<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New polls show no clear leader in either party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:22:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vw</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-258304</link>
		<dc:creator>vw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-258304</guid>
		<description>I’ve been following campaign 08 for over a year and I would have to agree with some news media persons when they say how much influence they have over a candidate.  From the beginning John Edwards was pushed into the shadows of Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama.  What would the numbers be if the media acknowledged John Edwards and his town meetings all over the country since 2006?  How many Americans would have known prior to these primaries and caucuses of where he stood on issues had he been regarded by them as a more viable candidate?  Shame on the media for making the decisions of who, when, where and why the American people should hear and know about any of the candidates running be it the republican or democrat party.  John Edwards has my vote and I am with him until Colorado!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been following campaign 08 for over a year and I would have to agree with some news media persons when they say how much influence they have over a candidate.  From the beginning John Edwards was pushed into the shadows of Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama.  What would the numbers be if the media acknowledged John Edwards and his town meetings all over the country since 2006?  How many Americans would have known prior to these primaries and caucuses of where he stood on issues had he been regarded by them as a more viable candidate?  Shame on the media for making the decisions of who, when, where and why the American people should hear and know about any of the candidates running be it the republican or democrat party.  John Edwards has my vote and I am with him until Colorado!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-257208</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-257208</guid>
		<description>If Hillary loses, which I doubt, Then I pray Al gore will throw his hat in the ring as a Green Party candidate.  How appropriate that would be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hillary loses, which I doubt, Then I pray Al gore will throw his hat in the ring as a Green Party candidate.  How appropriate that would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid Wyss</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-250569</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid Wyss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-250569</guid>
		<description>I am still stunned that anyone, no matter how incredibly naive, could believe Hillary&#039;s crocodile tears!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still stunned that anyone, no matter how incredibly naive, could believe Hillary's crocodile tears!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-219319</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-219319</guid>
		<description>Both Clinton and Obama would lose a national election.  Look to Edwards for any shot if you are a Democrat.  Simply put, Hillary is a polarizing figure who has disapproval ratings that are so high, she will not be able to pick up and centrist voters.  Obama can&#039;t win the South.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Clinton and Obama would lose a national election.  Look to Edwards for any shot if you are a Democrat.  Simply put, Hillary is a polarizing figure who has disapproval ratings that are so high, she will not be able to pick up and centrist voters.  Obama can't win the South.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama votes in senate same as Clinton?</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-211257</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama votes in senate same as Clinton?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-211257</guid>
		<description>IF obama is leading than IOWANS are looking mighty foolish!!!they fell for the oprah sake oil and now the country will judge!

WHEN OBAMA DID SHOW UP TO VOTE IN SENATE HE VOTED EXACTLY AS CLINTON DID! WHERES THE UNBIASED MEDIA!.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/29/comparison_of_hillary_and_obama_votes_on_iraq

By Greg Sargent and Eric Kleefeld &#124; bio
Since the comparison of the Iraq positions over the years of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is one of the hottest issues of the campaign, we thought it would be useful to post a comprehensive comparison of all of their votes on everything relating to the Iraq war. 

So here it is: A massive compilation of Iraq-related bills — and the votes by Hillary and Obama on them, side by side — beginning in early 2005, when Obama first joined the Senate. 

Of the total of 69 votes we compiled — some significant, some not — it turns out that the two differed on only one. You&#039;ll see that one in bold on our chart. But let us be clear: We are not posting this to suggest that their earlier difference at the start of the war — their most important difference — should in any way be overshadowed by these similarities. For many, that difference will remain paramount — for good reason. We just wanted to add factual grist to what is but one component of the debate. 

As you can see, Clinton and Obama have voted the opposite way on only one vote on our list: The confirmation of General George Casey to be Chief of Staff for the Army, held just this past February. Hillary voted against confirmation, while Obama voted to confirm. 

Additionally, please don&#039;t hold it against us if we missed any important votes. No agenda here, readers. If we did, let us know, and we&#039;ll add it immediately. Herewith, our full chart of Iraq votes after the jump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF obama is leading than IOWANS are looking mighty foolish!!!they fell for the oprah sake oil and now the country will judge!</p>
<p>WHEN OBAMA DID SHOW UP TO VOTE IN SENATE HE VOTED EXACTLY AS CLINTON DID! WHERES THE UNBIASED MEDIA!.<br />
<a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/29/comparison_of_hillary_and_obama_votes_on_iraq" rel="nofollow">http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/29/comparison_of_hillary_and_obama_votes_on_iraq</a></p>
<p>By Greg Sargent and Eric Kleefeld | bio<br />
Since the comparison of the Iraq positions over the years of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is one of the hottest issues of the campaign, we thought it would be useful to post a comprehensive comparison of all of their votes on everything relating to the Iraq war. </p>
<p>So here it is: A massive compilation of Iraq-related bills — and the votes by Hillary and Obama on them, side by side — beginning in early 2005, when Obama first joined the Senate. </p>
<p>Of the total of 69 votes we compiled — some significant, some not — it turns out that the two differed on only one. You'll see that one in bold on our chart. But let us be clear: We are not posting this to suggest that their earlier difference at the start of the war — their most important difference — should in any way be overshadowed by these similarities. For many, that difference will remain paramount — for good reason. We just wanted to add factual grist to what is but one component of the debate. </p>
<p>As you can see, Clinton and Obama have voted the opposite way on only one vote on our list: The confirmation of General George Casey to be Chief of Staff for the Army, held just this past February. Hillary voted against confirmation, while Obama voted to confirm. </p>
<p>Additionally, please don't hold it against us if we missed any important votes. No agenda here, readers. If we did, let us know, and we'll add it immediately. Herewith, our full chart of Iraq votes after the jump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-180202</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-180202</guid>
		<description>THE MEDIA, IS DIVIDING THE DEMORCATIC PARTY WITH THE UNFAIR AND BIASED REPORTING. THEY OFFER NOTHING POSITIVE TO THE READERS INREFERENCE TO THESE CANDIDATES...
IT’S DISGUSTING

Maybe CNN is opwned by republican owed and run FOX, thats why we stopped watching that station.. Time to turn the channel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE MEDIA, IS DIVIDING THE DEMORCATIC PARTY WITH THE UNFAIR AND BIASED REPORTING. THEY OFFER NOTHING POSITIVE TO THE READERS INREFERENCE TO THESE CANDIDATES...<br />
IT’S DISGUSTING</p>
<p>Maybe CNN is opwned by republican owed and run FOX, thats why we stopped watching that station.. Time to turn the channel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-180201</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-180201</guid>
		<description>&quot;NOPE! sorry Walt, Obama is on fire!! Can&#039;t wait till Texas votes for him, since everyonelse seems to finally be catching on!Posted By Brian, Austin TX : December 9, 2007 8:05 pm&quot;

AHH YEA OBAMA IS ON FIRE, LIKE A CRACK PIPE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"NOPE! sorry Walt, Obama is on fire!! Can't wait till Texas votes for him, since everyonelse seems to finally be catching on!Posted By Brian, Austin TX : December 9, 2007 8:05 pm"</p>
<p>AHH YEA OBAMA IS ON FIRE, LIKE A CRACK PIPE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-180200</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-180200</guid>
		<description>In oprahbamas 1995 book he is a self proclaimed cocaine &quot;junkie&quot; he isn’t that old, how long ago? Is he still using? I also agree that smoking pot isn’t that bad, but cocaine is another story! Bad example for the first black candidate, guess Oprah didn’t read that either...or does she now support cocaine use? No way would we vote for cocaine using muslin to lead this great country...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In oprahbamas 1995 book he is a self proclaimed cocaine "junkie" he isn’t that old, how long ago? Is he still using? I also agree that smoking pot isn’t that bad, but cocaine is another story! Bad example for the first black candidate, guess Oprah didn’t read that either...or does she now support cocaine use? No way would we vote for cocaine using muslin to lead this great country...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair,Washington DC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-178262</link>
		<dc:creator>Fair,Washington DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-178262</guid>
		<description>The sad thing about this poll is we had a strong Dem candidate that had more than 50% support in most states and now we have this divided party. The Obama supporters probably believe that if he wins the primary these same people who are peeved off at the way Obama came in to this race are gonna just jump on and support him. Some will, just because he will be the Democrat and they will support whoever the candidate is, but I think there will be some who will not cast a vote for Obama. Not saying they will vote Republican, but I can see them just staying away from the polls and in the general election that will hurt him because if theres anything we should have learned from previous elections every vote counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad thing about this poll is we had a strong Dem candidate that had more than 50% support in most states and now we have this divided party. The Obama supporters probably believe that if he wins the primary these same people who are peeved off at the way Obama came in to this race are gonna just jump on and support him. Some will, just because he will be the Democrat and they will support whoever the candidate is, but I think there will be some who will not cast a vote for Obama. Not saying they will vote Republican, but I can see them just staying away from the polls and in the general election that will hurt him because if theres anything we should have learned from previous elections every vote counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PKahn</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175835</link>
		<dc:creator>PKahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175835</guid>
		<description>An admitted cocaine user, not just that he &quot;didn&#039;t inhale&quot; but that he help support drug trafficing and all the violence and killing that goes with it! And we don&#039;t want to hear &quot;I&#039;m all grown up now and I&#039;m being a good boy&quot;. Character and judgement are paramount, and like Clinton, Obama is just as lacking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An admitted cocaine user, not just that he "didn't inhale" but that he help support drug trafficing and all the violence and killing that goes with it! And we don't want to hear "I'm all grown up now and I'm being a good boy". Character and judgement are paramount, and like Clinton, Obama is just as lacking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd DeMoss, Arcadia, Iowa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175770</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd DeMoss, Arcadia, Iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175770</guid>
		<description>Do the media recieve these polls, the ones they share are way different.  I can&#039;t wait to see the embarrassment on January 3rd.  Of course like any other attempt to create mass histeria they will just bury it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the media recieve these polls, the ones they share are way different.  I can't wait to see the embarrassment on January 3rd.  Of course like any other attempt to create mass histeria they will just bury it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c. roberts    NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175737</link>
		<dc:creator>c. roberts    NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175737</guid>
		<description>I agree with the poster who said that this Oprah-Obama show has been &quot;style
over substance. I&#039;ve great respect for
Oprah&#039;s accomplishment&#039;s but, felt
a but uncomfortable with her effort to
&quot;sell&quot; Obama as president. On his own,
he still, falls short on depth on nu-
merous policies. He&#039;s been duplicitous
in his criticism of others on policies
that he himself has supported. It is
great to see a &quot;fresh face&quot; and hear
someone deliver a well delivered speech
but folks, this is NOT American Idol!
We are seeking a strong nominee who
will be our Democractic champion to
eventually WIN and lead our nation as 
POTUS! As, a multiracial woman, who is
a vetern, over 50, I find that Sen.
Clinton to be that person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the poster who said that this Oprah-Obama show has been "style<br />
over substance. I've great respect for<br />
Oprah's accomplishment's but, felt<br />
a but uncomfortable with her effort to<br />
"sell" Obama as president. On his own,<br />
he still, falls short on depth on nu-<br />
merous policies. He's been duplicitous<br />
in his criticism of others on policies<br />
that he himself has supported. It is<br />
great to see a "fresh face" and hear<br />
someone deliver a well delivered speech<br />
but folks, this is NOT American Idol!<br />
We are seeking a strong nominee who<br />
will be our Democractic champion to<br />
eventually WIN and lead our nation as<br />
POTUS! As, a multiracial woman, who is<br />
a vetern, over 50, I find that Sen.<br />
Clinton to be that person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VX, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175706</link>
		<dc:creator>VX, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175706</guid>
		<description>&quot;Me&quot; at Bumsville:
Have you been following the campaigns or are you repeating cliche rhetoric?  Obama has given the clearest policy plans--do web searches, research beyond the CNN Political Ticker.  Edwards has also given concrete strategy.  I see it the least from Hillary, who seems to decide according to the polls.  

Sue, discrimination against blacks happens whatever your situation and background.  Credit Obama for his years of community service in Chicago; I think that&#039;s further from the ivory tower than you&#039;ll see in any candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Me" at Bumsville:<br />
Have you been following the campaigns or are you repeating cliche rhetoric?  Obama has given the clearest policy plans&#8211;do web searches, research beyond the CNN Political Ticker.  Edwards has also given concrete strategy.  I see it the least from Hillary, who seems to decide according to the polls.  </p>
<p>Sue, discrimination against blacks happens whatever your situation and background.  Credit Obama for his years of community service in Chicago; I think that's further from the ivory tower than you'll see in any candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel, rf wi</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175695</link>
		<dc:creator>mel, rf wi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175695</guid>
		<description>hillary should be ahead in nevada...it is probably rigged like the debate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hillary should be ahead in nevada...it is probably rigged like the debate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Ridge</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175645</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175645</guid>
		<description>CNN hates Mitt Romney. It&#039;s ashame our free left-wing press finds it necessary to pick our candidates. Use to be the American people picked our candidates. CNN&#039;s intolerance of Mitt Romney is a disgrace to this great nation. Really sad indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN hates Mitt Romney. It's ashame our free left-wing press finds it necessary to pick our candidates. Use to be the American people picked our candidates. CNN's intolerance of Mitt Romney is a disgrace to this great nation. Really sad indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.obamatruth.org</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175633</link>
		<dc:creator>www.obamatruth.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175633</guid>
		<description>A MUST READ FOR ANY OPRAHBAMA groupie
http://www.obamatruth.org/
FIVE REASON NOT TO SUPPORT OPRAHBAMA
1. OPRAH AND OBAMA SWITCHED PLACES. (Surly not the leader)
 2. Obama has ZERO foreign policy experience, infact no leadership experience 
3. Refusing to show up and vote in the senate on Iran, Abortion measures 
4. Seeking a trillion-dollar tax hike and raising the retirement age for Social Security!!!! 
5. Not in favor of a health care plan to cover all children rich or poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A MUST READ FOR ANY OPRAHBAMA groupie<br />
<a href="http://www.obamatruth.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamatruth.org/</a><br />
FIVE REASON NOT TO SUPPORT OPRAHBAMA<br />
1. OPRAH AND OBAMA SWITCHED PLACES. (Surly not the leader)<br />
 2. Obama has ZERO foreign policy experience, infact no leadership experience<br />
3. Refusing to show up and vote in the senate on Iran, Abortion measures<br />
4. Seeking a trillion-dollar tax hike and raising the retirement age for Social Security!!!!<br />
5. Not in favor of a health care plan to cover all children rich or poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me, Bumsville Ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175594</link>
		<dc:creator>Me, Bumsville Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175594</guid>
		<description>oprahbama, it&#039;s called &quot;style over substance&quot;. All he talks about is how bad the current president is but never about what he&#039;d really do because he has no actual policy plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oprahbama, it's called "style over substance". All he talks about is how bad the current president is but never about what he'd really do because he has no actual policy plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart woman 4 Clinton</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175582</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart woman 4 Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175582</guid>
		<description>Hillary&#039;s historic statement at the United Nations Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 that &quot;women&#039;s rights are human rights&quot; still echoes worldwide. As a lawyer, advocate, First Lady, and senator, Hillary has fought for issues important to women here at home and around the world for decades. Today, despite the progress women have made, they earn only 77 cents for every dollar men earn -- and women of color earn even less. Hillary is leading the charge in the Senate to strengthen equal pay laws and end pay disparities between men and women. She introduced the Paycheck Fairness Act to strengthen the penalties associated with wage discrimination, to ensure that the federal government sets a higher standard, and to increase oversight of employers. Hillary has also worked to increase access to capital and other support for women-owned businesses.
When it comes to each woman&#039;s ability to make the most personal of life decisions, Hillary has stood firm as an advocate for a woman&#039;s right to choose. She has expanded access to family planning services, including for low-income women. She spoke out forcefully against the Supreme Court&#039;s April 2007 decision that -- for the first time in decades -- failed to recognize the importance of women&#039;s health.
Hillary has worked to empower women throughout the world, especially low-income women. She has advocated for access to microfinance programs that enable women to start their own businesses and spoken out strongly against the tragic practice of sex trafficking.
As president, Hillary will continue her lifelong fight to ensure that all Americans are treated with respect and dignity. 
 
Hillary has fought the relentless and insidious efforts by far-right Republicans to limit the protections of Roe v Wade, while also working hard to expand access to family planning services.
Hillary has seen what happens when governments try to control a woman&#039;s reproductive health decisions. Whether it was Romania under a dictatorship saying you had to have children for the good of the state or China saying you had to have only one child for the good of the state, governments have dictated the most private and important decisions that we as individuals or families can make.
She has championed the Prevention First Act, which expands access to family planning services for low-income women, requires health insurance companies to cover contraception, and provides a dedicated funding stream for age-appropriate, medically accurate, comprehensive sex education. 
As First Lady, she helped pass the Family and Medical Leave Act and helped found the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancies, which established and achieved a goal of reducing teen pregnancies by one-third between 1996 and 2005. 
In partnership with Senator Patty Murray, Hillary waged a successful three-year battle to get the Food and Drug Administration to accept the overwhelming recommendation of the medical community and make Plan B (the &quot;morning after&quot; pill) available over the counter.
Hillary&#039;s work to empower low-income women has changed lives. She fought for the elimination of school fees, which prevent poor children in some countries from attending school, and for investments in health care and education for women and girls. And she helped found Vital Voices, a not-for-profit organization that continues to work to support women&#039;s leadership around the globe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary's historic statement at the United Nations Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 that "women's rights are human rights" still echoes worldwide. As a lawyer, advocate, First Lady, and senator, Hillary has fought for issues important to women here at home and around the world for decades. Today, despite the progress women have made, they earn only 77 cents for every dollar men earn - and women of color earn even less. Hillary is leading the charge in the Senate to strengthen equal pay laws and end pay disparities between men and women. She introduced the Paycheck Fairness Act to strengthen the penalties associated with wage discrimination, to ensure that the federal government sets a higher standard, and to increase oversight of employers. Hillary has also worked to increase access to capital and other support for women-owned businesses.<br />
When it comes to each woman's ability to make the most personal of life decisions, Hillary has stood firm as an advocate for a woman's right to choose. She has expanded access to family planning services, including for low-income women. She spoke out forcefully against the Supreme Court's April 2007 decision that - for the first time in decades - failed to recognize the importance of women's health.<br />
Hillary has worked to empower women throughout the world, especially low-income women. She has advocated for access to microfinance programs that enable women to start their own businesses and spoken out strongly against the tragic practice of sex trafficking.<br />
As president, Hillary will continue her lifelong fight to ensure that all Americans are treated with respect and dignity. </p>
<p>Hillary has fought the relentless and insidious efforts by far-right Republicans to limit the protections of Roe v Wade, while also working hard to expand access to family planning services.<br />
Hillary has seen what happens when governments try to control a woman's reproductive health decisions. Whether it was Romania under a dictatorship saying you had to have children for the good of the state or China saying you had to have only one child for the good of the state, governments have dictated the most private and important decisions that we as individuals or families can make.<br />
She has championed the Prevention First Act, which expands access to family planning services for low-income women, requires health insurance companies to cover contraception, and provides a dedicated funding stream for age-appropriate, medically accurate, comprehensive sex education.<br />
As First Lady, she helped pass the Family and Medical Leave Act and helped found the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancies, which established and achieved a goal of reducing teen pregnancies by one-third between 1996 and 2005.<br />
In partnership with Senator Patty Murray, Hillary waged a successful three-year battle to get the Food and Drug Administration to accept the overwhelming recommendation of the medical community and make Plan B (the "morning after" pill) available over the counter.<br />
Hillary's work to empower low-income women has changed lives. She fought for the elimination of school fees, which prevent poor children in some countries from attending school, and for investments in health care and education for women and girls. And she helped found Vital Voices, a not-for-profit organization that continues to work to support women's leadership around the globe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry, Columbia SC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175572</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry, Columbia SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175572</guid>
		<description>All the suppression of Ron Paul won&#039;t matter when he wins in landslides in all states. Keep up what you guys are doing it just fuels the movement. It is waking up Americans to the main stream media bias.

Go Ron Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the suppression of Ron Paul won't matter when he wins in landslides in all states. Keep up what you guys are doing it just fuels the movement. It is waking up Americans to the main stream media bias.</p>
<p>Go Ron Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midnite Ryder Everytown USA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175565</link>
		<dc:creator>Midnite Ryder Everytown USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175565</guid>
		<description>Gosh Kennedy&#039;s dad did buy him the Democratic nomination in 1960 and he turned out to be one of the all time greatest Presidents in history (And I have always believed that his brother Robert would have made an even greater Commander in Chief... ) 

Those old enough to remember - know that JFK was also one of the biggest womanizers in the White House (although Lyndon, FDR and others were more discrete)

So it always makes me curious why everyone so virulently attacks Hillary&#039;s character for chosing to stand by her husband while no one dragged Jackie&#039;s decison not to leave John through the mud... (And what about Senator Vitner and his poor wife? Guess the GOP has different standards - being &#039;the family values party&#039; etc maybe more forgiving!)

YAY There is about to be a New Dawn sweeping out the White House (UNLESS you&#039;d rather reelect the GrandOldSleazyParty again and prefer to dwell in perpetual darkness ugh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh Kennedy's dad did buy him the Democratic nomination in 1960 and he turned out to be one of the all time greatest Presidents in history (And I have always believed that his brother Robert would have made an even greater Commander in Chief... ) </p>
<p>Those old enough to remember &#8211; know that JFK was also one of the biggest womanizers in the White House (although Lyndon, FDR and others were more discrete)</p>
<p>So it always makes me curious why everyone so virulently attacks Hillary's character for chosing to stand by her husband while no one dragged Jackie's decison not to leave John through the mud... (And what about Senator Vitner and his poor wife? Guess the GOP has different standards &#8211; being 'the family values party' etc maybe more forgiving!)</p>
<p>YAY There is about to be a New Dawn sweeping out the White House (UNLESS you'd rather reelect the GrandOldSleazyParty again and prefer to dwell in perpetual darkness ugh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sick of oprahbama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175562</link>
		<dc:creator>sick of oprahbama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175562</guid>
		<description>WAKE UP AMERICA! Its time we stop playing with Oprah and elect a QUALIFIED PRESIDENT!!! not just a man because he’s black and oprah says so, she may know soap and books, but why in he world would anyone jeopardize your future because a TV talk show host said so?... This weekends Oprah circus, will not help obama, its make us all realize Oprahs running the show not obama...Our great country needs a qualifed leader, maybe if oprah was legally running, but obama is….

Glad the dog and pony show is over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAKE UP AMERICA! Its time we stop playing with Oprah and elect a QUALIFIED PRESIDENT!!! not just a man because he’s black and oprah says so, she may know soap and books, but why in he world would anyone jeopardize your future because a TV talk show host said so?... This weekends Oprah circus, will not help obama, its make us all realize Oprahs running the show not obama...Our great country needs a qualifed leader, maybe if oprah was legally running, but obama is….</p>
<p>Glad the dog and pony show is over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue, St Louis, MO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175546</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue, St Louis, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175546</guid>
		<description>You know, I like Obama. He&#039;s stylish, urbane, witty and intelligent. He is a privilege child - a Cinderella story as the above article defines. Oh, I would say that many would disagree with my statement - but the fact is Obama managed to avoid the necessity of being black in America. He was able to skip out on qualities such as perseverance, determination, a belief of principle, and the art of living that principle. He took as much discrimination as my neighbor who is white. He is an intellectual African American who lived in an elite world, the ivory tower or upper middle class. That is what concerns me. 

Although I regret to say, I did not walk with Dr. King in Selma. I walked in Berwyn and Cicero, the cities just outside of Chi-Town (Chicago), amongst white hostiles who reviled us and pelted us with dung and urine. I saw the hearts of bigots and racists, and I know that our nation is still populated with such ideology. I was young, and a teacher trying to teach in the inner city with history books whose final copyright was 1933. Apparently history ended with Hoover on the South Side of the city. We mimeographed pages that brought current events to our students. Earlier, I worked in the school during the race riots of 1967, and often dodged a bullet either from a white man or a black man. I walked through a city with military presence and smelt the burning of human flesh, or the shrieks of drunk men, angry men, both black and white, among the background of guns and flaming gas filled bottles. I worked with others, both black and white, to end the Jim Crow laws, and watched black men go off to war in Viet Nam.

At that time, Obama was a pubescent adolescent in Hawaii, Kenya and Indonesia - raised predominately white - with a father who only knew acceptance for the color of his skin – not rejection. Obama doesn&#039;t recognize the hate of discrimination - he&#039;s never had to face it - thus he rationalizes and theorizes upon it. We all have felt discriminated at times in our lives, all of us whether we are black, white, red, yellow, or brown. Obama is the product of what we wanted to see - urbane, cultured, intelligent and savvy, oddly enough he benefited from the gift of our determination. Yet even today he resides in his ivory tower, and rarely ventures far from his world of acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I like Obama. He's stylish, urbane, witty and intelligent. He is a privilege child &#8211; a Cinderella story as the above article defines. Oh, I would say that many would disagree with my statement &#8211; but the fact is Obama managed to avoid the necessity of being black in America. He was able to skip out on qualities such as perseverance, determination, a belief of principle, and the art of living that principle. He took as much discrimination as my neighbor who is white. He is an intellectual African American who lived in an elite world, the ivory tower or upper middle class. That is what concerns me. </p>
<p>Although I regret to say, I did not walk with Dr. King in Selma. I walked in Berwyn and Cicero, the cities just outside of Chi-Town (Chicago), amongst white hostiles who reviled us and pelted us with dung and urine. I saw the hearts of bigots and racists, and I know that our nation is still populated with such ideology. I was young, and a teacher trying to teach in the inner city with history books whose final copyright was 1933. Apparently history ended with Hoover on the South Side of the city. We mimeographed pages that brought current events to our students. Earlier, I worked in the school during the race riots of 1967, and often dodged a bullet either from a white man or a black man. I walked through a city with military presence and smelt the burning of human flesh, or the shrieks of drunk men, angry men, both black and white, among the background of guns and flaming gas filled bottles. I worked with others, both black and white, to end the Jim Crow laws, and watched black men go off to war in Viet Nam.</p>
<p>At that time, Obama was a pubescent adolescent in Hawaii, Kenya and Indonesia &#8211; raised predominately white &#8211; with a father who only knew acceptance for the color of his skin – not rejection. Obama doesn't recognize the hate of discrimination &#8211; he's never had to face it &#8211; thus he rationalizes and theorizes upon it. We all have felt discriminated at times in our lives, all of us whether we are black, white, red, yellow, or brown. Obama is the product of what we wanted to see &#8211; urbane, cultured, intelligent and savvy, oddly enough he benefited from the gift of our determination. Yet even today he resides in his ivory tower, and rarely ventures far from his world of acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunther Van de Blutengroth</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175534</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunther Van de Blutengroth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175534</guid>
		<description>CNN pushes agendas for liberals and the democrat party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN pushes agendas for liberals and the democrat party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biden Rising</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175493</link>
		<dc:creator>Biden Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175493</guid>
		<description>&quot;and no other candidate registering higher than single digit support.&quot;

of course, state by state is a different case...Biden hit 10% in SC compared to 15% for Edwards

http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_129_72.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"and no other candidate registering higher than single digit support."</p>
<p>of course, state by state is a different case...Biden hit 10% in SC compared to 15% for Edwards</p>
<p><a href="http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_129_72.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_129_72.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l b j, johnson city, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175462</link>
		<dc:creator>l b j, johnson city, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175462</guid>
		<description>Your headline says it all. No leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline says it all. No leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Card</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175437</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175437</guid>
		<description>This &quot;no clear leader in either party&quot; comment makes Election 2008 more interesting and challenging. I hope we get to brainstorm more on the issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This "no clear leader in either party" comment makes Election 2008 more interesting and challenging. I hope we get to brainstorm more on the issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Jr, LA, California</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175321</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Jr, LA, California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175321</guid>
		<description>Thank god... We may still have a chance at real change. Keep it going Barack, you&#039;re the only real shot we got.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank god... We may still have a chance at real change. Keep it going Barack, you're the only real shot we got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim, Peabody MA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175276</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim, Peabody MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175276</guid>
		<description>That is why I&#039;m voting for Pete Grasso...

http://www.GrassoForPresident.com

This country needs a true patriot with moral integrity.  One who will defend the US Constitution and restore FAITH in America...

The Faithful need to check out this great article:
http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewpoetry.asp?id=188951</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is why I'm voting for Pete Grasso...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.GrassoForPresident.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GrassoForPresident.com</a></p>
<p>This country needs a true patriot with moral integrity.  One who will defend the US Constitution and restore FAITH in America...</p>
<p>The Faithful need to check out this great article:<br />
<a href="http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewpoetry.asp?id=188951" rel="nofollow">http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewpoetry.asp?id=188951</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hey allons,tn</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175264</link>
		<dc:creator>hey allons,tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175264</guid>
		<description>hey the republicans are the same it would be hard to pick one of the same just a bush same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey the republicans are the same it would be hard to pick one of the same just a bush same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne, Silver Spring</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175260</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne, Silver Spring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175260</guid>
		<description>This is what some call a hit-job reporting, Clinton News Network.

The fact is Hillary is sinking and her network is trying its best ri cover up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what some call a hit-job reporting, Clinton News Network.</p>
<p>The fact is Hillary is sinking and her network is trying its best ri cover up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony, Los Angeles, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175259</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175259</guid>
		<description>With such powerful numbers I think we just may see a Clinton-Obama Ticket after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With such powerful numbers I think we just may see a Clinton-Obama Ticket after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, Austin TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175252</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, Austin TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175252</guid>
		<description>NOPE! sorry Walt, Obama is on fire!! Can&#039;t wait till Texas votes for him, since everyonelse seems to finally be catching on!

OBAMA ALL THE WAY IN &#039;08!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOPE! sorry Walt, Obama is on fire!! Can't wait till Texas votes for him, since everyonelse seems to finally be catching on!</p>
<p>OBAMA ALL THE WAY IN '08!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe, leesville, la</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175242</link>
		<dc:creator>joe, leesville, la</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175242</guid>
		<description>Interesting...the first poll this week that showed hillary with a lead in iowa, cnn shows it.Not ever showing newsweek with obama with a 6 point lead..and another one for him with a 7 point lead among others. Very sad. The Clinton News network is quite sad.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/iowa-primary.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting...the first poll this week that showed hillary with a lead in iowa, cnn shows it.Not ever showing newsweek with obama with a 6 point lead..and another one for him with a 7 point lead among others. Very sad. The Clinton News network is quite sad.<br />
<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/iowa-primary.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/iowa-primary.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt, Belton, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175208</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt, Belton, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/09/new-polls-show-no-clear-leader-in-either-party/#comment-175208</guid>
		<description>I would have thought Hillarity had bought the nomination by now..........w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought Hillarity had bought the nomination by now..........w</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
