistically-significant lead. The race in Iowa appears to have radically shifted in the space of a week or less."

In the Democratic race, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton appears to lead Illinois Sen. Barack Obama by a statistically insignificant 2-point margin, 25 to 27 percent, John Edwards at 21 percent, and no other candidate registering higher than single digit support.

Clinton’s campaign pollster, Mark Penn, quickly downplayed the results. “These races are always roller coasters,” he said in a post on the Clinton campaign Web site, warning “poll reader beware.”

Caucuses are extremely difficult to poll accurately, due in part to the unpredictability of Election Day attendance.

Still, New York senator’s lead in Iowa has slid dramatically or disappeared in most recent surveys. The Newsweek poll showed Obama leading by 6 points, underscoring the chaotic nature of that race.

The race has also grown much tighter in New Hampshire, where Obama seems to be picking up steam, pulling to within 3 points of Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton, 30 to 27 percent. Edwards garners the support of 10 percent of likely Democratic voters polled.

The Republican contest is growing more competitive as well, with four candidates now registering double-digit support: Romney’s support has slipped to 25 percent, with former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani registering 17 percent, Arizona Sen. John McCain 16 percent and Huckabee 11 percent. Nearly one in six voters are undecided.

In South Carolina, Mike Huckabee has pulled into a narrow lead with 20 percent of the vote, followed by Giuliani at 17 percent, Romney at 15 percent, Thompson at 14 percent, McCain at 10 percent – and around a fifth of likely voters still undecided.

Clinton's lead over Obama in the Palmetto State – taken before this weekend’s Oprah-Obama primary state tour — is just 3 points in the survey, 28 to 25. John Edwards – who won the state during the last presidential primary voting – follows with 18 percent, and the rest of the field barely registering.

The MSNBC/McClatchy/Mason-Dixon polls, conducted December 3-6, surveyed 400 likely primary or caucus-goers in each state, with a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percent.

Meanwhile, Clinton leads Obama with 34 to 26 percent in Nevada – with the rest of the pack in the single digits – in another Mason-Dixon poll released Sunday in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Voters there head to the polls January 19.

Giuliani leads the GOP pack in the Silver State with 25 percent, with Romney at 20 percent and Huckabee at 17 percent.

The Nevada survey was conducted December 3-5 and surveyed 625 registered voters. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

–CNN Associate Political Editor Rebecca Sinderbrand

Filed under: Iowa • Nevada • New Hampshire • South Carolina


vw   January 12th, 2008 5:58 pm ET

I’ve been following campaign 08 for over a year and I would have to agree with some news media persons when they say how much influence they have over a candidate. From the beginning John Edwards was pushed into the shadows of Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama. What would the numbers be if the media acknowledged John Edwards and his town meetings all over the country since 2006? How many Americans would have known prior to these primaries and caucuses of where he stood on issues had he been regarded by them as a more viable candidate? Shame on the media for making the decisions of who, when, where and why the American people should hear and know about any of the candidates running be it the republican or democrat party. John Edwards has my vote and I am with him until Colorado!

charlotte   January 12th, 2008 12:41 pm ET

If Hillary loses, which I doubt, Then I pray Al gore will throw his hat in the ring as a Green Party candidate. How appropriate that would be.

Ingrid Wyss   January 11th, 2008 7:09 am ET

I am still stunned that anyone, no matter how incredibly naive, could believe Hillary's crocodile tears!

Anonymous   January 4th, 2008 11:44 pm ET

Both Clinton and Obama would lose a national election. Look to Edwards for any shot if you are a Democrat. Simply put, Hillary is a polarizing figure who has disapproval ratings that are so high, she will not be able to pick up and centrist voters. Obama can't win the South.

Obama votes in senate same as Clinton?   January 2nd, 2008 11:28 am ET

IF obama is leading than IOWANS are looking mighty foolish!!!they fell for the oprah sake oil and now the country will judge!

WHEN OBAMA DID SHOW UP TO VOTE IN SENATE HE VOTED EXACTLY AS CLINTON DID! WHERES THE UNBIASED MEDIA!.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/29/comparison_of_hillary_and_obama_votes_on_iraq

By Greg Sargent and Eric Kleefeld | bio
Since the comparison of the Iraq positions over the years of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is one of the hottest issues of the campaign, we thought it would be useful to post a comprehensive comparison of all of their votes on everything relating to the Iraq war.

So here it is: A massive compilation of Iraq-related bills — and the votes by Hillary and Obama on them, side by side — beginning in early 2005, when Obama first joined the Senate.

