at the end of the day, we won't vote for Obama because Oprah likes him. She IS NOT so important. She may appear nice and all, but I don't trust her political, if there is any political intelligence at all.

This could hurt Obama, she's obviously biased.

HEY i like edwards or clinton i don't wont a celebrity i wont a president that for the poor and middle class the rich billionairs have g.w.bush republicans liars club.

I can't believe that just because Oprah endorses Obama that this could give him an edge over John Edwards or Hillary. Why would anyone want Oprah to run for president, she has no political background, she's more movie star than presidential candidate. My vote is going to John Edwards. He knows what it is like to struggle and will fight for rural America, hardworking families. I like the fact that Mr. Edwards hasn't taken a dime from the political action committees or Washington lobbyists. Pat

Oprah had an opportunity to give back to the thousands of women who supported her,gave her wealth, and helped to shape her into a powerful female force. Oprah could have been a major player in the election of our first female president. A slap to all came when she chose race over gender. And , there were no surprises there!

Hillary as president? do you democrats really want 24 years of Bush's and Clinton's? Its time for a change. Also Barrack Obama who has a charisma and a new face, but common the guy is a one term congressman who is completely unqualified to be the President of the united states. People should look at Ron Paul he is liberal on many issues and conservative on all the right ones as most Americans are. As Chris Rock said, On some things im a little conservative- on some liberal. Ron Paul will end the Iraq war and promote freedom for all Americans.

Andy, Austin TX

Oprah should stay out of politics, I thought she was smater than this, shouldn't the best women win? Oprah, shame on you for playing the Black card.

I do not love Oprah, and I wish she would step back in to her "normal setting."

All the Hillary supporters who think she is the most electable of the democrats are either ignorant to the facts or on the crackpipe.

If another candidate won the primary they would share the name recognition that is making clinton the percieved front-runner right now. Without that celebrity status the playing field would be much more even. Common sense tells you that if anyone will have trouble running against republicans it is hillary clinton.

She is the most divisive candidate in the history of american presidentical politics.

She has the lowest favorability rating of all candidates.

She has the lowest likeability rating of all candidates.

The largest amount of people say they would NEVER vote for her.

She is the only weapon the republicans have to mobilize their base.

She has the LEAST amount of experience of all political candidates except john edwards.

The republican candidate will be able to say she flip-flopped on the war.

Don't even let them get started on the list of scandals and suspicious dealings involving the clintons.

….NO FOLKS. CLINTON IS THE LEAST ELECTABLE.

I can think of a few reasons for Oprah coming out of her auto-imposed "neutrality" and backing this guy…

but…. does it really matters??? her support does not change the fact that he is EMPTY… that his speeches are just about hope, about "change" about….well, about nothing else, since he does not spend any time telling us how does he plans to do things….

tha fact is that faith ALONE will not save us… we need concrete steps to achieve the 'change'…..

HOW do you plan to change America, Mr. Obama???? Do you have the resources to do it???? Do you have the right people to help you, or do you depend on your 'groupies' ???

Some people complaint about the empty rethorics of politicians…. but - the way I see it, playing with people's emotions (e.i. : using hope/fear as the base of your plan) is not any better…..

Posted By Ivelisse : December 10, 2007 9:50 am

Maybe you should read his brilliant plans to change america before you post idiotic comments like that.

My fellow Democrats, in as much as I like to see Obama become the first black president of the United States as a black man, I know that a vote for him is a wasted vote. Republicans are very excited about what is going on in the Democratic party right now. They are waiting around, hoping that Obama would win the nomination so that they could rip him apart as soon as the nomination is over. Fellow Democrats, we need to wisen up here. The only true chance we have in 08 is in Hilarry Clinton.

Posted By Ike Woodbridge , VA. : December 10, 2007 8:49 am

This Comment is pure speculation. YOU need to wisen up a bit. The republicans have been getting ready to destroy hillary clinton for eight years. You also seem to be making the assertion that Barack Obama's entire candidacy is based upon being the first black president. INCORRECT.

Barack Obama has more experience than hillary clinton, and he has the Judgement and Credibility we can believe in.

Sarah, you wrote: "[Barack] is the nicer, cleaner Giuliani - all inspiring rhetoric, very little substance."

Please, please, do some research. The more informed our electorate is, the better president we will have. Sarah, and any other people who think Barack has "no substance" - go to barackobama.com/issues. He has detailed plans for how to provide Universal Healthcare (without a socialist mandate), get us out of Iraq responsibly, and create hundreds of thousands of jobs.

Accusing Senator Obama of having no substance simply reveals that you haven't looked into the issue.

Jim Garza from Houston Texas:

Stop spreading lies about Obama. If you would take five minutes to look at his website, you'd see that he's a committed Christian and that the hand over heart thing was during the Pledge of Allegiance. You could see videos of him with his hand over his heart during the national anthem as well.

Not that any of these things should be issues, but it only takes a couple of minutes of your time to find out the truth. Do you really believe anonymously forwarded emails are true? Maybe you're still waiting for that check from Microsoft for all the emails you forwarded?

One of the last people Oprah got behind was James Frey. How did that turn out? He is as qualified to be an author as Obama is to be President of the United States

Sarah, San Diego, CA - Actually, there's plenty of examples listed here of Obama supporters talking about his positions off of the top of their head if you cared to read them. Don't let your anger sway you in to making baseless accusations or mean-spirited statements. As far as Oprah, again, if you cared to read or listen to clips online, Oprah has spelled out rather clearly why she's inspired by Obama… his truthfulness, conviction, statemanship, empathy, etc., and not once did she mention his being "Black" as a reason. Surrogates, celebrity or otherwise, afford attention to a candidate that attracts attention and allows those paying attention to decide if they want to vote for that candidate. Surrogates don't tell you who to vote for, just to think about their candidates' qualifications and if you could vote for them based upon that information. That's all Oprah is doing, so don't hate the messenger and if you don't like the message, just switch the channel.

Oprah's influence will be limited to the empty women who follow her glitzy TV show. She really does nothing to help blacks except make a whole lot of noise that amounts to a whole lot of nothing. She doesn't care about Obama — she just wants to see a black man get ahead. The people who really care about who runs this country will NOT vote for Obama — not because he is black, but because he is simply not presidential material.

OW is an ENTERTAINER and should not waste her time promoting someone who is clearly not up to the job of president.

This would be another example of black-on-black violence; I can see the headlines now: "Oprah Kills Obama's Presidential Bid"

Have you people gone insane? (addressing the current 14% that think Oprah should run with Obama as VP) This is the political arena, not a spot for her opinions on literature, self-improvement, and spirituality… Wow, I was dismayed when 'W' was re-elected, i swear if this happens i'm moving to Europe…

I love Obama but I'm so sick and tired of hearing about Oprah that I would vote for Kucinich right now. Can the media fawn anymore over her? I just heard one of these moronic anchors actually ask Candy Crowley if Oprah might run for Vice-President. CNN should fire a person for asking that stupid a question. By the way, hasn't Oprah had a few problems with vetting her choices for authors as to their veracity?

