Doug in New Jersey,
You'd better hurry, or you'll miss your daily briefing from Rush.

Romney an openly BUSH Jr. supporter LOST!! Says something about Bush Jr., Bush Jr. Administration and Bush Jr. policies and his standing with American public today.

Hillary / Edwards take the que from Huckabee and bash Bush Jr. for his IRAQ policy and STOP funding the war lest your vote(s) will haunt you in November.

Yes the 43rd President Bush Jr. has cause for concern:
Having cheated in two elections. First in 2000 from Al Gore who later got the Noble Peace Prize (just in case people do not keep up with the news!) through the Supreme Court then through rigging and SWIFT BOATING (it’s a verb: unfairly depicting someone) war decorated veteran John Kerry in 2004!

With all the anti-Bush Jr. rhetoric that has helped Huckabee must be a DISASTER in the making for Bush Jr. if he is to venture to work for Republican candidates in 2008 election cycle.

Go Hillary44 08! http://hillaryis44.org/ http://facts.hillaryhub.com/
For a little national election snapshot: http://uselectionatlas.org/2008.php

Iowa done a great thing last night…NH follow suit! America needs this guy!

John and Hillary are nothing more than 1st and 2nd losers.., respectively.

Go Obama! I truly hope every democrat and independent in New Hampshire shows up for the primaries and gives Obama an even bigger win! A one-two punch to Hillary, and she's down for the count! Once that happens, and South Carolina goes strongly for Obama on the 26th, a new day will begin. One of real change and real hope. One of true unity, not the faux unity W. portrayed himself to be a proponent of. He will go down in the books and the worst ever.

Obamas time is now, thank you Iowa! Go New Hampshire! Show them all!

The irony amazes me, it is quite apparent that the racists sentiments are coming from the die hard Hillary supporters (liberals?)…not all but, but there are a few crazed lunatics out there.

There are a few narrow minded individuals out there that will exclude a candidate solely based on race or sex, that is there prerogative, it is America afterall.

But, having said that, what happened in Iowa last night is a positive sign that the country is moving in a more progressive direction. Most individuals born during the 1960s and after have a far different view on racial relations than those born before…and it seems that they were out in full force last night. Whether Obama wins the nomination or not…I was overwhelmed with a sense of immense pride as an American. Thanks Iowa!

I really don't understand this whole idea that Obama cannot win a general election. Also, Iowa may not be representative of our nation demographically, but the people of Iowa take their job as the first caucus in the nation very seriously and spend much time educating themselves on the positions and ideas of each candidate. I applaud them for this dedication to the process. As for Obama, he is truly a breath of fresh air and I am happy he won, but even happier with Edwards finishing second ahead of Hillary. John Edwards is a passionate voice with many quality plans that middle class America can rally around. Edwards or Obama is definitely a plus for our country.

Obama is the candidate of change! He is the future, as evidenced by his overwhelming support among young Americans. It's not even close among young America! He is the one and we recognize this! We want change and will have it. It's time to move away from the politics of old. We can't just sit back while old America and their old ideologies destroy this great country. This country needs healing. Obama is the one! His time is now!

Amazing how many NEW residents of Iowa we had registering and caucusing for Obama last night…goes to show the rumors were true that he was bussing outsiders in to caucus in Iowa from neighboring Illinois. Like Joe Biden said at the JJ Dinner in Des Moines, "Welcome to Chicago!"

Oh and Republicans re-registered and caucused for Obama because they didn't want Clinton to win because they know they can't beat her.

Clinton has more U.S. Senators who have endorsed her (10) than all the other candidates COMBINED. She has 76 members of congress endorsing her. She doesn't just HOPE for changes - she TELLS us how she will MAKE the changes. Obama talks about change, never says what he'll do to make them happen. Clinton may have failed her health care initiative in the 90s, but at least she knows what she needs to do to make it work this time. Obama has no experience so there's nothing to talk about. Oh except the 100+ votes he's missed while being in the Senate and all those 'present' votes.

HILLARY '08

Neither Hillary nor Edwards is trustworthy.

Obama/Richardson would be good.

I had been really looking forward to the end of Bush presidency and for a democrat president to take over. I then saw the republican debates and saw how Ron Paul completely out shined not only everyone in the Republican party but also the Democratic party candidates. Not only does he have much more political experience than Obama and Hillary, he hasn't flipped flopped on issues like the rest of the candidates, and his ideas make sense. I am surprised that a person like that is not the front-runner candidate. It makes me feel that maybe democracy doesn't work because people tend to pay more attention to a candidate's looks, race, gender, etc., than the actual meat and potatoes (that are experience/track record, credibility, and what the person stands for and has stood for in the past).

I'm pleased in general with the caucus results. Although I am currently supporting Edwards–Obama very closely his mirrors his agenda–and seems to have found a way ( a la Opra) to swing female consensus in his direction.

Although I was originally considering Hillary, I have changed my views because of the 190 lbs of excess baggage and old wounds that will accompany her to the White House, namely Bill. And my instincts tell me that both Edwards and Obama are more "progressive reform" oriented in their views of the nation than Hillary.

What really scares me is Huckabee!!!
Having read again some of his agenda–particularly on his radical views on eliminating employer contributions for health insurance (with no comments or plan on who will take up the slack for the increased insurance premiums) which really concern me. I believe under his administration he will continue the "compassionate conservative" practice of hiding federal tax increases in the services, utilities, and government fees that all Americans use. The problem is these taxes are "income indexed", thus, even impoverished Americans who use their cell phone and buys gas or cigarettes–pays the same taxes/fees to the fed as the multi-millionaire.

If a GOP has to run–God please let it be McCain!!!

Like it or not, the fact is that America is looking forward to a change. America is tired of a senseless war without gain and tremendous loss. Our forefathers fought for the rights that many of our elected representitives run roughshod over today. The absolute least we can do is vote! Too many people say they are not voting because their vote won't count. It does count and does matter. The great turnout in middle America Iowa for this Caucas should be a rallying cry to the rest of OUR nation. If Iowa can do it, why not the rest? I will vote for the candidate who best represents my interests, and the future considerations of my children. I will not vote for a man, or woman just because they say "I am a Christian." Born again or whatever. I was born once and I will die once.

Hello,
I have had the opportunity to watch and pay close attention to the presidential race this past few months. More importantly, I have had time to give the issues some critical thought and here are my thoughts:
Regarding Hillary; I am in favor of a strong and independent woman being the President of the United States, however, I don't think she is either. I am concerned about what message the fact that her husband cheated on her several times and she stayed with him, would send to our young people. In addition, I am concerned that people describe her as "cold" and "frosty", these are not the words that one would use to describe a smart confident woman, but rather a mean and aloof one. With regard to her healthcare plan 1) I don't think it will work and 2) Did she not already have a chance to implement her big "Universal Coverage" plan while her husband was in office? I am pretty sure she had her chance at healthcare and she/it failed. And last, but certainly not least, who in their right mind could ever tolerate 4-8 more years of hearing about Bill and his antics. Even if he was arguably a good president and even if she was the perfect presidential candidate (which I don't think she is), still nobody could stand to deal with all the continuous talk and attention and reports about Bill.
Regarding John Edwards; his healthcare plan cannot work. Small businesses and even larger businesses are struggling to remain afloat and can barely pay
for healthcare benefits for employees as it is. They can definitely not pay more and certainly to force them to do so would have detramental effects on our economy.
Regarding Barack; I find him to be fresh and strong and real. His messages and ways of thinking are new and cutting edge. He is a role model to many people. US is increasingly becomming more involved with foreign trade and in this global economy, his ethnicity is a plus. I am cheering for him!
Regarding Huckabee, I would say that while he seems "nice", his real message is one of extremism and that is really never good.

I am going over to Hillary Clinton's web site to donate some more money to her campaign. I have never given money to a political candidate before, but this will make the third or fourth time I have contributed to Ms. Clinton. I think she is the most viable candidate of the three top finishers tonight to help the Dems win the White House.

Yes, we do need CHANGE and I think this smart, tough, politically savvy woman is the person who can bring that about. She keeps her composure under attack and is a tough negotiator, all the while with a smile on her face and a machete in her skirts! She will get the U S economy back on track, and restore respect for the U S abroad. She is pro-environment. She will work to end this war and bring our troops home. She will work to bring solidarity to the Dems and the GOP and get people working together to make life better for all of us. Her domestic agenda to improve education, provide universal health care, protect /respect the rights of all are just a few of the social issues for which Ms. Clinton has earned my respect.

We are fortunate to have so many great candidates running for the Democratic nomination. I was saddened to see that Biden and Dodd were leaving the race because I think they have many fine qualities and have given much to the American people in their service in the Senate. (and Dodd in the House '75-'81). We need them in the Senate with both of them having vast experience and a long history in these important jobs. With Dodd's experience and expertise as Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and Biden's as Chairman of the Foreign Relations they have both contributed immeasurably to make life better for all of us.

I like John Edwards and really wish he had gotten the nomination in 2004. I think he was the best Democratic candidate then and could have gotten Bush out of the White House. I hope he will eventually join the Clinton campaign and run as her VP. What a great ticket that would be. The only thing better would be Gore, but he has said he is not interested in the #2 job again. There have been lots of comments on this board tonight both positive and negative. I respect others rights to state their opinion and hope when all the campaigning is done the best woman wins! GO HILLARY GO! In the White House we need a gentle woman, speaking softly (negotiating) laughing deeply(charming), standing firm, forging alliances, and showing the rest of the world there is once again an articulate, intelligent and tough leader in charge of the free world!

All of the presidential candidates have no experience in foreign policy. No hands-on, no- on-the-job training knowledge to deal with the fact that the world is running out of oil and 60% of our imported oil comes from the Middle East. The fact that we are in Iraq and the Middle East to secure our supply of oil, to keep the wheels of our capitalistic industry turning. Wake-up Americans, and elect our next president who has lived in the Middle East for at least ten plus years, a candidate with experience and knowledge from the world to govern the world. Who is this person? Where do we find him? Definitely not the present candidates. The American people should manage their own destiny by advertising on the web and newspapers for the candidate with 10 – 25 years of experience in the Middle East. Otherwise, the United States is pursuing the same destiny as the illiterate failed Roman Empire, destruction from within. Do we repeat the history of failed Empires?

linda, i'm glad you're such an expert on united states politics. your post could have been the most condescending thing i've read in a long time. you've basically, with one blog posting, been able to disrespect every democrat in the united states. nice job. instead of throwing out comments about how we are "blowing it" in the US, maybe you should focus your attention on canadian politics, or simply come live here, in which case your opinion of US politics would actually be respected. thats wonderful that the clintons are "loved around the world" but we are voting for the president of the united states, not canada. actually maybe I should take that back since you are basically our 51st state. you're welcome for our being your nations defense for the last 100 years or so.

BobSimmons January 3, 2008 10:23 pm ET

BARACK OBAMA CANNOT WIN:

I can almost absolutely guarantee that if Barack Obama gets the nomination, it will mean FOUR MORE years of republicans in office.

Barack Obama is black. America WILL NOT vote a black man into the presidency. Do you really think that the undecided voters in the swing states like Ohio, Missouri, and FLORIDA are going to vote for the BLACK GUY over the WHITE GUY?? Of COURSE they're not.

If you vote for Obama, you're saying you want four more years of republicans in orifice.

Bob what a DISGUSTING thing to say. But sadly this may be true. Some people will vote for Barack Obama beacuse he is actually black and smart and an inspirational speaker (you have to agree that speech last night was fantastic)
But great inspirational speeches aside most Americans will not vote for him and he will loose the general election because his name is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. Although most intelligent people like the leftwing democrats know that he is not a muslim, and that he is a christian, most of the country doesn't even know his full name is Barack Hussein Obama and this is what the republican smear machine will use to beat him. If Barack Hussein gets the nomination it will be too late to stop the Republicans.
Note to the media IOWA is not all of America. So hold off on writing the election the way you want it. All americans need to have a say in this.

We have Europeans and Canadians jumping in here in support of Hillary Clinton, and chiding us Americans for not supporting her. Of course, if she gets elected, these will be the same foreigners who will come back and blame us personally for invading Iran (which she will do).

Foreigners - we know that she shares her last name with her husband, and that he was popular internationally, but believe me, she ISN'T her husband. Look at her previous statements in regard to Iraq and Iran, and then understand why people like I will never support her.

People who think the answer is electing a Democrat just because he/she is a Democrat or a Republican just because he/she is a Republican is just plain not credible. We have the list of Republicans who have erred, should you need reminders of Torricelli or Rostankowski? How about Ms. Clinton and her brothers. She never found files and they were arrested for influence peddling. Neither party owns the high road. What exactly is Hillary's experience? How does hers exceed others? Edwards with a 28,000 sq. foot home and $400 haircuts champions the little guy??? How? Does he know any? Huckabee? Please he has won his one primary. He joins Thompson as an empty suit .

"I will go with experience, MY CHOICE IS CLINTON!"

What experience? Being Bill Clinton's wife? Is being Bill Clinton's spouse considered experience?

Apparently Bill Clinton didn't value the "experience" that he gained while being in that relationship as much as she did, considering the amount of time that he spent being engaged in "extra-curricular activities" with other women.

But anyway, as far as "real" experience goes (ie. actually holding an elected office), Obama is right on par with her, and he gets my vote, as he doesn't waffle on the Iran issue (she's just itching for the opportunity to invade it on behalf of her "backers"), and he isn't a huge flip-flopper on healthcare and Iraq!

Obama '08!

I watched cnn's coverage of the Iowa elections last night.I was very dissappoimted in the results. I thought by now the democrats would be smart enough to vote for the candicate who could win the election and white house once again. WRONG! How they continually fall for the trap that is laid out for them. Come on people i am a Canadian , and we are astonished every time you blow it.Clinton is double digits over anyone in the national forever so far, and you fall for all this crap about her. What baggage has she that republicans have saddled her with in their smears and you gullable people drink it up. When other people get 20 to 40 comments on the blog 's and clinton gets 632 etc. and they are mean spirited and full of lies you automatically thing they are true. This is the republican and democrats trying to smear her for their own gain. Obamba may be a nice man but he will not win only clinton can. what is wrong with a clinton in the white house besides the years of the republicans trying to smear and tear them down they brought prosperity, surpluses, people hadc jobs, they were and still are loved around the world and the social security was in a lock box but bush opened that.We would gladly have clinton as a leader here in our country if we could.Bennett could hardly stop grinning last night as obamba won, when fox news gives the nod to him you know you are in trouble. those people who are republicans who voted for obamba are doing exactly what they did for nader to cut the vote from the one who can win.here we go again you fall for it hillary is getting so attack because she is the threat.This election affects all countries because if obama wins the republicans win and that is what has destroyed the credibility around the world and has been so corrupt please wake up and get serious about your country.

Just for fun, if Obama wins the nomination he should pick Robert Byrd as his VP. You know, just to show that the lib policies act as if they are to support someone like Obama but in reality are the dream of people who have a past like Byrd's.

Now that Hillary came in a shocking third, don't count her out! Look for Hillary to come back with blistering negative attacks against Obama, invoking the race card to whip up ethnic sentiments among white Democrats across America not to vote for a black man to go for the White House! And the funny thing is, she just might convince white Americans!

Look, when she was First Lady and tried to launch her infamous National Health Plan, she wa derided by Congressional Democrats who saw her actions as encroaching on their turf. In response, she told her NHP volunteers that if Congressional democrats did not support her plan, she would demonize them!

This woman is worse than we really know! Don Imus calls her Satan, and not for jovial reasons. Between now and Super Tuesday, look for nastiness to envelope her campaign as she locks horn with Obama and John Edwards, but more particularly Obama.

"I am sure that if he is the nominee, the Repubs will make race or his name a huge part of their dirty campaign."

I think you have a typo here, change Repubs to Demoncrats and your statement would be factual, then again you could be a democrat, if so then being factual is the last thing you would want to be.

BTW, love that the libs here are showing their closed-minded hate and anger which is why they have made this nation so divided while conservative Americans have been trying to unite us. There is a reason no lib will honestly say that they want to win the war on terror, Bin Laden is not their enemy, their fellow Americans who don't have Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto as their bible who they label as "red necks" are.

Conservatives say well I don't agree with this guy, while the lib says I hate him, since most Americans are nice people who are not defined by their hate, if they have all the facts we will never see another Demoncrat win office again. This would be a victory for every American who does actually work and tries to live a positive, productive, compassionate life.

Charles, Fremont

How about voting for Edwards instead of not voting?

I BELIEVE EVERYONE ON THIS POST HAS ALREADY MADE UP THEIR MINDS WHO THEY ARE GOING TO VOTE FOR….SO WHY EVEN POST YOUR OPINION.

WE ALL JUST HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE WHO WINS.

i have give money to the Dem.party but if obama is who is on the ticket in Nov. no more..I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HIM .

I am a proud Liberal and a proud Edwards supporter! So everyone out there that thinks that Iowa is full of Evangelical Christians you are terribly wrong. Come visit Iowa and find out what it's like to be in a state where people are actually kind, polite and educated.

I am proud to be an Iowan and I am proud to be an American. Last night was an awesome experience getting to take part in the Democratic Process. Don't discount the people of Iowa. Not everyone in Iowa lives on a farm and to be that narrow-minded in pathetic. People in Iowa have something that you can't find almost anywhere else, a huge HEART. We care about our neighbors, we care about our children, we care about our future!

Daphne from Europe - keep your European nose out of our business. We'll decide who we want or in the case of Hillary, who we don't!

I have seen terrible comments, some biggoted, yet CNN holds comments to be viewed before posting. What happened to freedom of speech? A constituntional right. I find the process as sensorship.

The problem Hillary faced in Iowa is the same she will face across the country. She is polarizing. She has a lot of folks that support her as first choice, but not many that support her as their second choice. Many that picked Biden, Richardson or Dodd as their first choice, move on to Obama or Edwards when their candidates didn't have enough support. I would be surprised if many Dodd/Biden supporters now move to Hillary and believe that for the most part they will now fall in line behind Edwards or Obama.

Hillary is the Republican's best hope at keeping the White House for 4 more years. Which is typical for her, after all, she's experience at dodging them, not beating them..

Thanks Chris Loveall! A job well done on list of previous Iowa Caucus winners vs. Actual Party Nominees. A fellow political junkie!

ABC - Anybody But Clinton

The only thing that HRC has ever done is get elected by a state that she had never lived in base solely on her husband's popularity.

I do not think it is black or woman. I never put much stock in Iowa. There have been many who lost Iowa and went on to the presidency. I like Obama, but still think "Change" is a word. I think "Experience brings Change:. I am a Democrat and will stand by and support the person who wins our party's nomination, but I hope it will be Senator Clinton. I would have advised her to campaign everywhere but Iowa. The state has too much power and one state is in your face for months. I am glad it's over.
New Hampshire is very different. They vote with heads not hearts and I think the outcome will be very different.
As for John Edwards, I see him as a mean spirited person, who because he couldn't raise the money Clinton and Obama raised talked negitively about both. Perhaps tthe money for those 425.00 haircutscould have been better spent. I am looking forward to the come back kid. Bill Clinton has a lot of admirer's in NH and that will resinate with voters who are more comfortable with the know, not the unknow.

Everyone on this blog that says we need to careful about Obama because of racial devides in this country, Are the reason we need to support OBAMA simply because these are the people who are racist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We won't let people like you who are simple and shallow tell us what we can and cannot do.

OBAMA 08,12

Obama is, like George W. Bush, an empty suit. He's all arrogance and no substance. I have voted in every single election since I have been eligble. I have always voted for the democratic candidate. If Obama wins the nomination, I will either vote Republican or sit this one out.

No voting machines to rig in a caucus…

so glad how the Dem side has played out. just as I hoped. Clinton= 3rd place and 3rd rate. trying to run on experience when you are just so polarizing is not going to cut it. people are just tired of 20 years of Bush/Clinton rule. these families have destroyed this country so we need someone else to get it back on track. and Huckabee on the GOP side is not the answer.

Hillary Clinton has 169 delegates to Barack's 66 so far. These totals include super-delegates who have already said who they're voting for. Hillary's currently leading in Iowa, although that could change. But she holds double-digit leads, even sometimes up to 50%- support in super-Tuesday states. Obama may have won the battle, but he's going to lose the war.

If Obama doesn't win the nomination, there still has been some change. Iowa voters put an African-American on top for the first time. Since I don't live there in Iowa, I can only presume that the "race" factor had little to do with it. The next challege is New Hampshire; can either Edwards or Clinton break the mommentum that Obama seems to have started? I can't tell yet.

Hillary is rising to the top in the race for vice-president.

The Politics of Hope will prevail…..

As in " Throw those bums out ".

Congratulations to Sen. Obama.

You are "on track" for a new job.

Now you hopefully get to clean-up the Bush/Cheney mess.

Some job.

Well, it seems people are coming around to a little more honesty this morning. A large number of democrats are concerned about the electability of Barack Obama due to his race. I think this is a valid concern. It's obvious to me that racism still permeates our society. and I'm sure that the vast majority of blacks agree with me on that. Pre-caucus polls show that older Americans vastly voted someone other than Barack Obama; these are the people who usually turn out by a large margin. But there's hope; the younger generation wanted change and seemed not to care about the color of anyone's skin.

I do no think Barack Obama can win a general election yet. The democratic party is setting itself up to fail if it nominates him. Give it another decade. Nominating John Edwards or Hillary Clinton would be a much better choice at this time. Sometimes the truth sucks, and it doesn't feel right, but it's still the truth. WE must keep our eyes on the prize. We need a democratic president in '08.

Huckabee wins? Boy the GOP shows again that it is ran by the unholy alliance of capital and religion. We know their agenda well…war, wealth accumulation, environmental neglect, racism, lies, facism, anti-constitutionalism, wedge politics…in short all that is not America and it founding principles. America can and should do better. Vote Democrat, vote Edwards!!

Obama has proven that he is electable. He certainly has more appeal across all categories than Clinton. It is time that we stop trying to appeal to a sub population and have a President that serves all of the people. Republicans, Democrats and Independents have common desires and values. Why must we continue to attack people based upon the differences. When I see Obama - I don't see the color of his skin, I see a man with integrity. A man I would be proud to be our President. I haven't felt that way in a long time.

Folks, let's all step back, take a deep breath and put this in perspective. This is a caucus not a primary, the results are meaningless in so far as delegates are concerned and what real voters will actually do. Iowa has never been a litmus test of what the electorate wants. It gives momentum for sure, but the media has already santified Obama so he's already getting all of the positive media spin he needs. The media is playing us to keep this interesting. The relentless Hillary bashing is as dreadful as the sanctification of Obama (let's get real he's as slick a politician as the rest of the them. You don't do well in Chicago politics by being a breath of fresh air and innocence). If he becomes the Democratic nominee (and that's a big if) the scrutiny wiill begin in earnest and the results of this this straw poll will become meaningless.

From reading these comments it seems to me that the first priority of the Clinton camp is to stop a Republican from taking the Presidency again (and of course crowning Her Ladyship), whereas Obama supporters are looking for a new direction for America.

Given the vast numbers of Independent voters out there, the partisan strategy of "Hillary being the only candidate able to beat the Republicans" can only work so far. We are talking about the role of Commander in Chief after all. And the fear tactic of a vote for Obama being a vote for eight more years of Republicans is no different from the 9/11 scare tactics some Democrats have accused a number of Republicans of employing.

Clearly Obama talks of the future and can reach across party lines and races. There are several comments here from Republicans saying they could or would vote for Obama. They can't all be Karl Rove spinning a Machiavellian web of misinformation and deceit. Hillary on the other hand prioritises her sex, is highly partisan, and is focussed on the past - even having that throwback from the nineties Madeline Albright displayed prominently on the stage.

Given the demographics, Obama has scored a massive win in Iowa. It could be as soon as next Tuesday night that we know the name of the next President of the United States if the momentum carries him to a win in New Hampshire.

I find it funny that most of the anti-Obama opinions here contain either a ridiculously ignorant comment or a misspelling, and many of them then try to sound "intelligent" when they comment on how "intelligent" Hillary is. Let me ask all the Clinton supporters something: Tell me where she'd be and what she'd be doing right now if she wasn't the wife of Bill Clinton? I prefer to vote for the person that inspires me, not by their words, although Obama is a wonderful speaker and motivator, but inspires me by their choices, hard work, and obstacles overcome in their life. Why don't all of you pro-Hillary, anti-Obama folks do some research on Obama's life path to the White House versus Hillary's. One had it handed to them, one earned it.

I don't understand your note. What do you mean by moderation.

I foress the Democrats becoming more fractious with every primary. The process of negative campaigning will accelerate as Obama and Edwards continue to impugn Hillary's inconsistencies and perceived no electability. The way I see it, the party should beckon Al Gore to come forward and lead the party. The reality is that none of the 3 contenders, given the dissonance in the ranks, can beat the Republican candidate (Romney, Giulani or McCain), while Gore can win in a cake walk.

What makes you think Obama has no chance to win against the Republican? He doesn't win every heart, but he has a very broad appeal, and Iowa demonstrated it. When I see him, I don't even see him black, I see him as a decent person. I wish the media would stop refer him as black because it will perpetuate the race issue. I mean, I don't think about it until the media mention it. As far as I see, the majority of 'whites' have gotten over the 'race' issue, as demonstrated in Iowa. Will 'blacks' follow suite remains to be see - as I understand, South Carolina is predominantly 'black'.

Just as people say he cannot win Clinton - he demonstrated it in Iowa.
Just as people say he cannot win white votes - he demonstrated it in Iowa.

They didn't vote for a 'black' candidate. They vote for the person they believe can best bring the country together, because that's his message - end the divisivenes.

Of course, Iowa is just one state, and he has to demonstrate it in the remaining states.

Hey "Daphne from Europe", you, as a European ,should be pleased that FDR was not like any of the current Democrat candidates. Once the US entered the war, FDR was determined to liberate Europe. I am not so sure the current crop of candidates would be such a leader. Perhaps if you were "Daphne from Iraq" your opinion in US affairs would matter more….then, would you be so critical of Bush for deposing Saddam? I wonder.

From what I recall, Hillary's only experience in the white house was standing aside as the angry wife of her philandering husband- what policy decisions was she making?

I like to think of the Iowa vote as being 2/3s voted AGAINST Hillary. It's not a name recognition thing for Hillary, everyone knows her. Perhaps that's her problem.

Ron Paul served in the military as did John McCain.

None of the Dem front runners have. Being a rookie Senator doesn't cut it. Being a former first housewife doesn't cut it. Being an ambulance chaser certainly doesn't cut it.

While it's not a "criteria" on paper for a candidate to have prior military service don't think for a second that it doesn't matter to a lot of military veterans that vote. Don't believe me? Go research which candidate has the biggest support of the military.

I am surprised that people dont see Barack Obama for the phony that he is . Why anybody want to vote for him is beyond me. Go Hillary because you are our only hope of taking back the white house.Listen up you Democrats,the press is greatly biased against the Clintons and will do anything to derail Hillary.Please annoy the press by supporting Hillary.The press are like vultures circling especially that big mouth Chris Mathews always foaming in the mouth about Hillary.Obama cannot win in november and we Democrats will be shooting ourselves in the foot if we nominate him.I know that he looks good and sound good but believe me, there is nothing there.

For those who think AMERICANS cannot vote across race, gender and party lines, wake up and smell the coffee…

Okay Okay, his speech is emotional and filled with energy, but just how is he going to magically unite us?

And who's asking to be united anyway? I'm not. I want an immediate end to the wars, no more policing the world, get the troops out of Germany and Japan and elsewhere, Universal Healthcare, no more secret torture prisons, invalidate the Patriot Act, put very easy to understand limitations on when you can have an abortion, let gays at least have civil unions, completely get rid of the Dept. of Homeland Security.

As you can see, I'm left on some things, more right on others, libertarian on others. I don't want some phoney idea of being united.

Beware of all this "United" "Change" "Hope" talk; what they really mean is, "Unite you behind MY idea, Change you to MY way of thinking, Hope you agree with ME".

Obama's a really great public speaker. That's it. He doesn't ever give any reasons as to how he'll unite people who are on complete opposite sides of the major issues of the day.

im a rep and i would vote for edwards no way would i vote for obama

Huckabee is an opportunist. He smelled the evangelicals coming out to caucus in Iowa and he won solely on the basis of his title as a Baptist minister. New Hampshire will be different.

Fellow Obama backers, don't worry about the anti-Obama bitter loser posters on here. Just bask in the glow and laugh at them. They got served last night. SCOREBOARD! HAHAHAHAHA

Obama '08!

Ok, well Iowa has spoken. For thoses of you who did not watch last night, Obama won by a landslide, in a white state that usually votes red, so don't tell me America is not ready. Did any of you listen to his victory speech….WOW…I haven't heard a speech like that in a long time. I am white and I am for Obama.

OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Military records? Is anyone asking about Hillary's military service? John Edwards' military service? How about Mitt Romney's military service? Nope - doesn't seem that military service is a criteria for being a President.

Oh come on, you yankees!

Hillary is the best candidate. She deserves to win. Give the world a good president. After eight years with Bush we deserve it.

GO HILLARY! GO!

Edwards needs to reel in his wife. Anyone else noticed how she grabbed the microphone and took over? Everyone else's spouse stood by their partner, but she wants to be co-President. She is a liability to him. In America (up to this point) we have elected a President - not a couple to the job.

As a conservertive here in CT, regishtered Indipendent, & I like Mitt. I am & will Vote for Obama in November. Now is the time for change, that & I believe a better Canidate will come along in 2012, if he does not liveup to expectations

Wow. I can't believe some of the post I'm reading here!!!! Bill Schnieder? Liberal? Holy cow!!! Framing the election in Black VS white ? I was at the caucus. The Obama people where loyal and not to be swayed. I saw one black person in thier group so you can throw that red herring out the window.
As for the media frenzy that Hillary's third place finish is somehow a disaster, Edwards had his minnions assembled that he used 4 years ago so no biggie there and Super Tuesday is a whole different breed of cat. It requires people only to stop by and vote sometime in the day. It isn't 3 or 4 hours out of thier lives on a cold Thursday night.
In conclusion i would say we have an excellent group of candidates any one of whom would make a fine president and if you didn't get to meet them and talk face to face it is because you didn't take the time to do so. Let the media have thier fun. The people of Iowa take this business seriously and money and media spin is not the determining factor in the choices they make.

It seems that people here are still clinging to the notion that Obama cannot win the election because he is black; too many white people would never vote for a black man.
This is very strange thing to say, considering that a black man just won an election in one of the whitest states in the country.
Apparently all of us honkeys outside of the corn belt are a bunch of closet racists. If that is what you really think, a few questions for you:
1a) Are you white and registered to vote?
1b) If so, would you never vote for a black candidate for President, regardless of his policies, just because he is black?
2a) Do you know any other whites who are registered to vote?
2b) Will any of them, as best as you know, never vote for a black man for President, regardless of their policies, just because he is black?
2c) And of these racist voters whom you apparently know, is there really much of a chance that any of them would be voting for any of the Democrats in the first place?
Get a grip people. We still have some work to do in race relations, but it really ain't that bad.

The smell of change is in the air. Even from being stationed here in Iraq. I continue to serve proudly, but alot of us over here are like many people back home, we need a breath of fresh air. Take a step back, a deep breath and enjoy history. It's high time we stopped waiting for CNN and FOX to guide us, and listened for ourselves.

I will go with experience, MY CHOICE IS CLINTON!

You are incorrect Margert from California! Look at the 1992 - 2004 election and the signifcant turnout of the 18 -24 year olds.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/2004-11-08-under30_x.htm

That's just an opinion not a fact. Wrong facts you claim like many others have us stuck in Iraq for a third time when we should be hunting Bin Laden.
Voters, we beg you to, "wake up and smell the coffee"

Margaret January 3, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Margaret
California

Margaret..is that you?? Ummm….the 18 to 24 year olds beat the pants off HIllary tonight……Catch the wave….you haven't seen anything yet!!!

GoBama Go!!

Lourdes January 3, 2008 10:01 pm ET

Democrats are doomed. They are framing Obama's victory in a black/white paradigm that has, in the past, only served to evoke ethnic loyalty

This comment is the HEIGHT of ignorance!!! Lourdes….Obama has NEVER made his race, or the race of anyone else for that matter, an issue!! I encourage you to STAY HOME when we elect the next president of the United States….

GOBama Go!!!

Thanks Kylie…this comment of yours is very mature:

"We have to stop going to that stupid tiny little, predominantly white state…full of Evangelical Christians that hate Evolutions. "

This resident of that "stupid tiny little predominantly white state" is appalled that someone would write such a comment on what is supposed to be an intelligent political message board.

I'm proud of the Iowans who came out in record numbers…and everyone has their own right to caucus for who they believe in…because, in the words of John Mellencamp "Aint That America?"

Represent your own state…and support your candidate. Quit putting us down here in Iowa because we are first. We all have a right to vote and a right to support who we believe in…do so and respect the opinions of others as well.

If you'll excuse me I better go now…I have to make sure this MidWest wind hasn't blown over the Edwards sign in my yard….and while I'm at it this middle-classed corn fed Iowa Catholic girl that doesn't hate Evolutions as you stated has to thank the farmer next door for the food on the table and the ethanol in the gas tank. Maybe you should too.
Good Job Tonight Iowa!

The Bush/Clinton era is finally over. I'm ready for a new direction.

I just want to ask - all these people who say that Barak Obama is not electable because he is black - are all these people white themselves? And if they are, are they projecting their own racism on to "others"? I am originally from India and do not consider myself white and it never occured to me that Obama was unelectable due to his skin color. Why did hundreds of white people vote for Obama today? And if these white people from Iowa can support a black candidate over an Edwards, why can't other Americans do the same?

Also, do Hillary supporters really think that people who would not vote democrat if Obama was a candidate would otherwise do so if Hillary was a candidate? Essentially, racists would become democrat voters with Hillary as a candidate? How ludicrous an assertion is that? If electability is defined by race and gender, Edwards is the legit choice. Not Hillary!

Debra;
the reason CNN discussed how Bill felt (while not being concerned with any of the other candidates' spouses) may be linked to the fact that he used to be the President of the US - and also "lost" Iowa back then in '91. None of the other spouses have that experience. Why is it that some people always have to see sexism or racism or whatever-ism behind everything??

I am french and very interested in american politics.
Obama's victory is defenitely a boost in his campain but the race is still open
and there is still a lot do.
a lot of people say "I like him", "I am not racist but america won't vote for a black candidate"
Well…what about yourself?
If all the people who say that would vote for him , wouldn't he have move chances?

Race should NOT be a factor and if you think I am right, well…forget about race and focus on your candidate program

And remember: America can be a really surprising country so we never know,
"Never Say Never"

I'm a Hillary supporter, and I don't think that the Iowa loss is important. It was barely a loss anyway. The bigger deal here is the record turnout of new people, that Obama seems to mostly be responsible for (I believe the stats showed staggering numbers of young newbies for Obama.) I have to say, he has me rethinking things. I thought that he was unelectable (I regret) because he's black. But if he can win in white Iowa, and at the same time bring a huge wave of new voters with him, I now think he will be formidable. If he overtakes Hillary, I sure hope he stays with it. We need a democrat. Please democrats, rally behind the candidate, whoever it is.

guys, ultimately, whoever comes as your president, will be a dumb guy, not knowing the foreign affairs, creating a mess in countries like IRaq, afghanistan, Terroristan (Pakistan) etc,
instead you should have two differents guys, a president and a prime minister, one to look after internal politics and the other foreign relations,

WOW and GOOD JOB to the CNN CREW

Thompson & McCain are tied
273 votes different = 0.89% of their diff
= 0.23% of total votes

CNN & analysts call this a tie

Edwards & Clinton - Clinton looses and is definitely THIRD place
7 votes different = 1% of their diff
= 0.28% of total votes

CNN & ALL analysts call this third place

I think these are equal differences so is there a bit of "help" from your media in steering the election I dare CNN to explain their "interpretation" publicly

I am going over to Hillary Clinton's web site to donate some more money to her campaign. I have never given money to a political candidate before, but this will make the third or fourth time I have contributed to Ms. Clinton. I think she is the most viable candidate of the three top finishers tonight to help the Dems win the White House.

Yes, we do need CHANGE and I think this smart, tough, politically savvy woman is the person who can bring that about. She keeps her composure under attack and is a tough negotiator, all the while with a smile on her face and a machete in her skirts! She will get the U S economy back on track, and restore respect for the U S abroad. She is pro-environment. She will work to end this war and bring our troops home. She will work to bring solidarity to the Dems and the GOP and get people working together to make life better for all of us. Her domestic agenda to improve education, provide universal health care, protect /respect the rights of all are just a few of the social issues for which Ms. Clinton has earned my respect.

We are fortunate to have so many great candidates running for the Democratic nomination. I was saddened to see that Biden and Dodd were leaving the race because I think they have many fine qualities and have given much to the American people in their service in the Senate. (and Dodd in the House '75-'81). We need them in the Senate with both of them having vast experience and a long history in these important jobs. With Dodd's experience and expertise as Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and Biden's as Chairman of the Foreign Relations they have both contributed immeasurably to make life better for all of us.

I like John Edwards and really wish he had gotten the nomination in 2004. I think he was the best Democratic candidate then and could have gotten Bush out of the White House. I hope he will eventually join the Clinton campaign and run as her VP. What a great ticket that would be. The only thing better would be Gore, but he has said he is not interested in the #2 job again. There have been lots of comments on this board tonight both positive and negative. I respect others rights to state their opinion and hope when all the campaigning is done the best woman wins! GO HILLARY GO! In the White House we need a gentle woman, speaking softly (negotiating) laughing deeply(charming), standing firm, forging alliances, and showing the rest of the world there is once again an articulate, intelligent and tough leader in charge of the free world!

i am ready for another four years fo repuplican admin. because i remember "a saying if you want to get something nice you have to give up something nice" i want try for obama and i am ready for another four years fo repuplican adminstration.

and that's how much i love obama. thanks for opra winfrey.

Change is coming this country!!!!!

OBAMA 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hillary stick to your guns for change and do not let Iowa discourage you.

Iowa is not the perfect state to set the precedence as to who will become the next Pressdent. Remember it is a state that does not represent the rest of the US with regards to race, economics and ethniticy. So despite the press and hype …. prove them wrong go on to win where it matters in the USA.

Bill lost Iowa in 1996 and proved that Iowa does not dictate or set the tone as to who will be the next President and George Bush Senior lost to Bill Clinton.

OBAMA, has a bright future and i careles about his color. i'm optimism not pesimism. i love this country, the color of the people

I think the speechs said it all. Obama and Edwards talked about the people and thanked their spouses. Hillary was ME ME ME, my name is Clinton.

Why do people keep saying that Hillary is the only Democrat that can win? Have you SEEN the polls that show Obama could win the election with far more support than Hillary?

Hillary and all the Republicans will be the same vote as 2000 and 2004. Red vs Blue, most of the country doing the same old vote. There will be 3-4 states that make the difference, and the winner will likely have no mandate or >50% of the popular vote.

With Obama we might actually get a President that wins a support from both parties and independents. Hillary is the Democrats going for the safe bet, did we not learn from the last election safe and stoic does not inspire?

The Republicans inspire with fear and religion… if the Democrats only answer is, we aren't them… they will lost. Obama and Edwards at least inspire and bring something new to the table.

I am disgusted - not with Iowa, or the caucus, or the results. You want to know why the Dem party can't win? Go back and reread the comments. It's not about having different idiologies or political philosophies; that's to be expected. What's appaling is the natural instinct to take any opportunity to rip someone else apart when you "win". And we wonder why pro athletes get more attention than any of our domestic issues like economy, healthcare, or education? We deserve everything we get. Judging from this conversation, it won't be much in 2008. The election will be over, we'll be yelling at each other, and other countries will still be shaking their heads wondering when the spoiled brat in the house on the corner of Park Place and Boardwalk is going to grow up!

I am thrilled that Obama won tonight, especially in Iowa.

What a wonderful opportunity for him to move forward to share his message of change (and, yes, "Senator Clinton" didn't use that message until she was falling behind the senator from Illinois).

I can't think of anyone better than Senator Obama to move our country forward. He is a good man. . .an honest man. . .an experienced leader. . .and one who will listen to his constiuents while in the White House. Moreover, he will show the rest of the world that our country is truly "democratic" and we have moved full circle.

Congratulations to the Iowa team led by Obama state director Paul Tewes who made this terrific victory a possibility.

On to New Hampshire and the rest of our country. Vote OBAMA!!!

I think the press influenced this race–and as a result two candidates are withdrawing after only one small state has "voted." Because only the pretty, or the flashy, or those who give good sound bites get coverage, Bill Richardson, who, by the way, has been nominated for a NOBEL PEACE PRIZE multiple times, only got two percent of the vote, and Chris Dodd and Joe Biden got even less. I watched the news last night, and you wouldn't know there were any other candidates beside Clinton, Obama and Edwards. Why don't we demand more from our news? This is not a sprint. Look what a warm fuzzy feeling got our country seven years ago. This is too important to decide so quickly, or to let the press shape the race.

I'm glad Obama won so that the rest of the nation will begin to understand His connection to the CORRUPTION that is Illinois politics. The ;bloom' will fade quickly as Obamas' past is exposed in the upcoming Rezko Fed. trial…lay with dogs…… Remember, Jesse received MILLIONS of votes nationwide when He ran for President, but even the Blacks in Illinois Knew what a fraud He was and refused to offer the "symbolic"support . Obama is an empty suit propped up by the corrupt Illinois Democrats; they pushed Him into the U.S.Senate so that He would'nt run for mayor against Daley. Illinois Dems.(Daley) could care less who their "junior" Senator is.Come on CNN, take a close look at the junior Senator from Illinois….He does'nt talk to the Chicago/Illinois reporters anymore.

Other than in 1992, when Iowan Tom Harkin won a gimme that nobody even contested, nobody in EITHER PARTY has won the nomination without winning Iowa since 1988.

I am a moderate republican and Obama would have a 50% shot at my vote. I would as soon eat my own arm than let it cast a Clinton vote. Thinking HRC is your only hope is the type of thinking that served the you sooo well in the last two elections. You are going to need some [maybe a lot] of us republicans if you want to win this thing. Ignore that at your peril.

*** The whole Iowa thing is so overrated! When was the last time a first place winner in Iowa went on to win the presidency? ****

HAHAHA. Try last election. George W Bush. And the one before that, George W Bush. And the one before that, Bill Clinton. Oh, and the nominees for the party that lost the general election (Kerry, Gore, Dole) also won in Iowa.

OBAMA IS THE MOST ELECTABLE:

Enough with this "America is a bunch of racists" nonsense. What happened tonight should show you how wrong you are. Have you looked at any polls in the past 6 months? Head to head general election polls consistently show Obama beating every Republican. Hillary scores much weaker and wouldn't even beat Guliani.

Yeah there's a lot of racists in this country. So what? You think any of them are Demorcrats? The Dems don't have the racist vote anymore. This isn't the 1960s. Those votes are going to Republicans no matter who the Democratic candidate is. Or they'll just stay home (fine by me). However, the fringe right will come out in droves to vote against Hillary, who they hate with extreme passion. Nobody "hates" Obama except Hillary supporters.

————————————————————————————————————

HALLELUJAH! and AMEN!

*** Clinton won 49 percent of those voters, while Richards came in second with 20 percent ***

FYI there is no candidate in the race named "Richards." Perhaps you were thinking of Bill Richardson?

Stephanie, Blackwelder, and all of you grumbling, kvetching supporters of the cackling shrew… In 2004, Kerry won Iowa and became the nominee (not Dean, dear… Iowa destroyed Dean's campaign in very much the same way it will destroy Clinton's). In 2000, George Bush won Iowa and with it the nomination. In 1996, Bob Dole won Iowa and became the nominee. In 1984, Walter Mondale won in Iowa and… became the nominee. In both 1976 and 1980, Jimmy Carter won in Iowa and… became the nominee. Check the facts and put an end to the spin. Hillary Clinton got a spanking today in Iowa, will get a more severe spanking in New Hampshire, where Barack is already leading. She will be forced to bow out when Barack lands the decisive blow in Nevada and then South Carolina. This race is about hope, not fear; it's about the future, not the past; it's about coming together, coalescing around an agent of change, not rooting for more of the polarization we've been seeing for as long as anyone can remember; it's about taking a risk, sacrificing, trusting, not playing it safe; it's about being bold, not timid. We–with the help of Barack Obama–will have a landslide win over the Republicans in 2008. And the American people will be the only winners in that fight–a fight for unity, for solidarity, for hope, for the future, for our children, for the men and women in Iraq, for the elderly who are having to choose between medicine and the rent, for the unemployed, for the disenfranchised, for the hopeless, for the underdogs. It's time to show the world why it is that America is known in every corner of the universe as the land of hope and opportunity.

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/2008elections/tp/iowa_caucuses.htm

From the comments I have read I've concluded that:
1) Hillary Dems will not vote for Obama because he is black; however, many Republicans will switch to Obama if he is nominated (I'm one of them). I'm a white conservative and I think that it is time to get over the race issues and unite the country. So much about Republicans being racist and Democrats being tolerant.
2) Two of you have stated the vast difference in votes Obama 940 and Huckabee over 35,000. That is because Republicans count votes, Democrats count DELEGATES. No wonder you lost Florida in 04 (Concerned Citizen in Jacksonville FL).
3) Hillary will not be an efficient leader if elected, Republicans dislike and distrust her (I'm one of them). The ground troops do not like her or trust her (again I'm one of them).
4) Her experience is overstated. What experience she had in the White House? She can't remember anything while being deposed including documents with her fingerprints on them. Honesty???? she has none. Charm?? She has none.
5) GO GO, Republicans and Democrats care about the environment, they have different ways of thinking of ways to fix it. Obama however was the only one that spoke about doing something about it during tonights speech.

An Obama/Edwards, Edwards/Obama ticket would be unbeatable.

The people who are cheering over Obama's victory in Iowa are the republicans.I listen all the right wing nuts radio show and they keep saying how Obama is such a great guy,he used drugs when he was younger who cares,his muslim background is such a great asset and as soon as he becomes the nominee the republican smear machine will go after him in full motion.I bet they'll find someone who bought drug from Obama, they'll find a cousin from his father side who is muslim that a have a connection with the terrorists and so and so.Don't forget that the republicans were thrilled when Kerry won the nomination.They were good enough to portray a war hero like Kerry(who volunteer to go to Vietnam) as a military hater.They can't smear Hillary, everything 's been thrown at her, no surprises.It's time for the democrats to wake up and to vote with their minds and not with their hearts, republicans do it better that's why they won 7 out of 10 times.What a great night for Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

Hillary needs to go back to basics. "The economy, stupid." She needs to remind voters of the prosperity from 1993-2000 and promise more of the same. Forget "experience," people care about jobs.

I support Hillary because I supported Bill. However, she needs to lose "the insider" rhetoric and pick up on Bill's themes of hope and change. I want to see the economy turned around. I want to see the mess in Iraq cleaned up. I want the country to have adequate health care. These are issues that affect people's lives. "Experience" is too nebulous. Hillary also needs to use Chelsea to get young people on her side.

The Clintons are facing an uphill battle. A lot of people aren't voting for Obama, they are voting against Hillary. Her poweful enemies, like the Daleys in Chicago, are working overtime to see her fail. However, Hillary can win, but she needs to revamp her strategy and do it quickly.

Hillary, Obama, Edwards would all be great candidates. I would vote for any of them. I prefer Hillary, though. I think the best ticket for democrats is Hillary with Obama as VP. I don't understand the hatred for Hillary. She is very intelligent. I guess a lot of haters have problems with really intelligent women, especially the men haters. Others hate her just because her name is Clinton. Very few haters I have encountered say they dislike her because of her stands on the issues. Therefore, I have to conclude they hate her because she is an intelligent woman and a Clinton and they hate Bill. No rationale for the hatred. If they say it is because of the issues, then they should hate Obama and Edwards (they all have similar stands).

I expect Hillary Clinton to bounce back and win the Democratic nomination. Experience means a lot to me, and she would also be a change from the disaster of the past eight years, so she is the best of both worlds, and not one or the other.

Opponents continually say that it's been either a Bush or a Clinton in the White House since 1988 and it's time to change that, but the Clinton administration was considered by most to be successful, and Bill Clinton left office with the highest recorded approval rating, so what's wrong with having another Clinton? On the other hand though, Bush senior was a failed one-term president, and his son has been even worse, so no more Bush's ever again!!!

One thing is certain from the Iowa caucuses and that is the Democrats will win the election this year, regardless of who wins the nomination. Iowa was a state that went to Bush in 2004, but only 114,000 Republicans bothered voting, while 220,000 Democrats voted. That says a lot! Obama, Clinton, and Edwards all received more votes than Huckabee in a Republican state, and that is great news for the Democratic Party!

To all those who think Obama is shallow or inexperienced, perhaps reading either (or both!) of his books — Audacity of Hope or Dreams of My Father — might help clarify his background. He is an expert in the Constitution and the history of Constitutional law. He worked for many years at the grassroots level organizing for the poor and disenfranchised. He has traveled widely and has a global perspective. These are positive traits for any American president, and stand in sharp relief to the small-mindedness and mean-spiritedness of the one who currently sits in the White House.

Obama is smart and can heal our wounds.

Hillary likes to tout her experience as being one of the main (if not the single main) factor that makes her the best candidate for the job.

As a young person, though (I'm 22, just earned my B.A.), I have to say that in my eyes "experience" is not all it's cracked up to be. In fact, I honestly believe that many of the most experienced politicians in Washington are also most problematic. They tend to be stuck in their ways, unwilling to think outside the box, slaves to lobbyists and other such influences, addicted to power/money, and decidedly unimaginative, optimistic, energetic, or passionate about their work.

So this election, I'm not voting for experience - I'm voting for the candidate who will bring something new to the table, something that can hopefully change politics in this nation for the better. We've seen two full decades of Bush/Clinton in the White House (it's unbelievable when you consider that the last president without one of those names was Reagan), and I honestly don't think that more of the same will be good for this country. Barack Obama has my vote, along with those of the vast majority of my friends and classmates; to all those who say that young people like to make a lot of noise but never actually show up when the votes are counted, this year will hopefully be the one where that unfortunate tendency changes.

And as far as electability goes - how could people even think Clinton is more electable than Obama. How many republicans do you think would even consider voting for Clinton? She will galvanize the right like none other… Obama's race is much less a factor than Clinton's reputation among conservatives (and even many independents). She can't win with the democratic vote alone.

Its good to see that Obama has won the caucus. I HOPE he goes on to win the nomination and the election. The problem with Hillary is that she's not genuine (or if she is,she doesnt make an effort to show it to the world…she's not bill thats for sure). I beleive race will not matter. Obama is not fully black he's half white. He doesnt fit intp the homie stereotype. Most importantly he has not run because he is BLACK but on his issues and vision and thats what makes him stand apart from jesse , who i have no respect for, as he's not genuinely concerened about blacks but just an oppotunist.

"Obama will never win a "Red" state as a "Black" candidate."
Yeah, because Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, and the rest of the Old South don't have HUGE Black populations that would love to see a progressive black president elected–or are you and your Klan buddies planning to assemble your own voting squad to make sure certain people stay home this November?

It was a great night to be a Democrat regardless of who you support. We nearly doubled our turn-out from 2004 and with luck (hey who knows, right?) MAYBE most of those folks will actually turn out for the general election in November.

I am definitely an Edwards supporter, but Obama's speech was moving, well delivered and I have to say, presidential. I want to see more substance from him if he does become our candidate because the Republicans are ruthless and we all know that.

Iowa is a small taste of this country and perhaps not a great cross-section of our world, but how wonderful to see an African American win a 93% white state; how wonderful to see our democracy in action, people talking about politics, stating their cases, and being heard.

After the theft of the last two elections, and the absolute shame and arrogance our this administration, I am heartened to see people going out to vote and make a difference. It gives me hope to know that we still believe in this process after eight years of outright criminals running our government.

The race tonight left a smile on my face
Win: Obama
Place: Edwards
Show: Clinton.

I'll vote the party line for either of the top two. Hopefully after Clinton loses in New Hampshire she will drop out and it will be a great election. Either Obama or Edwards will easily beat anyone the Republicans put up.

Clinton or Edwards will win the nomination - Obama is too young, too inexperienced and too shallow. HOWEVER, any one of these candidates - even most of the republican candidates - will be a tremendous improvement over our current 'leader/clown'. There is light at the end of the tunnel.

ATTN: concerned citizen

Obama 926 votes and Huckabee 35,342 votes.

Those are not votes. Obama has 926 delegates. Huckabee has 35,342 votes.
The republicans caucus differently than the democrats in Iowa.

Not sure how Huckabee's votes translates into delegates. But the numbers aren't the same thing between them.

Demakooks, please walk torwards the light. You guys are spinning this all wrong. Iowa did not really vote for Obama and Edwards. They voted against Billary, socialism, and foolishness. Edwards hinted to this in his speech… The same will happen through February.

Obama or the trial lawyer will win the nomination. In November, the GOP will win 40-43 states.

A strong second place finish for John Edwards is all he needed. He ranks higher than Obama or Hillary against all republican candidates. With Dodd and Biden out of the race he stands to pick up their supporters. Obama has charisma. Edwards has a to do list; and issues will carry the rest of the primaries.

Congratulations to Sen. Obama. I believe that Sen. Clinton showed the most class in her speech, Sen. Obama the contest is not over, this is a long race and Sen. Clinton will give it her best. in the end we will have a nominee, hopefully one that can get to the white house and perhaps get us back in the right direction.

GO HILLARY GO!

OBAMA FOR AMERICA,…CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN

To all those who use "racist fear mongoring", OBAMA being Black is a NON-ISSUE. He is Biracial White Mother, Black Father with a very great Blood Line. He is the right person to lead America at the right time. Whatever your Politics or belief do not believe he can't win the South because he is black. He will, I do believe in the inherent good nature of every soul to see the light. There are many here who are trying to spread fear by being dishonest, however the greater majority of American's will vote for CHANGE whether it is OBAMA, HILLARY OR EDWARDS, the fact remain unchangeable that the DEMOCRATIC PARTY, THE REPUBLICAN VOTERS who will cross party to vote democratic for OBAMA or even Hillary will ensure a 48 STATE Sweep for the Dems in November.

People, change is in the AIR…It is incredible and it is EXTRAORDINARY…

"FROM POSSIBILITY TO REALIZATION, PRESIDENT OBAMA 2008!

AMERICA IS AN INCREDIBLE PLACE, OBAMA-CLINTON 2008!

I'm a Romney fan and hope he makes the nomination. But if Huck goes up against Obama, I'll vote Dem for the first time EVER! Romney and Obama are Uniters, they will be able to reach across party lines. Huck cannot and neither can Hillary or Edwards.

Our USA deserves to become truly Re-United. That seems to be Obama's message of change, verse one.
Our USA deserves an experienced extremely talented hard working man of Integrity like Mitt who has also reached across party lines and wants to help our country prosper as it should.

Clinton = Division continued: too much hate toward you, like toward Bush.
Edwards = Stay home and love your family this time around. Sorry but it's true.

A night full of surprises!!!! The Dems have such "risky" candidates, I would love to see America truly support either a woman or a Black man….although I like the Edwards values :)….But can the Dems actually win with this selection?

jlconsultants
http://www.joannaleigh.com

I kind of like the results, makes me feel encouraged that our votes count, not money.

But I think Iowa does not hold any importance compared to Florida. Giuliani is extremely popular there, and in fact I saw "google Ron Paul" signs everywhere. I think we're going to see VERY different results in different states.

Colin: Have you considered the Green Party?

Go Greens!

Wanna know why Republicans like Obama and why Obama could very well win this thing? Listen to these candidates talk! Edwards talks about everything that is wrong with America. Hillary talks about everything that is wrong with her fellow Americans (those she disagrees with, i.e. Republicans). Obama talks about everything that is right with America, about how he wants to bring together those whom he disagrees with, and a vision of this country as great. As someone from the Republican side of the aisle I'm dumbstruck to see a candidate whose positions are ranked to the left of Clinton's speak in front of a crowd chanting "USA, USA!" Maybe some of you Democrats, particularly the ones who love bashing Republicans, don't realize this but we see a lot of problems with you folks as well. One of the biggest ones is that your annointed demagogues like Clinton and Michael Moore and Jane Fonda all seem to hate this country. When we see a Democrat who's not afraid to display some patriotism for a change it restores a lot of our faith in your party's commitment to this country. You folks have as much of an obligation to be good countrymen to us as we have to be so to you, and Obama is really the one who seems to do that. While Edwards is busy playing class hatred and Clinton likes to stoke the red-blue divide Obama is up there saying America is a special thing that's really about all of us. That's a compelling message, and it shows that he "gets it." Hillary Clinton doesn't "get it." John Edwards doesn't "get it." Both of them are looking to be your president, not mine. Obama wants to be our president. That's the sort of thing that's going to win in November, because 2000 and 2004 showed that when you divide this country Republicans will beat you in the ground game.

Mike huckabee does not come acr