Comments on: Clinton: 'I actually have emotions' http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/ All politics, all the time Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Brenda http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-278655 Brenda Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:22:26 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-278655 I think after reading several of these post that we all need to look at the qualifications and record of these canadid's running for our highest office. Many of you seem to be juding Hillary for Bill's mistakes. Well all I can say is Bill might have something's in his backgound that is not worth rehashing as the media has already had a field day with it for years. On the other side as there are always 2 sides to ever story. Look at the accomplishments of Bill Clinton as Presidnet. he had a surplus when he left office which Bush spent the first year and has continued to get us deeper in debt each year. It was better with Bill in office that BUSH. I would gladly go back to the Clinton years as we had lower gas, no war , a surplus, and I could go on and on. But you narrow minded people only want to remember one thing about Bill Clinton. Give me a break!!!! First I don't approve of the scandle about him, but he is not the first or the last President to do something of this nature. Look at Kennedy. Now that being said. Bill is not running it is Hillary and she will make a BETTER Presidnet that Bill ever did. Stop and think about the mess we are in right now. Who would want to take over these hard times????? That is where EXPERIENCE comes in. Hillary has been tested in ALL fields of her life and I admire her for getting into this race. She is a stong, intellegent, qualified person that will be ready on day one. Don't think for a minute that the terrorist are not watching this election. They saw what a mess the last election turned out and knew we had someone in office that was not qualified. That is the reason we were attacked. We will be attacked again in the years ahead as they are not going to give up. That is just a fact not a scare. They are getting America right where they want us. Broke and have many of our men away from America. We need to STOP this war and get back on the right track. Yes it will take years, but hey BUSH has spent for 7 years and we can not clean it up in one or two year. Elect Hillary the ONLY way to start the recovery from the messy BUSH erra. Republicans say Democrats spent give me a break...that is a fairytale!!!! Democrats are the conserative ones in spending. The only reson that the congress has not accomplished more since taking control is BUSH stubborness and veto pin. Now McCain has been saying he would use his veto pen if elected. We do not need another REPUBLICAN President in office. It has been a disaster. THE ONLY ONE QUALIFIED IS Hillary!!!!!!!!! VOTE Hillary 2008 I think after reading several of these post that we all need to look at the qualifications and record of these canadid's running for our highest office. Many of you seem to be juding Hillary for Bill's mistakes. Well all I can say is Bill might have something's in his backgound that is not worth rehashing as the media has already had a field day with it for years. On the other side as there are always 2 sides to ever story. Look at the accomplishments of Bill Clinton as Presidnet. he had a surplus when he left office which Bush spent the first year and has continued to get us deeper in debt each year. It was better with Bill in office that BUSH. I would gladly go back to the Clinton years as we had lower gas, no war , a surplus, and I could go on and on. But you narrow minded people only want to remember one thing about Bill Clinton. Give me a break!!!! First I don't approve of the scandle about him, but he is not the first or the last President to do something of this nature. Look at Kennedy.

Now that being said. Bill is not running it is Hillary and she will make a BETTER Presidnet that Bill ever did. Stop and think about the mess we are in right now. Who would want to take over these hard times????? That is where EXPERIENCE comes in. Hillary has been tested in ALL fields of her life and I admire her for getting into this race. She is a stong, intellegent, qualified person that will be ready on day one. Don't think for a minute that the terrorist are not watching this election. They saw what a mess the last election turned out and knew we had someone in office that was not qualified. That is the reason we were attacked. We will be attacked again in the years ahead as they are not going to give up. That is just a fact not a scare. They are getting America right where they want us. Broke and have many of our men away from America. We need to STOP this war and get back on the right track. Yes it will take years, but hey BUSH has spent for 7 years and we can not clean it up in one or two year. Elect Hillary the ONLY way to start the recovery from the messy BUSH erra.

Republicans say Democrats spent give me a break...that is a fairytale!!!! Democrats are the conserative ones in spending. The only reson that the congress has not accomplished more since taking control is BUSH stubborness and veto pin. Now McCain has been saying he would use his veto pen if elected. We do not need another REPUBLICAN President in office. It has been a disaster.

THE ONLY ONE QUALIFIED IS Hillary!!!!!!!!! VOTE Hillary 2008

]]> By: hughvic http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-273217 hughvic Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:26:48 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-273217 Go Brenda! You are the best! It occurs to me that your insistence, your forthright demands as a sovereign citizen to make YOUR government and YOUR press and YOUR society bend to your will, is exactly -- exactly -- what the real radicals who founded this country must have wanted in a citizen-voter-ruler. You go, Brenda. Make them hesitate for a moment, and reflect on who's really the boss here. Sit them down in the hot seat, Brenda, because you're right: this is the most important job interview in world history, and you are the interviewer and so am I. And we and the others here have got to look the horse in the mouth or kick the tires or whatever and hire and fire as we see fit, because that is our duty and our right, without which there would be no nation to have a Chief whose office we hire someone to fill. Remind them that they serve at OUR pleasure at all times, and will promote them or discipline them or fire them as we see fit. They have no tenure, no labor protections, no right to do anything in our name of which we in the main do not approve. We honor only their offices, and not them. And they will honor our wishes, or vacate their offices. The press also, including CNN, hold the chartered office of the Fourth Estate, and they too serve at our pleasure at all times. They too will be promoted or disciplined or else fired and their office revoked. They are not above the Law, and in this country the Law is the People. Not the mob; the free-born sovereign People of a democracy. The Boss. Thank you Brenda. Jefferson would court you. Go Brenda! You are the best! It occurs to me that your insistence, your forthright demands as a sovereign citizen to make YOUR government and YOUR press and YOUR society bend to your will, is exactly - exactly - what the real radicals who founded this country must have wanted in a citizen-voter-ruler. You go, Brenda. Make them hesitate for a moment, and reflect on who's really the boss here. Sit them down in the hot seat, Brenda, because you're right: this is the most important job interview in world history, and you are the interviewer and so am I. And we and the others here have got to look the horse in the mouth or kick the tires or whatever and hire and fire as we see fit, because that is our duty and our right, without which there would be no nation to have a Chief whose office we hire someone to fill. Remind them that they serve at OUR pleasure at all times, and will promote them or discipline them or fire them as we see fit. They have no tenure, no labor protections, no right to do anything in our name of which we in the main do not approve. We honor only their offices, and not them. And they will honor our wishes, or vacate their offices. The press also, including CNN, hold the chartered office of the Fourth Estate, and they too serve at our pleasure at all times. They too will be promoted or disciplined or else fired and their office revoked. They are not above the Law, and in this country the Law is the People. Not the mob; the free-born sovereign People of a democracy. The Boss.

Thank you Brenda. Jefferson would court you.

]]> By: Brenda http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-268150 Brenda Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:44:43 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-268150 CNN would like nothing better than to keep all this bickering going on and on. We want to see the difference in these canadid's. I hope you people that work in CNN will ask some tough questions on the debate on the background to OBMAM. Are you afraid of what you might find out. Come on we the public need to know more about this man that you seem to be protecting. Be fair. Ask him about his faith, background, coming from Kenya, how he plans to bring the troops home without jeperdizing the others that have helped us. You are letting him just glide right in and you want this man to become our President. It is up to you to investigate and find out about this man. How many cells do we have here in the US now that are undercover? What does he plan to do about them? Come on ask him the hard questions so we can decide how we want to vote. Give us something to look at instead of keep on hashing the race issue. Forget about the polls we don't need to know these because they were wrong last time. Stick to the issues at stake here. The economey, the jos, healthcare adn ending the war. CNN would like nothing better than to keep all this bickering going on and on. We want to see the difference in these canadid's. I hope you people that work in CNN will ask some tough questions on the debate on the background to OBMAM. Are you afraid of what you might find out. Come on we the public need to know more about this man that you seem to be protecting. Be fair. Ask him about his faith, background, coming from Kenya, how he plans to bring the troops home without jeperdizing the others that have helped us. You are letting him just glide right in and you want this man to become our President. It is up to you to investigate and find out about this man. How many cells do we have here in the US now that are undercover? What does he plan to do about them? Come on ask him the hard questions so we can decide how we want to vote. Give us something to look at instead of keep on hashing the race issue. Forget about the polls we don't need to know these because they were wrong last time. Stick to the issues at stake here. The economey, the jos, healthcare adn ending the war.