You realize of course that if this had been a rally for Hillary Clinton, the CNN headline would have been "Clinton Fails to Fill 80,000 Seat Stadium at Rally" or "Stadium Less than Half Full at Clinton Rally." Funny how CNN spins this stuff.

Wow..only a democrat would think Oprah Winfrey is qualified to run for the second highest office in the land.

Well, nice to see Oprah completely discrediting herself. Has she ever actually come out and said what it is, exactly, that inspires her so darn much about Obama? Obama is like every other politician, he's just younger, black, and knows how to work an audience over. I dare any Obama supporter to talk to me about this man's positions off the top of their head - I bet they can't, because they have no idea.

He's the nicer, cleaner Giuliani - all inspiring rhetoric, very little substance.

As an American and as a Black American, I am offended that the media or anyone else for that matter would dare to think that Oprah's support of Obama would affect my vote in any way. Americans believe it or not are far more intelligent than the media gives us credit to be. Oprah is not the be all to end all and my vote is my choice, not Oprah's.

i dont get it opra's not backing a woman strange.so shes not backing a woman,or a republican. so what does that say. shame on you opra.

Posted By Tommy Long Maxwell, texas : December 10, 2007 9:02 am

she is not a sexsiet , my dear sure not racist either.

Surely - the same woman who publicly backs a lying drug addict-turned author and the plastic surgeon who has been accused of repeated mishaps including the death of Kanye's mother - surely this same woman would be a great moniker for showing us the best candidate for pres.

Genius move Obama. What's even more sad is that now all the desperate housewives out there who have nothing better to do than watch the trash that is her show will now flock to the polls like zombies to put in her vote because 'Oprah said so'.

Oprah comes from a humble background, and understands the plights of the ordinary people, as well as having ties to people in the higher echelon. Given these circumstances, I do believe she would be an impartial representative our country. In addition, I am of the opinion that she has done an excellent job with her present empire, so her experience would be a great asset in these trying times in our nation’s history.

I think Americans are very blindsided when it comes to politics. this is not about a black man , it is more of the change that we need,Clintons were in power for 8 years, if she was not able to make any changes ,Why should we give her another chance.
People the year to have your voice heard is now. and for those black people who claim that voting for Obama is a waste of their vote, they need to wake up, Martin Luther king had a dream , lets make his dream a reality.

Eyz,

Did my research BEFORE I wrote my note… it is not an emotional note, it is a question. You did not answer it, instead just like the hypocritical Republicans, you just threw it back at me and could not answer why he has chosen to miss or not vote on 70-80% of the issues that have come to vote during his time as a politician (not just two weeks or two months… because you guys are the only saying he has 8+ years of experience so I am quoting from that time period). And on issues that matter, as I said….not the trivial issues that Congress must vote on….so my research was already done and my question still stands…..like I said, have not heard an answer to that yet… and campaigning is not the answer… Hillary *(and in fact, all other Democratic candidates)has missed far less votes than Obama and has campaigned as much if not more than he has….and remember it is not just the vote that is his job… it is his responsibility to be petitioning his fellow congressmen/women to vote his way if he really is an agent of change and hope…. so he is not showing his capabilities to do that either…. or is he in your mind?

I think Oprah's support will hurt more than help him. Her speech was 100x better than his, the guy talks, talks, talks but does not say anything interesting. I think Oprah is helping Obama because she wants to run and became herself the first female president of this great country. Wake up democrats a Obama nomination will be a victory for the Republicans. OBAMA WILL NOT BEAT ANY OF THE REPUBLICANS NOMINEES. THE ONLY THAT MAY HAVE A CHANCE IS HILLARY. BEING A REPUBLICAN ALL I CAN SAY IS "GO OPRAH AND OBAMA" AND MAKE DEMOCRATS SHOOT THEIR OWN FEET.

I think that Obama and Oprah are pathetic. Why can we vote on who can run the country better instead of who can get the most rich people to support them? Even better - Why can we vote for the people who are really running our country????

Who's REALLY running for President?
Oprah or Obama? Either way, I can't imagine official State dinners at the White House with KFC as the entree and a rap group for entertainment.

You know what really scares me about Obama? It's that he does have a moslem origin and that the Islamic radicals have made and set a goal to have their people elected to our government offices in local and state positions. Their ultimate goal is to have a muslim elected to the position and office of the president of the United States. I have seen the pictures where and heard the different reasons why he would not wear the US flag pin and place his hand over his heart like a true american during the playing of the Star Spangle Banner. Do you think he will ever pray in public and acknowledge that Jesus Christ is his Lord and Savior and denounce Islam and make people aware of what Islam actually teaches?
It would be a nightmare if Obama was elected into the office of the President of the United States and once there he would turn out to be what Chavis did in Venezulea or worst yet claim that he really is a Muslim and a supporter of what we all fear at this time.

Oprah must take care in her support of Barach. She is entitled to support him but we do not want to get silly about showbiz people replacing experienced political figures. Crosby and Hope, Martin and Lewis ? We must seek people experienced in government who have character, judgment, and a good record. The Country is already split up over Iraq. We don't need to start a black v. white, or a rellgious battle to confuse the issues. The adoration of sports and showbix figures is already out of hand. Let's show some maturity.

WE MUST NOT LOOSE FOCUS, WE ARE NOT VOTING, TO GET ON OPRAH SHOW FOR A CAR OR A XMAS SHOW. WE ARE VOTING FOR THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT. SHE GAVE HIM A BOAST. NOW LETS GET TO THE ISSUES. I FEEL VERY BLANK ABOUT OBAMA. HE NEEDS TO SHOW ME WHY, I SHOULD VOTE FOR HIM IF HE CAN'T DO THAT THAN OPRAH FAME IS HER NOT HIS. HILLARY CLINTON IS MY CHOICE. GO HILLARY.

we need to be forreal our country has gone to the doges we had a man that got us out of dept secured ss. and kept us out of war now that we need him more than ever you bring in a person that is not proven his self and you tack all of our live into his hands and a talk show host we need the clintons in office more than ever I hope to god there is a god for all of us

Obama supporters, please do not be fooled by all the people saying that he doesn't have a chance to beat the GOP in 2008 — that is not true unless YOU allow it to become true.

Obama has a fantastic record in mediating dem-repub disputes to get things done. His experience in bridging the partisan gridlock-divide is SORELY needed like never before, and NOBODY can deny that.

