Trick or Treat

N.H. Women Tricked

Hillary got the Treat

I did not see hillary sniffle during the many Clinton W.H. Scandle

Ha Ha New Hampshire - You may have gaurenteed a republican victory. His politics (Divider) unlike husband. Obama and her husband connect with all people. The Dem for will be split with this type of Trickery on her own Dem.

Dems are Falling for anything

And let's get another thing straight. I don't care who they are, Democrat or Republican, The country is not going to change. You will still have the Washington political machine in power and it is not geared toward change, as the Democrats and Republican hopefuls have tried to convince you they will do. Anyone niave enought to believe the polotics in this country can change is dreaming. Healthcare is not going to change, immigration is not going to change and the only thing that 'may' change about in Iraq is the rate of our pullout because of a party change.

If anyone actually believes that HILLARY CLINTON can win in a general election, then I will submit that they are out of touch with America. She is not a candidate of change. We will go right back to the 90's if she's elected. Remember that? Congress and the President at each other's throats, special investigations, continuing resolutions, impeachment hearings, and scandal after scandal. Sounds a lot like things these days, now that I think of it.

The name Clinton invokes as much visceral, partisan venom as does the name Bush. I hope America doesn't fall for the teary-eyed, chameleon that is Hillary Clinton and the smug, arrogant, self-serving, "liberal elites" that comprise the Clinton political machine.

HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT! She can get the job done!

"When I visited Iowa in early December and did some phone calling and canvassing, within two days it was obvious to me that our campaign had a big challenge. A very large number of Hillary’s supporters were telling me that they supported Hillary and would vote for her in November, but they were not going to go to the caucuses. Old people, people who work night shift or 2 jobs, working moms, single moms all have a really hard time going to the caucus. These are our supporters. I was alarmed and talked with campaign staff and indeed the campaign knew in October that this was a huge obstacle for us. This is why I spent most of the month of December in Iowa and asked others to do the same. I felt that it was critical to pull out all the stops. The last two weeks my hope was that we could finish second. We tried very hard to convince our supporters to go to the caucus. About 70% of our supporters had never been to a caucus before. We told them that if 1/3 of Hillary’s supporters did not go to the caucus she would not do well in Iowa. We trained them on the caucus. We organized rides and buddies for them. They got this message multiple ways throughout the month. There was not a single supporter that was overlooked. We had a huge contingent on the ground working on this and support from unions and EMILY’s List. We got 70,000 people there when normally about 150K total participate. But it was not enough.

I was very surprised as I travelled around the state that I did not encounter any groundswell for Obama. For this reason I thought that Obama would come in third. Edwards was strong and I thought he would likely win. In the week prior to the caucus, many undecideds I spoke with broke for Hillary and Edwards. I did not find many breaking for Obama. I was in Creston, Ottumwa, Marshalltown, Iowa City, Dubuque, Fort Madison, and Mason City. I got the same story from every field organizer. They felt good. They felt our support was solid. They did not see movement toward Obama but there was movement towards Edwards and he was our competition. These field organizers were not in touch with one another so the fact that each told me this independently was significant. I was really surprised that Obama was so confident the two days before the caucus. There were many undecideds still. It was not at all clear what the outcome was going to be. I found it very disturbing that he was so confident.

The caucus itself was shockingly unorganized. The email below from a friend of mine says it all. In Iowa you can simply show up and vote. No one even checks your i.d. I was at a middle school in which about 7 precincts met. There was mass confusion – many people had no idea what ward or precinct they were in. There were no computer facilities to check – I happened to have a rough map I let people look at. I’m sure many were in the wrong rooms. In the precinct where I was no one was at the door to the caucus room making sure that people registered. People could just walk in. At the registration table there were 2 people checking in 122 participants. Many participants were brand new and clearly not known to their neighbors. There were people in the room who were not residents and it was the honor system whether they voted or not. The person who was chair and ran the meeting was inexperienced and he did not have control of the crowd. The rules were not followed. When an experienced person tried to have the rules followed, people got very confrontational with him. So it was a mess. In the precinct I attended Hillary won, Obama was second and Edwards was third."

Baffling group....dolt is the operative word

OBAMA and EDWARDS are not the right candidates, look at their records. This country cannot afford to provide on the job training to Obama or Edwards.

EXPERIENCE plays a role in making change. The American people were fooled once by the present administration, let's not be fooled again. Americans need to know that Hillary Clinton is the only one, besides Richardson, that can bring "CHANGE" and turn this country around and give it back to the American people.

Let's face it Hillary has exactly what this country needs (experience and backbone)to get in there (white house) on day one and begin to bring change. Thank you.

I voted for Clinton both times. I will not vote for Hillary. She lost me when she moved to NY for one reason only, to get the vacated Senate seat. Her only ambition is to seek the next highest position. This time it happens to be the Presidency. It's a good thing there is no worldwide position because she would run for that next.

And what's this thing about 35 years of experience? Does she include those six years on the board of Wal-mart in her fight for the un-insured and the poor? Is she counting the years when Bill was the president as her own experience? My wife has been a lawyer for twenty years. Can I please handle your divorce? Come on now, my wife has been doing it for some time now, I am qualified.

Bush 4 years, Clinton 8 years, Bush 8 years, Clinton ? years... This is not a Democracy but a Dynasty. This is no different than Bhutto leaving her 19 year old son the throne of Pakistan in her will.

I'm now worried that Democrats will continue their trend in nominating candidates who can't win. Republicans have only one hope in winning this election, despite all their faults and all the damage they're doing and will continue to do. They want her to win so they can win. They are experts at making an opposition candidate so distasteful to large segments of the population compared to a poor GOP alternative. Hillary would be so easy.

I HAVE NO SYMPATHY FOR PATHETIC LOSERS THAT CONTINUE TO PICK CANDIDATES THAT CAN'T WIN. YOU DO IT TO YOURSELVES AND I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANY CRYING WHEN HILLARY LOSES IN NOV.

Please, anyone (DEM) but her.

AMERICA, YOU NEED A PRESIDENT...NOT A PREACHER!!

Go look at what he has done...you better look very hard cause he hasn't done very much yet. And we still don't know what is going to do..ONLY WORDS WORDS WORDS..

FACE THE FACT AMERICA. THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS ALL IT TAKES ANS HAS PROVE HERSELF IS HILARY.EVEN IF YOU DON'T LIKE HER. THAT'S YOUR BEST CHOICE.

It is not over yet. time for idealism, character, honesty, integrity and judgement. Go Barack!

Obama continues to be the frontrunner despite numbers. He is not wavering in his message and the biggest compliment to him is the fact that now nearly everyone is emulating him and his message

keep on going and get out the vote before you call a winner

A woman in NC who will not be voting for Hillary.

Maybe the headline should be, "The Pollsters were Dead Wrong."

After watching several debates, I can say that Hillary misses the mark for me as her temperment seems incompatible with political progress–the rapidity with which she shouted down Edwards after Edwards tried to disassociate his campaign from Hillary's, followed quickly by her emotional statements about how this is all really personal for her (seems Edwards said that a couple days earlier) appears much to opportunistic to be real. Edwards and Richardson struggle with the "Presidential" factor as, I would not want to send Richardson to speak as my "Head of State", though bet he would be fun to have a beer with, while Edwards is too myopic on the working class struggle which–to be frank–will not accomplish anything, unless we want to be the new France.

That leaves me with Obama from the Dem camp. He is articulate and comes across as capable of leadership. I must admit to being humored by the rabid Clintonites above who harp on the experience factor as, to my mind, the Presidential post is about leadership and the ability to lead / inspire, versus the ability to debate / pass policy. Those who think anyone who has spent any time in Washington doesn't understand the gives and takes of the political process, and use this to talk down Mr. Obama, are fooling themselves. His appeal to Dems, Reps, and Independents tells me he is the most electable of the Dems and, simply, in a year in which the Dems should sweep up Congress and the White House, I would rather have a conciliatory, rational voice than one that comes across as hell-bent on avenging the Bush years. This isn't about yesterday, it's about tomorrow. And Clinton, to my mind, can be beat in a national election because she is too polarizing, she will unite the Reps and a large swath of Independents to mobilize against her and Bill, and even some Dems I know.

Another woman not voting for Dear Hillary!!!!

MN

Take a look at her policies. They are all BS statements. "Hillary has proposed an Apollo Project-like program dedicated to achieving energy independence" ... how? who? costs? who pays? How does that trickle down to the consumer if the corporations ignore the project? Bush has been making such statement for 7 years, where are the results?

Like all the politicians, they are wishy washy statements with no substance and the American voter is failing for the same stuff time and time again. You want change and yet vote for the same. Pathetic. If you want real change from a candidate who has detailed exactly what he will do, then Ron Paul is the only viable candidate.

Her fake tears won her NH, but she will not be President because of it. She has become even more divisive with these disingenuous fabrications, accrued more bagage. Sooner than later she'll tear up again.