December 21, 2007
Posted: 05:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The top Democratic and Republican presidential contenders will be invited to appear in nationally televised debates in California less than one week before "Super Tuesday," CNN, The Los Angeles Times, and Politico announced Friday.

The California debates, which will be broadcast on CNN, will take place in a delegate rich state that both Republican and Democratic White House hopefuls are mining for votes and campaign cash.

It will be the final time the candidates appear together on the same stage before February 5 when 23 states hold presidential nominating contests.

Republicans will appear at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley on January 30. Former first lady Nancy Reagan has personally informed candidates that they will be invited if they are frontrunners.

The California Democratic Party has sanctioned the Democratic debate, which will take place January 31 in Los Angeles. CNN, the Los Angeles Times, and Politico are organizing these historic events.

The three media organizations said candidates will be invited if they place in one of the top four spots in an early voting state, and receive at least 5 percent in either a California survey conducted by the organizers or any one of 10 nationally identified media sponsored polls in January.

Organizers will determine Democratic eligibility based upon the Democratic National Committee's early calendar schedule that includes Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. For Republicans, the list of possible contests includes: Iowa, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Michigan, Nevada, South Carolina, and Florida.

In addition to a CNN/Los Angeles Times/Politico survey of California voters, the media organizations said other polls they will use to determine eligibility include: CNN, Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg, The New York Times, CBS, USA Today/Gallup, NBC/Wall Street Journal, FOX/Opinion Dynamics, Washington Post/ABC, TIME, or Newsweek.

Filed under: Presidential Debates


Carolyn   February 1st, 2008 4:00 am ET

I find it very ironic that the crux of the Democratic debates is about change, listening to the American people, and having a government for the people again, all people. Yet the debate was held in front of a room full of celebrities, and probably big campaign donors, by invitation only. Tickets were not available to the "common, ordinary, everyday people."

Isn't that contrary to what the candidates say they are focused on? Don't celebrities have enough privilege and influence in this society, especially in Hollywood? Whose decision was that, cnnpolitico? And who the heck is politico? California is already not taken very seriously by the rest of this country in terms of their political savvy, as it is. Californians are looked at as shallow, star-struck, crunchy granola, protein-bar eating barefooted, sun-tanned, empty-headed bimbos who only care about their looks and having fun. Yet to prove the rest of the country wrong, only a select group of the most affluent people in this country are invited to witness the debate over the welfare and the economics of this country, which affects them the least. They are the serious people, who play other people for a living, and get paid millions to do that. They don't even live in the real world, yet they are the real people? I appreciate the arts (my sister Laurine is an actress in New York), but in this context, where is the sense in this? Hillary and Obama, why did you allow this to happen, when you proclaim to listen to the voices of the disenfranchised, the laborers, the people upon whom the backbone of this country lies.

And then to have it aired on CNN, as if everyone, obviously, has cable TV, in these economic, near recession times. I am disappointed in both Hillary and Obama for not seeing the hippocracy of this whole debate in this setting. Both of you lose points for that as far as I am concerned and it makes your professed concerns about mainstream America less credible. Is this what California represents? Hollywood? Why don't we change the name of the state to Hollywood, and make California the name of the city centered at Hollywood and Vine? My sister, Ginny, who is residing in New Hampshire has stated that Californians are shallow and stupid, even though she was raised in California too. In this instance, I cannot disagree, for those who made the decision to have the debate in this venue.

Deanna   January 31st, 2008 8:41 pm ET

We definitely need a complete party change in November because regardless of the Repub. candidate along with that comes baggage from the past in advisory and cabinet positions. Obama stands the best chance of a Demo. being elected in Nov. Obama will attract more of the independent and swing voters. It is my thought that if a Demo. get elcted that John Edwards would make an excellent Attorney General who would not be afraid to go after corruption and uphold the Constitution of the U.S.
Deanna
MO.

Enrique   January 31st, 2008 5:17 pm ET

How can I attend tonight's debate? The Kodak Theater is large enough to accomodate many people. Do they sell tickets, or how does one get to attend?

Poonam Singh   January 31st, 2008 4:25 pm ET

31st Jan, 2008, COULD BE REAL TESTING POINT for Obama.

If Obama's handling of questions is 'prim & proper' he may soon be ahead of Hillary.
Otherwise Obama can sure say goodbye.
If polling results are to be believed, then, Hillary's lead is only slender.

Today's (Jan31st) debate IS SURELY IMPORTANT FOR SUPER TUESDAY FEB 05, 2008, AS PEOPLE WILL BE WATCHING THIS DEBATE VERY THOROUGHLY.

Ken Herndon   January 31st, 2008 3:37 pm ET

It sure would be nice to put Clinto and Obama against the wall and watch them wiggle around and not specifically answer this question.

Democrats are known for raising taxes on Americans so it will pay for programs that Congress and the President okay. With this being said, at what percentage of a person's salary do you feel a cap should be placed where an Amercan is not responsible for being taxed.

I would bet that neighter would give a specific on this!!!

EILEEN   January 31st, 2008 3:14 pm ET

WILL YOU PLEASE ASK QUESTIONS THAT AMERICANS WANT AN ANSWER TO AND NOT TRY TO STIR UP ARGUMENTS AND RACIAL DEVIDE?!
WE WANT TO KNOW WHERE THEY STAND ON DRIVER'S LICENSE FOR ILLEGALS, ….illegal driver's licenses played a part in how radical muslims attacked us!…
Where do they stand L.O.S.T. treaty
where do they stand on the real issues?!

Earlyretire   January 31st, 2008 12:33 pm ET

Why are the debates so unfair in terms of air time? Seems the media is directing people to who they want to be the top candidates, maybe because the media is interested in what may sell news versus the best president of the USA?

If a debate is 60 mnutes and ther eare 4 candidates, why not track total time, end early, and give those tht had less air time free time to talk and make upp the diff in time? Is the press afraid of equality? I believe it is the press that resulted in John Edwards' fate and wil likely do the same to Huckabee… the only two people that could have made this an election of the best person versus us heading for a lesser of two evils AGAIN.

kathleen   January 31st, 2008 11:40 am ET

is a sense of humor important to you….and if or when you offend someone how do you handle it?

a republican that wants to vote for obama

Chuck Johnson   January 31st, 2008 11:36 am ET

What happened to Huckabee and Paul???? The media has already crowned the winners, and the people have ceeded the election process. I think Huckabee got about 10 minutes of time, and Paul received about 5 minutes.

Kathryn   January 31st, 2008 10:12 am ET

I was extremely disappointed in last night's debate. I, too, found it poorly managed and although I have been fan of Cooper's, I thought it was a bad job all around.

I actually felt that Huckabee even in his litte time won that debate but he and Ron Paul were not allowed equal time. Tired of McCain's constant war stance as much as I was of Rudy's 9/11 overused tirade.

At this point every station's bias is clear so in looking at all the stations I can gleen a bit of information on each candidate. Um, isn't getting information what these stations do for a living. Sad to think u have to channel surf to get a fair overview on these people.

None of the station are doing their job IMO. Get on with finding out the details, the plans specifics not the agendas. It's been a year these people have been spitting out the same stuff; we have almost a year to gather the details….that's the medias job. Stop with the race, gender and nonsense.

Louis Johnson   January 31st, 2008 10:03 am ET

Why would any sane person vote for Hillary Clinton? Hillary represents all that is wrong with American government. Exclusion, confrontation, and deception is not what America needs. Besides, The conservatives are laying in wait for her to win the nomination because they know they can beat her. Conservatives do not nearly claim the same confidence about beating Barack Obama in November. Vote OBAMA.

Hillary and Bill give more of the same warmed-over arguments for why they represent the best choice for America. Hillary has had 35 years to make a difference and failed miserbaly to convince me that she should be my President A lot of lip service, but I have not benefitted 1 iota from the Clinton leadership. Have you? Vote OBAMA

Hillary failed on bringing together a bi-partisan agreement on health care. When Bill was President. Why should I believe she can do it now? Vote OBAMA

Hillary supported and was paid handsomely by a Wal-Mart regime, that vehemently opposed organized labor in the US while shamelessly exploliting child labor abroad. She has not expressed an original thought no answered a direct question since the campaign started. Vote OBAMA

Enough of the Clinton's already! Vote for a new America with a new spirit and new direction. Turn the pasge on tis ugly chapter of American history.

Vote OBAMA !

LJ, Atlanta

Floyd Prince   January 31st, 2008 9:33 am ET

I would like to get tickets to the Obama-Clinton event please advise.

Joe   January 30th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

McCain has no answer but say I served. McCain flip flop in the last month on the economy and amnesty. He had to go and get someone this last month to rewrite his economic policy which originally was being laughed at by all business professionals.

Its too bad that CNN did not call McCain and make him stick to the question. When are we going to get moderators that will quit allowing all candidates to give campaign statesments inset of responding to the question?

The democrats are going to eat McCain up as being of NO substance. Most republicans will vote for Obama or Clinton if McCain is the republican candidate.

