December 13, 2007
Posted: 04:20 PM ET

An advisor to Clinton resigned Thursday over his comments on Obama.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — A top advisor to Hillary Clinton has resigned his position with her campaign after suggesting rival Barack Obama's admission of drug use could hinder his chances of winning a general election matchup.

Bill Shaheen, a co-chairman of Clinton's New Hampshire campaign, said in an issued statement, "I made a mistake and in light of what happened, I have made the personal decision that I will step down as the co-chair of the Hillary for President campaign."

"This election is too important and we must all get back to electing the best qualified candidate who has the record of making change happen in this country," he added. "That candidate is Hillary Clinton.”

Reacting to the news, Obama's chief campaign strategist David Axelrod told CNN's Jessica Yellin he thinks it was a "good decision."

"I think what he did was beyond the pale," Axelrod said. "He injected something into the campaign that didn't belong. We didn't ask for him to resign. I think it was a good idea. Hopefully it will send a signal you can't do these kinds of things."

"We believe the American people can sort out these issues and we weren't lying awake at nights worrying what Bill Shaheen said," Axelrod continued. "Maybe the Clinton campaign was."

Full story 

Earlier: Aide: Clinton apologizes to Obama

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton • New Hampshire


Beth & Jeff Chicago, IL - HILLARY IN 2008   December 19th, 2007 8:21 am ET

WE SUPPORT HILLARY '08 :)

She's the only one who can actually clean up the mess left by the GOP — NOT dreamer boy!!

Or vote Biden or Richardson b/c God save our country if the newbie gets elected = who isn't even wise enough to realize what he DOESN'T KNOW yet; let alone play pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey in the Oval Office! He clearly should have waited until 2012 or 2016. He's only 47, but he's such a baby that he's demanding to be King now :( Sadly the great Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Senator Obama is certainly NOT!!!! AND Oprah should stick with her own life and hawking her Book Club (which she can't even get right all the time either).

JUST SAY NO TO OBAMA IN 2008 :(

Anne America's breadbasket   December 15th, 2007 2:25 pm ET

Hello JB from Boston –

quote from above post:
You say at least Hillary will get the job done. Why? What makes you say that? She doesn't take a stand on any issues. She tries to stay in the middle. She has had to fire 3 workers in the past few days. Has any other campaign had to do that? NO!

She is an immoral unethical politician who will continue her ways.

Many voters don't want such a person in charge. I find it shocking that her fans would put up with such BS.
_______________________________

It probably would have been terribly enlightening for you to have watched the Bill Moyers PBS interview with Dr. Ron Walters last night (12/14) on how race is playing out in the campaign? Dr. Walters is the director of the African American Leadership Center at the University of Maryland. He had some very interesting concerns to say about Senator Obama's campaign strategy. He pointed out that many African Americans just don't feel the connection with Senator Obama nor that he is actually focusing on the major problems which concern them most ie poverty, the fact that 50% of the prison population is black, and the mortgage/foreclosure crisis – which is especially hitting the black community hard.

In fact Dr. Walters pointed out that Hillary's campaign staff had a much broader base of diversity than Senator Obamas! And she was very focused and in tune with the ISSUES of the black people, which is why the African American Leadership Center decided to support Hillary. (As much as women love Oprah -she just doesn't live in most women's world. AND Dr. Walters actually went further, saying some pretty surprising personal observations!)

Even the Mayor of Atlanta, Andrew Young has cautioned that Senator Obama does NOT have enough leadership experience yet. And is also supporting Hillary Clinton in her bid for the White House as well. (This is from a black man who was very involved with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and the Civil Right's movement in the South)

http://reddingnewsreview.com/newspages/2007newspages/andy_young_explains_why_he_is_no_07_091000299.htm

Before you make such accusations about Hillary maybe it would be a good idea to try doing a little research first. You have a right to support the candidate of your choice, but PLEASE be more knowledgeable before stating your opinions about others. Andrew Card is a man of great influence in his community and obviously knows both Hillary (and Bill – sometimes as much of an albatross around her neck as a asset) very well. I take a great deal more credence for a candidate by the support given to Hillary by Dr. Walters and Mayor Card than I ever would from Oprah or Barbara.

Joe, Boston, MA   December 14th, 2007 11:11 am ET

It was wrong for this guy to say anything but in a way he has a point. Republicans will take full advantage of Obama's past drug use and will completely lie and distort in order to win.

