CNN has gone to far regarding their bias for Obama in this campaign.

When HIllary wins it "doesn't mean anything". Tell that to the over 1 million people who turned out to vote in Florida.

CNN is almost as bad as Fox now in biased reporting, this time for the Democratic candidate.

We get it CNN, you want Obama to win. Thankfully the citizens of the United States of America get to decide who's president, NOT the biased cable news network.

bush-clinton-bush-clinton…. lol…

As for Obama's lack of experience with foreign policy. It's looks like the Republicans with their years of experience really did this country good these last 2 terms, huh? This is a whole other issue i could go on forever.

Bottom Line: I believe it's good for someone who hasn't been around long enough to let himself become a true politician, to run for president.

I know he has my vote.

As for McCain no thanks to spending the next 4 years in Iraq. Good luck with the draft, because i know i'm not reenlisting if you win!

The US has never shown ANY equal rights for African Black Americans.
In the US a president who doesn't get the majority of the votes can become a president (Bush re-election) how's that for "democracy"sounds more like Dictatorship.
The US should choose a woman OR a black president, maybe they should become the winning team. But Clinton hasn't shown much I can build on, and the world is tired of Bush and Republicans and the US stands on Iraq, Kyoto protocol and many other issues.
With Obama winning, the US will gain respect again here in Europe that is for sure.
We're glad Bush will be out anyway,
it should have been a black woman running for president, that would have been even better. But we'll do with Obama!!! Go for it!

I think Hillary's tears were passionate and real. She has done so much for our country and I firmly believe she will be the one to help our country get back on track. I have been fortunate enough to see her speak a number of times and she not only speaks with convinction, she resonates with those of us who are ready to be led by an individual who embraces change.

Vote Clinton 2008!

How come know one is really questioning the poll numbers and the results? Obama was clearly ahead in the polls and exit numbers but somehow Hillary won.

Sincere or not, I don't care!

I just want Bill back in the White House so he can help put this country back on track.

Go Clintons!!! I am voting for you

Why are we worrying so much about this. The woman who asked the question, asked it to get a response, she got a response from a human being who does care about this country, who has worked non stop for the last 35 years to make this country grow and prosper, Hillary is not only the best candidate we have but, she is the only candidate with a detailed plan that gets us out of this whole that we are in but, shows just how much she has worked on her candidacy, and on the American Economy that incase you have forgotten has become non existent from the time Bill Clinton to the end of the Bush Administration.

Are you forgetting that President Clinton never made a salary when He was in office, are you forgetting that Bush not only took the presidential salary but doubled it to make himself richer? Come on folks the choice is obvious but, the woman in N.H. that brought out Hillary's emotional side obviously only did so in order to make her look bad, it obviously didn't work, and the woman I guarantee never intended on voting for Hillary in the first place.

Stop making these stories out to be more than what they really are, most of CNN's coverage is only half true to begin with, God only knows if the actual story is true, it could have just been someone posing to be that woman from the original question.

GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She's got my vote and many, many others!

You are so selfish Mrs. Clinton. You will never make a good president till you learn to respect the will of the majority. How many more times shall you cry as president. You really do have to grow up, do you know that. You cannot do anything better than Mr. Bush!

James you really aren't expecting me to believe Hillary has 35 years experience in politics. She has held exactly 1 elected office, her current role as senator – which she was elected to one term before Senator Obama. That's 4 more years experience than Senator Obama. Feel free to point out her years as first lady, but what votes did she cast in that poistion, what budget did she need to get passed, what military decision was she faced with? None. The plain and simple fact is that she hasn't held elected office for 35 more years of experience than anyone. That's fact, and can't be argued otherwise. Now, if you want to say she has 4 more years experience, I'll concede that fact.

As for the unfair criticism leveled at her, again, I think you are mistaken. In your own message you:

1. trumpet Hillary's valuable experience making her the best candidate
2. suggest she is best equipped to make change because she hasn't been President (no other candidate has either, right?)
3. tell us her opposition would like to make us believe she HAS been President

You write, "Hillary Clinton would be an enormous change for America in many ways but first and foremost because she has NEVER been president. Her opponents would like to make us believe the opposite, but they can't."

What does this even mean? Has Edwards or Obama been making speeches telling Americans to remember some fictional Hillary Presidency? If so, shouldn't these tactics actually HELP her if her incredible experience makes her more qualified? I guess when I said I was confused before I was trying to find a nice way to say this makes no sense. You simply can't have it both ways, claiming her experience is invalubale to her candidacy then discounting it to show how she's ready to be the change America needs.

I hope that Hillary continues to find her own voice and whatever convenient thing it happens to be telling her at any given moment. Meanwhile, I'll continue to support the candidate I trust to say what he means and mean what he says, the candidate who doesn't need to find a new voice but has had a clear and consistent voice and message, one that I can hope for and actually BELIEVE in.

Marianne Pernold Young should be fired!

The people in New Hampshire who changed their minds from Obama to Clinton are flip Floppers Just like her….what message are you sending to the masses?

I thought the "experienced" candidate was my choice until i saw the tears of manipulation and Bill's attacks on Obama. I thought we would get two great leaders…..only to see Bill point his defiant fairy tale finger at us again. They are a team.

I would rather have someone with an innate sense of integrity, diplomacy, intelligence, and hope that would respond correctly in difficult times. We have already seen that it has inspired Hillary to soften her approach, even borrow some inspirational phrases as she criticized the power of words.

Obama with his inexperience has global leaders, corporate leaders and the world paying attention. His inexperience has people lining up with curiosity and interest. He has connected us in debate. Hopefully as we dialogue, we understand ourselves better and vote responsibly. Most important, let's listen, respect, and trust our decision.

Barack Obama said he would consider bombing Pakistan.

Wow. What does that say about his experience?

And by the way–we don't need another maverick in the white house right now.

There is no dought in my mind Sen. Obama is the man at the moment base on his mesage of hope?but Sen. Clinton is the best to lead America to Lead the World again for this simple reason:she has been tested over three decade,she has been verted over over and again.

yes there is urgent need for a change in direction in Washinton and that that's not mean we have to change all the waiters and waitresses in all the Restaurants,cap drivers,house owners etc.in Washinton before America get back to her feet again.The change needed is all about prooving capability,Maturity and deep anderstanding of Political Diplomacy and Governance.

The next President will definately leave and operate from Washinton and soon intergrate in Washinton let's not forget about that, and will have no orther choice than to accomodate Business and lobbies interest.the Presidency can't funtion proper without doing business with the people whom elected her into office.

I URGE SEN CLINTON TO QUICKLY WORK HARD TO WIPE OUT HER POLITICAL TAG FOR BEEN TOO DIVISIVE,SHE SHOULD CHALLENGE HER CRITICS TO PROOF SUCH BASELESS POLITICAL ACUSATION.

GOD BLESS SEN CLINTON,DEMOCRATS,REPUBLICANS AND INDEPENDENTS AND ALL THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES.

GOD BLESS AMERICA

Matt says he is confused. I agree. You are confused Matt. We all know what experience means and so do you if you just try a little, Matt. Do the other candidates have 35 years in politics under their belts? No. Does that matter? Yes of course it does! You are not fooling anyone but yourself when you suggest that Hillary Clinton is the source of unfair criticism coming from other candidates.

As a women we naturally have a soft side and tears flow easily so if you were running for president and not doing so well and a room full of women asks you how your holding up of course your gonna tear up at one point or another but for women to vote for her because she teared up is just dumb! I am a woman and former supporter of Hillary but because I supported her I followed her on the news and on during her campaign only to find out about the real Hilliary sides with Bush, who ducks questions, throws fits and is all about the money and fame she would have as first woman President NOT WE THE PEOPLE. Those were tears caused by stress, pressure and fear NOT tears from the heart because of her concern for the people!

Can someone please explain to me how having exactly ONE more term as a senator gives Hillary SO much more vast experience and makes her a more qualified presidential candidate? Did she somehow gain year upon year of knowledge casting however many more votes in the senate? The experience argument is wearing very thin with me as I don't understand how anyone can claim that Hillary has so much more of it. The last time I checked, BILL Clinton was the President and HE can claim that experience, not Hillary. Nobody ever elected her to run the country. And for anyone to claim that it is her opponents who are trying to make us believe she has been the president confuses me…if anything I seem to recall Senator Obama claiming her experience as First Lady had NOTHING to do with giving her the qualifications or experience to be President.

I suppose it is typical though, of a woman with all this self-claimed experience, who just managed to find her OWN voice in NH (who else was she listening to all those years she was gaining her incredible experience I wonder?), to want to be able to both claim her years in the White House as her qualifying experience to be President while at the same time blaming her opposition for making people believe she is an experienced politician.

I wonder which reinvented model of her and her new voice we'll get this week..and the week after that…and then the week after…and so on.

Hillary Clinton is by far the best candidate. If nothing else, remember that she is the person who organized and fought for a real Health Care and Social Security System in the 90's such as you can find in European countries. One that would protect us all, rich or poor, making it less expensive and thus more accessible to every American. Hillary Clinton would be an enormous change for America in many ways but first and foremost because she has NEVER been president. Her opponents would like to make us believe the opposite, but they can't. Many names have popped up recently to try to lay claim to the Democrate nomination but most of them we simply don't know or at best we have just learned how to spell their names. "What's wrong with experience?" a journalist asked John Edwards referring to Hillary Clinton after the New Hampshire primary. We should all ask that question.

If CNN likes one democratic candidate it's Hillary. Also if this woman was moved by Obama's speech and decided to vote for him that is much better than voting for Hillary because she cried. I understand showing emotiion is somehting we should praise but not in the election for presidency. Global leaders our NOT going to respect someone who chokes up (especially when asked a personal question GAG!). How about the passion and ambition to deliver a speech that inspires others to cry. I think Hillary has been on cloud nine in the Senate/White House for too long to realize what real people go through everyday.

There's no crying in presidency.

END THE DYNASTY: Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton?—-Democratic?

The United States is a country – wether the world likes it or not – holding the strings to the entire globe. It has the invisible banner of Uberpower and we all have to accept that. This is the reason why I follow 'Election 08′ so closely. I only hope that Americans have the sense to stay away from the Republicans this time. Although I do agree with some of them regarding their foreign policies.
If i had the choice of voting it would be Obama without looking back.
However, if Mrs Clinton were elected I honestly believe she has the resolve and strength to bring Americas global reputation back towards respectful.

Either way, in the eyes of the word – unless the states fall under the fiasco of 2002 – we will be a lot safer with the democrats of The United States.

Regards,

An independant Scotland.

Race vs. Gender. So what if Obama is electrifying. He is a fairy tale. Hillary is a woman. What is wrong with the women of this great nation. The men as President have failed this country. Women of America should stand behind Hillary and she what she can do. Surely she could do better than the other choices. It is time for a change and it is time for a woman……So what if she shed a tear. I think she is passionate about the people of this country…..Come on women. STAND BY YOUR WOMAN…….

America always has played such an important role in the world. It has so much potential to do good. If it was not for America Europe, Germany and especially former West Berlin, where I live, would not be the same they are now. The world wouldn't.

But recent events (particularly during the last 7 years) just make people forget about the good America did in the past. Please vote for somebody who can restore the function and image that America used to have in the world. And please make it a matter of issues.

Obama probably would bring America sympathies quicker. And whether he is not qualified (experienced enough) to bring about the change everybody seems to wait for is not for me to know or say. But whether Obama or Clinton – it hardly can get worse in my opinion. I don't know about the republicans though. They don't seem to (want to) learn from the past.

wow you all kidding , Do you really want a president with out experience?

I am a female NH voter, and I am totally disgusted with the voters who don't know what issues are important to them personally to know which candidate reflects those values. When I hear how many people were undecided right up to the minute they got into the voting booth or how a calculated crying moment could sway their vote, it makes ME want to cry. People, wake up!! Her husband was the king of calculated tears in front of cameras, so she had the best teacher! Voters who can't access the enormous amount of information available on every candidate and assess for themselves prior to voting day who they will support should refrain from voting. I think it's a major reason why we get some of the whacked out leaders that we do–those candidates/politicians who can manipulate by images and press and perception but are without any real substance. And the naive electorate who fall prey to those tactics and vote on their emotions or other useless reasonings. With an electorate like NH showed to be this week, it leaves me unsettled about our country's future. Thank you.

Hillary won't survive a presidency. Everyone knows that.

i HAVE BEEN IN SEVERAL EXECUTIVE POSITIONS IN MY LIFE AND AS ALWAYS MEN TYPICALLY THOUGHT IT WEAK IF I SHOWED ANY EMOTION. GUESS WHAT I CONTINUED TO BE SUCESSFULL AND THEY DISAPPEARED?

TYPICALLY MOST OF THESE MEN NEVER REALIZED THAT PEOPLE ARE MOVED BY EMOTIONS THROUGH OUT THEIR LIVES . PEOPLE IN POWERFUL POSITIONS ARE NO DIFFERENT. HILLARY IS NOT PHONY SHE IS JUST DISPLAYING A HUMAN TRAIT THAT WE ALL HAVE "FEELINGS" .

Hillary won the New Hampshire because of Edward blunder. There is a Tibetan saying that "Never let the opponent loose when he or she bows down". Edward double team on Hillary even after hillary loosing Iowa and when obama was already attacking her.

Hillary is going to win no matter what any one says
We need she and Bill to get back on track.
If she will get Colon Powell for vice it can be done.

that retarded OBAMA is winning this i don't car what anyone says…Clinton got emotional just to win more votes. WHAT A LOSER

35 years of experience in Washington. What have you done for me lately???? That s what we care about. Hillary, you are running for President of the United States. How many years of experience do you have doing that.

In 35 years in Washington, we could never associate the word emotion, or cry with the name Hillary Clinton.

Suddenly, as polls are saying she s about to lose 2 in row, she breaks down and of course for only 2 seconds. Cry me a river, come on.
She would not even break down when Billy cheated on her. pffffffffffffffffffffffffff….., we dont know which staff member Bill is gonna go after this time.

We face serious issues, we dont need another episode of the Clintons soap opera. We need to wake up.

How come there isnt a story on CNN.com about who I voted for? Does this really matter to anyone?

Maybe Kerry can teach him something about swiftboating. Kerry was very unpopular with Democrats and Independants. Alot of people voted for Kerry because in 2004 the Democratic contenders were comparable to this years Republican canadates. (not very good). I voted for Kerry, but did not like him. I will NOT vote for Barack Obama for President,(maybe Vic President) and it is not because of his age it is because his speaches are too glamorous. They have no substance just a lot of Southern Preaching tactics to get people rialed. Kerry delivers speaches with substances, its just his snobby attutude turned people off, resulting in his inability to bring it home. President Bill Clinton won twice. John Kerry and John Edwards have both lost. Obama is without substance, and the Media is holding Senator Hillary Clinton to much higher standards then the good old boys. Which in the end will be good for it will show her strengths. Not just taking on the Republican right wing she will have to deal with the NEGATIVES ATTACKS by the MEDIA. Probally because most of the famous Anchor people are men. (I said "most" Obama supporters before you go and start slaming me for my opinion) Yes Obama supporters are the most rude's people on the blogs these days.
"SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES"

Why are we still equating tears/emotion with weakness?
Every Olympic athelete has cried, the Queen of England has cried. YOU have cried!
You parents cried! ( probably when you were born, but not for the reasons your thinking)
It is a testament to the passion one feels, not an indication of weakness.
An being a woman I have cried especially when I have gotten no sleep and had a grueling schedule.

I believe it takes strength of character to allow yourself the freedom to feel your passion to the fullest and not have it squelched for fear of being labeled weak.

She has more moxy, nads or whatever than anyone else in the race and that's what we need right now!!
Do not under any circumstances think she is weak.
Remember Margaret Thatcher – no weakness there!

GO HILLARY GO – all the way to the White House!!!!!

Poor lady should have selected John Edwards.

Obama and Clinton are only interested in their entry into the history books.

Once elected they couldn't give a poot to anybody who actually voted them in office.

If you want commitment–then vote John Edwards.

All the rest are trying to put "cherries on their resumes".

Maybe she realized in this day and age where America is so incredibly divided over what political party they belong to, she realized that Hillary is not a candidate that gets us past that point.

Ever since Bill Clinton's first campaign where he went on MTV and introduced mass media to presidential campaigns, the political process has grown with a frenzied crescendo until it rivals rooting for a team in the superbowl!

We don't need another president that is as divisive as the current president Bush, just in the other direction.

How ironic this voter was reinforced by HRC's reaction to her question.

I am a Republican-leaning Independent that has been transformed by Barack Obama. I will take him over any Republican. I can not help but be captivated by this man's courage, brilliance, and unifying message. This is quintessentially important for Democrats, because they must nominate a candidate that can win a swing voter such as myself. A Clinton nomination will be a rerun of Gore and Kerry. Democrats must be awfully tired of this movie. I, and countless others, will not stand by while the Bush/Clinton dynasty propagates FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt). America will not be intimidated by the attacks and strong-arm tactics of the Clinton war machine. Go Barack!

By the way, you CNN readers are the same people who rank Celebrity "news" as the most popular stories. Wow I'm so impressed by your knowledge! Get a clue!

Most of you like Obama because he's the "new Ipod", the new Apple 'Wow", but nothing special or revolutionary.

Why do CNN readers hate Hillary so much? What is wrong with you people? Hillary, Edward and Obama all mean well for this country, but why be so negative about Hill-Dog? Mrs. Clinton is clearly more experienced and can put together a top-notch old-Bill cabinet. Stop being so negative about Hill-Dog!

K

Crocodile tears, my fellow patriots.

You might be right in saying that nobody really cares to hear how one woman from new hampshire voted, but I think there IS something we can take from this.

Don't base your vote on one issue, or gender, or race. Vote for who you truly, deeply believe has the best vision for the United States as a whole. This election isn't just about national security, or immigration, or the war in Iraq, or whether "its time we had a woman in the Oval Office". It's about ALL the issues that surround our country today. It is our civic responsibility to vote for the candidate who would be the best president. Be informed and trust your instincts.

May we come out of this mess with a great leader.

one more thing… ever since I was 7 years old, there has been a Bush or Clinton in the White House…

I'm SICK of it

Would a female CEO cry to get support to take over another company? I think not. Why should you vote for a woman who is going to cry to get votes? This world will not stand for an emotional woman at the helm. It's going to be an even more hostile world if Clinton is elected.

Just like the woman who asked the question of Hillary I had more respect for her before the tears. I was leaning toward Obama but now I am sure. I saw the tears of desperation and Bills rants confirmed the desperation. If you are a person of emotion it shows always not just when things are not moving in your favor. If I went for a job interview and the employer told me it was not going well, I don't think tears would make the situation any better.

As far as Obama is concerned:

Why would anyone think that any one other person can solve all there problems? If you listen to all the candidates Obama is the only one constantly saying we. He says that because although he will be the one leading the charge from Washington, it will take all Americans to push for change in America. What he can do for us is stay truthful and resist corporate influence as opposition to change. What we can do is replace those who are roadblocks and stay involved in the process.

Where was Bill's experience in 1992,

If Hillary was that experienced, why did she vote yes for a war? Her experience as first lady should have told her no.

“ Of course late 2006, she was quoted as saying President Bush was very charismatic” I guess that won her vote both times.

Hillary's politics is close to Bush's. We would have more of the same polarizing administrative policies.

She has blamed everything on republicans. Obama is in her cross hairs

Dems Loyalty will possibly be split this year and GOP will win again.

During her time at the W.H. Hillary talked about GOP and them out to get her and Bill. Even with all the scandal after scandal, she showed little emotion, as long as the blame others game was played.

If that is what our country needs. Bush approval would be higher.

Bill and Obama have an ability to connect with people of all backgrounds. This is reflective of their upbringing. Hillary has had a problem making that connection, even as U.S. Senator.

All the Democrats could do well to lead us in the right direction. However, Obama offers the greatest flexibility to work with both parties on new ideas. Hillary knew the war in Iraq was not worth the cost. However, in 2007, she turns around and gives Bush another authorization to fight Iran.

With experience, we have change. Where was the change here?

A president —- The Success of a president is tied to his administration. Bill had great support for furthering his agenda. Many things they failed at in his first administration. Second admin. he hired knew people who thought outside the box.

One person cannot know it all – that's with any good administration!

What Bill said about experience in 1992, is perfectly important today concerning Obama augment for change

Quote: Bill Clinton responded to Bush's claim “that experience means everything:”
Bill Clinton once said "the same old experience is not relevant"

The same discussion is going on today. We need Change Bill Brought then and Obama will bring it now.

Sometime you have to change the dice, when fixed to roll a certain way all the time.

Fear of change, is allowing more of the same.

_____________________________________________________________-

La'Kitgum, Concorde, NH January 9, 2008 4:13 pm ET

Americans are beginning to understand that Hillary stands for what the President of the USA should be and not Obama with his empty promises. Obama's leadership leaves a lot more questions to be answered but foremost, how can he be an agent of change without experience? How can he change what he does not know? How can he change what he does not have? Experience in economy, healthcare and security are all in Hillary's bag and Hillary can change them for the good of all America. Obama has a bag of experience but it is empty. He has nothing to change.

My prayers and Best wishes to Hillary and I urge all Americans (black, white, oriental, hispanic) to support Clinton because they will never regret their votes. We did it in NH. NH understands that it is issues, not body language, which stands out in this campaign and Hillary is all about issues. Listen to her carefully instead of cheering at her and you will understand just like the people of NH did – the issues matter,

Leigh Bearden~ i couldn't put it better myself.
What happened to us? We're American's and this is our future! We seem to be doing nothing but feeding our own hunger for drama instead of focusing on what really matters. Our behavior as a nation has lead us down a path of rapid self-destruction. When is enough enough?

I don't see the tears. Have you watched the video? Does anyone honestly see more than an exhausted woman who, yes, answers a question a bit emotionally — but honestly, tears? Weeping? Give me a break. This has been embellished and overreported to the point of making everyone look like a fool. I would rather a person's voice break when they voice love and concern for their country than see their fist pump and blood boil in their face. Watch the video and evaluate it for yourself.

whaaaa….whaaaa….whaaaaa. Cry me a river. We have a president that can not speak the english language now and now you want a cry baby in office. People really need to get a grip. What is Clinton really gonna do if voted in? Both sides of the isle can't stand her. You really think she can 'accomplish' anything. Pahhhhleeze.

Don't be surprised if you see McCain win the Repub's and ask Lieberman to run with him against the Dem's. If you have Obama and/or Hillary running against that…well……..throw your vote in the river.

I am an angry Dem that is sick of my own any more…..all I hear is talk…talk…talk.

I am sick that Obama and Hillary is the best we can come up with. 'I am the candidate for change!'…….blah…blah…blah….blah! Change what? Anybody have a clue? Do they really think they will accomplish much…being the most 'partisan' that we had to offer? Need some Repub' votes to get stuff done.

Grow up.

Find me a real leader.

Barack will win the nomination, it is time for change in America, the Clinton era is gone, if you want change stand up for the one who represents such. Hillary owes a lot to a lot of people and so does Bill, if she wins the nomination and ultimately the Presidency, nothing will change. We tend to forget the problems that occurred during the Clinton era and the scandal as he was leaving office. Barack is a breathe of fresh air for America something we so desperately need.

If you believe those tears were real, you are living in a dream!!!!

What I find so surprising is the comment that Barrack does not have the experience to lead our country but our current President never held a real job other than Gov of Texas which is basically a figure head postion. He was a complete failure in all businesses he was involved in before running for President. His first business venture was with the Bin Ladin family. Ironic? I think not. So obviously voters do not really look at the experience of a person when electing them to the most important office in the free world. I really can't see how any Democrat could do any worse w/this country than what has been done to us under the Bush adminstration. We are in a war that has put our country in debt to China. A war built totally on lies and more lies. A war we will never win and that has cost billions of our tax dollars and countless lives of our young service men. We need to all unite v. divide if we want to get back on track and be the strongest country in the world. Bush has done everything in his power to alienate other nations and destroy any relationships we did have. So as I see it the Republicans have had their 8 years to allow the rich to get richer and the middle class to get poorer. Its time for some balance and for the corporations to get out of the White House and oil companies to stop running our policies. Barrack has a vision for a better America so why not give him a chance to show us what he has.

As the mother of an active duty soldier; I would ask Mr. Obama…."your participation in the 2007 Senate investigation of Ft. Carson and the care or lack thereof given to returning combat soldiers…..why has this not been mentioned during the campaign? If you are so supportive of these soldiers and their rights…it seems that would be a key issue….unless the participation was just a posturing event and not from a true sense of caring".

This country needs to ask the question…..define…change!!! What EXACTLY in your platform represents change!

I am a 60yr old female, Who for one don't want to see a crying leader. To me she make herself look like a wimp. If your going to play in the big boys game , come with your game face on.

It's sad to see the rampant bashing that's infested this thread. It appears that most of us are Dems, so why can't we work together to determine who is best for our party? This is the very thinking that has polluted our political process for the past 20 years. It's as if we are looking for any opportunity to bash someone for supporting one candidate vs. another, then spewing regurgitated soundbytes in a feable attempt to sound "smarter" or "more informed". Think for yourself, truly research ALL of the candidates "experience" in making "change".
I am an undecided voter, but I can see the obvious slant in bias towards Senator Obama, by CNN, leading up to New Hampshire. Although, ever since the instance Senator Clinton got "emotional", she has completely dominated all news networks. I did find it odd though, that no news site talked about Bill Clinton crying in New Hampshire shortly after Hillary gave her victory speech. For those of you that haven't seen it, you can find it on You Tube. I just find it strange that we use the time that Senator Clinton crying to springboard this procession line of "feeling". I mean, if we're going to cover it so much, let's not leave out former President Clinton's "emotion" too.
I am leaning towards Senator Obama I must admit, even though I do believe Senator Clinton is a fine candidate. I not only believe that he can work with Dems & Repubs alike, but have read about his ability to do so in his short tenure in the Senate. Though Senator Clinton is a great woman, I have not seen such an ability from her record in the Senate thus far. This shows me that Senator Obama has a certain ability to work with both parties to serve a common goal.
Additionally, Senator Obama has a rather impressive level of experience thus far in the Senate. He is involved with more Committees than Senator Clinton and has displayed a greater ability to be more involved while in his position of Senator. He is on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee along with 3 of it's subcommittees. So to those that doubt his foreign policy experience, take notice. On the other hand, Senator Clinton is not any any of these committees although she is on the Armed Services Committee.
Further, he as well as Senator Clinton are on the Committee for Health, Labor & Pensions so they are both directly involved with deciding on issues heavily impacting our economy and healthcare. Please, I urge all voters to read up on each of the candidates and not succumb to soundbytes and TV anchors spoonfeeding us with their biased viewpoints. I realize that we all work, most of us have families to look after, etc., but we cannot allow ourselves to be swept away with these talking points and dirty politics. Our votes are too important to be undermined like this. They underestimate our intelligence. Though, the argument can be made that some of the candidates do too. I think we can change the way the media and government view us and attempt to exploit our vote. We are better than this…

She wasn't crying!!! She was showing alittle emotion but she nevered cried. Someone needs to be crying about the thought of Obama winning and making us suffer even worse than we already are. And if you are convienced that they are tears, I would rather have a woman cry when she is upset, than a man that goes to pointless war…

who cares, who this woman picked

So who cares!!

I have to give to Hillary though–an Academy Award for most appropriately timed tearful reaction to stress in theatre!!

A reply to Ms. Reinhardt a few comments below:

I hope you see the irony of your comment about the replaying over and over of a brief snippet of video having perhaps turned the results in Clinton's favor: is this not paradigmatic of how politics has worked for the past 20 years in the United States? Sound bites, brief shows of emotion and candidness, repetition of poignant moments that tug people's heartstrings? (Incidentally, to the other commenter below who made the 'hearts vs. minds' distinction, we should not go back to an Enlightenment rationalism where only Reason determines who should be the best candidate; if that were the case, Ralph Nader would have been elected years ago, for he is the most Reasonable candidate to have run for president since FDR…but I'll leave you to decide whether he would have made a great president).

The thought of being critical at THIS point in US political history of 'one clip' turning a tide is laughable and sad simultaneously. Ms. Reinhardt, do you recall the words "national security", "national tragedy", "never letting this happen to Americans again", "war on Iraq", "with us or against us", "you did a great job, Brownie", and millions of others that I don't have time or heart to post, repeated millions of times to the point where it makes us all want to barf? I say, if the Democrats can finally figure out how to make the "sound-bite" work for them, then more power to 'em cuz it's the only way to win an election in the post-caring, hyper-individualist, "be nice to fellow Americans on the street solely because you don't know which of them is packing heat" political culture (if you can even call it that) 21-century carnival that is America. The divide in America for 90% of the population isn't over religion/politics, southern/northern culture, pulling out of/staying in Iraq, the national debt, universal health care, or any of the other issues the media harps on daily. It boils down to two alternatives: do I get to drive carefree to work daily in my SUV with my Starbucks coffee sitting in the cup-holder while I watch my investments grow so I don't have to worry about my kids not being able to afford to get into the University of Michigan so they can have the exact same life we worked to give them (fill in the blanks with your own personal version of the same story) or do I care that the planet will likely not support life in 150 years if I keep focusing on these same stupid, unimportant, and blatantly selfish concerns?

Lower case cathy: I would think that at some point in your education one of your professors might have explained that multiple exclamation points is not standard English. During a debate, the way you present and frame your argument is more important in many cases than the words you say by themselves. Alas, our failed education system at work again.

But I digress — the person who compared Obama to Hilter violated one of the most ancient of Internet laws, known as Godwin's Law. At that point it became obvious that this entire thread had descended into wankery and they had ceased to be debating and merely became a troll. No further commentary was necessary on my part, because you should never feed the trolls.

I really don't hate Hillary. Really, I don't. She's a strong woman, which is a rare and fine thing in society. I do however take offense to the way she has adjusted her campaign to match the message people want to hear, rather than the message she really represents. Obama has been about changing Washington since the day he set foot in the capitol. The former FLOTUS doesn't want to change anything, she wants to return to the glory days of the nineties. Unfortunately, we cannot go back in time. That's not change, that's rebound. It is not what America needs, and it is not what will be in the best interest of the country. A good friend of mine recently said he is supporting Hillary because she will be able to assemble an administration within a week of returning to the Capitol. (Since when do we elect our leaders based on their ability to pick an administration? Although if we had had foresight for Bush & Co. back in 2000 we might have picked differently.)

Anyway, your post servers to remind that allowing myself to denigrate to petty insults on a message board is not what Obama wants from his campaign. He asked his supports and his advisors to never sink to the levels that Clinton and her cohorts always stoop — to confuse the personal with the important. In the end, my opinion, your opinion, and the opinion of everyone on the ticker is not important. Only our vote is. Bashing Hillary won't make people vote for Obama, and bashing Obama won't make people vote for Hillary.

Hillary wants to crush the Republican party. Obama wants to work with them.

In the end that is the reason I support Obama.

The lady that ask the question was smart enough not to fall to false tears, women have emotions we all know, even when the husband almost destroyed their marriage in white house, she never blink an eye, common people; she got good advisers, The told her and she listens , and it works, good job.

I find it odd that she shed tears over a question that was planted and none when Bill was caught cheating. Crocodile tears will bite her in her butt.

We should elect a President who will best serve this country even if they are a man, woman, black or white but not because they are a man, woman, black, or white. I was very disappointed in Hillary and more so in the people who voted for her because of her display of emotion. Would she of had the same emotion for the same question if she had won in Iowa? What if a leader from Russia, North Korea, China, or Venezuela had ask Hillary the same question would she become teary eyed? Teary eyed will not get us very far in a world full of terrorism.

America! looking at the facts, Hillary Clinton is what we need now. She and her Husband had done it before let them do it again. Do not be blind folded with words of mouth; let us give her chance. Don't be stupid and waste that vote. Wake up America!!!

The only reason it may seem she has more luggage is because she had more time to build it up. Now both Edwards and Obama are just as guilty for taking shady campaign contributions. If you look on CNN's website, you will discover that Obama and Clinton have about the same amount in donations and mainly from special interest groups. As far as honesty, well, both Edwards and Obama were busted in the debate when they overstated (i.e., lied) their most significant accomplishment. People get it through your heads…NO ONE RUNNING FOR OFFICE HAS A SQUEAKY CLEAN BACKGROUND!!! NOT Edwards, Clinton, or Obama, or any Republican candidate either, Capece? I will say this, as a lifelong Democrat, in all good faith I cannot leave our country to the hands of an unqualified candidate. Therefore, if Obama wins, I will vote Republican (and have a couple selected already) and am encouraging everyone I know to do the same, because it is irresponsible to give the highest position in our country to the most under qualified candidate. We can't afford it and it is not the time to gamble with someone who will be training on-the-job. Not even McDonald's would do this for their managerial position. Wake up and smell the coffee! Want inspirational poems that will lead you to greatness…READ and get educated on your potential candidates. Stop wasting your time trying to figure out if she made it up or not, everything said about this subject (i.e., her welling eyes) is pure and simple speculation.

As for the lady who attempted to falsely accuse Hillary of setting up two men to protest her candidacy as a woman yelling, “Iron my shirt!” at her last speech, know that Obama also had 20 anti-abortion protestors yelling, “abortion is an abomination!” in his last speech that evening. Was he setting us up too? OMG!!!! Can't be…he's our hero! Take off the goggles.

Politicians will always be politicians. Our government by construction will corrupt even the most well-intended individuals (I here this a lot from those in academia). So, until we formally organize and revolt against our government by protesting at the foot of the Congressional Building, like MLK did (it takes a non-Washington linked person from outside to create this change, and Obama isn’t it based on his documented shady record), nothing will happen. One man can’t clean our dirty laundry, it takes a colony and “we (the people)” not Washington will have to organize it. So what I am saying is that, when you have those weekends off, organize people and get involved so that we can stop wasting our time complaining and start doing something about – action over rhetoric…it starts at home.

Please note:Cathy with a capitol, that I am a highly educated young woman also.I do not have an unstable personality.I was giving my opinion as I see it with excessive exclamation points.I think bashing me for not using a capitol letter and exclamation points is how to sully our shared name.I can't believe you would bash me for that because I support Hillary.I did not see you bash the person who wrote Obama=hitler.

It's sad to see that American politics has become so pedestrian that entire articles and pages of blogs are dedicated not to what matters – each candidates stance on issues – but rather to insignificant dialogue over a few tears!? I understand that politics, especially in America, is in large part, a popularity contest, but I fear for this nation when voters cast their ballot solely on these superficial factors and not on the issues. As someone trying to choose a candidate who I feel will represent my beliefs and the direction I would like to see this country take, it is hands down Clinton. OK, everyone touts 'Obama for change' but what does that look like? What does that represent besides a catchy campaign slogan? Let's looks at the issues here: for example, Clinton wants to increase the amount of paid leave for new parents, which is something this country is groslly lacking and is the only industrialized country in the world whose government does not provide enough of! The result, America has the highest rate among violence in children! These are the issues that voters need to base their ballot on. Let's prove to the rest of the world that American politics is not just a glorified popularity contest but rather, as a nation, we have the intellect to vote on real issues that actually have substance and meaning.

"Lewis" – My thoughts exactly! Rudy WILL WIN! I am a staunch Catholic and hated Bill Clinton for his lack of morals and decency – not to mention his liberal crap – and I'm not very happy with Rudy for his behavior, but there is a one difference – Rudy wasn't in the White House and inviting Hollywood celebs to do the nasty in the Lincoln bedroom (Danny DeVito and his wife "tearing up the place"). I know Rudy will do America proud! He did a lot for NYC – which says a lot – crime was down and that says even more for NYC. Obviously the people of NYC loved him – he was a Republican mayor in a democratic city! He handled 9/11 better than anyone else could have handled that situation. Obama has ZILCH experience and Hillary can't use the argument that she's beein in the White House. Chefs have been in the White House, but you don't see them running for president. It's time for Rudy!

Now that this charade is over, watch the Clinton secret police start ripping into Obama and dig up every piece of dirt imaginable. That's what the Clinton's do best. Hillary for President? I'd sooner vote Granny for Possum Queen.

It is unfortunate so many feel that a small display of emotion is a sign of weakness. I'm not necessarily a Hillary supporter, but I believe truly strong people don't hide behind a "tough" exterior. Leading is about showing the people in your constituency that you can handle the tough situations, but it's not easy!! It's not like she fell to pieces. You go Hillary, and other candidates, let us see what's in there, for real, not the crap we get in the commercials!!!!!!!

The sad thing is, she was crying for herself. It was all about "me" and not about the voters or the nation. It would have been one thing had it been an outbreak of emotion or empathy towards the people, but it was a moment of realization that HER quest to the Presidency was in trouble.

OMG….what is WRONG with all of you. All these 'media' opportunities that have everyone 'thinking' about who should do what and how they should vote is INSANE! You must be crazy to think that all of these people are planted and staged by the candidate or their competition….right?

If any of you are smart, you best review the history of each candidate and how they have conducted themselves in public office. Sure Clinton has got a couple more years of actual service on capitol hill, but how can this be a rational way to determine if Obama or Hillary get a vote?

Look at their histories and NOT who is capable of orchestrating an 'emotional' event for the camera.

Unfortunately, neither one of them have much foreign policy experience, nor have been very successful with such affairs. So…if world affairs being 'corrected' or being improved is something you are concerned with, maybe you should look at these credentials and not if someone can 'fake-a-tear'.

Another reason why I sometimes think there should be a litmacy test for anyone to vote! Although…I am not entirely serious……but do you get my point???

The MEDIA is responsible for unecessary and irresponsible reporting on the whole Obama 'thing' as well. Never have I seen such ridiculous behavior. The media is getting bolder and more biased than ever before these days. THANK YOU 24 HOUR NEWS. 95% of the time we are listening to someone's 'opinion' rather than facts. They have some much time on their hands to fill air space, they stick anyone and their camera to spout incredulous things from their collective mouths. HOW ABOUT reporting voting histories of candidates, what things they have supported before thier campaigns, and how they have changed since???

Any takers?

Lets face it America, until lobbyists are not deciding our next president…we will just have to guess the lesser of two evils.

Get off the bandwagons and use your brains!!! Do your research.

God help us

How is it possible that a woman has held the highest political position in a Muslim country but not in the U.S.? Maybe a woman's perspective could help us sort out some of our long standing domestic issues, education, health care, focus on family. Not in the lie like a politician way which we have grown so accustomed to!

Very tired of a male dominated press telling us what is important. (CNN finally started to cover the horrible rapes in Saudi – the country where women have NO freedom of movement at all)

Am sick of reading and seeing in the press the lack of women around the world not given freedom of movement in some countries, being mutilated, raped and all manner of atrocities and yes, want to see a woman pres! Dems or Repubs, whoever gives that to me first is going to get my vote. Don’t give me any more of this too much, too little emotion crap. We are passionate about we believe in. We express ourselves differently from men and from each other.

Got it?

I don't understand why this is deemed a significant news story. Why should we care about who a specific person voted for just because they asked a question of a candidate?! The coverage and spin sure seem to be intentionally anti-Clinton. I hope the media prejudice will continue to backfire.

I don't understand why all the venom against Hillary about this. I don't know if I'll vote for her or not, but this wasn't about her being President. It was a personal (and human) response to a personal question. Whether it was genuine or not – what do I care? Am I to assume every deed committed or word spoken by a candidate (or current President) is genuine? The answer to that should be clear. And in spite of that, as a concerned and informed voter, I need to figure out who will make the best President. And I would hope that he or she cries sometimes, because there's plenty to cry about.

As far as her immediate mudslinging which followed – so what. Mud is flying in every direction in this campaign, and it's equally shared by all the candidates. Are Hillary's actions calculated in this campaign? They better be if she wants to be President. Show me a President whose actions weren't calculated. Lots of failed candidates maybe, but no Presidents.

Believe me, Obama is the candidate to watch out. He's the President people of America so much desire and not another crying woman of a particularly dynasty/bloc.

Do we really want a president that cries when things get tough. I think this electoral process helps to weed out the weak ones, yet this time it seems showing weakness helped her.

Is it just me….or does anyone else agree that CNN is totally anti-Clinton?? Of course Obama makes excellent speeches, he's trying to become President. That doesnt mean he has the experience to run this country.

Her Health Care plan failed because it doesnt WORK. Works nice in theory but in reality it doesnt cut it. (Hey! Just like communism!)

Forget the idea of ANY Democratic president..
If Obama, OR Clinton ( heck, even a couple of the rep's too) win then we can kiss our freedoms and constitutions goodbye completley, as they will be more eroded than they already are…

Pretty soon we will be as helpless as the U.K…. Or France…

Political correctness becomes an infringement upon the first amendment, these crazy whacky "gun bans" and other stupid laws that dont prevent criminals from ANYTHING dont work, the patriot act, YOU NAME IT!

Anyone else here been pulled over and had their vehicle searched for no reason other than "The patriot act says I can?"

Cmon people, please realize that our rights are only one election, one vote away from being taken away.. I love this country but if we keep losing our freedoms, we may as well move to Cuba… Healthcare, food, you name it, its provided, but there are no freedoms… Just sheep in s herd….

That isnt the picture painted in my mind of MY America…

Mark Steel in the Independent summed it up very well for me:

What a magnificent speech by Hillary Clinton, where she broke down in tears and spluttered, "Lots of people think elections are about who's up and who's down, but this is very personal for me. I've had such opportunities from this country."

At first glance it makes so little sense I thought if you chucked in a perpendicular and a polyunsaturate it could be one of Neil Kinnock's. But when you look again it's the scream of an articulate four-year-old. She's saying "Let ME be President because I WANT to. LET me LET me it's not FAIR." Maybe there's a bit they didn't show, where she said "And furthermore I say to Mr. Obama 'Hnnnng, yaaaaaaa go AWAY," and tips up a camera, and then Bill arrives to say "Now stop this at ONCE or you can't even be senator, do you understand?"

Most people seem to think this was a deliberate act, to win popularity by appearing human and vulnerable. Maybe at her next press conference she'll come on with a puppy. And her speech will be "This is Rosie." Then, fighting back tears she'll say "And this afternoon she's got to be put down. God bless America." And then the hall will fill up with balloons. Then, during a televised debate she'll respond to a question about energy policy with a botched suicide attempt.

But there may be other reasons why her campaign's slipped, which is she claims to be the best candidate to bring about "Change" from the days of Bush, but she's supported almost everything he's done, including the invasion of Iraq. Now she says she'll "Bring the troops home" so presumably her statement will be "When the war was popular I supported it. Then when it was unpopular I opposed it. So I am the only candidate who's consistently voted with the American people."

She supported the bombing of Lebanon, and her only criticism of Bush while he was planning to bomb Iran was that he "downplayed their threats". She also urged him to categorise the entire Iranian army as a "terrorist organisation". So she must be the only person in the world who thinks "We need a change – because Bush hasn't bombed enough places or called enough people terrorists."

If she ends up getting the Democrat nomination, she and the Republicans could get in a fascinating battle to see who can call most people terrorists. The CNN debate will involve the two of them stood there all evening taking turns to shout "Cubans" – "Syrians" – "Anyone who supports Chavez", until they get to Eskimos and the disabled.

This may be why, of all the candidates for either party, Hillary has received more donations from arms companies than any other. Because at last she might bring the change that's needed, and be a president prepared to take care of the impoverished arms companies. The Bush era has been lean hungry years for those poor souls. It's been their version of the dustbowl, weapons manufacturers forced to traipse across Oklahoma begging for someone to buy their withered laser-guided Tomahawk missiles so they can feed their children for another night.

But Hillary's prepared for change. Which is why the person she's suggested would be her Secretary for State is Richard Holbrooke, who first came to prominence when he helped organise the Indonesian invasion of East Timor. So the only change would be the return of people who fronted atrocities 20 years ago. It would be like if someone took over the BBC with the slogan "It's time for change" and brought back Noel's House Party.

Hillary's other slogan involves her "experience", proving she'd be "ready from day one". But her main experience as "First Lady" involved her plan to provide health care. After eight years in the job there was no plan, because the health companies objected it would dent their profits, and less people had health care than before. So by that logic Steve McLaren should ring the FA and demand his old job back, complaining, "This new manager can't be trusted, as unlike me he's not got any experiencing of buggering everything up."

There's a myth about the Clintons' rule, shaped by the times that followed them, that it was a period of peace and friendship, with occasional fun in the Oval Office. But the Clintons were crucial figures in shaping the idea that big business was not only the best way to run the world, it was the only way. Under their rule, the poor became poorer while the rich became super-rich.

Possibly the greatest hope for America lies not with Hillary, or Obama, but from the opposition to the war in Iraq, without which it's possible they'd have already bombed Iran, as suggested by Hillary.

And if her tearful act does rescue her campaign, Gordon Brown might try a similar tactic. In which case he'll splutter, "Lots of people think, ahem, economies are about (sniff) what's up and down, (pause) but (sniff) this is a deeply felt re-evaluation of fiscal indicators tending towards declining global growth requiring sustainable prudence within a homogenised market, and that's deeply personal for me (howl, splutter, sniff)."

I have seen her emotional before and I don,t think she was putting on

I don't believe you people. You say Hillary is made of stone – a cold fish. Then when she shows some emotion you say it's fake and contrite. Make up your mind.
Obama is a very charismatic speaker but that qualification is not necessarily the most important qualification for the President of the United States. And the backing of Oprah is even less important – unless he's written a book.

So if Bill cries, he's empathetic but if Hillary tears up, she's weak/manipulative. Some double standards never die, do they?

Ok, Im sorry but Im going to say it, I dont want a UNIFIER. This is what Democrats try to do every time they get into office, they try to unite the country. Havent you all realized that unity is impossible in America and the only reason Democrats have not been successful at any policy objectives ie Universal Health Care etc is because they always want to be friends. I want a president who will fight for what my party believes in and if some Americans dont agree with it (ie Republicans) then to hell with them. They had their turn and now it is ours. Ok yeah you might call me some evil bastation of the devil but when Republicans are in charge do you ever hear of unity with other parties NO and that is why America is run by big business and people can not get basic health care. Yeah Yeah unity blah blah blah. Look if Obama wins the party nomination he will lose the presidency, I dont care who the Republican running mate is they will tear him to shreds particularily on the issue of experience. Clinton at least can keep up with the rest of them and get something accomplished that will be in line with our Democratic ideals.

It's amazing the almost cult-like following people have for Obama, that he has practically brain-washed his followers into thinking that he can do no wrong, that he can "mesmerize" people with his speeches, to the point that they refuse to recognize his flaws, which are many, not to mention his very unimpressive record. If you were hiring someone to protect your family, to ensure their safety, would you go for the person who gives the most "electric" speech, giving you hope and joy, or would you go with experience???? It's ridiculous.

Clinton's moment was real, you couldn't script that situation even if you wanted to. And if you accuse her of being an "actor", then what the heck do you call Obama???? Every speech, every appearance of this man, is a PERFORMANCE, he is portraying himself as a reasonable candidate for President, and he derserves an Oscar, as he is so convincing that there are many who believe his performance. Hopefully for the sake of the safety of your family and mine, and the security of our country, the voters of the US will realize that Obama is an Actor, and a fake, and Hillary is the REAL THING, who will save our country. Clinton is Change, Clinton is Hope, Clinton will save America.

It is even more interesting to hear some of Obama supporters reasons to support him…HE ELECTRIIFIES THEM…..oh really…attend TONY ROBINS seminar….you will be even more electrify than by OBAMA…..you guys are so pathetic…almost like 5 year old in a candy store.

Let me say this…… it was an act! HIllary does not empathize with ordinary women but sees herself as better than that. I love Bill and Hillary. I voted for Bill. BUT, as time passes, I see them both as opportunists. Both of them have an undying "love" for each other that is directly correlated to their ambition and their scathing remarks about Obama's lack of "experience" are a bit of hogwash….. Yes, he isn't as old as Hillary but we have had many young Presidents and leaders who changed this country for the better by their example and boldness. I'm offended by the Clintons' smug attitude that they somehow DESERVE to win. The arrogance of it all makes me sick. This is what makes me a little worried about liberals…. I've seen it in my prior career as a banker and now in my life as a stay-home mom….they don't have a problem giving a few token positions to Black people but aren't yet interested in letting Blacks run the show. Many older and poorer Blacks in the Democratic party are used to this different kind of slavery and it is so much a part of their psych that they can't shake it. "Second-best" suits them just fine as they don't want to see too many successful Blacks (with real power). That would require them to evalute their own shortcomings and to take more responsibility for the Black community's problems. The sad truth is….. the purveyors of the old rhetoric who show up at Black churchs and cry might prevail to the nomination……

Two simple points –

1. Hillary did not cry. Being slightly emotional, is not crying.

2. If anyone thinks the Republicans will play nice if Obama is the nominee, they are drinking or smoking something that is clouding their thought process.

in 100 years when people look back at the presidents during a 24 or 28 year period, they will see: BUSH-CLINTON-BUSH-CLINTON. this wouldn't be surprising if this were an developing country corruptly run by a few families, but in AMERICA?? i just believe that the country needs fresh ideas

I sure hope she doesn't start crying when a foreign affairs meeting gets rigorous.

GIVE ME A BREAK. I COULD SEE RIGHT THROUGH THOSE FAKE TEARS OF HILLARY. THIS WOMAN PUT ON A GREAT ACT TO SWING THE VOTE HER WAY. SOUNDS LIKE AN IDEA FROM HUBBY BILL. WE NEED TO ELECT THE CANDIDATE WHO CAN MAKE DECISIONS FOR OUR COUNTRY WITH CONFIDENCE. MORE IMPORTANTLY, OUR NEXT PRESIDENT MUST BE ON THE OFFENSE AGAINST TERRORISM. WE CAN'T AFFORD TO ELECT A PRESIDENT WHO ISN'T. THIS WILL ONLY SHOW US TO BE A WEAKENING COUNTRY, AN INVITATION TO THE TERRORISTS TO STRIKE US AGAIN.

EXPERIENCE!!!! WHAT EXPERIENCE!!!

People can u tell me what experience Hillary Clinton has? 35 years i heard her say…so how old is she? so u mean to tell americans that u have been trying to bring change in the U.S for 35 years and with no success.That makes me to think that ur concepts weren´t working…in that case try something else!!! try the Obama method.

So being a presidents wife is what u add to ur credentials as being experience? i need proof of experience!!!

Let me tell u a little bit about Obama´s experience.After Havard where he was the first black president of theHavard law review ( People we all know Havard is predominantly white) he chose to settle in South Chicago to help and serve the needy rather than a well furnished, AC conditioned office….That´s the field experience that the future president of the United states need…not the experience gathered in lobby parties and etc.

I was in Germany during Bush last visit here…it wasn´t advice to be recognised as american.That´s the image of america out there.People have got enough of the establishment.They want something new;and accross the world Voices are rising to support Obama candidature.That´s the new image that America will gain by electing Obama as president.He is higly appreciated in and out of the U.S.

Take time to learn for urself.visit his web site.it´s just a mouse click away.

Get over ur fears,race,comfort zone and DO THE RIGHT THING

ALL FOR OBAMA

The USA media is putting the corrupt news media in the developing countries into shame. The emphasis are on the trivia like Hillary's 'teary eyed' almost comical to its oblivious attempt to manipulate the public. Just as ardently during the IOWA caucuses, this time I listened to both Obama's and Hillary's speeches to see what caught Iowan’s in frenzy over his speech and why practically the media has ignored even to sight some of what Hillary was hammering about that she did since she stepped up on the political plate with her husband.

Obama's speech before the New Hampshire electors was a repeat of his speech in IOWA. He did not send them into frenzy like the IOWANS. Hillary, on the other hand, talked of factual progress she had achieved through her collaborations with republican senators from North Carolina and South Carolina, thus passing bills that benefited children who formerly could not get insurance benefits. She also prevented the Bush Jr. Administration attempt to cut short the benefits he promised the returning veterans from Iraq. The news reporters are not emphasizing these achievements of Hillary, instead are focusing on trivia used to maligned and denigrated women in general.

To me, and I am sure to millions of Americans, Hillary Clinton embodies women of substance, intelligence, competence and education. She is an empowered woman of vision and aspirations to help solve the problems of this country.

BE FAIR AND PLEASE BE OBJECTIVE: THIS I ASKED OF THE REPORTERS, THE PUNDITS, THE TALKING HEADS, THE ANCHORMEN, AND THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY. LET'S ASK THE RIGHT QUESTION AND LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED IN KNOWING WHO BARACK OBAMA REALLY IS BEFORE WE ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO ADULATE AND GET ON FRENZILY WITH HIM.

Change is achieved brick by brick, not overnight. Hillary and her husband, two wonderful citizens of this country have long started laying out those bricks. We should not forget what they have done, what they had suffered in the hands of their political enemies.

The day New Hampshire nominated Hillary against the prediction of CNN pundits and anchormen, (the only television channel I thought is still believable but I am seriously in doubt about that now) is the day my faith is restored about the intelligence and the fairness of the American people.

Sumi Cue

There are lot ov Obama Volunters on this board who are posting negative comments about HIllary. Some of them are repeating same crap over and over again. Because they know CNN reads this. CNN is stupid enough to make their opinion base on this. That is why they were so confident that Obama will win NH. When results came in then real voters spoke……..all of you OBAMA volunter get a life.

Is she going to cry in the White House? Or – is it all for show? The big CON!

But, if a OBAMA, McCain or Huckabee was asked the same question – and started to cry – the "Not Fit" for the job would be everywhere!!!! Double standard?????

If she cannot control her emotions during the campaign how will she endure the stress and pressure presidency? Strength and stability is a necessity, emotional displays have no place in the business world no less the White House.

Wonder what the pay off was for that woman. That felt very much like it was staged. Clinton represents corruption and a continuation of what we presently have in our country. I don't want another four or eight years of what we already have.

As an independent, I will vote for Obama in general elections if he gets the nomination. I will never vote for Hillary. Rather, I will vote for any Republican candidate. We cannot stand another 4-8 years of strict Partisan politics with Clintons. Republicans hate them. Half of Democrats cannot stand them. Many voters find them only polarizing. Not to mention, they know how to look in the eye, lie and lie!! Remember: Father Bush vice presidency 8 years+Father Bush presidency 4 years+Clintons 8 years+ GWBush 8 years. Now another 8 years with Clintons. Well, America should do better. Though, Clintons (I include Bill as well) will possibly get the nomination causing lots of blood bath within the Democratic party. However, Republicans will get the presidency. None of the top runners in Republicans seem to have strict partisan agenda like GWBush and Clintons. We need both parties and all Americans get together. Issues will never be solved if a president is incapable if reaching the both side of the aisle. Well, all will be decided by Democrats. Ironically, Democrats will decide whether the next president will be a Republican or a Democrat!

Just because a woman shows her human side, some people take it as weakness. How stupid. I was glad to see her be real. It has to be pretty hard to face all those men on that panel giving her a run for her money. I have alot of respect for her.

According lot of people who attend Obama's rally, HE makes them cry….really…how about Michael Jackson…did he made lot of people cry during his performances….what happen….so are we looking for president who can get thinks done or someone who is phony playing with peoples emotions……what a bunch a crock

I don't think tears had anythng to do with it – the DIEBOLD fix is back.

I remember the nineties when Clinton was in office and they were much better times than either Bush era. I think 95 % of politicians are corrupted or just bad for the average citizen, but I believe that some of them are worse. Either way, Hillary or Obama would be relief from the last 7+ years.

In addition all of the Clintonista's keep claiming experience. BS. What experience? You are all liars!!! If expereience was what you were looking for, you would have voted for Biden who has way more experience than anyone else.

Also, be careful with those claims to experience. It could get you in trouble when you end up running against McCain, a man with real experience!!!

Reading your comments as you Obamans and Clintonians hack away at each other just makes me proud to be a Republican.

PEOPLE:::PEOPLE:::::Take a deep breath…take a brake….stop shooting.

Please let me hold your weapon for some minutes while u visit this

website:www.barackobama.com come one take a chance and read something

about the guy.At least he deserves it before u start shooting at him.

All of you Hilliots out there complaining that people are swayed by Obama's ability to speak. YES, speaking is important. It is why your beloved Bill Clinton was elected. It was why Ronald Reagan got elected and why JFK got elected. Communication skills are important. Have been, always will. So don't start beating up Barack because he is eloquent!!!

Randal, I'm sorry to tell you, but the being President of the United States is NOT the most important job on this planet.

The turning point for me was the sterling performance of Senator Clinton during the debate last week. She pointed out the 'work done' by her as opposed to the mere rhetoric of her opponents. She is sincere in her beliefs and is capable.In addition she is a she and this should be a cause for all decent men and women to appreciate and applaud.

This is a good glimpse into the heart and soul of a Democratic voter in this country – voting on emotion and feeling, rather than logic and intellect. It seems like every election comes down to that – a choice between the heart and the head. I think it was Winston Churchill who said, "If a man is conservative before the age of 30, he has no heart; if he is a liberal after 30, he has no head".

It really worries me how many people choose a candidate based on personal qualities rather than their ability to do the job. It's not like the president is going to be coming to their house every week for a backyard barbecue so I really don't see why most personal qualities matter. When selecting a president, we should be choosing the person who will best run the country. I don't care whether or not I'd want them to be my best friend because they're not going to be! Choosing someone you'd like to have at a party over someone who can steer the country in the right direction is a recipe for disaster. Exhibit A: In 2000, Americans chose the folksy, personable candidate over the stiff intellectual one and look where that got us.

Its sad, but Hillarys award winning acting and the endless press coverage, carried the primary for her. Maybe next time we can get both Hillary and Bill to cry on cue–that would be memorable. And the press would never stop covering it.

If hillary wins shes gonna take away our guns. and wthout guns whats gonna stop someone from invaded

Go Edwards

I can't believe how much you people are arguing over clinton's tears. Who cares how or why or if she even cried. If you don't like her don't vote for her. Anyway anyone with half a brain in their head would see that Obama and Edwards are the only realistic candidates on the democratic side. Clinton has too much luggage. It is tempting to vote for her, as a woman, for obvious reasons. But she is not a good candidate to go up against whatever idiot is representing the GOP. This country, our reputation, economy, etc. is in shambles and needs to be fixed!!!!!!!

GO OBAMA!

She was plain exhausted from all the campaigning. Looks like if she becomes president we'll have one tearful president – it aint a tough job and if she can't handle a few weeks on the campaign trail what will 4 years do to her?

I think that her tears were primarily because she realized that people were seeing through the superficial mask she always wears. She's a politician. She is an ambitious woman who was calculating enough to stay with her husband through his "lack of integrity" scandal, to serve her own agenda. He owes her and now she has called it in… having him go out and do her dirty work attacking Obama (who Bill Clinton has always claimed to have a "deep respect" for) the last few days before the New Hampshire vote. I say, if you want to be president… act like a President (Obama could teach her how) and quit sitting around crying with a bunch of women and go out and do your own dirty work. What world leaders are going to take her seriously? None that I know of. If she gets elected, it will be a shock to me. She keeps talking about experience, but has been in the Senate about the same time as Obama. She is running on her husband's popularity, not her own. I am a woman, but I refuse to elect a woman president unless she is a woman of integrity and substance and vision. I have not seen evidence of that. I have seen evidence that she is a politician who has devoted her life to politics and bieng successful in that arena. Furthermore, credible surveys say that over half of Americans have said that they will NEVER vote for Hillary Clinton. She is as hated by Conservatives as Bush is by Liberals, and I think that Obama has gotten as many votes as he has because people realize that electing her would just cause more gridlock in Washington. I have always been registered as an independent, but voted Republican. The exception has been this primary season, when I voted for Obama. Most of my Independent and Republican friends have done the same and I think that says more than a few tears and sending your husband on the attack in your place. Enough, already.

Hillary Clinton has always come across to me as very arrogant. I think the reason she was moved to tears is because her ego could not stand to be losing – as she was in the polls days before the New Hampshire primary and after a stunning setback in Iowa. I don't think it had anything to do with her caring about the country. It was her deeply wounded pride.

I am so sick of the gang bashing of Hillary.
Let her run.
Let Obama run
Let all the candidates run and forget the negativitiy.
Most people are so tired of it all from both parties, but the Democratic
Party has been the worse.
All the Democrats want the same thing, the old America back. The good America.
Obama is using his new voice to win over some.
Do not vote on emotions from the heart, but use your head and think.
Hillary is a real person, not what the news have told people to believe.
Every living person has emotions.
People voted for Hillary because she is a tough individual.
No mention of Romney's tears during the campaign.
Hillary has been attacked so much she has to be tough on the outside.
Good for her , good for America.
We need experience and brains in the White House, not good old back slapper types.

I guess she wasn't buying the "spontaneous" display of emotion. I would like to believe that Sen. Clinton was genuine but she and her husband have done too many things on the knife-edge of shady that I cannot. Plus, given the convenient timing my immediate reaction was a groan of disgust and a hope that voters would not fall for it.

I am all for a female President but she must be honest, genuine and without a checkered past.

Voters: please, please do not fall for the teary, well-timed acts of desperation. These people are well known for doing and saying anything to get votes — honestly or not.

The Democratic party has a rare opportunity to put forth an incredibly intelligent, highly ethical, honest and decent candidate who is also gifted with a high degree of practical decision-making, management skill and a steep learning curve.

Let's not screw-up this opportunity. Please vote for Sen. Obama.

Did Bill Clinton raise racial issues against blacks? NO. Did Hillary cry? NO. In the individual choice of candidates to back, objectivity counts. That is the only thing that benefits a nation.

People…..she did NOT cry. She became emotional, expressed it and answered a question from the peanut gallery as genuinely as she could. Before you go bashing what could be the best thing that's ever happened to this country, ask yourselves if you could endure the tremendous amount of pressure and commitment that it takes to run for public office. Seems to me if Hillary were a man, she wouldn't be taking such a public beating.
All the sour grapes should pipe down…she won in NH, 'nuff said.

What we need as a country is not someone who chokes up because it is "hard" or "tiresome". Our country has a projected $53 TRILLION dollar national debt. Yes, $53 TRILLION!! What are any of the candidates saying about that?! This is much more important than "how are you holding up?" Clinton is full of it, and everyone knows it. She's a lawyer trained to convince a jury of a clients point, not whether the client is truthful or lying. She will NOT work for the average American, she will work for whatever special interest helps (god help us all) get her elected.
Obama 08!

Mark
Texas

Oh please! How many times has Mr. Bush cried or shed a tear in office?!?!? Just because a person shows emotion doesn't mean they aren't fit to make executive decicions! And just because someone can deliver a speech well doesn't mean they can! Obama needs to have a lot more experience before I will EVER vote for him. This country needs someone with experience to fix the mess that we are in now. Enough with the talking, let's see some action! GO HILLARY!

It is tough to catch a break! I am getting pretty tired of the comments that because Hillary became emotional, she must be weak. These are probably the same people who wouldn't vote for her before because she seemed too "manly". If you don't want to vote for Hillary, that is your choice. But do not hold her under scrutiny because she is a woman. I saw a football player crying on TV last week because of how much a game meant to him, I guess that means he is weak too.

Following this year's primaries without exhibiting any form of bias is no doubt a tough one. Reading comments and opinion from people brings out different emotions at all times. However, i have observed that Clinton-haters are so extreme in their position against HRC that is a bit worrisome. Unfortunately, this unhealthy positions have been fuelled more by a bias media in the last couple of years. Watching the video where Senator Clinton purported cried, showed nothing but a quiver in her voice. The frenzy of reports and clips following this supposedly rare display showed nothing but a ploy to advertise how badly her loss in Iowa is (was) to her. Sadly or otherwise, this ploy back-fired!

I'll suggest that we all concentrate on issues that will drive growth, development, good health and propserity than for us all to play up venom and holier-than-thou concept that is engendering divisive politics and an unhealthy polity.

Clinton the actress doing her best work. The suckers in New Hampshire voted for her….

I see the lady who made her emotional didn't fall for it…

OMG! Why do people not see the real Hillary for what she is? She just wants to go back to the White House and finish stealing what she and Billy left behind 8 years ago! She had a chance to fix the health care system and FAILED! Bill had a chance to take out bin Laden and was too busy trying to get his you know what serviced and now we are engaged in this war everyone is or was against. FAILURE, that is how you spell CLINTON! Google – "Bill Clinton's failures" and read some interesting stuff. Remember, with her you get him! That question was a plant, no doubt about it. Look at history, the last senator we elected as President was Kennedy, a decent President but a womanizer none the less. Then a string of governors took over. How about letting a real leader take a shot at the job? Try being a Mayor of a major city and tell me this is an easy task! Rudy Guilliani is capable of getting a shot at running the country. He cleaned up one of the worst cities in America and help calm a nation with dignity and leadership after 9-11. Who cares about the divorces, as we all have our share of failed marriages. Some people are not as they seem when you marry them, the same is said about someone you elect as president. You actually think Obama will be good for this country? Think again! There is little about him that is American, even his name screams traitor to me. Think hard people and read about these people before casting your votes, TV makes people perform, and that is what we are getting, performances, not reality!

Thanks for setting the women's movement back 100 years with your phony-baloney tears, Hillary.

Clinton is so fake…. her tears, her speeches… her promises are all so fake… plus who wants a president who ends up in tears, you want someone to lead us not nurture us…

"O.K. Hillary it time to go to Plan C, we need you to dig deep, think back to the first time you saw Beaches…"

She got her 15 minutes of fame, let's move on!

By far she is the most EXPERIENCED candidate. Obama has gotten by so far on good looks. He has not lived the White House experience for 8 years, dealt with foriegn officials extensively, or given birth for that matter. This is 2007….it's time. The negative comments here are from men who have ego issues and would never want to see ANY woman in the White House. Get over it and yourselves!

Wayne of Greenville TX, you display the same dazzling logic as the neo-cons themselves when you ASSume that anyone who disbelieves Clinton's tears must be a neo-con. Maybe those who disbelieve her tears simply see her for what she is: PHONY!

The problem with the presidency is that anyone smart enough to do the job is too smart to take it.

The media does an excellent job of keeping voters focused on the important issues. Tears, gender, skin color, and religion outweigh everything but the ability to avoid slips of the tongue that can be magnified and taken out of context to embarrass the candidate. The survivor wins an election knowing that the media focus will shift to highlighting everything that is questionable. Sound decisions for the leader of our executive branch are based on how effectively the President can campaign and convince the media to make it the right decision in the eyes of the public.

If it bleeds, it leads! I encourage all of the candidates to accept the fact that this is how their actions in office will be portrayed. When the President gets a bloody nose, it far out shadows sound decisions made on the basis of ideals and integrity. America wants a hero. The media wants exciting press coverage.

HILLARY all the way. We love you. President Hillary Rodham Clinton Jan 09.
We in Ghana are praying for you. The God we serve used the foolish things of the world to confound the wise! It is finished.

Bush makes me feel….randy, baby!!!

If Clinton wins, we'll have a monthly 'period of instablilty' at the white house, and if she got emotional on a simple question from an undecided voter?! can you imagine how she would react to political pressure from places like Russia, China and the European Union? We need a strong and intelectual Candidate that will erase the Bush legacy and will make educated decisions when it comes to foreign policy and involvement and domestic issues such as the economy, education and health care. I will place my absentee ballot with the name of the candidate that firmly shows the attributes that a leader should have, and not the 'dog and pony show' character that all candidates have displayed so far.
Ed
Iraq.

Look back at funerals of well loved people and Hillary was bored
never shed a tear or even got teary eyed and now shes bawlin
WAKE UP America … she is playing you or attempting to for those
who will buy her act.
NOT THIS LITTLE GREY DUCK!

Hillary is about as superficial as it gets … and conniving. We have know that. Someone asks her a question about who does her hair, she gets all blubbery for less than 20 seconds, and then is immediately back on the attack. If it was true emotion, it was over what she felt was slipping from her grasp, and not some remorse over how much she had to offer the country. We know what she offers the country, we have seen it. And I for one am no Masochistic martyr that wants to suffer another four years while the Clintons employ our forbearance to massage their huge hedonistic egos!

Obama is a charismatic orator. It is possible to be a great orator & have no substance, i.e. experience. Any really good salesperson knows that. I shiver to think of what Russia's Putin could do to this dreamer!

Hillary was obviously doing this for effect. I can't believe anyone fell for it, and then to vote for her because of it is just unbelievable. I have always been a big supporter of President Clinton, but I'm tired of them and I think she's fake. Bring on Obama!

Bush makes me cry

So what if the tears were calculated? Don't you realize that everything in a political campaign is calculated? Every speech Obama makes is also calculated to stir up people's emotions. And he probably does not write those speeches himself, but is reading speaches written by other people. What's the difference between that and shedding a tear? Nothing – everything in a political campaign is calculated to stir up voters' emotions.

If only it were all about the issues.

If indeed, as I question it, Hillary did tear up, they were tears of longing for her former cook, maid and butler. I don't recall any truly capable female leaders wearing a flowered jacket to proclaim their qualifications. Golda Meier would not have been caught dead in such an outfit. Bad judgment to wear a flowered jacket.
Hillary is too girly and weak to be a leader. If she crumbles under the strain of the campaign, and gets hurt feelings when people don't like her, what would she do when people hate her and foreign nations threaten to bomb the US! A person should never be elected because people feel sorry for them, and any votes a candidate might get because they made people feel sorry for them, would counterfeit. Being President is blood and guts and strain, not a matter of whether your eyeliner is on straight. Hillary would be a repeat disaster for the United States.

I wouldn't believe anything that came out of either Cintons mouth and now eyes. They are a power hungry couple and that is why they stayed married. Two people who lie to the American people for a living.

This is such a dangerous time for the World that we need 'fresh blood' in the White House. These old standard Washington types have done enough damage. What do you have to lose? It seems to me it could hardly get worse, although good ol' boy George W. is trying hard to involve Iran and ignore the reccession and the climate change.

I am for Barak and Edwards and pray to God they become the new leaders of the 'Free World'.

This country is a mess.Experience is the most important factor in electing our next President..Hillary Clinton needs to get in there and get things back on track.Every-
thingis out of kilter.Our next President is going to have some serious business to take care of.We don't need someone in there playing around.We don't need rheteric
speaches we need jobs done day one.God help us if its not Hillary.

…. that's why McCain will win; because he's addressing the #1 problem we face today – nailing Usama Bin Laden. Once we are given the 'approval' to do that, the country will be safe. Ms. Clinton has already said she has no intention of fully protecting the country. McCain will let the professionals complete the task, his plan is viable. When UBL says he's coming to USA to completely Islamify our society, better take it seriously – unless you have lived and breathed the venom being spewed out there in the real world (not the cushy USA), Americans have no idea of the threat. You can't increase taxes or do anything else on the agenda if you don't have a functioning country.

EVERY NEOCON I KNOW WANTS OBAMA TO WIN. THE ONLY WAY NEOCONS HAVE A CHANCE OF WINNING IN '08 IS TO COUNT ON THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO SIMPLY WILL NOT VOTE FOR A BLACK PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

Hillary was told by her husband to find a time and place to cry so that she could get the sympathy vote. Nobody in my military believes she should be crying for America; we're all gonna survive without her 'help'. Very sad to see she thinks she could lead us, because we don't. It will backfire on her.

Hillary is always use to getting her way. In times of trouble or when things are not going quite her way she can't handle it and uses desperate measures. As a woman, I don't buy her tearful moment for a minute. Come on, she's been in the political spotlight for a very long time and has never showed any emotion. You're not fooling anyone Hillary.

"Everything" the Clintons have done and will do is fully and completely staged.
They are two phonies and if hillary goes into the WH you can turn the remainder of your paycheck over to the nonworking, baby making, drug snorting element
of our society.

Grace overland park kansas , very well said . Your first and second paragraph were spot on to how many feel about hillary. i do not hate the women ,, I just dont like they way she has rose to the top of the dem party hopeful's. I would welcome any women, race , or color as my next president if I thought that candidate had the experience and qualifications it took. What really caught my eye was your reference to condi Rice,, here's a women who happens to be black, that based on her resume alone may be the most qualified PERSON in the country today to lead this country. I feel that because of the one job she was appointed to by our current president she will never be taken seriously. What a shame !! She would have served any president who appointed her well and with honor and dignity, but because of what is happening at the current time she is being lumped in with the lies and deciet many feel the current administration is guilty of no matter how unsubstantiated or lacking in any real proof as to her role in it. To some she is guilty of doing her job too well !!! I hope as current events are written into history ,her part in our great nation will be seen favorably and her true colors will shine,, red, white , and blue

Obama recognizes he has a gift, and in a time of crisis, where there are gridlock, division, he decides to use his skills in the hope of bringing people together, get young people engaged, giving them hope.

How many of us after hearing that speech during the Democratic convention are so touched by his message.

Whether Obama will win or not will be up to the America people. Obama, however, has changed the world by his message. How many candidates are using the word 'change' now. After his loss in New Hampshire, he came out and inspire his troops w/ 'Yes, we can'.

He not only inspire people in this country. He inspire the world with his message.

I really wish people would vote for someone based on the issues. not because someone is republican.. democrat.. male female or black.

a local radio host in washington went to the Iowa Caucus. He said every minority was at the Obama table. voting for him just because he is black? true most females also did vote for hillary in NH..

I doubt many of the voters really know who they are voting for on any side.

Senator Clinton proved the “experts” wrong!!! She really has shown that substance, experience, and her "proven" ability for enabling change, along with a lifelong passion and experience in actually helping the majority of Americans, is what the voters care more about when choosing the best leader for this next critical term as president! Voters are not listening to the slanted views of the media "pundits" who care more about drama and a "story", rather than reporting the truth… Americans are smarter than the "sheep" they believe we are! The NH voters proved this!!!…

Thank goodness people are finally waking up and realizing that although Obama is a brilliant orator and nice person, he lacks the actual skill, leadership, experience, and ability to truly make change happen and lead our country… talk is cheap at this point – Look at his record as a State Senator in Illinois and in DC!!! Whenever he is presented with a difficult vote, he doesn't even take a stand – he votes "present”!!! He voted “present,” effectively sidestepping issues nearly 130 times as a state senator. On a sex crime bill, Mr. Obama cast the only vote in a 58-to-0 vote!! He barely has any record for doing much as a US Senator in Washington DC, but what is interesting is that he said he would vote against the Patriot Act, yet when he joined the US Senate, he voted for it!! He said he would vote against the Iraq war, and then voted for funding, AND, he SKIPPED a tough vote on Iran, distorted what the bill authorized, and criticized those who voted for it!! This does not show the true leadership that is required for creating the change we desperately need! He’s not the “outsider” that his campaign is trying to make him out to be – yes, he has fantastic speeches, but his record shows otherwise…it proves that he is more of the typical “sidestepping” polititian and lawyer that we have seen before, who lacks the “real” leadership to get things done. The Republicans will have a field day with Obama if he ever got lucky enough to win the Democratic ticket!!!

Rookies are not needed right now to run the country in the most important job in the world…. Remember the last "rookie" who used “likeability” without substance or experience to get elected? Back then, people liked GW Bush, they didn't care that he lacked experience because he talked in generalities and made us feel good. Well guess what, he won the White House and got us into this mess!! – GW Bush ran a very similar campaign as Obama, and his inexperience has been a disaster for our country!!…. Gore and Kerry warned all of us, but we didn’t listen. Obama can talk in generalities – anyone can do this, but he has no clear plan, no clear ideas, shows a lack of “true” leadership by avoiding difficult decision-making as proven by his actual voting record, and lacks the "real world" experience to deliver on his unsubstantiated promises and “generalities” for change…Hopefully people won't make the same mistake we made with Bush by believing in another rookie with Obama.

Americans will take this critical vote very seriously for 2008 by choosing the best person who has already proven she can lead with success, has already brought about "real" change, and can truly pull our country together to restore our reputation and our world position as the leaders we were once considered. With former President Bill Clinton by Hillary’s side, we will all prosper from such an amazing team that will help bring our country back from the difficulties that we have encountered with the Bush administration… especially with the economic difficulties and international issues we are already facing today and will face over the next few years. No more rookies and false impressions, folks – let's put the best team in the White House!! Senator Clinton is the "real" change Americans need! Go Hillary!!! The country believes in you and your ability to “truly” lead and enable “real” change as our next great President!!!

The entire election won't be fair to either Hillary or Obama. For Hillary it won't be fair because of her gender. For Obama it won't be fair because of his race. On the other hand some people will vote for Hillary because she is the first women ever to run for President. On the other hand some people will vote for Obama because he is the first black man to run AND make it this far. If one of these two win the election it sadly will be somewhat based on their gender and race. The same will be true if one of them or both lose the election. It's a shame that so many people will potentially waste a vote based on race and gender! This will be a historical election (it has already become one) and it will be an unfair election. I also agree with some that Obama has gotten allot more coverage from this election then any other candidate. But then again the media has NEVER been fair to anyone. Bottom line the election will go down in history for other reasons besides Hillary (first women) and Obama (first black), it will make history of being unfair!

Best of luck to Mrs. Clinton, but it is such a great opportunity to have a black man elected President. This could heal some hidden wounds and would be a fantastic example for the World. Not only Black but real intelligent, responsive to people and an honest father. Barak-Edwards That's the ticket. make it happen America!!

I think that she didn't get the boost in votes due to her tears. She got the boost as a reaction to all the vitriol thrown at her for not a tear, not "breaking down", but a half-sigh and a crack in her voice. If she shows no emotion, she's labeled frigid; if she shows the barest hint she's labeled unstable or a phony. I think that some voters were swayed by anger at the double standard she's being held to.

I have thought about all the candidates on the democratic side, and have decided that Hillary Clinton is the one for me. My analogy is simply this……. If I needed a root canal, I would go to the dentist who had performed the procedure many, many times other than a dentist who had never tried to do a root canal or had maybe done one or two. If the procedure is not done properly, you will lose the tooth. Believe me, we are going to have to perform a root canal on the rot that has set in during this present regime and I think Hillary Clinton has the experience, intelligence, compassion, wherewithall to do this. She has a plan to help us recover from the economic and personal destruction carried out on our society by the dictatorship in control right now. I have not heard from Barack Obama what his plan is. Yes, I agree that he is an amazing speaker and he will have my vote in the future, if and when he gets more experience. You can put this analogy in any forum, heart surgeon, mechanic, nurse, etc. etc. I just want the most experienced human being and the person who I can trust to look out for me and my family.

is this still news?

I hear she just got nominated for best actress in a dramatic role.

its all an act.. clinton, obama, mccain there all puttin on a show and we all we vote for who we want to lie to us,thats all were going to get

Clearly, the media will be choosing our candidate for us like they do every election. I think it's extremely awesome that we want to bring Democracy to the world–hey we could have high drama everywhere, packaged neatly into 10 second soundbites, where folks making six-figure salaries that work on television for a living can tell us about how Middle America thinks!

Tears being a political maneuver? Not from the team that brought you, "I feel your pain". No way! That's just terribly cynical–I mean it would almost suggest that they have this team of advisors watching their every move!

Seriously though, should we trust a democracy who starts to pick its president by having people vote by going to different corners of a room, only to be told, "No I'm sorry your candidate doesn't qualify for enough of the vote, you have to CHANGE your vote, go to another corner of the room". I mean, what is this the 18th century?

Fund donated by Indian Businessmen is working.

Outsourcing is a new Economic Cancer for America.

Please stop outsourcing our jobs to India.

so it's okey to be moved to tears by Obama and that's the basis of this woman's vote-but it's a negative if Hillary shows emotions about her beliefs, did you listen to what she said-the message and the intelligence and experience to back it. This double standard is so wrong. The Clintons left the White House and this country with a balanced budget, no wars, and SHE worked for health reform even then.. WaKE UP. She can get something changed – I have no negative feelings for Obama-he just doesn't have the experience. Why can he have emotions and not her?

Reagan was an actor and he made it, maybe it will work for Hiliary

I did'nt even think of that little thing as anything really. Only why is CNN playing this over and over after i saw it the first time. I think CNN has dramatized this little thing into something else. She had a small moment in a coffee shop. Maybe it was true and maybe it was not but it was not in some public speech in front of a huge crowd. Im not voting for Hilary and im not defending her either. I dont care. This is not anything should be cared about really.

I am concerned that enough coverage from CNN on such a silly little thing like that ends up causing silly things to be thought up. We dont know if that was genuine. Only she does. And if it was who cares anyways. It was was in a Coffee Shop. Not a big venue. Had it been there i would begin praying she doesnt win anything else.

I don't get you guys in the US. You realy are going to ellect someone who's still wet behind his ears? Someone who's all talk and hasn't done anything yet as proof he's capable of running your great country?

You're sure he's going to run it? Or ruin it, just like Mr Bush is teaching him by example.

Wake up guys, don't be fooled by his smooth talk and appearance. Instead, vote for someone who can and will bring the US back to being a healthy and strong nation.

Go ahead, Obama supporters, go ahead. Keep on saying that Hillary "arranged" the question — she didn't — or that she fakes emotion — what are you, mind readers? It just makes you, and your candidate, look smaller and smaller. The thing is, Hillary supporters aren't that far from your beliefs. What you have to do is convince us. Instead, you call us "shills," and that Hillary is "Bush lite," and all the rest. It's an interesting mindset, the politician making sweet music about bipartisanship, and yet his supporters are as intolerant and hateful as Limbaugh's audience. You're not doing yourselves much good. But go ahead, take another percent off Obama.

In her victory speech she showed again who she really is: robotic, false, artificial. Let's hope that the other states don't buy her calculated actuations. She has so much love for power, that tears come when she think she will loose the candidacy. Obama is the candidacy of hope and change, she is just part of the past.

Did she cry, didn’t she??? Who cares?
Sad is the country that elects a president based on whether he/she can shed a tear… If she has nothing else going for her other than tears, if she only won New Hampshire because of that, than it’s pathetic!
Snap out of it, Americans! Your self focus will end up harming you. Think of the message you are sending to the rest of the world with this… USA is the world leader and the only super power in the world today…That position comes with a certain level of responsibility. Why not focus on that a bit more, on the message being sent out to the rest of the world that looks up to the US in so many things… Focus on making these presidential elections about restoring the respect of the international community…
If it is about selecting a candidate capable of showing emotions, why not go for somebody capable of showing sympathy? We haven’t seen Hilary cry over issues like Darfur and the tragic conditions people live in there. She cries about getting elected, showing sympathy only for herself… Please…
What is being maid of these elections is a shire mockery…

So, let me get this straight… If Hillary doesn't show emotions she is too careful and too robotic? If she shows emotion and is truly on the verge of tears she is too weak? Can this woman get a break?
I personally like Obama's message of uniting the country but last time we heard this kind of talk about being a uniter, we ended up with 8 yeras of Dubya. It's time we get someone who not only can talk the talk but can walk the walk. Plus, last time a Bush made a mess of our economy and image it took a Clinton to clean it up. Now, it's time for the wiser Clinton to come in and make sure we get back on the right track once again!!!

If Sen Clinton is to be elected president I feel for by fellow brothers in arms when she is to become commander and chief because that is where the difficult decisions are made. What happens when she is tired and stress out over soilders wounded or dying in batttle with the terrorists? Is she going to just cry or is she going to stand up and act like a leader. You think we are having a hard enough time getting through to the simple minded terrorists now what happens when they see that the Key Stone to our nation is weak??

She preaches about change and how with her back ground in the White House that she has the experience. Experince in what walking around on your husbands coat tails waving at people. Change is a new face and new ideas. As first lady she had her chance to take her husbands ear and give him some good advice being that she was his clossest confidant, and so it would go to show you that well she must not have done such a good job since former President Cliton screwed alot of things up that had to be fixed or is being fixed.

Vote for whom you wish but take all that into consideration prior to picking the framiliar old flavor that just sounds good and confortable. Step outside the box.

Hillary may be feeling lucky she pulled off New Hampshire, after what being slammed in Iowa, but if after 35 years of experience, name recognition and a perception of invincibality and inevitability, she managed to beat an inexperienced black man almost 15 years her junior 39% to 36% ought to register in her mind that she can't go on like this on the national race. She has to go forward knowing and being reminded that she is not as like as she thinks.

When Americans can be swayed by a show of weakend emotions in a race to pick a strong and decisive leader for the worlds' greatest country, then Americans deserve what they get because they are one with their choice of emotionally weakened leader.

Obama will not win the presidency, but he sure has brought unexpected life to a campaign that could have been cold, dry and flat as Hillary's personality.

I'm Black, Republican and New Yorker and I am looking for a Giuliani-McCain ticket.

UNDECIDED! Yet, I am glad (Maryann____) triggered a response that I feel makes it somewhat impossible for 'we' as women to lead this country.

When I heard her voice crack and saw the tears well in her eyes, I totally appalled, I couldn't believe she (Hillary) allowed herself to 'resort' to such tactics. Sympathy is NOT what this country needs at the moment. I don't stand by Obama as of yet, but in discussion would like to see an Obama/Edwards Ticket. Well, just have to see.

However, IF the intentions of the Clinton campaign is to have another 8 yrs of Clinton, Obama has stated there is room at the table or in the White House for the former president.

However, Hillary please invest in a box of Puffs, and go home and bake cookies like Barbara Bush. Tears don't belong in the White House, we (woman) can show our tender side many ways without a tear.

Why does everyone keep talking about "tears." There were none! Hillary got a little choked up, and her voice cracked, but she didn't cry. I mean, come on. We all know what crying looks like – and that wasn't it. I'm sure that the "emotional moment" did have something to do with her comeback. It was a moment of genuine heartfelt humility. It was an honest answer to an honest question. That is what people want from their elected leaders. Ergo, voters responded well to Hillary.

I've voted for Democrats in every election since I was 18, but if McCain wins the Republican primaries then I am voting for him. I cannot bring myself to vote for either one of the Democrat poseurs. I also believe I may have lots of company on election day.

I would like to see Hillary shed a tear for the thousands of American lives lost needlessly in Iraq. She has never apologized, in spite of the overwhelming evidence that there was no threat of WMD's. She was wrong then and she has been wrong about almost everything since, except the gullibility of female voters in NH. Billary is in the past. Let's move forward, without the WTO, APEC, and NAFTA. Let's put America first for a change. Since she has soooo much experience, why couldn't she get health care reform out of the box, even among her own party members? Fool me once…

I really don't see why so many of you are so pro-Obama. He has a weak platform, and his popularity is based on his ability to deliver a great speech. Hillary has more political and law experience, has a solid platform with a future planned, has been in Washington and knows how the system works, and is an amazing candidate that shouldn't be overlooked. If Hillary gets the nomination in the summer she has my vote on election day. I'll vote Republican for the first time ever if Obama gets the nom.

Enny:

Your argument is moot…Obama is half white and has admitted himself to having little to no contact with his African father. How does that remotely make him
African American? Why do we not hear anything of his mother's family? She's the one who raised him! That's just not as tantalizing, is it? Who's racism is showing?

It would not surprise me at all if several years down the road we find out that something fishy happened in New Hampshire, and that the Clinton's were involved in it. Ghost votes, tampered machines…something. But we can still hope that, in the long run, it all becomes moot when Hillary gets beat. Hopefully, the voters and the media will wise up to the fact that the majority of the attacks in the future will be coming from Hillary. When her opponents fight back, she should not be allowed to play the poor me card. Level the playing surface, please.

You all need to read what John Edwards said about Hillary getting emotional and misty-eyed. You can tell he wanted to make a comment about having a crying woman as president, but he was smooth about it. If Obama takes the nomination, I hope he picks Edwards as his running mate.

All I could see from the T. V. screen was that Hillary could be as emotional and as human as all of us are.
However I want the next President of the United States of America to be far more
than that.
The President should not be teary and should not cry at suggestions from a voter or from any citizen.
If there are national or international crises during the presidency, would the President break down to teary appeal to her counterparts or even opponents?
I want our President to be a very, very strong person who can control and manage
any situations in the world and lead us to the right direction in a firm attitude.

I wonder if all the female voters that turned out for Hillary see the candidate or the breasts? Would they vote for this person because of her stand if she was a he? I do believe that a female will be pres one day, but dear God, not this one. Wake up and close your eyes.

Can someone give me a link where it says Barack (Barry) Obama is Muslim? I haven't found anything confirming that. I do know he went to Punahou School in Hawaii when I lived there. He played basketball and lived like any other American kid. I don't understand why his religion is so important. His family were not religious people. He is listed as Church of Christ in most websites. I wish people would get their facts straight before writing on these blogs. Maybe THEY are Muslims.

I wonder if all the female voters that turned out fo Hillary see the candidate or the breasts? Would they vote for this person becauseof her stand if she was a he? I do belive tht a female will be pres one day, but dear God, not this ne. Wake up and close your eyes.

There are some of us African Americans who don't fall for Hillary's act nor are we impressed with Mr obama. The Presidency isn't the place for OJT (on the job training). I do not belive we should be supporting people into the white house just to make a politcal statement on equality in the hopes that their lack of experience wil be made up for by checking off the – we got a minority in the white house box. I also don't want Bill, the fondler, Cllinton excercises his sexual deviancy with our supreme leader. I do, however, have a woman presidential candidate in mind who also happens to be of color, is highly intelligent, savvy internationally, and with morals that would put Hillary to shame – my candidate for 1st woman president is Condoleeza Rice. Her, I will follow. As for this crying episode. Thats just what we need to deal with terrorists – a few more tears i'm sure will make Osama Bin Laden lay down his weapons. How sophmoric can the woman be.

Be careful Hillary- not too much emotion. Remember what happened to Edmund Muskie!

It is hard to find out that voters in New Hampshire and the media (especially CNN) sucked Clinton's so-called display of emotion. To me that is no different than a crocodile's tears.

Hello bunch of obama whiners!

I initially and perhaps eventually vote for this guy. I even convince my Asian friends (who usually vote for Rep.) to vote for him b/c of what he, his multi-ethnic represents. I thought that having such family, he surely has a different perspective about the world, the people who are different, a fresher perspective a white-man born and raised in America all his life will NEVER even understand. But I support him based on my INTUITION that perhaps he is someone we need. As for his experience, the guy knows jack.

However, I don't see anything wrong with Hillary shedding her tears. What's wrong with you people. First, she was booed for her robot, rational, cold manner, and now booed for her showing her emotion???

Yah, she might fake it, but are we sure? Give someone a benefit of the doubt will you?
People tend to associate women with a cheesy bag of emotion. I know a guy who didn't vote for Royal (in recent France's presidential election) not because he prefer Nicolas Sarkozy's personality and politics. It was because "I will never vote for women because they are emotional."

Yah, I think Hilary is more rational and less emotional then many men combined.

So, for her tears, fake or genuine. Give it a break!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

The tears I can overcome. The fear card, never. I used to support Hillary. Now I see her as just another Republican after playing the fear card. Shame on her. I can not bring myself to vote for her now. I pray she does not win because I just may not vote in the next election if she does make it. I have always voted straight Democrat. Thanks Hillary for showing your true colors. Go Barack, change the country, change the world!!!!

After reading all these posts. I think I found the new criteria for my voting decision.

"Who makes me feel good?" LOL

Heck, isn't that what got us Bush???

Never underestimate the stupidity of Americans. My mom thinks everyone is smart – she was always a home maker. I try not to destroy her illusion.

I happen to work in the world and travel and if I've learned anything its that people are always dumber than you think and no one will ever turn down a handout (tax cut or otherwise). No matter how much it hurts later. What a bunch of suckers we are for instant gratification. I feel guilty about the glass ceiling so I'll vote for Hill; I feel guilty about slavery so I'll vote for Obama. Grow a brain. Save a polar bear. And have a beer with the picture of your choice for president.

"A person is smart" "People are dumb panicky animals" – Tommy Lee Jones in Men in Black.

Are you a person or part of the mob of people? Don't be a herd animal. Think for your self! Do some research! If you don't our fore fathers are going to wish they had not only instituted the ellectorial college but also made everyone be land owners and literate critical thinkers.

Speaking of ellectorial college – how many of you posters actually know what that is? You probably think we live in a direct democracy!

You Faux watchers need to stick to your own propogandist media and let the adults discuss real issues. GO Hillary!!!!!

i dont even believe THIS story!!
after hillary's campaign has previously been cayght planting questionsers earlier with set questions….
now they can say…we had nothing to do with it…
totally staged…
hillary should get a grammy or something!! whatever…
an for all the females who vote for her…simply because she is female…..
is sexist and… well, sad for us all

I am also a woman and believe that Hillary is quite capable and impassioned herself about bringing change. It's true, Bill is a huge asset to her campaign and even her accomplishments, but that is no reason to say that we need a woman who can "make it on her own." I happen to think she is a very capable leader and that holding a bias towards her for being a Clinton or for having been First Lady is just as bad as any other bias. I also wouldn't mind at all to see Bill Clinton back in the White House with her. I believe in them both individually and as a team.

Of course it is wrong to vote for Clinton on the basis of her emotion in one instant, or because of sympathy for her. But its just as ignorant to say that you would vote for Condoleezza Rice because she is a woman! She may have "made it on her own" in politics, if you say so, but ALL MEN AND ALL WOMEN in office have depended on the support of powerful MEN to get there, and though there are powerful women as well, Congress is 16% female and 84% male.

Condoleezza Rice has sold her soul to the Bush administration. If you would vote for her just for being such an "indendepent woman", why don't you stop to consider who she would be without Bush Sr. or Bush Jr.? She may not be married to them, but she has remained loyal to them for one reason: POWER. That is the goal of every politician, what we have to decipher is who will use it for the betterment of the American people AS A WHOLE. Clinton may seem calculated, but what politician doesn't? As a woman and brazen liberal, she has had to fight harder to be respected.

Ok everyone, computers do have spell checks. Use them. It's hard reading with the grammar and spelling errors. Also just wanted to say, if Ms. Young received so much attention by making Hill cry, well, maybe she should run for Pres.

Obama should have become a trial lawyer. What’s so bad about them? They keep the average American safe from irresponsible people and corporations.

Check out http://www.HelpMeSue.com and check out what kind of stuff people have to put up with on a daily basis. You’ll be appalled at some of the cases. Appreciate your trial lawyers. Without them, we Americans would have lost many of our rights years ago.

I'm flabbergasted that the staged tears and crackling voice didn't damage her in the polls. I thought that even Hillary supporters would realize what a cheap political device it was, but I was obviously wrong. Really? Hillary cried because someone asked her "how she manages to be so wonderful"? Really? I can't help but think that this the result of racism toward Obama from a homogeneously white demographic that finally happened to find a reason to like Hillary that they could rationalize. Come on? Hillary cried for the 1st time just before a primary due to a totally banal non-political question. If the question was in regards to the thousands of valiant young American troops that died due to the misguided occupation of Iraq, maybe I'd believe that her emotions overwhelmed her affectations, but the context of her newfound emotional sincerity is beyond belief. I personally hope that the pre-primary polls were the reason for the upset, as they likely brought about complacency in the Obama base due to the wide margin in which his victory was predicted. I can at least understand that without again (think: last two elections) loosing all faith in the American people's ability to smell BS when it's this thick. Thankfully, if indeed this emotional ploy was the cause of her campaign's revitalization, it isn't a trick that can be played for every major contest… or so I hope.

Well, I see that the Clinton hate-festival is in full swing again.

First, it was the same pollsters who questioned the republican side simultaneously. Why were the polls on the DEM side so wrong but on the REP side so right?

Second, you can't have it both ways. Either she will be criticized for being now human enough, and then when she shows her emotions, she gets railed on. So, it is proof that most of the posters here are nothing more than partisan hacks who utterly hate Hillary Clinton and are terrified that she will win.

And I have become an Obama supporter, but would never trash the woman the way most of you are.

And for those republicans out there enjoying this moment, clean your own house. This is the most miserable slate of GOP candidates that I have seen in 32 years. Every single one of those candidates is far more flawed than Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama and after the lies of Iraq, I am more willing to trust a DEM than a republican these days.

Don't worry, that little act of tearing was simply acting to get votes. She is tough and crafty, knows how to act to get what she wants, can't be trusted.

Ultimately I think Hillary is the candidate who can contribute the most not only to the US but to other countries around the world as well. I've read her autobiography and sincerely believe what she stands for is right for America and the world.

But I would also hope Obama could run for Vice President along her. Hillary-Obama combo would be the strongest President and Vice President candidates in American history.

The order is not important. I would like to see them become President, one after the other.

You have to vote for the one you feel will do the best job

I have read several references to Brittney Spears on this blog. It's truly a sad day in Mudville when that bubble-headed waste of perfectly good O2 is mentioned here. God help us all.

If Obama wins the Democrat nomination? I'm Voting Republican! Don't need another President that doesn't know what he's doing! Clinton is the only choice to get America back where it was in the 90's. Cheap Taxes, Cheap Gas and a Cheap cost of living. You say save the world? I say lets concentrate on saving America and let everybody else worry about saving themselves! Let's fix the country we all love! And no Mr. Bush im not talking about the middle east (you can't fix that!) I'm talking about the USA!!!

I think the tears were real. Just as real as they'll be when the going gets REALLY tough if she makes it to the White House. I think HRC is a sharp lady… but Obama has what it takes to lead this country.

We've had and seen enough of the Bush-Clinton admins… time for something NEW!

Get on with the show, and vote for "O!"

Are white people stupid, you are voting for a black president that
is a muslim and will do nothing for any white middle class kids.

In my entire life as a US citizen, this is the first time I have been truly excited about an election. Insanity is repeating the same behavior and expecting a different outcome, and what people are calling "experience" here is just more of the "same old same old" .Change means something entirely new and different, and as so much of our world seems to be crumbling around us, change is long overdue. Do not discount the power of words. The words of the constitution enspired the birth of an entirely new kind of nation, and the words of powerful speakers can inspire people to believe in the improbable and motivate them to reach for the stars. Thank you Mr. Obama for offering a glimmer of hope!

How much international experience did George Bush had before he got himself in the White House?

I sincerely hope that her tears wouldn't sway a vote in any direction. I would like to think that with everything this country and world has been through in the last eight years that by the time the primary reached your state that you would've made up you mind.

I hope that her fake tears, and I believe they where fake, wasn't the reason that she won NH even though the polls suggested she wouldn't. I'd rather think that the polls where just wrong or closed too soon.

As for the right canidate, I hope that every American can see that the way politcs is working in this country is wrong. Think about all of the in class, in work, or casual debates that have pitted the blue vs the red, or the dems vs the repubs, or the libs vs the conservs, that ended with no soltuions only more divsion.

Barack, talks about uniting the United States, about it being one country. I don't want to live in a world where once my political views come out I've created eneimes, and I'm tired of feeling hatred towards the other major political party in MY COUNTRY.

Want's next Secterian Violence?

It's time to Unite, and Barack wants to Unite.

Hill just wants it her way, or the blue way, and even though I am Liberal and Mostly a Democrat, I understand the importance of compromise, I believe Barack understands this too.

For example if Hill gets Universal Health Care in a way that takes profit away from the Insurance company, the rich guys, (even though I will Benefit) Understand that the Insurance Companies, and lobbist for their industry will do everything they can to change that in the next election. So maybe our universal healthcare onlt exist for four years.

If Barack gets Health Care for those who don't have it, but still allows the Insurance Compaines to keep some of their profit, then this is a plan that is good for both sides, just not my side, we can't be greedy or selfish if we want this country to work, again it's called compromise.

If that compromise can roll over into foriegn policy, maybe we won't need to worry about being safe, beacuse no country, faction, or idealogy will have a problem with us.

What a horrible stereotype for our possible first female president to perpetuate! These choreographed tears may have purchased a short term victory, but at the potential cost of re-enforcing the woman=weak myth that could/will keep many from voting for her in November. The real beneficiary is the other party.

Is Bill Clinton Calling the American Dream a Fairy Tale?

Any significant progress in this country has been the result of Americans working hard to achieve their dreams. The definition of the American dream has always implied men and women in the face of adversity, braving obstacles to make their dreams come through. If Bill Clinton is calling Barack Obama's bringing hope to those American men and women a fairy tale, then him and Hilary Clinton are certainly not for change. Therefore, they are either contradicting themselves and their slogan for change or they are trying hard to deceive the American people. The American people should not be taken for granted. They deserve respect and honesty, which Barack Obama has consistently demonstrated throughout this campaign. Barack Obama has brought hope to generations of Americans regardless of their background(s) through his bipartisan policy proposals for change and a positively refreshing view on politics in general. People need a clear definition of who is running for president and what they stand for. The question to the Clinton campaign is: who is really running for president? Is it Bill or Hilary Clinton? Or are we in for a Clinton Dynasty? If yes, what do they stand for? Absolute power or real change?.

Marianne is an idiot.
First she faults Hillary for getting emotional and then picks her rival because he made HER emotional – twice! And she thinks she's being logical!
what the hell??
A leader who appeals to our emotions effectively puts a ring through our noses and then we can be lead anywhere.
.Bush did it with lies(Iraq)and fear(the mysterious anthrax thing).
Remember how we were all led right down the garden path and right into a long expensive and deadly war because we thought that Bush was a good ole boy just like us?? Well that's what Obama's doing.
As these blogs are suggesting, most people do not know how to process information and are relying on the media to make up their minds for them with misleading headlines and imbalanced coverage of the candidates.
Think, think, think America and stop listening to the cheap shots the media is using to distract you from the issues.
A leader who gets emotional is human and passionate, a leader who reduces you to tears is manipulative and dangerous.
We picked the wrong guy to run this country for 8 years and now we are running the risk of doing it again. We can't afford another mistake like that.

Go Hillary Go!!

I think we've all missed the whole issue for Hillary's "tears". She was dreading the fact that Nancy P.(Speaker of the House) would be her boss if she doesn't win and a win for her would reverse the table, she would be Nancy's boss. I bet if we dug far enough we would find there is no love lost between the two and that Hillary has never supported Nancy. Hillary wants to be top dog or nothing and nothing means she will abort Washington altogether if she doesn't win. Being on a job and someone that you know and so dislike now becomes your boss is your worst nightmare, now you begin to cry in desperation at the thought of what to do next. Women voters, think about it, because Hillary cannot and will not change life for you while you're crying about the boss you have. Think about it.

I couldn't agree more with the poster "Randal." Being swayed by a candidate's performance during a rally? Come on!?! There are countless examples of great orator/persuaders throughout history that were better speakers than genuine leaders; PT Barnum, Tony Robbins, Hitler, etc. Geez, I liked hearing what few words Jerry Garcia had to say during some concerts I saw, but I'm not going to give him my vote for President as a result. Think, people, think. All that being said, personally, I support Obama, but not based on any soap box presentation given at a political rally.

Steve Wesong,

I am a pure African…not African American but people like you are some of the most bewildering human beings I have seen on this Earth. You people have been slaves in this country and subject to all sorts of miss treatment. You get the chance to have someone who can represent you and help boast your image but you turn your back on them like this. Obama has been approved by a lot of white people as capable of running this country as seen by his performance in Iowa a 95% white state and NH a 96% white state….why do you object to that. why do you stab him in the back.? what are you looking for?

dont you know that your sons and daughters will have more confidence hearing of an African American president…?

I am not saying support Obama only because he is black. I am say he is qualified to rule this country. As a result, you should use that opportunity to also improve your broken image in this country….

Her 'tears' were absolutely staged. She always resorts to female tactics when she's losing (they're picking on me, obsessed with me, etc).

And as for the body language they are studying on her? Can absolutely be staged.

One can learn the correct body language for job interviews (holding your hands with the tips of your fingers together in the shape of a steeple, making eye contact, etc), to portray confidence, sincerity, etc. so definitely she could learn body language to portray something she is NOT really feeling. She's grasping at straws. Let's see, voted for the war, never coming out admitting she was wrong (at least John Edwards admitted he was wrong), stealing Obama's "change" slogan not working, accusing them of picking on me, not working, hmm…. let's get more females votes…boo hoo poor me I really care for you…it's personal…

This is one woman who listens to the issues and not the boo hoos of a women who's losing a fight, whether it's with her husband, or the country…

Don't worry Hillary will cry during important international events. That little act of chocking up was nothing but a fake act to get your sympathy, to show she does have emotions. This woman is tough, clever and conniving, devious, will do anything for fame and her personal ambition. It's dangerous to have two Clintons in the White House.

Since when does sharing a bed with someone who has experience equal having experience yourself? Hillary Clinton has the experience of seven years in the Senate, but that's it! Why are our top three candidates political neophytes while people with real experience (Biden, Dodd, and Richardson) are shoved aside?

I noticed the press had tried to help Clinton by given her prime coverage and picked her best photo shots during the crucial moments during curial moments before NH. Clinton's acting was very fake to me, purely for deliberately displaying her 'passion'. She is a good actor, knows what clicks. Using 'passion' would do it. She is after fame and her personal achievements. Don't be fooled, people!!!
Do we want another 'Clinton family' again, this time two Clinton presidents. What kind of change is that?

Everyone is up in arms about these tears.

I would cry too if I were in her place. Just think of how they got the country and how they left the country. They were left BILLIONS of dollars in debt from king George l. Bill paid for that party and left a surplus for the next president. What do we have now. The "city on the hill" is divided, broke, and spread too thin with the drum beating to go into Iran. Those tears weren't of an emotional woman, but a woman who knows that all their hard work for 8 years was basically for not.

Manlia wrote:

"Marianne, Barack moved you to tears twice and Hillary hardly? Come now, it's whammy of a shame that the more Barack Obama took you to tears than Hillary could was all that made you decide to vote for him in NH."

The real shame is that some women voted for Hillary out of sympathy because they saw HER cry on television, and then told exit pollsters and the media about it.

I would much rather vote for a candidate whose ideas of hope, unity and integrity make me cry than vote for someone because I felt sorry for them.

Having been in business for 24 years and those years spent having 2 kids, gone through a divorce and covering Canada and the US, I can personally say that sometimes things are just very tough for anyone to handle. If Hilary looked emotional, well, all I can say is she's been through more trials by fire than any of the rest of us – mine included, since I've never been on the national stage.

Do I question her judgment – not at all. Do I know where's she been – I haven't walked in her shoes.

However I do know one thing, she has kept her focus on the future, despite whatever critiques have been hailed down upon her. She has kept her chin up and stood by her word and her voting record. No backsliding for this Senator. If all of you can look in the mirror and say that you have done the same, good for you. However, I can bet that most cannot be honest with themselves.

Pam in Everett, WA

Look: http://www.dailyjolt.com/presidential-pages/images/obama/with-mother.jpg; Obama's mom is white, so stop telling me that he is our african-american candidate.
This Obama knows about being black and under privilege as Tiger Wood.

J,( who was afraid to use at least his first name) since you like to do alot of reading, Why don't you read the Jefferson Bible, and tell me why Thomas Jefferson left out the deity of Jesus Christ, his birth, death and RESURRECTION!!.
Did that prevent him from being a good president? Does that change your perception of him? Know your history, before you try to tell me about mines or Barak Obama's.

Is J and John Doe Related?

"Jihadists, Al Qaeda, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Hamas, will NOT be taking advice from a western woman on ANY SUBJECT."

I cannot believe anyone would use such rationale to elect a president. In case you forgot, this is a presidential election for the AMERICANS. We make up our minds about who we think is the best candidate for such leadership role. To vote for a candidate because he/she will please the above-mentioned groups is a dangerous and senseless act. Vote for Obama if you think he is the best candidate not because he has a Muslim name. Some of the Obama supporters have really confounded me. How can such comment help Obama?

Obama, electrifying. Hmmmm. I guess what she meant was more charismatic. But then again history has been replete with Charismatic speakers who have inflamed the masses in the name of change. Hitler, Mussolini, just to name a few. Yes the face of America has changed. I write this as I live in a gated community, complete with private armed security who resemble Gestapo agents. By the way this community is in the lush resorts area of the Pocono's. In the mountains, amidst fresh air, scenic beauty and oh yes the violent gangs that have fled the urban areas such as NYC and Chicago and set up shop in more remote areas. 6 out of 10 people here now have no grasp of the English language. This all happened during Mr. Bushs' tenure as President. Speaking of Idealistic rookies. Change, there has been plenty of change. Just look around you, open up your eyes and get your heads out of the sand. It's not absolute change we need but harmonious balance. Not one of Obamas platform issues represent change for America as a whole, they seem to echo the same old song and dance with a nice twist of semantics and spin that has been developed by his marketing, errrr election team. As far as Hillary is concerned, for months the press and CNN has depicted her as cold, unfeeling, unemotional. She shows a little emotion and the Media stands on it's head as countless pundits throw sticks and stones and try to vilify her action. Let her run her race, same as Obama, Edwards etc. In the end the real change needed is for the Babel of countless voices to be rechanneled in a proactive manner befitting this great nation of ours.

It will be interesting to see if Clinton plans to cry in the face or world leaders, or even better, terrorists.

Do you morons really believe she is not human. Obama is nothing more than the smooth talker with little behind the eyes. He is a smooth talker of little substance. The only thing he will change in Washington is his shoes and his suit. Go Clinton. Our national debt was actually a surplus under Old Bill and we had national peace. Barack will show his tears when we have to nuke somebody of the Earth. HIllary will bomb them to hell.

The best thing that could have happened was Bill O'Reilly scrapping with an Obama security guy. He's got a beef with Obama now.

Now even O'Reilly is pointing out the media's bias against Hillary in favor of Obama, and he's broadcast footage from NBC reporters testifying to their uncontroled bias in Obama's favor.

It includes Chris Matthews who's a piece of sh$#.

What a world! What a world!

Holy crap this is a worthless article! What is this just a Clinton bashing forum? Heaven forbid we elect someone with emotions and who actually cares about people and our country!

What do you want another tough guy, robot who can watch people die by the thousands, while his defense secretary laughs about our troops not having adiquate armor?

If a part of you isn't at home crying every night over the atrosities that have been committed in the last eight years or for that matter in our country's history entire, perhaps you should stop blacking out reality and doing something to help instead of belittling someone who pours her heart and soul into trying to make this country a better place.

I for one am glad to know Hillary is a human being and am honored to be able to support, with my vote, the first woman president of the United States.

Hillary Clinton's tears set back the progress of women in power by 10 years. Just when pay equity for women was starting to materialize and women garnering more executive level positions than ever before, Clinton uses sympathy to earn a couple thousand votes at the expense of a feminist movement turning the tide against the good ol' boys network. She should be ashamed of herself.

What bothers me the most about this is how completely unmentionable the supposed Hillary Breakdown is. Generally speaking I get my news more from printed and internet based media, and considering the descriptions I'd assumed she'd had a full on teary eyed lapse from what I find to be her normally distant demeanor. But when I saw the video finally I was completely taken aback. Not by any emotional overload on Hillary's part, but the complete over reaction of the media. She wasn't teary eyed and her emotional and vulnerable response was only betrayed by a slight waver in tone and a crackling of her voice. The fact that anyone gave so much credence to this display, either as an indicator for positive or negative traits of the senator, when many U.S. Presidents have outright cried and sobbed or otherwise shown emotional displays before the whole nation astounds me. This is truly a case of an otherwise irrelevant aspect of a much larger national debate taking focus over the national discourse. Democracy suffers every time the personal involvement is held in higher regard than policy making.

Could anyone trust Clinton back into the white house? All this is about power people and about helping these 2 getting into their own deals. The only reason Hillary is here at this time and not divorced is because she cares more about her own agenda….taking all the crap from her husband is just to go back to where she was humiliated as a wife. She needs to find a job in Hollywood now after the race is over…….. give me a break.

This is the real story of the day. The woman that was closest to Clinton to witness her first foray into a not so promising acting career saw right through and was swayed to vote for Obama. The way the media has covered her little "moment" is obsurd. Instead of calling it what it is, a political stunt, they talk about how she's showing her "emotional side" and "opening up her heart" and a bunch of other nonsense.

Everytime when unthinkable happens, it is a human tendency to rationalize it with simple answers and the simple answer is "Hillary act was calculated."

To me simple answer is Mania or Fixation or Obsession that leads to impaired judgement when you are influenced by a personality. The hype created by this personality let you forget the reality. In the NH, the battle was between "Hype" and "Instinct" and the winner was "Instinct".

I whole heartedly give credit to NH voters as they voted for what they felt was best thing to do. Calling their vote an impulsive or emotional vote will be an insult.

if obama cried…he still would have lost new hampshire..and yes im a obama supporter..they'd still go for clinton.

To cry is good.
If you have never shed a tear in your life, then you have not had much of a life.
I am,

George Vreeland Hill

Who cares if her tears were fake or not.
I just want the Clintons back in the White House to at least put back our nation the way it was during Bill Clinton's era.
Look at us now. Do I need to say more??

I believe Obama is a great candidate, but not now.
Just having the knowledge vs. having an experience applying the knowledge result in two different things. We don't have time for his trial & error period. There will be times he'll pick up a dull knife to cut his steak, while Hillary picks up a sharp one. There will be times that Hillary will pick up a dull knife, but not as much as Obama. While he's deciding which knife to pick, one more precious life could be gone in Iraq. What if that was your child? Would you want to wait for Obama to learn to pick up a sharp knife?
Wake up, Obama-supporters.
Look around and observe the differences between your trained co-worker vs. your college intern.

Hilary played the part…hook, line, and sinker…it was very odd how such an emotional thought could segue way so eloquently into another bashing of Obama. She is a product of her husband and I think its sad politics can be manipulated so easily.

"I was moved to tears. Not once, but twice," she said. "And he has this enormous electricity. And I was just taken aback. And I just had to go with my feelings."
Feelings? That's how narrow minded some people are. Obama may be an orator but it takes more than that to be the American president .

If the candidates are only half as negative and superficial as many of the comments here, we might be ok.

My choice is Michael Savage, check out the program and then comment.

After reading through a few of these prickly self-absorbed responses I would hesitate to be a representative leader for any of you at all.

Maybe we should not be looking for the answer in one person and start taking some responsibility ourselves, in our own neighborhoods, for our entire country. Last time I checked this was a Democarcy — though it's hard to tell from the current administration. Do you truly believe any of these candidates could please a mob of angry, polarized, arrogant Americans?

Every one of these candidates should be commended for surviving the scrutiny of people like you and having unyeilding faith in our country.

Clinton, Obama and Edwards are all tremendous people bravely facing an insurmountable task.

With Bill Richardson dropping out of the race, we are down to three Democratic candidates, with little real political experience: Being First Lady is not real political experience. Who would vote of Nancy Reagan or Barbara Bush, if they decided to follow their husbands' administrations? We are down to two 1 term Senators and a 1/3 term Senator. In two contests thus far, neither Hillary, nor Obama, have gotten more than 40% of the vote. Thus far, neither is the consensus candidate. At this point, as long as Edwards is in the race, I will support him, not because I want him to win, but because I want a deadlocked convention, that will hopefully turn to the only real unification candidate for this election: Al Gore, who would win the general election in a walk.

None of the political canidates, especially H. Clinton, has presently detailed, specific plans on how they are going to solve the problems of the economy, comprehensive immigration reform, securing all of our borders with both Mexico and Canada, securinging our water borders and all our ports of entry, making the Veterans Administration budget mandatory instead of discreationary, dismantaling the IRS and implementing a flat tax, and continued fiscal support of the Global War on Terror worldwide—-just to mention a few. These politicians all speak in riddles, circles, and continue to beat around the bush. None of them have presented a logical and systematical plan to permanently get rid of the national bebt and I do mean permanently. none of them have have supported permanently getting rid of the marriage penalty tax nor the middle class tax. A national medical plan will fail miserably. WHY???? Just look at the Veterans Admisitration, MEDICAID, MEDICARE, and the DoD TRICARE System—–all of them are run by the FEderal government—–including the new presription plan—–and all are insufficient, ineffective, and underfunded. The Federal Government cannot effeciently run national health care and has alredy proven it in the past 60 years. My decision will not come until election day in November 2008. none of these politicians are realistic nor want to help the American people.

Sam since the last two elections were stolen by bush. why not a democrat this time. 2000 election fraud forever changed this country and gave the rep. and bush the run of this country for 8 years. It has been one of the worst adm. in the history of this country and If it takes country wide fraud to get the dems. in power and this country back to the citizens then sobeit. Dems. are going to take over all three houses this time around and let the investigations of the crooks that run this country now begin. Chaney, Bush, and all of the croneys should end up in jail.

As others have said, I think the media is largely to blame for this teary display being over-publicized and over-analyzed. Now her campaign seems to hinge on that one moment. Reminds me of when Howard Dean became red-faced screaming so passionately during a speech….the media made so much of it that I feel they ruined his campaign. He seemed to have lost out because of that one moment. Even my parents who are hardcore Republicans thought that was unfair. Don't let the media choose our president! Do your research and don't make a decision that is simply based on sound bites!! And by the way – Go Obama!

Go Hillary.Just think if she wins ,Republicans will start jumping out of windows.And we all want to see that. Hillary is what this country needs. Experience and brains.America has proven ,even the village idiot can become president,lets not go there again. Im voting for Hillary

I would rather have hillary as president because she is stronger than obama and has experience in the white house, obama is way to nice, he would break under pressure.

Northern whites will say that they will vote for Obama, but really they wont. Southern polls will be more accurate on this issue. Really the republicans have brought Hillary on themselves.

I am a woman.
I have been voting for over 25 years in the US – I am a baby boomer too.
I am not swayed by a tear in HRCs eye, not by a long shot.
I am not swayed by a crack in her voice as she talked in NH yesterday.
Just as I was never swayed by Bills quavering lip in moments of real emotion.
This couple is playing the US political game, playing it to the hilt.
Politics in the US is a game, that is why she brought it up in conversation.
American politics is the biggest game in this nation.
I am registered as an Independent and I am proud of that distinction.
I wil not vote for her just because she is a woman.
She has too much politcal baggage.
Her "C" baggage will keep her from making progress as US President.
She is not the right choice for the times we live in.
She would have had a better chance in 2004, but that ship has sailed and sunk.

I am a woman.
I have been voting for over 25 years in the US – I am a baby boomer too.
I am not swayed by a tear in HRCs eye, not by a long shot.
I am not swayed by a crack in her voice as she talked in NH yesterday.
Just as I was never swayed by Bills quavering lip in moments of real emotion.
This couple is playing the US political game, playing it to the hilt.
Politics in the US is a game, that is why she brought it up in conversation.
American politics is the biggest game in this nation.
I am registered as an Independent and I am proud of that distinction.
I wil not vote for her just because she is a woman.
She has too much politcal baggage.
Her "C" baggage will keep her from making progress as US President.
She is not the right choice for the times we live in.
She would have had a better chance in 2004, but that ship has sailed and sunk.

Am i missing something.? It's not that shocking to see Clinton take the lead in NH but what people aren't talking about is how Obama took so many votes coming in behind her t…hat in itself was AMAZING!!! ..he is a newcomer compared to Clinton . I just don't see the excitement on this win for Clinton ..I have empanthy for her, i know she is a politician that was polished for this but she can't speak change for the voter because frankly i haven't seen much of it in NYS (OH! wait..the weathly got more money while the poor became worse off in NYS).
NH's lead was not the amazing , think about it….consider her history, her preparation… for someone in power for the length of time she had , and that's including as a partner of a politician enabling her to have public persona, then throw in her own term as a NYS Senator (note: she is not a native New Yorker..she was planted here). I feel bad for the woman who was used by Clinton to garner votes..Glad she gave her vote elsewhere. She should have been paid for being tin the clip. I am so annoyed that no one is looking at the picture of the middle class in NYS…we are drowning and she is our represenative that shouldn't be letting this happen!!!!

Who cares. Remember? Swift boat…

As far as independents go, I'm one of them – but anyone who runs opposite hillary gets my vote.

To anyone who thinks Hilary is "our only chance at restoring America's image," just leave the country for one second. IF our country is ever to change the "American perception," it has to be done through intelligence. Obama is simply a more intelligent person than Hilary Clinton. This has nothing to do with gender, this has nothing to do with race. He is an orator who has visions for America. Those of you doubters who keep asking, "How? How? How?", I ask you this: what organization/company/country/etc. EVER has a "road map" before they have a mission statement? Martin Luther King's "Dream" speech does not talk about "how"–are you laughing at him?

People really need to look carefully at each candidate's integrity as a part of his/her "record." Clinton is a good candidate; however, her integrity is questionable. Money has bought her morals before (there was a time when she sought socialized health care), money will be able to buy it again. Her husband, though once a great president, is Karl Rovian in his tactics to solicit votes for his wife.

It is simple–if America wants to change our "image," we need to stop supporting conglomerations and globalized corporations (many of which supported Bush and now support Clinton) and opt for intelligence and a VISION. We can have a great America, we simply need to work hard and get rid of the characteristics that have become synonymous with–and make the rest of the world hate–America.

As a Republican, who is seriously sorry Bush2 got elected, (and yes, I voted for him) I find that Clinton's campaign seems to be running on emotionsand 'feel good' and 'womens empowerment' more than any substance or a real platform.

I don't know who I'll vote for in November. I'm not sure I really want to vote for anyone, but there are people I do want to vote against.

I mean, if you didn't like Bush 1 and 2, think about how you're going to feel with Clinton, the sequel. As with most movie sequels, the first is usually the better of them, and the first Clinton White House really wasn't all that great.

I do know that I won't vote for Clinton(s) in this election. Her campaign tactics are decietful and out to win votes, not to make a point, not to present herself as a viable leader for our country.

I'm sorry that Bill Richardson would pull out, I'm sorry he didn't get the support he needed. I might have voted for him.

Will Obama overcome the negatives of the Clinton campaign to get the Democratic nomination? I don't know. Is he the man for the job? I don't know that either, but the more I listen to him, the more I'm hearing something fresh and different, and maybe even believable.

I used to trust politicians. That may have been naive, but I was young. Now I don't. In Washington, it's nothing but a power struggle. Greed, Power, and Self Importance are the words and way of life. That is no way to run our country, but it is all that's there.

Will any of the Republican candidates be any better? I don't know. None of us will until someone is elected in November.

I fear for our country. Not from the evils and enemies beyond the gate, but those inside the gate who would do us great harm. Clinton(s) is at that top of that list in my book, and her actions have shown it again and again. The concept of 'change' to her is not understood. The Status Quo will reign supreme with her, and that would be the worst thing for our country now.

The candidates of both parties have been speaking for decades for change with
no specific substance. The only real change has been bigger and deeper whole,
trillions dollars of debt, hopes of empty promises – brain washing the
people, filling their coffers, ignoring their duties, responsibilities, plunge
the country into a war for over 5 years and lost of lives.
A true change of substance will be when the people can express
“THEIR WILL” on ALL MAJOR ISSUES”. The duties and responsibilities of
the Congress should be and must be ”strictly construed”.
The future destiny, liberty, freedom to live , work etc. should be in the hands
of the people to “express their will” on ALL MAJOR ISSUES!
“Find out to what people will submit and you will find the exact measure
of injustice that will be impose upon them”. It is better to suffer,
rather than to relinquish any “HOPES” to express “THE WILL ON ALL
MAJOR ISSUES! It is a mistake to continue to give “unlimited power”
to anybody, to plunge the country into a “war, debt of trillions of dollars”.
The Congress did not comply with their duties and responsibilities!
Their greed – wealth came first before the country and the people.

Mrs. Bill Clinton is a fake who has outlived her 15 minutes of fame about 15 years ago!

all of it seems to be a farce. the question wasn't so intense and Hillary had no reason to cry; dirty emotional politics is what she exhibited…trying to woo other voters (mostly the females) by shedding some tears might get her a few primaries but when it comes to being the president, it takes guts and determination which she seems to lack.

I hope clinton will win

I will never vote for her. She and her husband are crooks. When they need the black vote, they pander to them. Then they castigate Obama as a flip flopper, just what the republicans did to Kerry. The Clintons are trash. I am a dem. but will stay away or vote for McCain in the general election.

It is indeed disappointing that the women of New Hampshire who voted for Hillary just because she cried and wanted to give her moral support. They were so easily manipulated by the oldest political trick. So much for the New Hampshire voters being politically savvy.

It seems that most reviews here given by the people from Obama camp who doesnt want clinton to win.

I would like to shed some light on Senator Hillary Clinton’s most recent victory over Senator Barack Obama in the N.H. primaries. Many people are still trying to figure out exactly what caused such an unexpected “comeback” for Senator Clinton after many leading national polls and news networks predicted an almost seemingly inevitable win for Senator Obama. The answer lies in the announcement of Senator Clinton’s remarkable gains of female voters. Why such a large support from women? A recent campaign rally of Senator Clinton’s contained an “unidentified” male heckler in the crowd holding a sign which read “IRON MY SHIRT” as he yelled the phrase repeatedly at Senator Clinton. At first glance, this image inspires emotions of outrage and anger, but after further scrutiny it should reveal something that I don’t believe most people are paying attention too, sexism scamming. First, when men want to boldly discriminate against women in such a public forum they would not use this statement. Males are more prone to use the phrases “GET IN THE KITCHEN, MAKE ME SOME FOOD, GET ME A BEER WOMAN, or their all time favorite A WOMAN’S PLACE IS IN THE KITCHEN BAREFEET AND PREGNANT”. In my honest opinion, only a woman who was trying to rally female anger and support towards overcoming a historically male driven society would use such a tactic. I think this male individual was placed in the audience by the Clinton campaign in order to envoke such a reaction from female voters. I believe the Clinton campaign may have just pulled off the biggest sexism scam in election history! If everyone in this country would stop scratching their heads in amazement at how she managed to rally such strong female support in a very short amount of time, you would realize the answer too. Thanks for listening.

I was shocked and appalled by what I read here. How can anyone cast a vote on the assumption that the one they really want to win will win anyways? As far as Hillary and her tears, I think the country needs a strong personality to run it, not a tear stained face. As far as Hillary and her political experience, well perhaps I missed something there but didn't Obama come up under Paul Simon as a protege, covered all Illinois children for health insurance, He won the Illinois senator race in a land slide without the backing of the democratic party and pushed through the first ethics bill in 25 years. U.S. senator representing Illinois, and pushed for ethics reforms. Hillary won the New York seat basically by name recognition. In 1974 she worked in the house judiciary committee's on the impeachment of Nixon. She worked on Carter's campaign. She spearheaded Bill Clinton's Health Care task force that never presented anything to Congress or the Senate and then dissolved. I am all for equal rights and it's not about the sex of the candidate to me it's about the ability to do the job. Did Americans learn nothing about voting for a name? If so may the powers that be help us all.

WELL, ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT MARIANNE PERNOLD YOUNG, YOU ARE A MEAN WOMAN. THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION BUT YOU BETRAY YOUR FELLOW WOMAN OF OR CLOSE TO YOUR AGE. YOU WON RIGHT THERE TRUE FRIEND IN HILLARY BUT YOU DID NOT DELIVER BY SUPPORTING HER. FEW BLOGGERS WERE SAYING THAT YOUR QUESTION WAS PLANTED. THANK YOU FOR CLARFYING THIS POINT. HILLARY IS THEN REALLY GENUINE. AND SHE HAS THE EXPERIENCE TO CHANGE THE ECONOMY AND PULL PROGRAMS TO HELP SINGLE MOTHERS IN THIS COUNTRY. SHE IS INDEED THE BEST CANDIDATE OUT THERE.

If we were at war with country X why would we even consider a president who has any backgrounding country X? Amazing how fooling people are, seem like a
new world order prophecy to me.

People say Hillary has experience? Experience doing what? being the wife of governor, of a president? come on. That is absolutely NO experience. Barack as equal or more experience, better judgement, and atleast has integrity… and being an inspiritional speaker will come in handy in times of trouble.remember, its the people that you surround yourself with… do we want more of the same? We need change!!!

Hillary finally sounded totally genuine! I am so glad and perhaps that is the key to her going on a winning it all. I hope that she also makes "genuine" comments about her change ideas. I would like for her to say that she would change our rotten economy so that more people get jobs, like the last Clinton administration did. I hope she changes this horrible situation where daughters bury mothers and mothers bury daughters due to breast cancer and other female specific problems.. I just can believe that we have not conqured that abomination. I hope she says that she wants to change the less than half measure taken by Bush on drug benefits for medicare recipients. I hope that she says that she wants to change another abomination which is deficits generated by tax cuts for the rich. I think our economy is finally sinking due to that burden and, of course, the Iraq financial burden. I also hope that she talks of change in the war in Iraq. Perhaps we can not pull out immediately upon Democrats winning the next presidential election but she can say she wants to see fewer men being maimed and being killed while maintaining enough military support to help the currently useless Maliki goverment while that government finds some solution to their need to protect their own country in the near future.

there's no crying in baseball !!

I say kudos to Clinton for letting her emotions show on the campaign trail. It's a dangerous thing to do- if she's too hard, she's "unfeminine" and "inhuman" and if she's too soft she's an "emotional woman" and "having a break down" (I don't know who decided a slightly wavering voice constitutes a breakdown- especially considering these are the same networks that have been covering the Britney Spears debacle lately)

voter fraud
obama and paul were cheated
in the precint of sutton it is reported paul got 31 votes, while Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul
exit polls shows obama was leading clinton
even the cnn exit polls show them to be tied
why would people lie after they had voted
this is a fraud
check this link
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/010908_widespread_fraud.htm

Clintona are imposing themsleves on the American people, Hillary is 100% convinced that its her turn to govern, they are treating USA like their family asset. Govern she will govern but it will be a disaster, electing someone based on her husband's experience and leaving the right candidate on the side.

No matter what is claimed, it's clear Hillary has no experience that prepares her for the Presidency. On top of that she's widely misliked. The party has just made a mistake in laying back and letting her take the lead; why haven't more qualified people stepped for the Democrat party! Right now, Senator Biden is only one in the party lineup actually ready for Day One; and he of course hasn't a chance.

It should never have come to this.

The media will try to elect Hillary; but the people will not have it! Then what?

The thought of a Hillary Clinton presidency just makes me feel defeated. The thought of a Barack Obama presidency, on the other hand, seems positive and brimming with potential, even in the wake of these shameful Bush years. I am interested in intelligence, grace, foresight…and I want to be inspired.

Clinton's NH (narrow) win will, I think, strengthen the resolve of those of us who do not believe she is the best person for the job. I think we're going to donate more $ and time in an effort to bring about some real change. It's time.

I am a woman and there is no way I would ever believe a word Hilary said. It is all a calculated ACT!

Obama had the deceny to initially congratulate Hillary after she won the NH caucus, while Hillary never congratulated Obama. That to me shows how disingenuous she really can be –she can't even return a compliment. If she had any respect she would have congratulated Obama in the same manner that he congratulated her. So no — I don't think Hillary's tears were genuine at all. Who wants a president with no interpersonal skills. I'd take Obama's lack of experience over Hillary's fake tears anyday.

Jeanine G:

Condi Rice has no problem with dealing with the Mullahs.

Politicians certainly don't have a patent on mud slinging. We Americans claim a deep desire to discuss important issues instead of politicians hurling invectives at each other. After reading the comments here, however, I'm astonished at those who believe they can pierce/bare the soul of a candidate. Have we really grown so cynical and mean spirited? My crystal ball is muddier. I'm 'forced' to make rational decisions based upon the candidates' intelligence, pragmatic ability to solve incredibly complicated problems, wisdom based on past actions, and demonstrated compassion for those with weak voices. We need to wake up! No one can shine when put under an electron microscope! Listen with an open mind, research with diligence, and make your decisions based upon intelligent comparisons. We don't need to be armchair psychiatrists. Democracy is based upon our ability to make crucial choices utilizing our brains, not bashing.

As a woman, I am ashamed for the woman who voted for Clinton out of sympathy for her tears and I applaud Marianne for seeing through Clinton's shameless ploy. And I am not amused by Clinton's supposed "35 years of experience" as well as her feverish tactics to highlight her role as the first female President. First of all, what is this saying about women if she wins the office? That as a woman, you have to be MARRIED to a popular politician to gain the bulk of your "experience" as well as name recognition? face it, without Bill, Hillary is nothing. We wouldn't be talking about Hillary if she wasn't married to Bill and pretty much piggybacked off his successful campaigns. When we get a female President, I want a woman who has made it ON HER OWN. i realize that Hillary is an excellent attorney and senator in her own right, but the bulk of her experience comes from her association with Bill. If Bill didn't win his gubernatorial and presidential campaigns, I doubt Hillary would be a candidate today.

If Chondoleeza Rice or even Madeline Albright was running for President, I would feel compelled and thrilled to vote for them out of a desire to see a female President (provided I agree with their issues). Chondi Rice has became successful BY HERSELF. SHE was appointed to her position, and she served in it. On the other hand, the only election Hillary has won is as a Senator. And the fact that her husband is extremely popular among democrats (especially in NH) overclouds her negative aspects.

let's vote for someone who has made it on his/her own. obama would be one of those, jon edwards, guiliani, mccain. all of them did NOT rely on famous family members to get where they were. romney and clinton, on the other hand, did. and maybe it's just me, but i am not too eager to elect someone who is related to famous politicians because i think their relationship clouds their judgment and they don't really know how to do it by themselves (i.e. george w.)

It's time to put this "Hillary has 35 years of experience" nonsense to bed. Experience doing what? Does being first lady of Arkansas qualify you to be President? Why don't we rise up and nominate Janet Huckabee to run?

She's a bright woman who has been married to a politician. Let me say this once so all the Hillary followers can understand:

SHE HAS SEVEN YEARS OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE!!!!!!!

Just about the same as Obama.

What we need more than anything is a President that half the country doesn't despise. Enough. The constant attacks on Bill and the constant attacks on Bush were counter productive. Get smart, people, if the Dems nominate Hillary and the GOP nominates McCain it is checkmate. Her Muskie moment may have won over NH women but Independent men all over the country will not vote for her.

She'll lose another 50-49 heartbreaker and we'll be stuck with a Republican (no matter how moderate) to replace Justice Stevens. And that is truly scary.

TIme to rally behind Obama. Let's thank the Clintons for a job well done and look to the future.

Do we really want a president who cries because she wasn't winning? Her tears were for herself not the people.

What is happening to our country? A candidate wins the Iowa GOP caucus, despite increases Arkansas tax burden by 47% for the average citizen, because he's a minister. McCain wins New Hampshire, despite saying it's okay to stay in Iraq for 100 years. Fox "News" excludes a candidate from their forum, because they don't like his views. Clinton wins New Hampshire because of crying? Seriously? I weep for our country.

Our country is dying, and it has all to with foreign policy (misunderstood) & monetary policy (not discussed).

I really do not understand why people keep falling for political tactics??? Does anyone really think that any of the candidates care about any issues that mean anything to this country. We fall for the same things every 4 years, and frankly I am sick of it.

Criticizing someone for their rationale for voting for one candidate over another. amazes me, but not suprising. If a tear moves someone to vote for someone, then so be it. Look at all the people that do not even vote!

As soon as Iowa was done, all we heard about was how Clinton had to figure out a way to connect………5 seconds of last minute tears…..what a shock, how totally unexpected.

The really lame part of this story is how the media portrayed it as anything more than a stunt.

This is what happens when the media sensationalize political events.

The fact that the clip of Hillary was played over and over definitely had an impact on the outcome of the New Hampshire primary. I find it outrageous that the media can so subtly yet brazenly manipulate political events in this manner.

People are really ready for change, and Hillary Clinton is more of the same. America is turning into a country ruled not by leaders of the people but by family dynasties.

A "Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton" presidential succession would really be a historical embarrassment, and future generations would likely scratch their head in puzzlement that we were so complacent about choosing our leaders.

Jeanine G January 9, 2008 11:02 pm ET

I'm not sure if Condi or Maggie T. would agree with that but I know your intentions are good.

Go Obama '08

I was an American Soldier, I am an American Soldier, I will always be an American Soldier and I support Barack Obama for President of the United States of America!

This is total nonsensse. She made Mrs Clinton win Iowa and now she says she voted for Obama. It is mockery of our democracy. The presidential candidate cries to gets votes.We Americans vote for someone who cries simply because her long held ambition is at risk. She didnt cry for America. She cried because she was hopelss. Please note that a nation can not be bult on tears but on the vision and charisma of a leader.

Everytime I see the footage of Hillary, prentending to be having an emotional breakdown, it makes me physically ill. Someone please tell me what she meant, when she paused during her hissy fit to state "you know(SOB), I see what is happening and we have to turn reverse it". What was it she saw, mabe a black man making a serious bid to become president? Who was she really speaking to?

Clinton's slim win did nothing but prove that status quo "is in the house", and they have no intention of leaving. I was very surprised and disappointed by what Bill did and said yesterday. He was like an entirely different person. The man looks haggered as well.

Given what he said and what she did, do these people really stand for change?

Crying is Not a sign of weakness! It shows she cares for our country. I was going to vote for all along and I still am!

Geezus. PHONY PHONY PHONY. Bill and Hillary. PHONY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hillary Clinton has a heart and it showed in her reaction plus being tired. Attacking her just shows me you people have no heart. She has my vote.

I have read some of these comments and what i find amazing is the credit your giving of Hillary's acting skills..SHE HAS NONE! didn't you all see that sopranos skit she did?? HELLO PEOPLE. I know you all might hate her but that was real emotion.

Hillary is crying because she is losing what she thought was something she was entitled to . I puke each time she says "when I was in the White House". She was not elected to any office but the one she holds now as a senator. to call Obama a newbie only means she is one term ahead of him in terms of actual experience within HER authority not her husband's. She promised she would not "use Bill" to campaign for her and she quickly got him out there when she saw the attention that Obama is garnering.
She is still the calculating, scripted woman she always has been, trying to spin tears to show she can be vulnerable. However, the kinks in the sheild were put there by the Obama campaign not hers.
If she wins the democratic nomination, which I doubt, I will vote for whatever republican is on the ticket.

Why are you not complaining about Iowa voting for the males. They never elect a woman to elected office. They have no women in their government positions filled by elections. So why can't Hillary compalin about that. It is quite apparent it is true since Edwards was 2nd in Iowa but 3rd in New Hampshire. It seems Obama supporters only complain when it is their guy. I am with a few on here that thinks I will vomit if I hear change come out of Obamas mouth one more time. He gives same speeches over and over using his church voice that sounds like he is preaching. And why is everyone so sure the African American people will vote for Obama in South Caroline? I am a firm believer they vote for the candidate that most represents what they want in a president. Why would this not concern Obamas supporters that they would vote on race but critize Hillary because they feel women voted according to gender. I give the American people more credit.

this is the same woman that made fun of stay-at-home moms for "baking cookies," and now all of a sudden she is touchy-feely? Please! This is a woman who would spin on her head and spit nickels if it got her votes, so pretending to get emotional is a cake walk for her! Even still, the Tin (Wo)Man couldn't muster enough "emotion" to get a fake tear to roll down her cheek…pathetic. What may be the only thing more pathetic than this gross display she put on is the fact that voters in New Hampshire are so short-sighted that they would vote for her based on that, apparantly forgetting the last 16 years of having her ram herself in our faces. Just another time when I think to myself that America deserves what we get!

This entire blog is sickening!

I have read very few posts that I would attribute to intelligent and informed people.

Just a bunch of meanies who read so much baloney into a small story.

Dear God, I pray they all get hangnails and can't vote on election day!

Bunch of crock??

Many democrats, almost all independents, and every single republican will never, ever, ever, ever vote for her.

Ever.

She is reviled by 47% of the US. That’s 47% of the vote instantly gone. Add on the sizable portion of people that start disliking her after they learn or hear more about her and you have insta-landslide loss.

I have yet to have a Hillary supporter convince me that she can win the general election when everyone except a fanatically minority despise her.

How can she possible win? People do not vote for those they do not like (except Nixon).

Please, please convince me. Because at this point, this life long dem plans to sit on her hands if Hillary is the nominee.

I am tired of hearing all this bull about Obama not being able to bring about this change that our country desperately needs. If you actually listen to his agendas they are in my opinion more sound than any of the other candidates. Obama wants to change america for the better. Hillary just wants to be the first women president. SO PLEASE AMERICA LETS ACTUALLY PUT SOMEONE IN OFFICE THAT WANTS TO HELP US.

William, Vancouver BC, Canada January 9, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Thank you William for your service to the Monarchy and defence of the Realm.

Maybe you should stick to electing MPs whom then elect the Prime Minister as I know for a fact you have no experience in electing a President!

Not sure what details are on Hillary’s CV that makeup 35 years of experience but she graduated from Yale in 1973. Hum, let’s do the math 1973 + 35 = 2008!!

You might as well say "vote for me because I am older!" Biden, Dodd and Richardson all have impeccable records and real experience.

We are not electing a local council member, mayor, or dog catcher we are electing a President and I want my President to have vision, judgment and ability to inspire the people!

Vote Obama '08

I was an American Soldier, I am an American Soldier, I will always be an American Soldier and I support Barack Obama for President of the United States of America

I defy anyone to name ONE thing that Hillary Rodham Clinton has accomplished FOR WE THE PEOPLE in her supposed 35 years of public service.

Has anybody heard of a this evil thing called VOTING FRAUD!!!! The diebold electronic machines used in NH in some precincts are prone to tampering as was revealed by several tests. Why is it a surprise that the HIllary and her hubby can stoop to any measures to insure their king size bed in the lincoln bedroom they have missed for the last 8 years!!!

A TV add spent on NH primary, over 5 million dollars.
Playing the emotional card, a NH win.
There are somethings money can't buy, a convincing crying act, priceless

I think Hilary's bump was entirely due to the media. Claiming her candidacy was over if she didn't win New Hampshire, only the country's second contest, was completely biased and only served to ignite Clinton support. To be fair, the Clinton campaign should have to pay for all the free air time and the Obama campaign should be given a huge donation by every news organization that carried the story. The media influenced this primary and nothing else – and today's coverage is even more disgusting – blaming inaccurate polls, possible racism, the female hidden vote, etc… It is vile how much the media can "create" news and influence the future of our country.

Barack Obama is who America must elect in order for our country to progress and recover from the politics in Washington over the past few years. He is the reason masses of people are turning out to the polls, he is responsible for EVERY candidate changing their campaigns to a message of change in government, which he has stood for since his speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. Barack Obama inspires, unites, and stands by his premises. One who can do this can persuade a divided Congress to pass legislation, inspire average Americans to achieve more, and reason with other countries around the world. His foreign policy will help us regain our allies, his education proposals will raise the rate of literacy in this country, and his health care proposal is the most reasonable and feasible of all plans presented by the other candidates. Hillary's idea of universal health care isn't feasible, look at Canada's economy and where it is headed. Our country is far too large to realistically be able to cover everyone. Our system must be reformed, but universal coverage isn't realistic. It is time for America to take this very important opportunity to stand for REAL change, not continue the trend of two families (Bush and Clinton) to run our country. Lets go in a new direction!

Feeling a candidate's "electricity" while speaking is hardly a reason to vote for that person for president.

There have been many people during my lifetime who were "electric" speakers who were also criminals and murderers, and more.

Not to be critical…but….I can't see someone being the leader of the free world who cries about the pressure of a campaign. There are a LOT more pressures being President. What would she do under those pressures???? I am all for seeing a woman take that position….just not Hilary. She behaved exactly the way men expect women to act. A future woman President needs to be strong emotionally.

Hillary Saw an opportunity and she took it. I am not moved with crocodile tears. She claims that she has all this Washington experince but let's face it – She only recently served in the Senate and it does not make her an expert. Hillary knew she was loosing to Obama and she did it to gain votes. Also, there is no stress level difference for the rest of the presidential candidates, so what makes her so special? Running a country is a lot more stressful, harder, intense, demanding, and so many other things than running for the precidency. If you can handle the heat, get out of the kitchen.

nikole.

Are you married? But I bet you can take a lot of credit for your influence on him as you grow together. My wife and I have grown together. We influence eachother all the time.

To say that Hillary had no influence on Bill, just as he will have on her presidency is utterly naive.

Did any of you watch Mrs Elizabeth Edwards speak yesterday? Tell me her experience supporting John Edwards means nothing?

And I will say this again.

The Obama camp is literally riddled with HATRED. Hatred for what bush has done to the country. Hatred for the Clintons -like they had anything to do with it . Hatred for the 'status quo' or anything to do with politics at all.

They are not uniting anything. Reread all the posts. Its all HATRED towards anything and anyone except Obama.

You will not unify ANYTHING. You will just find someone else to HATE. Next is the republicans. Then what? Anyone who disagrees with Obama ? Whats after that?

Any nation who disagrees with Obama ? HATE them too ?

We hillary supporters DO NOT HATE Obama. We like Obama. We just think he is too inexperienced.

When the going gets tough in the race for the White House, the country needs a person who is going to stand on the issues and the challenges ahead we face as a country. Please don't tell me people are naive enough (and oddly sympathetic) that all Hillary has to do is turn on the water works to get a vote. That's not democracy, that's a joke.

People are dying because of her WAR vote. So all you ladies that gave Hillary a sympathy vote. Shed a tear for those dead soldiers and their families. By you ladies voting out of emotions and NOT good Judgment are saying that Ladies are inferior to men.

As they cannot control their emotions. Crying is seen as weak to the rest of the World. If they really gave Hillary a vote because of crying, it is a VERY SAD thing Ladies.

Send us all to hell in a handbasket cause someone can shed a tear on que.

Go………………….. Obama 08

I think three things pushed Hillary past Obama in New Hamsphire. One is the Hillary campaign getting Bill Clinton to go on the attack against Obama (distorting Obama's Iraq war stance and Iraq voting record) and Hillary's attempt to show her softer side (the tearing factor). Secondly was that McCain drew more than expected independent voters to his cause. If Obama would have garnered 8000 to 9000 more independent votes, this primary would have had a different ending. Thirdly and most importantly, John Edwards presence in the race hurt Obama the most. Edwards drew in ~48000 votes of which ~70% cited Obama as their second choice. Edwards candidacy diluted Obama's Democratic and Independent support. If Edwards had dropped out in Iowa, Obama would have probably ended up with 48% of the primary vote compared to Hillary at 41%.

The Clintons have superstar complex – they have always postured themselves as celebrities and Hillary's emotional moment was no different. I can see their greed for absolute power behind that quivering voice and welled-up eyes. That clip is like seeing a kid whose lollipop has been snatched away from her. It's "argumentum ad misericordiam" – she tried to win votes by sympathy (and mudslinging, to boot) not through the merits of her platform. She was so desperate to win that she stooped so low that she can crawl through a close door (what makes her different from a cockroach?) If she wins the nomination, I will support a Michael Bloomberg candidacy. If Bloomberg is not running, I will support the republican nominee. 8 years of the Clintons in the ORAL Office is enough!!!

Does anyone else even slightly wish we could elect a President without the media saturation of the current day???

That said, I do appreciate this forum; but give me a specific reason why you believe (or do not belive) in a particular candidate without surrounding your case with the current headlines.

As I read this list of comments, I am (again) acutely aware of the range of emotions stirred by politics. I truely wish we could stand as a unified nation, but it seems as if we Americans only do so as a result of a national crisis (at least we do that).

At a time when our Country is despised and considered weak or unreliable by many of our global neighbors, we all know the next President will face a myriad of challenges. So I ask of my fellow countrymen: please do not vote on passion alone, but use your heart and your head. We cannot afford to vote stubbornly.

I love how "made her cry" is assumed to be the truth? No one made her cry, she fake cried and it's all in her body language. Please, we're not stupid girlfriend.

Interesting that so many people were polled as voting for Obama, even the exit polls, even the woman who made her cry, and yet Clinton still won.

How is it that all of these polls were so wrong and wrong only for Clinton and Obama?

I think it is more likely that someone at some state-level electronically stuffed the ballots.

Americans should vote for either Obama or Edwards from democrats or Ron Paul or Mitt Romney. Hillary cried becuase she lost and Huckabee is not trust worthy.

I just have to say this before I go nuts. I am neither Republican or Democrat. I try to vote for those who represent my values, hopes, and desires for the country to follow. May I say a couple of things about Mrs. Clinton?

1. She got teary in front of everyone because it suited her purposes and was probably dead dog tired. I cry too when I am tired. It was not motivated out of passion for this country.

2. She claims to have more experience than Obama. Did she just not leave her first year or second year as a Junior Senator? That is experience? She was not Madam President when Bill was in, she was simply Mrs. Clinton, First Lady. She was not the President.

3. I am fine if a woman gets elected President, but lets elect the right one! Personally, right now I associate her with scandal, letting friends go to Prison, deception, right winged conspiracies, and all that other stuff. she has not proven herself worthy to be President.

4. I dont care if you are white, black, Mormon, Catholic, Pink or purple. For once, we need someone who can keep some promises. What about that great healthcare plan Hillary had way back when? It's doing great, dont you think?
(Sarcasm…) Come on women, show some intelligence and vote for the right person. Not just because she is FEMALE!!

Thank you for giving me the forum to share some thoughts. Anerson, you are awesome…

I would like people to stop crediting Bill Clinton's achievements to Hillary. And why is it okay to claim 35 years of experience?

Let's get real here folks.

In the middle-east, women who take political positions, or are leaders are NOT respected, they are not listened to…they are not effective in that region of the world.

Jihadists, Al Qaeda, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Hamas, will NOT be taking advice from a western woman on ANY SUBJECT.

Hillary may think she has the experience, but I'm betting the most experience she's had talking with Arab leaders has been on Mosque tours and sitting down to a dinner. Because that is a far as they believe a woman can enter into politics.

How do we use Hillary to rebuild our status in the world when they won't talk to her as an equal?

And is there ANY White Male Republican that any arab leader trusts or will allow in a peace seeking solution? IN FACT the true jihadist WANTS the Republican "Crusader" white candidates to WIN the White House because the Repubs give them the strongest reason to fight…they are perfect recruitment tool.

A Woman is office means years of beling blown off because they don't want to argue with a woman and be sullied and its hard to rally jihadists around killing a woman.

Barack Hussain Obama, a Christian president, with a Muslim name, who has a reputation for reaching out. A man who will look like the people he will be negotiating with, is the best way to earn their trust & respect.

The time for Change should also include who will be most effective in communicating with THE REST OF THE WORLD too.

That would be OBAMA

William from Vancouver,

Americans are not stupid. We are just tired of the same Bush-Clinton cycle that's been spanning our country for the last 20 years. We need someone new to lead us in a new direction. Look how far our country has fallen in the last 2 decades, and you will understand why the new generation is looking elsewhere and forward to someone else to lead us back to where we belong in this world.

I don't think we need another president in the office that divides our country. It seems like people either hate Hillary or love her. At this crucial time we need a leader that can unite us, not a leader that can further widen the gap.
I hope that she does not become our democratic nominee, if so, I think another Republican might take over the White House.

A person I know previously worked for HC and she told me "this woman is incapable of tears." Don't be fooled like most of the voters in NH.

I've never been too much into politics, but I will say with recent events, I can think of nothing else. As the story of the next President unfolds, much like a great mystery, I rush home every day to see what new clue the media has left behind. The suspense of this great tale is elevated by its twists and un-expecting factors. Each day I'm pulled into this story and consumed by its overwhelming dynamics, a woman and a black man running for our Executive Chief Officer.

But I have to ask, since its brief mention is intriguing, did John Edward's comments of Hillary Clinton's emotional moment a strategic move to ultimately hurt Barack Obama? As a black woman, I'm truly insulted by the question, is America ready for a woman or black President? To ask suggests that there is inferiority to a white man and/or a lack of luster in the chromosome that decides my gender or in the pigment that causes my skin to be colored.

To purposely generalize, I know that there is not a man alive who has not felt the wrath of a woman, and a woman scorn is a true force to reckon. There is no under minding the struggle and the continued double standard that compels us to come out of the very realm of what makes us a woman just to compete for the same position and/or the same compensation. We were not created in spite of man, but to complement his general characteristics, as they equally complement mine. So tell us, we are not tough enough to run the White House because we are too emotional, well, we will show you. And indeed the female vote in NH did just that.

Having said (typed), that, there are more male chauvinists than racists. With Barack Obama out of the race for the Democratic nominee, John Edwards is sure to win. Because, again has the luster that my gender and race will not allow me to carry. It is the same unsaid phenomenon that the Republic party believes, that the United States will not vote a woman into the White House, because a woman is not going to tell him what to do.

Can you tell by my passage, who I support? Clinton? No, Obama, and I found myself disgusted with John Edwards with his intent sabotage (venting). I support Obama because he makes me believe, and only a true leader has the power to make a person to believe. This gift is not possessed by everyone, and it may lie dormant in many until the right circumstance allows it to be demonstrated. It cannot be taught. In the manufacturing world there is a difference between a manager and a leader, both with authority. I’d follow Obama (if a manager in the working field) because I believe and trust is judgment, and not because there would be some repercussions. Clinton is like a manager, who knows her stuff, and I would comply with her direction because of her knowledge. But when you believe in the direction given, it makes the actions that you take and events that you embark upon much more fulfilling.

Note that Lower Case cathy is not the same as this Cathy, as she supports Clinton and I support Obama.

Please, Lower Case, do not sully our shared name. Excessive exclamation points are the first sign of an unstable personality.

I'm an educated, highly intelligent young woman, which is why I think Clinton is NOT the best solution for our country. She's not a role model; all she proves is that if you marry the right man you can move up in the world. What happened to one's own ability? One's own bootstraps?

People, make up your mind. If someone wants to see bad on someone else, will find it, no matter what, if someone wants to see good, will find it also. How about to try to be objective, fair ? All those mean attacks on Hillary are just simply results of weak, simple minds.
If Hillary does not show emotions – she is cold, if she shows emotions – it is not right either. She did not cry, she was touched – what is wrong with that? It does not mean she is weak……she is strong, lady. Maybe those who are not able to keep their emotion under control are simply jealous.? I would like to see all thos critics in her situation- how they would handle themselves and the situation.
She does not need to act…
Obama was quite emotional on his speech after NH primary, and this is OK?
It is Ok to show emotion, Hillary did not have any breakdown – breakdown looks very very different. She just got touched, sad…this is OK.
Hillary is going through such a hell from some people – is this what smart classy lady has to go through trying to do something good for people? Such a hostile comments, attacks on her.

A lot of women can learn from her – to be a lady, to be able to hold emotions and poise when bad is happening, to be caring, smart, strong…

Dave Thompson
I agree we should be talking about the qualifications of the candidates. To me as well as many other Obama supporters, two important qualifications for president are:

1. Integrity
Obama – Consistant in message and behavior throughout campaign. Has not made any personal attacks on his opponents.
Clinton – Changed her personality after Iowa defeat and spinned it as "Finding her voice" the day before the election and after "35 years" of experience. Attacked Obama's message ( "Fairy tale" ) and the spirit of the American people ( "False hopes" ). Blatently stole Obamas and Edwards messages days before the election. Edwards – "Extremely personal to me." Obama – "Change the culture of Washington"

2. Leadership
Obama – Calls the people to action. He inspires them to not only demand the governemnt they deserve, but to get up off the counch and participate.
Hillary – Tells people that she is the most qualified to lead.

These are VERY important qualities of a president and frankly qualities that have been lacking for a long time by any political leader over the last 20 years including Bush and Clinton.

I am a Canadian but what ever happens in your country affects ours.

I truly do not understand how a country can vote in successive family members to run their country. There is nothing more dangerous, the Clinton"s are in the same class as Bush, the "represent the interests of the big corporations first club".

Your reputation abroad has been completely damaged, your employment is in a shambles, your percentage of people below the poverty level is like a third world country , you now have a banking and housing crisis.

What did the Clinton's do to further your country or make changes for the better of all your people? This many years later you still have the SAME problems but now they are much worse!

I do not believe for one minute that the Clinton's will dig you out of this hole, but they might dig it a little deeper.
LM in Calgary, Alberta, Canada

I guess I didn't see the tears only a crack in her voice. These are the most sickening blogs I have ever read,. The news coverage for Obama has been over the top. Were the news people afraid he would pull the racist card if they didn't give him all the attention?? Last night, they said he read his speech off a tele prompter then go on to say what a magnificent speaker he is…does that make sense.?? As far as I can tell, he's not God or even close to it. Doesn't compare to JFK, Bobby Kennedy, or Martin Luther King. His speeches say nothing but change….BUT change what is what a lot of us would like to know. Lay off the Clintons. Grow up and stop your whining. Its not very becoming from what is supposed to be a variety of people.

yes:but I didn't inhale.
I did not have relations with that woman.

I did not care about all that then and I don't care about it now.Hillary stuck by her husband through all of that.And the only reason people cared about those two things is because he was famous.No one would care at all if john doe made those comments or did any of those things,so who cares that has nothing to do with being qualified for president I don't get why it was or still is an issue.Hillary is not Bill so none of that even matters and neither does any of their marital issues.I think its clear that they love each other and stick together.Bill is not president anymore and no one cares about your marital issues so why do you care about theirs?Hillary is the most qualified candidate like it or not.

GO HILLARY! YOU HAVE THE SUPPORT OF SMART AMERICANS.

I'LL BE THERE THE DAY YOU ARE INAGURATED!

Come on AMERICA! Clinton’s tactic is tasteless and plagiarized. Clinton has seemed to manipulate the viewers once again with her irrefutable need to contradict Obama’s message. Candidate Edwards clearly expressed comparable passion, in fact more on the state of America at the NH debate, however we hear nothing of the genuineness of Edward’s plea for change. Obama and Edward both have had their own voice from the start, yet Clinton just discovers hers after several debates and a caucus? Clinton has not been the Nation’s candidate, and women need to see that women’s rights are not what unify America, nor does dividing parties for political gain exemplify the best candidate. It’s time to wake up America and recognize the snake in the grass, a wolf in sheep’s clothing and a manipulator among the most “experience”. We need a change, and Clinton’s tactic is not becoming of her to conjure negative publicity towards candidates for her own personal gain. Wake up America!

anyone seen this comic strip at pimpampum.net? the secret of Hillary's come behind victory.

Secret Strategy by Evil Boo

I agree with you Dave Thorson and I do apologize if any of that venom comes through in any of my comments. I think that for some of us anyway, the frustration comes primarily from how many people buy into Hillary's the pandering that is soooo obvious. In addition, it doesn't take a lot of research to figure out that there is no more real substance behind anything she does or has done then the man her and the former president love to attack for being soooo inexperienced. In addition, there has been this sense of entitlement portrayed by the Clintons that is nothing less than disgusting. As far as I can tell, HRC has done NOTHING that entitles her to be one inch closer to the Whitehouse than Barrack Obama; significantly less than some on the GOP side if the overblown experience argument actually wins the day.

I would also like to echo your sentiments regarding most folks operating on sound bites rather than looking into the candidates and the issues. I have read Barrack's book(s) and have been impressed with the way he handles himself, including the grasp of issues he does seem to portray, during the debates and various interviews. Hillary, not so much. One thing is for sure, this election is going to be very interesting. As for venom, we aint seen nothin' yet… Wait until the Clintons really get going, they are the masters of spin and mudslinging. Hopefully Barack is well prepared.

GO OBAMA!!!

THIS IS NOT NEWS PEOPLE!!!! Get to the issues!

First of all. she didn't cry. I am sure all of us have teared under much less strain. Secondly, who cares who the woman "who asked" voted for? Six kids died in Iraq today and this is a featured story????

I truly believe the crying of cry baby clinton, and the temper tantrum of her stinking husband , was a political stunt put on by both of them. You can' tell me that there isn't something fishy, when the day before Obama was nine percentage points ahead, and comes in 2nd. the truth is both Clintons are low life crooks So Hillary supporters if you want this cry baby in the White House, wait tell she has an affair with one of the pages,interns or aides. The truth is I would rather have my dog in the White House, then this witch.

To Dave Thorson,

What scares you about reading these posts is that you can now see how divided our country would be if Hillary Clinton becomes our next President.

She is just like Bush, either loved or totally hated.
No in-between.
THIS is the biggest reason people need to vote for Anybody But Clinton!

To Unite our country with any other President! Other countries are watching, too and wondering if Clinton's and Bush's are a sort of dictator.
Be careful, there's more at stake than you Hillary supporters think.

"There's just no crying in baseball and the Presidency is no exception."

Uh, there is crying in baseball. Shut it.

Congratulations to the Clinton Camp on the NH victory!; although by a very slim margin, a victory nonetheless.

I once had the utmost respect and admiration for both Bill and Hillary, but the more I learn about them the less I trust them. The recent and somewhat public negative attacks against a fellow Dem with a very strong message and following has further tarnished the Clinton reputation.

Question:
Is Senator Obama painted as weak and inexperienced due to the fact that he refuses to cheat on his wife? Is Mrs. Obama also weak and inexperienced because she would not stand for infidelity on the part of her husband?

Slick Willy has some nerve attacking Sen. Obama in any fashion; and Hillary should never suggest that any adult (especially Obama) is weak and/or naïve, as I have less respect for a woman that accepts infidelity, than the Man who cheats.

It is much too early to determine who will win. Everyone is overreacting to Obama. He has a long way to go. Once people realize where he stands on
some of his issues, he is going to fall behind and stay there!

Sometimes it's hard to believe the sexist attitudes out there. On one hand, Hillary is characterized as too hard, not personal. And if she shows genuine emotion, she's "playing the girl card" as one writer called it. Ridiculous. You'd think Hillary broke down sobbing the way the media has covered 30 seconds of an interaction! Get over it, people. You think you're so freaking informed about who she is & what she presents to this country and all you do is read crap media coverage and watch YouTube. Give me a break. Read her health care plan, learn about the things she's already achieved. For that matter, examine Obama's record with equal scrutiny. Those of you that think our country is better served by some hardened male with no emotions are full of it. We've been poorly served by enough of those types over the last 200+ years, most recently with Baby Bush.

I have heard that according to the hand counted ballots, Obama won 38% to Hillary's 34%, according to a watchdog group that is discrediting the Diebold voting machines. Has anyone heard this?

http://www.legitgov.org/nh_machine_vs_paper.html

Hillary rocks! I believed many people would have seen Hillary weak after that emotional moment, but after the successful campaign in New Hampshire and second thoughts, the moment showed a human side – not a repetative candidate. Go Hillary!

People, people, people.

NO ONE is not going to vote for Hillary because she's a woman.

They're not going to vote for her because she's a CLINTON.

It has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with emotional baggage almost a decade old.

personally, i think hilary clinton is full of crap…. and if shes already crying before she even becomes president, i dont want her to be president and start cry because " its a sensitive matter "!!!

shes full of it, go obama

Jon from LaCrosse Wis. We need a change, enough of the Bushes and Clintons.

I think media is giving Barak Obama a free ride . A few weeks ago just before the Iowa caucus when Tim Russet was interviewing him Mike Huckabee and Barack Obama in Meet the Press one after the other, the difference in the tone of the questioning and probing was so obvious. Mike was always put on the defesive , while the discussion with Barack was vas if he was adinner guest, treated very congenially l with no tough questions asked.

Does not the media have a responsibility to ask the tough questions of all the candidates?

Hillary Clinton showed humanity when she cried. I know, I know, politicians seeming human is hard to believe, but trust me on this one–it was genuine. Hillary Clinton is an amazing person, and I truly believe that she not only wants what is best for this country, but has the ability to achieve it.

On the other hand: Obama = Hitler.

If you don't believe me, see the following:

Hitler was a "feel good" orator, who rose to power when his country was at its lowest, and then continued to use his new found following to carry out his twisted racial agenda.

Enough said?

I believe the close race between Obama and Clinton is largely due to many Democrats liking and respecting both. However, as a woman, I believe a "tie" should go to the woman. Yet I am supporting Hillary Clinton not because it's a tie but because she is the best prepared to lead our country and reestablish our standing as a strong democracy. Eight years in the Senate, ten side by side her husband as he ran the county, strong career, strong mother, great record of public accomplishments and service.

Having said that I am impressed with Obama and believe he is a strong current and future leader for the Democratic party.

We must remember that running a campaign is a different exercise than governing. Delivering a speech that has impact is important yet, in my eyes, is near the bottom of key elements of a successful presidency.

The "emotional" moment occurred when Hillary Clinton said, in response to the question, "This is very personal for me." This was protrayed in the media as a "genuine" moment, but this line actually comes straight from John Edwards.

It is Edwards who is always saying over and over gain that "this is personal for me." If you read the transcript of the N.H. debate, in fact, Edwards uses these words again in response to a question about health care:

MR. EDWARDS: ". . . this battle is personal for me. You know, we need a president who believes deeply here, who believes deeply this battle, and it is personal for me."

It is much too early to determine who will win. Everyone is overreacting to Obama. He has a long way to go. Once people realize where he stands on
some of his issues, he is going to "bomb out."

Black, Republican and New Yorker!

Hillary chokes up and wins New Hampshire. The woman has a bagful of tricks, even mud and stone, that she will use to get elected.

I have said before and will say again: America is not ready for a Black President. America may be ready for a female President, but not Hillary Clinton.
Hillary is doing this, as she unconsciously confessed: FOR HERSELF! She said this thing is so 'personal', as she choked up. That she was behind in the polls made her choke up.

America's biggest phony, right after Bill Clinton.

Obama , will be the best president for this country . ANd what a big change it would be.he wiill chance America for the better. you can't go wrong,But God knows best.If it is the will of God, Obama will be president .

Divide and conquer. All this petty arguing between the Democrats is going to give ammunition to Right Wingers when the time comes. How do you all know this whole story wasn't from some ambitious Right Winger who just wanted to bait the Obama Clinton camps into a petty topic? Stay focussed on the real issues or the right wing is going to devour us with this junk. Demand real issues be focussed on. Everywhere!

It is much too early to determine who will win. Everyone is overreacting to Obama. He has a long way to go. Once people realize where he stands on
some of his issues, he is going to "bomb out."

How long are we going to dwell on unimportant trivia?

I started to read these comments to capture the pulse of the electorate, but I could only go so far.

What is really scary here is not the candidates nor the election, but the cynicism shown by the venom in so many of these comments.

I'm sure that the many comments made are by those who do not have a clue about the issues or the qualifications of the candidates but make up their minds on 30 second sound bites by the media and the campaigners.

You'd be much better off spending your time on exploring the pros and cons of the candidates than by spewing your venom.

The style of speaking is called Pathos the Greek philosophers noted that usually only politicians and preachers used this in their public speeches. They use human compassion as a weapon. Probably the best public speaker of all times was Adolf Hitler. In his precisely crafted, meticulously calculated speeches he made the German government seem like the underdog and the victim. He also always claimed Jew terrorists were trying to destroy the motherland. Thousands were driven to wailing and weeping to his words, completely under the radical thumb of nationalism. These fake liberals and conservatives are bought and paid for compliments of the Neo-con, globalist scum. Their grand daddies were the Nazi's money check.

Marianne……you knew the right thing to do. And I'm proud of you. Obama 08!

Way to go Republican party! As soon as Hillary(ous) is nominted, they will pull out the same old file that let the Republican party win all of the nonpartisan votes in 2000. They don't even have to look for new dirt on the Clintons. Does anyone have a memory that lasts longer than 8 years? It's no wonder the rest of the world thinks we are all crazy. I do too. Google the words Clinton and scandal to get a clue.

Mike from Green Bay, you ask what Hillary has done that makes her so much more experienced. If you do not know what Hillary Clinton has done in her long career, than look it up to see her qualifications. Her time in politics is NOT limited to the 8 years Bill Clinton has spent in office. (Not to mention the fact that she was so active as a first lady, that people actually took the time to debate the roll of the 1st lady, since never in US history had a 1st lady done so much…and her health care bill not coming through was the fault of the senate/congress, not hers)

And if you want to look at her history, also note that she sacrificed her own career early in Washington to support Bill in Arkansas. So if you want to question her being human, and showing emotion, that is the act of a selfless heart.

Way to go Republican party! As soon as Hillary(ous) is nominted, they will pull out the same old *\^! file that let the Republican party win all of the nonpartisan votes in 2000. They don't even have to look for new dirt on the Clintons. Does anyone have a memory that lasts longer than 8 years? It's no wonder the rest of the world thinks we are all crazy. I do too. Google the words Clinton and scandal to get a clue.

I guess now, all the other candidates have to do to win a primary election is to get all teary. Give me a break. If you people can't see that this was FAKE than you need a new pair of glasses. Hillary will say and DO anything she has to to win this. Don't let that happen. She is worse than Bill EVER was and he was bad enough. She is out for #1 – herself. She thinks she deserves this and if and when she gets it – everything she has promised you will be forgotten on day 1. Remember she keeps saying that she is the only candidate who will be ready on the first day she is president. That is about the only thing she has been saying that has any truth to it because on day 1, she will be doing what she wants to do – not what is best for you or the country.

Interesting ….all of this heated debate about "crying". Last time I checked, crying usually involved tears and emotional catharsis, followed by "could you pass me that box of tissues". That was not crying…not even close. Last month, Romney had three incidents of being similarly choked up over the course of 12 days…in an apparent failed attempt to convince voters that he is not a robot…funny how the press didn't even shrug at that.

Since 1992 the Clintons have been in the national spotlight and Hillary has never shown any kind of emotion at all. When Bill’s affair was on every news station every day she showed no emotion. On 911 as a Senator from New York she did not shed a tear in public. Now she is down in the polls about to lose to the better candidate and she starts crying. Please tell me the United States public isn’t so blind that they fell for this dirty trick. Obama 08.

I think all you libs must be blondes. Oh well RUDY,RUDY,RUDY,RUDY and so on.

"Ticker: Voter who made Clinton cry picks Obama"

MADE Clinton Cry? What an irresponsible hyped headline!

Stop bashing Hillary. This was a hard fought competition and won. Even Obama knew enough to acknowledge. That is why it is not good to believe the media hype.

I am both British and Canadian.

Americans must be politically stupid to even consider voting for Obama when they have Clinton.

Obama runs on "change" now–easy talk–but IFF he was elected President, he would be running on "experience" four years from now.

America needs experienced politicians NOW: vote experience.

Also, CNN is hopelessly biased towards Obama. Shows lack of taste and judgment.

Oh I am so sick of everyone's "Psychology for Dummies" analyses of Senator Clinton's "tears". First off, she didn't shed any tears. She was soft spoken, and honest.

It takes a very strong candidate to stand up to constant attacks and criticism. Part of the job? Yes. But c'mon – if Obama or McCain had humbled themselves to show their true selves every one of you who criticize Senator Clinton would be rushing to your nearest ATM to send more money to their campaigns.

As a woman, I am offended by such petty criticism. Criticize the important things like their views or their positions on the war – stop nitpicking the small stuff. This is precisely the reason our country is in desperate need of a real leader.

Honestly, sometimes my generation just shames me beyond what words can say.

Yep, Bill still wants to smoke cigars at the White House while Hillary tries to fix the health care system that'll fix him when his lungs go black as she goes for another botox injection…the picture of American health under a wannabe who calls Obama a "senator killer". Obama is no more of a senator killer than the Hillary who really cried. The only time that she is going to really cry is when it's all over…and it ain't over til the fat lady sings.

So far we've had five different winners running in three different states
in both parties. It involves these: the second half of a giant political
machine, running on big promises and nostalgia. Followed by a
fresh-faced celebrity candidate with enough teflon to avoid serious
scrutiny.

On the other side: Gomer Pyle type who retools himself while he speaks,
invokes Huey Long populism, and speaks enough gaffes to warrant
Dan Quayle's admiration. Then we got a blinking AARP poster model
with an insatiable need for conquest who truly believes an endorsement
from Watergate Republican Henry Kissinger is a plus. Lastly, a smooth-
talking floorwalker who thinks playing Mr. Nice Guy gets you the Presidency
when we all know it's a dog fight.

Even a new third party cannot make it. The system needs to be changed
from the bottom up. Like it's been said: all polatics is local.

We have three good candidates in the democratic party that all deserve to have a chance. All three swore to support the winner of the nomination. So many of the posters here,that say negative things about the other candidates,are not doing their candidates any good. If one candidate winning will make you switch your party,then go. That is treason to your choice of nominee. The democratic party does not need the votes of weasels that blindly support one candidate to the exclusion of the others. All three candidates are qualified to be president and are on the right side of the issues. None of the republicans are. If your choice is between one democrat and republicanism,then we don't need or want your vote.

Yeah, Hillary has really been beaten down by the media considering I literally heard on more than one occassion FROM THE HILLARY BASHING MEDIA… "Hillary is going to win the nomination we already know that." and that was months ago. Yes the media is biased towards her alright they want her in the white house.

Once she started to explain what her strategy was – what she would do on day one etc. – it looked to me like a programmed political device arranged in detail with Bill.

Why does the first woman to make it this far have to be her? Hillary is ok. I don't like her, but it's not like i hate her guts. Listening to Obama's speech last night, you would think that he won, and in a way, he did. I'm under 18, and i would really be happy if the adults of this country would make the right choice. If clinton wins, i'm moving out of the country!

Scripted tears or not, if the public accept emotions as a relevant response to a political question, then they get what they deserve. Today, if one claims that two plus two equals four, he may be accused of being arrogant. Everyone pays more attention to body language than to the facts. I prefer the "just the facts ma'am" time.

ummmmmmm. all i no is that like clinton is a woman and she should like get respect. they have FEELINGS also guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE THOUGHT OF A "CRY BABY" PRESIDENT IS FAR TOO FRIGHTENING WITH THE WAY THE WORLD IS TRAVELING TODAY…

CNN did not repot the whole story about this woman. Here's the rest of it and it tells you one of the many reasons that people like me are voting for Obama:

Marianne Pernold Young, 64, a freelance photographer from Portsmouth, N.H., told ABC News that while she was moved by Clinton's emotional moment, she was turned off by how quickly the New York senator regained her "political posture."

"I went to see Hillary. I was undecided and I was moved by her response to me," Pernold Young said in a telephone interview with ABC News. "We saw ten seconds of Hillary, the caring woman."

"But then when she turned away from me, I noticed that she stiffened up and took on that political posture again," she said. "And the woman that I noticed for ten seconds was gone."

Thank you Maggie for posting that.

I had mentioned it a few time before, but the sheep just ignore it.

For two to three weeks her campaigns STATED GOAL was to make her APPEAR softer and gentler by bringing out the family props that were not allowed to speak.

She went right into attack mode the next sentence after "welling up" and also left out was her EXPLAINING that it is tough, "you know", you gain a few pounds as pizza is so easy to eat on the campaign trail.

PANDERING to the WOMAN VOTE and it worked for these fools in NH and the media is part and parcel BY NOT SHOWING THE WHOLE STORY.

The pizza comments were part of it as well, I challenge any of you Clintonista's to dispute that.

i totally agree with mike from texas. clinton should beashamed. i mean its not like she has experience. she thinks shes the best just because her husband was president. he wasnt the best either. bill gave our nuclear files away to some foreigners just like that. some president he was.

I think someone said that Hillllary got the women's vote after all, if's that true I want to know if they were all blonde. Can someone help me???

THAT WAS A DISGRACE. the president does not win votes over emotional breakdowns. politics should be about the mind not some touchy feely words!!!

The tears I believe, the words I don't. I believeHillary was frustrated to see the object of her relentless personal ambition so close but slipping through her fingers. Concern for the great opportunities the U.S. is going to miss out on if Obama wins? Please.

Hillary won, she pulled an act, got simpathy, and won, simple as that.
Hillary can't act in front of worldly leaders, she does, we die. Why? We won't be taken seriously, be disrespected, and assaulted. Im not saying "GO OBAMA", I'm saying, "BOO ACTING" as it is not something that a leader needs. Leaders need to be strong and fair, not touchy-feely.

"Yet another voter deciding by heart rather than mind. Deciding by nothing more than an excellent speech. Give me a break…..delivering an excellent speech is not enough to be the president of United states. The candidate needs to have some experience and insight on how things work, rather than just rhetoric, for the most important job on this planet."

Can I ask what exactly Hillary has that somehow makes her so much more experienced for the job? Just because Slick Willy held office doesn't make her any more qualified to do so, and being a state senator is a far cry from being President of this great nation. I'd hardly expect the Packers to hand over control of the team to Deanna Favre, just because Brett is a future hall of fame QB. I'm sure he's told her all about zone coverage, line stunts and pass routes, and maybe even shared a game tape or two with her as well. Certainly she' qualified, right? The only experience to match being President, is to actually be President. Until elected, nobody has the perfect qualifications. It's time for America to try something new. The definition of insane to keep repeating the same actions and expecting different results. As a nation we are one election away from a padded room and a jacket with wrap around sleeves.

Bravo!! Bravo!! Job well done Hilary.

Though, I may have a couple of acting teachers in mind for you. It could use a little work.

Not everyone fell for it,… maybe you should try to be more convincing next time.

also, have bill refer to your crying while in the W.H…. as another fairytale

Since he is an expert!

Clinton and Obama are BOTH terrible for America. We need someone to respect and protect our Constitution, NOT push for "change" based on their extreme liberal views! This whole "change" thing Obama is pushing is so ridiculous. Americans will destroy our country if we allow one of those idiots to become president!

i cant believe any1 fell for that!…she plagerized Edwards "it's personal to me" before her fake tears…How naieve does she think people are…

Obama 08.

Clinton and Obama are BOTH terrible for America. We need someone to respect and protect our Constitution, NOT push for "change" based on their extreme liberal views! This whole "change" thing Obama is pushing is so ridiculous. Americans will destroy our country if we allow one of those idiots to become president!

Hillary threw everything including the kitchen sink to win this. It was desperate. It's pathetic to vote for someone to just make them feel better about themselves. Will she be 'crying all the way back to the White House' as Maureen Dowd astutely indicated in her column?

This ploy that Hillary used win New Hampshire. is as old as the republic. She played her gender card to appear so ‘vulnerable’, a sort of a damsel in distress while this 'man is getting away with something.' The unfair part of this is that Barack Obama can not talk about race factor in this. It’s a no win situation even when both she and the ex-President (disgracefully)used a very slick racial allusions on him. Sort of saying, 'wait a minute (Obama) this guy is ‘slick, a hustler, not ‘clean’ enough to use Biden’s term and finally you don’t know who this man is, etc.' The code message are so clear, it is not even subtle. It's peculiarly New England style begotry and it worked.

However, we know, the armor the Clintons have is now chinked. No matter what happens, Hillary cannot redefine herself wholly–she is who she is. So we’ll see. As for Obama he will live to fight another day. Who told these two–Clintons—that they are owed the White House? There are enough problems to address in our country than to have these two tired and dysfunctional couple come into the lime light again. Give us break, let another generation go in to address the serious issues we face in this country and the world.

Give me a break. It has nothing to do with sex. Whether or not Clinton was stressed and tired, which would lead to question how it is she would deal with a Presidency which can be the epidome of stress or whether it was a play to get more votes, the point is that either way whether it gives her a more human view in the eyes of women or shows that she is ambitious and not beyond anything to win, it should reflect negatively on any person man or woman. There's just no crying in baseball and the Presidency is no exception. She didn't show those tears at the funeral of a close friend but yet she broke down when it came to her Iowa defeat and on the eve of New Hampshire. I have no issue whatsoever, no, I would gladly welcome a woman into the top spot of the White House and think it would be awesome to hear Mrs President, however, I do have an issue with anti-men movements and anyone who votes for a candidate on the basis of race or gender. I certainly have an issue with women who are looking at her as this pillar of the strength of women all the while using her husbands influence and despite her book question the motivations surrounding their relationship after the controversy surrounding Bill Clinton's presidency which is not something I think should be swept under the rug so easily. So sure put a woman in the White House as President, but make sure she is who you want representing our country. If not or until then, let's choose the best person for the position and for me that is someone who is going to instill change in a major way. Someone who will move us past this melancholy lull of the status quo and move the United States into a position of leadership not by bulling but by example, that will not force other countries to our way of doing things but instead that we can be diverse as well and maybe we could learn a thing or two along the way, someone that will tell big business that it's no longer ok to ship American jobs overseas to save themselves money at the cost of American livelyhoods, someone that will prevent the greed of big business from preventing Americans from getting medical attention, from losing our homes after reeling us in with low introductory rates and small print and causing the housing market to bottom out and affect the overall economy not to mention what these foreclosures have done to all homeowners. Has your candidate addressed these issues? Mine has, perhaps yours is too busy worrying about the other candidate?

What we do here, we do for ourselves as individuals, we do for our neighbors, and we do for our country. Let's make sure we get it right this time.

Vote for a Change
Obama 08.

(How many of you read that this was posted by a guy and ignored the substance of the message? How many of you read Obama 08 and ignored what was actually written?…that's what I figured.)

IF THIS ELECTION IS RIGGED FOR HILLARY..THEN DEMOCRAT IS OVER…I WILL BE VOTING FOR A REPUBLICAN OR BLOOMBERG AS INDEPENDENT.

SHE TOOKS MONEY FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST AND FUGITIVE.

JIM Phoenix, AZ January 9, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Again, What have Hillary done to any of these reporters to be crucified like this every single day? Can't they accept the fact that she Won fair and square? Do you think that any of these reporters analyzed Obamas win in IOWA this much? Come on American people,

We should have experience and someone that can deliver more change and a better economy and Hillary will be the one to do it best.

BECAUSE THEY KNOW SHE'S A CROOK..WE ALL DO.

I have to applaud many of the above commentators with theyr psychobable. Senator Clinton did not cry. Instead of wasting time and print, if you dislike Senator Clinton so much then vote for a Republican. The misogynism is so apparent and lack of balance in your reasoning is equally evident. Obama who? Senator Clinton 08

I did not believe her tears for a second, she is playing a game!!!

Again, What have Hillary done to any of these reporters to be crucified like this every single day? Can't they accept the fact that she Won fair and square? Do you think that any of these reporters analyzed Obamas win in IOWA this much? Come on American people,

We should have experience and someone that can deliver more change and a better economy and Hillary will be the one to do it best.

My 20 year old Virginia Tech sophhomore ( a registered republican , no less) home for the holidays and I drove 3 hours Monday night to Concord , NH to hear Barack Obama's 10pm rally . At 9pm the lines were at least on three sides of the Concord High School's circumference. Waiting in 30 degree weather with frozen ice and snow. most were young men and women. Even in 1972 my anti-establishment, Vietnam War , Tricky Dick era days have I never seen what's going in the Democratic Party today. Obamo is electrifying people — not Hillary Clinton's scripted tears.

I guess "Barry" Obama is the one crying now.

I feel shamed that people of New Hampshire voted Hilary for her cry. Moreover, Senator Hilary Clinton is abusing her womanship, so sad for a Presidential candidate in a country like United States of America; it is not a third world country.

The peole of United States should remember that,
"EXPERIENCE CAN PULL YOU BACKWARDS BUT YOUTHFULLNESS CAN PUSH YOU FORWARD".

God bless America and Barak Obama

I just want to say that the polls before the New Hampshire primary were correct but the voters changed their mind at the polling boot because they know no one is watching them. No one would know who they actually voted for. They can say publicly they have will vote for Obama and privately vote for Hilary because Hilary is white. Race had a lot to do with the race last night eventhough other people tend to dismiss that notion.

thanks
Abdul

So what the same old lying clowns that have ruined my country, I would rather just vote for who really represents America's spirit, not some Jerry Springer dramatic queen, who refuses to pass the torch to the younger smarter more truthful candidate.
Who's election is it anyway, Bill Clinton's. This entitleship to the Presidency by the cheating lying candidates who have won the last twenty years is ludicris.

As soon as America, set the oars of change in the water, it's possible we'll be able to steer clear of disaster, before it's too late. How much hatred can we take.

I'm just asking.

I sincerely hope that all Democrats and others who are supporting Hillary have strtaed doing their homeworks for the forthcoming Republican onslaughts. For years, this woman has stabbed the Republications, and like any smart enemy, they are lying in wait! It is unfortunate that most of the "old-timers" (ages 35 and older) have very short-term memories for events such as:
"I never had … with that woman"
"It depends of your definition of 'is'
"I smoked, but did not inhale!"
Oh, what about Hillary's failed health-care policies?
What about the current movement to "draft" a third-party candidate, if a divider such as Hillary is put out there by the Democrats?
Finally, would anyone really want to wakeup each day listening to the Clintons for the next 8 years? America, please wake up and let us all have some "common sense". We should simply let go of the "past," we have seen it all; there are some viable alternatives out there NOW, and this is the time to seize it. DO not forget, the old never likes to change; they always want to dominate.

VOTE OBAMA!! THIS IS WHERE A NEW CHANGE BEGIN, THIS IS NOT THE END OF THE RACE BUT THE BIGINING. OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT 08. "YES WE CAN"

Change to what¿?

Give me a break folks. NH people did not vote for Hillary because she was teary!!! Way to go CNN on that lame thought. Please, has anyone seen the clip? She hardly looks as if she got emotional. It's just a bunch of hype! Someone needs to blame why she won the Dem vote in NH. Does it occur to you that she is up against very strong odds? People are bashing her more than the others because she is a woman? I am not voting for her because she is a woman. I am voting for her because she has a GREAT plan, a well thought out plan that could maybe work in our great country of ours. Maybe get us back on our feet. She is experienced! Her opponent is full of a lot of good ideas, but has he proven to follow through? Have you seen the work in the past? Has any deep questions been answered? Don't just go with your gut feeling. Vote for who is the best! We are in dire need of change, but we need someone who can follow through with their plan!

Stay strong Hillary, I'll vote for you.

Interesting to me is the contrast of message between the 2 of them that the Hillary supporters just dont seem to get.
The voters going for Obama (and I am leaning that way over Hillary) arent looking for 'experience' in the traditional sense, they are looking for a …'new experience'… in politics. Much broader message, and a more appealing message to the public who hold low, low opinions of their current president and congress.

Poll after poll, Obama wins the 'who is the best candidate to unite the country' thing. I think people want to move forward and not back, generally.
And to this point, I have posited that Hillary would be all about rehashing the Bush admin failures and would be implicitly looking for revenge on the GOP for the last 8 years. People want to move forward. Revenge will only be divisive, no matter how much we may feel the y deserve it. NOt a uniting strategy.

Similarly, the thing about Edwards is that he is using a one-dimensional tactic that sounds like we will have one big lawsuit going on for his presidency. I like Edwards, but he is leaving the impression of conflict and abversarial justice. Perhaps justified in almost all of his terrific examples, buit it doesn't sound like a uniting startegy to me.

I worry sometimes about the level of experience Obama has, but I think if he convinced the public about how he would suround himself with those with much more experience and that some of those folks may be independants or republicans, he is going to be hard to beat. If he overcomes that objection, then the GOP has nothing on him. The real worry they have is that he is creating a movement. How do you deal with that if you are the GOP?

I like Hillary, but I really do think she may not win the general election. Look at how many dems are turning out to vote right now. Phenomenal! . MOre importantyly, look at how many republicans are not (comparatively). This is great that a lot of GOP'ers may be staying home on election day. Make Hillary the nominee though, and the GOP electorate will come out in droves, erasing our early advantage. You can probabl;y count on another close election at 50/49%, with the dems coming out losers again. Dont undeestimate that sentiment, I hear it every day…from democrats and republicans.
Nothing would fell worse than that

Amazing, the woman that asked the question votes for Obama. Thanks alot!

Obama/Edwards 08, YES WE CAN!!!

HILLARY WON THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY BECAUSE SHE USED THE "SYMPATHY" CARD.

PEOPLE FELT GENUINELY SAD FOR HER, NOT THAT SHE FELT SAD FOR THE COUNTRY!

CLINTONS NEVER LOSE- TILL OBAMA SHOWED UP, THATS ANOTHER REASON SHE CRIED.

WELL HEAR THIS HILLARY — AS THE OZZY OSBOURNE SONG GOES: NO MORE TEARS! YOU 'SUCKERED" A LOT OF VOTE S WITH YOUR PHONY CARING ATTITUDE.

AMERICA KNOWS BETTER NOW. WE NEED A LEADER WHO IS STRONG , AND WON'T COLLAPSE UNDER PRESSURE…AT LEAST REAL PRESSURE..AND NOT A PRIMARY'S PRESSURE.

A VOTE FOR HILLARY – IS A VOTE FOR THE STATUS QUO IN AMERICA FOLKS.

NOTHING WILL CHANGE. AND YOU WILL ALL HAVE TO BLAME YOURSELVES FOR VOTING FOR THE CLINTONS.

AMERICA HAS EITHER A CLINTON OR A BUSH IN THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES, AND LOOK WHERE IT GOT US

WE THE PEOPLE NEED A FRESH OUTLOOK, AND A NEW HOPE IN AMERICA.

WE THE PEOPLE NEED TO BE SEEN IN THE WORLD'S EYES AS A COUNTRY WHO IS FOR THEIR PEOPLE, AND THE GOODWILL OF ALL MEN AND WOMEN ON EARTH.

TODAY'S LEADERS HAVE MADE A MOCKERY OUT OF AMERIC AND HER POLITICAL SYSTEM.

OBAMA WILL BRING THAT CHANGE-THAT IS SO DESPERATELY NEEDED IN OUR NATION.

AGAIN, CAN AMERICA "SURVIVE" MORE OF THE SAME THAT WE WILL GET BY VOTING FOR A CLINTON THAT HAS BEEN IN OFFICE BEFORE, AND HASN'T FURTHERED ANY CHANGE FOR THE PEOPLE??.

it's been said that Hillary Buses in Crowd from Massachusetts

Is Mayor Bloomberg entering the race trying to stop Senator Obama?

Are we headed for a race war?

I'm a 58 years young woman and in all this rich age that I possess, I have learned thru experience that when one experiences resistence like Clinton is getting it is because she has done what was right and good for the people she represents and if we elect inexperienced Obama, because of his charisma and his silver tongue we will quickly realize our mistake. To be successful like Clinton has been in alot of areas in her life and to be knocked down and perservere under extreme pressure and persist when the going gets rough is the kind of leader I want representing me. Vote Clinton. ar

And New Hampshire picked Clinton. Why is this considered a "story"?

"Hillary Buses in Crowd from Massachusetts"

"Hillary Clinton has been caught committing an act of outright dishonesty and deception by stacking the rally with people who do not represent the people of New Hampshire."

Experience is not enough when you create a divide so wide – that nothing gets accomplished. Why are Americans more angry with Congress then with Bush? Nothing has been getting resolve with all of this partisan bickering.

We all want to remember the 90's as the good old days with a better economy – but think harder and remember all of the partisan bickering and how the Federal government was shut down for awhile with the Contract with America. The reason why Bush won is because of all of the baggage that came from Bill Clinton. We don't need the animosity in the White House any more.

I don't want a President to represent the Rep, or Dem,or Men,or Women, or the Christians. The President should represent all of us.

Obama is able to bring people together.

I am so dissappointed with CNN and your reporting of the Clinton campaign. I have acutally switched my vote to supporting Hillary. Your biases are so transparent and Candy Crowley is not someone I would ever want on my side.

Hillary Clinton's resilience is a model for all. I'm now convenienced this country needs a woman as a president.

People seem to think that Barak Obama's message of unity and hope are lacking substance. You are forgetting one thing-regardless of any plan Hillary may have, none of it amounts to a hill of beans if she can't get the other side of the isle to agree with her. You MUST have unity first to have success. That is the part no one seems to understand. She is terribly decisive, and, apparently, very manipulative. I used to have confidence in Bill Clinton, despite his many indiscretions. My confidence was washed away when I heard him landblast Obama, and refer to any idea of his winning as a "fairy tale." A lot of nerve after everything Black voters have done for him and his manipulative wife.

As far as his name goes, he, just like the rest of us, didn't get to pick our names, the schools we attend, or the circumstances that lead us to where we are. I certainly pray that women weren't compelled to vote for her because of pity. As a black woman, I know that we have been crying for over 500 years, and have had a much harder way than she could ever imagine, yet most haven't and still don't give a tinker's behind about our tears. All her contrived tears did was anger me because it smacks of manipulation.

Hillary could NEVER win against any Republican, so if anyone out there is supporting her, they should make sure that none of their children needs to go to college via the G-I bill.

HILLARY PLAYED THE CRYING GAME,BUT IT WONT WORK AGAIN BECAUSE PEOPLE WOULD KNOW THAT SHE IS A FAKE

I think it is good for the Hillary camp that she voted for Obama. Otherwise, all will be crying foul that it was set up.

The press crucified Hilliary these past few days, and now they won't even accept responsibility for their actions. Now the press, and some of the posters here, don't even give women enough credit to vote on issues. They say we vote on who cries, and who we feel sorry for. I'll tell you what, I've seen George Bush cry and I never voted for him, I never felt sorry for him. I was smart enough to see George as the most corrupt president we've ever had, tears or no tears, and I look to HIlliary to try to get us out of the mess he created. CNN should be ashamed of their coverage of HIlliary, it's what you would expect from FOX!

It was heart- warming to hear AP's projection of Hiilary's triumph last night. Like me, a lot of Canadians who are not directly involved in the US election, are rooting for Hillary not because of sympathy but because she and McCain are the two strongest time-tested candidates who should fight it out in the general election.

This woman has been ostracized and called obscene names even in these supposedly moderated (by CNN) tickers. Apparently all these attacks backfired in NH.

Aside for the incident when she showed her emotions and passion for the job in the cafe, Hillary won because she won the NH debate on Saturday night by a big margin, despite being ganged-up on by Edwards-Obama's very obvious alliance. She showed strength when she responded to the Edwards' attack with her experience in bringing about changes. She also showed her human-side the way she handled the likeability question with a great sense of humour and tact. She also scored a lot of debate points by saying that electing a woman would be a huge change.

After watching the debate, I would have voted for her if I were a NH voter.

As another person commented, Obama's oratory for change and hope is wearing thin as it sounds too preachy — fit for a church pastor not for a Presidential candidate. It is having the same repulsive effect as wjhen Edwards talk about figthing for middle class and poverty. Obama has to find another mantra other than "change" as it has been overused and neutralized by Charlie Gibson of ABC in the debate by pointing out that almost all candidates in past elections talk about change when they run for office. I think he alreay found one in "yes we can".

Finally, if the Americans cannot entertain the idea of electing Hillary because she is a woman, we would like to invite her to Canada, which has a precedence of having a woman Prime Minister.

I think Hillary should win. Hillary is a woman, the US has never had a female president. Obama is black, the US has never had a black president, either. However, Obama is still a male, regardless of skin color. I think it would be nice to have a woman's perspective.

Hillary is definately the most qualified candidate and has done more for our country than the others.So she got a little emotional,perhaps she just really cares.The US wants other countries to change because we don't like their ways or how they treat their women;however a huge portion of the US will not vote for her simply because she is a woman.That is sad.WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!We need something different as of eight years ago.For those who bash the Clinton administration and probably voted for Bush:The best I have ever saw things in the US and the best off this country was happened to be during Bill Clintons administration.What is wrong with People who thnk she will be a bad president because she is a woman?I'll put this in prospective for you.Men have always run this country,look where that has gotten us.Honestly do you really believe that she could do anymore harm to our country than all the men have?We need to try a new approach to a system that is not working and amazingly maybe that is a woman.People make me sick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL, man you people are haters to the extreme. Get over your self, most Americans dont know what we talk about here. So lets just get along and be happy that the Dems are kicking butt.

VOTE OBAMA!! THIS IS WHERE A NEW CHANGE BEGIN, THIS IS NOT THE END OF THE RACE BUT THE BIGINING. OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT 08. "YES WE CAN"

Could we please give this story a proper burial. It's tiresome, completely sexist and ludicrous. She was hardly balling, but revealed a more sensitive side, which is more than I can say for all the men that have been President since I can remember–back to Harry Truman. We don't need any more macho posturing from Presidents–please no more "bring it on" nitwits in the White House! We had enough of the men who talk tough, but don't have to suffer the consequences of their words.

As a woman, I am appalled that women would vote for her and consider it being a feminist. Hillary is playing this game on two levels – saying that she is the most tested and experienced – yet it is obvious that she cannot take what she dishes out.

Hillary has been much more cruel in her attacks against others, but expect the male candidates to be gentlemen towards her. She is NOT being criticized any more than any other candidate! Gimme a break!

If Hillary wants to be President she needs to know that criticism is constant. I don't like Bush – but I can honestly say that he is criticized on a daily basis – sometimes even undeservingly. What is Hillary going to do if Castro insults her, or Hugo Chavez? Is Bill going have to defend her? That totally weakens her position.

Did Castro tell Jeb Bush that he was chubby and could benefit from some exercise because he is a man? (Oh, but if someone said something about Hillary – people would totally make it out it is due to her being female). When Chavez joked about Bush having left the smell of sulfur at the podium – was that because he is male? What would Hillary do if she got criticized the same way?

Seriously, people say that Huckabee looks like Gomer Pyle, and Romney looks like Herman Munster. People attack all of the candidates.

Why is it that when Hillary is criticized it is just because she is a woman? I say the woman needs to grow up, instead of acting like a school girl. If she wants to be the President then she needs to present herself in a way that proves that she can handle it. Because the world is not going to treat her with kid gloves.

I thought that the reason the media covered this so obsessively was that lizards were not previously known to experience emotions.

I was an Edwards supporter when he first started talking about "two-america" in 2004 election. Then I got tired of it after realizing that it is all words and no action to back it up.

I was an Obama supporter first. Then I realized that all he does is give good speeches but not enough substances in there.

I did not like Bill Clinton that much while he was President. although he is doing good work now.

I was not sure about Hillary when she ran for the senate.

Then I read that she won in upstate New York where Democrats do not normally win. Then I also found that she cosponsored by bills with Republicans. Then I saw the debates. She is very intelligent and fit for President.

You know, wouldn't it be a little more classy for her to not seek publicity. Good grief.

Glad she voted for Obama. Gives her an opportunity to weep for 11 months.

What a stupid reason to pick a Presidential candidate.

The woman said Obama made her cry twice so she voted for him…..now why did she cry? SOmeone must have been playing with her emotions….that is what Obama is doing exploiting people's emotions…talking like some sort gold send angle….it is almost laughable…very soon we are going to hear he is actually Jesus himself…..lol

Has anyone noticed that Hillary didn't beat Barack by a very wide margin, in fact, it's a very small margin. Barack still has more delegates which makes him what…? I dunno…the FRONT RUNNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I still cannot beleive that the so-called "educated" women voters of New Hampshire would vote for a candidate because her eyes got teary….. a sad commentary on who are voting for the President of the United States.. Maybe the same teary eyes will work for her in the White House!!

Something wrong about the potential leader of the most powerful country in the world breaking down emotionally to the point of tears.

Should Obama become the president, every one of you would be crying every day…

People in Kenya seem excited for Obama that is good because i'm excited for him too. Its just that some are excited for the wrong reasons. It is true that when Obama become president he will help to control the war in Kenya and bring our boys home from Iraq. However, i don't know about him bringing power to Kenya. Kenya is his ancestoral home but America is his country. The country he obviously love so much and want so much to change from what it has been during the last eight years. I believe in Obama's message of change. "YES WE CAN". Vote Obama 08.

Glad to hear at least one voter wasn't swayed by HC's fakery. Mind you, the media didn't have to fall for it either so in a way I can't blame HC for shrewdly taking advantage of their idiocy. Please, it was barely a quaver in her voice!

Jon Stewart was very funny about it on The Daily Show, pointing out how many male politicians have cried a lot harder in public over the years.

Unfortunately there's plenty of stupidity to go around.

Wake up, people – the Clinton juggernaut is a FRAUD! Slick Willy was elected with 43% of the popular vote, re-elected with 49% , both numbers lower than GWB for crying out loud! There isn't now and never was anything inevitable about her nomination – all smoke and mirrors! She couldn't even run in her "home" state of Arkansas for fear of the inevitable humiliation.

Listen to her telling you how important White House experience is (why wasn't it important in 1992?) And just in case you actually believe being married to a president passes for "experience" – let's get the ball rolling for Laura Bush in 2012!

For all of you Obama-Extremist, you obviously do not understand his message, not one of you has any respect for Sen. Clinton, you spout so much venom with every comment that it is shameful to see. Sen. Clinton is an honorable Lady, she cares a lot for this country and she deserves our respect. Sen. Obama as well I believe has his heart on the right place, however I disagree with some of his ideas, but I choose to respect him and understand that he is also trying to make this country better and I thank him for it. but for people like Joanna to suggest that Sen. Clinton's emotions after a month for 18-20 hour days meeting thousands of people and the streess of running a campaign causes a fairly simple question to spark her reaction that for some reason that means she is weak or less desirable to become president is moronic. perhaps joanna is the perfect person and she should be the next president!!! I cannot stand when people believe they can judge everyone when they have never walked on their shoes. it is pathetic!

The response was most likely staged. However, she is a politician and it is to be expected. Do not forget that calculated moves are NECESSARY when dealing with other countries and the House/Senate. Right now, you probably expect that I am a supporter of hers. In actuality, I am a conservative and tend to follow more along the lines of Senator McCain. I do not understand where everyone gets the idea that Hillary is so experienced in the political arena. It is simply not true. Just because she has been at Bill's side for all his offices does not constitute having experienced the position itself. Face the facts. When it comes to experience in the Senate, she too is a "Rookie." When President Clinton's cabinet members were advising him in private meetings as to how he should proceed in matters such as Kuwait and Kosovo, I guarantee her presence was not allowed. On another matter, I am a health care professional, and I disagree with any candidate who says this country would be better off under the concept of universal health care. Please get a clue! WE ALREADY HAVE IT! Anyone who goes to the ER cannot be turned away! It is illegal to do so. That means we must provide care already for everyone. If we are pushed to universal health care (which is essentially government controlled), can you imagine how much more inefficient and wasteful the practice would become??? Hillary's "resolutions" to the nation's current shortcomings are socialist in nature. If you do not believe me, then please, look them up. Then look up what it means to be a Socialist. You may be surprised.

I could write much, much more regarding Hillary, but I will leave you with this. Vote by what the candidates' policies are, and at least make an attempt to understand what they mean. Do not vote for Hillary because of her gender, and do not vote for Obama because he is black. No one should vote strictly based off party lines either. Make an INFORMED decision!

P.S. Please stop insulting people for their views on how to make this country better for everyone. Most of the people who are tossing these insults around could not even pass fourth grade grammar courses, and it deeply scares me that people like this will decide who will become the next American President.

I have watched the media and everyone focus on the two canditates, Clinton and Obama, and all I see is the following:

a. Obama delivers a speech as if he is a evangelical minister. Everytime I see hime speak I have the urge to raise my hands in the air, sway back and forth, and start to say "Ahem" over and over again. Last night's speech was a prime example of this.
b. When Hillary speaks I feel I am in a court listening to a lawyer give final arguments, not a lot of emotions just the facts. She did that last night, thanking everyone but really you thought you were going through all of the dirty details of a trail all the while waiting for her to say "If it fits you must convict".

What each and everyone of us has to look at it and answer for to ourselves…"Do we want a person who sounds great but may not have the experience/depth running the country or someone who has more experience to run the country but can be a bit rigid". We are in dire straits here and it is very easy to get excited about hearing some words but in the end we need action, we need a plan, we need to get our troops home, get our economy going, our children educated and so many other items.

We can drink the Koolaid (just like they did in Jonestown) but if we do not ask questions about the Koolaid before drinking we may end up as the people in Jonestown, a dead country.

We need Obama to give us substance. His speeches are great but I am not drinking the Koolaid he is spilling cause I have no idea what is really in it.

We need Clinton to be more animated. If I was on her campaign I would hire an acting coach cause she needs to loosen up and use her arms and move around, my god my grandmother is more animated than her. I am not drinking her Koolaid because I am sure it is bland and has no taste.

For me they both have a lot to work on but I will take substance over talk, Hillary gets my vote at this point but INovember is a long ways away.

If we don't want leaders who show emotion, then why the hell is Obama so popular. He emotes constantly. Why is Edwards kind of popular, he emotes constantly. Mitt Romney has cried, John McCain has cried, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George Bush, the list goes on and on and on.

Oh wait, I get it–its okay for man to show emotion, but not a woman. Okay, then, I get it.

Time to end double standards and stop spewing your hateful rhetoric. Maybe you should listen to the message of hope Obama speaks of and act on it….or, is it really just words.

Judging by his lack of ability to influence your behaviour, I'm all the more convinced that its just words.

Hillary, strong record in the senate, lots of legislation which has helped millions of people, compassionate, a student, strong, decisive, willing to consider multiple perspectives (sometimes to her detriment), has a plan that includes all americans….

I'm sticking with her. Maybe the Clintons have fought dirty (when defending themselves from the Republican machine, which by the way Obama would have to do as well)….but they are real and we know what we're getting with Hillary.

Hillary O8.

Well all I can say is that if it was fake, she deserves to win for pulling it off.

Also, I went to an Obama rally… talk about playing on people's emotions!

Give me a break. This was a typical Clinton staged event and I wasn't fooled as obviously so many were.

The real losers tonight are not Barack Obama or Mitt Romney, but rather the media. THeir obsession with Barack Obama and their ruthless tactics against the Clintons has caused many Americans, including I, to be absolutely disgusted with their bias. There is a fine line between professionalism and chastising Hillary Clinton over a simple loss in one state.

This further shows the the success and victory of the Clinton Machine. They defeated themselves another machine, a machine that will use myriad tactics to sway the minds of the American People, the media.

The voter did not make Mrs.Clinton cry. She did get choked up and was emotional, but she was not moved to 'tears.' Please revise your innacurate headline, and let's focus our discussions on which candidate can best return America to it's former stature, and how we go about getting her elected.

I had an opportunity to hear Mrs. Clinton speak at a woman's conference in New York last year. After that experience, I was an avid "Hillary 4 Prez" supporter….until yesterday. I was appalled at the pretence of tears. Throughout this whole campaign, she and her staff have attacked Obama at every turn. Two volunteers and a staffer were either, asked to resign or left on their own, because of their mud slinging. Now she wants to be overcome by her passions for this country. And, what does "I have so many opportunities from this country " mean anyway?

Obama '08
_______________________________________

Tara- you were never hillary supporter to begin with. It just shows how childish Obama supporters are. I understand most of his voters are under 35 now this is almost childish. All I hear is from then " I will vote republician if hillary wins nomination. I lost respect for hillary after seeing her emotional" Sorry we are smart enough to know that you are hardcore obama fan. May be that is why we see so many negetive comments about hillary because most of Obama supporter are younger with computer access. HOWEVER WHAT MATTERS IS VOTES. Not your ability to come and type childish messages.

I don't know about you guys and gals, but I don't want a sissy for president. If she can't take the rigors of the campaign trail, Hillary wouldn't stand a chance as president.

Obama just lost by a couple percentage points

Clinton was lucky people felt sorry for her. I really hope Us Americans (excluding everyone who didnt fall for it) wont fall for this sad attempt to gain our votes.

And how can we ever have peace in the middle east if Arabs dont even recognize women as leaders??? if we elect Clinton we are SCREWED

GO OBAMA

and you shouldn't be sick of hearing change. anything else will just end up being like Clinton or Bush. THATS WHAT NEEDS TO CHANGE

It was heart- warming to hear AP's projection of Hiilary's triumph last night. Like me, a lot of Canadians who are not directly involved in the US election, are rooting for Hillary not because of sympathy but because she and McCain are the two strongest time-tested candidates who should fight it out in the general election.

This woman has been ostracized and called obscene names even in these supposedly moderated (by CNN) tickers. Apparently all these attacks backfired in NH.

Aside for the incident when she showed her emotions and passion for the job in the cafe, Hillary won because she won the NH debate on Saturday night by a big margin, despite being ganged-up on by Edwards-Obama's very obvious alliance. She showed strength when she responded to the Edwards' attack with her experience in bringing about changes. She also showed her human-side the way she handled the likeability question with a great sense of humour and tact. She also scored a lot of debate points by saying that electing a woman would be a huge change.

After watching the debate, I would have voted for her if I were a NH voter.

As another person commented, Obama's oratory for change and hope is wearing thin as it sounds too preachy — fit for a church pastor not for a Presidential candidate. It is having the same repulsive effect as wjhen Edwards talk about figthing for middle class and poverty. Obama has to find another mantra other than "change" as it has been overused and neutralized by Charlie Gibson of ABC in the debate by pointing out that almost all candidates in past elections talk about change when they run for office. I think he alreay found one in "yes we can".

Finally, if the Americans cannot entertain the idea of electing Hillary because she is a woman, we would like to invite her to Canada, which has a precedence of having a woman Prime Minister.

How to start and what to say?
Who have labelled persons of african origin to be called african american? Is it that persons of african origin call themselves the same or is it by people of other complexion?

Why are not caucasians called European Americans, and people of Asian origin as asian Americans?

In any case, why divide a great nation on race, origin, religion, orientation?

I feel it is high time African American start calling themselves and demand to be called Americans. They are as americans as any others are.

And also the government stops immigration policies of bringing in cheap labour from developing countries. First they (the elite/rulers/exploiters of mankind) brought slaves by force, and now they bring in the guise of immigration. South Africa, Ghana, India…….(endless list) train and develop their human resources at great cost and the States and other surrounding nations along with australia and europe bring in these talented sons and daughters of developing world and let them rot in underpaid jobs. It is said break the self-esteem of a nation(person) and it(he) will be slave forever.

Now coming back to politics, having come to this part of the world, please you immigrants assimilate fast and don't go for cheap labour jobs and work for hours to pay bills and mortgages and live and die in debt, and leave behind "debt" as inheritance to your offsprings. Beat them at their own games. There are shining examples of recently immigrated people getting rich. Have focus and stop complaining. Network and help each other to grow than PHD.

There is no race in this world. We all came from Namibia/Kenya, whites, browns, blacks, yellow, big nose, monkey nose or whatever…..and there are only two classes…Haves and Have-nots.

Vote for those who value your labour and put in place laws and policies to empower you and strive towards equitable distribution of wealth. Hard work, loyalty, dedication and zeal to improve oneself shall be appreciated and rewarded. But monopolies of elites and Have-alls have to be broken and that is possible only with voting for candidates who promise in writing what they will do and in what time span to reduce the gap between haves and have-nots, in a productive and meaningful way and not through dols, but with right policies in place to reward both the entrepreneurs and working class fairly.

Vote for the candidates who don't stir "pseudo nationalism" in this global village, who don't stir "outdated religious bigotries" as against "spiritualism" and true positive concerns for the well being of human race without creed, race and religion. There can be only one captain in any ship at any given time but all else have a role to play as well.

demand to know from the candidates: What will they do to bring in peace to this world?
What will they do to make minimum standard of living for each american?
How will they encourage growth and innovation, entrepreneurs while minimising exploitation?
How will they reduce working hours of men and women so that they have decent earnings and time for families?
What else they will do to make families and bring values of our ancestors back and not breaking families?
How will they be servant of americans and not rulers?
don't talk about free health and schooling. These are distractions. We need opportunites..fair and equal and God has given us hands and reasoning to think and earn our living..It is the barriers which have been created which have to be removed and not free meal, health, insurance, cheap mortgage…but fair share of opportunities….

Fundamental rights..freedom to work, educate, earn and live….any restraint…Stop.

Ask Obamas and Clintons : What will they do when they retire after serving? Will they resign if majority of populace demand if they find them lacking or underperforming? Will they be available to individuals to meet them in open indabas and demand from them accountability….

Or we will have to call them sirs and madams, while they are supposed to be calling us sirs/madams as we are the ones putting them in position of serving us.

What drives me crazy is that all these commentators coming in, saying that people's response to this 'emotional moment' was just an excuse to not have a woman president; and that those of us women who refused to fall for it were 'traitors' to the cause, or trapped in a "sexual caste system".

Gloria Steinem, et. al.

I am the result of your struggle. I can view a candidate not as a female or male. I can run as a candidate, not as a female. I can be Secretary of State. I can be President. I can be a soccer mom too, if I want to be. You made me what I am today. To see you of all people throwing around the 'gender' card is sickening.

I saw the 'tears', I heard the woman's question (it was about her hair or something stupid like that). Hillary Clinton decided to show this "delicate" side, knowing that a man would NEVER be able to do that. Or attack her for doing it without looking like a evil sexist man.

Saying she "found her voice", when in fact she doing nothing more than falling on old stereotypes of women as "delicate, gentler" creatures. It was craven, it was calculating, and this neo-feminist saw right through it. I will never vote for her. Just the implication that if I don't follow the gender card, we'll "lose everything, and go backwards", as Hillary said. Ridiculous.

I agree with many of her policies. If it were just on paper, I'd probably vote for her. But the reason I won't, is that I know she's a fraud. That doesn't make me a traitor to my gender, and I deeply resent people saying it does.

Hillary is manipulating the nation for votes. I personally wouldn't trust that woman as far as I can throw her.

President Bush polls are at a record time low, I feel sorry for him, so I gave him a call last night and told him if he would come on CNN news and say things are not great for American and start crying for us, his poll numbers would go sky high. Look Mr president what do you have lose, it worked for Hillary.

I had to laugh out loud as I read comments from the feeble minded Clinton supporters claiming that CNN is pro Obama and does nothing but "Hillary Bash".
You people must have just climbed out from under the proverbial rock, especially those of you from New Hampshire that voted for her yesterday. However, back to the point. CNN has a well known Clinton bias and clearly showed it.
As far as the tears, why can't folks get it through their thick skulls that Hillary Rodham Clinton is one of the most ruthless women in the public eye today? Why do they refuse to see the obvious?
The Clinton, as well as the Bush regime are criminal, period. For anyone to take a stand for Hillary Clinton isn't just downright stupid, it's also very dangerous. While those of you that worship her like the second coming of Christ are being blindsided, your commander and chief currently, is still planning to attack Iran.
Oh, yeah, with your goddess' full support.
You aren't Democrats. You appall me.

A person aiming at becoming the president of the most powerful country gives up hope after one loss in Iowa and attempts to win the sympathy and mercy of the people by crying and bringing tears. In case, if Hillary Clinton gets elected, is she going to solve the problems of this country and the world by crying and try to win the mercy and sympathy of people.? This really makes me to question whether is she is really ready to run this country??

Chris, "I really don't think he knows what he's talking about (issues and how to handle foreign policy)and for the first time I may have to vote Rep if Obama gets the nod." You are so right, Susan Rice a former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs and the many others who advise Obama don't know what they are talking about on foreign policy issues. Some former Clinton administration officials who are advising Obama are his National Security Advisor, Secretary of the Navy, and an Assistant Secretary of State. The list goes on and in addition to the experience of those advising him on foreign policy matters is his experience in foreign policy including receiving his degree in international relations, and now serving on three of four foreign policy committees in the Senate. So Obama has had more experience in foreign policy than either Hillary Clinton or John Edwards and you claim that he doesn't know what he is talking about.

It seems to me that it is you who doesn't know what he is talking about when it comes to matters of foreign policy. Apparently, Obama who has the most foreign policy experience doesn't know what he's talking about on foreign policy. And all the people advising him are as un-educated as he is. Of course, we are to believe Bill Clinton's National Security Advisor doesn't know what he is talking about either since he and the others advising Obama are the ones who help to formulate his foreign policy positions. If Bill Clinton thought he knew what he was talking about then maybe, just maybe he does. But now, his NSA is wrong and Hillary Clinton is right. What a good husband for supporting his wife instead of agreeing with his former NSA. His wife is right and his former advisor is wrong.

I am a 64 year old black woman who has always voted for and always loved Bill Clinton. I absolutely do not like Hillary, and after his comments about Barack on Monday, I have losy all respect for Clinton. He did to Barack what republicans have done to bill for years and now he proves to be what most politicians are, willing to dowhat ever he has to to get whatever he wants. No more Clintons, will never like or vote for one again

Hillary really needs to decide if being a woman will hinder her as President the way her campaining is bringing her to tears from having to work hard long days during a campain. She can't be weak on the campain and expect to be viewed as a strong leader as President.

This story seems to me like another piece of pro-Obama propaganda. Clinton doesn't just have a vision for a better America, but rather she has the experience needed to insure this country continues to prosper, and regain its international reputation. I cannot understand how blind some people are, I would prefer to see a Republican in the White House before Obama. I would even prefer four more years of Bush rather than Obama.

J

Tell me what Mr. Wright said that was inaccurate. We have 400 years of information that backs his statements.

Dear America

I'm a UK citizen born and bred,

Is Hillary the best President you'll never have?

Obama might rise another day, Hillary won't

only you know america

Rory McD

WAAHHHHHH…boo hoo hoo…WAHHHHHHHH…PLEASE VOTE FOR ME…PLEASE!!!! – HILLARY CLINTON 2008

Once again, the media is attempting to lionize Hilary Clinton, this time by declaring (inaccurately) that a questioner made her cry. I watched the tape as did millions of others. She did not cry over the question. In fact, she did not cry at all. She did show emotion, however, when talking about her country. I think that's a good thing. Get your facts straight, CNN!

Anybody whose smarter than a 5th grader would have seen through Hillary's Act II. I call it Act II because in Act 1going to Iowa, no tears, confident she's winning; Act II she l didn't win in Iowa, teared up, confidence down. Now she has bounced back to Act 1. Let's see what she'll come up with for Act III or is Bill going to cast in Act III.

I truly believe that Hillary's tears were real. She wants to be the president so badly and she thougth it was all slipping away. Hillary was thinking about her own personal goals.

People need to wake up. I'm sick and tired of us sitting around letting politicians have their way with us, we all have to wise up. The Clintons already serve two terms in the white house, voting for Hillary could bring about yet another term. A term of broken promises such as those she promised on healthcare in 1993. We have a long way to go to know who will be the next democratic nominee and i hope all of us are wise enough to know that the best person for president is Barack Obama. I feel in my heart of hearts that he will win. He will make a good president. He is optimistic, he is the one who will bring a new change, a change we can belive in. People, look around and see what's going on in this nation. Do you want a president who will unite us OR a next president such as Bush. Do you want to change or do you want to go on with the same old things. Wake up America. VOTE OBAMA!!!!

I have always be a Clinton Supporter Bill and Hillary.
I found her tears fake but I am sure she saw the ship downing down so why not show some emotion but within a few hours she was back to the "old attack dog" attitude against Obama.
I guess the Clinton's visited Micheal Vicks home in VA.

"I HAVE OVER 35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE!"

-Hillary-

ALL POLITICIANS LIE.
But we NEED a politician who can REALLY DO THE JOB, unlike BUSH or DANCING OBAMA.
I just want to go back to the good old CLINTON days where we are DEBT -FREE, WAR-FREE AND CHEAP GAS EVERYWHERE.
We want you back Clintons.

I think obama will be president

If this had been a man crying, he'd be out of the race. It's ridiculous to have a serious presidential candidate crying on the campaign trail. The media would tear a man to shreds for breaking down.

She's crying because she knows she hasn't an ounce the charisma of Obama. It's her only defense. Sadly, it may have worked on the sheep in New Hampshire.

sorry to say but this is the reason why women shouldn't be president……. A LEADER DOESN'T CRY

I believe the teary eyes was a farce. She believes in herself and what she wants. She learned this from Bill

I am sure that she is just cackling about it right now. what a bunch of sheep there are in New Hampshire! and the Oscar goooooooooos to.

I am hoping the women out there are really listening to what men are saying about Hillary. They are insulting all women, with claims that we cannot think for ourselves, and we need men to think for us. This is one of the big reasons Obama is running against Hillary. One comment made by a popular deje was that Bill told Hillary to cry so she would get votes. Another comment was that stay at home moms in New Hamshire were the people who voted for Hillary. What does that say for the rest of us women. I love men, don't get me wrong, however, they have been ruling and disrespecting us for too long. Women are stronger than men. Thats a known fact. I do not want a white president or a black president in the White House. I want a people President. We have to stop using the race card and come together as a Nation, and Hillary can do that.

I AM a woman and though I, too, was touched by her tears, it solidified for me that I would not vote for her if given the opportunity. I have concerns about someone who is obviously overwrought from the campaigne trail and had such a public display of emotion. What will she do if she is voted president and has to face the rigors of running the country, has to fight congress, and face foreign affairs? I lost respect for her as a presidential candidate and didn't feel that she was upset for the country but rather because she was losing (according to the poles at that time). Good luck to Hilary but she lost my vote…..

"CLINTON IS NO COMEBACK . Never place too much stock in polls, particularly when vetted against reason, and it was unreasonable to expect a nearly 40 percent voting difference over a 2 week time frame from previous steady and consistent projections. However, the Obama campaign did make significant large margins of gain. The Obama Campaign drew larger crowds compared to both Clintons. The Clinton regime, should have coasted through NH but they limped out barely and it is reasonable for every expert to say that the Clinton regime is underperforming and some triumphant comeback is not the case as the Clinton regime continues to lose ground."

This is an outstanding statement – and I couldn't agree more. How can you say that someone who, a week ago, was projected to take New Hampshire with no problem, only wins by 2 points? Obama is our necessary catalyst for change – his passion, drive, and honesty are what this Country has needed for far too long. Supporters of Obama need to be out in force and TAKE NOTHING FOR GRANTED….A Change is happening in America and I am thrilled to be a part of it by supporting an incredible leader of change.

Hillary welling up in tears is total B.S. Come on, we don't want a leader who is going to cry and tear up over a simple question, we want a leader who will lead us through the hardest of times. It's rediculous that she won N.H.

It is with frustration and confusion when I hear and read all the comments on HRC's experience. Why aren't voters more informed.
She has served less time as an elected official than Obama. Serving as a first lady for 16 years does is not and should not be a qualification for the job of president. HRC's two major programs, health care & education failed during the Clinton era due to her inability to listen to and engage others. Despite all the lessons she should have learned throughout her public life, her arrogance and self-importance will eventually be her undoing.

I'm sure the pressure and guilt was too much to bare. But not to worry, the rest of the women came through.

Clinton's tears and the suggestion that they caused many people to vote for her are offensive. If a man teared up like this he would have lost votes, people would have considered him weak and all the same stereotypes that men have endured for centuries would have been re-enforced. I can imagine the debate that would be going on if Obama had teared up. Whether Clinton's tears were a calculated political move or sincere isn't the real issue.

The real issue is that there are people who would vote for her because she had teared up and these are the same people who wouldn't vote for a man if he teared up. If Obama behaved like this many people would think, "what is wrong with this guy. Why would he cry like this? Do we want a President who tears up when he is having a discussion with foreign leaders, etc. A man who cries like this can't handle the stress of being President." No, men must always maintain our self-control because of sexist women who insist that we provide for them and work our lives away so that they can get something for nothing.

I may be accused of being sexist for saying this but I am fed up with women using men and getting something for nothing. Get out of the house, get a job and work for a living and stop living off of your husbands and boyfriends. I have a word for women who live off of men and it is "parasite." I have no problem with a woman being President because at least she would have a job. I am tired of people judging men by a different standard. If a woman cries its shows that she is caring and emotional. If a man cries, these women jump on it like harpies and point out how weak he is. Men have come a long way in the last few years. We and many women have tried to make men and women equal but that isn't the case yet. Women still are treated better then men. I say no: MAKE WOMEN WORK FOR A LIVING.

VERY NICE ARGUMENT BY SHELL. TO THE POINT AND FORCEFUL.
THANK YOU.

This was another put-on by the Clinton team. He played the bad tough guy
while she played the goodie goodie. I am a woman and I personally resent this playing of the girlie card. Now McCain can play the old card, Romney can play the religious card and Guilianni can play the misjudged good fell card. But what makes my heart sing is now Barack Obama can go on being the class act that he is. Thatcher never got weepy nor Albright or Bhutto. INot even Rice. t's a big weird manipulative plan by Billary to get attention of a few old ladies to vote for Hillary. Sorry but I will never be swayed by over-emotionalism or drama by any person in public service. It shows me a complete lack of character if by some unearthly chance it was real and if it was fake (as I think it was) she will no longer get one bit of interest from me. I don't care who is standing behind her throne.

Obama would have won NH if we hadn't had CNN playing the cry-baby candidate over and over again. That was exactly what you did to Dean and Dole. FS (for shame) Less entertainment and better news. You also brag about " the best team on television" too much.

I have noticed also that CNN is on an anti-Hillary campaign!

For me, a Hillary supporter, I can't believe that any people are so stupid that a few tears will really change anyone’s mind. I have my mind made up by looking at the Senate websites of both Obama and Clinton, and the Thomas Congressional library to see what kind of legislation both have been involved in.

So now I will tell you why I do not like Obama.

On immigration: Supported Bush-backed immigration reform legislation, which would have increased funding and improved border security technology, improved enforcement of existing laws, and provided a legal path to citizenship for some illegal immigrants. Voted to authorize construction of a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexican border.

HOWEVER Obama voted to bring low-cost foreign labor into New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. What about the African-Americans who were displaced in that city ready and willing to work?

On Iraq, he opposes using military force in Iraq, HOWEVER, his voting record shows that he supports the war. He voted twice in 2006 against bringing America's troops back home, as 1 exapmle. ANd he has removed some of his speeches from his website where he has talked in support of the war.

In the beginning, I also supported the war in Iraq, but now I have changed my mind and think 911 was an inside job to gain the support needed by the public to support it! (Which is a whole other story!)

Obama voted more than five times for USA-PATRIOT's renewal.

Obama's record on choice is less than 50%. He pretends to be pro-choice while voting for anti-choice justices who have vowed to end choice.

His most recently sponored legislation requires the US president to secure around the world all nuclear weapons and nuclear usable material. If this is not a law to sponsor US interventionism around the world, then I do not know what is.

And on his voting record, just go to his website and see that during his term as Senator he is 'not voting' 85% of the time! He sits on the fence and then criticises the voting decisions of others.

He may have been doing a little for Kenya in these days (coincidentally his grandmother lives there) while he is in the news spotlight, but before, he has mainly been busy trying to get funding for Fermilab, a local company contributing to his campaign. Whereas when Hillary was not in the news spotlight, she has visited Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and other places, long ago involved on an international level. Where was Obama? 'Not Voting' and cying about funding for Fermilab, where Hillary was on the Senate floor confronting Donald Rumsfield, Bush, and Cheney on no bid contracts and tactics of failure in Iraq, and even our resons for being there. Anyone ever read her speeches? ANyone ever read the speeches of Obama? Compare, and you will find the differnence between a person well versed on history, issues, and proposing detailed solutions and a person giving speeches filled with idealistic language and hype with no real soultions.

Anyone else have anything of intelligence to say that they can back up with references or solid examples?? Please upgrade the quality of this blog by refering to specfic examples and reference regarding your statements! Otherwise you sound like Obama!

And to think my vote would be based on some tears?

Too CNN, I did not even need to know about her tears! This is not a real story or substantial issue to report, and I feel deliberately emphasized in the news to later imply that this is why she won, feeding off the gossipy catty nature of people who do not like Clinton. BBC and Al Jezeera are not making such a big deal out of it!

My comment – If you pundits could let the people decide for themselves, instead of you stating what the polls said before the polls closed, maybe we'd get a fair election. You were so determined to write off Hilary Clinton and make a big story, that you caused people not to vote for Obama. I am thoroughly disgusted with the way you broadcast the election news.

You need to tell what happened, not why and not before it does.

V. McLaury

CLINTON '08 – THE ONLY DEM WITH ENOUGH EXPERIENCE

As a lifelong Democrat of the old Southern Democratic tradition, I can honestly say, the Republican nominee will win on November 4, 2008. Whenever the Democrats start nominating feminists and minorities as heads of their parties, it is essentially over. The United States is still a predominately white male dominated nation. Who are we kinding here. You can not sell Hillary in the general election in middle part of the country. I guarantee this will happen

I have a new found respect for Hillary who, after all she has endured from her husband, has a tear or two left for us. That said, I continue to believe she is not the best person for the job of President.

I think it's odd that people only see HRC as first lady. If you go to her web site, you can read her bio and see she's had a wealth of experience working with and for the public.

The work she's been doing for decades as a children's and women's advocate is impressive. You don't do that work to be powerful, you do it because it speaks to you and because you're passionate about helping others.

As first lady of AR then of the US, she didn't sit around getting facials and having tea parties. She championed cause after cause and did not sit still. She used her influence to do good things for many people.

Regarding Bill coming to her defense, I'd expect no less from my own husband. What would he do, sit back quietly while people knock his wife around?? I'd hope not, and that wouldn't be his nature. If he were on the sidelines, not speaking out, the headlines would read, "Bill Clinton quiet during Hillary's campaign. Is there problems at home?" Another example of being darned if they do, darned if they don't.

Oh – and I'm sick to death of hearing about Bill's affair(s). How many of us know people whose spouses have cheated that have stayed married and worked it out? They were just fortunate enough to not be in the public eye when they were going through it all. It's unfortunate that her personal life has trumped her public service when considering her as a viable candidate.

I don't need to like or be BFF's with the President. I need him or her to do a good job and pull our country out of the mess that's been created since Clinton left office. I think she can do it.

Hillary '08

Yeah, considering she asked Hillary "Who does you hair?" I trust so much her judgment. BTW, have you considered she lied CNN about who she voted? Simply not to suggest she might be 'weak"? Like many women who write on this blog and trash Hillary think its the way to go?

Obama is just a good speaker.. yesterday night he had his victory speech prepared and wasn't able to improvise anything that was appropriate for the result.

Hillary'08!

Ashley cf iowa – check your facts. Obama has eight years of experience as an Illinois state senator and was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004, giving him over 11 years experience as an elected official.

I find it interesting that almost every Hillary supporter lambasts CNN for their biased reporting about their canidate,showing her in a negative light. Folks, this is the real Hillary, a lying flip-flopping phoney unindicted criminal who will tell anyone anything they want to hear (that's what liars do) until she is elected and then to hell with the little people…it's all about me and my ambitions! Anyone who can't see through that is a gullable idiot and anyone who would vote for her because of her anatomy is just an idiot.

To Tamara Peterson and others who think women shouldn't hold office because of hormones, etc…I hope you are a man, because a man would rightly not have to live with these hormones and therefore not understand what it's like. This is one of the reasons why I'm voting for Hillary. She is smart, accomplished, and ran a successful campaign that surprised many (check out articles in the most recent Newsweek) despite hormones, mood swings, hot flashes, and womanhood in general. What a shame for a woman to think that way.
It is a sad truth that Hillary cannot win people's hearts no matter what she does. If she doesn't cry, she is steely and cold-hearted. If she cries, she is a faker. I am surprised that Hillary has lasted this long in this mean-spirited madness. It takes a strong woman to face this world as Hillary Clinton.
Will someone please explain to me how exactly they know that Clinton was fake-crying? Were you there in the audience? Were you sitting inside her head? Just because it happens the night before the primary does not mean it's fake. It's a heavy accusation to make without proof.

Sorry CNN, but I was sooooooooo stoked when Hil came thru! I was also very sad to see some folks say about Obama: "If he doesn't get the Dem nomination he will go independent" Way to go Ralph Nader #2.!!! We can see how that ended up in 2000 can't we? TAlk about ego's. I really don't think he knows what he's talking about (issues and how to handle foreign policy)and for the first time I may have to vote Rep if Obama gets the nod. All you dudes chalk it up to women's feelings, but where were you all when you elected King George TWICE????? I knew we were going to war with Iraq the minute he was elected…and I'm, not the only one. Who cares that Uncle Bill got set up by some fluzie..the lies he told didn't kill Americans!!!!!!

Ms. Young voted "with her feelings"?

Some years ago, Americans voted with their feelings and chose a likeable guy to run the country, and see what happened…

I admire Obama's eloquence and intellect and am mesmerized by his speeches. But it will take more than my feelings to be persuaded that he is the best person to run this country this early in his national political career.

He has to do more than what he has done for us, and has to be tested more in the national arena and prove his moral and political courage.

Only when he has proven himself beyond doubt that he deserves to sit in that oval office chair will I vote for him — that's 4 or 8 years from now.

BUT NOT NOW. NOT YET.

There's too much at stake now to entrust the future of this country in the hands of a an untested, freshman senator who has yet to prove his moral and political courage in the face of big political challenges.

So…….who was(is) her acting mentor?!

Why can't people just say that New Hampshire voted for Sen Clinton not because she displayed some emotion, but because they have always known that she can deliver the change they want. With her experience, she has developed the skills on how to bring about change in the US political scene. Obama does not have enough experience and maturity to have those skills and his young voters are too young to realize that.

A state with 96 % white and a black man lost with 2% i dont think that he (obama) lost anyway cos his vote show that the change is really coming and everyone is coming along UP OBAMA YES WE CAN

It is so sad that all CNN has to talk about is Hillary getting tearful when there is so much more to consider with this upcoming election. Please try to give an unbais commentary instead of the nonsense you seem to think the US voters want to hear. Most serious voters want to hear about the issues that face our Nation. As for the women in NH that made Hillary cry she should be ashame of herself for being proud of turning around and voting for someone else.

I am disheartened to believe that so many females fell for the tears as the deciding factor. I am female and would love to have a female president one day. But to me, tearing up is not what is going to influence me. I want someone who will make a difference. If we vote someone in because we feel sorry for them, then we most certainly deserve what we get. Unfortunately, I don't think that our country can handle any more corruption and special interests. We are lagging so far behind the world communities in so many, many areas….health care, education, mortality rate, infant birth rate/survival rate, the list goes on and on. We need someone who cares more about our country than the lobbyists and corporate interests that gave them the money to influence them. I see Hillary as a very corrupt personwhose agenda is power and control, not one who truly feels that her country needs her. Between her tears and Bill's "fairy tale" comment, the decision was swayed. They will stoop at nothing to get votes.

i am so proud of obama cos he is a symbol of change that will affect the world not just in america i live in the london and i know wat we (blacks) come accross everyday and if he (obama ) can be the next president of the only country the british public respect most we (blacks ) in the united kingdom will be respected also
thanks

The way that woman decided to vote for Obama is how we got George Bush as president for 8 miserable years. I am apalled that people would put someone in a position of such great responsibility based on how they were electrified by that candidate!

this won't get published but it is true, FAKE, umm and I am no fan of Hillary's either, and definetly not a Republican, but Obama's "amazing speeches" are as concocted as those tears, since when does he speak like Dr. King, or Jesse Jackson? Sorry don't buy that either, that black pastor voice he gets sounds fine when it comes from someone real he is bogus……
Patrick-

HILLARY DID FIND HER VOICE, BY LISTENING , SHE SPENT HER WEEK LISTENING TO BARAK'S STUMP, FIVE MAJOR PIECES FROM HER SPEECH WAS WERE DIRECT ALUSIONS TO THE SPEECH BARAK HAS BEEN GIVEN FOR MONTHS. WHAT A SHAME AMERICANS AT TIMES LACK THE INTELLECT TO SPOT A MIMMIC WHEN THEY SEE IT

By their deeds, you can know them. By their words, you can see their minds and hearts. The preceding and perhaps the following hailstorm of anti-Hillary comments are indicative of the low level of mentality of her detractors. Unknown to them, the spin-off maelstrom of their ad hominems, condemnations and insults which betray their low education and poor thinking and their boiling hatred of her is producing what outcome – the soon head-scratching and confounding phenomenon that this horde of pro-Obama's supporters are PULLING and PUTTING Barack Obama FURTHER down. He himself would disown them for good for he would not and could not stomach much less tolerate the negative values they project of themselves to the American media audience. This horde of misplaced Americans is really NOT for CHANGE but for a culture of hatred, animosity, bias, envy as the wave of the future for Americans. They bring down to the ground the very HOPE that Barack is trying to lift into and nurture in the hearts and minds of Americans. They are doing him a DISSERVICE of the first order. All right, they deserve free speech, but they do not deserve the consideration of people in their right mind. You know, like they and the press did before the NH primary voting hours, they are again bound to fail and Hillary will reap the fruit of their anti-Barack actuations. Number 1 of Barack's political agenda is to silence them once and for all, not only for his sake but also his law and his responsible supporters' sake.

Clinton stated, after her victory in N.H., that she has finally found her voice. My question is why it took her 35 years, a couple debates, and losing an Iowa caucus to find her “voice”? The problem we face is that many Democrats, like me, will not vote for her. I guarantee that a Republican will when Presidency, if her name is on the ballot. She is not supported by many Democrats. Although, I will not vote Republican, she wouldn't get it either. I would just catch a movie during the polls, and for the first time not vote!

what has hillary done for the 9/11 heros that are fighting for their lives with the effects of september 11

I think it was all a ploy to get people to feel sorry for her!!!
She was losing and had to try something. It was probably Bill's idea!!

I had an opportunity to hear Mrs. Clinton speak at a woman's conference in New York last year. After that experience, I was an avid "Hillary 4 Prez" supporter….until yesterday. I was appalled at the pretence of tears. Throughout this whole campaign, she and her staff have attacked Obama at every turn. Two volunteers and a staffer were either, asked to resign or left on their own, because of their mud slinging. Now she wants to be overcome by her passions for this country. And, what does "I have so many opportunities from this country " mean anyway?

Obama '08

Please – her crying was totally staged and calibrated. Just another gimmick to do whatever it takes to win.

Look, folks. Racism is still alive in a very subtle manner. You want Dems to win, it's Hillary who is the best bet. The repubs will smother Barack with the race card, "muslim" and "african" background. Oh, yes. Would you tell a pollster that you would not vote for person of different color? I think that's one of the factors that happened in the NH primary with "independents" (really repubs in their heart) who voted in the Dem primary. The repubs will play these card and background on Barack if he gets the Dem nomination. The repubs would like Barack to win. There are a lot of negatives Barack has to surmount. Dems, be realistic and pragmatic. Go for Hillary. She is the person those Repubs who fear most.

It is something else to see all of these Obama supporters again spin their spite towards Hillary. First they said the question was a plant when Hillary teared up. Now they were proven wrong. Then they say she got the media to show that clip over and over again, yet she was blasted by those commentators for it every single time it was shown.

I applaud New Hampshire for voting with their heads. Obama is a great speaker and has great style, but it will be substance that we need in the United States to get us out of the terrible predicaments we're in now. Obama ran 8 years to early. We are in peril domestically and overseas. And I am certainly not going to leave those issues in the hands of someone who barely has state level experience let alone at a national or international level.

Here's to hoping Hillary gets the nomination and then Bloomberg/Hagel jump in on their own ticket. That would give me the opportunity to sit down and make an EDUCATED decision on two great camps on who will be our next president.

ZIGAFUSE in Belton, SC January 9, 2008 4:45 pm ET

I have to say, CNN's Candy Crowley has had this demeaning, somber, and unexcited tone about Hillary, while the rest of the CNN crew is obviosly supporting and rallying behindObama. CNN, please keep it real. I am disappointed.

A month ago, everyone was complaining that the coverage was all skewed in favor of Hillary, now the rest of the crew is obviously supporting Obama???

I don't know what little clips you're hearing that cause you to think that everyone's behind Obama, but I watch enough CNN to know that's not the truth. Wolf Blitzer throws her softballs at every debate, half of the post-election coverage team are former Clinton staffers (Begala, Carville, Gergen). It wouldn't be possible for Carl Bernstein to kiss her butt any more than he after Iowa or last night in New Hampshire.

Which CNN personalities do you think are favoring Obama? Maybe you just got so used to watching CNN do nothing but cover her favorably that now that they've got to cover Obama because he's a competitor with a chance of winning the nomination, you think they're biased.

I find it interesting how the media has portrayed Senator Hillary Clinton and her emotional display versus the emotional moment of Governor Mitt Romney. He was criticized as weak, whereas Senator Clinton is characterized as "human and accessible". The media, which I thought was supposed to be unbiased, reporting the facts, is unfortunately, skewed by the individuals who write the news and report it. The Liberal Machine is in action, and it makes me sick. Our local newspaper's headline read, "McCain Trounces Romney" and makes it sound as though he was leaps and bounds ahead. He was 5 points ahead. In tiny New Hampshire, that doesn't equate to many voters. Anything to sell a paper. Pitiful. I don't believe ANY candidate, Democrat, Independent or Republican, would've been able to accomplish what Romney did at the Olympics. It was a HUGE accomplishment, and yet the media would rather show a clip of Huckabee playing the guitar than a feature of how Romney turned the Olympics from millions of dollars in the red to a million dollar profit-making event. Could Huckabee have done that? How about Obama or McCain, Clinton or Guliani? Doubtful, highly doubtful. Romney can turn this deficit-ridden government of ours into something we can all be proud of. I KNOW he can!

"J" – You are right ref Obama's Church and Racist link –

I just saw on "Situation Room" Reporter was in Kenya talking to 2 of Obama's relatives and asked them what they wanted to say

"Good Luck and bring Power to Africa"

What the Hell was that all about?

What I find amazing is that I wrote a great comment in support of Clinton that, if read, would probably have stopped some people and changed their minds about some things, but somehow, despite it's authenticity, and superior wording in comparison to some of the mud being thrown around, it did NOT make this page after mediation? How is that? Wow…I wish I copied what I wrote down, because i would post it again and again till it made this page. But instead, let's post the comments that read as though an uneducated illiterate wrote them with little or no real knowledge of what's going on.

Why does America constantly allow itself to be fooled time after time after time? If you honestly believe DEEP down in your soul that Hillary was REAL then your vote is valid to me. However if you don't believe that people would go through extreme measures to WIN then maybe you have a slight problem. Their is this old cliche' that President Bush has pulled on America and it says "FOOL me ONCE shame on YOU, FOOL me TWICE shame on ME." Just think about it……. Were you fooled? Ask you SOUL not your mind

Gotta love the women's comments who caused the Clinton tears, "I had to go with my feelings…"

That's a fantastic way to determine your potential next president, lady. ::: sarcasm:::

STATUS QUO MUST GO!

Tracy Michaels January 9, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Your thinking is noble but naive.

The low down Clintons ARE THE ONES WHO DRAW FIRST BLOOD UNPROVOKED!

Instead of seeking to convince Americans what the shameless and self-destructive Clintons will do for the country (not much), they attacked Obama's person and campaign for America, and why?

Last time we check, SELF-PRESERVATION & SELF-PROTECTION is an essential for ANY human being or group?

The overly ambitious and SELF-ABSORBED Clintons were unable to connect with Americans (and rightly so) in the furtherance of their PERSONAL Clintonian AMBITIONS!

Failing to TRICK AMERICANS, the Clintons sought to APPEAL TO THE LOWEST IN US.

Unfortunately, some Americans do not want CHANGE; through spite, the Clintons are willing to fuel divisiveness, STAGNATION and recession!

STATUS QUO MUST GO!

"Iam very disappointed in CNN's endorsement of Obama. I had never heard Wolf Blitzer criticizing President Bill Clinton so harshly. Clinton had a right to say what he said (since it was proven to be true")"

CNN is the new FOX? Sure acts like so……

Hillary is more threatening to Bush then Obama. I mean Bush may hate an event like a Black man as Unblack (skin color not so much stereotypical branding ) Obama may be and Bush only needing Blacks in the "I CAN USE YOU" department as opposed to the "YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING" department a woman like Hillary is more of a threat to the Republican party particularly Bush and his JUNTA then Obama because you can tell he's not only racist but a male shovanist. And Hillary I'm certain if elected would place upon him the impression of a Laura Bush with Balls… Litteraly… HAHAHAHAHA
Bend over dumbya mama's c'ming in and all your repub buddies can make a line they're next.
MUAHAHAHAHA

The implication that women decided who to vote for because a candidate was moved to tears is insulting to women. Women know far better than men that talk is cheap and that people's future actions are best predicted by their past actions. Women will use their heads AND their hearts but not solely their emotions to make their voting decisions. How about you guys?

Let someone quote me in a month's time. Winning thru croc tears is her very doom.Now voters know the tricks .Will she cry again in Nevada, South Carolina etc? Maybe Bill will. Ok then Chelsea.

Hilary is going to lose this elections big time very resorting to crafty political manouvres. Obama now gets the authenticiy vote hands down.Watch!

I can tell you all its not rocket science that if Hillary becomes preident, she will be tapping one of the most popular and effective presidents by her side.

However, this is also to say that Hillary herself had no say in Bills administration. While we can look to Laura Bush and say that is reasonable, not with Hillary Clinton. She is highly educated and motivated .

We also will look to Elenor Roosevelt , whom was probably behind 80% of everything FDR did.

If you hate the Clintons, nothing is going to change your mind. But keep the mud slinging out of it. Snide and hatred are not going to get Obama elected. Neither is super HYPE with no substance.

Voting in hillary clinton is somewhat voting in a two term president. Suggesting anything else is foolish and naive.

Hey Kathie In Arkansas: This has nothing to do with the glass ceiling, at least not for Hillary. Her opportunities are now and have always been endless. I for one am ready for a woman president, just not this one! It has to do with the way she so shamelessly panders to anyone and everyone. Have you been watching the same HRC as me? She's in the south, she puts on a phony southern accent. She comes across too cold and her advisors tell her to soften up, so she almost cries. She is accused of being too connected to Bill or visa versa, the whole coat tails thing, so she "reinvents" her campaign in a matter of days by telling everyone she is on her own, no Bill attached, just Hillary. Meanwhile, at that very moment, he's stumping for her with the whole woe-is-me, the media is being unfair conspiracy argument while trashing Obama as the votes were being cast in NH. Classic Clinton politics, but no substance…zero!!! Sure, Barack presents himself well, but why is he being criticized for that so loudly? I'll tell ya' why… Because he outshines the one whom so many think is entitled to the Whitehouse, HRC. He has written a book that more than adequately addresses and analyzes the issues and the background. He has had countless forums, interviews, etc. where he lays things out. Hillary continues to tells us what we want to hear. She always has. It's called pandering and the Clintons are the masters at it! Speaking of Hillary, maybe you'll be the first one to share all of this great experience. What has she done beyond tag along with Bill…really? How much longer has she been in the Senate than Barack? The comparisons are as desperate as they are unreal. The only cool thing is that I think America is waking up to it! Get real! VOTE OBAMA!

joanna January 9, 2008 2:55 pm ET

People can be so easily taken. "Crying" and "breaking up" usually suggests tears … but where WERE the tears?? I watched it several times – never saw tears or heard a breaking voice – just acting that alot of people actually fell for.

Such an obvious play for sympathy … I'm scared to death now we're looking at the next US President – God help us!!

"You know, I have so many opportunities from this country, I just don't want to see us fall backwards." Exactly what did this say? Sounds like she's saying if the country doesn't elect her, she'll miss alot of opportunities! ??

- joanna

Joanna,

Hillary did indeed get opportunities. Tough luck for most Americans though. Most of us get a life of servitude and political correctness. If I lived in Hillary's world, I'd be afraid of "falling backwards" too.

I sure hope this New Hampshire thing doesn't carry any momentum! Bizarre outcome for a state whose motto is " Live Free or Die".

La'Kitgum,

FYI, 'Orientals' are rugs…we're called 'Asians' in the 21st century.

IF Hillary did win the Democratic Nomination, she would have a very hard time, if not impossible chore, in finding any man or woman who would want to be her Vice-President! Perhaps….Madeleine Albright?

While I also believe that Obama has a unique and credible resume that qualifies him for the Presidency, I sincerely think that his ability to energize and inspire should not be underestimated. When a leader moves the American people to take part in solving an array of complex problems, such as the myriad that America faces, that leader is far more successful than an "experienced" candidate who cannot, whether they intend it or not, unite the country.

We do not elect a King, we elect a President who guides policies but must ultimately rely on the support of the people.

Even if, for one second, you believe that Clinton's tears were not a plan of some sort of political strategy to help expose a 'more emotional side', it still does not show well upon any leader.

If the stress of the campaign trail causes her to break down into tears, how could we as citizens trust her to be able to make incredibly stressful decisions every day for four years without pause? If this minor difficulties and media frenzy causes her to get teary eyed because of one question by a citizen, how is she really going to be able to handle herself in office?

Don't feel sorry for her. Don't vote for her because she's a woman