Joe   January 30th, 2008 9:37 pm ET

CNN let McCain continually give his political song and did not stop him and make him address the question. That was not journalism that was simply non professional by the panel. You might as well endorse McCain if you will not make him 'show' his ignorance.

Shame on you CNN! That was disappointing and the debate was simple poorly managed.

Calvin Lidmark   January 30th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

I am amazed that, for all practical purposes, the Presidential Candidates are inaccessible. I am blown away that candidates running for the highest office in our Nation, do not have time to respond to inquiries, some of which politely suggest we contact our State Legislators. That would be okay, if it were not for the fact the issues are "national" in context and relevant to their election campaigns, as well as, work at Capitol Hill. Of course, those who are not in office currently do have an excuse. However, with the emphases on "listening" to the American public, showcasing their town meetings, and being a voice for those who "cannot speak for themselves," canned replies and offers to support their election campaigns resound. Among other inquiries, I recently asked why the proposed economic "stimulus" package is delayed after our tax returns are done. Doesn't it seem more practical, effective, and efficient to require the IRS to use a technological "tickler" or simple form to process the stimulus rebates at the same time. No wonder nothing gets done! Please share my views and frustration with your viewing audience. I suspect I'm not alone.

While I am pleased to learn Congress is willing to work with President Bush on the proposed economic stimulus package. Most presidential candidates and economic experts agree that the need is immediate. If this is the case, why is the IRS waiting to process the stimulus package funds after processing our 2007 tax returns? This does not make sense and seems inefficient.

It seems to me, that all the taxpayers’ information is readily available at the time of doing their 2007 tax returns. Surely, the IRS could have a "tickler" or simple additional form to complete. Then process the stimulus funds at the same time of that of our tax returns. If the funds are indeed available, there should be no reason for "hanging on" to the funds and going through another whole and essentially, "repeat,” return to process the stimulus rebates.

I am asking you to introduce this sensible action and require the IRS to comply by processing the stimulus rebates at the same time as the processing of our citizen's 2007 tax returns."

crystal   January 30th, 2008 7:46 pm ET

I am very excited for these debates. I am particularly excited for the GOP debate. Now that there are only four candidates, perhaps the time allotments will be more even. I know that the current administration is not known for it's fiscal conservatism, and I believe we need some of that in the next administration. There is only one fiscal conservative left, Dr. Ron Paul, and I will love to hear what his plans are for fixing the economic problems we face today. Ron Paul 2008

usha   January 30th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

Ask Mr,Obama,why he is not hiring minorities on his staff? Mrs Clinton hired more minorities on her staff than Mr obama. Also ask him ,75% prison population is young African Americans,How is he going to help them?

Anonymous   January 30th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

Ask Mr,Obama,why he is not hiring minorities on his staff? Mrs Clinton hired more minorities on her staff than Mr obama. Also ask him ,75% prison population is young African Americans,How is he going to help them?

Marcia   January 30th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

I agree with Shelley….the public should be allowed to go!

Vicki Ainsworth   January 30th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

If elected President what would you do to reverse the current market trend in the real estate debacle? Be specific. The feds are dropping the rate, but, the banks are overworked and understaffed with an influx of paper work so much that there is not enough people to handle the workload. What would you do?

Andrew   January 30th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Will Ron Paul be there?

If he isn't I'm afraid the whole debate will be pointless

and a sham!

Ron Paul talks about issues that concern me.

Patricia Spangler   January 30th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Will Ron Paul be in the debate tonight? If no, why not?

John   January 30th, 2008 2:51 pm ET

I like the convenient "they will be invited if they are frontrunners" bit. How does one define "frontrunner?" Top 3? At least 10 delegates? Nicest suit? Fewest cavities?

Why don't they just come out and say it: If your last name isn't Clinton, Obama, Romney, or McCain, just stay away, because your views aren't important. I mean, it's only the process of electing the next "Leader of the Free World."

Liberty Lover   January 30th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

Why is CNN being evasive? Who will the Republicans be at the debate?

Al Nagengast   January 30th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Please give Ron Paul a fair shake to noght.
He has NEVER gotten one yet in these debates!

T, Anderson   January 30th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

So, is there a list of which candidates will be allowed to speak at this debate?

MattB   January 30th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Regarding McCain and his alleged support of the military: take note as to which Republican candidate has received the most funds by far from veterans. It is Ron Paul, not McCain.
Glad to see that folks are noticing the shameful and obvious bias of the media and debate organizers against such candidates as Ron Paul and Kucinich. Do you suppose it will be any different for this debate?

June   January 30th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

I absolutely agree with Marian.

Debate Moderators,

Please ask relevant questions about the real issues. Avoid the media generated issues…race, gender, Bill Clinton, Kennedy, etc. Who really cares. I care about the Economy, Education and the Environment. All three are so very connected and if properly addressed would lead us to peace and social justice.

I would love to see a debate on just issues and not what he said/she said.

Kay   January 30th, 2008 11:37 am ET

I'm wondering if someone will please ask John McCain what he has done for the last 25 years as a US Senator for the Vets. I was amazed when I heard about the condition of the Walter Reed Medical Center. If he is such an advocate for our military….I can't seem to find his record on what bills he has written or co-written to care for our vets, soldiers etc? He uses this as his belt of honor…however, I'm wondering what he really does. I live in Michigan and I have never gotten such negative phone calls against Mitt Romney as we received from the McCain camp….it turned me off from him BIG TIME. Now I'm looking closer at his record and would like some answeres if his main issue when he speaks is the military…where is his record for our military other than his support for the war…he has been there for 25 years….what has he really done?

Robert   January 30th, 2008 10:49 am ET

With the Democrats now down to two candidates, I'm concerned that CNN will want to thin the Republican field down to three, and exclude Ron Paul.

This, of course, would be a disservice to the country and to the Republican Party as well.

Dave   January 30th, 2008 10:15 am ET

Why not make this a real debate? Let Ron Paul speak up for a change. I know the media's agenda is important, but why not just for the heck of it, put the ratings first. I know your ratings would go up if you held a fair, unbiased debate, unlike the other networks. This debate could be highly interesting and even entertaining. Think about it. You could give back to the American people the right to make an educated choice when they vote.

Brian   January 30th, 2008 9:31 am ET

Debate Moderators,

I would echo Marian's post above about asking the candidates about real issues. I also like Matt's suggestion that each candidate be given the same question.

Most importantly though, please give each candidate equal time…unlike the last debates by MSNBC and Fox (mostly MSNBC) where the top 2 candidates (McCain & Romney) were given the bulk of the time. I am interested in hearing what each candidate has to say, not just the front runners. The front runners might not be the front runners if the other candidates were heard equally (doubtful but possible).

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration in this matter.

Brian

IowaforHuckabee   January 30th, 2008 3:22 am ET

Please allow equal time for all of the candidates. Allowing more time for certain candidates is not only unfair to all of the candidates, but very unfair to "we the people" who want to hear what they all have to say so that we can make an informed decision. Not to mention, that it can become very tiresome and boring listening to the same candidate say the same things over and over.

CHARLE E   January 30th, 2008 3:17 am ET

Please ask about social security, thats my only hope in life beside my hope in God Almighty.

Marian   January 29th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Debate Moderators,

Please ask relevant questions about the real issues. Avoid the media generated issues…race, gender, Bill Clinton, Kennedy, etc. Who really cares. I care about the Economy, Education and the Environment. All three are so very connected and if properly addressed would lead us to peace and social justice.

Matt   January 29th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

Bradford: No, the reason Keyes is not in the debate is NOT because he is the only real threat to a Democrat winning in November. But, I agree with you on your main point – is he is on the ballot, he should participate. Also, I disagree with the current trend of asking different questions for each candidate. Why not ask the same questions of each candidate (allowing them equal time, of course) and allow the candidates to define themselves? As it is, some of the questions are so biased that they expose the questioners' biases, rather than the thoughts of the candidate.

Bradford Hager   January 29th, 2008 2:06 am ET

Why is Alan Keys being left out of this debate? He is on the the ballot!

Could it be that he is the only real threat to a Democrat winning in November?

Buzz   January 28th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

Question for Hillary Clinton – if possible?

The Baker-Hamilton Report recommendations for peace in the Middle East and with Muslims states in RECOMMENDATION 13: "There must be a renewed and sustained commitment by the United States to a comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace on all fronts."

It also states: "Political engagement and dialogue are essential in the Arab- Israeli dispute because it is an axiom that when the political process breaks down there will be violence on the ground."

The US gives between 25 to 30% of all its foreign aid to Israel, a nation of 6.5 million, on par with per capita income with much of Europe. Israel is a nation that sold our military technology to nations of potential threat; gave US shared intelligence to the Soviet Union; fired on the USS Liberty and killed 37 US sailors after circling the US intellegence ship with clear identification for more than three hours, etc. Yet Israel seems to control American politics in their favor, making it difficult for the US to maintain an even-handed, credible, foreign policy within the Arab and Muslim world.

As president, how wil you interact with the second largest lobbyest group at the national level, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, AIRPAC, and what will you do to encourage limits in its control over congress?

