December 30, 2007
Posted: 08:00 AM ET

BOSTON (AP) — As a presidential contender, Mitt Romney has the looks, the money and the campaign machine. He also has something of a candor gap.

When confronted with questions that might conflict with his message of the day or political record, the Republican candidate has shown a tendency to bob and weave or simply dismiss history. He has done so all year, providing an easy target for his opponents.

"If a person is dishonest in his approach to get the job, do you believe he will be honest in telling you the truth when he does get the job?" former minister and Romney opponent Mike Huckabee said Saturday.

This past week, Romney did it again over questions about whether he was planning to air negative ads — in particular on the subject of illegal immigration — against John McCain. The Arizona senator has been surging in New Hampshire, where Romney is angling for back-to-back victories after a hoped-for win in this week's Iowa caucuses.

"I haven't made any decisions on what issue ads might come forward, down the road, but those aren't what we shot today," Romney told reporters on Wednesday. "What we shot today was just
me to camera."

On Friday, his campaign went on TV with a new commercial, a so-called contrast ad that did not feature Romney speaking, but a narrator comparing his record to McCain's on immigration and tax matters. On Saturday, the campaign announced a second spot, focused entirely on McCain's immigration record. In between Romney also released a third commercial, criticizing Huckabee for increasing spending and pardoning criminals while he was governor of Arkansas.

The ads Romney mentioned to reporters — the "closing arguments" in which he speaks directly to Iowa and New Hampshire voters — have yet to air.

Statements from his campaign accused McCain of initiating the negative ads with personal criticisms of Romney, as well as a mailer to New Hampshire voters attacking Romney's own immigration record.

"Sen. McCain has a troubling history of neglecting substantive issues and getting personal in his attacks against those who happen to disagree with him," said Romney spokesman Kevin Madden. "It's the McCain way."

Romney started the year with a similar example of candor deficiency.

On Jan. 8, when he staged a "National Call Day" to kickoff his campaign, he called a news conference to herald his unprecedented one-day take of $6.5 million. When the multimillionaire was asked whether he might spend his own money on his campaign, Romney said that scenario "would be akin to a nightmare," since he was relying on popular support for his campaign. He added that he reserved the right to donate, though.

In reality, Romney had already donated to his political committee at the time of the question. A campaign finance report he released in mid-April revealed he contributed a $2.35 million check by the time of his "nightmare" comment, starting the prior October.

He has gone on to loan a total of $17.35 million to his committee, although the total could be more. His next report won't be made public until mid-January.

As the year has progressed, there have been more examples, not just of artsy language, but of ignorance of or embellishments about his personal and political history.

In April, Romney said, "I've been a hunter pretty much all my life," only to have aides reveal he had gone hunting only twice at the bookends of his life: once, during a summer visit to an Idaho ranch as a 15-year-old, and again, in 2006, when he participated in a big-donor excursion to a Georgia game preserve on behalf of the Republican Governors Association.

A subsequent check with state officials revealed no hunting license for Romney in any of the three states where he has homes, and Romney himself later confirmed he did not own any guns. The ones in his house, which he had mentioned publicly, were owned by his son Josh.

More recently, Romney told a national television audience on Dec. 16 that he had been endorsed by the NRA while running for governor in 2002.

A day after his appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," Romney told reporters that he had checked with the gun-rights group "and they said, 'Well, we didn't give you the official endorsement,' but they phone-banked members … in Massachusetts, encouraging them to support my candidacy, so it was, if you will, a support phone bank, which is not an official endorsement."

The hunting gaffe in particular has provided easy shots for other candidates. "I don't go around saying I was lifelong golfer because I once rode in a golf cart when I was eight years old,"

Huckabee said, adding that, "You are not going to hear me making up stuff about my biography."

In his new ads against McCain, Romney also looks past his own record on tax cut and immigration matters.

He criticizes McCain for twice voting against Bush administration tax cuts, although while governor at the time, Romney told members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation he "won't be a cheerleader" for proposals he did not agree with. "But I have to keep a solid relationship with the White House," The Boston Globe reported in 2003.