Of the total of 69 votes we compiled — some significant, some not — it turns out that the two differed on only one. You'll see that one in bold on our chart. But let us be clear: We are not posting this to suggest that their earlier difference at the start of the war — their most important difference — should in any way be overshadowed by these similarities. For many, that difference will remain paramount — for good reason. We just wanted to add factual grist to what is but one component of the debate.

As you can see, Clinton and Obama have voted the opposite way on only one vote on our list: The confirmation of General George Casey to be Chief of Staff for the Army, held just this past February. Hillary voted against confirmation, while Obama voted to confirm.

Additionally, please don't hold it against us if we missed any important votes. No agenda here, readers. If we did, let us know, and we'll add it immediately. Herewith, our full chart of Iraq votes after the jump.

Anonymous   December 13th, 2007 6:58 am ET

THE MEDIA, IS DIVIDING THE DEMORCATIC PARTY WITH THE UNFAIR AND BIASED REPORTING. THEY OFFER NOTHING POSITIVE TO THE READERS INREFERENCE TO THESE CANDIDATES…
IT’S DISGUSTING

Maybe CNN is opwned by republican owed and run FOX, thats why we stopped watching that station.. Time to turn the channel

Anonymous   December 13th, 2007 6:55 am ET

"NOPE! sorry Walt, Obama is on fire!! Can't wait till Texas votes for him, since everyonelse seems to finally be catching on!Posted By Brian, Austin TX : December 9, 2007 8:05 pm"

AHH YEA OBAMA IS ON FIRE, LIKE A CRACK PIPE

Anonymous   December 13th, 2007 6:54 am ET

In oprahbamas 1995 book he is a self proclaimed cocaine "junkie" he isn’t that old, how long ago? Is he still using? I also agree that smoking pot isn’t that bad, but cocaine is another story! Bad example for the first black candidate, guess Oprah didn’t read that either…or does she now support cocaine use? No way would we vote for cocaine using muslin to lead this great country…

Fair,Washington DC   December 11th, 2007 6:39 pm ET

The sad thing about this poll is we had a strong Dem candidate that had more than 50% support in most states and now we have this divided party. The Obama supporters probably believe that if he wins the primary these same people who are peeved off at the way Obama came in to this race are gonna just jump on and support him. Some will, just because he will be the Democrat and they will support whoever the candidate is, but I think there will be some who will not cast a vote for Obama. Not saying they will vote Republican, but I can see them just staying away from the polls and in the general election that will hurt him because if theres anything we should have learned from previous elections every vote counts.

PKahn   December 10th, 2007 11:25 am ET

An admitted cocaine user, not just that he "didn't inhale" but that he help support drug trafficing and all the violence and killing that goes with it! And we don't want to hear "I'm all grown up now and I'm being a good boy". Character and judgement are paramount, and like Clinton, Obama is just as lacking.

Lloyd DeMoss, Arcadia, Iowa   December 10th, 2007 10:54 am ET

Do the media recieve these polls, the ones they share are way different. I can't wait to see the embarrassment on January 3rd. Of course like any other attempt to create mass histeria they will just bury it.

c. roberts NY   December 10th, 2007 10:35 am ET

I agree with the poster who said that this Oprah-Obama show has been "style
over substance. I've great respect for
Oprah's accomplishment's but, felt
a but uncomfortable with her effort to
"sell" Obama as president. On his own,
he still, falls short on depth on nu-
merous policies. He's been duplicitous
in his criticism of others on policies
that he himself has supported. It is
great to see a "fresh face" and hear
someone deliver a well delivered speech
but folks, this is NOT American Idol!
We are seeking a strong nominee who
will be our Democractic champion to
eventually WIN and lead our nation as
POTUS! As, a multiracial woman, who is
a vetern, over 50, I find that Sen.
Clinton to be that person.

VX, New York, NY   December 10th, 2007 10:18 am ET

"Me" at Bumsville:
Have you been following the campaigns or are you repeating cliche rhetoric? Obama has given the clearest policy plans–do web searches, research beyond the CNN Political Ticker. Edwards has also given concrete strategy. I see it the least from Hillary, who seems to decide according to the polls.