Will you talk with Hamas?

Note: you are free to modify any part of my question(s) as long as the intent remains with the intent.

Buzz Kalkowski
California

AAAAANDRE   January 28th, 2008 3:12 am ET

Gee, I hope they give Ron Paul a few extra questions…
They seem to be giving him the "short shrift".
I like the way he talks and would like hear more of his views.
There was little to no reporting of him in the last debate.

Rosemary Levi   January 27th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

I am an International Simulcast Television/Radio (CNN Bldg.) and Certified Court Interpreter in the Spanish language since 1979, and have practiced this pofession in a multi-level, multi-field capacity for the past 35 years.

I would like to volunteer my services as a "Simulcast Television Interpreter" for the upcoming presidential campaigns in Los Angeles.
Please let me know what I need to do.
Respectfully,
Rosemary Levi, Certified Spanish Interpreter
Email: NeoShoShy@aol.com
Phone: 323 573 0806

Donald, Los Angeles   January 27th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

I too would like to attend the democratic presidential debate at the Kodak Theater – how does one go about getting a seat? What are the criteria for an invitation?

lorimax   January 27th, 2008 3:44 pm ET

They held a lottery that people could enter to attend the debates.
The winners were already drawn and people were notified .
I did enter but was not one of the lucky ones.

Gravel '08   January 27th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Oh, the joys of slavery. That sweet smell of the media choosing the "front-runners." Nothing quite like the feeling of being chained, ignorant of any notion of freedom.

As a supporter of Mike Gravel, I apologize to you, CNN, for him. I am sorry he is trying to say what he believes is the truth. I am sorry he tries to hold others accountable for his actions. I am sorry he refuses to take money from lobbyists. I am sorry he tries to make a difference in this country.I am sorry he isn't young and handsome. And I am sorry that he doesn't hide behind that old lie of "hope."

Kathy Burch   January 26th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Let the process reduce the number of candidates in the debate. There are only 5 left at this point and I have noticed incredible bias against RonPaul from the Republicans and the media. RonPaul is the truest Republican running in the primary. Does Nancy Reagan remember that RonPaul was one of only a few Rep. that stood up for her husband and gave him the oppurtunities to go to the top? Let the voters decide….5 candidates…..we can pick whom we like….

Kathy Burch   January 26th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

RonPaul was one of only a few Republicans to originally stand up for Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan would not have been afforded the oppurtunities without the initial support of RonPaul. Is Nancy Reagan aware of this? Does she remember when RonPaul stuck his neck out for Ronald Reagan? RonPaul is the truest Republican running in the Presidential primary and has been treated shabbily by his own party and the media. What are you people afraid of? ….that the American voters will discover RonPaul and what he stands for? We can make up our own minds, there are 5 candidates left….let them debate!! Kathy Burch, Maryville, TN

dave isaac   January 26th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

I hear CNN will be covering the next kentucky Derby. They will have a group of sharpshooters at the first turn ready to take out any horses not in the first three places. This will make it much easier for all of us idiots to accept their annointed winner….

chickc   January 25th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

I'd like to attend the Debate at the Kodak Theatre on Jan 31st (primarily because I'm undecided and would like gain a more personalized insight as to who really has our best interests at heart). Where do I go to submit my name? Thanks.

Deven Pandey, LA   January 25th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

I am very much interested in attending the upcoming Democratic debate to be held in Kodak theatre. Please advise.

Thanks,
Deven

joe j kremsky   January 25th, 2008 12:12 am ET

I live in Burbank and would like to know how I would be able to get admittance to the Kodak Democratic debates? And could you ask questions from the audience? thank you for this opportunity

Carla   January 24th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Are tickets available for the Republican Debates… If so, how do I obtain ?

Jay Baker   January 24th, 2008 7:58 pm ET

I need 3 tickets for Thursday nights debate.Please post the ticket process.

Pat   January 24th, 2008 6:21 pm ET

Well these jerks aka unAmerican corporatist fascists that run our media have gotten what they were after. Dennis Kucinich has run out of funds and can no longer get his voice out by paying for lawsuits and ads to compete with the 24/7 GLARING, FREE, and UNFAIR coverage given to the corporatist candidates splatttered all over our TV screens.
Dennis has announced he is dropping out of the Presidential race.

This is not as much a loss to Dennis Kucinich as it is to ALL Americans.
We should ALL be in deep sorrow that the media can so DEFACE our elections and exert almost complete control over them.

As the guy says when facing the destruction of lives on both sides in Romeo and Juliet:
"ALL ARE PUNISHED!"

Slolearner   January 24th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Duh, Of course Ron Paul will be there! He has beat Rudy three times now and took second in Nevada as previously stated above. However it is strange that CNN TV has stopped covering Paul?

Here are the Nevada State results (since it is not being reported by media):

Republicans | Polls | County Results
Candidate Votes % of votes Delegates won Projected winner
Mitt Romney 22,649 51% 17
Ron Paul 6,087 14% 4
John McCain 5,651 13% 4
Mike Huckabee 3,616 8% 2
Fred Thompson 3,521 8% 2
Rudy Giuliani 1,910 4% 1
Duncan Hunter 890 2% 1
100% of precincts reporting

Ryan   January 24th, 2008 3:02 am ET

It is too late to get a ticket. The deadline to request for one to be included into the lottery for tickets was today at 12pm. Now, the only people going will be invitees by the candidates and winners of the lottery.

Due Diligence   January 23rd, 2008 11:06 pm ET

CNN – YOU do NOT decide WHO we the Voters want to hear!

Our Country is facing an economic crisis of historic proportions and you want to limit which Candidates running for the Office of President of the United States of America will be heard by the Citizens of this Nation?

I think you need to reconsider and make sure that every Candidate who is still running for President is included in both debates.

They are all Candidates for the highest office in the land – and I want to hear what every single one of them has to say.

shelley trent   January 23rd, 2008 8:50 pm ET

How can we get tickets to the democratic debate in hollywood? Shouldn't the public be allowed to go?

Narayan   January 23rd, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I will be very upset if Ron Paul is denied the chance to participate in this debate because Nancy Reagan thinks he's not a "front runner".

Kathryn   January 23rd, 2008 4:18 pm ET

After researching the Rezko/Obama relationship from 1990 to the present, I am greatly concerned about their personal and professional relationship. Let's forget about the land deal involving Rezko and Obama's personal residence in Chicago. What really concerned me was that Obama (while in private practice) appears to have acted as a lobbyist on behalf of Rezko. Obama's actions consisted of writing letters to government officials on Rezko's behalf requesting they approve using $14 million of tax payer's money to help finance one of Rezko's land development projects. This article was originally published in the Chicago Sun Times. Further, Rezko's various companies have given quite alot of money to Obama's presidential campaign. This is not the "change" this country needs.

Mary C. Johnson   January 23rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Although it seems unlikely that Dennis Kucinich could win the Democratic nomination for President, I appreciate his stands on important issues like Iraq, Iran, and universal health care. I would very much see him be included in the debates so that his views may be aired.

Luke Davis   January 23rd, 2008 11:26 am ET

CNN = Exclusion

Why the heck are Gravel and Kucinich not invited? They're not "serious" or something? You'd think that after over a year of campaigning, they'd be taken seriously.

CNN, you disgust me.

Liz   January 22nd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

I hope Wolf won't be hosting this one. It appears that he has a habit of cutting off candidates from speaking if he doesn't like them, and the clock doesn't exist if he approves of them. Is there any way to make these debates fair and ethical?
(AC seems to do a better job monitoring these debates).

Laurel from L.A.   January 22nd, 2008 3:59 am ET

How do I get tickets for the LA democratic debate Jan.31st?

John Brady   January 21st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

That thing about Romney being a flip -flopper. Maybe there is something in the water up there in MA. John Kerry seemed to have a flip -flopper problem. Oh, he did'nt become President either. How gosh !

Mark Wilson   January 21st, 2008 10:13 pm ET

I would like to attend the Democratic Debates in Los Angeles on January 31, 2008. How can I get tickets or get on a list to be part of the audience. Anyone?

Greg, California   January 21st, 2008 8:54 pm ET

Dennis Kucinich should not be excluded from any of these debates. As many others have pointed out, the "debates" as they are currently with Clinton and Obama with Edwards in the sidelines are beyond dull and pointless! Let's get someone in there that speaks the truth and, like Edwards, focuses on what is important rather than slinging mud at each other.

Dennis Kucinich, despite the media blackout, is still in the race. Imagine how his compaign would be doing if he had the free media publicity that the top two get – or even a small fraction of it.

Stop excluding Dennis Kucinich. He must be heard.

Yvonne   January 21st, 2008 8:20 pm ET

Greed and corruptness are the only motives for excluding the voices of legitimate candidates from reaching the people, period. Iowa PBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN should be ashamed for playing a role in usurping democracy from the American people in a presidential election! I greatly admire Congressman Kucinich, and am joining the growing public boycott of the media networks that do not allow ALL of the candidates to be heard.

