Posted By Anonymous Somewhere, NH : December 13, 2007 3:35 am

Hmmm – right and this lady who doesn't even have the brains to dump her lousy lawyer and get a new one is telling the rest of us how to vote?? LOL

GOP TROLL

Instead we can just have Obama advise the little darlings: "Don't worry if you are a drug abuser – you too can someday grow up to become the President of the United States of America."

Has such a nice ring to it, don't ya think?

You peeps crack me up = You are such a hoot and a half. I'm sure there's a village somewhere in Texas which will be soooo happy to finally have it's Idiot back. Yep – obviously Just Say NO isn't working.

1 sentence is a stmt.
2-4 sentences are an in-depth opinion.
5 or more usually go unread due to the numberous other rambling rants.

In your case: I blurred out after: How far do we carry this "honesty" thing?" skipping down to "I am for Hillary–we need her."

nuff said, now I’m rambling..

I don't understand the "pretend" thing. Why pretend that the truth is other than it is. Street drugs and party drugs are common in America, including the traditional American drugs horse, maryjane, and blow as well as the newest products of America's pharmaceutical industry like oxycontin. There is no reason for unmarried women to pretend they are virgins. There is no reason to pretend that Congress is not owned lock, stock, and barrel by corporations. There is no reason to pretend any more that those corporations are even slightly interested in our welfare. There is no reason to pretend any more that America is the greatest, best, toughest, biggest, proudest anything.

We have lots and lots of problems. Our country doesn't just need to have a couple of screws tightened; we need a complete overhaul, a lot of body work, and a paint job. We are not riding around in a Ferarri.

Obama is an extreme left wing person and the more his records are revealed the better informed we will be. Right now, he is living on HOPE and his arrogance to think that he will be able to fool the Democrats; then if he wins the nomination, the Democrats will be horrified when the Republicans spill all of the left wing issues Obama supported while a State Senator.

The Democrats will then lose the general election because no matter what you all want to believe, America is not a left wing country.

Edwards and Obama started the negative attacks on Hillary when all she wanted to do is discuss the issues. Now, that Obama's veneer is starting to crack, all of his supporters are upset and his campaign continues to try and divert his left wing liberalism.

Well, you reap what you sow.

>>Your comment is awaiting moderation. Due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

(My post–again)
I don't exactly understand
this "honesty" thing. Does it completely fix everything? Obama apparently did some pretty serious drugs, and because he was "honest" about it, that makes it all ok, and he is wonderful. How far do we carry this "honesty" thing? If it is learned that someone murdered someone 15 years ago, but they admit it now, does that mean that the murderer is wonderful, because he is now being "honest" about it, and it was a long time ago, and he is a better man for it now? Or is he still a murderer? And on Obama's drug use, and drinking. I think it is worth wondering, if he gets the presidency, if things get rough, he might go back to the drinking and drug use. I don't agree that "everyone" did drugs and went on drinking binges at a teen. I didn't, and my friends didn't. And I don't think it is anything to be proud of, even if he is "honest" about it.
I am for Hillary–we need her.

Posted By J. McKinney SW MO : December 12, 2007 7:50 pm

Posted By Jennifer, Palm Beach, FL : December 13, 2007 9:49 am

Declarations of desparation, heh, Jennifer.

To all appearances, Obama's wiping the floor with Hillary and it's largely her own doing. She has no one else to blame when she's at home watching the Presidential election results in her nightgown, next November.

It is so hard to believe that Obama and Edwards are tied with Hillary in Iowa. It sounds to me like Iowans are listening to the people who thrive from hating Hillary. Neither Obama nor Edwards can beat Hillary on policy. The only people who will not vote for Hillary are people who do things out of spite.

Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate, the most experienced candidate and she's READY TO LEAD.

This follows Andrew Young saying Bill Clinton dated more black women than Barack.

And Geraldine Ferraro saying Mrs. Clinton was the victim of sexism at the debates.

And Tom Vilsack saying "who really watches Oprah anyway?"

Do you really believe this? To imply that Lawyers and Judges and yes, even politicians are all dishonest proves that you are the moron that you claim Hillary Clinton is. Perhaps you should run off to see the Wizard and ask for a brain...

BTW – Obama came out with this long before he announced for he was running for President – read his book Dreams of my Father that was published in the mid-90's.

What this is is a complete desperation move by HRC because she knows that she is going down.

Just like I applauded Bush for admitting his past indiscretions, I do the same for Obama.

Secondly, BUSH IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT ANYMORE (no MORE Bush's).

You geniuses doing the hammering, can you ALL look in the mirror and say you NEVER twisted one up or maybe tried a little nose candy at a party in the 90's?

We have a politician that is speaking the truth, something we should covet, but you are attacking him because he is not YOUR candidate, he's not mine either, but he earned my respect.

Two phrases come to mind, "I didn't inhale" and "I did not have sex with that woman", so much for the truthfullness of your king.

This reeks of the typical Clinton "dirty tricks" of the 90's, raise your hand if you have seen this before, the gutless wonders have their surrogates spew the hate so the message get's out there, they come out and claim they had nothing to do with it and the media let's them off scot free with "no blood on their hands" and the needed "damage is done.

The 90's are long over and they can't get away with this anymore.

Hillary 08! (Women really run the country, so let's admit it and elect one!)

Posted By Susan : December 13, 2007 8:43 am

Susan, you're kidding right? First of all, he HAD poor judgement...25 years ago. You never exercised poor judgment when you were a teenager? If not re drug use, than boys you dated, friends you chose, decisions you made. If not, then by golly, you should run for President.

And you apparently forget that one of the past two President's was Hill's husband, based on that and the depths to which her campaign has and is sinking, what on God's green earth, makes you think her judgment will be any better.

As for your last statement: Just keep telling yourself that as your paycheck is about 80% of your male counterpart's

You really should wake up and try to inform yourself OBJECTIVELY. Take off the Clinton-colored glasses and do a little research.

Bingo!! I think we just heard what the hidden dirt on Obama is.. Was that a Freudian slip Hillary or politics of personal destruction??

"These comments were not authorized or condoned by the campaign in any way," -said Clinton.

ie..., the chairman of Hillary's campaign is not authorized to speak for her campaign.., in this case.

This is when the fun begins. LOL

OK, Jerry, first of all, Clinton did go negative first, and still hasn't stopped. Her "campaign" has, for the last several weeks, leaked misinformation and outright falsehoods re Obama, digging up kindergarten and third grade essays, planting questions in both GOP and DEM debates, packing audiences (with an assist from CNN).
She is desparate, she is a liar, she is a megalomaniac, and Flying Spaghetti Monster help this country if she becomes President.

Secondly, the Obama drug use is a non-starter for the GOP. They would have to defend W's use and abuse or come across as being major hypocrits(then again that has never stopped a career politician before). Besides that, Obama's drug use has been in the public domain since he wrote his first book.

Essentially his honesty in this matter has pre-empted anything the GOP may try to do with this information. By the time the general campaign heats up it will just be old news.