<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final: The New Hampshire delegate breakdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Jones Cleveland, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-289799</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Jones Cleveland, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-289799</guid>
		<description>Great Job in Nevada Obama !!!
DON&#039;T BE FOOLED BY THE MEDIA !!!!
Obama Still Leads By 1 !!!



Obama just came in a close second in Nevada which was an incredible accomplishment going up against the &#039;inevitable&#039;. But everyone must know the facts. The media has such a desire to see Hillary and McCain as the nominees that they are totally misleading the public. The Democratic nominee will be determined by who recieves the most delegate votes....PERIOD !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Job in Nevada Obama !!!<br />
DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE MEDIA !!!!<br />
Obama Still Leads By 1 !!!</p>
<p>Obama just came in a close second in Nevada which was an incredible accomplishment going up against the 'inevitable'. But everyone must know the facts. The media has such a desire to see Hillary and McCain as the nominees that they are totally misleading the public. The Democratic nominee will be determined by who recieves the most delegate votes....PERIOD !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maynard</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-267269</link>
		<dc:creator>maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-267269</guid>
		<description>we do not need 4 more years of clinton..just remember who the mouth piece is and who does the lip service...now is not the the for hillary...why    because of the last name.
      
     hillary has no NO experience in politics, outside of be married to MR MOUTHPIECE  hillary will just be repeating things that are told to her and how to assert herself to the group of people she has at hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we do not need 4 more years of clinton..just remember who the mouth piece is and who does the lip service...now is not the the for hillary...why    because of the last name.</p>
<p>     hillary has no NO experience in politics, outside of be married to MR MOUTHPIECE  hillary will just be repeating things that are told to her and how to assert herself to the group of people she has at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-255745</link>
		<dc:creator>gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-255745</guid>
		<description>delegates,delegates,delegates.  This is the name of the game.  How can one
say that Clinton won if she has the same number of delegates as Obama? Reporters tell us the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>delegates,delegates,delegates.  This is the name of the game.  How can one<br />
say that Clinton won if she has the same number of delegates as Obama? Reporters tell us the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hectoracuna</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-255245</link>
		<dc:creator>hectoracuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-255245</guid>
		<description>Everyone wants to say they called the whole race after a couple of tiny Primaries. Pundits can be so tiresome. Lighten up buttercup!

Re-direct your frustrations with politics by engaging Americas true grass-roots candidates. While the media tries to figure out why their speculation and guess-work doesn&#039;t yield results, Arizona is quietly making a bold political statement. 

Which candidate cut a hole in the America flag while illegal aliens cross our border in the background?

Which candidate wears an eye-patch like a pirate?

And, did you know there are THREE women in Arizona&#039;s Primary ballot?

http://projectwhitehouse.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone wants to say they called the whole race after a couple of tiny Primaries. Pundits can be so tiresome. Lighten up buttercup!</p>
<p>Re-direct your frustrations with politics by engaging Americas true grass-roots candidates. While the media tries to figure out why their speculation and guess-work doesn't yield results, Arizona is quietly making a bold political statement. </p>
<p>Which candidate cut a hole in the America flag while illegal aliens cross our border in the background?</p>
<p>Which candidate wears an eye-patch like a pirate?</p>
<p>And, did you know there are THREE women in Arizona's Primary ballot?</p>
<p><a href="http://projectwhitehouse.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://projectwhitehouse.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANDREW SMITH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-246331</link>
		<dc:creator>ANDREW SMITH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-246331</guid>
		<description>please be clear who really win the election  at new hamshare.Is it the one that 

have     9delegates plus 2super delegates = 11delegates=hilary
                        
                             OR

     9delegates plus  3super delegates=12delegates=OBAMA

 WELL HILARY WON  ?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please be clear who really win the election  at new hamshare.Is it the one that </p>
<p>have     9delegates plus 2super delegates = 11delegates=hilary</p>
<p>                             OR</p>
<p>     9delegates plus  3super delegates=12delegates=OBAMA</p>
<p> WELL HILARY WON  ?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ski</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-243189</link>
		<dc:creator>ski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-243189</guid>
		<description>Now that things are going better in Iraq, the media has turned their attention toward the elections and the &quot;change&quot; candidates.  Let&#039;s ask ourselves what exact changes need to be made.  Change needs to be for the better and the candidates better know how changes are executed!!  Remember everyone, we live in a world that is quite dangerous today.  All the &quot;change&quot; candidates may presumably know something about balancing a budget, running businesses, or rallying the country, but we need experience in foreign affairs more now than ever!!   Republican, Democratic, or Independent,  read the candidates&#039; website and any other &quot;true&quot; information you can get your hands on and vote accordingly.   Be careful everyone who gets your vote, because it may impact our great nation for a long, long time!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that things are going better in Iraq, the media has turned their attention toward the elections and the "change" candidates.  Let's ask ourselves what exact changes need to be made.  Change needs to be for the better and the candidates better know how changes are executed!!  Remember everyone, we live in a world that is quite dangerous today.  All the "change" candidates may presumably know something about balancing a budget, running businesses, or rallying the country, but we need experience in foreign affairs more now than ever!!   Republican, Democratic, or Independent,  read the candidates' website and any other "true" information you can get your hands on and vote accordingly.   Be careful everyone who gets your vote, because it may impact our great nation for a long, long time!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.LyOns, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-243162</link>
		<dc:creator>C.LyOns, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-243162</guid>
		<description>Hillary has MI because the other candidates are boycotting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has MI because the other candidates are boycotting...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-243084</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-243084</guid>
		<description>Obama - Please don&#039;t choose Edwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama &#8211; Please don't choose Edwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gbryant</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-242906</link>
		<dc:creator>Gbryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-242906</guid>
		<description>Hillary has Michigan without a doubt.