Liz   January 21st, 2008 7:48 pm ET

I wonder if this will be a real debate that actually includes all the candidates, unlike most of the other debates so far. The American people are getting snowed by the media and corporations that gain from their chosen candidates who are allowed to participate in the debates, and who also coincidentally support their lucrative agendas. I am disgusted by this so called "democracy in action".

William H. Bassett   January 21st, 2008 7:05 pm ET

How have the candidates acted to support The California Democratic Party’s Resolution Number, Now SD07.53 A (formerly MAN06.25)
Calling For Full Investigation Into Abuses Of Power By President George W. Bush And Vice President Richard B. Cheney – ???
Adopted by the Democratic State Central Committee of California
AKA "California Democratic Party"
At Its Annual State Convention
San Diego Convention Center
April 29, 2007

William H. Bassett   January 21st, 2008 7:00 pm ET

THE QUESTION

Every citizen must demand – from every candidate for office, from every Congressional Representative and Senator now in office an answer to the question:

What have you done to fulfill your Oath of Office, to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, in the face of the many credible allegations of impeachable offence leveled against George W. Bush and Richard Cheney?

How can you, standing for office, ask anyone to vote for you in the face of your failure to demand hearings and investigations? How can you ask us to believe, that once elected, you will honor the oath you have, so far, failed to honor?

And, from every journalist, newscaster, interviewer and media pundit –

How, as journalists, can you justify your failure to demand an answer to this question?

sam   January 21st, 2008 6:39 pm ET

Can you please stop asking meaningless questions like when you started running for president or what your new years' resolution is and start asking questions about Science or Stem Cell Research?? This way we will actually see which candidate would be the best for the nomination.

tina jones   January 21st, 2008 5:58 pm ET

I would like to here someone ask Senator Clinton Why she did not remove her name from the ballad in Michigan. This is any essential question that hundred of my peers who like answere if she want our vote in Detroit. Also there is a law that allows Cuban to stay in our country if the make it to dryland not in the ocean. However for Hatians the are removed from this country and sent back if found in the ocean or dry land. I'd like to here someone discuss this law and how its fair??
Oh I forget there is no predjudice or discrimination in the US my fault !!! Its time to ask some question that matter to the country not the same old questions in every debate

Kelly   January 21st, 2008 4:47 pm ET

So is this why CNN left John Edwards off their January poll? Were you hoping the others would follow suit? You never cease to disgust me.

Scott   January 21st, 2008 11:56 am ET

Let all national candidates debate.
To exclude Kucinich and others is a disservice.
Some reports say at least half of voters are undecided.
Shame on you.
I trust your real reasons will be revealed. My suspicions are that a combination of pageantry and sports spectacle (and now there are 4, and now there are 3, etc.) is a part of it.
Kucinich's policies would make private health insurance irrelevant in our lives. Perhaps a sizable chunk of your advertisers aren't too happy about being made irrelevant.

marilyn   January 21st, 2008 10:42 am ET

Let ALL of the candidates Democratic and Republican into the debates! Who does the media think it is to censer the political process this way?? I thought there were laws pertaining to equal air time for political candidates?

I have no clue who I am going to vote for right now, being an independent I could go either way, and have in the past voted for both parties, It is totally unfair to limit my choices by no media time for ALL the candidates!

Natalie   January 21st, 2008 10:06 am ET

Has anyone heard Hillary say what in her 35 years of experience qualifies her for the Presidency? I haven't.

melanie   January 21st, 2008 6:51 am ET

I just added a post that was a rather vehement protest against CNN and other media providers' exclusion of candidates such as Ron Paul, Kucinich, and so forth from the televised debates, and it was removed by the moderator.

I believe I threatened to boycott CNN if they did not include Paul in the California Republican debate. That is not going to change, even if you delete my comments. How many other people are protesting this election-rigging behavior by our beloved media, and having their comments removed? Eh?

Fess up, CNN, or at least consider these comments a form of market research.

Peter Grace   January 21st, 2008 3:22 am ET

What candidates have been invited or will be invited to the January 30th GOP Debate at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, CA?

The criteria for whom shall be invited is here: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/21/top-candidates-to-be-invited-to-super-tuesday-presidential-debates-in-california/

Will Doctor Ron Paul, the Congressman from Texas be invited ?

He has garnered interest from many voters in other states. Will the California Primary coming up, it would be good to hear from all the candidates including Dr Paul. Will the LA Times and CNN invite him? Or, is there truth to the talk of a media conspiracy to ignore Dr Paul ?

As a California voter, I would like to hear Dr. Paul at the debate.

John Darnell   January 21st, 2008 3:19 am ET

Why can't you let all the candidates be in the debates.

MSNBC just recently excluded Dennis Kucinich based on some organizational politics. MSNBC invited him and then disinvited him 44 hours later. I researched it and found out that the network didn't want him in because of thier own interests.

Our freedom of speech to hear all the candidates is the point. WE AS AMERICANS HAVE A RIGHT TO HEAR ALL THE CANDIDATES EVEN IF THEY WON'T WIN. THIS IS WHAT AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT! It's only fair to them and us as AMERICANS…

JOHN

Tim Davis   January 20th, 2008 11:57 pm ET

Vote for Romney! The media coverage of his "flip-flopping" is ridiculous. His decision for being pro-choice and then going pro-life is one that nearly every person must make. What his reasoning for being pro-choice was that he didn't want to criminalize abortion, just like nobody would want to criminalize adultery (except maybe Huckabee). By criminalizing abortion it makes that practice, even when it should be used (i.e. rape, or when the mother's life is jeopardized by the pregnancy) an unstudied and very poorly understood practice making it extremely difficult to improve upon the practice. As governor of Massachusetts he realized that by being pro-choice we were ruining our country. As opposed to merely not criminalizing abortion people were starting to lose their morals and not even value human life. He realized the error of his ways and even though he pretty much knew that by changing his stance to pro-life he would basically be giving up his seat as governor of Massachusetts he stood his ground and went with what he felt like he ethically had to do. That does not sound like a "flip-flopper." Romney is the only candidate that understands the economy and can get us out of our current crisis. Health care, economy, morals. Romney is the man for the times!

BASTILLE   January 20th, 2008 11:44 pm ET

By not posting these comments; you, CNN, are just proving my point!

BASTILLE   January 20th, 2008 11:43 pm ET

haha, i dont think CNN wants to post my comment. Fine, CNN, if you dont want to hear this news now hear it the night january 31 with the loud trumpets, bugles, tambourines, and drums that will echo into the halls of the debates!!!!

Stephanie   January 20th, 2008 11:31 pm ET

I am outraged upon learning that CNN has excluded Dennis Kucinich from the debate in South Carolina after first inviting him. The voting public needs to hear the voice of Kucinich. He must be included in the California debates!

I support Dennis Kucinich because he has stood up against this war based on lies and is the only candidate offering a true, workable not-for-profit health care plan; he plans to create millions of jobs for Americans to repair our infrastructure and to make our country respected and effective again.

Kucinich has been belittled by the media and yet he is the candidate that can truly heal this nation. Not with vague slogans about change and unity, but with real policies on the issues that we are facing.
Let Dennis Kucinich debate!

allen   January 20th, 2008 11:30 pm ET

CNN why would you take my comment of what ever happend to freedom of speech. i think its wrong that gravel, kuchinuch, and paul are being excluded from the debates and i think there voices should be herd just like all the other candidates no matter what the polls say there have only been a few primarys how can you judge by that i think all of them should be in the debates. please look at all thesecommints on here they are all saying the same thing i am the american people are crying out for justice.

P.S. if you take this comment off like my last then freedom of speech does not exist anymore.

joni   January 20th, 2008 11:20 pm ET

I think all the candidates should be in the debates no matter how the polls look if they are being excluded from the debates how can gravel, kuchinich, and paul be herd by the american people, I think its wrong that the media is trying to trying to choose my president for me. you dont even hear anything on these big media corrperations about hese candidates because these big corrperations are scared of them because these candidates say they will stop these media corperations from doing such unconstitutional things. what ever happed to freedom of speech in this country.

Allen   January 20th, 2008 10:20 pm ET

it is not fair to the american people that mike gravel, dennis kucinich, and ron paul are being left out of these debates. they say its because of the polls but we all know that is a lie its all a money game and that is very wrong our founding fathers would be ashamed of the things that are going on right now. these are the only candidates that are actualy telling the truth and not feeding your head with a bunch of lies like clinton, obama, edwards, rhomney, guliani, Mckaine, and huckabee. if you look at how much these so called top candiates spend millons on just trying to be president it is sad if you stop and think if they spend all this money on just this in just a year imagine 4 years in office or maybe 8 they will be just like bush and fund wars we should not even be in and policing the world for what oil and power. this makes me sick to think that one of these could be president. I think that the american people and the media do what is right and give these three candidates a chance and let the american people here there voices and there views on things, but i think that the right thing will be done to change the rules on being in the debates.

thanks, and give peace a chance.

Stella   January 20th, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Allow the democratic process to be heard – let Kucinich participate in the debates.

cheryl davis   January 20th, 2008 9:55 pm ET

Well, I am from now on boycotting the following stations:
CNN
MSNBC/NBC
ABC
FOX
PBS
and also TIME-WARNER, DISNEY, GE, AND AARP who "own" these stations.
About all that is left is Comedy Central and C-Span. Oh well, I do not watch much tv anyway, as it was rightly called the idiot box back in the 60's and most recently the boob tube. I will get my info from the computer, the only trusted source of news and a few periodicals that are news reports.
My candidate is and will remain Dennis Kucinich, who is ignored and actively excluded from the debates because he is the man of the people with the message we all want to hear. Wake Up America! We need choices, not just the voices that the corporations want us to hear.
I will vote for an independent before. I will not vote for the lesser of two evils. I want choices. No corporation has bought my soul and I wll not allow them to.

Jeremy   January 20th, 2008 9:14 pm ET

I HATE CNN !!
DO NOT USE LOW POLL NUMBERS TO JUSTIFY THIS CENSORSHIP! IT IS BECAUSE OF THIS CENSORSHIP THAT KUCINICH HAS LOW POLL NUMBERS!!
CNN, YOU ARE JUST FEEDING INTO THE CYCLE!!!

nkj767   January 20th, 2008 6:01 pm ET

Here are the Nevada State results (since it is not being reported by media):

Republicans | Polls | County Results
Candidate Votes % of votes Delegates won Projected winner
Mitt Romney 22,649 51% 17
Ron Paul 6,087 14% 4
John McCain 5,651 13% 4
Mike Huckabee 3,616 8% 2
Fred Thompson 3,521 8% 2
Rudy Giuliani 1,910 4% 1
Duncan Hunter 890 2% 1
100% of precincts reporting

PLEASE NOTICE THAT RON PAUL TOOK SECOND PLACE! It is a shame that this is not being mentioned by media.

Michael Dunne Healy   January 20th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Two questions for Senator Clinton: When you first came to the White House in 1992, it is my understanding you fired or had fired long employed non-partisan employees from the travel bureau. Do you plan to do the same to those now there if you return to the WH?
Is it true that when you left the WH in 2000 you took with you some government property belonging to the taxpayers? If true, are you planning to return the property to their rightful owners, we taxpayers?

Michael Dunne Healy

Danny   January 20th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

I beg you to reconsider excluding Kucinich. Most trusted name in news? Not anymore if you do not allow Kucinich debate.

Misha   January 19th, 2008 11:58 pm ET

Los Angeles… for those of you who would like to attend the debate… go to cadem.org.

The California Democratic Party has a limited number of available public debate tickets and will hold a lottery to distribute them. The lottery will be held on January 23rd and debate ticket winners will be notified by email on January 25th. The deadline for ticket requests is Thursday January 23rd at 12pm. Due to normal security requirements all lottery ticket requests must be through this website and the tickets are not transferable.

AGE REQUIREMENT: All audience members must be at least 18 years old and bring a valid photo ID.

The ticket lottery can only be entered online. We regret that we are unable to take entries over the phone.

Michelle   January 19th, 2008 11:47 pm ET

I notice that there is a statement under the comment box that "Comments are moderated by CNN…" Good. I hope they are actually reading them and noticing the percentage of them expressing outrage at CNN providing yet more examples of the main stream media trying to rig our elections by excluding from the debates candidates that are not bought and paid for by large corporations.

You may add my voice to the protest.

Please reconsider, CNN.

Max, South Dakota   January 19th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

I'm not a big fan of these debates because not all the candidates are invited to the deabte, like Kucinich or Gravel. Espically in the last debate in Nevada, when Kucinich was denied into the debate, even though he met all the requirements but at the last minute MSNBC denied him from being in the debate. The media is choosing our candidates.

Esther   January 19th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

I cannot attend the debate because I live in Florida.
Would someone explain why Sen. Hillary Clinton continue to emphasize that she is the most experienced candidate when she compares herself to Obama?
Other than the fact that she lived in the White House for eight years with her husband, how much more legal and community service experience does she have than Obama? Of course she has lived 12-15 years longer. So in comparison,their accomplishments are about equal. However,I may not be aware of ALL those wonderful accomplishments of Sen Clinton. Educate me!

Jeremy   January 19th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

UNFORTUNATELY, I have just found out that CNN has cut Kuicnich from the debate in South Carolina. I am greatly disheartened and speechless. What have you done, CNN!!!! Your justification is PATHETIC. Don't use the low poll numbers to justify this censorship. It's because of this censorship that KUCINICH has low poll numbers.

Congratulations–CNN, you have just Defiled a Democracy!!

Jack   January 19th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

Why was this SPECIFIC CRITERIA made? How did CNN come to the conclusion that you need to do all this to have a voice? Why did CNN make it so selective? Do the same rules apply for republicans? If they do not, isnt CNN inconsistent with its implementation?

Juli An   January 19th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Let's see how CNN can "fix" the debate by eliminating Ron Paul and bringing in Rudy Giuliani or Fred Thompson – We're watching you CNN! Again, another major news conglomerate is trying to determine the outcome of the election by marginalizing and boycotting candidates – Freedom of Speech? How about your Right to Vote?

T. Watkins   January 19th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Over the last four years I always said if Hillary ran I would vote for her in a heartbeat, because I loved Bill. Well over the last year I have listened to all of the Democrats speak on what they can do for this great country. Well I've heard all of them say that we need a "Change" and Hillary said I have the "Experience" to make that change but what has "She" done over the last eight years in the senate to make a difference? Is she really asking us to vote for her because of what Bill, her husband, did to make a difference? I say lets really think about what we as a people really need leading us into our and our children future. Do we need a president when things get ruff "She'll cry" for it? There's no crying in politics! We need someone who can bring the UNITED STATES of America together first! Someone who has the capability to ask those hard questions, while being respectful. Someone that will hear and understand what we as a people NEED at thi s critical time in our country. That person I feel is Senator Obama. To Answer my favorite president of the United States, YES I DO BELIEVE IN FAIRY-TALES!!!

Dylan L.   January 19th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I think that all candidates that are activley running should be allowed to be in the debate for their respective parties. I don't think it is right, for people like Mike Gravel, Ron Paul, and Dennis Kucinich to not have a cahnce to voice their opinion, because they don't have the resources or are not polling enough somehwere. Maybe if they were allowed to enter the debate they would pick up more votes, and eventually become front runners. All three candidates I mentioned have great potential to be front runners in this race, but because they are not being heard by the people they don't have a shot now. Just look at the fact that Mike Gravel has won many blind polls, but when it comes to an actual debate he is never heard, which contributes to the fact that nobody knows who he is.

Jack   January 18th, 2008 8:58 pm ET

Why was this SPECIFIC CRITERIA made? How did CNN come to the conclusion that you need to do all this to have a voice? Why did CNN make it so selective? Do the same rules apply for republicans? If they do not, isn't CNN inconsistent with its implementation?

hope   January 18th, 2008 5:24 am ET

It is already advertised as a Closed Debate on several sites. No tickets sold to general population.

By this not being an open debate, we can plan on seeing "planned polls" and unfair airtime after the debates. The debates should be fully open to the public to hear true response and gain fair in-house polls.

ALL CANDIDATES SHOULD BE ALLOWED and voices should be heard. But, be careful — as said above, you could soon be termed a terrorist. Research S 1955 and HB 1959. Write your Representatives. Stop these now. The Fourth Estate has been compromised and can no longer be trusted.

Vote RON PAUL!

nkj767   January 18th, 2008 2:48 am ET

Since Ron Paul is running ahead of Thompson and Giuliani, we look forward to seeing Ron Paul in all future debates. Following are results of Michigan primary (from Michigan Messenger):
Republicans – 16,661 votes cast (75 percent of the vote counted)
Mitt Romney — 45 percent — 7,529 votes
John McCain — 25 percent — 4,204 votes
Mike Huckabee — 13 percent — 2,273 votes
Ron Paul — 6 percent — 1,069 votes
Fred Thompson — 4 percent — 671 votes
Rudy Giuliani — 3 percent — 491 votes

James   January 17th, 2008 11:46 pm ET

I know I will not be available to attend, thanks to my second full time job to make ends meet. I hope that someone here would pose this question if the opportunity arises;

I would like to know, what the candidates think the will of the people is, we asked to end the Iraq war, and they fund it, we ask to control our borders and ports, and they are still open, we ask to label our food, and its still absent, we ask for ethics reform, and corruption is at a new high, we ask for safer streets, and they cut funds for law enforcement, we ask for better education, and our schools are over crowded, with under qualified educators, we ask for better paying jobs, and we get a small increase in the minimum wage, we ask to enforce immigration laws, but have sanctuary cities, we ask for government protection, but we have predatory lending, false advertisements, and unethical practices, we ask for urban development, and they create it in other countries, we ask for fair tax codes, its more complicated then ever, we need affordable housing, and that is a crazy market, we ask for better transportation, and fuel prices skyrocket, we ask for control over the cost of living, and everything goes up, we ask for a choice in the things we buy, and get cloned meat, and dairy products, we need better trade, and get dangerous goods, we ask for a competent government, and we get, well you know my point.