If Obama got the nom, I think he would win if he got a VP running mate that was a good complement to his strength as a diplomat and uniter/mediator. Some folks just cannot fathom the fact that skillful diplomacy IS the strongest/toughest force to get our troops home and protect the country from further terrorist attacks. To reassure these people that his adminstration has the necessary teeth to succeed, Obama needs a VP who is more rough around the edges and has a more "macho" reputation. He needs a "tough guy" (or tough gal) partner who could serve as a buffer for the GOP's probable attempts to sabotage Obama's work out of desperation to conserve their corrupt little paradise in Washington. Then, Obama could focus on his work as President — and yes, he does have well thought out plans for health care and security and etc. - some are very ambitious and likely would take some time to reach fruition, but nevertheless, they make good sense and are worth striving for — ANY president is going to be bogged down significantly by the burden of having to try to clean up the mess that the Bush Admin has created, so I expect that ANY candidate's (either party) outlined plans would take longer than they are proposing.

Obama is THE candidate that stands for true ethics reform in Washington — what could be more important right now than restoring Americans' trust in their government? NOTHING.

Obama is the best chance we have to increase transparency and accountability in Washington, and this is ESSENTIAL for preserving democracy. Period, end of story.

I will be REALLY disppointed if Hillary gets the nom. Of course, if she gets it, I will vote for her. However, for now, I am really hoping Obama pulls this off, since I am tired of voting for people I do not respect or like. I think it would be brilliantly symbolic if Obama's grassroots campaign succeeded in beating Hillary and her blantantly corporate one. GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!

2016??? Why are so many of you suggesting this magical number as the year for Senator Obama to run for president? Is another 8 years of wait time enough for him to become as JADED as Hillary and the rest of the Democratic pack now running???

No…I say NOW IS THE TIME FOR SOME MAJOR CHANGES!!! We do not have the luxury of waIting even one more year under the regime we're now experiencing.

OBAMA…the ONLY REALISTIC choice for 2008!!!!

As helpful to Obama's bid as support from Oprah in the form of endorsements and praise may be, he could only be injured by her as running mate. Obama possesses many assets that may eventually win him the White House, but he's also burdened by liabilities. The American people don't see in Obama a man who is particularly experienced or prepared to take the reins of foreign policy. As disputable as these perceptins may be, Oprah's addition to his ticket would only exacerbate them and further impede his path to Pennsylvania Avenue.

Rusty in Chesterfield, SC, please tell me you're joking. Otherwise I see men in white coats coming for you in the near future.

Just because Oprah has an interest in politics is no reason to consider such a ridiculous proposal. Since Brad Pitt is interested in rebuilding New Orleans should he become the next Secretary of HUD. Wait I visted a state park over the weekend maybe I'll put my name in for Secretary of the Interior..give me a break

A popular TV personality does not necessarily an appropriate or effective leader make.

Ike Woodbridge of VA 22192 posted a response that I have to disagree with.

You truly believe Oprah is backing Obama because of race? Hillary has not been tested, she has been ridiculed. The only test for Hillary was when Bill Clinton appointed her to lead universal healthcare and she failed miserably. Obama has more years in elected public office than Hillary. Let's be honest, Hillary would not be running for President is she wasn't Bill Clinton's wife.

Oprah has had many chances to support past presidential candidates, both black and white, from Jesse Jackson to Bill Clinton. She opted not to because these politicians disappointed her. One thing about Oprah that many people are away of is that Oprah looks at the person first before she even touches the politics behind them. She believes in Obama's character first and foremost.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1393

Barack Obama stands a far better chance of winning a general election than Hillary Clinton. It is quite clear, through many polls (like the one linked above)

"Does Clinton have experience as a community organizer, really working closely with people and their day to day lives? I don't think so"

Dan from Texas, are you serious? Look into Hillary Clinton's entire biography and you will see that most of her life has been spent working for the betterment of her community and more specifically women and children.

Oprah is a very brilliant woman, but she just made a not so brilliant move. I am African American, and I want to remind Oprah that the Presidency is not about race. The Presidency is about experience, courage and vision. Obama has not been tested by any means, but Hillary has been. Hillary has a better chance od winning than Obama. Oprah in all her smarts should know that Barack Obama if nominated, would lose the general election even before the election day. Thus, I most humbly ask Oprah: Please don't NADER this election. Simply put, don't ruin this one Oprah.

God's holy word mentions of an antichrist in the future times that we are approaching. I submit to you that Obama is a closet Moslem with a membership in a Protectant Church to hide his true beliefs from mainstream America.
After becoming President He will make a pact with Satan and become the world's leader. Only he can bring peace between Isreal and Palestine.

mark, TX - for you and others making claims like this, let's go over the equation again. Oprah's popularity gets people out to hear Obama speak so that those people can make up their own minds after hearing him speak whether they will vote for him or not. Oprah has said that she is not trying to tell people what to think but rather just ask them to think.

Headline poll ask if Oprah should RUN for VP? THE VP is only on the ticket of the nice gentleman who asked. They don't individually run.

I hear all these comments talking about how Oprah will hurt not help Obama's campaign and how sad it is that he needed her to back him up…. so WHY is it that RIGHT after he called up Oprah… HILLARY…CLINTON… decided to call up who? Maya Angelou? Come on now. Obviously Hillary thinks that Oprah helped Obama. That's why she got Maya in the first place. So to all the people that think Oprah was wrong to do it. Take a look at your precious Hillay and how much of a copycat SHE is.

And in response to that gentleman that made up 5 LIES about Obama… it's people like you that are dragging this country into the dirt with lies. Learn the facts before you spout off at the mouth

Republicans are very excited about what is going on in the Democratic party right now. They are waiting around, hoping that Obama would win the nomination so that they could rip him apart as soon as the nomination is over.

Heard an interesting statistic recently: 35% of us are registered Republican, and 50% Democrat. People are tired of the Republican way of doing things, and Obama stands in MUCH clearer contract to the Republican status quo than Clinton.

No Republican has ever had 30,000 show up for a campaign event. Neither has Clinton. Quit the fear-mongering, open your eyes and see where the momentum is.

You want to pick up swing voters and disillusioned Republicans? You want to win? Get Obama on the ticket.