]]> By: hughvic http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-267076 hughvic Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:46:54 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-267076 doris, You're right to be skeptical, only just here it seems to me that you are not skeptical enough. I take the gist of your refutation to be: unless one were there at the moment, one could not know what happened or who staged or shot the footage. Look, please: CNN was not there, and did not shoot it. It's available on this site. Please view it. It shows most of what I assert. CNN knows who shot it, because they know from whom they received it. It's just that they'd rather cover that fact with the squid's ink of riddling us about whether her tears were authentic, as though that matters one whit compared to actual electioneering and destruction of our press freedoms through corruption of the media. Yet you say that it would be impossible to know the provenance of the footage unless you'd been there. Come on. Other reports throughout the day prior to the vote, from this network and the others, had it that their reporters were not allowed interviews with Hillary, and that she was not responding to, for example, questions shouted on the fly. If you're experienced in journalism, as I and millions of others are, then you'll know that this is a common strategy on the eve of elections, and that reporters usually take it in stride, as they did that day. On this site you will find further footage, CNN footage, to that effect. Likewise for CNBC, Fox, and the broadcast networks. I knnow. I checked. Please do so yourself. Finally, my resume should not be relevant here -- should not be needed by you or required of me -- but I worked for those people for 20 years. It's not as though I suddenly went incommunicado with the DNC shop, if you see what I mean. No grudge there, doris, but let me just presume to advise you as a fellow voter that if you defend politicians for being politicians it's best to be prepared for disappointment. I was disappointed as a consultant, many times, by candidates of both parties. I happen not to be jaded, as some of those here are naive enough to wish to pretend to be without really even knowing how to feign it, but I'm as wary of politicians as Jefferson was, bless him. So by all means don't take my word for it. But try asking the questions I ask here instead of the questions CNN wants you to ask. Try asking my questions of CNN. Search their site for any instance of their having asked any of these most obvious, first-year J-School questions. See what you get. Caveat emptor. doris,

You're right to be skeptical, only just here it seems to me that you are not skeptical enough. I take the gist of your refutation to be: unless one were there at the moment, one could not know what happened or who staged or shot the footage.

Look, please: CNN was not there, and did not shoot it. It's available on this site. Please view it. It shows most of what I assert. CNN knows who shot it, because they know from whom they received it. It's just that they'd rather cover that fact with the squid's ink of riddling us about whether her tears were authentic, as though that matters one whit compared to actual electioneering and destruction of our press freedoms through corruption of the media. Yet you say that it would be impossible to know the provenance of the footage unless you'd been there. Come on.

Other reports throughout the day prior to the vote, from this network and the others, had it that their reporters were not allowed interviews with Hillary, and that she was not responding to, for example, questions shouted on the fly. If you're experienced in journalism, as I and millions of others are, then you'll know that this is a common strategy on the eve of elections, and that reporters usually take it in stride, as they did that day. On this site you will find further footage, CNN footage, to that effect. Likewise for CNBC, Fox, and the broadcast networks. I knnow. I checked. Please do so yourself.

Finally, my resume should not be relevant here - should not be needed by you or required of me - but I worked for those people for 20 years. It's not as though I suddenly went incommunicado with the DNC shop, if you see what I mean. No grudge there, doris, but let me just presume to advise you as a fellow voter that if you defend politicians for being politicians it's best to be prepared for disappointment. I was disappointed as a consultant, many times, by candidates of both parties. I happen not to be jaded, as some of those here are naive enough to wish to pretend to be without really even knowing how to feign it, but I'm as wary of politicians as Jefferson was, bless him.

So by all means don't take my word for it. But try asking the questions I ask here instead of the questions CNN wants you to ask. Try asking my questions of CNN. Search their site for any instance of their having asked any of these most obvious, first-year J-School questions. See what you get. Caveat emptor.

]]> By: doris http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-266608 doris Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:21:59 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-266608 hughvic: Boy you should be in movies editing. Or maybe at the boxing matches so you can narrate every detail. How do you know just every minute that she supposedly was ushered away from everyone. Your imagination cooly reflects that you should be in monitoring. You act as if you were holding the chair so she could sit. It is so unrealistic that people can make up details to their own likings. Unless you were there at the moment when this happened you have no idea what happened & who staged & who shot it. hughvic: Boy you should be in movies editing. Or maybe at the boxing matches so you can narrate every detail. How do you know just every minute that she supposedly was ushered away from everyone. Your imagination cooly reflects that you should be in monitoring. You act as if you were holding the chair so she could sit. It is so unrealistic that people can make up details to their own likings. Unless you were there at the moment when this happened you have no idea what happened & who staged & who shot it.

]]> By: hughvic http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-256289 hughvic Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:01:42 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-256289 Aren't four hours of "awaiting moderation" enough? Aren't four hours of "awaiting moderation" enough?

]]> By: Brenda http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-255763 Brenda Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:05:46 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-255763 All of you people that are coming down on Hillary are crazy. She is enduring all of this becasue she loves our COUNTRY and wants to clean up the mess BUSH will be leaving. You condem her if she is not warm and caring, then when she shows emotions you condem her also. I personally think she reacted this way becasue she was touched by someone knowing what she was having to go thru. She will make a wonderful President ,but she is human too. She didn't cry but I think the lady that asked about her and how she was doing made Hillary stop and think about herself for a change. She is so busy trying to explain her record adn get to know everone else, she doesn't take the time she needs for herself. This is the true Hillary. Caring, responsible and qualified. She is by far the BEST choice for the job. If you would check out the background of OBMAMA you would not be happy with the true facts you would find out about him. He is not what people think but what they want to thnk. Check it out. He also has no record to prove what he is promising. This election is to important to throw it away again. Look what happens when you put someone in office that doesn't have the qualifications to become President. VOTE HILLARY 2008 THE ONLY CHOICE FOR AMERICA TO BEGIN TO RECOVER All of you people that are coming down on Hillary are crazy. She is enduring all of this becasue she loves our COUNTRY and wants to clean up the mess BUSH will be leaving. You condem her if she is not warm and caring, then when she shows emotions you condem her also. I personally think she reacted this way becasue she was touched by someone knowing what she was having to go thru. She will make a wonderful President ,but she is human too. She didn't cry but I think the lady that asked about her and how she was doing made Hillary stop and think about herself for a change. She is so busy trying to explain her record adn get to know everone else, she doesn't take the time she needs for herself. This is the true Hillary. Caring, responsible and qualified. She is by far the BEST choice for the job. If you would check out the background of OBMAMA you would not be happy with the true facts you would find out about him. He is not what people think but what they want to thnk. Check it out. He also has no record to prove what he is promising.
This election is to important to throw it away again. Look what happens when you put someone in office that doesn't have the qualifications to become President.
VOTE HILLARY 2008 THE ONLY CHOICE FOR AMERICA TO BEGIN TO RECOVER

]]> By: Brenda http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-255728 Brenda Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:54:04 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-255728 Instead of giving Hillary a hard way yo go you need to be checking out OBMAM background. If you knew some of the things about him you would not vote for him. Do not be fooled. We need a good President to clean up the BUSH era. Hillary is the only one qualified to do this. VOTE HILLARY 2008 Instead of giving Hillary a hard way yo go you need to be checking out OBMAM background. If you knew some of the things about him you would not vote for him. Do not be fooled. We need a good President to clean up the BUSH era. Hillary is the only one qualified to do this. VOTE HILLARY 2008

]]> By: doris http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-250233 doris Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:13:16 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-250233 Tears,Tears,Tears, That is all everyone mentions. Hillary did not shed any tears, Hillary did not shed any tears, get it, Her voice faltered, but she did not shed one tear, watch the reruns. She was emotional, yes, but not one tear slid down her face. It becomes so useless to try to impress everyone she did not cry. I've seen Bush get emotional numerous times, I saw his father shed real tears, he had to stop speaking 2 or 3 times he was sobbing so hard. I heard sympathy for him. A lady shows emotion & the world comes to a halt. Emotions are a human trait. When the world gets to the place that a "tear" makes so many people upset, we are really in trouble Tears,Tears,Tears, That is all everyone mentions. Hillary did not shed any tears, Hillary did not shed any tears, get it, Her voice faltered, but she did not shed one tear, watch the reruns. She was emotional, yes, but not one tear slid down her face. It becomes so useless to try to impress everyone she did not cry. I've seen Bush get emotional numerous times, I saw his father shed real tears, he had to stop speaking 2 or 3 times he was sobbing so hard. I heard sympathy for him. A lady shows emotion & the world comes to a halt. Emotions are a human trait. When the world gets to the place that a "tear" makes so many people upset, we are really in trouble

]]> By: Jdd http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-243020 Jdd Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:28:23 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-243020 Well, Hillary sure did get the sympathy votes she needed to pull this off. You women need to wake up ....she is too far out of touch for speaking of the middle class and for the concerns of women. And she surely doesn't even come close to represent me as concerned female voter. She' s learned quite well from her husband how to tell the people what they want to hear to get all the votes she will try to capture. Remember the record of Clintons to be repeatedly dishonest. Also, what experience of 35 years qualifies her to say she has more experience over her candidates. For one thing we don't need an attorney running our office and not another 8 years of Clintons. It's the Clinton's Presidential Career Dream to run the office again and try to run the American people. How I wish this could be another female running instead --- Be wise, as we really need to clean up bad politics. Well, Hillary sure did get the sympathy votes she needed to pull this off. You women need to wake up ....she is too far out of touch for speaking of the middle class and for the concerns of women. And she surely doesn't even come close to represent me as concerned female voter. She' s learned quite well from her husband how to tell the people what they want to hear to get all the votes she will try to capture. Remember the record of Clintons to be repeatedly dishonest. Also, what experience of 35 years qualifies her to say she has more experience over her candidates. For one thing we don't need an attorney running our office and not another 8 years of Clintons. It's the Clinton's Presidential Career Dream to run the office again and try to run the American people. How I wish this could be another female running instead - Be wise, as we really need to clean up bad politics.

]]> By: Someone Intelligent http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-242604 Someone Intelligent Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:23:56 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-242604 If Hillary really "cares" about you or America then why in every speech she gives does she keep saying "I, I, me, I, me, I, me, when I, I, I , me"? All the while Obama is saying "us, we, we, we, you and I, Americans". For once, just once, we have a presidential candidate who cares more about the American dream than himself! But all of you are too blind and dumb to notice (only the Hillary fans!). Open your ears and listen to the two closing speeches last night you will clearly hear a different tone in Mr. Obama's voice! Shut you mouths and open your ears and eyes when she speaks again, you'll see what I mean. You people make me sick, believing what she and Bill and her slimy campaign manager (did that guy freak anyone else out in those interviews with him....can he give a definite answer on anything..."I am not sure who will be on her campaign team in the future, after all I am only her campaign manager" and some of you people buy that? She (and Bill) will do, or say ANYTHING to win! Because they have a life to keep going and its a lavish one! If you can't see that...then you are truly blind! If Hillary really "cares" about you or America then why in every speech she gives does she keep saying "I, I, me, I, me, I, me, when I, I, I , me"?

All the while Obama is saying "us, we, we, we, you and I, Americans". For once, just once, we have a presidential candidate who cares more about the American dream than himself! But all of you are too blind and dumb to notice (only the Hillary fans!). Open your ears and listen to the two closing speeches last night you will clearly hear a different tone in Mr. Obama's voice!

Shut you mouths and open your ears and eyes when she speaks again, you'll see what I mean.

You people make me sick, believing what she and Bill and her slimy campaign manager (did that guy freak anyone else out in those interviews with him....can he give a definite answer on anything..."I am not sure who will be on her campaign team in the future, after all I am only her campaign manager" and some of you people buy that?

She (and Bill) will do, or say ANYTHING to win! Because they have a life to keep going and its a lavish one! If you can't see that...then you are truly blind!

]]> By: Tinfoilhatlady http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-241459 Tinfoilhatlady Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:42:54 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-241459 Hilary Clinton is evil. Do some research on Cathy O'Brien. Hilary Clinton is evil. Do some research on Cathy O'Brien.

]]> By: hughvic http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-239185 hughvic Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:59:18 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-239185 Cindy, the power mad Mike Huckabee long ago sold out the Gospel in order to accept what the Nazarene refused: the offer of ultimate worldly political power. To Huckabee the Gospel is now reduceable to helping the poor. Summatively. Seriously. Look up the Florida "debate" sponsored by the same folks sponsoring this blog. Cindy, the power mad Mike Huckabee long ago sold out the Gospel in order to accept what the Nazarene refused: the offer of ultimate worldly political power. To Huckabee the Gospel is now reduceable to helping the poor. Summatively. Seriously. Look up the Florida "debate" sponsored by the same folks sponsoring this blog.

]]> By: Mel http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-238276 Mel Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:56:35 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-238276 It is impossible be a female politician and not attract criticism for each and every smallest act - from both directions simultaneously. Too tough. Too weak. Too emotional. Too robotic. When what they really mean is: too female. Male politicians are raked over the coals for their actions and comments, but at least they are given a modicum of latitude to have a personality, or not have much of a personality as the case may be. The standard for Senator Clinton seems to be "fulfill my every fantasy for what a flawless leader/mother/friend could possibly be, but if you disappoint me in some small way, well I knew this job was too tough for a woman." We've got to admit that this election is indeed partly about whether the country is ready for a woman to lead it. Because really, how much difference do you think there really is in their positions? Sure there are minor differences, but when you ask the candidates what they would do about the war, about poverty, about the environment, they are not different enough to argue over. We are choosing the leader we want. It would be such an incredible gift to every American girl to elect our first woman president. Even if nothing else changes at all, the country would never be the same. When all is said and done, can we not at least have made an impact on every young girl who worries about being thin enough instead of smart enough; who thinks being sexually precocious is going to help her somehow; and who doesn't raise her hand in class to keep from competing with the boys? It is impossible be a female politician and not attract criticism for each and every smallest act – from both directions simultaneously. Too tough. Too weak. Too emotional. Too robotic. When what they really mean is: too female. Male politicians are raked over the coals for their actions and comments, but at least they are given a modicum of latitude to have a personality, or not have much of a personality as the case may be. The standard for Senator Clinton seems to be "fulfill my every fantasy for what a flawless leader/mother/friend could possibly be, but if you disappoint me in some small way, well I knew this job was too tough for a woman." We've got to admit that this election is indeed partly about whether the country is ready for a woman to lead it. Because really, how much difference do you think there really is in their positions? Sure there are minor differences, but when you ask the candidates what they would do about the war, about poverty, about the environment, they are not different enough to argue over. We are choosing the leader we want. It would be such an incredible gift to every American girl to elect our first woman president. Even if nothing else changes at all, the country would never be the same. When all is said and done, can we not at least have made an impact on every young girl who worries about being thin enough instead of smart enough; who thinks being sexually precocious is going to help her somehow; and who doesn't raise her hand in class to keep from competing with the boys?

]]> By: Bryan http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-238221 Bryan Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:52:31 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-238221 Two possibilities: 1) Clinton is showing genuine emotion. Do you see other candidates crying? DO YOU WANT A PRESIDENT WHO IS GOING TO CRACK UNDER PRESSURE LIKE THIS? 2) This is a fake and calculated move to hide what she actually is, which is stiff and unlikeable. Neither is acceptable from a potential President. Two possibilities:

1) Clinton is showing genuine emotion. Do you see other candidates crying? DO YOU WANT A PRESIDENT WHO IS GOING TO CRACK UNDER PRESSURE LIKE THIS?

2) This is a fake and calculated move to hide what she actually is, which is stiff and unlikeable.

Neither is acceptable from a potential President.

]]> By: hughvic http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237789 hughvic Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:12:30 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237789 Who's bitter? And who cares whether she was faking? What a dumb red herring that is, and how typical of CNN and therefore of the Hillary campaign. If CNN really cared whether she was feigning emotion, they'd tell us whose footage it is. They're just spinning our wheels. Don't indulge compassion when choosing the next person to occupy the most powerful office in world history. Don't indulge in emotive decision-making at all, in fact. Be idealistic and patriotic, but by all means be ruthless. The Chinese goverment is. Who's bitter? And who cares whether she was faking? What a dumb red herring that is, and how typical of CNN and therefore of the Hillary campaign. If CNN really cared whether she was feigning emotion, they'd tell us whose footage it is. They're just spinning our wheels. Don't indulge compassion when choosing the next person to occupy the most powerful office in world history. Don't indulge in emotive decision-making at all, in fact. Be idealistic and patriotic, but by all means be ruthless. The Chinese goverment is.

]]> By: Cindy http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237735 Cindy Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:09:05 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237735 As a woman who was high school valedictorian, a summa cum laude college graduate and earned a master's degree with a 4.0 GPA, I have another comment to add: First, I'd like to see the GPA and vita of the narrow-minded guys who responded on this board. Second, Narrow-mindedness and woman-bashing comments make my temper itch. Good grief, get a life and realize that women are intelligent and they don't need to be "ironing" to be accomplished successful American citizens. Apparently some mindsets haven't changed since the days of Susan B. Anthony. I also want to address the minister-bashing comment. I'm certainly not a Huckabee fan. When he ousted Gov. Jim Guy Tucker with a takeover of the state capitol building when he was Lt. Gov. of our great state, he was put on my list of politicians with questionable motives. However, it does not matter what we think about the messenger, just don't mess with the Message. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is not a fairytale. It is a simple yet powerful message. As a woman who was high school valedictorian, a summa cum laude college graduate and earned a master's degree with a 4.0 GPA, I have another comment to add:

First, I'd like to see the GPA and vita of the narrow-minded guys who responded on this board.

Second, Narrow-mindedness and woman-bashing comments make my temper itch. Good grief, get a life and realize that women are intelligent and they don't need to be "ironing" to be accomplished successful American citizens. Apparently some mindsets haven't changed since the days of Susan B. Anthony.

I also want to address the minister-bashing comment. I'm certainly not a Huckabee fan. When he ousted Gov. Jim Guy Tucker with a takeover of the state capitol building when he was Lt. Gov. of our great state, he was put on my list of politicians with questionable motives. However, it does not matter what we think about the messenger, just don't mess with the Message. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is not a fairytale. It is a simple yet powerful message.

]]> By: Anonymous http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237284 Anonymous Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:30:37 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237284 I do think her tears were genuine but not in the sense that she was upset about the state of America. What she is upset about is the fact that she now has a great chance of losing. I do think her tears were genuine but not in the sense that she was upset about the state of America. What she is upset about is the fact that she now has a great chance of losing.

]]> By: helfselp http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237003 helfselp Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:07:02 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-237003 anyone that says Hillary is faking it or acting or whatever should really try to look at their own judgments on themselves. It's a big deal to be a candidate for the commander in chief and i can only imagine how hard it is for everyone on the campaign trail. (families included) let's try not to look at the negative and lets embrace the nugget of compassion that we all have inside us for other humans. cause at the end of the day, that's what we ALL are. It's very easy to sit behind a computer and throw stones. Maybe she was acting. Maybe she was genuine. Maybe,maybe, maybe. you simply don't know. just let it BE instead of making yourself bitter over a display of emotion from someone you might not agree with politically. Those that feel the need to lash out are thinking from an opinion based on fear and distrust of others and most likely themselves. try compassion. it's a better choice than bitter. anyone that says Hillary is faking it or acting or whatever should really try to look at their own judgments on themselves. It's a big deal to be a candidate for the commander in chief and i can only imagine how hard it is for everyone on the campaign trail. (families included)
let's try not to look at the negative and lets embrace the nugget of compassion that we all have inside us for other humans. cause at the end of the day, that's what we ALL are.
It's very easy to sit behind a computer and throw stones.

Maybe she was acting. Maybe she was genuine. Maybe,maybe, maybe. you simply don't know. just let it BE instead of making yourself bitter over a display of emotion from someone you might not agree with politically.
Those that feel the need to lash out are thinking from an opinion based on fear and distrust of others and most likely themselves.

try compassion. it's a better choice than bitter.

]]> By: hughvic http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236935 hughvic Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:00:16 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236935 What more can the outfit the Los Angeles Times calls, on its front page, the Corrupt News Network do for Hillary Rodham Clinton in her hour of need? That, my friends, is the question. Can you, say, get Hillary's oppo people to place some breeder stories with Bloomberg so that you can promulgate defamations of Obama in good conscience while hiding your traces? Can you pretend, for example, that there was ever any doubt as to Hillary's being a person of emotion, as in the emotions of anger, rage, resentment, jealousy, spite, vengefulness, fear, aggression, hurt, insecurity, indignation? How can you play the race card against the gender card and get away with it? Are your overpaid sophomores equal to the challenge, or will they fail their liege when she needs them most? Gird yourselves, men and women of Ted's benighted former Fourth Estate, for this is a time for adults, and you've much growing up to do. CNN. Give me a break! What more can the outfit the Los Angeles Times calls, on its front page, the Corrupt News Network do for Hillary Rodham Clinton in her hour of need? That, my friends, is the question.

Can you, say, get Hillary's oppo people to place some breeder stories with Bloomberg so that you can promulgate defamations of Obama in good conscience while hiding your traces? Can you pretend, for example, that there was ever any doubt as to Hillary's being a person of emotion, as in the emotions of anger, rage, resentment, jealousy, spite, vengefulness, fear, aggression, hurt, insecurity, indignation? How can you play the race card against the gender card and get away with it?

Are your overpaid sophomores equal to the challenge, or will they fail their liege when she needs them most? Gird yourselves, men and women of Ted's benighted former Fourth Estate, for this is a time for adults, and you've much growing up to do.

CNN. Give me a break!

]]> By: Marie http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236912 Marie Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:57:58 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236912 I believe Senator Clinton will be a wonderful president. She has more experience than any other Democratic candidate running (and nearly every Republican candidate for that matter). Hillary has been unfairly criticized by the media on every level. It also seems that the other candidates are barely criticized for their shortcomings. Personally, I am disgusted with the media and I feel certain that the media's undo influence of the past will be offset by a record setting turn out of Democratic voters. Perhaps many are choosing their candidates out of complete ignorance. Many people haven't a clue as to their candiate's record. I would suggest they research each one before casting a vote. Furthermore, President Bill Clinton was one of the best in our lifetime. I might suggest that those of you who wish to critisize him also research all that he has done for this country. Hillary, I believe, will bring a welcome continuation of that legacy. It is my opinion that Hillary is a candidate of strength, substance, and integrity, and that Obama is a flash in the pan -- little or no experience, all style and no subtance. I believe Senator Clinton will be a wonderful president. She has more experience than any other Democratic candidate running (and nearly every Republican candidate for that matter). Hillary has been unfairly criticized by the media on every level. It also seems that the other candidates are barely criticized for their shortcomings. Personally, I am disgusted with the media and I feel certain that the media's undo influence of the past will be offset by a record setting turn out of Democratic voters.

Perhaps many are choosing their candidates out of complete ignorance. Many people haven't a clue as to their candiate's record. I would suggest they research
each one before casting a vote. Furthermore, President Bill Clinton was one of the best in our lifetime. I might suggest that those of you who wish to critisize him also research all that he has done for this country. Hillary, I believe, will bring a welcome continuation of that legacy.

It is my opinion that Hillary is a candidate of strength, substance, and integrity, and that Obama is a flash in the pan - little or no experience, all style and no subtance.

]]> By: Graham F http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236852 Graham F Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:52:54 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236852 What a ridiculous display and the "me, me, me, I, I, I" that followed was truly despicable. If Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, I will look long and hard at voting against her. What a ridiculous display and the "me, me, me, I, I, I" that followed was truly despicable.

If Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, I will look long and hard at voting against her.

]]> By: JM http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236709 JM Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:39:28 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236709 I agree w/ Hollie . . .I wish the "undecideds" (i.e., haven't bothered to consider it until now) would just stay home rather than make a quickie, last-minute decision. About the tears . . . things like that are simply sensationalized by the media to distract us from considering what's really important. It's so inconsequential, let it go! If you vote for a candidate based on such trivial things, please don't vote!!! How about considering issues, platforms, experience? I agree w/ Hollie . . .I wish the "undecideds" (i.e., haven't bothered to consider it until now) would just stay home rather than make a quickie, last-minute decision.

About the tears . . . things like that are simply sensationalized by the media to distract us from considering what's really important. It's so inconsequential, let it go! If you vote for a candidate based on such trivial things, please don't vote!!! How about considering issues, platforms, experience?

]]> By: AC http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236695 AC Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:36:00 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236695 To all the gentlemen who wrote negative comments about a Hillary showing her compassion by getting a little emotional. Excuse me...you guys really don't get it do you? It's too bad because we will probably have another "man" in office. It's time for a change all right, it's time for a woman to be President and restore America to it's former greatness but from your comments you are obiviously not bright enough to figure it out! To all the gentlemen who wrote negative comments about a Hillary showing her compassion by getting a little emotional. Excuse me...you guys really don't get it do you? It's too bad because we will probably have another "man" in office. It's time for a change all right, it's time for a woman to be President and restore America to it's former greatness but from your comments you are obiviously not bright enough to figure it out!

]]> By: JM http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236671 JM Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:32:08 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236671 What is so wrong with wanting to be president? Yes, she does. They all do. Frankly, I'd hate the job. But if Hillary wants to tackle the challenge - and I believe she is up to it - why criticize based solely on that? If you don't like a candidate's voting record or platform, that's one thing. But to criticize just for being ambitious . . .I just don't get it. What is so wrong with wanting to be president? Yes, she does. They all do. Frankly, I'd hate the job. But if Hillary wants to tackle the challenge – and I believe she is up to it – why criticize based solely on that?

If you don't like a candidate's voting record or platform, that's one thing. But to criticize just for being ambitious . . .I just don't get it.

]]> By: dnebeker http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236632 dnebeker Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:26:17 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236632 Emotional intelligence is part of her many strengths. Most people have criticized her for not showing her emotions. I am for her 100% Emotional intelligence is part of her many strengths. Most people have criticized her for not showing her emotions. I am for her 100%

]]> By: we the people http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236417 we the people Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:48:57 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236417 Hillary was crying because she knows she is losing...lol it's not because "she has feelings".....The clintons are so used to winning, that if they lose...they BECOME SORE LOSERS!!..... SHE IS A SORE LOSER---THATS WHY THE TEARS .... Hillary was crying because she knows she is losing...lol it's not because "she has feelings".....The clintons are so used to winning, that if they lose...they BECOME SORE LOSERS!!..... SHE IS A SORE LOSER-THATS WHY THE TEARS ....

]]> By: DJ http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236324 DJ Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:29:47 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236324 Sen Clinton is a professsional politician and will turn her emotion breakdown into some miracle work she has done for New York State. We are still the highest taxed State in the country,terrible job growth,a young population that is exiting the state in record numbers and unfunded mandates that are killing what little economic successes we have. New York is hurting and Hillary is as much to blame as the rest of the Democrat leadership. New Yorkers have been emotional for a long time because their elected officials continue to let them done!!! Sen Clinton is a professsional politician and will turn her emotion breakdown into some miracle work she has done for New York State. We are still the highest taxed State in the country,terrible job growth,a young population that is exiting the state in record numbers and unfunded mandates that are killing what little economic successes we have.
New York is hurting and Hillary is as much to blame as the rest of the Democrat leadership. New Yorkers have been emotional for a long time because their elected officials continue to let them done!!!

]]> By: Lesley http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236256 Lesley Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:15:56 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-236256 More young women should be out there supporting Hillary. She is in position to break the ultimate glass ceiling and I can't wait to see what other barriers might shatter as a result. Keep fighting the good fight Hillary, you have my vote!!! More young women should be out there supporting Hillary. She is in position to break the ultimate glass ceiling and I can't wait to see what other barriers might shatter as a result. Keep fighting the good fight Hillary, you have my vote!!!

]]> By: JJ Jax, FL http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235999 JJ Jax, FL Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:33:32 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235999 The problem isn't in the fact that she showed that she was human, it was that she showed the wrong emotion at the wrong time. She talks about being strong, but she breaks down and cries after ONE loss(Out of 50?)? In the words of her lying, cheating husband, GIVE ME A BREAK! The problem isn't in the fact that she showed that she was human, it was that she showed the wrong emotion at the wrong time. She talks about being strong, but she breaks down and cries after ONE loss(Out of 50?)? In the words of her lying, cheating husband, GIVE ME A BREAK!

]]> By: stuart http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235980 stuart Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:29:59 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235980 obviously its good to have this much dialogue and interest in our future. the bad part is that ms clinton, despite her claims, has generated much of the discord and anger- so what does that tell me? it tells me that she cannot unite this country, let alone democrats. her time has come and gone, and like it or not, she needs to realize that she is part of the very problem that american politics have become. obama may be young, but he is sincere in his desire to right the ship and make the system work for the people. call him what you want, the man has struck a chord with many people, he is authentic and inspiring, and he doesnt make jokes at the expense of mahatma gahndi. someone called hillary a monster- thats a little far fetched, but whats the worst thing anyones called obama- inexperienced? rumfeld and cheney have years of experience but horrible judgement- ill take obama anytime over hillary or those two. obviously its good to have this much dialogue and interest in our future. the bad part is that ms clinton, despite her claims, has generated much of the discord and anger- so what does that tell me? it tells me that she cannot unite this country, let alone democrats. her time has come and gone, and like it or not, she needs to realize that she is part of the very problem that american politics have become. obama may be young, but he is sincere in his desire to right the ship and make the system work for the people. call him what you want, the man has struck a chord with many people, he is authentic and inspiring, and he doesnt make jokes at the expense of mahatma gahndi. someone called hillary a monster- thats a little far fetched, but whats the worst thing anyones called obama- inexperienced? rumfeld and cheney have years of experience but horrible judgement- ill take obama anytime over hillary or those two.

]]> By: LizB http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235930 LizB Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:21:47 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235930 I don't get it. it's not like she was bawling. If one of the male candidates got choked up while speaking passionately people would be touched. She's female so she's either weak or calculating. DLBGYD Hillary I don't get it. it's not like she was bawling. If one of the male candidates got choked up while speaking passionately people would be touched. She's female so she's either weak or calculating.

DLBGYD Hillary

]]> By: Matt http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235907 Matt Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:17:00 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235907 After reading some of these comments - what really scares me is that so many people who know nothing about history, economics or foreign policy are able to vote. It scares me that people like Hillary or Obama give the "working class" the false impression that taxing "the rich" more will somehow make the "working class" better off. Do you think they really believe that rubbish? Do you think they don't know that the reason tax cuts "benefit the rich" is because the rich are the ones who pay the majority of taxes? How can cutting something that you don't pay in the first place benefit you? All they are doing is engaging in class warfare to buy votes from people who either don't know any better, or who feel guilty for their success. After reading some of these comments – what really scares me is that so many people who know nothing about history, economics or foreign policy are able to vote. It scares me that people like Hillary or Obama give the "working class" the false impression that taxing "the rich" more will somehow make the "working class" better off. Do you think they really believe that rubbish? Do you think they don't know that the reason tax cuts "benefit the rich" is because the rich are the ones who pay the majority of taxes? How can cutting something that you don't pay in the first place benefit you? All they are doing is engaging in class warfare to buy votes from people who either don't know any better, or who feel guilty for their success.

]]> By: Dance http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235854 Dance Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:08:55 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235854 In reply to Jessica two posts above my first post, WHAT?! I'm 18, you're an admitted youth and you somehow believe we should not be involved? The policies, the war, the debt, our international standing, do you think that will magically go away once you grow out of the "youth" demographic? This is the first election I can vote in and I've never been more politically fired up. We're the one commenting on a CNN story, so why not spread the message of whatever brought you to this site to your (really, our) peers? In reply to Jessica two posts above my first post, WHAT?! I'm 18, you're an admitted youth and you somehow believe we should not be involved? The policies, the war, the debt, our international standing, do you think that will magically go away once you grow out of the "youth" demographic? This is the first election I can vote in and I've never been more politically fired up. We're the one commenting on a CNN story, so why not spread the message of whatever brought you to this site to your (really, our) peers?

]]> By: Lynn http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235830 Lynn Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:05:13 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235830 I wonder if any of you would dare call a man a "faker" for having an emotional moment? And the idea that she "planned" an emotional moment for her own gain is absurd, have you ever tried to do that? I'm willing to bet that its fairly difficult. And if you have successfully done so for your own gain, bravo, maybe you should talk to the GOP, you may have a future there. Frankly Hilary Clinton has gotten her supporters because of her tireless work to help Americans AS A WHOLE, especially those who are disenfranchised. As for those who are commenting that she is a "hysterical, anti-family, anti-military, anti-American, virulent, militant leftist feminist fundamentalist extremist" have you been listening to a word she or any of the other candidates have said? Or better yet, have you looked at her track record both in the Senate and as the First Lady? Or is all the good work she's done been overshadowed In response to "The Greatest Post of the year", although I congratulate your nice use of rhetoric and extreme language, I challenge the validity of any of those statements. First off, by calling someone "hysterical" for one publicly caught emotional moment, you are taking what actually happened and exaggerating it, and then trying to pass off your conclusion as logical. Second, anit-family, really? A wife and mother is anti-family? Why? Because she doesn't immediately condone homosexuality or abortion? By staying with her husband after what I'm sure was an incredibly difficult time in their marriage? If she hadn't stayed with him, would that have made her more "family friendly"? If she was a man, would this be an issue, or an attack even? I haven't heard any of these "anit-family" comments about Rudy Giulian or any of the other male candidates and I doubt that I ever will. Also I challenge calling someone anti-military and "militant leftist extremist" in the same breathe as you contradicted yourself . If you're going to use extreme rhetoric, pick a side or use more appropriate language. And I forgot about her being a feminist. God forbid that a woman speak up and be noticed. How dare a woman, who may truly understand the concerns of women or the challenges women face, run for office. Hilary Clinton may be a feminist but she is certainly not an extreme feminist or "feminazi" as she has been called. If we all would take 2 minutes and stop thinking about our own self-serving, money-grubbing agenda's and looked at what the candidates could do for OUR American instead of "my" America, maybe we would not currently be in the situation in which we find ourselves today, namely funding a war which has essentially bankrupted programs and initiatives which help ALL of America, such as, oh education maybe?. Furthermore, those who are supporting Hilary Clinton are not supporting her because of what she can do for us individually, but rather what she can do for the country as a collective. You want change and not just someone who talks about it, look at her record. She's talked about it, she's done it, and she's done it well. Also, come on people, unite for gosh sakes! The bashing of one candidate for the primaries and then turning around and expecting none of those comments to come back and bite them in the proverbial butt seems naive. Instead of bashing the candidates and trying to make our point that "mines better than your's", which is really is less about which candidate is better and more about whether you're smarter than the person your arguing with, maybe consider listening to all the candidates and evaluating them based on their merits as opposed to the sensationalist gossip you hear. Sounds likes a novel approach to me. I wonder if any of you would dare call a man a "faker" for having an emotional moment? And the idea that she "planned" an emotional moment for her own gain is absurd, have you ever tried to do that? I'm willing to bet that its fairly difficult. And if you have successfully done so for your own gain, bravo, maybe you should talk to the GOP, you may have a future there.

Frankly Hilary Clinton has gotten her supporters because of her tireless work to help Americans AS A WHOLE, especially those who are disenfranchised. As for those who are commenting that she is a "hysterical, anti-family, anti-military, anti-American, virulent, militant leftist feminist fundamentalist extremist" have you been listening to a word she or any of the other candidates have said? Or better yet, have you looked at her track record both in the Senate and as the First Lady? Or is all the good work she's done been overshadowed

In response to "The Greatest Post of the year", although I congratulate your nice use of rhetoric and extreme language, I challenge the validity of any of those statements. First off, by calling someone "hysterical" for one publicly caught emotional moment, you are taking what actually happened and exaggerating it, and then trying to pass off your conclusion as logical. Second, anit-family, really? A wife and mother is anti-family? Why? Because she doesn't immediately condone homosexuality or abortion? By staying with her husband after what I'm sure was an incredibly difficult time in their marriage? If she hadn't stayed with him, would that have made her more "family friendly"? If she was a man, would this be an issue, or an attack even? I haven't heard any of these "anit-family" comments about Rudy Giulian or any of the other male candidates and I doubt that I ever will.

Also I challenge calling someone anti-military and "militant leftist extremist" in the same breathe as you contradicted yourself . If you're going to use extreme rhetoric, pick a side or use more appropriate language. And I forgot about her being a feminist. God forbid that a woman speak up and be noticed. How dare a woman, who may truly understand the concerns of women or the challenges women face, run for office. Hilary Clinton may be a feminist but she is certainly not an extreme feminist or "feminazi" as she has been called.

If we all would take 2 minutes and stop thinking about our own self-serving, money-grubbing agenda's and looked at what the candidates could do for OUR American instead of "my" America, maybe we would not currently be in the situation in which we find ourselves today, namely funding a war which has essentially bankrupted programs and initiatives which help ALL of America, such as, oh education maybe?. Furthermore, those who are supporting Hilary Clinton are not supporting her because of what she can do for us individually, but rather what she can do for the country as a collective. You want change and not just someone who talks about it, look at her record. She's talked about it, she's done it, and she's done it well.

Also, come on people, unite for gosh sakes! The bashing of one candidate for the primaries and then turning around and expecting none of those comments to come back and bite them in the proverbial butt seems naive. Instead of bashing the candidates and trying to make our point that "mines better than your's", which is really is less about which candidate is better and more about whether you're smarter than the person your arguing with, maybe consider listening to all the candidates and evaluating them based on their merits as opposed to the sensationalist gossip you hear. Sounds likes a novel approach to me.

]]> By: Dance http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235819 Dance Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:03:12 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235819 It is JUST as sexist as some men saying Hilary isn't qualified as a woman to say that you are going to vote for her largely because she is a woman. So you relate to her feelings? Good, though one needs to aim for policy and not very possibly faked tears to determine who should have their vote. I've seen arguments that Hilary will bring healing and feelings and compassion to the US on the premise she is a woman. Do you think emotions are unique to females? Hell no. Hilary's continuous insistence that she is somehow more fit to be Prez because of her experience is laughable. While she may have accomplished some things, many of her other prerogatives have failed in the past. I don't know whether to laugh or be worried when I see people list being First Lady as viable political experience. She was a Senator, that's it on the national level. Republicans HATE this woman. In Iowa and so far in polls in New Hampshire, we've seen almost record amounts of voters. I fear that if Hilary actually gets the nomination, so much of the Christian-right will mobilize against her that she'll be unelectable. Obama has my vote at the moment, but I fear waking up on November 3rd to a Republican in office. It scares me. It is JUST as sexist as some men saying Hilary isn't qualified as a woman to say that you are going to vote for her largely because she is a woman. So you relate to her feelings? Good, though one needs to aim for policy and not very possibly faked tears to determine who should have their vote. I've seen arguments that Hilary will bring healing and feelings and compassion to the US on the premise she is a woman. Do you think emotions are unique to females? Hell no. Hilary's continuous insistence that she is somehow more fit to be Prez because of her experience is laughable. While she may have accomplished some things, many of her other prerogatives have failed in the past. I don't know whether to laugh or be worried when I see people list being First Lady as viable political experience. She was a Senator, that's it on the national level. Republicans HATE this woman. In Iowa and so far in polls in New Hampshire, we've seen almost record amounts of voters. I fear that if Hilary actually gets the nomination, so much of the Christian-right will mobilize against her that she'll be unelectable. Obama has my vote at the moment, but I fear waking up on November 3rd to a Republican in office. It scares me.

]]> By: Robert Bell http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235711 Robert Bell Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:48:58 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235711 Maybe Osama Bin Laden will feel sorry when she breaks down and cries and he'll say "There, there, little lady, I'll call off the Jihad, I didn't know you had such sensitive emotions!" That might work. Maybe Osama Bin Laden will feel sorry when she breaks down and cries and he'll say "There, there, little lady, I'll call off the Jihad, I didn't know you had such sensitive emotions!"

That might work.

]]> By: Jessica http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235698 Jessica Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:47:00 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235698 I know very little of politics though I highly disagree with the staetment that Obama has the ability to inspire the youth. I myself am apart of that category and from my point of view they will rarely ever be inspired. It is almost nature for them (us) to be apathetic sad but true. So I believe it is important to have them knowlegeable but involed I dont think so. Go HILLARY! I know very little of politics though I highly disagree with the staetment that Obama has the ability to inspire the youth. I myself am apart of that category and from my point of view they will rarely ever be inspired. It is almost nature for them (us) to be apathetic sad but true. So I believe it is important to have them knowlegeable but involed I dont think so.
Go HILLARY!

]]> By: Jeff NH http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235689 Jeff NH Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:45:42 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235689 You know your political campaign is in trouble when you actually have to explain to people that you really are a human being with emotions. Pathetic. You know your political campaign is in trouble when you actually have to explain to people that you really are a human being with emotions. Pathetic.

]]> By: Brenda http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235648 Brenda Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:39:09 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235648 I think this shows the soft caring side of Hillary. After all she was not making a political decision here. I think she is a strong person with excellent qualifications. She is the only one that is really qualified to become President. Do you want another person in office that has got to try to learn on the job trainning? BUSH has been a real disaster for our country. We are in war, in debt, jobs in jeapardy,no health care for everyone, he didn not how to be President and look what happen!!!!. We Do not need to go thru this again. Terrorist are watching and will attack again. We need to be ready and not have someone in office that has to learn how as we know the past 7 years we have a President that has not learn til yet. He will come and go and never really know HOW TO BE A REAL PRESIDENT. We suffer this set back with BUSH in office. WAKE UP AMERICA. Hillary is only only choice here. Personally I would not want this mess, but she is willing to step in and began to clean up George Bush's mess. As far as Bill standing up for Hillary this shows that he cares about America. After all things were much better under the Clinton's than they have ever been under the Bush's. Clinton knew how to balance the budget and leave us with a surplus in the bank. All Bush knows how to do it spend it and borrow from others. We are deeper in debt now than in any other Presidency. Then the republicans say the democrats spend too much....Give me a Break it is the REPUBLICANS that can't control their spending. Our only hope is for the Democrats to get behind the only qualified one and take HER to the whitehouse for 2008. If not we will all suffer the consequences. VOTE HILLARY in 2008 HILLARY ALL THE WAY in 2008 I think this shows the soft caring side of Hillary. After all she was not making a political decision here. I think she is a strong person with excellent qualifications. She is the only one that is really qualified to become President. Do you want another person in office that has got to try to learn on the job trainning? BUSH has been a real disaster for our country. We are in war, in debt, jobs in jeapardy,no health care for everyone, he didn not how to be President and look what happen!!!!. We Do not need to go thru this again. Terrorist are watching and will attack again. We need to be ready and not have someone in office that has to learn how as we know the past 7 years we have a President that has not learn til yet. He will come and go and never really know HOW TO BE A REAL PRESIDENT. We suffer this set back with BUSH in office. WAKE UP AMERICA. Hillary is only only choice here. Personally I would not want this mess, but she is willing to step in and began to clean up George Bush's mess. As far as Bill standing up for Hillary this shows that he cares about America. After all things were much better under the Clinton's than they have ever been under the Bush's. Clinton knew how to balance the budget and leave us with a surplus in the bank. All Bush knows how to do it spend it and borrow from others. We are deeper in debt now than in any other Presidency. Then the republicans say the democrats spend too much....Give me a Break it is the REPUBLICANS that can't control their spending.
Our only hope is for the Democrats to get behind the only qualified one and take HER to the whitehouse for 2008. If not we will all suffer the consequences.
VOTE HILLARY in 2008
HILLARY ALL THE WAY in 2008

]]> By: Michael http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235474 Michael Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:16:25 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235474 I have been viewing some of these posts and have come this conclusion. If you don't like Hillary Clinton, do not vote for her. Vote the same way you did 7 years ago. You will get what you deserve once again - Bush before, Obama (or Guiliani) now. All 3 without any international experience - which from where I sit, will be one of the most important factors in picking the next president. All of these childish, moronic comments directed towards Hillary Clinton regarding robots and such are what our country has digressed into. No respect for a mother, no etiquette, and gullible to sound bites. Hillary Clinton has had to perservere with much adversity and that adversity has made this candidate strong. Exactly what the country needs: strong, intelligent leadership with a specific strategy on how to govern. Mentalities like some of these ridiculous posts are some of the reasons why our country is rated 29th in education. Short attention spans and a fast-food, "want it now" baby boomer mentality. Hillary Clinton would be the perfect choice to correct all of the current and forseeable problems in our government caused by years of ineptitude. Viscious attacks like the posts we see in here are exactly the way things are going in this country right now. Face reality and facts: Obama would be in over his head at this time in his career. Maybe 8 years from now, with some Senate foreign committee experience, but not at this time. Pick the logical choice for our nation right now: Hillary Clinton. I have been viewing some of these posts and have come this conclusion. If you don't like Hillary Clinton, do not vote for her. Vote the same way you did 7 years ago. You will get what you deserve once again – Bush before, Obama (or Guiliani) now. All 3 without any international experience – which from where I sit, will be one of the most important factors in picking the next president.
All of these childish, moronic comments directed towards Hillary Clinton regarding robots and such are what our country has digressed into. No respect for a mother, no etiquette, and gullible to sound bites. Hillary Clinton has had to perservere with much adversity and that adversity has made this candidate strong. Exactly what the country needs: strong, intelligent leadership with a specific strategy on how to govern.
Mentalities like some of these ridiculous posts are some of the reasons why our country is rated 29th in education. Short attention spans and a fast-food, "want it now" baby boomer mentality. Hillary Clinton would be the perfect choice to correct all of the current and forseeable problems in our government caused by years of ineptitude. Viscious attacks like the posts we see in here are exactly the way things are going in this country right now.
Face reality and facts: Obama would be in over his head at this time in his career. Maybe 8 years from now, with some Senate foreign committee experience, but not at this time.
Pick the logical choice for our nation right now: Hillary Clinton.

]]> By: Barb in Buffalo http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235434 Barb in Buffalo Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:12:10 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235434 From the second she announced considering to run for senator for NY, I KNEW this was just a stepping stone to the white house. Why do so many people love her in NY? BECAUSE THEY ALL LIVE IN NEW YORK CITY. Promises she's made for creating 200 (a lousy 200) jobs in Buffalo? Zip - not a one. Buffalo has lost 15% FIFTEEN PERCENT of its population since she took office because there are no jobs - no opportunities. Do I think she'll do what she promises, through all those fake tears and "I just think of everyone else" poses? Get a grip. This monster is all about power. Hers. She's obviously not getting my vote. From the second she announced considering to run for senator for NY, I KNEW this was just a stepping stone to the white house. Why do so many people love her in NY? BECAUSE THEY ALL LIVE IN NEW YORK CITY. Promises she's made for creating 200 (a lousy 200) jobs in Buffalo? Zip – not a one. Buffalo has lost 15% FIFTEEN PERCENT of its population since she took office because there are no jobs – no opportunities. Do I think she'll do what she promises, through all those fake tears and "I just think of everyone else" poses? Get a grip. This monster is all about power. Hers. She's obviously not getting my vote.

]]> By: Steven http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235379 Steven Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:06:27 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235379 The debate over whether her emotions are real or not is simply a distraction. The debate over whether she is genuine or not is speculation as you have not idea if she is or not. You are all guessing and hoping one way or the other . If you don't know her you have no idea! Meeting her for 10 seconds does not equate to knowing her! This is all emotion! As for me I disagree with her POLICIES! That is why I am not voting for her. It has nothing to do with gender or tears or emotion. Believe or not I don't really care! I don't hate her I just don't want to see her in office. The debate over whether her emotions are real or not is simply a distraction. The debate over whether she is genuine or not is speculation as you have not idea if she is or not. You are all guessing and hoping one way or the other . If you don't know her you have no idea! Meeting her for 10 seconds does not equate to knowing her! This is all emotion! As for me I disagree with her POLICIES! That is why I am not voting for her. It has nothing to do with gender or tears or emotion. Believe or not I don't really care! I don't hate her I just don't want to see her in office.

]]> By: Speedkidney http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235369 Speedkidney Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:05:32 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235369 Oh Barack you're so mean to me. Stop it. I'm so helpless. Oh Barack you're so mean to me. Stop it. I'm so helpless.

]]> By: Taylor S., Jackson, MS http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235358 Taylor S., Jackson, MS Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:04:36 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235358 You should all face it- in the instances of Over all well being, Economy, Diplomacy, and composure, Bill was the best president America has had since Vietnam. And Hillary will prove to be the other component of the greatest power couple in the world--and she is the ONLY one who will assertively make America BETTER! GO HILLARY You should all face it- in the instances of Over all well being, Economy, Diplomacy, and composure, Bill was the best president America has had since Vietnam. And Hillary will prove to be the other component of the greatest power couple in the world–and she is the ONLY one who will assertively make America BETTER! GO HILLARY

]]> By: carol http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235342 carol Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:02:53 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235342 Oh Yeah, BillB and Tom, crawl back under your rock. Oh Yeah, BillB and Tom, crawl back under your rock.

]]> By: grassman87 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235324 grassman87 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:00:11 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235324 If the end result of this election is a complete removal from the public eye of Hillary and Bill, then the end will justify the means. America is so tired of these concieted asses, them going away completely is the only final solution. $10 says she and Bill divorce after she loses this election as she will hold him responsible and realize that she doesn't need him anymore to try and achieve her goal of taking over the world. Good Riddance and the end cant come soon enough. If the end result of this election is a complete removal from the public eye of Hillary and Bill, then the end will justify the means. America is so tired of these concieted asses, them going away completely is the only final solution.

$10 says she and Bill divorce after she loses this election as she will hold him responsible and realize that she doesn't need him anymore to try and achieve her goal of taking over the world.

Good Riddance and the end cant come soon enough.

]]> By: bbkenn http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235306 bbkenn Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:59:31 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235306 I am surprised at the vituperation and real personal feelings people have about Hillary that are based on emotion and on what people "think", not on what they actually "know". It astounds me that people would vote for a president who has to be more than human, yet human; show no emotion, yet be emotional; know how to be personal; yet not take anything personally; and on and on it goes. I absolutely love Obama, but I am afraid of his lack of experience in politics; I have seen what has happened to several Presidents who had the same enthusiasm, the same idealism, namely Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, even George Bush; and that lack of experience cost them either the presidency itself, as in Carter; huge mistakes early in office, as in Clinton, earning him the permanent hatred of Republicans ever since; and George Bush, not even living up to one campaign promise of being a uniter, not a divider, etc. This is not what I think will happen to a seasoned fighter like Hillary. This country is in such a mess both on the domestic front and also on the international front, that it will take someone who's been in battle and has been scourged who will be strong enough to take on these huge problems. I just don't see Obama being able to do this. I was really upset he chose to run now. He would be a shoein in either 4 - 8 years. This country cannot afford to have a president chosed based on who they like, who they can have a "beer" with; who stirs their heart. It needs to be based on who can really clean up the mess left by George Bush! I am surprised at the vituperation and real personal feelings people have about Hillary that are based on emotion and on what people "think", not on what they actually "know". It astounds me that people would vote for a president who has to be more than human, yet human; show no emotion, yet be emotional; know how to be personal; yet not take anything personally; and on and on it goes.

I absolutely love Obama, but I am afraid of his lack of experience in politics; I have seen what has happened to several Presidents who had the same enthusiasm, the same idealism, namely Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, even George Bush; and that lack of experience cost them either the presidency itself, as in Carter; huge mistakes early in office, as in Clinton, earning him the permanent hatred of Republicans ever since; and George Bush, not even living up to one campaign promise of being a uniter, not a divider, etc. This is not what I think will happen to a seasoned fighter like Hillary. This country is in such a mess both on the domestic front and also on the international front, that it will take someone who's been in battle and has been scourged who will be strong enough to take on these huge problems. I just don't see Obama being able to do this. I was really upset he chose to run now. He would be a shoein in either 4 – 8 years.

This country cannot afford to have a president chosed based on who they like, who they can have a "beer" with; who stirs their heart. It needs to be based on who can really clean up the mess left by George Bush!

]]> By: BillB http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235190 BillB Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:45:20 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235190 <b>POST Of THE YEAR!!!! Thanks Tom!</b> The last thing my United States of America needs is some hysterical, anti-family, anti-military, anti-American, virulent, militant, leftist feminist fundamentalist extremist like Hillary Rodham serving as president and crying over her utterly worthless life when the office requires a person of actual strength, which neither Rodham nor her equally worthless "husband" Boy Clinton have. -Tom POST Of THE YEAR!!!! Thanks Tom!

The last thing my United States of America needs is some hysterical, anti-family, anti-military, anti-American, virulent, militant, leftist feminist fundamentalist extremist like Hillary Rodham serving as president and crying over her utterly worthless life when the office requires a person of actual strength, which neither Rodham nor her equally worthless "husband" Boy Clinton have.
-Tom

]]> By: Sue http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/08/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235131 Sue Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:39:20 +0000 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/07/clinton-i-actually-have-emotions/#comment-235131 I am not going to vote for Hillary, because I feel she is not qualified to be the President of The United States. All the tears and emotions doesn't impress me one bit. In turn, I will not vote for Obama because of his background. He is a practicing Muslim, because he will not salute the flag of our great nation, nor will he place his hand on the Bible to take the oath of office, which is what every President that has taken office has done. This really concerns me since the Muslim's have made their brags that they will destroy the USA from within. An acorn doesn't fall far from the tree and I don't think he is likely to change his beliefs and the religion he was raised to believe. Talk is cheap, but truth will prevail. People need to search their hearts and listen to a higher being to make the right decision for whom to vote. I am not going to vote for Hillary, because I feel she is not qualified to be the President of The United States. All the tears and emotions doesn't impress me one bit. In turn, I will not vote for Obama because of his background. He is a practicing Muslim, because he will not salute the flag of our great nation, nor will he place his hand on the Bible to take the oath of office, which is what every President that has taken office has done. This really concerns me since the Muslim's have made their brags that they will destroy the USA from within. An acorn doesn't fall far from the tree and I don't think he is likely to change his beliefs and the religion he was raised to believe. Talk is cheap, but truth will prevail. People need to search their hearts and listen to a higher being to make the right decision for whom to vote.

]]>