January 8, 2008
Posted: January 8th, 2008 04:10 PM ET
Watch Obama react to Bhutto's death
Watch Bill Clinton's comments Monday night.

(CNN) – On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, former President Bill Clinton criticized the media for not pressing Barack Obama more fully on Iraq, and accused the Illinois senator of shifting his position to reflect changing attitudes on the war.

"It is wrong that Sen. Obama got to go through 15 debates trumpeting his superior judgment and how he had been against the war in every year, enumerating the years, and never got asked one time, not once, 'Well, how could you say that when you said in 2004 you didn't know how you would have voted on the resolution? You said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war," Clinton said at a campaign stop in Hanover, New Hampshire.

"And you took that speech you're now running on off your Web site in 2004. And there's no difference in your voting record and Hillary's ever since."

He added, "Give me a break. This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen."

Clinton's wife, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, is battling Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The former president briefly acknowledged that his wife's senior campaign advisor, Mark Penn, was mistaken to claim that Obama had no bounce out of Iowa after winning the state's caucuses because the poll numbers on the day after were relatively unchanged.

Then he abruptly changed the subject - suggesting that Obama's campaign had employed underhanded tactics.

"What did you think about the Obama thing calling Hillary the senator from Punjab? Did you like that? Or what about the Obama handout that was covered up, the press never reported on, implying that I was a crook. Scouring me - scathing criticism over my financial reports. Ken Starr spent $70 million and indicted innocent people to find out that I wouldn't take a nickel to see the cow jump over the moon.

"So you can take a shot at Mark Penn if you want. It wasn't his best day. He was hurt. He felt badly we didn't do better in Iowa," said Clinton. "But the idea that one of these campaigns is positive and the other is negative when I know the reverse is true - and I have seen it and I have been blistered by it for months - is a little tough to take. Just because of the sanitizing coverage that's in the media doesn't mean the facts aren't out there."

He added, lightheartedly, "Otherwise, I do not have any strong feelings about that subject."

The former president made the remarks as polls showed his wife trailing Obama in this important first-in-the-nation primary state.

Update:
Responding to the comments later Tuesday, Obama said the Clinton campaign was "frustrated," and he dismissed the notion the press has gone easier on him.

"Maybe I've been missing something, but it seems like you guys have been reporting on me the entire year," Obama told reporters. "I remember this summer when we were down 20 points, we were getting knocked around pretty good. And I didn't hear the Clinton camp complaining about how terrible the press was."

Related video: Watch John King and Jessica Yellin on Bill Clinton's comments

– CNN Associate Political Editor Rebecca Sinderbrand

Filed under: Barack Obama • Bill Clinton • New Hampshire


Do Title Fees Justify The Protection Title Companies Offer? « Wicked Blogging   August 12th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

[...] CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive ... [...]

AstroTurfing Works « Cinie’s World   August 8th, 2009 11:01 pm ET

[...] accusations that Hillary hated Martin Luther King, and charges of racism about Bill Clinton's fairy tale and Jesse Jackson comparison [...]

Brenda   February 5th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

You people that are voting for Obama are going to be very suprised IF he should win the nominee as there will be a change again only worse that BUSH. He doesn't have the experience needed to hold the most important job in the country. We can not go thru another President that has to learn on the job. See what a mess we are in right now with BUSH!
Hillary is our only chance of hope. She will be come the best President we ever had if only given a chance to prove herself. She has the experience, qualification and ability to bring change to our great country once again. Obama has not been tested and will have to learn. We don't have time for him to learn on the job. Our country is in a real mess. We are in war, in debt, in recession, loosing jobs, too dependandant on oil from other countries. Take a good look at what BUSH is leaving the next President. Stop talking about Bill he is not running! Bill is not saying anything any different than Michelle is of Obama. All the media is scared to really get the low down on this Obama character. They only put out there what you want to hear. He will say anything to get elected. Hillary has been tested in all areas of her life and will lead the country to a great victory. She will make history becasue she will be the First Woman President.
Get off the tidal wave of Obama or drown. Vote Hillary 2008

Brenda   February 5th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Go Hillary for the election today. I no longer think of Ted, Caroline,Oprah and others that have endorsed Obama to be nothing than just their opinion. This does not mean because these people endorse him that is good. Most people if they are voting have a right to make up their own mind and not be influnced by others. I feel like Hillary is the best choice to walk into this mess that she will inherit from BUSH. Believe me I would not want this mess, but it will tak a strong person with experience to create the change we need to get us out of this mess....recession included. Bush has done nothing in the last 7 years but spend money and go into a war that was not worth the lives or money that has been lost.
Wake up people we do not need another person in office that is not qualified.
Vote Hillary 2008.

reggiewho   January 31st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

I'm watching the debate right now and I like to see both of them talk about how they feel and what they want to do for everyone but when they start doing he said she said that turns me off all the time, and I'm getting sick hearing Hiliary's come backs, Grow up

OBMAM 08

Rachel Sacco   January 21st, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Bill Clinton has received my support and kind thoughts. His Republican like slime comments about Borack may win this battle for Hiliary, but watch out when you want the hard working Iowa voters during the real contest. The hours I would have put in for any of the three candidates have been spent. Bill, you will not win me back.

Robert   January 20th, 2008 9:16 am ET

BILL CLINTON HAS REDEFINED THE TERM "WAILING WILLY". THE TIME TO WRITE HISTORY IS WHEN YOU ARE ACTUALLY IN THE OVAL OFFICE, NOT AFTER YOU HAVE SOILED IT. MANY OF US ARE DOG TIRED OF HIS FACE, HIS VOICE, HIS UNENDING BID FOR ATTENTION. HE HAS ALWAYS NEEDED TO CLUTCH A SKIRT TO DEFINE HIMSELF, NOW IN HIS ATTEMPT TO RIDE BACK TO ATTENTION BY HOLDING ON TO THE HEM OF HILLARY'S, HE IS PULLING HER DOWN, AND IS THE BEST TOOL THE CONSERVATIVES HAVE IN COUNTERING THEIR AGENDA.

AntiBrenda   January 15th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Some people's comments explain why Bush got the office for the second time even after rigging the election for the first time. If somebody thinks Obama is racist then we need to close this thing. I was participating because i thought it involved serious and educated minds. I am not supporting Hillary or Obama but it is ludicrous for someone to call him a racist. If you are looking for racism look out somewhere else. Or may be you just don't understand what it means. Please consult a dictionary.

Brenda   January 14th, 2008 10:23 am ET

OBMAM is a rasist and if you supporting voters would just check out his background you would not cast your vote for this man. If you are hell bent on voting for him after looking into his past then do not complain when were are in worse shape with him in office. OBMAM being President would be worse than BUSh's 3rd term. If you are not afraid to look at his background then make a intellegent decision after reading all the background information then the information you are reading is not what he really stands for.
The only intellegent qualified person to win the Presidency is HILLARY.

Brenda   January 13th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

If you are going to critized Hillary or Bill for something they say then do not take their message out of text and turn it around to mean what you want. Show the WHOLE statement. That is what is wrong with all of the media. This is HIllary's race not Bill's. She is a intellegent lady that has the qualifications to be President. Wake up you jerks and stop giving her a hard tiome. She is putting her self thru all of this scrunity to help US from this BUSH era.
Get behind her and look at her qualifactions and stop knit picking on partical statments. I think you need to look at this Obmam long and hard and investigate into some of his backgrounds. Then compare them for yourself. Then you will see how inexperienced he really is.
By the way did you see what a GREAT job Hillary did this morning on MEet The Press. She was put into soem pretty tough questions by him and came thru with flying colors. If you missed it then I suggest you go back and find out what was said so you will have the whole picture of her and how smart she is.
I am not convinsed more than ever that she is the ONLY one running that is READY to become President for 2008. Look what Mess she is walking inot that BUSH will leave. Bill left a surplus and BUSh spent it and millions more. Bill was our Best President in 30 years but you know what HILLARY will be much better than BILL. She is her on woman and has been tested and gruled by the media. Don't vote for a young inexperienced OBMAM that is talking the talk with no record to see. Go with HIllay who can talk the talk and walk the walk.
GO HILLARY! Our Future BEST PRESIDENT. A real change from what we have now.

rusty   January 12th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

You know, it really amazes me that the public is even considering putting the Clinton's back in the White House. This sort of stuff is not unique when it comes to the Clinton's, their entire political career is speckled with it. It is the last thing this country needs. More partisan bickering, scandals in the White House, and nothing of substance getting done for the greater good of everyone. Please, look at the history of this political family, and ask yourself, is it really worth it? Are they really that good? I think not.

Linda   January 11th, 2008 9:01 pm ET

I like other Black Americans, think some people are confused in thinking that because Mr. Obama is Black that he will get all of the Black votes. I believe that Mr.Obama should not take the Black vote for granted. Mr. Obama should recant his previous statement that more Black will come out to vote just because he is running for President. I also believe that Former President Clinton was correct in saying that if Mr. Obama believes he can pull out of Iraq right away if he becomes president he is in fact believing in a fairy tale. What plan has he outlined in pulling out of Iraq? What previous experience in Mr. Obama career has demonstated an ability accomplish a major task as pulling out of Iraq? Promises of accomplishing this mission is what it is a fairy tale promise. Being Black does not guarentee black votes!

Joan   January 11th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Women Are Never Front-Runners
By GLORIA STEINEM
Correction Appended

THE woman in question became a lawyer after some years as a community organizer, married a corporate lawyer and is the mother of two little girls, ages 9 and 6. Herself the daughter of a white American mother and a black African father — in this race-conscious country, she is considered black — she served as a state legislator for eight years, and became an inspirational voice for national unity.

Be honest: Do you think this is the biography of someone who could be elected to the United States Senate? After less than one term there, do you believe she could be a viable candidate to head the most powerful nation on earth?

If you answered no to either question, you’re not alone. Gender is probably the most restricting force in American life, whether the question is who must be in the kitchen or who could be in the White House. This country is way down the list of countries electing women and, according to one study, it polarizes gender roles more than the average democracy.

That’s why the Iowa primary was following our historical pattern of making change. Black men were given the vote a half-century before women of any race were allowed to mark a ballot, and generally have ascended to positions of power, from the military to the boardroom, before any women (with the possible exception of obedient family members in the latter).

If the lawyer described above had been just as charismatic but named, say, Achola Obama instead of Barack Obama, her goose would have been cooked long ago. Indeed, neither she nor Hillary Clinton could have used Mr. Obama’s public style — or Bill Clinton’s either — without being considered too emotional by Washington pundits.

So why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one? The reasons are as pervasive as the air we breathe: because sexism is still confused with nature as racism once was; because anything that affects males is seen as more serious than anything that affects “only” the female half of the human race; because children are still raised mostly by women (to put it mildly) so men especially tend to feel they are regressing to childhood when dealing with a powerful woman; because racism stereotyped black men as more “masculine” for so long that some white men find their presence to be masculinity-affirming (as long as there aren’t too many of them); and because there is still no “right” way to be a woman in public power without being considered a you-know-what.

I’m not advocating a competition for who has it toughest. The caste systems of sex and race are interdependent and can only be uprooted together. That’s why Senators Clinton and Obama have to be careful not to let a healthy debate turn into the kind of hostility that the news media love. Both will need a coalition of outsiders to win a general election. The abolition and suffrage movements progressed when united and were damaged by division; we should remember that.

I’m supporting Senator Clinton because like Senator Obama she has community organizing experience, but she also has more years in the Senate, an unprecedented eight years of on-the-job training in the White House, no masculinity to prove, the potential to tap a huge reservoir of this country’s talent by her example, and now even the courage to break the no-tears rule. I’m not opposing Mr. Obama; if he’s the nominee, I’ll volunteer. Indeed, if you look at votes during their two-year overlap in the Senate, they were the same more than 90 percent of the time. Besides, to clean up the mess left by President Bush, we may need two terms of President Clinton and two of President Obama.

But what worries me is that he is seen as unifying by his race while she is seen as divisive by her sex.

What worries me is that she is accused of “playing the gender card” when citing the old boys’ club, while he is seen as unifying by citing civil rights confrontations.

What worries me is that male Iowa voters were seen as gender-free when supporting their own, while female voters were seen as biased if they did and disloyal if they didn’t.

What worries me is that reporters ignore Mr. Obama’s dependence on the old — for instance, the frequent campaign comparisons to John F. Kennedy — while not challenging the slander that her progressive policies are part of the Washington status quo.

What worries me is that some women, perhaps especially younger ones, hope to deny or escape the sexual caste system; thus Iowa women over 50 and 60, who disproportionately supported Senator Clinton, proved once again that women are the one group that grows more radical with age.

This country can no longer afford to choose our leaders from a talent pool limited by sex, race, money, powerful fathers and paper degrees. It’s time to take equal pride in breaking all the barriers. We have to be able to say: “I’m supporting her because she’ll be a great president and because she’s a woman.”

Gloria Steinem is a co-founder of the Women’s Media Center.

teresa   January 11th, 2008 11:09 am ET

all the anti clinton comments are mostly from male's....does that say the male ego's if hillary getting president will be tough on the boys,,,,whaa!!!!! i can't believe gown men would say such things about a female...i am glad i don't know any of you....what has this country come to,when we can be so vicious and hateful. obama is young,inexpereince and has to work his way up the ladder. for ANYONE to vote for him needs to read about him,his family and his voting record...maybe if you did that you might come to your senses.if obama gets president we will find ourselves in the same position we are in now,,a inexperience prsident that fumbles over every issue.if the media would ask him the tough questions, like they ask hillary maybe some truths woulod come out.
is middle name is hssien.the republicans will love it if obama gets president they are already saying they will use his inexpereince to win the election.wake up......
maybe all the big male ego's out there need to get a brain...i didn't rwalize we had sooooooooo many chauvist males in this country...shame on you

dennis   January 10th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

If we want to talk about experience, then Bush wife should be putting up her resume for 2012, Well we all know that Jeb Bush is next, America is too great to be run as a dynastic club, her experience is lock and key in the archives, release lets see what she did while in the white house.

We need good judgment at this critical time; not a crying lady, their are lot of strong ladies out their to offer the body change she is talking about.

Brenda   January 10th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

You Go HILLARY!!!
Well all I can say is if we want someone that knows what needs to be done of this MESS George Bush has us in they will vote HILLARY. We can not afford to chance another someone with not enough experience. Obama this is no job for you. We are tired of gettting someone and letting them have on the job trainning. We are still paying for that now and will be for many years, because of BUSH.
Obama wants to compare hismset to MLK and JFK. Come on give me a break there will never be another of either of these great men. Obama might want to be but don't be fooled. You voters need to check this man out and get off of the wave that is just going along for the ride. This election is very important and people need to wake up. We can not have another republican president...talk about spenders. Bush spent everything Clinton had and still has us in DEEP DEEP debt. Clinton's record will prove she is the only one that is really qualified to be President. I best you can't find anyone that said they voted for GW Bush now. Well we can not afford to turn our top office over to someone that is NOT ready. He might be later on, but this is not the time. We will be challenged again by the terrortist. We NEED to be ready and Hillary is the ONLY one that is ready.
Don't be fooled, we can not keep going down this same road. Obama is would be a change but not the right change for America.
VOTE change for America....HILLARY for 2008 the only one smart enough and qualified to prepare us to get out of the war and help the middle class.
Stop giving her a hard time and focus on the issues. With a democratic congress and President we might be able to clean up the BUSH era.
HILLARY IS OUR ONLY HOPE For the next 8 years. By that time Obama might be ready.....but not now.

dennis   January 10th, 2008 9:14 am ET

Wake up people Bill has nothing to say, is just cheap political attack, he just telling the few that cares to listen that having a black president is the biggest fairy tales, is a political language, he wouldn't put it straight

NHforHillary   January 9th, 2008 8:32 pm ET

You people are blind. It's not a tactic and it's not a trick, she has always been that way about black people, racism and the things she speaks about and always will be. Like it or not, that is who she is. She has done a lot as NY Senator. You could say she is making it up if she didn't have a track record but she does. Show me Obama's record and what he has done – oh wait – HE DOESN'T HAVE ONE!!!!!!!!

Her list:

In 2000, Hillary was elected to the United States Senate from New York. As Senator, Hillary has continued her advocacy for children and families and has been a national leader on homeland security and national security issues.

After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Hillary worked with her colleagues to secure the funds New York needed to recover and rebuild. She fought to provide compensation to the families of the victims, grants for hard-hit small businesses, and health care for front line workers at Ground Zero. And she continues to work for resources that enable New York to grow, to improve homeland security for New York and other communities, and to protect all Americans from future attacks.

She is the first New Yorker ever to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee, working to see that America's military has the necessary resources to protect our national security. She has visited troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and at Fort Drum in New York, home of the 10th Mountain Division and other New York bases, as well as at Walter Reed Military Hospital. She has learned first-hand the challenges facing American combat forces. Hillary passed legislation to track the health status of our troops so that conditions like Gulf War Syndrome would no longer be misdiagnosed. She is an original sponsor of legislation that expanded health benefits to members of the National Guard and Reserves and has been a strong critic of the Administration's handling of Iraq.

But Hillary has recognized that we can't ignore our problems at home while we face challenges overseas. She has introduced legislation to tie Congressional salary increases to an increase in the minimum wage, because she believes if America's working people don't deserve a raise, neither does Congress. She has supported a variety of middle-class tax cuts, including marriage penalty relief, property tax relief, and reduction in the Alternative Minimum Tax, and supports fiscally responsible pay-as-you-go budget rules. She helped pass legislation that encouraged investment to create jobs in struggling communities through the Renewal Communities program. She has championed legislation to bring broadband Internet access, which is so important in today's information economy, to rural America.

In the Senate, Hillary has not wavered in her work to expand quality affordable health care to more Americans. She worked to strengthen the Children's Health Insurance Program, which increased coverage for children in low income and working families. She authored legislation that has been enacted to improve quality and lower the cost of prescription drugs and to protect our food supply from bioterrorism. She sponsored legislation to increase America's commitment to fighting the global HIV/AIDS crisis, and is now leading the fight for expanded use of information technology in the health care system to decrease administrative costs, lower premiums, and reduce medical errors.

Her strong advocacy for children continues in the Senate. Some of Hillary's proudest achievements have been her work to ensure the safety of prescription drugs for children, with legislation now included in the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, and her legislation to help schools address environmental hazards. She has also proposed expanding access to child care. She has passed legislation that will bring more qualified teachers into classrooms and more outstanding principals to lead our schools.

Hillary has been a powerful advocate for women in the Senate. Her commitment to supporting the rights guaranteed in Roe v. Wade and to reducing the number of abortions by reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies was hailed by the New York Times as "frank talk...(and) a promising path." Hillary is one of the original cosponsors of the Prevention First Act to increase access to family planning. Her fight with the Bush Administration ensured that Plan B, an emergency contraceptive, will be available to millions of American women and will reduce the need for abortions.

Hillary is strongly committed to making sure that every American has the right to vote in fair, accessible, and credible elections. She introduced the Count Every Vote Act of 2005 to ensure better protection of votes and to ensure that every vote is counted.

In 2006, New Yorkers reelected Hillary to the Senate with 67 percent of the vote.

"Hillary passed legislation to track the health status of our troops"

I just witnessed the burial of my 22 year old active 82nd Airborne Army cousin, who was like a brother, at Arlington National this past weekend. He went through sickness after sickness until his final sickness over the holidays that resulted in his final passing. The first sickness occurred while fighting in Afghanistan and then kept coming back when he came home. When he got sick again and was training for Iraq, they told him to 'suck it up'. He got married last summer to his high school sweetheart and their whole marriage was him being sick from fighting overseas and not being taken care of properly over there and over here.

Thank you Hillary for caring, we need more care for our troops. Maybe if there was more care for our military personnel he would still be alive today.

What has Obama REALLY done!? Besides talk like a preacher in a church and act and compare himself to MLK & JFK (he isn't even close). I am just waiting for his next speech that starts with "I have a dream...." because he is oh so close.

Dottie H   January 9th, 2008 8:26 pm ET

If I wanted t vote for Hiliarym which I DO NOT, the sight ad sound of Bill getting his mouth flapping about ANYTHING related to his wife's campaign would make me not vote for her. My fear is if she gets in WHO will be the president? Bill or Hiliary???

He disgraced the White House once, I refuse to give him another chance.

joey   January 9th, 2008 7:03 pm ET

I just couldn't believe that Hilary has so many tricks when I was the tears in her eyes just one day before election. I just don't know when people will wake up to realize what kind of people the Clintons are. The Clintons always use black people and lies to advance themselves while they profoundly express how much they love the black people and how truthful they are. She went to Flatbush in Brooklyn to participate the parade of black people and held babies. But when it came to buy a house, they bought a house in a place where you couldn't find any black people. Bill had so many girlfriends, but which one is a black girl? Now Bill professes that the woman he married is the best woman, the smartest, the most caring, bla, bla, bla. If this is the case, why did he have so many extra-marital affairs with other women? Isn't his lady the best woman, the smartest, the most caring woman in the world? It is a big lie again.

It takes a super black man like Obama to see through what the Clintons are. Obama will unite the nation while the Clintons divide the nation to advance themselves financially and politically.

Rocco   January 9th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Hilliary and Bill will do anything to get back in the White House again. She is a big manipulator, those were crocodile tears. I hope people can see that she has done nothing as a senator of NY. What experience and record of public service she is talking about. Yes, it's very personal for her to win ....... not for the country or us but only for herself.

NHforHillary   January 9th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

Another thing – about the conservatives that say they will back Obama. It's called 'I will back him now, but not when it comes to election time'. It's called politics. That is why a lot of NH Indepenents that usually vote Dem voted for McCain so that Romney wouldn't win. It doesn't mean they want to vote for McCain or that they want to vote Rep, it is a tactic. And that is the same thing the conservatives are doing with Obama – they say they back him up now so that people will vote for him because they feel that they can beat him out over Hillary. It is too bad it is such a game, but it is. The same games were played in Iowa, and yes you Obama backers, Obama played the same dirty tricks there so calling out the Clintons for playing dirty is the pot calling the kettle black.

Marita   January 9th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Mr. Bll Clinton is 100% correct on his speech againts Obama. When it comes to debate between Bill Clinton and Obama I don't think Mr. Obama has a chance to win. Mr. Clinton is an excellent orator and debater.

NHforHillary   January 9th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Hillary has a very long political track record. Why do you think there will be gridlock in the Senate, Prez, if she is elected? If you know her background and all of the political work that she has done since she was very young, you would know that she grew up as a Republican and a Goldwater Girl. She knows both sides of the spectrum and has even said that she is to quote "a mind conservative and a heart liberal" when she stepped down as the President of the Young Republicans at Wellesley after changing her views during the American Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War. She left the Republican party for good after being part of both parties in 1968 when she saw veiled" racist messages at the RNC. If anyone would know how to unite the parties, Hillary is THE ONE because she knows both sides and can play to both parties. If you know Obama's background, he is more Socialist than she is, besides his wavering on women's rights – so I don't know how he believes he can unite the parties being so left-wing under the covers and not having any real decisiveness on issues in the Senate.

She has a long track record of working for children, families and for the American middle class – the heart of our country – to make us stronger and to make us better people. She has a good heart, good intentions and comes from a working middle-class family whose mother came from a dysfunctional family and was abandoned along with her sibling at the age of 8, yet was still able to raise her children with family values and a strong educations. Hillary knows what she was given by a mother that wasn't given much and she seems to want to give that back to our country. She doesn't sugar coat her speeches, they are from the heart and are true to what she believes in and what she has worked for her entire career. Take a look at her work, her life and what she stands for. You all talk about where Obama comes from and what he has gone through, Hillary's background wasn't spoonfed to her – she had to work for it and was taught to stand up for herself and that is what she did to win in NH.

GO HILLARY! Don't let these boys bully you around.

Alex   January 9th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

What really has Obama done for the nation? He is a good speaker and has some charm, beside that he has nothing to show for. Obama fans wake up. This is not a movie or a ball game. If the nation wants to have a fair chance to replace the tyrannical regime of last 7 years, then be practical and don not blow this opportunity. Republicans will like nothing more than having Obama as the Dem candidate. They are licking at their chops, as they even do not have to use their dirty tricks.
vote for Obama = vote for any republicam. Period.

MATTHEW BLACKTHORNE   January 9th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

Mrs Clinton is the ONLY candidate with a solid Science and Space Technology policy: Obama has already said he will delay/cancel (same thing) America's manned lunar program. How can he lack Vision so, when America's space budget is LESS than 0.7% percent of the Federal Budget?!! AMERICA CAN EASILY AFFORD IT!!

Michael   January 9th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

I have withdrawn my support from Hillary and placed it behind Obama because of Bill Clinton's actions. I have always supported the Clintons but the curtain was pulled back for me one too many times revealing their slimy tactics. They are no better than Bush and Karl Rove.

Kevin C   January 9th, 2008 1:16 pm ET

I don't like Bill out on the Campaign trail bashing Obama. As the former President of the US he should not be out there tarnishing Obama's good record by twisting words. He is in a diffult position I understand being the husband of a candidate, but he is not the candidate this time around.
America, we need to be moving moving, NOT BACKWARD! This is the chance we have to breathe new life into our country. Clinton is old news. With Obama as our leader we could show the world that we are committed to changing from Bush's ways, not going back to the policies that enabled Bush to get elected in the first place!!! A fresh new face on the international scene it would not only launch the US back into a better standing in the international community but Obama is committed to uniting the world against our common threats we're all facing.

When Obama swept in Iowa it was on the front page of the World newspapers, more so than in our own papers! I couldn't believe it and neither could Europe. They are impressed, as well they should be. Obama is not the run-of-the-mill politician, he is the man to take us into our next era. We need a united country to solve he issues we're facing and he seems to have to tune of the real people.

Let's not forget that Bill's presidency, for all the good he did the US, was most famous for the embarrassment and public impeachment process that he put us through. I am so sick and tired of those kind of politicians. How many have been arrested for their various types of corruption and dissent!!

We all knew in the back of our minds that there was a reason why Hillary didn't leave Bill after that fiasco. Now we know!!

Think about it! No one would consider her if she was the divrocee of the ex-President?? She is nothing without Bill by her side, whereas Obama can one his own merits.

If Hillary wins the nominations, we will lose more Dems to the Republicans just not to have her as ouyr President!

Mr. Preston   January 9th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

It is so sad that I am reading so many posts from uneducated voters, who appear to give their vote for the wrong reasons. I have heard very little on this page about platforms and real issues. I have also failed to hear anyone address the character and sincerity of any of the candidates. We as Americans need to stop voting for people because they are female, African American, or charismatic in the delivery of a message. I implore you all to go and read the platforms of these candidates. Please review the history of these candidates and their votes in congress. Verify that these candidates actually vote in accordance with the positions stated within their platforms. Check the true character of the candidates that you support and do not simply purchase the hype of the message. Know that your candidate fights the battles that he /she so vehemently preaches about. So many people are claiming a candidate for reasons of little merit. I simply say to you, “Know your facts before you decide who the best candidate truly is.”

Now, I would like to dispel the disillusionment of experience. What is experience? Is experience the idea of having done something similar or identical to something you plan to do or is experience success at endeavors of your past that are similar to obstacles you plan to face in your future. I have widened my vision to span the horizon of each presidential hopeful and I have yet to see any experience. Who says that being a governor makes you qualified to be the president. What diplomacy does a governor demonstrate? What foreign policy does a governor generate? This list of questioning goes on because the positions are vastly different. More importantly, there is little comparison between the job senator and president. So again I ask you where does this term, “experience,” come from when none of the candidates have been president. All of these candidates have failed to demonstrate certain abilities of the president simply because their current positions don’t allow them the opportunity to demonstrate certain skills. Therefore, there is an experience level deficiency for any candidate, who is not the incumbent, who runs for president. This is something we all know intuitively, but fail to address, because we would prefer to distinguish candidates by skill level instead of matters of merit. WAKE UP!!!!

p0nk   January 9th, 2008 11:39 am ET

"...But the idea that one of these campaigns is positive and the other is negative when I know the reverse is true..."

and the reverse is what exactly? that one is negative and the other is positive? That's what i love about the Cllintons, the uncanny ability to say absolutely nothing and be quite passionate about it.

Christina   January 9th, 2008 9:02 am ET

Obama may win the Democratic nomination-however he cannot win to be the President of the country. This is not a matter of black, white, red or yellow, however in some sense seems to be so. We had a black mayer in Philadelphia, John Street. It happened several times to be to school district of Philadelphia, before 8 years and during the time John Street was mayer. The whole white population of the school district was replaced with other black peoples. Why this happened? This is one reason that Obama cannot make the way ahead to be President-the other and main reason he never has been a Governon and has no idea to be in executive position- executive and legislative duties are totally different and far away from each-other. This is not the issue of special capabilities of Obama, this is more an issue of the republicans. The clearly have understood that id Clinton is democratic nomenee it will be much harder for their candidate to beat Hillary in the presidential election, however if Obama will be elected-the republicans have a sound reason to have a slepy mind-the Presidency is theirs for other 4 more years. This is why they are just working to knowck out Mrs. Clinton from the race-Hillary out-is they have Presidency! Please read those line on November 2008.

gene   January 9th, 2008 8:38 am ET

THANK YOU N H VOTERS YOU UNLIKE IOWA USED THE BRAINS GOD GAVE US ALL

casee   January 9th, 2008 8:21 am ET

Congratulations Hilary!
You go girl!

Media savvy is born out of experience...Say it like it is Bill..

Way to go!
I'd say you know a thing or two about the media, and your right..... the media knows exactly what they're doing.

The idea of impartial reporting and getting the facts is a thing of the past.
Now it's all about what sells copy. No matter what the truth is or who it hurts.
Sensationalism.

Someone in an other post said Obama Hussien has climbed in wealth and position and left his Keyan family in a mud hut.

Where will the American family be left should he reach the White House??
Any media anywhere asking these questions????
Guess not huh?

greg   January 9th, 2008 7:39 am ET

Say what you want about Bill, but he knows how to win elections. There will be a few unpleasant "surprizes concerning Hussein Obama that will surface soon and he will be history... politically... independent or not.
Personally, I wuold like to see a Bill Richardson vs. Ron Paul election take place, but I know that is just a pipe dream.

MATTHEW BLACKTHORNE   January 9th, 2008 6:45 am ET

If America doesn't vote for Clinton (or McCain or Huckabee), then it will be making a bigger mistake than it did not having Al Gore for President in Y2K instead of you-know-who. Mrs Clinton is the ONLY candidate with a solid Science and Space Technology policy: Obama has >already saidCAN< AFFORD IT!!"

cp3mvp   January 9th, 2008 4:37 am ET

Just curious...what is it that Obama has done that makes you think he is capable of fulfilling all his promises? Not a Clinton fan either, I'll admit I don't really feel like there is a good person to vote for, but its interesting how people say Obama is running such a clean campaign. The first thing Obama and Edwards do when fielding ANY question in a debate is point at how Hillary is unfit for being president. And by the way, I can say all the same things Obama has said, and probably better and more eloquently, but it doesn't meant that I can actually fulfill these promises.

Lance in Monrovia   January 9th, 2008 4:26 am ET

I'm tired and until a few hours ago I was starting to feel lazy. I was thinking about all the things I could start doing with my spare time again once we had the nod locked in New Hampshire. I figured that would seal us an early Barack Obama victory and it would be a short and sweet trip to the nomination from there. I was worrying and wondering if our efforts in California could turn out more frosting than cake and I was as surprised as I was grateful for that unexpected question in my head.

I was wrong.

No cake or frosting for us, folks. It's going to be person by person, bayonet to bayonet, even steven in the trenches. We've worked our butts off to have that opportunity and don't kid yourselves, its the most golden one we could ask for. We got lucky tonight instead of fat and lazy. Lucky.

I'll explain.

Only now, a few hours after losing New Hampsire by 2 points and probably still counting, I'm beginning to realize that this is the best possible senario we could have wished for. Just like how Bush needs terror and how Rudy needs Hillary, uh... we need our own Darth Vader too. We need a villian for our art house indie flick to become a blockbuster with legs. Without Hillary Clinton, there's no third act to our script. There's no Death Star. There's no sequel.

Without a close race, we wont continue to build the public interest and hone our muscles for a general election. If Hillary bowed out now Barack would still seem untested in the Republican showdown. There'd be no drama or sweat equity invested in the many States left to weigh in.

Maybe if he'd lost by ten points I'd say something different. But it was so close that all it did was keep eyes on us and keep it interesting. Get it?

He lost by a point and a half, maybe. He's going to win South Carolina and Nevada is going to be a razor's edge either way. It's wide open and ours to lose. If you're in the dumps wash the dirt out of your ears and eyes and look around.

Look at what a brilliant speaker Barack has evolved into and what a movement he's created. Why? It's because of the adversity he's faced, because of the passion adversity creates and not the ease of his candicacy. Never ease. Ease = ease up.

No doubt its the same in all our lives. We're defined not by our victories, but how we handle our tribulations. Our trials make us who we are. Whole.

Yes, The Empire Strikes Back. Now we must use the force and Darth Vader Must bite the dust if we are ever to restore the old Republic to its former glory.

Let it all come what may and let it all matter. Let each State have an equal voice in deciding the next leader of the free world as should be their right. New Hampshire might have deprived a majority of the country of their say in electing the first black man to the office of President. How unfair would that have been?

If Barack and through Barack we, all of us, cannot win anywhere the fight goes from here, then we don't deserve it because ultimately we NEED to win the general. The best person needs to win for the sake of this country. Thanks to Barack is all shaping up to be the most honest race to the White House in modern memory. There's a real choice to be had and we've provided it for the American public.

Earlier tonight, as results came in, preparing for my weekly meeting to phonebank, I said a prayer for Barack. I'm not overly religious, but this was a big deal for me. Melissa, my wife, corrected my prayer. She said, "Instead of asking God to help Barack win, say, 'help the best person to win. That's all you can hope for."

She was right. To me, it was saying the same thing, but the phrasing was everything, because I know in my very soul that Barack IS the best person. I have nothing to fear and nothing to hide in that regard. Let them vet him until the cows come home to Bill Clinton's farm.

Bill Clinton was right today when he suggested that Barack Obama needs to be vetted. Let it be played out across the entire American field until they've had a belly full. Let the entire country engage meaningfully in this discussion. Instead of an afterthought as we usually are in California, we will now be in the thick of the storm and our thoughts will count. People will be invested as they never have before.

It's truly in our hands now whether you've realized it yet or not.

I say let the rain come. Let it wash away everything but the truth. Barack Obama is by far the best candidate to run for President in modern political history AND THAT'S THE TRUTH.

The more people are exposed to him the more they'll see what we already see. Bring on the pundits, the naysayers, the well wishers, the flip-floppers, the arm chair quarterbacks, the good weather friends. I welcome them. I welcome the American public in every State to open their eyes and pay attention because if we're paying attention nobody can steal our democracy from us.

Mind me, we'll see Barack in the White House because of this loss tonight more than any win in New Hampshire could have assured, which might have given him the nod but not a free pass to the oval office. If anything it would have constricted him.

Expose Barack Obama to the harshest, strongest light imaginable and it will make him even more of a beacon, every hard night like this will make for a good one to follow and will make him and his case and us stronger.

Hone your political muscles against Darth Vader now because you'll need them in the general to fight with and trust me that's where we'll be. This is just a sparring session folks. It's just the beginning, and the more we can get people to pay attention to a close, dramatic race, the better we'll all be for the future of this country.

Never think that what we're doing doesn't matter, because it matters more than anything else we could possibly be doing. It's the most important thing we could be doing in fact. The result is secondary to the act of participating. We're changing the world as much as our own lives simply by thinking and being the change we want to see.

Believe it. Our enemies tremble at the thunder of our approach.

The most tragic thing tonight would have been a slip back into apathy and laziness or worse, a slip into hopelessness and negativity and the fear that is the dark side.

Anybody who's weary, who's fed up, who wants to give up, well, you're human, but you're also still here paying attention. You didn't give up. You hurt and the hurt makes you mad and then you use it. Your reaction defines you. Giving up is not an option.

That didn't happen. Not to him. Not to us.

I am more motivated. I am more fired up. I will not lie down and go quietly into the dark. I will stand up and I say let the rain come. Let the Death Star approach. Let the thunder roar and the clouds weep, because you can't wash away or drown out the truth, you can only make it clean.

Good morning.

Lance

RG   January 9th, 2008 3:56 am ET

Wow, this is helpful for the greater good. Giving more falsely-inspired fuel for the other party. The person two down is pretty hilarious. We don't know about Obama's family? Helloooo? Has there been another candidate who's written a transparent book about his family...before he was famous? All the facts are available once you decide to look at the source instead of chain email fwds.

DC   January 9th, 2008 3:51 am ET

Wake up guys!! Don't sell your soul to the smooth talker!
Obama is running here in the US for president, and his relatives is running in Kenya. Do you know what would happen – if he wins. Of course he wants change, not for you people, but for him. WAKE UP!!

Prez   January 9th, 2008 3:30 am ET

Search on Youtube= Obama + google ...for the real talk. Listen America!

doris   January 9th, 2008 3:06 am ET

Wellllllll, I guess a lot of people really got shook up over the outcome of New Hampshire. All these people can't be wrong. If a lot of these Hillary haters would have done their homework in studying the long years of her dedication in working for the thousands of children she has helped & devoted so many years of her time to, they just might see a very compassionate, caring human being. She has been doing all this work since the 70's. Ask many who have met & worked with Mrs Clinton what kind of a person she is, All of them say she is a good listener, she is compassionate, she truly is an advocate for families & she works very hard for anyone who asks for her help. Ask Joe Ward who had a 13 year old son who needed a bone marrow transplant. Mr Ward could not come up with the insurance for his son, Ask him who saw that his son was taken care of. In a letter he wrote to Mrs. Clinton he said, "How do you thank someone for saving your childs life, when your'e down to your last hope, you came through. You can bet Mr Ward will be supporting Hillary Clinton. She has worked & tried so hard to get insurance for us. You may not always agree with what she does, but no one has tried any harder to help our children. I am sick of those who keep saying, she cried, she cried. She showed emotion, but no way did she cry. I saw Father Bush become so emotional & crying that he couldn't talk. Does that make him a bad person? Of course not, How many of you castigating her have ever cried?Showing emotion to me proves to me that you are human & have compassion. Hillary Clinton doesn't often show the real person she is, but I would guarantee you that if you needed a helping hand, she would offer hers. As for Obama, I also wonder if he really realises just what he is getting into if he should become our next President. It sounds so simple to say, I will change this, Its time for a change, little does he know how uphill his battle will be. Our country is in such a mess that his lack of experience will be his and our downfall if he gets in. Let someone who's been there, done that, try to clean up the mess.

Andrea   January 9th, 2008 2:51 am ET

I think that Hillary was, in her acceptance speech, sincere, heartfelt, genuine, and appreciative; also, committed to improving the nation and all who live there; caring, focused, trustworthy (yes, trustworthy), and a woman of vision with a plan and the determination, knowledge, and education to move the nation forward in a new direction. Congratulations, Hillary! I was not keen on the Bush dynasty and know it looks similar with the Clintons, but I think Hillary stands in her own power supported by those such as Bill, but an individual who deserves a chance to reignite the nation and to change not just the country, but the world for the better.

Prez   January 9th, 2008 2:37 am ET

Thats what the Clinton machine does best, divide and lcik their chops.Which face can neutralize those who hate our policies(overseas), not the crying one.28 years of the Bush-Clinton dynamics if elected.WE DESERVE TO BE GRIDLOCKED IN THE SENATE IF SHES ELECTED. I vote Repub if she is!

Mike in Kentucky   January 9th, 2008 2:08 am ET

Boy I really hate typos!

"I was not very politically aware at the age of 8!"

Sorry

Mike in Kentucky   January 9th, 2008 2:02 am ET

Eric in Massachusetts January 8, 2008 11:01 pm ET:

You are right Eric.

I have lived through 10 Presidents in my life, althought the first is mostly a memory of things my family said, I was born in 1952, and I was not very politically aware age of 8! :-) .

In my memory, every one of them ran on a platform of change. How could it be otherwise? Toss them out I want in!

Now that Hillary has won in New Hampshire, the debate will move on to other states, and the race has not been decided by a long shot!

It comes down to this, do you want change for the sake of change, or change mitigated by experience?

Change as a slogan, or change lead by someone who has the wherewithall to effect it?

The choice is simple and over the next few months, Americans will make it.

I think they will choose correctly!

Don't hate...Hillary in '08!

Justin   January 9th, 2008 1:35 am ET

Go Obama! You still got me fired up!

GoldCanyonGal   January 9th, 2008 1:26 am ET

OMG! This was the best read of the day, if you read it start to finish! A hard lesson for the Obama crowd tonight. Sorry for your loss, but somebody had to sober you up. Take a deep breath, a long hard long look at the many things you did wrong in the NH Primary and stop blaming Bill.

NHforHillary   January 9th, 2008 1:24 am ET

NH spoke today and voted the RIGHT way, not with the loopholes of Iowa which Obama exploited. He is a sugar coated MLK wannabe. He has no substance, he has been in the Senate for one term...ONE TERM...and he is 'riding the wave'. To him, this is a game, not a matter of truly fixing the country. We don't need 'change'. Change will come when that toolbag GW is out of the Whitehouse, whether it's a Dem or Rep in there....change will happen when he gets out of D.C. We need someone who can fix our major problems, not a motivational socialist speaker. He is a great public speaker but that won't get rid of the deficit, fix the economy or end the war in Iraq the RIGHT way. It takes experience and know how, that's how people get hired for high paying jobs that take experience....it's called a resume. Unfortunately he doesn't have one, but he gives pretty good lip service!!

It is too bad that so many people are being brainwashed by evangelists and socialist motivational speakers. We truly do need change, people have to change the way they see politicial figures. We need people to really THINK about what is behind the smoke and mirrors (huckaburgers? MKL speeches?) and not be fooled by what is on the outside.

Mark   January 9th, 2008 1:18 am ET

CNN, could you clarify what President Clinton is referring to about Obama not having always opposed the war, about not having known how he would have voted in 2004? What is Clinton citing, and how does it fact check?

Mike   January 9th, 2008 12:59 am ET

I've read a great deal of these responses and the thing that strikes me, is many people, Republican, Democrat, Independents gravitate towards Obama, they see the sincerity he exhibits, the innate sincerity that he wants to work for only the American people, that he is in this race only for the American people. He is a moderate, he has a wider fan base and general appeal then Senator Clinton. If the Democrats want to win this election, if they truly do, they need to side with Senator Obama, because he is the candidate who can take the Democrats to the White house, not Hillary Clinton.

Think of the general election, Independents, young people, and strong supporters of Obama who would have voted for the Democrats would not want her as their candidate and vote Republican just to not vote for her. She has been planning this for far to long, this White House run, and to be honest she wants to get elected at all costs even by selling out to corporate lobbyist to get campaign finances and using the most popular Democratic President in the last 46 years, to condemn Obama. He is the future of this party, she would be wise to put her pride away for the good of the Democratic nation and back Obama, instead of tear him down and think she derseves this nomination. Democrats need to unite, she is not the return of Bill Clinton and the 1990's, it is a new time and a new era. We need a president for 2009-2013. These years could be better than the 90's think about that.

K Davis   January 9th, 2008 12:48 am ET

Hooray for Obama–he's keeping our hopes alive! Yes, we can change our country for the better! But we won't if Clinton has her way. The Republicans will see to that.

Bill Clinton has a lot of room to talk about other people mistreating Hilary. Talk about a liar–he's a pro. Why does anyone listen to him?

Anonymous   January 9th, 2008 12:46 am ET

Obama is the president for a change and for the betterment for the future.
How can an emotionally sensitive hilary stand against the terrrorists?

Mike   January 9th, 2008 12:45 am ET

I have always voted for the Democrats. However, I will vote for theRepublicans this time if Obama wins the nomination. I do not want a populist who has no idea how to run the country to become my next president. I have had enough.

We, the people, are about to hire our next president. Make sure that this person has skills to do the work. We are not looking for a movie star. We are looking for a new CEO of USA.

Frank from Seattle   January 9th, 2008 12:44 am ET

Sinead in Ireland. Maybe you should concentrate on disarming and getting along and leave us to our democratic process.......or do you think what's been going on in your neck of the woods is sanity?

Pedro A Restrepo   January 9th, 2008 12:35 am ET

Anybody and /or anything is better that deceiving, mediocre, ignorant clan of thugs that are currently at the white house. Particularly good are all democratic candidates : capable, smart like Hillary or 'fres ' and eloquent like Obama. All we really hope for is to take us back to the good America we new before Bush Jr.

Robert Smithers   January 9th, 2008 12:26 am ET

I think Mr. Clinton needs to watch what he's saying, or else hillary is going to slide back into the slump she just managed to get out of today. is this any way for a veteran politician to be bashing opponents? I would hope that he knows such rhetoric will only turn Hillary's campaign negative and hurt her significantly, and seriously is the last thing she needs right now.

Tom Davie   January 9th, 2008 12:13 am ET

Clinton should have got CRUSHED in Newhampshire where 44% are independent voters.

EVERY SINGLE major media network HYPED Obama to the point he was the new JFK or even the second coming himself.

HOW could the guy POSSIBLY LOSE , especially with all those 'supposed' polls?

The guy lost a KANGAROO COURT somehow.

Congrats to Hillary.

Canada Loves DEMS   January 9th, 2008 12:05 am ET

Obama seems like a nice chap, not sure why he's doing so well. Hillary just isn't "LIKEABLE". It's like Al Gore, ... he's more than qualified, would make a great president, and he can't win because people don't LIKE him. Kerry too, same problem. Politics is hard, glad I am not a politician.

I am stumped regarding the question: can Hillary win vs. the Republicans ? I think so, the Republicans seem so weak, I think Obama or Hillary could win.

I want Bill in the White House as First Man ! Would be a HooOoOOT!

Mike, Stamford, CT   January 9th, 2008 12:01 am ET

Anyone but Hillary!

Patricia Habel   January 8th, 2008 11:42 pm ET

As a nurse I and an american women voter and I support Hillary Clinton. She is the canidate that has the experience to not just talk about creating change but the canidate to make change. She will work for the people, the underinsured and uninsured american will be heard. No one in this country should die because they are without healthcare.

I Love Romney   January 8th, 2008 11:39 pm ET

I am not ready for Obama or Clinton. But Romney is handsome, so I vote for him.

James Sloh   January 8th, 2008 11:36 pm ET

first of all Obama voted against the war in Iraq. Hillary Clinton was the one that voted for the war in Iraq. Bill Clinton is not runing for President, Hillary Clinton is the one runing for President , not Bill. Bill and Hillary are just delivering false massege out there. saying wrong things about Obama Just because he the front runner. I don't think is what the voters are looking. Bill and Hillary Clinton are just trying to damage Obama records just because he the front runner. Barack Obama is the President that can bring Change to this Country, unit , bring People together , Education and provide Health Care for every American. when Hillary Clinton was the front runner early back in 2007, Obama and Edwards didn't say Negative things about her. Change is what America want, not Experience.
we need a president that will be honest with the American people, and that president is Obama. we don't need a President that will say negative things about someone that is not true just to damage that preson Records.
16 years of bushs/ 16 years of Clintons is enouge. America need something new.
all those things Bill and Hillary Clinton saying about Barack Obama are wrong, just attack. I hope Voters doesn't believe those things. Good look on the campaige Barack Obama!!

Rambo   January 8th, 2008 11:35 pm ET

Obama biggest PC creation. All hype, no substance, Talks as if he is a genius, if you actually listen to him, sounds like Bush without the English mistakes.

Wendy   January 8th, 2008 11:33 pm ET

I think Clinton can do a good job. American, please, please take this election serious this time. I am not an US citizen, i am just a international student in the US...
I am writing here because I know that America is not in a very favorable situation now.. It’s good to have hopes and changes, but please see the difficult situation Americans are facing both domestically and internationally now… America really needs a leader who is capable and has international experiences. Clinton has lots of experiences in international relations and most of the foreign countries like them. I am not a citizen but I am really scared when I think about how a leader who has no international views and just knows where Texas is has been elected….. USA is still the most important country in the world, everyone in the world is looking for a capable leader with experiences in international relations…. Thus, please don’t just focus on religion or personal life…. A good Christian doesn’t mean that he/she is a capable leader…. We can’t put religion and politics together…

Rudy Tampa   January 8th, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Hey Billy,

Go for it Bill, you know better than all of these critics. tell them the way it is.
Go Hillary you have my vote.

Eric in Massachusetts   January 8th, 2008 11:01 pm ET

Mary, keep in mind that Hillary is not Bill. Bill is not on the ballot. Quite contrary to what you say, it is a happy day that the people of New Hampshire have stood up and said no to Obama. He is a wonderfully eloquent speaker, but his message is just about "hope" and "change" but no substance. This primary goes to show that so many are not gullible enough to fall for empty rhetoric.

You'd think that the Obama supporters just woke up from a 40 year nap or something. In my almost 40 years of life, I have seen "change" as a theme of every single presidential election. When I was in Elementary school, the kids usd to run with that slogan. It was empty but it sounded good. How can so many Americans fall for such empty words?

I'm listening to Obama's concession speech and he is a very good speaker talking about immigrants and slaves and the Old Testament and the theme is "Yes we can". It's hilarious. What the heck is he talking about? He is all about slogans and speech, but no actual message. In almost 10 minutes, he has not really said a thing..... just a bunch of empty slogans. This is why New Hampshire has said NO OBAMA.

Obama's new slogan is "Yes We Can". I propose something more along the lines of "NO YOU CAN'T". Ha ha.

Rachel, Storm Lake, IA   January 8th, 2008 10:56 pm ET

The dirty tactics that Bill Clinton has resorted to in campaigning for his wife absolutely disgust me. It's fine to attack your opponent's position because it is an election after all. However, the "fairy tale" comment is completely out of line. It's as if the former president is asserting that the underdog has no place in American politics, that only those that have established themselves in power deserve to travel down the path to the White House. If that's the case, if a fresh face that brings everyday Americans into the political structure is only a "fairy tale", then I have no hope for the future of this country. Are you saying that Hillary deserves to win this election because she's stayed married to you out of thirst for power? Are you saying that just because Obama has followed a non-traditional path that that path can't lead to greatness? Dirty tactics such as these have forced me to lose all respect for Bill Clinton and if his wife wins the presidency I will step up my search for employment abroad, because I don't want to live in a country where having the right name is the only required qualification for becoming president of the United States.

mary   January 8th, 2008 10:51 pm ET

Clinton's are brilliant liars and crooks, you mean, Pam S. Bill Clinton was impeached. Does no one remember that perjury? Do they not remember all the favortism he showed to his and Hillary's family in presidential pardons?.What Bill did here is accuse Obama of his and his wife's crimes.

Sad day for citizens worldwide that so many are so gullible and the rest of us have to suffer corruption in government on account of the wolves pulling the wool over their eyes.

Pam S.   January 8th, 2008 10:37 pm ET

HILLARY HAS WON NEW HAMPSHIRE! Proving once again that the Clinton's are brilliant.

Mr-somalia   January 8th, 2008 10:36 pm ET

after watching carefully what senator Obama is saying about change
and others imitate him by adopting the same word "change" in their speeches
i thought myself, that is a leader

i am from somalia and i am watching closely how the real democracy is unfolding in your country and its really amazing to witness the 21st centuary democracy

i have one thing to warn you the democrat registered voters and independent voters
and my warning to you is if you choose a white female who doesnt represent a change but a repeat of her husbands mistakes and disasterous affairs which caused you to loose the following elections and you nominate her as your choice for democratic party presedential candidate above someone so pride that represents every race and the dominant relegions in the world than you are not democratic voters but another rednecks.

so dont choose a white lady above a guy so young, pride, mixed race, multi-faith
straight forward that wants to unite the country rather than devide

what will be the consuquence, well
black folks will think even a white lady is preferred above black guy and that will litterly mean undemocratic, racist and devided country and the world will see this and ask a question what is the difference between china with no human respect and america

hope you make obama your president or face the same stamp put on undemocratic country

take care and good luck to obama

john   January 8th, 2008 10:32 pm ET

Tell it like it is Bill Clinton. Hillary be yourself. Bill worked against the odds to become President. He then had to fight off the wolves for the last four years he served his country. Hillary I think you will make a great President.Best of luck.

Trober   January 8th, 2008 10:21 pm ET

Hillary is "experience" last week, "change" this week. Next week? Anything it takes to have a vote. Pathetic. Obama has no experience, Hillary has no experience. Those are the facts. American voters just don't get it, it's not who's in office at the time who made the economy, nor made the terrorist situation the U.S. has to face. In an ever-increasing globally competitive world, we are a nation of fools if we think we are invincible electing either Hillary or Obana.

Gisella   January 8th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

The media shoud report the facts after they happen and stop making predictions. No need to force their wish up on the people and try force them to pick their favorite candidates.
Why are you afraid of a woman president? It is time to give that a chance in America too. It works in other countries!!!

Eric in Massachusetts   January 8th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Shawn, you must be a kid and don't remember the 90's. The 90's were pretty great. The economy picked up and things were good. And what makes you think that Hillary can't change things? Bush and the Republicans will be gone. That will be change. There is only so much that a President can do. If you all recall correctly, there are 3 branches of the Fed Government. The president must work with the Legislative Branch too. What makes you think Obama can do any better? Hillary has a pretty good history of taking on the Republicans. Obama only has a pretty good history of missing votes on the Hill. In provate industry, he would have been fired for not doing his job.

Read some books on civics and how the Federal Government works. ALL presidents talk about changing how Government works but there is only so much that a President can do. He/she must work with Congress to get anything done.

Eric, from THE Republic of Texas   January 8th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

Rut row, Raggy... Looks like that Vast Right Wing Conspiracy I keep hearing about (oddly enough, only when the going gets tough for a Clinton) has struck again... I mean, you know, with AAAAAAAAAALL of those Conservatives who work in the media and who have it out for the Clintons.

shawn   January 8th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

I am so amazed by Bill Clinton. Mister cool is feeling the heat!!!!!! of Obama.

For the record Mr. Clinton, Obama is a 47 year old MAN, not a kid.

Maybe, the Obama factor is a fairy tale. However I am ready for a new story being read to me,, than the same old one told in past years by you and Hillary! The Clinton's had the run of the White House for 8 years. Move over and let someone new. Someone who can CHANGE the way things are now in this country.

nab   January 8th, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Hi OBAMA supporters, he is just like BUSH. U guys think he is going to give you everything ....and as if he is going to fix verything. Never true, all your dreams will be shattered, he is nothing in politics. U guys thought Bush fixes national security and see where America is today, going down in every aspect.

SO GO FOR HILLARY... She is the most experienced.

Andy   January 8th, 2008 9:59 pm ET

Men, think about why you don't like Hillary. Distance yourself from your feelings about women overall and think about her as a candidate, not a symbol of your ex-wife or mother who didn't love your enough or live up to your expectations, give you enough. There is a gender issue happening in New Hampshire – why is it so evident? Hillary issues or gender issues.

There is something happening, Obama said. Perhaps his contribution is really more to the awakening, the awareness to so many that change has to come than to his eventual leadership of the party, the country – at this point, anyway.

Mort Sipress   January 8th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

I was disappointed in the way CNN covered former President Clinton's remarks on Barak Obama's record on Iraq. Your analysts mainly did a horse race thing, especially saying that Clinton was out of place and acting like a loser. There was virtually no attention to the substance of what Clinton said.

If Clinton was right about a combination of some contradiction in Obama's stances and right about his usually voting the same way that Sen. Clinton voted, then he was making valid points. The policy substances should have been an important focus of your analysis. That was absent in the parts of "The Situation Room" that I saw.

In short, are you letting enthusiasm over Obama infect your own views of what to report on.

In an earlier example from last week, Gloria Borgia began pointing to where the press had been unfair to Senator Clinton. Before she could finish, the rest of those on the air at that time simply drowned her out and didn't permit her points to be made.

You are not always fair. I know that Fox is awfully unfair. I hope CNN does not move in that direction.

sue   January 8th, 2008 9:54 pm ET

Clinton is our hope for a return to smarts, removing the dumbing down we have experienced with the last uneducated voters selection. Hopefully the majority of voters will read and vote for bringing this country back to where we were in the 90's.

Jack   January 8th, 2008 9:50 pm ET

I do love and respect Bill, I just never thought he is this cheap. This is her fight, not his. If she can't take this stress and pressure this early; how could she lead this wonderful nation? I wonder if she is going to be another incompitent in the making.

OBAMA is the way people, please don't let this chance pass us by!!!!!!

God bless.

Herman   January 8th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

Bill Clinton, one of the best presidents we've ever had. Hillary Clinton will be on the best presidents we'll ever have!

Nora   January 8th, 2008 9:42 pm ET

Bill's only partially right. Obama's entire platform is a fairy tale. He's promising America the sun, moon, and sky. Do any of you Barack supporters ever think about how he's going to hand all of you the keys to the kingdom? He trying to sell you a pipe dream.

kdame   January 8th, 2008 9:42 pm ET

I agree with the last post. This is a dream for Obama which will never transpire.

We need someone who will make us proud of our country again. The world hates us due to George Bush and we need change, but not Sen. Obama.

My son is a U.S. Marine and we need to end this war over oil. George Bush had hidden long enough.

We need healthcare to take care of our children and citizens.

We need to create value in our society again, which has been lacking for years.

I am not sure who is the best person to represent the U.S. as Commander and Chief, but not Obama who lacks the real experience and real values.

We need someone to fight for the children, they are our future.

Margaret   January 8th, 2008 9:38 pm ET

Considering the state of the nations now, I wouldn't care if we had four President's in office if that's what it takes to clean up this mess. A lot of voters are falling for the oldest campain trick in the books...keep the public focused off their own weeknesses by directing their attention to some superficial item, if it was a plant, was her tears sencier, etc..in the same way that some of you probably want to point out that I mispelled some words and didn't use proper gramar, rather
than consider the point I am making. Yes, it's great that a black man is making history, and it's great that a woman is making history, but I can see all too well how the press is manipulating the public to favor one over the other. They keep pointing out that Obama is leading in the poles..I only heard one reporter point out that those poles are only in one state..If you want the truth, look at the number of delagates appointed to each candidate, NATION WIDE. Clinton..176...Obama...71
I will vote for the nominated Democrat regardless, but I am making a concious effort to look past the manipulations and misguiding reports to make the best informed choice possible.

Sbanks   January 8th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

Obama will never win this election even if he wins the primary. The southern states will never vote for an African American man and will render the Democratic party helpless to yet another Republican President.

I concur with Bill Clinton when he states that Sen. Obama is living a fairy tale. If the American people want four more years of George Bush, vote for Obama in the primaries. This is basically what you are doing is giving the Republicans exactly what they want.

Us Californians and New Yorkers as well do not want a man named "Obama" for President! He wil never win this state which is worth 55 electorial votes and New York worth 31.

He talks a good talk, but cannot walk the walk!

Deobrah Wade   January 8th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

I couldn't agree more with Bill Clinton's statement. I have tried to be as objective as I can when analyzing the best possible choice for president but it seems that the news media reports the same consistent skewed story about Obama's success with his message of change but I have yet to see the media attempt to contrast the two candidates views.

In the debates and in the interviews I have seen, Hiliary Clinton explains in detail how she would go about solving the issues that face this country however I have yet to hear any kind of message of any substance from Obama. Still all you see in the news is this popularity contest for one candidate and polls still are close.

It concerns me that even CNN fails to dig deeper into the true issues that gravely affect our country and reports the news as if this election were a beauty contest and the voters had less than a 5 grade education.

The debates have been the only platform for anything meaningful and Clinton clearly was a front runner. Talk about Spin, shame on you CNN

AJ, IL   January 8th, 2008 9:15 pm ET

I think Bill Clinton campaign for his wife reflects bad for presidential politics over the last 2 months. When you hear the negative comments coming from Bill and Hillary, they just reinforce what is wrong with politics in Democratic party. If Hillary wins the nomination, don't be surprised if Mayor Bloomberg enters the race as an Independent.

Miranda   January 8th, 2008 9:03 pm ET

I think the moment I began to see Bill Clinton in a negative light relating to his wife's campaign was when he was on Charlie Rose. He was supposed to speak about his new book, but instead he acted as a de facto mouthpiece for the Hilary campaign. His arrogant attitude about Obama, when he called a vote for Obama "rolling the dice," made me turn off the television.

I think Obama's positive campaign, and especially his Iowa speech, stand in sharp contrast to Billary's bitter anger. My mom said the first thing she thought when she listened to Obama's speech was "He reminds me of John Kennedy." America hasn't had a real leader in years; the Republicans are all scrambling to be the next Reagan, but many of the Democrats seem to be content with criticizing and squabbling.

Tommy   January 8th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

Who is actually running for the presidental office office Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton? Is Hillary cashing in on his husband's popularity?

Ombama should have Oprah speak out in his defense as Hillary has used Bill Clinton to speak (whinny) for her defense over media coverage.

Ed   January 8th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

"Go Bill. It is about time someone talked more about the sugar coating of the media and why Obama Hussein has not been interrogated like everyone else. Let's start with his family in Kenya. There are so many unanswered questions."

There you go Bill. These are the type of people you and your wife are courting. Funny how the high school and less educated people are the ones that vote for Hillary.

Yo, Bill, it all depends on what your definition of is, is.

Sylvia   January 8th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

Let's look at the previous history of Mr. Obama. He just says what you
all want to hear. Look at his voting record in the Senate. Anyone that needs
a TV star to push him to the top is in dire need of a political campaign. His
campaign should be able to show his experience instead of his campaign
rhetoric that promises wonderland. Remember George Bush wasn't
experienced and promised you the promised land, look what we got now.

Britney Spears   January 8th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

I love Hillary. I do not like Obama. It's easy to talk a big talk. All politicians are crooks. I mean lets get real.

Obama is a Muslim. Why would you vote for someone who believes in the same values as the terrorists who caused 9/11. Come on America, wake the eff up! Vote Clinton. Atleast she is not a Muslim and a Hussein!

CLINTON 08

aj   January 8th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

Give it up, the Clintons are old news. Move over for Obama and watch America shine again!!!!

Matt, New York Ny   January 8th, 2008 8:54 pm ET

I've lost a lot of respect for the Clintons in the last several days. I don't think they were so great to start with though, there were a lot of scandals, not just the sex scandals. Hillary claims to have already ran this country for 8 years anyway.

I can't believe America got that mesmerized by the Clintons. We don't need more of these two, we need to mix it up. The founding fathers I'm sure would advice against this, the idea of a two family monarchy. We really need to turn a page and get some new folks in there, and having a black president with a foreign background inspires us and really makes us feel good about who we are.

Most importantly, Hillary will not win a national election. I'm a democrat – hardcore and I cringe at voting for her, which I will do to stop the republicans, but I cringe at the notion of it, and I know others feel the same way I do and I know republicans will come out in droves to stop her if she gets the nomination.

Able   January 8th, 2008 8:51 pm ET

It's painful to see on this message board comments parroting what they've heard and saying, "Yeah, yeah! That's right! We don't know anything about Obama! He's all talk, no substance! No one knows where he stands! No one has looked at his record! Isn't he a jihadist drug dealer? Yeah, I heard that from a reputable source, yeah! Hillary all the way, she has 35 years experience and is Ready To Lead Now (and was 35 years ago!)!"

Sheesh. Since we obviously have internet access if we're on here, how about stopping by Obama's site to see where he stands on issues, whether his detailed plans have substance or not as alleged, or whether he really said what the Machine says he said. Clearly, we're not much for reading...we just scamper after the loudest voice mob-style. It will be a real shame if people changed their minds and voted for the Clintons because they jumped on the speeding bandwagon and believed exactly what they heard without checking it out for themselves.

Lisa C   January 8th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

I will vote for any democract BUT NOT Hillary Clinton.
Come on people. If she wins the nomination, Lord help me, I am voting Republican.

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 8:47 pm ET

"Citizen January 8, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Hillary's biggest mistake? Tying her political hopes to Bill, a long time ago. She wanted the benefits, but she has to deal with the negative consequences, too. Unfortunately, the country has also had to deal with the consequences. We've had Bush for eight years because of Bill's philandering (Gore would have won if not for all of the fallout around Bill). Finally, what kind of feminism is being promoted by Hillary's example? She should have ditched Bill long ago…."

Sorry, Al Gore won the election, the Supreme Court decided that G. W. Bush would be President.

Lisa   January 8th, 2008 8:47 pm ET

Seriously, I would vote for any Democrat BUT Hillary. If she is the only choice, I will be voting Republican. The Clintons should drop out, please.

Rich   January 8th, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Sounds to me like a husband coming to fight his wife's battle. By the way, did anyone pickup the comment former President, Mrs. Clinton said during the debate. She commented that she implemented change when she was in the White House. I may be mistaken, but wasn't Bill president? Wasn't it his administration? What cabinet position did she hold? She won't lose this campaign now, she lost it when she didn't leave his butt when he messed around. If she would have done that back then people now would give her a little more consideration. I'm undecided on who I'll be voting for when the Illinois primary comes up but I'm pretty it won't be her. I just don't think she's a strong candidate, especially when hubby comes to fight her fight.

EG   January 8th, 2008 8:45 pm ET

I am a woman and would vote for a woman any day, were the right one to run. But I think it's pathetic that all of a sudden today, the gender card started to get waved. Even on this comment section, women are saying, Poor Hillary, the boys are being unfair to her ...it must be because she's a woman. No one was saying that all year when the majority of the D party was in her favor.

I have yet to here whining from the Obama camp, though. All summer they were way down, and...no whining about the unfair press. They just got to work and appreciated their supporters. No race card being played. No mudslinging coming from Obama, and the one time it came from someone on staff (the whole Punjab thing), he shut that down with massive force and made it clear he would not play that game. He hasn't jumped once on any glaring hypocrisy or gaffe Hillary has made these days, and there have been quite a few. He has ignored his staff and supporters and media that tell him he needs to bite back. And this is how they respond? Crazy.

Emily   January 8th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

The Clinton's have a legitimate point. I am still undecided between the Democratic candidates, but I think people need to focus on the issues. I would also like to point out the media has given Hillary unfair press. I believe this has to do with her gender....no I am not a feminist.

CJ Savvy   January 8th, 2008 8:40 pm ET

Well,well, the first laddie's standing behind the missus.Alright,alright, I suppose it should be first gentleman then. If Hillary is nominated and goes on to win the election, then this indeed would be a fairy tale ending.

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 8:40 pm ET

Wake up America, theres no way you want more of these people. Use at least some common sense.

Nathan   January 8th, 2008 8:31 pm ET

History can't repeat itself. Who will take the decisions. Bill or Hillary. We can't have two presidents in the same office. That's what it will be if the American people faulter. Go Obama. Time for real positive change in this country.

