December 14, 2007
Posted: 07:49 AM ET

Huckabee leads in a new poll out of South Carolina.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee surged to the top among Republican presidential candidates in South Carolina, while Sen. Hillary Clinton's lead over Sen. Barack Obama among Democrats narrowed since July in that state, according to a new poll.

The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll of South Carolinians was released Friday Huckabee was the choice of 24 percent of South Carolina Republicans in the survey conducted by telephone between Dec. 9 and 12. When the same poll was conducted in July, Huckabee was in the lower tier with just 3 percent of support from registered GOP voters.

Former Sen. Fred Thompson was second with 17 percent, slightly down from his previous 18 percent.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who led in July with 30 percent, dropped to a tie for third with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, both at 16 percent. Romney's showing was a major improvement of his 6 percent standing in the previous survey.

The poll showed Sen. John McCain falling from 21 percent in July — the second highest — to a fifth place 13 percent now. Rep. Ron Paul's 11 percent for seventh was a major boost from the two percent registered by the July survey.

The sampling error for the poll of Republican primary voters is 4 percent.

The survey suggested that one of Huckabee's main strengths was his personality.

In particular, he tops the list when likely GOP voters are asked to name the candidate who is most believable.

The poll of Democratic primary voters showed Clinton leading with 42 percent, Obama second at 34 percent and former Sen. John Edwards third with 16 percent.

The remaining Democrats were at 3 percent or less.

The poll's sampling error is plus or minus 4.5 for Democratic primary voters.

Obama, who moved up 7 points since the July poll, was helped by increased support among black voters.

While in July, 33 percent of African-American Democrats said they would vote for Obama, he now has 45 percent of their support compared to Clinton's 46 percent.

Among Democrats, 41 percent said they've definitely made up their minds about who they'll vote for in the primary, while 22 percent told pollsters early primary results could help them decide.

The remaining 36 percent said they don't know who they'll vote for, but those earlier primaries will not affect them.

Republican voters appeared less decisive about their choices, with just 25 percent saying their minds were made up, and 22 percent saying early primary results could help them decide.

The other 52 percent said while they're undecided, the earlier primaries will not affect their vote.

The poll also looked ahead to a possible general election with Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee and Mike Huckabee or Rudy Giuliani leading the GOP ticket.

The survey of South Carolina registered voters, which has a sampling error of 3 percent, showed Clinton with 48 percent versus Giuliani at 47 percent.

Huckabee edges Clinton 48-47 percent in the head-to-head poll.

Jimmy Carter, in 1976, was the last Democratic presidential candidate to win South Carolina's electoral votes.

The survey's question about what issues were most important to voters in determining their choice for president showed significant differences in the priorities between Republicans and Democrats.

Democrats placed Iraq and health at the top of their list with 31 and 30 percent respectively.

The economy was third at 24 percent, followed by immigration at 7 percent, terrorism at 3 percent and abortion at 3 percent.

The economy was the most important issue for 24 percent of the Republicans, while immigration was next at 23 percent, followed by Iraq at 16 percent, terrorism at 13 percent, abortion at 11 percent and health care at 10 percent.

Filed under: Poll • South Carolina


William Karam, New York city, NY   December 14th, 2007 6:36 am ET

Oprah has crossed the line.
Enough.

Jessica M., El Paso, TX   December 14th, 2007 7:05 am ET

This is kind of a misleading headline. If anything, its good news for Clinton, it shows that she is increasing her lead from previous recent polls. Oh-oh, I think there IS an Oprah backlash. Oops. I find it funny how after everything, the Oprah side circus, spending more money than any other candidate, all the positive biased media, and having better organization on the ground and early campaigning, Saint Obama still can't take a real lead in Iowa either. If this didn't help. I don't know what will.

And lets not talk about Edwards, he's been campaigning for the presidency since 2004 (he hasn't even had a "real" job, except this).

tere, fl   December 14th, 2007 7:21 am ET

why did you not do a general election poll with obama as the democratic nominee you biased ****

Adam, Augusta GA   December 14th, 2007 7:24 am ET

Why is Huckabee surging in the polls? I mean what does anyone know about him except that he is republican and a baptist preacher? Is he getting support based on his religion?

Allen Ridge   December 14th, 2007 7:26 am ET

Olde Slick Huck is a product of America's liberal MSM wolfpack press. They know olde liberal Huck is the weaker of all the leading candidates running for president. Hopefully GOP voters will not be fooled by the "propping" up of Huck by our liberal press

brian, rockwall, texas   December 14th, 2007 7:26 am ET

i hope huckabee's popularity isn't mostly due to the "christian" thing. our country is paying, and will be paying for generations to come, for the last elected favorite of the christian coalition who also claimed to be a "compassionate conservative" and a "uniter, not a divider". please thing beyond that and realize the most important things right now include things the present administration has no interest in…things like global warming, diplomacy, world standing, human rights, reducing deficits, and an honest administration. i don't know what is going to be included in this presidents library, everything's been deleted, or destroyed.

mapper john   December 14th, 2007 7:46 am ET

If this poll strength continues, the GOP is in much more trouble than I ever thought.

Karen, NYC   December 14th, 2007 7:51 am ET

besides the personal issues Gov. Mike Huckabee is having he would be a breath of fresh air on the Republican side.

Justin, Gaithersburg MD   December 14th, 2007 8:02 am ET

The article never mentions women's rights… and yet the tag under Huckabee's headshot says "Huckabee's record on women's rights is under scrutiny."

Very classy CNN.

KEITH JAMES LOUTTIT   December 14th, 2007 8:10 am ET

2 soon 2 look 4 winners.

Lee, Mays Landing New Jersey   December 14th, 2007 8:11 am ET

That's good. Huckabee is the most authentic of the bunch (too many fakers, phonies and flip-floppers) and his outlook and beliefs are right where most southern republicans are.

Rather than nominating a chameleon like Romney or a lizard of a different color like Giuliani, this is a more honest republican choice. For example Pat Robertson's choice of Giuliani was dishonest and purely political, while the average republican voter is choosing someone more like himself or herself.

It will make for a clearer and better choice in the general election, especially when on the democratic side they choose someone other than Hillary, another politician too chameleon like.

Agree or disagree with Huckabee, he gives us a clear choice.

Don, Ft. Worth, Tx.   December 14th, 2007 8:11 am ET

Gov. Huckabee is not electable. The Republican party has much going against its candidates this next year. The Governor can not overcome them as he lacks broad appeal. This is not a comment about him or what he stands for good or bad, just an observation.

TC Orlando, FL   December 14th, 2007 8:24 am ET

Here we go again, the last thing we need right now is another right-wing religious fundamentalist nutjob as our preacher-in-chief. He belongs in a little church house in the middle of Arkansas, not in the White House.

anon, new york, NY   December 14th, 2007 8:36 am ET

While Hillary might have dropped her lead since CNN's July poll, she has increased her lead over Obama since Opprah's stump for him a week or so ago. That could the backlash from Oprah's stump.

In addtion, while Obama might have about equal votes with Hillary from the blacks in south carolina, he lost out to Hillary 3 to 1 in getting the white votes in south carolina.

Alex, Philadelphia, PA   December 14th, 2007 8:37 am ET

How come on TV they don't mention Ron Paul jumping to 11% at all? I'm just wondering why the limited exposure?

I. Dern (Fairfax, Va)   December 14th, 2007 8:40 am ET

It's good to see that voters aren't responding to the media's sudden and intense smear campaign against Huckabee.

The intensity of the spotlight and the nitpicking is incredible. Good to see that the US is not as easily manipulated as the media would hope.

Alex, Miami, FL   December 14th, 2007 8:41 am ET

I would like to know if people paid 35$ to vote in the Iowa polls how come they are not allowed to see them or for a registered count. While I am glad Mr. Huckabee came in first which I suspected , it came as a surprise to me that no one reports that the funny thing about the Republican results is that Ron Paul is at 11% here but the Survey USA poll that was released just a few days ago excluded him as a choice in South Carolina just the same way Dennis Kucinich was excluded in Iowa. Meanwhile Iowa voters are not allowed to manually look at the results despite paying $35 dollars to vote. Something smells fishy and it's not the fish.

Liam Thomson, Milford, NH   December 14th, 2007 8:44 am ET

U R Right, Keith. It is 2 soon, and yet, not 2 soon to know who not to vote for, like any Democrat who lives in a fantasy world and makes empty, unrealistic, and dangerous promises. Time will tell. I just want that DEM Congress gone, they are so inept it is mind blowing.

Common Sense   December 14th, 2007 8:47 am ET

It would be a great race in 2008 if Obama and Huckabee are able to keep the other challengers at bay. It would be a great story of how two unassuming candidates surged to the top when they weren't expected to be the nominees. I've written more about it last month: http://uscommonsense.net/blog/2007/11/20/huckabee-vs-obama-in-2008/

Common Sense   December 14th, 2007 8:48 am ET

Keith, you are correct. However, one of the joys for political junkies is watching how races shape up. You never know what will happen tomorrow.

Diamond. Bradenton, FL   December 14th, 2007 8:48 am ET

Obama moved up 7 points.

How many points did Clinton drop? ashamed to say, hmh?

When you exploit people's kindergarten and teenage years for political gain, you pay a heavy price.

TB, FL   December 14th, 2007 8:49 am ET

Agreed Keith…way too soon!

Kissimmee Florida   December 14th, 2007 8:54 am ET

Iam glad that Hillary is loosing ground iam a republican undidecided yet my vote is between Arkansas former governor and Guiliani i am from ths estate of Florida.

Surrealist, Fort Myers, FL   December 14th, 2007 8:54 am ET

Tis a sad day indeed. The two must laughable excuses for leaders–are near the top of the pick!! Just shows how the press, polls, institutions–again are pushing us to selection of a candidate. On the right–the Christian Right–is co-opting the media, polls to put in one of their own. On the left–the elitists,–and Ivy League graduates in power–are pushing for another Harvard grad–to add to their wall of fame.
Take a second look at these two buffoons. Don't let the traditionalists elect another "business as usual" specimen. During the next Presidency, lets make sure we see some action coming from Washington–not just more broken promises and perpetuation of the same old stuff under new management–and called a different name.

Anon   December 14th, 2007 8:55 am ET

I don't know what people see in him. But good luck Huck. I'd rather see him win the GOP nomination than any other neo con.

J Willaimson Buffalo, NY   December 14th, 2007 9:00 am ET

This underscores the fact that the Republican party has been hi-jacked by religious fanatics and right-wing loonies. Say what you will about Richard Nixon, but he was the smartest Republican politician of the 20th century (three times a presidential nominee) and never would have allowed these demogogues within a country-mile of his organization.

Emil,Silver Spring, MD   December 14th, 2007 9:00 am ET

I wished this to happen after I listened carefully to his stament and answers to questions on CNN/debate.
I also felt his concern about the future of all Americans bleu/red base on his 'faith shown' (personality) in God.

now the result is, He is said to have taken the lead in key state.

Gov. Huckabee cheer, keep it on.

Mark, Minneapolis MN   December 14th, 2007 9:08 am ET

I'm curious to know where climate change or the environment ranked among Dems and Republicans polled. Was it offered as a choice by persons conducting the poll?

Hiding in the hills   December 14th, 2007 9:09 am ET

Just keep attacking Huckabee - he is enjoying the attention and his numbers keep going up.

Karen   December 14th, 2007 9:14 am ET

Huckster in the white house…all of my worst nightmares all rolled into one.

S.B. Stein E.B. NJ   December 14th, 2007 9:15 am ET

It will be a while before we can really call a winner of Iowa. How about we wait until the caucus is over to call a winner. I would prefer that all of these primaries and caucuses started after April.

Walt, Englewood, FL   December 14th, 2007 9:16 am ET

Ron Paul in 6th place not seventh and only 5 points behind Romney and Giuliani and 6 points out of second place. Not bad for a candidate ignored by the media.

Martin, Clarksville, TN   December 14th, 2007 9:24 am ET

Wow, more bad news for Hillary! It looks like people are beginning to wake up and realize that she is not the leader our country needs. I just hope her poll numbers continue their steady drop as more Americans realize just how bad she would be for our country.

Anybody but Hillary in 2008

Chuck, Miami, FL   December 14th, 2007 9:34 am ET

This shows you how pathetic Mitt Romney's campaign has been. He has spent millions and was leading IOWA, NH, and SC for months. Now his lead has evaporated. Go Mike Huckabee.

Chris, Middletown, CT   December 14th, 2007 9:49 am ET

I am a Republican….and the sad thing is…I will vote for Obama over anyone running (except Giuliani) - the country needs a moderate….not a right or left wing….they cannot win…if the Dems run HRC - then the Republicans will win - we nobody believes Saul Alinskys socialist beliefs have any place here

Bryan, Folsom, CA   December 14th, 2007 9:52 am ET

The media made Huckabee. He's their little pet. They'll break him when the time comes. He's cute, but little more. He may please the Republicans with his country wit and charm (and I'm sure he's a nice guy). But he can't defeat the Democratic candidates. That's quite plain. Wake up.

Thankfully, we've yet to hear the fat lady sing.

Randy S. Lawton, OK   December 14th, 2007 9:57 am ET

Posted By anon, new york, NY : December 14, 2007 8:36 am

One question: Do you lay awake at night making this crap up?

Pulling facts out of your orifices doesn't make them true.

I just love the way all the wannabe pundits on these threads spew forth facts as they want them to be. And all the prognosticators that can see the future and tell us who is pre-ordained to win primaries or even the general election.
The fact is, and most people realize this, is that polls, especially leading up to the primaries, are about as reliable as a screen door on a submarine.
But, keep on trucking, folks, don't let facts get in your way.

David Columbus, OH   December 14th, 2007 10:05 am ET

Huckabee leading? Who wants to vote for this guy? What a joke. When will people start doing their own investigating instead of listening to CNN?! WHEN!?!?

Ben Campbell, Hillsville, Virginia   December 14th, 2007 10:07 am ET

What a line of bull, CNN! There is no way under the stars that Hillary Clinton has a chance of winning South Carolina if pitted against a Republican candidate in the general election. Not even if the Republicans nominated Dick Cheney! This head-to-head "poll" of yours is just further proof that your network is doing everthing within its power to secure the nomination for her for the sake of having a great "story" to report on. Americans may be growing dumber, but they're not so far gone as to believe such manipulated data. Take a drive through South Carolina, stop and speak with its people. Let's see then if you still believe Hillary stands a chance of winning the state's electoral votes.

And by the way…I'm a Democrat. A realistic Democrat!

Nat, Brooklyn, NY   December 14th, 2007 10:08 am ET

Just hope that Mike Bloomberg will enter the run for the White House, otherwise, we are in a big trouble.

Jacob, Newton IA   December 14th, 2007 10:08 am ET

Why do people like this guy? We need a guy who can fix problems, not be a smoooooth talker. Talking doesn't solve anything. The man has spent his adult life doing exactly that - talking. Romney does, Huckabee talks about doing. Look at results, not words.

New Yorker   December 14th, 2007 10:11 am ET

Here we go again, the last thing we
need right now is another right-wing religious fundamentalist nutjob as our preacher-in-chief. He belongs in a little church house in the middle of Arkansas, not in the White House.
Posted By TC Orlando, FL : December 14, 2007 8:24 am

GUESS WHAT TC-
I'd much rather see him in the White House than a left-wing, anti-Christian, advocate of women's rights ABOVE babies rights, cut and run, misguided democrat/socialist. I guess alot of other people would too, hence his soaring to the top! I love you and the democrats but not your/ their agenda.

Walt, Belton, TX   December 14th, 2007 10:12 am ET

Sorry Mike, one loser from Hope, Arkansas is more than enough.

Neither advocate a strong national defense and neither served their country in uniform, and we saw how Clinton decimated the military.

Two capitulators from Hope would be idiocy!

Mike, Des Moines, IA   December 14th, 2007 10:13 am ET

Afther Ron Paul Win my State and NH we be a easy surf and take them all.

Jon Moulee, Black Oak, Arkansas   December 14th, 2007 10:16 am ET

How much of Huckabee's support is attributed to rapists hoping for a presidential pardon?

That's Reality   December 14th, 2007 10:34 am ET

To Brian, Rockwell, Texas -

I'm glad Bush doesn't make his decisions based on how it will effect our "world standing". The world, as represented by the United Nations, is not going in the right direction. If it was the U.N. would have done something, long ago, about the genocide in Darfur, the human rights abuses in Viet Nam, China, N. Korea, to name a very few, and would do something about nations who violate nuclear arms agreements, rather than leaving such things up to anyone who dares stand up to the monstrous deception that is going on and YOU have fallen for. Check out what's really going on in the world and you'll understand the battle that Bush was courageous enough to become involved in. People who hate Bush haven't received all the facts but, evidently, only what certain media has to offer, or just can't discern what's really going on here. When you mention human rights, please don't forget the unborn babies; they really are human, also.

Ron, Kensington, MD   December 14th, 2007 10:42 am ET

Does anyone seem to forget the fact that Huckabee does NOT have ANY foreign relations and policy experience? Didn't anyone see Huck's idiotic, loose cannon comment on Imus when Imus asked him, "So do you think your having zero foreign relations experience will have an affect on your candidacy?" Huck's response was "You're right, I do not have any foreign relations experience, but I did stay at the Holiday Inn last night." Huckabee was trying to be "funny" but PEOPLE! This race is for the President of the United States, Leader of the free world. Huckabee is likeable, but does not have the experience of the other GOP candidates and will defintiely flop in Iowa. Iowan's are not going to fall for his "cute" little puns that his speech writers use to distract questions from foreign policy.

Randy, Little Rock, AR   December 14th, 2007 10:44 am ET

Its amazing that CNN will do no reporting on any of the ethics charges against Mike Huckabee. This is CNN corporate's dream candidate for Hillary because he will fall apart in the General. I have never seen a candidate with a worse Republican record and clear ethics violations make it so far. The MSM is really smart on this stuff. They know if they push a Christian to the front just like Pat Robertson, it will be our demise. At least in the past Republicans could take time to realize that Pat wasn't it, but now with a short Primary, the MSM knows that we won't have time to exam this guy, and if they just ignore the stories, no one will find out. Scares the heck out of me, its sort of the Liberal Media's revenge for having Bush for eight years. By the way folks,I live in Arkansas and Mike Huckabee would campaigned for 4 democrats in one cycle because these 4 republicans wouldn't vote for one of his tax increases. Huckabee is crazy and he threatens Republicans here all the time. I mean super creepy. Enjoy him as the nominee…

Jon B Olathe KS   December 14th, 2007 10:47 am ET

So much talk how people are "anti-christian" simply because the are a democrat or a republican who thinks Huckabee would be a disaster in the Whitehouse.

What a crock. There is not big "anti-christian" movement out there. Its the 75% of the country that isn't overly religious evangelicals saying to you "keep you religion in you church and out of our politics"

It's a pro-freedom message, not an anti-christian. You can practice what ever you feel to your hearts content, but when you start trying to push governemnt policies soley on religious merit it is oppressive to those who don't share your views of religion.

Huckabee has said over and over (like his little spot ad in the Iowa debates wed) that "you cannot keep faith from influencing your decisions." THIS IS DANGEROUS. A president is to be the leader of free men not a congregation.

ron, stanta barbara, CA   December 14th, 2007 10:51 am ET

Apparently Ed Rollins thinks Huckabee can win the Presidency. And if you dont know who that is or dont think that matters …. well …

Jeremiah, Phoenix AZ   December 14th, 2007 10:52 am ET

I'm getting concerned. It appears much of Huckabee's rise is due simply to the "likeabilty" factor. Are you kidding me people? We're going to elect the most powerful person in the world because "Shucks, we like to hear his Southern voice and his witty one liners."?

Let's discuss records, accomplishments, vision, and capacity to bring about real change.

Nobody can touch Romney when it comes to PROVEN ABILITY TO LEAD. He's been incredibly successful in business. He brought real vision and leadership to MA and he brought people together to bring about real change. How else do you explain balancing a budget deficit without raising taxes? Finally, he took a scandal laden, financially troubled Olympics and made them a huge success.

Mitt Romney has shown time and again in everything he has done that he is a real executive capable of taking on big problems.

I'm amazed when I read the posts that say "Mitt hasn't told us *how* he's going to do this or that.' Are you kidding? Of ALL the candidates out there on both sides, Romney is the ONLY candidate who has actually put a real health care in place. he doesn't need to speculate about how it might be done. HE'S ALREADY DONE IT!! Just like he did with health care, just like he did erasing a budget deficit without raising taxes, just like he turned around the Olympics and countless businesses…like he's *always* done, he'll lay out a clear plan, put the right people in place, and execute.

That's what we need people - A PROVEN LEADER.

I am definitely voting for ROMNEY!

Tom W - Dedham, Mass   December 14th, 2007 11:00 am ET

This shows you how pathetic Mitt Romney's campaign has been. He has spent millions and was leading IOWA, NH, and SC for months. Now his lead has evaporated. Go Mike Huckabee.

Posted By Chuck, Miami, FL : December 14, 2007 9:34 am

First off "Chuck", he is losing his lead in the polls because of the moronic, bible thumping bigots who are supporting someone based on their faith.

As a Christian who happens to lean Conservative, I am disgusted that these narrow minded fools are even associated with the GOP.

Can you post some thinga that you like about Huckabee, some stances on issues?

Maybe you like instate tuition for illegals, parole for convicted murderers, parole at an average of 1 every four days he was in office etc, etc among his "stances".

Just like ROMNEY, I don't like ANY of those either.

Nominate him Republicans and I am taking my vote to Obama or Biden.

Kelly, New Hampshire   December 14th, 2007 11:00 am ET

Huckabee is a great candidate- like all voters should do- check his record, you can't believe all candidates when they say "I'll do this and I'll do that," you have to check their record. By the way - global warming isn't as bad as they say- we've had more snow up in New England in the past few weeks than ever- AND I just saw a program about how the artic ice is growing- the weather channel says it's a scam! I believe there is some to a certain degree- but not nearly as bad as they say. I love how people criticize others (like Bush) and have yet to even try and walk in his shoes- he's got the hardest job on the planet!

Anonymous   December 14th, 2007 11:12 am ET

Huckabee vs Obama

sounds a lot better than

Rudy vs Hillary

Rafi, NY NY   December 14th, 2007 11:16 am ET

22 percent told pollsters early primary results could help them decide.

Does anyone else think it's sad that more than a fifth of voters openly admitted that they'll vote for whoever the majority is, rather than thinking for themselves?

Ann   December 14th, 2007 11:49 am ET

It's not that Democrats don't like religion. It's just that they don't feel it..

Samantha   December 14th, 2007 11:50 am ET

He's surging in GOP polls because when so called conservative chrisitians here the word Jesus they are automatically sold. While I admit there are problems in this country most of them will not be solved by a baptist minister president. I was raised southern baptist and most members are the most hypocritical and judgemental of any religion I've came into contact with.

richard b Tampa Florida   December 14th, 2007 11:57 am ET

whoops…. there still are a few thinking, decent amercians with a sense of moral bearing left. I guess Hollywood hasn't had quite enough time to brainwash all amercians yet. Are you getting the picture you self serving, professional Washington elites, Amercia isn't quite sold out completely, if a canidate like Huckaby can generate poll numbers like he is doing there may be some hope for this disfunctional, goning down the drain country yet! I LIKE MIKE!(and I dont mean Vick).

Dan   December 14th, 2007 12:13 pm ET

Huckabee vs Obama

Please let's have a battle of ideas not a Hillary vs. Rudy battle of sleaze.

Greg, Phoenix, AZ   December 14th, 2007 12:46 pm ET

It is not surprising that a former preacher is going to be in the lead in these single-issue voting states. The problem for Huck is that he has little chance to gain the votes of moderate Republicans (who will most likely support Giuliani due to his moderate social views and proven leadership capabilities) and absolutely no chance to gain the votes of independents (who don't vote for candidates who don't believe in evolution, suggest that sick people be isolated from society, suggest that women should be submissive to their men, etc. etc.)

Given that Huck can only get the votes of the Christian conservative element, it means that he would have no shot whatsoever if seriously competing in a general election. Just look at how excited the Democtratic strategists get when they speak about Huck. He is to them, as Hillary is to the Republicans.

AJ, IL   December 14th, 2007 1:11 pm ET

When are most Americans going to stop deluding themselves? Most Americans care passionately about one or two issues and based the rest of their decision for a presidential candidate on personality and character.

Huckabee and Obama have loads of personality and character. Hillary is still hanging strong due to her last name being Clinton and that she is a woman. Rudy is still hanging strong due to his association with 9/11.

G.M. Meadville, PA   December 14th, 2007 1:29 pm ET

WHERE'S THE NEWSMEDIA'S COVERAGE OF THEIR DARLING RUDY'S CAMPAIGN SINKING LIKE A LEAD BOULDER?!!!…ENOUGH OF THE HILLARY BASHING ALREADY!!!!!!!

Ian, Eastham MA   December 14th, 2007 1:57 pm ET

"Nobody can touch Romney when it comes to PROVEN ABILITY TO LEAD"

Welcome to Mass and the proof that your wrong

Francesco Calco --Olmsted Falls, Ohio 44138   December 14th, 2007 2:04 pm ET

————-

—–Oprah Winfrey has been buying up young and middle aged white women for many years—waiting for the right moment to throw them into the black take over of America…With Obama now–and herself as the king-maker–she seems to have gathered in some
85-90 % of the black population to go along with the frenzie of "at last a
Black savaior" to save us from the white boss man…..As Bill Clinton would do to Hillary —-should Barak
be elicted—-he would be sent to the salt mines–and the 'Oparh' would declair herself as the first ——
– "Queen of America" !

aaron, minneapolis mn   December 14th, 2007 2:35 pm ET

Go GOPs!! Please vote for Huckleberry. Another idiot err I mean George Bush in the white house…perfect.

Tim, Seattle   December 14th, 2007 3:45 pm ET

To Chris, Middletown, CT

The cold war called and wants their rhetoric back!. The commies arent under your bed anymore and Red Dawn is just a movie. So put away your commie ray gun and socialist decoder ring and join the 21st century. I am tired of yawning at all your paranoid socialist diatribes.

J Williamson, Buffalo, NY   December 14th, 2007 5:32 pm ET

As far as Obama is concerned, I have a couple of thoughts, which may be right on the money - or not at all! My feeling is that the Obama campaign made a big tactical error by show-casing Oprah four weeks before the(Iowa) election. I think he's already hit his high-water mark and will drop 5 to 7 points by election day. He's opened himself (along with Oprah) to too much speculation and second-guessing. Forget phone numbers and email addresses - people will come out or they won't. Nothing new about this observation. Yes, I do believe the Obama campaign should have done the "Oprah tour" in the closing days of the campaign and thusly rode to victory. No time for the negativity to fully set in. This doesn't speak to the highest ideals of human nature, but, after all, we're talking American presendential politics here. P.S. For those of you out there who are entirely mesmerized by this presidential section process, may I recommend getting a copy of "Making of a President 1968," by Theodore White. I'm guessing it's long out of print, but if your local library is worth its salt, they should have a copy on file. Hubert H. Humphrey - now THERE was a candidate.

Rich   December 14th, 2007 5:33 pm ET

Someone plz teach Huck ho to brush his teeth. Run the country what joke Don't all you people know this is all BS CNN PROPAGANDA

Felicia, North Carolina   December 14th, 2007 6:58 pm ET

Yikes! Has anyone been paying attention to WHY Huckabee has taken the lead? Romney had a lead in 4 key early states and has lost most of this lead due to the "religion card" Huckabee has played. You don't have to agree with Romney's Mormonism, but there should NEVER be a religious test and smears put on a candidate that has occured in the last month. Romney clearly has the most experience out of the GOP Candidates and is a clear trouble shooter when it comes to cleaning up a mess.

Mike, Provo, UT   December 14th, 2007 7:06 pm ET

If Huckabee manages to take Iowa and South Carolina, there's little doubt that Giuliani will take most of the rest of the nation and end up with the nomination. However, if Romney can manage wins in the early states there's a good chance he can ride the momentum to a national win… I think that's what it comes down to.