This is a big ticket item, and its going to take some negotiations, and some arm twisting, that is why I think Obama will be a better candidate to handle our national issues, but we need Powell for our international affairs.

OBAMA/POWELL with Lou Dobbs in the cabinet 2008

A negotiator, an enforcer, and a protector

David   January 17th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

Let Kucinich debate!

nkj767   January 17th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Since Ron Paul has been running ahead of Giuliani and Thompson (in Michigan, actually received more votes than Giuliani and Thompson combined) we will be looking forward to his participation in all upcoming debates.

Melvin Gill   January 17th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

I would like to see all Canadates that are still seeking the office of Presidency
given the chance to explane their views in the debate. The media does not have the right to narrow the field for us. We the people are suppost to make that decision. And not just a few states. And not based on polling. Show some respect
to all.

Joseph Esposito   January 17th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Please allow the American people to decide whom they wish to vote for and not CNN executives.

Please Include Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter and Dennis Kucinich in your debates.

JTMartin   January 17th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

i want Wolf , or someone to ask the candidates what to they plan to do for the black community. I have to care about me and mine first and I do. I'm sorry for the Latinos plight, but it is no better than mine here. Especially, since they have invaded this country in the last seven years. The ILLEGALLS ARE the reason for a great deal of the economy woes. Just read my statement and ask a question related t it.
Thank You,

JTMartin   January 17th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

I need to say this because it is not being said my anyone. I am a sixty year old black grandmother. I have watch the town I live in become more and more Latino 70% of whom are ILLEGAL. I have watch the schools decline, the hospitals fill-up and black losing tons of jobs. The Latinos have come in here and taken most of the unskilled jobs because they are willing to work for three, four, five dollars an hour less. Wages we as blacks, have lived here all ours lives can not live on.
Blacks and Latinos are NOT a coaltion. I have not seen one Latin get lynched.murdered, drug or ensalved since they have been in this country . We have endured it all, and still do. They walk across the border and take my husbands job because they are willing to work for four dollars less an hour. I say all this to say. I have beena Democrat since I watched JF Kennedy debate Richard NIxon. JFK inspired me to be a community activist and major in pol. soc.
I and sick and tired of the party taking us (Blacks), for granted. I want you to ask a specific question regarding what the candidated plans on doing for blacks. I Why is "my" party allowing these people come in here and take my and my familes jobs and businesses. They are so busy trying to get their vote s ney don't seen to care if we vote for them or not. I want these ILLEGALS stopped. I want their being here illegally challenged when they attempt to get a job . I want the illegal IDS challlenged. They show up with a birth certifcate and they can not speak a word of english.
My family has been here since the 1600's. We have fought in every war . My daddy became disabled lying in a dutch frozen waiting on planes to return from their missions to repair. My oldest brother died in Vietnam in the Marines. I want the party I love to love me back or we will find somewhere else to go. We can and do vote . Most of us have not switched to the Republican party for Reagan or Bush. We have remained. Treat us like it!!!!!

joe albiani   January 17th, 2008 9:18 am ET

There is no debate without Dennis Kucinich! He is the only one with different ideas than the three tweedledums the media seem to love. America is supposed to be about free speech. If Kucinich is silenced again free speech is a mockery.

Wendy   January 17th, 2008 1:47 am ET

I am am desperately trying to find out how to attend this historic event. This is my daughter's first election; she is very inerested and I would love to keep her interest in politics alive. Any suggestions?

Venus   January 16th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

CNN is NOT selling tickets to this event. It is invite only. I guess they want to pack the house with who they want to support. Why can't the public have access to their candidates? What's going on CNN??? Not fair for Californians.

HHH   January 16th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

I AM SORRY – but ALL candidates should be allowed, Republican or Democratic. I am a RON PAUL fan, but anyone running should be allowed. FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Go CALIFORNIA — Go to the debate and speak your peace. Whoever you select, (LIKELY Kucinech or Paul). PLEASE!!! SPEAK OUT!!! Select the best for our country!!! They are truest and do NOT flip flop, and will do what is best for our troops, and keep jobs here in our country! SELECT PAUL OR KUCINECH — GO RON PAUL (I am a Ron Paul fan, I guess you can see, but they are alot alike).

CNN shouldnt be pregidous to speakers, allow all to speak!

Chitra F. Mojtabai   January 16th, 2008 2:03 am ET

I, along with hundreds of other Los Angeles Democrats, would love to be able to attend the January 31st Debate at the Kodak theater. I recognize that this debate is NOT open to the public, but perhaps when the distribution is finished and they find that they have extra seats, why not fill them with enthusiastic and interested Democrats. Is there anyway to be on a list for that possibility that anyone knows of?
Thank you,
ChitraFM@aol.com

Tonya Dummar   January 16th, 2008 12:17 am ET

For years, I have donated my money and support for Hillary Clinton. Unfortunately, she has gone too far to the right for me. Obama can hope for change but we need action. As a senator Obama, What did you accomplish? That is the reason why, I voted for John Edwards. John Edwards is a fighter who will go after the corportate greed. It is time for the redistribution of wealth in this country. The middle class needs to unite for John Edwards. Vote for John Edwards.

Isabel Gaytan   January 16th, 2008 12:07 am ET

I would love to attend. How do we get tickets?

James   January 15th, 2008 11:28 pm ET

Soon your comments may be termed a, terrorist plot. Research S 1955 and HB 1959. Write your Representatives. Stop these now. The Fourth Estate has been compromised and can no longer be trusted.

Kat   January 15th, 2008 6:10 pm ET

I would like to see both parties give us, the American People hope for the future for 'OUR NATION". Jobs, housing fairness. It seems more and more that our rights are being stripped away. When does illegal mean illegal. When does press 1 for English STOP! This the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and we are a proud nation. Anyone wanting to wave thier former country's flag should visit mapquest, and make their way back to the bliss they left behind.

hunter   January 15th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

hey i was wondering if it was possible to get tickets to go to the democratic debate???

Jenna Wade   January 15th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

What a Croc

ANY Candidate that is still running should be allowed to participate in their parties debate, regardless of where they stand, how many votes they've gotten in caucuses or primaries, or how much money they have.

This is just WRONG

Unless the candidate has stepped out of the race then they should NOT be excluded.

Why is the media choosing our leaders?

Shouldn't we be able to hear EVERY CANDIDATES VIEWS and choose for ourselves?

Shame on CNN for EXCLUDING Dennis Kucinich from Nevada presidental debate

yentl   January 15th, 2008 11:27 am ET

I would like to attend the debate in Los Angeles.

Steven   January 15th, 2008 12:09 am ET

NBC just got PUNISHED by excluding kUCINICH!! Turns out judge had to force KUCINICH in the debate, and then the judge put a protective order canceling the debate if KUCINICH wasnt there!! CNN, do not do the same!

Bill   January 14th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

There should be no exclusion of any candidate from any debate. It is not the responsibility of the media to project who will win a primary or use the airways to sway public opinion. At the time of your debate it is still possible for any candidate to win their party's nomination. It is possible that it could be that last debate is when their message might get across and win. I feel it is your right to endorse any one you please, even to give your opinions why. However you have no right to stiffle any candidate's message from getting out. Here is another thought. How about covering 2 or 3 issues and let each candidate respond to the question and tell us how they would deal with each of the problems that our country faces. We don't need to hear them sniping at each other or why the competition is wrong. We know they don't agree ,otherwise, it wouldn't matter who wins. With this format, maybe we could get to know the candidates, their opinions and solutions and not just another 30 second sound bite.

stephen galloway   January 14th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

I am also interested in attending. I live in Los Angeles.
let me know how?

Eric Sievering   January 13th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

I am interested in attending the debate at the Kodak Theatre on January 31st. How can I get tickets, and or ask a question at the debate?

thanks

Eric

Carolina   January 13th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

I would like to know how to get invited to the democratic debates?
Please sent me some information at my email account. Thank you!!

Danny   January 13th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

After MSNBC's excusion of Rep. Kucinich, if they do not relent, CNN will be one of the last real news network for politics. Please do not make the same mistake.

GP   January 13th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Oh no! 2009

GP   January 13th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Oops! 2008

GP   January 13th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Why would we be surprised that the debate audiences are limited to invited guests only. The organizers can cite security reasons for limiting the audience. But the fact is that no matter who gets elected, the insiders will continue to be invited guests only. During the campaign season, the people on the street are needed for political reasons only. After the election's over, they will be off the administration's radar. Cynical, yes. Accurate? January 21, 2006, will provide the answer.

Carol Morgan   January 13th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

I hope the people are really listening. When two major candidates are trying to be excluded ,Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul ,it is not a party thing anymore it's an American thing. Dennis4president.com. Why are they trying to silence them . Listen to them and you will know! Want your country back? Vote!

Dennis Castillo   January 13th, 2008 11:12 am ET

My question is for both sides of the polictical debate on illegal aliens.

