When HIllary wins it "doesn't mean anything". Tell that to the over 1 million people who turned out to vote in Florida.

CNN is almost as bad as Fox now in biased reporting, this time for the Democratic candidate.

We get it CNN, you want Obama to win. Thankfully the citizens of the United States of America get to decide who's president, NOT the biased cable news network.

As for Obama's lack of experience with foreign policy. It's looks like the Republicans with their years of experience really did this country good these last 2 terms, huh? This is a whole other issue i could go on forever.

Bottom Line: I believe it's good for someone who hasn't been around long enough to let himself become a true politician, to run for president.

I know he has my vote.

As for McCain no thanks to spending the next 4 years in Iraq. Good luck with the draft, because i know i'm not reenlisting if you win!

Vote Clinton 2008!

I just want Bill back in the White House so he can help put this country back on track.

Go Clintons!!! I am voting for you

Are you forgetting that President Clinton never made a salary when He was in office, are you forgetting that Bush not only took the presidential salary but doubled it to make himself richer? Come on folks the choice is obvious but, the woman in N.H. that brought out Hillary's emotional side obviously only did so in order to make her look bad, it obviously didn't work, and the woman I guarantee never intended on voting for Hillary in the first place.

Stop making these stories out to be more than what they really are, most of CNN's coverage is only half true to begin with, God only knows if the actual story is true, it could have just been someone posing to be that woman from the original question.

GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She's got my vote and many, many others!

As for the unfair criticism leveled at her, again, I think you are mistaken. In your own message you:

1. trumpet Hillary's valuable experience making her the best candidate
2. suggest she is best equipped to make change because she hasn't been President (no other candidate has either, right?)
3. tell us her opposition would like to make us believe she HAS been President

You write, "Hillary Clinton would be an enormous change for America in many ways but first and foremost because she has NEVER been president. Her opponents would like to make us believe the opposite, but they can't."

What does this even mean? Has Edwards or Obama been making speeches telling Americans to remember some fictional Hillary Presidency? If so, shouldn't these tactics actually HELP her if her incredible experience makes her more qualified? I guess when I said I was confused before I was trying to find a nice way to say this makes no sense. You simply can't have it both ways, claiming her experience is invalubale to her candidacy then discounting it to show how she's ready to be the change America needs.

I hope that Hillary continues to find her own voice and whatever convenient thing it happens to be telling her at any given moment. Meanwhile, I'll continue to support the candidate I trust to say what he means and mean what he says, the candidate who doesn't need to find a new voice but has had a clear and consistent voice and message, one that I can hope for and actually BELIEVE in.

I would rather have someone with an innate sense of integrity, diplomacy, intelligence, and hope that would respond correctly in difficult times. We have already seen that it has inspired Hillary to soften her approach, even borrow some inspirational phrases as she criticized the power of words.

Obama with his inexperience has global leaders, corporate leaders and the world paying attention. His inexperience has people lining up with curiosity and interest. He has connected us in debate. Hopefully as we dialogue, we understand ourselves better and vote responsibly. Most important, let's listen, respect, and trust our decision.

Wow. What does that say about his experience?

And by the way–we don't need another maverick in the white house right now.

yes there is urgent need for a change in direction in Washinton and that that's not mean we have to change all the waiters and waitresses in all the Restaurants,cap drivers,house owners etc.in Washinton before America get back to her feet again.The change needed is all about prooving capability,Maturity and deep anderstanding of Political Diplomacy and Governance.

The next President will definately leave and operate from Washinton and soon intergrate in Washinton let's not forget about that, and will have no orther choice than to accomodate Business and lobbies interest.the Presidency can't funtion proper without doing business with the people whom elected her into office.

I URGE SEN CLINTON TO QUICKLY WORK HARD TO WIPE OUT HER POLITICAL TAG FOR BEEN TOO DIVISIVE,SHE SHOULD CHALLENGE HER CRITICS TO PROOF SUCH BASELESS POLITICAL ACUSATION.

GOD BLESS SEN CLINTON,DEMOCRATS,REPUBLICANS AND INDEPENDENTS AND ALL THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES.

GOD BLESS AMERICA

I suppose it is typical though, of a woman with all this self-claimed experience, who just managed to find her OWN voice in NH (who else was she listening to all those years she was gaining her incredible experience I wonder?), to want to be able to both claim her years in the White House as her qualifying experience to be President while at the same time blaming her opposition for making people believe she is an experienced politician.

I wonder which reinvented model of her and her new voice we'll get this week..and the week after that...and then the week after...and so on.

There's no crying in presidency.

END THE DYNASTY: Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton?--Democratic?

Either way, in the eyes of the word – unless the states fall under the fiasco of 2002 – we will be a lot safer with the democrats of The United States.

Regards,

An independant Scotland.

But recent events (particularly during the last 7 years) just make people forget about the good America did in the past. Please vote for somebody who can restore the function and image that America used to have in the world. And please make it a matter of issues.

Obama probably would bring America sympathies quicker. And whether he is not qualified (experienced enough) to bring about the change everybody seems to wait for is not for me to know or say. But whether Obama or Clinton – it hardly can get worse in my opinion. I don't know about the republicans though. They don't seem to (want to) learn from the past.

TYPICALLY MOST OF THESE MEN NEVER REALIZED THAT PEOPLE ARE MOVED BY EMOTIONS THROUGH OUT THEIR LIVES . PEOPLE IN POWERFUL POSITIONS ARE NO DIFFERENT. HILLARY IS NOT PHONY SHE IS JUST DISPLAYING A HUMAN TRAIT THAT WE ALL HAVE "FEELINGS" .

In 35 years in Washington, we could never associate the word emotion, or cry with the name Hillary Clinton.

Suddenly, as polls are saying she s about to lose 2 in row, she breaks down and of course for only 2 seconds. Cry me a river, come on.
She would not even break down when Billy cheated on her. pffffffffffffffffffffffffff....., we dont know which staff member Bill is gonna go after this time.

We face serious issues, we dont need another episode of the Clintons soap opera. We need to wake up.

I believe it takes strength of character to allow yourself the freedom to feel your passion to the fullest and not have it squelched for fear of being labeled weak.

She has more moxy, nads or whatever than anyone else in the race and that's what we need right now!!
Do not under any circumstances think she is weak.
Remember Margaret Thatcher – no weakness there!

GO HILLARY GO – all the way to the White House!!!!!

Obama and Clinton are only interested in their entry into the history books.

Once elected they couldn't give a poot to anybody who actually voted them in office.

If you want commitment–then vote John Edwards.

All the rest are trying to put "cherries on their resumes".

Ever since Bill Clinton's first campaign where he went on MTV and introduced mass media to presidential campaigns, the political process has grown with a frenzied crescendo until it rivals rooting for a team in the superbowl!

We don't need another president that is as divisive as the current president Bush, just in the other direction.

How ironic this voter was reinforced by HRC's reaction to her question.

Most of you like Obama because he's the "new Ipod", the new Apple 'Wow", but nothing special or revolutionary.

Why do CNN readers hate Hillary so much? What is wrong with you people? Hillary, Edward and Obama all mean well for this country, but why be so negative about Hill-Dog? Mrs. Clinton is clearly more experienced and can put together a top-notch old-Bill cabinet. Stop being so negative about Hill-Dog!

K

You might be right in saying that nobody really cares to hear how one woman from new hampshire voted, but I think there IS something we can take from this.

Don't base your vote on one issue, or gender, or race. Vote for who you truly, deeply believe has the best vision for the United States as a whole. This election isn't just about national security, or immigration, or the war in Iraq, or whether "its time we had a woman in the Oval Office". It's about ALL the issues that surround our country today. It is our civic responsibility to vote for the candidate who would be the best president. Be informed and trust your instincts.

May we come out of this mess with a great leader.

I'm SICK of it

As far as Obama is concerned:

Why would anyone think that any one other person can solve all there problems? If you listen to all the candidates Obama is the only one constantly saying we. He says that because although he will be the one leading the charge from Washington, it will take all Americans to push for change in America. What he can do for us is stay truthful and resist corporate influence as opposition to change. What we can do is replace those who are roadblocks and stay involved in the process.

If Hillary was that experienced, why did she vote yes for a war? Her experience as first lady should have told her no.

“ Of course late 2006, she was quoted as saying President Bush was very charismatic” I guess that won her vote both times.

Hillary's politics is close to Bush's. We would have more of the same polarizing administrative policies.

She has blamed everything on republicans. Obama is in her cross hairs

Dems Loyalty will possibly be split this year and GOP will win again.

During her time at the W.H. Hillary talked about GOP and them out to get her and Bill. Even with all the scandal after scandal, she showed little emotion, as long as the blame others game was played.

If that is what our country needs. Bush approval would be higher.

Bill and Obama have an ability to connect with people of all backgrounds. This is reflective of their upbringing. Hillary has had a problem making that connection, even as U.S. Senator.

All the Democrats could do well to lead us in the right direction. However, Obama offers the greatest flexibility to work with both parties on new ideas. Hillary knew the war in Iraq was not worth the cost. However, in 2007, she turns around and gives Bush another authorization to fight Iran.

With experience, we have change. Where was the change here?

A president -- The Success of a president is tied to his administration. Bill had great support for furthering his agenda. Many things they failed at in his first administration. Second admin. he hired knew people who thought outside the box.

One person cannot know it all – that's with any good administration!

What Bill said about experience in 1992, is perfectly important today concerning Obama augment for change

Quote: Bill Clinton responded to Bush's claim “that experience means everything:”
Bill Clinton once said "the same old experience is not relevant"

The same discussion is going on today. We need Change Bill Brought then and Obama will bring it now.

Sometime you have to change the dice, when fixed to roll a certain way all the time.

Fear of change, is allowing more of the same.

_____________________________________________________________-

La'Kitgum, Concorde, NH January 9, 2008 4:13 pm ET

Americans are beginning to understand that Hillary stands for what the President of the USA should be and not Obama with his empty promises. Obama's leadership leaves a lot more questions to be answered but foremost, how can he be an agent of change without experience? How can he change what he does not know? How can he change what he does not have? Experience in economy, healthcare and security are all in Hillary's bag and Hillary can change them for the good of all America. Obama has a bag of experience but it is empty. He has nothing to change.

My prayers and Best wishes to Hillary and I urge all Americans (black, white, oriental, hispanic) to support Clinton because they will never regret their votes. We did it in NH. NH understands that it is issues, not body language, which stands out in this campaign and Hillary is all about issues. Listen to her carefully instead of cheering at her and you will understand just like the people of NH did – the issues matter,

Don't be surprised if you see McCain win the Repub's and ask Lieberman to run with him against the Dem's. If you have Obama and/or Hillary running against that...well........throw your vote in the river.

I am an angry Dem that is sick of my own any more.....all I hear is talk...talk...talk.

I am sick that Obama and Hillary is the best we can come up with. 'I am the candidate for change!'.......blah...blah...blah....blah! Change what? Anybody have a clue? Do they really think they will accomplish much...being the most 'partisan' that we had to offer? Need some Repub' votes to get stuff done.

Grow up.

Find me a real leader.

If you believe those tears were real, you are living in a dream!!!!

This country needs to ask the question.....define...change!!! What EXACTLY in your platform represents change!