IT'S QUITE OBVIOUS THAT MCCAIN'S AND HUCKABEE'S COMBINED STRATAGY IS TO KEEP ROMNEY AT THE STARTING GATE WITH THEM, BUT NOT FOR LONG. HOPEFULLY, THE REPUBLICAN VOTERS WILL RECOGNIZE THAT ROMNEY IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE THAT CAN WIN FOR US IN NOVEMBER '08

When I heard Romney claim that he's now a "Change" guy, I had to laugh out loud, since it's only a matter of time before someone points out that he is indeed Mr. Change — as in, changing positions on every issue out there with the wind. Careful, Mitt; they're onto you.

MITT ROMNEY IS SO SUPERIOR TO HIS REPUBLICANS RIVALS. IT IS NOT EVEN FUNNY ' WAKE UP GOP !

OUR NATION NEEDS A PRESIDENT ROMNEY TO STRENGTHEN OUR ECONOMY, DEAL WITH A POTENTIAL RECESSION, AND BRING NEW PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS TO WASHINGTON. HE IS A PROVEN LEADER FROM OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY, AND WILL WORK TO HEAL THE BROKEN SYSTEM CURRENTLY IN WASHINGTON.

I can vote for Romney, Rudy, or Thompson. I could vote for McCain if I have no other choice, despite his clear junk yard dog meanness. But I will not under any circumstances vote for Huckabee. I honestly don't think most of his supporters know his real record. He pardoned more criminals than the previous 3 Arkansas governors combined, including murderers. His record on taxes is poor. His record on illegal aliens is worse. Judicial Watch said he was one of the top 10 most corrupt politicians in the U.S. He has all kinds of ethics problems. He is unelectable.

Go Mitt

AK, Residents of MA know. We bought a lemon from Mitt's used cars once (no offense towards used car salesman). We wont do it again. I am from Stoneham. MA (Nancy Kerrigan land), and Romney is not only generally not supported, but he is hated, like a saleman who sold you a lemon. That should tell the rest of the nation something. Romney cant get a local endorsement if he bought one. Romney has spent $50M (WSJ) and Huckabee $1.7M nationally. Huckabee kickd his *ss and spent pennies on the dollar. That is not compelling for the GOP chances (Obama spent 40M vs. Hillary's 50M) - much more comparable

If I were Mitt Romney, I sure would point out tonight that John McCain is willing to make a troop commitment in Iraq for ONE HUNDRED YEARS!!! That blew my mind when he said that the other night.

I wouldn't vote for Willard Romney for anything. I have a home in Massachusetts and I know the only reason Willard won for governor is that the Democrats put up a
"Hillary" type candidate for governor, Shannon O'Brien, who was even more irritating and arrogant than Hillary if that is possible.

THAT'S THE ONLY REASON WILLARD WON!!!! HE KNEW HE WOULD NOT WIN IF HE TRIED TO BE RE-ELECTED.

The only thing real about Willard Romney is that he is a real phony; he is also a real hypocrite, real liar/exaggerator. He's right up there with the inventor of the Internet, Mr. Albert Gore.

Iowa's biggest concern was religion, luckily the rest of the country is not that stupid, he'll be the overall winner, huckabee has no idea what he's doing

The latest mantra against Romney is that he is trying to "buy" the election. No, he is trying to serve the country because he is passionate about America. Additionally, NOBODY HAS WORKED HIS BUTT OF MORE THAN MITT. JUST LOOK AT HIS TRACK RECORD OF MEETINGS THIS YEAR. JUST LOOK AT THIS PICTURE. HE IS EARNING EVERY VOTE WITH A TON OF ELBOW GREASE. THE AMERICAN WAY. YOU HAVE EARNED MY VOTE MITT.

What is so negative about comparing two canidates records on the issues, and saying that we need someone from outside washington in the White House. All of us Evangelicals need to quick being so arrigant. If people would just open their eyes, they would see the Mormons are not a cult and that they are a very Christian organization. Just because they may not have the very same view on the god head as other Christian faiths, doesnt mean they are not Christian. Jesus Christ is at the center of the LDS faith. So lets all grow up, and not let the one issue of Religion keep us from voting for, or against a canitdate.

I am looking forward to Gov. Romney asking Sen. McCain why he (McCain) is "OK" with the U.S. staying in the Iraq war for 100 years. (According to McCain's own words last evening in New Hampshire) I didn't believe it, just like the astonished audience, until I saw it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM

So McCain is "OK" with us producing 5 generations of U.S. soldiers in order to send to the Iraq war? I do hope Mitt will ask him about that.

ROMNEY/OBAMA

OR OBAMA/ROMNEY

That is the ticket!

I think anyone who votes for Mike Huckabee is just plain stupid he is a joke . Mitt Romney is the best canidate on both sides hands down.

The clause was put in the Constitution by the framers of the Constitution for one reason and one reason only. they did not want anyone born outside the USA
because they did not want anyone that was not natural born from securing command of the militatry. There was no argument of debate on the subject because all the framers of the Constitution agreed on the subject..
Should the Constitution be amended today amending or deleting the requirement? Yes, I think so, but it would takes quite a few states to ratified and usually this ratification takes years.
Yes, I spent many many doing this research.

I hope John Edwards wins

To Steve Blaine- why do you care about John McCain's 'natural born' status so much? This was not an issue in 2000 and its not an issue now. You bring up the same comment in every article about McCain. No one cares. I know you support the man and want him to win, that's why your so fixated on it. Don't worry, its a non-issue and he'll do fine without your help.

Hey democrats, did Obama buy victory in Iowa? He spent 2 million more on ads than Romney? They are all doing what they think will get them the nomination.

I support Romney because Romney kept his promises as an elected official. He did his best to represent his constituency. Though his positions may be different now than earlier, he is a man of integrity and will actually follow through - he knows how to build a team, break down barriers to change, and he knows how to implement projects and bring them to completion. He has positioned himself to run for President and is willing to spend his own money to get out the vote.

On the other hand, Huckabee didn't tell the truth about raising taxes (he said he would not in is opening address as Governor) yet raised them later. Huckabee has basically positioned himself as the anti-Romney candidate - and uses a religion whisper campaign to promote himself.

Huckabee vs. Romney comparision
Huckabee didn't finish his masters degree - Romney finished two
Huckabee tried to take the furniture - Romney bought his own
Huckabee never achieved the American Dream - Romney has (This is in part due to Huckabees inability to finish things he starts)
Huckabee was chubby and started jogging - Romney has always jogged
Huckabee had 14 ethics charges against him as Governor - Romney has zero
Huckabee keeps his family off the stage - Romney lets his family participate

Finally, they are all politicians, however, I think Romney knows enough about business to turn around the American budget - he knows the cost of business and will know how to veto excessive ear marks. He can recognize from a 10Q the success or failure of a business and so can understand effective sanctions against rogue nations. He knows how taxes influence business and could provide Congress some insight on how to change the tax code rather than fire 82,000 IRS employees. Changes to the tax code could be more business friendly, especially for small business. Romney can do it, Huckabee, McCain or Giulianni cannot. I find it interesting that Huckabee supports McCain in NH, McCain supports Huckabee in Iowa, and Guliani supports Huckabee and McCain.

Why are they all afraid of Romney? Because he would be the better President!

Everybody needs to remember, this primary election is about the number of Delegates you recieve from each state. Not if you come in first place in the first contest.

Huckabee won last night and recieved 17 delegates from Iowa but Romney also recieved 12 delegates from Iowa coming in 2nd. Wyoming's caucus is tomorrow (Saturday) and Romney has a HUGE lead in Wyoming giving him 12 delegates if he wins in Wyoming. What does this mean? Romney will have 24 Delegates on Saturday and Huckabee will still only have 17. Romney will then be in the lead for the number of delegates needed to win the nomination heading into NH!!!

This ain't over yet Huckster, Your 15 minutes are up!!

Romney 2008!!

What happened to the hair Mitt?

Competetive? He lost by well over 10,000 (10^4 or 10 X E4) votes.

REPUBLICAN CAUCUSES January 03, 2008
Race Status Candidate Votes % Del* Precincts
Iowa

Updated 10:05 p.m. EDT, Jan 3, 2008

County Results
95%reporting

Huckabee 39,814 34% 17
Romney 29,405 25% 12
Thompson 15,521 13% 3
McCain 15,248 13% 3
Paul 11,598 10% 2
Giuliani 4,013 4% 0
Hunter 515 1% 0

Steve, you're right that the Consitution doesn't define "natural born," but that doesn't mean its definition is implied in the Constitution. Which means a definition in any US law is perfectly legit. It could still be challenged in a lawsuit, as anything can, but I don't think any court, much less the Supreme Court, would even take up the issue because it's already considered settled in a legal sense.

Think of it this way: How many of the country's first several presidents were born on U.S. soil? Well, none, because it was such a young country at the time. If there hasn't been a change to the law since the 1790s, why wasn't this an issue back then?

This is not an up-in-the-air issue. It's a settled matter. And this isn't the only part of the Constitution that was left purposely vague specifically so that it could be interpreted later by accompanying laws.

————————————————————————————————————

If you read the whole outline you would have seen reason for inserting the clause natural born in the Constitution and if you would have read the Act in 1790 which contained natural born clause you would understand why it was repealed in 1795.
I explained all this several time. If you do not believe me go to a library where they have all these laws and look them up. That is what I did.

January 4, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Steve:

I'm in the Army and my daughter was born in the Netherlands when I was stationed there. We have her dutch birth certificate, an English translation of it, and a "Report of US Birth Abroad" from the State Department that all have to be maintained and used together whenever a birth certificate is required. Are you trying to tell me that she isn't a natural born U.S. citizen and couldn't run for president someday?

I already know the answer but I am just curious to see if you will continue to show your ignorance and post inaccurate information.
You are right. She is a citizen of U.S. But is not a natural Born citizen that would qualify her to run for President. I have put the Law quoteson this program many times. If you do not be believe the law quotes I gave you and the Constitution look them up youself.

Romney an openly BUSH Jr. supporter LOST!! Says something about Bush Jr., Bush Jr. Administration and Bush Jr. policies and his standing with American public today.

Yes the 43rd President Bush Jr. has cause for concern:
Having cheated in two elections. First in 2000 from Al Gore who later got the Noble Peace Prize (just in case people do not keep up with the news!) through the Supreme Court then through rigging and SWIFT BOATING (it’s a verb: unfairly depicting someone) war decorated veteran John Kerry in 2004!

With all the anti-Bush Jr. rhetoric that has helped Huckabee must be a DISASTER in the making for Bush Jr. if he is to venture to work for Republican candidates in 2008 election cycle.

Go Hillary44 08! http://hillaryis44.org/ http://facts.hillaryhub.com/
For a little national election snapshot: http://uselectionatlas.org/2008.php

Why can't anyone spell the word 'lose' correctly?

Oh BTW, Clinton and Obama spent as much as Romney in IA. They spent what they had to!

Obama says he is going to change things. But he don,t say in what way.we mite not like the way things will be changed.better stick with Hillary some one that knows what she is doing. get some one that has tested the waters. thank JR

Well… Iowa certainly was energizing. Fortunately, it has not been very telling historically…because it isn't a valid representation of the nation. No one candidate will appeal to every segment in America. Loved in IA but tolerated in NH, revered in SC but laughed at in NY. We are a diverse Nation with diverse ideas.

Here is how I approach it, as a conservative R… Either Obama or Clinton will win the D party nomination. Hillery took a hit last night but is far from out. It’s too early to predict. Remember Bill didn’t win IA or NH in 1992. Obama was impressive! The win and the man were impressive. I have to admit even as a conservative R, I admired his speech. He sounded and looked like a Presdient.

Who will Obama select as a running mate? Obama/Clinton (assuming she would even consider it) would be an incredible ticket. Clinton/Obama would be formidable. Obama certainly has the charisma, persona and belief that he represents change. But remember they are both Senators who historically do not fare well in presidential elections. So…WHO can best beat Obama or Clinton?

It isn’t Huckabee! He will never stand up to the scrutiny that is coming. He’s not apart of the political/economic establishment that exercises immense influence in this country…and I don’t believe has the skills, expertise, financial backing or broad appeal will overcome that fact. His folksy style is appealing but where's the substance? I’m sure the D party would love him to get the R nod. He would be easy to beat in the general election!

True he didn’t buy a win in IA, because he didn’t have to. What if NH had been first? He would have had to spend heavily there if he WANTED to win or even place. That’s not the case in the rest of the country where he will have to spend heavily in every other state (excepting SC) if he wants to win. Who cares how much Mitt spent in IA! Presidents don’t get elected without spending LOTS of money. If they don’t have it they are going no where.

McCain will not beat Clinton or Obama! His participation in the “Gang of 14” destroyed any chance he may have had. Not to mention his age, position on immigration, and the fact that he is an old established senator who has not done anything in the past to make needed changes. Plus Senators are handicapped out of the shoot.

Thompson is done! Stick a fork in him.

Ron Paul? I love him …but no way will America elect him.

Whuliani? Only time will tell if his strategy to ignore IA and NH will pay off or doom him. I seriously doubt he will withstand the intense scrutiny that he is going to receive as the primaries progress. He is too vulnerable IMHO to beat Obama or Clinton.

So who is left, that can WIN? ROMNEY! The only chance the R party has to win the Whitehouse.

What a great day for America Mitt Romney looses in Iowa after spending 7 million. The people in Iowa saw what a phony he is and hopefully the people of New Hampshire will do the same.

Romney an openly BUSH Jr. supporter LOST!! Says something about Bush Jr., Bush Jr. Administration and Bush Jr. policies and his standing with American public today.

Yes 43rd President Bush Jr. has cause for concern:
Having cheated in two elections. First in 2000 from Al Gore who later got the Noble Peace Prize (just in case people do not keep up with the news!) through the Supreme Court then through rigging and SWIFT BOATING (it’s a verb: unfairly depicting someone) war decorated veteran John Kerry in 2004!

With all the anti-Bush Jr. rhetoric that has helped Huckabee must be a DISASTER in the making for Bush Jr. if he is to venture to work for Republican candidates in 2008 election cycle.

Go Hillary44 08! http://hillaryis44.org/ http://facts.hillaryhub.com/
For a little national election snapshot: http://uselectionatlas.org/2008.php

nice picture

I've almost always voted Republican, but if Huckabee gets the nomination, I'm voting for the Democrat, even if it is Hillary. (Shudder)

Until then, hopefully a number of other people can wake up (or also go to sleep for a good long while) and get over this silly talk of one candidate's religion over another. When you match up records and accomplishments among the candidates, it should be very clear that Romney is by far the most qualified candidate–see 23 incredibly successful years in business, closing a budget deficit in MA *without* raising taxes (something Huck would have never thought of), and using his innate leadership ability to turn around the SLC Olympics.

I am definitely voting for Romney!!!

Excuse me MediaJunkie. Mitt Romney might have had those views before, but now it is different. He was asked in one of the debates why he changed his position. He said that he was wrong origionally and now he does not support his hold ideas. He at least said that he was wrong about something in the past and move on from there, unlike H Clinton for starters. He actually has some honesty.

If HuckaBigot and his Evangelical/ Born Again backers win the Republican nomination, there is no way that the Republicans would win the election for one simple reason: Huck would loose Idaho, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington (and maybe even Utah) immediately becaue each of those states have considerable Mormon populations (which overwhelmingly vote Republican) and many of those Mormons would never vote for someone so blatantly ignorant and bigoted about the Mormon faith.

Don't understand how anyone can vote for a candidate that voted for the Patriot Act as McCain did..

Look, I can't stand Romney and would never vote for him but that's because he is a WAFFLER, a FLIPPER, a PANDERER.

I was extremely pleased that he lost last night for those reasons.

All this being said, I am getting the feeling that he lost because of his religion and that's not cool.

What a weird juxtaposition we have between the parties, right?

Iowa Democrats want change regardless of the source, come out in record numbers and vote a black man to the top.

Iowa Republicans want the same, come out in record numbers and vote out of discrimination of a religion rather than intelligently stating more tangible reasons.

One side embraces diversity while the other one fears it.

Can't really blame the Republicans because just look at the field of candidates. When their change candidate is someone like Huckabee, watch out!

It's sad times for Republicans.

Let me get this straight, if you don't like an evangelical person, then your not a bigot? And your not judging someone? And you know more than them? And you love others more? And you have a grip on the bigger picture? And you are more tolerant of others, especially evangelicals. No hyprocrisy here!

Looks like a deranged passenger in a B grade flick.

I don’t know who started up the idiocy about McCain’s citizenship, but it was obviously someone who wanted to derail any substantive discussion of the issues. It isn’t McCain’s citizenship that I question, it is his record on campaign finance, votes against the Bush tax cuts, legislative deal making on Senate ratification of presidential judicial appointments, faux pa on immigration, etc. and his Bill Clintonesk blustering like a bandy rooster in an attempt to silence any criticism of him on those issues.

As far as I’m concerned, Huckabee’s catapult to the top in Iowa has been largely based on his own innuendo and surragates openly branding Romney as a cultist. Huckabee's posturing is nothing more than a cynical attempt to throw up a smoke screen over his record on tax hikes, pandering to illegal immigrants, pardoning violent criminals, and lack of credible positions on foreign policy.

McCain and Huckabee congratulating each other on their “positive” campaigns has got to be a sketch straight out of late night comedy shows. The hiring of “Hitman” Ed Rollins shows how calculating and cynical Huckabee is. It strikes me odd that voters haven't been turned off by the collusion on the part of Huckabee and McCain to derail Romney since neither one of them seems to be able to do it by themselves. It seems that it takes the two of them combined to equal one Romney. If they are successful will they get to have a third person on the ticket to be V.P.?

I understand that some republicans are laughing at their party in embarrassment over Huckabee's Iowa win. I guess they're wondering if this is the best they've got and so am I.

Romney's defeat in Iowa had nothing to do with his religion and everything to do with credibility. He has done NOTHING to further the cause of the middle class and everything to crush it. He, one of the true "elite" has no clue or desire to comprehend the daily struggles most of us go through and would no sooner be a man of the people than Hillary Clinton. They are too slick, too pandering, and too arrogant.
We sent them packing in Iowa, now do the same in New Hampshire and show these opportunists who is taking back control of this country.
Maybe they can run for office in the Caymans with their offshore corporate accounts that nobody seems to want to talk about. Can you say "tax haven"?
How about "traitor"

If Mitt Romney is not the nominee for the Republican Party, in Nov. '08, the Republicans will see their Party go down in flames against any of the Demo candidates.

Read what Rick from Syracuse said.

Ths vast numbers of middle class and poor people in the US are sick of the Republican brand. Sick of pride and arrogance, and religion and patriotism being worn on a sleeve like a little flag lapel pin your wife can accidentally run thru the wash when you're at happy hour. Republicans have proven themselves at best unqualified, at worst - humiliaiting, in the eyes of the world.

You can continue to argue about who can shoot more ducks, or who loves god more. It's not gonna matter. The vast majority of citizens just aren't listening anymore.

Just sit back and watch the Democrats clean the floor with this crop of gomers. It's gonna be fun!

why do the mormons think that the reason mitt lost was his faith?
if iowans are that bigoted how can you explain obama's showing??
the answer is you cant…Mitt is a ken doll,a man who has all the convictions of a used car salesmen…ask massachusetts about Willards record here and we'll tell you all about him..Its over for romney,he paid 2000 per vote he got yesterday and still got beat by a snake handler from arkanas…its over Willard,time to go back to what you do best,union busting and venture capitolism at the expense of the american workers…

GOOD JOB HUCKABEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MITT WILL NOT WIN WITH ALL HIS LIES ( SAID HE SAY HIS FATHER MARCHING WITH DR. KING) HIS FLIP-FLOPING ON ABORTION. HE CAN NOT BUY AMERICANS VOTES ( OUT SPENT HUCKABEE 15 to 1.. 15,000,000 To 1,000,000) NEGATIVES ADS DON"T WORK ………..ONLY 3 YEARS AS GOVERNOR 25YEARS AS A BUSINESSMEN YES.. BUT YOU CAN'T RUN A COUNTRY AS A BUSINESS

HUCKABEE IS THE BEST CHOICE TO RUN THIS COUNTRY.. YES HE WILL NEED HELP AS ANY PERSON WILL……….. HE IS HONEST……. HE BELIEVES IN THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA…. WANTS TO HELP THE MIDDLE AND LOW INCOME PEOPLE…..WANTS TO MAKE AMERICA STRONG AGAIN….HE IS GUIDED BY GOD ON A DAILY BASIS…………..
HE HAS 10 YEARS AS GOVERNOR AND ELECTED 3 TIMES,,,, HE MUST KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING…..

GOD BLESS TO ALL———————-
PLEASE VOTE WITH YOUR HEART———————
VOTE ON THE ISSUES AND NOT WHO YOU THINK WILL WIN—————–

PEACE OUT

Evangelicals voted for Huckabee 49% to 10%, yet he only beat Romney by 9 pts, so don't look at this as a referendum for the GOP from 300,000+ corn farmers. The rest of the country sees that we are at a turning point in our government. Dont think about who you'd like to live next door to or have dinner with, grow up and look at the challenges that will face our next president.

There is only one man for the job: Mitt Romney!

I am certaintly disappointed in Iowans that they were so ignorant to some very important issues facing our country as whole, i.e. economy, immingration and foreign policy that Huckabee lacks so mightily. The battle continues and Huckabee will not be the winner at the end. Huckabee cannot be the Republican nominee for the simple fact that he is a hard-core liberal with socially conservative views - he is ¾ donkey and only a quarter elephant and that's not acceptable to the majority of Republicans.

Be strong Gov. Romney! Show America that you are that fiscally conservative PROVEN leader that America so desperately needs right now.

Jen Cedar Falls, IA January 4, 2008 10:47 am ET

Wayne, what kind of childish comment was that? Irrelevant and a bit telling that you're one of those 'holier than thou evangelical christians' is my guess.

You couldn't be further off the mark, Jen. I was raised Catholic, but am now a pagan.

And I'm a life-long Democrat who would never support an unworthy clod like Mitt Romney - even if someone held a gun to my head and said "supprt Mitt or I'll shoot".

If this is the sort of "reasoning" you're using to choose a candidate, Jen, quit now while you're behind.

To all those who think Romney tried to "buy" Iowa…

If spending money on a campaign legally and appropriately is 'buying' off voters, then well so did Huck and Obama buy their votes. Except they just didn't think the voters deserved as much money as Romney did.

It's reassuring to see voters looking at the candidates and paying no attention to Karl Rove tactics or political attack ads.

Corporate Romney's downfall will be his association with Bain Capital whose dealings with China are currently being investigated due to national security concerns. Americans will be reminded too much of the Cheney/Halliburton ties, no-bid contracts and a perception of backroom multi-billion dollar deals with defense contractors.

Romney is not going down again!

Wake up people, Ole Huck won in Iowa because of 60% of the voters were evangelical or baptist christians. Lets look at the timeline and you decide the reasoning behind the momentum shift from Romney to Huckabee in Iowa.

For months, Romney had a fairly steady lead in Iowa. At the same time, Mike was a nobody in the back of the pack. But despite Iowa being a strong evangelical state, Mitt held the lead for some time. And when did this change?

When Mitt gave his speech "Faith & Politics", the topic of religion was brought into the spotlight of the GOP Republican race in Iowa. Before this, religion was not a major topic in the race. But after, it seems that the evangelical voters in Iowa based their votes only on the topic of religion! So, when you have a mormon running against a former baptist minister in an strong evangelical state, what do you think is going to happen?!

Gain some common sense people!
It is quite remarkable that he received the number of votes that he did. He is doing a great job, and is the best candidate for the presidency.

"No candidate should become the spokesman for his faith. For if he becomes president he will need the prayers of the people of all faiths."
-Mitt Romney

Romney used to tout the fact that he used to build businesses in foreign lands as his experience for foreign policy. I haven't heard him say that lately. Just something to think about.

WOW I MUST SAY THAT I'M SUPRISED MUTT DID THAT GOOD. I THOUGHT HE'D PACK IT UP AFTER IOWA BUT I GUESS HE'LL HAVE TOO AFTER NH…STILL DON'T THAT THE BASHING HE GIVES OTHER CANIDATES. HE'D PROBABYL KICK HIS OWN PARENTS TOO WIN THOUGH.

Steve:

I'm in the Army and my daughter was born in the Netherlands when I was stationed there. We have her dutch birth certificate, an English translation of it, and a "Report of US Birth Abroad" from the State Department that all have to be maintained and used together whenever a birth certificate is required. Are you trying to tell me that she isn't a natural born U.S. citizen and couldn't run for president someday?

I already know the answer but I am just curious to see if you will continue to show your ignorance and post inaccurate information.

I think the issue with Romney being mormon is that more than just Evangelicals have been brought up to view Mormonism as wrong. While I don't share this view, most Christians I know, moderate to extreme have been taught to view Mormonism as a cult. Romney simply doesn't have much of a chance at all with most Protestant religions, unless as stated above, he switches his religion. While I certainly hope this country can look past religion someday, it won't be anytime soon. Granted I live in a southern state and the views of more liberal states may be vastly different, but I simply feel there's 0 chance of him being elected.

NO WITCHES IN THE WHITEHOUSE!

Mitt Romney is running for President???

I hope aggresive campaigning does not involve corruption and fraud by any candidate in either republican or democratic party. Every candidate should aggresively put forth national policies that will guide them to be true presidential candidates rather than attack the personal characters of individuals.

Romney vs. Huckabee vs. McCain. We'll see how it plays out in the debate next week. Now that we've gotten past this religious junk I'm sure New Hampshire will think of some intelligent questions to ask. And when it comes to the debates, who clearly rings out on top? Romney!!

We have yet to see a debate where Huckabee is a front runner (remember his rise came AFTER the democratic infiltrated YouTube debate). I can't wait to see his record ger trounced my Mr. Romney. He has yet to answer to the voters on the hard issues (pardons, clemencies, reduced tuition for illegal immigrants, "fair tax") and you better believe Romney will bring it up!

Although it would be kinda cool to see Chuck run up on stage and kick some @$$.

Every Romney supporters,

Mark my words: Your candidate will get a beating on Jan5th GOP debate in NH, and then he will lose New Hampshire on Jan8th. Only an irrational person at this point will think Romney can win. Huckabee has already set fuel on him by beat the huck out him in Iowa by 9 point. McCain will set the fire by crashing him in New Hampshire. Not only will Romney goes down, he will goes down in flame. He will goes down in front of everyone. By the way, do not even think your candidate has a chance for a nomination after New Hampshire. New Hampshire is his last stand. His entire strategy is based on winning Iowa and New Hampshire and uses that momentum to win the rest. Well, he lost Iowa soundly, and when he lose New Hampshire, he will be gone. Evaporate! A year from now, you won't even remember him, he will fade into history as Wesley Clark did before him.

Apparently the liar Romney is going to start up with the negative ads again.

It's a shame the empty suit has nothing to offer but more and more negative ads.

I expect Willard Romney the Liar to start talking about "Change" now. He probably is starting to realize The War Mongerer has no coattails to get him to the White House.

I'm happy to see Clinton and Romney get trashed in Iowa. They both represent the type of politics everyone is tired of, using large sums of money to run personal attacks agianst rivals with misinformation. In my opinion not the best choices. Way to go Iowa. I'm glad to see Iowa saw through the facades of these two phony front runners.

Jen: "What we Iowan's did for the country last night was nothing less than impressive."

I'm sorry, I'm not impressed because a bunch of people showed up at the same place at the same time in cold weather. You didn't do anything "for the country" last night, you did it for Iowa. Don't flatter yourself.

And if Huckabee actually goes on to win this thing, then what you did "for the country" last night was shoot it in the face. Did voting based on religion really work so well the last two elections?

To the people of TIME: Please stop your anti-Romney position. Romney isn't "on the ropes" and McCain, as far as I can tell, hasn't been 'resurrected.' Romney won twice as many votes as McCain in IA. It was a landslide victory for Romney over McCain. Huckabee is going a big flat nowhere after IA, most everybody agrees with that. So who's got the momentum going into NH? It's gotta be Romney. He was clearly (by 2 to 1) favored by IA voters over McCain.

John McCain will win in New Hampshire.

Shame on religious bigotry in American politics - the only candidate for the White House is Romney. If this does not happen, America will reap a whirlwinnd of disappointments

If Romney will be the 45th President, then who will be the 44th?

I am a Democrat who would have voted for McCain in the 90's, but when he sold out and became a Bush backer he completely lost me. Huckabee doesn't seem qualified to me and is counting on his "likeability" to win for him, which has worked with Republican voters in the past so is not completely out of the realm of possibility. Romney has no credibility because of his flip-flopping. Giuliani is fading fast and on top of his family problems, shallow as this may seem, there are just too many pictures available of him in drag to make him seem presidential.

I personally found Barak Obama very inspiring in his acceptance speech in Iowa. He seems like the one person who will truly end the partisan bickering that has left us in a stalemate for so long. I know he has the respect of some influential Republicans and Democrats and would likely surround himself with people who would make up for any lack of experience he may have. He is extremely intelligent and specialized in Constitutional law, which also gives me hope.

All of you who think the Democrats will blow it by nominating a black man as their candidate need to take your blinders off. We cannot afford this petty nonsense anymore. We need to elect true leaders who will get our country back on track.

Obama 08.

The Race is on, but we don't have a winner yet!

The news from the Iowa Caucus is that we have new leaders in the Primary races. Republican Mike Huckabee and Democrat Barack Obama have won what the Big Media called "surprise" victories. Don’t believe it.

In the Case of Mike Huckabee, he appeals to the Republican base who want a candidate who reflects their Christian values. Huckabee also has a knack for speaking directly and plainly to people's hopes and dreams for their country's future. The media calls his style "folksy" but don't believe it. He knows how to deliver his message with absolute precision. I called him a dark horse candidate back in the fall of 2007; and it seems I can take credit for being right, at least for now. Big money was banking on Rudy Giuliani and he finished in 6th place with 1% of the vote. Giuliani is looking forward to New Hampshire where he believes he can do much better. Mitt Romney will have something to say about that. He placed 2nd in a state where he spend a lot of money. He could have done a lot worse, although I don’t know why his camp chose to stake so much on Iowa.

On the Democratic side, Barack Obama was truly the surprise winner followed by a persistent John Edwards. Hilary Clinton expected to do better but don’t count her out. Iowa is no indication of how the rest of the country will vote. Clinton still has to deal with elect-ability issues as well as her image issues. Democrats want real change and Obama is banging the “vote for change” drum that worked so well for Bill Clinton in 1992.

All I can say is no matter what happens; independent voters will decide who gets to be President in November.

Jay Paul “The Seventeen”
http://theangeryindependent.blogspot.com/

Mitt Romney has proved his experience, his values and his character. He is the best candidate for the Republican nomination and the best candidate overall to save this nation from "more of the same Clinton and Bush politics" and as a hugely successful businessman who understands the US economy he is the best qualified to save this nation from the worst recession since the 20's. This naiton needs a President who has the family values to hold the nation together through difficult times, but at the same time a President who has the corporate know-how to turn our economy around. Mitt Romney is the only candidate with this unique combination that we so desperately need for the next 8 years.

ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT AND FOR ALL AMERICANS-

Whos cares if he's Mormon, Catholic, Evangelical, or Jewish.

He's qualified for the job!

Vote Romney 2008-

He is the right man for the job!

I hope Mitt wins. He is clearly the best candidate for the job, and has by far the best record of getting things done. It's hard to argue that a man that can do what he's done will have trouble getting it done at the white house. My vote is on Mitt, because I believe his record of sucess in his private life (1 wife, good family, etc.) and professional life (no need to mention how he made is money) are the best indicator of his future success.

Go Mitt!

Romney spent $15 million for a second place finish in Iowa! That is not a good fiscally conservative message to be sending to the American people. I can't believe all these talking heads keep trying to push Romney and Giuliani (did he drop out of the race?)

It is a sad day if we don't consider the children born to US service members to be full and natural born citizens because they happened to be born while their parents were serving the United States overseas.

There are lots of examples besides what you stated but the term was meant to make sure foreign born U.S Citizens did not seize control of military.

Go Mitt ! ! ! Romney 08!!!

I was surprised that Clinton did not win Iowa, not because I support her but because I thought she had it in the bag. I was not surprised that Huckabee won. However, the Republican party is not one homogenized group. There are:

1. Corporatists, who contribute money to candidates who will give large corporations tax breaks, repeal regulations, and ignore it when they break the law. These people do not care about flag burning, gay marriage, sexually explicit plots on TV shows, vulger lyrics in popular music, etc. In fact, they are the ones who produce explicit TV shows, vulgar lyrics, and sick video games for our children. They will turn against Huckabee because his social agenda is meaningless to them and his integrity might make him difficult to handle. Huckabee can expect well-financed "swift-boat" campaigns that will challenge his character and history, and corporate money will be behind it.

2. Social Conservatives, mostly evangelicals, who are concerned mostly about sexuality, propriety, and the presence of their religious symbols in public places. They are politically naive and have been shamelessly used by Corporatists. They vote for a flag-burning amendment but what they get is lower wages and fewer benefits. They vote against gay marriage, but their jobs get outsourced.

3. Racists and segregationists, mostly southerners, who prefer local white control to federal civil rights laws and use anti-federal arguments dishonestly. The facts are they do not care which level of government enforces segregation as long as some level does.

4. Goldwater Conservatives, who believe in local economies, local customs, local markets, regional food, neighbors working with neighbors. They do not realize that the global economy is destroying small businesses and local customs. They are sincere but very naive.

5. Libertarians, the dingbat fringe. About 5% of the electorate, but very sincere in their beliefs.

I predict that the corporatists will gut the Huckabee campaign. A lot of sleazy stuff is about to come out about Huckabee. Almost all of it will be lies or ridiculous exaggeration, but 25% of the electorate will believe anything outrageous or scandalous. To them, a good story is much more interesting than a true story.

Props to those who "have a brain in their head". And those of you who have one sentence exclamations… I guess you're necessary to make the world go 'round?

I to am Christian and I think there are some major questions about a lot of religions out there - including my own… but this race is not about finding the answers to "those questions". It's about who has the best record, who sticks to their beliefs and who honors their word.

By the way - the only thing CNN is good for is this blog - bias may give them more viewers - but who can enjoy working for a company that encourages such uneducated statements just to get a reaction out of its customers?

GO MITT!

I see the Romney campaign-bots are here posting their canned slogans about what a great businessman Mitt is and how he, personally, one man saved the Olympics for the world! Big deal! We here in New Hampshire do know a phoney when we see one and that's why I'll be voting for ANYONE but Mitt Romney! Why would we vote for someone who couldn't get elected dog catcher now in the state he was once governor. Says a lot about this egomaniac!

The differences between Romney and McCain are many.

One of them is campaign funding. Romney uses his own money. McCain depends on the supporters. No big corporations would try to buy him out.

The second is illegal immigration. McCain is more forgiving to illegal aliens.

Big corporations claim that illegals provide cheap labor and help the companies with competitiveness. This is a short-term view. Illegals don't have to pay for health insurance, FICA, income taxes, even car insurances, while they can receive just about every welfare benefits paid by taxpayers. That is why illegals can afford to live in the U.S. at the wage level they are paid. Big corporations benefit the most on taxpayers' money. This drives rich few and poor many. This will undermine our democracy as our middle class diminishes. If you hope the expanding middle class in China will help their democracy, you will be disappointed. You have no idea the difference between a democracy and a communist regime.

The third is that McCain can start his commander-in-chief job from Day One.

McCain is a comeback kid no matter what circumstances he was thrown into.
He is a natural fighter and survivor. He suffered campaign problems during the summer and many thought he was done for then. Look at him now! Huckabee is not electable. Romney is very worried about McCain. You can see it in his eyes. I don't mind Romney in the White House, but I prefer McCain much more so for his conviction, character and integrity. I can trust him with our country.

http://www.johnmccain.com

It seems to me that our country was founded on religious freedom. Those who bash candidates based solely on their religious affiliation are very"UNAMERICAN."
A few weeks ago when there was the internet "scare" that Obama was muslim, the continued attacks from Huckabee on Romney for being mormon, all of which true or not is not what should be used to determine who is most capable of leading our country. The most imnportant things to consider are the issues, NOT the candidates religious affiliation or personal belief that are independent from politiacl views and leadership ability. I hope America can be better than that.

As for me, I'm still undecided. (Not a Huckabee or Clinton fan.)

Romney's going down again!

I'm still not sure about who to vote for among the Republicans. Among the Democrats, I'm a bit more concerned about Obama than I am about Clinton. If Clinton wins, at least she'll think twice about the situation in Iraq. Both Obama and Edwards have been so out front about wanting to get out of Iraq that they pretty much have left themselves no choice but to leave, even if events on the ground continue to improve there.

iven that events on the ground have certainly improved in the last few months, it would be sad to see Obama or Edwards engage in a hasty retreat without any real vision of how to improve American stature in the Middle East. Believe me, if they hate us now for being in Iraq, they will hate us even more for leaving Iraq in shambles. Why is it that the democrats won't paint the true picture of the mess that Iraq will become if America leaves early. Winning the White House is not worth that much! You can win the White House this election cycle and lose it in the next one for actually carrying out the plan to exit Iraq early. Why do these politicians have to be so short-sighted. Take the long view. As a nation, we have to stop running this war as if it's American Idol. We would never have won the Civil War if a twenty-four hour news cycle had been badgering President Lincoln every step of the way. How many generals did he go through before he found the right one? Quite a few! We must be the most impatient people on earth. Perhaps it's the effect of two-hour Hollywood films where everthing gets resolved in two hours. It's not real life. I trust McCain with tough decisions more than any of the Democrats. As for the other Republicans, I'm still waiting to see how they plan on dealing with terrorism, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Obama's road to change does not change all that; it's primarily a road of retreat that will only undercut the gains our troops have been making over there since the surge.

Mitt is the only one who will win a national election for the GOP. So what if Huckabee wins Iowa. Iowa is totally unrepresenative of the entire country (likewise NH). Let's give it until Super Tuesday and see who's still standing.

Just a random thought -

Why are the American taxpayers paying the salaries of the active Senators (about $165k annually) who are running for president? They are spending way more time worrying about some hopeless dream than they are doing what they were elected do to.

It should be considered to make it a law to have to resign or take a leave of absence in order to pursue a candidacy to a higher office.

I, along with most other Americans, work long and hard for my pay and keep seeing more and more taxes taken out and used for pointless causes.

Change is definately what is needed!

Dr. Ron Paul is the only Republican I'll support. I am tired to death with the Religious Right, with their hateful, intolerant and peculiar form of Christianity and with the neo-cons, who believe in empire-building and never-ending war. Let's get back to real conservatism, a respect for our Constitution and a government and citizenry that values individual liberty.

I TOTALLY agree with Joe White's comments. I am a conservative Christian, but I will not let others use religion to manipulate me. I have a brain in my head and I will use it to analyze things. I won't let Opra who is just a host of a talking show nor a person who used to be a pastor tuse religion to blind my eyes and shut down my brain.

Huckabee is using religion to manipulate people. He does not have a brain to be a president. He gives the illegal kids scholarships when those kids' parents did not pay their dues. They do not pay tax, and I have to pay more than 15,000 grants for tax per year. I have to support those ILLEGAL. Huckabee does NOT have any right how to use the tax payers money for ILLEGAL kids. He rewards them for entering the United States of America illegal and for breaking the law.

Religion is very important but being a president is not ALL ABOUT religion, it's about how that person can fix the country such as bring jobs back to the americans, deport the illegal immigrants, make people follow the rules and laws that we have in the US….

Mitt Romney is the one with the brain in his head, and I am personally believe that he can be a GREAT PRESIDENT. I do not like his religion but I have respect for what he believes. I also have respect for his point of view about religion as well. Look at president Bush, he is a christian and then what happens to the country and the american. Can anyone tell?

Joe White January 4, 2008 10:57 am ET

Huckabee's win last night is by far the worst move evangelicals could have possibly done.

Huckabee: "What people want is somebody they work with, not somebody who is their boss who could fire them."

Oh really - do I want the idiot sitting next to me at work leading me? Not a chance, the reason why Romney is fiscally the most successful candidate is because he is the brightest candidate. Huckabee is merely a smooth talker, and nothing else.

He's also a phoney. Yeah right he expects us to believe he is innocent of his negative personal shots at Romney's religion.

"And many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord…did we not prophesy in thy name and do great works in thy name?
And in that day I will say unto to them, Depart from me, ye workers of iniquity - I never knew you."

Huckabee is a wolf pretending in sheep's clothing. I'm a conservative Christian who supports either McCain or Romney for their Republican principles - and I won't vote for Huckster if he's the nominee. Republicans everywhere should take note - there are millions like me.

I trusted Iowa to vote with their minds on the Republican side, but many voted for spite! What you spend to get the word out is not relevant to the content of your message or your qualifications.

Voting for spite is self-defeating behavior and Iowa Republicans shot themselves in the foot last night.

Two new polls are out this morning — both taken pre-Iowa — and they have a very close race on the GOP side between McCain and Romney. Huckabee is far behind, let's see how far he can rise.

OK so Iowa voted. They did OK by making Obama a choice, but on the other side, they decided Huckleberry was the choice??? OK, well GW is the same cartoon the Huck would be, Do they really believe that we want another cartoon in the Oval Office? Let's get back to reality. Obama is the man.

Mitt Romney never lets facts get in the way of political self-interest, even when the facts involve a decorated Iraq war veteran seeking a pardon.
At age 13, Anthony Circosta shot a classmate in the shoulder with a BB gun. He pleaded guilty in juvenile court to a felony assault and was sentenced to 364 days of probation. From then on, Circosta's life was apparently exemplary. He enlisted in the Army National Guard as a medic, served as a volunteer fireman, and earned a college degree in criminal justice. In 2002, he served as a National Guard medic at the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, which Romney headed. Deployed to Iraq in 2004, Circosta was promoted to first lieutenant and awarded the Bronze Star for meritorious service.
Circosta needed a gun permit in Massachusetts to gain promotion as a security guard and pursue a career as a police officer. But, to get the permit, Circosta first needed to have his record cleared of a childhood felony. He told the pardon advisory board the childhood incident was not his proudest moment, "but it happened." He moved his life beyond it.
Twice, the Massachusetts clemency board recommended a pardon. Twice, then-Governor Romney declined to grant it.

I guess Romney never made a mistake - not even as a child. He is like the tin man - missing a heart.

If we wanted a flip flopper who changes positions frequently…(for abortion rights….against abortion rights…..for gay rights…against gay rights….) - we would election Hillary (for licensing illegal aliens…against licensing illegal aliens….for the war in Iraq….against the war in Iraq)

The country is in dire need of a moderate…..Giuliani is the only social liberal fiscal conservative we have running….support him (70% of the population describe themselves as moderate) - the Democrats believe all the rhetoric they have been spoon fed….to them "Republicans are evil" - we need to be the first party to endorse a moderate…the Democrats have embraced all left wing (well…and a socialist) I cannot support the right wing of the party any longer (well…unless they are dumb enough to run Hillary….then I will)

After all that has been said on CNN concerning the IOWA caucases, a headline announcement was made "Can America handle a black president". What does that mean? If America elects an African American as President, the intent is clear.

America is stronger than that statement implies. The statement implies that the color of skin would make the "Black" President something America could not handle. Shame on CNN for making such a statement. The statement is the same as asking can Black America handle a white president. The statement is so very insensitive and provocative towards creating negative thinking. I hope and pray that American climb above these statements and ask can America be better than it has been in the past?

I know that Mitt Romney isn't perfect (what candidate is?), but I feel he's the most qualified Republican in the field now who has a chance at beating the Dems. I find it sad that Iowan Reps would select a candidate who has so much trouble remembering/following world events. Is this the best we can do?

It should be interesting to see what kind of negative ads (nothing else to call them) that Romney runs against McCain. I am not supporting McCain, but he is a respectable candidate in most ways.

To Garrett: Ron Paul won't make it much farther. I doubt that he will get many more delgates; some more but not enough to make the nomination. He may claim that he is for a "constitution size government," but the constitution allows Congress to make laws. It is for the judicial branch to reivew the laws and see if they could be allowed under the constitution.

Romney got thumped in Iowa after spending about 8 million dollars to try to buy the win. Maybe he has learned now that he has to actually go out and earn the votes of Americans and he can start by being honest and truthful. Stop the pandering and the cliches and start talking to people and telling them what you will do to solve the serious problems that face this country.

My guess is Romney doesn't have a clue about how to bring about substantive change in this country. That's why he falls back on the same old rhetoric. I expect him to come out attacking McCain for all it's worth as he tries to regain his momentum in New Hampshire. Even if McCain does well in New Hampshire, I don't see him winning the nomination. He's too old and has been burned by his strong support for the president's surge in Iraq and that pathetic attempt to solve the immigration problem. He has alienated a lot of Republicans.

Huckabee won't win in New Hampshire, either. I think his fifteen minutes of fame are just about up. He simply doesn't have the experience or knowledge to govern as president. Folksy charm and bible stories will only get you so far.

Meanwhile, Giuliani is running his stealth campaign by avoiding Iowa completely and not campaigning very much in New Hampshire, where he is trailing badly. He is courting votes in states like Florida and California, hoping to devise an alternate strategy to win the nomination. I don't see the conservatives going with a pro-abortion, three times married man who cheated on his wife while his mistress was living in Gracie mansion.

Good luck to the Republican voters who have to sort through this bunch. Thank goodness I am a Democrat.

If the best the Republicans can do is Gomer Pyle and
the guy from Fireball 5000, they are doomed.

I think Romney's puppet strings are showing.

Go Ron Paul.

Barack Obama won last night's caucus not because he was part black,
nor part white, but because he is good candidate. I was sorry to hear a
lady newscaster on CNN this noon say "Can America handle a black
president"? Now that is just stirring up controversy and drawing
attention to his race. Please let him stand on his merits.

Romney's confidence is commendable, but it seems largely to have been produced through the lenses of his rose colored glasses. Huckabee didn't simply slip by Romney, he blew by Romney in a major storm of tornado dust. And he did it in a beat up VW. Huckabee may not be the competition in NH, but McCain is surely prepared for the battle and he is already positioned to apply the same beating to Romney that Huckabee did in Iowa. Once again expect to see Romney lie about himself and McCain as he continues to wield the dirty stick in the campaign. And once again, expect him to be trounced.

When John McCain was born in 1936 at the Coco Solo Air Base in the Panama Canal Zone, the Canal Zone was US territory - just as every embassy we have around the world . The fact that it was leased property has no bearing on this.
————————————————————————————————————-
Since his parents were both US citizens and he was born at a US military installtion in US territory, he always has been andalways will be a US citizen.
January 4, 2008 10:59 am ET -Yes but not a natural born citizen
—————————————————————————————–
Steve, you've already posted this.

McCain IS a natural born citizen.

I was also board abroad to a US citizen and I'm a natural citizen.

My son was born in Japan and is ALSO a natural citizen.

What exactly is your motive in your post? You are a citizen but not a natural born citizen as required by constitution to hold office of Presidency.
————————————————————————————————————
Good Point (Steve Blaine Washington) but any candidate that brings it up will be eaten alive because non of them have given as much to this country as McCain. I'm neither republican or a McCain supporter but I'd be tempted to punch anyone in the face that even brought this up….

Look up the references I gave in the article. Anyone not born in a particluar State is not a natural born citizen as required to be a president. They are citizens but not a natural born citizens entitled to become President. Look up the law.

I am very disappointed as I sit and watch CNN today, "Can America handle a black president?" Are you kidding me? Why does our mainstream media choose to target issues that are irrelevant? Can't something occur, like the need for change, without race being an issue? STOP CREATING FALSE ISSUES TO TRY AND EVADE THE REAL ISSUES AT HAND!!

I cannot fathom that people (including the press) are saying that Gov. Romney ran a negative campaign. Some say the most negative they have ever seen? Hello! Most of these comments come from people outside of Iowa. He ran a campaign based on the issues. Yes, he did attack Huckabee's record. Why is that out of bounds? He spoke eloquently about what he would do and highlighted the record of the competition. Obviously the "conservative Christians" did not buy it. Now he'll move on to hard hitting NH and see how it plays there. Those of you who don't trust Gov. Romney are deceived. He is an honest man who will bring great success to our country. If you don't think that, hey, it's America. Think what you want. Please, don't criticize him for highlighting other's records. That is very relative to the debate. Last word: Iowa didn't pick Reagan either!

Go MITT!

Go Mitt!!

Does any candidate that thinks that Romney runs a dirty campaign really have thick enough skin to run this country? Every ad that I've seen from Romney that others have labeled as "dirty" have simply stated where Romney's views and previous actions differ from his opponents. Is that not what people want - to know how the candidates differ?! Or should we just vote blindly without any knowledge of what candidates stand for?

Grow up America!

Mitt Romney has proved that he's just another politician. Smile,
slick hair, slick message and stab the other guy in the back.
No thanks, we don't need politics as usual. We like Mike!!!

I am a huge Romney Supporter but he has to focus on what he can do as a President. He is so much more viable of candiate than Huckabee why waste his time battling with someone of Huckabees Caliber he is only helping Huckabee by running contrast ads.
Romney has an incredible Resume that can help fix a lot of the problems in Washington and the country. I think he should highlight his ability to get keep the US Economy moving and then to get it to lead the world again. He can certainly spotlight Immigration, the War In Iraq but what will serve him best is the economy. I don't think people question his family values Mormons have always been known as family orientated Church. He needs to quit defending his past statements on ProLife and Alternative lifestyles and move forward with whay he does best. I want a candiate that is not going to just talk about what they are going to do but how they are going to get it done.
OBAMA was AMAZING last night in his victory speech, Absouloutley Inspiring, although he needs to detail how he will do all of the things he hihglighted he would change just like Romney needs to.
Saying something needs to be changed is one thing making it happen is another. He is off to a great start. If he is sincere in his desire to bring the country together regaurdless of party affilliation and if he can detail his plan like how to get out of Iraq by winning and not just pulling out then he will get my vote. Keep in mind I am a huge Romney supporter.
If Obama and Romney don't win their Parties nomination then I think they should run on an independent ticket together. Contrasting views on several major items but the dream of one and the brains of the other could be a dream team.

Its not a good idea for a Ken-doll to go to "battle" with a man who fought the good fight in Vietnam, and has the scars to prove it. I'd pick different metaphors if I were Romney.

It is one freakin' vote, but from the amount of hype and spin that's been devoted to it, you'd think Election Day in November for the rest of the US may as well be canceled. Take a breath, get a grip, give your heads a shake. And oh, yeah, there's some other stuff going on in the world (you remember the world, right, that's everywhere on Earth that is not the US) right now, too, or had you noticed?

Yes, Mitt, go.

As far away as possible….

Please take your right to vote seriously this is not a time for AMERICANS to elect a President based on his/her warm and fuzzy speechess..Our Nation is need of restoration and we must act responsibly and select the candidate wisely.

Last night, I read through many documented statements made by each candidate. For the most part, I was confused about the stance each one of them has been labeled to take… and the media just makes it worse. At one point a candidate says one thing. Then, at another point, it almost sounds like they're contradicting themself. And I'm talking about all candidates… not just one.

In the end, this is going to be mostly a judge of character for me. It's not about who says what anymore - because alot of what everyone is saying, is BS… just because someone else told them what to say. More important is how they address the people that look up to them - and even how they support those they consider in a less fortunate position. It will come down to a discernment of character for me, in the end.

That being said, it is hard for any of us to look past our own biases - whether based on religion, beliefs, incompetence, etc. Just figure out one thing - and then stick to it… which candidate can find the hope in you? Let's unite under our principles and the spirit of the law - and may the best man win.

Both Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney are excellent candidates. This election is all about the economy, which makes Romney the obvious best choice for the GOP. However, given Romney's disconnect and Huckabee's good standing with the religious right , it makes perfect sense to campaign as a team.

This election cycle should go to the Democrats, but because they decided to throw two controversial minority candidates at us, Republicans now have a legitimate shot at winning.

Romney/Huckabee '08

I know some Romney supporters that could not get into the caucus due to the traffic and congestion from thousands more than expected showing up to vote. Trust me, I was there last night, it was absolutely incredible! Several cars had to turn away, my family walked a mile from where we parked through snow and ice, in 10 degree weather to get there.

What we Iowan's did for the country last night was nothing less than impressive.

We are intelligent, we are informed, we care and we show up to vote! You can cry all you want about us going first.

Hate what is evil, hold to what is good - Vote Barack Obama!

This election is coming down to 'which candidate is likely to hurt me the least'. I'm sad to say it, but that's how I feel.

Both Huckabee and Romney seem to have somewhat changing stances on some issues. While I don't disagree with positioning, I'm offended that they think nobody would notice (nobody like me, I guess).

Hillary, well, it's hard to believe her when her lips are moving. Obama, I think he means well, but makes me feel like he's trying to learn the violin while already onstage - with equally tragic results.

Edwards, well he's a Nilla wafer among a box of tasty cookies. Inoffensive, goes with everything, yet lacks a certain penache.

About the only candidate who has been honest, so near as I can tell, is Dennis Kucinich, and nobody believes he's remotely electable. Sigh……

Correction: in my previous comment "(further tax incentives for abortions, adoption counseling for those considering abortion, etc.)." should read "(further tax incentives for adoption, adoption counseling for those considering abortion, etc.)."

John McCain seems the obvious choice for me this year. Of all the candidates, he is the true bi-partisan one. If he had any more integrity, he would overflow. But then again, that is the beauty of this country. Let's forget who is qualified to run this country, rather, who is the most popular. That makes no sense to me. Let's quit trying to divide this country, and pick someone wh deserves it. John McCain is my choice.

Romney tried to buy victory in Iowa, and failed. Here's to his continued failure in New Hampshire. He would have been better off spending his money at Hooter's.

Way to call it Wayne. Romney was crushed and rightfully so. I hope he's ready for McCain in New Hampshire because he will be tougher, but the sleeper is Ron Paul, waiting to knock Fred out of the race and back to Law & Order. New Hampshire likes fiscal conservatives and independent thinkers, eh? Well who's more fiscally conservative than a guy who never votes for taxes, never takes government-paid junkets, never votes for a Congressional pay raise, doesn't participate in the Congressional pension program, returns a part of his staff budget to the treasury every year, wants to end the IRS and cut spending back to the same levels we had 10 years ago.

Ron Paul, that's who! Get ready Romney, we're comin' for ya!

wow, i just saw the results, its about what i expected. sorry but Romney tried and didn't do so well, its actually kinda sad he lost to the chuckahuckabeast combo.

The lesson from Iowa is not that Romney can't buy an election. Romney had overwhelming support in Iowa from non-evangelicals. The lesson from Iowa is that no amount of money can convince evangelicals that a Mormon could possibly be the best candidate for the White House. Take the previous comment from "Walt" from Texas as a classic example.

It's not that money can't buy an election, the lesson is that no amount of money can buy an even playing field for a Mormon. That's kind of alienating message for the GOP to be sending 6 million Mormons in America, but it is an message that many Evangelicals love to give. Just read the message boards, and it is clear. I read so many negative comments about the doctrines of my Mormon faith from Evangelicals, many distortions of the truth, yet I would not consider attacking their faith.

The key to winning an election is clearly "likeability". If one is not likable, a "change of position" becomes a "flip-flop", a comparison with another candidate becomes "negative adverising", etc. The lesson from Iowa is that for many Evangelicals, a key component of the GOP, that a Mormon cannot be likable by definition, no matter how much money is spent trying to get an even playing field.

It's time to evaluate the close connection that Mormons seem to feel with the GOP. Perhaps Mormons, such as myself, should consider the independent vote, or try to go with the Democrats, and foster policies within that party that would reduce the amount of abortions women choose t