Don, Ft. Worth, Tx   December 14th, 2007 8:23 am ET

I find it interesting that the Clinton camp tried to make this a Republican remark. It was uncalled for and shows that she is very much a divider for blaming everyone especially Republicans if the sun rises in the west. Everything is a conspiracy and she is the only person with any grace, knowledge, etc. She has as much or more baggage in this race than any candidate of either party. To see the gushing by her supporters is just humorus. I am an independent taking note. Biden or Obama are the best choices from this group. The others just don't have it.

JB Boston MA   December 14th, 2007 8:20 am ET

Hey Rodney-

You say at least Hillary will get the job done. Why? What makes you say that? She doesn't take a stand on any issues. She tries to stay in the middle. She has had to fire 3 workers in the past few days. Has any other campaign had to do that? NO!

She is an immoral unethical politician who will continue her ways.

Many voters don't want such a person in charge. I find it shocking that her fans would put up with such BS.

I too am shocked that people would vote for her. She clearly has a hard time hiring good people. WHat makes you think she will do any better when she becomes president and has to hire many more people? Maybe Hsu is looking for a job when he gets out of prison!

Alice, TN   December 14th, 2007 7:59 am ET

Come on! Hillary was FULLY aware…this woman would be furious to be out of the loop…it has ALWAYS been the Clinton MO to attack the character of their opponents. Bill Shaheen was a scapegoat, a sacrificial lamb thrown to the wolves in an attempt to quell the criticism. Some other poster noted if it were Bush's campaign involved, he would be tarred and feathered. What is it with you Clinton apologists? Frankly, I think you suspect they're scumbags, but don't want to admit it.

babyboomer middle class America   December 14th, 2007 7:17 am ET

"If you are an American who yearns to finally get beyond the symbolic battles of the boomer generation and face today's actual problems, Obama is your man. Who wants to spend the next 8 years refighting the same fights that have been going on for decades?"

Posted By One America : December 13, 2007 4:32 pm

————-

Well sonny, if you don't think that "todays actual battles" pertain to "the battles that the boomer generation has been fighting for decades" then you're in for one very rude awakening (if you should be so lucky to live that long)!! Social Security, long-term health care are just the tip of the iceberg. Are you even aware that the awakening of the environmental movement BEGAN in the late 60's? (Gore was obviously paying attention in Ecology 101)

AND if Senator Obama is running on the premise that he has a vision invoking Dr. Martin Luther King Jrs ringing "I Have A Dream" speech – delivered on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial before a gathering of over 200,000 strong in August of 1963 — just exactly what "symbolic battles" are YOU referring to, pray tell?? Dr. King Jr's greatest DREAM was for a future where blacks and whites and people of ALL race and color could coexist HARMONIOUSLY AS EQUALS. The younger generation seems to be oblivious to what the "boomer generation" actually fought and stood up for…

http://www.usconstitution.net/dream.html

And if Bush would have actually FOUGHT in the VietNam war himself, we wouldn't be in Iraq today! And don't give the same trite argument that it's all because HILLARY voted for it – BECAUSE the American public was spoon-fed the same blatant lies as Congress AND hey it seems the majority of our country bought into it. (OMG some people STILL believe that Saddam was responsible for 9/11 and had WMD!!) When the vote on Iraq was taken 10/11/02 EVEN Senators Biden, Dodd, AND Edwards voted for it = SO why is Hillary the only one taking heat?? (Obama was not in Congress yet)
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237

NOW everyone is jumping down her throat for voting for sanctions on Iran WHICH OBAMA DIDN'T EVEN SHOW UP FOR = cuz what he was too busy stumping in Iowa or was already on paper against it but simply forgot about it or gee nobody told him?! Obama was ONLY one of two Senators who couldn't seem to make it back for the vote?! (Edwards isn't in the Senate now)

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00349

AND GUESS WHAT, "the boomer generation doesn't want to spend ANOTHER 8 years refighting the same old battles either" — simply because the attention span of the AMERICAN VOTERS is shorter than a nanosecond!!

Eyzwidopn, LA,CA   December 14th, 2007 3:45 am ET

Abhorrent, vindictive, desperate, shameful, devious, condemnable… and typical for the Clintonian machine. Where was all of this serpentine behavior when HRC was leading in the polls, preparing for her inevitable coronation? This isn't a "revelation," this issue has been known about for years and in the news a few weeks ago when Obama shared the story with high school students. Was there a noticeable, lasting fallout or backlash on his drug usage after he did so? No. What does that suggest? That the story had no legs in the media, despite Romney being the only Republican to condemn Obama's admission. So if it had no legs a few weeks ago, it wasn't for HRC's campaign to try and raise it again. If the Republicans were going to use it then it should have been the Republicans who raised it. Is it a coincidence that everytime there's an issue with HRC's campaign being responsible for airing Obama slurs that the scandal gets regurgitated "unintentionally" in the media, allowing HRC to enjoy the subliminal "hit" on Obama while she gets to claim ignorance, condemns the actions of the culprits and dismisses them? HRC hasn't been falsely painted with "high negatives," it's just a part of who she is after years of battling alongside Bill in the political trenches, rightly or wrongly. For all of you HRC supporters, if you can't see now that a vote for HRC means revisiting and reliving the lies, scandals, divisive, secretive, and retributive nature of the last nearly 16 years, then you have truly allowed feverish passion to trump reason. We've been there and done that with that type of degrading, demoralizing, non-productive politics. How in all that is right and proper can we think that continuing that path in January 2009 is going to be in the best interest of our country?

Jon, San Francisco CA   December 14th, 2007 2:20 am ET

I am routinely amazed at how blatantly insincere Hillary Clinton is. Keep on chipping away, Mr. Obama. We're long overdue for a little integrity.

Knoxville, TN   December 14th, 2007 12:59 am ET

Go Obama!

Gracey Knowle, Dallas, Texas   December 14th, 2007 12:54 am ET

Just like Nixon again. What did she know and when did she know it.

Janel, St. Paul, MN   December 13th, 2007 11:38 pm ET

I'm kinda hooked on reading this "Political Tickler," but as each day passes, I am discouraged by some of the feedback that doesn't focus on the issues that are important to our country. Too many personal attacks and less focus on what we are concerned about.

First of all, I should state that I am an Obama supporter. While I've never been for Senator Clinton, I find myself feeling somewhat sorry for her. I know that she entered this race with some high ideals and certainly the goal of winning.

To date, I've not truly discovered her thoughts about what she will bring to this country as leader of the free world. Her comments sometimes differ from day to day. Her campaign has become very negative. . .not a positive sign to prospective voters, nor to the world at large. It seems to me that she is running scared, and the messages from her campaign are sickening.

I'll admit that Obama doesn't have all the answers, but I have been led to believe he is an honorable man — an honest man, a smart man and one who could lead other countries throughout the globe to once again hold our country in esteem.

It is time for a change, but not the one that Senator Clinton talks about. We need a complete turn-about.

Obama 08!!!

jf, ames iowa   December 13th, 2007 10:44 pm ET

Why is this a negative attack? Obama has admitted to snorting cocaine. Shaheen merely stated the truth. Do you really think the republicans won't make use of his drug history?? Oh wait–all the republicans on this blog–want obama to be the nominee.

Nathan, Melbourne, Victoria   December 13th, 2007 10:32 pm ET

You can argue about the pros and cons of Hillary Clinton, her experience and her candidacy, but one thing that you can't argue about is that Obama's admitted use of cocaine shows a large character and moral flaw. Audacity of Hope, try the Audacity with Coke.

NO DEMS'LA.   December 13th, 2007 9:03 pm ET

I'M LOOKING AT 2 DRUG HEADS. THEY JUST TALKING HEADS ONLY. ALL THEY CAN DO!

Julie, Atlanta, GA   December 13th, 2007 8:00 pm ET

Typical Clinton sleeze…If anyone believes this guy resigned on his own accord, well, I just can't believe anyone can actually be that naive.

Go John Go John Go John – John Edwards is THE most perfect candidate and he is THE ONLY candidate who can and will win. WAKE UP, AMERICA!!!

john williams san diego, ca.   December 13th, 2007 7:51 pm ET

if the slime attack led by the 'forehead' begala keeps up, her majesty will run out of campaign staff by the end of the year.

Ken, Alexandria, VA   December 13th, 2007 7:32 pm ET

This is not about the drugs or the question. This is about leadership. Obviously, Hillary lacks the leadership to know or admit to know the information that flows in and out her campaign. How could i trust her as president? Just a question from another independent.

Charles   December 13th, 2007 7:19 pm ET

Personally, I don't find anything wrong with Mr. Shaheen's comments. It's a sad legacy of the 60's generation that drug abuse isn't the political liability that it once was. I, for one, wish that the potheads stayed out of the Oval Office.

Donald Johnson, Irwin, IA   December 13th, 2007 6:49 pm ET

This is crazy. A candidates cannot be held accountable for their supporters comments. People on here are just dumb. When it was leaked that one of Obama's supporters had derailed the Colbert candidacy in South Carolina, all the Obama supporters came out on here saying that their candidate cannot be held responsible for their supporters' actions. You can't have it both ways! I am an undecided voter leaning towards Biden, but would support Clinton in the general if it came to that. Some people are just Hillary-haters who find something wrong in everything she does but finds nothing wrong in their candidates. Hypocrits.

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL   December 13th, 2007 6:41 pm ET

I see every Obama supporter is out early on this story, the fact is that Sen. Clinton does have the skills to be president and for dems to start critizing one another is just fuel for the other party. you may not like Sen. clinton and I can respect that, but the names you all are using? you are making a mockery of the process. as for Sen. Obama he has plenty of problems to resolve himself and he does not seem to shine very well in many areas, so this is far from over folks.

Jeff Sacramento, CA   December 13th, 2007 6:40 pm ET

It appears the cream is starting to rise to the top. The previous comments were on the mark! If HRC can't surround herself with honorable people to campaign for her. If she can't reign in all of these "rogue" staffers that are making comments she constantly has to appologize for or disavow.
How will she be better in the White House? How will she suddenly start to exercise better judgment? HRC in office means nothing accomplished for 4 years. Please for the good of our country vote for ANYONE BUT… Hillary or Rudi! Lets get some honesty and character back in office.

Len, Fallbrook, CA   December 13th, 2007 6:21 pm ET

Why do I think this whole thing was planned well ahead of time?

xtina - chicago il   December 13th, 2007 6:20 pm ET

Why not discuss the qualifications of these candidates instead of dwelling on the soap opera stuff? Anyone care to name a few moments of leadership Barack or Hillary have had that didn't involve sitting in Senate chambers voting on some bill? Or didn't involve taking more taxpayer money?

stclaire, San Diego   December 13th, 2007 6:19 pm ET

Title: Sacrifice of The Lamb

….Next?

Walt, Belton, TX   December 13th, 2007 6:17 pm ET

Wonder how much money went under the table to thank him for both making the comment, which she obviously wanted him to do, and then graciously stepping down and exiting stage left…

Chrsitine NJ   December 13th, 2007 6:15 pm ET

How great leadership Senator Hillary Clinton, she is just, brave enough to face and shoulder as she made the staff information is wrong and caused her responsibility.

Michelle D. - Atlanta, GA   December 13th, 2007 5:59 pm ET

It was her advisor's comments…not Hillary's. He did the right thing. Don't let the door hit you on the rear on your way out.

Still, this sounds like a deeper problem and I'm sure there is going to be an internal shake-up after this fiasco.

Mike. NJ   December 13th, 2007 5:57 pm ET

I wouldn't be surprised if Clinton was behind the comment and is letting Shaheen take the bullet. Was it a calculated risk to put a question mark on Obama? The Clinton's will say just about anything to get in the Whitehouse and chalk it up to knowing how the 'system' works….not the type of 'experienced' politician we need now.

Rodney Dallas TX   December 13th, 2007 5:54 pm ET

Claude, Mesa AZ

Did the sun in Arizona bake too deep into your skull. How dare you come on here and begin to call people fools for voting for whom they believe is right. Hillary may not be the best candidate but at least she'll get the job done. All the other candidates are telling you what you want to hear. Come on, you voted for John McCain, what does that say about you?

michael, grand prairie tx.   December 13th, 2007 5:53 pm ET

DONT BELIEVE THE HYPE….
I have no doubt in my mind that they were behind it, the e-mail scandal, this one, the novak story, she's a snake that even Slick Billy has to get away from every now and then.

Rodney Dallas TX   December 13th, 2007 5:52 pm ET

Her aide was saying that the Republicans would be asking questions like "When was the last time he used drugs?" and if he is "still using drugs". As a democrat, I want to know those answers myself. I do not believe this guy should have stepped down for saying what others are thinking. He knows the Repubs are going to attack that and he's right.

Dan, TX   December 13th, 2007 5:41 pm ET

If this is who she choses to lead her presidential campaigns, how can we trust her judgment in who she'll pick to help her run the country. Unbelievable.

Who can support Clinton. It is Obama or Edwards now.

Corbett, Seattle WA   December 13th, 2007 5:34 pm ET

It was a dirty trick and not what you would expect from a Clinton (did not inhale) supporter. However, as a Obama fan I have to admit that there is a strong argument that once you write about doing Cocaine you lose your right to be President of the U.S.

I would say that Obama is the exception but I think I am in the minority.

Hank Morgan   December 13th, 2007 5:31 pm ET

Hilary was disappointingly ineffectual with each of the assignments she received during her husband's terms in office. Her work on medical insurance, health care, and social security were all defeated. Katic Couric asked HRC how she expected to be successful when she was such a failure in the 80's. HRC did not give much of a response. The Clinton presidency was wrought with indiscretions, scandal, and secrecy. We do not want to repeat that horror. Bill Clinton rode on the wave Reagan left but managed to drown, and almost was impeached in the end.

Anonymous   December 13th, 2007 5:26 pm ET

Shaheen's comment that he was only pointing out what Republicans would, is like saying "the Devil made me do it". That came short of taking responsibility for himself. Who really believes Hillary doesn't approve what her advisors say on the record, I don't.

RealityKing   December 13th, 2007 5:21 pm ET

Big whoop, Hillary has as many as she has nasty political attacks. This came from her campaign chairman. Hello in there…

ABH USA   December 13th, 2007 5:19 pm ET

Great – glad you stepped down Bill. I certainly hope the voters see the bigger pattern from Hillary Clinton's campaign: attack, attack, attack, play victim.

It's time to tell political stragists (Clinton, Rove, etc) that voters reject the campaign of smear and embrace candidates that share their vision and personal honesty (Obama).

dmw. roeland park,ks   December 13th, 2007 5:17 pm ET

The Clinto Advisor should quite.

But, this is politics. People are so naive, yet, claim to be pragmatic and realistic.

I hear all of the news media, who is suppose to be subjective, rant on and on about how Horrible Hillary is. Yet, did not say a word when Obama and Edwards attacked Hillary.

If Obama wants to play with the big boys (girl), then play. He seems to be using this to his advantage as well. I did notice that his campaign has put out a fund raiser over this very issue.

Imagne that.

Dan, NJ   December 13th, 2007 5:14 pm ET

Is there any doubt he will be rewarded for his loyalty if Hil gets elected? Same old politics.

RightyTighty   December 13th, 2007 5:12 pm ET

You mean Hillary doesn't fire people for that kind of political mud slinging??

Brian, Tampa, Florida   December 13th, 2007 5:09 pm ET

A serious loss for Hillary's campaign. Mr.Shaheen should have given more thought before issuing his statement. After all we have a President that used cocaine, loved to party,has a DUI,and lies to America. Anything is possible.

Diamond, Bradenton, FL   December 13th, 2007 5:09 pm ET

The "ready to lead" candidate hasn't even been elected yet and she's already had at least FOUR resignations.

You can't do these kinds of things and get aay with it.

Serves him right!

Hopefully, it should be a sound warning to all.

JK Ashburn, VA   December 13th, 2007 5:05 pm ET

In 1994, when Mitt Romney was running for the Senate against Ted Kennedy, one of Kennedy's staff said something inappropriate related to Romney being Mormon. Kennedy made a big public deal about firing the guy and the aftermath itself created more awareness of Romney's religion than the original comment. Romney lost about 5-10 points in the polls almost immediately thereafter as a result of bigoted Massachusetts voters suddenly being aware of his religion.

This is a standard tactic of campaigns that are not doing as well as they'd hoped. Certainly a technique the Clintons have practiced from time to time.