Sue, discrimination against blacks happens whatever your situation and background. Credit Obama for his years of community service in Chicago; I think that's further from the ivory tower than you'll see in any candidate.

mel, rf wi   December 10th, 2007 10:09 am ET

hillary should be ahead in nevada…it is probably rigged like the debate

Allen Ridge   December 10th, 2007 9:32 am ET

CNN hates Mitt Romney. It's ashame our free left-wing press finds it necessary to pick our candidates. Use to be the American people picked our candidates. CNN's intolerance of Mitt Romney is a disgrace to this great nation. Really sad indeed.

www.obamatruth.org   December 10th, 2007 9:21 am ET

A MUST READ FOR ANY OPRAHBAMA groupie
http://www.obamatruth.org/
FIVE REASON NOT TO SUPPORT OPRAHBAMA
1. OPRAH AND OBAMA SWITCHED PLACES. (Surly not the leader)
2. Obama has ZERO foreign policy experience, infact no leadership experience
3. Refusing to show up and vote in the senate on Iran, Abortion measures
4. Seeking a trillion-dollar tax hike and raising the retirement age for Social Security!!!!
5. Not in favor of a health care plan to cover all children rich or poor.

Me, Bumsville Ohio   December 10th, 2007 8:52 am ET

oprahbama, it's called "style over substance". All he talks about is how bad the current president is but never about what he'd really do because he has no actual policy plans.

Smart woman 4 Clinton   December 10th, 2007 8:33 am ET

Hillary's historic statement at the United Nations Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 that "women's rights are human rights" still echoes worldwide. As a lawyer, advocate, First Lady, and senator, Hillary has fought for issues important to women here at home and around the world for decades. Today, despite the progress women have made, they earn only 77 cents for every dollar men earn — and women of color earn even less. Hillary is leading the charge in the Senate to strengthen equal pay laws and end pay disparities between men and women. She introduced the Paycheck Fairness Act to strengthen the penalties associated with wage discrimination, to ensure that the federal government sets a higher standard, and to increase oversight of employers. Hillary has also worked to increase access to capital and other support for women-owned businesses.
When it comes to each woman's ability to make the most personal of life decisions, Hillary has stood firm as an advocate for a woman's right to choose. She has expanded access to family planning services, including for low-income women. She spoke out forcefully against the Supreme Court's April 2007 decision that — for the first time in decades — failed to recognize the importance of women's health.
Hillary has worked to empower women throughout the world, especially low-income women. She has advocated for access to microfinance programs that enable women to start their own businesses and spoken out strongly against the tragic practice of sex trafficking.
As president, Hillary will continue her lifelong fight to ensure that all Americans are treated with respect and dignity.

Hillary has fought the relentless and insidious efforts by far-right Republicans to limit the protections of Roe v Wade, while also working hard to expand access to family planning services.
Hillary has seen what happens when governments try to control a woman's reproductive health decisions. Whether it was Romania under a dictatorship saying you had to have children for the good of the state or China saying you had to have only one child for the good of the state, governments have dictated the most private and important decisions that we as individuals or families can make.
She has championed the Prevention First Act, which expands access to family planning services for low-income women, requires health insurance companies to cover contraception, and provides a dedicated funding stream for age-appropriate, medically accurate, comprehensive sex education.
As First Lady, she helped pass the Family and Medical Leave Act and helped found the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancies, which established and achieved a goal of reducing teen pregnancies by one-third between 1996 and 2005.
In partnership with Senator Patty Murray, Hillary waged a successful three-year battle to get the Food and Drug Administration to accept the overwhelming recommendation of the medical community and make Plan B (the "morning after" pill) available over the counter.
Hillary's work to empower low-income women has changed lives. She fought for the elimination of school fees, which prevent poor children in some countries from attending school, and for investments in health care and education for women and girls. And she helped found Vital Voices, a not-for-profit organization that continues to work to support women's leadership around the globe.

Jerry, Columbia SC   December 10th, 2007 8:24 am ET

All the suppression of Ron Paul won't matter when he wins in landslides in all states. Keep up what you guys are doing it just fuels the movement. It is waking up Americans to the main stream media bias.

Go Ron Paul

Midnite Ryder Everytown USA   December 10th, 2007 8:21 am ET

Gosh Kennedy's dad did buy him the Democratic nomination in 1960 and he turned out to be one of the all time greatest Presidents in history (And I have always believed that his brother Robert would have made an even greater Commander in Chief… )

Those old enough to remember – know that JFK was also one of the biggest womanizers in the White House (although Lyndon, FDR and others were more discrete)

So it always makes me curious why everyone so virulently attacks Hillary's character for chosing to stand by her husband while no one dragged Jackie's decison not to leave John through the mud… (And what about Senator Vitner and his poor wife? Guess the GOP has different standards – being 'the family values party' etc maybe more forgiving!)

YAY There is about to be a New Dawn sweeping out the White House (UNLESS you'd rather reelect the GrandOldSleazyParty again and prefer to dwell in perpetual darkness ugh)

sick of oprahbama   December 10th, 2007 8:20 am ET

WAKE UP AMERICA! Its time we stop playing with Oprah and elect a QUALIFIED PRESIDENT!!! not just a man because he’s black and oprah says so, she may know soap and books, but why in he world would anyone jeopardize your future because a TV talk show host said so?… This weekends Oprah circus, will not help obama, its make us all realize Oprahs running the show not obama…Our great country needs a qualifed leader, maybe if oprah was legally running, but obama is….