Lourie Salley, Salley, SC   December 14th, 2007 10:00 pm ET

Romney and Thompson have lost points, and Huckabee and Ron Paul have gained in South Carolina, largely as a result of Ronmney's insulting remarks about the Confederate flag.All over the South Carolina, signs are appearing, that say "Dump Romney" or "Dump Thompson", and "Dump McCain" with the Confederate flag.Signs are going up that read, "Romney-Carpetbagger", and "Thompson-Scalawag".Laugh if you will, but politicians court political suicide in the South by insulting Southerners and their flag

Indy in AZ   December 14th, 2007 10:49 pm ET

And this too, shall pass.

Val Davydov, Agawam, MA   December 14th, 2007 11:41 pm ET

Jeremiah, I am definitely voting for ROMNEY too!

NO Huck and Chuck in the White House!

j.r.   December 15th, 2007 12:04 am ET

gone with clinton! why do you think she should be president? She looks tired already.

New Brunswick, NJ   December 15th, 2007 8:50 am ET

Ron Paul is actually a lot higher. He has fans everywhere. Don't let the mainstream media fool you! they should realize that Americans have awoke from their slumbers! Huckabee isn't that popular, the MSM wants the Dems to crush him (because he is so pathetic) and are scared of Ron Paul! Why do you think we have all these candidates now mocking RP, talking about the income tax and preaching the constitution!

Matt, Dallas TX   December 15th, 2007 12:09 pm ET

Hm. You know, we'll actually buy a lot of your BS excuses for downplaying Dr. Paul, but I don't believe that you really are unable to count to six.

levotb Oakland, CA   December 15th, 2007 11:44 pm ET

Ask yourselves: Would the liberal MNM and RINO Fox folks be falling all over themselves about the Huckster if they believed he was a real conservative and not a liberal just like them? No! They are deathly afraid of Tancredo, Hunter and Paul because these three candidates have fiercely loyal followers and want to seriously change things. The MNM wants the status quo (more illegal aliens invading from Mexico, more trade with Red China), which is why they marginalize these three candidates.

Stephen Haddonfield,NJ   December 16th, 2007 1:27 am ET

Ron Paul is within the "margin or error" of the other top tier candidates when will they start giving him the press he has earned? I should be thankful it is at least mentioned in this article.

rhys, Saint Petersburg FL   December 17th, 2007 11:15 pm ET

Paul is in a statistical dead heat with everyone but Huckabee. Everyone knows that Paul's supporters are the most enthusiastic, and that polls are lagging indicators. I'm so excited.

Watch Huckabee implode after he does well in the State that nominated Pat Robertson. Paul is going to take South Carolina.

3rd in IA
2nd in NH
1st in SC

Vote for the Constitution. Vote Ron Paul.

Robin, Houston, TX   December 19th, 2007 7:34 pm ET

Everybody should know by now that Ron Paul is going to win the republican nomination. Everyone I have introduced him to ends up falling head-over-heels for him. A few months ago I would mention him and nobody knew who I was talking about — now when I say his name I get a bunch of "yeah! I love that guy!" etc. He's the Grand Uniter between all political sects. No other repub has the kind of deep rooted support that Paul has.

Ryan, Rochester NY   December 22nd, 2007 11:27 am ET

thought this was a good article.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWIzYWI4NTBjYTc3NGE1OGEwYWMyZjE1NDZjOWVmMDQ=

William   December 29th, 2007 3:28 am ET

Where do they get these poll numbers from? I never get anything in the mail. I look around online, no place to take a poll. Don't go by the numbers these news sites give you. Try to take a poll yourself and you will see.

Vote Ron Paul - he is the last hope for us, unless you want to convert to the Amero.

Matt McIntyre   December 31st, 2007 6:40 am ET

RON PAUL is the only hope for a free America. These poll numbers don't reflect massive grass roots support for Paul. There are 100's of thousands of normally apathetic voters (like me), who don’t show up on any polling lists, and who are tired of phony political rhetoric, fear tactics, expensive imperialist foreign policy, income taxes, an erosion of civil liberties, and a departure from our constitution. We will show up in droves to vote for our savior and you will all be shocked. WAKE UP, he is the best candidate since Regan!!! Huckabee is religious demagogue and if we elect Hillary it's: Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton. Spread Democracy around the world?! Let’s spread some here, first. Vote Ron Paul.

josh   January 4th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

They are all just politicians… Why can't we get back to the days when "normal people" like scientists and doctors are in positions of power? War-mongers and businessmen are NOT fit to lead this great country of ours.

check out all candidates views at http://www.president101.com/politics/ …. it's easy seeing what everyone believes straight from their mouths, sadly most are all liars and fish out of water (flip flopping).

Larry - Texas   January 6th, 2008 11:52 am ET

There are as many nutjobs posting here as on CNN. Ron Paul is electable? Give me a break. Give me some of what you are smoking.

Huckabee is more, much more than just a Baptist Preacher. He is sharp, very sharp, and will beat Hitlery and YoMamma to shreds in any debate. Those of you who slam him and ask Who is this guy? need to do some reading and listening. Get some education for God's sake, turn off MTV.

It's going to be interesting so stay tuned.

hhkeller   January 10th, 2008 7:30 pm ET

Is Ron Paul joking?

Brdlady79   January 11th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

As a resident of Arkansas, and a Republican, I can assure you that mike huckabee is no Republican. The huck has raised taxes, provided public benefts for illegals including many millions for illegal alens, plus $1.00 year rent for the mexican consulate in Little Rock, and encouraged the legislature to pass a bill to extend in-state tuition for illegals. No matter how much lipstick the Huck puts on the pig, trying to change his position on open borders/encouragement of illegal immigration - it's still a pig….he called Republican legislators in Arkansas "shiite Republicans" when they didn't buy into his liberal leadership. Now that's the making of a real President. Huckabee accepted many, many personal "gifts" - how many times was he brought before the Ethics Committee? Peopleo of South Carolina - and all of the US - look at his RECORD. Please do NOT be fooled by his charming fortune cookie quotes. This man is NOT A REPUBLICAN. At least not to this Arkansas Republican. He does not, never has, nor will he EVER, represent the Republican party that I believe in.

Andre Mirabelli   January 12th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

CNN Opinion Research Corporation came out with a poll on 1/12/08 pitting various Democratic verses Republican candidates against each other. It shows that any Dem can beat any Repub except McCain. However, as is the want of the corporate media, they do not even ask about the one Dem candidate that has previously beat McCain in such polls, John Edwards. Edwards got more votes than any of the other Repub candidate in Iowa and NH and they ignore him because they can call the shots. He scares the corporate media too much for them to even mention his name in a poll or in the analysis of its results. That's why they own the media, to make sure that we balance 8 years of the far right doing whatever they want with 4 or 8 years of compromise so that we keep the Supreme Court and the rest of the government a nice friendly center right, which is how they get to keep the country where they want it. That is what the right gets away with calling the left wing media.

John Ottman   January 13th, 2008 3:26 pm ET

I'm 43, and just when I was solidly entering the cynical phase of my life regarding American politics, along comes a cadididate who actually inspires my imagination, and that's Obama. I don't know for sure if Obama's the real deal, but he holds the greatest potential of changing not only how the world views America, but how we view ourselves. This is exciting.

dave brown   January 13th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Ron Paul stands for something and is not afraid to speak his mind. He's not just another talking head, PC U graduate. The media constantly attempts to stump Ron Paul, twist his words, and convince Americans that Ron Paul is not a legitimate candidate despite his outstanding, consistent record and his ability to demonstrate logic.

If America was a business, we would be out of business, or at least headed in that direction. Sure, you can spend money you don’t have, but don’t forget you have to pay back your debts–with interest! What did our forefathers say about costly foreign entanglements? Here’s an idea: why don’t we focus on our own nation. Just a thought.

Charles Bentley   January 14th, 2008 8:04 pm ET

I think Ron Paul has a broad appeal.

He is a honest american.

He is no fanatic except for Freedom

SUZANNE ELLIS   January 16th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

I hope and pray to GOD that the women in this country stand together and put Hillary in the White House. If you watched the Nevada debate last night she was clearly the winner. Hillary speaks like a president, she does'nt studder when answering any questions about anything, you know Obama is good at making a speech but he sure does'nt shine when asked a direct question. She is truely the one we have to put in office, none of the others even compare to her, she'll not only stand up for women's rights but also those of African Americans and Latino's, and I believe they know this. Yes this is definely historical, we've needed a woman in the White House for a long time,, and it could come soon enough for me, and I hope the women in this country will stand together and make history!!!!!!!

Danielle   January 18th, 2008 1:14 am ET

Come on America! Do your own research; don't rely on info given to you by ANY media… all of these candidates have websites… take 2 days and you can get a good idea of all of them… dem. & rep.

I've done this, and it is my research-based opinion that Ron Paul is the right person for the job. He understands the economy better than anyone else! If Republicans are concerned about the economy they should vote for Ron Paul!

Barbara Atchley   January 18th, 2008 8:30 am ET

Women want Hillary in the Oval Office??? I don't think so.

I am a woman and here is what I do not what.
- a carreer politician who owes favors to everybody who has scratched his (OR HER) back in the past.

-I do not want a crooked business man who's company has bought and paid for Clear Channel Communications (the voices of conservatives for years)

Follow the money if your smart enough and find out who is in bed with who before you cast your vote.

Research the following and tie it all together…. its very interesting indeed!

Bain Capital

Clear Channel Communications

Fox Radio

McCain-Feingold Act (reform on soft money , ha - they did nothing to reform the 527 groups where millonaires still channel their advertising money anomiously.)

Fred you say? - "Thompson spent nearly two decades in Washington as a lawyer-lobbyist". Take a wild guess who his buddy's are!

Comments have been closed for this article

CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2007 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com