Everybody loves Oprah. The problem is Obama. He said 4 years ago as the keynote speaker at the Democratic National Convention that he wanted to return America to one where people of low means could accomplish the American Dream. Does he mean the same America that allowed a poor man named Bill Clinton to rise the to the top. Or the American that allowed a poor man like Obama to rise to unimaginable heights? Or the same America that is allowing a poor man named Huckabee to surge in to latest campaign. Or the American that allowed a poor man named Justice Clarence Thomas to rise to great heights. What is wrong with an America that already allows extreme vertical movement in the social, politcal, and business world that you are going to fix Mr Obama? Then you have the audacity to spout the idiotic line about the 'incompetence of the White House and that only Obama can bring real, meaningful change'. Like you have never made any mistakes? To be a true stateman, Obama, you must acknowledge and honor your opponent for their RIGHT deeds then keep on honoring them for even their WRONG decisions. They are at the top of America doing their best to lead this country in a truly chaotic world. THEN you can disagree with their direction and offer a NEW direction as you see fit. THEN the American people MIGHT believe you. But to chaulk up the current White House as 'incompetent' is TRULY speaking down to the perceived ignorance of your audience. Shame on you for daring to call the American people stupid. Shame on you for assuming the American people are stupid. Should you be successful in your bid for the White House, how are you going to react when the next wave of campaigners chaulk up your endeavors as 'incompetent'. We are NOT ALL that stupid Mr. Obama, and YOU are no different than the rest of the SHILL and SHAM artists running for President other than one or two true and sincere and honest folks. People of America, please search in your heart for the REAL truth sayers. It is your nation at risk.

Oprah is backing this candidate simply because he is black. Where I am from that is called racism.

Posted By Todd New York, NY : December 10, 2007 12:16 pm

Todd did Oprah tell you that over tea or are you making this up? I personally believe the latter and until you start accusing Barabra Streisand of racism and sexism, pipe down!

The Republicans are excited because they have information that will destroy Hillary if she gets the nomination. It is clear to me that voting for Obama is not a wasted vote. Voting for Hillary is a waste.

Tom, New York - I think that we all expect a debate on the issues and recognize that when candidates differ, there will be challenges to their positions. I had no problem with HRC calling Obama on his "universal healthcare" claim or even challenging specifics about his voting record, just like I had no problem with Obama calling HRC disingenuous about Social Security and not completely honest about her stand on other issues. But trying to exploit what he said in kindergarten or third grade for political purposes is petty and comical. I don't agree with the name-calling or below-the-belt attacks by any candidate but we should be intelligent and emotionally mature enough enough to recognize the difference between them and distinguishing a position or policy point.

George W. Bush redefined the meaning of experience and intelligence as qualifications for president and Americans are paying the price. And those of you that say Obama needs Oprah, no, Oprah needs Obama who will uphold Americans Constitutional rights which "Big Brother" is taking away.

The difference between Opera and Obama was apparent as soon as Obama took mike from her.I think the race in the end will be between Huckabee and Clinton.I am closely listening to both.This year the race is not between Red and Blue ,but between what the policy is for America and its people.

Uh er oh where's the number to call in the votes for this American Idol…I got to be at the American Idol campaign..gee gee gee….

"Please tell me why anyone would make such an important decision on whom to vote for at this juncture in our history based on what Oprah Winfrey says…
Posted By Bill, Commack NY : December 10, 2007 12:00 pm"

Because too many Americans are plain stupid? I didn't need Oprah to learn that Obama has no substance, but now I know for sure that he has none.

I'm voting for Obama, my daughter if voting for Obama, my wife is voting for Obama, my friends are voting for Obama, my neighbors are voting for Obama. Obama is going to blow the field away in the primaries and in the general election. All the negative talk here is by people who are too emotionally invested in Clinton to just take a unbiased view.

Obama has plenty of experience. Does Clinton have experience as a community organizer, really working closely with people and their day to day lives? I don't think so. He's walked the walk already.

His grandmother lives in Africa. Think he's interested in understanding world politics and how it affects his family at home and abroad?

He blows away the field in real experience.

As for politics, that's what advisors are for.

I love Oprah,and if she was running, I would for sure vote for her.But I will not vote foe Obamma,he seems inexperienced. Being an independent,I am listening closely between Clinton,and Huckabee.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/opinion/02rich.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

1. IF Oprah had indorsed Hillary, the Media would have covered EVERY SINGLE MOMENT of Oprah and Hillary’s interactions. (Excluding only them going to the bathroom).

2. A MAJOR plus for Obama and he should be getting Media coverage. This is BIG!

3. Seems the only way Oprah would not get some ort of criticism for who her 1st Presidential endorsement. Is if Oprah had backed a white male.

4. Oprah backing any white male would have been haled a major accomplishment for that white male candidate.

5. The negative comments all seem from jealousy and hatred.

I would like to respectfully respond to Ike from Virginia. My 1st impression of your comments led me to believe your assessment of this contest is based on a pre-existing preference for Hillary Clinton. I pray that is your position, otherwise I fear you along with too many of my African-American brothers suffer from this lack of self-esteem, and self-defeatism that had so many of us actually resisting the Civil Rights movement in the early 1960's. If this is the case, you are the EXACT target of Michele Obama's "Wake Up" comment. As an African-American myself I say this…. if you are allowing Bacack's ethnicity to become SCARED of the republican party, then please keep that to yourself so that your cowardice doesn't infect anyone else, please.

Tom, New York - The figures you quote actually are for a two month period beginning in September 2007 (Sen. Barack Obama has missed the most votes of any Democratic presidential hopeful in the Senate over the last two months, including a vote on an Iran resolution he has blasted Sen. Hillary Clinton for supporting. CNN.com, 11/2/07). No argument on the facts and as far as the Iran resolution, Obama has admitted that he made a mistake in not getting back for the vote but he was on record for not supporting the resolution prior to the vote. All of the presidential candidates have missed votes during their campaigning and most folks accept and understand that, which is why it hasn't been a significant issue for most. As far as Obama's record in the Illinois legislature and the U.S. Senate overall, all you have to do is read what's listed here and check out the U.S. Senate official site to see what issues he's voted on and compare those votes to Senator Clinton. After you do your research, let's compare notes.

Tom, NY, NY

You are either ignorant or a liar. This link shows how many votes were missed by all candidates:

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/senate/vote-missers/

As you can see, McCain (54.1%), Biden (35.8%), and Dodd (34.4%) all missed more votes than Obama (34.1%). Hillary (19.0%) did not have to miss as many votes early on because she had name recognition and did not have to campaign as much early on.

The missing votes issue is a NON-ISSUE. None of these candidates have missed votes that would have had an impact on legislation. Unfortunately, campaigning is a necessary evil.

When reading these blogs, I find it interesting than many Clinton supporters post anti-Obama messages that are emotionally filled with rhetoric but no substance (sometimes to the point of racist hatred). Whereas, Obama supporters talk directly about issues, list FACTUAL stats and are more than ready to debate about who is ready to be the next president.

Obama will be able to beat Republicans in the general election. He is already taking on one of the most powerful attack machines there is.

Obama '08

Oprah is backing this candidate simply because he is black. Where I am from that is called racism.