Glad the dog and pony show is over

Sue, St Louis, MO   December 10th, 2007 7:59 am ET

You know, I like Obama. He's stylish, urbane, witty and intelligent. He is a privilege child – a Cinderella story as the above article defines. Oh, I would say that many would disagree with my statement – but the fact is Obama managed to avoid the necessity of being black in America. He was able to skip out on qualities such as perseverance, determination, a belief of principle, and the art of living that principle. He took as much discrimination as my neighbor who is white. He is an intellectual African American who lived in an elite world, the ivory tower or upper middle class. That is what concerns me.

Although I regret to say, I did not walk with Dr. King in Selma. I walked in Berwyn and Cicero, the cities just outside of Chi-Town (Chicago), amongst white hostiles who reviled us and pelted us with dung and urine. I saw the hearts of bigots and racists, and I know that our nation is still populated with such ideology. I was young, and a teacher trying to teach in the inner city with history books whose final copyright was 1933. Apparently history ended with Hoover on the South Side of the city. We mimeographed pages that brought current events to our students. Earlier, I worked in the school during the race riots of 1967, and often dodged a bullet either from a white man or a black man. I walked through a city with military presence and smelt the burning of human flesh, or the shrieks of drunk men, angry men, both black and white, among the background of guns and flaming gas filled bottles. I worked with others, both black and white, to end the Jim Crow laws, and watched black men go off to war in Viet Nam.

At that time, Obama was a pubescent adolescent in Hawaii, Kenya and Indonesia – raised predominately white – with a father who only knew acceptance for the color of his skin – not rejection. Obama doesn't recognize the hate of discrimination – he's never had to face it – thus he rationalizes and theorizes upon it. We all have felt discriminated at times in our lives, all of us whether we are black, white, red, yellow, or brown. Obama is the product of what we wanted to see – urbane, cultured, intelligent and savvy, oddly enough he benefited from the gift of our determination. Yet even today he resides in his ivory tower, and rarely ventures far from his world of acceptance.

Gunther Van de Blutengroth   December 10th, 2007 7:36 am ET

CNN pushes agendas for liberals and the democrat party.

Biden Rising   December 10th, 2007 4:56 am ET

"and no other candidate registering higher than single digit support."

of course, state by state is a different case…Biden hit 10% in SC compared to 15% for Edwards

http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_129_72.aspx

l b j, johnson city, TX   December 10th, 2007 2:10 am ET

Your headline says it all. No leadership.

Jose Card   December 10th, 2007 12:53 am ET

This "no clear leader in either party" comment makes Election 2008 more interesting and challenging. I hope we get to brainstorm more on the issues.

Carlos Jr, LA, California   December 9th, 2007 9:59 pm ET

Thank god… We may still have a chance at real change. Keep it going Barack, you're the only real shot we got.

Kim, Peabody MA   December 9th, 2007 8:48 pm ET

That is why I'm voting for Pete Grasso…

http://www.GrassoForPresident.com

This country needs a true patriot with moral integrity. One who will defend the US Constitution and restore FAITH in America…

The Faithful need to check out this great article:
http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewpoetry.asp?id=188951

hey allons,tn   December 9th, 2007 8:22 pm ET

hey the republicans are the same it would be hard to pick one of the same just a bush same.

Wayne, Silver Spring   December 9th, 2007 8:19 pm ET

This is what some call a hit-job reporting, Clinton News Network.

The fact is Hillary is sinking and her network is trying its best ri cover up

Anthony, Los Angeles, CA   December 9th, 2007 8:17 pm ET

With such powerful numbers I think we just may see a Clinton-Obama Ticket after all!

Brian, Austin TX   December 9th, 2007 8:05 pm ET

NOPE! sorry Walt, Obama is on fire!! Can't wait till Texas votes for him, since everyonelse seems to finally be catching on!

OBAMA ALL THE WAY IN '08!!

joe, leesville, la   December 9th, 2007 7:51 pm ET

Interesting…the first poll this week that showed hillary with a lead in iowa, cnn shows it.Not ever showing newsweek with obama with a 6 point lead..and another one for him with a 7 point lead among others. Very sad. The Clinton News network is quite sad.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/iowa-primary.html

Walt, Belton, TX   December 9th, 2007 7:03 pm ET

I would have thought Hillarity had bought the nomination by now……….w

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP