January 7, 2008
Posted: 05:10 PM ET
The CNN Ticker

Dixville Notch is steeped in campaign lore.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The outcome of the New Hampshire primary won't be clear until late Tuesday night, but the results in one tiny Granite State town will be known much sooner – just a few minutes after the stroke of midnight.

Dixville Notch, an isolated village located in New Hampshire's northeast corner, will begin voting at the stroke of 12 a.m. Tuesday. The ballots won’t take long to tally: according to the Boston Globe, Dixville Notch has just 17 registered voters this year — three Republicans, two Democrats, and 12 independent voters.

The town, home to around 75 residents, has opened its polls shortly after midnight each election day since 1960, drawing national media attention for being the first place in this first-in-the-nation primary state to make its presidential preferences known. (Although since 1996, another small New Hampshire town — Hart's Location – reinstated its practice from the 1940's and also opened its polls at midnight.)

But the result in Dixville Notch is hardly a reliable bellwether for statewide results. The town’s Democrats picked Wesley Clark in 2004, Bill Bradley in 2000, and Bill Clinton in 1992. (John Kerry, Al Gore, and Paul Tsongas were the actual statewide winners those years.) On the Republican side, Dixville voters backed George Bush in 2000 (actual winner: John McCain) and Bob Dole in 1996 (actual winner: Bob Dole).

CNN's Tom Foreman and the Election Express are headed up to Dixville and will report the results soon as they are known.

– CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

Filed under: New Hampshire


Mark -Iowa   January 8th, 2008 5:49 pm ET

Thanks to Hillary's temper tantum during last weekends debate , followed by Bills "sour grapes" outburst against Senator Obama, I have definately decided NOT to support this sorry pair of has beens. Hillary s so-called 35 years of experience has produced very little and her campaign rhetoric sounds an awful lot like a dose of status -quo. No Thank you. Will someone please show the Clinton's the door…

Our nation is hurting. We are ready for change. "OBAMA", 2008

Sandy   January 8th, 2008 11:14 am ET

Iowa has picked the correct nominee twice in 40 years. NH, who cares what you think because your record isn't too much better. Anyone who votes for McCain, who is basically a Bush supporter agreeing with everything he does, is basically rubber stamping the same old politics in DC. Hillary is the best person to vote for. Hang in there Lady. These two states are nothing compared to the rest of the country. Don't give up because the rest of us have enough sense to vote for you and put the right person in DC.

Jerry Calendine   January 8th, 2008 9:40 am ET

Neither Hillary nor Obama can win if nominated. Hillary is perceived as a witch (spelled with a "B") and Osama Obama has strong Muslim family (middle name "hussein") which America will not allow in the White House.

Glenn   January 8th, 2008 5:39 am ET

GO RON PAUL!

Phil   January 8th, 2008 2:06 am ET

My heart actually goes out to HIllary and Bill. When you look at the big picture, they have been true to their words. If Obama were not in the race, Hillary would be a slam-dunk no-brainer. But the very thing she brags about and proclaims is the very thing that kills her, in my book: Experience.

Experience only counts when experience is accomplishing something. Washington is full of "experience." Where has it gotten us? I have nothing negative to say about Hillary, except she is truly part of the Washington establishment. Her vote on Iraq… when Obama had both the insight and the courage to go against the grain, by not only voting against it, but foretelling precisely why it was a mistake… speaks volumes for Obama, and unfortunately… against Hillary.

Hillary's problem is that like all of the others… Obama excluded… she plays "the game" instead of being an Obama, and following her conscience. That is the biggest problem in Washington. Too many games are being played. The time has come for someone with true leadership abilities to step into the spotlight. Someone that is seen as "believable and able" when it comes to getting away from "business as usual."

We all remember G-Dub speaking of how he was a "uniter." History proves that this was no more than talk. He had his chance. And unfortunately, Hillary has had her chance as well, and she did not get the job done.

The very fact that Obama has accomplished what he has to date… not to mention his track record as a State Legislator, and what he accomplished at Harvard… is substantive, and gives him tremendous credibility. Being a uniter at the state level is no small matter. If Mitt and others can point to their past successes as proof of the kind of leader they can be… why do we have a different litmus test for Obama?

The whole argument for "experience" is actually subterfuge anyway. I don't remember who said it, but some politician already pointed out that there is no real "training" for President of the United States. There is no magic formula, and no guarantees that any specific background is a key to success. The closest test we have is ones leadership ability, and their ability to works across party lines (and ego lines) to get results.

Were it not for Obama, Hillary would be the obvious choice. But with all that Obama brings to the table, I have more reason to chose him over HIllary, despite the fact that I do believe that Hillary is up to the task of President. Although I do not buy the argument of her being too divisive (simple rhetoric that many have been duped by), I also don't buy the experience argument. Washington is NOT lacking in the "experience" department, yet… what have the countless years of accumulated experienced netted the American people? Zero… Zip… Zilch. We all know its true.

My heart goes out to HIllary. It should have been her turn. But as the saying goes… timing is everything. In my opinion, she has earned the right. But the bottom line is that Bush has gotten us into a mess.

Experience did not play a role in the Democrats cowardice in letting Bush railroad them into Iraq. So why should bonus experience-points be given to Hillary… or taken away from Obama?

Now more than ever, we need a different strategy… a different leadership style… someone who thinks outside of the "Washington Box," and someone that can truly work to bring this country together to solve the tremendous problems we now face, as a result of the Bush fiasco.

Hillary had her chance. Sadly… the time has come for her to step aside, and give Barack a turn. In the end, when it comes to any and all politicians… all we can do is listen to what they "say," and hope they are up to the task. Sometimes they are not… but sometimes they are.

There are never any guarantees… no matter who we chose.

edward greenberg   January 8th, 2008 1:54 am ET

lets go with hiliary all the way.she will make a good leader.

Janel, St. Paul, MN   January 8th, 2008 1:46 am ET

To Conie, in TX:

You didn't study the web site of Trinity United Church of Christ, where Senator Obama and his family attends. The mission of that congregation (stated on the web site) is as follows:

"Trinity United Church of Christ has been called by God to be a congregation that is not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ and that does not apologize for its African roots! As a congregation of baptized believers, we are called to be agents of liberation, not only for the oppressed, but for all of God's family. We, as a church family, acknowledge that we will be building on this affirmation of "who we are" and "whose we are," call men, women, boys and girls to the liberating love of Jesus Christ, inviting them to become a part of the church universaal, responding to Jesus' command that we go into all the world and make disciples."

MoJo   January 8th, 2008 1:37 am ET

Ask yourselves this: if the person I'm supporting were president in 2002, would the US be in Iraq today?

Clinton: yes
Edwards: yes
Obama: NO

Hillary can defend her vote all she wants, and Edwards can apologize till he's blue in the face. They got caught up in the war cry. Only Obama kept his head.

What Americans should value most in a President is reason and foresight.

Dustin in CA   January 8th, 2008 1:15 am ET

Obama, Edwards, and Hillary get their talking points right out of the Communist manifesto. Marx would be proud. If you want Socialism, just say so. Why don't you people just admit it?
The "Republicans" aren't any better……just a slower path to Socialized Facism.
Dr. Paul is the only candidate that will treat the problems and not the symptoms.
Thanks Mary, you aren't alone.

Mike, Austin Texas   January 8th, 2008 1:07 am ET

Obama is Christian not muslim. The smear of his name around him swearing on the koran was also false and the fact is that Rep. Keith Ellison swore on the Koran not Obama who used his personal bible. Obama carries a message that trascends race, that trascends political parties…not "Blue or Red states, but the United States." There is alot of hate out there, but I am proud to see that so far this nation has come together to voice that we will no longer tolerate the status quo.

Let's make history. Be a part of history.

Vote for a change. Vote for Obama.

Obama/Edwards 08

Shannon, Charlottesville, Virginia   January 8th, 2008 12:49 am ET

since when does 'muslim background' translate to terrorist? does changing your religion disqualify a candidate? i've changed mine, and it continues to evolve. i want a president who thinks.

Kitty, Denver, CO.   January 8th, 2008 12:48 am ET

Tom Davie

It was: Hillary-0
Edwards-1
Obama-7

Shannon, Charlottesville, Virginia   January 8th, 2008 12:44 am ET

conie, are you inferring racism? i don't see how servicing the needs of the black community is racist–it does not constrain his commitment and dedication to a single demographic. this is a "low class" smear tactic. you don't get a *high-5* because you, dear, are looking very guilty of what you accuse obama of being–a racist.

OBAMA 2008

Tina   January 8th, 2008 12:42 am ET

If you're looking for a great candidate who is good on the campaign trail, Obama is the ticket. He's got charisma and he's smooth with the words.

But if you're looking for a strong President who could stand up to the hard knocks, Hillary is our gal.

Go, Hillary! You've got the brains to lead us through this extremely important transitional face. Let's not jump ahead 10 steps without looking and spouting off nice phrases. let's take one step at a time with carefully CALCULATED steps.

Go, Hillary! She's the right person for the job right now.

We'll see you in 8 years, Obama!

Angry Californian   January 8th, 2008 12:35 am ET

OK, wait a minute… do we Americans really have it that bad? How many own their own home, have a car, health care, a job, free public education? If you have travel outside of the U.S., you will realize we don't have it so bad. BUT, we know it could be better, we have experienced better. Our reputation in the world could be better, our government more efficient and future focused. The sad truth is that anyone capable of making the appropriate and necessary changes in this country steers clear of government.

I am undecided. Clinton…Obama…Edwards… but, saddened by some comments that reflect the candidates race and sex as a concern. How about taking that out of equation and looking at who can do the job? Has anyone of these candidates proven that? I appreciate those with facts stating them. Didn't know Obama passed so many Bills in Illinois, what were they?

Maybe we should be concerned with who the VP is… Our current VP sure had a hand in what went on. Anyone know the percentage of Americans who actually vote. I heard it was less than 50%.

GG, Frisco, Texas   January 8th, 2008 12:30 am ET

Joeisrightstill……..I think you onto something here. It would work perfect for his campaign and the Republican couldn't bother him about experience b/c Biden is smart, funny, to the point and don't put up with alot nonsense. I can see it too ……Obama/Biden

Kendall   January 8th, 2008 12:29 am ET

I am with Hutch…Obama is all fluff and has no substance. I am voting for HRD. NOOOOBama!

Bill   January 8th, 2008 12:19 am ET

Senator Obama is very convincing and has a way with words. That is great for an apprentice aspiring for a better job when they get the necessary experience under his belt.
I will vote for Senator Clinton or the Republican candidate if he has some on the job experience.
President is not a job with a how to manual. Experience counts!!!

Kokou   January 8th, 2008 12:15 am ET

For ur information. Obama won 7 votes, Edward 2, Richardson 1 and Hillary 0.

Thanks,
Kokou

Amy   January 8th, 2008 12:00 am ET

Hold on, the President wields the sword, not the pen. Congress wields the real pen. Watch who you are nominating! I say Hillary.

John   January 7th, 2008 11:31 pm ET

Hillary is the best hope for a Republican win. She is a polarizing figure. The Republicans would be out in droves to make sure she doesn't get in while a lot of Democrats would be apathetic. I'm personally hoping for a 3-way split so that Gore could be drafted at the Democratic convention, which means I would probably vote for Edwards in the primary, except that I live in Michigan where only Hillary is on the ballot, so I'll probably stay home instead.

Deanna from New Jersey   January 7th, 2008 11:30 pm ET

I am annoyed with the inconsistencies in our political process and these small states and town that believe they are more important than the majority by creating their unique process to gain undue media attention. Each uses a different tactic, caucus, no caucus, independents free to vote for either party in one state while not in others, midnight voting hours and my ultimate irritation, moving the primary date to increase a state’s influence over the general outcome. A small town like Dixville Notch with 17 registered voters should not receive any air-time, instead I watched media coverage implying the outcome of this small town’s primary is predictive Republican candidate.

nicole thomas   January 7th, 2008 10:13 pm ET

Hill-a-ry! Hill-a-ry! Hill-a-ry! We can't afford to take chances with our country. She's a sure thing.

Hyde Parker   January 7th, 2008 10:04 pm ET

I've made my way to the bottom of this long column of hopes and rants. What strikes me is how many of you who have attacked Barack Obama verge on illiteracy in your comments. What kind of advertisement is that for your points of view?

Sen. Obama has represented me since 1997, first in the Illinois Senate and now in the US Senate. [Note that Hillary, she of the great experience, has been in office since 2001.] I'm proud of my previous votes for him and will vote for him again on Feb 5 and Nov. 4. He is real.

MaryS   January 7th, 2008 9:44 pm ET

Ron Paul has my vote. Give me back my Constitutional freedoms! I am sick of the government deciding what is in my best interest. I am perfectly capable of determining what I chose to eat, drink, drive, watch, attend etc… and really don't need a government "sin" tax, regulation or mandate to protect me. Government employment grows while the national economy suffers. It takes vast numbers of government employees to enforce an ever growing number of government rules and regulations. Has anyone stopped to consider that when the government is waging a "war" on domestic issues like drugs, gun violence, and poverty, that the government is waging a war against its own citizens? It is time to stop supporting this dangerous self perpetuating government growth. Our Homeland Security measures scare me more than the threat of terrorist violence. Ron Paul is the only candidate who proposes significant changes that may result in a return to a less invasive more effective government.

Frank Rizzo   January 7th, 2008 9:38 pm ET

I vote for Ron Paul is a vote to re-charge the America I love! Don't think for one second that an underdog can't win. It's attitudes like that hurts democracy!

Tom Davie   January 7th, 2008 9:27 pm ET

I really wanted Hillary to win this.

However, as the media SPIN MACHINE HYPES Obama more and more, its going to become a landslide.

HYPE HYPE HYPE

I am going to vote republican. If you vote a guy in on HYPE with no real experience, then Democrats dont DESERVE a president.

Just can't do it   January 7th, 2008 9:14 pm ET

I just can't vote for a person who may or may not have been brought up with the same lessons and morals as the people we are fighting across the ocean. I've got to stick with Hillary - she is tested, tried and true.

Florida4Hillary   January 7th, 2008 8:53 pm ET

The only thing that will "change" if Obama gets to Washington will be the song he's singing and the lowering of expectations once he gets there.

We have no record he CAN get anything "changed" because he's been a senator for one term, most of that on the road, and something like 80%+ absent from voting. Stellar record, that. Something we can really get behind. He hasn't had enough time in the Washington machine.

He WILL get chewed up and spit out. Haven't we had enough "training wheels presidents" with George Bush? Hope and Change will get you a good pretzel in Central Park. I need a candidate that has unmatched respect on the world stage (where a president's most important work is done), AND the experience to know "what will work" and "what will fail." Hillary has been through the wringer. Hillary is respected, well-liked, and friends with many of the leaders of the world. Hillary is my candidate. Barack is a smooth talking rock star…. big on flash, but where's the substance?

He speaks well, is young, good looking (to some), and he makes good canned speeches. If his performance in stammering and stuttering during debates before spitting out a semi-baked, "hope and change" laden answers, however, this man is VERY wet behind those prominent ears! I will SERIOUSLY think about voting for an experienced "centrist" or "liberal" Republican before I vote for Obama.

Flagstaffer   January 7th, 2008 8:42 pm ET

If we really want this country to go in the RIGHT direction, I suggest you look at John McCain more favorably. He is the only candidate who understands issues on BOTH sides of the aisle.

Thank You

reabeinmass   January 7th, 2008 8:26 pm ET

It's obvious this site is being dominated by the Clinton "machine", and make no mistake about it, it is just that. I am a moderate Republican in Massachusetts, which essentially makes my vote meaningless in the general election, but given the choice between the two, I'd vote Obama in a NY minute…..

Fran   January 7th, 2008 8:21 pm ET

Be brave everyone. There are 48 other states to be heard from. Hillary will NOT win the election. She keeps talking about experience. What experience does she really have? I personally am not ready for a woman (particulary this woman). How many of you who are yelling for Hillary would stay married to Bill? Only if you are in politics. Let's hear from you in November.

Hans   January 7th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

were bots because he doesnt excite you? harsh…and i didnt know paula abdul and simon chose the next president

Hillary just plays off John's Passion and Barack's need for change in washington

OBAMA/EDWARDS 08!

jhon smith   January 7th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

DEAN, THE MAN IS MUSLIM BACKGROUNG BUT HE IS ASHMED OF IT! HE BACAME CHRISTIAN COUPLE YEARS AGO. I GUEST THIS MAN HAS NO SOUL. HE DENIED GRAND PAP, THE FAMILY HISTORY.

Florida4Hillary   January 7th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

I'm voting for Hillary, even though my vote "won't count," maybe overwhelming support for Hillary here will show Democrats who they need to put up to win this key swing state.

Sorry Obamabots, but the guy just doesn't excite me. He's for "chaaaaange" and "hope"? WOW. Is that somehow supposed to be a "fresh" message? Last I checked, that's pretty much the message that all out-of-power-party candidates run on!

It's incredibly sad that the Democratic electorate is going to pick its candidate on the same criteria they do "American Idol." We'll deserve every ounce of pounding we're going to take from the Republicans if we do!

Sal Gaglio   January 7th, 2008 7:53 pm ET

I think NH is a great place to start mainly because there are more independents than either Democrats or Republicans. Because of this non-partisan mix it is as close to a purple state as you'll get

Katie   January 7th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

Vote for ron paul. He has my full support, even though I'm normally a democrat. Google him!

Teresa, Kansas   January 7th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

Seems like Hilary's '35 years of EXPERIENCE" would have taught her not to cry in front of camera's while running for president!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SHE JUST PLAYED INTO THE STEREOTYPES AGAINST WOMEN VYING FOR POWER EVERY WHERE!!!

OBAMA/EDWARDS 2008

ayz   January 7th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

Forget the fact that the Clintons are old news and lets focus on Hilary as a candidate V Obama, in all the debate and especially the NBC N.H debate over the weekend Hilary does not eve come across as having half the pose and intellectual disposition as Obama.

I am not voting for brand name, i am voting on who i think is bext qualified for the job and hands down, Obama wins.

James B. Free   January 7th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

The Rebublican vs. Democrat Soap Opera is on!! Watch the silver tongued butchers hack it up amongst each other. Stock up on your Pepto B and endure the blathering. Is there one honest politician amongst them. The only one who knows a lick about fixing anything is Paul … the guy does have integrity too. It's too bad the rest are bought and paid for … couldn't possibly think for themselves or voice the truth. God Save America!!!

Sandra Hadaway-Reaney   January 7th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

If we do not elect Hillary as Presidet we are in a lot of trouble! She is the only person running who can get the job done. She can start to work on Day 1. That's very important. We do not need a president-in-training. We have 48 states in addition to Iowa and New Hampshire. Why do so many people want these two states to rule the rest of us? When my turn comes, I'll be voting for Hillary.

UnNorth   January 7th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Hillary? Her lack of ANY real experience, or for that matter, any accomplishments whatever, the great (and secret member) Health Care Debacle, billing records sought for years, but mysteriously appear at the very end of the investigation, ties to Sandy Berger our Security Head who has the gall to STEAL and ALTER or even DESTROY documents soudght by the 911 Commission. On the other hand, did her brother not reap financial rewards - or Mark Rich the felon - benefit from Clinton pardons? Oh yes,, Hillary, go for it . If IT is course in humility

Ian   January 7th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

The power to motivate the young and historically disengaged voters of Iowa, not to mention the indepedent voters of that state clearly points Obama's power to inspire and motivate. The culture of fear that our current administration cultivates can be dissovled and replaced with moderate and rational thought of Barack. He was very, very effective state senator in Illionois and wrote and passed more bills than any legislator in Illinois history. He took his Havard law degree (can you say starting $200,000 salary at a big firm) and went to the South side of Chicago to work as a community organizer for 1/100th of the money. That is inspiring! That is the civic engagement! Hilary sat on Wal Mart's board of directors. Tell me who you want fighting for you?

erin   January 7th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

i can't believe that a town of 75 only has 17 registered voters.
there is no way that of those 75, only 17 are of legal voting age.
what does that say of our country as a whole?
people are worried about the canidates… what about the voters…what about all those people who can vote, but won't?

it just seems to me the real story about that town is the unacceptable number of registered voters in it.

people are always ready to blame the 18-25 age group for not voting.
its not just the young people, this town is the perfect example of that.

Florida Independent   January 7th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

GO HILLARY!
WE LOVE YOU IN FLORIDA!
YOU CAN GO THE DISTANCE!

Kim   January 7th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

I am from Iowa, a small, mostly white midwestern state; every four years we have the responsibility and honor given to us for the first in the nation causes. I personally have had the opportunity to meet each and every candidate for president, from both parties, over the last year, given the opportunity to talk to each and asking what I thought were tough questions. We in Iowa do not take this honor of being first in the nation lightly and work at educating ourselves to make an informed, intelligent decision. We may be small and insignifcant to most of the rest of the nation, but we are a proud and educated people that do what we do for our country. What more would you want from any American, no matter what state they are from.

eboughey   January 7th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

I will be voting for Hillary. I think she has the skills, intelligence and overall desire to be president. If anyone can bring our country out of it's miserable state, it's her in my opinion. I don't care if she's cold or emotional, the facts of her achievements in the past speak for themselves.

She's also had to work twice as hard as all of the other candidates because she is scrutinized so much more for being a woman.

Mone   January 7th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

I appreciate hearing from Dennis—who is a lifetime resident of Illinois—someone Obama was suppose to represent. Some proof he is the real deal???? Oh yes—that’s right—Obama was only present to vote for—what—about 1.9% of the time! So how did he do to get things done??

Lynda –I think you hit it on the head–with the surgeon /investmet CEO statment.

Good for Hilary getting all fired up during the debates-at least someone is passionate about improving this country –something we haven't seen in a long time.

We need someone who can get the job done. Although I think Hilary can come off cold, etc. and is by no far the perfect candidate –She has my vote!

Nita   January 7th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Lynda Douglas what you wrote is all so true. However, I think NH is alittle caught up with the Iowa thing. You would hope that the people in NH would have more sense than to go out and support this Pied Piper of the red party. I hope they read some of the comments on the NYT about people who no longer think Obama is that hope.

Kevin Pendergast   January 7th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

Didn't Pat Buchanan win the New Hampshire Republican primary in 1996? You have Bob Dole winning in this article.

Troy, Seattle, WA   January 7th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

The word Change is powerful, specially when it causes a shift of power and influence. That is what Obama can bring!!! The other candidates did not talk about real change until they saw what impact Obama's message had. The fact is this, someone always has to be first. When the world doubts your every move, you must stay strong to your belief, adapt, learn and work hard. That is the american way, we can create a better America togethere it is not just a dream.

Sérgio, Porto, Portugal   January 7th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

I would just like to ask you all folks:

Since when "change" became a hip word?
Since when every single candidate started bragging about being agents of change?

How can Republicans (in particular) argue that they want to change the ways of Washington since they agree with George W. Bush on most issues?

After you answer that…think why.

Tom Davie   January 7th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

News flash

final vote in tiny New Hampshire town is in

3 votes Obama

2 for Edwards

2 for Clinton .

Headline:

OBAMA BLOWS EM AWAY AGAIN !!!! 47% VOTE TO 22 % VOTE. EDWARDS CLAIMS STRONG SECOND PLACE VICTORY AS HIS 2 VOTERS WERE BETTER LOOKING.

delegates won

Obama 1

Clinton 1

Edwards 1

connie floyd, crockett,texas   January 7th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

hang in there Hillary, I am still with you and there millions just like me. This in one little state and one straw poll. There are still lots of states left. Pls don't quits till the fat lady sings. HILLARY 08′

Kay   January 7th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Please help our country by voting for Hillary!

MARY AND JACK   January 7th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

WE ARE VOTING FOR HILLARY, WE AGREE WITH THE REAPER ITS THE REPUBLICANS PUSHING OBAMA BECAUSE THEY FEEL THEY CAN BEAT HIM IF HE GETS THE TICKET.

yk   January 7th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

If you fall for everything, you can stand for nothing. Clinton is not a bad person but she is saying and doing what she needs to do to win.. It is so fake. it sickens me
to know such a smart person can be so robotic. We have a need for the truth,change, and a transparent government. We want a move from the same
old old old! politics. She is identified as being a part of the status Quo and she
has not got away from the mood of the Past. We need the new, fresh, and
honest Obama. He will consult with hillary as well as other democrats, independents, and republicans. He just has to lead us out of the hate people
carry for Hillary that leads to fighting and getting nothing done! We need Him
or we will go to Hell in a Hand Basket.

Anne Detroit, MI   January 7th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Hillary is Bush lite - how is that "change" in Washington ? ?

no obama or hillary!!!!   January 7th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Look how quickly BOTH Obama and Hillary turned this country's cry for help into their own personal platform of "change". And now they battle over this platform. They are not people, the are politicians.

I will vote for someone with four decades of consistant principles. The fact that he comes straight from the working class is merely a bonus. RON PAUL 2008.

SeaGail   January 7th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

And re the comment about drug use, there are plenty of Americans who, at some point in time, made the mistake of trying drugs - but you don't have to advocate it, you admit you made a mistake and move on and you try to encourage children not to do the same, but you can have you head in the sand about it. Look to George W. people - you think he didn't do things - and it wasn't just the drinking. Barak is a human being with human failings, but overall, his message and desire are far removed from any youthful mistakes. Weigh what's important …

American Abroad   January 7th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

NH - the place where freedom shines and always has, needs to look seriously at Dr. Ron Paul!

the other candidates are more than willing to send more of our family members out to the middle east… some are even happy to do so for another 100 years!!

first of all, forgetting about the money, I do not want my sons or their sons to fight this fake war on WMD's… er… Regime Change… no that's not it… Empire… yeah that's what it is today….
then about the money… the US is spending all its resources on this farce, yet we can't keep things to together at home. Our infrastusture is failing, we can't fund retirement, we fall behind in education globally, and our economy is suffering from severe hemmoraging.

Ron Paul 2008. Lets get the focus back home and stop nation building elsewhere and rebuild this nation to once again be the envy and not the enemy of the world.

aj huntington ny   January 7th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

that's why these caucuses are not a harbringer of who will win even the nomination. If you google around about past caucuses, you will see that only 50 PERCENT of the time in the past have the winners of states' causcuses gone on to win the nomination !!

SeaGail   January 7th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

Re Obama - that's the canned attack … no substance, just hope. All you have to do is go to his website and find out plenty of specifics if that's what you're looking for. If we don't get someone who really speaks to changing the way things work so that something CAN get done, it will be more of the same no matter what.

Obama '08!!! (and I'm a 50s woman)

Dave, California   January 7th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

Michael, Korion…Keep one thing in mind.

When the US dollar loses value, espicially when compared to the Euro, globally our products becomes more competitive. If suddenly it is cheaper to buy an american product than a european product, what will people typically buy? While it shows a slight depression in our economy, the falling of the US dollar allows for us to compete more in the global market. And as econ 101 will tell us, when the demand rises, supply will follow suit and…Bam! Healthier economy!!

Just something to consider before screaming the sky is falling!!

Lynda Douglas   January 7th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Hello New Hampshire!

Tomorrow you will help choose the nominees for President of our country. Those of you who have observed, participated, and voted in many elections over the years know that CHANGE is not a new or original issue. Neither is pressure to vote for the most likable, popular, but inexperienced candidate. That's how we elected George W. Bush. That's how we ended up with the War in Iraq, high gas prices, shaky economy, triple the national deficit, home foreclosures, violations of the Geneva Accord, and loss of respect from allies all around the world. This is what we are leaving our children and grandchildren to suffer through.

I want a smart AND experienced candidate and that is Hillary Clinton. Hillary is very likable in person, but heck, I don't care if she's likable or not. I want someone in this job who has what it takes to be the President I can support, have confidence in, and be proud of. That' person is Hillary Clinton.

Would you want to have a likable but inexperienced surgeon operate on you or someone you love? Would you want to invest, buy stock in a company with a likable but inexperienced CEO?

Hillary has been through the fire, she is tested, she is smart, experienced, hard working, and the person I want and trust to be the next President of the United States!

Lynda Douglas
Wentzville, Missouri

Patrick   January 7th, 2008 6:21 pm ET

Hillary has rightfully or wrongfully been called a cold fish showing no emotions. So isn't it somewhat funny she shows some emotions just a day before the primary and gets press on it. Is crying on demand a prerequisite for being a presidential candidate. Just adds to that other comment about her; being manipulative.

Hutch   January 7th, 2008 6:19 pm ET

Obama seems to call Oprah in when his campaign is in trouble. He should just have her run the presidency; then we'd have the best of both worlds: someone of color and a woman. Obama's stunt in Iowa in bringing in Oprah to tout him just proves he doesn't have the experience or know-how himself to wow a crowd himself. I can just hear him on the campaign trail when he's in trouble on the phone with Oprah, "Boo-hoo, can you come in and rally for me? Boo-hoo!"

I'm sorry, the guy is boring and slow to respond to debate questions. Of course the Republicans would love to have him to run against - he lacks experience and will crumble like a house of cards under their scrutiny. From what I've been hearing about his work in Illinois - its lacking.

Kyle, NY   January 7th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Can we all just relax a little bit here. This is simply a nice little article about a small town and there long time tradition. Theres no need to get all mad about it. I really hope Hillary loses again to back her embarassing 3rd place finish in Iowa

Jimmy, Iowa   January 7th, 2008 6:07 pm ET

I caucussed for Barrack Obama in Iowa, just to latter catch my son smoking a jiont. During my reaction and punishment he argued back that it was ok to smoke Pot because Obama did and he is going to be President and will legalize it. So how do I argue with this. The only choice I have is to try to get Obama to explain to my child and the children around the United States that he used his past exsperence as a vote getter. A political stunt that could create a loss of life for some child with an overdose of drugs. America, Barrack made a very large mistake at the expense of our children he DOES NOT NEED TO BE PRESIDENT> THAT WOULD SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE TO OUR YOUTH. I can not take back my vote, but can do every thing I can to get this message out. I have changed my position to John Edwards, until I watched the debate. Now I will Support SENATOR CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES> Barrack go lead Kenya. You have as much tie there as you have here.

Ellen   January 7th, 2008 6:07 pm ET

I am going to vote for Hillary.I don't understand what her personially has to do with the good job she is going to do.I don't like a lot of people I have to deal with on a regular basis. But that does not stop my useing their service as long as they do a good job.Forget all that frendily stuff. Let her get this country straightened out again

Michael   January 7th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

Dr. Ron Paul is what this country needs to stop the bleeding! My 3 year old daughter is going to have to pay for the mistakes that our presidents are making, because of the devaluation of our currency and pointing our country towards total economic collapse! I love Obama also, but he doesn't have any plan to fix our fiscal downfalls. Unless we bring our troops home and stop printing $2.5 Billion per day, and borrowing billions per day from the Chinese, our children will be paying for it 10-20 years down the road! It is not a pretty situation, people.

NH, it is up to you to make the right decision! Make it Ron Paul!!

Alex, Syracuse, NY   January 7th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

To whoever asked about Obama's faith-NO, he is not Muslim. That is another tactic used by the right wing-put wrong information out there to try to discredit a candidate. Obama is a Christian who goes to church. Please do dome research on the candidates, and don't just watch news reports. Go online, google the candidates, and look at their platform and voting history. Then, and only then, will you be able to make an informed decision. Don't be fooled by slick advertising or ridiculous commercials designed to tug on your heart strings. These ploys will just distract you from the real issues. And please-don't vote for someone because he/she is likable. Look what happened the last time the public chose the affable, guy next door type…we got the BIGGEST IDIOT EVER, an enormous deficit, record oil prices with tax breaks for the big oil companies, and a never-ending war in Iraq. Not to mention attacks on civil rights and the constitution, corruption at the highest level of office, and cronyism and a level of incompetence that is unbelievable.

Paul   January 7th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

More people live in Glendale, California than caucused in Iowa. When will this elaborate political system get a reality check and quit pretending that two insignificant states like Iowa and New Hampshire can determine what the rest of us Americans should think about who should be president? Sorry, but I will do my own thinking, thank you!

A   January 7th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

Regardless of your feelings for against Hillary, Republicans simply need to bring up the term "Another Clinton" during general elections, and a huge body of her support will disappear.
Any of the democratic candidates would be a huge plus over any of the forseeable winners of the republican primary, but Obama is the only choice of a candidate that could make it to the whitehouse.

james   January 7th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

i just can not see how everyone is saying if clinton finishes second on tues. that she is done!? this is a LONG process and A LOT OF THINGS can change in a month! plus the poles and opion in iowa did not turn out to be right on the money!?

thanks
james
lake charles la

Let the Leaders Lead, Arcadia, Iowa   January 7th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Maybe if Hillary will cry one more time it will make a difference. Come on this is to elect the President of the United States. John Edwards-Obama ticket is a winning one. Move forward America and quit fooling yourself. Hillaryites had better get out their crying towels you are really going to need them after tomorrow. The election money could not buy, or could it.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   January 7th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Dixville Notch residence, vote 75 strong for Barack Obama, help make a CHANGE.

Jane   January 7th, 2008 5:44 pm ET

I am a professional female over age 50. I 'm aware that many of Senator Clintons support base are woman of my age catagory. I would be pleased and honored to help elect our first woman president. However, I have very recently decided against Hillary. I somehow feel that her message lacks sincerity and I question her level of trustworthiness. Hillarys performance during last weekends debate has done little to further her cause. Her outburst was embarrassing and put me in mind of behaviors demonstrated by our current commander and chief . Further, I believe that her unprofessional conduct is fueled in part by anger, and concerns over Senator Obamas defeat in Iowa and probable defeat in New Hampshire. For me, this is unacceptable.
I am an Iowa independent and one of many undecided individuals. However, I am listening to and impressed by Senator Obama. I am encouraged by his message of hope. Experience may be a concern but with the contribution of experienced and appropriate cabnet members and staff, this man would make a fine president.

Korion   January 7th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

I'll take visionary leadership over the experience that has our country plagued with trillions of dollars of debt. Our currency is no longer respected. Globally folks prefer to do business in euros vs. dollars. Not to mention the experience which has lead us into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a recently retired 20 year military veteran who is currently unable to find suitable employment you can bet I am so over status quo politics of either party. Obama has this veteran's support in 2008.

hello   January 7th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

The reason the FL primary has not or little effect/ number of delegates this year is because the state did not have permission to host it so early! To forlorn in FL, make sure your state follows the rules this year so you get all your delegates!

hello   January 7th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

How could George Bush not have been the eventual winner of the Republican Primary in 2000? He became the president, and is who they backed in the primary election.

NewPatriot-Arizona   January 7th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

I will vote for Dr. Ron Paul because he is the only candidate that can interpret and explain our U.S. Constitution in plain ENGLISH !

Katie   January 7th, 2008 5:37 pm ET

If Hillary had the same easy press as Obama she'd be way ahead..Read Michael Fauntroy"s article on Huffington post

Eileen   January 7th, 2008 5:37 pm ET

Hilary "isn't" hated by 50% of the country. Be real and if you are going to quote statistics then quote correct ones.

The problems with some men and also some women is that they can't take it when a STRONG woman is in front.

I pray that Hilary will prevail. She is the strong and intelligent and compassionate leader that our country needs!

Hans   January 7th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Obama isnt polarizing…he unites Republicans and Democrats and Independents unlike HRC….

Beware of your failed logic

Claire   January 7th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Obama has only 2 years of experience. He will join the ranks of John Kerry and Dukakis-unelectable as President. The simple question remains, would you hire someone to be the President of your company with only 2 years of experience? No. So, why would we vote someone, with such limited experience, for President ?!

Andrea Las Vegas   January 7th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

VOTE HILLARY! 50% OF THE NATION LOVES YOU!

Greg, Houston TX   January 7th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

I can't believe anyone with any sense of self-respect can openly admit to supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton. What we need in this country is a new form of segregation: all those who think Hillary is wonderful and would make a great president move to one part of the country, and I'll move where they are not.

Cindy   January 7th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

To those who repeatedly point to the "fact" that Hillary is hated by 50% of the country such as James F. above, just wait until Obama has the nomination to see how fast his negative go through the roof. One poll last week showed him at 46% negative already up from a much lower number…it's already started. Beware.

Andrea Las Vegas   January 7th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

JAMES F is delusional-the other half LOVES Hillary

Ann S.   January 7th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

I am so sick of Clinton and I do NOT want her back in the White House. She had her eight years!! Also, if you think crying on the trail with about a dozen cameramen and more reporters today was anything but SCRIPTED you are living in a fantasy zone.
Sorry HRC, your time has passed and I am so glad for it! Anyone who wants more of the scheming/philandering/poisonous Clinton White House years should go out and pick up Sally Bedell Smith's new book about the strange, selfish Clintons. Better yet, read it excerpted in the Weekly Standard.
Sorry Clinton, there is an anti-YOU vote out there!

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

What does this woman mean? "She don't want us to fall backward"? Who is us? and where is backward?

If Senator Obama, a black man, can bring himself up to run for President of the United States he can………………

Tom, Ottumwa, IA   January 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

I am proud I rejected Hillary and her politics of fear. I voted for Bill, but she is just too polarizing and hateful. I hope America follows our lead.

Anita   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Hillary Rodham Clinton… is no pushover, she is her own woman, stands on her own merits and the strongest/best candidate to beat the republican party.

Obama is the PIED PIPER for the republicans. Hillary has a tough road - but she will win in the end. Just let Obama keep on talking and talking and talking.

dean   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

I heard one of news channels say that nh people were going to make statement
because theyvoted for busch in 2000 & not 2008. hopely the statement we'll be that they learned from there last mistake. and vote for someone who has a clue what the american people need. John Edwards

dennis   January 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

well you people dont realize what you are doing by voting for obama. im from illinois where hes from and ill tell you this. obama hasent done a thing for illinois and the only reason hes a senator is because he had knowone to run against him the last election. beware,hes a smooooth talker that will promise you the world. sincerely, dennis from illinois lifetime resident

The Future Is Now   January 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Jack, if the Democratic leadership hadn't blown it, you'd have had a voice. Keep in mind on the GOP side that Dixville Notch has picked the eventual GOP nominee since 1960. Democratic picks are all over the place. Iowa and NH represent retail politics at its best with informed voters, tough questions and winnow out those who are shifty, don't tell the truth or try to buy the election. This Vermonter salutes both of them. Stop the sour grapes.

No HRC isn't out of it. Not yet, anyway.

Shannon, Charlottesville, VA   January 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

mati, it's a political tradition in this country–has been for decades–and it offers some insight into the hearts and minds of NH voters. relax.

dean   January 7th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

I would likr to hear questions asked about obama being of the mouslim faith
is it true???

James F.   January 7th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

Hilary is hated by around half of the country. Hated. If Democrats care at all about having an electable candidate they will back Obama. He is able to bring new people into the democratic party and will easily beat any republican nominee. I understand the Clintons hold a special place in your heart and the idea of having Bill back in the White House is appealing, but please, use your head not your emotions on this one. If you pick Hilary it will make every republican in the country go to the polls to oppose her, the republicans will win not only the White House, but possibly Congress as well.

Obama is it. He is the real deal. Its time to turn the page.

NewPatriot-Arizona   January 7th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Thank you CNNnews and ABCnews for inviting Dr . Ron Paul to your debates…. as for FOXnews, they will be at the bottom of the stinker.

Mike   January 7th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

75 people. Now that's an indication of what the majority of the country thinks. Alert me when there is something more substantial to go on.

sue   January 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

The media should be looking at Obama's track record. To have someone with little experience to run the country just says alot about the United States. Or maybe he will let Oprah help him run the country.
Hillary stay strong

Tim   January 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Obama is the clear, standout leader among both the Democrats and extended to the Republicans. While her intentions are good, Clinton worries me. Look at the way she has responded to Thursday's Iowa defeat. She starts mudslinging so badly that Edwards steps in, she has jumped from campaigning with experience to campaigning with change to campaigning for the experience to change, and now nearly cries.

Consensus and unity is with Obama.

reaper   January 7th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Obama can't win the electoral college. that's why Republicans want him so bad.

No Hillary   January 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Yeah, just what we need, a leader with Hillary's experience of standing behind Bush while smiling and waving!

Go Hillary   January 7th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Hillary Rodham Clinton… is no pushover, she is her own woman, stands on her own merits and the strongest/best candidate to beat the republican party.

Iowa and New Hampshire's do not represent mainstream America

Super Tuesday does! Go President Hillary Rodham Clinton!!!!!

She's the Man for the Job   January 7th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Hillary Rodham Clinton… is no pushover, she is her own woman, stands on her own merits and the strongest/best candidate to beat the republican party.

Iowa and New Hampshire's do not represent mainstream America

Super Tuesday does! Go President Hillary Rodham Clinton!!!!!

Susan   January 7th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Obama is the right choice. He's a new kind of politician that we need today. Clinton keeps dismissing his "words" as empty rhetoric, but maybe she doesn't remember that the pen is mightier than the sword. It takes some great rhetoric borne from great ideas to move a nation forward. You know, I bet politicians said the exact same thing about Abraham LIncoln. Now, I dare you to tell me the Gettysburgh Address was empty rhetoric or that King's I have a Dream speech was empty rhetoric or even Roosevelt's "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself" is empty rhetoric. That's exactly the kind of rhetoric I want from my president — hope and inspiration and a unifying vision.

scotty   January 7th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Obama talks about change with no concrete statements and mentions we don't want the same old Washington in his very arrogant manor and makes it very clear on nationwide TV that he would love to have some of the staff including Hilary from the Clinton presidency
so what does that tell you- I GUESS HE REALLY DOES WANT SOME EXPERIENCE AROUND HIM AS HE IS LOST

DON'T MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE TWICE WHEN EVERYONE DIDN'T LIKE AL GORES PERSONALITY VOTE FOR HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Elliott   January 7th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Hillary's policies have been indistinguishable from George W. Bush's policies. We need _real_ change. We need respect for the American people, sane monetary and foreign policy, and respect for the rule of law. Google Ron Paul. Look at the facts. Then cast your vote for real change in this great nation. Support Ron Paul!

Todd   January 7th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

I can't vote OBAMA and I will not. The democrates, if they choose a person based on a few states, will find that they put an unelectable candidate in the nomination. If so, I hope that Al Gore decides to run for the green, grey, or red party. This die hard democrate will vote republican if it comes to an Obama ticket. I have watched every debate and I have read way to much to make me feel comfortable voting for Obama.

Alison   January 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Hillary

I support you. As part of the Armed Forces, I believe only you can make a strong difference. Be strong.

Matthew   January 7th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Pat Buch won '96 NH Primary.

Randy   January 7th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Jack, Florida polling places are shaky. Did they ever get the ballot situation straightened out??? They cheat for Republicans anyhow.

Garry Lemons, Benton, Arkansas   January 7th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I agree Freestyle..PLEASE pick Hillary…don't make the mistake of being fooled by Obama and his empty promises. he is a great man, but he is not what this country need to pull us out of the mess the Republicans and Bush have gotten us into.
I agree also with Jack K.—- WHY??? do these two states have so much influence??

Americans must be really desperate to pick a novice with no real experience and hope he is a good choice.
Wise up. Clinton knows how to handle herself and she MOST definitely knows how to handle this country and get it back on track!

Like her or hate her, she has the know how and she has the guts to do what is right.

Randy   January 7th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Be strong Hilary, it's a long road.

Jack K.   January 7th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

Just who care's what 75 people in New Hampshire think?

Man do we need to rethink the way our Primaries are done!!

What would be wrong with some larger states–and more populous ones?

I suppose it would be different–if Americans weren't so easily willing to accept the nominations from two podunk early states–with no basis in reality o with the rest of America!!

Forlorn in Florida. We don't even get to pick!!

Mati   January 7th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Another idiocy. And tomorrow you are going to have big headlines about the 17 votes! Is this a joke?

Freestyle Pete from Long Beach   January 7th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Please vote for Hillary in NH! We need a person that is actually able to make changes to our great country!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map