Lucy   January 8th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

I cannot believe that Bill said what he said about Obama and Iraq! He should know very well exactly what Obama said and the context of this partial quote. Yet he threw this out there to make people question Obama's honesty–that is so low. At most, I'd give him the benefit of the doubt and say that even if he actually knew nothing about Obama's real statement (which is possible considering that he brought George Bush into it, who was not in the original statement at all) and was just repeating some info an oppo-research staff member told him, it still was irresponsible. I think it's also terrible that the press is just quoting BC and not reminding the public of the WHOLE quote and the context–that was TOTALLY different than what BC is inferring here.

In case anyone doesn't know what the whole quote is, Obama said in response to a question about what he thought about the Democratic candidates lack of foresight into the war that he could not say what he would have done in their place since he was not yet in the Senate–he did not in any way say that he wasn't sure if he was against the war or not! The question was one of those thorny ones that was trying to put him in a position to possibly criticize his fellow party members; Obama was being judicious. Plus, he went on to say more than that.

BC has totally distorted reality for personal gain. But what's new?

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Sinead in Ireland, I got it Sinead in Ireland

Sinead in Ireland   January 8th, 2008 8:19 pm ET

THIS IS CRAZY
I just saw someone here posting that we should support Obama against Cllinton, by telling people to "just look at the polls"

Honestly, I rest my case and give up

America, vote for who the polls tell you

robots!!
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

bury the media

bury the polls

THINK, LEARN, READ

will the last intelligent person leaving America please bring the flag!!!!

anthony   January 8th, 2008 8:16 pm ET

LOL don't compare Obama to Bush, Obama was smarter at age 8 than Bush is now.

Of course I can say the same thing about the entire Democratic field versus Bush as well

lisa   January 8th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

why do people call Bill Clinton giving a speech "desperate for the Hillary camp"? Looking at the polls.. not too bad. Should not feel desperate. I didn't take the speech in that way at all.

rabblerouser   January 8th, 2008 8:13 pm ET

Experience and change aside, when Bill was president, we had peace, good jobs, lots of money, were able to buy big houses cheaply and gas at the pump dropped at one point to 99 cents a gallon. Who do you think made that happen? The Boggey man? If Hillary's strategies can bring about the same results, I'll vote for her. This isn't about Hillary or Obama, or Bill or anyone of these guys. This is all about me – and I'd like to have more money, peace and gas at 99 cents a gallon again, thank you...

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 8:13 pm ET

Remember, these people have no concious. Thats why this country is suffering so.

Hope Gethers   January 8th, 2008 8:11 pm ET

From Obama Iowa 2008 to Obama New Hampshire 2008
From Oakland, Califolrnia on the cell phone my 30-something son provided me to keep in touch with him in Brooklyn where he lives with new wife who is employed by AP Manhattan and points London and he at AOL Manhattan and Dulles, Maryland and beyond in Bangalore, I called THAT THURSDAY evening and declared: VICTOR, HISTORY IS BEING MADE!
IOWA, white IOWA, voted that content of the character and capacity of the intellect matter more than skin color. And New Hampshire is poised to vote the same.

Forty years later - January 3, 2008 - forty years after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr April 4, 1968 (when I was new teacher Oakland USD) a young man named Barack Obama, African and American, stands on the shoulders of MLK.

A stunned Bill has called the rise of Barack Obama over his Hilary a fairy tale. I must admit I am too astonished. I'm ten years Hiary's senior, I grew up "colored" in West Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where summers I played jacks on the white marble stoops of our rented row house, 1940s. (By '60s I was at Berkeley and finally 1963 a college graduate.)

Not a fairy tale, a real run for the presidency of United States of America by a colored man, an African-American, boggles my mind even though there was Selma Alabama and the Civil Rights Struggle and the sacrificeof MLK Jr.

Thank your Barack Obama for the "audacity" of your HOPE. God be with you.

James   January 8th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

Obama talks about change. What a fairy tale. What is he going to change. What do we know about Obama and what he stands for? At least we know what Hillary Clinton stands for.

rm   January 8th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

Barack Obama in 2008 reminds one of George W in 2000.

Largely unknown, and untested in the national and global context, and saying what everyone wanted to hear. Let's hope, Let's change, Let's hope, we'll make everything perfect, and let's hope some more.

Do we need another on-the-job learner.

Margaret   January 8th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

President Kennedy was one of the most loved and embrased Presidents in American history..It's all about what the press wants us to know...Kennedy's mistresses (plural) were being led out the back door as First Lady Jackie Kennedy was coming in the front. Enough about Bill's sex life and look at the wonderful things he did in Office. WE HAD NO DEFICiT FOR CRYING OUT LOUD ! This is a first ever in the history of our great country. A woman President married to a man who had also been President ! WOW . I think that it will take a power house like Hillary to, not only take over the mess from the Bush administration, but doing it in the middle of a war!!! That might be a first in history as well, I'm not sure, but war time is not a time for a President to be learning White House 101. No one seems to point fingers at the other candidates mates when they go out campaining together. Why should it be different for Bill. He is the very first man who may well be the first husband, first gentleman, first man ( or what ever they decide will be the appropriate title for him) of the White House. First Lady Jackie Kennedy did great works along side her husband, as will Bill when Hillary becomes President.

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

They play dirty. They can zap the thrillll out of a wet dream

anthony   January 8th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

You vote for them based on personal like or dislike when there is no difference between them policy wise.

This thing about experience is overblown, our current president is a figurehead, the people he surrounds himself with make most of the decisions

Jayson   January 8th, 2008 8:02 pm ET

Lets face it the Clinton camp is desperate. Once again she is trying to come across as human by crying (crying because she isn't getting the toy that she believes is rightfully hers). Also the attacks on Obama regarding the licenses for illegal immirgants is a joke. At least he wasn't the one who changed his opinion in the course of a single debate.

If they wanted to make something an issue about Obama they might try attacking him for the numerous times he voted only as present.

Byron   January 8th, 2008 8:00 pm ET

How can you vote for someone because you like him, her or not,. When we vote we must step on the ground and look at the candidate's skills and the experience for the job.
Hillary has it all and that s why some people who are calling themselves "independents" who are suppousedly leaning Democrats on today's primaries(maybe just for the primaries) are throwing as much mud as possible against Hillary by all means. They know she can win the White House and bring about change to America.
Why do not you identify yourselves as independents leaning republicans and stop attacking the Clinton's who are a family loved and supported by most Democrats whether you like it or not. And it is not because they give good speeches, but rather because of the successful administration that they did run way better than the one that we have now.

No one is perfect, but God stop judging and leave it to God.

So Hillary do not give up and bring the White House back to the Democrats. U can certainly build a better future for us all. Facts are better than words.

Hillary for President 08!!!

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 7:59 pm ET

It's a sad day in america because of the Clintons. You can see these two are sick.
They want this at all cost no matter how the people feel about them.

Mike, Austin Texas   January 8th, 2008 7:58 pm ET

I am severely dissapointed by Bill Clinton and this new desperation act in an attempt to tarnish Mr. Obama and boost votes for wife Hillary. I guess it just shows you what people will resort to when they are in a corner. I have respected Hillary up to this point and will add that while Bill did accomplish some great things while in office, he is hardly any person to be criticizing anyone else.

Jose Card - Independent   January 8th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

Hi Jr., California,

"I am still waiting for someone to tell me about H.C.'s 35 years of experience. I am still waiting after 6 requests.

I'll tell you what, if someone can answer the question, I'll vote for her."

I have had the same question since Hillary started to brag about her experience, which simply doesn't make sense to me. If CNN would allow this posting after several attempts on my part, you may get something this time.

Just google for "Newsweek Hillary Hidden Hand" and you will find the article that may give you the answer you and many others seek.

Hillary did get lots of experience from Bill's administration. She prefers presidential power to fidelity. How true is this article? It's written by a Clinton biographer and you are the judge.

That may explain why it is unnecessary for Bill to release the documents from his administration before this primary and Election 2012.

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

I can't understand why someone would want their country run by the Clintons who propagates hate.

anthony   January 8th, 2008 7:53 pm ET

Now Easy choice Edwards, no need for that kind of talk, Edwards is a nice guy and so is Obama

anthony   January 8th, 2008 7:52 pm ET

Chill out people, the truth of the matter is there isn't much difference policy wise between Obama and Clinton, it is just a matter of who you personally like better. Policy wise they will follow the same tracks

Easy Choice, Edwards!   January 8th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

Barack Hussein is a scammer with his CHANGE. So much for CHANGE when he has all Bill Clinton's former advisers. WHAT? That's right kiddies, all those old people you bash are on Barack's team, and former Clinton teamers!

Go Edwards 08!

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

i can't understand why someone would want their country by

Liv Manto   January 8th, 2008 7:48 pm ET

Denise Jolly, are you for real,

stop living in the lala land. jobs out of usa? Have you gone mad?

During clinton, we didnt have debts, our husbands and son were safe at home, the world does not hate us, everyone can buy a decent house.

What do you wish to do, sing songs and dance all day with OBama?

lisa   January 8th, 2008 7:46 pm ET

It is funny to me that as I have read comments, the women are more angry torward Bill Clinton than talking about the issues Hillary is for and about.
She is way far more educated than Obama and experienced.
Her "failed" healthcare plan was her putting her neck out there for change... so she has been pulling for change since way before Obama was in politics.
I am not against Obama.. I will just add.
I am just noticing.. I wonder if some women are not wanting her in due to Bill's personal mistakes.. That is definately not a way to make a descision.
If you would do research on her, you would find she is very smart on her own without Bill.

marc   January 8th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

I'm from Canada and boy I like your politic and I think its time for you guys to have change and go for Obama. To bring the Clinton back its to bring the past, don't be afraid of change that's what make your country so great.

Len, Fallbrook, CA   January 8th, 2008 7:42 pm ET

The sounds of silence.........................

Kerry..................
Kennedy............
Dean.................
Gore..................
Pelosi..............
Reid................
Sharpton.............
Jackson................

I won why????????

angelina_ MN   January 8th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

Wait a minute, who is running Bill or Hillary or both? Bill needs to step out of the way, while he can contribute to democracy now, he is only siding with his angry wife. People want CHANGE: and the CLINTONS do not want change, they are the status quo.
Think about it:

Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton? = NO I DONT THINK SO WE WANT CHANGE, LAST TIME i CHECK THE DYNASTIES WERE ALMOST ABSOLETE.

Grey   January 8th, 2008 7:38 pm ET

Bill,
Why are you trying to force-feed us? You guys had your chance. It's a new millenium. The White House is not a trophy – it's a place of business and govenment.

I trust a guy that started with nothing and made himself something (by enlisting the help of others) over someone afforded everything and through poor judgement and greed, messed it up.

Please, for the good of the party and America, step aside. It's embarrassing.

Brent T.   January 8th, 2008 7:38 pm ET

Now I know there are a lot of Republicans on this board talking smack about Clinton and/or Obama and they are just trolls that can go away. But Dems on this board need to cool it. This is exactly what the Republicans want is for the party to become splintered in this fight between Clinton and Obama. The fact is that both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are in this race to reverse eight years of backsliding and make this country a better place.

It saddens me to hear Bill Clinton getting so negative as I have a great deal of respect for him as a politician (if not as a husband). The press has questioned Obama over and over again about his 2004 statement regarding how he would have voted if he were in the Senate in 2002 and he has been consistent in his answer. Obama had just delievered his famous DNC Keynote Address and was arguably more popular than the either of the candidates running for president at the time. He answered that he did not know how he would vote because he did not want his comments to be used against John Kerry and John Edwards in the 2004 election. If he would have said, "I would have voted against it". He would have become a persona non grata in the Democratic party. It was a political answer and you can hate him for it if you like but he answered the best way he could have at the time.

As for Obama voting for the funding of the Iraq War, so what? If he would have voted against it, Bill Clinton would be saying that Obama must hate our troops and wanted them to be underfunded. The fact is that Obama, not Hillary, spoke out against the war in 2002. Hillary was in a position of great power and could have used her position to convince other Democrats to stand up against the war but she didn't. She didn't because the vast majority of Americans wanted the war in 2002. She didn't want to take the political risk of standing up against public opinion and Obama was brave enough to do so while he was running for the Illinois State Senate even though the majority of people in Illinois were in support of the war.

I really wish Bill Clinton and, frankly, the rest of Hillary's supporters would look at the national polls showing head-to-head match ups of the Republican and Democratic candidates. The fact is that Obama beats all of the Republicans in November by much larger margins than Hillary and Hillary actually loses to the frontrunners: Giulliani, McCain and Romney and barely beats Huckabee who is still unknown in most of the country. I like and respect Hillary a lot but most of the country does not. She has the highest unfavorable ratings of any candidate in either party and is hated almost as much as George W. Bush is. Most importantly, she is extremely unpopular amongst independents whose votes are absolutely needed to win in the fall. John Kerry captured 49% of the Independent vote in 2004 and he still lost. To win, you must win over more Independents. Obama polls the highest with Independents of any candidate in either party nationwide. He was the most popular Democrat with Independents in Iowa and the results in New Hampshire tonight will show that he can win Independents even when pitted against a Republican with Indie appeal like McCain.

I personally am voting for Obama because I feel that he is the candidate that can bring people together (as he has done his entire career) to find solutions to our nation's problems that we can all agree on. I believe that Hillary Clinton is too devisive of a person to accomplish this. Hillary would have been a fantastic president in 2004 and maybe she'll be a fantastic president in 2016 but now is not her time. Obama is the right person at the right time for our nation and the world.

norcal   January 8th, 2008 7:38 pm ET

I am a big fan of Bill and Hillary, and think Bill was one of our best presidents we ever had - policy-wise. But, it seems like they take one wrong step after another with Hillary's campaign. Although I want to, I just haven't believed anything Hillary says at all. If you turn off people who want to support you, what do you have left?

When I listen to this clip of Bill, it really makes my stomach turn. I think he is actually doing damage to the tremendous legacy he has been building as an ex-president. It also makes me think back to how much he could have done as president, if he hadn't blown it so badly, personally. (Shoot! I can't even stand remembering how he did nothing to stop Rwanda. The correct decision was painfully obvious at the time, but probably not taken due to political calculations. I am so sick of political calculations getting in the way of doing the right thing. Hillary has been exhibiting political calculations in spades throughout her campaign.)

I also think Bill's conduct opened the door to eight years of Republican incompetence, and we are all paying the price. I mean how do you take the emotional support of the entire world after 9/11 and turn that around to what we have now? I think Al, even though he wasn't the best speaker in the world, would have made it if he didn't have to overcome all that baggage. Al was clearly better than W in every way. I think Newt and his buddies just did such a good job sickening the country with Bill's mistakes. If the Clintons can make their supporters feel like I do, what are they doing to the rest of the country? That's how Hillary can lose in November.

Remember how dead McCain was six months ago? Well, apparently all is forgotten. I think he's going to win the nomination, and I don't think the Republican candidates will suffer as bad a disadvantage as they should by the time November rolls around.

I know incrementalism is the way our policymaking tends to work, but with all Hillary's talk of compromise and the source of her donations, I don't believe anything really significant will happen during her administration. I also think the Republicans will have a field day dredging up all the old negative stuff they have to work with. My nightmare is watching Hillary lose the presidential campaign. If she wins, I don't think we'll see anything dramatic happen anyway. Recent modifications aside, Hillary doesn't really sound different from the Republicans in terms of Iraq policy and having troops there long-term. I know she has worked at establishing a moderate to conservative track record to shore up her right, but I think that political concern will continue to influence her policies once she is in office as well. Great.

Obama has impressed me more and more over the months. I decided that I would support him a month ago, and it looks like America is seeing the same qualities I do. I didn't think he would make it this far, but I am really happy to see my pessimism was unfounded. It's really great to feel good about a candidate. With his charisma and intelligence, I think he has the potential to overcome the incrementalist roadblocks inherent in our policymaking system. Through his charisma, Reagan was even able to get bad policies passed and to even violate the Constitution without any accountability.

Imagine what a president of Obama's intelligence, reason and likability could accomplish for our country. Just like much of the country, I am extremely optimistic about an Obama presidency. It would really be a new day. We would very likely benefit tremendously internationally and in the war on terror.

It's a new day in America.

Denise Jolly   January 8th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

Bill Clinton should have kept his zipper zipped and now he should zip his lips.

When President Clinton cheated he cheated all of us. He was shown to be a liar and a cheat..

He screwed up things for our party and we got stuck with 8 years of George Bush

Barak Obama inspires the American people and he helps us believe in our country again as we did with John and Robert Kennedy.

I am a life long Democrat in spite of the Clintons. Hilary did nothing for us in regard to health care in this country. Bill set in motion the flow of jobs out of the USA.

I believe we can rebuild our country with Barak Obama or John Edwards. The torch is being passed. Thank God!

Denise Jolly in Portland

Charles T, VA   January 8th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

For those of you commenting on Obamas grandma shame on you and shut up ignorant morons when you don't know what you are talking about and playing politics.

1) Obama is taking good care of her, didn't you see the house made of cement and well decorated? A house made of cement in a village where they live in mud huts? Its a duplex she is living in you losers! And what was she doing preparing meals for the goat by peeling on some corns for the goats? In Africa where there is hunger you feed goats corn? In africa where there is enough grass to feed the goats and grandma Obama feeds them corn? WOW!

2) She is grandma and does not want to live in America, she is doing just fine there with the dollars Obama sends to her so SHUP UP YOU ALL!

A couple of thoughts   January 8th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

Facts from the media don't seem all that clear ref. Obama. Was he ever a Muslim? If so, did he convert to Christianity or was he just kind of doing what his parents at various times wanted – likely the case, not that it matters, really, if one is on the right level ref. one's beliefs no matter the religion – love, kindness, caring, peace, et. al. What do Muslims think overall, though? Many Muslims throughout the world do not believe a Muslim can switch religions without serious repercussions, even death. Would Obama invite additional, personal terrorist activities because of the possible belief that he did convert?

Does the fact that so many single parents head households affect the respect level of a woman running for politics? That is, do many young adults still disrespect their mother telling them to do their homework first/transer that resentment to Clinton, have them stamping their feet at even the suggestion that their lover (Obama) may not be good for them in the long term/that they should look at who he really might be? Obama's viewing himself as presidential material (I can do what I want to do when I want to do it as I am special) without going through the ropes – having to put up with others telling him what to do along the way – is rather reminiscent of those same spoiled kids who wanted everything they wanted when they wanted it without having to work for it.

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

"Stop the Iraq war NOW January 8, 2008 7:07 pm ET

"Mike in Kentucky,

While some of what you suggest is "out there", I have to tell you this: my friend and I (we are both middle-aged women, sick-of-bush democrats) were discussing the fact that "charisma and good speech delivery" are what seems to attract people to Obama——-such a shallow decision or reason to admire a person and want to vote for them to be a leader. We said that some of the world's leaders were elected or "swayed" by just the charisma and good speech delivery……..one leader that came to our minds was Hitler. People were drawn to his charisma and charm and awed at his speechs……….what I am saying is, people need to look PAST this "charm and charisma and good speech delivery" and see what kind of substance is behind the "first glance". Things just can't be taken at face value——that's a dangerous road to go down for our country——to just pick a leader because they are "better-looking" or "they give a good speech". That's even why bush was elected, I would submit——he was "more likable and better-looking"

I agree 100% with everything you write here, and I can't find anything in any of my posts that suggests that I disagree, although references to Hitler or the Anti-Christ (not in your post but in another) might be a bit over the top, your point is taken..

Stop the Iraq war NOW   January 8th, 2008 7:34 pm ET

You people have plenty of personal attacks and judgments about the Clintons, but you have no substance to back up WHY you want Obama as President. It is SO easy to take the "EASY WAY' and irresponsibly bash people because you "hate" them, when you don't even PERSONALLY KNOW THEM. Stop playing "holier than thou" and leave the personal judgements about Bill (or Hillary) Clinton OUT of what should be an arena of FACTS about the running Presidential candidates. I am not interested in why you "hate billy because"........SO WHAT??? I want to know WHAT a person DID or FAILED TO DO to improve our country. I need to know that the average person is able toseparate Bill Clinton and HIS administration from the fact that he has a wife who is a completely different person with a brain of her own. (Those of you who assume that Bill will tell Hillary "what to do" are sexist and backward).

When I criticize, I try not to get personal. I try to deal with reality and what IS, not what I THINK IT IS.

Osker   January 8th, 2008 7:34 pm ET

The primary just started. Hillary has to keep her cool and Bill has to stay away from now. Obama has no change beatig Hillary in the end. They should keep peace and run on the same ticket in November.

That is change!

SteveJobs   January 8th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

Hillary Clinton's years as Bill Clinton's closest advisor and confidant gives her a unique perspective on the office of the President and how it works. Her years in the Senate give her the knowledge of how to get things done on Capitol Hill. She is not, in any measure, inexperienced in the ways of Washington and how to make it work.

She is the best hope we have to influence change in Washington that will benefit us all. She knows how to work the system and that's why the Republicans fear her…Many Republican commentators are singing the praises of Mr. Obama….ever wonder why?

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME ...WHAT HAS HILLARY CLINTON ACCOMPLISHED IN NEW YORK STATE IN 8 YEARS AS SENATOR, THAT HAS SO MANY PEOPLE SAYING SHE IS OUR BEST CHOICE. TO MY KNOWLEDGE, NEW YORK DOESN'T LEAD THE NATION IN ANY CATEGORY THAT WOULD SHOW HOW GREAT A LEADER SHE HAS BEEN.

Alice, VA   January 8th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

It was bound to come to this. The Clintons feel an entitlement to the White House. Seeing the nomination slip between their fingers brings out the hate in them. Watch folks, if Hillary loses NH, and il looks like she will....the Clinton attack machine will shift to high gear. The Clintons just don't get it....the voters are saying they have had enough of the division, the mud slinging, the partisanship, and it appears them as well.. Hillary, if you really care about America, run your campaign, but do it cleanly. If Obama gains momentum, and the people want him.....do us all a favor and drop out.

lisa   January 8th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

What is important is Clinton did a great job getting us out of debt, more than anyother president in History.
He was a great president. His personal life does not concern me. I think Hillary would be great. She is a very intelligent and a strong woman. She has proven herself and is very experienced in politics.
What is wrong with Bill standing up speaking out on his wifes behalf showing he is backing her? Why is the media giving critiisizing for that?
No matter who gets in there is going to have a tough time. Bush team has messed us up so bad that it is going to be tough to fix what they messed up.
I have not made up my mind but I do agree that Bill Clinton should support his wife and speak on her behalf. She supported him when he was in office as we all know.
I do not think that Obama has gotten the same treatment as Clinton from the media. I have not heard any negative things except for what Bill Clinton said about him and I agreed.
I am tired of hearing about the likability of the canadates.
Focus on the issues because this country is in such a mess we need to get it fixed. Woman, black, white, purple... Who cares...
People are scared of a woman being president.
I will take experience and solutions to our problems over anything.

Phil Chicago   January 8th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

I live in chicago and not substantial change or law has been made by Senator Obama in favor of this State. He may be a good speaker, but this is not about words, but about politics.
We need someone with experience and the Best Fit candidates are both Hillary, and McCain. They do not go to any extremes, have worked in favor of our nation for years and could potentially make a good President.
If not Hillary, then I d rather to vote for McCain than handling our country to a candidate who has not made any concrete changes even as a my state's senator

bbc   January 8th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

Listen carefully Bill. You can almost hear the chickens coming home to roost.
I think this is what they call KARMA!!!
Please go away now, you're old and bitter and you aren't relevant any more.

Deake   January 8th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

WAKE UP AMERICA. Barrack Obama's smooth talk and hyped up rally campaign speeches will come to a screeching halt on Day One if he gets elected President. There will be no fever to whip up. There will be no burst of applause for the mention of the word 'Change'. Then where will you be? The silence will be deafening.

Vote for Hillary Clinton.

KO   January 8th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

Frankly speaking Bill, you are only componding your wife's woe by attacking Obama. I am loosing my respect for you.

mike   January 8th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

how sad that bill has to start throwing mud now. he shows his and hilary's true colors. they are only out for "US" not the "USA". hilary should withdraw. sad sad sad day for america.

Caroline   January 8th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

HEY BILL - I suppose you think that we're all a bunch of ignorant hillbillies!
Did it ever cross your mind that perhaps we (that is, the lowly voters) might be able to read - or God forbid - think on our own?!?!

It is clear to this voter what you and your wife are all about - WIN AT ANY COST - even if you chip away at the very integrity of the position.

As a woman, a professional, a mother, I would LOVE to see a woman in office. But you, Hilary, will NEVER earn my vote!

Dan   January 8th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

What a shame on that statement credited to Bill which is more out of desperation, anger and frustration. Such bogus statement wont help his wife who is hidding under his shadow.
Obama represent change not only for America but for the world.

Craig   January 8th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

Sinead I like your view except for one thing Bill's 8 plus Hillary's time will mean more debt to repay vs having a negotiating stance their already stained access to the old boys club will compromise the ability to stand for something and fall for anything. To much "prior" back scratching.

Politicians are like diapers they should be changed often and for the same reason.

Katy Thompson   January 8th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

Bill, oh Bill. It is so sad that you have to try to use your washed up, washed out influence to try to save your wife.

First of all, she would be more effective as a senator than the Commandor & Chief of this great country.

Second, yes it is true she has been at your side when you were president but were the decisions you made yours or hers? Come now. If she became the president of this country, whose decisions will they be? If you would be on the sidelines prompting her in her every move, that would be like a student receiving instruction from a tutor. What happens in the absence of the tutor? God forbid anything happening to you, however, we need someone who can carry the load on their own–not being coached. Someone who won't falter or fall apart under pressure nor use any low or underhanded tactic just to get elected but who is sincere.

She has now jumped on Obama's band wagon talking about change. Why now?
Why didn't she start her campaign about change like Obama did.

She has said that she has 35 years of change. I have been around a long time and have not seen it. Did she mean her failed healthcare plan?

I think the Clinton movement is history. This is a new day. The world awaits to see if the American people will send the right message.

William   January 8th, 2008 7:13 pm ET

Seems to me I remember back in the 80s a Little Rock, AR paper referring to Bill Clinton as a chameleon. The Clintons have been the best this country has ever seen at changing colors to match the political mood. You never know what you are getting with Bill or Hillary Clinton until you've got them, then it's too late.

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

"SteveJobs January 8, 2008 5:10 pm ET

I have been doing research all day. I still have not seen where Hillary Clinton was President of the USA before. Where is the experience? Performing duties as Senator, Governor, Foreign Affairs Rep., or Puppet in a Monkey suit is not the same as being the leader of the most powerful nation in the world. Not one candidate running, Republican or Democrat, has ever walked into a meeting holding the title of Commander and Chief and had to make decisions for and about America's future. Every one of them talks a good game, but All-Stars are made in the game not in practice."

Your sports analogy is interesting but without intense and exhaustive practice, even All-Stars do not get into the game.

Hillary Clinton's years as Bill Clinton's closest advisor and confidant gives her a unique perspective on the office of the President and how it works. Her years in the Senate give her the knowledge of how to get things done on Capitol Hill. She is not, in any measure, inexperienced in the ways of Washington and how to make it work.

She is the best hope we have to influence change in Washington that will benefit us all. She knows how to work the system and that's why the Republicans fear her...Many Republican commentators are singing the praises of Mr. Obama....ever wonder why?

andydiaso   January 8th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

give it up Bill. Obama is the new kid on the block

Sinead in Ireland   January 8th, 2008 7:09 pm ET

CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE

Funny thing. People who are writing about Obama making all these huge changes and how they hate the "politics" of Washington, should catch themselves on.........

.DOSE OF REALITY

All those Washington Politicians are not going anywhere, neither are the pressure groups and political lobby groups, they are VERY well funded!! The senate and congress will still be there too. So, how can people think Obama, or ANY president can get in office and just do exactly like he/she wants? Without support from those same people/groups the president’s bills will NOT pass! So no matter who gets in, compromise and the traditional "you scratch my back and Ill do yours" will continue, it's the American way, like it or not! You want change start with the system first. Obama or anyone else will face the same. If he were to be elected and tried to be a hard nose, he'd get nowhere, then what change will you get? none:) Then people will have had such big hopes they will complain about Obama not delivering. At least Clinton has experience dealing with these people and getting the best possible outcome. Aside from the personal situation that happened to Bill Clinton, he did a great job for the country, economy and the world. He just should have kept his trousers up, but that is not the most important thing in the world to me, I’d rather have a prosperous US, a safe world and a smart leader who can say three syllable words:)

HILLARY 1ST 8 YEARS
OBAMA 2ND 8 YEARS
DEMOCRATS 16 YEARS OF SORTING OUT TO DO!!

Reality bites!

Robert Wooller   January 8th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

There has been too much coverage of Obama, maybe if there was more coverage – and positive coverage at that – of Hillary, she would be doing better in the polls.

Anon   January 8th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Amen to that Bill.

Hillary is the most experience and most capable of leading our country.

I want another TRILLION DOLLAR SURPLUS and a balance budget.

One must not think of the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton names are the only President known growing up or fed up hearing the names over. You first think of economy. Booming economy bring jobs. We need an experience candidate.

Mr. Obama couldn't even fulfull his duties as a US Senator. He missed 80% of senate votes and there are times he is present in the senate but he doesn't vote. He's scared that somebody might attack him of his votes.

Shame on Obama voicing about the Iraq war and the votes. He wasn't even a senator then. As a senator, he did not cast a vote on Iran. He's scared?

John Chicago   January 8th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Obama may have the willingness but you also need the experience. We are engaged in a challenging reality. The goal has been to avoid Hillary's Nomination, and if you have not realized among core democrats nationwide Hillary remains strong. The advantage of Obama seems a clear republican strategy where so called "independents" would vote in the democratic primary. There s where Obama's advantage comes from.

But what would happen on the election day if we lack of a strong candidate like Hillary , let us see if Obama can be even be a threat for a Republican contender. Hillary can do so, and that s what we do not see. It is not about how much we like her or not. It is about our future and if you compare the Clinton's administration to todays' you can see that they did a better job in multiple areas. The economy was better.

It seems that sometimes we forget about reality and allow ourselves to be carried out and be misled by emotions.
If we want change, let us not think about the one who sounds poetic but about the one who can bring the democrats back to the White House after a disastrous era that has characterized the Bush Administration.

God bless you Hillary

Stop the Iraq war NOW   January 8th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Mike in Kentucky,

While some of what you suggest is "out there", I have to tell you this: my friend and I (we are both middle-aged women, sick-of-bush democrats) were discussing the fact that "charisma and good speech delivery" are what seems to attract people to Obama---such a shallow decision or reason to admire a person and want to vote for them to be a leader. We said that some of the world's leaders were elected or "swayed" by just the charisma and good speech delivery........one leader that came to our minds was Hitler. People were drawn to his charisma and charm and awed at his speechs..........what I am saying is, people need to look PAST this "charm and charisma and good speech delivery" and see what kind of substance is behind the "first glance". Things just can't be taken at face value--that's a dangerous road to go down for our country--to just pick a leader because they are "better-looking" or "they give a good speech". That's even why bush was elected, I would submit--he was "more likable and better-looking"

Felicia   January 8th, 2008 7:04 pm ET

Everyone is talking about who did and did not vote to fund the war. HELLO PEOPLE we were all ready to support the war the day of and the day after 9-11, we stopped supporting the war when we found out that we were looking for sadam and not binladin. Lets just be real, we all came together to support a common cause and we where decived by the president

jeral   January 8th, 2008 7:03 pm ET

The cable news media has targered Hillary since day one. Scrutinizing every wrod she said – every gesture she made and has given Obama a clear field ' cheering him on without questioning anything he has done or said. When he didn't vote recently not once did we hear he did not vote because he would have to give account of his vote.The news media gave Bush a free ride in 2000 and 2004 and look at mess the country and the world is in. Nor did the news media question or infvestigate him if he just said he was not going to answer.
It should be appauling to all informed intelligent voters that the 18 to 30 year olds are for Obama because he is cool as reported today. 18 to 3o year olds have no idea what is going on in the world, -what a deficit is – or most of them don't even know who the first president of the United States was and think its cute and funny. My 4 grandchildren 23, 19, 18 and 16 and their friennds,who make 3.5 in college and A,s in school don't know and care less because they troo are only interested in what's cool. – Certainly not interested in a serious person who would like to heal the probems for a better america for all of us. SAD DAY IN AMERICA.!!!!!! Have you forgot how bad everyting was in "92 and how good they were during the 90's and excellent at the end of 8 years, SHAME ON YOU!!!

Alex   January 8th, 2008 7:03 pm ET

and what do we know about this obama guy, do we really know him, his records !
Last time I remember from tv on 2004 election was the comment that the news achor made which is " American men are more likely have beer with mr. Bush than Mr. Gore ! Now look what he has done for last not 4 but 8 long and meaningless years ! People please get smart and stop being emotional for the last time, please !!!!!!!

Sandra Clark, SC   January 8th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

I feel sorry for Hillary. I hate to say it, but Hillary is done. Even Bill can't save her now.

OBAMA/EDWARDS 08!!!!

Sen. Obama, please choose Edwards as your VP. You guys will steamroll over the Republicans. They have no chance.

I donated to Obama's campaign, and will give much more if he picks Edwards as his VP.

Geri E. Villegas   January 8th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

It's only 2 states and they are primary votings at that – Hopefully experience and passion will mean enough to people to keep Hillary Clinton on the Democratic ticket for the (November) election that counts! Wouldn't it be nice if her choice for VP is Obama – he'd get the experience and, with his eloquence and drive, be perfect for the next term as the President – after President Hillary Clinton cleans up the current state of affairs!

Mari Fernandez, Salt Lake City, UT   January 8th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

I voted for Bill Clinton, and like the man. But after hearing his tirade against Obama today on CNN I am disappointed in him and his wife!

Hey, Bill, be careful how you criticize Sen. Obama, he may well be the next Democratic candidate for the presidency and YOUR word will be used against him!

Bill's tirade, Hillary's emotional reaction to a question...... and seem like desperation to me. I am a 54 year old woman, I would LOVE to see a woman president, BUT NOT Hillary!

What don't they get about the word, CHANGE? God bless Obama!

René   January 8th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Obama is taking the cigar out of Hillary

GO OBAMA 2008

West, Anaheim, Ca   January 8th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Where does Bill Clinton get off saying the Obama has changed his view on the war. His wife did the same thing, she voted for it and then changed her views down the line to make sure the democrats didn't come down on her. She knew she was going to run for president so she changed mid stream also. Sometimes people make the wrong choices and change their mind mid stream. That doesn't make them bad people, but Bill Clinton shouldn't make Obama out to be this bad person when his wife did the same thing. We aren't stupid out here!!!!!!!!!!!!

Alex   January 8th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

This is why we, America nation will lose our edge as a the greatest nation on earth.
People listen do not confuse Potics with the Entertainment, Politics ain't no entertainment, we are so emotional, shallow and gullible, we are plain dump and stupid.

judi a   January 8th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

I love seeing the Clinton's on the defense. His comments about Obama is classic Clinton. If anybody knows about "a fairy tale" it is him.or them.

architecture   January 8th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Bill Clinton is absolutely right. I have followed media coverage for months. Obama has been given a free ride by the media. We don't know "how" he would bring about change because he has not been asked the question. Maybe it would be a good answer and then again is might be an unrealistic answer based on inexperience. We don't want a Rock Star for president; we want a proven leader. If we want to ride the waves, we should go to the beach.

The media picks on every little thing Hillary does if they think they can put a negative swing on it. They don't talk about anything that they can put a positive swing on. They don't do that with any other candidate. Lets consider the gender card that Gloria Steinem talks about in her recent article unless you think it is something even more sinister.

Look at what the response is to Bill's comment--desperation some call it. Let us be honest. If her campagin is passive, they are attacked; if they defend themselves, they are attacked; if they are assertive, they are attacked.

californian   January 8th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Obama's credentials and background????? Please TV people report it. I'm hungry for to know the facts. I've known hillary through ups and downs as if I knew her personally because of TV. For Obama only from Ophra hahahaha and you're for him? PLEASE DO A BACKGROUND CHECK........

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

We don't owe Hillary or Bill Clinton nothing. We are not apart of the status quo.

They are worried about how they are going to pay back all those people they took all that money from and can't deliver the country too.

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 6:51 pm ET

"Anti-Christ Question January 8, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Hasn't anyone read the book of Revelations? Or, maybe the Left Behind series? Obama fits the Anti-Christ description; a leader who rises up from no where with a promise to unite the world through change. He is already dabbling in international politics when he has no experience or authority to do so. I love what he is saying but are we all falling under his smooth-talking spell? It is a bit freaky how he has risen from no where to possibly become the leader of the free world. At least with Hilary, we know what we are getting."

Hahahaha!! I wondered how long it would take for someone to bring up the image of the Anti-Christ! I am an athiest and a secular humanist and I have read the Book of Revelations, more than once. It seemed only a matter of time before subject came up.

Remember, he's gonna run against Evangelical Christians. Expect more of this!!

Kathryn Fuller   January 8th, 2008 6:51 pm ET

This country is in SERIOUS trouble. Not only do we have the war in Iraq that is out of control, but we are at the doorstep of war with Iran and Pakistan.

Our economy is about to go bust. The housing market is in the toilet, and I can NOT remember when our world has been in this bad shape.

I have a SERIOUS question for all of you. Who can pull us out of this mess? Who has the strength, experience and diplomacy to do what it takes to make our world a better place?

The question is not if we want a woman or a African-American man in the White House, it's about who can do the job.

When Bill Clinton finished his 8 year term, we had a balanced budget and a 3 TRILLION DOLLAR SURPLUS. I don't care about his sex life, they ALL are sleeze bags as far as I'm concerned. Look at the people that scream the loudest about homosexuality, they are homosexuals!!

Come on people, WAKE UP! Pay attention, who ever takes control of this next 4 years will determine the FATE of our great United States.

In my opinion a Freshman Congressman/Senator just doesn't have what it takes, not for what we need now.

I pray for our country if anyone but Hillary Clinton gets in office, she's not perfect, but she is the BEST person for the job!
Kathryn Fuller

dehlia   January 8th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

I'm so very glad I'm an independent! However, I've got to say that I'm surprised by the amount of people who are buying what Hillary is selling! She has always come across harsh, hard and brash (unless she's playing "1st lady to be"). So, how is it that so many people have fallen for the fake tears and a deep heart – we've never seen that before & it sure came at just the right time!
If so many people want change and want a new dynamic in Washington then perhaps some people should be more accepting of the fact that you won't get everything in a candidate that's campaigning on change! But, honestly, what do we have to lose at this point?!
Obama & Edwards seem sincere, determined, and undoubtedly different. I would really like to see that ticket.
Meanwhile, Clinton (H) is becoming (or coming across) too much like Clinton (B)!

just a voter   January 8th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

actually, many of us are just YOUNG (under 40) people fed up with both parties' failing self-interest methods of running our country. we're inspired by anything that we perceive to be the OPPOSITE of modern american politics. and like it or not, our numbers are only growing. if you'll notice, it's THIS article, NOT obama, that's provoked the comment negativity. my mind's not made up yet, and neither are many others, and undeniably this kind of activity is no service to hillary.

MT   January 8th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

The gall of Bill Clinton to call anyone else a liar...wow.

And the rest of you who are so frustrated and incredulous about the Obama support...you just don't get it...Washington is full of experience and what we have is a complete mess...so to keep putting the same players in power(with different chairs as one candidate put it) and expect a different result would make us fools, don't ya think?? What we need is a wipe of the slate – a new start – out with the old and in with the new.

And to act like Obama is some fresh faced kid right out of college is completely ridiculous. Sure he doesn't have a long resume like Biden and Dodd but we know he is smart and to date, he has made the right decisions. So if you Dems who support Hillary want to be bitter and say that you will NEVER, NEVER vote for Obama in November, that is fine. Go ahead and cut off your nose to spite your face. Obama is the most unique candidate in the entire presidential field – you should be proud to have such a candidate represent your party.

Sinead in Ireland   January 8th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

To:
Mindy Chatsworth, California

Well Said!

I am in awe, all these Obama posters cannot all be REAL democrats, if so then the country is in BIG trouble, and the vile posts are unreal! For people "claiming" to support a man who has a mantra of unity, and who wants to "unite” people and "unite" the country?? With all the HATE flying around this board from those claiming to be Obama supporters, such an idea IS a Fairytale!!! I believe some Obama supporters are posers on here; also I think Republicans are pretending to be Democrats on here as well. The Clintons are possibly the MOST investigated politicians ever, save for Nixon! Millions of dollars spent, years of investigations and NOTHING!! All of that came from the right wing eejits (that is irish for idiots!), led by Ken Starr, right wing republicans and FOX et al………

My personal belief is that the media IS manipulating this election more than usual, it is disgraceful. Sadly I only get FOX news (pity me!! but my cable is owned by the same right wing freak who owns FOX in American Rupert Murdoch!!!) and I do get CNN Europe (I live in Ireland at the moment) but they only report on the USA very little!! I am watching both channels constantly since the election began in Iowa (watch one and record the other) I can tell you that the majority of Election coverage is about Obama, the majority of photos/videos are showing Obama people, Obama rallies etc. I have to ask myself one thing, if Bill o'Reilly "loves Obama" like he said the other night, and FOX are talking constantly about him in such a "loving" way and trashing Hillary CONSTANTLY then there HAS to be an Ulterior Motive, they are die hard Republican Right Wing Christians. Does this not seem just a wee bit odd to any normal thinking Democrat??? I believe they want him to be nominated because they think he can be taken down by the Right wing moral majority and they can cast just enough doubt on his background and religion, his experience, his voting record, number of missed or absent votes in the senate to sway some independent or converted supporters away and get a Republican win. This would be the worst thing for American and the world!!! Remember, it is not just young people who tend to jump on the band wagon, they probably wont be bothered much when the mud begins to fly, but, the older Obama converts may be swayed, it only takes a tiny doubt to make people think. The same media frenzy that is all in support of Obama now, can change when FOX begins to sling the mud. Then what? Last night on Bill O'Reillys show he interviewed Huckabee and actually asked him what democrat he'd like to go up against if he was nominated, his reply? Obama.............say no more....

And to those complaining about Bill Clinton speaking out? Well, he has a RIGHT to speak out and reply because people like you continue to make claims about his administration and transferring his job as president to Hillary, I say fair play to him! This gives him the right to speak back! All the wives of the others speak out, and so does Oprah:) Fair is fair! Oh and by the way, I am married, but I can assure you that I am NOT my husband, and Hillary is NOT bill!! We are not all extensions of our spouses!!

Democrats should think with their heads right now! Hillary can BEAT the Republicans, no more dirty laundry, already investigated! If she were elected this time, Obama could work in the Cabinet, gain more experience, he can deal with the mud slinging and hard personal questions that eventually WILL come up via the media. He can get though it whilst he is working in an important role, gain some solid experience, demonstrate himself, continue to grow and Then when Hillary vacates, Obama can win the next 8 years, then we get 16 years to attempt to undo the world wide mess the “Shrub” and his evil doers have created!

Finally, I'd like to see the USA bin all the polls one month before elections begin so human beings on the ground can and will be forced to talk and actually think for themselves! Novel thought, doing the research and thinking for yourself!! The media is out of control and has become WAY too powerful!! Scary, very scary......... Also, the government should allow each candidate the same amount of time on Television for campaign adds, then no more!, Followed by a republican debate, democratic debate and then one final debate with both candidates. No need to waste millions and millions of dollars and force ALL candidates to take big money from corporations and lobby groups etc. This is fair and think of the good that all those left over MILLIONS could do for Americans needing health care or children in need or more homes in New Orleans etc...........
Democrats, if you ARE democrats on this board! Stop the hateful and personal remarks against other Democrats, argue your points with facts (if you have them!!) When people start attacking others on a personal level it is because they have NO facts to back themselves up….full stop!! So fellow Democrats please start thinking for yourselves, do the research, ask the questions, then you can change the world

Hillary 1st for 8 years
Obama 2nd for another 8
Democrats for 16 years
SORT IT OUT!

Edwards gurl   January 8th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Obama Hussein is a snakeoil salesman. It's so disturbing to me to see people backing this joker. He is riding the wave alright,,,wait until it CRASHES! Edwards is going to be the next President, not some Muslim that attends a church for blacks only. Edwards would never attend a white only church with a minister (like Barack's inspirational leader he writes so kindly about in his book) who blames white america for 9/11 or blames the israelis for the so called pal misfortunes. Give me a break! Want a racist in the house, vote Barack, want a man that will embrace you no matter what your background is and that has experience! vote Edwards!

Edwards 08!

Jacqueline Carter-Matsapola   January 8th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

I am embarassed that a former President ( or maybe I should make that with a small "p") is behaving in such a biased, unabashedly shameless manner. Bill CLinton was the President of the United States, not the president of Hillary Clinton. THis whole idea of her running is evidence of her poor judgement as well as Bill's. As a former President, you don't choose sides in a primary campaign unless it is your running mate. Otherwise, it is in poor tast to appear so partisan. Thank God for Obama! We can see that the "Hill/Bill show" merely offers more partisan and divisive rhetorical bull___!
As a President, he has let me down and I gave the guy $3000 during his effort. I must be forgiven for flip-floping because he has really, really disgusted me with his behavior!!

Indy Dreamer   January 8th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

It is refreshing to see all of us, the frequently silent majority, engaged in this election.

Charles, picture this: Barrack Obama/ Ron Paul as independents. I'd vote for that!

David Stacy   January 8th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

I think everyone is forgetting that Obama won the Iowa Caucus so I think he deserves a little extra media cover. Whoever wins New Hampshire will get extra coverage. And let's face it this is a historical election for the Democrats no matter who wins.

Patrick, Bethlehem,PA   January 8th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

Now we know what is going to happen if Hillary becomes president. When it gets too hot in the kitchen call Bill.

Andrea   January 8th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

The theory that a manager can manage anything often goes along with The Peter Principle where one is elevated beyond one's level of competence. I don't believe, though, that Obama has managed anything directly, so where is he ref. his level of competence? I think the public rallies around Obama in part because they want to believe that they, also, can do anything they want without experience. Perhaps that is part of the thinking ref. the . . .what was that book . . .The Secret. If you wish it it will be instead of if you work for it and gain experience and have the education in various areas it might happen. Oprah also promoted that book, did she not?

A need for change . . . of course there is a need for change. That isn't a revelation. It is too bad that Al Gore isn't running. He has been saying that for years.

blackman   January 8th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

O COME ON DEMOCRATS.. DID YOU NOT REALIZE THAT YOU WILL BE HAVING A MUSLIM CANDIDATE IF OBAMA WINS? WHAT'S HIS TRACK RECORD??? LEAVING HIS GRANDMOTHER IN KENYA IN POVERTY ?? WHERE'S HIS FAMILY FROM KANSAS?? HAVEN'T HEARD OF THEM.

Tyler in Raleigh, NC   January 8th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

Hey Willy!!!!

WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD "IS"?????

Until you can answer those questions, anything you say about what Hillary "is" and "is not" does not mean anything.

He sounds tired, wiped out and old. Parading out there like they are innocent and why is the media so against us? He goes negative and trashes other and then claims they are the positive and not depressing campaign? Do people actually believe either Clinton when they speak anymore?

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

All of these blogs prove why we need Obama and not Hillary.

Oliver   January 8th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

Bill. Please respect yourself as a respectable President. Do you know that your attacks against Obama may hurt your wife's candidacy? Please, Mr. President, we love you but do not force us to elect your wife? We do not like the idea of you becoming First Man in the White House. We care much about integrity of our beloved White House.

Kim, Dallas, TX   January 8th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

Wow, my respect for Bill Clinton just bottomed out. To think I used to feel he was the greatest thing that ever ran this country and that he was treated unfairly when impeached. I am very disgusted with how he and Hillary are running their very corrupt, smeared campaign. He needs to make a point of showing the support Obama has from Bill's very own government. Many of his inner circle are supporting Obama, not Hillary. Also, Hillary was applauded in the news for months and months on end. I thought the slant towards Hillary would convince all to vote for her instead. I really felt the media was going to determine who would win. This show in Iowa and New Hamshire have renewed my faith in the whole election process.

Stop the Iraq war NOW   January 8th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

Well, let's see if my blog today gets posted.......last night I wrote one and it did not.

In last nights' blog I brought up the fact that Obama has not clearly told his position on some things-–namely, Gay Marriage. Does Obama support Gay Marriage? Well, I actually researched that, and he related in a recent interview that he supports Gay Marriage, but does not think socially that it will "work"--he suggests that marriage is more about religion, but that "Civil Unions" and giving Gays and Lesbians the SAME LEGAL RIGHTS that straight married couples have, just calling it "Civil Union" instead of "Gay Marriage".

In the meantime, Hillary is AGAINST Gay Marriage, but is FOR Civil Unions.

We need to get specific and talk about what else Obama "supports". AND what Hillary supports. Can anyone tell me specifics about what Obama wants to "Change", besides being for legalizing "Civil Unions" for Gays and Lesbians? Please, I'd like to know, really....

GaryO Virginia Beach   January 8th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

No question about it, the press is definitely going easier on Obama. Not only that, the national media is united in doing whatever it can to ensure Obama WINS the Democratic nomination. And Why? MONEY!!

Face, it the news media is part of the entertainment industry, and it competes for audiences. An Obama victory creates drama, bigger audiences, and more advertizing revenue as Obama faces off the Republican challenger.

The national press, the fourth estate, is completely dominated by the profit motive. CNN, the all-news network, has no compunction at all against sacrificing our country for a few ratings points.

Robin, L.A.   January 8th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

CNN: I am watching your "political analysts" pan and taunt Bill Clinton for this well-stated defense of his wife (which all the other candidate spouses do regularly, esp. Mrs. Edwards).

This is not news, hate to say. This is CNN's effort to entertain viewers so they won't change the channel and go to Fox.

Your finger is not on the pulse, Wolf. Whether you like Hillary Clinton or not, people agree with her husband. You guys sitting around that "situation room" do not have a clue.

Come on journalists, do your job. We demand it!

Stan   January 8th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

Obviously, Bill sees his chance for a Supreme Court nomination vanishing quickly.

Paul   January 8th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

Well done Bill

It was about time for you guys to speak up. Obama may have the willingness but you also need the experience. That s a republican strategy in chich leaning republican "independents" would vote in the democratic primary so that Hillary wouldn't be nominated as our front runner.
Is it that they are scared of a First Female President who besides being smart would change the status quo. Let us see clear, because besides McCain no other republican candidate could possibly stop her from winning.

Go Hillary!!!

Kennedy   January 8th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

We do! We do! We do believe in fairies!(tales i.e)

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

"SteveJobs January 8, 2008 6:10 pm ET

To Open Eyes,
And everyone else who keeps defending Bill Clinton for his "private life issues". Clinton was impeached for sitting upright in the Oval office, looking me, you, and every American right in the "open eyes", then telling a LIE….Not for any of his personal issues…..Be real."

I don't think President Clinton's legal troubles were about anything he said on television, but rather what he said in Court under oath.

Lying under oath, about a personal sexual affair was the legal issue.

Telling a lie about a BJ or two on TV is not impeachable and in the end the Senate decided the entire matter (including the entire and exhaustive Ken Starr investigation, including the perjury ) did not amount to an impeachable offense. He was aquitted by the Senate.

Be real.

Marlene   January 8th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

This is getting very, very painful for the Clintons, as I knew it would. It is sad but they are truly bewildered. They really feel so strongly that they are the smartest, most qualified people alive to run this country. After all, they did for 8 years, right? Never mind they were 8 of the most dysfunctional, distracting years in the history of American administrations. Still, they got away with everything so what's the problem? One shining example that people don't seem to connect the dots to is that while Ken Starr and the rest of the country were consumed with the shameful problems of the Clinton administration, terrorists and extremist groups were gathering strength, training and planning.

No one will drag Obama down. He is a born leader and will be our next president. Obama will go down as one of the best presidents in our country's history.

david mccluskey   January 8th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

No, Bubba, Give ME a break! Clinton never got a majority of U.S voters to elect him, lost the Congress in '94 because of his ineptitude, his wife becomes a Senator from New York with no creditials. He overpromised and underdelivered as President – a presidency full of promise, but not a lot of accomplishments of significance.

Your time in the spot light is almost done!

Misha   January 8th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

Obama is not fighting for the average American – he will raise our taxes. Right now only the poor and the extremely rich can afford housing and those of us who are working taxpayers have to pay the bill to subsidize both. He will absolutely continue the downward slide of the middle class while taxing the heck out of us. Bill is right – Obama is a fairy tale – and one that will become a nightmare quickly.

aware   January 8th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Obama, you are just plain wrong. Your face and your platitudes have been plastered over much of the media constantly and in glowing terms. I was initially curious, then bored, then disgusted and now totally turned off. I thought you stood for honesty and fair play? If you read the blogs, you will see the hateful, mean spirited comments your inspiration produces. By their fruits....

Dave   January 8th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Hello?!Bill Clinton sounds desperate.All the Clintons do is point fingers...By the way Bill Clinton should know all about fairytales....

Citizen   January 8th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Hillary's biggest mistake? Tying her political hopes to Bill, a long time ago. She wanted the benefits, but she has to deal with the negative consequences, too. Unfortunately, the country has also had to deal with the consequences. We've had Bush for eight years because of Bill's philandering (Gore would have won if not for all of the fallout around Bill). Finally, what kind of feminism is being promoted by Hillary's example? She should have ditched Bill long ago....

Carrie   January 8th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

Pat, NY

I am not scared of change. If anyone is acting right-wingish, its Bill Clinton.

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

steve, this is for you
China will likely replace the USA as world leader, said Bill Clinton in a recent Washington Post interview. It is just a matter of time. Clinton should know. He has personally done more to build China’s military strength than any man on earth.

Don't be coned by the Clintons.

MR   January 8th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Wow you all claim to be Democrats? You look like the same attack dog fascist republicans that went after the Clintons in the 90's. Oh the 90's. Remember? That was a very awesome time with the greatest president ever. The middle class grew at an unprecedented rate because of the Clinton economic package of 19 94. You people in here are a disgrace to the Democratic Party. Well you can't fool me most you fascist in here are really Republicans. And you Democrats jumping ship like a bunch of rats to support Obama are in for a rude awakening come November. I can't wait to see this.

Pat, NY   January 8th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

First of all, all the HATE talk from the Obama supporters, is kind of odd, don't you agree? Very scary, narrow minded, right-wingish isn't it?

Secondly, doesn't it scare everyone that the G.W. Bush supporters are now supporting Obama? Considering that all the independents went for Bush, before, why would we follow their lead, here?!

Thirdly, can we really afford another "Uniter, not a divider" like Bush? Are we really that stupid?

Iowa and NH are not exactly representative of the rest of the country. Let's all chill a little.

jessi   January 8th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

He didn't get knocked around AT ALL and he certainly isn't now.

Marsha, Portland, OR   January 8th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

MIKE IN KENTUCKY – Excellent point!

I Agree 100% if Abe Lincoln had been more experienced maybe we could have avoided one of the bloodiest wars ever to have occurred on American soil and settled it in a more diplomatic matter.

Marie   January 8th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

I'm angry about the media coverage too Bill!

I'm angry as hell that Edwards isn't getting his fair share of coverage - the media has been turning this into a Hillary vs. Obama election for the past year.

Clearly, Iowa was a wakeup call that somebody who has clearly been discriminated against by the media (Edwards) can vie for electability with the media's darlings (Obama and Clinton). He came in ahead of Clinton, and Obama's lead wasn't all that significant.

I will support Edwards all the way!!! He at least remembers that the president is supposed to be on the side of the average citizen.

MT   January 8th, 2008 6:19 pm ET

Karen M. Jenkins – I agree that Obama's record should be looked at but the problem here for Bill Clinton is that he is failing to disclose fully what Obama said. Obama had said that he could not say how he would have voted had he been in the Senate at the time of the vote and therefore had a chance to review the NIE documents(i.e. maybe there was something in there that prompted people like Hillary to vote for the war authorization) but then added that from his vantage point (i.e. no access to NIE document) the case for war had not been made. The fact that Hillary and others voted for the war authorization without actually reading is NIE document is a complete travesty. And because she did not read the document she technically had the same vantage point as Obama – his take was "no war"; her take obviously was quite the opposite.

This smear attempt by Bill Clinton is not going to work – Obama is not such a fool that he is going to repeat something throughout his campaign that can so easily be refuted. The Clintons for one are reeling b/c they are getting beaten by someone who insists on playing nice.

J   January 8th, 2008 6:18 pm ET

Mmmmmm, did he flip the bird at the camera??? This was really funny. When you loose your cool you show your dumb side, and on TV yet......wow

Former Clinton Supporter-Iowa   January 8th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

A bit of advice for Bill..... shut up and go home.

South Carolina   January 8th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

thankgod no HIllary in 2008.

Craig   January 8th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

I am not quite sure if I missed something about all the pro Clinton hype coming into the primaries.
Each time Obama made a stride the media made a pity plea for Hillary and I understand why. The issue of experience is a "NON ISSUE" Hillary has none to really speak of if we are assessing both on the same basis.

They have both simply watched th emachine work and now want to run it, the only difference here is as is proven when the status quo holds on to power nothing changes its the same "good old boys" in the smoke room with Bill if Hillary is in.

Obama offers us one thing and we need that a country run by politicians who have to feel the weight of the people they govern they are representatives not rulers and they meet machinery and modify not create.

Nothing from Bush to Clinton will change it remains the issue of money and friendships back-door arrangement and podium smile.

We need to bring the people's burden to bear on the politicians who think they are untouchable.

Bush's high disapproval rating meant nothing for him to thumb his nose at us.'
Lets start it now remind them a snow-job is not enough to lead us further into the mire, we want accountability and genuine concern, not circular rhetoric and repeats of old decisions the old club has lost it CHANGE is not only the buzzword it is the REQUIREMENT for us to move forward and grow.

Carrie   January 8th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

My dream ticket, Obama/Edwards 08!

Mackenzie   January 8th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

is no one getting this?

Obama and Edwards are working together, thats going to be the ticket. Obama sits on the sidelines while Edwards acts like his attack dog!

The republicans could beat this ticket, look at there voting record and get a grip people! The right wing media are pumping Obama only to drag him down and get there guys back in! Start to think with your head and not the hype.

CensoredByCNN, Roxboro, NC   January 8th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Bill never shot his mouth off when the candidate of "inevitability" was stealing,,,,no,, make that granted all the ink.

Jim   January 8th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Are you kidding me. Obviously Bill has not been paying attention. We no longer wish to hear about how bad someone is! This has been a positive campaign, that is why Obama leads, everyone has had enough of your 1990's politics. Sorry that your wife is losing but that is life, to stoop to this level you are pushing those people away who really admired you. That includes me, I loved what you did in the past despite your other activities. Now, shut up and go to the corner, let the wave ride into the future, sorry but you and your wife will not be part of it.

Brendan H., San Antonio, TX   January 8th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

To Dave:

Comparing Hillary's pedigree to Laura's is like saying Ronald McDonald and Emeril Legasse are kindred spirits of the kitchen.

just a voter   January 8th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

HEY AMERICA! if you don't like the media slant, blame it on ol' bill clinton for passing the 1996 media deregulation bill that allowed the ALL TIME LEAST AMOUNT OF PEOPLE to own (and project their views on) ALL MASS MEDIA. kinda sucks when they're not on your side, doesn't it? hope those corporate kickbacks were worth it, clinton family.

Mackenzie   January 8th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

is no one getting this? Obama and Edwards are working together, thats going to be the ticket. Obama sits on the sidelines while Edwards acts like his attack dog! The republicans could beat this ticket, look at there voting record and get a grip people! The right wing media are pumping Obama only to drag him down and get there guys back in!

Tip   January 8th, 2008 6:11 pm ET

Anti- Christ....Uhhh do you know what Hilliary really feels about Christ? I think not. You must by the tears as well... By the way the Anti-Christ won't be married with children. Read your Bible.

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 6:11 pm ET

Hey everybody you know it takes money to run a campaign. Everybody should give something to the Obama cammpaign.

Marsha, Portland, OR   January 8th, 2008 6:11 pm ET

People who can't figure out Hillary's 35 years of experience must be illiterate because I've read about it in three books already. Go to the library.

Or, go ahead and vote for Obama because then you're going to have another Republican in the White House. I know I will not vote for him in the general election. I have at least 10 friends who refuse to vote for him in the general election. I honestly would rather see a republican win the white house. With a republican – at least I know what I'm getting – the status quo – nothing will change for another four years. And if by some chance he does win the general election, you will not get any change for the next two years, because he's going to have to read books about what to do for the first two years before he knows what to do. Oh yeah, I forgot, I'm the only one that knows how to read...Obama supporters don't know how; otherwise they'd be voting for Hillary or Edwards:

In a Rolling Stone interview in early 2007 Obama stated that when he first got elected to congress he knew very little about international relations so he had to spend a lot of time reading everything he could get his hands on.

Oh yeah – this is the guy on want negotiating our international agreements – some guy who has had NO EXPERIENCE and got all his knowledge from books.

Learn how to read Obama supporters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stop thinking with your ears and remember your brains!!!!!

I know what I will get with Hillary because she lays out the specifics or were you too busy not listening in the debates because you were mesmerized by Obama rambling?

With Obama, all I know is that I'm getting hope? Hope for what???? Oh, and please, oh please don't tell me to research his website again. I've looked at it a million times.

Hope is a WORD. I want action. I want experience. I want know how. I don't want some man that stands on a pulpit, sounds like a preacher, and delivers me a sermon about hope and change.

SteveJobs   January 8th, 2008 6:10 pm ET

To Open Eyes,
And everyone else who keeps defending Bill Clinton for his "private life issues". Clinton was impeached for sitting upright in the Oval office, looking me, you, and every American right in the "open eyes", then telling a LIE....Not for any of his personal issues.....Be real.

BillTheSaxMan   January 8th, 2008 6:10 pm ET

Hey Billy Boy, if you think Hillary's so great, why don't you marry her?

JoeBrown   January 8th, 2008 6:09 pm ET

Clinton is right.. one day everyone will see Obama for the fraud that he is.

sam   January 8th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

No way Obama is going to win. A lot of the Democrats I know aren't going to vote for him. I never voted for a Republican, but I will vote for any of the candidates running over Obama.

NEWS ALERT NEWS ALERT   January 8th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

O yea, we do luv fairy tales; sure feels good. bets living in status quo dung anytime.

bev   January 8th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

He's right, but he ought to get off the stage and shut up just the same. Hillary can speak for hersefl. Bill needs to bite his lip and sit on the side lines until asked by his wife to do otherwise.

sandy valencour   January 8th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

What is this ugly name calling stuff. Bill Clinton was a president that got the national debt to go away. He has a right to ask questions and who else is qualified to get to the nitty gritty? I am sorry but all I really read about is Obamas educational statements. Right now I want to know how this country is gonna get out of a war we don't want, how we are going to get the respect of the world back, how we will become a world leader again, and , most important, who is going to put this country first before the entire world!!! This country is in trouble from the very bottom of our population to the top of the middle class. Jobs that were "created" are low paying with no benefits. Families are struggling. Food Banks are hurting and then, do I have to cover Health Care???? I haven't made up my mind who to vote for but it won't be Obama unless he answers some questions so that would leave McCain. I don't live on TV blips or quips, I read and go the the idividuals sites to get it from the horses mouth. I don't listen to crap. If Hillary Clinton had yelled and screamed about where this country has gone the last 7 years, she would have been touted as strong...if she were a man. I didn't see an "emotional" Hillary as the news press would have you believe. Don't any of you think for yourselves or investigate. Tell me, what did Bill Clinton do that was so wrong? I have always said that the Democrates screw women and the Republicans Screw the country. What Bill did is between he and his wife. Crooked, I don't see it. Liar, just like any other man that got caught. I have heard Republicans say Reagan cost them money, but they made big money under Bill Clinton. As we all know, you can't be everything to everyone and there will always be disgruntled people in every walk of life and in every party. The name calling has to stop because it shows that you aren't intelligent enough to present facts to show your point. I like Obama, as a person, but my country means more to me than a decision of party votes and I will cross the line in this case. Experience doesn't mean same old thing, it means someone that knows more than the new comer. She was struck down repeatedly and kept coming back, especially on the Health Care for everyone. When did experience mean same ol same o. What a load of crap. This election has come down to personalities, gender, color, not issues. I don't care if they are purple, if they put this country first and the people that live here.

Jason   January 8th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

My sister-in-law just turned 21...has anyone realized that to date basically all she has ever known is Bushes and Clintons as president? If Hilary is elected, that'll make a minimum of 24 years that those TWO families have run this country. Just think, "Billary" can serve another 8 years and by that time Chelsey and the Bush girls will be eligible to take office.

I for one am sick and tired of this political family-feud that's been going on for the last 20 years...

OBAMA '08

Rob   January 8th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Change would have been a Clinton/Obama Ticket. Change won't happen overnight as it took years to screw things up to where we are. A Clinton/Obama Ticket would have provided 16 years to get things done.

What do we have now? It looks like another Republican President because Obama is unelectable in the South and they play big in the General Election.

Dave   January 8th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Hiliary's experience? You mean being first lady for 8yrs? Maybe Laura Bush should run next.....

Bill, do your wife a favor and simmer down. You didn't have issue with experience when you were the young phenom on the scene. And anyway, maybe Obama will match Hiliary's offer of letting you run the Whitehouse intern pool if he wins...

Anti-Christ Question   January 8th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Hasn't anyone read the book of Revelations? Or, maybe the Left Behind series? Obama fits the Anti-Christ description; a leader who rises up from no where with a promise to unite the world through change. He is already dabbling in international politics when he has no experience or authority to do so. I love what he is saying but are we all falling under his smooth-talking spell? It is a bit freaky how he has risen from no where to possibly become the leader of the free world. At least with Hilary, we know what we are getting.

Mo Jo   January 8th, 2008 6:02 pm ET

Utterly pathetic.....I do not understand why Hillary is allowing Bill to open his mouth unscripted. Is it coincidence that he becomes assertive and she is in tears all within the same 24 hour period? I think they are trying to play the "strong, assertive man defending his poor little wifey", who just so happens to show her "emotional side" all within the same 24 hour period.....talk about scripted...these two should be up for Oscars!!

Boo Hoo, Bill....you are not helping.

David, Bala Cynwyd, PA   January 8th, 2008 6:02 pm ET

Hillary has employed her 35 years or experience in defining her opponents and running her campaign. She has had every opportunity to use all of her inside Washington contacts and her press operation to contrast herself with her opponents. She has done her best and the results of her management, her experience and her choices are becoming visible. The media and the voters are doing what they are supposed to do, reporting the facts and reflecting their preferences at the ballot box.