Go Hillary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has Michigan without a doubt.</p>
<p>Go Hillary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W - PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-242640</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill W - PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-242640</guid>
		<description>4 years ago, we had a scandal with voting machines. DIEBOLD manfactured the machines. The CEO of DIEBOLD was a huge Bush supporter, and stated publicly that he &quot;guaranteed&quot; George Bush the election. And by a &quot;miracle&quot;, George Bush won the presidency on the final state, Ohio, a state he was behind in all along, and where voters stood in line in the rain for hours to vote. Do you think they stood in lin in the rain for hours to vote for HIM?

It has been proven repeatedly that these machines can be easily rigged. Yet 4 years has gone by, and here we are again. What has been done? NOTHING. No investigation, not even a government study. People control these electronic voting machines. They are programmed to produce big numbers for whoever they want them to.  Are you sure the votes were counted correctly this time, or that they will be in future elections????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 years ago, we had a scandal with voting machines. DIEBOLD manfactured the machines. The CEO of DIEBOLD was a huge Bush supporter, and stated publicly that he "guaranteed" George Bush the election. And by a "miracle", George Bush won the presidency on the final state, Ohio, a state he was behind in all along, and where voters stood in line in the rain for hours to vote. Do you think they stood in lin in the rain for hours to vote for HIM?</p>
<p>It has been proven repeatedly that these machines can be easily rigged. Yet 4 years has gone by, and here we are again. What has been done? NOTHING. No investigation, not even a government study. People control these electronic voting machines. They are programmed to produce big numbers for whoever they want them to.  Are you sure the votes were counted correctly this time, or that they will be in future elections????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler in Raleigh, NC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241906</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler in Raleigh, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241906</guid>
		<description>So what you are saying is.... Obama one MORE delagates than Clinton.  

The &quot;win&quot; will get her momentum, as Iowa got Obama some.  But really, this election is pretty much dead even.  The interesting part will be what Edwards and Richardson do after they lose in their home states....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you are saying is.... Obama one MORE delagates than Clinton.  </p>
<p>The "win" will get her momentum, as Iowa got Obama some.  But really, this election is pretty much dead even.  The interesting part will be what Edwards and Richardson do after they lose in their home states....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randolph Monroe, Chicago</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241671</link>
		<dc:creator>Randolph Monroe, Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241671</guid>
		<description>So Hill has 9 Delegates and Obama has 9 Delegates and Hill has 2 superdelegates and Obama has 3 superdelegates. 

So 

9 + 2  = 11

And 

9 + 3 = 12

and 

11 &lt; 12

but Hillary won?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Hill has 9 Delegates and Obama has 9 Delegates and Hill has 2 superdelegates and Obama has 3 superdelegates. </p>
<p>So </p>
<p>9 + 2  = 11</p>
<p>And </p>
<p>9 + 3 = 12</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>11 &lt; 12</p>
<p>but Hillary won?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Braineel</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241660</link>
		<dc:creator>Braineel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241660</guid>
		<description>A piece of advice for John Edwards, expand your list of examples for your speeches when it comes to the health care issue. I am very much behind your use of powerful concrete examples but as someone following the race to the Whitehouse closely hearing exactly the same message over and over is not as exciting as your competitors. I understand the importance of staying on message but I think that can be done more effectively than you are now doing it. I hope you will continue to enliven the debate with your very valid points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A piece of advice for John Edwards, expand your list of examples for your speeches when it comes to the health care issue. I am very much behind your use of powerful concrete examples but as someone following the race to the Whitehouse closely hearing exactly the same message over and over is not as exciting as your competitors. I understand the importance of staying on message but I think that can be done more effectively than you are now doing it. I hope you will continue to enliven the debate with your very valid points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles DiVenti</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241449</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles DiVenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241449</guid>
		<description>This is a victory for Clinton&#039;s democratic machine. I&#039;m still wondering what she accomplished in the Senate. For that matter, what experience did she have to win the Senate seat in New York State? A failed health care plan. Maybe if you consider table placements and seating world leaders at dinners in the White House she has significant experience over Barrack. Hillary is an anomaly of the Press. Her expereince is imaginary.

Barrack is the candidate of true conviction and has an uncorrupted vision for America. As for the expereince, when he started as a US Senator he had eight years experience on the the state level which far exceeds Hillary&#039;s. 

Barrack means what he says while Hillary tells a Americans what they want to hear. 
American don&#039;t get fooled by the Hillary spin machine! Look at her Senate record. What legislation has she put forth and passed?It&#039;s time to stand up and really be counted. Vote Barack Obama 08 and get a say in the future of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a victory for Clinton's democratic machine. I'm still wondering what she accomplished in the Senate. For that matter, what experience did she have to win the Senate seat in New York State? A failed health care plan. Maybe if you consider table placements and seating world leaders at dinners in the White House she has significant experience over Barrack. Hillary is an anomaly of the Press. Her expereince is imaginary.</p>
<p>Barrack is the candidate of true conviction and has an uncorrupted vision for America. As for the expereince, when he started as a US Senator he had eight years experience on the the state level which far exceeds Hillary's. </p>
<p>Barrack means what he says while Hillary tells a Americans what they want to hear.<br />
American don't get fooled by the Hillary spin machine! Look at her Senate record. What legislation has she put forth and passed?It's time to stand up and really be counted. Vote Barack Obama 08 and get a say in the future of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241373</link>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241373</guid>
		<description>PLEASE.................
Don&#039;t you think that after 20 years we need someone other than a Bush or a Clinton to lead us.  So, too, McCain is a real patriot but he&#039;s been around forever.  If it&#039;s Hillary, where&#039;s the change?  As a republican yearning for change, I&#039;d vote for Obama over McCain.  I&#039;d vote for McCain over Hillary.  I&#039;d vote for Romney over all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE.................<br />
Don't you think that after 20 years we need someone other than a Bush or a Clinton to lead us.  So, too, McCain is a real patriot but he's been around forever.  If it's Hillary, where's the change?  As a republican yearning for change, I'd vote for Obama over McCain.  I'd vote for McCain over Hillary.  I'd vote for Romney over all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241348</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241348</guid>
		<description>any prediction for Michigan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any prediction for Michigan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Ruffins</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241344</link>
		<dc:creator>M Ruffins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241344</guid>
		<description>I really liked the Clinton ERA and its impact on the Middle Class but their willingness to hit below the belt with the &quot;WIN AT ALL COST&quot; tactics make me question their integrity. In addition I feel that many of their policy flaws didn&#039;t  show up until after Clinton left office (nafta, cafta etc.) And I really have to reflect back to their lack of support during the &quot;04&quot; Campaign. It shines light on the fact that they really wanted GEORGE BUSH to win so that she(Hillary) could win with little opposition atleast so they thought. That is a campaign built for individual success namely (THEIRS) and NOT the PEOPLE&quot;S SUCCESS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the Clinton ERA and its impact on the Middle Class but their willingness to hit below the belt with the "WIN AT ALL COST" tactics make me question their integrity. In addition I feel that many of their policy flaws didn't  show up until after Clinton left office (nafta, cafta etc.) And I really have to reflect back to their lack of support during the "04&#034; Campaign. It shines light on the fact that they really wanted GEORGE BUSH to win so that she(Hillary) could win with little opposition atleast so they thought. That is a campaign built for individual success namely (THEIRS) and NOT the PEOPLE"S SUCCESS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bukky, Balt MD</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241340</link>
		<dc:creator>Bukky, Balt MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241340</guid>
		<description>ha! so she &quot;won&quot; but he dint have to win to win HA HA HA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha! so she "won" but he dint have to win to win HA HA HA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Webster</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241321</guid>
		<description>I love how all of you love &quot;great oratory&quot; from senator Obama and Hillary.  Last time I checked, it was actions that got the job done, not saying a bunch of &quot;inspiring&quot; crap to make you vote for the person.  Ron Paul has stayed consistent throughout his years in Congress, and is virtually untouchable as far as doing what he says.  Picture a toilet flushing, and that is what is happening to our once great nation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how all of you love "great oratory" from senator Obama and Hillary.  Last time I checked, it was actions that got the job done, not saying a bunch of "inspiring" crap to make you vote for the person.  Ron Paul has stayed consistent throughout his years in Congress, and is virtually untouchable as far as doing what he says.  Picture a toilet flushing, and that is what is happening to our once great nation...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.B. Stein E.B. NJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241286</link>
		<dc:creator>S.B. Stein E.B. NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241286</guid>
		<description>I wish there was something to make it clear how the delegate system works in both parties.  This is confusing to people.  Is there some way or place that does the explaining?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish there was something to make it clear how the delegate system works in both parties.  This is confusing to people.  Is there some way or place that does the explaining?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241274</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241274</guid>
		<description>WOW... amazing the ignorance (and shall we say lack of experience) that shows from Obama supporters....obvious from their comments that they do NOT know the process of the delegates going to the National Convention to choose the party&#039;s candidate....the tally that CNN has is obviously incomplete IF you want to include superdelegates... which you really cannot do now because those votes can (and most likely will in some cases) change between now and the convention.   Plus, CNN is only including superdelegates that have &quot;pledged&quot; their support publicly at this point... so the total delegate count in NH is NOT finished yet....just like Iowa&#039;s is not finished yet either.... yes, the portion of delegates decided by the public vote/causcus total have been determined and that is the only for sure number...and Obama is leading by one at this point ....

Keep tuned.....no matter what anyone says this is not going to be decided anytime soon....

And maybe some of you guys should educate yourself on the process instead of spending your time showing your ignorance here in the ticker blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW... amazing the ignorance (and shall we say lack of experience) that shows from Obama supporters....obvious from their comments that they do NOT know the process of the delegates going to the National Convention to choose the party's candidate....the tally that CNN has is obviously incomplete IF you want to include superdelegates... which you really cannot do now because those votes can (and most likely will in some cases) change between now and the convention.   Plus, CNN is only including superdelegates that have "pledged" their support publicly at this point... so the total delegate count in NH is NOT finished yet....just like Iowa's is not finished yet either.... yes, the portion of delegates decided by the public vote/causcus total have been determined and that is the only for sure number...and Obama is leading by one at this point ....</p>
<p>Keep tuned.....no matter what anyone says this is not going to be decided anytime soon....</p>
<p>And maybe some of you guys should educate yourself on the process instead of spending your time showing your ignorance here in the ticker blog...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila McCoughlin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241165</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila McCoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241165</guid>
		<description>EXCUSE ME....DOES ANYONE REALIZE THERE ARE 2 PARTIES RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT? A N D MORE THAN 3 CANIDATES? HELLLLLLOO THERE ARE SOME REPUBLICANS OUT HERE THAT WOULD LIKE SOME NEWS ON OUR CANIDATES!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCUSE ME....DOES ANYONE REALIZE THERE ARE 2 PARTIES RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT? A N D MORE THAN 3 CANIDATES? HELLLLLLOO THERE ARE SOME REPUBLICANS OUT HERE THAT WOULD LIKE SOME NEWS ON OUR CANIDATES!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W - PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241114</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill W - PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241114</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m not getting this delegate thing - you can &quot;win&quot; a delegate, but they don&#039;t have to vote for you?  And there are &quot;Super Delegates&quot; who can vote for whoever they want?  It all sounds crooked to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I'm not getting this delegate thing &#8211; you can "win" a delegate, but they don't have to vote for you?  And there are "Super Delegates" who can vote for whoever they want?  It all sounds crooked to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seam, Philly PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241106</link>
		<dc:creator>Seam, Philly PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241106</guid>
		<description>Vote ABC – Anyone but Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote ABC – Anyone but Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241054</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241054</guid>
		<description>Constant winning: be it second or first all the time will eventually put u first.  Go Romney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Constant winning: be it second or first all the time will eventually put u first.  Go Romney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginny Ca</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241022</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginny Ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241022</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget the TOTAL delegate count now stands 180 for Hillary (including superdelegates) and 78 for Obama (including superdelegates).  Go Hillary!  Keep rackin&#039; &#039;em up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't forget the TOTAL delegate count now stands 180 for Hillary (including superdelegates) and 78 for Obama (including superdelegates).  Go Hillary!  Keep rackin' 'em up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241019</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-241019</guid>
		<description>Now, I get it -- Just like with the Electoral College, it&#039;s not about raw numbers; it&#039;s about delegates where it counts: 
Obama - 3 statewide delegates, 6 district delegates, 3 superdelagates = 12
Clinton - 3 statewide delegates, 6 district delegates, 2 superdelagates = 11
Edwards - 2 statewide delegates, 2 district delegates
Obama wins!  Edwards will give his delegates to Obama, for a total of 16 delagates to Clinton&#039;s 11.   Repeat that through the primary season, and Obama can wrap this up before the convention.  

Do you think Hillary would consider being Vice President?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I get it - Just like with the Electoral College, it's not about raw numbers; it's about delegates where it counts:<br />
Obama &#8211; 3 statewide delegates, 6 district delegates, 3 superdelagates = 12<br />
Clinton &#8211; 3 statewide delegates, 6 district delegates, 2 superdelagates = 11<br />
Edwards &#8211; 2 statewide delegates, 2 district delegates<br />
Obama wins!  Edwards will give his delegates to Obama, for a total of 16 delagates to Clinton's 11.   Repeat that through the primary season, and Obama can wrap this up before the convention.  </p>
<p>Do you think Hillary would consider being Vice President?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240999</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240999</guid>
		<description>O you bet Hillary&#039;s crowd are sore losers. That crowd was probably not even from NH. This primary does not pass the smell test. Hillary is too cocksure about being the nominee she told Couric she WOULD be the nominee as did McAulifee. Both say this with such certainty even before the IA caucuses that it is hard to beleive this is not rigged.  Hillary had a very small crowd for there to have been a massive turnout and for her to have won with 2% more of the vote. They called for more Democratic ballots early yet they say the independent vote was split evenly between McCain and Barack. If this is true we know those Democratics were not coming out in droves fo vote for Hillary. She is too dislike. But with the corrupt machine politics they could eek out a win for her just like they did for Bill. Note how both came within 2% only Bill lost. Even so, they get the same number of delegates thus the comeback kid moniker for Bill. The real story is going untold and that is how Barack has galvanized a movement in this country. Now if only we the people are allowed to elect the people&#039;s candidate instead of the dirty political rigging of votes that we have witnessed last night in NH.  Obama is by far the best candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O you bet Hillary's crowd are sore losers. That crowd was probably not even from NH. This primary does not pass the smell test. Hillary is too cocksure about being the nominee she told Couric she WOULD be the nominee as did McAulifee. Both say this with such certainty even before the IA caucuses that it is hard to beleive this is not rigged.  Hillary had a very small crowd for there to have been a massive turnout and for her to have won with 2% more of the vote. They called for more Democratic ballots early yet they say the independent vote was split evenly between McCain and Barack. If this is true we know those Democratics were not coming out in droves fo vote for Hillary. She is too dislike. But with the corrupt machine politics they could eek out a win for her just like they did for Bill. Note how both came within 2% only Bill lost. Even so, they get the same number of delegates thus the comeback kid moniker for Bill. The real story is going untold and that is how Barack has galvanized a movement in this country. Now if only we the people are allowed to elect the people's candidate instead of the dirty political rigging of votes that we have witnessed last night in NH.  Obama is by far the best candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. DiPasquale</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240974</link>
		<dc:creator>J. DiPasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240974</guid>
		<description>I&#039; m sick and tired hearing of your shameless promoting, self proclaimed Best Political Team.  It seems to me they too were wrong in the New Hampshire primaries.   They&#039;re nothing more than Monday morning quarterbacks.  You could hear the same commentary on other networks who don&#039;t have &quot;the best political team&quot;.  One question - how come no one from &quot;the best political team&quot; said one word about delegates to the respective conventions won by each candidate.  Did they forget that&#039;s how the nomination process works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I' m sick and tired hearing of your shameless promoting, self proclaimed Best Political Team.  It seems to me they too were wrong in the New Hampshire primaries.   They're nothing more than Monday morning quarterbacks.  You could hear the same commentary on other networks who don't have "the best political team".  One question &#8211; how come no one from "the best political team" said one word about delegates to the respective conventions won by each candidate.  Did they forget that's how the nomination process works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240924</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240924</guid>
		<description>As a british person, I am at a loss. How the results from New Hampshire can declare a winner in the contest? I thought a draw would a proper result or a win for Obama, due to the 2 to 1 win, or am I missing something here?
The tears swung the minds of the delegates? (Bo ho) funny way to choose a leader, shed crocodile tears and you win. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a british person, I am at a loss. How the results from New Hampshire can declare a winner in the contest? I thought a draw would a proper result or a win for Obama, due to the 2 to 1 win, or am I missing something here?<br />
The tears swung the minds of the delegates? (Bo ho) funny way to choose a leader, shed crocodile tears and you win. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian, Tampa FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240914</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian, Tampa FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240914</guid>
		<description>So for all intents and purposes, Obama actually won by one superdelegate.

There was a double victory for the Obama campaign in New Hampshire: first that he could win an equal number of delegates as Hillary, and second that the media will hopefully butt out and let the candidates and voters interact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So for all intents and purposes, Obama actually won by one superdelegate.</p>
<p>There was a double victory for the Obama campaign in New Hampshire: first that he could win an equal number of delegates as Hillary, and second that the media will hopefully butt out and let the candidates and voters interact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Seravo</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240913</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Seravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240913</guid>
		<description>Hillary should fire Penn and hire Carville.  She also needs to discuss the issues as she sees them and how Obama is not talking about them.  So far, Obama talks a good talk, but his rhetoric is shallow.  Hillary has the experience--it was obvious during the NH debate.  She needs to challenge her opponent to state his platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary should fire Penn and hire Carville.  She also needs to discuss the issues as she sees them and how Obama is not talking about them.  So far, Obama talks a good talk, but his rhetoric is shallow.  Hillary has the experience&#8211;it was obvious during the NH debate.  She needs to challenge her opponent to state his platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLINTON 2008</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240870</link>
		<dc:creator>CLINTON 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240870</guid>
		<description>Mrs. Ladybird Johnson  Former First Lady, United States Of America. Women can move beyond the struggle for equal status and for material goods to the challenges and opportunities of citizenship. I always hope that the very best of our people will go into politics and some of our best are women. So, I say: &quot;Don&#039;t hold back. Don&#039;t be shy. Step forward in every way you can to plan boldly, to speak clearly, to offer the leadership which the world needs. to pluck out prejudice from our lives, to remove fear and hate where it exists, and to create a world unafraid to work out its destiny in peace. Eleanor Roosevelt has already made her own splendid and incomparable contribution to that foundation. Let us go and do likewise, within the measure of our faith and the limits of our ability. Let Eleanor Roosevelt teach Us all to turn the arts of compassion into the victories of democracy. Eleanor Roosevelt taught us that sometimes silence is the greatest sin.  VOTE CLINTON 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrs. Ladybird Johnson  Former First Lady, United States Of America. Women can move beyond the struggle for equal status and for material goods to the challenges and opportunities of citizenship. I always hope that the very best of our people will go into politics and some of our best are women. So, I say: "Don't hold back. Don't be shy. Step forward in every way you can to plan boldly, to speak clearly, to offer the leadership which the world needs. to pluck out prejudice from our lives, to remove fear and hate where it exists, and to create a world unafraid to work out its destiny in peace. Eleanor Roosevelt has already made her own splendid and incomparable contribution to that foundation. Let us go and do likewise, within the measure of our faith and the limits of our ability. Let Eleanor Roosevelt teach Us all to turn the arts of compassion into the victories of democracy. Eleanor Roosevelt taught us that sometimes silence is the greatest sin.  VOTE CLINTON 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLINTON 2008</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240865</link>
		<dc:creator>CLINTON 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240865</guid>
		<description>FOX &amp; Friends&quot; gang the Most biased clueless political team on TV- Next to the old cronie Chris Matthews on MSNBC. Biggest IDIOT in the news goes to Bill Kristol! Who said this guy knows anything about voters; he gives gay people a bad name?  Fred Barnes, Mort Kondracke, Bill Kristol and Nina Easton ALL looked like deer in the head lights all night!  Could not think of anything to say on camera. Since they were proven they did not have a clue!!! We laughed at FOX trying to keep talking about republican race that ended 15 min after the polls closed. 

Clueless-EASTON: She&#039;s not going to pull it out here. WRONG

Clueless-KRISTOL: She has lost the first two states, it looks like, and I think she&#039;ll lose the next couple. WRONG

Clueless-Barnes:  She&#039;s the problem, that&#039;s what people don&#039;t like. They don&#039;t like her. They don&#039;t trust her. WRONG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOX &amp; Friends" gang the Most biased clueless political team on TV- Next to the old cronie Chris Matthews on MSNBC. Biggest IDIOT in the news goes to Bill Kristol! Who said this guy knows anything about voters; he gives gay people a bad name?  Fred Barnes, Mort Kondracke, Bill Kristol and Nina Easton ALL looked like deer in the head lights all night!  Could not think of anything to say on camera. Since they were proven they did not have a clue!!! We laughed at FOX trying to keep talking about republican race that ended 15 min after the polls closed. </p>
<p>Clueless-EASTON: She's not going to pull it out here. WRONG</p>
<p>Clueless-KRISTOL: She has lost the first two states, it looks like, and I think she'll lose the next couple. WRONG</p>
<p>Clueless-Barnes:  She's the problem, that's what people don't like. They don't like her. They don't trust her. WRONG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imelda Blahnik</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240817</link>
		<dc:creator>Imelda Blahnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240817</guid>
		<description>Bill W - Edwards can release his delegates - but he can&#039;t force them to go with one candidate or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill W &#8211; Edwards can release his delegates &#8211; but he can't force them to go with one candidate or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patsy C - Iowa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240812</link>
		<dc:creator>Patsy C - Iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240812</guid>
		<description>The media have been behind Hillary from day one and they helped put her over the top. If she is so experienced and knows exactly how to run the country, why didn&#039;t she do something during her eight years in the White House? She says she has 35 years of experience. Most of it was as a spectator. What has she done? Now she has all the answers. The Clintons had their chance and it is no longer their time. Some of the messes we are in today stem from Bill Clinton&#039;s leadership. And I was a Clinton supporter during both his terms. Now they are part of the old Washington politics. Let&#039;s give someone with new ideas - and no past to forgive - a chance to change our world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media have been behind Hillary from day one and they helped put her over the top. If she is so experienced and knows exactly how to run the country, why didn't she do something during her eight years in the White House? She says she has 35 years of experience. Most of it was as a spectator. What has she done? Now she has all the answers. The Clintons had their chance and it is no longer their time. Some of the messes we are in today stem from Bill Clinton's leadership. And I was a Clinton supporter during both his terms. Now they are part of the old Washington politics. Let's give someone with new ideas &#8211; and no past to forgive &#8211; a chance to change our world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christlyn Robinson</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240810</link>
		<dc:creator>Christlyn Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240810</guid>
		<description>In spitde of the 39% vs 37% supposedly victory of Sen. Hil Clinton, Sen. Barack is still the winner. His speech last night just goes to show you the character of the man and his sincerity to bring this country together in unity. His speech was as impeccable and as consistent as he is. I think that Hillary should borrow a page from him. I listened to both speeches last night and all I heard from her was gloating. The fact that her supporters booed Sen. Barack was just a reflection of what kind of people really support her. SORE LOSERS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spitde of the 39% vs 37% supposedly victory of Sen. Hil Clinton, Sen. Barack is still the winner. His speech last night just goes to show you the character of the man and his sincerity to bring this country together in unity. His speech was as impeccable and as consistent as he is. I think that Hillary should borrow a page from him. I listened to both speeches last night and all I heard from her was gloating. The fact that her supporters booed Sen. Barack was just a reflection of what kind of people really support her. SORE LOSERS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240743</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240743</guid>
		<description>OK, 9 each and &quot;* There are also 8 Democratic “superdelegates” in New Hampshire. Of those, 2 support Clinton and 3 support Obama, according to a CNN survey.&quot;

So that is 12 - 11 Obama favored, so on with the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, 9 each and "* There are also 8 Democratic “superdelegates” in New Hampshire. Of those, 2 support Clinton and 3 support Obama, according to a CNN survey."</p>
<p>So that is 12 &#8211; 11 Obama favored, so on with the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W - PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240699</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill W - PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240699</guid>
		<description>Question - What happens to John Edward&#039;s delegates if he concedes - can he give them to Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question &#8211; What happens to John Edward's delegates if he concedes &#8211; can he give them to Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jelly Bean</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jelly Bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240669</guid>
		<description>I have been a bit torn up about which canidate to vote for myself.  

I guess New Hampshire feels the same way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a bit torn up about which canidate to vote for myself.  </p>
<p>I guess New Hampshire feels the same way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brattleboro, VT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240644</link>
		<dc:creator>Brattleboro, VT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240644</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why some of you are so discouraged. We&#039;ve started knowing about Obama less than four years ago, what is not the case with the Cintons. If the guy did this in NH I think it&#039;s a huge victory. Obama is the America&#039;s choice whether you like it or not. Those who booed him will cry these coming days. 

America, wake up from your deep sleep, you leader is there! Obama will lead you to the promised land: Unity !!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't understand why some of you are so discouraged. We've started knowing about Obama less than four years ago, what is not the case with the Cintons. If the guy did this in NH I think it's a huge victory. Obama is the America's choice whether you like it or not. Those who booed him will cry these coming days. </p>
<p>America, wake up from your deep sleep, you leader is there! Obama will lead you to the promised land: Unity !!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almanojodo</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240642</link>
		<dc:creator>almanojodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240642</guid>
		<description>With Romney&#039;s 30 delegates, Huckabee&#039;s 21, and   McCain&#039;s 10 ROMNEY IS THE WINNER SO  FAR!   The pundits try to twist the story to their  point of view rather than  giving  the hard facts about delegates won.  It&#039;s a 50 state affair with  far too much hyperbole on the early campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Romney's 30 delegates, Huckabee's 21, and   McCain's 10 ROMNEY IS THE WINNER SO  FAR!   The pundits try to twist the story to their  point of view rather than  giving  the hard facts about delegates won.  It's a 50 state affair with  far too much hyperbole on the early campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240626</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240626</guid>
		<description>My math may be rusty, but if Clinton and Obama each won the same number of Delegates, that would make New Hampshire a tie.  Oh except one other item, There are 8 Super Delegates, of which 5 have pledged their support, 2 to Clinton and 3 to Obama.  Again my Math may be off, but at the moment, doesn&#039;t that make Obama the winner of New Hampshire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My math may be rusty, but if Clinton and Obama each won the same number of Delegates, that would make New Hampshire a tie.  Oh except one other item, There are 8 Super Delegates, of which 5 have pledged their support, 2 to Clinton and 3 to Obama.  Again my Math may be off, but at the moment, doesn't that make Obama the winner of New Hampshire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip  Celina OH</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240611</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip  Celina OH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240611</guid>
		<description>Diamond makes an astute observation from the text.  Obama  has 12 delegates versus 11 for Hildabeast.  (If the survey of the superdelegates is assumed correct).

  That means, come convention time, the state of New Hampshire (in addition to Iowa) goes to Mr. Obama.

Barack: 2
Hillary: 0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diamond makes an astute observation from the text.  Obama  has 12 delegates versus 11 for Hildabeast.  (If the survey of the superdelegates is assumed correct).</p>
<p>  That means, come convention time, the state of New Hampshire (in addition to Iowa) goes to Mr. Obama.</p>
<p>Barack: 2<br />
Hillary: 0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240595</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240595</guid>
		<description>Obama, Clinton ...  does it really matter?  For the most part, they&#039;re not talking about real change; just shifting few things around here and there.  Domestic and foreign policy are driven by money.  Always have been always will be; no presidential candidate can change that.  So let the people keep their money by getting rid of income tax, and alleviate the crushing inflation that makes our money worth so little.  The only candidate who recognizes that and talks about making our money *worth* something again is Ron Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama, Clinton ...  does it really matter?  For the most part, they're not talking about real change; just shifting few things around here and there.  Domestic and foreign policy are driven by money.  Always have been always will be; no presidential candidate can change that.  So let the people keep their money by getting rid of income tax, and alleviate the crushing inflation that makes our money worth so little.  The only candidate who recognizes that and talks about making our money *worth* something again is Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenoshaMarge</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240590</link>
		<dc:creator>kenoshaMarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240590</guid>
		<description>Guess what? We are in for a very long, boring year.  I am gazing into my crystal ball and I see no change in the pundidiots in spite of their being wrong about nearly everything. A win in New Hampshire is just that, a win in New Hampshire. Now everyone that had buried Hillary Clinton is scrambling in all directions trying to explain why she isn&#039;t still dead. I support John Edwards but see him fading fast. Don&#039;t like Obama because I need more of a message than &quot;hope and change&quot;. And I sure as hell don&#039;t think that anyone can work with the Republicans in Washington. I want a fighter. If I don&#039;t get Edwards I guess I&#039;ll go with Hillary. Hillary/Clark seems like pretty good ticket to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what? We are in for a very long, boring year.  I am gazing into my crystal ball and I see no change in the pundidiots in spite of their being wrong about nearly everything. A win in New Hampshire is just that, a win in New Hampshire. Now everyone that had buried Hillary Clinton is scrambling in all directions trying to explain why she isn't still dead. I support John Edwards but see him fading fast. Don't like Obama because I need more of a message than "hope and change". And I sure as hell don't think that anyone can work with the Republicans in Washington. I want a fighter. If I don't get Edwards I guess I'll go with Hillary. Hillary/Clark seems like pretty good ticket to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240582</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240582</guid>
		<description>In fact, Obama won because he got more delegates than Clinton!!!  Don&#039;t forget that 3 of the &quot;superdelegates&quot; voted for OBAMA and only 2 of them voted for Clinton.

Score:  Obama 12, Clinton 11

GO OBAMA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, Obama won because he got more delegates than Clinton!!!  Don't forget that 3 of the "superdelegates" voted for OBAMA and only 2 of them voted for Clinton.</p>
<p>Score:  Obama 12, Clinton 11</p>
<p>GO OBAMA!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin, Lexington MA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240545</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin, Lexington MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240545</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the CNN question out there on the front page: Just imagining having to decide between Clinton and McCain in a national election makes me completely nauseous.  McCain is a fossil, from another era, another time.  Clinton is, well, Clinton.  The Clinton-Bush dynasty needs to stop now.  But all McCain will give us is more years of war and more enemies around the globe with American arrogance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe the CNN question out there on the front page: Just imagining having to decide between Clinton and McCain in a national election makes me completely nauseous.  McCain is a fossil, from another era, another time.  Clinton is, well, Clinton.  The Clinton-Bush dynasty needs to stop now.  But all McCain will give us is more years of war and more enemies around the globe with American arrogance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: googlybear</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240538</link>
		<dc:creator>googlybear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240538</guid>
		<description>can we expect the rest of the clinton campaign to be centered on a crying woman? 

do we want out country run by a crying woman?

the new hampshire vote is a reflection of emotions, not due process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we expect the rest of the clinton campaign to be centered on a crying woman? </p>
<p>do we want out country run by a crying woman?</p>
<p>the new hampshire vote is a reflection of emotions, not due process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ressa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240527</link>
		<dc:creator>Ressa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/09/final-the-new-hampshire-delegate-breakdown/#comment-240527</guid>
		<description>Out with the old, in with the new. I agree with Kim on the news, I&#039;d like it to be real news anyway! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out with the old, in with the new. I agree with Kim on the news, I'd like it to be real news anyway! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