Why should the American people believe any thing that you and or the government says about illegal aliens? We have a our leaders stating anything from amnesty to building walls and yet we have our govenment sending middle class jobs overseas; giving tax breaks to the riches people of this country. I guess the illegal alien will again be a break for the rich via employement salaries and benefits. They will accept less. Why pay $30.00/hour when you can send work overseas and pay $2.00/hour or stay home and pay $10.00/hour. The rich (corporations) must feel that the middle class has out priced themselves and needed to create a new middle class. While them give themselves millions of dollars retirement funds. What will they do with the present middle class?

On health care. Will you as president take away the health benefits of the congress so that they can also use the health care benefits can we all have to use; such as Medicare.?

Bryan   January 13th, 2008 1:17 am ET

The security around the Kodak Theatre and Hollywood & Highland is going to be crazy and super tight! Getting to work will be interesting for me.

As for people wanting to attend………you can't.

John, Queensbury NY   January 12th, 2008 11:08 pm ET

Many of the candidates speak of change and election reform, and I feel this deals with both. Certain candidates are being excluded from nationally televised debates. Do you feel that this exclusion, perpetrated by big corporations that control the media, constitutes an unfair election practice that limits the viewpoints and choices presented to the viewing public? If you candidate were elected President, what would he/she change to ensure that it is the American people, not big corporations controlling the media, that decides who becomes president?… or would he/she "stay the course"? THAT would make an interesting debate question.

The USA PATRIOT Act, which enhanced law enforcement's ability to combat terrorism, erodes the civil liberties of American citizens provided to them in the Bill of Rights to the US Constitution. Shouldn't a candidate for President of the United States, sworn "upholder" and "defender" of the Constitution, oppose the USA PATRIOT Act? Is there not a constitutional means to ensure that Americans are safe from terrorism… and from their government? Do YOU known how your candidate feels about the Patriot Act?

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1755

Michelle Crames   January 12th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

As a Democrat, I would love to learn how to be invited to the debate. Please advise.

Dave   January 12th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

Do you guys plan on snuffing out Dr. Ron Paul's message just like Fox News? I sure do hope not . . .

Nory   January 12th, 2008 7:29 am ET

Are mike gravel and dennis kucinich being allowed in these debates? If only a handful of states have had their primaries..how is it right to exclude these candidates from the debates when their views are uncovered?

Danny   January 11th, 2008 8:14 pm ET

I just hope Kucinich is included in these debates.

michael   January 11th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

Please include Dennis KUCINICH, Stand Up for a Democracy!

Michelle   January 11th, 2008 12:35 pm ET

Can we suggest a question / topic to discuss? I am a transgender woman and all the Democratic candidates say they support ENDA. What ENDA? The one currently in Congress? An inclusive ENDA that includes the transgender population? Would they allow a non-inclusive ENDA to pass? Wouldn't it make more sense to just modify the Civil Rights Act and remove all the enumerated classes in favor of "Cannot discriminate in employment for any reason other than a bonafide job related requirement", or something like that?

Thank you,

jibbguy   January 11th, 2008 8:52 am ET

If CNN locks-out Dennis Kucinich from their debate; it will look extremely "fishy"… And even criminal. It will fuel the feeling many have that Big Media is trying to control elections and democracy… That the corporate-owned and dominated media are deliberately limiting the choices of voters; and perhaps also that the Democratic Party is not only allowing it to happen but furthering it.

This feeling is becoming more widespread; and many besides Kucinich supporters are starting to notice a distinct bias against the reform candidates…. Candidates who's views on subjects like Universal Health Care, ending the war immediately, impeachment, election fraud, and reform of the lobbyist system are often in direct conflict with the corporations that own these news organizations, and their sponsors.

Dennis Kucinich is the clear choice of the majority of Progressives. Silencing him is a dangerous precedent….. If this sort of misuse of media power is allowed to happen without comment, where will it end? Next year it could be the Religious Right who are silenced.

CNN has a civic responsibility to include Dennis Kucinich in the upcoming debate. To bow to pressure from any side… Corporate sponsors or the other Democratic candidates… Is to fail in their mission to the public. And what happens here will be watched, and carefully noted, by millions. By their choice, CNN has a chance to disprove these "urban legends" and conspiracy theories regarding the corporate control of Big Media…. Or confirm them.

Kevin   January 11th, 2008 8:52 am ET

I heard Keith Olbermann say something.

He said when he wanted to do something for a political reason, his boss or the executive in charge demanded he give a business reason to do what he wanted because they could not be political.

Olbermann in this case came up with one.

Allow me to be that newsman coming to you, the executives at CNN, to give you not a political reason but a business reason for putting Dennis Kucinich in the debates.

Ratings and viewers will increase significantly.

They will go up from what they were if you were to have a Edwards-Clinton-Obama debate.

You see, Americans have heard all they need to hear in a debate from these three and will be bored out of their minds if you don't include the man they know little about.

Thank you for considering how this makes business sense to include Dennis.

lisa   January 11th, 2008 2:02 am ET

How do you get tickets to the 1/31/08 debates?

Curtis Bradley   January 11th, 2008 1:41 am ET

DENNIS KUCINICH must be heard by the people. Silencing DENNIS KUCINICH should be illegal.

Railroading the democratic process is FASCIST, and against the Constitution.

We should be able to hear every candidate running for president not just the ones some corporate news station deems electable. Corporations controlling the outcome of a public election is FASCISM.

Dennis has introduced articles of impeachment for the lying war criminals that have hijacked this nation, H Res 333.

Dennis will kill NAFTA and WTO and bring work back to the U.S.

Dennis Kucinich will put the U.S. back to work implementing new sustainable energy technologies across the country to help us break free from oil's shackles.

Dennis has immediate plans to save our environment.

DENNIS IS NOT OWNED BY THE CORPORATIONS. DENNIS KUCINICH IS OWNED BY THE PEOPLE AND THE PEOPLE ARE WHO HE WORKS FOR.

CNN and other news corporations do not care for the people of this country if they don't let DENNIS KUCINICH and other candidates speak in this debate.

CNN is guilty of rigging the election process if you do not let all candidates have a voice in this debate.

CNN and other news corporations are helping to create the FASCIST STATES OF AMERICA.

THE CORPORATIONS PROFITING FROM THE WAR ARE MORE DANGEROUS TO THIS COUNTRY THAN IRAN, NORTH KOREA, OR OSAMA..

DENNIS KUCINICH will return the power to the people, that is why you corporate fascists are so fearful of him.

Benjamin P.   January 10th, 2008 11:34 pm ET

There are no tickets available, you must be invited, I do not know how to get invited though. It says this on the Kodak Theatre Events Website. Here is the Link :

http://www.kodaktheatre.com/events.htm

if anyone knows how to become invited please let us know

Jackie   January 10th, 2008 10:56 pm ET

I am also interested in attending. I live in Los Angeles.

Jeremy   January 10th, 2008 10:26 pm ET

Please CNN be fair, please

Jeremy   January 10th, 2008 10:25 pm ET

kucinich place 2nd in the San Mateo Straw Poll in California

Jeremy   January 10th, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Kucinich hopefully be there, I as a citizen of this country want my voice to be heard through kucinich

James A.   January 10th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

anyone got any information yet on the ticket situation in LA? I would love to attend and support the candidates. Please let us know CNN!

lonnie white   January 10th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

How do you get tickets for Cali. Jan. 31st debate?

Kelly Cofield   January 10th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Dennis Kucinich is the voice of reason and integrity for the Democratic Party. He was right about Iraq, he will create jobs by getting out of NAFTA, sustainable energy, planet preservation, workers rights, single-payer universal healthcare, equality. The Kucinich plan of Peace Through Strength is viable and so is he if his platform could be heard. It doesn't speak well for the Democratic party to align with the MSM, MIL and political machine to silence him. Perhaps the establishment is reluctant to let him speak, Dennis will undoubtably mention the impeachable crimes of this administration and the lack of accountablity enforcement from the Democratic party. What would Carlyle, Halliburton, GE, Boeing, Blackwater, etc,etc,etc…do if there were no more foreign enemies to fight? There's no money in peace.

Kelly Cofield   January 10th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Dennis Kucinich is the voice of reason and integrity for the Democratic Party. He was right about Iraq, he will create jobs by getting out of NAFTA, sustainable energy, planet preservation, workers rights, single-payer universal healthcare, equality. The Kucinich plan of Peace Through Strength is viable and so is he if his platform could be heard. It doesn't speak well for the Democratic party to align with the MSM, MIL and political machine to silence him. Perhaps the establishment is reluctant to let him speak, Dennis will undoubtably mention the impeachable crimes of this administration and the lack of accountablity enforcement from the Democratic party. What would Carlyle, Halliburton, GE, Boeing, Blackwater, etc,etc,etc…do if there were no more foreign enemies to fight? There's no money in peace.

alice   January 10th, 2008 5:32 am ET

please send me info on how to attended the debates

Velvet Garriques   January 9th, 2008 10:59 pm ET

I"d like to attend the debate in either one of the states. i have some very important questions for all the candidates to answer. Democrats, and Republicans know what is at stake here, but do the american people? America you had better wake up! this Presidential nomination is critical to the survival of american people. First and foremost, in categorical priority; #1 working americans, (blue collar) #2 poor americans, single mothers, persons with disabilities. older americans, veterans, #3 the middle working americans, #4 special interest groups, upper elite, corporate america. This is whats at stake right here and now. If any of the other candidates get the nomination this process will be diligently worked towards reversing the process. It will then become 4,3,2,1. as it has been for yhe last 75 years. So when you look at the nominees stats be very careful in whom you choose! this election hinges on a lot of significant historical data, hopefully if the american people are really serious about change, Obama is your choice out of proverty! He knows not to sell out to his adversaries, the work that has been done is to vital for any mistakes to be made at any point in his campaign. He still has one ace in the hole, that will shock all the experts analyst, Mr. Obama knows there are only a few of us who know the truth behind this madness. As you all ponder who you will vote for remember The Gettyburg Address, that should answer your question on whose the right candidate to become our Nation's next leader. So if you study long and study wrong you haven't felt whats it's like to be in the dog house.. TRUST ME ON THIS ONE! This chapter in the Historical books has already begun with the ink to the paper! I urge all the young people to vote for your future, based on past failures of your US Officials.

Daniel Chow   January 9th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

I will be in Los Angeles on Janaury 31, 2008 and I would like to attend the Democratic Party Debates. Are Tickets available to the General Public?

Colleen   January 9th, 2008 9:26 pm ET

I too am very interested in attending the Democratic debate in LA and would like to find out how we can attend.

John   January 9th, 2008 8:28 pm ET

I'd like information on how I can attend the debates as well. I'm an Independent and don't know how I'm going to vote yet. I'd love the opportunity to see the Democratic candidates in person so I could get a better feel for them.

Heather   January 9th, 2008 8:18 pm ET

how do we get tickets to democratic debate in los angeles? Go clinton!

Jenna   January 9th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

What has to happen in order for to attend the Democratic debate?

I am very interested in going.

Susan Byrd   January 9th, 2008 4:01 pm ET

Can someone email me about how to get tickets to the Jan. 31st debate at the Kodak theatre? Thank you.

African American Male (California)   January 9th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

I would like to know what questions you folks have before January 31.

African American Male   January 9th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

For some time I have favored Hillary, however her "reality check" comment got me to thinking. Thousands of people voted for Senator Obama in Iowa and New Hampshire; rivaling Senator Clinton's support. So I question if Hillary would respect the voices of descent when suggestions are made that seem unconventional. This is the foundation of America's problems, when "experienced" people like Allen Greenspan reports the members of the House of Representatives that the economy is strong. Several members question the accuracy of his data telling Mr. Greenspan that they are not seeing it within the communities they represent. It was apparent to me then he was speaking of corporate America and Mr. Greenspan was not going to be forced to change his position. The voice of the people lost that battle.

So I wish to submit a question:
Hillary & Barack have stated this "election is about the people".
After all the votes are in, do you agree that the top two candidates should join on a Presidential/Vice Presidential nomination; would'nt this be the true voice of the people?

Ben Elliott   January 9th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

The debates had a uneven start not allowing all candidates to be heard!
So The three media organizations do the same thing here what a bunch of cowards!

I'm glad to report so far Duncan Hunter has a commanding lead in the polls in San Diego Ca. and it is way more than 5%!

VOTE FOR DUNCAN HUNTER!

BiG MiKe   January 9th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

why would anyone vote for obama? the guy that doesnt know anything and has no experience what so ever???all he doest is talks about past and thats about it he has no interest about anyone in USA cmon people wake up can you see hes brain washing you all…. you have to go with someone who knows what theyre doing and what they say they will do they sure do so..So i think the oone and only person who can get us back on track would be Hillary Clinton..

RonPaulRon   January 9th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

You have to wonder just how Socialists or Communists or maybe even Fascists got the power in this country to put limits on who can run for office or who can speak to the people? The two establishment parties put limits on any third party candidates the last time Ross Perot scared the crap out of them and now they are using all their power to shut down those who emulate President George Washington, Patrick Henry, General Robert E. Lee, or President Jefferson Davis, (the great defenders of the original Constitution) by keeping certain candidates out of the debates!

Not sure there is a lot of difference between China and the U.S.? Heck, without China we could not afford to give millions or billions away every year!

Maria, Los Angeles   January 9th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

I would like to attend the Democratic debates in Los Angeles on 1/31/08, and I was inquiring on how I could do so? Where would I be able to obtain tickets?

Orvilette, Los Angeles   January 9th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

I would like to attend the democratic debates in Los Angeles. Where can I get tickets?

Kelly   January 9th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

Consider Duncan Hunter- he's about securing the border and building a fence- stop the trade with China and keeping jobs in the USA- has anyone else even mention these importan issues- he needs support so if you are a conservative and want real change- consider Duncan Hunter- http://www.gohunter08.com
he stands by his votes.

Naim   January 9th, 2008 7:13 am ET

Is there a way to get tickets for the debates anyone ?

ashly   January 9th, 2008 2:41 am ET

I would like to know how to get tickets to the democratic debate.

Victor, SoCal   January 9th, 2008 1:27 am ET

I have the same question as some of the other people have asked. How can I attend the debate in Los Angeles?

Lynell   January 9th, 2008 12:34 am ET

Can general CA citizens get tickets to the debates? If so, how?

Suzanne   January 8th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

I would like to know how to get admittance to the audience for the democratic debate in Los Angeles.

WF   January 8th, 2008 8:31 pm ET

Does anyone know how I get tickets?

Jason   January 8th, 2008 8:18 pm ET

Has anyone received an answer on how to attend? I also live in the area and would love to be there.

Danielle   January 8th, 2008 7:44 pm ET

So according to CNN's requirements citizens who participated in Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada, 4 out of 50 states and those who participated in a poll decide which contenders can speak in a nationally televised debate for the benefit of all voting citizens?

It would be worthwhile if networks broadcasting debates provided voters with all viewpoints regardless of polls and a few state results. Doing so would produce educated voters, hmmmm educated voters.

I do hope everyone is taking the time to do some real research looking into voting records, top advisers and the money trail for all contenders.

We, the deciders, will get the leader we deserve based on our own efforts.

Sergio   January 8th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

My father-in-law lives in Moorpark California just a couple of miles from the Reagan Presidential Library and I know he would appreciate being there for the debate. What is the process for admission to the event?

Michelle, California   January 8th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

I would like to attend the upcoming democratic debate in California. How does one go about getting a seat?

Thank you!

Philip   January 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Same question as Michael, would love to attend the debates…any clue as to how?

Michael   January 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Just wondering, whats the process to attend the debates in Los Angeles? I live nearby & would like to attend. But I'm not sure if they are closed debates? Thanks in advance!

Bill Hrin   January 8th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

I am a democrat bu am tempered by the fact that key states needed for an Electoral College win are too conservative for BO to win.I would like to see a poll state by statenot by popular vote to see how viable/realisitic his chances are.Bill in NJ

Dave Owen Canastota NY.   December 23rd, 2007 9:30 am ET

It appears to be another presendential campaign where "WE THE PEOPLE" are once again challenged to choose the lesser of two evils based on the candadates runniing rather than who will lead this country down the right path, enforce exsisting laws and protect it's borders…

GRACE, SUN CITY CENTER, FL   December 22nd, 2007 7:59 pm ET

THANK YOU CNN.
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR A CANDIDATE TO GO
INTO FEBRUARY 5 WITH NO ELECTORAL VOTES
AND STILL HAVE A CHANCE MATHMATICALLY
TO WIN THE NOMINATION??????

richie,nevada   December 22nd, 2007 1:07 pm ET

By the very latest, this is where Clinton will show her strong, wide-based support and capture the democratic nomination. She leads in all the large states by double digits, and has greater than 50% support in several.

Posted By Mark R. Fort Lauderdale FL : December 22, 2007 2:24 am

I really don't care about polls. I have been watching elections and they don't turn out what the media speculate.By the time we go to super tuesday, most people shall have known how to vote.
I am supporting barack for many reasons.

Mark R. Fort Lauderdale FL   December 22nd, 2007 2:24 am ET

By the very latest, this is where Clinton will show her strong, wide-based support and capture the democratic nomination. She leads in all the large states by double digits, and has greater than 50% support in several.

B, Atlanta   December 21st, 2007 8:33 pm ET

Eric, I am thinking on democratic side, may be Edwards will be that candidate if Obama and Him had some understanding on VP job for him. On Republican side, I am thinking Huckabee would be that candidate

Eric, SI, NY   December 21st, 2007 6:32 pm ET

Can you be at the debate if you qualify but say you are "suspending" your campaign or stop campaigning after Iowa, New Hampshire, or South Carolina? If you can then what would you have to lose then to go to the debate and blast the candidate you disagree with the most.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP