January 3, 2008
Posted: 10:01 PM ET
Independent voters overwhelmingly support Barack Obama.

Independent voters overwhelmingly support Barack Obama.

Schneider: Independents overwhelmingly support Obama

In a result bodes well for Barack Obama heading into New Hampshire, the Illinois Democrat overwhelmingly won among Independent voters — 40 percent of those voters chose Obama, compared to 25 percent for John Edwards and 14 percent for Hillary Clinton.

Why is this good news for Obama? Only 20 percent those who attended the Democratic caucuses said they were Independents. But a significantly higher percentage of self-indentified Independents are expected to vote in New Hampshire’s Democratic primary next week.

– CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Barack Obama • Independents


Dan Birch, New Hampshire   January 4th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Folks, what record does Obama have to back up this big talk about "change?" He gave a good speech at the Democratic convention in 2004, then became the US senator by default and is now wanting to become the president? He is a good orator and is charismatic but that doesn't qualify him to become the president. Wake up, folks.

We need to save this country from falling into the hands of Obama.

Ray, grand rapids,mi.   January 4th, 2008 3:27 am ET

I never thought in my lifetime i would ever see what i saw tonite, but to my surprise, i found a candidate that moved me!!! I think if he(OBAMA) makes it to office, he has the charisma and the drive so we can finally have bi-partisan agreement to get @#$% done!!!! We need a president that finally walks the walk without the smoke. The train has left the station for Obama and the tracks flow downhill. I think I'll buy a ticket, and get on when he comes to Michigan. I think all democratic Americans should do the same if you TRULY want change!!

Chris   January 4th, 2008 2:36 am ET

Oscar,

So what if I haven't heard of Obama before recent memory? I didn't know who Kerry really was unitl he got the nomination either; I had no idea whatsoever who BILL CLINTON was until he campaigned for the nomination. At least I knew who Obama was before he was even a U.S. Senator.

And the reasons you stated (Hope and change) are the reasons he's got support. Yes we have heard his message before, but this is the first time many believe it is more than a politician using power words to win your vote. No one's buying anything, it's being given away for free.
'
You see, the great thing about this country is it's a Democracy. So for the love of God, let people believe again in this country and this process again.

kam   January 4th, 2008 2:32 am ET

who will be the democratic candidate? My opinion is you really can't tell after the Iowa caucus because the LOW turnout of voters for the democratic party compared to the republican party. My pick is still Barack Obama for Democrats and Ron Paul for Republicans. Its gonna get exciting.

barackoblogger   January 4th, 2008 2:09 am ET

It's time for Hillary and her generation to pass the torch.

The younger generation doesn't see race in the same way that hers does.

Tim   January 4th, 2008 2:01 am ET

Oscar wrote: " Why are you buying this! We all have heard this message of change and hope before."

Yes we did, back in 1992, when a dem was elected president on that very theme and re-elected because the changes actually happened.

Without Hillary as the guaranteed nominee to rally the GOP stay-at-home crowd and with the dems turning out caucus goers 2 to 1over the republicans, and with Obama, an African American winning .in state with a 96% white population in a RED state…and doing so with the support of the majority of women and the greatest share of independants.

Obama had a good night. He owns the change issue and the people are all over it. Republicans are in big big trouble.

jack, ny, ny   January 4th, 2008 1:14 am ET

don't count your chicken before they hatch. That is all I have to say. Bunch idiots voted from Iowa doesn't mean they represent entire US.

Rhino   January 4th, 2008 1:13 am ET

Don't for one moment believe that all Iowa independent voters jumped on the Obama bandwagon - this one, among many, declared for the first time a party preference and took part in the Republican caucus.
Don't associate "independent" with "democrat".
You will lose.

Joe Ossai, Bedford, NH   January 4th, 2008 1:04 am ET

Obama can not be stopped. This is history and America is back.

LAWAN H. AHMED   January 3rd, 2008 11:56 pm ET

My fellower friends, brothers, sisters and country men
Judge Obama by his educational knowledge, and not by the color of his skin. We are ready for a change in America and in the whole World. Any young generation white, black hispanics Chinese who can speak and people listen, and learn is the future example to America. Do not under estimate people.

No question asked, Obama will win.

Eric, from THE Republic of Texas   January 3rd, 2008 11:37 pm ET

"Independents," eh? Really?
Say there, "independents…" who was the last Conservative you voted for? Can't really call yourself independent if you never have, nor ever intend to, vote for a Conservative once in while.

Oscar   January 3rd, 2008 11:28 pm ET

Oh my goodness. Wake up America! Reading some of these I am going to now vote Democrat because Obama inspires me is ridiculous. Did any of you even know this person existed a couple of years ago, even last year. All of a sudden he is the person of change. Why are you buying this! We all have heard this message of change and hope before.

Why is it different now. Please look past Obama's charisma and excellent public speaking skills and quit being sold.

Jim T   January 3rd, 2008 11:21 pm ET

I always thought my vote was a simple decision for me. I have always registered Ind. but have voted Democratic. Ever since Hillary announced her candidacy I thought she was who I would vote for, mainly because of the '2 for 1′ deal, having Bill as part of the package. Trouble is, now that I've seen her campaigning she is really turning me off and I find her to be almost unlikeable and quite frankly, she is embellishing on her credentials and experience. I am now leaning towards the Obama bandwagon. Who knew!!

Greg2600   January 3rd, 2008 11:18 pm ET

Obama could be a great leader. Edwards I think has a better shot with independents nationwide. Hillary I think is the worst one of all, unless she winds up vs. Huckabee or Romney and either makes a fool of himself. The percentage of young voters really were overwhelmingly for Obama. That concerns me, because these kids never bother to vote in November, and I don't they will this time either. Edwards appeal to the middle aged is more of a key. IMO, the strongest centrist candidates are Edwards and John McCain, but I don't think either will get the nom. Giuliani should have run as a Dem, he might have won. As for Barack's chances in Nov, hard to tell, because thanks to Republican gerrymandering and that idiotic Electoral College, its blue vs. red. Even if Obama wins the Gore/Kerry states, he would need to sway a Red state like Ohio or Florida over to win. Given the shenanigans in those states, don't know if he can do it. Unless the Republicans nominate Ron Paul, he'll have my vote.

P Crutchfield Jr.   January 3rd, 2008 11:16 pm ET

Yes, America is ready to roll the dice. We rolled the dice with Jack Kennedy and Bill Clinton and now Barak Obama. The difference is that Obama is more Kennedy like that Clinton and has the moral turpetude which Clinton lacked. He is a fresh face with fresh ideas and now it is a time for change. This is indeed a Watershed moment in American Politics. The recycled policies and traditions of the Clinton and yes, even John Edwards have long served their use. This election is about the next 20 years not the next 4. Nothwithstanding how Hillary has done in Iowa, she needs to go home.
I anticipate that after she loses the nomination, she and Bill will seperate or devoice.
It has long since been a marriage of convience. There would be a tremendous amount of political baggage had she gone into this race as a devoicee or a seperated woman. Lets get on to New Hampshire and then, wow, South Carolina.

Corey Gardner   January 3rd, 2008 11:16 pm ET

Never forget that David slew the giant!

On to the White House, President Obama! I will be there to see you sworn in. God bless America!

Steven in Charleston, SC   January 3rd, 2008 11:14 pm ET

The general concensus has always been that no Democrat can win in a "red" state — in fact, that sentiment has been expressed a couple times already on this message board.

However, that sentiment neglects the fact that several southern "red" states (South Carolina among them) have large African-American populations. The majority of African-Americans consider themselves to be Democrats, however voter turnout among this group of people tends to be lower than among other groups, partially because they tend to be poor and voting is more difficult to accomplish logistically for poor people than it is for the rich and middle class, and partially because they frequently feel taken for granted by the Democratic leadership.

As a result of the above, if Obama succeeds in winning the nomination, he has a very good chance of winning at least at least one traditionally "red" southern state.

Burton   January 3rd, 2008 11:12 pm ET

Lourdes, get the facts! Senator Obama just DID win in a RED state!! He won in a 97% white state! The Senator should be judged, as Iowa Democrats (and independents + some enlightened Republicans) did on the basis of his qualifications…his on-the-ground experience as a community organizer…his leadership in working across party lines to pass critical legislation in Illinois and even during his first years as U. S. Senator.

Joseph, Seattle, WA   January 3rd, 2008 10:56 pm ET

Obama will be the next President of the United States. When voting for a President Americans vote for someone they can trust, someone who holds their values. They did so for Bush in 2000 & 2004. At the Presidential level, smarts don't count for a hill of beans, think Gore & Kerry who have them and lost, and Bush who doesn't and won, twice! Fortunately for Democrats who lean independent Barrack is trustworthy, smart and a guy who is very likable. We know what he stands for. He has been the same person since he ran for and won at the Harvard Law Review. He will win Red states because he can speak to both sides of the isle. He doesn't even have to win NH to stay in the lead, a strong second will do the trick. With Edwards & Richardson supporters moving toward Obama he just might do it. On to New Hampshire!

james   January 3rd, 2008 10:55 pm ET

If you still don't understand why or think that it is some kind of a republican conspiracy, as if everyone who was ever registered republican is in on a secret rovian plot to take down clinton…let me tell you about myself.

I served in the Army for several years, also serving in Iraq. I voted for McCain in 2000. I didn't vote in the 2000 general election because I didn't care for Bush or Gore. I was very disappointed in the fear mongering and incompetence of Bush. However, I didn't vote in 2004, because Kerry was just as bad to me.
Obama is the FIRST candidate since that has inspired me to vote again. I've looked at his record of service, his accomplishments, and his history. I've read his books and learned what kind of person he is, how he views things, and have a good idea of what kind of president he will be… That is why I have registered Democrat for 08.

I am a former Republican, turned Ind, voting Obama.

Tyler in Raleigh, NC   January 3rd, 2008 10:48 pm ET

I am an Independent… i would be Republican if they could give me a leader (not Bush) I could support. I would vote for Ron Paul, perhaps McCain… but no one else running on the Republican ticket.

If Obama wins, I may vote Democrat for the first time since I was eligible in 1992.

Gene   January 3rd, 2008 10:45 pm ET

Do the Dems have a viable candidate who can carry the country in Nov or is there a "white knight" in the wings i.e., Gore?

Jay   January 3rd, 2008 10:40 pm ET

If Iowans can overlook Obama's race and identify him as the sharpest candidate, then that bodes well for him in a national elections.

And Lourdes, no Democrat is going to win a diehard "Red State," Black or othewise.

Lynn, Reno, NV   January 3rd, 2008 10:37 pm ET

Obama will win a red state, because he appeals to the independent voter. That is why he is the one that is the best choice. The racists will vote Republican no matter who is the nominee, and the independents really like Obama and despise Clinton. I hear it all the time here in Nevada from Non-partisans: I like Obama but I don't like Hillary.

Aaron   January 3rd, 2008 10:35 pm ET

NH isn't a lock for Obama. With McCain getting 3rd place, he'll end up getting a good amount of those independent votes.

Trang, Fremont CA   January 3rd, 2008 10:34 pm ET

Thank you, Independents!

Ava   January 3rd, 2008 10:26 pm ET

It's also a good thing that he did just as well as Hillary did amongst Democrats. Obama 'beat Clinton amongst democrats, 32% to 31%. People initially predicted that Hillary would beat him amongst democrats, but that's not the case.

So. Obama can do just as well among democrats and he cleans up amongst independents. This is great.

With this loss, Edwards supporters will start peeling off and move to Obama. Most of those Edwards supporters aren't going to Clinton. Hillary is in trouble.

James   January 3rd, 2008 10:26 pm ET

See, that's the type of talk that was going on 3-6 months ago regarding his ability to win the primaries and caucuses. Yet, look what has happened.

Lourdes   January 3rd, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Democrats are doomed. They are framing Obama's victory in a black/white paradigm that has, in the past, only served to evoke ethnic loyalty.

Obama will never win a "Red" state, especially in rural states, as a "Black" candidate. Media reporters and Obama supporters alike need to be aware of the subtle message that comes from their "victory" for African Americans.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com