Bill Clinton has employed his judgement in the past, and our country witnessed his dirty laundry, which had a tremendous effect on Al Gore's loss to our sitting President. Let's not forget cause and effect and why we have the problems that we have in 2008 and who contributed to the causation.

sredders   January 8th, 2008 6:01 pm ET

Bill,
I like you, but get off the negativity bandwagon and actually do some research before you speak. Tim Russert on MTP asked him about the funding of Iraq question. Go watch that before you keep bringing up that subject...

MFK   January 8th, 2008 6:01 pm ET

What a shabby twosome these Clintons are! The Billary Team can't believe there are politicians other than their anointed selves who can lead this country back to greatness. It's not that Bill was another Lincoln or FDR. He was just another average president whose legacy is greater in his mind than it is in the minds of others. And Hillary is just an opportunist who moved to New York because she saw it as a great launching ground for her presidential campaign. I don't think the residents of New York State are any better off because of her much peddled "experience" at work in the Senate. Again, she's just another average Senator. A growing number of the American electorate see this. But the Billary Team can't allow itself to accept this, so they run down anyone who attempts to challenge their fantasy. It's their Fairy Tale that's beginning to come apart.

Sean, Detroit   January 8th, 2008 6:00 pm ET

People are always complaining about "so called "flip flopping" and changing political positions. Isnt readjusting your opinions in light of new information and rethinking your course based on real time situations the mark of an intelligent person? America already has a president who "stays to course" regardless of where it leads us. We've had 8 years of preconceived strategies with no room for real world adjustment, which is why we are still in Iraq and more American lives are being wasted over there every day. A wise man (or woman) makes decisions based on weighing all of the facts of the matter and then acting. For example: when you back your car out of your driveway do you just "floor it" and hope for the best? I doubt it.

Jr., California   January 8th, 2008 6:00 pm ET

35 years of experience????

JCH   January 8th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

Here's the truth:

Don't believe Bill Clinton's half-truth. The Clinton camp is frustrated and desparate.

This is Obama's response to Bill's lies in as printed in the NYT:

As for Mr. Clinton’s pounding away at Mr. Obama’s war stances over the years, Mr. Obama said: “But I think Tim Russert answered Bill Clinton this morning. Every point that he raised was a question that had been answered _ had been asked and answered, not only on “Meet the Press” but repeatedly.

It is a little frustrating for the president to _ the former president _ to continually repeat this notion that somehow I didn’t know where I stood in 2004 about the war. He keeps on giving half the quote. I was always against the war. The quote he keeps on feeding back was an interview on Meet the Press at the National Convention when Tim was asking, `Given your firm opposition to the war, what do you make of the fact that your nominee for president and vice president didn’t have that same foresight.’ And obviously I didn’t want to criticize them on the eve of their nomination. So I said, `Well, I don’t know what _ you know, I wasn’t in the Senate. I can’t say for certain what I would have done if I was there. I know that from where I stood the case was not made.’ He always leaves that out.

“And you know, I understand why he’s frustrated. But at some point since we’ve corrected him repeatedly on this and he keeps on repeating it, you know it tells me that he’s just more interested in trying to muddy the waters than actually talk fairly about my record.”

kelly   January 8th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

All this bitterness is just turning more and more people away from them. I know I'm turned of by the whole "I'm in it to win it" comment she made the other night. She's not in it for the country – she's in it for herself. This has been her goal for the past 35 years...and now someone has come along and pulled the rug out from under her. Now the gloves are off. These are relly nasty people.

Jason   January 8th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

Bill nailed it: "biggest fairy tale I've ever seen."

All this attention over Obama/Clinton is fueled by the corporate media's desire to obscure the real candidate of change in the Democratic race: John Edwards.

Josiah   January 8th, 2008 5:58 pm ET

In reference to Bill Clinton's comments on Obama experience being the biggest fairly tale ever is not only laughable, but is so contradicting and far-fetched, specially when its coming from a former president who lied straight in the face of the American people about his extramarital affairs. Hillary would do better with him staying at home and just watching CNN like the rest of us.

DC   January 8th, 2008 5:58 pm ET

Totally disgraceful, my respect for the Clintons has gone out the door. I'll vote Republican or for a third party if she gets the party's nomination. One family, too much power & now they see it slipping away so things are getting nasty.

trent porter, tx   January 8th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

we simply don't want – or need – hillary. it's that simple.
she's crooked and vacations with the bush family.

LULU KNOX, IN   January 8th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

What does obama mean when he says change??? The only change I see is going from a Bush to Obama both having no experence or any plan for anything!!!Both very sicking smiles. Both have and will distroy the US as we have had it . Actually Hillary is to good of a person to have taken on ALL men candidates on the D sideand the R side. They are all a bunch of babies!!!!!!!!!! Obama has gotten a free ride from the media and his best friend OOOOOOOOOO and her money!!!!! Also I seen him on a morning show taking about his father(BLACK FATHER) what about his Mother????? His he hiding her?????? Obama and his wife make me ill they think the R people are for them; think a again ; they just want a person they know they can BEAT!!!!!! And they know they can not beat Hillary !!!!!!! All you people that support Obama get use to having nothing because the US will be broke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LULU

gene   January 8th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

BUSH LIED TO THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT AND MADE FOOLS OF THEM AND WE ALL PAID THE PRICE OBAMAS TELLING THE YOUTH IN THE EARLY STATES HE IS THE MAN OF CHANGE HE CAN MAKE THE WORLD BE NICE RIGHT! IT WILL NOT HAPPEN HE WILL NEVER BE VOTED THE PRESIDENCY THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SUPPORTING OBAMA WILL BE GIVING THE POWER BACK TO THE SAME PEOPLE WHO GOT US IN THIS MESS WE ARE IN NOW WE AT LAST HAVE A CHANCE TO GET RID OF THESE LIERS AND THIEVES DO NOT GIVE IT UP OR WE WILL BE IN FOR MORE HEARTBRAKE AND MORE DEBT EVERY OBAMA VOTE MAKES THE NEO-CONS JUMP FOR JOY BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN EASILY DEFEAT HIM

Marty   January 8th, 2008 5:56 pm ET

We Dems ought to be thinking about who is electable in November. I'm thinking about Richardson or Edwards. I wonder what the Supreme Court would look like in 5 years if a Republican wins again.

Ron   January 8th, 2008 5:55 pm ET

Seems Hitlery is unable to stand up to Obama. Needs hubby to fight her battles for her. Is this how she is going to run a presidency?

Anonymous   January 8th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

If experience is all that counts when it comes to making an excellent leader I guess Methuselah would have made the greatest jewish leader and human would be dinosaurs' pet!

Joe, Wilmington DE   January 8th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

Yes, unity is a fairy tale to someone described as an "uncannily good liar" (Sen. John Kerry's description of Bill Clinton's talent at bending the truth) or Hillary Clinton's "if you're not with us you're against us" mantra (George Stephanopoulos' book "All too Human"). Please. No more Clintons, no more Bushes.

Maybe if we turn the lights out they will all go away.

Joan Harrington   January 8th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

Sometimes I think even CNN has a glass ceiling. That surprises me. Lately you are appearing to be totally biased towards Hillary and promoting Barach Obama with a ferver that appears to be biased. I have found myself punching my remote away from CNN more often because I get so frustrated over your coverage in regards to Hillary. People are overlooking the fact that Obama has NO experience and even though he is attractive he has not yet accrued the intelligence and experience needed for President. Even CNN has a "dancing-with-the-stars" mentality.

John, Burlington MA   January 8th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

davidvoter08 you are SO right. We are in this mess because of red neck religious idiots on the right and tv-watching-attention-deficient liberals on the left. We need someone with experience and common sense to get us out the mess we're in, not a glossy corporate puppet. If you want anti-corporate, go with Edwards, but otherwise, there is no contest.

Martin H, San Jose - CA   January 8th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

I must say that it is very interesting to see the Hillary Camp go on an all out war . . . Now that she knows this wouldn't be a cake walk!

In any case this has only re-affirmed my decision when it comes time to vote and that vote will be for OBAMA!

Patrick Belvin   January 8th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

Bill Clinton's comments are reflective of a now desperate campaign being run by Hilary. You can bet these tactics would not have been used had Hilary won the Iowa Caucus.

Now Bill Clinton, who is well liked by most New Hampshire people, is trying to use his political clout in an attempt to attack Barack Obama. Better be careful, Dollar Bill, your strategy might backfire.

Leo, Mesa Arizona   January 8th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

Mr. Obama is emerging as a real leader. He is winning the campaign test and is truly an inspirational individual. We saw the shock in Iowa. Now, look at New Hampshire go! Feel the power!! GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nereda Haque   January 8th, 2008 5:51 pm ET

Clinton's are not getting a fair shake in the media.

I am applaud at the press assuming that what happens in Iowa and New Hampshire sows it up for all of us. In fact, I'm infuriated. We haven't had our say in Washington State yet, and we will. I don't follow the crowd. I'm not influenced by the hoopla. I want facts. To the candidates, I don't want to hear about inspiration without substance. Just tell me the substance. That will tell me how good you are.

I certainly feel we need someone in office who knows the ropes.

I'm all for Hiliary Clinton whose love for this country surpases her fame or anyone has can show their gifts.

Have we forgotten that Mr. Clinton worked for a $1.00 per year and donated his time to the white house. Hiliary has lived all her life in service to her country. Her record is phenomenal. Where are the men in this country that have even accomplished half what she has accomplished.

I have always favored the Republicans. This year I'm open to facts...I want the resume.

I'm 56 and I'm not for any gender, race, or class. I am for experience.

James   January 8th, 2008 5:51 pm ET

Has anybody came to the conclusion that the press is all over Sen. Obama, Because he is wining? American loves winners, especially underdog winners. The press was all over Sen. Clinton not to long ago may i add.

Obama-man   January 8th, 2008 5:51 pm ET

This race reminds me of a familiar television spot.

Obama: "Hello, I'm a Mac."

Clinton: "And I'm a PC."

Maria Henning   January 8th, 2008 5:50 pm ET

I can't believe the difference in the way the media has portrayed Obama as opposed to Hillary. The meida has practically crowned him the nominee of the Dem. party with
only the results of one state's caucuses and total of 18 delegates votes, vs. 17 & 18 for the other Dem. candidates. Even though I live in Iowa, I don't think that 38% of 230,000 democrats should decide who the next President is going to be.

Why don't you scrutinize his voting record in the IL. legislature and his one year in the U. S. Senate, like you have done with Sen. Clinton's? Why haven't you critized his debate performances like you have Senator Clinton's?? She made one mistake on answering the question on immigration and she was crucified for it. Yet, Obama gave a very poor response to the same question on the next debate and it was no big deal.

I am sick and tired of the way the media has treated Senator Clinton. You've been charmed by Sen. Obama's rhetoric, as you were by George Bush's likeability, and are not doing your job by vetting his candidacy like you should.

I am also tired of hearing about "change" as the only qualification for a candidate for President. Since when has experience become a dirty word?

What you have done in the media is creating a bandwagon effect based on the results of one election in one very small state and you made it sound like there is a "wave" that it cannot be stopped. I would like to remind you that there are 49 other states who also have a saying in who gets to be President. By the time Feb. 5 comes along, the results of the primaries in 23 states might not even count, the way you're carrying on.

By the way, the commentator I respect the most on your team is David Gergen. He seems to be the only fair one in the group.

Sincerely,

Maria Henning

retbray   January 8th, 2008 5:48 pm ET

Let's get back to days of "Hi, my name's Jimmy Carter and I'm running for president" The democrats finally have a rallying cry and are enthusiastic for the first time since those days. Let Obama pull the party together again and maybe we can all work together for eight years to change both the national and international crises in the world.

The Clinton reign is over, Bill. Off to Elba!

Caprissa   January 8th, 2008 5:48 pm ET

The fact of the matter is this Country will not vote a woman or a black man into the next Presidency.

You may see some action out of New York, California and parts of Florida.

Remember the last two elections. Most of the people in the other 47 states are just plain ignorant and will vote the way their priest, pastor or reverend wants them too.

If either of these two candidates gets the Democatic ticket, our next President will be a republican.

I am sorry to say this but it is a fact of life.

Maybe in 20-40 years but not in 2008.

jorge z   January 8th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Josh if you think that Bill Clinton was the best president of our time, you are as nasty as he was, he never told the american people who he really was, an adulter and a disgrace for this country. His wife even worst she chose to be with him after all the scandal, and keep the power and the money. It is time for them to get loss.

Tip   January 8th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

...by the way he was sworn in with the Holy Bible, you're confusing him with someonelse...just the FACTS Mam!

How irritating is it when on the up side of the polls all is well, but now when on the other side our true colors must be shown.

Sean, Detroit   January 8th, 2008 5:45 pm ET

Bill Clinton was one of the greatest presidents our country has ever known. Maybe his heart surgeon forgot to replace something when he had his chest wide open. How else can you explain this ridiculous rant/tantrum? Smells like desperation has gotten the best of the Clinton clan. When things arent going well for them they ALWAYS blame the media. I love you Bill, but seriously, just sit down and look pretty like a good little wifey. It is *so* over for Hillary, and this rant shows that they know it too!

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 5:45 pm ET

If Obama is elected, we all flee out to Maxico

Ron Stein   January 8th, 2008 5:45 pm ET

The Clintons are at their worst when they see that Holy Grail slipping away. Too bad for them that pesky things like "elections" have to interefere with their arrogant sense of entitlement. Let's savour the moment. They're both about to be sent back into the 1990's where they belong. Good riddance.

Jorge Phoenix, AZ   January 8th, 2008 5:45 pm ET

After reading most of the comments after this article, it pains me to see that you the American public still defend Obama or Edwards don't you see that they will be incapable of governing properly? Can you see a Bush in the making? If you choose Obama or Edwards a puppet will be the president with advisors that will do their little dirty works and we will be in such a depression that even Oprah will take back her endorsement after everything comes tumbling down.

"The most experienced and the only one that should be our next President is none other than Hillary Keep going forward the battle is not over yet"

Jaymes in Cali   January 8th, 2008 5:44 pm ET

Somebody recently said, "Obama is on the freshman lineup and Hillary is already playing on the varsity team". I can see that when they talk. If Obama gets the Dem nom, the country will elect a Republican Pres (Mormom or Baptist preacher) for another 4 YEARS! It ain't happnin' folks, Nobama!.

bh   January 8th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

For those that think Obama is suddenly the front runner because he did win the primary Iowa; please notice that he did only get 2 more delegate votes than Clinton. So do not suddenly be so quick to think Clinton is down and out. Clinton will most likely be the nominee and the next president; we can certainly hope!

Karen M. Williams   January 8th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

I have great admiration for both Bill and Hillary Clinton. Finally the truth about Obama gets spoken. The words were late in coming.

What Obama and the other candidates have thrown at Hillary is outrageous. It was time her campaign took the offensive.

What has Obama done for this country? The Clintons have more than 30 years experience and track record of doing great things not only for this country but for the world. Yes, I refer to The Clintons and consider her entering the White House will bring TWO Presidents not just one. Why not tap into Bill's 8 year experience as President? Look what his administration accomplished: peace, a surplus in lieu of a deficit, lowest unemployment rate in history, highest home ownership in history, etc.

I have been following the polital race closely, and to date I have not heard any specific steps about what Obama would do about the Iraq war.

There is nothing wrong with Bill C. coming to the defense of Hillary. The other candidate wives helped in their campaign, why not Bill C.

It is about time someone spoke up. Thank you Bill for waking others up. Hillary Clinton has my vote.

Karen M. Williams
Retired Professional, Florida

Citizen   January 8th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

Are YOU a slave to the to the media, "get truth guy"? So, how can you have so little faith in your fellow citizens? Granted, I have had my doubts – especially when Bush was elected a second time. But aren't those who are supporting Obama also supporting the idea that we CAN be informed, empowered and make a difference?

Record is important, and I'm not ready to bash Hillary. She has a strong record on some issues (education and children's rights), but touting her "experience" is slightly disingenuous. She was first lady for eight years before "preparing" for her own run in the senate. And frankly, I don't think she stands a chance in a general election.

Strong character and ethics are qualities that I look for in a presidential candidate, in addition to record and experience (by the way – I don't think Obama's experience is too shabby). On that front, I'm with Obama all the way.

Philip, IN   January 8th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

Wow... there are what, 1153 posts on this blog. I wish I had time to read them all. The wit is amazing – from everyone! I seriously think the writer's strike is going to fail – the television executives and producers could just come here and take some pre-written wit.

Just me   January 8th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Hey, Bill never did like you! Hey, Hill never liked you either.

But, I do have to say to everyone out there regardless of party of choice. It is about time that everyone, not only the news media, take a close look at Obama.

The man has never answered a question directly! Ever! Find one time anywhere where he gives any subtance to his thoughts/ideas/concerns etc. I like to feel good too and I wish every one did feel great! Obama, it is not just like real life, we have to live and face the truths of life. Facts are facts. We would like to hear that from you and not just the rhetoric that you spill from your face.

pauolo green   January 8th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

Am sure the clintons forgot something in the white house which they need to retrieve,i keep hearing her say 39years of experience and am the most experieced,i want to know where her experience is for the last 12years that America is heading for recession. I kindly advice you to give up than to bring shame to your husband bill. Is bill going to be your first lady or man?

OBAMA   January 8th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

Obama should win because he's black

ANYONE BUT OBAMA   January 8th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

OBAMA STANDS ABSOLUTELY ZERO CHANCE......IF HE WINS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HE WILL BE STOMPED AGAINST THE REPUBLICANS

WITH HILLARY WE HAVE A SHOT...AND WITH HILLARY COMES GREATNESS...

Robin, L.A.   January 8th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

Bill is doing what the other spouses are doing: speaking up on behalf of their candidates.

More to the point: he happens to be right. The media has given Darling Obama the Lite treatment.

And commentators on this blog are right: CNN, you need to rotate your reporters. The woman covering Obama's campaign is probably wearing his button just below the camera line.

To all you people who say that Hillary should not take credit for Bill's years as president, I would turn the tables around and ask you this: If you don't give Hillary any credit for those years, then why are you associating her with those years? Judge her on her own merits as a senator, which is what you want us to do with Obama, right?

And one final thought: why is Obama an "outsider" and Clinton an "insider" when they both work in Washington at the same place?

Dave   January 8th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

So much for Bill Clinton the "political genius" . Nothing plays into Obama's narrative more than Bill Clinton whining about what, "a vast left wing conspiracy"? Add to that the return of serpent head and Bergala to crank up the attack machine. These clowns are clueless. All that will be left of the Clinton base by Super Tuesday is a bunch of octogenarians that are a week behind in reading the news because they're waiting for their large type editions!

Fred H. Lockley   January 8th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

All this moaning and groaning by that wimp Clinton. His wife is losing and he stands in front of people and just whines. Why don't he go back to NY. He's not doing Hillary any good.

John Luxon   January 8th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

I am a canadian following the race. I find watching Iowa and NH like watching the NFL playoffs. I'm almost standing at times cheering for Obama. I will hand it to CNN, the coverage is no less than top notch. As far as the Clinton comment, I'm sorry, I thought it was Hilary that was running...I was not aware that Bill was running..is he confused..wouldn't be the first time. The perception created here, is when it gets tough, hubby speaks out to protect 'the wife'. We didn't hear Hilary responding, and is it now that all the candidates will come as a 'tag' team. Does Bill know his place as 'First Gentleman'. You have to wonder who will be making the decisions at the White House if Hilary was to win. You have to also wonder if he would sabotage her position, again.
If it gets tough in the White House, is Hilary going to cry and Bill step in to ward off the bullies.
Just a question, 'if Hilary as President were to die, would her successor be the 'First Gentleman'...maybe this is what Bill is thinking...get a 3rd term.
Obama is THE answer, Huckabee is a good alternative as for the rest...Hilary wants to be the first woman president, Rudy is another Bush, MacCain is 71...Romney is John Kerry, Edwards is a good Vice Pres. selection for Obama and good luck with anything different.

keep the peace   January 8th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

What Senator Obama said is that WE can bring about change and WE know that WE togather as a people can bring about change.

TPatton   January 8th, 2008 5:35 pm ET

I am a young first time voter and the "fairy tale" comment form Bill Clinton has definitly made up my mind. I will be voting for Obama. Bill Clinton in my mind is hurting Hillary at this point.

Liam   January 8th, 2008 5:35 pm ET

walt taylor January 8, 2008 5:05 pm ET

It is unfortunate that Donna Brazile is speaking for the Democratic Party on the Situation Room. Since she is a black American,she is no longer objective. It is easy to see that because she is an African American, she is for Obama, even though the Clintons have stood for Black people over and over. It appears that this election is turning into a racial situation. Too bad !
------------------
You are the one who is a blatant racist. You are claiming that because she is black she has no right to support a black candidate. By your logic, then all those white people who are supporting white candidates are acting in a racially biased manner.

So, by your rules Blacks should never support anyone of their own race, but whites are free to always support white candidates. Sounds like the spirit of Strom is alive in you. What a Maroon!

blee   January 8th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

desperate times call for desperate measures. apparently that includes standing up in public and punching yourself in the face.

jason of indianapolis   January 8th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

How about Obama/Clinton

Tip   January 8th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

Adultery, Scandal, China, Osama, etc....Please!

Felicia   January 8th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

I think that hillary has lost alot of voters because of her mudslinging, I was undecided until the NH debates, after the debate it was clear that my vote is going obama. I us to have respect for the clintons. NO LONGER

Hessie L. Harris   January 8th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

I can't tell whether I am watching a political campaign or a Britney Spears meltdown! Hillary, who formerly claimed the "Miss Inevitable" crown lost Iowa and is falling apart. She looks highly stressed and a lot older. In debate, she comes across like a shrew rather than a candidate giving opinions and defending her positions. Her crown, once without a hair out of place, looks stringy. Worse yet, she tears up. The last thing a woman running for the highest office in the land should do is cry at adversity. She has just played into every "goil" stereotype currently for or formery in existence.

Then she goes on to claim that she should be elected because she should be president as she would know what to do from day one. Why would she know that? Does that come from her previous experience as co-president? Voters are understandably uncomfortable about such allusions. While many would love to see Bill Clinton in office again were that possible, no one is comfortable having him make or influence national policy through pillow talk in a very strained marriage.

Furthermore, the role that Bill Clinton is taking in the campaign is not helping. He is attacking Obama as if he, not Hillary, were running. Is he?

She states that some people are "ready " and some are not. Isn't that for the voters to decide?

Steven Stewart   January 8th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

You people are amazing! First you denounce Clinton for throwing mud when both Edwards and Obama have been using dump trunks for six months before the Clinton campaign even began to activate its "machine". You attack the woman as a literal ice queen with no basis but with serious hate. I once thought that Obama could have been a possible choice for me, and I was estatic for a Hillary/Obama campaign. But now knowing the supporters of this man and what they are capable, all this illogical hate, I pray that Hillary Wins for the safety of this nation. I might even half to back some other person in the major election because I will not follow a person who allows such debauchry and destruction to thrive. You people are disgraceful.

And for all polite followers of Obama Ideology, I do not intend to offend you, though I do not understand any of your reason. I think your letting passion control you, rather than reason. I have done a copious amount of research on every major person, and there really isn't much to go on with Obama. Passion is what got in this mess in the first place, we need some who can rationalize and be a problem solver. Obama has a message, but no really achievable goals. I know he seems like an amazing person, but please don't make this mistake.

I love humanity, and the world, not matter its faults.
Every question has an answer.
Every problem a solution.
Love Everyone and Love the World

Thank You.

VJ   January 8th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

Go for it, Bill!

Is_Real   January 8th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

The Clinton machine is done. I am glad of it. Bill has no relevance in questioning anyone's integrity, look at his track record. I am not really into Obama that much either. ( I am so-called African-American as well) I question the fact that most of the candidates are in the Council on Foreign Relations which in turn means they all have the same interest. Obama is the lesser of the two evils we all know this. This whole pulling the troops out of Iraq is a joke. Our military will remain in the middle east. This is their plan whether we want to believe it our not. Besides why would they give up our position to invade Iran. The only thing they have to contend with is China and Russia interest in Iran. This may be the catalyst for WW3 as we know. We are in some perilous times people...please wake up.

davidvoter08   January 8th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Mr. Barack Hussain Obama is all hype, not substance!!! I finally understand why Americans elected Gorege W.Bush twice!

Because they want a nice guy they can have a beer with, not a leader, not someone strong but less likable.

C. Bercier   January 8th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

First and formost: You go Bill!!! You are the Husband...you should stick up for your Wife!!! Good For you! My Husband sticks up for me even if I am wrong!

Second: Women of the U.S.: Get your act together! We have come a long way baby! We cannot stop now!! If you do, then think about this: We dont want to hear no whinning when you, as a woman, dont get as much pay as a man or maybe treated different.......

We have had male Presidents and look where we are!!!! Lets try a Woman....Hillary is a strong, smart Woman who has the experience we need and does hear our need for change... SHE IS CHANGE!

Let's change the world together!

Nicole, Birmingham, AL   January 8th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

First, just a few months ago Hilary was unbeatalbe in the press; now that the people have spoken everyone is saying the press is going easy on Barack; no their not going easy on him, but they are giving him a fair shot, one every candidate deserves. Next Hilary doesn't have as much experience as is being claimed. She was a lawyer, she was first lady of Arkansas, then first lady of the U.S. She may have met dignitaries and held deep conversations with them, but that doesn't constitute experience in foreign policy. Besides the president doesn't make decisions on their own, they have cabinet members and members of their administration that help shape this country. No one can ever have experience being president unless they have already been president. Now unless Bill will actually be the one running the country, Hilary has no more experience than anyone else! I am starting to wonder what the Bushes and Clinton's are really gainging from holding the highest office is the country, because no one has benifited from them being in office besides themselves and their friends and some of these special interest groups! As far as Hilary's experience with healthcare, her so called plan she came up with while Bill was president was not brought down by republican's and special interest groups alone, she helped to torpedo it because she was given and offer she couldn't refuse.

ANYONE BUT OBAMA   January 8th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

ERICA....ID LET THE WIFE OF A SURGEON OPERATE ON ME......IF SHE WERE A SURGEON....

DUH

Another Steve   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

Oh please Bill, for months the press all but announced your wife Hillary as the Democratic Presidential candidate. It was a forgone conclusion and all you had to do to become the 1st ladies man was sit back and watch. Well now the momentum has changed not because of the press, but because the voters don't like what they see with Hillary. She will polarize the Democrats and we will more than likely get either a Republican President or possibly an independent if someone like Obama runs when and if Hillary got the nomination. The VOTERS don't like Hillary, plain and simple. You can whin all you want as all this is doing is showing your true colors and what you Clintons really think about all of us voters.

You are a very smart man and love history. This is history in the making. Obama is way more intellectual than Hillary. Way more chrismatic, way more articulate, way more able to work with others, way more electable, shall we go on? You know all this yet keep trying to derail his campaign for your wife. Well us voters only see desperation and that is a sign of weakness and we do not want that in the next President. If you truelly want to help Hillary step aside as you look like a fool.

keep the peace   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

The Clintons sound like a bunch of drunks. They are continuing to embarrass the Nation. Lets all pray for them.

Now I am beginning to understand what blacks must live through everyday of their lives. I'm going to pray for them and myself too. I'm sorry African American People for the way we have treated you.

Dan   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

Did you just say "i do think it's damaging, especially for young people, to perceive our democracy as being run by just a few political families"? Are you serious? If you believe otherwise, please go to your nearest gun shop, pick up a gun and shot yourself in the head. Politics in our beautiful U.S. of A. is not only controlled by a few RICH families, but also by the businesses that their RICH friends own. Let's just keep it current so you can follow: Bush (junior & senior) = Zapata Oil, Arbusto Oil, along with all the contacts they ever made in the oil business. Dick Cheney= Halliburton Company and all the contacts that he made in the engineering and contracting business. You really think the average citizen really means anything to these politicians? They have to pay back all the little favors and large contributions that got them where they are at today and trust me, they do. This whole election fiasco that comes around every four years is just to give the average citizen the illusion of involvement in the political process. For the most part, every one buys it. They make you root for a Democrat or a Republican, but at the end of it all, who decides what really goes on in government and what direction it takes (domestic & foreign) policy, are the people that have a lot of zeros in their bank account. Reality sucks, I and hate to be so blunt, but it is what it is. For giggles, do some research on all the politicians in Washington right now (from the party of your choice) and tell us which one is not rich? Until we can start electing politicians on merit and that actually care about the citizens of this country and not because they have a pretty face or a lot of money in the bank, we are doomed to follow in the footsteps of every empire that has ever roamed this earth. Like the Roman Emprire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire, and the Byzantine Empire, we are bound to self destruct. Mark my words.

john colvin   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

Obama is right. Th Clinton campain is frustrated, but if it weren't for Bill's frustration to start with there probably wouldn't be HIllary campaign. I hate to think of Bill back in the white house acting as HIllary's mouthpiece to the rest of the world the way the campaign is using him now. I don't wand a president who will stand by her man when he releases his frustration on the international stage. Nor do I want a president
who causes a partners frustration. In the white house, on the international stage, frustrated partners usually blow something up.

Pot & the Kettle   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

One last thing. If anyone thinks that whoever our next President is won't raise taxes, I'd say you're in Fairytale Land with Bill!

Seunjohnson   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

Mr. Obama was asked about this outburst by Mr. Clinton earlier today. Courtesy of Jeff Zeleny, here’s the reply: “I understand they’re frustrated right now. I suspect that they’ll both try to get back on track in terms of the strategy for them to do better than they feel they’re doing right now.”
As for Mr. Clinton’s pounding away at Mr. Obama’s war stances over the years, Mr. Obama said: “But I think Tim Russert answered Bill Clinton this morning. Every point that he raised was a question that had been answered _ had been asked and answered, not only on “Meet the Press” but repeatedly.
It is a little frustrating for the president to _ the former president _ to continually repeat this notion that somehow I didn’t know where I stood in 2004 about the war. He keeps on giving half the quote. I was always against the war. The quote he keeps on feeding back was an interview on Meet the Press at the National Convention when Tim was asking, `Given your firm opposition to the war, what do you make of the fact that your nominee for president and vice president didn’t have that same foresight.’ And obviously I didn’t want to criticize them on the eve of their nomination. So I said, `Well, I don’t know what _ you know, I wasn’t in the Senate. I can’t say for certain what I would have done if I was there. I know that from where I stood the case was not made.’ He always leaves that out.
“And you know, I understand why he’s frustrated. But at some point since we’ve corrected him repeatedly on this and he keeps on repeating it, you know it tells me that he’s just more interested in trying to muddy the waters than actually talk fairly about my record.”

Dave Williamson   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

For Bill Clinton to suggest his 'wife' is getting unfair treatment, is absurd. She has no more experience than Obama. I think the nation is tired of clintons and bush's.

kbsamurai   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

The Clintons feel they are entitled to another eight years in the White House. The 90's are gone. Move on, nothing to see here.

what was said on CNN video clip and reported verbatim in the NY Times
says it all.
----------------
Mr. Obama was asked about this outburst by Mr. Clinton earlier today. Courtesy of Jeff Zeleny, here’s the reply: “I understand they’re frustrated right now. I suspect that they’ll both try to get back on track in terms of the strategy for them to do better than they feel they’re doing right now.”

As for Mr. Clinton’s pounding away at Mr. Obama’s war stances over the years, Mr. Obama said: “But I think Tim Russert answered Bill Clinton this morning. Every point that he raised was a question that had been answered _ had been asked and answered, not only on “Meet the Press” but repeatedly.

It is a little frustrating for the president to _ the former president _ to continually repeat this notion that somehow I didn’t know where I stood in 2004 about the war. He keeps on giving half the quote. I was always against the war. The quote he keeps on feeding back was an interview on Meet the Press at the National Convention when Tim was asking, `Given your firm opposition to the war, what do you make of the fact that your nominee for president and vice president didn’t have that same foresight.’ And obviously I didn’t want to criticize them on the eve of their nomination. So I said, `Well, I don’t know what _ you know, I wasn’t in the Senate. I can’t say for certain what I would have done if I was there. I know that from where I stood the case was not made.’ He always leaves that out.

“And you know, I understand why he’s frustrated. But at some point since we’ve corrected him repeatedly on this and he keeps on repeating it, you know it tells me that he’s just more interested in trying to muddy the waters than actually talk fairly about my record.”

B. Ambrose   January 8th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

No more dynasties............period..............democracy forever...................

Andy   January 8th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Billy Boy you are getting your well viewed nickers in a twist.

After i listened to Hillary's less than gracious (lol) speech from Iowa i am convinced she is now DEAD MEAT in this race. She is carrying to much baggage and political debts to be of any use to America.

Dan   January 8th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Obama...130 votes of "present" when serving in the Illinois senate. Now that's leadership...NOT

Aaron   January 8th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

As a social worker I am glad to hear talk about change. Most of my job is about navigating the existing systems that have failed my clients for years. We need change and I do believe in hope because it can be made reality if we work together. The United States of America and its people need someone to unite us and that is Obama. I am sad to hear the former president speak, at a cost to his positive reputation, on behalf of his wife in this manner. It is obvious they have changed their campaign tactics to muddy Obama's record, and that I do not respect, and hope that if Hillary does lose she will lose with her integrity intact.

As for issues of race and how we label ourselves I think it is wonderful that we are able to share our cultures with one another. We each have an ethnicity, a way of describing out cultural heritage, but the one thing that unites us is that we are Americans. And for that I am proud of thanks to Obama.

James   January 8th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Boo-Hoo, Bill. I didn't hear any complaining when your wifey was ahead 20 points in the polls. Maybe that's because back then people thought YOU were running again and they told polsters they'd vote for Clinton. Now that voters realize that your wife is running, they are not interested. What is your wife's name anyway? HC? HRC? She can't even make up her mind about her name, much less anything else.

Mike   January 8th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

How quickly Americans forget...remember the humiliation Clinton brought to the White House..I would have had more respect and would have supported Hil if she left him while he was in office...they talk about not facing facts..they are both living in a fairy tale..always have - working the system to get ahead..who in their right mind would pay Ole Bill millions to speak?!?!? Haven't we heard enough of the Clintons??? she talks about change, as one newsreporter stated..look at the RELIC Hilliary is carrying around with her! WAKE UP AMERICA...think back 8 years ago what was done and not done in the White House...and how, if Hillary wanted to do something, as she says she can...why she didn't back then...all talk! Go home to Arkansas..oh, that's right, they don't want you either!!!!!

yaliktono   January 8th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

People in this country are so desperate for change that they will gravitate toward anything or anyone that looks, even remotely, like it. What has Obama done during his four years in the Senate other than position himself for a run at the presidency? He's articulate, charming, professional and polished, but I sense a real disingenuousness about him. What change has he REALLY singularly affected? Research that question and then make a decision about him. Please look beyond the glitter before getting on the Obama bandwagon. I'm very disappointed with the field of candidates on both sides. I'm tired of having to choose between the lesser of evils – and I would be hard pressed to argue that Obama is that.

I said earlier that people are desperate for "change." I say that because they don't know what else to call it. I really believe that, underlying it all, the American People yearn for honesty, authenticity and integrity. They want for a leader that will restore dignity to the presidency and pride in our government (which has been waning for many, many years). Barack Obama says he can do that for us. If that's true, why hasn't he before now?

L Summer   January 8th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

Bill, If you knew as much about free trade as you do about Big Mac's the economy would not be in the shape that its in now. Stick to what you know and "chill" with a happy meal.

Becky Larson   January 8th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Jan 8, 2008 4:20 CDT

Why are you asking if Hillary can turn her campain around? You don't know the outcome of todays election do you ??? Is it because CNN & the media are against Hillary and don't give her a chance ?
It is comments like this that CNN makes while the election is still going on that is not fair to a canidate. In some business' , what the media does would be called " steering" and it is illegal.

No Bill, its not a Fairy Tale............ its a nightmare what the media does to Hillary !!

Steve   January 8th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Why is Bill giving speaches anyway? I thought his wife was running. You dont see Michele Obama speaking to crowds. Is this how she will be "prepared on day one?" When the going gets tough...I'll just call my husband to handle my battles. Yeah...good move Bill...good move. And correction...the biggest fairytale was "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

Leonora42   January 8th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

Here is something to consider regarding the Obama candidacy. The USA is the most powerful and richest nation in the world. Just as I would feel extremely uncomfortable boarding a 787 jetliner with a novice pilot, I would be equally uncomfortable with a novice president in these turbulent unstable times. I would however consider Sen. Obama as a potential vice president.

One secondary thought: I have heard enough about change. What the USA needs is "currency" in world and domestic affairs.

Greg   January 8th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

After all this time,now that things aren't going well, she is going to pull the crying card? She seems to be running out of ideas.
It's not a good play for someone who thinks that they can lead the U.S. What happens when She becomes President and Iran attacks us? Do we arm ourselves with "Kleenex"?

Love ya Bill, but...   January 8th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

Bill, I love ya but, the biggest fairy tale is "I did not touch that woman!"

JoeSchmoe   January 8th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

I can't believe how naive people are to believe that Obama could walk into office and change the American political system. Of course we want to believe what he says, but how innocent and naive he must be, and those supporting him, to truly believe that type of change can take place. Even if he actually attempts to fulfill his promises, he has to contend with congress and the senate. These are seasoned politicians that are not simply going to roll over and say O.K. Mr. President, we'll do whatever you say. It is unfortunate that there is a political game to be played, but the fact remains. Hillary knows how to deal with the system in order to accomplish our desires. I hope that the american people are not so gullible as to believe and accept the unattainable goals that Obama is promising.

P.S.   January 8th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

As far as Republicans go. McCain would have had my vote.....8 years ago. I'm not so interested in him after he's been nothing but a pet parrot for GWB since the 2000 GOP Convention. A vote for McCain is a like getting GWB for 12 years. No Thanks! Hillary or Obama save us from the GOP and those annoying Ron Paul supporters!

COMMON SENSE   January 8th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

LAdies and Gentlemen,

Do you really think Mr. Obama stands a chance against McCain? MS CLINTON is the only democrat capable of taking votes from republicans; not Obama. And that is what Democrats need in order to win. No crazy dreams of a newbie into the big game. Republicans will knock Obama down very easily.

Let us see

Bob Michael   January 8th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

To the Clinton Folks.....especailly Hillary and Biil:

Insanity, as defined by Einstein:
"Doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results"

This is a perfect portrayal of the Clinton Campaign Strategy......

june gross   January 8th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

Thank you Bill, for standing up for your wfe, the very capable nominee, Hillary Clinton. She deserves the nomination and we DESERVE her. Love and Blessings on you both.

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

you called this the electorate's growing hope? it's a fulse hope that was manufacturing by the Media, we are not buying this.

JoAnn   January 8th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

I am so fed up with political running mates bullying Hillary Clinton, I have served in the military and at the time we were looking for Saddam, Well, today we are searching for someone by the name of Osama. I sure do not want to vote for a man who we will call Pres. Obama, I dont care how smart he is. We are in America and I just can not
bear the thought of a US President by that name. Another thing is Hillary is smart I really think its about time we give a woman a chance. Whats the difference, if men
have not done much in the past few years. Look at the past Edwards, McCain, been there, and done that. Their agenda is the same as always. Women should be happy we have a woman come such a long way. Go Hillary, You got my vote and after I get
my word out she may have many votes from women. It may be after all a gender issue this political year. We will see. We've come a long way baby!

Zac   January 8th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

This only underscores why Presidents usually step out of the public eye or go on to lead moral fights against hunger or HIV after leaving the White House: because a past President still campaigning dips him into the muck of politics when he should be more concerned with maintaining the dignity of the title he earned.

It's also why Al Gore, after winning the Nobel Prize, doesn't need to seek the presidency. Who'd want to be president when they can be a Nobel laureate?

I'd rather be recognized for tilting the world toward peace than winning a popularity contest. And if you can tilt the world toward peace while being president, then that's another issue.

The point is this: I don't imagine Barack Obama going on the campaign trail after leaving the White House and complaining about media coverage and other lowly issues of politics. And I love Bill Clinton. It's sad to see him at this moment.

ANYONE BUT OBAMA   January 8th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

ILL VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT OBAMA...PLEASE.....NO OBAMA

HOW FAKE IS THIS GUY???

TRYING TO GET OPRAH WINFREY TO BACK HIM USING THOSE CHILDISH GIMMICKS TO WIN VOTES

TRYING TO GO WITH THE "IN THING" TO APPEAR POPULAR

TRYING TO REACH OUT TO KIDS WITH A SPEECH AS FAR FROM POLITICAL AS YOU CAN GET JUST TO WIN THE YOUNG VOTE

YOU KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF OBAMA BECOMES PRESIDENT RIGHT?????

HE'LL RIP OFF HIS MASK TO SHOW HIS TRUE ALIEN SELF AND GO "GOTCHA!!!!"

Betty   January 8th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

I don't want another Republican. There isn't ten cents difference between all of the candidates but Edwards and Obama.

The first time I saw Obama was in a senate hearing on C-Span–I was very impressed by this young man, searching out who he was on the internet. This was well ahead of the bid for president. Yet, there is something one can't define holding back supporting him. Frankly, his positions aren't clear enough. He is an eloquent speaker, obviously educated, intelligent young man. I just don't think he can deliver by negotiating with the absolutely, embeded power brokers.

One believes that Edwards has stated his position more clearly FROM THE BEGINNING. As a Republican, one didn't just jump on the Edward's bandwagon. After much looking, reading and soul searching; Edwards had more credibility, clearly stated positions, from which this cynical person, has not seen him deviate.

Although, I don't think there has been enough media coverage of Edwards, thankfully, there has been plenty of internet information. Also plenty of trivial nonsense to muddy the waters.

I think Edwards was the one to clearly bring the """change""" theme into play with his radical but true statements about mega-conglomerates, multi-national corporations.

It is beyond comprehension that folk fail to see he isn't talking about those who incorporate a small/medium or even a large business. He is speaking of the drive for ownership of this country and all countries by multi-national, mega, global conglomerates who have fed on each other until the tiers of ownership is almost impossible to distinguish as to who owns what: Far too many of the names/brands we think are as American as apple pie are globally owned. It's easier to understand out sourcing when the enterprise is globally owned. One isn't making a statement of whether, overall, this is good or bad, it just is
.
Why would policy decisions, ordinary Americans see and question matter to global ownership? Common sense dictates, it doesn't unless it affects what matters most to the global investors--the bottom line: PROFITS:

The allegiance is to profits, not country. Edwards is saying: He will work to return the directional flow of profits and allegiance to these UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to which we, the people, American citizens, pledge allegiance . He will not allow lobbyists for these mega corporations and other countries to inhabit the White House. The issues are complicated. I applaude his courage to stand up for what he has to know will cut him down. He isn't a stupid man, albeit he isn't from a moneyed family, he has shown his intelligence, willingness to fight the big boys and even more amazing! WIN.

I don't care how he styles his hair, where he lives, how much money he has EARNED, I am looking for someone who has proven he can win.

Many of the issues, economy, jobs, health care, environment are tied up in freeing Washington from paid influence of special interest.

I support him yet, at the same time see the probably foregone conclusion: There will be money spent like water flowing in the Mississippi in a flood to keep this upstart out of Washington. After all is said and done, it is politics, the survival of the fittest or the richest.

Our present occupant of the Oval Office hasn't even bothered to cloak his commitment to big, bigger and biggest or as he so eloquently put it; his supporters of the Haves and Have mores.

Obviously, this is only the personal opinion of one of the peons. But, one thinks it is as valid as the innumerable pundits spewing out through the supposedly public airwaves; infotainment specialists.

fyauthor   January 8th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

I think that the Clinton's threw in the towel– gracefully?

Peace & Love

Yancey

Terri   January 8th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

PLEASE!!! You would think that Bill Clinton would have learned a thing or two over these past years regarding Ken Starr. First, MR. Clinton – you caused the whole mess. Second, MR. Clinton, you loved Ken Starr before......until you got caught breaking the law. Third and final, MR. Clinton, don't ever, ever bash the Republicans again for playing dirty politics because that is EXACTLY what you are doing now. Thank God for Barack! A change is so needed in Washington, especially if MR. Clinton is still allowed to speak.

Claude, Paris/France   January 8th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Hi guys in the U.S,
just go on like this, this is exactly the way the French "Democrats" (ROYAL) have lost again the French "Republicans" (SARKOZY): they fought so hard against eachother during the primary campaign that finally the selected Democrat (ROYAL) was so weakened that she had no chance against SARKOZY in the "final round" ...
Concerning "Billy Boy" (I did not know it was Bill Clinton's nickname, I should not have given the same one to my 3.5 years old son ...), he really should refrain from accusing somebodyelse of lying, please, too riduculous.
On the other way, I must say the medias played a big role here in France to push ROYAL during "Democrats" primary and many french politics analysts said that this was a manipulation aiming at easying SARKOZY's win at the end, as many people were rather reluctant to vote a WOMAN as a President. Now the question is: are a woman or a "half afro-american" really in position to beat a white, male Republican this year in the US ??? If not sure about this, then the Democrats may have to push EDWARDS, even if it is very sad to have to think this way ... Good luck to all of you and happy '2008 ... whoever the winner maybe !!!
Ah, by the way: all sincere Europeans (not talking about BERLUSCONI or AZNAR) told you from the beginning the 2nd attack on IRAQ would end-up with a disaster. I understand OBAMA was against: maybe the only guy with a real good "political feeling", which is at least as important as experience to lead a country like yours ... look: the BUSH-family did not lack of experience, right ? "I'll make IRAQ safer" ... sounds like Billy Boy's comment: "This guy is a liar" ...

BRANDA CHI WILLSON   January 8th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

YES! We are one nation and one contry. Before Obama becoms uniter for this contry, and forsit thing he should do is let black people go to school and go to work. I came to this contry for 20 years and worked 6 companies, and I only had 5 coworks were balck and three of them came from Affirca. If they think take money from working calss to help the poor, and that is worry, worry, and worry. I came to this contry 20 years ago from China. I only had $100 at the time. Now I worked at high tech company and made a good pay. I won a house and two cars. Why? I studied hard and worked hard. This a great contry for every one. If I can do it and SO DO YOU? Do nothing but want to money? Ha Ha Ha! Day dram!

Chris   January 8th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

What amount the immigrants? Are they going to reclaim the alamo?

Emily N.   January 8th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Sometimes the word unity is not as great as it sounds. The country needs both parties- Democrats and Republicans- for check and balances. What would it be like if we were all so united that there was only one party? I know some countries with that system- Vietnam and China, for example...Their government has one party- The Communist Party- so united that oppositions dare not speak up for fear of persecution.
There will always be opposition in the political system. The country needs someone who can work with the opposition and get results. That's as good as we can get to unity, and results count, not a fluffy notion of unity. To be fully united is to have no free will, and that is not America.
I don't see Hillary as a polarizer.Republicans are simply afraid of her. But that doesn't mean she cannot work with them. I think her Senate track record has proven that.

Dolores DiBartolo   January 8th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

I am a woman, and a senior citizen. I am so ready to support Barack Obama and have been since he spoke at the convention four years ago. He is the only candidate for change and just what this country needs right now. The Clintons need to get a grip and walk out into the sunset, hand in hand. He wants us to give him a break, as he sounded off today. Well, why not do us and our country a huge favor and finally give us a break. Oh and while you're at it, be sure to carry out your baggage. We have dealt with it for far too long. We will have a woman president sometime in the future, just not this woman. We have had our fill of the Clinton and Bush families to last a lifetime. Goodbye and Good Luck.

Paul Folger   January 8th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

It's the politics of confrontation all over again. Hillary & Bill Clinton have no chance of uniting this country. A true leader tries to build bridges. Obama will try and has the best probability of succeeding. I would vote for ANYONE other than Hillary, and plan to do so.

DEBBIE FROM IL   January 8th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

WOW DONNA!!! WHAT DOES BILL CLINTON ATTACKS ON OBAMA HAVE ON YOUR FEELINGS OF BEING AFRICAN AMERICAN. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE AND DONT TURN IT INTO IT. PLEASE ARE COUNTRY NEEDS TO BE UNITED. THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN AFRAID OF.

GO HILLARY!!!!!   January 8th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

I KNEW SOONER OR LATER OBAMA'S FAKE FANTASY HE TRIES TO BRAIN WASH AMERICANS INTO BELIEVING WOULD COME TO LIGHT.

GO HILLARY 2008

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Obama has no idae how to run a country, not even a state, a city or county, how can he, a pure politician who was always flip-flop his positions upon his political needs, have zero knowledge of international and demestic (he thought Canada has a president is a laughing example), is being manufacturing by Media, to run this greatest nation in the world?

Jackie Mac   January 8th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

I really, really don't like Obama. I think he is arrogant and often patronizing. I cannot believe that after two states vote, we are stuck with him for our nominee. And, although I am not for Clinton, I think the media crowned her opponent and don't blame Bill for being PO'ed.

Hill"08   January 8th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

President Clinton is absolutely right. Obama has gotten a free ride from the media. What is his plan? He has not been specific on anything except his adaptation of Hillary's healthplan. I donot know how I will vote in November, but I do know I am ashamed of the American media. We had a serious female candidate and the American media has worked overtime to kill her campaign. She did not get a fair shake from this media. I hope she will continue in the primaries...and I will give financial support to help.

Kimberly   January 8th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Can we all just get alone!!!!!!!!
what we need is someone to do something about,

Jobs,Education, and most important HEALTH CARE for everyone!!!!!

Hope   January 8th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

I like how idealistic Obama is, but I do not feel that he has a solid and effective method to deliver change to our country based on the fact he has been avoiding answering important questions several times. Don't we need a president who is sure with what he or she is doing with our country? We need someone who is aggressive and will work really hard to make changes in this country. I think Hillary Clinton has the solid experience to deliver our hope.

I feel that if Obama wins the Democratic party, the whole 2004 election will repeat itself! We will have a republican president again.

well-wisher   January 8th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

This truly is a circus, ladies and gentlemen!

Hillary sheds a tear (or so it seemed on all major networks) and people think she has emotions. Not so. Bill is in his own world trying to erase the legacy of a liar, perjurer and simply a man who was dumb enough to get caught cheating on his wife.

Barack is trying to sell the "change" brand to this politicians-weary country. And the Republicans are trying desperately to avoid looking like a bunch of religion-driven (or faith-driven, as they like to call it) fanatics. I ask you, my fellow Americans – do we really have a choice? I think not. The Rome is truly burning.

Larry K, Greenville, SC   January 8th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Actually, even in the 2004 speech that Bill Clinton is referencing, Obama was against the war. The Clinton cap always leaves out the second half of the quote. Obama said that he was not in the Senate at the time, but he did not believe that the case had been made. That is what he said, transcripts are out there, but the Clintons want to rely on people just believing them and not doing independent research. That is a terrible way to do politics.

Dee Andre   January 8th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

B.O. has completely alienated me from the Democratic Party. He's doing an outstanding job of pitting age groups against each other. Making promises of how he will "change" the U.S. and the world but never bothering to let the voter in on how he will implement his implied change in policies. I have had seven years of inexperience thrust upon me with G.W.B. My vote is going to H.R.C. – whether I like her or not – I care for my country. It is undeniable, she has 35 years exposure in the political arena, she's shrewd and saavy and will, I believe, bring to her administration diplomats and statesmen who are up to the serious challenges my country faces.

fyauthor   January 8th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

I think the Clinton's threw in the towel– gracefully?

Well, at least Hilary wasn't directly involved.

Peace & Love

Yancey

MJ - San Antonio, TX   January 8th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

So Bill is now "crying" to the media because his wife is not the front runner. I would have ANY OTHER DEMOCRAT for President than his wife. His 8 years in office with nothing but lies. I DO NOT TRUST HIS WIFE NOR HIM. I DO NOT WANT ANYMORE BUSH'S OR CLINTON'S in the White House. Bill go cry somewhere else. This Hispanic will not vote for liars.

William Withrow   January 8th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

What people do not realize is that although Bill Clinton has a set of political gifts which are unique and unequalled in American history, these gifts are not transferable assets. If he could and were running again, it would be no contest. However, having his endorsement or having him capaign for you is of little value. It was no good for Gore in 2000 and it's no good for Hillary now. During the impeachment, Clinton could say he made intentionally misleading and deceptive statements but did not lie, and the people would buy it. No other politician alive would dare make that statement. If he says something, it's funny. If Hillary says the same thing, it falls flat. So having Bill go on the attack won't help because he's not defending himself and therefore can't muster up that same support and sympathy.

Becky Larson   January 8th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

I watch CNN 24/7, but am very disappointed with the coverage and comments about the Clintons. I am a Edwards supporter myself, but think that everybody is jumping on the Obama bandwagon because its the thing to do in 2008. Its good for the media becauase its new news for this campain. I think it is awful how the people cannot just make their own decission without the media forcing their comments about the canidates. Even exit poll reports can influence people and people don't need to know how other people vote!

Bill Clinton is right and I think people should see how Obama has changed his position on issues.

I was really not for Hillary because of one answer in a debate that I heard. Now she has shown me that she is strong, smart, cares about the average person,and yet tough enough to stand up for what is right .

As Bill said..... I'm giving her a break !!!!!!!

Beth   January 8th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

I totally agree with President Clinton: the media is not pressing Barack Obama on any of the difficult and important questions. Why not ask him who he plans to serve in his cabinet and as his advicers? Would it be the Big O, Sharpton and Jackson? He doesn't have the background, experience, or the circle of experienced people surrounding him. Guess the media forgot that's what happened to President Carter – Carter sounded and looked great during the run for President, but he didn't have a circle of experienced friends and advisers to pull off four years of good, growth governement. Look where that got the country!

Mo Unity   January 8th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

"Mo Unity_ get out of fantasy land and into reality."

Fortunately, i can think beyond how the mainstream media would like me to think. And reality is- the right person is winning right now. And America, is not as divided as the powers that be want us to believe. You on the other hand can benefit from some of that reality. Don't be scared. Take the "red pill". Live an examined life. It's time.

donna   January 8th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

It's unfortunate when the collective voice of the deregulated media backfires on you, isn't it?

Lettie Riel   January 8th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

I think Mr. Bill Clinton is 100% correct. I'll be scared if Mr. Obama will win .this election. America should probably examine who really he is before committing themselves to vote for Mr. Obama.

JULIE MICKELSON   January 8th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

DEAR BILL

YOU ARE JUST MAKING IT WORSE FOR YOUR WIFE, JUST REMEMBER THE BOTH OF YOU ARE NO LONGER SOMETHING TO DEMAND THE RESPECT YOU THINK YOU DESIRE. LET HER FIGHT HER OWN FIGHT.

Jake   January 8th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

This thread truly exhibits the ignorance of the "educated" voter.

My guy is better than yours. blah blah blah

Nothing changes except more friggin' money comes out of my pocket to go into the hands of crooks, liars, thieves and generally people who are completely full of poop.

AB   January 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Obama is running on a change and united platform. He is already showing what he can do. Independents, Republican and people who have never voted before are excited about the electoral process. Barack is doing exactly what he is saying he will. He is changing this nation. Even the Republicans have adopted his "Change" message.

Karen M. Jenkins   January 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Even though I am voting for John Edwards, I resent the bad reviews Bill Clinton is receiving for his very legitimate observations about Barack OBama. I remember a lot worse being said about Clinton (and Hillary) when he was running and holding office... no one of you came to his defense or thought the people throwing stones were frustrated, mean awful people.

My oh my, how things have changed... I thought you were there to report news; not make judgments and set the pulse of voters. You are getting as bad as FOX- they are fair and balanced, too. If you had spent more time telling me what OBama has accomplished in his life besides two or three beautiful speeches and making a friend of Oprah, I might be voting for him, too.

Regardless, we have impeached Bill Clinton once; off the President's case! If OBama is fit to be President, he can defend himself. He is sure to fall out of favor with people soner or later.

Thanks,

kmj

Brenda   January 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Well it is true that everyone needs to see all the accomplishments of those in running for office to be able to make a qualified decision on how to vote. I think the press and TV are ganging up on Clinton. You say she is negative when she is trying to bring out her accomplishments against others. Then when someone cares about her and she shows her true side you you complain about that also. Do you want someone that has no heart and feelings for others in office. Do you want a person with not enough experience in office. Give me a break...Look what happened 7 years ago and we are still paying the price. Bush didn't know how to be President and still doesn't. Wake up America. Terrioris are going to taget us again and we can not have someone that has to try to learn while in the office.
I am not just referring to the only the democrats. This Mike Huckebee is another smooth talking character. He is no saint and believe me I have lived in Arkansas....America doesn't want this man in office at all.
I would like to see the accomplishemnts of each of these canidates up front so we can compare. No one likes negative ads, but we NEED to know what they are talking about. Because just like the Huckabee....he only tells what he wants people to know. If others in Iowa knew what we do in Arkansas he would have not even made the top 5. Please this election is important to all of us Americans. We need experience no another new comer. Your talking about CHANGE. A new CHANGE would be Hillary Clinton for President in 2008. First lady President that is a change. The only qualifiedon in all the 10 that are running to become President and that this mess that Bush has made and begin to clean it up.
My VOTE IS FOR HILLARY!!!!!

SteveJobs   January 8th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

I have been doing research all day. I still have not seen where Hillary Clinton was President of the USA before. Where is the experience? Performing duties as Senator, Governor, Foreign Affairs Rep., or Puppet in a Monkey suit is not the same as being the leader of the most powerful nation in the world. Not one candidate running, Republican or Democrat, has ever walked into a meeting holding the title of Commander and Chief and had to make decisions for and about America's future. Every one of them talks a good game, but All-Stars are made in the game not in practice.

Carrie Fugett   January 8th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

I get the feeling I am watching a "Survivor" show or "Dancing with The Stars". I thought we were supposed to be hearing from each of the candidates on where they stand on issues and seriours problems facing our country at this time. Am I wrong or have I just gotten lost thinking that things are not really being addressed or if they are, a great deal of critism? I do think we are smart enough to hear where each candidate stands and make our own decisions without all the bells, whistles and rhetoric that is being tossed about.

DrC   January 8th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

This vague concept of "change" with no concrete plan or experience to back up his slogan, should concern everyone.
Let's turn this slogan into what it really means:
Obama is calling for "change we can believe in". Voting for a substance deprived slogan, will produce exactly that for working class Americans – change. Hillary will produce Dollars for hard working Americans and has the skill and experience to manifest her plans.

moggyman   January 8th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

Cmon Pres Bill get out of this it is not your campaign- remember when the press built you up to win. So this is Hillary fight and she already shedding tears so she admits she is loosing but you of all people must get it clear, So be Mr Clean and clear out buddy you did your best leave the media alone . We just love the reading.

Amy   January 8th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

I am getting sick of seeing the clip of Hillary gettting so called upset. She took Edwards main idea, it is personal, Then Obama I am for change. She needs to get her own ideas and words and stop taking others.

david   January 8th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

I think it's time you move your reporters around they are becoming biased to the candidate they are fallowing around. The woman who is fallowing Obama should join his campaign. She starting to sound like his campaign manager not a reporter.

alex   January 8th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

Obama don't have the experience to run the country. He just want to talk sweet to have the vote he wants. But look at the national poll, Hillary is winning.

Philip Dumas   January 8th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Hillary LEADS in delegate count!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/

Nothing in NH will CHANGE this!

Onto Super Tuesday!

You go girl! And throw some more elbows!

Obama is the Carter for '08. Big smile. Big promises. No substance!!
Remember the gas lines, recession and hostages!

Go Hillary Go!!

–philip

Paul J   January 8th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Hold the horses! Is Bill Clinton running for President again or is it Hillary Clinton trying to be the first female President? It is understandable that the former lady husband would stand up and fight for his wife but unfortunately I believe that just shows how desperate they are in their failing strategies. Hillary campaign has never been about her policies but about looking towards the “other guy” meaning the person who is leading and giving attacks. Their attacks will not fool voters like myself and they must strategize other alternatives and focus on policies rather than attacks. Bill Clinton has stuck his neck out because of his own frustration with his wife campaign and its has nothing to do with Obama or any of the other candidates. He is frustrated and very well should be. Again, only one word can describe their presidential campaign; DEPERATION!

owl   January 8th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

It is unfortunate that experienced politicians such as Bill and Hillary still believe that the voters will believe what they say when they attack Obama. I agree that they are experienced politician, but that does not necessarily mean Hillary can lead this country to the right direction today. Just like its because a man has been working as an executive manager for 20 years does not necessarily mean he deserves to become a CEO. The problem that I have with Hillary is that she doesn't seem to have a clear vision.

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

What is wrong for a weman who married a former president to run a president? are you saying if you run a public office ONLY under the qualification of your family members were never working in any public office positions? You are so narrow minded.

MRS. PENA   January 8th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

I am sick and tired of hearing about comments from black political figures or just in general. Is this about the white and the black winning at the poles? It sure feels like it. Everytime there is an african american speeking out on behalf of obama, all you hear. AS A BLACK AFRICAN AMERICAN { Donna Brazile speaking to Wolf Blitzer,} why say that. you don't hear AS A HISPANIC AMERICAN, AS A JEW AMERICAN, AS A WHITE,ORIENTAL,OR ITALIAN AMERICAN. I WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR OBAMA, BLACK BLACK IS ALL THEY SEEM TO SPEAK ABOUT. ITS SICK TO HAVE TO HEAR THIS ALL THE TIME WHEN THERE IS A BLACK AFRICAN AMERICAN RUNNING FOR SOMETHING. STOP WITH THE LABELING OF YOUR ETHNIC RACE YOU ARE. DO YOU HEAR HILLARY CLINTON CAMPAIGN SAYING, AS A WHITE FEMALE AMERICAN. SOUNDS DUMB,HUGH. RUN A CAMPAIGN, NOT WHAT RACE YOU COME FROM.

THANK YOU,

Stephen   January 8th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

I wish we could have a rational discussion of the serious issues facing this country and make a decision based on facts and valid political answers. However, it only appears as if we have sunken to a very, very low place, and 99 percent of these blog entries seem to prove it. Inflation is here. Health care is a mess. The gap between the rich and the poor is gaping, and the middle class is becoming an extinct species. Oh, and go ahead and throw in a potentially never ending state of war, but all people can do is denigrate each other and the candidates. We seem to have become a weak, permanently divided, self-indulged culture of talking heads spewing nothing but insults and hate speech. All I can say is: "God save America" because it's obvious we Americans aren't up to the task ourselves!

Ann   January 8th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

I, as an African-American, have always wanted to meet former- president Clinton in person some day. I no longer have that desire. Not after his "Nasty" put-down of Barack Obama today. I've always held higher admirations of Bill Clinton. Now, I see his true colors. Why can't he just continue to help Hillary, fighting "fair", instead of slinging nasty remarks at Obama!!!! I have been for Obama 100% since day one, and I hope he wil be our next president.

walt taylor   January 8th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

It is unfortunate that Donna Brazile is speaking for the Democratic Party on the Situation Room. Since she is a black American,she is no longer objective. It is easy to see that because she is an African American, she is for Obama, even though the Clintons have stood for Black people over and over. It appears that this election is turning into a racial situation. Too bad !

your a bunch of crazies   January 8th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

A lot of you have false hope. Obama will not become president. If he does become president..how long do you think he REALLY will be president for??

......Clinton is right on the money when he talks about his lies.

T   January 8th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

When wives of other contenders campaign for them, no one complains or tells them to "stay out of it". Bill Clinton is Hillary's husband, and I don't see the big deal in him campaigning for her. Hillary '08.

Gigi   January 8th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

Thanks Bill for finally having the guts to expose the "make believe" world Obama is projecting. Sure it's nice to idealize what this world should look like and what we all want it to be. But lets get real. Obama's optimism is just that, optimism not based on reality. What has Obama done since becoming a Senator besides running for president? What's his voting record? What national programs has he instituted or championed? I certainly hope we don't throw out a sure thing for an inexperienced unknown. As a Black American I have all intentions of voting for Hillary because I KNOW her record, Obama needs to get one before assuming he's capable and experienced enough to run this country.
GO HILLARY!!!!

LARRY FINKELSTEIN   January 8th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

WE ARE THIS CLOSE TO ELIMINATING BILL CLINTONS THIRD TERM........AND IF YOU WANTED TO GO AFTER HILLARY CLINTONS EXPERIENCE-8 YEARS OF WHITE HOUSE PILLOW TALK DOESN'T COUNT AS EXPERIENCE. JUST BECAUSE YOU LIVED IN THE WHITEHOUSE DOESN'T COUNT AS EXPERIENCE. THE FANATASY IS OVER FOR THE CLINTONS WHO NEED TO FADE INTO OBSCURITY.NO COMPLAINTS WHEN SHE WAS IN THE LEAD BUT AS THE TIDE TURNED SHE STARTS CRYING...LITERALLY. JUST WHAT WE NEED FROM THE FORMER FRONT RUNNER AND POSSIBLE PRESIDENT. THIS IS A MARATHON AND SHE IS CRYING 2 MILES INTO THE RACE. SHE HAS NOT HAD IT ANY TOUGHER THAN ANY OF THE OTHER CANDIDATES. SHE IS PART OF THE PAST AND THE PAST IS THE CURRENT PROBLEM WITH THIS COUNTRY. THOSE MANLY SUITS YOU WEAR ARE ONLY A COVER FOR THOSE MANLY CANKLES.

MP   January 8th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

Wow- a good example of power politics- reminiscent of a scene from Le Femme Nikita when they "Send in the cleaner." I don't think your going to win this one though Bill.

Kumar   January 8th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

Yeah.........OBAMA is going to win all the way....then he is going to loose general election to a republican....oops!

Del   January 8th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

the Clintons are talking about these tactics because that is what they do - spread negative campaign literature around, especially paid for by the 527s - they did it in Maryland during the 2006 election and probably during their 8 years as well. It takes one to know one.

Seunjohnson   January 8th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Mr. Obama was asked about this outburst by Mr. Clinton earlier today. Courtesy of Jeff Zeleny, here’s the reply: “I understand they’re frustrated right now. I suspect that they’ll both try to get back on track in terms of the strategy for them to do better than they feel they’re doing right now.”
As for Mr. Clinton’s pounding away at Mr. Obama’s war stances over the years, Mr. Obama said: “But I think Tim Russert answered Bill Clinton this morning. Every point that he raised was a question that had been answered _ had been asked and answered, not only on “Meet the Press” but repeatedly.
It is a little frustrating for the president to _ the former president _ to continually repeat this notion that somehow I didn’t know where I stood in 2004 about the war. He keeps on giving half the quote. I was always against the war. The quote he keeps on feeding back was an interview on Meet the Press at the National Convention when Tim was asking, `Given your firm opposition to the war, what do you make of the fact that your nominee for president and vice president didn’t have that same foresight.’ And obviously I didn’t want to criticize them on the eve of their nomination. So I said, `Well, I don’t know what _ you know, I wasn’t in the Senate. I can’t say for certain what I would have done if I was there. I know that from where I stood the case was not made.’ He always leaves that out.
“And you know, I understand why he’s frustrated. But at some point since we’ve corrected him repeatedly on this and he keeps on repeating it, you know it tells me that he’s just more interested in trying to muddy the waters than actually talk fairly about my record.”
Mr. Obama hasn’t commented on all the remarks made last night by Mrs. Clinton about Dr. King and L.B.J. and civil rights, et al.
We’ll be back later with more reaction, we’d bet as the primary results start rolling in.