I agree with Ike Woodbridge, when he suggests that Obama may not win the presidency and votes cast for him will result in a Republican President in '08. The best opportunity that Democrats have to ensure a win in the White House in '08 would probably be to vote for Hillary. I hate to pick sides between the two, but you have to in order to make a calculated decision.

I'm reminded of the presidential election which pitted Gore against Bush and Nader. I feel like we lost significant votes for Gore, because so many people voted for Nader as a means of sending a message. That message fell on deaf ears and Bush was elected.

We need to be mindful of what we are doing as a voting population. I would LOVE to see Obama as president, but I'm skeptical as to the number of voters he will actually receive when it's time to vote.

I am very impressed by Obama. He voted no on the war. If anyone is trying to claim that Hillary has experience because she was the First Lady then explain that vote. Obama can win the presidency. Hillary has higher negatives than any other candidates. There are many Democrats that are very concerned that they will lose if Hillary is on the ticket. They are already running ads against Senator Mary Landreau comparing her to Hillary. We need to have the faith and courage to make the right choice.

Eyz,

Your second post…..who started the negative attacks? Not Clinton now did she? You of course will say that Barack did not attack.. he just asked her to clarify her positions or take a position…. but it is an attack when she states her position and he then chooses not to accept it and instead says things like she has no integrity, she is not being "honest"… etc… those are attacks no matter how you try to twist it. (the funny thing is that the one example that is most clear is the drivers license issue where he "attacked" her and then the following debate he gave almost the same answer as she had two weeks before… so it was an attack wasn't it?)

So, now that she is responding to the attacks (which I don't agree with but can understand) you Obama supporters start crying that she is "dirty"? Signs of immaturity now isn't it? Kind of childish behavior isn't it?

And I still do not understand how Obama supporters can say he has more experience in politics? He has missed about 70-80% of the requested votes on important issues since his time in politics? Is that doing his job? Is that leadership? take a stand or position on something to try to make a difference, change, and hope? I don't see it that way… I think it is lack of courage to make change…..

Not that he cannot mature into a great leader… but the time is not right now… I do believe we need someone who is capable of making the changes NOW that we have to have as a result of the mess the current administration has created….

I don't know who is best to do that, but I don't see it as Obama right now….

And yes, I have read his website, the only difficulty I have is his ability to recite half of what is written there when asked at a debate or at one of his appearances.. so not sure he really understands his own words (or whoever the words are from) on his website so I have hard time trusting them…(actions speak louder than words)

This is so absolutely awesome!!! What a great time in my political history! Take it all the way, Barack!! Thanks Oprah, you were — what can I say — brilliant for Barack!!!!!

Please tell me why anyone would make such an important decision on whom to vote for at this juncture in our history based on what Oprah Winfrey says…

As Oprah gets older the more I see that I truly do not like who she really it. No white children in her African school, Supporting Obama (surely based on skin) and the muted racist comments. If Obama were white, Oprah would not be supporting him, nor would she be supporting Clinton. Voting should be based on the candidates ability to lead our country whether Black or white and our votes should not be influenced by anyone society deems to be GREAT. Maybe Oprah should run for president. I personally will not vote for anyone who does not fit the bill and definately not for anyone who slaps our country in the face with the failure to site our state pledge. The Oprah stance is to win the votes of Women and blacks - We need equalism not racism!!

It is rather puzzling that Ms. Winfrey is supporting Mr. Obama. Oprah Winfrey has built an empire by making shrewd, intelligent and informed choices and now this…very strange. Obviously Mr. Obama is not the right person for the job and one must question Ms. Winfrey’s judgment. What does she hope to gain?

Eyz….
Since you are so educated on the accomplishments of Obama, please educate the rest of us on why exactly he has missed approximately 70-80% of the critical votes while in the legislature and Senate? Are making decisions on important issues not important to Obama? Or is he missing the courage to take a stand on something and show it with actions, not just empty words? I need some more education from an Obama person on this to help me decide about his credentials…..

Thanks.

Hey…no one on this or any other board is getting someone to change their vote by posting trash. People have the right to express their opinions and vote as they please.
My opinion is I would NEVER vote for Hillary Clinton because of her character.
I question any woman who calls herself a leader and puts up with a man (Bill) who has repeatedly disrespected her, their marriage and their daughter.
A woman like that either has real self esteem issues or a real selfish political agenda that requires staying in such a relationship. Either way, her judgement is suspect and she's not presidential material to me.

BARACK OBAMA 2008
HONESTY, INTEGRITY, WISDOM & STATESMANSHIP!

Oprah is supporting Obama because he's the most inspirational candidate (which is usually the first thing she looks for before endorsing anything/anyone), and because she believes that he can effectuate real, positive change in Washington unlike any other candidate running. Would those of you throwing the race card around embrace the silly notion that all of HRC’s white supporters are only backing her because she's white, or that women are only backing her because she's a woman? How about showing some intellectual evolution and stop the hate-mongering. And for those of you who believe that Obama can't win because of the tired, ill-conceived arguments that he's not experienced enough or tough enough, do the math. Obama has more elected years in office than HRC and more practical years working in the community at a grassroots level on issues affecting everyday Americans. His stated aggressive policies towards terrorism along with his forward-thinking diplomacy approach were once ridiculed and then embraced by foreign policy experts and military officials alike ("google" and do the research). Considering Obama's weathered HRC's petty, below-the-belt and comical attacks on him with flying colors, I think it's safe to say that he's more than capable of withstanding any right-wing Republican shots. Here's the bottomline that folks should be focusing on. Can HRC get elected with her high negatives? Yes, but it won't be with a 50+1 majority but more than likely something closer to a 46-43 edge at best. With that kind of deficient win, HRC will not be able to govern or lead effectively because of the animus and distrust she generates from those "red states" and the other side of the isle that will bog down the legislative process in even nastier partisanship. That's why Obama's maturity, intelligence, vision, and skills as a proven leader, coupled with his broader appeal over HRC and lack of combustible "political baggage," will allow him to do just as he says as President of the United States… bring both sides of the aisle and independents together to address and find solutions for the vital issues facing our country.

can Oprah help him win the electoral college and keep the Republicans out of the White House.

I think not.

your level of naivete is appalling, if you wanna accuse oprah of making this a race issue then accuse chuck norris who is for huckabee and barbara streisand who is for hillary just to be fair to obama, but nah that aint gon happen because you thrive on your ignorance, racist thinking, feeling and comments, oprah is free to choose who to support, just because she is a mega star and she chooses obama now thats all about race? f.y.i he is of mixed race, half white, half black, since you are all about race, how are you sure oprah isnt supporting his white side? lol

Obama helped to deliver the first significant campaign finance reform law in Illinois in 25 years. He brought law enforcement groups around to back legislation requiring that homicide interrogations be taped and helped bring about passage of the state’s first racial-profiling law. He was a chief sponsor of a law enhancing tax credits for the working poor, played a central role in negotiations over welfare reform and successfully pushed for increasing child care subsidies (NYT, 7/30/07). As a Chicago community organizer, Obama notched accomplishments ranging from job-training programs to a successful attempt to improve city services at the Altgeld Gardens housing project, chaired a voter-registration drive that helped carry Illinois for Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton in 1992 and led an effort to acquire state money for a dropout prevention program that still operates today (any Obama bio you can find online). So to those who want to criticize Obama by saying that he's too green, that he did nothing for the people of Illionos or doesn't know how to lead, maybe you should think about addressing whatever your personal issues are that allow you to make such blatant falsehoods. It's a shame that more people don't know how to share in a dialogue on the issues without trying to manipulate others with some form of fear-based "hyperbole." Wow!, how Bush/Cheney like is that.

If you think black women share more in common with white women as opposed to black men, then you are clearly white and don't get it.

Posted By Shaquan, DC : December 10, 2007 11:18 am

Shaquan,

I'm a successful black female and I don't get it. Maybe you as a black man could explain it to me. Obama is too inexperienced to hold and effectively run the office he seeks. I would not vote for a 4th grader as senior class president. This is what I equate a vote for Obama to be. Maybe I would vote for him in 8 years, but not now.

**AND**

Learn to loose graciously.

Posted By Maria, Houston : December 10, 2007 11:16 am

Please learn exactly which words to use in your post or you will appear VERY uneducated. The correct word is LOSE not loose. "How dare are you"…what does that mean? Please, if you want to support Obama, learn some grammar. It will make you look as if you are educated and even-tempered, and not a blubbering idiot.

The latest poll of the state taken BEFORE Oprah hit South Carolina has the race within 2% whereas Clinton had been leading for a long time. And this could really put Obama on top.

Hey Don from San Fran, you wrote: "it's time for Obama to come out, on his own, with a clear-cut plan to meet the challenges our country faces today."

If you are unaware of Senator Obama's detailed plans and strategies, it means you're not paying attention. Go to Barackobama.com/issues it's all there! He has a great mix of inspirational generalities and nitty-gritty specifics.

Barack's got a real plan for change, while Hillary continues to vote alongside the Bush-Cheney agenda. To me, the choice is clear.

Wel;l I can tell you I am happy Oprah came….however it doesnt change my mind on Obama. It would be a wasted vote for him since he wont beat the republican in the general election.

Thank you obamatruth person for showing some facts, and not just dealing in emotion, as most Oprama supporters do.

I also have major trepidation about Barack Obama because:

-he will not wear an American flag pin
-he will not put his hand over his heart during STAR SPANGLED BANNER
-he didn't do anything except raise taxes in Illinois
-his answer to America's issues is to raise taxes (I could do that, why not elect me for President?)
-the hard part is NOT raising taxes, NOT increasing Congressional spending, and Obama has no clue about approaching it that way
-he just failed to show up for the tough votes on Iran and abortion (what kind of leadership does that show?)
-he wants to "solve" all our country's social issues by simply asking rich, successful people to pay for them (NOT what our country was founded on)

-he makes inane statements such as "being related to Dick Cheney is a 'sad situation'" - oh THAT's real nice

-he doesn't want to show his hand to voters, so his method is simply to NOT SHOW UP when votes are being taken that will illustrate his record

-his supporters haven't named anything he has done EXCEPT raise taxes to provide more government handouts (he calls them "programs"- they are in fact welfare and other free stuff paid for by hard-working people to people who don't particularly care to work)

Everyone is talking about experience, experience, and experience. Sure experience is great when you are looking to hire a scientist to lead a team of researchers to find a medical cure for some illness, but we are talking about POLITICS here! Being a US president requires conviction, judgement, ability to inspire, and surrounding yourself with reliable and intelligent people. This is true of all presidents. Bill Clinton's knowledge and experience came mostly for his law studies. He wasn't a career military commander. He wasn't a career economist and he wasn't a career engineer. He had good cabinet members that performed well.

Oprah likes Obama because past presidential candidates have disappointed her. Now what can she mean? She's not only talking about Republican candidates (i.e. GW Bush) but also Democratic candidates (i.e. Bill Clinton). Americans need to put aside their pre-conceived notions about how important executive experience is relative toward the presidency. If political experience was the only determining criteria to be President, GW Bush would not be president, Bill Clinton would not be president, GH Bush would not be president, and Ronald Regan would not be president. All the above mentioned previous presidents had at least one person in their political parties running for president with more political experience than any of them.

Now I understand why up to now, Oprah has elected not to get involved in politics. She should have continued to stay uninvolved. It was embarassing….

And, Obama… how can he think he is ready to be a leader when 80% of his time in politics he has not been there to do his job… not had the courage to try to make change and create "hope" by voting on important issues… instead he chooses not to vote… maybe because he does not have the courage to decide? A leader? The republicans of course are doing what they can to push him as the candidate…. they will retain the office of President if he is chosen to represent the democrats….

Oh well, the Obama supporters have no answer for his "experience" so they are going for hype and "Hollywood Oprah" appeal…..wow…… embarassing….

Let's hope that this Oprah/Obama sideshow doesn't derail the Democratic party, and cause us to have to endure another 4 or 8 years of Republican rule. Obama is not only inexperienced, he is hesitant–has trouble with decisions. Why else does he vote "present" instead of yes or no on most of the votes that come up in the senate? He is talking about hope, but we all can hope–that is nothing new. But can he turn this hope into reality? I don't think he can. I think we need the strength and experience of Hillary. THINK, Democrats, and don't be swayed by a talk show host who is playing the race card. I won't vote for Obama–not because he is black, but because he needs more seasoning. Maybe in 8 years, after Hillary has managed to straighten out some of this mess.
Go. Hillary!!

Re: Tommy from Texas

What it says among other things is that Oprah, a black woman, feels that shares a more common bond with Obama, a black man.

If you think black women share more in common with white women as opposed to black men, then you are clearly white and don't get it.

OMG, Oprah is not supporting a woman, she is supporting a black man! How dare she!!!

Oprah is a successful self-made woman who did not get where she is by being married to a powerful man. She is independent open-minded strong person and she can support anyone she believes in and help in whichever way she deems the best. This is still a free country.

How dare are you trying to shame anyone for expressing their belief?

How dare are you calling her "a racist", just because she supports a man who happened to be of mixed race?

Why are you supporting Hillary Clinton? Are you racist? Are you sexist?