Similarly, Romney accuses McCain of backing an immigration bill this year that provided "amnesty" for illegal immigrants, even though it required them to pay fines and stand in line with legal immigrants if they wanted to become citizens.

Romney bases his criticism on the bill's inclusion of a so-called "Z" visa that, once obtained, would have allowed illegals to remain indefinitely if they did not pursue citizenship. Among the bill's backers was his party leader, President Bush. Yet in March 2006, Romney sounded sympathetic to the idea of integrating illegals into U.S. society.

"I don't believe in rounding up 11 million people and forcing them at gunpoint from our country," Romney told The Sun of Lowell, Mass. "(T)hose that are here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process towards application for citizenship, as they would from their home country."

Filed under: Romney


Paul, Ladera Ranch California   December 30th, 2007 9:07 pm ET

Huckabee lacks the sophistication to be president. No other candidate on the Republican or Democratic side has any executive experience whatsoever. Being a member of congress does not prepare someone to be an executive of the largest organization on earth. The American people are smart and will come around, regardless of how the AP and other liberal media try to spin the facts. Romney will win the election.

Mrs. America   December 30th, 2007 7:07 pm ET

I find this article interesting and would like to see similar ones on all of the top tier candidates of both parties. Thank you.

Val Davydov, Agawam, MA   December 30th, 2007 6:27 pm ET

My vote goes to Gov. Romney without hesitation. AP has nothing else to say against Romney that's of importance to voters, so they came up with these pity stuff.

Romney 08! Romney all the way!

Jen Cedar Falls, IA   December 30th, 2007 6:04 pm ET

The AP reporter who wasted their time putting this garbage out there needs to switch professions. AP should be ashamed of printing it, too. Mitt Romney has more credibility, integrity, supporters and successes than this reporter could ever hope to have. This was a childish article at best. Go back to school and take the course on bias reporting.

Chris S - Gerald, MO   December 30th, 2007 5:54 pm ET

Terry in El Paso, TX:

Sure Romney is a corporate guy, but let's not forget corporations are also all about the bottom line, and if it doesn't balance, well that's just not good for business. Show me a candidate out there not telling us all what we want to hear filling us full of hope for the future. Unfortunately though, hope is not a strategy and we cannot keep up the current deficit spending that will be passed onto our great grandchildren. What happens when the Chinese cash in on all their bonds? It bankrupts the country. We have to at least consider the guy with experience in balancing the bottom line.

K Wilkinson Texas   December 30th, 2007 4:19 pm ET

Romney's record speaks volumes. He does not intend to deport 12 million at gun point. He intends to penalize states, cities, and companies that pander to illegals. That is sound reasoning. As jobs and benefits disappear the illegals will self- deport. He also specified that "Illegals that were here paying taxes, and NOT taking benefits should begin a process towards legalization". That is a far cry from the millions that are here living off of the system. He has opposed drivers licenses for illegals and pushed for English immersion in the class room. He is above the mark on the illegal immigration issue as compared to Huckabee and McCain.

Huckabee is an ass! "You are not going to hear me make up stuff about my biography". As a matter of fact, you won't hear Huckabee talk about his biography at all. Not truthfully anyway! It is full of bigotry, ethics committee investigations and violations, family trouble and unpopular political policies. I have to laugh when he refers to his honesty in opposition to Mitts. He's about as crooked as snakes back!

Chris Fischahs, Los Alamos, NM   December 30th, 2007 3:59 pm ET

I don't trust Mitt because of his record. Mitt, a fee is a Tax! Pro-life means pro-life… regardless of the polical consequences. Because I don't trust him to stay true to his convictions… I will not vote for him. (This same reason is why I would not vote for Bob Dole - conservative yes, but I knew he would sell out on his principles… and McCain is in the same boat.)

Instead, I TRUST Fred. The others tend to talk in Clintonspeak about what they believe, or what they say now is different than their record. Sen.Fred Thompson is the only candidate who has detailed where he stands on the issues. http://www.fred08.com/Principles/PrinciplesSummary.aspx?View=OnTheIssues

As President, I want a man who is uncompromising on his core beliefs.

I TRUST FRED to remain true to his principles.
Clear. Consistent. Conservative.
http://www.Fred08.com

Gundy, NY   December 30th, 2007 3:04 pm ET

Of course it was written out of Boston…. I'm sick of all the liberals there–still pissed that he won the Governors seat and deliberalized their state. Mitt is a stud, deal with it.

Raymond, El Paso TX   December 30th, 2007 2:41 pm ET

Candor? American voters should be very concerned about his refusal to address the issue of his ties to Bain Capital and especially their involvement with China’s Huawei firm and the 3Com corporation that holds significant defense contracts. Why does he just not come out and say he is opposed to this deal due to national security concerns?

Cheney showed that even though he denied no longer being involved with Halliburton , they still somehow received preferential treatment and no-bid contracts as part of the Afghanistan invasion, the Iraq occupation, the nation-building that is still taking place there and during the Katrina fiasco.

Does Romney = Cheney except that Cheney already paid his dues to his old corporation but Romney still owes his?

Here are some Republican comments regarding the Bain Capital, Huawei and 3Com deal:
Senator Jeff Sessions, Alabama:
“If there is a loophole that is allowing valuable defense technology to be obtained by the Chinese military that will enable them to accelerate their military expansion, then we ought to close it,”

Representatives Pete Hoekstra and Duncan Hunter, of Michigan and California:
“This sale raises the ongoing and thorny issues of illegal technology transfers to China, public reports of Chinese cyberattacks on U.S. government networks, repeated efforts by the Chinese government to gain access to military sensitive and classified technologies of the U.S. government, and continuing concerns about infringement of intellectual property rights by Chinese companies,”

Senator Christopher Bond, Missouri:
“It is troubling to me that a foreign military organization with interests in communications might obtain access to our security systems,”

Senator Jon Kyl, Arizona:
“Senator Kyl has serious concerns about the purchase of 3Com by a consortium that includes a company with numerous ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army,” said his spokesman, Ryan Patmintra.

Representative Thaddeus McCotter, Michigan:
“I wouldn’t trade with the Soviet Union, and I wouldn’t trade with China,”…. This is something that is a clear and present danger to their standard of living, (speaking of his constituents)”

Kristy Sanborn, Buckhorn, Mo.   December 30th, 2007 1:49 pm ET

Do we really want a President (Romney) that doesn't understand the meaning of the word "amnesty" and is trying to convince us that the immigration bill that didn't pass was giving illegals 'amnesty'?

Carolina   December 30th, 2007 1:34 pm ET

You cannot be serious!

Mike Huckabee lies everyday about who his advisors are. That is candor gap and you clowns are failing to report it.

Julie T   December 30th, 2007 1:27 pm ET

This article says it all.

Terry, El Paso, TX   December 30th, 2007 1:20 pm ET

Romney is a corporate guy. He speaks corp-speak. Corporations do not consider truth when creating a message for a specific audience. In advertising, they say what will make you buy - not necessarily the truth. When communicating with Congress, they say whatever will make Congress vote the way they want - not necessarily the truth. When communicating through their lawers to a court or a regulatory agency, they say whatever will favor their cause - not necessarily the truth. Communication to them is persuasive, not informative. If your corporation sells real estate, then now is the time to buy. Market is up? Time to buy. Market is down? Time to buy. Market if fluctuating wildly? Time to buy. House is on fire? Time to buy. Don't have good credit? Time to buy.

So Romney speaks corp-truth, not truth as a philosopher or a saint would define it. Truth to him is defined as the "phrase, sentence, or paragraph that will compel you to vote for me on election day." The rules are:
1. If it helps my election prospects, it must be true.
2. If it hurts my election prospects, it must be false.
3. If science says it's true, we can hire a scientist who will say it's false.
4. If my current statements are not consistent with my previous statements, then you must be mistaken.

Kevin Hale   December 30th, 2007 12:47 pm ET

Looks like the A.P. is attacking Romney with their time honored "cut and paste" journalism. They know Romney has just regained the lead in Iowa and in New Hampshire holds a slim lead over McCain. Since Romney is the only one Hillary can't beat they are beating him down now. It's easy to take a quote and change the context entirely to prove your point. Isn't that what Clinton did for 8 years? Isn't that what cost John "I voted for it before I voted against it" Kerry in 2004? Please esteemed members of the A.P., try not to insult our intelligence with your Jerry Springer journalism.

Ba Gua   December 30th, 2007 12:16 pm ET

"As a presidential contender, Mitt Romney has the looks…" If this is what is important for being elected, then the US is politically pathetic. What's next, Mitt on American Idol? Grow up, America!

Jon Sanderson   December 30th, 2007 12:11 pm ET

I AM SO SICK OF "GOTCHA" JOURNALISM. This is getting so old and tired. The liberal media doesn't have any real dirt on Romney, so they have to play the dirty old "gotcha" tricks to see if they can trap him in his words. Give it up libs. You're scared to death that Romney will beat the Dems in a general election. And you should be.

Rob   December 30th, 2007 12:09 pm ET

Who cares about a biased AP reporter's opinion. Most people in America are smarter than a J-school graduate. CNN - why do you push opinion pieces instead of reporting news. Bet most people have the answer.

Jim in Orlando, FL   December 30th, 2007 12:08 pm ET

OK CNN, when de we see a hit piece like this on Hillary ? There's plenty of inconsistencies in her background to post a nice long diatribe ! Don't you have some editorial pages somewhere that this kind of smear can be flushed to ?

In Boston   December 30th, 2007 12:06 pm ET

I'm sure we will see the media attack Mitt Romney increasingly over the next few weeks. This smear job is one good example of what to expect.

After all, Romney actually can beat all of the Democratic hopefuls and we wouldn't want that would we?

Dale Davis, Glendora, California   December 30th, 2007 11:57 am ET

A question for Huckabee. If you are posing questions about things like "don't Mormons believe Jesus and Satan are brothers?," in order to bait anti-Mormonism, do you think you could actually become commander in chief of a country who has to deal with a real Holy War with 1 billion plus Muslims? YOU ARE THE PHONEY. FURTHERMORE, INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW IF IT IS TRUE THAT YOU WERE THE KEYNOTE SPEAKER AT AN ANTI-MORMON RALLY IN SALT LAKE CITY IN 1999, UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION? ALSO, WHY ARE ALL OF YOUR FORMER SURMONS FROM PREVIOUS YEARS LOCKED UP?

mike kaplan   December 30th, 2007 11:56 am ET

Nice to see Romney get called on his continual half-truths and outright lies.

And proves once again that religiosity is no guarantee of honesty.

Heather   December 30th, 2007 11:54 am ET

I can't believe whoever wrote this is sharing the same hypocrisy that they claim Romney to have. They have been soon misled on even some of Romney's statements. NO, this isn't entirely true actually. They pointed out a twist of so many things. Obviously a no news article poised to bring up contention on Romney's record. Well, this isnt' news, stay out of the CNN political ticker. There are thousands of analysis of each candidates! Why not include NRO's article including his endorsement? Romney is a very well qualified and HONEST individual. He's kept his words from the beginning and has held true to it. He's intelligent and holds high morals. A great leader!

Jonathan   December 30th, 2007 11:39 am ET

Does CNN just hate Romney? Or does constanly picking on the leading candidate make for a more dramatic election and therefore more interesting news? Media should quit choosing our leaders and sick to their job.

Jacque Bauer, Los Angeles, CA   December 30th, 2007 11:29 am ET

What a pathetic attempt, but typical for AP, at a hit piece on the leading conservative candidate immediately before an election.

Where is the corresponding story on Hillary? Entire books could be written about her and Der Slickmeister's pattern evil behavior.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com