Navilan Sidbury   January 8th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

The Clinton Campaign thought they had this election "in the bag," and surprsingly things are shifting . They are now angrily scrambling for an edge that seems to be crumbling right before thier eyes. Hillary Clinton seems to be looking more toward a new addition to her resume, rather than to serve and improve the quaility of life for the American people. The Americans sense this and that is why her campaign is crumbling.

th3elite   January 8th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Hey Billy! If ur readin this(or anybody else) well, u see my words? U better recognize and memorize!
Ur pretty cool tryin to run ur wife's lil party, right?
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOONNNNNNGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look , its been like 4 years that obama said that stuff.
GET OVER IT MAN!!!
NOBODY CARES IF HE SAID THAT 4 FRIKKIN YEARS AGO MAN!!(i might as well just type in all caps now just to get this through his IMPEACHED head....)
KEEP BOSSIN UR WIFE AROUND AND SHE'S GONNA GET IMPEACHED TOO(holy cow i'm gonna p in my pants if that happens, thats how hard i'll be laughing)
LOOK, I DON'T LIKE UR WIFE(thats right, I said it) BUT I KNOW THAT SHE CAN DEFEND HERSELF BETTER THAN U CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(thats right, said it again)
Yo, pay attention to CNN when they show those emails peeps go and send in, i'm gonna send a good *cough*complaint*cough* review to them of ur wife and U!!!
-Fatal Rider
P.S. hows it feel being dissed?

P.A. G.   January 8th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

HOW DARE MR. OBAMA IMPLY THAT BILL CLINTON IS A CROOK. HE IS A CROOK!

T. Reidy   January 8th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

I am a proud U.S. citizen living in Canada. I think it is so hipacritical that for so long many democrats and women voters have almost begged Hillary to run for president, and have now turned their back on her for someone so inexperienced. Hillarys beliefs for her country have not changed, so why has her so called "supporters" turned their backs on her. They want some one strong, yet she is too strong. She shows a little emotion for what she believes in, and she is too weak. But yet they will vote for someone with no experience. Very very scary.

Einstein   January 8th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

You people don't even know who heads the DNC. It is not Bill Clinton it is Howard Dean.

Lynn   January 8th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

What I want to know is, why does this story keep showing up at the top of the Ticker when others have come out subsequent to it? Maybe there is something to this "CNN is pro-Hillary" thing. Hmm.

bel   January 8th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

It's now evident more ever that the Clintons come across as if they are entitled. Hilary's tears and Bill Clinton's anger are nothing more than frustration over their loss of control. Hilary's mask is off now and her rage, arrogance, and sense of entitlement are on full display. It's so obvious that they are control-freaks. I think people are going to see this now. We are so tired of the Clintons and Bushes!! It's time for new leadership!

DYLAN RIVIS   January 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Nice work, Bill ! There goes Hillary's last hope of resurrecting her increasingly sourfaced campaign. Attacking the people's (democratic) choice is not exactly wise at this juncture , especially as Hillary made the mistake of choosing to show a little somewhat suspect time-wise 'emotion' this morning on the heels of the networks beginning to write her off.

No wonder the people are opting for 'change', a change from Bill and Hillary, it seems. It's hard to take someone seriously anymore who effectively blew his party's power base by allowing his intern to blow him under the desk !!!

Do I hear a rooster crowing ??

Kathleen Ladislaus   January 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

When in American history has a woman run for President who is married to a previous President? I am not saying what President Clinton has said regarding Barack Obama is right or wrong, but we are in all new territory here. I will say I am listening carefully to what all the Democratic candidates say in the next week. My absentee ballot for the state of California is still waiting for an x to be put next to a name. We have some good candidates, the choice is not so obvious.

Ken Harris   January 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

I'm getting some really coolt-shirt ideas for caricatures/cartoons involving Hillary and Obama...:)

Pam Holt Los Angeles, CA   January 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Bill Clinton is right about Obama.

Dennis Kucinich is the only PEACE candidate with the record to back him up. The only one smart enough to not be misled by Bush/Cheney.

Anyone but Kucinich and it will be more of the same, and I guess that's what we deserve, right? We are our own worst enemies, except of course for the mainstream media, which is Public Enemy #1.

Dilip Samuels   January 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

I like Bill Clinton ... the smoothest talkin extempo ex- USA President ever but man the frustration shows in this picture

Obama is a Harvard guy and was editor of the Harvard Law Review ... come on guys ...experience indeed ...look who's running the US of A today

Obama will do fine ..the right wing media is already making sure his roots in Africa are visual and will slow Americans down

If the USA needs to rebuild its world image ..Obama fits the bill
Dilip

AJ, IL   January 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

You die-hard Clinton supporters, just don't get it! Notice I said Clinton supporters and not Hillary supporters. This is part of the problem with Hillary's campaign. Bill Clinton is both an asset and liability to Hillary. As long as Bill remains positive about all the Democrats, he is an asset. But as soon as he goes negative against any other Democrat, primarily Obama, he is a liability. Hillary's connection to experience and likability flows from Bill Clinton. Without him, Hillary would not be a viable presidential candidate.

You can't live in a glass house and throw stones. Bill Clinton is looking for anything on the ground around him to throw. Unfortunately, the house that Obama built is made up of plexi-glass. What Bill Clinton is throwing bounces back at Hillary's house. He is one of Hillary's worst enemies for her to get elected in the last four weeks.

OBAMA in '08!

betty moss   January 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

the press is fawning over obama. it is so obvious on all the morning news shows. why do they hate hillary so? you can see it in their faces. they cannot hide their contempt. why are people so afraid of a smart woman. i have found that the only news to watch is the jim lehrer newshour on PBS. they give indepth, both sides of an issue, reporting.

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

more votes were manufactured by the medias, they are so political motivated group that try to control our nation through Obama.

davidvoter08   January 8th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

Mr. Barack Hussain Obama is all hype, not substance!!! I finally understand why Americans elected Gorege W.Bush twice! They want a nice guy they can have a beer with, not a leader, not someone strong but less likable.

Ben Mo   January 8th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

Bill is 100% right, the midia are saying all the nice thing about Obama because
they are affraid to be branded as a racist, but they can say all the trash they want
about Hillary because most of them are acually SEXIST.

MJ   January 8th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

The fairy tale isn't quite as big as the one you told to the American public. And I quote, "Now you listen to me, I did not have sexual relations with that women". The wheels are coming off the train and I am enjoying watching the wreck.

TODD   January 8th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

Here's my thought on this entire process. Yes, Obama will be awarded the presidential nomination. Why, you ask? Think about how the political game operates, especially within the Republican Party. Votes and well-wishes are being given to Barack through this "game" of politics in hopes that most, when Election Day comes around, will rethink it through and vote for the Republican contender. Another 4 to 8 years again of Republican rule. Probably so, if the Republicans are doing what I think they're doing to gain more time in Washington.

Samuel,Blackfoot ID   January 8th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

As a nation we the people of the United states should really look into who we want as a president. It is like if you are going to hire someone for a job. Seriously look at their education,public records,honesty. It is all there for us to read called Public record.

wheresthelove   January 8th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

This board has turned into some sort of sick journey through the twisted psyche of American Politics 2008. I am amazed at the amount and intensity of the vitriol, especially from you Obama supporters – isn't your candidate running on uniting people and breaking from the politics of the past?

Many of you seem to be missing the point. The electorate is moving towards rejecting the politics of division, invective and insider power plays – we've had way too much of that for the last 20 years. Let the candidate win who shows they can give us something better than that.

johnson   January 8th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Obama has lied and that's what this article is about. Lets stick to the topic people. The topic is Obama changing his opinion. Why is he covering up his prior views.

If you try to turn the blame towards someone else who ran 8 years ago instead of being open minded then you're only hurting yourself because your neglecting to see that persons flaws..

kris   January 8th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

mike January 8, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Stop and think. Look at your posts so much anger and hate. You should all be ashamed.

MIKE MIKE!!!!!??
people get angry for a reason..just as bill clinton is angry because his wife is a loser.

Bill Curtis   January 8th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

it's Simple BUSH/CLINTON/BUSH... enough is enough! it's time for Hope!

Ken Harris   January 8th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Oh I see john mith... When things aren't going the way the Clintons think they should, then we have a conspiracy? Is that right? Well, thanks for clearing that up for us...

Amazed!!   January 8th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

I am just AMAZED at the Obama craze. Come on People! Wake up!! Just think of all the inspirational people some good, some not so good. Cult leaders too like Jim jones drew a large following but did not have the true heart. (not comparing anyone here directly) but smooth talking is also a weapon. Look at the times we are in War, threat of resession, Al Keida, etc... Do we really want to take the RISK of Obama for a hope and a dream. I'll tell you what Hillary WILL give us hope especilly the economy!! It's proven! I am very worried! I don't blame Bill for reacting. Obam has not been inspected or torn apart in the media (including) CNN like Clinton has at EVERY turn. Are you going to let the media make your choice? Hilary is a good hard working American who cares.

Are we entering into the Matrix?

Hill"08   January 8th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Thank you, Mr. President! The media has dogged Hillary Clinton since the race began...actually for nearly 15 years. Obama has been given a pass by the media....no hard questions. He is a media creation...and change? Not one supporter can tell what his programs are. His healthcare proposal sounds alot like an adapted version of Hillary's plan. How can he talk about changing the world when we have so much misery and crime in our own country. Americans want a leader who can first deal with America's problems. I have yet to hear how he will pay for anything. Exactly what are his views on the dealth penalty, social security, taxes, the economy, Americans losing their homes in droves in this mortgage crisis? He needs to explain to the people exactly what his views are on illegal immigration andwhat and how he plans to deal with these issues. Has he got any ideas how to solve our education mess in this country? Who are the people who will surround him if he is elected? We need real questions from the media...not free passes. Free passes were given in previous election with nothing substancial being asked by commentators in debates and around the country. We must not allow ourselveo that route.

JJ   January 8th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

I am still trying to figure out how the Clinton's count up to 35 years experience for Hillary – I count only one term as a carpetbagger US Senator who initially won election because her opponent came down with cancer and then won a second term on a promise to stay the entire term???

Another thing that is bothersome is how she and her husband can try and lay claim to a "change" label – if she became president it would mean two families would trade the position of president for 28 years!!! I do not see how that is good for the country and somehow = "change" . . . I do not know of any precedent in American History – it rivals changing dynasties in old Europe!!!

Dee   January 8th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

If you look at the Media coverage Hilary gets far more coverage than Barack especially after she tear up..she got an entire days worth of coverage. What Barack is getting is more votes.

Speedkidney   January 8th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Why don't you let your wife speak for herself.

Maybe she'll just start crying:

"Obama is so mean to mean."

Eric   January 8th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

If you do "not know anything about Obama" it is your own fault. He has written 2 biographies and his website is full of the specifics of his policies. Don't fault Obama for your own ignorance

James   January 8th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

It's incredible how uninformed and ignorant some of you are and how easily you believe what the Clintons tell you. Tim Russert, Keith Olbermann, Brian Williams and many other journalists have vetted Obama and asks those same questions about Obama, and got answer from them. Clinton's assertions are absurd and now I can see why a lot of people simply dislike them.

Einstein   January 8th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Matt from TX:

Just look at the numbers!

NH is a republican state and has been for years. Currently there are about 350,000 Independants there a number we have seen rise during the past 12 years while the number of registered Republicans has dropped during that same period.

It doesn't make sense that the numbers would change so drastically without a reason.

Maryann Faith IA   January 8th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

PRESIDENT CLINTON IS EXACTLY CORRECT!

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

All the news media are trying so hard to manufacture a president of USA, so bad we have such a group of pure political motivated people doing our news report. They are trying to manufacture a elected Hossin Obama as this nation's next president even before the people cast their votes.

JAN   January 8th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Obama?! If Obama is elected, I am moving to Amsterdam where the people there actually have rights and freedom. I thougt America was "land of the free"? NOT ANYMORE! We the people have no rights anymore. We are all robots doing exactly what we are programmed to do with no say-so anywhere. We don't protest anything like they did in the 70's, and we are scared to take a stand on anything! Who cares if Hillary lies? I'm sure Obama does too, he just hasn't been around long enough for people to figure it out. Bill Clinton probably does need to shut his mouth, but I was a big Bill Clinton fan. He's the only one lately that has done any good for our country. So he lied about his own personal business. BIG DEAL. That just makes him human. Doesn't effect what he did for our country! If you can sit there and tell me you have never made a mistake, then you yourself are a liar. Just because you cheated on your wife/husband doesn't mean you shouldn't get that next big promotion at work, does it? A divorce, maybe. But it's none of your work's business. Maybe Hillary cheated on him too...who cares?! I just want what's best for our country and Obama does not have the experience. If there's going to be any hope for our country, Hillary is it.

Good luck Hillary!

Silvio Renzulli   January 8th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

I got one thing to say enough of dynasties. The public has had enough of Clintons and Bushs. Its time for a change, a fresh face and Obama is it. Get over it Bill, Hillary will not get in. Her likability is lower than Bush's approval rating. Thats pathetic! People want a president they can like. Obama has touched something in people that transcends party, gender, age, race or any other affiliation. He can bring the country together, your wife can not. He has what the public once thought you had, a kind of magic. Only difference is Obama's is genuine. You're comments show your true colors.

Peggy Ledbetter   January 8th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

I am so disappointed in President Clinton. Clinton has been the darling of the media. He has used his charm to win popularity with the media. His wife has not been under critical scrutiny. She is never held to account on what she says she has done. Being married to a President does not make you able to be president. Very eye opening to see what one will do when they see their dynasty faltering. Very self centered these two.
What shame to try to bring down a person like Barack Obama who inspires us to truly reach 'The American Dream ". Never since Kennedy have I felt such inspiration from a candidate. And Hillary and Bill want to take that away from me?
NO WAY!

RT   January 8th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Bill Clinton is the first president I have ever voted for. I have always held him and Hillary in the highest regard. Right now I am so disappointed with him and the Clinton campaign. We obviously do not need more of this in the White House. Go Obama.

Dee   January 8th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Wow...this is getting embarassing for the Clintons. This is the kind of politics Americans are sick of.

Jr., California   January 8th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Re: Hillary's 35 years of experience

OH I GET IT NOW! SILLY ME! SHE MEANS THAT SHE HAS 35 YEARS EXPERIENCE AT BEING A HUMAN BEING! I FEEL SO STUPID THAT I COULDN'T GET IT.

And thanks to you all for attempting to justify her 35 years of experience. She would of gotten my vote, but it seems that she is lying. So sad.

Zack Lear   January 8th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

High school popularity contest eh sir?? Folks don't know what Obama stands for? Mr. Mohinder Suresh you very confused little man, wake up. Don't allow your bad highschool memories effect your judgment. That was years ago when you lost your student council election in a landslide. Don't let your bitterness blind you. Obama 08 and beyond.

p.s. Stop acting like reading Time magazine makes you more informed on issues. It makes you sound like a Republican when you do that.

mike   January 8th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Stop and think. Look at your posts so much anger and hate. You should all be ashamed.

Mike, Denver, CO   January 8th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Billie's remarks indicate the Clintons are getting desparate – they see Obama as a real threat to their latest ascendency to power, and have nothing of substance with which to counter him. I am not necessarily pro (or anti) Obama, but I am certainly anti Hillary, one of the most disengenuous candidates in recent memory...not because she is female or a democrat, but because she has no real platform other than to say or do whatever is necessary to win.
It appears as if the electorate is beginning to see through her, despite the media's fawning over her. Hopefully it will continue.

rh   January 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

any support i ever gave former president Clinton have just went out the window,you do not wait until the 11th hour when your wife is down to say that trash, i like fairytales there is no carreer polititians in them.Thats what happen they count the young people of America out of all political decisions for so long,now when a cadidate comes along and say come one come all it shows up the candidates who think they own shares in the whitehouse.We all want to stop giving away this country in free trade,the bloggers need to keep up the pressure with all the information they use to expose the frauds,experince polititians have continually sunk this country into the whole we are in now,so let the a new man take the wheel this time.If Hillary did the math that would mean two family ruling for the past 20 years,well i thought that was the reason the founding father sailed away from England some of them leaving everything they owned.All Americans are due a a stronger dollar a better economy a trust worthy government and a president that can think for himself,when other country are refusing our currency wow that a new low.

John Adkisson, Sacramento, California   January 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

President Clinton is veering close to a breakdown of his former credibility as a world voice. The over reaction to his spouse's poor performance in primaries makes him look like a hack bent on power–when he has always enjoyed a statesmanlike place in the political lives of Americans and non-Americans alike.

Perhaps if he gets a grip soon, he can return to the elder statesman role and really accommplish something. He is clearly not going to become "First Gentleman" by ranting and raving about Obama - who has simply out-campaigned the Clintons this time around.

Pot & the Kettle   January 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Shouldn't the Dems throw this type of mud toward the other party? Isn't it the other party that got America into this mess in the first place? How can ANY candidate preach unity when each one of them is dividing their own party? For one, I would rather hear how each candidate is going to take action and make America what it was intended to be, a democracy of free choice for the betterment of all Americans and not what it is now, a land of fear, greed, benefits for the rich while the poor get the shaft, corporate greed, special interest running the land, injustice, and the blind eye to all men created equal to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. Stop telling me why I shouldn't vote for a certain person, and tell me why I should vote for you!!!!

Ken Harris   January 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Hey all you Hillary supporters, repeat after me... Hillary Clinton is NOT, I repeat NOT automatically entitled to the Whitehouse. Her experience, attention to detail or not has not earned her this position. In fact, it is her vast experience that is the real fairy tale here as it is hugely overblown by all of her supporters including the king of all blowhards, her loving but wandering husband, Bill Clinton. Please tell me what she ever did that qualifies her more than anyone else in the race including Obama. You know as well as I do that it will be a very short list and if not, it will certainly be no longer than Barack Obama's list of accomplishments. Have you even looked at Barack Obama beyond what the media that supports the Clintons tells you? Have you read his book? Do you want a female president soooo much that you you would put Hillary Clinton in the race so she can have her clock cleaned by the GOP during the general election? Does it not bother you at all that she "cries" foul for a fraction of what she herslef has pulled already in this campaign? Does it not bother you the way she panders to you? Can you not see her say, do, change, twist anything and everything to secure your favor? If not, than you are truly the ones with the clouded vision. Hopefully it will clear up for you with an object lesson in democracy very soon!

Barack will win this thing and hopefully the Clintons will fade into their rightful place in history!

Liam   January 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Well, Bill Clinton is an expert on fairy tales. God how I fondly remember when he used to point that finger at us, and spin his fairy tales such as: "I did not Inhale" and that wonderful Clinton fairy tale: "I did not have sex with that Woman".

Now Hillary is spinning her: keep us save from terrorism fairy tale. Remember that Bin Laden attacked the USA several times while HillBillary was in the White House, and because of Hillary's 35 years of getting things done, and being ready from day one, Bin Laden got away with every attack, and was able to hit us on 9/11. Now Hillary is ready from day one to stop him. How is that for a great Clinton Fairy Tale, folks!

observing from MI   January 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

More on bad Bill...
if someone other than Hillary gets the democratic populations acceptance for being
the democratic nomination, will others forgive him for how he is blasting the other
democratic candidates? As head of the Democratic National Committee, he is
being too biased. To support Hillary, he should have stepped down from the DNC
to avoid the conflict of interest issues. But no, power is everything to the Clintons.

CALVIN, GREENVILLE SC   January 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

I THINK MOST ANTI- OBAMA POSTERS ARE MISSING THE POINT. I THINK THAT WHAT BRINGS PEOPLE TO SUPPORT OBAMA IS THE PERCEPTION THAT WE WILL FINALLY HAVE A PRESIDENT THAT WE CAN HOLD ACCOUNTABLE. PEOPLE REALIZE (IF COMMON SENSE IS USED) IS THAT THE FACT THAT THE CLINTONS HAVE SURVIVED ALL OF THESE INVESTIGATIONS, SHOWS THAT THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE. BEING PERCEIVED AS SUCH DOESNT PROMOTE THE THEORY OF AMERICANS TAKING BACK THEIR GOVERNMENT.

john mith   January 8th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

FLEM WETHER BILL CLINTON RETURN TO THE WHITE HOUSE OR NOT BILL WILL FINE. PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT GOING TO BE FINE ARE THE AVERAGE AMERICAN. SO YOU CAN MAKE YOURS NONSENSE COMMENTS THINKING THIS IS A JOKE. GUEST WHAT? IT IS NOT.THE MADIA IS ABSOLUTELY UNFAIR TO HILLARY. BUT LETS THEY GET BEEN NOMINATED THEN YOU PEOPLE WILL FIND OUT ABOUT YOUR MISTAKE. OBAMA HUSSEIN BARACK IS RUNNING ON THE WORD HOPE. WITH NOTHING IN IT. SHE STANDS BY RECORDS WETHER WE AGREE ON IT OR NOT THAT'S A DIFFERENT STORY. HUSSEIN BARACK OBAMA SHOULD NOT RUN AWAY FROM HIS RECORDS. THE SAID THAT HE IS AGAINST THE WAR BUT 300 BILLION TO FOUND IT HILLARY VOTE AGAINST. HE VOTED 70 TIMES PRESENT AS STATE SANATOR ON ISSUE LIKE ABORTION,ENERGY BILL, SOME SOCIAL PROGRAM. HE DID NOT VOTE YES OR NO BUT PRESENT. HE SHOULD BE ASKED AND HE MUST EXPLAINED WHY. I THINK THAT'S BEEN FAIR. BUT NOBODY IS ASKING THOSE QUESTIONS. IT IS A GENERAL CONSPIRACY OBVIOUSLY.

Hans   January 8th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

It's hilarious to read so many uninformed people on this message board...im glad the people of Iowa and NH decide the fate of this country and not u loonies

Teesha Jackson   January 8th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

First, let me start off by saying I am black and I have voted both Republican and Democrat. The discussion is media coverage for Obama. At present, I am not drawn to one particular candidate yet and I don't want to make a big race deal here. But hypothetically, let's eliminate the fact that Mr. Obama is black. Would he be receiving the amount of coverage he is now if he was not black? What is in his message that sets him aside from everyone else. In my opinion, almost all of the candidates, Republican and Democrat, are discussing the same things and trying to convince us they can make "changes". So considering that they both could be making American history here, why are they not receiving the same equal coverage? Or, is it that one just has less presidential appeal? Because I don't see much difference in their messages. Teesha, Michigan

DMT   January 8th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Both the Clintons should pack up and leave the country, he's a complete discrace and shes stupid enough to stick by his side. I guess money can buy anything if you are a Clinton.

Tyrese Gail Williams   January 8th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Does anyone really care what this sleazy, lying, philanderer says? Obama will unite
us, Hillary will divide us. The choice is very simple – unity or polarization. OBAMA 2008!!!!!!!

Judi   January 8th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Hillary has my vote, no matter how CNN and FOX news.

The bias ummistakable. CNN is trying to back the winner before the winner is declared.

Can we have some objective in journalism?

Dan   January 8th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

In my opinion Mr Bill Clinton Needs to have a seat and simply watch .
He is trying to fight for another 3rd term in office indirectly .
He needs to Leave Mr Obaraka Obama . The Voters have decided whom they want . The voters have decided and Mr Bill clinton has no right or doesnt need to remind Us of Iraq . Enough is Enough .

Ashok   January 8th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

You all OBAMA followers...Don't be puppets in wrong hands.

You are being led by republicans and right-wing masterminds to fall into their trap.
They are trying to mis-lead people making them think that supporting a black candidate is IN because it would be a CHANGE.
JUST WAIT and SEE...
If this republican agenda (which it won't) succeeds, they will expose real OBAMA in his true colors (of course monochromatic black) and steal away the presidency and this time they won't need the Supreme Court because they will have the misguided throngs of OBAMA supporters to do the dirty work for them.
WAKE UP and SEE THE WORLD IN BRIGHT LIGHTS not the dreamy halo.

Hillary for 08 and 12

obamaalltheway   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I'm sick and tired of the same two families having control of the White House for over 20 years (Bush and Clinton). It IS TIME FOR A CHANGE.

Enough about experience already- iThe President doesn't actually execute- they just need to inspire others to do the execution for them.

GO BARACK!

Sandra   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Free Ride- Fairy Tale?

Hillary has 34 years of experience as what elected official? Oh, that's right, she has only been in elected office for 7 years. Obama has been in the US Senate for 3 and the Illinois Senate for 8 years (and the state of Illinois is far bigger than the state of Arkansas). Which reminds me, why didn't Hillary go back to Arksansas and run for office? Less I digress-

Hillary was declared the front-runner and the nominee before she put her hat in the ring. Even now on CNN she has been projected to recieve over 169 delegates and we have only had primaries/caucuses in two states thus far- and you're talking about favortism.

The free ride was given when she moved to New York and won the Senate. The fairy tale was the hype given on the Healthcare Reform that she didn't complete during the Clintons 8 years in the White House.

Hillary Clinton is not entitled to the White House- she has to earn it.

A.S.B.   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Clinton's beware.... American's are tired of the fighting, back-biting and distastefulness of Washington. The Democrats have for the most part, remained focused on the issues we face as a Nation, while the Republicans came out of the gates swinging at each other. If either Hillary, Bill or any of the Democratic Candidates resort to negativity and mean spirited rhetoric we may as well buckle up and get ready for four more years of the same old crap.

a.s.b.

Joe   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I agree 1000% with Bill.

How can any of you sit here and defend Obama when he changes his opinion everyday. Everything he says is only to manipulate you so that he gets into office.

It's ludacris. Someone steps up and points out the FACTS and the first thing you want to say is "join the Obama express"?????

How about saying something meaningful and asking why Obama didn't retort with an answer on why he's covering up his lies??

Patrick, New York,Ny   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Wow! Would you all listen to yourselves. This is exactly what Obama doesn't want to happen. Save it for the opposition. OH, wait, if OBAMA were the nominee, there is no opposition. There is no us against them, only us. How beautiful is that?

Mo Unity_ get out of fantasy land and into reality

Patrick Oliver   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I have nothing against Obama. He seems like about as decent a person that's run for president in the past several years. But I do think the Clinton's are totally right: the media hasn't been nearly as tough on him as Hillary Clinton. Personally, I think this campaign is making it obvious that sexism is a lot stronger in this country than racism.

As a voter and as a citizen, I am completely disgusted with not only our country in general, but our ridiculous political system. Why should the people of Iowa and New Hampshire (2 small states that aren't representative at all) have SO much power in the presidential race??? It's bad enough that every state has completely different rules about who can vote for which party. And caucuses are so different from primaries.

The only thing that would be fair is a national primary day. Then all American voters would have equal access to the candidates and an equal vote. Regardless of what candidate you support or like, I think we can all agree that it is just EGRIGIOUS for the media to basically be declaring Obama the winner of the Democratic nomination when literally 12% of the Democrats in 1 small state (Iowa) have voted! Since perception creates reality, the other 100 million of us have basically had our votes disenfranchised by the media! Hillary Clinton had a national lead of 20 pts last week. Now it's gone. And after NH (one small state), likely Obama will be the national leader tomorrow. Whether you actually like her or not, we can all agree that after 35 years of public service and almost a year of campaigning, Hillary is basically getting ripped off just because Iowa (the ONLY state that's NEVER elected a woman to a statewide or national office, by the way) got to vote first and Obama got 8% more (of the 12% of registered Dems that chose to caucus - which is not that many actual) votes. That's just as unfair as Al Gore being elected president by 500,000+ voters, but not declared the winner.

This country isn't a democracy at all!! The presidency is not decided by 300 million Americans. Their votes can be overridden and the election decided by 540 political appointees (i.e. the Electoral Colleage). And we stand for this!! The expression "Popular Vote" doesn't even exist in other actual democracies! The highest vote getter wins.

It's all so disgusting, no wonder so many people just tune it out. If he does win the nomination, I sincerely hope Obama can get elected. But I can just see McCain and the Republican machine scaring everyone against voting for someone with so little experience. And we'll have 4 more years of Republican rule by an old white guy. Just watch. God help us!

Lou Winsky   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Incredulous! Bill, it's time to pasture that old nag.

Sue, Granville OH   January 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Sounds like the Clinton political machine is getting a little desperate!

If she felt entitled to become the nominee, she's getting exactly what she deserves. Sure, it'd be nice to see a woman president–but after eight years of Bush, I'd really like to see a GOOD president, and that would definitely be Barack Obama.

The traditional Democratic base must take their Clinton blinders off and see who this man really is–the best possible hope for our country and the party. Enough is enough, Bill–the Clinton era is over.

Casey, Minneapolis, MN   January 8th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

I just wish someone would actually ask Obama what he's going to do!! Yes, we are all ready for change – HOW are you going to do it?!?!

Barbd   January 8th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Let's hope the American public is not duped by Hillary like the great state of New York. She promised 200,000 jobs. What? She couldn't produce those jobs? She has done absolutely nothing in the senate. How can you expect her to do anything if she is elected President. In her first term, she promoted her book and traveled the country raising money for the Democratic Party. When the stupid people of New York voted her in again (after she said her first duty was to the State of New York) – she started her run for President. Wake up and smell the coffee. The Clinton machine is all about power. I say ABH (anyone but Hillary)

vince, Phoenix AZ   January 8th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

(sniiiiiiif.... ahhhhh...) smell that???? that's the sound of desperation.

Larry Buchas, New Britain, CT   January 8th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Bill,

You have lost your charm and now have resorted to attacking a Democrat more than any Republican I can remember. How come we didn't hear you come out for John Kerry while he was being swift boated? Maybe because you didn't have a stake in that election.

These accusations sound absolutely absurd. Give us a break, you need a time out. I get the sense you would resort to anything to get back in the White House. This obsession of yours is sickening.

You should open a wing in your library for Karl Rove.

observing from MI   January 8th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

I always thought that Hillary was being treated with kitten gloves...
all I ever saw was articles that if given tough questions, many will say you're being
mean to a woman. In a few campaign speeches, she attacks others...but no
candidates dare attack her because she is a Clinton and a woman making
her practically untouchable. Hillary's strange background and funding has
never been questioned.

Now say it like Hillary, slow so a 6 year old can understand it...

This
has
lead
to a
very
big
ego
bubble
to be burst.

denise   January 8th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

bill you were the love of me life. the best pres. i voted for 2times.but now you are acting like a spoil child. we don't owe you and your wife nothing. so stop crying like a baby.it's suppose to be about hillary not you.

Hans   January 8th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Another showing of why the Clintons are the most polarizing people in America

Time to Unite

Larry Smith Tolland CT   January 8th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

This really does not matter at all. No France loving liberal left wing loon would win the white house. Vote American, vote Republicain. Lets win Iraq a war every liberal loon sent our troop in. Remember, Bush didn't send us to war congress did! Clinton helps fund the war, and so did al-qaeda lover Obama.

Jack   January 8th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

You the news media ganges are as nasty as any fare minded can imagine. You don't care about our country as an ordinary person. All what you care is scoring points and how much money can you and your employers make. Quit playing politics with our country's future. Be fare!!. You all know how much this country is in a mess right now internally and abroad. You want an entry level person in politics to lead our nation at this time of crisis ? Can't you predict what could happend? Quit gambling with our future and be humen enough to help our country stand on its feet again.

Mark Gassama   January 8th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Whatever, Mr. President! What else could Bill Clinton have said? It is completely understandable the he would raise the issues now that Mrs. Clinton has demonstrated that she has no platform on which to stand. Yes, she is an intelligent woman, but the experience she professes to have possessed is no better than the experience a guard with longevity at the White House possesses. If the issues raised by Mr. Clinton were significant, Hillary would have raised them a long time ago. Desperation begets desperate acts! Obama is the future of our nation. We need a leader who has opposed the war in Iraq from the onset as did Barack well before the commencement of the aforementioned war (the "War"). The War is Hillary's as much as it is George Bush's. She supported it when it was popular and politically expedient. When it proved to be disastrous, she made and continues to make every effort to disassociate herself from it. We are not blind!

Einstein   January 8th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Kate:

Bush Senior = 4 + 8 or 12 (He was VP and oh yes helped Saddam gain power as head of CIA.

Jerry Dorey   January 8th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Alice: "We need a qualified leader. We don't need an intern" – Could someone let Bill know?

Mo Unity   January 8th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Does anyone think that there's something just a little wrong with a Former President coming out against a person of his own party like he did. Bad form Mr. President. Bad form. And i really respect what you did for everyone in the 90's, but you don't get a do over. Let it go.

carolh11   January 8th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

One last post on this topic – The Clinton campaign organization is known to be one of the best in politics. What is striking is when Bill was running for the first time, his "out of nowhere" challenge of the traditional dem candidate race was just as jarring as what is happening with the Obama campaign now! If any campaign knows when a surge and a "movement' begins, its theirs! They know exactly what is happening, it's just they don't know how to react to be on the losing side!

Maria   January 8th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

How about a Hill/Obama ticket?? We could have them both!

Kevin, Louisville, Ky   January 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Why are the baby Boomers all screaming foul ..now that the next generation is finally taking over! Obama and Edwards represent the future..the Clintons are so done ...maybe if Chelsea spoke the youth of America will start listening!!

Obama and Edwards are the present ..Go Guys ..Bill ..so sorry you n hillary are over the boomer hill

Bye!!

CM   January 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

By HRC's logic, we should dispense with the nominations and voting. All that is required is a run-off between her and Laura B. After all, Laura can claim years of experience as well. Think of all the money, time, and effort that would be saved, to say nothing of the useless punditry that would be avoided.

Bruce Taylor   January 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

It seems the Democratic Party is embracing its future in the candidacy of Senator Obama rather than its past in the candidacy of Senator Clinton. This is wise because she would not win in November. Obama will attract swing Republicans and Independents,Clinton will not. Hopefully,the Democratic Party has come to realize that the nation is made up of more than two states,not just California and New York.
Considering that the only major foreign policy decision ever made by Senator Clinton was to enable President Bush’s headlong rush to war in Iraq ,any talk of experience is rather subversive of the truth. Coupled with her husband’s debacle in Somalia, the pictures of them touting experience leaves the mind spinning to say the least. The segue from the first Clinton adiministration to the Bush White House was seamless indeed and the circle would be complete with the election of Senator Clinton. The methodology,the lack of probity,and the ability to manufacture truth are all there. It is the responsibility of the American people to at some point demand something other than their own indifference and to do something more than simply assuage their vote. Change begins from the people up. Hope would seem to be a good place to start.

Liam   January 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Well, Bill Clinton is an expert on fairy tales. God how I fondly remember when he used to point that finger at us, and spin his fairy tales such as: "I did not Inhale" and that wonderful Clinton fairy tale: "I did not have sex with that Woman".

Now Hillary is spinning her keep us save from terrorism fairy tale. Remember that Bin Laden attacked the USA several times while HillBillary was in the White House, and because of Hillary's 35years of getting things done, and being ready from day one, Bin Laden got away with every attack, and was able to hit us on 9/11. Now Hillary is ready from day one to stop him. How is that for a great Clinton Fairy Tale, folks!

Larry K.   January 8th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

Arguments against Barack Obama:
1. He is too inexperienced to be President.
2. George W Bush was inexperienced.
3. His speeches are nothing but fluff.
4. He will be shredded by the GOP machine.
Then again:
1. Bill Clinton was inexperienced in 1992.
2. Really? Is that REALLY why GW failed?
3. He is uniting many people with different backgrounds. His core message is ALREADY WORKING.
4. What makes you think the GOP can do it better than Hillary? What does that say about Hillary?

JC, Hot Springs, Arkansas   January 8th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

YOU GO BILL!!!!!!!!!

ROH   January 8th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

She made sweeping dishonest and categorical statements as to Obama's record. Edwards and Obama set her straight. It wasn't Obama and Edwards who "ganged up" on her. It was only Edwards. Obama was only defending his record from Clinton's distortions of them. Watch the debate for yourself on youtube.

On another note, playing the "experience" card again when she has voted for what history (and currently) will show as one of the most monumental mistakes in the history of the United States as well as the world MUST be considered.

And concerning the issue of "specificity", Clinton always accuses Edwards and Obama of being unspecific on issues when they clearly have been VERY precise and detailed and nuanced in their explanations. Again, go watch the debate on youtube and decide for yourself. If "specificity" is such an important issue for her, then she should be more specific about her so-called "experience". Merely touting a word based on having been first lady in the white house and a dubious senate record that was complicit in inheriting a disasterous foreign policy is "experience"?!?!

Mark C, Asheville NC   January 8th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

This is vintage Clinton and illustrates his least attractive qualities: his self-absorption, sense of entitlement, and tendencies to whine and wallow in self-pity. Fortunately in a few weeks both Clintons will be off the national radar screens for good.

Rob W   January 8th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

It's a sad day seeing the republican-machine steal the elections at the primary stage, but thats exactly what is happening. This blog is full republican blogs or the Democratic Party is full idiots just like O'Reillys Culture Warriers.

Mary Polleski   January 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Hilary Clinton is definetly starting to feel the pressure. As a result, Mr. Clinton has to do what he can to stand behind his wife. She became very emotional in one of her most recent speeches. To me, that wasn't a good look. That is not someone I'd like to be in charge of pushing a red button. Bill Clinton was an exceptional orator but Hilary Clinton is lacking in that area with almost a monotone, rehearsed, and disturbing voice. You can't be a president if you can't even communicate in front of large crowds. Look at George W. No one, not even republicans, take him seriously anymore. If she could deliver her speeches a little better, perhaps people would actually take time to listen. Look at Obama. He's saying little to nothing but almost everyone is drawn to his speeches and appeal. He is new to all of this but still has the presence; similarly to Reagan – little experience but presence. And Reagan was an actor. I'm torn between voting Republican and Democrat this year but I can't see Hilary stepping up to the job. Maybe I'll just flip a coin for McCain or Obama.

mark   January 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/01/08/free_ride/index.html

says it all....Bill is turning himself into a joke. I used to like him a lot but I am growing weary of seeing him again campaigning for Hillary.

It's time to move on. They know it. They don't like it. And they're lashing out.....and, frankly, lying – again – in the process.

what power does to people......

there's been no free ride (check out the link)

Mo Unity   January 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

You are implying that younger voters don't do their research and make informed decisions. That's not fair or logical just as if i said older voters were stuck in their way and as a result – out of touch. Go to http://www.barackobama.com and search for yourself if you are truly seeking the truth. Otherwise, let's not treat this as if it were a football game. You all know if Hillary won the nomination, the opposition would drudge up everything and the kitchen sink. There is a lot of material there regarding the Clintons. It would not be good. Think about it. Just think.

Bruce, San Francisco,CA   January 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Kate, thats exactly what i have been thinking about, i guess Chelsea will run on her mother's experience like Hillary is running on Bill's experience and Jenna will run on her father, George Bush's experience, we will see. Democracy in action

Leilani   January 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

What she did yesterday made her look desperate. She could have been herself a long time ago but she decided to pander and be phony to the American people, As I women I am offended at her behavior yesterday and how she feels entitled to be the President, what about us the people, we want a better future and to me she does not understand the middle class, the poor or what America really needs. When I think of Hilary I think of how power hungry she is she does not care about us, she and Bill care about there legacy more. He did some good things but give other people a chance to help and build bridges, she is better know for blowing up bridges than creating them.

J. Davis   January 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

This whole primary situation has shown me that it will be a looong time before a woman is allowed to break the 'good ole boy barricade' politically. When the male contenders are said to have 'laughed' at a comment, Hillary is said to have 'cackled' When the men are 'forceful and passionate', Hillary is said to be 'strident and shrill'. I have never heard anyone make fun of the way a male politician dresses. When she spoke forcefully in the recent debate, she was said to have 'lost it a little'. When Edward actually hollered, pounded his chest and pointed his finger at Hillary, while 'alliancing' with Obama, he was said to have spoken with passion. MSNBC reported that Bill Clinton said 'Well, I can't make her young, tall or male'. It was totally taken out of context. He said that in response to a question from a reporter about Obama being young, tall and a man and Pres. Clinton when on to praise Hillary, but no one heard the conversation in it's intirety because Joe Scarborough is intent on 'burying the Clinton's. The Post even saved an old picture of Hillary which was unattractive and used it on their 'PANIC" headline. And the sad part of all of this is that many women still vote the way their husbands do. A very intelligent and otherwise what I thought was savvy woman friend told me that her husband had done a 'lot of research' and they were going to vote for _______. The evangelicals will vote for anyone who professes to be a 'born again Christian'. I'm sorry, I consider myself to be a Christain and I'm ashamed of some of the things that our current politicians do in the name of our Lord. Thank you, J. W. Davsi

caywen   January 8th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I love all this Obama drama. This is all a big Obama-rama. An Obama-rama drama. Now they have a video of his momma. So now it's a big Obama's momma rama drama.

Owl   January 8th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I hope for a president who, is calm and strong in who they are, wise and willing to listen to all opinions, who believes that we must get America working right for all it's people befor trying to change the world.

I believe we are not man or woman, we are not a color and we are not a political party. We are all first and foremost a human. (spirit having a human experience).
I believe the constitution was created by humans who had an idea of the better good of ALL people.

If we want Peace, we must remove anger
If we want Humility we must remove, my way or no way.
If we want Compassion, we must remove judgement .

I ask that we make a decision for president, based on a spiritual (not religion) understanding, of what we want to create in our own lives, and the lives of others.

Good Blessings
Owl

Scott, Madison, WI   January 8th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Melissa:

As my mother always told me, "If you can't play nice in the sandbox with the other kids, you need leave and play on your own".

Relax and refocus; it's just a different couple than they had planned to coronate prior to Hillar's last shellacking!

FYI: Hillary's foreign policy experience consists of pillow talk, drinking tea and receiving a teapot for her outreach efforts. As Senator Dodd pointed out sooo clearly, "witnessing" experience doesn't count! Otherwise, Mrs. Dodd would be running!

Ken, Dallas, TX   January 8th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Wow.

You guys are totally distracted. Whether or not the candidates live and die by the polls, clearly the American electorate does so. Does anybody respond to these topics who actually thinks before he (/she) writes?

If you want to slice-and-dice candidates, try to find one who's failed to articulate a plausible energy policy; since not one candidate has said anything coherent about energy policy, you can go after the whole slate on that topic.

If the American people were really fed up with demagoguery, we'd just quit falling for it. If you really want reject divisive, "he said/she said", strangle-you-by-your-heartstrings political tactics, then do so.

Maybe the candidates are insincere; maybe they're all pandering to poll results; maybe their ethics have been overcome by the ruthless desire to win. Maybe each and every one of them knows that it's not reason to which they must appeal, but the collective weakness, meanness, the id of our people. In this, they are a faithful reflection of the American people.

It's way past time to face a basic, ugly fact: George W. Bush's election and his presidency have been emblematic of the ethical and cultural weaknesses, the mindless self-indulgence, and the ruthlessly divisive narrowness ot the current American perspective. The Bush presidency has been just what the American people asked for, and what we have deserved. If we would elect a better President then Bush, we must first become better people than we were when Bush was elected - twice.

Obama going after Clinton, Clintons going after Obama, Edwards going after everybody... These things are form without substance, a sideshow conducted to engage the emotions of the mentally infirm. By paying so much attention to such trivia, we prove again and again that we remain the same people who elected George W. Bush - twice.

Democracy often fails to give us the government we want. Instead, it tends to give us the government we deserve. Will we elect the next President as a thoughtful, reasoning people, or will we elect the next President as a mindless herd, following the best look, the best sound bite, the most attractive facade?

What do you deserve, America?

Cody   January 8th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

She voted for the war and continually voted to fund the fiasco. Deal with it.

I love me some "slick Willy" Bill, but America wants change, not a repeat of last decade.

Jr., California   January 8th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

I am disappointed in Bill. I expected better from him. It might be hurting H.C.'s chances. That's too bad, the Clinton campaign is starting to look desperate.

Travis Sugarland, Texas   January 8th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Poor Willy. You have to feel sorry for the guy. It's all coming to an end. I'm sure Bill believes that if Hillarea would just be quiet and follow his lead, things would be fine.

There is a lot at stake. The Clinton machine is in trouble. The effects will be widespread. I see that Bill is bringing in his boys. The problem is, much of his former staff is now with Obama. On CNN, a former Clinton foreign affairs advisor just said that she has no foreign policy experience.

Hillarea is in trouble. Spin it all day, she needs help.

Len, Fallbrook, CA   January 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Last one got lost or moderated to death,,,,

Tough decisions now the the best and most qualified two candidates on the Dem side have dropped out, namely Dobbs and Biden.

Hillary…

No defined measurable experience
No defined tough decision making background
Never really managed/lead anything or anybody
Can't wait to go to war with the GOP if elected, don't think we need that.
Will raise taxes, create more entitlements, and raise taxes again
For Illegal immigration and amnesty

Obama…

No defined measurable experience
Promotes "change", but the specifics on what will change, and how it will change is in short order.
No defined tough decision making background
Never really managed/lead anything or anybody
Votes present quite a bit, that is not a decision
Will raise taxes, create more entitlements, and raise taxes again
For Illegal immigration and amnesty
Believes in God, but gets a pass on that, unlike Huckabee

John…..

No defined measurable experience
No defined tough decision making background
Been unemployed for all practical purposes for the last few years
Will raise taxes, create more entitlements, and raise taxes again
For Illegal immigration and amnesty

There is a trend here...

There is a reason the senators do poorly in the election no matter what the party.
They have minimal, if any leadership and managerial skills.
They would never be contenders for any CEO position of any company of consequence.
The purpose of a senator is to represent his/her people, a trait forgotton by all of them.
In reality all they do is move money from one entitlement program to another to buy votes and raise taxes when the run out of money so they can buy more votes.
If the Dems really want a shot at the White House you had better draft Biden otherwise you will be looking in from the outside again.

As an independent I would not vote for any of the current Dem candidates.

B. Everitt   January 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

I too have noticed the glowing media coverage over Obama during the past several months. It’s about time for some criticism.

Sky   January 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

I wish someone would expose the Clinton fairytale.
The great economy of the 90's had nothing to do with him or his wife.
The economy thrived around Y2K. For almost a decade leading up
to the year 2000, the federal government mandated that corporations, financial institutes, federal agencies, etc., become Y2K compliant. There was a huge growth solely dependant on this one temporary project which cost billions.
No one even thought about what was going to happen when 2000 came and no disaters followed. No grid shutdowns, no factory blow ups, not one problem.
So there was no longer a need for all these highly skilled, high paying jobs.
Bozo could have been president during the 90's and the outcome would be the same. Now Clintons can share the blame for the slowdown that happened after the year 2000. How? NAFTA! Now thats a fairytale.

Seam, Philly PA   January 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Mid America January 8, 2008 4:08 pm ET

The Republicans will eat Obama for breakfast, and Edwards would be a pop-tart.
--------------------------------------

We shall see about that! Doubters will be eating their words for breakfast next year.

Republicans have no clout in 2008.

valerie mccray   January 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

The Clintons are old school news I am a no mom who can clearly see if you look at the big picture. To be a great leader you have to start off leading from the beinning.Obama talked about change and clearly that is already happening look at the candidates thay are all talking about it now. He has already made change thay all followed his lead wheather they took it upon them selves to use it negitively or positively.That is what makes a great leader someone who who can stand for something and stick to it and belive in it.The Clinton are all over the place now they really can not see a way out now and from the beinning thay made the wrong moves. Change we must and change never gets old. Val Mc

Alice   January 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Obama and JFK? What's the connection. Please.

Munachi   January 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Thanks Bill. Before now I was undecided, wavering between Obama and Hilary. After your rant, I am now decided in favor of Obama. You have just conceded defeat. If you ever want to see the democrats back in the White House, join the OBAMA MOVEMENT.

teresa   January 8th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Every one wants to jump on the negative train that they seem to think Hillary is on, Not I. I read up on Barrack Obama, I read his books, listened to some of his speeches and tried to discover what it is so fascinating about him. I agree he gives a stirring and inspirational speech. But as Mondale once said" Where"s the Beef?" As for John Edwards, I cannot find any major corporation he challenged as a lawyer, only small businesses and I also found he took a chunk of the money awarded to his clients and put a few small companies out of business. An ambulance chaser isn't what I deem as the right man for the job. So I feel the Change to my party is between Hillary and Barrack. Recently, some people say if Hillary wins it scares them and she would be weak on security. Hillary for the last sixteen years has been pushed, beatened, slandered, shoved, poked, swore at, cheated on, publically humiliated by Bill, criminalized and accused of just about everything bad the republicans and now an ambulance chaser and a smooth talker can lip out. STILL SHE STANDS. Now that is strength. We know her from inside and out and back again. We cannot say the same about Barrack and smiling John. And if that is not enough, let us take Barrack to his word and listen to him, read about him and learn to understand him. And so I have, Most was inspirational and connected, until I read about his church, Trinity United Church Of Christ ans it's leader Dr. Jeremiah Wright. And I wondered why no media picked up on this. I reccommend all your listeners to research this area about Barrack. He speaks of forward with change, Dr. Jeremiah Wright speaks of Black THeologly and the raising of the black people. I tried hard to find it not to feel prejudice, but as I listened and read, I soon felt Barrack is the messenger. A change, where equality will suffer, especially women. I can compare his speeches and Dr. Wrights speeches to those of George Wallace and the Klan which supported him. We know Hillary can be a tiger, why isn't it we an't see the wolf beneathe the same old white shirt and black suit?

Patrick, New York,Ny   January 8th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Bill CLinton is the best....goo HILLARy 08!
Dont forget what they did for us in the 90s....8 years of peace and posperity

NOBAMA

Kmgross   January 8th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Everybody is talking about the media this and the media that – the media is WHITE! The TV is WHITE! The magazines are WHITE! Go figure!!

Alice   January 8th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Bill Clinton is correct in his opinion about media coverage. This coverage has made Obama a king and Clinton a lost cause because of a win in Iowa. Where is Iowa. Are we nuts. We need a qualified leader. We don't need an intern.

Ginny C   January 8th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Bill Clinton is absolutely correct in saying you have given Obama a free ride. You are becoming like the Fox channel more and more. I am starting to believe that we get better and more fair coverage from our local stations.

We just had 8 years of inexperience and incompetence in Washington. This country can't afford another 8 yrs of this. Obama has had no foreign experience at all. What is wrong with people? Wake up before it is to late!

Mo Unity   January 8th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Wow! Would you all listen to yourselves. This is exactly what Obama doesn't want to happen. Save it for the opposition. OH, wait, if OBAMA were the nominee, there is no opposition. There is no us against them, only us. How beautiful is that?

Arun   January 8th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I guess it all depends on the definition of "is"...of course, Romney's not really sure about "saw" either, so they both could be pretty sure about what they ... are "aware of..."

To that end, I'm surprised with as early as this campaign season began, we haven't heard more "rabble rabble" from Bill Clinton. He's just now getting in his groove...his wife is spooked and he needs to get more on the offensive...

But, even aside from that, it boggles my mind that every time a candidate's positions reflects that of a population (especially a majority) that candidate is criticized. THE WHOLE POINT OF THESE ELECTIONS is to pick someone who can adequately reflect the WILL OF THE POPULAR SOVEREIGN (all of us voting types) to the outer world. So what if Obama's position changed with public opinion. That's exactly what I would expect him to do...what is popular...WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT.

Judith Simpson   January 8th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I agree that the media has given Obama a pass by not asking any hard questions of him . I have no idea what this big change means he doesn't say what kinds of change and how he plans to get them thru the other branches of goverment. Are you afraid to press him on anything because of his race and you don't want to be criticized for being unfair to a black candidate.
Also I am getting to the point I don't want to watch the situation room as your views are one sided. I started watching CNN because they used to present all sides but that does't seem to be the case anymore.
Thank You
Judith Simpson

Matthew   January 8th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Hey, I have an idea – how about Hilary runs, and wins or loses, on her own merits rather than with Bill's help? I don't understand why there appears to be a general acceptance that it's fair that Hilary's campaign depends so fundamentally on the active, daily participation (as opposed to the mere support or endorsement) of one of our generation's most effective politicians. If she's capable of acting as President, why isn't she capable of running a campaign that doesn't rely on Bill?

james   January 8th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

They all are the same, none of them are worth voteing for...Im just staying home.

mARILYN   January 8th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Clinton be cool. Obama might choose you for his running mate. Just don't dig any ditches.

denise   January 8th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

if the clinton's go after obama, do they think that the blacks are gonna be with them.if they send the smear crew out after obama ,do they think that it well split the party,that the young will follow them.they might get the dem's. party nod for pres.but at what cost.for the gop's to win.and the party to be forever split.

Brian   January 8th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Obama should look familiar to Bill. He garnered the same treatmant as president.

Jane Terra   January 8th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Obama has NO experience. Hope can't pay my bills. Hope can't lower the price at the pump. It is time that his record is out there by the press. They have given him a free ride! He coudn't vote for the war cause he wasn't a Senator....he didn't vote against the Iran resolution because he was out campaigning. He couldn't make it back to Wahington, but he could slant it as an act for war.

Bush promised to unite people.....how has that gone so far?

Wake up all you dreamers.

RofLA   January 8th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Pres. Clinton taking up for his wife? Now we see who will really run the White House! When she is losing...he comes from behind the curtain. Let Mrs. Clinton fight her own battles–if she knows how. I can't believe he blames the media when the media has been rough on all the candidates. Mrs. Clinton said she's running on her experience. Maybe she should use it to stand up to the other candidates.

MK   January 8th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Clint, watch meet the press. Tim has asked Obama all the questions you mentioned. I was ok with the answer you get.

CALVIN, GREENVILLE SC   January 8th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

THE CLINTONS ARE STARTING TO LOOK PATHETIC. I WONDER HOW THE TERRORISTS AND EVIL DICTATORS PERCEIVE A PRESIDENT THAT WILL START CRYING WHEN THE GOING GETS TOUGH. WHEN EVERYONE IN THE WORLD HAS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS, IT IS A MUST THAT WE CONTINUE TO BE PERCEIVED AS A STRONG NATION. A LEADER THAT STARTS CRYING WHEN ASKED WHO DOES YOUR HAIR IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM. A NATION WILL NOT BE FEARED IF THE LEADER OF THAT NATION IS SCARED.

Casey, Minneapolis, MN   January 8th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

I don't understand how people can equate the Clintons with the Bushes. When Mr. Clinton was in office our country was in such a good state: we were respected around the world, the middle class was going, there was actually a plan for people to get off of welfare and contribute to society rather than burden it, and we had a surplus. I just don't understand why people are afraid of trying to go back to that.

I don't claim to know much about politics, but I know that life wasn't too bad back then.

Erica   January 8th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

Would you let the wife of a surgeon operate on you? Hillary apparently would.

Mark C, Asheville NC   January 8th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

Buh–bye Bill! Buh-bye Hillary!

Larry DeVito Mason NH   January 8th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

Hey Bill, give ME a break, give US a break, and be gracious in defeat and not sound like a spoiled child. Get real.

Kate   January 8th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

Bush Senior = 4 years
Bill Clinton = 8 years
George W Bush = 8 years
Hilllary Cliton = 8 years
Jenna Bush = 8 years
Chelsea Clinton = 8 years

That I say is democracy ;-)

Micah, Phoenix AZ   January 8th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

Why do people think, that because Obama is a good speaker, a man who can inspire, that means automatically that he has taken no positions or stances on the issues? That he has laid no specifics out on the issues. People, do some research before spitting out untruths. He has been speaking policy for YEARS......

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

Y. Parker   January 8th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

I am not at all surprised by the sudden downslide of our nations former First Lady of eight years, and neither should anyone else who has read all the available information about her and her husband on the Internet (The Clinton Years, The Clinton Murders, and Who Killed John John), as well as all the books about her by respected and credible authors. I do not believe that anyone with this knowledge could ever vote for a woman surrounded by so much suspicion, wrong doing and coverup would draw enough votes to become president, and I also believe that this is the main reason for her downfall.

I predicted from the very beginning that Hillary would never be president, and that if the Democrats wanted to win the next presidential race, they had better come up with someone more likeable and credible....a candidate they could really trust and respect...and it looks like that person just might be Obama!

As a frequent blogger on the Internet, I can also see how opinions of others and the sharing of information has a strong effect on how one will vote in the elections. Because of the availability of so much credible information, information one may never know about unless someone tells them about it or refers them to (there are so many links to these informative sites) that can really influence people and even change their minds. So I really believe that the blogs written by others can have a huge bearing on the outcome of any election. For example, I wrote a blog during President Bush's campaign in 2000, "I Smell Something Rotten and It's Not Coming from the Whitehouse" that eight or nine hundred responses, and which I believe had a strong influence in helping him get elected. There were many others as well....and as long as there is an Internet...and there are bloggers....many will flock to read and share their opinions and information with one another.

Mohinder Suresh   January 8th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

It's interesting how folks don't even know what Obama stands for. They don't care. Apparently, he has a high likability rating, and when your support comes from the readers of people-magazine (as in, folks that have never looked inside an issue of Time magizine), it's quite obvious that this nomination more closely resembles a high school popularity contest than a serious election.

Kate   January 8th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

Bush Senior = 4 years
Bill Clinton = 8 years
George W Bush = 8 years
Hilllary Cliton = 8 years
Jenna Bush = 8 years
Chelsea Clinton = 8 years

Long live democracy!!!!!!!! ..

R. W. McSween   January 8th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

Hats off to Bill Clinton. I do not know what special interest is backing Obama but they must have deep pockets and a lot of influence in Washington. That in itself is not unusual or surprising as that place reeks of incompetence, lies and half truths. The youth of this country are making a big mistake voting for change when they have no clue what change he will make. I am sick of hearing about his chrisma. I think that is a poor basis for president, as well as I fail to see what charisma or good looks he has. Clinton was the best president since Kennedy and I hate hearing Obama compared to Kennedy. Clinton left our country in the best shape it had been in for years; no deficit, good foreign relations. Has everyone forgotten that. Bush has destroyed our nation and now the youth wants more of the same incompetence and lack of experience. I would feel a lot better having Hillary Clinton as president in these trying times. SHE COULD TAKE OVER ON DAY ONE AND NONE OF THE OTHERS COULD. WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.

Slownomad   January 8th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

I've been a Democrat my entire voting life. I've worked at the polls, I've walked precincts, I've made calls, I've donated money. In every election since 1980. And nothing has pissed me off as much as the Clintons and their "entitlement" mentality this time around. I've had it with them. It's all about them and "their party". Clue time, Bill. It's not "your" party!!! It's not Hillarys! It belongs to Democrats and you just can't stand that we might kick your tired old butt to the ground. Haven't you done enough already to hurt the Democratic Party? Please, just go away!

Priscilla   January 8th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

After the crying scene and the bashing from Bill. I have definetly made up my mind. I am not voting for Hillary. When you really think about it all this experience has got us just where e are today. I beleive Obama can bring them all together (Dems,Rep,Ind). Hillary I know that you have passion but what you are demonstrating is just what we would see if you were President. We need to get away from that. Thank you for showing me your true colors.

Del   January 8th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

poor losers, surely no one is really surprised. hilly-billy have spent their adult lives wollowing in the deepest blackest hole of American politics. Carville & Begala hold the extra set of keys to that hole. I'd like to have a hilly-billy shut-up button it would be worn out by now. Just like they are. Can't wait until we can be concerned ans interested in American politics and not have to see those faces or hear that name . I would still like to read the list of her 35 years of accomplishments. I wish the media would have her answer questions about her past. they have given her a cake walk. So why are they crying ? They have hit Romney and Huckabee on their religion big time. Some on Obamas. why not hilly for the lack of any. Going into a church and sticking a Bible under your arm for the cameras does not a christian make, no more than going into a garage makes you a buick.
They are frauds to the bone.

Kmgross   January 8th, 2008 4:22 pm ET

Why does it have to be a "fairy tale" for Obama? Because he's black? Does white America think that the position of President of the USA is only for them and its only a "fairy tale" for blacks.

carolh11   January 8th, 2008 4:22 pm ET

Let's all remember here, this is POLITICS! They're going down swinging, and swinging with a hard left as brutal as they can! Hillary was the front runner, the coronated candidate by the party, and treated as such for a very long time. Shocked and stunned, this is the only reasonable political retaliation they think they have. If for one minute they thought a little beyond the "play", they would realize this is the exact politics that the people are voting against.

jan   January 8th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

You Obama supporters are off your rockers.....what on earth do you think Obama is really going to accomplish? If any of you think on President can possibly end every screwed up mess we have right now you have to be crazy....he's a bag of wind and I thank Bill for pointing out the blatantly obvious.....the media is an absolute mess covering these primaries. Go Hillary.....we need your over the top attention to detail and ability to actually do what is neccessary to make something happen.....no just simply smile and say 'I'm gonna make everything better".

Tom   January 8th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

The Media and the print and TV Press is giving Senator Obama A free ride in this Election!

CALVIN   January 8th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

I JUST GOT TOO ASK THIS IS BILL RUNNING FOR OFFICE OR HIS WIFE NOT A SMART MOVE BILL I LOST ALL HOPE IN THE CLINTON CAMP I WAS VOTING FOR YOUR WIFE NOW I WANT

GO OBAMA 08

Jill in Little Rock   January 8th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

I'm sorry, I'm having a hard time wrapping my brain around this. How would a "President Clinton" be a change in Washington? Someone help me please!!

no binladen believer for president   January 8th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

Obama ws raised and educated by radical muslims. Is this what we want for a President???

Someone have him address this subject

Mark, Toronto Ontario   January 8th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

Its so sad to see these "Obama is a Muslim" lies appearing time and time again. The people who spread these lies must lead sad, pathetic little lives that they have to spread this misinformation in the hopes that they will be believed.

Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you still spread these lies. What is it that you are really afraid of? Are you that ignorant? You can't stand to have someone "different" in the White House? Let me guess, you say you are Christian, but you don't mind spreading words of hate...doesn't sound very Christian to me.

Darrell   January 8th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

Bill's Complaint about the press is not fair. When Hillary was ahead. No problem with press!

America has move on from divider type politicians.

Time for a new Movement for america.

Experience - ....Bill, Hillary, please give credit to who deserves it. Not you! your administration's hard work. You had very little Washington experience in 1992.

The Same will happen for Obama and his admin.

Ride the wave of change by being a democratic uniter, not a divider

Chris, Denver CO   January 8th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

I've been a Hillary supporter, but I'm losing a lot of regard for both Clintons as their desparation brings out their nastier side. Blaming the media? Sounds more like Bill O'Reilly than Bill Clinton. I'd be perfectly happy with Obama, and I hope the Clinton's don't do irreversible harm to his campaign. They could have a little more grace and remember that Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment worked better than in-fighting ever has.

Jack Jett   January 8th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

Clinton is right. I have never witnessed such a Obama bandwagon. He is a great guy and will probably make a great President. However, the press holds Mrs Clinton to a higher standard and that is NOT fair.

The media is partly to blame for getting us into this war.

Matt Wong Washington   January 8th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

I love it how Bill and Hillary are calling Obama's Vision for change a "Fairy Tale" and "Poetic Politics." Anyone involved with supporting Barack Obama knows that this is something extraordinary and no one involved is actually listening to their complimentary attacks. Just maybe when two terms are up President Obama will be defined as the Fairy Tale president who brought to life what no other president in history could and turned Washington government into an act of poetic justice. Each canidate running, even on the republican side is citing "change" as if they have any idea what they are not capable of doing as human beings or leaders. If Bill only knew, and I think he does that Obama represents a new wave of politics and a new wave for Washington government that only he can truly inspire and bring to life. Hillary is a wonderful addition for the United States but don't try and knock down history by writing it off as something you wish you were being accredited for.

david   January 8th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

everyone needs to settle down and look at all the facts regarding each candidate. which candidate will hopefully make your life better concerning healthcare, social security, high energy costs, the war, employment, etc. as for those bashers of the candidates does this make you better than those you bash? i would also recommend looking up the constitution , sherman anti trust act and other laws that were set up to protect the people. see what you have now . and for some of you who comment on this forum , are these your own views? or are you influenced by outside forces that distort the real truth. last but not least this country is at a crossroads but if the american people make the right choice this time and there are no hitches such as what happenned in florida last time may be, just maybe this country can return to what it was and that is the greastest country in the world. good luck to each candidate on either side. just don't give us another 4 or 8 years of the same mess.

Dorothy, White Salmon, Wa   January 8th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

I would like to just ask the Obama supporters one question: What legislation has he introduced or been a co-sponsor of since he came to the senate? What percentage of bills has he voted on since he began running for the job of President?
He hasn't introduced one bill. Check it out.

Hilliary has not only gotten medical care etc for injured guardsman returning from Iraq or Afghanistan (which they wouldn't have had) but she also got health care for thousands and thousands of children.

She is right. She is the doer. He isn't.

Ito, Yokosuka Japan   January 8th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

If Obama can survive the Clinton hate machine, he can surely survive the Republican attack machine...

Bring the heat, Clinton's...keep sounding shrill, bitter, cold, and sore...

Go Obama...keep faith, honor, and dignity in the process...

Peter   January 8th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

JOHN EDWARDS!!

Michael   January 8th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

I Do beleive that American should focus more on our own issues: economy, deficit, social program, plus illegal immigrants. NO countries like US has such a broken border and so many illegal immigrants happily work and live here. No matter a woman, an African-American president, or a republican, kick them out of our country. America is for americans.

Sudan and Tibet, it's none of our business, for God's sake.

Anonymous Vermont Girl   January 8th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

As usual, the Clintons are dividing the party and the country once again. It's pathetic to see and hear Bill, the king of situational ethics, calling the kettle black. Let's see? When do they go back to wearing their former president and first lady hats? Do they think we will forget this low-end behavior. How sad that they can't let others grow and lead. They are confused and have lowered the bar on the presidency and first lady roles for this great nation.

tim   January 8th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

I think it is doing more harm then good to have Bill Clinton speak for Hillary...

I am still remembering the great liar in his time and how easy it was for him to distort the truth. At least with a new president I would like to support one who is not a liar or has that history.

Secondly Hillary is just out of touch with what we are wanting to hear from a canidate.

I am seeing a doomed effort for Hillary as president...

Kathy, Roseville, California   January 8th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

I am glad that the former President said exactly what he said.
Obama lies.

Hillary 08!!!!

Franklin Cain   January 8th, 2008 4:16 pm ET

The idea of having this disgraced, disbarred, impeached former President whining about unfair treatment of his "so-called" wife by the media that worships the Clinton's is ridiculous. CNN did not gets it's nickname of the Clinton News Network by mistake. They and all the other old media types have always fallen all over themselves to grovel at the feet of the Clintons.
Now that an intelligent, young African American has a shot at their percieved prize, they are once again taking the low road and using the politics of personal destruction, deceit and any other immoral or unethical means to achive their end.
The idea of having these two "trailer park" politicians back in the White House should make any thinking person violently ill.

Jan, Toledo, OH   January 8th, 2008 4:16 pm ET

The media has annointed Obama the next Democratic nominee. I just listened to Wolf Blitzer's show that said that all these comments by the Obama campaign have been covered. When? I listen to all three news networks and have not heard any of these accusations that Obama made. There has not been the scrutiny of his background that other candidates have gotten.
If you owned a company, which would you hire for a CEO. The person who said that he would make a lot of changes, the CEO with experience, or the person with experience that had the knowledge to make changes? Why do we want anything less for our country.

Robert Bell   January 8th, 2008 4:16 pm ET

Some more fairy tales from Bill Clinton:

"I did not inhale"

"That depends on your definition of 'is""

and the all time classic::

"I did NOT have sex with that Woman!"

I guess Bull, er, ah, BILL knows a fairy tale when he sees it.

By the way, on behalf of all GBLT QRSTUV bi-genderd and queer people as well as the "little people" I protest the use of politically incorrect language such as "Fairy Tale" as an insult to people of lesbian bi-gender and/or the magically enganced.

We demand a heartfelt apology from Bill Clinton.

MOUNIR   January 8th, 2008 4:16 pm ET

COMMON BILL
STAY OUT OF IT AND DO WHAT YOU DO BEST . GET A YOUNG LADY SO YOU CAN KEEP BUSY CAUSE PEOPLE WANT A CHANGE NOT A THE SAME OLD STORY . SORRY BABA YOU ARE OLD NEWS.

Jeanne Carrier   January 8th, 2008 4:16 pm ET

Wow! Deja vu all over again! For a split second I wondered who was running, Bill or Hillary. The former President has no business going on the attack like that. His role should be that of all the spouses, smile sweetly and support the candidate. When will the Clinton campaign get it?? No one wants to vote for "Billary" Clinton.

Paul Braxton   January 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

I find it humorous to hear Bill Clinton crying low blow for Hilary, can he recall all the low blows he throw or the press chose not to respond to when he made comments that were not 100% accurate or polite on his road to the Whitehouse. Please Mrs. & MR. Clinton you are in a political dog fight for the highest office in the land. What made you think the Democratic Party was just going to carry you back to the Whitehouse on their shoulders? I wonder what other world leaders would think of an American President who cried his or her way into the Whitehouse. If a candidate has not made any lying or deceitful statements or claims in reality, not that which his opposition feels is wrong. Why cry? Hey big guy, suck it up and keep going or get out of the race. In closing, may I ask how truthful is it to say, I have not had sex with that woman, simply because the act did not take place in a bedroom. You were our president, what message does that send to our children about the value of telling the truth? Go Barack Obama!!!

Ken Harris   January 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Hey Melisa: I think it's possible your fears are valid, but backwards. I think the GOP were hoping that hillary would get the democratic nod so they could cream her in the general election. If Obama gets it, unless there is some serious dirt that surfaces on this seemingly fine man, I honestly do not see a republican candidate that can beat him. BTW, I have been a republican (actually more like a RINO at times) my whole adult life and Barack Obama is the first person who has really inspired me. Read the book folks ($8.97 + S/H):

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream

This guy is as good as it can possibly get for the leader of the free world in my opinion. He is really something! I think if we pay a little less attention to technical positioning on the political spectrum and talk about what all of us, D & R, have in common and which issues affect us all, we might just be able to solve some problems and perhaps finally do something more than give simple lip service to bipartisanship. He'll make it a reality and perhaps get a jump on fixing some of what is so very wrong in our government. GO O!!!

Matt, Houston, TX   January 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

This is GREAT! The Clinton supporters are telling us that the Republicans are voting for Obama in the primaries because they know they can beat him and the Obama supporters are telling us the Republicans are voting for Hillary because they know they can beat her. One of you has to be wrong . . . oh, wait a minute, you both are! Do you seriously believe that there is a vast conspiracy by the Republicans to vote for a particular Democratic candidate in the primaries so they get someone they think they can beat? Get serious.

It would also be nice if everyone would stop lumping me in with their opinions. If you are sick of someone, please refrain from saying we are all sick of them; if you think your candidate is the best, that does not mean everyone who doesn't support your candidate is stupid, evil, brain dead, asleep, etc.

Oh, by the way, every single candidate has all of their positions and how they will handle the Presidency spelled out on their web site. If you don't know where a candidate stands on the issues, it's not because of their ommission, it's because you are too lazy to research them so stop blaming them when it's really your own fault.

One last thing, blaming everyone else for your failures is not very Presidential. Every time Hillary tries to blame someone else for her problems, she is showing how she would handle the Presidency and it ain't pretty. What ever happened to 'The Buck Stops Here'?

The Chris   January 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

i am not surprised by Bill's lashing out at Obama. That would come standard from any spouse of a presidential canidate.

What i find funny, is that earlier in the race, she proclaimed to join the "change" bandwagon, but Bill is using the same negative attacks that have plagued our country for as far back as i can remember.

i believe that it takes away from Hillary when she stands for change, but has her husband do the same old politics game.

Obama is standing for change, that is why we indorse him. He doesn't stand for change and then do the same stuff.

sorry Hillary, back to the senate with you...

Andy, New York, New York   January 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Bill Clinton as President is one thing, but Bill Clinton as a stumper on the campaign trail for his wife is another thing. If Bill keeps this up long enough he is going to erode whatever likeability he has with Americans who definitely don't like his wife for President, and definitely question his sincerity as her stumper after all the years of cheating on her.
If she is such a good person for the presidency, as he claims, why did he spend all those years earlier wandering after other women? The more I watch them together on the trail the more I am convinced their marriage is one of political convenience.
To me, she supported himin his political endeavors because she knew the favor would be returned one day. It was a marriage based on a political arrangement. And that is why she broke down and said 'it is personal! Her entire life's work is wrapped around this moment, and the American people, not Obama, are sending her a cold message that matches her personality.

Teddy McC   January 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Wouldn't it be neato if one of those reporter thingys could tell us if there's any TRUTH to BC's claims when he said of Obama 'Well, how could you say that when you said in 2004 you didn't know how you would have voted on the resolution? You said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war,"...

I want to know if those two claimed quotes are true and fair, but I can't find ANYWHERE where Hillaryclinton.com OR any of the "news" reporters who have even addressed it! The reporters are too busy doing "That guy insulted her," That women insulted that guy" stories to bother with facty stuff. Wouldn't be as cute or as appealing as the pap they're putting out of NH right now, though.

And why does no one else here seem to care about whether it's true or not? Everyone is just bickering over why Bill did this, or how hopeful Barak is. Can we PLEASE know if one if these people actually is a liar?

Shackafella   January 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Bill, Bill, Bill...

I understand. You gotta do something, after all Hillary stood by you through the toughest of times. You know it's difficult to have someone's back when the DNA is on the dress!

I'm not mad at you. You are simply trying to swing the pendulum back in your direction. I just want you to know that, you are wasting your time. Go out with dignity.. oh yeah, you don't know anything about dignity otherwise you woulda simply said " I have had and inappropriate relationship with a White House intern and and I am guilty as charged. I am sorry."

We the people respect honesty, and repentance. We know that man is not perfect. You are a smart guy, I'm not sure how you missed that class.

Go down fighting! I love a good fight. The fact of the matter is... U & Hillary are going down! It's a wrap. Obama 08 is the best thing to happen to America in decades.

Christian, Tampa FL   January 8th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

The country is tired of not only the Bushes, but the Clintons as well. Both families, while politically different, represent an era of divisive politics that we in the electorate just can't take anymore.

Obama made clear his disappointment with the "D-Punjab" memo, and we've never seen anything from his campaign like it since.

Exasperated   January 8th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Yes, President Clinton has it right! The Press is the one that is promoting Senator Obama
and the Press is responsible for helping destroy Senator Clinton's campaign. That poor woman cannot say or do anything only to have it portrayed unfairly and negatively by the American Press. What gives??
I thought the Press was supposed to be unbiased, but CNN is getting as bad as FOX News!
Senator Clinton is a brilliant woman with brilliant ideas. I had planned on backing Senator Edwards, but the way the Mrs. Clinton is being treated, makes me wonder if she isn't the best candidate???

House Mouse   January 8th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Obana, still a mystery...
Clintons, our dirty History !

Never knew Bill was so crazy about Hillary.
He certainly didn't help her...just same old. Forget it and get on with it.

john   January 8th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Hope and change comes from within each individual.
Don't rely on a politician for something that is so intangible as change because it can mean too many things.
I an still waiting for Bush to give me my Lifetime Savings Account (LSA) where I don't have to pay any management fees and my interest isn't taxable. Guess in his pushing home ownership he forgot some need help saving a downpayment.

Richard Alan   January 8th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Mr President (Clinton),
You have one of the most supported and respected legacies among liberals. Are you really such a believer in nepotism that you would blindly risk the American Dynasty of the Clinton name in order to attack the new progressive leader of America? I am sorry to see it, sir. I have been fond of you since I was a child. I am sorry to see it.

Richard Alan, 23, OR

jerromme   January 8th, 2008 4:13 pm ET

I think Clinton should retract his comments. Obama is a symbol of hope for many and an honest man. How about all the Arkansas dealing you had Mr. Clinton. And all the coverups in Arkansas while you were governor. All the coverups under the Rose Law firm which happens to be Hillary's. Clintons past was well covered and he went ahead to dupe America to put him in office for 2 terms. So please Clinton shut up and let an honest man speak.

jean   January 8th, 2008 4:13 pm ET

Fantastic! It was great to hear Bill Clinton stand up for Hillary. Every other candidate's spouse has the right to do this but none of them would get the mean and hateful response that Bill gets for doing so. There is no sense in trying to change the mind of those who hate the Clintons. But, for those with an open mind, who truly do want to elect the best candidate – and this includes those who cover this election. Be fair, be forgiving, be real. Nice job Bill.

Phil Kessack   January 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Hillary says she has "eight years of White House experience." So did Sox, but that didn't mean he was competent to be President.

Sandra   January 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

You go Bill for sticking up for your wife- but both you and Hillary are trying to build a dynasty just like the Bushes- I would expect this level of negative campaigning from the Republicans, but from you it is disturbing.

And you wonder why Obama is leading! Obama '08

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Joanne McCann says:

"Abe Lincoln was a 2 year Rep. of the house before becoming President and he united this country. JFK was a young wide eyed Senator with little experience if you all remember and asked us not what our country could do for us but what we can do for our country. It is that time again. Not to sit back and let business as usual prevail."

It is interesting that you would reference these two Presidents.

Abraham Lincoln presided over the most convulsive four year internal event in American history, in which the country tore itself apart and battles took place on our own soil, between Americans, in which tens of thousands died in a day or two. He lived to see the Union healed, but as you know, was murdered at the end.

John Kennedy was elected in 1960 and was murdered in 1963. He was a young and inspiring speaker and he proposed that we go to the moon in the "next decade or before" but he barely lived live to see the process started much less finished and Americans actually set foot on the moon during the Nixon administration.. Lyndon Johnson picked up some of his adgenda and carried it out in his term as President Kennedy's successor Kennedy also ordered the ill fated Bay of Pigs invasion in Cuba. I know this will be unpopular, but the myth of Camelot is not the reality.

Paul TN   January 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

January 8, 2008 12:52 pm ET

The Clintons are starting to make the sick with all of this crying and moaning about not being treated fair. Hear comes the old Clinton dirty politics we are so used to seeing. Do you want Hillary as the Commander-in-Chef of the Military that will have her finger on the nuclear trigger for 4 years when she can’t even take a few negative comments with out crying?

Miss Smith   January 8th, 2008 4:10 pm ET

I'm voting for Obama's wife in this election.

OPRAH/OBAMA in '08

Jason   January 8th, 2008 4:10 pm ET

Obana still a mystery, Clintons are HISTORY

Alexandra   January 8th, 2008 4:10 pm ET

Bill to the rescue. Again Hillary shows that she can't stand up with control of herself and "Personal Goal". I guess it si payback time for when Hillary "stood by her man". He will fight for the White House and control over her. How cowardly!!!

Frank Penna   January 8th, 2008 4:10 pm ET

It seem a bit strange that Bill Clinton has such a remarkable memory about what a individual stated and doesn't know when he had sex.
Statement that "I don't know how I would have vote in 2004" does not mean that he did vote. Senator Clinton did support the war. Now she claims to be against it.
Her remarks are demoralizing to are men and women in the armed forces.

Clintons are pros at smear campaignes and Bill Clinton, who in is glory days as
president , was impeached, and disgraced the office of the president leads the pack.

If Senator Clinton should be elected who will be President Hillary or Bill?
Seems that Bills roll is one of special consulant to the President as per Senator
Clinton.

Mrs Clinton should run on her credentials and stop with the mud slinging by her
self and by those she chooses to surround herself with.

Melissa   January 8th, 2008 4:10 pm ET

Bill Clinton has the right to be angry with the media. It has all but elected Obama. Haven't we had enough of "resume light" in the WH?

Bob   January 8th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

Hey Bill..! I'll take an Obama fairytale over a retake of a Clinton nightmare anytime..! Why don't you both just go away..?

Chris   January 8th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

Hey Wood, what do you have to say about Edward's wife talking???? I don't see you remarking to that! He just stands there with his hands folded while his wife keeps on jabbering on! If you want fairness, then talk about the others also.

Mid America   January 8th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

The Republicans will eat Obama for breakfast, and Edwards would be a pop-tart.

Matt Davenport   January 8th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

I don't know what you all see in Obama!
He's a quick talker... That's it.

You attack the clinton's, claiming they're splitting the party apart. Grow up!!!
By attacking bill and hillary... you show the world you are no better-than they are.

Edwards all the way!!!! If obama wins the nomination, then I'm voting for the republican.

Carrie   January 8th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

BrY

I have a mind of my own. My whole life, the Bushes and Clintons, have been in the White House. I am tired of it. We live in a country thats better then this. Since 2004, I have been an Obama supporter. The media or anyone else doesn't influence me on who to vote for or like.

Dorothy, White Salmon, Wa   January 8th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

Bill Clinton has every right to call Obama on something that he has done that presents the wrong picture of his past position and voting record. And, CNN shouldn't think that unusual just because he happens to also be the former President. I don't like the negative comments put out by CNN. I think your Wolf Blitzer's' comments are unbecoming a television news network that is supposedly unbiased.

Glenn,B'ham,Al   January 8th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

"I did not have sex with that women" I'm so tired of looking & listening to Bill Clinton & George Bush that I could break down & cry!!

Jerry, Tampa, Florida   January 8th, 2008 4:07 pm ET

Ahhh – The Irony – Bill is slamming Obama for the very same voting record as his wife. The morons in the clinton camp will say whatever they have to in order to get elected. I’d be crying to if I were them! We'll all be glad when they're sent packing!!!

john   January 8th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

Hi,
I definately doubt Senator Obama's saying that he is quite ready on day 1 to clear up the mess infact i am not sure if he would be really be able to bring in some change atleast in his 1 year of presidency .Its kind of really sad that we say that we are the Superpower but still hesitate to elect a women as the Commander in Chief where as someof the 3rd world countries have already had Women Commander in chief probably 20 years ago!! As far as War In Iraq goes come guys grow up one question to all those senators who say they did not vote for it Well what have you done to prevent the or help in minimising the damage during past 4 years (just political speeches!!!)
Its a big mess we have a whole of veterans who have problems with Health insurance..the increasing budget deficit just to name some i truly do not think Obama would be an opt candidate ready on day 1 (reason no plans revealed to date what is the action plan ) Atleast with Clintons i am sure former president Clinton does have a good track record of balancing the political act either in middleast or balancing the balance sheet with surplus...At end it matters is peace and respect for us in the world .....
just a thought!!!!

Marianne Beasley   January 8th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

I am a Yellow Dog Democrat from Arkansas. I have voted Democrat for decades. But if Obama takes the nomination, I will switch in independent and do everything I can to see him defeated. Sorry, Obama, but you ain't presidential material. And if you cause us to lose the chance to have Bill Hill, then I'm going forever from the Democratic Party. That's what the Dems want? Obama? Then I am no longer a Dem.

Jen   January 8th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

He is right! In answer to some people, Bill Clinton never lied to America about politics, he lied to them about personal matters, that were none of their business anyways. He was a great president, and got our country out of debt, when everyone said back then that it couldn't be done. And inregards to Obama, there is no difference between him and Clinton in voting, and nearly no difference on the issues, so if you hate Hillary so much, don't vote for Obama! It does scare me how little experience he has, because he can lie and noone will know the difference. Bill Clinton just pointed one thing the republicans will certainly use against Obama in the months leading to November. I don't think he will win in 2008, and if he ran as an independent, he would be handing over the election to the republicans. Which, I think he has already done. And who ever wins you have to realize it would more likely be a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket. If they are serious about any chance of beating the republicans anyways.

Mike Smyth, New Orleans, Louisiana   January 8th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

As a Democrat who voted for Bill Clinton both times, I'd like to say 'Shut up Bill."
Your time is up, and every time you open your mouth your wife's poll numbers drop. Don't these two get that?

Nicole, Birmingham, AL   January 8th, 2008 4:05 pm ET

What's wrong with beleiving in fairy tales; what is wrong with wanting a safe country to live in, wanting a war to end, wanting gas prices down, wanting to be able to send your kids to college or even provide your family with a nice affordable home to live in and food in the fridge? Hilary is getting desperate;the other night during the debate, she says "lets be realistic" or "lets get back to reality". I'm sorry but I live in reality everyday and it ain't pretty. I guess it's easy for someone who has millions in her bank account, but for this single parent, I struggle with reality everday. I have lost all respect for Bill Clinton; she's your wife, but even you know her being president is self serving, a ego trip. It is funny how you seem to be so loyal to your wife now, but you couldn't remain loyal to her during your marriage. What is even more ridiculous is why she stayed after causing her so much embarrasment! I know why she stayed and this is coming from a female perspective; she stayed because she knew she needed to get to the White House and she would need you to get there. Any other woman would've dropped your behind then and there!!! Bill you came from a very poor background you know how hard life can be for the middle class and poor. To say that Barack is only providing a fairy tale, I say it's about time someone provided this countr y with something other than despair ,heartache and empty bank accounts. It sounds to me now that you've earned a few million dollars you and Hilary are the one's that have lost touch with reality!

TEE   January 8th, 2008 4:05 pm ET

ITS UNFORTUATE BILL FEEL THIS WAY, I THOT HE WAS A MAN OF PRINCIPLES. ........ANYWAY STOP CRYING HILL, NO ONE TOOK AWAY UR CANDY....DONT HATE THE PLAYER !!!!!! NOW THE CLINTONS KNOW THE DO NOT OWN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY...

Mireille, Charlotte   January 8th, 2008 4:05 pm ET

Please stop using the word 'Slam'

It's so over the top harsh most times. It makes an article sound so much worse. It's lesser than the actual word needed.

Arlene   January 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

Bill and Hillary spouting that she has "experience" is tantamount to saying that your physician's wife is capable of treating you because she's a nurse and has worked in his office for years. Sorry, but being a First Lady does not qualify you for the Presidency. If change is what the people really want, then we need to get away from the old boys/girls club and start fresh. I'm totally undecided, but in my opiniion, Hillary Clinton is not the answer to this Country's problems.

Colie Brice, Asbury Park, NJ   January 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

Let it go Bill. Don't betray your dignity any further. All we are saying is give change a chance.. Obama/Kucinich 08

karen   January 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

I have been a supporter of Bill Clinton for over a decade. However, it appears now that Hillary is behind Obama in the polls, they are pulling out all stops – expressing anger during the debate, in tears yesterday, gettin endorsement from blacks, and now Bill attacking Sen. Obama the day of the first primary. Shame on them. I had more respect than that for them.

Sharon   January 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

It's time for the Clinton's to take their fairy tale's and head back to Never-Never land! On their way tell them to say hi to Michael, Wendy, and Peter Pan of course! I can't speak for everyone but I am so sick of their tall tale's and so is the rest of America.

I don't know who I will vote for President of the United States, I only know I will not be voting for Senator Clinton.

Sit down Bill, Hillary has done a fine job messing up her lines and getting her statements wrong she doesn't need you adding more damage than she is.

Neil   January 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Well I guess this time I hope that our electoral college does the right thing and vote for the right candidate....Hillary Clinton. This popular movement is based upon emotions because GW has done such a poor job during his tenure in the White House. If Obamas people succeed we WILL have another GW in the White HOuse...one without experience or back up from Congress. Do you know what lame duck means? Look it up under four years in the White House and you will see Obama's picture. Get a grip...Hillary is the only viable candidate.

Lisa, Corpus Christi Tx   January 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

I find it extremely disturbing that a former president would come out and essentially trash another candidate, especially when they share the same party.

Yes, he has a right as Hillary's husband to campaign for her, but it would be logical for him to stay positive, and share her accomplishments with the voters instead of attacking a fellow democrat who might very well get the nomination. It would be impossible for him to back pedal now if Obama does receive the nomination. Everyone will see him as a hypocrit, especially the republicans.

This Machiavellian philosophy is exactly why Americans are weary, and need a change. This may have worked in the past, but Americans are a great deal wiser now. The Clinton campaign sees this election only in terms of what will get Hillary elected, not what is in the best interests of Americans.

Obama is not even my first choice, I am leaning towards Edwards. But, I still find it extremely sad.

Nancy   January 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

All you Obama supporters are doing is turning people off from him. Did you ever think that if he is elected President he will need Hillary's votes. Only one thing makes sense to me YOU ARE STILL SCARED TO DEATH OF HILLARY. You need to tell all the wonderful things Obama has done,: his experiences using drugs while in High School, his muslim upbringing, You should find all kinds of good things to talk about. But for some reason you prefer talking about Bill and Hillary. AMazing This goes for the media too.

Gbryant   January 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

To: Wood Kanampiu

There are lots of different kinds of MOVEMENTS.

Gary   January 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

WE HAD THE CLINTONS & BUSHS.. MY GOD!! WHY CAN'T THEY JUST GIVE IT UP.. MY GOD!!..ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!

Scott, Madison, WI   January 8th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

BrY:

The media was helping the country coronate the Clintons until just prior to Hillary's disappointing 3rd place in Iowa but then it was O.K. to drink the koolaid. Right? They just didn't see the Edwards and Obama coming to double-team them. Edwards couldn't have said it better in the debates about speaking out to power, and (big surprise!), here it is playing out just as he stated. Case closed!

Ken Harris   January 8th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Hey Darren, MN... As for being aware of Obama's true beliefs, as much as it is practically possible to ever really be aware of what someone truly believes, I have read his book, The Audacity of Hope, and therefore feel that I know as much as there is to know about how he looks at the myriad of issues facing this country and the world, as well as his outlook on life in general. I challenge anyone to point to a single elected official and tell me they knew everything there was to know about him or her before the votes were cast. We can only digest information that is known so that there's always a certain seat-of-the-pants factor.

Aside from the book, the app on the DM Register site that was made available during the Iowa Caucus is an excellent way to compare the candidates on a variety of issues:
Insights Into the Candidates

In addition, the Brian Williams MSNBC Interview from yesterday is another very good source.

If one can take a good look at the two aforementioned sources, then simply read the book, even just first 42 pages (chap 1), and then not vote for this man, something is seriously wrong in the universe!

Randall, Knoxville, TN   January 8th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Gee, I t hought the Clintons liked minorities. Maybe just when they're in their place.

teri   January 8th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Stop whining, Bill. Hillary is losing because she is the biggest phony, not the media. The media had been very pro-Hillary and now you got the nerves to diss them. CNN has been so good to your wife from day one. Give me a break!!! The Clintons make me barf.

Bye-bye Clintons. Take your wife with you and do America a big favor.

OBAMA 08!!

Biden VP
Edwards AG

Ryan, New York, NY   January 8th, 2008 4:01 pm ET

get truth guy January 8, 2008 2:57 pm ET

If Hossin Obama is elected, I will move to other nation. This is the worst we could see if the greatest country on earth is in the hands of Hossin Obama…

Don't let the door hit you on the but on the way out, bigot.

BTW, which country do you plan to move to where your poor grammar is going to be accepted along with your intolerance? Just remember, it's got to be a country tolerant of Americans, but intolerant of Muslims and with our world standing, those are few and far between.

Anna   January 8th, 2008 4:01 pm ET

Will the people who keep saying his grandmother lives in a shack, please shut up!! She lives in a modest home on her own land. She lives a simple life and seems very humble. It is killing all you loving elite corporate/republicans isn't it? You just don't get it do you? Obama comes from humble beginnings and that is why so many people are drawn to him. He is the common man. We need a guy who would care about the working class man and not the elite families of America.

As for Bill, well he hurt Hillary more than helped her with that fiasco.
I don't belive the teary eyes Hillary is showing but if it is sincere, than just wait until Obama wins in her home state Illinois. I can't wait to see the mental melt down on T.V.
The days of the elite good corporate old white boys are coming to an end.
Obama is going to be president.

Pam, Indianapolis, In   January 8th, 2008 4:01 pm ET

My forthcoming vote for Hillary Clinton was never because of Hillary. It was because of devotion to Bill Clinton. The crap from Hillary and Bill over the last week and specifically the last twenty four hours have pushed me to vote for Obama!

Your bitterness, your lies and your hypocritical rhetoric are a shame....

For Bill; Remove the post from your own eye before trying to remove the thorn from someone else's.

For Hillary; Well.. you still have not learned to listen anyway ;so never mind!!

Wood Kanampiu   January 8th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

Who is this guy again?
Is it the Bill Clinton who was once the president of the United States of America?
I thought he left office after his second term?
How many times can you run for the presidency in USA? Excuse me I always thought it was twice at most. But the guy talks like he is actually the one running for the seat. May be him,Hillary, and Chelsia are the trinity. No wonder Hillary counts her husband's experience as her own's.
Sorry Hillary. Americans expect you to fight it out on your own else you step down for your husband. But I still doubt if your guy has anything for Barack Obama. In case you missed it, it was said OBAMA IS NOT JUST A CANDIDATE BUT A MOVEMENT.

Marianne Beasley   January 8th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

Right on, Mister Bill ! Say it ! I'm with you, Babe. Hillary and Bill, all the way.

AB   January 8th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

i need help understanding the Obam-enon. seems if you like obama, there are very few reasons not to vote for hillary clinton.

i understand the desire not to have a clinton or a bush being the only people to occupy the white house since 1988. i do think it's damaging, especially for young people, to perceive our democracy as being run by just a few political families. (i guess i don't think "likability," whatever that means, is a good reason to vote for someone.)

on almost every other point, she trumps obama. their voting records in the senate are 90% similar, but she has proven her competence at promoting progressive causes for 35 years and has also done a far better job in the senate. he might very well be able to prove the same and display a great record one day, but shouldn't we let him be tested before trusting him with the highest office?

the repeat player game also tends to advantage past players in negotiation. and a nuclear, unstable pakistan is really what the next president will inherit.

the mayor of LA was in NH canvassing for hillary, and he said, "hillary clinton is more seasoned and a better decision-maker now than bill clinton was in 1992." and i believe that. i see it as a unique opportunity for us to get someone who is maybe more ready than anyone in our lifetimes has been to do that job. and to get someone the republicans have already thrown everything they possibly can at. it's going to be an ugly general election.

as for change, obama has a lot of the same people, too. one of his campaign managers worked for ira magaziner. a lot of them worked for kerry. another was a pharma lobbyist. maybe 25 out of 1000 jobs in any new administration go to people who proved themselves via the campaign; the rest will go to a lot of the same people they would go to if hillary won. part of the reason washington is immune to change is the same people shuffle in and out all the time, and they change over a much longer cycle than 4-8 years, regardless of who's occupying the highest office.

the presidency is the one job where having experience can be counted against you. it's very odd. someone explain the excitement to me, please! because if he wins the democratic nomination, i'm definitely going to be out there making sure dems take the white house back, and i'd like to be enthusiastic.

Louis, New York   January 8th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

as usual, Bill didn't tell the truth. I highly suggest anyone who wants to take this and think he is right, search the truth for themselves as i did. Bill only took part of what Obama said and twisted it to make it look like he was flipping on the war.
To Obama's credit, he did not leave our troops without equipment when it was his turn to vote for funding, because that is exactly what happens when you vote against funding troops in the field. You leave them there without equipment.

All Bill did here was more spin, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the Clintons, the Internet has them beat, their lies and spin can't go without being uncovered in minutes through a decent search engine.

Atleast Obama is truthful, whereas everything that still comes out of the Clinton's mouths is fabricated or twisted to their own goals. We don't need to hear that nonsense anymore, we need politicians who can and will tell us the truth. Oh how refreshing that would be.

ANYONE BUT CLINTON '08

memyself   January 8th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

What a bunch of lies are being posted here about Obama.

His mother died in 1995 of Ovarian cancer. It would be kind of hard to have her by his side campaigning or living with his family. Claiming some kind of high ground for Clinton because her mother lives with her and Obama's doesn't is a hateful twisting of the truth considering that the man's mother is dead.

His grandparents are quite elderly with health issues and have said they don't want to be in the public eye. Obama is demonstrating the best possible family values by honoring their wishes.

There was an erroneous report a while back about the school Obama attended at age 6. The AP then sent reports to actually check out the school and here's what they reported: "interviews by The Associated Press at the elementary school in Jakarta found that it's a public and secular institution that has been open to students of all faiths since before the White House hopeful attended in the late 1960s." After attending this SECULAR school for 2 years, he went to a Catholic school until the age of 10, when he moved back to the US and lived with his grandparents.

Obama has never been a Muslim and belongs to a congregation of the United Church of Christ.

Paul - Columbus Ohio   January 8th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

I think Bill and Hillary just need to quit politics and fall back in love with each other. A few back rubs, some chocolate and some red wine.

She would cry less, he would complain less, and our country would be the better for it.

Come on Bill, Hillary, think about it.

DC   January 8th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

Bill Clinton, you are not helping Hillary's campagain, when the former President of the United States said "I did'nt have sex with THAT women" its a disgrace to you and Hillary. GO OBAMA

carolh11   January 8th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

Watching the afternoon fêtes on MSNBC during NH primary today. It's lookin like the Clinton's are bringing out ALL the party dogs on the networks to help bring down Obama! Albright, Beigh, etc.. Who's next . Carville, Begala? Desperate times call for desperate measures, and from the looks of it, it's beginning to look like a well attended memorial service.

Kan   January 8th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

Mr. Clinton, don't get too low for your high standards. Let go. Don't get absurd for your wife. Everybody knows Hillary is no Bill. Just because she is a Clinton does not mean she needs to be automatically elected over others.

Since Hillary herself cannot appear too negative, her husband has decided to take on that role. Very sad Bill Clinton has to get down and dirty. Let go Mr.President, let go.

CE, Wisconsin, USA   January 8th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

I kinda like fairy tales....Besides her position on Iraq has been a nightmare and we all know you were opposed to this war from the start.

Sincerely,

A two time Bill Clinton supporter for Obama

William J.   January 8th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

The Clintons are way off base here. They are uncharacteristically out of touch with the prevailing sentiments of the American people. Perhaps ten years ago Bill would have had a more significant audience willing to accept his comments, but it's becoming more and more clear that the Clinton's time in American politics has come and gone. America has moved on, and I think the American people (and certainly Democratic voters) will regard Bill's trash talking Obama for what it is: an act of desperation. Hillary's message is not getting traction, and voters are demanding a lot more sincerity than can be generated by focus groups or advertising consultants.

It comes down to whether a candidate is a political horse-trader or leader: The Clintons are horse-traders; Obama is a leader. A leader will beat a horse trader every time.

BrY   January 8th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

Almost everyone that has commented on this thread is proving Clinton correct – The media tells you who is the good one and who is the not-so-good one… and you all parrot it. Start thinking for yourself.

andy   January 8th, 2008 3:57 pm ET

I do care who wins and i hope that the the guy who wants to blow us up and destroy us does not see the USA again as a candy ass country, my god people get some strength!!! Im a democrat I don't like war but see the writing on the wall ! so be careful for what you wish for! I wish we could be an america with all there types in are white house democrat , republican and independent! ! But I see that you are for people who want for them self and not the country to bad and so sad ! maybe bloomberg should run!!! if you had stopped and listened to the forum on cspan maybe your argument would be different but todays person buy on impulse !! etc. cars , houses rings, music, presidents !!!

Neil   January 8th, 2008 3:57 pm ET

The biggest fairy 'tail' in recent American politics was a disgraceful philanderer from a state with ASS embedded in its name staying (among other things) in the White House for a ridiculous 8 years, taking credit for whatever good happened during his tenure (Hell, he even made some key corrections on my Ph.D. dissertation) and his (in)significant other, who has a law degree, is a feminist, but did not have the conviction and strength of character to say "The hell with you Bill" because she saw his coat-tails to be a sure ride into the upper strata of American politics.

What a joke!

Gary   January 8th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

Crying on T.V.,and now you have your husband lying again.. please enough is enough.. my GOD!...

William Rodgers   January 8th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

The Republicans are masterminds at winning elections. They tell their constiuents what they need to do to get a Republican nominated and it is this. You change your status from Republican to Independent allowing you to vote for any party, then go out and vote in the primary for the Democrat that you think wouldn't win in the General Election, making it a shoe-in for the Republican candidate. Illegal, no. Underhanded and unethical, yes.

joe   January 8th, 2008 3:55 pm ET

When Clinton came to NYC when Democratic-elect Dave Dinkins was in trouble in the polls in his mayoral re-election v. Giuliani, he had this spin– 'I can't help but believe that where a Republican leads a Democrat in the polls in a city that is 5 to 1 Democrats to Republicans, that there is some racial prejudice behind this'. He ignored the fact that Dinkins was elected to begin with in this 5 to 1 city and that Dinkins' problems in the polls were his 4 years of incompetance. So here Clinton is, accusing Barack of underhanded campaign tactics. Of all people, the Clintons accusing others of sleaze. And that the media is too soft on Barack. Please Here in NYC, the NY Times has a continual lovefest with Hillary. The editorial page downplayed Barack's win in Iowa with the theme "it's begun'– in other words, we mustn't conclude anything from Iowa, it's only a starting point– Hillary will still win.

When the elections are over, if there is nothing left for the Clintons to aspire to in politics, I suggest Hollywood. they've got great acting talent and great connections with the moguls there who contribute generously to Hillary. I'd say they have academy award potential, esp. Hillary. An absolutely brilliant, convincing and compelling actress.

Sherry   January 8th, 2008 3:55 pm ET

Don't be fooled by anyone, folks. Make your own decision. Do your own research on individual candidates!

DON"T BE CHEATED BY SOME SWEET WORDS! OBAMA sounds good but is he or will he be? NO ONE can say! EVERYONE is saying maybe we need someone different. What if he is worse? What if he brings disasters to America? We are facing so many challenges right now. There are so many uncertainties in America right now. Our country is almost a mess now! We can't risk of any more damage!

Clinton may not be the best Choice. But we know they won't bring disasters to America!!!

KENNETH GOFFE   January 8th, 2008 3:55 pm ET

Bill Clinton sound like he has lost his mind Obama stance has been the same all along .Iowa was a rude awakening for Hillary of whats to come America is ready for change & healing.Obama has the tools to rerpair it.

scott   January 8th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

I love Bill Clinton and his wife. Would have loved seeing them in the Whithouse again. BUT I see where this is going with Obama and I am excited and I love it. At 46 years old I haven't felt this hopeful since 1992 when Clinton was first elected.

Karen, MN   January 8th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

On another note, if the choice is between Obama and John McCain in general election. I will vote for McCain.

I don't like risking the country in the hands of an inexperienced rookie. Although I've been a die-hard Democrat for ever.

J   January 8th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

i'm so disgusted i wanna puke. obama is the end of the democratic party...turn out the lights the party's over!

Sandi Gilbert   January 8th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

I've been a politically involved citizen all my my life and I don't recall, in the past 40 years, seeing ALL candidates, regardless of party, look as tired and in need of a few days of sleep. I've listened to replays, on the news, of remarks made by , again ALL candidates that were unnecassary, rude and/or curt.

The only issues we should be talking about are those of our nation and its citizens and the numerous problems we all face. Our world is very small and it is past the time for all of us to face the fact that we need each other and if we-the-people don't start correcting the error of our ways and clean up our "needs" and take care of our enviornment, economy, education of all, food for all. "Our" problems will only get worse.

Dianne Greer   January 8th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

Bill,
Go sit down and calm down! Why are you and Hillary so angry?

Mag. art. John Chacko Pallikunnel M.A. Fine Painting Mural Design   January 8th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

The American White house is a great house for a right President and not a place for Bill boy to play arround. The women need respect too. So I do hope the American people will choose a better candidate other than Mrs. Clinton because she has proved that she could not manage her betterhalf and how she will be able to manage others in American House of senat and Parlament? I do believe in the cause of Abraham Lincon and John F kennedy they all stood for better cause and done great deeds for Americans and it's in American history too. Even Bush families have kept moral values well. we all know Benazir Bhutto is a martyr of democracy and loved by millions of gods loving people. Indira Gandhi had also done great things for her people many people of the Earth feel not well with the Clintons because of not acting as the President at his office. I know the Americans have greater values and stand for values . I feel like many others in the world Bill has sacrified the American values for mere pleasure. The Americans need a better president .

nancy   January 8th, 2008 3:53 pm ET

The very idea that President Clinton, a democrat would attack a democratic candidate is disgusting. Whether his wife is running or not, it's completely unconscionable. Yuck!

L. Anderson   January 8th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Tell Bill to quit blowing smoke. I can't believe his past history makes him a positive for his wife, they question Giuliani about his past indiscretions, which are nothing compared to Bills outright lies, and Hillary stands by her lying husband. She is ultimately doomed. What a manipulative try to gain support with a planned teary so called emotional play to show she's human, she's human I'll give her that, but compassionate-no way! It's all self-serving and she has that "never ending axe to grind".I turn the channel whenever I see them.

Greg Kochenash   January 8th, 2008 3:51 pm ET

Can someone explain why Obama will not hold his hand over his heart when reciting the pledge of alliegance?

PG   January 8th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

Well it's about time. Obama is not being questioned at all. Everyone wants change however we need to be realistic, what change has Obama accomplished? What has he done for the American people? What has he done in the Senate or for Illinois? I agree he is a motivational speaker and has some ok ideas........but then again so does Kucinich! Lol. How do we know he can actually bring about change when he has no track record? I look at it this way, when you’re up for a job you come prepared with a resume that shows your qualifications and what you have accomplished.
The next president will inherit many things including a War and a Deficit.
Can our country afford to hire someone without a proven resume? If you had a Business that was poorly managed and needed change, who would you hire? Does experiance count? Until Obama or Edwards can prove otherwise, Hillary is the only qualified candidate.

Deb O'Connell   January 8th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

America needs a CHANGE alright ....Hillary Clinton in the white house.
GO HILLARY.

Judy   January 8th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

What's the matter with Americans??? Can't they SEE the trouble we are in both foreign and domestic affairs... We need somebody in the office of the President who knows what is going on... We need somebody that has seen the shinanigans of Iran Iraq Afghanistan etc... We need somebody who knows the score... We must have Hillary Clinton as president... She has seen first hand how the game is played... All other candidates have experience with affairs of their home state... Mr. Obama is a new player to this game. He lacks the experience needed to handle such a difficult job. Don't fool yourselves into thinking he can make change... Congress won't let him do much... Please, please please.... VOTE FOR HILLARY!!!!

Donna, Saratoga Springs, NY   January 8th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

Atta boy Bill.
Say it and say it loud.

Peter   January 8th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

Hello America.
Bill is right as allways.But you don't get it.
Obama is cold,arrogant and powerhungry. That,s why he will win!
On the losing side will be,Democracy,America and the World.

Erik in NC   January 8th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

If anyone is confused on where Obama stands on issues and what his plans are for CHANGE, you can visit his website. It's not like he hasn't spelled it out right there for everyone to see. Yes, he emphasizes change in his speeches because he wants to inspire people. With a slowing economy and mindless war, America could use some inspiration. But don't go saying he doesn't have substance and a plan for change...he has a BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE on the issues tab of his website for cryin' out loud! READ before you JUDGE!

rich   January 8th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

May I offer some entertainment after Hillary concedes the race.

From all Fire Stations around the country, I propose the Wizrd of Oz song--–

Ding Dong the Witch is Dead, the witch is dead, the witch is dead, ..........................

We should all have a sing along.

And then immediately into " Happy Days Are Here Again."

Are we in agreement?

Carrie   January 8th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Bill Clinton sounds like a bitter old man. Crawl under a rock and retire! I can't wait until the day comes that there isn't a Bush or Clinton in the White House.

bearable   January 8th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Hey, give Bill a break! He did alot of good things for all of us.

MEB   January 8th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

All the Hillary supporters wants to give Hillary credit for when Bill was the President as if she helped run the Oval office. What in the world makes you think that since her husband was the President during a time when the economy was good, that she somehow will be able to get us back there. Thats like saying that since I'm a good engineer that somehow my wife (who has never been an engineer) will make a good engineer just by being my wife. Utter nonsense. Hillary has just as much experience as President as the other candidates......NONE.

It is all about hope. Thats how people vote. The vote for the candidate that they HOPE (because no one knows for sure) will bring them and the country what they want.

Keep in mind people that Clinton rode the .com boom of the 90s. That is what carried the ecomony. The internet (not the one that Al Gore invented, but the real one) is what stimulated the economic growth. The economy started a downward trend in 1998 (still under Bill). Although he gets credit for the good times of the 90's he had little to do with the investment boom that was going on then. So since we are in different times, she does not have that luxury and raising taxes (which is her plan) has never stimulated growth.

Eric Finkbiner   January 8th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

We need a change but not another Clinton. Do you really think she stayed will Bill for any other reason than her own political agenda. I think Bill need to remember what a scum bag he is. We need a drastic change in the country and his name is OBAMA.

Hillary is getting more scutinized because of who she is and who her husband is.

They are both Washington insiders to the nth degree and only want the prestige and power that comes with politcal office.

***Yawn***   January 8th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Billary needs to pack it up and go on home to Arkansas; wait for Chels to get married and give them some grandbabies and then concentrate on being the best Granny and Boompah that they can be.

Bob Lipsett Sr. North Attleboro, MA. 02760   January 8th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Face it "AMERICA" $70 million dollars to try to nail Bill Clinton while you say that $6.2 Billion dollars to kill or mame our All Volunteer Army and Citizen Soldiers is worth it. West Clark said the UN invited the USA to interviene in Bosina . About Sandy Berger, he migh have taken a document or two that didn't relate to National; Security, only to the YTK if you can remember that occassion.

America must remember that not by dirty tricks, as did this current leader against John McCain, did America know who they were voting for. It amazes me that these Mitch McConnoll, Dan Burton, Newt Gingrich and Henry Hyde relentastly dogg his presidencey, much to the point that it took a government shutdown to avoid any more of the GOP agenda being shoved down our throat.

A former friend at the start of this invasion in Iraq said to me "Thank God that Al Gore wasn't president. He said it took guts to bring the battlke into Iraq. How did it take guts to throw our "All Volunteer Military and send Reserves and National guardsmen for 3 & 4 deployments and it took guts for that more to kill 3,909 of our miitary and why did Rep R-OH John Boehner say at the time, 3,700 of our military sacrificed their lives was a "SMALL PRICE" to pay for our position in the Middle East. Even now as we defend Israel Olmert has been quoted as saying a two nation state in the Middle East would be the end of the Israel domonition.

Hillery is not the best choice, sorry about that Bill, I respect you for having the courage to walk down the streets with Chelsa in hand talking and mingling with the Vietnam population and the "Heros" welcome you get all over this world.
Sex is prevalant all around this globe and to think that the USA was tarnished by SEX well how about the lies that took over 220,000 Iraqi lives and how about the lie that Cheney at the end of Desert Storm while still sec. of def. told the Shi'ite minority that if they were to overthrow Saddam they could expect help from the USA. Saddam got wind of this coup and immeditaly dispached troops to slaughter 10s of thousands of Shi'ites that later in '04 we saw the horrible sites of people being dug out of the earth, men women and children slaughtered just for a broken Cheney promise.

Then the stories of Judy Miller dictated by Ahmad Chalibi the pet of the Pentagon that there were stockpiles of WMDs in Iraq. Being greeted as liberators? didn't these wize kids read about "Cinco de Mayo in 1862" against a well armed Nepolean army??

Clinton did not give nuclear secrets to China. GWB did that when he gave a non signature of the nuclear non policication treaty with out reservation to INDIA.
Say what you will about Clinton, in this world they would choose Al Gore and Clinton to lead this country so it would be the greatest with someone who has fought the big government and won many times the ticket that I as a Independent would support is Edwars/ Dodd in 08. Dreamer, I guess but they could egnite the American spirit that is so lacking in our America, as Chris Dodd said "Where is the spirit that all americans sharded shoulder to shoulder during WWII fighting three well armed nation and came out victorious.

Now these fools are giviing away our country by the basketful. Watch the prices of the grocery stores as the Oil Companies consort with Archer Daniel Middland and Cargil with the planting of corn being the largest since the end of 1944. Hold on to your wallets, lets have some real discussion about the fixes of our problems and not only say "CHANGE"

Frank Rivas, Rockville, MD   January 8th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

what a pathetic figure this man has become. this man is making a disgrace of himself. all the good feelings that one could have for him are going down the drain because of his delirious, crazy arrogance, thinking that the Clintons and only the Clintons know what is better for the democratic party. he is being worse than the narrow-minded republicans. wake up, mr. Billy; sorry she can not turn into queen Hillary.

sandra, corona, ca   January 8th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Last time I checked Bill C. was/is a disbarred atty.......b/c he's a liar and a disgrace to the office he held. Now he's using lofty rhetoric to smear Obama, who, to my knowledge, has never been disbarred for lying. Bill, how can anyone take you seriously? You held the highest office in the land and arguably the most powerful leadership position in the world and you didn't think enough of it to show any self-control or respect for your wife or your country. Move along. No one cares what you think.

Put the fork where it belongs b/c you two are done.

nazirmo   January 8th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

American voters have been blindsided. All they care is hope and inspiration.
Running the affairs of a major super power needs someone who can deliver on
issues, not hope and inspiration.
Hillary Clinton has been talking about issues. There is talk of recession.
Hillary is the best bet to do something constructive. Americans wake up and
see the best potential . I still believe that Hillary Clinton can do something about
the economy the way Bill Clinton did. Give her your support.

Spencer   January 8th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

What I find fascinating is how desperate and vicious Bill Clinton is as a result of the slightest possibility that he and his wife may not be in the political spotlight anymore. Is is scary to watch.

Ed, NH   January 8th, 2008 3:44 pm ET

I will vote for Hillary today. I am old enough not to be confused by all this media franzy about Obama. He may be the next best thing in politics, but he is NOT ready to lead!

Anthony   January 8th, 2008 3:44 pm ET

So this is what it looks like when an old political machine dies out, huh? Ugly.

I don't care if Obama or Edwards wins. Anybody but Hillary. The fact is, Bill Clinton was a master politician. Hillary Clinton is no Bill Clinton. Heck, Bill Clinton is no Bill Clinton these days! Your 2nd string QB doesn't get an automatic bid to the Pro Bowl, just because the 1st string QB retired.

Goodbye Hillary. Hello Hope!

Texas   January 8th, 2008 3:44 pm ET

Bill, You were an empeached President that would't step down. Did you forget all the ugly stuff you took into OUR White House. You coming out for Hilliary today just reminds me that you will be back in there if she wins...You must think that she isn't qualified to be President either, or you would let her speak for herself .

Let the empeached man go his way and takes his wife with him..we need to build a new America that can be respected by the rest of the world and this will take new people.

holly   January 8th, 2008 3:43 pm ET

oh please please go away Bill and Hill. We've had enough.

David   January 8th, 2008 3:43 pm ET

Good lord people, the NH isn't even over and all this "nail in the coffin" is well wishing; until Super Tuesday, anything can happen. As for whatever Bill did in his day – I voted for him twice – he isn't totally off base with his comments. The media HAS been playing softball with Obama and he has NOT presented anything viable beyond saying "I'm not Clinton". Yes, I read his health plan – P.U. Can you really image this guy at a Middle East Peace Summit, I mean really? Character is a part of the presidential equation but a candidate must have experience. Heck, the Hand Puppet – who I did NOT vote for twice – even had some qualifications. Whatever else anyone thinks, there is one irrefutable fact – Clinton is more qualified. As a Repub who is supporting McCain this go round, I'll tell you this – if Clinton gets the nom at the convenstion, I'll be up all night come election night anxious for the outcome regardless of the Repub she's up against. If Obama gets it, I'll turn in early on election night with a smile on my face.

C-dogg   January 8th, 2008 3:43 pm ET

I for one remember on several occassions and networks hearing "Hillary is going to get the nomination there is no doubt about that" or something along those terms. I also don't remember her getting grilled when she was the front runner. Before Obama one the media was obsessed with Clinton.

RBaker   January 8th, 2008 3:43 pm ET

To: Carroll Johnson: Bill Clinton isn't about 'change' – he and Hillary are in the same club as Bush – The Bush's and Clintons are friends:

Look up the "Bilderbergs" or "Bohemiam Grove", or do some research on the "Council on Foreign Relations". – They're all in the same 'clubs'....

Kay   January 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Bill needs to stay out of this. His wife ought to be able to run her own campaign garbage. Funny how none of these details came out BEFORE Iowa and BEFORE the surge in interest in NH. Shame on you both.

Robert J.   January 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Mr. President just think about how you came into power in 1992, and 1996. You were supported by the black community which Senator Obama comes from. Now that he brings a vision of inclusion of all Americans of all backgrounds you wish to do all in your power to destroy it. You have just show us your true color. Just think about your wife. What is she doing? She is running on experience fairytale just as Senator Obama. All she have is ambition to be the first female president. All you politicians are nothing, but faker. 28 years of Bushes and Clintons running this country is enough. I love you and your wife before but, now I don't because of target media coverage of Obama. That is dirty politics, dirty game, and that is how a dictator acts. Give me a break, this whole thing is the biggest fairytale of you and your wife I have ever seen. Both of you want to be President?

Husband and Wife want to be President? Is it Fairytale?

Mike, Fort Washington, MD   January 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Someone needs to ask Bill what's his definition of the word "fairy"!!! Don't believe a word that is coming out of his mouth. He and Billary have been lying to the American people for years and THAT WILL NEVER CHANGE!!!

Jerry Dorey   January 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

It's not right to say Hillary has only 35 years of experience – actually, it's quite a few more than that.

Year 1, I hear she was acting assistant milk monitor in kindergarten. There hasn't been a lot in years 2 thru eleventy-five, apart from Chairmanship of the Procrastination Committee; but I'm sure that by now, she's rested and ready.

M. Smith   January 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't almost everyone in the country backing Bush when the decision to go to war with Iraq was made? I'm having a hard time understanding Bill's point when I know that this was indeed the case. Everyone was looking at the same intelligence information and Democrats are just as much responsible for us being in this mess as Republicans are. So what the heck is Bill talking about? Congress, with the Democrats help, backed Bush when he led us to war.

I'll say it just like Bill Clinton said, "Just because of the sanitizing coverage that's in the media doesn't mean the facts aren't out there." Bill Clinton is a master at using creative spin, I fear that Hillary has learned too much from him. Lets move away from Bush,Clinton,Bush,Clinton and elect a real agent for change. Lets not elect someone with so much baggage. Lets elect someone who will be ready to lead us on day one without having to first deal with paybacks for special interests groups and lobyists.

Forget all the new candy thats being dangled in front of us and lets fix programs we already rely on like medicare and social security. We have to get our financial house in order before we elect someone like Hillary. Simply put, we can't afford her at this time. Do we even care about our childrens economic future? How easy will it be for them to pay for things like food, clothing, shelter? Hillary will promise wonderful things, but there is always a price and its called higher taxes.

Sandra   January 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Obama is too inexperienced and I think he is very arrogant. He thinks he is charismatic and I suppose a lot of people think so, too. I don't. He makes claims that he has not and most likely cannot back up. He recently compared himself to John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. - that made me laugh out loud! He has won Iowa and maybe he'll win New Hampshire, but I don't think that means anything. In prior elections it did, but times have changed. Obama is NOT a shoe-in - he might lose whether he runs as a democrat or an independent. Has anyone heard what "changes" he plans to make?" I haven't. The conventions are a long way off and a lot can happen.

Amy   January 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Here is all your Obama research. Not hidden and open to all at: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf

BrY   January 8th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

Almost everyone that has commented on this thread is proving Clinton correct – The media tells you who is the good one and who is the not-so-good one... and you all parrot it. Start thinking for yourself.

JRS   January 8th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

Barama is a great speaker, poised and confident. His young age is attractive to many voters as well. Jimmy Carter also embodied change. He's a great man but he wasn't quite able to show a lot of follow-through as president. I will get behind Barama if he wins the Democratic primaries, but I want change with experience. Go Hillary.

Arlene Hoffman   January 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Dear Bill,

Thanks for speaking out. I'm behind you 100%.

Chumley Newhouse   January 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Who is the 'our' in that last statement? I have a difficult time believing that you are meaning everyone in the United States. For some I do believe that Obama is the correct choice. For others not. Let's every one vote our hearts and souls. The United States immediate future wanes in the balance. Let us vote with a clear un-biased concience for the person that will lead our homeland for better and for worse into the future world. And please, let us give those oil barons their sand and dirty land back and vote for a president that has a priority to mandate alternative fuel by a future date that they may not even need to shoulder so that this can happen.

LaYoya   January 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

What Bill said is correct! The Republican will have a field day picking apart Obama, so I think if there are any skeletons in the closet, it is alot better for Obama to come clean now.

Also, everyone wants CHANGES! Does anyone really know what are the changes that the candidates are proposing?

The most important thing, is that the next president has to be strong enough to pull America out of the current situations:

a. Iraqi war. How are we going to end this war without much more "children & women" getting killed?
b. Recession (I know no one wants to talk about that). How is the president going to pull America out of the recession?
c. Deficit (the amount of money we Americans owe the Chinese ... hey Americans ... we have to pay all these back!!!). Where are going to get the money to pay the Chinese? (we are the credit card Nation)
d. Social Program (Healthcare for the children & elderly, education, etc).
e. Foreign View of US (We are viewed very positively outside US...have to change the image). What are we going to do to help poor nations, e.g. Sudan, Tibet.

So the next president has to strong and experience to deal with all these major issues; not just someone out there calling for change. Change is great but there has to be a great leader that drives these changes!!!

charles   January 8th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

It is doubtful that all the disparaging remarks "will" lead to a win for Hilary.

Roger   January 8th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

No, artseafartsea, it isn't because she's a woman. It's because she's a con artist.

Dwight   January 8th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

Let's send them all to the showers and leave the post open for 4 years. We might find that we do not need any of them!

theangryblackman   January 8th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

Listen to the Pot Calling the Kettle....
Bill didn't complain in the early 90's when he was the darling of the media and the press gave him a pass. Never asking him the questions it should have. Now he has the nerve to complain! He sounds like a whining 3 year old.

Donna Kassman   January 8th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is a very intelligent, selfless, hard working, patriotic American, always working for the good of all, was a wonderful First Lady, has been a very successful Senator for New York State, and who could certainly run our Country starting on day one. She will clean up our Country image here and abroad and will build the United States into the country it was before the bush-destructive-years.

You hateful people, with your double standards, who live on the dirty edge of life, need to stop trying to shipwreck the United States of America, and you need therapy. Your stupid and you should be ashamed. Our Country deserves a President Hillary Clinton and I'm thankful she cares that much.

You lame, rotten, stupid people, America doesn't need your low life attitude. Slamming Hillary and Bill Clinton doesn't make you special. You are an insult to the United States of America. Thank God there are people like the Clinton's who want the United States to be all it can be.

(May I add "he who casts the first stone"–remember you could very well be the target of hatred–and how would you like it.) You don't even personally know them and yet you judge them. Give me a break.

Thinkaboutit   January 8th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

It is silly to read comments about how Republicans are all for Obama and their easy victory over him when, actually, Obama has 'publicans running for shelters to escape the coming landslide. Good grief, see Obama for what he is -a bright light for a change.

lw   January 8th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

These days I am just learning and knowing better about the Clinton's. Wondering how can Hilary run the white house and be a President of this great country?

charles   January 8th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

Well, Mr. Clinton can call Mr. Obama's campaign a fairy tale and he can accuse him of underhanded politics,but, at the end of the day, It is doubtful that all the disparaging remarks will not translate into a win for his wife.It simply goes to show how desperate the Clinton's are and to what extent they will go to preserve the status quo.They are now majoring in mudslinging. The republicans could probably learn a few tricks from them.

Karen, MN   January 8th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Bill Clinton is right.

Sad thing is that most people don't really research on candidates. They believe whatever they hear from the media, and media worships Obama like GOD.

Do the homework, research on Obama's record.

Obama won't last through the first round in general election.

nazirmo   January 8th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

American love something that rhymes. 9/11 came Osama and no one yet knows where he is – Bush second term will end 2008 and Osama will be still in hiding somewhere. They haven't even got hold of the mumber 2
And then start 2009 – Americans will have put Obama in the White House.
So after Osama , Obama – can anyone name the next ?

Jesus Jones   January 8th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Bill Clinton needs to get a life. Period.

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL   January 8th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

if the Hillary-haters get their wish, all I have to say is "be careful what you wish for" you all are trying to put down (2) very intelligent, giving individuals. President Clinton's work after his days in office is nothing but remarkable, he has done so much good for so many people around the world. you all choose to forget that and that is the sad part, Sen. Obama is constantly attacking Sen. Clinton on how truthful she is and how transparent she ought to be and what a liability she is? that is your idea of a positive campaign? when the dust settles and we all choose a president we may remember again that the Clinton's are contributing to the betterment of this society I just hope is not too late when people realize this.

bob   January 8th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

I'm just not sure how someone being different and saying they will change things means they are qualified for President. Obama basically says he is going to change things because he is not Hillary. Yet he doesn't really say much else and some how people have fallen for this emotional appeal. I'm not saying he isn't an intelligent person who couldn't some day be a great leader, but at this point in time I just don't see how he is ready. At least he could explain how he will be a strong leader, without simply saying over and over again he will change things. That just doesn't tell me much.

People are upset because Bill says the media should be more critical of him. I say better now than in the Fall with the Republicans doing it. Let's face it, he will be attacked severely by the Republicans.

Me   January 8th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Why in the world would I want to put the Clintons back in Wash., DC? Bill Clinton is a cheater. To me a cheater is a thief of the truth. Who can trust a cheater? Hillary has a game plan and it is called: "Getting Even"! I am not interested in the family shenegans of a woman who declares that the man she is "standing by" NEVER once cheated on her!

Nope, not once! But MANY times! This couple needs to find a quiet way to just go away! I am NOT interested in being a victim of the "Clintons" ever again!

Maybe, that is why so many people are willing to back Huckabee and Obama? They are tired of the same sleazy game players with agendas of "getting mine"!

This country is in horrendous scarey times. We are facing a lot more people virtually living on the streets because of the disasters that Bush put in place.

God Help Us, if the Clintons rise again! Time for fresh faces with good hearts. What happened in ARK with White Water and the aide that committed suicide because of the Clintons???

Nope! I don't want to see them again!!!!!

Everett Bell   January 8th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

It's obvious now the Clinton's are desperate and using under handing comments towards Obama the best Canidate Bill need's to examine his own moral record and his mis-handling of Osama when he was in the White House, he could have prevented 911 if he wasn't soft on terrorism after today Hillary should pack it in, that fake crying proves she's to weak to be the cheif and commander of this nation.
OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT.

Ramona Ford   January 8th, 2008 3:35 pm ET

You go Bill;

I think both you and Hillary should relax and continue to point out her record; spend more on commercials to get the truth out on Obamas' record.

You are both great and just what this country needs to pull out of the bottomless pit created by Geo. Bush Jr. and the republican party.

I pray for Hillary to stay strong, but be her sweet and pleasant self.

Clinton in 08!!!! YEAH!!!

Sandra   January 8th, 2008 3:35 pm ET

New term: Clintonboating

Obama will now be subjected to the vicious, vindictive and downright malicious Clintons. As an African-American woman, I will not vote for Hillary Clinton under any circumstances. I will vote for any Republican running before I would cast a vote for Clinton. I have never voted for a Republican in my life. I am 60 years old and have voted in every election.

Max, NYC NY   January 8th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I'm not an Obama fan, but would those of you who feel compelled to use his middle name at every opportunity ("Barack Hussein", "Hussein Obama", "Obama Hussein" etc. ad nauseum) mind telling us all what exactly you think you're adding to the conversation by doing so?

Other than demonstrating your xenophobic ignorance, that is.

Tere   January 8th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I agree with Mr. Clinton, the press has been extremely kind to Mr. Obama. I would like to see harder questioning of his accomplishments and plans. I know that Mr. Obama is promoting "change" but I'm not convinced he can deliver, I get un uneasy feeling thinking of his inexperience and facing the world as it is with him in the Whitehouse.

I am a Nevada non-partisan citizen and would love to see harder questioning of Mr. Obama by the press, including CNN.

artseafartsea   January 8th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

It seems everyone loves Obama. I haven't seen the scrutiny of him that is happening with Hillary. Hmm, wonder why that is? Could be that she is a woman? And most of the media pundits are men? Interesting.

John, Oakland, CA   January 8th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

Anyone who says Obama supporters are jumping on a bandwagon has head their head in the sand - or worse - for the last year. HRC has been the media favorite for the ENTIRE election year.

Americans are getting to know Obama better, and they like what they see. The truth is that the Clintons are not capable of seeing that, and certainly not capable of conceeding it, because they are in this to win, NOT for the best interests of the American people.

It's time to move on folks. I know it's painful, but it's time.

The "network" Obama will bring to the White House is US. You, me, and everyone else. It's OUR turn to govern this country. That's how it was always intended to be. Of the people, for the people, and by the people.

Here we come. GET OUT OF THE WAY BILL.

Chelsea Garen, Vista, California   January 8th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

I agreed with Bill Clinton's view, Media is too much covering for Obama's "band wagon", it is not right, and not ture !

Obama has only one year senator experience, he wants to be command-in-chief ! COME ON, AND GIVE ON, and GIVE ME A BREAK !

Hillary is the best, qualified person, to be command-in-chief !

RBaker   January 8th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

MARGIE – You want an 'intelligent' reason NOT to vote for Hillary?

Study the "Bilderbergs" or look at the "Bohemiam Grove", or do some research on the "Council on Foreign Relations".

(But most people are not 'intelligent' enough to do it....)

change again   January 8th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

OK...so Hillary wanted to run this thing her way. Bill stepped back, stayed out of it....and let her run with it.........until now..... Her decisions, her strategies and choices for staff.....HUGE MISTAKE.... This was supposed to be a coronation, a shoo-in.

Now today we are hearing that there is a "major shake-up" in her campaign. Apparently with Bill's recent involvement he now will bring in James Carville and Paul Belgata to save the day......THESE ARE BILL'S GUYS!!! Everyone knows that, or should if you are a true Clinton supporter. Most importantly, Hillary wanted no part of 'em before..... Out with Hillary's choices.. in with Bill's.

BIG BIG BIG warning sign.

Her choices, her decisions, her strategies even as early as her first caucus and first primary were wrong. She was making all the wrong moves. She was moving towards losing it all for the Clinton machine. The last eight years of preparation and fund raising were not done by Hillary alone. Now that she had to get out there and do things all by herself..... disaster.

BIG WARNING SIGN.........

How in the world could you think she could run the country?! The answer....She couldn't and she wouldn't be.

BUSH.....CLINTON....BUSH....CLINTON..... Simply more of the same...this is NO CHANGE. Did you hear that? NO CHANGE...

Let's take back our country!!!!!! I am not telling you WHO to vote FOR...just give each and every one of the others on all sides time and consideration...without party affiliation, if you can.

Hummmm.... I wonder how many AMERICANS (first) we have out there......

Jen, Cedar Falls, IA   January 8th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

Bill Clinton is sounding a lot more like Chavez and Musharref lately.

Telling us citizens what we should do.

You've been in the White House for 8 years, it's time for someone new.

You're looking like a dictator and you have some people eating right out of your hand! That's scary!

ab   January 8th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

What the hell is Bill doing? Who's campaign is this anyway? Let your wife fight her own battles (which she is losing, by the way). Tired of the Clinton's and God forbid if Hilary is to win! Bill should be ashamed of himself. I'm actually embarassed for the Clinton's. What a poor display!

reader-of-many-sources   January 8th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

We don't need a Clinton Dynasty. Relax, Bill. You are becoming desperate. Hilary couldn't unite Legos. I'm more interested in seeing Barack get the nomination. It's better to take a chance on greatness. I also believe he has a stronger chance of beating a republican candidate in the main election. He can swing more independent votes. Keep up the good work (outside of your wife's campaign). By the way, did you even compare your wife's speech to Barack's after he won Iowa?

Matthew Passaro   January 8th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

I am deeply disappointed in President Clinton. I wish that he would realize that what Barack Obama is doing, is exactley what he did in 1992. He is reengerizing the masses that have felt out of place since January 19, 2001. I understand him coming to the defense of his wife, and can truly appreciate it, but their time is over. It is time for a new generation to take the lead. For god sake Mr. President, let us have this one.

Bukky, Balt MD   January 8th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

OK people stop the hate. I NOT A HILLARY supporter. I support Obama but if he should happen to not WIN the nomination I will vote for ANY ANY ANY ABSOLUTELY ANY other democrat. Hillary is not my choice, neither is Edwards, but I will vote for any democrat just to keep the presidency from a republican. ANY democrat running would be better than ANY republican running.

So stop the hate people. Vote for your first choice in the primaries and if they dont win the nomination put on your big girl panties or big boy boxer briefs and vote for the nominated democrat. The ultimante goal is not get Bush and his republican cronies out.

Z, St. Louis   January 8th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

Hillary is as phoney as the polyester in her pantsuits..I too would like to hear about all of this "experience" she has..Doing what? Being a shady lawyer and
campaigning/fundraising for Bill is about all she really has done. Her Senate time so far has been making grandiose statements, and then kow towing to president
doofus.Where is all that "fight" for what people want? Instead she panders
to her party..Forgetting that she represents PEOPLE NOT PARTY...
And lets not forget she's been very cozy with the money people. She's
tied too much to the K Street Lobby people and the big doners. We have
that kind of bunch in power now! Where would the change come in Hillary?
Her message has been that of change my way and no other. We've had 4 years of current president dumbass doing the "take it or leave it" policy., we dont need another person that thinks they know it all and won't listen to advisors that arn't politically motivated. or even worse the people of this country as whole.

Her presence is that of a plywood cutout wrapped in a brown pansuit. She has
absolutely nothing charisma wise. Her message and tone of her speech is
that of arrogance and smugness. Again, we have that now. And it doesnt work.
There isn't really anything about her I like..And i pity Bill for having to come out
like a bruiser for her. He's really putting his reputation on the line for her,
and i think its going to backfire.He's trading in his general likeability for that
of a negative ad-man.Chasing pudgy women is going to be his downfall yet,
since he now has to do this crap for Hillary..

My vote is for ** NONE OF THE ABOVE! ** Time to dismantle the two major parties.. They are useless and corrupt..

Ryan, San Mateo   January 8th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

It is obvious to me that the 'Right' is trying to manipulate even this Comment board.

California voter   January 8th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Everyone needs to take a chill pill. Get some perspective on this. Remember CNN and other media stations spent hours/days/weeks talking about and rehashing stories on Anna Nicole Smith. Was she worth all that coverage? Are the results of Iowa and New Hampshire really that meaningful among the 50 states? Yes, they are first to vote in a primary or caucus. How many votes does that mean for each candidate? To make a sports analogy, would any team with their salt quit in the first five minutes of a football game because they are behind 6 to 7?

I agree with Bill Clinton, Barack Obama needs to be challenged and questioned by the media like they did in covering Anna Nicole Smith. He is running for President of the most important country in the world. We need to know who he really is and whether he is really ready to be President of the United States.

dave   January 8th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

OBAMA IS JUST AS BAD. IF HE GETS ELECTED, WHICH I SINCERLY DOUBT, WE ARE GOING TO BE IN SOME REAL TROUBLE!

Jeff from Jersey   January 8th, 2008 3:29 pm ET

Roger

Your non-vote is really a vote to not participate.The "system" admittedly sucks but non-voters have helped get more terrible people elected than voting for the wrong choice ever did.I do not agree at all with your assessment of Hillary Clinton nor that of Obama but I'm so confident in my assessment of the candidates that I'm willing to stake my vote on it.

Hillary is most certainly not a war monger.Lots of honest decent people were suckered into that vote by false and illegal means,none more than the people that voted for Bush!That is as baseless and vicious as any of the candidates has ever said .I thought that you say you despised that.

Like it or not we are part of a global economy now.Free-trade agreements actually keep more people working in their own countries instead of sneaking into this country illegally and taking those jobs without putting a dime back into our country.Those jobs were leaving anyway because "corporate america" would no longer pay americans a decent wage or benefits to do them and they were using child and slave labor overseas to do them long before there were any agreements,free-trade or otherwise.I know because I was an auto worker.I knew those jobs were gone when I first saw an ad that the newest GM cars were being imported from Korea.Those agreements were to try and protect children and slave labor overseas from being abused.

.Non-participation and apathy will never change anything for the better.That's been proven a hundred times over.That is when special interests truly thrive and the people suffer the most.I'd rather see you make the wrong decision than to make an even bigger mistake by not voting at all.As I am reading these posts I can plainly see just how "united" Obama has made things.....not!

Kate   January 8th, 2008 3:29 pm ET

Carroll Johnson ... what changes did Hillary make again?? .. and what EXPERIENCE does she have (apart from the NY senate seat) ... someone please respond!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO FAR THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY RESPONSES ... I GUESS THERE'S NOTHING TO REPORT??????

Beckie   January 8th, 2008 3:29 pm ET

OMG!

Bill Clinton is wagging his finger and looking in the camera again, telling America "his fairy tales". Need we remind you Mr. Clinton you were impeached, the White Water Scam, and the finger pointing in the camera about what went on in the Oval Office. How can you even be on the campaign trail holding your head up? Mr. Gore didn't need your help either. Remember?!

Yes we can forgive but not forget when the finger wags again....

Why wouldn't America want change? I don't know who our country needs but it isn't you!

Robert E. Eldridge, Jacksonville, Fl   January 8th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

Obama did not win Iowa and he likely will not win New Hampshire, either.
Sixty-two percent of Democratic voters voted for someone else.
Go figure.
Too early to raise the right-hand and swear...
I think so.
Hype not substance.

dave   January 8th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

HILLARY CLINTON HAS FINALLY SHOWN HER TRUE COLORS. THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOR A FEMALE, ESPECIALLY A CLINTON!! THEY SPENT 8 YEARS SELLING OFF OUR COUNTRY AND THEY ARE TRYING FOR MORE. DO AMERICANS REALLY HAVE SUCH A SHORT MEMORY???

Karen, NYC   January 8th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

He sounds bitter. Who is he angry with? The American People? Oh that's right, I guess he's upset because we didn't follow the Clinton's playbook script to allow the entire family to become President regardless how outdated their message is, how corrupt their 2 White House runs were and how disconnected they are with other Americans.

Maybe they should buy a small island and crown themselves King and Queen. That should feed their overblown egos enough to Shut Up and Sit Down!

Sharon   January 8th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Bravo! Bravo, Bill Clinton.
It's about time someone got ticked off by the media's unfair and unbalanced campaign coverage that has let slippery Obama slip by with his cliche speeches. That includes you, CNN. Obama's got a lot to hide in addition to his negative voting record, drug use and that arrogant attitude. The cowardly media has embarrassed itself by drooling over Obama. They don't ask Obama the tough questions just like they failed to ask Bush the tough ones before the iraq war. We all know where that got us. I'm a registered Independent who always votes Democratic. If Obama is the nominee, I'm voting NOBAMA and looking elsewhere for my candidate.

Tom Naples   January 8th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

As a spouse, Mr. Clinton is questioning more about his wife’s opponents than should be allowed. As a former President, I cannot recall in my memory ANY former President stumping for a candidate by criticizing the opponent and the media’s coverage of that opponent. What gives this man the right? Is it because of who he is? Well, in a court of law, witnesses with questionable morals and motives usually are knocked down. What the media should be doing, if it wanted to be critical of EACH candidate is to ask the HARD questions about the scandalous behavior and involvement of Senator Clinton while she was earning her vast experience through osmosis. Look, most of the country CANNOT stand you OR your wife. Time for a reality check. It's called democracy in action.

Jack   January 8th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Republicans throughout the land are quitely celebrating at the thought of Obama being nominated by naive democrats.

Chad, IN   January 8th, 2008 3:26 pm ET

The really sad thing is that Bill is correct. Obama seems like he's gotten a pass when it comes to a close look by the press. If you can look past his cocky attitude, smooth elocution and repetition of his "change" mantra and examine his experience and his voting record, you can clearly see the man isn't quite what he says he is.

Regrettably, since Hilary isn't doing as well as everyone thought, it's just going to see like sour grapes.

rich   January 8th, 2008 3:25 pm ET

Dear husband of Hillary,

You bettter pray to God your wife gets the nomination or whatever time you spend together with your wife will be sheer hell.

I don't know how I can say this, but I feel for you.

Happy New Year

Carroll Johnson   January 8th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

And dont forget that obama has a lobbyist in NH. I know cause thats where i live!! So special interest groups for obama scares me like privitization...hmmm sounds familiar dont it Bush.

Farah   January 8th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Obama showed he has the character, ability, the will, the knowledge to become one of the best President, the first best president in the first century.

I love Hillary, but Hillary could not, and could not accomplish nothing comparing to what Senator Obama could do.

Frank   January 8th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Who is the candidate? Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton? I am not interested in listening to Bill Clinton. This consistent and irritating tag team action is changing my prospective vote from hillary to obama.

Lu   January 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

I heard the press saying Obama was a drug dealer? ... No one know anything about this guy... I think he's all talk and no action..

Carroll Johnson   January 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

This whole "change" thing that obama has been riding on is crazy. Its very clear that Clinton was leading change probably back when obama was in diapers. Hillary was able to make change when the parties where at constant odds. Can u imagine what accomplishments she can achieve for this nation if she's elected and the house and senate are on demoncratic!! Change then would become reality and i believe Hillary can do it. Besides Bill has her back and i know i trust him...even if he did have an affair. So dont half the country except we didnt find out about it.

AlanB   January 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

Can you imagine an election with no Clinton or Bush in the Presidential foray? I can and it sounds exiting. I have nothing against Hillary, but it is time to put someone in the White House that has not been corrupted by partisan politics and narcissism. This is not about Democrats versus Republicans. It about doing what is best for America. Please support the vote for change.

Melisa   January 8th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Is anyone aware that the Republicans also support Obama to win the nomination? Does that concern anyone? If Obama wins the nomination, democrats can pat themselves on the back for delivering the general election to the Republicans. Think people!!!

Ken Harris   January 8th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

When is Hillary Clinton going to run on her own merit and stop riding on the coat tails of her husband? She is not now nor has she ever been entitled to be president just because Bill Clinton was and/or is such a beloved figure in the democratic party. America is waking up to the fact that Hillary Clinton will do whatever she has to in trying to get to the Whitehouse; put on a phoney accent, turn on the tears, crank up the woe is me rhetoric, and none of it with a fraction of the thoughtful sincerity Barack Obama portrays 100% of the time. As for the Punjab thing Billy-boy makes reference to, a little research will quickly reveal that Barack had absolutely no idea that a misguided staffer would do what they did. Say what you want, but he has run a consistently clean & positive campaign and the Clintons are only showcasing their own pathetic desperation now that things haven't turned out to be as preordained as they and/or others thought they should be. She can cry all she wants, but thinking young Americans are realizing that the experience she so proudly touts is the real fairy tail; the same brand as that possessed by the rest of the experienced establishment professionals that have screwed this country up so thoroughly and for so long. She will have no chance of restoring our standing in the world, Barack will. She will make no headway in bringing both sides of the aisle together because too many from the GOP hate her, Barack will. She is a divider. Barack is a uniter. Americans have not so easily forgotten about the obvious disdain she felt for the military when Bill was president. The list goes on and on and on. We need something fresh and new and Hillary isn't it. So the whole experience argument is bunk...pure and simple! Barack is thoughtful, intelligent, and inspires people to be and vote better than they are. It is my feeling that when combined with a well-crafted cabinet, these are the qualities that will propel this country to greatness once again...

mimi   January 8th, 2008 3:20 pm ET

I would like to know about these 35 years of experience...?! Doing what?
In that case I have 34 years experience...at what you might ask...being alive. I'm 34. So vote for me!

You watched your husband be president, so now you can do it?
That's the equivalent of a housekeeper having worked in the white house for 12 years saying vote for me, I have experience because I've seen, served, and cleaned up after heads of state. I need details lady.

She had 8 years to work on that healthcare plan of hers when Bill was in office. If she didn't get it done then, why should I be impressed with her plans now?

And I'm sorry I don't believe the croc tears and the 'personal' comments. What, she had it hard growing up in comfy Park Ridge IL? boo hoo...Gimme a break! What I know of Park Ridge IL is that Obama better had not been caught there at night.

Sorry but the old guard has had their say. It's time for someone to regain the respect of the world. Wake up it's not Woodstock anymore. It's time out for old white men and their wives telling everybody what's good for them. You see where it's gotten us this far. Don't be bitter, just watch democracy at work.

Isn't this what you guys marched for so many years ago?

Undecided   January 8th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

I'd never vote Republican but if the Clintons keep this type of campaigning up, I'll stay home rather than vote for Hillary, and I know quite a few people who've said the same. Keep it up, Bill and Hillary, and you won't make it to the WH, anyway. This is just the first part of the race and, if you succeed with the nomination, you will NEED Obama supporters and you're in process of alienating them.

watching and waiting   January 8th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

The problem for Mrs. Clinton is that one cannot be the seasoned politician that she claims to be (thirty-five years of experience) and then turn around and claim that she is an agent of change. This problem is compounded by the fact that she has her husband, the former president, campaigning for her touting her "experience" which just reminds the voters why they want change (change from the divisive politics that characterized the Clinton years as well as the many mistakes and bitterness of the last eight years under President Bush).

Obama may not have that much experience but then who really has any experience to be president? It is a position like no other in the world – there is no apprenticeship that one can serve and there is no school that one can attend to learn how to do the job.

I am not a member of the Democrat Party though from time to time I do vote for Democrats at the local, state and national (Congressional) elections. Having said that, I might be compelled to vote this year for Mr. Obama should he win the nomination and the Republicans choose Romney, Guilani, or McCain. The American people want a change from the partisan politics that have made any issue almost impossible to discuss in a reasonable way. Mr. Obama and Mr. Huckabee have tried (Obama I think better than Huckabee) to remain above the sordidness that has characterized elections since the involvement in Viet Nam.

Clinton is an intelligent woman who undoubtedly feels strongly about many issues. However, intelligence, gender, and eight years as a guest in the White House do not entitle her to the presidency. She needs to tell her husband to stay home; she needs to figure out how to appeal to the issues that male voters care about; and she needs to ditch the old Clinton operatives that she took on today (Carvel and Begala – two masters of the down and dirty politics if there ever were masters) as well as those Bill Clinton helpers that hae been directing her campaign thus far. She needs someone who is going to be honest with her and tell her no. THere is little hope that that will happen. One further thought – if she were to get the nomination, who could she inveigle to be her running mate? That would definintely be a non-job, much like ThomasMarshall's tenure as Vice-president was when he served under Woodrow Wilson. That position would be a deadend job for any aspiring politician as he/she would be marginalized because Bill Clinton would be her laddie of choice to go out as the representative of the President.

Shannon   January 8th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

If what Bill says was true, HIllary would have been using that quote against Obama over and over at the debates! Bill has used this distortion before.... you are getting tired and are embarrassing yourself Bill! Have some self respect. Americans aren't so stupid!

"Obama was being asked to criticize Kerry and Edwards for their votes.

He declined, noting that perhaps hypothetically if he had been in the Senate at the same time as them and seen these intelligence reports, he'd come to the same conclusion they did.

But from his vantage point outside the Senate, the case was not made and if he was given a chance to vote based on that, he'd vote "no" for sure."

donald   January 8th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

There's no crying in Politics. lololol

Carol B., Maryland   January 8th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

He seems to be talking from experience. Experience is sometimes a bitter lesson. ALL the candidates need to answer the tough questions. All this frenzy and expecting someone to be the great Swami, Messiah, or Mephistopheles is a bunch of shallow pabulum.

Nelson, Colorado Springs Co   January 8th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

well it has just begun for Sen obama hate and discontent, it apart of running for the president. Now Mr clinton is being player hater

Michelle   January 8th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

TO PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY READ THIS (YOUNG AMERICANS, NOT CANDIDATES): One year from now, when this is all over, and our future continues to grow into the hands of the "young people" for generations to come and train up generations to come – who are "fired up" for change – here is my question: REGARDLESS of what President occupies the White House (because I know that your every hope and "dream" in life is not pinned to one human or political office), what is YOUR PLAN to change this country/society for the better – from where you live today?? Please help us understand because a year from now, that is where we will be. Thanks for answering.

Dave   January 8th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Gbryant – gene – S in Texas – Monte Brown, New York, NY – Roy C.

I'm starting with this list of HRC supporters. Please support your votes with intelligence, and not mindless dribble and answer these questions for me. If you you know nothing about HRC except what other people tell you then say that. Read about her supporters and the legislations that she supported in their favor. Research her voting record and see what she actually voted for.

"Again I ask…Can a HRC supporter please tell me what legislation has HRC drafted that became law or that was rejected, or what is her record on voting on each legislation that was drafted under her term, and her reasoning for voting the way she did as senator? Please tell me what other offices has she held besides being, one of many women that screwed Bill in the white house."

By the way, I do not support OB or JE either because of their voting records or lack thereof to provide substantial votes that appease me, and not just the special interest that finance them.

In addition, I ask the same from Obama and Edwards supporters. A great majority of posters speak the same mindless dribble that Bush supporters speak. People challenge Bush's intelligence, but it seems to me he is taking your tax money and making himself and his friends rich...so who's the dummy! HRC will do the same...

David Han   January 8th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Media can be deadly misleading if it has bias or missing antthing. Pls report what Obama has done and who he is. I am a foreigner, even in my eyes, I think his stance on Iraq war is a bit qustionable at the first place. Change is dirty world in election and can be used by tactic talker. Good luck America and God bless those who are hard working.

donald   January 8th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Now that Billy boy opened his mouth I will support Obama. I am sick of lies, special interest groups, and lobbist, and clintons

Joanne McCann   January 8th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Bill Clinton did an amazing job for the economy and deficit for us, no one is disputing but he also embarassed this country more than any other President except maybe Nixon. If Bill were running this would be a very different discussion. But he is not.

Mike   January 8th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

Listening to Obama speak reminds me of listening to Martin Luther Kin Jr. speeches. They create goose bumps! It's time for a change and it's definitely time to get young Americans to speak up and vote! Good for Obama and I hope he wins the nomination!

Glenda   January 8th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

I'm not buying the Obama hype. The media has made him the darling. If you listen to the people of his state he's done nothing for them. The last time this country voted for change we got Jimmy Carter. Not voting for Hillary either. There is no one out there to vote for. I will have to choose the lesser of two evils when election day rolls around. I would rather have experience than smooth talking fella who can convince people he can CHANGE America. Only when the people of this nation rise up and say they've had enough will you get real change. You think Obama's the answer? I have a nice little bridge in Brooklyn that's for sale and it looks like I have a long line of fools willing to buy it. Wise up people.

E.Fortune   January 8th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

What would it take for Clinton to run as Obama's Vice President?

Darrell   January 8th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

Bill is hurting his wife.
What experience did Bill have in washington as Governor?
1992 - he had – none.
now it is time for change,

not more of the same.

Steve-O   January 8th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

Yikes! The wheels are really coming off the wagon.....

js   January 8th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

I would like to know why someone doesn't speak out about Obama's
Muslim background. He says he's not Muslim, but his dad was and his
grandparents were. This country does not need to elect a Muslim for
president of the UNITED STATES. WAKE UP PEOPLE.

Chris   January 8th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

Barack is now more than a candidate, he is a movement. It doesn't do the Clintons any good to throw mud at a movement. If she wants to get her campaign back together she needs to embrace the movement, admit that Barack is a star and then make a solid case about why she's better. This negativity is backfiring big time. I'm no Clinton hater, but the basic is this– it's a far more powerful thing to be FOR something (a la Obama) than to be against something. Hillary started this whole thing just railing against Bush, and Obama started it railing for hope. It doesn't take rocket scientist to understand why Obama is bringing people to the polls.

Meanwhile, I think it's time Bill starts to think about his legacy a little more. Does he really want to go down as the white guy who was trying to rob us of the first possibility of a black President by going negative? He may embrace the idea of being the country's first "black President," but this guy is the real deal. And Hillary could have a long career ahead of her even if she doesn't win the nomination. She should consider if she wants to be the person who throws mud at what could be the next American Presidential Icon. The Clintons need to think a little more big picture, in my opinion.

Joe Vanderbosch, Appleton, WI   January 8th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

Thata boy Bill, finally someone telling the truth about this flake, Obama.

Bryan   January 8th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

I find it interesting that people who voted for Bush, knowing that he had never left the country and had no international experience, are now changing their narrative and attacking the same ideals they so strongly fought for in the prior two elections. It didn't matter that he ran an oil company into the ground, failed at running a baseball organization, and left Texas as the most polluted state in America. The difference here is that the country is speaking out against the political establishment. Hillary has gone into attack mode which is exactly what this country needs to move away from. Bill Clinton is embarrassing himself with these sweeping statements. I think he was a brilliant president, but if Hillary becomes President, that will be 28 years in a row that a Bush or Clinton were in the White House. Hillary only fuels the partisanship!

I also find it interesting that people keep saying Barack Hussein Obama. I'd like to ask these people to tell me Huckabee's middle name...or how about McCain's?

E.L.T   January 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

To all you ignorant types... do your research!!!

People are with Obama because they are sick and tired of being sick and tired. Quit bringing up his race, his middle name, or his absentee father. He had NO control over those matters. I suppose I would be equally justified by pointing out that Bill's middle name is "Jefferson" , and I should be able to equate him with slave-owning Thomas Jefferson? As for his family being in Kenya in poverty, do you know the relationship between them? Just becasuse he acknowledges his family does not mean they have a good relationship. We all have family we have had strained relationships with. For the jerk that commented about his mother being absent on the campaign trail... SHE DIED IN 1995!!!! For the jerk that asked what Indonesia has to do with anything... his mother married an Indonesian after his she and his father divorced.

For the record, Obama's elected time in public service (Senate as well as other elected positons) is longer than Clinton's. Hillary has only been a senator since 2001. If Obama's elected time before becoming Senator doesn't count, then neither should Hillary's time. 7 years in any other job wouldn't even make her mid-career if you want to look at it that way. To paraphrase a good, yet true statement, JFK, MLK , Harriett Tubman, were all inexperienced.. Taken one step further, Jesus was inexperienced... so Obama, you're in good company.

By the way, Obama continues to be scrutinized by the media. They just realize that America at large needs that breath of fresh air he brings...

more to come folks...

Amy   January 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

America has simply decided to turn the page away from the Clintons and the 90's. And Bill and Hillary simply don't get it. They are so disconnected.

Melissa   January 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

I think Bill Clinton was an amazing president (personal issues aside). But, I'm hoping he can not get too bitter as Hillary begins to fade out of the limelight. In my dream administration, we could have Obama as President and Bill Clinton as peace envoy to the middle east. Oh yeah, and Al Gore as Secretary of State. So, watch what you say Bill. Remember, at the end of the day, we're all fighting for the same cause, aren't we?

Del LaBelle Boise Idaho   January 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Please someone make a list of ALL the things , in the 35 years, that Hillary has accomplished. How has healthcare improved in New York since she has been senator, or anything else for that matter? They pull out from the deepest black hole of American politics that they wollow in when they are losing. Glad they're gone , free at last..

Jim   January 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Why didn't you ask these questions during those 15 debates Mr. President?

You have let Sen. Obama trumpet all along assuming that your wife is inevitable, now that you are losing you suddenly are blaming the media. Give us a break, we all know you are a smart politician but your time was then and Obama's time is now!

Ryan, New York, NY   January 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Gbryant January 8, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Ryan in New York:

That is exactly what I mean. A person's upbringing should be out in the open. Like has been said before, if it was anyone else that the media was not sugar coating, he would be on a watch list.

You've got to be kidding. First, it has been out in the open, far more than it ever should have been. Every Obama-related on this Political Ticker gets at least one moron making some reference to his middle or last name (like we're in 2nd grade) and people are always calling him a Muslim. It's you people who are more concerned with what race or religion a candidate is that need to be on a watch list.

Second, it's pretty pitiful when the best thing that the Hillary Hit Squad can pull out is his ethnic background, something that he had no part in creating, unlike all the issues that Hillary's created for herself through her oustanding "experience."

Brendan H., San Antonio, TX   January 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

OMan:

Put down the hookah before posting, please!!!

ZOI   January 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Thank God someone finally stands up and comments on this. Obama is full of contradictions and promises for change when he mentions no action plan. We all want change, yes, but WHAT EXACTLY is he going to do to make change??? That is the question I need answered to even consider him. And as for Hiliary, for those who want to know her great record, if your wondering so much, you could simply look it up, or watch the debates. Where have YOU been? This is not a popularity contest people, this will be The President for crying out loud. Those of you who see it this way really need to grow up. You need to Really Think about the future.

Patrick, New York,Ny   January 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

GO BuBBA!!! BILL CLINTON ALL THE WAY>>>This whole thing so far has been a media hype free pass for Obama and THe CLintons are so under appreciated and demonized for all the hard work they have done for our country.

Independent voter   January 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

I understand that a "CHANGE" is good! We need to be very careful and not rushing into a change if we can not be sure if it is an acceptable change. I hope that americans take time to consider a careful analysis of individual candidates, especially on each person's proven abilities to do good politics. I worry we let our emotion ride the tidal wave of change and ending up as a witness of our own destruction. Do your own research, cultivate your own decision, stay focused, and do not let prejudice guide your soul.

May the best candidate win regardless of race, sex, and party affiliation.

Brendan H., San Antonio, TX   January 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

To Willowood:

The Clintons had nothing to do with Jet-Pilot being installed in the White House.

Both elections were riddled with voting irregularities that are just now being investigated.

How else would you explain 184 precincts in Ohio in 2004 casting more ballots for Bush than there were people living in those precincts, let alone registered to vote?! And, ironically, when the vote totals were "corrected" later, the amount of overcharge for Bush was exactly the same – 3,303 votes in precincts north of I-70 and 2,002 votes in preceincts south of I-70.

Aaron   January 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Charles T from VA, you might be correct and then your argument falls apart. I don't think Hilary is stealing anything right now she is getting her butt kicked so you can't really make that claim. However, it is likely that Obama runs as an Independent if he doesn't get the nomination, of course that does two things, one it ensures that Hilary will lose, two it ensures that he will lose. We saw this with Ross Perot and Bush senior.
So lets assume that Obama does get the nomination, he hits the campaign trail looking for a strong base to build off of and finds that Hispanic's (a large portion of the Democratic base and growing) won't vote for a black guy! The republicans who are running no one of real interest (except my boy Ron Paul) win the election hands down because in the end the Christian Conservative right always shows up. The Democrats have totally screwed themselves again, hope you are ready for 4 more years of some crazy religious republican.
Your very thin silver lining is to hope that Republicans (such as myself) get irritated enough to start throwing their votes to a Libertarian or Conservative Independent, because it won't be going to Obama.

Barbara   January 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Have people forgotten what happened to Bill Clinton because he lied, and lied under oath? And he and Hillary would always blame someone or something for their mistakes and poor judgements? Bill should fade away, his opinions don't interest me at all.

MIKE   January 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

HILLARY AND BILLS OWN STATEMENTS WILL BE THE REASON WHY SHE LEAVES THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. AS AMERICANS WE MAY FORGIVE, BUT WILL NEVER FORGET.
OBAMA MAY NOT HAVE GONE TO PRESIDENTIAL SCHOOL TO EARN HIS DEGREE IN EXPIERENCE,BUT AT LEAST HE GIVES AMERICA A REASON TO BELIEVE.ALL HILLARY WANTS TO DO IS RELIVE THE PAST.THAT’S NOT CHANGE NOR IS HER PLANS FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE,JUST ASK THOSE WHO LIVE IN NEW YORK AND THEY WILL GIVE TELL YOU WHAT HER PLAN INSTILLS.I BRING YOUR ATTENTION TO THE ARTICLE IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL DATED JANUARY 5, 2008,TITLED “A QUESTION FOR HILLARY”.THE HIGHEST PREMIUMS IN THE NATION AND REFUSES TO ALLOW LOWER COST HEALTH CARE,13% OF WHICH ARE UNINSURED.
OBAMA HAS BROUGHT YOUNG VOTERS TO THE SPOTLIGHT AND ARE SPEAKING WITH THEIR VOTES.SOMETHING THAT NIETHER CLINTON COULD ACCOPMPLISH.IF THAT’S NOT A SIGN OF CHANGE THEN, I DON’T KNOW WHAT CHANGE IS.
THOSE IN WASHINGTON AND SPECIAL I NTEREST GROUPS HAVE BEEN GIVEN FREE REIGNS LONG ENOUGH.IT’S TIME WE HAVE SOMEONE WHO WORKS FOR THE PEOPLE.

jack, ny, ny   January 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Can someone answer me what does Obama stands for. He says hope and change. What does he mean? I bet none of the obama supporter knows anything about it.

Joyce Mosier   January 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

President Clinton is so very, very correct in that Obama is spouting nothing but daydreams and fairy tales. He sticks his nose up in the air as though he is just too far above anything nasty, but he like everyone else is fighting for position and he just isn't that clean. Besides, what specific "changes" is he going to make? Paint the White House pink? Get rid of Congress? No, he'll have the same everyday options that everyone else has had in the government.

And wasn't it coincidental that he visited his "roots" when he did. So he can give a good speech. There's lots more to being a president than that. I do believe Hillary has the wherewithall to be a good president and the guts to withstand any kind of attack and the mentality to decipher the problems in the world and better our position. Lord knows that after Bush our position is lower than it has ever been! Actually, I feel sorry for the next president. He really is inheriting a mess, both at home and abroad. Two wars looking like it might be three or four and even a country not accepting dollars? China owns us right now and heaven help us if it calls in the debt we owe–or sell our IOUs to an enemy country.

Good luck, Hillary! And, Bill, it would be good to see you around again. And bless you for sticking up for your wife and partner!!

Sue, Michigan   January 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

DMON-Clinton lied about what should have been a personal issue-GWB lies about things that matter to all of us-our personal freedoms for one. I'd rather have the former than the latter, thank you. You do realize that your favorite President can have you taken from your home, lock you away, give you no lawyer, no rights, on his sayso? What? You don't think he could? He's done it already–all those nifty little Executive orders and signing statements have given him more secret power than any President in history.
And to those who discredit what Clinton says just because you don't like him-take a little time to get to know your "transparent" candidate. There isn't a man out there without something to hide, or something to spin...Obama is as much a politician as Hillary or anyone else-he's just softer spoken and seems like the guy next door. Well, we have that now, and look where that's gotten us.
The guy next door hired every Washington insider he could find, and they proceeded to dismantle everything good about the US.
Taxes? Let's see, if the Feds don't have tax revenue, then the states don't get any except from their own people, and here in Michigan, that isn't quite cutting it, since our economy has totally tanked under Bush. A good friend of mine put it this way "Taxes are the dues we pay to live in a civilized society." I'd rather tax and have a balanced budget than be in debt to the Chinese for decades. How about you?

av3   January 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

WE HAVE HAD A BUSH CLINTON DYNASTY THE LAST 20 YEARS. THIS TYPE OF INCUMBENCY BREEDS COMPLACENCY AND CORRUPTION. GEORGE WASHINGTON WAS SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW THIS, HE TURNED DOWN A GUARANTEED THIRD TERM. IF THE CLINTONS LOVED THIS COUNTRY SO DEARLY, AND IF IT WASNT ABOUT POLITICS, THEY WOULD SEE THIS AND DO LIKEWISE. THE EXPERIENCED ESTABLISHMENT IS RUNNING THIS COUNTRY INTO THE GROUND WHILE PADDING THEIR OWN POCKETS.

TO THIS THERE IS NO DEBATE.

Gideon   January 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Can't wait to see the "Clinton-Bush" dynasty to vanish
from the American politics.

The Clintons are running for their ego and hunger of power!
Not for the Democratic party or the country!

Paul   January 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

I voted for Obama in Iowa. Now I'm sorry that I did, I think I was influenced by all the marketing, hysteria and hype of Obama-mania.

I am so shocked that so many of Obama "supporters" espress so much hate and partizanship (even if inside the Dems), which is exactly he's running against. Just read the thread above... It's amazing how someone so cool and presumably nice can have supporters like that. It's as if Ann Coulter has been cloned a million times and set on the loose. The more I watch and read this, the dirtier I feel.

I spent all day yesterday reading his website again for details on his position on issues. He has the same core view that Bill Clinton had in 1992 and later. Obama is just a "new and improved" version, with a marketing gimmick of the moment (what "change" has now already become).

Eric   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

"We expect all of this politics-as-usual fear mongering (Hussein/Islam/ Kenya/ who is Obama really??) from the Republican xenophobes at Frontpage and Fox. It's quite shameful when it comes from fellow Democrats – especially a fellow Democrat who says that she's about change."

Couldn't have said it better myself. It saddens me that Democrats are using the politics of fear and hatred against eachother on this forum... When did liberals begin to believe that this was ok? Or, were the republicans right about the Clintons all along? Barack is now more than a candidate, he is a movement, a dream to many.. .

RealityKing   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Bill is pissed because this is his last best hope for a somewhat dignified legacy.

jane   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Its a shame to see Bill Clinton scramble like this. Its not like his wife isnt still the front runner. its just two elections so far, there is still a long way to go.
Obama must be doing something right. This early in the game and Hillary calls on Super Bill Clinton to the rescue.
Give someone else a chance, enough of the Clintons and Bushs, they have had there chance.
They need to realise the people want hope and not just another Old washington insiders.

Brad Allen   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

I'm so sick of people claiming we need Hillary because of her 'Experience'.
We've had people with this so called experience in the White House and Congress for years and all they keep doing is screwing up everything!
I am ready for Real Change, not the same ol' politics we've had for so many years (like the dirty tactics the Clintons (whom, I used to like) are using now).
Go Obama!

Mike   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

If Obama is a Fairy Tale, then Bill Clinton is in it and playing the part of Pinocchio

rick   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

hey folks, Obama has bheen running this campaign for nearly a year, he never attacked Hillary and Bill when he was behind. And if Clinton is so concerned that the nation does not know what he stands for, why don't they direct everyone to Obama's web site?

Realty is Clinton =the past, and you cannot change that, they are from the 90's.

I hope they don't make fools of themselves but I see it coming

Obama 08!!!

sabrina01   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

THE PEOPLE ARE SO EASILY MISLEAD BY BILL AND HILLARY SHE ONLY SPEAKS PART OF THE TRUTH...OBAMA VOTED AGINST THE WAR HIS OPPONENTS WERE FOR IT WHEN IT WAS TIME TO SUPPORT THE TROOPS THAT ARE ALREADY OVER THEIR DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT HE WILL NOT SUPPORT THEM.....SHE AND BILL DOESN'T STATE ALL THE FACTS JOHN EDWARD STATED HIM AND MC CAIN WORK ON A BILL OF RIGHTS FOR THE PEOPLE AGIANST HEALTHCARE COMPANY ....IN HER RALL SHE SAID " YEAH JOHN SAIDS HE'S FOR THE PEOPLE BUT HIS BILL DIDN'T PASS! WHAT SHE DIDN'T MENTION IS WHY BUSH AND HER HUSBAND REJECTED IT....ONE VOTER WAS FOR EDWARDS THEN WENT TO CLINTON BECUASE SHE SAID HE DIDN'T PUSH THE BILL OF RIGHTS ....WHO CAN SUPPORT A UNTRUTHFUL PERSON IF SHE HAS TO STEEP THIS LOW ...SHE HAS NO CHARACTER AND ITS ABOUT THEM THEY THINK THE WHITE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN TAKINGFROM THEM WELL THANK GOD THE VOTER GOT MORER INFO AND WENT BK TO EDWARDS .....GREED IS THEIR DESTINY

Kim B   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Obama will win the nomination... and ultimately the White House... Obama08'

vicky long island   January 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Few posted comments are based on emotion instead of logic. Those who take the time to study ALL of both Clintons' achievements would realize that both have done a lot of good for our country. No candidate is stronger than the media. Before a broadcast last night, about two dozen N.H. were gathered together by a broadcaster. I think CNN. When asked how many had changed their mind, most hands went up. And, when asked who would they vote for now, most said they had changed to Obama. Anyone with a pea brain could see through the pre broadcasting criteria!!! This primary is not about who will do the best job – it's about the power of the media.

Fred, TN   January 8th, 2008 3:08 pm ET

Bill, we are tired of hearing all the static. JFK was the last true Democrat in the White House. How many years of Bush Clinton can we endure.

The Dems have had their chance to end the war and have neglected to push for change. I am disgusted with both parties and it looks like Ron Paul is the only
true change agent on the trail.

PR   January 8th, 2008 3:08 pm ET

People! Obama is a FLASH IN THE PAN! He is not ready for prime time. I do not want a repeat of on the job training, that is what Obama will require. Even with OJT Bush FAILED. In MN, when Jesse Ventura got in for gov. it was due mainly to the younger vote AND IT WAS A BIG MISTAKE!! Obama must be highly impressed with himself to run for president with his current experience. Hillary and Bill are a team, a good team and they give a rip. America was not in the gigantic SINKING pothole that we are now when they left the White House. Bill's personal discretion history are his to own. Bill harmed himself and his family not the whole U.S. and generations to come. Hillary has worked hard for many years, she is the RIGHT PRESIDENTIAL CANIDATE!

SteveJobs   January 8th, 2008 3:08 pm ET

I am so tired of people, the media, and opposing candidates saying that any of the other candidates are "Not experienced enough", to run the country. Last time I checked, there is , NOT 1 SINGLE FORMER PRESIDENT running in this election. And as far I know NOT 1 SINGLE PRESIDENT, From George Washington to George Bush Jr., ever ran a country before being elected to run this one. So give it a break with this not experienced "CRAP". No one running is "Experienced" at running a nation.

Adam   January 8th, 2008 3:08 pm ET

Is there no limit to Bill and Hill's belief that they deserve the White House? Refering to Obama's campaign as a "fairy tale" shows their belief that a rejection of those two is so beyond belief that it must be fictional. Is it at all possible that people are finally saying WE DON'T WANT YOU!? I think you are the one living in a fantasy world Bill.

Plus, aren't these same issues of outright supremecy over detractors and self-righteousness that cause people to hate Bush?

I can't understand why people still like these two. My vote is for a man of dignity.

Go Barack

MImi Penaranda   January 8th, 2008 3:07 pm ET

You go, Bill. I am voting for Hillary no matter what Obama has to say. The man was so arrogant about his win in Iowa, can you imagine how he will react if he wins the White House? He reminds me of George Bush!

For me Hillary is the only candidate, Democratic or Republican, that cannot be pushed over and who will stand up for my rights and everybody else's when the push comes to shove.

Brendan H., San Antonio, TX   January 8th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

Remember this Obamites:

1) Bill Clinton lost Iowa and New Hampshire in 1992 – and went on to the White House!

2) Bill Clinton is not the one you want to engage in forensic debate – he tore Bush, Sr. a new one and anybody else that got in his way!

3) The Clintons have shown that they know how to win!!!

Mike, Land O Lakes, FL   January 8th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

As much as I love Bill, right now I prefer anyone but Bush/Clintons. This isn't about family dynastiy. I think the Clinton's are getting a little too desperate with Hilary crying like a baby yesterday and all!!

Steve   January 8th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

Hillary can't do it without Bill. Bill needs to ride off into the sunset. Obama will win out.

nathan Smith   January 8th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

I'm pulling for hillary, and I hope they win, it always takes a clinton to clean up after a bush, however Obama wouls also be good, I hope they will join forces, that would truly unify our party.

Jill   January 8th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

Ladies and Gents:
There are great people running for the Democratic Party's nomination. Our problem is we have an embarrassment of riches. The differences among the Democratic candidates are slight. Emotions are high. Everyone on the campaign trail is exhausted. Let's not become like the other party by tearing each other to pieces or attacking each other personally. I, for one, will be thrilled to pieces with ANY of our candidates as the Party's nominee, and will support him or her all the way to 1600 PA Ave.

Mike H.   January 8th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

I'm no fan of the Clintons but Bill is right on in arguing that the media has given Obama a free pass. We are in the midst of an important presidential election and the American public is being asked to buy a pig in a poke by the New York Times, Newsweek and CNN. There has been virtually no examiniation of Obama's views, record (such as it is) or how he would turn his high hopes into reality. The press depicts Obama as the Second Coming and is failing us miserably. Mike H.

The Saint   January 8th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

Finally, someone said what I have been thinking for months. Leave it to the greatest president of my lifetime to step up and say it right!

Edwards '08!

Anonymous   January 8th, 2008 3:03 pm ET

Why is Bill complaining now?

Harry   January 8th, 2008 3:03 pm ET

God, what a hypocrite! I can remember a little more than 16 years ago the same things happening to Bill Clinton; the media tossing up "softball questions", his waffling on topics of National and International importance, the list can go on. His accusation of "underhanded tactics" against his wife was the same tactics his campaign team pulled off in 1992 and 1996. I beleive 'ol Bill is suffering from a touch of slective memory loss!

dorothy   January 8th, 2008 3:03 pm ET

This is one of the most exciting years we have ever had. I don't want to run down any candidate. I want change and for the better for all, not just a few people. I like Hillary, Obama, John and anyone of the them can bring about change for the better for all. Everyone needs to get out and vote. This race is only about personality because no one's really asking the right questions, like how are you gonna make changes and what makes you think You can. I don't know why anyone would want this job but thank God we get to help choose who will Try and I say Try to make the lives better for all. I will vote Democrate because it's time.

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

"January 8, 2008 2:23 pm ET

I believe that it is totally unfair and unjust that a former president–husband or not can get up in a public forum to speak on behalf of another candidate."

That was from a post above.

Bill Clinton did not surrender his First Amendment rights when his wife decided to run for President. No one has questioned Oprah's right to stump for her favorite candidate. There is little difference between the two in this regard, both are powerful, high profile national figures.

By the way, politics has been, is and will probably always be a dirty business regardless of how much we "hope" it won't. There is simply too much at stake for niceness.

And to tell the trruth, I want a President who knows how to attack and defend, the world is a harsh place.

Claustro   January 8th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

Media bias, people. Right down to the 'Then he abruptly changed the subject.' Tell me that didn't make you feel something? They KNOW what to write. They KNOW how to make all the 'little human beings' feel the way they want you to. Get up and get out there and /talk/ with these candidates. Do NOT let these people (the media) paint you into their agenda. Obama? Clinton? Romney? Huckabee? Whoever! Just make sure you have the facts, and not some corporate smear job masking as truth.

Margie, Atlanta, ga   January 8th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

By the way, the media especially CNN, are biased and afraid to say anything negative about Obama. Why?, because they think any attack on him and the black community will be upset. Shame. What happened to balanced reporting and the viewers decide????. I am very dissappointed at John King, one of my favourite reporters. I know who they are all rooting for. Its so obvious in their individual comments. At least we know where fox news stand.

Al   January 8th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

The Clintons are showing that they are poor loosers and it's ugly. If they keep these type of attacks up, Hillary's approval rating will be less than Bushs'. Show a little class and she may still have a chance.

Mike   January 8th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

Hey, Obama supporters,. I hear you: Bill should not express an opinion. But you fail to address the main point... What is so great about Obama other than he's not Clinton? What will he do that's different from Clinton/Edwards? Why is it that his lack of experience doesn't matter? How can he invoke the names of Bill Clinton and JFK and not invite comparisons to them? Why does he employ a lobbyist as his New Hampshire campaign chair while at the same time eschewing their influence? Why did he say he opposes the war and then vote to spend $400 million to fund it? Why does his insurance plan leave 15 million people without insurance? Why have objective observers noted that his environmental policy is toothless when compared to that of Clinton's or Edward's? These are legitimate questions that deserve answers, no matter who asks them.

Armysoldier   January 8th, 2008 3:01 pm ET

I am sick and tired of the Bush and the Clinton family. I do not want a Clinton in the White House. It is almost like the Clinton's believe that Hillary should be President because she is Hillary. The Clinton's have thier own agenda and it has nothing to do with the people of America. She speaks of all her years of experience so why is she crying because she is losing. I am not an Obama supporter, I am just anti Hillary. Please, I do not want the Clinton family in the White House.

Ted, Riverhead, NY   January 8th, 2008 3:01 pm ET

Note to Billy: "Don't stop dreaming about tomorrow............." That's all you have now is dreams, cuz your philandering ass ain't going back to W's house!!!

Karen   January 8th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

Go Hillary!

Obama is a slick talker and that's it. He wants to be President without doing any of the WORK to get there. He's only been in the Senate for two years and he's missed half of the votes. He's being held to a lower standard.

Gabe Polson, The Woodlands,TX   January 8th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

It is about time the Clinton campaign started stating the obvious. Case-in-point...the final poll out of NH shows the race closed over night. CNN is touting a poll from two days ago with Obama leading by 9. However the latest poll released today shows the race has tightened with Obama leading by only 5. CBS also has a similar poll. I have watched CNN political reporters talk about the huge Obama crowds yet no stories about Clintons huge crowds. In fact, Clinton's rally in Manchester last evening drew more than 4000 people; the largest of any campaign this season. The night before there was a crowd of 3700 hundred in Nashua. But this is not being covered by the press. I feel the media is going to be disappointed when the NH primary is over and the race is a lot closer than they would have liked it to be. I don't care who you vote for but I want people to make up their own minds and don't let the media choose our President. Thats how we got the president we have now. That is why we need change.

Emmitt Bowles Chicago Il   January 8th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

Former President Clinton's comments should be taken at face value.Especially after lying to the American Public about a scandal that almost caused him to be impeached.Negative comments and flippant attitudes are why Americans are so fed up with the American Political process.

John   January 8th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

Bye Bye Billy Boy

ABC   January 8th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

I will vote for ABC (anyone but Clinton)

The Clinton and Bush dynasty is over.

Let's have some new changes.

Susan S.   January 8th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is the one distorting her record on Iraq. What a nerve she has siccing Bill on Obama. I'm a flaming liberal and I can't stand her for exactly this reason.

Nancy - Dallas   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

FINALLY! Maybe Bill can wake a few people up to this media-driven frenzy around Obama. I agree with him and others here it's unfair coverage and it is a fairy tale. I also agree it's an insult that the media think they can fool America into electing this man President of the United States with no experience at all. I have researched all the candidates and Obama is the least qualified of both parties. Please, America, wake up - do your home work - we do not need another inexperienced president in the White House.

Metto G   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

I am democrat, and I am also a black educated woman, I agree with Bill Clinton, the media has been harder on Hilary than Obama. I will not vote for any candidate because of the color of his/her skin, neither will I vote for Hiliary because she is a woman. I will vote based on the one candidate I feel can do the job. I view this a a deleberate act by white America to ensure that a Republican will be in the white House. We all know that inspite of all the (hoop la) the Regan republicans will rather have a white women as a president than a black man. We have come a long way but racism is still with us...we have not come that far! Wake up black people this is all a game!. How many of you truly think that Obama will have any chance of winning the General Election?.

David, Kansas City   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

obama – edwards / edwards – obama... either ticket will defeat the republicans. But make no mistake, they are ALL crooks and liars. Including Hillary.
The past 2 elections have been botched and swept to the extreme right.
Anything other than that BS suits me fine.
Obama has no experience? Fine, have him accept the VP nomination, with Edwards in the presidency.
It's amazing that a platform as simple as "Change" for America gains so much support, huh? Perhaps that's because we're ready for and demanding change...?
Hillary has some great strengths but I think it seems destined that she will not win. And if she were the nominee, she would not defeat the republican ticket.
So let's stick with a chance to win and vote edwards,obama or obama,edwards in '08.

Obama-man   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

Slick Willie,

I lost all respect for your wife when she decided to "stand by her man" after you embarrassed her and the country she so (teary-eyed and weeping) loves. But then, she used you as well to get herself positioned for the presidency.

Both of you are hypocrites.

sally   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

Poor Clintons, They though the invisible

Vic Novosad, Sugar Land, TX   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

To Willowood and others who distort history: It was NOT Bill Clinton who put George Bush in office. It was all the voters who refused to see the writing on the wall because you were so enamored with his hypocratic faith-based speeches and empty personna. With one hand over his heart, and a person who could not pronounced a word consisting of more than one syllable - sixty percent of the voting public became mesmorized and swept up by appearance and conservative talk show hosts - put George Bush into office - not once but TWICE!

What the voters got in return from this man whose ignorance of everything presidential and world leadership was a war in the Middle East sacrificing almost 4000 of America's finest, corporate tax cuts and high-rising fees and soaring prices. He abandoned the U. S. Constitution in favor of underhanded betrayals of what America stands for, and a standing in the world from which we may never recover. ALL OF THIS WAS DONE ON THE ADVICE OF AIDS WHO THIS INEXPERIENCED PRESIDENT TRUSTED TO RUN THE COUNTRY'S BUSINESS BECAUSE HE DIDN'T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT WHAT THE PRESIDENCY IS ALL ABOUT.

America wake up! You're about to send in a George W. Bush clone who will surround himself with the likes of Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby, Alberto Gonzales and George Tennet, who will take him down the path of destruction. If you want to continue George W. Bush's presidency, vote for Barak Obama. Otherwise, help elect Hillary Clinton, who has put her political life on the line for all Americans.
Finally, to those of you who continue to say she's lying about her 35 years of service to governments, you are wrong. Go research her and you will learn that this woman is telling the truth.

Keri-Texas   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

If Obama wins get ready for the Manchurian candidate. I have a bad feeling about him. Really what has he done to be qualified for this job? He'll become the world's puppet, Washington insiders will have a field day with him. At least I know Hillary has stood up to the Republican machine many times and won. At least I know she has some fight in her and doesn't just act like an overgrown lap dog.

I dare say, if Obama gets the nomination I'll vote Republican for the first time in my 62 years.

lulu   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

Billary, you had your chance in the WH; you sullied your nest and legacy. Your "interning" has left a very bad chapter in American history. I am ashamed of your presidency. Shut up and go AWAY! You cannot win this election for Hillary, who is after actually ****running****! Her mistake is keeping you around; you are excess baggage.

Suzi   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

Good for Bill! What he said is correct, and also if Obama or his supporter cannot deal with the realities, then Obama cannot stand a chance in the real election ... the Rep will tear him apart.
Right now the media is worried about the back-lashed from the large Obama's supporters, should the media say anything "negative".

ratt   January 8th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

For all of you blasting Obama for no substance a simple trip to his website will provide a 64 page synopsis of what his goals are. Before you criticize it might be a good idea to do a little reading.

Mike   January 8th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

"This is a statement in very poor taste. Why don't you just come right out with it, and accuse Mr. Obama of whatever it is you're trying to insinuate."

The whole "Hussein" discussion is a code-worded cloak for the N-word. The racists need to just get on with it and start using the N-word to describe Obama instead of playing these little word games with us. C'mon, let's hear it, say what you mean, not this little "he's a Muslim" toe-touching game. Go ahead and get it out in the open, OK?

megan   January 8th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

For you people who endorse Obama, how many of you voted for Bush? Thanks for the last 8 years! At least Hiliary has some experience, and for those who ask what experience, start naming Obama's accomplishments.

Jack   January 8th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

It's pretty funny to hear a Democrat complain about a biased media.

Michael   January 8th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

Has Bill Clinton officially lost his mind? I used to be a great fan of his, but his actions on this campaign trail have led me to believe his desperation to return to the White House has clouded his ability to see what is really going on in politics today. I think it's time for Hillary to bench him before he continues to cause damage to her campaign. And in regards to Mark Penn.... the man has made a living studying micro-trends, but failed to see the MACRO trend that is the desire of the American electorate to be inspired to take action towards building a better future for themselves and those around them. Their arrogance caused them to miss the big picture....AGAIN.

carmi   January 8th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

Go Hillary!!! Can't believe the media is focusing on Barack winning........WRONG

Think about it: he is so inexperienced...!!!

Thanks for reading

Beatriz Rosado   January 8th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Bill Clinton not onlly has the right to help his wife campaign he has an obligation . Nobody complains when the wife of Mr. Obama does the same. Give me a break!

toosad   January 8th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Obama made his woman cry...gotta let him have it now

rob   January 8th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

1. Hillary is toast. It's over.

2. Bill's stock is dropping fast. The Whiner in Chief? He's seems quite reckless, and now is whining like a spoiled 14 year old.

Obama is twice the personality Hillary is. it's over.

Gobama!

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

If Hossin Obama is elected, I will move to other nation. This is the worst we could see if the greatest country on earth is in the hands of Hossin Obama...

Margie, Atlanta, ga   January 8th, 2008 2:56 pm ET

WHy don't we ever learn. This was exactly how George Bush won 2 terms. Look at what he has done to this country. I like Obama but he lacks experience. He cannot learn on the job. Not at this time. What is wrong with experience?. The rest of the world has to have experience for any top job.
Hilary has been bashed enough and uo till now NOBODY has given me an intelligent reason why she is not right for the job. If the democrats are not careful a republican will win the white house.
As for Edwards, he needs another $400 hair cut. He wants Obama to win so that he can be VP, fat chance. I hope we get a Clinton/Obama ticket. That will definitely be CHANGE.
Good luck to them all. Good luck to America.

Hanayaka   January 8th, 2008 2:56 pm ET

Personally, I would like to see what Obama will actually DO about the Iraq War. He makes glorious claims that it's not right to be there, but during the NH debates pretty much spat out the same exact thing Hillary had already said. We all know that he said he was "against" the war, but then voted to fund it. Um, hello?! Obama talks real big but never actually says what he's going to DO. Quit painting pretty pictures with your eloquent speeches and design some real plans.

Edwards, you are my hero!

Tate   January 8th, 2008 2:56 pm ET

People keep talking about Obama's lack of experience, but look what alleged experience got us Bush....we are in war and coming into one of the worst recessions ever and this was an "experienced" president. I'm ready for change
someone who wants to work for change, somebody who views this nation differently and will fight for the average person. Call it a fairy tale or whatever you want Bill, you guys thought Clinton was a shoe-in and it ain't happening.... Oh when the house of cards fall down....

jim, netcong nj   January 8th, 2008 2:56 pm ET

the clintonistas really believe they are deserving of the presidency whether or not the people want them. reminds me of the song 'tomorrow belongs to me' from the movie caberet. i am a baby boomer, about the same age as hillary, and i say we have screwed the country up enough, let the youngsters take over, before we make things worse.

JT   January 8th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

Just like Obama it seems his supporters can only respond to criticism of him by attacking the person making the charge, rather than answering the claim on its merits. Politicans usually don't attack their opponents while ahead and that is a good thing. I have no problems with attacking one's opponent when necessary, as long as the attacks on accurate. But if you can avoid doing it, you should. And if you are winning without doing it there is no need to. Every word Bill said was true. If any Obama supporter would like to actually refute the substance of his argument I would welcome the attempt. But this deflection is pure politics, the kind Mr. Obama claimed he would change.

And to the person who claimed that Bill said Hillary's campaign wasn't negative, he didn't say that. He simply said if her's was, then so was his, and the media should cover it. I am sick of how Obama's supporters make everything about the opponent and allow Obama to get away with being a total hyporcrite and a liar. No one can criticize Obama for things they have done, but he is free to criticize them for things he does.

Patrick, Bethlehem,PA   January 8th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

David says: "All this anger, is just not American."

I suppose it is okay if the anger comes from the Clintons

Liv Manto   January 8th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

Hmmm.. let me see..

In one corner, there is Oprah with Obama, dancing.

In another corner, there is Hillary with an ex-president who is probably the best president ever – No debts, no war, everyone can buy a house during his time.

Get a grip democrats, those who speak for Obama are probably republicans who knows Obama is easy to beat.

Dont be swayed by the clones of Ann Coulter and O'Reilly. The republican party pays for this campaigners by the extra dollars you pay for your gas.

Dont be tricked again.

JUNE   January 8th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

PLEASE BILL..I LOVE YOU BUT YOU HAVE ALREADY HAD YOUR PRESIDENCY. THIS IS ALL ABOUT HILLARY.

Amos   January 8th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

Wondering, really, if AMERICA is TRUELY READY for a female such Hillary and or for a neger such Barack to lead in or on United States of America ? ? ? ! ! !

So, tell me. Anyway : I am with and for both,

Amos

DBeeson   January 8th, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I normally vote republican but at this moment I would vote for anyone as long as it keeps Billary out of office. We have had way to many years of the Bush/Clinton/Bush group running things down. Although as a military member I feel that no matter who wins we (the military) will be left holding the bag we need someone with a new idea of how to do things and BILLARY IS NOT IT!!!!!

Anubhab, MA   January 8th, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I don't understand why people are having difficulties to choose between Obama and Clinton. We know they both have the same message about change, but people need to understad that you can not bring change with words. You can touch peoples heart, make them emotional but you cannot run the country with words. Just by saying that we need change, time is now; is not going to do much of a job.
What we need is somebody who wants to make change but also has the experience to do so. I like Obama but he does not have that experience like Clinton to bring that change. He is motivated but lacks the experience where as Clinton has experience and desire to make change.
Its like hiring a worker in a company, who do you want? One who says i will work hard and bring change or somebody who says i will work hard and bring change because i have done so before and have records to prove it. When you become the president you dont have space to make mistakes. You cant say "OOPs my fault" and get away with it. Not to make such mistakes you need to know what to do, which is done by having experience and Clinton has that.

Penny   January 8th, 2008 2:53 pm ET

I'm delighted to see Bill Clinton take on Barack Obama's record. Obama claims to be the candidate for change from the usual Washington scene. Doesn't everyone?
And anyone with a grain of sense, knows we ALL want a change, so that's a non-issue in my book. Obama hasn't proven himself and it frightens me that so many young people/independents are approaching this election as a popularity contest and not the opportunity to elect someone who can reverse the damage done to the USA in the past 8 years. One rally for Obama said it resembled a football pep rally! Sen. Obama is a fine man and may make a great president...someday! He is very charismatic. So was my second husband and he turned out to be a liar and a cheat!
I can only hope someone can reverse this trend toward "pulpit politics", which is how I characterize Sen. Obama's campaign speeches. I get the feeling I'm in church when I hear him speak. Nothing wrong with church, but I don't need a "feel good" message or messenger in the White House! This country needs a leader not a cheerleader!

Andy   January 8th, 2008 2:53 pm ET

It has been interesting British papers about individuals who try to leave the Muslim religion and about polls which show that a huge percentage of Muslims believe that an individual should be killed for leaving the Muslim faith. Once a Muslim, always a Muslim to many throughout the world. What is the view of Muslims worldwide ref. Barack Obama's switch in faith? It is a religion of peace for so many, but often only if their doctrine is followed and not questioned; only if their religion is not cast aside. How would his change of faith affect his ability to negotiate with dogmatic Muslims or terrorists indoctrinated to despise those who do not follow the Muslim faith, especially those who have left it?

I don't believe that whether one is a woman or a person of colour would be of such importance in Canada. It is unimportant, really, altogether. The main issue should be who the individuals really and truly are and where they stand on issues, if they, indeed, know without others telling them what to say such as spin doctors, speech writers and the like. Who, really and truly is Obama? Who, really and truly is Hillary Clinton? The infatuation with Obama is rather like, it seems, the valedictorian who is one by popularity rather than substance, but is there because he could generate the support of the school population who really doesn't care at all about ideas, just popularity. Hitler rallied youth, the population, also, so a fan base does not necessarily count at the end of the day/have a positive outcome (not that Obama should be compared to Hitler, just that fervent supporters aren't always thinking about issues, just following the crowd). I haven't checked, but was Obama in the military anywhere? Would he have been or just changed countries to avoid it? I know Hilary wasn't, but I am questioning, here, Obama.

How is Obama going to affect change when he has to encounter those who disagree with him? He can't just offer platitudes and an outstretched hand. What if, for instance, the miliatary refused to follow his command? What would happen then? What if he fractures government into factions who refuse to work with such an inexperienced person trying to lead them? The population may be coming out in droves, but perhaps those in government will start missing sessions as he did when he apparently didn't turn out to vote. Was that working in the best interest of the people when he didn't show up (or is that incorrect media info?) I don't know all the details of his life or the ins and outs of American politics, particularly. However, I am riveted by the astounding choices Americans make ref. leaders and the process to get there. George Bush with little worldwide political experience?? (although smart enough to oust the real winner who has gone on to greater causes). Obama next? There was the same kind of rampant following when the Dixie Chicks stood up and spoke out against the war when the public vilified them – and now the public is blindly following Obama? It is like the wave, this way and that. Incredible. If he wins, he may, in fact, be the greatest leader the U.S. has ever had, a wonderful leader who can help to change the U.S. economy and the world. I hope that the public is clear about who he is, what he stands for, and what he is capable of, though, and they question him hard and long, as they should be all the other candidates. What a magnificent chance for change, though – and how exciting that he is causing so many to get out and vote – or is that partly the media doing that? When the media fixates on individuals, it really fixates leaving many others who could be front and center off to the side. Watch what you are watching, also, not just who.

Robert M. Reidy N.Y.   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Someone should lead these two old horses back to the stable.

The stallion can go out to stud and the old gray mare ain't what she used to be...

Karen   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

To Lee Chang from Canada, welcome. I sincerely apologize for our pandering media and the hatefel, spiteful, malicious bloggers they attract. If you want some serious discussion, try the Wash Post, etc. There are still a couple of serious places to get a rational issues discussion. We are a miserable lot, aren't we.

Clae Shy Winter   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Reference to Candy's response on CNN about Bill Clinton campaigning for Hillary. Note to Candy Crawford:
Don't let the oppositional comments about the bad effect of Bill on Hillary's campaign fog up your thinking and comments in response to. The people who haye them are still angry about Bll and/or Hillary and will remain anrgry. The people who loved the admknkstration, wkill always respect Bill and Hillary and their administration.

Yes, their administation. The people who say she did not have that much involvement and influence can not also negatively wrap them up as a dynasty. to be avoided.

The oposition would love to go up against a newcomner Obama who with all his charisma and philosoph=y does not have a track record of accomplishments.

Are we asking less of our presidential candidates than we would of a new CEO?

Jeff from Jersey   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Obama is the very definition of the word disingenuous,a title he shares with Romney and Giuliani.He has lied from the very begining.

Hillary Clinton has more experience in her pinky than Obama has in his whole body.Hillary made an honest effort to change healthcare in this country.That is a very,very important fact!Hillary Clinton has had her successes and made mistakes but they have been the mistakes of someone that has been trying to change things.She is the one candidate of both parties that had made a sincere and honest effort to stop the status quo and improve our country by helping the hardworking american people and those that need help the most,not just here,but around the world as well.She totally "gets it" that America and americans are now,like it or not,part of a global community,a concept that far too many of you just aren't capable of grasping or would just rather not.

Obama and even Edwards are guilty of NOT making mistakes because until now,neither one has honestly tried to DO anything.That is the worst mistake of all,aside from voting for either of them.At least Hillary has the guts to try!

rabblerouser   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Hillary has proven to be the most experienced of all the candidates – her record and achievements are out there if you know how to do the research (the vote smart website is a place to start). But the media have always hated the Clintons and tried to bring them down, but couldn't. Now the media's manipulating everyone by inaccurate reporting and shoving Obama down our throats, while telling us every day how far Hillary is falling behind.

It should be a no-brainer that the toughest job in America (maybe the world) should go to the most experienced person, not the least experienced person. But since Americans have grown up on Hollywood, we are easily manipulated by charm, looks and few fancy words.

Hillary isn't as charming as Obama, but then again, she's a woman and different standards apply to her. She has to be tough, but when she is, she's not likeable Sadly, it may still be a man's world after all.

Janet   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

How Hillary claim she has any experience outside of being a senator in a state she had only visited until she got this wild hair to be President? She was the First Lady who barely had a security clearance. She visited foreign countries to kiss babies and have tea! Her health care reform bill died! The rest of her time was spent trying to ignore Bill's infidelities. I'm still trying to figure out what experience she's talking about. Why doesn't the media question her about that Bill?

And, talk about fairy tales, you surviving an impeachment is the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.

Dave, Evergreen CO   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Not only is Bill Clinton going to help get his wife defeated but he's going to destroy his own legacy that he has been working so hard on over the last 7 years. It's like watching Willie Mays playing for the Mets in 1973; sad and depressing to see your old heroes hanging on past their time.

CN   January 8th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Now that's the pot calling the kettle black. It make my day to see drop your drawers Willy upset. Pleaese continue CLINTOON.

Gavin Indiana HRC   January 8th, 2008 2:51 pm ET

We have to wave off the clouds....

Kick the balloons out of the way....

Dust off the confetti....

AND REALIZE THAT OBAMA IS A FLIP-FLOPPER AND EVERYDAY WE HEAR MORE AND MORE NEWS ABOUT HIS INCONSISTENCY, AND INEXPERIENCED SHUFFLING...

It's really disturbing that OBAMA SAID THERE WAS NO DIFFRENCE BETWEEN HIMSELF (Obama) AND BUSH! Not to mention is dangerous flip flopping on the Patriot Act, Health Care, and what about abortion ?

Obama is a nice guy Im sure, but his record is starting to show all the discrepancies and gaps.

We need a President that is ready ON DAY 1 – who has proven change, who will continue to change and lead....We need SENATOR RODHAM CLINTON !!
HRC 08'

BG   January 8th, 2008 2:51 pm ET

The Republicans are going to have a field day over Obama being for the war and saying he agreed with Bush. It's bad enough he wasn't even in the Senate for the vote on Iraq and claims he was against it, talk is cheap. Then he votes while in the Senate to fund the war, giving Bush a blank check. Not good. I doubt they will go after his Muslim background, his pro Bush pro Iraq funding is going to sink him alone.

Bridget   January 8th, 2008 2:51 pm ET

This is very funny. All of the original commenters felt sorry that Bill would stoop to this level. Then, finally, the Clinton campaign became aware of the story and read the comments. At that point, a steady stream of negative remarks about Obama (some of them attempting to sound intelligent, others just pure racism and hate mongering). Forget it, lame political flacks, people are not that stupid. Let's not waste any more time with these comments. I think we all know what the real story is; it doesn't look favorable to Hilary and makes Bill look a bit hysterical.

RBaker   January 8th, 2008 2:51 pm ET

PS- To those of you who said you voted for BUSH – especially 'twice'.

Sorry but since you've already demonstrated INCREDIBLY bad judgement, YOUR judgement/opinions might be wrong, again...

How could anyone vote for Bush TWICE? If you think it's a good idea to invade countries left right and center, then you should really think about YOUR opinions a bit better...

Liz Wetzel   January 8th, 2008 2:50 pm ET

Bring Clinton days back, when everyone can buy a house, no war, no debts.

DOnt vote for a another warmongering Republican, arent you tired of them yet?
Dont vote for OBAMA who is another Republican trick. You know why the republican markets OBAMA by creating websites like Girl for OBama or having young blondes say she likes OBAMA.

Prove to them the Democrats are not stupid. Dont be tricked again by the Republicans. REmember the election that Bush stole?

DRS   January 8th, 2008 2:50 pm ET

How pathetic, Bill. Just because Obama has matched your wife in terms of money, power, intellect, and savvy, you decide to malign him. SHAME on you. I know that you want Hillary to win, but your disposition is certain to make her lose. I think Obama is the best thing for this country. As to the person who is questioning his Kenyan backgroud, do your research before you speech. As the old addage goes, "it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

CWM   January 8th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

Pretty cheeky of Bill considering the candidate who really has a gripe about media bias is Edwards. He is the ONLY Dem leading all Republicans in head-to-head polls and truly has the best chance of winning.

Let's face it. Hillary or Obama versus a Republican would be a great story (first woman or first african-american) but would probably, unfortunately, result in a victory for the Republicans again. But the media would get rich on the increased viewership so they want one of those two to win.

Considering the lack of national coverage of Edwards, he is really making an amazing showing.

Big-Deal   January 8th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

I love it.

Patrick, Bethlehem,PA   January 8th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

By asking "what has Obama done" and thinking you are scoring points, unfortunately, you are showing your political ignorance. His achievements as a state legislature have been well documented.

For decades we have been told that money / lobbyists have been ruining our democracy. Money is said to be the root of all evil. Senators Barack Obama and Dick Lugar realized that the best way to start getting rid of all evil that have been affecting politics is to start at the source – money & lobbyists. That sounds like good judgment to me. That sounds like change to me.

John Fitzpatrick   January 8th, 2008 2:48 pm ET

There is something very brash and un-presidential about Pres. Clinton campaigning for his wife and slamming democratic candidates. A better role for a former president would be to remain statesman-like and in a position to support whichever candidate wins the nomination.

Obama will win North Dakota too   January 8th, 2008 2:48 pm ET

North Dakota for Obama. This is another state he will surely win. Hillary cry all you want. Yall can bash Obama till the sky turns red.It will not change a thing.

Tom B   January 8th, 2008 2:47 pm ET

What scares the fire out of me–An untested, short on basic international skills–person running the military. If push comes to shove, Mr. Obama is no cleaner than anyone else in the current race. If we are in the least aware of how the world works, movement and change is brought about by knowing where the bodies are buried and carrying a big shovel. If Mr. Obama is put in the white house the country will be run by his handlers and the lobbists he seems to abhor. The reality: politics is a dirty business. I am espousing no one, I am fearful of another feel good presidency. Mr. Bush had the same line. Young people should consider their future not their thoughts of bringing down the establishment. Radical change without immediate improvements to replace the old leads to anarchy.

The talking heads, pundits, whatever you wish to call them, are speaking and pushing Obama to insure the election of a Republican president in order to protect their multimillion dollar incomes. People need to remember that the big shots running the media are as smart as the guy running the garbage dump but with much more to lose.

Michael   January 8th, 2008 2:47 pm ET

I agree with Bill too. Obama is a good talker, to those naive Americans, especially to democrats and independents about the change that they want. He seems a fighter for all Americans.

Wake up, people. Show American what he did good in Illinois. Experience is not everything. But without experience, it's nothing. American need someone can act, not talk. I bet democrats will lose again in 2008 if Obama get nominated. Some smart Rebulican like Romney will win the game.

Marilyn Smith   January 8th, 2008 2:47 pm ET

I have to agree with Bill Clinton, it really does appear to be a snow job by the Media to make Obama look squeaky clean. I find that just too good to be true. People had better wake up and see Obama for what he really is, inexperienced and not ready for the job.

Mike San Diego   January 8th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

Oh the clintons are in Panic Mode.......I'll bet the farm if Hillary loses they get a divorce in less than 3 years. They have no need for each other anymore.......

davidvoter08   January 8th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

Hillary Clinton has the intelligence, strategies, experience and passion to change this great country to a great DIRECTION!!! She has the power and will achieve what she said! Not only an excellent orator who promises anything only for cheating voters to support for him. Unfortunately, he never considered whether he can keep his promise or how to realize what’s he said. If a person says he can do anything, we should doubt his honesty, such as Obama! Change is good, but can change to a positive or negative direction! We should reminder 8 years ago, Bush also said changes. Let’s support Hillary, because we love this country! We will not allow this country suffer another disastrous presidential term! I find the similarity between Barack Obama and George W. Bush!

Melvin Banks, Royal Oak, Michigan   January 8th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

Bill,Bill take it easy. I love you, I think you were wonderful for the country, I even have a picture of you on my desk at work. However your wife is not going to win. Mr. Obama is best person for the job. Change is coming to America, And I can't wait.Obama 2008. No one can stop this wave of change and hope. Change and Hope oh what wonderful words Go Obama Go this country is with you all the way.

Karen Whithers   January 8th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

I live in Florida and majority will be voting for Barrck Obama. Sick and tired of the way Washington is run. Nothing new, each administration is just like the last. Rubbish idiots in Washington should go. The world is changing and so is America. The money and influence can not change peoples hearts.They will take the bribes from the Clintons etc and still vote for Obama. We are a new generation devoid of racisim and we will not allow our nation to be led again by old geezers like Clintons or racists like Oreilly , who can scream untill their heads explode for alli care.I am white and this black/white divide will end.That stupidity belongs to days past.Obama come to Florida, you will get our votes too, this is your state, you are our next president.

Eric in Massachusetts   January 8th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

David, we all know why Oprah has gotten into this race..... race. She has always stayed out of it until now. It's odd, when she was campaigning in SC, her accent and dialect changed too. It was more ebonics. Just weird. I wish people would keep this race about qualifications and not race. Too bad.

People just don't seem to understand that Obama is not electable. He will do worse with our country than Bush has.

Kris Shanahan   January 8th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

I don't know which is the better candidate. This is because I don't know much about OBama other than he has a pleasant personality and it optimistic. He seems OK. What I think is the problem is not Hillary or Barack -but is the ignorant public AND the lack of effective or even in some cases biased news coverage.

US citizens are so unaware of the world arround them and so easily led by the spin machines of all sorts. They readily agree with the negative ads and spin, considering all politicians as inferior. Instead of thinking thru the issues (which really haven't been discussed much) – the independents always want a fresh face. Then they are always making us take a gamble with their fresh face-sometimes the results are OK and sometimes the results are really bad -as with Bush. You guys were idiots not to vote for Gore but you didn't like him because he wasn't new.

The party entrenched reliably vote their ticket which recently has been more republican especially in the south-where everyone thinks the same and they are strongly influenced by their conservative minister. But it is the independents that will decide this thing -so it looks like a gamble again. Hope it works, you haven't been doing very well lately.

Mike   January 8th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Ah, last thing we need is a black president. Sorry. Don't need someone who is backed up by Oprah based on "fluff" when it's really because he is black. But really in the end the electoral college will decide who wins. Think this year I'll go republican.

Pacheco Power   January 8th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

When it comes down to it, what experience does Hillary have? If I have to settle for a democrat in office, I would rather it be Obama. Hillary needs to stay as far away from the podium as possible!

Common Sense   January 8th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Sour Grapes. Wah Wah Wah all the way home, in Ar-kan-sas.

Debbie Bent   January 8th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

OMG!1 I can't believe the Clinton campaigners are so desperate, even Bill will start attacking Obama. Shame on you Bill.

The only Hillary supporters are those who think it is a way to get Bill back into the Whitehouse. I've got news for you, he won't even be able to give her an opinion on anything including the meals the staff should prepare.

Mary Bailey   January 8th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

It's not the advisors Stup*d, it's YOU Hill! People do NOT want YOU! You are corrupt, you are a KNOWN liar, you are entwined in corrupt partnerships, corrupt money, corrupt people.

Bill, you have stole millions of dollars from the American taxpayers. I for one am TIRED of paying for your limousines, your caviar, your multiple homes, vacation resorts, your thousand dollar suits, your security, your girlfriends. Bill, you Suk.

The best advisor in the world would tell you ONE thing. DROP OUT and GO AWAY!

RBaker   January 8th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

Can you imagine Hillary as President?

*sniff* "I am so saddened by this invasion" *tear*
"I feel so sorry for those people" *sniff-sniff*
"Their mothers and children" *tears-cry*
"The poor and innocent" *crying"
"Oh it's just so sad" *balling her eyes out*

Gloria   January 8th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

Bill stayed at the party too long.

The meltdown of the Clintons is both painful and embarrassing to watch.

Valerie   January 8th, 2008 2:43 pm ET

Old Bill needs to get out of the way and let his wife speak for herself. He is doing her more harm than good. Also he should keep in mind his own glass house.

GO OBAMA! '08

Bernard   January 8th, 2008 2:43 pm ET

Bill please, I'm begging you as a lifelong Democrat JUST GO AWAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!

Wufpakmom, Illinois   January 8th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

Whoa. That went ugly in a fast direction, didn't it?

Alice, VA   January 8th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

Bubba,

It should now become apparent that America is not in love with you and Hillary as much as you would like to believe. Look at the primaries as a referendum on you and your wife....they are sick of the bickering and partisanship that started during your Administration and is ongoing through the current one. ENOUGH OF THE OLD STYLE OF POLITICS...ENOUGH OF THE CLINTON/BUSH ERA. Obama represents a new era....accept it and PLEASE go home!!!!

M Lowe   January 8th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

MORE MUD SLINGING.

GO-OBAMA 08

Robert   January 8th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

What a bitter, arrogant speech. It is always interesting to see how powerful people react when they are not in control of the outcome. I like Bill Clinton and expect a more rational tone. The reality is people have vetted both candidates through 15 debates, 100 talk shows and endless campaigning and they like Obama more. He and Hillary will need to get behind the Democratic ticket no matter who it is. They don't deserve victory just for showing up. I am voting for Obama.

J   January 8th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

By the way, Hillary is still the front runner nationally. GO HILLARY!!

nick   January 8th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

lmao....like bush never cheated.or kennedy or eisenhower?....get a life,do your homework.what is baracks change? he doesn't say.next year we will be in kenya with oprah.why do you think she wants him in there?and the 90"were productive...this whole thing baffles me.people make all these coments without being in formed.

thechiefschief   January 8th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

The bottom line is that people are simply not interested in "Diet Clinton" this year ... Hillary is NO Bill Clinton ... and voters have had ENOUGH after 28 years of trading back and forth between the Bush and Clinton political "dynasties" ... they have answered Ronald Reagan's seminal question "are you better off now than 4 years ago" (this year that calculation is x 7 from 1988 to today) and concluded that the answer is NO and that we need a COMPLETELY fresh approach ... not more calculating by the same old tired political hacks. Hey Bill ... remember what they say about the "best laid plans." :-)

kelly   January 8th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

Ok, enough!!!
I urge all of you Democrats to take a long hard look at: RON PAUL!!
I have always been and independent/democract, and Dr. Ron Paul is the only candidate from either party that actually knows what he's talking about. He cares deeply about each individuals civil liberties, our economic condition, and stopping the american empire that wants to police the world instead of making sure it's citizens are free and happy!!!

Please check him out...go to google or youtube and type in "ron paul"

Dr. George M.D.   January 8th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

Mr. Barack Obama is an intelligent, highly idealistic and compassionate human being. His ingenousness and clarity of speech is both refreshing and earthy. What most concerns me is his personal safety. The dangerous elements remain most powerful in this country. The corporations still will continue to pursue their greedy interests,and power,at the expense of all Americans. Assassination attempts against a leader that can't be bought or do their evil bidding won't be a new phenomena. Lobbyists can influence and pursue the pharmaceutical companies , and health care agencies ,in providing commercial care to humans and universal health care will be blocked. Organized crime, from several ethnic groups has permeated all service related areas,hollywood,and drug peddling,insurance, and no doubt murder if money or power is involved;Thirdly,but who's counting,white supremists,may seek to assassinate this beautiful black man,with ancestry still living and working on farmland in Kenya. We need to exponentially provide high security for this young leader! I love Hillary and Bill Clinton too. Hillary's recent crying jag moved me., and her beauty and femminity are rewarding.

Ptucker   January 8th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

Pres. Clinton is absolutely correct. Eer since Orpah Winfrey and her millions came out for Obama the press has been behind him 100% and nothing has been brought up about him or his previous comments that hasn't been over looked by the media at large. You should be proud Oprah! You really CAN buy an election. Only problem with that is, you're turning REAL democrats away from the party and we'll back a Republican before we back Obama.

Senator Clinton: Fire your campaign guy! Start over and don't look back! We're not licked yet! Let me know what I can do to help! I refuse to let another big Purse buy the White House like the Bush's bought it last time!

Ralph B.   January 8th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

If Hillary was "co-president" as she virtually claims, wouldn't electing her be a violation of the term limitations imposed by the Constitution of the United States? I know the Constitution of the US is pretty much dead but that amendment should live and Hillary should go away.

J   January 8th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

So easy to judge, lest we look at ourselves with a pure heart. We are electing a human being here people. No one is perfect. Everyone lies. I personally don't care what a candidate does with his/her personal time. I don't care what his/her husband/wife did years ago. I care about what the future President will do for our great nation. All of us, every single one of us, experiences LIFE. Stop the name-calling and judging. Share your thoughts like intelligent human beings. This isn't kindergarten.

Ryan D'Amato   January 8th, 2008 2:40 pm ET

I love Bill Clinton, and have to say that I wouldn't mind having his wife running our country... He was a great president and he would surely be leading her.

I was trying to make my pick for 2008 today and I thought i was going to be leaning towards Hillary...

However I cant understand why the media isn't covering Ron Paul.

The more they ignore his presence... the more I'm starting to want to vote for him...
It really bothers me in our Country we have a media who's scared of the issues, just like the rest of the Republican candidates.

I didn't learn anything about Ron Paul until I went online... its not fair at all, he has a real shot at winning.

If people really got to hear his message it would be a whole different ball game.
!-RON PAUL 2008-! Google him its apparently the only way to get a fair and balanced picture of the real issues.

l egoti   January 8th, 2008 2:40 pm ET

Hillary's experience (just shy of 2 senate terms) is LESS than Obama's. Sorry, but being First Lady for 8 years, even if added to her resume, is still roughly equivalent to Obama's terms in IL legislature and US Senate combined. The "experience" pitch of the Clinton's is PUFFED UP.

Likewise the "agent of change" pitch. If Hillary were a true agent of change or our "champion" as she claims, she would have initiated and fought for meaningful legislation and fought the GOP obstructionists these past years under Bush - but she has not. Instead, she has enabled Bush with bad votes while Bill has sucked up to the Bush family.

Hillary is a follower, not a leader. I repeat: Hillary is a follower, not a leader.

Clintons are desperate and it shows. Rants by Bill and poor acting by Hill.

Both Clintons are "me, me, me" candidates. Neither has a vision for America or the courage to carry it out.

Instead, Hillary has a "personal investment" in staying with a sex-addict spouse for political and financial advantage. Now she wants payback for the emotional suffering she bargained for when she hitched her life to Bill.

Sorry, but this voter ain't rewarding her for her poor choices in her personal life or her political life.

Linda Pacifica CA   January 8th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

It is quite obvious to me that Republicans want to run against Obama. There is a reason why they are so threatened by Hillary. Think about it. She is better than Obama. No offense to Obama. He is a nice guy, but not well prepared to fix this mess of a country that Bush has left the next President.

Shirley   January 8th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

It is amazing how Barak Obama is not being held to the same standards as Hillary Clinton. Hillary appears to be required to explain her emotions, her competence and her will in one short breath. On the other hand, Obama can simply say the words change, change and change and many uninformed Americans cheer. What’s up? People, stop making decisions based on your emotions. Hope is somewhat of a chance, something you muster up. Faith is true belief. Do you really believe that hope trumps experience? If so, good luck.

Skip Sponheim   January 8th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Let me get this right, if I could.......Mr. Clinton is talking about somebody else and he's using terms like, "The biggest fairy tale I've ever seen", or words to that effect?

I thought Mr. Clinton was the one that fulfilled that catagory when he question what "it" is...............!

James   January 8th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Bill is correct. ... the media has fell in love with the thought of a black man getting the nomination and possibly becoming the president. Now that he is the frontrunner, let's see how the press views him.

Jehowlind   January 8th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

I'm not a Hillary supporter. But having said that, Like it or not, Bill Clinton has lost more intelligence than Barack O'Bama could ever learn. Period. But, he can't run for President. I don't think Hillary would be right for the United States as our President, and neither would O"Bama. Being President should not be a learn-as -you-go situation. Why is it that we can't get anyone with enough intelligence and forethought elected as President??? Because the whole election process is shot to hell. People who genuinely should be considered as viable candidates can't get their messages out. The media is biased and completely useless.
The sound-bite mentality of the moment is what we hear. Blah Blah Blah, just like the teacher on the Peanuts Cartoons. On the Democrat side, John Edwards MIGHT be able to handle things with the right team. As for republicans, I like Ron Paul. At least he hasn't flip-flopped on the issues, and believes we should realize the Constitution is an agreement we have to ourselves. You should read it sometime, along with the Bill of Rights. Government should stay out of my personal life, my paycheck, and not try to be my doctor, either.
Obviously, we can't give time to every single person who'd like to be President,
but there has to be a better way. The 2-party system is broken. Democrats should be running away with this thing, but they can't get out of their own way.
Republicans have become greedy, self-centered and ignorant and arrogant, just like that idiot we have for a President. Thak god I never voted for him....
He has squandered our good name in the world, our war debt is crushing us, the dollar is sinking faster than the Titanic. His lying, disgusting arrogance has caused us untold misery, caused the deaths of thousands of our finest soldiers
so he could get Saddam.....Gee, that was a fair trade-off. If you still don't get it, then let me spell it out for you....George Bush and his lying V.P. Cheney fixed the facts of the war around their agenda....ever heard of the Downing Street memo? Google it and find out. Why do you think Colin Powell got out??He knew it was all bull***t.
Anyone who is stupid enough to think Saddam/Iraq had anything to do with 9/11
is stupider than Bush....and that's not easy. But hey, all you Bush voters got exactly what you deserve.
Like I said, The government is broken. They have become a huge monster, taking more and more from us. Our money, our civil-liberties, our good name. All Gone. Thanks, Bush.
So, let's go out an elect some feel-good politician with no experience, who thinks he is MLK re-incarnate. Oh, yeah, don't forget, if Oprah likes him, then he must be just what we need.
Keep it up, America. Keep shooting yourselves in the foot. Sooner or later, you'll wind up shooting yourselves right between the eyes.
This is our home, and we have the right to decide who gets to come in, and how we want to spend our money.
Wake up...We've been asleep far too long.

Hallerberg   January 8th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Actually the press HAS checked out the facts on this one–see http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/01/obama_and_iraq.html . There you will read that Obama has been consistent on the war. The one hedge, which seems to be what the Clintons are using, is an interview before the 2004 Democratic Convention when both Kerry and Edwards were the candidates, and both of them had voted for the war. Even there, the full quote is ""What would I have done? I don't know. What I know is that from my vantage point the case was not made." Sounds like consistent opposition to me. And, as someone who worked for Bill's re-election as a foot soldier and who had a Hillary08 sticker on his car already in 2005, I can hardly express how disappointed I am in their current campaign. I am moving toward the "anyone but Hillary" camp.

David   January 8th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

It's not about hating or fearing anyone; and it's not about length of experience. It's about re-embracing American values of hope over despair, tolerance over hatred, community over selfishness, courage over fear, intelligence over dogma.

"Warren" and "Michael Guinn" are right: Clintons served well in resisting our slide to fascism; now embrace the movement for Obama: it's the hope we and you kept alive the last 35 years!

Sun in Texas   January 8th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Obama has fooled so many of you for the longest time. He starts off by going around saying he "I didn't vote for this war." Of course, he didn't he was not a US Senator. He was a STATE senator and therefore, not eligible to vote. He was not privy to that information. But I wonder what he would have done if he had been in the hot seat. It's always easy to say what we would and wouldn't do–but when we are actually faced with the sitution we do not know what we will respond the challenge life gives us. In the past few months, he's rephrased it...now he says "I opposed the war." So did I and millions of other Americans! But he made sure he "implied" he had acutally voted b/c he knew there are a whole of voters out there that wouldn't know the difference. He's mislead you–especially the young voter. Don't belive me on the vote–look it up.

Linda   January 8th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

I view the Clinton's as sleazy politicos. They and Mark Penn believed they could
buy the presidency, just like GWB. Hopefully, those times are done and people are more hip to the fast talking insiders. Tho, it doesn't seem to get a lot of press that Obama took the 2nd most pharma and insurance money after Hillary, more than all the rest of the field. I find that disturbing. He is not an open book and he is not a populist.

Joelle, Milwaukee, WI   January 8th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

James January 8, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Bill one commet for you 9-11 shut your mouth

Dear James,

911 happened under King George's WATCH!

Furthermore, he was brought up to speed, warned, warned, and warned... however, it was HIS DECISION – As the DECIDER – to do EVERYTHING in his admininstation 180 degrees from how Mr. Clinton did it!

We all know how WELL that WORKED...

Dan ~ Longview, WA.   January 8th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Where is Ron Paul CNN?

Huckabee was on Leno, your handlers said "JUMP"!

Ron Paul was on Leno, your handlers said "stand down".

As a citizen of the USA I demand equal coverage of all of the cantidates from all media outlets!

Go RON PAUL!

IndependentDemocrat   January 8th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

I'm a (was) big supporter of President Clinton even after his scandolous behavior in the WH; however, his personal attacks on a fellow democrat is a new low, un-statesman-like and even if Hileray were to get the nomination I would have doubts supporting her now. Maybe her winning the nomination is the true fairytale – hey, yesterday is gone it's Obama's time. Is the media's purported lack of scrutiny of Obama's record another 'right-wing conspiracy'? Get over it you guys had your time and Hilery shopuld be thakful that she got a seat in State that she had never lived until she decided to run for the seat all the time knowing that it was a stepping stone to the WH. As a blackman I always felt that you were our 1st Black President but maybe that was another fairytale...please stop before we lost all respect that we blacks had 4 you and were the main pillar of support...finally a blackman is not judged by the color of his skin but by the content of his character...and judgement.

alli2   January 8th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

This conversation shouldn't be about who's right and who's wrong. There are issues here that everybody keeps blowing off. Bill/Hillary or Obama, female, black, bald or ugly-it doesn't matter.

We are a country at war. We are a country in the throws of finacial instability. We have citizens without healthcare, citizens living below the poverty level. We are the Mayflower for every "visiting" nationality. Our schools are no longer considered competetive in the areas of science and math. We are a vulnerable target. So yes, experience might be something you would consider as a requirement to run this country. And yes, as citizens, we should demand to know the speifics of how these issues will be handled.

All of us need to be voting based on information and specifics. I'm afraid the media, as an information base, encourages emotional participation. You can see it in the frenzied, reactive faces of the frontrunners and their supporters. You can ar it as people say they prefer one candidate over another because they want change. Hell, we all want something changed in this country. But I'm not going to vote for any candidate who has the "right buzzword" until they can tell me with a reasonable amount of certainty how they're going to handle it. Then let me make an informed decision. Words have no meaning without substance. And that goes for all candidates, democrats or republicans!!

As soon as we, the citizens, stop screwing around with empty negative rhetoric , someone might actually hear what the candidates are saying through all the BS and media projections. I truly believe the caucus' and primaries give the media job security and months of entertainment .

Educated, informed apathy is sad but just as sad, and frightening, is zealous, educated but uninformed participation.

GEORGIA WOMEN FOR OBAMA   January 8th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Most Georgia women will be voting for Obama. Clinton you just made it worse for Your silly evil wife. CNN Better tel the world and the nation that we have decided to support Obama. We are tired as a nation of things being done the same old way in Washington. Things have to change. Bill go rest sir.This is Obamas year.You can not force us to love Hillary.We are several thousand strong in Georgia, and our vote is for Barrack.

Women groups in Georgia.

concerned...   January 8th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

I like Obama, I really do. But I am afraid to hand him our entire country. His talk is pretty, no, beautiful. But you could elect anyone then- say, my husband, my father, my neighbor. But we need more. Obama's time will come, and that is in the future after he learns more government and foreign policy, after he practices a bit more– then I will feel he deserves to be at the head of this country... hands down.

Bill   January 8th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Will someone please pull President Clinton aside and remind him that we needed him in two months to assist whomever the democratic candidate is, whether it is his wife, or Obama, or Edwards. But now it might be too late. When good old fashioned blue dog democrats like me are openly calling for him to go out to pasture it is sad, we could have used his skill and intelect in the upcoming election. It appears he has lost sight of virtually everything that is important and is in danger of becoming just another has-been.

RCH   January 8th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Well, well, well ... the old and real Bill has decided to re-surface ... let the bashing begin, huh! What will we be hearing next from either he or Hillary? Will it be another "I did not ... I did not ... I repeat, I did not ..."

Matt   January 8th, 2008 2:36 pm ET

Obama has the credentials (Illinois Senate, National Senate, University of Chicago Professor) and the experience (Hillary inflates hers to more than it is worth and degrades his) So it is obvious that ..beep..beep...beep.. the Clintons are dumping out their garbage and fear mongering. I am sick of these fear mongers, I have looked at the Obama take on Economy (excited about proposed 0% capital gains tax on startups and innovation), Health Care and the War. Hillary CANNOT unite us, whereas, I think Obama has the moderate smart positions that most americans can agree with, no matter their party affiliation. If she goes against McCain, she may lose. But if Obama goes against him... lights out, McCain is too old.

Jerry   January 8th, 2008 2:36 pm ET

"I spent 35 years fighting and working for change." – Hillary

Now THAT'S the biggest fairy tale.

Frank Jackson   January 8th, 2008 2:36 pm ET

Ah Bill Clinton...I sure wish the 22nd Amendment wasn't preventing him from running again !

Go Hillary...we need you both!

Neil   January 8th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

All of you Obama lovers who I believe are just Bush lovers since he has the same rhetoric that Bush had when he ran can start packing your bags and move to Kenya and mountains of Pakistan. CHANGE? What about reform? What about EXPERIENCE? Do you want another Bush that will just wing it? Or maybe you want Obama to choose a Vice President who will run the country such as Chenney has done for the past seven years and why? Because Bush had no experience. Wasn't he the President of reconciliation and compassion? BLAH BLAH BLAH If Obama gets the democratic nomination then you can be SURE that the Republicans will keep the White House. He talks a good talk and so did GW but it's more then talk that makes a good President and especially a President that will represent our country in a way commensurate with our stature in the world. I hope Bloomberg throws his hat in the ring so we can have a true INDEPENDENT if that's what the country wants and also a candidate that has a chance to become President. All of you kids who barely know how to balance your check books and pay back your student loans need to take a step back and analyze the situation instead of being overtaken by a smooth talking emotion appealer dreamer. I want the US to be the US again and Obamma is not the candidate...SORRY.

lws   January 8th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

Hilarious and sad that people like Rick Abrantes are still cutting and pasting chain email fwds. Hilarious in that it shows how much more seriously we Americans take email fwds than documented fact. Sad in that is makes that part of the R base look really dumb...embarrassing for the rest of us.

Jean, Park Ridge, IL   January 8th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

Instead of name-calling, why not dispute the facts that he stated. Hopefully people will wise up and realize we are a country at war and need someone with some experience in office. Instead of accusing Hillary of voting in favor of the war, why not state the whole truth – in favor of the war given the information she had – which was false.

GEO. B   January 8th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

Barack Obama is a great word merchant and many are drooling over his slick rehtoric. No way should he be the leader of the USA or a coalition of countries that look to us for help. When it comes to budget, war, economy, world affairs, global warming, health care etc, etc Obama hasn't an ounce of knowledge or experience.

Deputy Dan   January 8th, 2008 2:34 pm ET

Why do so many of you have your head stuck in the mud?

I'm not in favor of Hillary because she voted for Bush's war in Iraq and if she couldn't see through the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Powell lies she isn't smart enough for the job; and if she did see through them what does it say that she voted for the war and continues to vote to fund it?

Obama talks a good talk but he wasn't even there to vote against the war. He can say he didn't vote for it but he didn't vote against it either. What has he done to stop the war? Didn't he say in an early debate that "all options are on the table when it comes to Iran" (including nuclear weapons)? Where is the change in that?

Americans want change but they keep going back to the same kinds of politicians to get it so they won't. Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul are all opposed to the war and would get us out quickly. Yet not many Americans are supporting the candidates who would really give us change.

The elections are rigged. The last two presidential elections were stolen. Google Greg Palast and check Google video and YouTube for him as well and you'll find out exactly how it was done. Don't you think they have perfected the technique by now?

There are too many powerful interests who want this war to continue. You know who they are. Some of them even own television networks as well as being defense contractors.

If you think one man or woman elected president is going to change things you're sadly mistaken.

The solution includes total public funding of national elections to get ride of the heavy influence of big business and having the courage to throw out all of the bad politicians of both parties. We elected Democrats in 2006 to make change but they've done very little. Our health care system sucks, we are #37 out of the top 50 countries in quality of health care yet ours is the most expensive. We are spending billions each month on the war which cannot be won militarily. Trillions of dollars are missing from the Pentagon, Billions are missing that were shipped to Iraq in cash (in $100 bills) - where did that money go? Our system is riddled with corruption and the politics of greed. We desperately need at least one more major party. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are going to save our country. It's too late, Bush/Cheney have done so much damage we will never get back to the country we had just a decade ago.

Jim   January 8th, 2008 2:34 pm ET

Bill,

Please stop this. I love you big guy. I think you were a great president. But every distorted/untrue word you utter out of the Republican play book makes my respect for you, what you accomplished in office, and what you have accomplished since slip just a little bit.

Hillary lost Iowa. She is going to lose the Democratic nomination. It is time to get behind the Democratic nominee. Having a Democrat that isn't your wife in office is ten times better than having a Republican in office, particularly if we have to choose from this pathetic slate of loser Republicans.

Jim

Darryl   January 8th, 2008 2:34 pm ET

Go ahead and elect Obama. Eight uyears ago you elected Busch and ruined the country. Go head and put Obama in and finish the job. He stands right there and says he believes intaxes and well raise taxes and give breaks to big money. You believe Busch's bull why not Obama's. Four years from now when your in the next depression. You all will be crying I didn't vote for him. You guys bash the Clinton's, but look at the facts. The only time this country had great growth and progrees was under him. Take the blinders off

M Lowe   January 8th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Give it up Bill !!!!!!!!!!!!!(Mr. X-President)

Hillary is not you. You were a great president and still are. But Hillary is not you. She is running her experience of 35 years. What experience? First Lady?? All candidates need to support whom ever gets the nomination for the Dem. Party.
If its Mrs. Clinton, fine, so be it. But if its NOT, so be it.
Don't slam the other candidates just because your team is down in the polls.

Hey, lets bring this country together.

United we stand, divided we fall.

GO--O.......BA.......MA 08

John New York, NY   January 8th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

A bitter angry man.

At least he wouldn't tear up when asked about his hair.

Che   January 8th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

she bullies when she's up in the polls, then she cries like a baby when she's down, or throws a temper tantrum like a two-year -old. Sorry, Hill, but not every democrat likes you, not every woman likes you. She claims to have 35 years in government service...there are housekeepers that have scrubbed toilets in Washington for longer, and I am sure that there are "escorts" who can claim 35 years in government service . All she has done is ride on Bronco Billy's coattails, then claiming his ideas as hers...wonder whose idea it was to give Vince Foster a "going away present". Would like a scandal -free White House for a change, and am tired of the bush-clinton-bush-clinton years ...hard to believe that the last president we had whose last name wasn't Bush or Clinton was Reagan...almost 20 years of the same faces...maybe that's why even Ron Paul is looking better to voters than Hillary. Someone, anyone is better than a Clinton.

Linda Pacifica CA   January 8th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Obama is not experienced enough to run the country. He will be abused. I do not feel safe with him as our President. His rhetoric does not impress me. there is no substance to what he says.

Jacque Bauer   January 8th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Clinton Toast: Two slices, very burnt and very bitter.

Robert Wagner   January 8th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

I agree with Bill. The GOP agenda and their media machine are promoting Obama because he is their only hope of retaining the White House. I'm sorry but Iowa and New Hampshire are not good examples of whether or not the United States has become color-blind and the southern states that have a history of being racist have a lot of say of say in the General Election. Getting their biggest threat out of the way early is a simple task thanks to the Republicans who claim themselves to be Independants. Wake-up people the media is the Republican Machine and it is working. Obama is a great man but he is NOT electable.

Walt Smith   January 8th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Let's get real, Ex-Prez. No body got pissed off when it was your time for a fairytale, when you were the kid from Hope, Arkansa, when you became a fresh face in old politics. Now Barack has the same shot and you are giving these hypocritical shots as if no one knows the entire truth.

Let's stay real, Americans. The way to salvage this country is not to be Red or Blue but to be American. America must come first! This is all Barack is saying and the young people of America see the wisdom it carries. It does not take experience to know this, it takes vision. It does not take a Washington insider to do this, it takes someone willing to work with every one, in or outside Washington to bring about real change. Barack is prepared to do that and America is ready to change for the better.

This is not emotion, this is plain common sense.

Donna Kassman   January 8th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

The major television "show hosts" need to report the news and keep their "personal" opinions about the Presidential Campaign to themselves. You learn directly or indirectly what side the host is on (they try to influence the public). Their job is to report the news...stop slanting news reports, keep host opinions out of the mix, and be FAIR. The American people are smart enough. Then the analyst should do their jobs.

josh akron oh   January 8th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Roger: you Hillary supporters, who think you're helping to make Hillary's case by bashing Obama — for me, this isn't about what Obama is, but what Hillary ISN'T. She has no REAL experience. She isn't a decent, honest human being. All she's done for the past several months is use lies, deceit, and fabrications to try to weasel her way into power, and now that she isn't being automatically coroneted president by the American people, she's losing her mind, and blaming everybody but herself.

She's just as disingenuous as John Kerry and Al Gore were, and if she's the Democratic nominee in 2008, then the result this election will be the same as it was in 2000 and 2004. Furthermore, as a Democrat, I simply won't vote. I won't vote vote for the Democrat, nor will I vote for the Republican, I just won't vote.

I'm sick of using my vote simply to give the green light to liars who take the United States political process for granted. I'll either vote for a candidate who I believe in — who I believe will deliver change, who won't be a war monger, who won't support "free trade agreements" that sell out American jobs to cheap third world countries on behalf of their corporate backers– or I simply won't vote. Period

Roger, backup your words...what evidence do you have that proves Hillary is what you say she is? You don't even know the real Hillary; you listen to lies propagated by the Media. I can point out several lies just in the past few months alone, that add to the negative persona created for her.

If you don't vote, don't complain after the election.

Den   January 8th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Well, I thought it wouldn't be over till super-Tues and that Hillary still had a chance. Though slim. Now I read this tirade from Bill and that confirms it. The true Clinton candidate is Billary. Now I know for sure this ship is sinking.

Alan Gill   January 8th, 2008 2:31 pm ET

America will stand or fall depending who they put in the White House,a candidate who keeps making promises the public likes to hear is not going to save America. America needs a tough experienced politician who will do what is needed for the country even if the measures are unpopular.

Steve   January 8th, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Obama is a wolf in sheeps clothing. Wake UP all you sheep!!
I will have to vote Republican if he wins

James D.   January 8th, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Media bias against HRC? Give- *me*- a- break- Bill.

Major commentators for CNN...let's see...Paul Begala, David Gergen, and James Carville. ALL THREE WORKED FOR CLINTON!

Carville will VERY likely take over HRC's campaign next week. Carville has casually said on TV he has given her campaign advice recently, etc.

Lame Bill. The megalomania of the Clintons is being revealed. Scary...and a bit heart breaking for me. I used to love them.

David   January 8th, 2008 2:31 pm ET

GET A GRIP AMERICA! If you would have heard her speak last night, there would be a hands down victory! All this anger, is just not American. The Clintons have done more for this Nation and I voted for Bush twice now, and regret it terribly now. Even if she does not pull out a victory tonight, the COUNTRY is ready to speak and I cant wait. This guy from Illinois has NO and I repeat no International experience, and never in my life would I see a celebrity like OPRAH get her nose into politics. She has used her media empire that I feel is just down right wrong. Hillary, STAY STRONG AND GO GET EM!

Cole   January 8th, 2008 2:31 pm ET

This race is over and now its starting to get ugly. The Clintons are completely falling apart. I'm just amazed at these elitist Clintonian liberals who continue to disparage Obama supporters. I know where Obama stands on the issues, and I know where Clinton stands. The fact of the matter is that I dont need to agree with Obama on every issue. I just want a president who is open, transparent, and wants to involve everyone not just those who are completely aligned with his policy views. The fact is that for a long time too many Americans were disinterested in the Political process and ignorantly allowed the extremists in both parties to consolidate their interests and hi-jack both parties. The time has come for this to end, regardless of whether Darren from Minnesota likes it or not. Obama has the abilitiy to unite, to lead, and to inspire this country. IT's time for a change, a change for the better. OBAMA 08

Linda Pacifica CA   January 8th, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Thank you Bill! Please continue to stand up for Hillary. She is being unjustifiably attacked by Big Business! God Bless you and Hillary for standing up for America!

Sam Jr.   January 8th, 2008 2:30 pm ET

I don't think any one person in the office can make a difference whether it is Obama or Clinton or Edwards!!

ITS THE NETWORK THEY BRING ALONG TO THE OFFICE THAT MAKES ALL THE DIFFERENCE. (Thought that was a no-brainer until I started reading some comments here).

By far we have had some of the most prosperous years under Bill Clinton's watch regardless of what he did in his personal life.

By electing Hillary, she too will definitely bring in the right network of people with the right kind of experience.

Obama lacks the experience and no matter how feel good his words may be, by voting for him, would be a mistake as he will be sure to crumble in the presidential elections to the republicans. And the republicans know it.

Obama is a nice guy. But nice guys finish last.

RG   January 8th, 2008 2:30 pm ET

The "senator from Punjab" thing is old, and it was not only NOT condoned by Obama; it was condemned by him–that's something that's been well documented, and BC knows it. Obama has bent over backwards to keep this sort of thing from happening again.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/84581
"The Clinton campaign was justifiably angry, and seized on the episode as proof that Obama had abandoned his vaunted "politics of hope" and had offended Indian-Americans in the process. Obama was furious with his staff. "Some of my roommates in college were Indian and Pakistani," he told NEWSWEEK. "I had to call some of my best friends and explain that my campaign wasn't engaged in xenophobia." Obama held a come-to-Jesus meeting with his senior aides at his Chicago headquarters and vented his anger. "If you're even going close to the line, you better ask me first," he recalled saying. "That was the most angry I've been in this campaign."

Also odd that he thinks he media has been unfair towards them and courting Obama. Up till now, it's been nothing but the opposite; in fact, the long-running joke is that CNN is Clinton New Network. But this is just the nature of the beast, and candidates just need to roll with it. The bitterness here is unprofessional. He, of all people, should know better.

cory   January 8th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Yes, I may have shot back hard at Bill, but the simple facts of the matter are that he is lying– again!

Now, with that said, yes I am a real person, not a "staffer".

To all of those who assert that Obama has no chance or that the repulicans are switching sides to vote for Obama– simply not true. Yes, there are in fact many people who have gone against their own party affiliation, but they are making this choice based on solid opinions of the candidate for whom they have chosen to cast their vote in this democratic process. To understand the multitude of reasons why they have done this, perhaps you should listen to the reasons these folks have cited when doing so.

To all of the non-believers and "ye of little faith"– Obama can win the preidency this fall. I was in Springfield, Illinois last February. It was amazing to me (someone who has been around politics all my life) to see so many people braving the sub-freezing temperatures just to hear this man announce his big for the whitehouse. I have never seen such an event and probably never will again in my life.

Where the Clinton's and all other dis-believers have failed to do is calculate exactly where Obama gets his support. He is the anti-establishment candidate. When he ran for senate, he he ran against the mighty "Chicago machine", yet he won out against them. Here again, he is running against a party machine– the Clintons who have the support of the DNC. For many Americans, he offers a refreshing choice to make a difference because they see an outsider with a chance. For all of Obama's eloquence, his speeches are inspiring, but that is not the sole reason why he continues to gain support.

From the beginning, Obama promised to make this election about the AMerican people, not about himself (or any other individual for that matter). This is why he has been snowballing. In order for the Clintons or anyone else (think republicans this fall) they will have to figure out a way to combat this phenomenon. Presently, it appears that it will be difficult for anyone within the establishment to accomplish this!

Von   January 8th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

I like Bill and Hilary Cinton, but my God, they have become so pathetic... Hilary 's "show of emotions" was designed to do what?? The presidency is not a prize, it is the choice of the American people to give to whom they want So Bill go retire somewhere, and Hilary if you want to win this, stop, and I mean stop attacking Obama.

jed   January 8th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Maybe someone's already posted this, but Hillary is the one that jokingly said she could be Senator in Punjab: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/memo1.pdf

I think Bill is twisting statements a bit here.

The Craziness Continues   January 8th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

To: Cable King Pittsburgh PA January 8, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Nothing new, but how did we get so nasty as a nation?

When? You're reading it on this board. When the Clintons, and the Clintonistas, got in power. The Clintons, Carville, Begala, Blumenthal, et al. It is was never about the good of the country, it is about them holding onto power.

Reagan used to go at it with Tip O'Neil (Dem -SOH) on issues all the time in the 80s, but he also said at the end of the day he could sit down and have a beer with him cuz they genuinely liked each other.

Poiltics was just politics back then .... but the Clintons took it to a different level and it has never been the same.

josh akron oh   January 8th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

scott January 8, 2008 12:39 pm ET

Go away Bill.

You are a crook, a liar , and the list goes on !!

THE BEST THING YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR WIFES CAMPAIGN IS TO GO HOME.

STAY AWAY………YOU'RE GOING TO HAND THE ELECTION OVER TO THE

So much a crook, that hundreds of million dollars later, all Ken Starr found was a blue dress...and perjury.

Yea, whatever man...Look at what this loser president is doing in office now; if his actions are not worse than perjury for oral sex, I'd like to know what universe you're living in. Clinton was a popular President, and remains so.

he's speaking the truth...Obama and Hillary's voting records are identical; look them up:
http://votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=55463

He's refused to take a stand on the Iraq war...Period.

He didn't even show up for the Iran vote.

What's more, Bill Clinton toughened sanctions against Iran in the mid-nineties, whil Dick Cheney cheated American law by creating an offshore subsidiary so Halliburton could continue doing business with Iran. Hillary is consistent with that action; Cheney is not, i.e. make money from Iran, then blow them up.

Jenny   January 8th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

The President is absolutely right. Never listen to someone' words without take a look at what that person has done. A dream will never come truth with just simply "talk." We do not want to be miserable for just dreaming. Also, let give at least some respect to the people who had, have , and still serving the country, serving us.

DIANA, RANCHO MIRAGE CA   January 8th, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Though I am an independent and have not decided yet whom I would want
as our new president; I totally agree with President Clinton about Obama.

I am sick and tired of the media, yes the media not reporting all things.
We seem to live in a nation that only remembers events by rote.

I want the truth and the whole truth reported by all the media outlets.

"Lets not go for "Dreamers but Realist" After Bush our nation can not stand
another mistaken fool to run our country. It is going to take more work than
ever to give our great nation the status it once had and Bush and his cohorts
threw away.

And by the way I would rather have a president that listened to the polls than one
that proclaims he does not. This tells me that the people that he (she) represents are not important and are too stupid to know what they want and what is good for
them. We can all see where that has gotten us with this idiot of a president.

Michele   January 8th, 2008 2:28 pm ET

It's about time someone questioned the media's "fairytale" take on Obama. The media needs to start focusing on where the candidates stand on the issues that MATTER to the United States of America. Who cares that Obama can give a good speech? A speech is just talk, not action. I want to know how he is going to act on the issues, so far I can't tell. My vote is still undecided.

kid101   January 8th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

obama/edwards or vice versa. you're the odd woman out Hil. 3rd wheel yet again. Hubby can't save ya. You thinnk Obama is slick for running for senate and promptly president? You did the same thing in NY, just took you a lil more time...

Eleanor   January 8th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

wow How tacky and disrespectful of Bill Clinton to come out and call Obama a fairy tale!!
I have always repected Bill Clinton but he needs to apologize for that disrespectful remark just b/c Obama has been ahead of Hillary.Obama is a respectful politician with good character and qualities and had as much right to throw his hat in the ring as well as Hillary
Bill needs to go back to speaking engagements
Perhaps American is rising up and finally saying enough of Clintons and Bushes
The country has had 20 years of one or the other!!

Freedom of Speech   January 8th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

This is the church that Obama goes to. Read the 10 point vision on this web site

http://www.tucc.org:80/about.htm

Scott   January 8th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Darren in MN and all the other "young people/dreamer" bashers,

You might want to check your demographics a bit more carefully. I know the Hillary campaign wants to portray things as if it's "just those immature college kids" who are voting for Obama.

She was defeated soundly by everyone UNDER 50 in Iowa. The ONLY demographic she won was voters over 65. I know "40 is the new 30" and "30 is the new 20" but come on. In fact, it sounds like something you'd hear on a grade school playground when you say "if you don't agree with me, you're immature."

Look at the numbers, don't just swallow the spin. It's precisely because of tactics such as these that people are turned off to HRC.

FRANK SCALF, MURFREESBORO, TN 37127   January 8th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

CLINTON SAYS GIVE ME A BREAK ABOUT OBAMA–I WISH CLINTON WOULD GIVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE A BREAK AND DISAPPEAR

oldster   January 8th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Yup, you are Mr. Integrity Sir. Except for that part about the intern, and where your dink was during your tenure as president.

Tom Davie   January 8th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

...........I am still waiting for someone to tell me about H.C.'s 35 years of experience. I am still waiting after 6 requests..............

How about you just go to Clintons Biography.

Being first lady of Arkansas and of the country doesnt mean you sit around ironing and cooking.

While its not 'voted into office' experience , its still political experience. Dealing with issues and trying to get things done.

Its also regardless if you are sold on Obama. It wouldnt matter if she had worked together with Jesus Christ himself, you would find a way to bash it down.

Marcus, SF CA   January 8th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

This is soo irratating! Why couldent California be 1st to VOTE?? I cannot wait for 2/5 so I can vote for Hillary.

Daniel Peebles   January 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Dear Bill and Hillary Clinton:

I am losing respect for you more and more as the days go on. The ring is slipping from your fingers, and all you can do is attack a man who has inspired more people in the last few months than you did in the entire 8 years of being president.

Let me say it again:

BARACK OBAMA HAS INSPIRED MORE PEOPLE IN THE LAST 4 MONTHS THAN IN THE ENTIRE 8 YEARS YOU WERE PRESIDENT.

How about Hillary's experience?

Are we better off because of all her experience?

She LOST the battle for universal health care.

I am really SADDENED to see the arrogance and the desperation of the Clintons. They are both losing their minds.

Bill Clinton is losing the respect of millions.

Thank you.

Joanne McCann   January 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Abe Lincoln was a 2 year Rep. of the house before becoming President and he united this country. JFK was a young wide eyed Senator with little experience if you all remember and asked us not what our country could do for us but what we can do for our country. It is that time again. Not to sit back and let business as usual prevail.

RuthieM   January 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

I never imagined I would see Bill Clinton in this mode. I'm sorry. It's sad, it's bad. Not to mention he is distorting Obama's positions. Long ago I'd wished Bill Clinton would stop stumping for Hillary and just retreat and go write his memoirs like a good former president because his presidential exaltation was diminishing day by each day he was out there for her, looking desperate. If there's anyone the media has given a free ride it's been Hillary, all the way through up to the Russert debate, and even then. But at some point one's true colors must evolve, and so it is only Hillary herself who is causing whatever effect today because her own true colors have brought her there. And if Obama is a 'fairy tale' then is our former president telling the American children that fairy tales are bad?

Dee Ward Mena, AR   January 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Someone has to stand up for Hillary since the press is certainly backing obama. I hate for him to do this as so many people think it reflects badly on the Clintons but gosh, give them a break. CNN has been terrible to Hillary, Fox has been more fair. I can't believe that CNN has not read the blogs criticizing them for their over coverage of obama and their negative coverage of Hillary. If Hillary loses it will be because the press gave the election to obama. He has done nothing. He says he was against the war from the beginning. That is easy to say when you didn't have a vote. When you are in there and have to make a decision you have to make a decision, when you are talking about it you can say "I WOULDN'T HAVE VOTED FOR THE WAR" Easy to say when you didn't have a vote. Go back to Kenya where your black heritage began. By the way, they say you are going to call Kenya and see if you can help. I know your black heritage is from Kenya, does that mean that if Kansas has a tornado, you will call Kansas where your WHITE heritage is from Oh yes, I forgot you are a black man, not a HALF BLACK/HALF WHITE...since you don't recognize the White part of your heritage because then you couldn't run a a black candidate.

OMan   January 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Mr. Clinton,

The reason Obama is being potrayed by the media as hero of the democrats is simply put in the following ways.

1. Economy is not at is best, Businesss including the media organizations do no want to pay additional taxes and nor do the people of USA.

2. People would rather have a president who will not raise taxes and make the military establishment rich by spending and increasing the deficit under the hope that organizations will hire more if they are not taxed and are profitable due to economic wars such as the one going on now.

Does is sound true. I am sure you and many would agree in part.

After all a country dominated by a particular color is never going to vote for a person of another color from the minority.

OMan.

pc   January 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

ppgallini – lack of experience? He is a senator, not really sure what else you can expect. Sure he wasn't married to a president and he's not 90 years old like the rest of the candidates, i don't see how this makes him any less qualified than the other candidates. His positions on most of the topics that I care about are pretty similar to Hillary's, the only difference is he hasn't sold his soul for campaign money, LIKE EVERY OTHER CANDIDATE HAS...

teddy orlando fl   January 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

OMG Bill Has finally lost his mind HRC needs to go

if they try to fight it they will drag down the dems

HRC time for you do something presidential

Bow out

Obama is here now and any underhanded dirty tricks will just hurt the dems

time for you to go

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 2:24 pm ET

I don't like both (Obama or Clinton), but I hate the media, they are bunch of crooks... If Obama Hossin is elected are we gonna be shileded by his deal with his commerades, not fear attach in next year? again I don't trust this guy, he is a pure politician, he flips his positions all the time when he needed. I rather to live under Bush's not rosy but true promises.

Truthspeake   January 8th, 2008 2:24 pm ET

The problem as I see it is that Hillary has become a true "poliician" and she had my vote and confidence up to the point where she wouldn't change her stance on her vote for the Iraq war. Somebody gave her very bad advice about that. Just like the bad advice she adhered to yesterday with getting emotional which will ultimately boomerang on her. And now Bill is mudslinging. After the Bush years and all the damages done, this country needs someone who will unite us and who won't be just another politician with empty promises. Truth be told, this time around, I'd prefer someone with little experience, after all, it is so-called "experience" that has the US in the turmoil its currently in both here and around the world. Let the healing process begin...we need to take back our country!

B.W.   January 8th, 2008 2:24 pm ET

STOP INSULT CLINTON...
I DON'T THINK BILL WANTS BACK INTO THE WHITE HOUSE... THE REASON OBAMA'S LACK OF EXPERIENCE!!! I NEVER HEAR OF HIM...

Roger   January 8th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

To you Hillary supporters, who think you're helping to make Hillary's case by bashing Obama - for me, this isn't about what Obama is, but what Hillary ISN'T. She has no REAL experience. She isn't a decent, honest human being. All she's done for the past several months is use lies, deceit, and fabrications to try to weasel her way into power, and now that she isn't being automatically coroneted president by the American people, she's losing her mind, and blaming everybody but herself.

She's just as disingenuous as John Kerry and Al Gore were, and if she's the Democratic nominee in 2008, then the result this election will be the same as it was in 2000 and 2004. Furthermore, as a Democrat, I simply won't vote. I won't vote vote for the Democrat, nor will I vote for the Republican, I just won't vote.

I'm sick of using my vote simply to give the green light to liars who take the United States political process for granted. I'll either vote for a candidate who I believe in - who I believe will deliver change, who won't be a war monger, who won't support "free trade agreements" that sell out American jobs to cheap third world countries on behalf of their corporate backers– or I simply won't vote. Period.

LGardner   January 8th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

I believe that it is totally unfair and unjust that a former president–husband or not can get up in a public forum to speak on behalf of another candidate. The other candidates are in this race without a president influence behind them. This is a very high profile and history making campaign this year, so it is going to be ugly, however Clinton (like Bush) shouldn't have "Daddy" coming to the rescue.

willowood   January 8th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

What the former President forgets is his role in helping the Republicans take the White House for 8 long, unproductive and very destructive years. His 'numerous indiscretions' gave the Republicans all they needed to stop the progress of any necessary legislation addressing real problems. But impeachment proceedeings were the call of the day. Neither Bill nor Hilary deserve another chance to lead this country. Once burned your fault, twice burned MY fault .

mab   January 8th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

I'm very concerned on how far right Obama is, is connections to Islam, as well as
Kenya. With the situation in Kenya as it is how can he make sound judment with his grandmother and family living there. To many unanswered questions about this Man. I might have to go with Hillary just because of his stance on immigaration.

OMan   January 8th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Mr. Clinton,

The reason Obama is being potrayed by the media as hero of the democrats is simply put in the following ways.

1. Economy is not at is best, Businesss including the media organizations do no want to pay additional taxes and nor do the people of USA.

2. People would rather have a president who will not raise taxes and make the military establishment rich by spending and increasing the deficit under the hope that organizations will hire more if they are not taxed and are profitable due to economic wars such as the one going on now.

Do is sound true. I am sure you and many would agree in part.

OMan.

Michelle   January 8th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Interesting coming from someone who is a huge liar. "I tried marijuana, but didn't inhale..." Oh come on! At least Obama, being the honest man that he is, admitted he did inhale. The Clinton pair is a joke. Can't stand them anymore.

JUAN   January 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

I did not have sex with that woman !

Mark tanstill   January 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Mr President, I love you and your family, but I have to tell you my 19 years old niece need to know that when it comes to the presidency there are other qualified people in this country than the Bush Clinton Bush …. Clinton? clan.

Once again I love you mr President but it isn't personal.

DATSJUSTLIFE!!   January 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Bill, Bill!! I would have never ever used a disparaging word against you!! I was in your corner when u took it to the Republicans and fought your way back from near political ruin. But to say that Obama's story is a fairytale?? Ha what a crock!! Are you really in the best position to be talking about fairytales....i mean "It all depends on what the definition of IS...IS"???? LOL You are doing what I know you think is best for your wife and the second reincarnation of your political life but give us a BREAK. Hillary is toast and the more YOU and the clinton wagon play politics to smear Obama...the more, in the off chance that Hillary does get the nomination, I will be sure and vote Republican for the first time EVER!!

Hillary has gotten in the mud...she has given us half truths and as the old folks say...thrown the rocks and then hidden her hand! So again give us a BREAK with your ridiculous comments and face the facts that arrogance does not always ensure success!

Yan   January 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Bill is right on!

I am not saying Hillary's campaign is not negative, but Obama used all dirty tactics on Hillary and no one is paying attention to! Obama needs to be exposed !!!

The Republicans will knock Obama down in the first round if he becomes the Dem nominee.

TCHUTAKATE   January 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

HILLARY IS THE BEST, SHE IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT

Mike in Kentucky   January 8th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

A quote from Senator Obama on CNN's election coverage page today on the New Hampshire primaries:

"My job is to be so persuasive that if there's anybody left out there who is still not sure whether they will vote, or is still not clear who they will vote for, that a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany ... and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama," the Democrat said in Hanover.

I don't know about you, but I will not require a beam of light to persuade me how to vote nor do I expect an epiphany to make up my mind. For those who might need a little help with this..."Epiphany -(adj.) A realization. Theophany , darshana . any religious or spiritual apparition or vision."

We've already had one fool who thought God wanted him to be President and look where we are today.

Every word that Senator Clinton utters is scrutinized and parsed to death by the media, every gesture she makes or emotion she shows or does not show is analyzed by the talking heads and quite frankly not in a flattering way.

Let's see if Senator Obama's remark about divine intervention in these elections gets any air play.

Bet it won't.

Shrek   January 8th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

I am totally diappointed with Bill. There is enough violence and hatred in the world. We don't need him creating more within our country. Especially as a former President. Mr. Clinton, Perfessionalism is paramount. I feel that a Comander and Chief should be able to stand and be able to fight strong. At times they may be alone in their fight. If H.C. becomes president will B.C. have to rescue her from other heads of countries who will fight against her? If you take a look at all the past Prseidents from when they entered office to the time they left, you can tell that the Job has taken its toll on them. These were very strong men. Is H.C. physically able to stand and fight for the next 8 years? I just don't think so. I will be casting my vote for Mr. Barak Obama.

God   January 8th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Bill,

God here. Sorry about Jesus. I thought he was sitting here at the right hand but you know how it is with kids – look away for one second...

Anyway, don't sweat it. Free will rules the day, and no matter what Jesus says, we're not taking sides.

By the way, you may want to review that list of commandments I sent down ;-)

Love, Peace, Out...

God

ALB   January 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

The Clintons need to quit slamming Obama and focus on themselves. They have been slamming him non-stop since Iowa which is funny considering Hilary seems to be plagiarizing Obama's very words as her own.

Obama is no wind bag, he's the breath of fresh air this country is dying for. And for those of you feel differently, you clearly haven't paid any attention. He has democrats, independents, republicans, men, women, whites, and blacks behind him. If he isn't the best representative of the American people/American dream, I don't know what is.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   January 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

To Eric: It is visually obvious that Obama is black that's why people are using their "ears" and "intelligence" to determine who is the best candidate. Oh, and by the way, Obama's mother is a white woman from Kansas and his father is from Kenya. My DNA probably shows I'm related to his father from Kenya.

Theo   January 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

So what's Obama gonna do besides looking all pretty & smug?
Bush won that way, look at us now..

JA Cook   January 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

The Clintons are all about the Clintons and ego. As things look a bit tougher, they're turning to slash and burn and bringing up issues they should have brought up a long time ago – if they're real issues at all.

Re: Rick Abrantes comments – warn me if YOU ever run for an office. Your kind of reasoning is frightening. What kind of name is Abrantes anyway? Has anyone run a background check on your parents and grandparents?

Joe   January 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Sounds like there is more " vast right wing conspiracy" going on here

cal al   January 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

We expect all of this politics-as-usual fear mongering (Hussein/Islam/ Kenya/ who is Obama really??) from the Republican xenophobes at Frontpage and Fox. It's quite shameful when it comes from fellow Democrats – especially a fellow Democrat who says that she's about change.

Darren, MN   January 8th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Ok children it is time for a reality check. I would venture to say that 95% of you are not aware of Obamas true believes and political record.. Take the time to read and research just a little, don't just jump on the media band wagon. My assumption would be your all new to politics or your on the far left hand side of the spectrum. Both being equally dangerous. I must be living in fantasy land, but I seem to remember the 90's as one of the most productive decades of the past century.

Karen   January 8th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Typical Hillary tactic–let Bill spew the venom, while she cries crocodile tears with the ladies. I am a member of what should be her prime demographic target, but I do not trust the woman, do not like her, did not vote for her for either senate run, and do not want her to represent Democrats in the presidential race. She has done nothing for New York State (yes, I live here) that did not involve her tagging on the coattails of Chuck Schumer.

DMON   January 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Yeah keep hating instead of working to make this country better! Number one, Bill Clinton lied to all of us...this is a fact and so why should he be "the grand speaker of truth". Fact? The fact is you lied and ruined our country with your own personal indescretion so your baseless. Calling Obama "Hussein" is a name and if you took your head out of your racist blinders you'd know that it is a common name throughout the Middle East and Africa. Nice to know your not Xenophobic while our brothers and sisters in the armed forces are over there defending you! Get a Clue! It's also nice to know that the truth of the matter is that "you don't want change" for the better! This is the 21st century so deal with it, like McCain said "I look forward to debating the issues with Sen. Obama", if you don't know that this is what you vote for than move to another country because it is obvious you do not know how to and that is just sad.

Ron C SCarolina   January 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Obama..Obama...you kiddin me? Read up on his REAL religion!! Belongs to group where zero whites are not accepted!!!

Walt, Belton, TX   January 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Hillary and Billiken Clinton must not be allowed any more access to power. They abused what they had when they quickie pardoned all those felons for profit. Consider that Billiken was a felon himself for evading being drafted until another Billiken, none other than good ole boy, Jimmy Carter, the worst President in the last 100 years, pardoned him.

Don’t put these two crooks back in the White House.

dan   January 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

I'm sorry, who is running for president again? Maybe Hillary isn't winning because she has her hubby taking all the cheap shots at her opponent. Lame. Opposing the war and then voting to fund the war once we're there isn't flip flopping.

KaiserSosay   January 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Sour grapes.....Clintons = the past

Obama = the future.

Bill is tarnishing his legacy! lol

Natalie   January 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

The truth of the matter is, no matter what Bill/Hillary has to say, the time has come for America to have a Leader who is willing to do something different to get different results. Not the same old "politics as usual" song and dance. He has by far the most integrity of any candidate I've seen in a real long time. It is evidenced by the way he is running his campaign. Do a little more research into what he has done in Illinois and you will find just how capable he is and how much we need a President with these abilities. There are enough resources in this country for each and everyone to get what they need. We just need a leader who can help us to realize this. Believe it!

danielo   January 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Hey Bill,
You never were aganst the press when the MSM were all about Clinton the inevitable, Clinton perfect mistake free campaign machine, Clinton the front runner, Clinton appeals to women, Clinton all these good things.
Now you you think the media is unfair. Why didn't Obama or Edwards complain bitterly at that time?
Tell people why Hillary is the genius president ... Talk about Hillary. Going around with "Obama this Obama that" wont help!

Patrick, Bethlehem,PA   January 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Sorry Bill, but a fairy tale is when an unkown gets to clean the whistle of the leader of the free world.

Susan   January 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Yes – it was totally sugar coated. Just like our current regime's campaign. Scary and untrue and shallow. Please, NH, be so careful.

LOL in NH   January 8th, 2008 2:14 pm ET

So Slick Willy is calling the kettle black? Hummm.... sounds like someone already picked out the china pattern for the White House. Sorry Bill, no more cigars in the White House for you!!

AJ, IL   January 8th, 2008 2:14 pm ET

All you Hillary supporters and Hope-haters, stop repeating Bill Clinton statements that are false. If you live in a glass house, you shouldn't throw stones! This is exactly what Bill Clinton is doing for Hillary. Sorry, but Bill Clinton has lied numerous times as President and recently on the campaign trail. Bill Clinton LIED about not supporting the Iraq War (there is video footage of it). Bill Clinton LIED about George Bush Sr. going on a diplomatic mission for "would-be" President Hillary. And now Bill Clinton is LYING about Obama's stance on the Iraq War. (Sorry Bill Clinton there is video footage of Obama condemining the rush to war with Iraq back in 2003).

OBAMA in '08!

tq   January 8th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

What a whiner. Clinton should watch fox news then if he doesn't like media coverage of obama. Sounds like a fox noise pundit.

Ashok   January 8th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Fellow citizens...
Time to wake up from the dream of this fairy tale of CHANGE.
Get a reality check from the dreamweaver...like may be Kenya question.
Time for every democrat to come out and vote and win over the surge of independentss.
Remember every vote counts...We do not want another president learning his skills on the job. (the current one does not even have learning skills) We want a president with EXPERIENCE to bring change and ready on day one.

MM   January 8th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Obama scares me more than any other candidate running in both parties. I really have no idea where he stands on any issue. I think the media has turned him into some type of rock star-almost like American Idol. They have not pressed him on one single issue and have given him a major pass as he can do no wrong. I keep hearing about change but change will happen no matter who gets elected. I cannot understand the people in this country and their sheep minded mentality. Maybe it was the Oprah factor-I do not know. I do know for sure I would vote for anyone but him as I do not want a rock star president.

Sally, Corvallis Oregon   January 8th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Let Hillary fight her own battles Bill – and PLEASE – Show some dignity EVERYONE and rise above the name calling and attack-mode... this country's been through enough these past 8 years

Rosie   January 8th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Change, what a thought. I am a child of the 60's and to think that there is finally someone running for office, that has new thoughts, and joing ALL parties together. Gee.. maybe this is the return of Camelot .

Amber   January 8th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

I think that Bill should let his wife fight her own battle. : /

alcortez   January 8th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

My experience with Bill Clinton tells me he is the most ungrateful and self indulging and corrupt politician in America. I volunteered over 100 hours as a precint leader for his first presidental election campaign in 1996 and never received a word of thank you from neither him or the Democrat party. Also I strongly believe myself and most other Americans will never forgive him for the dirty things he did while he was in the office and when he was leaving the office.

Amy   January 8th, 2008 2:11 pm ET

I think Oprah should be more careful about who she supports. Her impact on this election should not be underestimated.

wondering   January 8th, 2008 2:11 pm ET

I wonder how many of the negatve responses are operatives from Obama's campaign staff, or even from any of the Republicans? Politics is politics...and there aren't any of the current candidates that are "changing" that. Look through the hype and propaganda...look at the facts, then make an informed decision.

Mike, Waterbury, CT   January 8th, 2008 2:11 pm ET

Why are you Obama supporters so quick to yell at the Clintons for negative campaigning? Bill is right. Obama and Edwards have been slinging mud since day one.

Some say that Obama is above the fray? Why was he making back door deals with the Richardson supporters to ensure victory? How do you think Clinton was brought down to the real world?

Obama has refused to say anything about what he would do as President, so let's look at his record. When there is a tough decision to make rather than vote yes or no, he runs away (so as to be absent from the voting – like he has done in the Senate), or he votes "Present" (like he did in the IL Senate. DO WE REALLY WANT A PRESIDENT THAT CAN'T MAKE A TOUGH DECISION.

Sometimes the right decision is not the one you agree with completely, but you still need to make it. I do not want a President that is afraid to make a decision. Despite all the horrible things that Bush has done – you have to give him credit for at lease making a decision, something that Obama is apparently afraid of doing.

Realize that the glitz and glamour will wear off – and when you get down to it, All Obama is, is a weasle too afraid to stand up and take a stand. How very unpresidential is that?

Dunga   January 8th, 2008 2:10 pm ET

The hope for Sen. Clinton to become next US President is squarely sitting.

Madeline Jackson, Silver Spring Maryland   January 8th, 2008 2:10 pm ET

Obama has gotten a free ride from the male dominated media. It is unfair and disgusting. In fact Hillary has been vilified by the media daily, while the male dominated media has cheered for Obama. I am a life long democrat and I will never vote for happy talk, free ride, unqualified Obama. I would rather see the Republicans win the the White House again.

Chris   January 8th, 2008 2:10 pm ET

I think Mr. Clinton has been reading too much of his own press talking about how "beloved" he is in New Hampshire. People do remember him, just not nearly as fondly as he'd like to believe. I also think that there was an absolute conceit in Mrs. Clinton campaign and mind that she was the Anointed One and that her presidency was pre-ordained.

I am an Independent and what resonates about Mr. Obama to me is that the change he is looking for is a fundamental one about the way politics happens in Washington. I do not think that anyone can possibly think that the current way to doing business is a constructive one so it simply doesn't matter just how much experience in that failed system the candidate has.

Noroan Wolfe   January 8th, 2008 2:09 pm ET

I am appalled but not surprise by the hateful, vitriolic comments posted by persons who seem to be Obama supporters. Why are these hate mongers supporting a person who is working so hard to send forth a message of hope? Their rants belong on the Springer show. Their support for Obama is one of the many reasons I will not vote for him. Just as scary are the comments from those supporting Obama because he makes them feel good – that is not the job of a president. Go get a friend, for Pete's sake!! Something is deeply wrong with the mix of Obama's of supporters and they are not the people I want to run this country.

I will be supporting Hillary – based on her service to this country, her passion for this country, her intelligence and her far more realistic world view.

Mark tanstill   January 8th, 2008 2:09 pm ET

Mr President, I love you and your family, but I have to tell you my 19 years old niece need to know that when it comes to the presidency there are other qualified people in this country than the Bush Clinton Bush .... Clinton? clan.

Once again I love you mr President but it isn't personal.

Brad   January 8th, 2008 2:09 pm ET

Here is the two big problems I have with Hillary Clinton:

1. Why should I listen to Bill speak praises about her when he has never shown her any respect during their marriage?

2. Why should I believe that Hillary will stand up for herself on a world stage when over and over and over again she has let Bill walk all over her and disgrace her?

I am sure I am not the only person who feels this way.

I am an Independent Voter and I have yet decided to vote for for president.

Dan, TX   January 8th, 2008 2:09 pm ET

I would like a thoughtful calm and serious person in the white house. Clinton's arrogance is frightening.

pam Eugene OR   January 8th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

OMG
Can you imagine someone calling Bill Clinton a crook! He is the biggest liar, crook and thief out there. Well, maybe a close second to his wife. Go home Bill...we have had more that enough of you and you wife.

Arcas, NY   January 8th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

It's in the interest of the Republican party for Obama to win, and Romney or Cain will win even stronger then last election win of Bush over Kerry.

On the other hand, even if he wins, with a Judiciary in the hands of the Republicans, a split Congress and Senate, and with an inexperienced president(as opposed to Hillary who knows the inns and outs of Senate and White House) for 4 years nothing will get done in US, and after that the Republicans will win again.

I know Obama is cool and all, but this is not a popularity contest otherwise let's have Ali G run for president and I'll vote for him, at least he makes me laugh.

The truth is that Obama was demolished in the ABC-Facebook debate when Hillary told him that he was lying when saying about fighting lobbyist organization, since he himself did lobby for OIL(there goes your green dream of a clean planet) and one of the campaign officials of his campaign lobbies for PHARMACEUTICALS. Obama said simply "That's not true". And what does Mr. Stephanopulos say after the debate ??? That "Edwards stood out" ! This is a joke, since Stephanopulos shouldn't even be allowed to make opinions on the Clintons after he was snitching informations from the White House to Milloshevic, a war criminal.

OBAMA is a republican   January 8th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Ah, the republican dogs are here again, touting for OBAMA because OBAMA is another Republican, a trick by CHENEY.

WE ARE SO TIRED OF REPUBLICAN TRICKS. We want our life back, our GOOD LIFE we had when BILL CLINTON was president.

BRING IN THE REAL DEMOCRATS PLEASE

sean c   January 8th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Excellent posts guys !!!

Speaking of 50k/per hour speaking engagements.

That Bill bit about – " I CAN'T MAKE HER MALE "

That is the exit strategy – THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT READY FOR A FEMALE PRESIDENT.

So they will say. All across this country, with their NEW book /media deals.

I think we head this off Now !!! Because, I do not want to hear their "STORY" told over and over and over and over..... Again !!!!

In this country, we just have not got used to the idea of embracing outright deception, deceipt and dishonestly. We strongly dissaprove of Hillary, because she can not pass this most basic of tests. – PERIOD !!!!

Abdul JanMuhammad   January 8th, 2008 2:07 pm ET

Hillary is unelectable because of her hair. Let's face it.
Obama 08, baby!

Pict63   January 8th, 2008 2:07 pm ET

What a hypocrite, what about the following fairy tales?
"I never had sexual relations with that woman"
"Define sexual relations"
"I never inhaled"

J.Mahone   January 8th, 2008 2:07 pm ET

I am an African American and would love to see a Black man in the White house. Trust me this is not the one. The media and everyone else has given him a free ride because they don't want anyone saying they are using the race card. Wake up America he sounds good but I love this country enough to tell you he's not the one.
Just don't blame it on us when you began to see the light. This is the White mans choice and African Americans are excited with the idea.

pjonathan   January 8th, 2008 2:06 pm ET

Running to redeem a father and now, a husband, is a story worth writing.
Much has been written about George W running to redeem his father's "failure" to "go to Bagdad".
Some has been written this time around about Senator Dodd running to redeem his father's failure-ethical lapses- and Governor Romney running to redeem his father's failure-his brainwashing comments.
The press has been nibbling around the edges of Hillary running to redeem Bill and herself. That story, however, is the most intriguing of the bunch.

In addition, an article written about all of these "redemption" runs would probably convince us that voters should never vote for a presidential candidate who is related to a president or presidential candidate. I think with just my information it is fair to say that redemption runs lead to poor judgment in the political decisions of a campaign and in presidential decisions, clouding both. An experienced political writer or writers would be able to fully research and present clearly the results of that research.

I think that Hillary Clinton would still be leading if Bill Clinton had been kept in the background. What I am seeing and what I believe the press is starting to report is that Hillary's race is all about Bill redeeming Bill and Bill's legacy and Hillary redeeming Bill, Bill's legacy, and Hillary's legacy. Obama and Edwards have been clearly stating for a long time that their presidential race is about America or about the middle class or about the other America, not about them. Hillary in NH is just starting to say that her race is not about her. But she just said that the race for her is very personal, suggesting policy but in reality much more telling.

Richard   January 8th, 2008 2:06 pm ET

What a sleezeball... sounds like he's getting a bit shrill. What happened to Hilary's touting her 'everyone is after me.... boohoo.... because I'm the leader'

J Williamson Buffalo, NY   January 8th, 2008 2:06 pm ET

Go Bill! I'd vote for you again in a New York minute! I'm glad the campaign is finally taking the gloves off -people will always take a muted response as an affirmation, as you well know. Godspeed!

Bill, Chicago, IL   January 8th, 2008 2:06 pm ET

ppgallini If Obama won the nomination (which I dont think he will), and I'm an Independent, I will vote Republican or move to Europe.

Buh bye – enjoy France...

Jay Graham, Dallas, TX   January 8th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Republicans want Obama to win so that they can pull fresh dirt on him. For Clintons they have not got anything new left to bring it on. For the last 15 years so much has thrown on Clintons that people are tired. That is why media under the influence of GOP gets Obama into limelight. He will be crushed in general election if McCain is their nominee. Democrats wake up!

Jesse M.   January 8th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Clinton said:
"What did you think about the Obama thing calling Hillary the senator from Punjab? Did you like that?"

I don't know about the rest of Clinton's accusations, but this one is pretty unfair. Obama apologized for the memo which used that line, saying that he hadn't seen it before it was sent out and it didn't reflect his views, calling it "stupid and caustic" - see http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Jun192007/foreign200706198289.asp?section=updatenews - and regardless of whether you believe him, the "senator from Punjab" line in the memo was based on an earlier joke made by Hillary herself when speaking to an Indian-American audience, when she said in March that "I can certainly run for the Senate seat in Punjab and win easily." (again, see the linked article)

well-wisher   January 8th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

This is from a man who lied to the entire nation, committed a perjury and was convicted of it, and then impeached! To expect any truth from his wife is just as unrealistic as to expect any truth from him. People in this country forget (and forgive) liars and politicians too quickly. The Rome is truly burning.

Scott   January 8th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Wow, is this how a statesman and former President acts? Bill, how about showing some decorum.

This blather about how the press has been beating on Hillary is ridiculous (especially when it comes to CNN). Nobody, with the exception of a small article in the NY Times last month, has QUESTIONED her "experience" claims. It's as if reporters just buy into them prima facie.

In the debate Saturday night, when highlighting what SHE (not Bill) has actually accomplished, she chose Healthcare as her example of what SHE has accomplished. Did I miss something or was that an abject failure?

I'm an Independent (and former Republican). If Obama wins the nomination, I will strongly consider a vote for him. I would never vote for Hillary. She has shown in the past 4 days that she cannot stand up to the heat of a campaign. How will she react on "Day 1"? It doesn't get easier after New Hampshire.

Coby Texas   January 8th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

All the things that everyone is accusing Barack of is really negative. People are worried about his family in Kenya. ??? So freakin what. I'm yet to hear him go negative in his campaign other than defending himself against vicious Clintons. All the Clinton jock riders are pathetic. You know Barack represents a positive change, whatever tactics he uses are just that tactics, which is what every candidate in the race right now is doing. I keep hearing about H.C. experience outweighing Obama's. Are you freaking kidding me. If I was married to a attorney for 20 years, does that allow me to practice law? no. Stop hating on this positive man. Clintons and all supporters are starting to look pathetic.

Tony, Tulsa, OK   January 8th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

John McCain will be our next president. Thank you very much Obama supporters for not caring about vetting your candidate ahead of time. The media honeymoon will end, and then who do you think the American public will vote for, a heavily experienced man named John McCain or a newbie named Barack Hussein Obama? I realize you live in fairyland but please try to be honest with yourselves.

Graham   January 8th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

ppgallini,
how in the world can you make the prediction that an obama presidency would lead to a world war or nuclear attack on the US?? absurd.

Dissappointed   January 8th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

I just lost all respect for Bill too. By the time Obama gets the nomination, he will be as hated as Hillary is. Perhaps, forgetting about all the Clintons–not just Hillary– is the best that can happen to our country.

DB   January 8th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

It's time to say goodbye to the DLC. It's time has come and gone. Stop trying to defend a dying ideology, President Clinton. Democrats need to be Democrats, not Republican-lites. Stop trying to destroy another candidate simply because he is not DLC.

joeland7   January 8th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

OBAMA ROCKS – the people of Little Rock are glade that the Clintons left. Bill is upset that Obama has more charisma than he. Good that Obama is running or else I would have to vote for Huckabee.. smile... OBAMA ROCKS LITTLE ROCK

get truth guy   January 8th, 2008 2:03 pm ET

All the medias were biased to Obama since this election coverage, that's underandable since most of them are librarors, they don't like someone like Clinton or Ramany... I watched the last Saturday night debates, media hosts obviouly biased to Obabma, asked the questions like why people not like you (Clinton) but Obama, that's totally unfair! Charlie even said last a few presidents promised something but never delivered to counter argueing Clinton's "false promise" from Obama... Is that the debate host should do as the fair middle man? I am sick and tied on the media 'cause they never promote godd things to our socielty all they have done were negative things. This Clinton-Obama thing is just a best example.

Fred   January 8th, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Well all I can say is I am glad you can turn on the tv, see an Obama rally, see White,Black,Hispanic, etc come together for something positive, while so many people here , hide behind the internet, with their hate, fear and doubt. Some of which clearly are closet racists, who can label a man solely on his middle name. If Hillary is counting the support of that kind person, then more power to Obama.

Lee   January 8th, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Thanks for saying what is the absolute truth, President Clinton. Obama has been given a free pass long enough. The man has not been vetted and the media is already making far-fetched predictions.

If the sheep that are following along to the bleating of "change, change, change" don't wake up now the Dems are in for a rude awakening once the Reps get a hold of Obama.

Obama cannot even develop his own platform, he's stealing it from John Edwards! The Boston Globe and L.A. Times have both done stories on it recently. If the man has to steal the intellectual property of another candidate to have a campaign, how in the world do people expect him to run a country?

Obama has not represented his own constituents well. He has been absent from voting more than he has been present, which is a sad statement all on its own.

Voters do your research instead of just following the crowd!!

Gbryant   January 8th, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Look all you Obama fairy tale supporters.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D

Eye Opener   January 8th, 2008 2:03 pm ET

First of all, as an unbiased observer, I find it disgusting that people cannot simply express opinions without name calling and derogatory remarks, milestones of intelligent and civilized discourse.
Secondly, I find it extremely naive that the American Public, the same voting public who have demonstrated an almost equal divide between republican and democratic ideologies, the same public who do not see eye to eye on the issue of separation between church and state, and the same public who still grapples with the issue of racism to this day after slavery was abolished in the late 1800's, would be so trivial to think that this election is about personalities.
With all the crucial issues facing the country today, from the economy to foreign policy, immigration and healthcare, regional wars and the global economy, we should be more concerned about electing someone with the right credentials and abilities to return the glory to this once proud country of ours.

Shannon   January 8th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

That's right, Bill! You can "Give me a break!" There's so much that could be said about the Clintons! And they are lucky that no one has stooped to the levels that they have. Desperatiion! I had some respect for the Clintons....but the past few months have shown a really new light. Catch up! Figure out how to really reach the voters. Negativity just wont' work on us!

AJ, IL   January 8th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Bill Clinton is becoming the equivalent of Elizabeth Edwards. Let's shout and try to belittle the opposition as much as possible. Spouses stumping for candidates show focus on the person they are supporting. Tell the public what makes them good enough to become president and a little bit of relevant personally history that voters can connect to. This is what Michelle Obama has been doing for Barack Obama. Occassionally giving some details of the "would-be" policies of their spouse but mainly focusing on selling their spouse to the American public.

For a former president to get so negatively involved in campaigning for their spouse is disappointing and disheartening.

OBAMA in '08!

Karen   January 8th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

I have never seen such a bigger set of ignorant people, no wonder other countries look at us and take us as a joke, that is exactly what we are, no substance, no clue, fall for anything that people put in front of us and walk around with blinders on. Unbelievable, step back and look at the big picture people, God will come down on this earth himself first, before the bible belt, rural america and southern americans will vote for Obama, keep dreaming this is clearly going to spin us right into another 4 years of republican politics, it's just slipping out of our hands as we speak, idiots!!

Mac, Detroit   January 8th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Wow, Bill. A new low. I didn't think it was possible. Congratulations, you've completely surpassed my expectations *applause*

Obama in '08!!! woo! hehe

elly   January 8th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

GROW UP!!!! Obama supporters, he might win but then he will have to govern. Let him get some experience, including campaigning, under his belt and then run. Right now Obama is being set up for failure because of his lack of experience. Then who will he have to turn to for help? Not Oprah, but the last Democratic president, Bill Clinton. You all are being awfully short sighted and will be eating crow when your charmer has to call in the "experienced" ones for help.

Jim P. - Chicago   January 8th, 2008 2:01 pm ET

As a Republican I thought I would never say this, but you're right on Mr. Bill. The sugar coating by the media of the Obama campaign is nothing short of absurd. This is what progressive liberalism has brought us, a black candidate for President of the U.S. that is beyond reproach for fear of being racist. I'm sure some middle of the road Democrats are finally thinking, "what have we done?" God help us!

KD   January 8th, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Yes HILLARY there is a GOD, but you don't know HIM

Joanne McCann   January 8th, 2008 2:01 pm ET

I don't think anyone disputes Hillary's ablity to be President. I think the bottom line difference between Hillary and Barack is who will unite us as a nation. Unfortunately, right or wrong, people either love or hate the Clinton's there does not seem to be any middle ground. The Republicans spent 8 years trying to bring Bill down to no avail. But they still spent millions and wasted a lot of precious time on trying. I don't want to go through that again. Sen. Obama seems to instill hope, integrity and unity in people. He inspires them to want to act, to be part of the process, and to take some responsiblity in the outcome. That is truely the only difference in my opinion. We are at a place in our countrys history that is calling for us to unite as a people and make the United States of America great again. In all my 42 years I have never gone to see a politition speak. I have never cared about the primary and have felt, ever since I could vote, that I have voted the lesser of two evils. I want better for my children, for my country, and for world peace. Sen. Barack Obama inspired me to become involved as he has many others. All should be listening and acting no mud slinging.

Barbie   January 8th, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Wow, Bill is a little testy about Hilary losing now to Obama and appears desperate to get back in the White House at any cost. Hilary has done some good things but she does represent the past. We must look to the future and if we are going to stop the bleeding in the US with all out serious problems we must truly have a leader to unite Red/Blue politics and Black/White/Yellow and Brown Americans. Obama seems to present a fresh approach and I think we need this now more than ever.

Scott, Royal Oak, MI   January 8th, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Bill and Hillary = Bitter Betty and Weeping Wendy

amy R   January 8th, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Who is the one lone person who keeps repeating that if Obama wins the nomination that they will vote Republican or move to Europe?

Repeating the comment won't make a difference to Obama. Especially since Obama is the only person who can with the general election anyway. So good riddance. Enjoy your stay as an expatriate in Europe.

Bukky, Balt MD   January 8th, 2008 2:00 pm ET

So the tactic has changed to Hillary being more sensitive and Bill doing the mud slinging.... Hmmm nope not gonna work.

We all new that as soon as Obama won one Mud would come from the wood works. Sling away... you'll just look like a bully beating a peacenik

frieda   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

It is important to look past the rhetoric and analyze the needs of diplomacy and governance for the US as it faces a critical audience globally. The message that Clinton is trying to impart, in my humble opinion, is one of pragmatic analysis of the world political body and the challenges facing humanity today. I urge all of you who have commented at an emotional level to refrain from emotion and become critical thinkers in the face of such dangerous times. It matters little which man or woman is a better orator, but rather which man or woman most embodies the characteristics and statesperson skills to navigate the body politic of the world. We cannot resort to ethnocentric diatribe at such a critical time. Please look rationally and pragmatically at the world at large and realize how different we all view our world and how difficult it is to embrace all views.

Florida   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

It's sad to see Bill Clinton, a man whose life and presidency were built on hope, decry his natural successor.

Carol Pettipher   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Thank goodness Hillary Clinton showed human emotion. I am still waiting for someone in the current administration to do the same about the damage, collateral and otherwise, of the past seven years.

Duop Chak, Colorado Springs, CO   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Bill Clinton has shown frustration and he also failed to show his political skill in this particular speech, hard to believe—well, things can change very quickly.

De Juan TEXAS   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

The media is attacking Hillary as well as the Republicans. They all want Obama to win the Democratic election, because they he can not win the Presidential election. Hillary can carry the south. Obama can not. I still have not heard what he stands for.

James   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Where does Bill Clinton get the nerve to criticize anyone? He was the biggest embarrasment to the presidency in history! At least I doubt any of the candidates will play around in the oval office now, and cetainly won't outright lie about it.
Ol Bill isn't a + for hillary, he's a liability!

Arshad   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

He opposed the war in public in an anti-war rally. It's public information. He predicted the outcome of Iraq war exactly it turned out before the war. It;s documented. His judgment made him go to public and voice opposition to the war in the middle of his Senate primary. Hillary;s judgment made her follow Bush blindly and authorized war. That's the difference, Bill.

Now once your wife and others made a bad call, sent 160000 US soldiers in the middle of a war (they did not go there by choice, your wife Hillary and Bush and others sent them along). Bad jusdgment and bad decisions have already been made, right or wrong. Don't you think a US senator has obligation to support the troop in war zone regardless of how bad the decision was to begin with, until the soldiers can return safely. So voting for an unnecessary war showing poor judgment and supporting fund to stand behind troop in the war zone is not same thing, Bill. If he did not vote for these funding in senate, you and your wife now would tell everyone, Senator Obama abandoned US troops in the middle of war zone with funding their need. He is driven by what's right thing to do. You couple is driven by what make your resume "look" stronger so that you can keep making american people fool.

What has been started by Obama, are not going to stop by so called campaign strategy or record distortion or attack campaign, planned destruction of opponents in a systemetic way. Obama is beyond that phase. You can keep trying of you think you even have a remote chance. One last thing, both of you will bite your tongue and speak in Obama's convention and support his candidacy and campaign for him eventually. So stop this drama.

NJ   January 8th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

I'm sorry but even Obama's ideas of change are just fairy tales. do you people honestly believe he will be permitted to implement them? There is Congress, lobbyists, etc. while they may sound wonderful, I just do not see how he will be able to deliver.

Cowen   January 8th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

I think Bill Clinton needs to step aside and let his wife do her own work on the campaign trail. If there is anyone for her to blame for lagging in the polls it's her husband. It makes both of them look petty and foolish as they attempt to ruin other candidiates who just so happen to be ahead of Hillary on the poll counts. If Hillary really is the change maker she so often refers to herself as, then people would SEE and KNOW the CHANGES she wouldn't have to go around reminding everyone of all the "great things she has done already". The time has come for our Country to get the leadership it deserves. A leadership for ALL people and not just the rich and famous. Barack Obama is the person who can deliver. So what if he isn't in his 70's or 80's and doesnt have ALL the experiences of the world...We all have to start somewhere. We need a President who can speak out and motivate the other leaders in Congress to follow their promises and to remember the people who elected them. I believe Barack Obama will do that.

Christina   January 8th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Obama is covered too much by republicans and democrats. The aim is to knowck down Hillary. After that republicans will have another President. Barak Obama shift his position many times, especially for the war.

Media is worst than artillery. Media is deciding who will win and the way the media is positioned - who win the republican nomination -he is the President!! Full stop!!

tim   January 8th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

It is unfortunate to notice how much panick has exasperated the Clinton campaign. Very embarrassing too for Bill to come and speak on behalf of his wife...why can't she stand up and say it herself...

Dirty tactics in a vain attempt to shield the vague and show of emotions betting it would carry you to the White House.

Stay away, Bill...you are only going to make matters worse than they already are!

RealityKing   January 8th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

HillBillary has just re-instated James Carville and Paul Begala as their new head mud slingers. Now watch as the politics of personal destruction switches into high gear, reminisce of yesterday past..

Ken in RI   January 8th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Look, I have tremendous respect for Bill Clinton as a politician. He did many, many things in office that were terrible for the country (go here if you've forgotten: http://www.alternet.org/stories/72336/ ). But he's not being a smart politician now. The buzzword is "change," Hillary's trying to leverage that buzz, and Bill is just making everyone think that we're headed back to 1992. Furthermore, he is a more compelling speaker than his wife, and an overall more engaging person. He's going to end up getting more media than her because people prefer him to her. Which is not going to help her campaign. Yes, he should be working for her campaign in an advisory capacity (read: behind the scenes). But every time he gets up in front of TV cameras, he is stealing her limelight. He should let her be the star of her own campaign.

yvonne jackson   January 8th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

I would like to know more about Senator Obama,where did he come from and what is his true political record. What has he done or attempted to do for the country? when did he do it and how long has he given his life to the political arena. He speaks of change can he go deeper as to what he knows he will be able to change. He speaks of change and dances across the stage,but lets go deeper,how about his experience. As far as Senator Clinton is concern she has given her life to the american political arena,so be she is a woman yes,but she is a strong ,out spoken and dedicated woman,full of compassion. We have seen through the years her stick to resolve,even when she was under the microscope regarding her and President Clinton she did not fold,she stayed. I think this says a lot about her ,not being one to bail out when things get messy. Lets have some more answers and question about the Senator Obama.

Chris- Ohio   January 8th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

To the poster who suggested that we need to raise the voting age

Maybe you should go fight in Iraq.

dawit isaac   January 8th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

What a shame for a man who blew his chance for greatness – alas for lack of judgement and character! to have the audacity to critique the esteemed Senator from Illnois. Please Americans let us not hear from this Clinton – Bush clans again once and for all.

tim   January 8th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Obama has done nothing of substance. He is just a windbag. Please elect somebody who has been a proven boss.

Wilberto Jimenez, Monmot, MD   January 8th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Michael –

On your English usage diatribe: Perhaps Bill did mean it this way. The mechanism by which he feels is bad, not that he himself feels bad, i.e. that he is unhappy. It would correlate with someone who doesn't equate oral sex as "sex".

go hillary   January 8th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

To Jr in CA – HILLARY – 35 years experience. Read the entire sentences she uses. She mentions child poverty and has been working on that for 35 years since she graduated from Law School and worked on the Children's Defense Fund. Meanwhile she has worked on many other things. There, now you have to keep your promise and vote for her.

Brad   January 8th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

Obama Hussein needs to be shown door....

BionicWoman   January 8th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

I am sick of the media portrayal of BozObama as if its the 2nd coming. I am fed up with the Hillary haters who are disguising their hatred of women leaders. I saw the debate in NH – on one side you have 2 guys talking rhetoric and promises with no details and nothing to back them up – and on the other side you saw 2 adults with experience in life and wisdom.

How could anyone trust this guy to handle Iraq? This is getting scary. This election is not about domestic issues and changing America. Oh, the kids can say so, but as adults who have lived a little longer – we really must get control of this situation because this election is really about a new direction in Iraq. Its about healthcare and the economy.

Do we really want to take a chance on loosing healthcare after finally getting someone to do this for us? Those kids don't care about healthcare. Its the adults who do. Its the adults that have to pay taxes and mortgages. These kids are screwing up our lives because they want to vote for a Pied Piper. And the media is helping because they are no longer journalists, they are tabloid writers.

Naba   January 8th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

Personally , I think that show of emotions by Hilary at this time was kind of fake, and in no way related to how much he care about the ordinary people.She almost teared up not because of her love for America, but ultimately for the love of her political dreams which seems almost shattered.
I mean, come to think of think of it, She will never have show this emotion if she was winning as anticipated.
She didnt have no choice than to show emotions on TV, its the only way she can counteract the Obamania tidal wave sweeping accross the electorate.
Tears for votes. !!!! Go Hilary.
Naba
Virginia

ms joy   January 8th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

One day the Hil is crying ok fine! Now today Bubba is trying to beat everybody up.
Get over it if she looses it was because she was suppose to. what Bubba think's he can save the day by beating folks up. Forget about it! Suck it up and keep on moving. and what is this suppose to make folks vote for the Hil I don't think so I think it's a turn off! One more for the Bam!! LOL!!!

Tom Smalley,IOWA   January 8th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Give me a break bill clinton,A fairy tale ?,seems Hillary was sobing about the fact your time in the white house was the worst ,and the damage done and scandels that she is finaly seeing the american people REJECT YOU as a first man in the white house? She thought she could get in and some how RIGHT a WRONG for how your 8 year term and what it stacked up to be ? Or what it didn't stack up to be? the DISGRACE you brought to the Whitehouse, From the day you got off the plane in Iowa her numbers have gone done every day. Where were you when I and many others wrote the White house when Oklahoma government was not Playing Fair to the citizens of that state ? Or should I say who else was in the oval office with you when we Pleaded for help? Look pal every one thinks Hillary needs to say she is sorry for this so call War vote? Have you Every really sat in front of the American People and say YOU ARE sorry for the DISGRACE you brought to the OFFICE? One thing also you should be honest and tell every body you are greatfull to the YEARS before you took OFFICE for the Great Economy you benifited for those years? Be a Man billy, Seems your Wife "IS" not ready to be President on day 1 ? Why all the staff change today ,thought she is ready? and now she really is for change and is changing allready and she has not won one yet? I wonder she may have got the office if she left you? If a person puts up what you did to her ? what will she herself put up with in office?

von   January 8th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Whining about Obama saying that he is comparing himself to JFK and MLK is something that he did not say, but obviously you feel this way about him.

Do yourself a favor and drop out of the race because you cant beat greatness.

Bill   January 8th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

I cannot understand why the media or the other candidates have not challenged Hillary Clinton's claim to 35 years of experience. Being married to a cardiologist does not qualify one to perform open-heart surgery.

DD, New York   January 8th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

REply to BJ: It is in todays news (CNN's website too) showing obama's grandmother outside a shack in Kenya. That's how I know!

aware   January 8th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Bill is right on target! Much of the media has fanned the flames of sexism for stories/bucks! Obama will fade as people come to their senses. America had a love affair with Bush too. Unfortunately, they elected him twice.

Democrats will throw another one away   January 8th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Obama just talks; Hillary will fight.

Pres. Obama will talk about universal health insurance; Pres. Hillary will fight for it.

Pres. Obama will run away from the fight; Pres. Hillary will WIN it.

That's why Republicans hate Hillary so much. She fights and she wins. And the side she fights for is the people's side and not the Republicans's Wall Street side.

Let's face it, everyone has faults (even Hillary), but only Hillary can win in November. And Democrats aren't losing anything by voting for her over Obama. She is just as idealistic and passionate as Obama, but she can get the job done. She is a progressive Democrat who couldn't show her colors in the 1990s because the REPUBLICANS CONTROLLED CONGRESS! So stop giving her this bum rap about being "ineffective" in the '90s. She proposed national health insurance, for God's sake!

***
By the way, you folks and your antipathy towards "going negative" are a little naive. I'll agree that attacking someone for what they did 30 years ago is wrong, but it's 100% fair game to attack someone's RECORD and POSITIONS ON THE ISSUES (or lack thereof). How else are you going to know the weaknesses in a candidate's ideas? George Bush isn't going to tell you the problems of this ideas. Barack Obama won't either. Only their opponents will point out the problems. There's nothing with "negative" campaigning of that type.

Crystee Stigge   January 8th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

The press is once again hiding the facts. ABC's 20/20 portrayed the Clinton campaign as using "Push Polls" in Iowa against Senator Obama. I am a Clinton champion, and I did more reporting then they did. I received a very negative Clinton "Push Poll" and immediately demanded to speak to the manager. I was given an 800 number to call, upon doing so I was told that the account was from "out of state" and they could not give anymore information. My request for "change", do the job that needs to be done as reporter. Treat the canidates with the same respect and the same issues. Then let the people decide, not you.

Trey   January 8th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

This race is not about gender and not about skin color. It is about setting a new direction to lead the US. Obama has put forth a strong message that tears down politics of old. The Clinton team is frustrated that their name alone cannot win the election and unfortunately they are choosing to play dirty politics. I anticipate Obama will stay positive as it is his optimistic message that has carried him this far. Hopefully the Clintons can play fair and not divide their own party.

I have shifted my support from McCain/Guiliani to Obama partly due to his powerful and authentic message of change. I also feel other independents like myself are doing the same.

jack, ny, ny   January 8th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

I agree with Bill. Obama is telling fairy tale to all those naive americans. He got no plan. He is just coping stuff from Martin luther king and JFK. This guy is a complete sham just like Bush.

kamenwati   January 8th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Bill, please keep talking. The more you open your mouth the more people you drive away from supporting your wife.

All you Clinton lovers out there, you ever stop for a moment to think why the Republicans were able to take over Washington after the Clinton presidency? The fault rests with Bill Clinton. His self-indulgence and deceit allowed the Republican thug machine to claim the high ground. Clinton's perfidy compromised Gore's ability to run an effective campaign, and made it easy for the Republican election stealers to do their dirty work.

Azar   January 8th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Poor Bill. I voted for him twice. Unfortunately, he abused his power while in the White House, the Democrats lost the majority in the Senate and the House, and his administration was responsible for the division in the country. I do not think that Hillary will do better than her husband. Hillary belongs to the old guard. We seriously need a fresh start. Obama has the vision for the future of America, he has very good judgment, and he will bring us together. Further, he will work with us to help make America a better place for all of us. Look at the voter turnout in Iowa and New Hampshire. Do you really think that if he were not running, so many people would come out to vote? Think very hard before you put him down.

Love Obama but vote Hillary   January 8th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Obama talks so much about hope and change, As a US senator and as IL state Senator what change did he bring about. His words ring hollow.. with out the track record.

See how the Republicans will bring his race, his ancestory and his way too liberal stance out in the open during general elections.

Democratic party hasnt learned with the debacle of 2000 and 2004 , both times they elected candidates who were not electable .. one because of his personality and one because of his flip floping.

I really like Obama.. and wish he could be the president instead of Hillary but I will say that aint happening.. even if he gets the nomination.

Clintons will not campaign for obama.. there will be split in the party.. Obama can not perform in debates.. the republican machine will make mince meat out of his campaign .. wait until the primaries are over.. another Karl Rove will emerge.. and put up the unbeatable coalition..

Only the battle hardened Clintons are the right people to counter this..

Remember General Election is a whole new ball game..

slinkymalinky   January 8th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

The International Herald Tribune reports the Illinois senator has become huge in Germany, where he is being compared to the much-loved John F. Kennedy.

The Berliner Morgenpost ran a headline this weekend calling Obama, "The New Kennedy." saying, "The Black American Has Become the New Kennedy."

And an editorial in the Frankfurter Rundschau ran with the headline, "Lincoln, Kennedy, Obama" ... "hope and optimism are the source of the nation's strength."

BARACK THE VOTE!!

Brennan - Seattle, WA   January 8th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

People complained for years about how "young" people wouldn't come out and vote, how they wouldn't get involved in the process and how they were not "interested" in their country. Now Obama has gotten them interested and excited for a new direction in this country, they come out and they become active in the process and vote, and now we get gems like:

"hollie January 8, 2008 12:55 pm ET

We need to start raising the voting age…….end of story."

The generation that told us to get interested is now mad that we don't vote their way.

Obama and other younger politicians are the future of our country. My generation is disgusted with the devisive, hate filled politics of the recent past and we will vote accordingly. I used to want, to become a politician and recent history has turned me away from that, but Obama returns the idea to my mind. Every generation has a pivotal moment where they wrestle control from the previous and I am not afraid to say that I HOPE this is ours.

Nancy   January 8th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

I'm sorry, Which Clinton is running for President? Bill or Hillary? Hillary says she "can lead from day one" is she unable to get to day one on her own? OR does she need her husband to fight her battles first?? Is Barack's wife sticking up for him too?? You had your chance Bill STEP BACK.

ppgallini   January 8th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

If Obama won the nomination (which I dont think he will), and I'm an Independent, I will vote Republican or move to Europe.

My worry is that Obama's lack of experience and wide-eyed views of how to get things done (i.e. unrealistic – and even Edwards agrees with that) will create a world war, a nuclear attack on this country .....or worse. He's got NO IDEA how to run a country . Oh yeah – and no experience either.

Jojo   January 8th, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Who is Obama?Whe does he come from?What did he change in Illinois state Liegislature?If I remember,he voted "Present" almost 19 times;which mean that he couldn't make decisions on important issues.When asked,he said that how people used to vote there.So why didn't he bring the same change he's talking about?
Please,don't let the mass media influenced the election;they just need a story to talk about.Please don't let republican choose who they want to run against.Please,look at the issues and where the person stands.
Yes you hate Hillary or Bill,but they may be the only hope for democrats to win in November and Republicans know that.
Will you give this amazing country to someone named "HUSSEIN"?Somebody you don't know but who talks sweet as honey?Can Obama explains to voters what he was doing in Indonesia?If he says school,does he mean that there's no better schools in the US?He wants to change this country;for what?Where are going?what is it going to bring that we haven't seen?
Please voters,think.Yes think before you cast your vote.Don't just dream;wake up.

De Juan   January 8th, 2008 1:51 pm ET

I hear everyone talking about change with Obama, but I have not heard anything from Obama. Where does he stand. If you still have the same congress and senate, then what changes can he make. Talk is cheap. I see all the blogs and wonder if anyone knows how congress works.

Heidi   January 8th, 2008 1:51 pm ET

What I don't understand is why are we hearing so much out of Bill? We don't hear all of the other candidates spouses putting in their thoughts on the campaign trail. Is this how it will be if Hillary is elected, Bill putting in his thoughts EVERYWHERE? I can't stand her, but add him on top and I feel nauseous.

Eric   January 8th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

The only reason people flock to Obama is because he is black.

Cheryl   January 8th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Bill Clinton has the right to say anything that he wants! He has been at this for years he is not a fool. The press is biased to Hillary, they paint her in a bad light because she is a woman. The way she was ganged up on in the last debate was awful, but did she buckle and cry then no! Because she is a strong woman and that is what we need in the white house! I can not believe that more women are not standing up for her! Where do you as women want to end up on the totem pole very bottom? The fact that we would even consider electing a black man before an experienced woman makes me sick! By the way the republicans want Obama thats why so many of them are walking into caucuses and registering as democrats to put him on the map so they can beat him!!!!!!!!!!!! It"s called a strategy the same way that they got Bush elected through the church with the abortion promise. vote CLINTON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Phil Memphis, TN   January 8th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Wow. God forbid anyone say anything negative about Obama. What makes him exempt? Pointing out that he has voted exactly the same as Hilary on the war, while he tries to make a case that he somehow is right or different and the others are wrong seems like a reasonable point to make.

Then he is criticized for campaigning for his wife? I believe the other candidates spouses and family are doing the same thing. Because he was President he somehow gave up his right to support a family member, or for that matter any candidate of his choice? Puhleeaassee

I am still undecided and leanig away from Clinton or Obama and towards Edwards, but stop with the "how dare he" comments.

Anne   January 8th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Poor Bill...he wants back into the White House so bad he can taste it! So close and yet.....so far.

tuttifrutti   January 8th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Who's running for Prez? It's about time the Clintons get their just desert. I wonder if the wives of the other candidates will speak out when their spouses are attacked? The Clintons are upset since they thought Hillary was a cinch to win the candidacy for the Democratic party. She's weak and she is showing it to the nth degree. Thanks for NAFTA.

Daus   January 8th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Mr Clinton

Let your wife fight or compete for herself against Mr Obama

Denise   January 8th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Listen to you people. You sound like a bunch of 7th graders. What ever happened to reason and common sense?

Based on your comments the Obama supporters are hypocrites. You are all for his message but by evidence of your scathing comments you aren't putting the message into practice. Which lends weight to the argument his campaign and supporters are more interested in talk than action.

As for hits on the Clintons. There has never been anything proving they are crooks. The independent counsel spent years and millions trying to make the case against them but couldn't. Unless YOU can prove it I suggest you practice what Obama preaches; CHANGE and stop hammering them on something you 'think' .

As for hits on Obama. How can we hit on him? No one knows anything about his record and that's largely because he has escaped the media's scrutiny. Up to now his campaign has been all talk that makes you feel hopeful. John Edward's speeches give hope too but no one is talking about him like they talk about Obama. Let's face it, if you honestly believe the media has no influence on the outcome of elections then you are someone new to politics and frankly that's what scares me. All the first time participaters that have no clue or have no desire to research the candidates on their tangible merits. Voters who take the easy route and vote based on emotion and not on facts.

amy R, Iowa   January 8th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Obama has nothing to hide. That is a problem for Clintons and their establishment who have secrets and manipulations as part of their plan. So they try to come up with the spin of they don't know where Obama stands on things. Obama's stand are no secret. In fact, it seems the Clintons have tried to copy a few for themselves. Obama's Blueprint for Change out in the open online for all to see at http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf

Annie   January 8th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

The difference in Hillary's and Obama's message is this-Hillary is telling the Democrats to ask what the country can do for you, and Obama is telling the Democrats (and the Independents and Republicans) to ask what you can do for the Country.

CJL   January 8th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Who needs comedy writers in Hollywood when we've got these characters for laughs? Writers couldn't make this stuff up!!

Kate   January 8th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

TO ALL HILLARY SUPPORTERS AND MEDIA ... PLEASE LAY DOWN HER EXPERIENCE AND HELP US UNDERSTAND ... IF YOU CAN'T THEN STOP THE EXPERIENCE CHANT!

RWR   January 8th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

I was going to comment but instead will commend the following for having clear visions of the Clintons......Scott, Flem, Brian, Dr. Roy, PW, Jr., TK, JCH, BJ, Ron L., Dalton, Jeff.

A few others, Andres & Josh, are delusional.

Everyone have a great day, and maybe we'll get something done in 2008.

Kim, Sacramento, CA   January 8th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

This answers my question of who is Bill Clinton "really" campaign for??? The answer is Barack. If he was really campaigning for his wife he wouldn't be acting the fool like this and making untrue statements – Bill Clinton is a much smarter politician than that.

Wilberto Jimenez, Monmot, MD   January 8th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Gbryant –

"Why not bring up the background and the middle name Hussein."

This is a statement in very poor taste. Why don't you just come right out with it, and accuse Mr. Obama of whatever it is you're trying to insinuate.

And no, I'm not an Obama "fan".

doug   January 8th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Fact) Bill Clinton cannot tell the truth.
Fact) Bill Clinton says Hillary's the most qualified to be President.
Conclusion: Hillary is not the most qualified to be President.

Emily   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I see the Obama Cult is alive and well. What a dissapointment!

What exactly is it about this guy that you can't accept any honest criticism? Does he walk on water or something? Someone writes great speeches for him. He commands and audience...and then what? Is he going to speech his way through everything?

Check your facts before you come down on Clinton for saying the truth!

Artie   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

If they can't take the heat from Obama, what would they do against the Republican attack machine?

hjones   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

who is running you or the mrs you had your turn already.

land of lakes   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

When is the press going to do their job? Thank you, Bill, for doing it for them.

This is the most one-sided coverage on a political candidate I have ever seen. But it’s not going to work; we are committed to voting for the Senator from New York!

Madonna Regan   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

To All Media,

WHY do you people hate Hillary Clinton? Is it because she is a Lady and more intelligent than you are people? Why ALL of you, when I say ALL, I mean, CNN, NBC, ABC, FOX, MSNBC MEDIA people leaning toward Barack? Is it because like you say people "likeable" but being likeable does not mean he will make a good president. Do you people realized that he is not as bright or intelligent as Hillary? Have people watched your own hosted debate? Barack could not answer questions as intelligent as Hillary. HE IS INEXPERIENCED! Is this the kind of president you want to lead? YOU PEOPLE TREAT HILLARY VERY UNFAIR!

Madonna Regan
Wife and A Mother

James   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Bill one commet for you 9-11 shut your mouth

William   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

At one point in my life I had great respect for Bill Clinton. Now, recently, I clearly see that he is as much Conniving as those that attacked him during his presidential Bid. GO Barrack. I have researched his stance on the issues and his background as far as his childhood, and I am pleased!!!

ppgallini   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Last I remember, we voted not once but TWICE for a president we'd "most like to have a beer with". And look how well that turned out!

Look at EXPERIENCE. Look at PAST ACCOMPLISHMENTS. The best barometer of future performance is PAST PERFORMANCE.

Keep personality out of it people. Obama may or may not be likable. Who of you acutally knows him personally??? You believe him but you have no proof that he is what he claims to be. Its the classic example of the wolf in sheep's clothing. Or leading the sheep to the slaughter. So gullible are the American people and caught up in media hype.

This is not a popularity contest. This is about leading and getting things done. Hillary's record, if you ever care to look at it, shows she gets the job done.

Obama is a child. He talks a good talk. But has no substance. You'll see.

GO HILLARY!!!

manny james marietta ga   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I will be voting Replubican this time around. My party is so stupid. We are caught up in a wave of no return..Between the Media and the Replubicans, they are finally getting their way..Getting Hillary out of the way has been a priority from day one.. That's why I am changing my party to the Replublicans. They are so much smarter. They understand that all they have to do is put the negitive tone out there and the MEDIA will pick it up. Especially if it involve Hillary. We are watching a successful execution of Hillary and the DEMS can't see it. I am and African American who will never vote for Obama. If Mike Huckabee wins the nomination, I will be voting for him.. You will see a huge split in the party if Obama win. It will turn out to be one of the lowest turnout in quite awhile. Hillary Supportes are very angry!!!The Clinton supporters see and understand the one sideness of the debate. Now I understand why some country's gag on the press. Dan Abrams said it best last nite. " If 70% of the people in this country get there news from tv, and it's all bad news for one canidate, it's not fair. Everyone should receive the same treatment. Even Mr Obama would agree with that. Afterall, he said he's going to bring this country together. Race doesn't matter to me. The only thing matter to me is getting the right person in the white House. Do any of you Obama supporters know what he stands for. Please reply!!! Wake up america and don't be fooled again..

Tee   January 8th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

The funny thing is.....the clintons wants to pit dems vs rep.....obama wants to try and get all working together. i guess when all you see is dems vs reps it's a fairy tail mind you most of us are indy voters. reps better start paying attention or obama is going to run away with the election.

down with the good ole boy system!!

Gbryant   January 8th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

OH GREAT. NObama just made a statement that we need to be partners with Kenya? We need to help stop the violence, but how is Kenya going to help us with national security? Going to hear a lot of this if he is nominated.

Steven Furtado, Kunkletown PA   January 8th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

@ Charles T, VA

I should point out that the country HAS had an independent president before:

George Washington.

Fred   January 8th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

I see some people thinking that the independents who are voting for Obama is some kind of GOP plot. Well you have got it twisted, because it is a Hillary nomination that conservatives were ready for. All you had to do was turn to Fox news and see they had their attack dogs ready to pounce. But this surge for Obama put a monkey wrench in their plans, and now they have to go back to drawing board. And you can talk all you want about how much love Obama is getting from the press now, I am sure a couple of months ago when Hillary was on top you didn't have any problems then. What we are seeing now is the system work as it should, and for the first time in a long time voters are saying we Don't have to settle, we decide who we are going to back. This isn't Obama, or the media pulling some con job on the public, this is the will of the people here, standing up for something, instead of settling for the status quo. I am sorry the Hillary supports aren't getting the benefit of that movement, but you, Bill, whoever can't stop of the will of the people.

aware   January 8th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

The inspirational Obama certainly inspires a crowd of very hateful bloggers. This is not the influence America needs. I thought the message was supposed to be unity/love not division/hate?

greenplant   January 8th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

The media wants Obama to win the nomination so he can get crushed in the general election so that they can do specials and montages about how racist america still is. Pathetic.

Robert   January 8th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

To Bill Clinton: :Go fish!"

Kwaku Daako   January 8th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Bill Clinton just makes me sick. Listen to the kettle calling the pot black! The Clintons are for the past. They had their time! Good Bye! Obama is for the future and that's what America needs – someone who inspires Americans to higher ideals and a sense of optimism about their future.

Missy   January 8th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Bill Clinton is right on the fact that the media is playing with kid gloves when it comes to Barak Obama he has'nt been asked any real tough questions. I wonder why that is the media to afraid of Barak Hussein Obama to ask him any tough questions. At this point I don't know who I am going to vote for but I know it won't be Barak he's got a sneaky kind of way about him.

andy   January 8th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

I think the man should have run as a Independent and not a democrat ! ands von I cant wait till new york and california thats where Im from and Im latino and she still is who we would like :) !

Daus   January 8th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Mr. Clinton

Let your wife fight for herself againt mr Obama.

curtis   January 8th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Bill, you may want to move out of Harlem you have officially lost your ghetto pass

Gary   January 8th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Billy's desperate now. His hopes of babysitting the Interns is slipping away.

L.M.   January 8th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

GO BILL! GO HILL!
It is about time someone tells Obama like he is. Sugar coated? You betcha. What happened to Oprah? Hunh?

To Frederic: We ALL built America – black, white, red, yellow, brown. Don't be so racist. It appears to me that without coming out and saying it, Obama is trying to make this all about race. "Look at me." He totally forgets his "white" side! Oh, and so does Oprah and Tiger (who is after all 1/4 white among others).

It is NOT about race – It is about who can do the best job as President. Anything is an improvement over what we have now, but we need someone strong who can say what they are going to do as opposed to "we need change." I need change too – about $10,000 a year would do it for me!

TheTruthHurts   January 8th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

I'm sure someone has said it before, but what is this amazing record Hillary is running on? Isn't she a second term senator who's never been elected to anything else except class treasurer? She was FIRST LADY for 8 years. Surely, she was an activist first lady, but where is this 35 years of getting things done in politics when she's never been a candidate before New York.

That is a little disingenuous I think. Obama hasn't said a word about it and he is probably saving that one and a few others if needed.

She and he are making it easier and easier and they don't even see it.

Adam   January 8th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Whats wrong with a representative changing his views and opinions especially if it just happens to reflect the publics?

Lee Chang, Surrey, Canada   January 8th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Charles T, VA: You are naive, misinformed and arrogant. And America deserves its destiny in the drain, if all are more Americans like you.
Lee Chang, Surrey

Chris, Orlando   January 8th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Time for new blood…..look at the HRC stage in Iowa…Bubba…Albright….McAuliffe….Gen. Clark….doesn’t look like change to me.

She talks like that if she is not President (teary-eyed phony), the whole country will go to Hell. How narcissitic can one get?

There is no basic policy difference among the Lib candidates…the question is who can get things done…..we know Hillary has accomplished nothing and she would get nothing done as President.

PSK Lakeside, AZ   January 8th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Did Hillary get emotional on you, Bill? Stay out of it- if she sinks or swims it should not be dependant on your intervention- I think she can sling her own mud.

Petra Fuhrmans   January 8th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Agree with President Clinton. The press is treating Hillary horribly and Obama is all of a sudden viewed as the answer to all our problems. He can not do any wrong in the eyes of the media. Where is the objectivity? He may be a great inspirational speaker, but it is unnerving that this country may actually fall for a feel-nice candidate instead of an actual leader who can fix our problems. Hillary is a can-do candidate for this can-do nation. Obama is mean-spirited in calling her campaign "depressing". It is downright "depressing" to see us go for fluff once more instead of substance and dedication from Hillary.

Virginia-Broward County FL   January 8th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Hillary, you still have my vote! I think that you have worked hard to prepare for this day – gained valuable experience along the way. From your college days at Wellsley/Yale to your days as first lady in the governors mansion in AR. Than as first lady in the White House you were involved and supported Bill even when the going got tough. You prepared yourself to be a NY Senator and have worked tirelessly on children/womans issue and health care. I think you have the sincerest intentions to make this world a better place. You have been a roll model for woman across the nation and especially for Chelsea! Politics is a down and dirty business and the "good ol boys" feel threatened that a woman could become President. You Go Girl-don't give up!

Jojo   January 8th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

I really think that Americans who believe and vote for Obama are not only stupids,but do not think.
Let be realistic:Obama says he "is going to change the way business is done in Washington."That's fine.What has he changed since he has been there?For the record,he voted to fund war in Irak;voted for the patriot act;voted for the energy bill that has special interests,...
He is going to bring change:Is education going to be free?Is health care going to be free?Are we going to have free debts,free taxes,free this,free that?Is he going to change the color of the white house?
Also,who is he?Where is he coming from?His father is from Kenya and his mom from the US;so what does Indonesia has to here?
Those are the questions voters have to ask themselves.Discus on issues,not on a slogan,words or dream.Also,don't forget that after that,the Republicans will be waiting and will not give him a free pass.They don't care,they just want to win elections.Be very careful.Yes you hate Hillary or Bill,but remember that on November,they will be aside and the Repubilacans will kill your dream once for all.

Terry   January 8th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Take a back seat, Bill. Hillary too. This wave of true support for Obama is way beyond the manipulative and calculating politics that control your every move.

Michael   January 8th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

This may be a cavil, but you would think a Rhodes Scholar and graduate of Yale School should know "one feels bad," not "one feels badly." Can't this preening narcissist at least be familiar with English usage?

Pete   January 8th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

"It's time for the Baby Boomer generation to step aside. I like Bill Clinton but it is time for us to move on. I am tiring of the 60's generation dividing this country over past battles. We have important issues to deal with and the boomer's self-absorbtion is getting old. Mrs. Clinton, get out of the way, stay in the senate and let Obama unite the country!
"

I totally agree with this comment.. the boomers did great things in the 60s.. but they have become what they used to hate in our current times

They are ripping this country apart...... because they all still hate each other

Akilah Hughes   January 8th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Gimme a break! Bill Clinton was great in office, but he's not running. People obviously want Barack Obama more than Hillary Clinton. Let her fight her own battles Bill!

let's be real   January 8th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Slick Willy isn't so "slick" anymore is he? Stay out of this, man. You're making your wife look bad.

Though I support Hillary, I do believe this move is very stupid. If negative campaigning hasn't been working so far this year, what makes you think it will work now? It only repels potential voters from voting for you. This move will inevitably increase Obama's lead to a point where he will have won by over 10 points again. Speak about how your wife can also be of change, not about how Obama "changes views" during the war. Most people are not convinced about Clinton's association with "change."

Obama's main weakness is inexperience. Other than that, I really can't say there's another weakness he has. Yes, Obama promises change, but can you really trust someone with very little experience to bring this change? As the saying goes, it's easier said than done. Talk is cheap; unfortunately, people all around, including this forum, are buying the crap. Remember, we as Americans voted for George Bush in the first place and look what happened. Don't make the same mistake again based on words. Actions speak louder than words, and right now all I can see from Obama are words. Show me the experience please.

Christine Tynes, Virginia Beach, VA   January 8th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Bill: SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP! You and your silly, corrupt wife had your chance. You have some nerve to speak of liars and half-truths. What the heck did you and your wife do during the time that you were in the White House?? Yeah, don't think "liberals" didn't pay attention and start digging deep to find all the crap the two of you pulled during your reign. The Republicans weren't the only ones paying attention.

Funny how the gloves are coming off now that Hillary isn't the automatic shoe-in you thought she would be. Its time to go forward, not backwards... and while I don't think Barack has everything he needs to do this job, I'm sure he will somehow gather everything he needs. And you know what? The American people will help him do it!

It's too late. Your time is done. Go retire and start being a husband to your wife to console her in her time of need. :(

Sick and tired   January 8th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Wait. . .the Clintons aren't crooks? Didn't they just return a bunch of dirty campaign money?

Anyway, so the point of that speech seems to be that there is no difference in Clinton's and Obama's voting records. If they're the same, then I'll still take Obama, thanks.

Nice, Houston, Texas   January 8th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

POWER MONGERs BILL AND HILLARY

These Power Mongers WOULD DO AND SAY ANYTHING TO GET BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE. I mean.......... ANYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WE DON'T WANT YOU BILLARY, its the 21st century.

STOP THE SWIFTBOATING of OBAMA

James Warren   January 8th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Barack Obama reminds me of Elmer Gantry amd a used car salesman.

Bill, Milwaukee, WI   January 8th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Go Bill!

It's about TIME someone told it as it is...

Let NOBAMA go INDEPENDENT or REPUBLICAN or ILLINOIAN; his WIZARD OF OZ fairy tale will never get me to vote for him!

NOBAMA: the ONLY DEMOCRAT who thinks the MATRIX is REAL!

Nancy O   January 8th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Change – the time is now and Obama is the one!!

blah blah – what experience does Hillary have, 8 years in the senate? Or is she trying to tell us she was running the country and not Bill? If that's the case then nothing will change and she was a sleazy president.

I've tried to like her but can't find anything honest about her – she has no integrity.

She took money from a fugitive, tax evader and traitor WHO her husband pardoned. Does Marc and Denise Rich ring a bell? If not, google them. Wake up America

Besides does anyone see a pattern here – Bush Sr.1989-1993, Clinton 1993-2001, Bush Jr. 1999 -2008 and Ms. Clinton 2008 – ??

How can it get any worse???

Martin, Clarksville, TN   January 8th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

If Obama's campaign is a fairy tell, I guess that makes Hillary the wicked witch.

Anybody but Hillary in 2008

Jon, Lantana   January 8th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Lets see here. I am very disappointed in Obama supporters in General. Every post you see on here from one of his change disciples, you see bigotry, hate, and downright lies to make their candidate look better. Take a close look at all of these blogs and you will see. Look at how many investigations have been against the Clintons and how many of them resulted in a charge, NOT A ONE. You Obama supporters play in to the Republican lies and playbook, by using baseless accusations as a way to support your person. If Clinton was a man you would not make fun of her stoic and solid personality. Yes, she is a woman, but she doesnt have to be all pretty and frilly to be a woman. She acts just like any other politician out there. I think the major reason you resort to lies and nasty nasty nasty rhetoric against her is because there is a major flaw with Obama, he is NOT qualified. Albeit I think he is a great guy, but lacks the experience to get the things done that he is touting. Lets hear some actually specific ways you will influence change instead of touting change, change, change, change. Every president has brought about change in one way or another and is a cop-out for him. Put more scrutiny in all the candidates instead of relying on false promises by Obama.

Arshad   January 8th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Mr. President, we all trust your words. We all remember your assertion with a pointed fingures on TV screen, "I did not have s-- relationship"

You two are obsessed about power. It's all about you, not about anyone else. Look how a whole generation of yonger people have been inspired by a candidate, named Barack Obama. People who are running for President, they all are good, smart people. No of years in washington is not enough. If it was, Al Gore, John Kerry would have been president. Biden and Dodd would lead the nomination. But it;s not. It's a blend of wisdom, judgment, character, ability to inspire people about a building a better future. Senator Clinton is one fine, accomplised senator, no question about it. But may be people are looking for something different in this election. She is a good candidate. But Senator Obama may be just a much better candidate.

So you can lie all you want. You can scream, she can cry all you want. You can twist his record, send e-mail about he being a muslim plant or a drug dealer. All this will do is will make you a liar one more time, will drag you down from the respect democrats show to you. Let;s face it. Hillary is not capable of drawing independent vote. Without them she can not win in general election. Does not matter how experienced or formidable candidate she is. The strategy you are adopting is making one thing clear, you will destroy the most electable democratic presidential candidate for your wife's ambition. A former American president, the most popular democrat in the country, I thought, was better than this low level of distortion.

Dee   January 8th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

He added, "Give me a break. This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen."

Hmmm...I don't know Bill...Every fairytale I've ever seen...always has a happy ending!

nikki   January 8th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

I just can't believe how obama's campaign seems to be just fluff and nonsense . Has he been pressed for serious issues? he seems to be a new wave preacher talking up crowds but there is nothing concrete to fall back on!

TheTruthHurts   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

It's just sad. Even if everything Clinton says is true, it's sad that they can be no more effective than to blast Obama with obscure criticisms not supported by actual voters who would actually be the ones who could be sympathetic characters.

I like Bill, Hillary, Edwards and Obama and it's sad that Obama seems to be the only one that can consistently take the high road regardless of what daggers might be thrown. Obama may have evil staffers doing his bidding, but it still says alot that the candidate hasn't felt the need to stoop low.

isoprene   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Good Job Bill.

Finally there is someone who speaks the truth. Lets do reality check for Obama. He is a fake. Wow Obama supporters of Hope and Change? You cannot stand the truth, so how come you can bring the change. Also what a politician. If not the nominee, he will be the independent. Lets wake up America and Stop the false hope and lies and fabricated change. Lets STOP OBAMA.

Mike in San Francisco   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Bill, STOP. Give it a rest! Enough already!!

I voted for you twice and still respect you.

BUT....., you and Hillary can't see that the country is suffering from over 24 years Bush I, Clinton and Bush II FATIGUE. It's time for a new generation to lead in a new direction.

Your presence on the campaign trail with Hillary only REINFORCES policies of the past.

Adele   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

I am sick of the Clintons proclaiming that Hilary should be the candidate fo choice just because she has six years experience in Washington. I thought that Obama has 16 years. Who wants to go from Bush to Clinton then Bush to Clinton. I think that the American people have had enough of the Clintons and they are simply looking for change from someone who seems authentic.

GEORGE LEVY   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Truth is that neither Clinton is a Democrat. No Democrat would have signed a Welfare reform bill that pulled the safety net from under thousands of needy families and left black kids to sleep with rats in Chicago ghettos, or sign a military appropriationss bill that denied abortion needs to females in the services.

Cable King Pittsburgh PA   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Nothing new, but how did we get so nasty as a nation?

Buzz   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Bill just hurt Hilary with his stupidity. Everything the Clintons do just backfires. I can see Obama's victory solidified already. The Clintons are out of touch. Bill cannot attack Obama on honesty issues – he's not qualified to do so. Even if the Clintons change their approach now they will continue to lose credibility.

Now I see folks attacking Obama through devious means – his other name, his heritage etc. That is a sign of desperation.

OBAMA '08

Helena B.- Memphis, Tn   January 8th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

I feel that the Clintons are using dirty politics to try to bring Obama down. I think that they are doing the same thing they accused the Bush campaign of doing and that is trying to use smear tactics to win votes. But America is so tired of all of those games that the Clintons are trying to play. We do not need another Clinton or Bush in office they've been in office since the late 80s. We are tired of the same old thing. We need a new direction and we need new leadership. We need a new plan. And I dont feel that Hillary can do that for this country. Hillary is not strong enough. She cant even control her own emotions, how can she control this country. I hope that some people feel the way I feel. I'm voting for OBAMA 08!

Eric in Massachusetts   January 8th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Hi Wilberto,

I am real.... not on one of the campaigns. I have defended Hillary, but I actually voted for Bush in 2000 and 04. The Dems just did not have viable candidates in either race. Bush has really caused problems but Gore and/or Kerry would have been much worse. I'm sorry to say that it's shaping up that way again now. UNLESS Hillary is nominated. I would switch back to Dems and vote for Hillary. I might even vote for Edwards, but I'd have to think that one through first.

But, if it is Obama on the boards, I WILL vote for the Republican, whether it is McCain, Romney or Huckabee. Any of the 3 of them would do much much better than Obama.

In my opinion, Obama did this too soon. He should have completed at least one term as Senator. And he should have at least tried to make it to the Senate to place his votes. He has an abominable voting record... something like 63% I think. My concern is that he is running so quickly. Why? Is he afraid that if he ran an entire term in the Senate that he would be found out? What is there to find out? Don't get me wrong, I think he is a good man. He just does not have a clue what it takes to run a country. And why is his mother living in a shack in Africa shucking corn? That's horrible.

For me, it is either Hillary, Edwards or a Republican.

New Hampshire   January 8th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

If Obama equals change, then why has he taken such great pains to mimic President Clinton....everything down to his use of "Hope" is Clintonian, his swagger, his mannerisms, his gestures, but all without the the depth, skills, ideas or sincerity. Sure, Bill Clinton told some tall stories–since Obama has so far copied Bill–how do we know he won't tell similar tall stories.

Where is the authentic Obama–he's the great pretender and its time the press and voters take a close, deep look. If we get Obama, we don't know who we're really getting because he's never been his real, authentic self–nothing more than a copy. If he can't do anything more than mimic the other greats then we don't really know who he is or what he stands for or what he'll do.

Obama preaches a higher form of political discourse–but I haven't seen it–he attacked first and on a personal level. He didn't attack ideas or record, because that would be tantamount to attacking his own–to the extent he's shown up to vote.

The younger voters who've taken the lead in getting him elected are too young to realize that Obama is Bill Clinton circa 1992. (They were no older than four or five at the time). Time for the adults to stop being so easily persuaded by our youth! We're supposed to lead them, not the other way around.

People, this isn't a game, this is about the future of our country. Our country is hurting, dying, suffering....its time to get past celebrity hype and the media's coronation of its latest golden boy....so let's get real. I have a very, very bad feeling about the latest golden boy–they have almost always served to disappoint. Please take off the rose-tinted glasses America.

Hillary has made some mistakes sure, and sure she doesn't let us "in" nearly as much as some other folks do, but she is genuine, authentic, ready to lead and has the record and experience to show she can make profound change. Obama just doesn't have that. Hillary can provide strong, decisive leadership–Obama can't–gaining consensus is not the same as strong, bold leadership–which is what our country desperately needs. When Hillary listens to questions, its clear that it isn't about her, but its about us. When Obama listens, its clear that its about him and his ego.

Hillary is not her husband. She's stronger, more thoughtful, more compassionate. She'll make an incredible president. She's the real deal people.

It is too early to say this is over for her. I hope she mounts an aggressive, strong fight to the finish and reveals Obama and Edwards for what they really are–two profoundly ego-centric, shallow guys who have no real vision for repairing America. Talk is nice–action is essential.

I'm with Hillary. Hillary '08!

av3   January 8th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

WE HAVE HAD A BUSH CLINTON DYNASTY THE LAST 20 YEARS. THIS TYPE OF INCUMBENCY BREEDS COMPLACENCY AND CORRUPTION. GEORGE WASHINGTON WAS SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW THIS, HE TURNED DOWN A GUARANTEED THIRD TERM. IF THE CLINTONS LOVED THIS COUNTRY SO DEARLY, AND IF IT WASNT ABOUT POLITICS, THEY WOULD SEE THIS AND DO LIKEWISE. THE EXPERIENCED ESTABLISHMENT IS RUNNING THIS COUNTRY INTO THE GROUND WHILE PADDING THEIR OWN POCKETS.

TO THIS THERE IS NO DEBATE.

Jim, VA   January 8th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

The media bias is so blatantly obvious that this election sadly has become an American Idol contest. No one has asked what specific changes that Obama is going to bring. No one has investigated his past. The most notorious one-side network is MSNBC. It has become essentially the anti Clinton kiss Obama network. Sickening!

Rafi, NY NY   January 8th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

WAVE wave WAVE wave WAVE (get it? it's an actual wave).

Karen? Are you drunk?

Bill W - PA   January 8th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

When the going gets too tough for Hillary, she cries and brings out Bill Clinton.

Boo Hoo!

Gil (CA)   January 8th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Former President Clinton balanced the budget and left a surplus; let's not forget. That said, Both Hillary Clinton and John Edwards bring experience and potential to the table, while Barrack Obama brings dreams and little else. Does anyone remember what happened when the last dreamer/outsider was elected to the White House in 1976? Jimmy Carter's plans were stymied by the Washington Machine at almost every turn; his was the first election in which I voted, and I endorsed him vigorously as I wanted an outsider and dreamer to change Washington. Although I still believe that Jimmy Carter was the better candidate then, and I have watched him walk the walk during the last 30 years, this time around I would much rather vote for an experienced person who can navigate Washington and not one who simply talks the talk. I support Hillary Clinton because she knows what can actually be done to change things, because she is married to the most fiscally-responsible former president of the last 20 years, and because she is a woman–talk about an outsider; she has managed to gain the respect of her NY constituents. She can work effectively for change.

A reader   January 8th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Everyone seems to be on Obama but he has not received any type of criticism like Hillary has. No one has really questioned his past. Why does he cover up he is muslim? Why does he show that he went to Catholic school? Big deal. I went to Catholic school and just had to pay extra. I am not Catholic. What has he done in his first term? What has any of these candidates done? We have no idea what these people are going to be able to do when they get in office. They tell us what we want to hear. At least with Hillary, she knows what to expect. She helped Bill run the nation. Nation didnt do too bad during those 8 years compared to the HELL we have endured with Bush the almost 7 years.

K   January 8th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

what is all this "experience" hillary keeps talking about? would you let a doctor's wife perform surgery on you, just because she is married to a doctor? would you let the broker's husband handle your money just because the broker herself retired?

J. Davis   January 8th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

This is exactly why we don't need a female as Pres. of the US....reasons being, she's too emotional and she's not strong enough to fight her own battles, her husband is doing it for her. Is she going to cry on national tv every time there is a national crisis?

Sorry Bill, but has it occurred to you that you are not running for Pres. in 2008, Hilary is? I love you, but she's not the one!

Obama 2008

Tim   January 8th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

tBill Clinton is right,this is a fairy tale. What change is Obama talking about? Obama is more hype then substance. He only sayswhat people want to here. Poeple need to wake up and see through all of this. IF Obama wins the primary. We will have 8 more years of GOP President in the White House.

Andrew   January 8th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Just give it up Billary....positions on Iraq wouldn't even be required had a strong policy on the Middle East and terrorism been put in place by the *ahem* Bill Clinton Administration. All the smoke & mirrors that created the artificial optimism in the economy was taking all of Bill's time, so terrorists largely went neglected to to do as they please.

So, Bush had to do something....Hillary drank the kool-aid....and Bill Clinton is swallowing a bitter pill that is only attributable to his woeful failure as a leader.

Anonymous   January 8th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Bill Clinton is an adulterous rat. His wife has no experience to speak of. I am voting for Mike Huckabee.

Boy, the first black president is sure showing his true colors. Now, Now, Bubba.

TO THE CLINTONS: GO SOMEWHERE AND SIT DOWN!!