If you don't like Senator Obama, don't vote for him. But this fake outrage of Clinton supporters only shows that they have no class and are willing to use any dumb excuse and smear. Learn to loose graciously.

Okay, CNN. We've gagged down days of Oprah/Obama hype and a weekend of nonstop coverage. Now we can even listen to her ENTIRE 20 MINUTE STADIUM ADDRESS. Her speeches contain no meat, only "inspirational" fluff about her opinion of Obama. She must be hoping that her opinion of him is enough to swing votes in his direction. It might, if she could help him articulate a clear agenda and tell us exactly what he wants to do as president instead of giving us vague generalities. Oh, that's right, maybe he doesn't need to be specific since he said he's running because Martin Luther King spoke of "the urgency of now". That was 45 years ago. "Now" is long past; it's time for Obama to come out, on his own, with a clear-cut plan to meet the challenges our country faces today.

What's in it for Oprah? This is America and nobody does anything for nothing Or is it as they say
" Money talks and —–?

Obama is a talented man and a good speaker but, and that's a big BUT, with only 2 plus years in the US senate and zero foreign policy experience he should have waited to run for president. I could see voting for him in years to come, but not now. This country has serious troubles, too serious to hand the reins of power to a neophyte.

Oprah is just supporting Obama because he's African American, if he wasn't she wouldn't be supporting him. He has no leadership experience and will be stepped on once he's in the White House (if he ever gets there). So sad for Oprah.

What kind of experience did George W. Bush have? What a silly statement to make, and look at what he has done to this country for the last seven years What kind of shape are the majority of Americans in today because of him? We are looking for a change, and are sick and tired of the Bushes, and Clintons in the Whitehouse. I think Hillery would be fine, but enough is enough. I wish Senator Obama the very best in his run for the highest position in the country.

Oprah's involvement in Obama's campaign is a net positive in that it can potentially bring new voters into the democratic process, even if they ultimately don't vote for Obama.

However, I do believe this new spotlight on Obama and Oprah can work to the advantage of his Democratic rivals. Edwards, for example, can contrast the glitz and glamour of Oprah with his "humble roots" and his dedication to "regular working people." Richardson, Biden, and Dodd can also contrast their pragmatism and seriousness (to match serious times) with Obama's lightness. This actually strikes at one of Obama's weaknesses.

There is also a threat that Oprah may overshadow Obama's message in that the "we" that comprises Obama's base consists of regular people, but Oprah is anything but that. Will Oprah's campaigning be seen as "meddling by yet another Hollywood figure" to those in Middle America? Or were these people never going to vote for Obama to begin with?

You can read more of this analysis here: http://www.theseventen.com/2007/12/impact-of-oprahbama.html

This is wonderful news. Ike, you are completely wrong. Obama is exciting conservative voters too! I know many Republican voters that have not only decided to vote for Obama but have actively been fundraising for his awe-inspiring campaign. I know of not one conservative voter that has switched to supporting Clinton. She is who most conservatives fear most. 24 years of two families ruling our government does not make for an American history that our country wants or needs.

I think the only reason Oprah wants him to be President is so she can get her own network!

Personally, I'm tired of hearing his name mentioned by her!

I enjoy being entertained by talented actors, good movies, etc. - Oprah is definitely one of those entertainers who has provided good talk shows, and wonderfully crafted movies of the week, however, she will not influence me on my choice of candidate for President. On the contrary, I deeply resent any celebrity who thinks, even for one moment, that their ability to promote good entertainment will automatically make me a follower of their own political, and personal beliefs. It scares me to think that Oprah viewers who buy any book she endorses will do the same for a Presidental candidate - just because she says so. Is she that powerful? Not to me.

Oprah and Obama…or perhaps "Sanford and Son." Kind of catchy. Oh and the 30K at the staduim? MMMMM, better check with your groupies at Newsweek. They said closer to 20.

Ike- that's a joke, really. like the GOP can't rip Hillary apart, too. they are chomping at the bit for Hillary or Obama. the lady is just too polarizing. she will make it too easy.

Ike
The only true chance we have in 08 is in Hilary Clinton.

* shudders *

Please, do the world a favor by not voting in the November elections.

Hopefully Opra's disappointment in politicans will not keep black people from voting for the Clintons again..

1) Obama is NOT black. He is of mixed race! Just because he and his campaign refuse to acknowledge the fact he's half white, doesn't change the fact he is.
2) Anyone who decides whom to support based on the endorsement of a celebrity should seriously consider doing the republic a favor and tear up his voter registration card!

The comment that Obama is not for health care for children is wrong. All the democratic candidates, including Obama and Clinton, have plans to cover all children. You can be for whoever you want, but please don't post things that are not true.

I hope to add some clarity and truth to this sordid discussion:

1. Obama is ready to be President. He has more experience than Abraham Lincoln did — and we all know that Lincoln is considered in both learned and everyday circles as quite possibly our finest President. Lincoln had 8 years serving in the Illinois state legislature and had 2 years serving on the national level as a congressman. Obama has the same 8 years in Illinois and has nearly 4 years serving as U.S. Senator on the national level.

2. This nonsense about his lack of foreign policy credentials is a joke. His B.A. is in foreign relations from Columbia University. He sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Select Committee, two other Senate foreign relations committees, and is on many Veteran Affairs committees. The leading foreign policy experts in the COUNTRY all agree with his proposals and ideas.

3. Oprah is positive for Obama, they represent the promise of America, and the fact that she is black has little do with her support of him. She has said on many occasions she is supporting him b/c he is truly the best PERSON in her opinion and she reiterates that people know the difference between backing a person and buying a book. It is primarily designed to get people to vote period, not just for Obama. Are we that cynical as a country now? Don't we want people to get engaged?

4. Obama has addressed the Kyl-Lieberman vote by saying he missed it, tried to get back, and apologized as it is one of the hazards of campaigning. No other major candidates have apologized for missing anything — and they have all missed votes. Further, Harry Reid, who is backing Sen. Clinton, did call that vote at the last minute when he KNEW that Obama was in route to New Hampshire.

5. Obama's Social Security plan is practical and is focused on raising the ceiling, which will need to be done no matter who occupies the White House. Again, this is an issue beyond spin and partisanship, the ceiling needs to be raised, just ask the leading spokespersons and experts on the subject.

6. Obama's health care plan is realistic and practical and will SAVE MONEY. Some of the other plans, like Sen. Clinton's will actually force people to purchase health care that may be too expensive for what a given household can afford — which defeats the purpose of making people's lives and daily budget easier. Clinton means well but in the end Obama's plan gives people options and is loaded with subsidies to ensure that women and children get what they need rather than forcing it on them.

7. This notion that Oprah supporting Obama just b/c he is African-American is a travesty. If that logic were the litmus test of this endorsement then anytime Clinton, Edwards, or anyone else received an endorsement from a White person that person would be racist. No one claims that Sen. Clinton's White endorsements are racist. Give me a break.

8. Why should Obama wait when he has what it takes now? America is replete with history telling someone to wait. People need to relax, quit being so cynical and take a hard look at this guy. We are easily roped into thinking that in America a person can't both look and act nice and have substance there. Obama is the real deal — the fact that he comes in the form of representing both Black and White people should be a plus, not a minus. He represents the best of all of us. We could miss out on one of the best presidents ever. Please do your research and open your minds.

I see we have a couple of ignorant fools commenting here today.

Obama in 2016? after he would've been corrupted by Washington? after the oceans would've risen? After America would've invaded Iran? You guys must be sick? You can go ahead and wait for 2016 in your dreams - I'm not waiting. I'm having Obama in 08 and that's the way it's going to be.

Hillary is change? Which part of it? The Status quo? Poor judgment that led to the invasion of Iraq? Norman Hsu? Sex scandals? Corruption? Another Clinton for 8 more years? Which part of change, precisely?

You may be so dumb as to be comfortable with 2 families ruling America for 28 years, but that's not what the majority of sensible Americans think. Hillary would be better as Senate majority leader. She and Bill would've handed the baton to a new generation of leaders, while calling the shots as King-makers - not dirtying themselves in mud. Greedy people!

Oprah has beeb reading her notes and sometimes has to go back and re-read it again. This does not make me feel confortable. When making a speech like this, you should talk to people, from bottom of your heart, and show us why you support him and why voters vote him. I feel that there are so many focus on "lines", Dr.King's line, or others. The core reason was not clear. She was not prepared this well or, another reason she doesn't know this "favorite thing" well. I think, like many people say, if you want to sell a book, you must read it first. She for sure sold a lot of books which she , I believe, read them all. But, this time she did not sell the book BECAUSE SHE DID NOT READ THIS BOOK. Oprah, with all respect, doesn't do Obama a good favor politically. As she said, she doesn't know politics well. If you take away all the "lines" she used, there is not much left for voters to truly think why Obama. But, I still love to see her in TV, where she doesn't have to read her notes.

I'm so tired of the Oprah-haters, Obama-haters, and the "we can't do it and I know because I'm African American" respondents. Oprah has the "right" to support whoever she feels compelled to, just as everyone else in the country. It is also very ignorant and irresponsible to suggest Oprah is supporting Obama's candidacy because they both are black. You are making this a race issue, not them. Obama is making an impressive run at the Oval office and that in of itself is a testament to the dire sense of fundamental change America is thirsting for.

IT AMAZES ME HOW OBAMA CONTINUES TO ATTACK HILLARY ON HER IRAN VOTE AT HIS OPRAH RALLIES. BUT HE DIDN'T CAST A VOTE BUT CLAIM'S TO BE AGAINST. THAT'S NOT LEADERSHIP, WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH HILLARY OR NOT SHE PUTS HER RECORD ON THE LINE AND STANDS BUT HER DECISIONS. I LIKE OBAMA BUT THE IDEA THAT ON ELECTION DAY 2008 HE'S GOING TO SWAY ALL THESE REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR HIM IS JUST BALONEY. NO MATTER IF IT'S HIM, JOHN, OR HILLARY THIS COUNTRY WILL STILL BE DIVIDED NO ONE MAN OR WOMEN CAN CHANGE THAT ON ONE DAY. REPUBLICIANS WANT OBAMA TO WIN SO THEY CAN PAINT AS AN ANTI WAR LIBERAL THAT HAS NO EXPERIENCE. THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO SAY THAT ABOUT HILLARY. GO!! HILLARY.

Pretty sad if Oprah has the power to convince any one of us re who we vote for…this is about our lack of judgement and her abuse of her power.

Ike from VA - the ONLY way to deal with that perception is to change it by VOTING for our candidate. People should not be led by FEAR, and not voting for Barack based on what you said is making a choice by fear.

Obamatruth- You are clueless.
- He is on the foreign relations committee in the SENATE and has visited 32 countries as a delegate from US.
- As a citizen he has traveled to many countries, his family is diverse and he has worked hard with the poor, been part of the working class and understands through life experiences what is going on in the country.

- He is not looking to change the retirement age, he is primarily looking at should people stop paying SS taxes at $97,000 - Bill Gates is all paid up within 4 hours on Jan. 1st.
- His healthplan is more for children, and adults are given a choice because the bottom line is you can't force or mandate grown people (HRC & JE)!

Try getting the truth first and dispute the true facts before speaking.

It is better to be thought a fool, then to open your mouth or in your case blog and remove all doubt.

FIVE REASON NOT TO SUPPORT OPRAHBAMA
1. OPRAH AND OBAMA SWITCHED PLACES. (Surly not the leader)
2. Obama has ZERO foreign policy experience, infact no leadership experience
3. Refusing to show up and vote in the senate on Iran, Abortion measures
4. Seeking a trillion-dollar tax hike and raising the retirement age for Social Security!!!!
5. Not in favor of a health care plan to cover all children rich or poor.

Please don't post lies like this. Your first charge is just ridiculous. On the second point, Obama's specialization in college was international relations, and he also is on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

As far as number three goes, yes, he missed the vote on the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment, but he didn't "refuse to show up." The vote was announced after he had already left Washington for a debate later that day. The vote took place about 40 minutes after it was scheduled, so there was no way for him to make it on time even if he had tried.

Obama does not support raising the retirement age, he supported lifting the cap on what earnings are taxed for Social Security.

Lastly, his healthcare plan does cover all children, coverage is mandated for children as with Edwards' and Clinton's plans. He doesn't mandate coverage for adults.

If you have legitimate complaints about a candidate, that's fine. What you posted is a list of lies and distortions.

Oprah has some clout over people. I wonder why; truly I do. I have to say that I have not watched much of her show. I will say of her endorsement of Obama like I have said of other celebrity endorsements of other candidates; it is our responsiblity to do our research about the candidates ourselves. That means watching the debates, reviewing the material that they have on their websites just to start. Remember, if you don't vote, you shouldn't complain. I voted in many elections which is why I am some what irritated that more people don't vote.

As a Hillary supporter, I'm very excited to have Oprah stumping for Obama. I really like Oprah, and think she did an excellent job of bringing the crowd to Obama. Sadly, he didn't capitalize. His speech afterwards was so awkward, so disjointed and his deferential tone (to Oprah) made it more believable that She (not He) was running for office. He doesn't have it together now and I find it impossible he will for our 2008 hopes.

Experience is NOT a measure of how great a president can be. JUDGEMENT IS!!