Justin Time   December 13th, 2007 5:02 pm ET

Note to CNN: you are not helping your candidate by bringing up this story, even though the guy is talking good about her, he is a crony, who will say and do anything to get Clinton elected. Similar to the campaign in general, "say and do anything to get elected: Clinton 08″

Ron, TX   December 13th, 2007 5:02 pm ET

How on earth can Clinton be "ready to lead on day one" when she has trouble keeping her own campaign together? They're all sending out rediculous emails about Obama being a muslim, claiming that his past with drugs is some big deal, planting questions all over the place…

Every time, Clinton claims not to have known anything. To me, it sure doesn't sound like she's ready to lead…

Jennifer, Evergree, CO   December 13th, 2007 5:00 pm ET

Gosh it's nice of Sheehan to resign but he should have been fired for his irresponsible and borderline slanderous remarks. At least he had the good sense to walk away. Maybe Mrs. Clinton will now have the good sense to refocus her campaign on the issues instead of these ridiculous personal attacks.

Steve, Portland, OR   December 13th, 2007 5:00 pm ET

No mud slinging on Hillary's part. Just use others in the campaign, then the blame goes to them. I expect Hillary thinks people will sympathize with her on this? Not a chance. This disorganized campaign organization needs to tell her to start talking straight to the American public. Americans are sick and tired of dishonest wiffle/waffle politicians who are out for themselves. That is why your numbers are dropping.

Fred, Walnut Creek, CA   December 13th, 2007 4:59 pm ET

The guy attacks Obama for the Clinton's, gets the information out there as their underhanded attack, and then Hillary makes it look like she didn't know about it or authorize it.

HOW DUMB DOES SHE THINK PEOPLE ARE? SHE IS THE SLICKEST POLITICIAN AND IS A FULL FLEDGED ATTACK DOG. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE KNOW THAT FROM HER PAST.

This just makes it more clear…the MORE PEOPLE SEE HILLARY FOR WHAT SHE IS, THE MORE THEY DISLIKE HER.

Betsy, Kansas City, MO   December 13th, 2007 4:58 pm ET

Good Riddance!

Obamafan   December 13th, 2007 4:55 pm ET

Hillary hasn't even made it to the White House, and she has already began having the same problems the Bush administration has been experience throughout his adminstration: resignations and step downs. *shaking my head* Just more of the same with Clinton in the White House.

LinnieFB, Corona CA   December 13th, 2007 4:49 pm ET

Why do I think this was all planned by the Clinton campaign….you put it out there for all to see, you disavow and pull it back, then your guy falls on the sword as planned. Politics 101…

It's a new day!

Go Obama!

Pedro, Fort Dodge, IA   December 13th, 2007 4:45 pm ET

Woo hoo! After all the talk about Clinton cleaning up Washington, we see Obama cleaning up her campaign just by maintaining his own integrity. Honesty is not a vice. Maybe if Clinton understood that, she would not plummet in the polls everywhere she has actively campaigned.

Martin, Clarksville, TN   December 13th, 2007 4:44 pm ET

Once again one of Hillary's workers leaves the campaign because of mudslinging. What we really need is for Hillary to leave the campaign.

Cat, Costa Mesa, CA   December 13th, 2007 4:44 pm ET

Don't get me wrong, I am NOT a Hillary fan, but COME ON!! Thats rediculous! Who was offended? No one. Did it hinder Obamas campaign? NO! The problem with the democratic party is that everyone is so concerned about causing offense no one will stick up for themselves or their remarks!

Thats what we need in this country, spineless jellyfish!

Nancy, Chicago   December 13th, 2007 4:43 pm ET

Good, finally the Clinton Camp admits to a sleazy attack because they got caught. The Clintons should never have tried to call an upstanding Senator such as Obama a "drug dealer" just to win an election. It is very desperate.

anon New York, NY   December 13th, 2007 4:42 pm ET

He did the right thing by stepping down. The Democrats don't need distractions like this.

Clinton surrogates often make the dumbest comments. I wonder if they're secretly supporting Obama or Edwards.

Bob, Roxboro, NC   December 13th, 2007 4:41 pm ET

It appears that Hillary and her immediate advisors have blundered onto the only remedy for being "found out".

In my lifetime, when someone is discovered to be unethical, the portion which comes into view is merely the tip of the iceberg. I'm sure this is the case here as well.

Bradley Schaubs, Greeley, CO   December 13th, 2007 4:40 pm ET

It's all good to apologize and burn your bridges, Mr. Shaheen. Next time, though, think about the consequences before you open your mouth.

Mr. Ito, Yokosuka Japan   December 13th, 2007 4:40 pm ET

Knowing Clinton, he was probably paid to say something bad, apologize, then resign and endorse her on his way out the door.

A subtle way to stain Obama and make Hillary Clinton look like an innocent victim.

The thought of Hillary Clinton being a victim is laughable.

She'll probably call him a NEO-CON plant if her poll numbers continue to slide. Better yet, she'll probably make him part of the vast right-wing conspiracy that is always out to get her.

And if it gets complicated, she'll outright deny knowing him.

Jackson, Monrongo Valley, CA   December 13th, 2007 4:38 pm ET

I think it is admirable that David Axelrod resigned, but I don't feel it was necessary. After all, Obama was the one that told everyone about his drug use… David was only voicing something that everybody knows is the truth.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   December 13th, 2007 4:37 pm ET

I don't believe Mr. Shaheen quit, Hillary fired him. Hillary did her investigation and found him responsible for this slander on Obama. Hillary isn't like GWB who always said "I will deal with anyone whom I find responsible for wrong doings" and nothing was done. Hillary has the integrity which we all expect in a president.

kathe oakland, california   December 13th, 2007 4:36 pm ET

I have to wonder where do these candidates get these aides – don't they screen them? And I would suspect Hillary had no problem with her folks saying that about Obama – but to actually take responsibility for her people she will not do that. You know it is like a parent – children know what is acceptable and not acceptable as a member of a family so please Hillary……I certainly don't think you were surprised at that type of behavior and performance. You will need a lot more than Bill Clinton to get my vote – how about honesty, and telling us just where are you coming from anyway – I still do not know after all this time. To me you are just another rich person who will follow the Bush Administration policies and dishonesty.

t. u. binghamton n.y.   December 13th, 2007 4:36 pm ET

What a gentleman

One America   December 13th, 2007 4:32 pm ET

If you are an American who yearns to finally get beyond the symbolic battles of the boomer generation and face today's actual problems, Obama is your man. Who wants to spend the next 8 years refighting the same fights that have been going on for decades?

Claude, Mesa AZ   December 13th, 2007 4:32 pm ET

To all of you fools who are going to vote for HRC. She will run her white house the same way her campaign is being run. Absolutely disgusting. Hell, she hasn't even got there yet and people are already stepping down. HRC supporters need to wake up and vote for someone else.

John Q. Public, USA   December 13th, 2007 4:32 pm ET

We need the Senate to launch a full-scale investigation into this matter.. just as the Democrats would have done if Karl Rove would have made the comment.

Ed, Hilton NY   December 13th, 2007 4:32 pm ET

Quit?
No, this guy was obviously fired.

Fred, Reston VA   December 13th, 2007 4:31 pm ET

Looks like honesty and integrity to me. From Hillary's people. Although the drug question will be out there for the next year if he wins the nomination.

More importantly, democrats need to stop making excuses for Obama in the primary. Clinton's 30% and Edwards' 30% don't buy the "judgement" and "hope" garbage and i gurantee 100% of repubs and 75% of independents won't but it either in the general election. And think about what you do, because if Obama get the nomination and loses (which he will) he will never get another chance because the anger at him for wasting our chance in 08 will be worse than anything felt towards Nader or Kerry. It will take another generation to get another Obama, why take the chance? he can wait 8 years can't he? he's only 46.

rosemergy   December 13th, 2007 4:31 pm ET

The downward spiral continues…

Ivelisse   December 13th, 2007 4:29 pm ET

Great!!!

now the rest will learn to leave the talking to her!!!!!

negative remarks should end…..

Jaik , chicago, IL   December 13th, 2007 4:29 pm ET

yet another way to rehash this story into the headlines again, 1 day of free negative press for Obama for the original statement, wait till the next press day to apologise, for another free negative ad, and then a 3rd day for the resignation, 3 days of free smear ads provided by CNN in support of Hillary.

JB, Columbus Ohio   December 13th, 2007 4:29 pm ET

"This election is too important and we must all get back to electing the best qualified candidate who has the record of making change happen in this country," he added. "That candidate is Hillary Clinton.”

Because nothing says change like a washington insider who has been in politics for 35 years…

This whole notion that Clinton=change is laughable.

As for the drug thing…CLinton camp put shaheen up to it, in one of those, unofficial, do it but say we had no idea you were doing it kind of ways.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP