January 10, 2008
Posted: January 10th, 2008 06:30 AM ET
Bill Richardson drew single digits in the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary.
Bill Richardson drew single digits in the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary.

WASHINGTON (CNN) - New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson will quit the race for the Democratic presidential nomination after fourth-place showings in the campaign's first contests, sources said Wednesday.

Richardson, who served as energy secretary and ambassador to the United Nations in the Clinton administration, drew 5 percent of the vote in Tuesday's New Hampshire primary and 2 percent in last week's Iowa caucuses, far behind leading Democrats Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards.

"The numbers are the reason - not enough votes and not enough money," a Democratic strategist involved in the campaign told CNN. However, "He enjoyed it and believes he made a contribution."

A second source close to Richardson confirmed the governor's plans to CNN. His campaign had no comment on the sources' accounts, but the party strategist said a public announcement was planned Thursday in New Mexico.

As of September, Richardson raised about $19 million during his White House bid and had spent about $13 million of that, according to Federal Election Commission records. A year-end report is due at the end of January.

– CNN's John King, Candy Crowley, and Mark Preston

Full story 

Filed under: Bill Richardson


Diane   January 10th, 2008 7:45 pm ET

Anonymous, when's the last time you had a job interview where they told you experience doesn't count? (And I'm sure your job, if you have one, is nowhere near as challenging as Leader of the Free World.)

Canadian   January 10th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

To all Americans.
It is heartening to see the energy and participation in this Presidencial election by many more Americans compared to the usual 'apathy' that grips a people tired of the old games of selfish politicians.
Please realize that the World has changed with economic globalization. What happens in the country with the World's largest economy and the World's most powerful military affects literally every person on Earth.
We Canadians are used to catching a cold when you sneeze, but like I said, now the whole World can catch the cold.
So, do your duty as American citizens and now also as the people who can have the greatest influence for good or bad on every human being. The World needs to trust America again.

Legate Damar   January 10th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

I was very sad to see Richardson's performances. I believe that he is the most qualified person from either party as well as being my second-best fit on the issues.

C. Spradley   January 10th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Geez, CNN doesn't even let Richarson finish his speech. More blather between anchors and reporters.

C. Spradley   January 10th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

So, Anonymous, you wouldn't mind if your surgeon had never performed surgery before.

Tom Masters   January 10th, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I'm glad he's out this quickly, now if we can get ALL of the other non-candidates out so we can actually get down to biz, that would be great.

Dave Brown, that would be clever on either side, but almost none of them are that smart bro, sorry.

Anonymous   January 10th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Being President of the United States has nothing to do with being experienced. It's about the ability to lead this nation and the free world. I expect the President of the United States to have character, confidence, tolerance, be a critical thinker, purposeful, and enthusiatic.

I am voting for Barack Obama. I believe he is the kind of leader our nation needs and the world we live in today needs.

I can see a world where President Obama can sit down with the citizens in Rapid City, South Dakota and talk about growing the local economy.

I can see a world where President Obama can visit San Antonio, Texas and celebrate Cinco de Mayo with tens of thousands of people.

i can see a world where President Obama can visit Inkster High School in Inkster, Michigan and make a huge impact on the student body.

And most important I can see President Obama visiting Iraq and sitting down with all the politicians to bring that country into a true democratic society.

I believe Obama gets it. The President is suppose to serve the people.

We need a servant.

Bob   January 10th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

The Mainstream Media is Against Gravel

Yesterday I posted that Richardson may endorse Gravel with his 5% support and it was not posted. This is just another example of the mainstream media CNN the Clinton News Network being against the minor candidates.

Gravel 08!

shelly   January 10th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Clinton/Richardson '08 Would be awesome!! I would also like to see Clinton/Obama, however, I think the latter will never happen now.......

Shelly

John T, Omaha, NE   January 10th, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Frankly, the only negative thing I can think of with regards to Richardson was his early claim at a debate that the troops could be removed from Iraq in under 200 days (he was quickly denounced by his peers on stage). Other than that, the man is intelligent, articulate, and experienced. He just got into a race with too many other potential firsts: 'first black president', and 'first female president'. If the democratic lineup were as generic as the 'old white men' that the Republicans have, Richardson would have really stood out. I don't advocate voting or not voting for a candidate b/c of gender or race, they are trivial. However, the media really fixates on these types of anomalies in a presidential candidate, and this might have given Bill much needed exposure. Too bad.

Sharyn, CT   January 10th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Apparently having the best resume doesn't make you qualified for the presidency anymore.......

Dave Brown   January 10th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

Too bad about Richardson, but inevitable.

When I watched the Democratic debate from NH (Clinton, Obama, Edwards, and Richardson) I reacted with: WOW - here are 4 extremely talented people! I want ALL FOUR!

So here's how I want it to work: First place winner gets to be President. Second place winner gets to be VPresident. Third place winner (likely Edwards) gets to be Attorney General. Fourth place winner (likely Richardson) gets to be Secretary of State.

Now wouldn't that be a kick-butt ticket?

Jay Graham, Dallas, TX   January 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

Now that Richardson is out, it will be tough on Hilary to shield the attacks from Edwards and Obama. Bill came to her rescue during the last debate when Obama and Edawards ganged up to attack her. That was one of the reasons women did not vote Obama and Edawrds who was thrown 3rd. If Edwards don't take SC, he is out.

Len, Fallbrook, CA   January 10th, 2008 11:51 am ET

Tough decisions now the best and most qualified three candidates on the Dem side have dropped out, namely Dobbs, Biden, and Richardson.

Hillary...

No defined measurable experience
No defined tough decision making background
Never really managed/lead anything or anybody
Can't wait to go to war with the GOP if elected, don't think we need that.
Will raise taxes, create more entitlements, and raise taxes again
For Illegal immigration and amnesty

Obama...

No defined measurable experience
Promotes "change", but the specifics on what will change, and how it will change is in short order.
No defined tough decision making background Never really managed/lead anything or anybody
Votes present quite a bit, that is not a decision
Will raise taxes, create more entitlements, and raise taxes again
For Illegal immigration and amnesty
Believes in God, but gets a pass on that, unlike Huckabee

John.....

No defined measurable experience
No defined tough decision making background
Been unemployed for all practical purposes for the last few years
Will raise taxes, create more entitlements, and raise taxes again
For Illegal immigration and amnesty

There is a trend here

There is a reason the senators do poorly in the election no matter what the party.
They have minimal, if any leadership and managerial skills.
They would never be contenders for any CEO position of any company of consequence.
The purpose of a senator is to represent his/her people, a trait forgotten by all of them.
In reality all they do is move money from one entitlement program to another to buy votes and raise taxes when the run out of money so they can buy more votes.
If the Dems really want a shot at the White House you had better draft Biden otherwise you will be looking in from the outside again.

As an independent I would not vote for any of the current Dem candidates

Marti, FL   January 10th, 2008 11:35 am ET

Governor Richardson is to be commended for his candidacy. With the diverse range of qualified candidates in our field, it has made me so proud to be a Democrat. My former Republican Party has only catered to generic cookie-cutters in this primary with each one resembling Bush in too many ways. Our country is ready to move forward, and we have tremendous opportunity ahead of us at the prospect of making history with one of our Democratic frontrunners as president. It gives me great hope and inspiration to be an American again, which has been missing for far too long. God bless our country!

Karen   January 10th, 2008 11:33 am ET

Of course he's dropping out. The media (special interest group) refused to market him. Sad, the same old same old. Way to go CNN for your equal coverage of the candidates.

Marilyn Bryan, Taylor, AR   January 10th, 2008 11:06 am ET

Experience isn't always measured by "political experience". As first lady of
Arkansas, Hillary Clinton worked harder for the welfare of children than many
of those elected to office. Her support from and by Arkansans far exceeds that of former Gov. Huckabee, both financially and otherwise. Her efforts, as first lady of the nation, toward bringing affordable health care to all was stymied by those
with greater lobbying ability and deeper pockets.
Personality and charisma are not prerequisites for becoming a great president, witness the outcome of Pres. Bush's years in office. An open mind, the ability to learn, and the appointment of persons interested in the welfare of all Americans, not a chosen few are.
Education and health care are the main issues facing a far greater number of
Americans today, and will remain so regardless of whom is elected.
Alleviating the situation in Iraq is mostly up to Iraqis. Most Americans supported
Pres. Bush in the beginning, due to misinformation and a misguided sense of
patriotism.
Those who tout the "good economies" of the Reagan and Bush II administrations
were/are not looking at the balance sheet.
This is not a personality nor a beauty contest, but a race to determine who has
the determination, the ability, and the knowledge to withstand the hardest tests.
For those of us who have known Hillary Clinton best and longest, there is no
doubt that she can and will.

share   January 10th, 2008 10:57 am ET

I AM LOOKING FORWARD FOR RICHARDSON TO ENDORSE HILLIARY FOR THE PRESIDENCY BECAUSE SHE IS FOR NON-DOCUMENTARY ALIENS HERE IS ANERUCA SO THAT ALL LATINO'S AND SPANISH DECENDENT COULD BENEFIT IN THE LONG RUN WITH HER CANDIDACY -PRESIDENCY.

Jay, Connecticut   January 10th, 2008 10:48 am ET

Its sad that the most qualified candidate on either side is forced out of the race because it has come down to just another Hollywood show.

Paul   January 10th, 2008 10:43 am ET

Okay, I'm a Richardson supporter – have been loyally for a year. I think I see the logic behind the idea that he might take a break from the campaign, or rather that he will drop out and then NOT ENDORSE ANYONE UNTIL AFTER SUPER TUESDAY. This man HAS to be the VP candidate or the country will be in the garbage disposal of world diplomacy by 2010. So, he waits until he sees which side the chips fall on Super Tuesday, and in the process he saves his money so that he has something to contribute to whichever campaign he joins. I personally hope it's Obama, but frankly I'd take Hilary/Richardson over Obama/Biden any day. Biden was a disaster in the campaign, far worse than Richardson, horribly arrogant and instantly attackable by the Republicans as the quinessential DC insider, toffee-nosed east-coast aristocrat (remember what happened to Kerry in 04?). If Obama wins and goes with Biden then the whole message of hope and change is gone – he wouldn't be that stupid.
Richardson is going to go back to sit in the Governors mansion in Santa Fe and wait to play the offers against each other and the country will be the better for it.

On another note, all the wierd extremists on the message board who take issue with a policy that puts human rights ahead of jingoistic so-called "national security" are deeply troubling to me. To quote a great comedian, for them the Enlightenment was just something that happened to other people. We have to respect human rights first and foremost – its a question of world security not "national" security – whatever that means?

Liz   January 10th, 2008 10:43 am ET

This is what the national media will do to the BEST person to win the White House. Bill has the best experience and knowledge to be able to lead the country in a new positive direction on day one!

I am hoping that one day he will get the media attention that he deserves and will again run for president.

He had my vote in NH and will have it agin the next time he runs for office!!

Jack K.   January 10th, 2008 10:36 am ET

Bill Richardson would rather eat his own underwear than accept a postion witha Hillary Clinton administration!!

I wonder–can doe we really SEE: how "unrepresentative"she and OpraBamas are of the majority of people that the Demcratic Party purports to represent?

Dan   January 10th, 2008 10:30 am ET

sabrina, your comments about Obama supporters being "hateful people" are unfounded. If you check national polls, about 47% of Americans have very unfavorable views of Ms. Clinton. This is a reflection and product of her personality and actions. Its not about hate, its about being fed up.

As for Richardson, I see him going to the Obama camp, like most who served under the first Clinton adminsitration (very telling). His 5% would have swung NH and possibly ended the Clinton run. By exiting now, he assures to prevent a similar outcome in Nevada.

And in a General, he has a lot to offer Obama out west and among Hispanics (can you say Florida?).

The next question would be whether that swings Edwards to HRC's camp.

Money   January 10th, 2008 10:29 am ET

Good luck to you Gov. Richardson and thank you for always being a gentlemen which is more than I can say for a couple of other candidates. Hopefully, you will endorese Sen. Clinton, but even if you don't what will stand out with me is your maturity and respectufulness towards Sen. Clinton even when you disagreed with her polices/views. I'm Hispanic and I would have voted for you if I thought you had a chance in winning but America is not ready for us yet! Thanks also for taking the risk and running!

Pat Huntington NY   January 10th, 2008 10:28 am ET

Bill Richardson said on the Logo Channel Debate that homosexuality is a choice...I say, good riddance Bill! Go back to your small corner of the nation.

Scott, Madison, WI   January 10th, 2008 10:27 am ET

Thank you, Bill. Your best moment was during one of the debates when you cut Mrs. Clinton off at the knees during her shrill defense displaying complete inexperience and inability to discuss, compromise or NEGOTIATE.

Wayne, Greenville TX   January 10th, 2008 10:18 am ET

Georgia January 10, 2008 9:51 am ET

Breaking News: Obama in serious involvement with Illinois state lobbyist now under Federal indictment, Rezko, after several denials and contaradictory statements on him multiple times. Obama received significant campaign money from Rezko, despite public exposure in Illinois newspapers, is involved with him in a house purchase deal with Obama buying his house for 300,000 less, and has called him a friend in an interview with George S on ABC last May. This story was just broken on GMA on ABC by Brian Ross, investigative reporter. If you say that you are Mr. Clean in American Politics you must back it up with your own personal resume. This guy is as corrupt as any other and has lied to the Americans in his greed to be President. Remember the ols adage, don't throw stones from glasshouse. The chicken has come to roost Mr. Obama. No long are Mr. Clean Clean, but, you are a liar and quite simply a cheat.

Why on earth would we want Obama as a President???????

Hey, Georgia!!!

Your "Breaking News" story is over a year old!!! Here's a link to an article in teh Chicago Sun-Times that includes a question-and-answer session with barack Obama himself that shows that your "Breaking News" is yet another Karl Rove-style smear campaign.

Those interested in the truth should follow this link and read the article:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obama05.article

Bill, NY   January 10th, 2008 10:14 am ET

okey dokey, don't let the door hit you on the backside! later fool.

Frank, Waverly, NY   January 10th, 2008 10:04 am ET

That is too bad. Richardson was the only democrat with any credentials. Now the democrats are going to give us a muslim and a hypocrite on their party's ticket.

S.B. Stein E.B. NJ   January 10th, 2008 9:59 am ET

Richardson was a good candidate. He did lack a lot of the charisma of Clinton, Obama or Edwards. I have to say that his speech patterns in the debates were a little slower than I would have hoped for from a presidential candidate; this is not to say that I don't think he is not intelligent. I think that he is smart.

If Richardson is willing to be a V.P., then the big three remaining (Clinton, Edwards and Obama) should consider him since he has a variety of experiences that could prove valuable to someone who has little direct foreign policy experience.

If I were his advisor, I would let it be clear that I would suggest he hold off on endorsing anyone until after Febuary is over. See who remains after that and look at what they have to say. If you like it, endorse the person; say nothing if you have reservation about the candidate.

sabrina   January 10th, 2008 9:53 am ET

Obama supporters seem to be very hateful people. On this thread, and others, i see nothing but vitriol from them. Is this what your candidate inspires in you?
This is supposed to be comments on the exit of Bill Richardson, is it not?
I for one, hope that Obama is not elected because of the people who trash all others with hatred in his name.
Good luck to Mr. Richardson in his future pursuits. He is a good and caring man.

Georgia   January 10th, 2008 9:51 am ET

Breaking News: Obama in serious involvement with Illinois state lobbyist now under Federal indictment, Rezko, after several denials and contaradictory statements on him multiple times. Obama received significant campaign money from Rezko, despite public exposure in Illinois newspapers, is involved with him in a house purchase deal with Obama buying his house for 300,000 less, and has called him a friend in an interview with George S on ABC last May. This story was just broken on GMA on ABC by Brian Ross, investigative reporter. If you say that you are Mr. Clean in American Politics you must back it up with your own personal resume. This guy is as corrupt as any other and has lied to the Americans in his greed to be President. Remember the ols adage, don't throw stones from glasshouse. The chicken has come to roost Mr. Obama. No long are Mr. Clean Clean, but, you are a liar and quite simply a cheat.

Why on earth would we want Obama as a President???????

Glen, Boston, MA   January 10th, 2008 9:49 am ET

Of course young people aren't going to care that much about experience – look what it's gotten us. On paper, the Bush administration is the poster child of inside-the-beltway experience. That said, what experience did Bush have? Texas government barely ever meets. I think we need intelligence. You can learn on the job for this one.

Also, for everybody saying Americans are swept up in celebrity charisma and ignoring very respectable candidates, I'm not sure I agree. Richardson is a great politico, but not necessarily a great president. Great presidents have to be able to inspire people – they have to be the emotional center of the government. He's too immersed in the politics – which would make for a great cabinet level position or VP.

Elizabeth   January 10th, 2008 9:43 am ET

What will the point be of all the other primaries if everyone drops out after the first 4 or 5? By the time I get to vote in my state's primary, it will be down to probably the nominee for each party. Maybe starting the 2008 presidential campaign 12 months ago was jumping the gun a tad early?

Kevin   January 10th, 2008 9:31 am ET

Why are people so sad to see this guy drop out?? He's a complete idiot, I'm glad to see him go! Drivers licenses to illegals in New Mexico?? Come on...

Diane   January 10th, 2008 9:29 am ET

I'm devastated. The Governer is clearly the most qualified man for the job, with the the most relevant experience. For the first time in my life I might not vote at all...the Clinton and Obama campaigns have been a 3-ring circus up here in NH and Governor Richardson was a breath of fresh air. When I hear that people voted for Obama because he's an "electrifying speaker" I'm reminded that so was Adolf Hitler. Being President of the USA is a difficult job and is not for beginners, no matter how good they sound from the soapbox.

FEG II BAL   January 10th, 2008 9:27 am ET

I understand that we must know about who should or should not be elected but I wonder why Tvs keep showing only the fathr side of Obama which is black but never shows his mother family?, is it not discrimination, is it not something against his campaign. Mother and Father are both dead why going to Kenya everyday is so important at this moment?

Ron   January 10th, 2008 9:23 am ET

Bill,
Thank you for your service to America. We'll miss you.
We'll see you again next year, in a Democratic administration!
New Mexico is a beautiful state.

Ron

Jack K.   January 10th, 2008 9:23 am ET

It's a shame. Mr. Richardson is a good hearted individual–and would be a nice reprieve from GW Bush.

Sadly, he was beaten out by the educational elites and financial elites of the Democratic Party–who are staking their claims on Obama and Clinton.

This leaves only one candidate–not IVY LEAGUE connected nor BIG MONEY connected–to finish the job of electing a President who truly has the interests of ALL AMERICANS within his agenda.

The poor, the hourly wage earners, the outsourced thousands, the construction workers, the service workers, non-professional health workers–are as much a part of the trend occuring right now towards Obama/Hillary–as hamburger is to mackeral!!

Only one man has stood up with a MANDATE that he will represent the OTHER AMERICA who works hard, but can't seem to get ahead of the rising (almost obscenely so) costs of health care, essential services/utilities, food, shelter, and fuel–as the special interests continue to squeeze as much profit as the nation can bear–then a little more. When the profits dry up from cost-cutting at home–then American labor is the very next thing to be "outsourced" to nations with unfair labor/trade laws.

It's time for a change. Not just little changes–but BIG CHANGES–life changing change–that is meaningful–and will steer our nation in a new direction!!

There is only one candidate who is willing to take up this mantle.
Although his AGENDA FOR CHANGE has been hijacked by both other DEM and some GOP candidates–the "real thing" is still John Edwards.

I pray our brothers and sisters in MI, SC, FL can see the difference.

He is still not accepting any money from SI groups (social or political) so your donations to help drive this campaign of REAL CHANGE FOR WORKING AMERICANS would be sorely appreciated. I send him a little from every check.

For the first time my lifetime as a voter–I've got a candidate in John Edwards who inspires me with his desire to re-engineer Washington back to what our founding fathers intended.

As a retired military veteran with nearly 30 years of service–I've served under 7 Presidents. By far, Edwards is the best example of what the American people have been hoping for I've seen come along. Don't be swayed by waffling messages–tied to the most recent poll data.

John Edwards–like Coca Cola is the REAL THING.

I urge my Democratic colleagues to rethink their future and their childrens future–before another great man falls by the wayside–and we end up, again, with a President who promises much–but is too tied to the upper crust to really make the meaningful changes!!

Wayne, Greenville TX   January 10th, 2008 9:15 am ET

carol January 9, 2008 7:39 pm ET

I am sorry to see Governor Richardson leave the campaign for the presidency. I don't understand why such a great American is overlooked. It seems like accomplished and experienced leaders are overlooked. Not only Richardson, but Biden and Dodd! It is such a shame. I hope the next president is a democrat and he or she puts these men to work in government positions where their talents can be best used to bring us together as Americans and to return our country to a respectful position in the world.

Some people are best at heading up a team, Carol – others are best as team members. I think that when it's all said and done, either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama will get the Democratic nomination and win the presidency in November. And when the winner is putting together his or her cabinet, I would expect to see the other candidates tapped for cabinet posts.

For example, Bill Richardson should be considered for Secretary of State, based on his diplomatic experience. Joe Biden and Christopher Dodd should also be considered, due to their many years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Mike Gravel might be good at heading up the Department of Energy or the Department of the Interior, based on his many years of experience in Alaska politics.

And John Edwards might make a good Attorney General.

robert herbert   January 10th, 2008 9:14 am ET

what a shame!!! this guy is charismatic,good negotiator,well prepared and
excellent person.
hillary or obama for president.

Mark in OKC   January 10th, 2008 9:03 am ET

The loss of Governor Richardson from the race is a loss for our nation, particularly when our nation is though of in such low esteem throughout the world due to the last 7 years of W's dynasty. While democrats should be proud of the filed of candidates we have, and the fact that Clinton, Obama and Edwards would be good choices over any of the republican candidates, it is the media in great part that must take a serious look at how they conducted themselves during the past year.

Bill Richardson is without question the most qualified person to lead this nation back to diplomacy and the road to energy independence. The media decided early on to make rock starts our of Hillary and Obama – clearly seen throughout the debates a most questions were for them.

While either Hillary or Obama will serve our country well, as President, is is clear we have lost an opportunity to have the most experienced individual take the mantle of the democrats. If the remaining candidates do some real soul searching, Governor Richardson would be the number 1 pick for the VP spot – if he would accept it.

Good run at it BR!

Ron   January 10th, 2008 9:01 am ET

Ok, I have a question about the total delegates each candidate earned thus far, can someone help? If Iowa and NH have a total of 84 delegates (D), how do the candidates end up Clinton/183 and Obama/78, for example?

Jim   January 10th, 2008 8:55 am ET

I heard he had a bad cleft pallete....that's why he's dropping out.

Whobama?   January 10th, 2008 8:55 am ET

Do the country a favor, Governor... don't go near that Kool-Aid pushing crock, Obama. Hillary is the best choice for America, and you know it. Throw your support toward a candidate who can truly affect change in this country, a candidate whose resume speaks volumes.

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for President!

HH, Pittsburgh, PA   January 10th, 2008 8:39 am ET

OK, Mr. You shouted: "REMEMBER, HILLARY'S POLICY BROUGHT RIGHTS FOR WOMEN." What "policy" and what "rights for women?" LOL, this isn't 1920. Please explain your ridiculous remark.

Simon   January 10th, 2008 8:38 am ET

I didn't like his pullout strategy – too much too soon, and he didn't back the fence. But he had a very affable persona, had good fights with Biden at the debates (though I'm glad Joe win them), and undoubtedly has a good deal of experience. A missed opportunity in many respects....

teanne   January 10th, 2008 8:29 am ET

Just look what a trashy backwards state NM is...and this guy wants to run the country...oh my...

Bill W - PA   January 10th, 2008 8:10 am ET

It's the smart thing for him to do. The media has this down to a 2 person race, Clinton and Obama – they're the only ones any stories are being reported for. You wouldn't even know antyone else was running on the Democratic side. Edwards will definitely be next. While Richardson has gone out of his way to back Clinton and might give what little money and support he has left to Clinton – I'd virtually guarnatee Edwards will back Obama. And Edwards has way more support to give than Richardson does anyway.

lcb   January 10th, 2008 8:09 am ET

Last time we heard the word "uniter" we got Bush!!! Another on the job training, please, this country cannot afford it!!! EXPERIENCE, is what is needed. Bill had it, now the only person that can deliver is Clinton. Change with experience!

Jack   January 10th, 2008 8:01 am ET

I too am sorry to see Gov Richardson drop out of the campaign. He was an important addition to the forum and had many good ideas. After serving his state so well he should be rewarded with yet another position within a new Clinton administration. I hope that he will join Hillary's campaign. A Clinton/Richardson ticket would be a hard ticket to beat.

Mary, Beaver, PA   January 10th, 2008 7:09 am ET

Bill Richardson deserves better, but obviously Big Government, Big Business and Big Media didn't want him in the White House. When are the American people going to wake up and see that there isn't a government OF THE PEOPLE and FOR THE PEOPLE anymore?

When I was in grade school at the height of the Cold War, our teachers smugly told us that the Soviets voted, but, since there was only one party, they could only vote for the candidate offered by that party. So, how are we different, considering that the two majority parties offer us candidates whom we don't like year after year and yet we are compelled to vote for them because an independent candidate has no chance of being elected? Face it! We vote for the candidate that they, the Establishment, stuff down our throats.

It's time for Americans to get angry, and that time is WAY overdue.

Clinton 2008   January 10th, 2008 6:59 am ET

I'm glad to see some media is raising questions about obamas plans, experience etc... We have not heard much from his campaign other than lets change things, but he never tells you what those changes are?? Yes it great he got young voters out in IOWA, but more voters are older with serious concerns on how to pay a mortgage, health care, gas etc...Obama tells you nothing other than we can change things. I believe that Hillary Clinton has the power and backing to get change done immediately and she will because the stakes are higher for woman in politics than men, even black men. Look at the difference in media coverage. Yes, obama he can give a beautiful inspirational at times speech, but that’s not going to help with foreign policy or our economy. Obama mandates that ONLY children will be covered under his health care plan, but what he doesn’t tell you is how a parent would be forced to pay for it, by cutting their food bill or gas bill? Black Americans need to really think this through and not get caught up in a media drive to elect a black man based on color of his skin only, but a Person who has a plan of action, which we have not seen from obama and is why he lost NH. Experienced voters have been asking for substance since the Oprah show turned his campaign attention to a race on race, which was a big mistake for us. I’m a black woman with young children and I have firmly decided to support Clinton; she has proven that she can get things done. I cannot in good conscience support obama just because he is black, it’s my children’s welfare and future, which as a mother is more important than an inspirational speech. These are the reasons our country faces allot of the troubles it has today. Obama may be a great president in few years. With the current state of affairs in other countries, I fear he isn’t ready and I personally DO NOT want to wait 4/8 yrs for him to leave the position like we have been doing with bush/chaney.
As a black woman I was torn between the two and again decided on Clinton. I honestly believe that she is the better fit for our great country right now. Maybe obama in a few years. I hope and pray that ALL voters will look past color and gender and see what’s really important. Ignore the media, who should be ashamed by putting every black news anchor on TV exploiting race. We do not want obama pushed down out throats. They should be reporting facts so educated voters can make a wise decision. Thank you

Nice, Houston, Texas   January 10th, 2008 6:58 am ET

We love you Bill.

Endorse the uniter

Obama 08

Nando   January 10th, 2008 6:47 am ET

Now if we could get John Boy to wake up a smell the coffee this would be good newss, But on the bright side GOV RICHARDSON I HOPE YOU SEE YOU CAN"T TRUST THE CLINTONS THEY WILL TURN ON YOU LIKE A OLD BLIND DOG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

gerry   January 10th, 2008 6:05 am ET

As candidates drop out, we shall see more evidence of he dirty tactics of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth who ruthlessly intend to resume their dynastic occupation of the White House.

Bill Clinton has forgotten the standards of decorum befitting former presidents and he is showing his true colors.

Obama is a uniter, Lady MacBeth a divider.Obama has been bringing people of al, political persuasions together, and he has been bringing into the political picture millions of people who hitherto had not bee not interested.

He has been a ray of hope, and he has been elegant and respectful all the way.

If the fates would have him win the Democratic Nomination, he would have been so wounded by the Macbeths that his and his Party's chances of a resounding victory would have been seriously affected.

Now, tell me. Is this best way that people can use their "experience" in public life?

Is it no wonder that people like Obama, Huckabee, Ron Paul, and, yes, Mc Cain( experienced, not a waffler, and he is principled and decent) have taken such a strong place in our hearts?

The MacBeths, like their counterparts in the Republican Party, need to retreat and make way for the new dispensation.

We are done with the dynasties.

Gerry

Honan   January 10th, 2008 5:10 am ET

Sorry to see you go! I hope all people vote for Hillary Clinton – Senator Clinton proved the “experts” wrong!!! She really has shown that substance, experience, and her "proven" ability for enabling change, along with a lifelong passion and experience in actually helping the majority of Americans, is what the voters care more about when choosing the best leader for this next critical term as president! Voters are not listening to the slanted views of the media "pundits" who care more about drama and a "story", rather than reporting the truth... Americans are smarter than the "sheep" they believe we are! The NH voters proved this!!!...
Thank goodness people are finally waking up and realizing that although Obama is a brilliant orator and nice person, he lacks the actual skill, leadership, experience, and ability to truly make change happen and lead our country... talk is cheap at this point – Look at his record as a State Senator in Illinois and in DC!!! Whenever he is presented with a difficult vote, he doesn't even take a stand – he votes "present”!!! He voted “present,” effectively sidestepping issues nearly 130 times as a state senator. On a sex crime bill, Mr. Obama cast the only vote in a 58-to-0 vote!! He barely has any record for doing much as a US Senator in Washington DC, but what is interesting is that he said he would vote against the Patriot Act, yet when he joined the US Senate, he voted for it!! He said he would vote against the Iraq war, and then voted for funding, AND, he SKIPPED a tough vote on Iran, distorted what the bill authorized, and criticized those who voted for it!! This does not show the true leadership that is required for creating the change we desperately need! He’s not the “outsider” that his campaign is trying to make him out to be – yes, he has fantastic speeches, but his record shows otherwise...it proves that he is more of the typical “sidestepping” polititian and lawyer that we have seen before, who lacks the “real” leadership to get things done. The Republicans will have a field day with Obama if he ever got lucky enough to win the Democratic ticket!!!
Rookies are not needed right now to run the country in the most important job in the world.... Remember the last "rookie" who used “likeability” without substance or experience to get elected? Back then, people liked GW Bush, they didn't care that he lacked experience because he talked in generalities and made us feel good. Well guess what, he won the White House and got us into this mess!! – GW Bush ran a very similar campaign as Obama, and his inexperience has been a disaster for our country!!.... Gore and Kerry warned all of us, but we didn’t listen. Obama can talk in generalities – anyone can do this, but he has no clear plan, no clear ideas, shows a lack of “true” leadership by avoiding difficult decision-making as proven by his actual voting record, and lacks the "real world" experience to deliver on his unsubstantiated promises and “generalities” for change...Hopefully people won't make the same mistake we made with Bush by believing in another rookie with Obama.
Americans will take this critical vote very seriously for 2008 by choosing the best person who has already proven she can lead with success, has already brought about "real" change, and can truly pull our country together to restore our reputation and our world position as the leaders we were once considered. With former President Bill Clinton by Hillary’s side, we will all prosper from such an amazing team that will help bring our country back from the difficulties that we have encountered with the Bush administration... especially with the economic difficulties and international issues we are already facing today and will face over the next few years. No more rookies and false impressions, folks – let's put the best team in the White House!! Senator Clinton is the "real" change Americans need! Go Hillary!!! The country believes in you and your ability to “truly” lead and enable “real” change as our next great President!!!

Jason   January 10th, 2008 4:38 am ET

Spoiler Warning: I'm a Cynic!

Every 4 years we have a chance for true reform and renewal in our political process, and every 4 years, we sleepwalk with status quo candidates who begin to all soud alike while we pare away all the honest, decend candidates.

Bill Richardson is yet another candidate like that. Lots of experience, a good record, a fine and sincere and intelligent man.

We don't want change. We just want inspirational speeches that are vague in details and strong on hope. Meanwhile, we're still fighting two wars in third-world countries that never attacked us while the debt has been doubled and the dollar is sinking.

I'd take an administration with Dodd, Richardson, Paul, Biden, and Kucinich over any of the rest of the boobs that are left.

Good going America!

Felix   January 10th, 2008 4:27 am ET

And what about a Obama for president, Richardson vice president?

Effiong   January 10th, 2008 4:21 am ET

I guess all the news stories is about how wrong the polls have been in the NH primary but what i ahven't heard is that these are the same polling results we were hearing on the republican side of the campaign in NH and for some reason the projected winner in the polls John Mccain also was the exit poll winner on Tuesday night. There is nothing wrong with these polls, i think there just seems to be a little bit extra stuff going on and i am not suggesting race..I am just saying how come one side was right and the other so wrong with the same strategic polling? May be the media outlets can add this perspective to the discussions

Bryan Mackenzie   January 10th, 2008 3:55 am ET

I watched all the debates on CNN here in Dubai.

Bill Richardson came over as qualified genuine and sincere. If Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination now, I hope she will consider him as VP.

I think this would give a massive boost to her campaign and I think they would work together very well.

I hope Hillary see this comment.

YesWeCan   January 10th, 2008 3:37 am ET

Oh, now he figures it out ?

lynne   January 10th, 2008 3:36 am ET

It's a shame that the media doesn't report the statistics that prove the end result in the initial primary elections.
Crying- give me a break, I saw no crying, I saw a very tired, very qualified canidate state a personal view.
I also saw a very powerful speaker who when appearing on the late night and day time talk shows declaring his canidacy for the presidential nomination showed poise, intelegence and personal indepence. Now when speaking sounds like a familiar vioice of the 60's whom I idolized and admired very much. I think it wise to keep to the promise of being an individual of change and not try to personify the great ones that preceded him.

Keith   January 10th, 2008 3:27 am ET

um yea. this election is already rigged. clinton is down with the rothchilds.

Sam IA   January 10th, 2008 3:14 am ET

Richardson would make the perfect VP should Obama or Edwards win the nomination. The experience catcalls go out the window. Hillary would do better to pick Grahm of Florida. You know ole Jeb will be planning his next coup . Fileing down the stamping die for the ballots, setting up traffic spot checks, getting the magnets ready to put the diebolds on the fritz. Most of the crooks in Ohio are either in jail or removed from office so we might have a shot there this time . Bwahahaahah

Gary   January 10th, 2008 2:31 am ET

C'MON PEOPLE.. He's only been running as Hillary's VP the whole time! He never was seriously running for President. Richardson was in Bill Clinton's cabinet, hello?Look at every debate from the first onto the most recent NH debate. Richardson protected Hillary, only really talked to deflect the focus when she got stuck in her non-answer giving and her fakeness showed too much. He was a mole, placed there by none other than the bot herself Hillary. It stinks of her tactical, but ineffective forseeable actions. Her intent was to divide the Latino voters using Bill Richardson, asking Latinos to vote for him not Barack–even though Clinton did nothing in the Mr.'s term. Then she wanted women to vote for her, because well she's a woman. Then asked her buddy in NY Mayor Bloomberg, to announce a run as an Independent to well take all your independents away.. I can hear her laugh/cry all the way in Cali. I hope she can hear the crowds cheering OBAMA 08' right back. One group she'll never gain–self thinking, principled, hard-working Americans that are all FIRED UP AND READY TO GO! Time to go donate again, got to go.

Jack, Greenville, SC   January 10th, 2008 1:49 am ET

Please let my comment from earlier today be posted. Thanks.

America Rising   January 10th, 2008 1:14 am ET

Governor Richardson was a well-qualified candidate and has been a great contributor to our country. Any of the remaining Dem candidates would do well to give him the opportunity to continue to serve at a national level.

I would hope to see Governor Richardson endorse John Edwards now but ultimately the choice will belong to each voter who had intended to vote for the governor. I would encourage his voters to take a look at the policies and platform of Senator Edwards because they will find a candidate worthy of their vote. John Edwards is working to restore integrity to America and make the American dream attainable for all of us once again.

Vote Edwards '08

Keith   January 10th, 2008 1:08 am ET

Remember Ron Paul? Yea you should learn about him.

Jimmy   January 10th, 2008 1:05 am ET

Good Luck Governor Richardson. No matter who you endorse. You are a good man, and will continue with the wonderful service you provide New Mexico, America, the rest World. Thank You

"Senator Hillary Clinton for President of the United States".

OBAMA SUPPORTERS> you all need to learn some respect. In almost every comment section of every political article there are 10 times more Obama supporters bad mouthing other canadates. They seem to be real scared of Senator Clinton. They make themselves easy game for the Republicans, beings they are playing right into their hands.

Stephen G.   January 10th, 2008 1:00 am ET

This wont be the last of the extremely credible Bill Richardson. If he doesn't end up a VP Candidate, he will certainly have a top job in the government when Obama is President.

I hope he ends up endorsing Obama over Hilary now that he is out, but with his history with Bill I wouldn't be surprised to see him endorse Hilary, especially if Hilary cries in front of him....

rawdawgbuffalo   January 10th, 2008 12:43 am ET

i see it some wha differently regardless who wins the derby .... poor mr or mrs next president

chad   January 10th, 2008 12:39 am ET

not a big fan of the democrats. but its kind of sad cause he was by and away the most qualified of them all.

Paul   January 10th, 2008 12:14 am ET

Richardson certainly has admirable experience but for anyone that ever watched the debates he did not do a good job of articulating his positions. That is a must when you're running for the most powerful position in the world (though it doesn't explain our current situation!).

I think people views are misguided when discussing experience. I feel Hilary's "experience" simply reflects she is more of a cog in the machine of special interests. What health care changes ought we to expect from someone receiving droves of money from health insurance lobbyists. Obama offers a fresh perspective. Although it's a valid question if he can deliver on his promises, I think even if he was not able to succeed we would be in the same boat with any of the other choices we have.

Obama would be greatly helped by the endorsement of Richardson. It seems that would fill the "holes" that some see in his campaign as far as experience. Democrats need to open their eyes and see that a Clinton nomination leaves the most room open for a Republican victory. There is too much anti-Hilary sentiment even within the democratic party. Many of those now voting for Obama and Edwards will not back Clinton if she is nominated, though Clinton's supports would certainly back Obama. I'm very wary of a republican victory versus Clinton and 4 more years in Iraq. As an independent myself, I know voters like me would not turn out for Clinton.

OldOne   January 10th, 2008 12:14 am ET

Richardson is a good man BUT...
In this last debate when he kept coming in with his "what's wrong with" then describing himself and his 'can't we all just get along' attitude... I knew he was a VP candidate only. He would make an excellent VP by the way.

I still believe Edwards is the best one for the job looking at what he has actually and physically done. He's a southern man, he knows talking, and working don't always win, sometimes you need to carry that "big stick" and be willing to use it, AND know how to Win with it! He has shown this prowess in courts, no matter what anyone has to say about him being a "trial lawyer". I also know a "frivilous lawsuit" is always some one else's!

Middle class and lower class Americans are fighting for their lives while ALL of us are going to have to fight to put Uncle Sam back in Washington and out of our private lives! What happened to our Constitution?

I was disappointed in the last debate that Hillary was the only one who mentioned securing our ports and borders. Say what you will about a tear... this is why she won in NH

Overvig   January 10th, 2008 12:11 am ET

The media really played a big part of this election, mostly the Democratic side this year, first they only covered the candidates with better poll numbers and to get better poll numbers you either needed money to buy alot of air time on your own ( that means you have to be a millioniare or got alot of money from special interest groups or large corporate backing) or a name that was recognisable (Edwards) or something different ( like, a first women or a first mainstream black man running for President) then they were the candidate of choice by the media, they got mass media coverage. Richardson,Biden,Dodd candidates with resumes to be proud of, got if they were lucky, their name put out their in passing by the media.The media should be better then that, elections should be more balanced, each candidate should get they same amount of money and the media should give equal time to all candidates and I think polling should be outlawed, then and only then would we actually get a fair election and the best President. I for one thought Joe Biden was the best candidate, I had to research it on my own, since the media barely covered him, if only given a fair chance by the media he would of made a great President.

Prayu   January 10th, 2008 12:09 am ET

Hillary's experience is an overrated travesty. She's a Washington insider yes, but in a way that is polorizing and divisive. She is in no way the best way to achieve change in the government, because she and her team of advisors and supporters, are all the same old folks from the 90's.

And for the record, every single President always has a horde of experienced advisors behind him that look out for him and gather information for him. It's not like Obama will be tossed into the Oval Office alone and forced to answer Jeopardy questions about Presidential secrets. What's needed is an inspirational leader who can think outside the box, who shows consistent integrity and strength of character.

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL   January 9th, 2008 11:58 pm ET

A good and honorable man, the democrats really outdid themselves... these are candidates that anyone can be proud of... too bad the Republicans are not as excited for their choices... come to the light my republican friends... we love ya all the same...

GO HILLARY!!!

Kevin, Landover, MD   January 9th, 2008 11:57 pm ET

Edwards should MAN UP and do the same by getting out of the race. Edwards knows he will NOT win and will only go further down in the votes. Edwards is now being a spoiler for Obama. Edwards should drop out NOW and get a deal for a Cabinet position in the Obama Administration. He would make a Very good appointee as Health care or Education Secretary.

TO EDWARDS: IF you want change like you say? then you know that by taking away 15 % of the change vote from Obama. You would be guaranteeing that NO CHANGE will occur under a Hillary Administration. If you do the right thing and throw your support to Obama, YOU would be considered a HERO for CHANGE!!

Steven Bengtson Sr.   January 9th, 2008 11:55 pm ET

Bill is a good man and I hope he is considered for Hillary's VP!

Tom Davie   January 9th, 2008 11:46 pm ET

I just read all the replies and its just shocking.

This thread is about Bill Richardson, yet Obama supporters cannot help themselves but shove MORE DIGS in at Hillary clinton.

Obama supporters are the candidate of HATRED.

Show some respect and keep your candidate out of this. Its about Richardson.

jacque bauer   January 9th, 2008 11:42 pm ET

This loser claimed that he would engage in diplomacy with the "Soviet Union" if elected! (Ref Saturday night's debate). And this was Clinton's Ambassador to the UN???

That was always Bill's secret for success – surround yourself with stupidity and ugliness and you will always look the best...!

(This doesn't speak well for Hillary, but we already knew that. Uh oh, here comes the tears again...!)

Jay Germaine   January 9th, 2008 11:38 pm ET

Is Hillary the holder of opportunities that they can be handed out? Or does the country have so many opportunities that she is the only one that can acheive them for her?

The first I know the answer to. The second, I pray the answer is the same as the first....NO

Jose Card - Independent   January 9th, 2008 11:32 pm ET

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/08/Dobbs.January8/index.html

Unfortunately, as Lou Dobbs said our presidential campaign has gone in the direction based on dynasty, momentum, charisma or, God save us all, likability. To me, lots of marketing skills in our candidates are most promoted by our mass media's similar marketing personalities. Do we choose a president based on his or her ability to market his or her ideas? In other words, is marketing a required quality in leadership?

Governor Richardson is the most experienced candidate in the Dem league. Hillary is the least experienced. And yet, Hillary won NH primary, while Richardson is dropping out. This greatly disappoints me – an Independent.

I wish Governor Richardson the best in his future campaign for Election 2012. Rome was not built in a day and he should consider a rerun.

I also wish Governor Richardson to endorse Obama, who has the best chance in defeating Hillary. We need a Washington outsider to change our government. Hillary is closer to G.W. Bush than McCain is. Bill tried to smear Obama as being the same as Hillary on voting records. Then what better experience does Hillary have over Obama? Bill is a perpetual liar, who may have a chance sitting on our Supreme Court some day. He will certainly make our Supreme Court the laughingstock worldwide. A constitutional amendment is needed to prohibit justice appointments of families due to conflict of interest among the three branches of our government. President Taft was not appointed by his wife from the White House.

We desperately need real change for the better.

Roy Sutton   January 9th, 2008 11:15 pm ET

Hillary Clinton I feel is sending subliminal racist messages

such as we have to stop this

we can't go back wards

she makes it sound like the people have forgotten the unspoken rule of race.

I would like to have her explain what she means by those comments

Jason   January 9th, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Seriously, does anyone remember the last time that they tried to run on a third Clinton term? If you don't, look back to 2000. The nation does not want a third Clinton term. Hillary needs to run on something other than Bill's coattails.

If the Dems put Hillary up for the nomination, they will lose. It is just to easy of a race for the Republicans. All they have to do is raise Hillary's negatives by 4 points and they win.

Also the argument that everyone would have negatives when they are done with teh Republicans is just bull. Hillary and Kerry had high negatives because they were poor public speakers. Not the case with either Obama or Edwards.

As for Bill Richardson, his debate performances were pitiful. He's a great and smart guy, just a poor VP candidate.

Richardson is going to run for Domenci Senate Seat and win.

Hillary/Bill are going to go real negative and lose the nomination.

Obama will win and probably pick Biden as his VP.

Expat Teacher, Washington, DC   January 9th, 2008 11:06 pm ET

This is really a crying shame. Governor Richardson is the best person for the President of the United States. He has the best policy ideas, best international experience and is the most electable of all Democrats.

Jim   January 9th, 2008 10:52 pm ET

I'm almost certain you won't post what I typed. I just wanted the Bought and Paid for so-called "Lap Dog" News people to know that WE know the truth.

Jim   January 9th, 2008 10:49 pm ET

Oh, so this is where they all hang out. Does anyone else know that both the IA and NH voting was rigged? There were people standing at the polls, keeping an eye on the polling stations to report any irregularities like thugs standing next to the doors asking who you gonna vote for and keeping a tally on how many Ron Paul voters attended. Well boys and girls, the votes in and both the Caucus tallies were Rigged by the voting machines again. The votes for Ron Paul in IA and NH, collectively for all counties were added up at the doors of each polling station. And Ron Paul received thousands of votes. But for some odd reason, the numbers on the TV never changed. Hmmm....Why is that you wonder? BECAUSE THE ENTIRE THING IS RIGGED PEOPLE!!! WHY DO YOU THINK THEY WANT VOTING MACHINES AND NOT PAPER BALLOTS AND BOXES? Welcome to Amerika !!!!

Jimmy from colorado   January 9th, 2008 10:47 pm ET

Good.He was running to get VP ticket and as he realized Clinton has chance to win he is droppin,congrats Gov.you are gonna be running mate of Hillary good job.Same old folks in DC and we do expect new Politics?I think Hillary will take all of Clintons aides including Bill himself.I do not expect any change but more bitter fight than even of 90s

ZH   January 9th, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Richardson does not look or talk like a president. i wonder how he was able to collect 17m.

Go for Hillary!!!

Adrian   January 9th, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Obama is the one he is the one we need he is smart he knows the issues heis the only one in this campain can almost rally every one to a common cause and get some thing done.

Can anyone in the media please tell me what they are saying when they say america is not ready for a black man to be president what does that mean
please explain !!!!!!
and do they really know what kind of message that sends to all little black americans across the country. please please explain!!!!!
I heard this on cnn and other media also your not alone.

Should a black child need to allways feel as though they need not aply .

Okla.

AJ   January 9th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

terry Mc., hillary's advisor threatened richardson when he asked supporters to vote obama as 2nd choice. it is just so abominable. bill, hillary, dem. m/c, stop spreading the crap...

Zhonni   January 9th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Richardson certainly had more than enough experience to be president. If there were allstars of resumes or hall of fame, he would be one of them.

I still take issue with Sen. Clinton saying she is the most experienced candidate. It seems it is becoming truer by the day as the most experiecnced are dropping out.

Obama still has more experience than she does, but she has more Washington experience.

Bimmer   January 9th, 2008 10:39 pm ET

Before Obama or Clinton considers Edwards as a VP, he or she should give John Kerry a call for a word of advice.

Eliza   January 9th, 2008 10:15 pm ET

Bummer! Richardson's background, in particular his experience with foreign policy, really made him one of the top picks in my book.

Art in CA   January 9th, 2008 10:13 pm ET

This is unfortunate. He was my choice.

He is probably the most qualified and most successful foreign diplomat the U.S. has. Bill has been nominated for the Nobel Prize four times.

ALL six years as Governor of New Mexico he has had a balanced budget even while increasing health care for uninsured children!

Godspeed.

E. Elliott, Orlando, FL   January 9th, 2008 10:09 pm ET

He is a more qualified man than the Goop's have. But he joined the rest of the Dems in pushing the policy of amnesty for the 12 million criminal immigrants. All of them are for it, but he was out in front with the most irresponsible position. The Dem's will not even include the issue on thier questionaires. He is not pretty like Romney nor well financed, but he is still a good man. If only he had stood for the American working man and not the criminals that are devaluing the labor of Amricans, he would have done better. Only one policy has merit. Capture, Punish, Expel.

NAVYCRUZER, PENSACOLA, FL   January 9th, 2008 9:45 pm ET

RICHARDSON WAS THE ONLY CANDIDATE ON BOTH SIDES THAT HAD THE TRUE QUALIFICATION AND TEMPERAMENT TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS KNOWLEDGE OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND HIS ABILITY OF REAL LEADERSHIP WOULD HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVE IN REPAIRING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATIONS MISTAKES.

Larry A. Martin   January 9th, 2008 9:42 pm ET

Does anyone actually believe that it matters
who wins the Presidency?
There has not been a President since JFK
that was willing to attack the cancers that are
eating the wealth and spirit of the nation.
I know this is fun for a lot of people, but it
will not make your life better nor your childrens
future more bright.
The nation is populated by fat and happy people
who do not seem to understand the slow erosion
that has been stripping the nation of its future.
Whoever wins will only concentrate on the meaningful
superficial, and never go after the reasons these cancers
have now put themselves into positions that will require
the whole nation to rise against them. And what politician
will tell you to do that?

MR   January 9th, 2008 9:41 pm ET

HILLARY CLINTON IS VERY SMART. WHY SHE WOULD WANT TO CLEAN UP THE MESS THAT WILL BE LEFT BEHIND BY PRES. BUSH IS BEYOND ME. BILL CLINTON CLEANED UP THE MESS LEFT BY THE PREVIOUS PRES. BUSH. CLINTON FIXED THE DEFICIT BEFORE AND THEY CAN DO IT AGAIN. CHANGE CANNOT COME ABOUT UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT TO CHANGE–EXPERIENCE DOES COUNT–AND HILLARY CAN MAKE THE DIFFERENCE.

REMEMBER, HILLARY'S POLICY BROUGHT RIGHTS FOR WOMEN–THIS IS CONCRETE PROOF OF CHANGES SHE HAS MADE. VOTE HILLARY, WE WON'T REGRET IT.

Elvis Dupree   January 9th, 2008 9:41 pm ET

Bill Richardson has served his country well, going back to his time with Kissinger. Let's hope he continues to do so by endorsing Obama instead of psychoBarbie. I am sure there is a place for him in any administration. His skills in diplomacy would work to unite America and promote a fresh view of America to the world.

Taylor   January 9th, 2008 9:41 pm ET

I'm sad to see Richardson out of the race. He would have made a great President. Richardson along with BIden and Dodd were by far the most qualified candidates.

Judy LaMott, Marin CA   January 9th, 2008 9:37 pm ET

On the issues, Governor Richardson was my clear first choice and I am sorry to see him leave the campaign. But reality is reality and he probably made the right decision. I just hope he throws his support to Barak Obama. I would also like to say that I hope Nevada disallows admittance to Wild Willy (Clinton) and his heat seeking trouser snake. He'll only embarrass Hillary when reporters track him through the various brothels.

Gobama   January 9th, 2008 9:35 pm ET

Can't wait till Hilarious and Billicose drop out. LOL

STATUS QUO MUST GO!

Jack, Greenville, SC   January 9th, 2008 9:34 pm ET

I hope that Richardson will back Obama, as the more I read about Richardson's views (the way he feels about the war, the way he now sees health care reform, etc...) the more I realize that he backs a lot of the initiatives and the executive style the Obama embodies. Unfortunately, some sense of his prior loyalties might compel him to back Clinton. That would be a shame.

Gobama   January 9th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Can't wait till Hilarious and Billicose drop out. LOL

brian   January 9th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

But why, oh, why hasn't Fred Thompson ended his vanity campaign yet? He's done far worse and isn't in it to bring attention to an issue like Kucinich.

Obama/Richardson has a very nice ring to it, and as a lovely parting gift, we'd get Pat Roberston having a stroke when they win.

Dems be losers   January 9th, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Human rights over national security...

Illegal invader rights over citizens rights....

Nice try, exit stage left....

Cove   January 9th, 2008 9:27 pm ET

I think the single most damaging action my Country has ever taken was the authorization to torture.

I felt so strongly about the issue that I went to see the Governor of my State, Bill Richardson, who was running for president. For a few years I had been giving Richardson a very hard time with a blog called "Fat Bill and Me." Even though I knew I wouldn't be welcome, when the Governor held an "open door session" for his constituents I was one of the first in line to speak to him.

To my amazement, even though Governor Richardson knew of my trashing of him in the Blogosphere he invited me into his office to have a one on one conversation.

I asked Richardson, I actually told Richardson that I needed him to condemn torture. In the middle of the conversation about him condemning torture and what happened at Abu Ghraib prison, the Governor leaned back with a pained look on his face. He seemed to be thinking, “Could people really think I support torture?"

"I've made statements to the national media about that" the Governor said.
I replied, “No, I need a personal letter from you.”

Without missing a beat, he then said in a loud but somewhat amused voice to an aide, "We can throw in something about the NSA."

I looked totally bewildered at the Governor and with an incredulous look on his face, Richardson said, "You know, the National Security Administration wiretaps."

Again baffled, not being on the inside for any of this stuff, I said frankly, "You know, Governor, I don't care what they hear me say."

Then the more serious Richardson took a minute and said quietly "We'll get you something."

As far as I know Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico was the only candidate for President this time around who publicly and personally condemned torture. And proved to me that Richardson has heart. Go luck in the future Governor Richardson, I think you would make a great Secretary of State.

S.K.M. Boston Mass   January 9th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Hillary Clinton's economic experience ends at being a director on the board of directors for Wal-Mart. Her experience on healthcare is in copying John Edwards' mandated policy. Her experience in elected office is four years shorter than Barack Obama's. Her claim of 35 years is not just an exaggeration but outright ludicrous. Remove twenty of those years when she was First Lady on the state and national level. Sorry, being a wife isn't experience, just like being a husband isn't. Another eight years comes from being a lawyer. She claims to have 35 years of experience, but has only been in elected office for 7 years. She was never appointed to a position. Her actual experience is one fifth of her claim

Kyle G. Columbia SC   January 9th, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Richardson you are a noble man and did great things for this country but lets all be real WE knew he NEVER had a chance!! Also, to the folks who say Richardson, Biden, and Dodd had long impresive resumes I agree but some of you folks say JOHN EDWARDS. What in the WORLD did he do for America (bills/laws wise) more less his own freaking state? NOTHING!!! They asked him that question at the debate and he mention the Patient Bill of Rights but was shoot down when the moderator informed us (the viewers that didn't know) THAT BILL WASN'T PASSED!! What I've notice is a lot of politicans really don't pass CRAP!! Hillary you can't cry yourself to the White House. If the American people believes this land I own no land anywhere but I got 20 arces in Flordia I can sale you.... FOOL me ONCE shame on YOU, FOOL me TWICE shame on ME.

Nina   January 9th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Hopefully, Hillary will pick him for the VP.

Former Rightie, Pittsburgh   January 9th, 2008 9:10 pm ET

I started to like Bill. It's really too bad he will not be around by time the vote gets to Pennsylvania. Maybe we'll see a VP offer in his future. He would carry a huge Southwest population.

Ms. C Johnson   January 9th, 2008 9:07 pm ET

I hate to see Bill Richardson leave, he is such a jolly man. and he has so much experience. I wanted to see him stay in the race. Maybe someone will give a position in there cabinet.

Danny U   January 9th, 2008 9:05 pm ET

La'Kitgum In NH ~ How much legislative experience did JFK have when he ran for president? Eight years in the Senate, three less years of legislative experience than Senator Obama. The only thing HRC shares with JFK is political name recognition.

How do you think Clinton will change anything when she's taken more money from the pharmaceutical, defense and health care industries than any other candidate REGARDLESS OF PARTY? She was the experience candidate and now she states she's the candidate of change and frankly, I don't understand how you can invoke change when some of the industries in the most dire need of reform are the same industries that have contributed a bulk of her campaign money.

She voted to give the president authority to invade Iraq and refuses to admit it was a mistake (see John Edwards) and didn't read the NIE before committing our troops to war. She also voted yay for Kyl/Lieberman even though other more senior Deomcratic senators rebuked the bill due to the smiliarity in verbiage to the Iraq war bill. Rather hawkish, don't you think? The list for reasons not to support could go on and on. I'm an independent, more liberal than conservative, and would never consider voting for Senator Clinton.

Edwards would be wise to follow in the path of Richardson to ensure Obama's nomination.

Robyn   January 9th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

I'm a Hillary supporter but a fan of Richardson. Thanks for being a good candidate, Bill. You will be missed.

Kevin,FL   January 9th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

IT WAS ABOUT TIME!! HE HAD NO CHANCE.. CLINTON 08!!

threeriverscrossing, Raleigh, North Carolina   January 9th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

Governor Richardson we are proud of your positive, gracious and noble moral advocacy of your campaign. You inspired us to think about what is the true meaning of freeing the Iraq people, that the American spirit in not about nationalism of occupation, genocide, or destain for free will and human values around the world but that the American spirit is about innovation, economic growth, moral prerogatives and freedoms that are by measured by results in the quality of lives of the American people and as well as in the world community as a whole. Foremost, a master negotiator with legendary outcomes that exemplify risks, courage, and freedom.

Fiona Kennedy   January 9th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

I think it's a shame that he has decided to drop out. I think the Dem's need a voice of reason and Richardson was it. He seemed very down to earth and was a perfect foil between the other three. Hopefully when the Democratic nominee is announced they will find a place for Richardson in the cabinet. He has some good ideas and is very experienced especially dealing with hostile people,

Sandie   January 9th, 2008 8:56 pm ET

Governor Richardson, you are a great man with a lot of experience . I hope you will support Hillary-you would make a great VP. I think the two of you will make a great team and hope to see both of your names on the ticket. Best of luck to both of you!

Crozet   January 9th, 2008 8:55 pm ET

In the morning Lou Dobbs skewers pundits for their calls on the New Hampshire election, suggesting they had been kicked in the teeth. The very same evening Lou announces Governor Richardson's resignation from the presidential race prior to confirming the information.
Lou you have met the media pundit (sic reporter) who makes the early call without confirming sources, and you are him.

Ls   January 9th, 2008 8:54 pm ET

Hmmmm he was a good guy

I hope Edwards endorse Obama if he drops out and i hope Obama choose him(Edwards) as his running mate! those tow would be great together and do wonders for this country....The time for change is NOW and it wont come from Billary.

Becky-Texas   January 9th, 2008 8:52 pm ET

andy,

now one cares who the spanish group cares, no one, atleast not me, we are americans, don't divide us!

Obama all the way

Jason McDowell, Louisiana   January 9th, 2008 8:52 pm ET

I think a Clinton, Richardson ticket would be great, they already know each other and and both have great expirence!!! Go Clinton

elizabeth   January 9th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

Sorry to see Bill go- he was extremely qualified and would have made an excellent President- just didn't have the star quality of the others that have dominated everything else so far. He barely got a chance to speak at the debates. It's disappointing- I hope he gives it another shot at some point.

Laura -Tulsa OK   January 9th, 2008 8:47 pm ET

Sorry to hear that a candidate who believed in the Fair Tax is no longer in the running. By the time this is all over, we'll be back to business as usual in Washington....

Shander21   January 9th, 2008 8:47 pm ET

He will never endorse Clinton, especially after he he burned his Clintonista bridges by asking his voters to caucus for Sen. Obama as a second choice in Iowa. It doesn't really matter anyway...I mean, 5%?

Marty   January 9th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

so when is Edwards dropping out...he is done..everyone knows it but him...this is a two person race....I like them both....so Edwards: get out and let the voters pick from these two super stars!

Evan   January 9th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

Obama/Richardson would be an excellent ticket.

Now if Edwards could just cash in his chips, too, Obama's numbers will skyrocket.

spdubois   January 9th, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Good luck !!! Wish you the best !!! HRC all the WAY !!

J Williamson Buffalo, NY   January 9th, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Gov Richardson is so uniquely and abdundantly qualified to be president, I find it somewhat distrubing that he didn't make a real race of it (I don't think the fault was his). Has a MTV mind-set taken over presidential politics? I keep hearing references to Barack Obama as a "rock star" and I wonder what that has to do with being president of the US? Have we moved to a point where the "best" candidates aren't necessarily the most experienced, but an individual who can "rock the house?" Will we ever again nominate a person like Franklin Roosevelt or Dwight Eisenhauer? I don't think either one would pass the "rock-star test of today, and I've no doubt that they would find the selection process of today absurd. P.S. Thank you Gov. Richardson, you really did elevate the debates with your knowledge and thoughtfulness – I've no doubt that you'll continue to serve the country you so love for many years to come.

Roy   January 9th, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Governor Richardson, I'm sorry that you are opting out, but just know that you did great to the eyes of New Mexico residents. I hope that you decide to endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton.

E. C., Houston, Texas   January 9th, 2008 8:41 pm ET

The Media has completely IGNORED Edwards and Richardson,as well as... Biden and DODD...ALL FOUR, GREAT and EXPERIENCED MEN..... who would make Superb Presidents of our Country.
Think that there is NO MEDIA BIAS? What are we, the American People, thinking that we would listen to the MEDIA....make or break a Candidacy? We need to Wake UP and FIRE THE MEDIA! We must learn to be more Vocal and send Complaints to the Networks! Remember Katie Couric who tried to tell the U.S. Voter each and every morning who to vote for..... and then cracked offensive jokes and ridiculed the Republican Contenders? Guess she got fooled! NBC also received many complaints! Media Bias in a Presidential Campaign should NOT be allowed.

Jennifer   January 9th, 2008 8:41 pm ET

It is a true shame that in our country, the people with the most experience and the best to offer us don't get a chance because of money. When will the political process be truely reformed in this country so all canidates receive an equal chance to be heard?

Joe   January 9th, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Richardson will endorse Obama, positive.

BrooklynZoo   January 9th, 2008 8:38 pm ET

He was Clinton's Secretary of Energy, so do you think he will endorse Hillary?

I totally agree that he would make a great VP, especially for Obama – his experience could partially negate questions about Obama's international experience... although I don't know if America is truly ready for a Black President AND a Latino Vice-President...

Shawn   January 9th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

...and if he is in fact dropping out he should endorse Ron Paul and not Clinton. Others I know that like Richardson like Paul as their second choice.

Errick   January 9th, 2008 8:34 pm ET

I believed in Gov. Richardson's strategic diplomacy model concerning the war.

However, Let's Not forget-Miss Hillary supported the war in Iraq!

Plus had a hard time trying to justify why she voted in favor for the war, but now she has changed positions.

Know who has been unclear and uncertain?

:) OBAMA ALL THE WAY-2008!

P.S. Love the idea of health care for all children, and yes children do not have a choice, but parents (cogent adults) do!

Digger, Los Angeles, CA   January 9th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

The best-qualified candidate both in foreign and domestic affairs, Bill Richardson had my vote from the moment I met him. I will keep my fingers crossed that the ultimate nominee will make him part of their ticket.

Matthew, Minneapolis, MN   January 9th, 2008 8:32 pm ET

MSNBC is saying that he isn't dropping out and that this is all false??

E. C., Houston, Texas   January 9th, 2008 8:31 pm ET

Another experienced, well-respected, tried and true leader of the Democrats withdraws from the Presdential Campaign. Dodd, Biden and now, Richardson cannot get the Vote because of an inexperienced novice, Obama, and a politically divisive woman, who has no future as President. What is wrong with this picture? Young people who are voting for these two candidates had better wake up to reality. Better read credentials and experience before that historic 'first vote'is cast. Just because a candidate creates a 'rock star' atmosphere, and the other is a feminist, means absolutely Nothing. At this time in our history, the U.S. does not want or need a President who must have 'on the job training.' Because of this choice, there will certainly be a Republican President elected 2008.....Thank Goodness!

Bob, Phoenix   January 9th, 2008 8:31 pm ET

Bill Richardson is a smart, professional politician. Smart enough to know that he never had a remote chance to win. He was doing it for free exposure, to potentially influence some pet issues, and to be considered for a key cabinet job.
Dodd is a septugenarian making babies! Biden? If you've paid any attention to press conferences, Senate committee hearings, C-Span, etc. over the last 25 years you should conclude that he is the most insufferably arrogant, self-inflated, caustic SOB on the planet – people just don't LIKE the guy! Pretty tough profile if you're running for prom queen (which is what American political contests have become to reach the average American Idol voter).

Jennifer   January 9th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

Fred Thompson is next!!!

Gudy   January 9th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

I wander if in the case that Gov. Richardson would have received the same attention and extra air time on CNN as CNN has been giving to Obama if the Gov. would be leaving the race this early. But I still have to congratulate Lou Dobbs for the great article posted earlier today about the big media coverage of the elections and stuff. I would like also, if I may, suggest to the rest of the producers and reporters in the same network, to take advantage of the great professional skills of Lou Dobbs, and learn from him how to do an efficient, high quality, impartial journalism. Cause we want the facts, the thinking we do for ourselves!!

Shawn   January 9th, 2008 8:29 pm ET

It would not be a bad campaign tactic to "drop out" and come back in. If that's the case, it's the best move his campaign has made yet. This is probably the most publicity he's had to date. Perhaps inspired by those Burger King commercials when they took away the whopper for a day?

Gorbashov, Long Beach, Ca.   January 9th, 2008 8:29 pm ET

He made a contribution, and will make a good Vice Presidential candidate, or Senatorial candidate in New Mexico.

We welcome his supporters to the Edwards camp!

Edwards/Richardson in 2008!

docrock,lewisville,tx   January 9th, 2008 8:28 pm ET

It seems the insane circus that has become our election process has taken three of the most experienced delegates from our ballots.One can only hope that the voters have enough left to vote for in this spin doctor controlled,media hyped horse race,pundit picked mess.Good luck!

David Lopez   January 9th, 2008 8:28 pm ET

As a New Mexico resident I am looking forward to $Bill cutting our taxes and raising our user fees to make up the shortfall.

Welcome home, $Bill.

Dozirulf   January 9th, 2008 8:27 pm ET

caywen is correct. MSNBC has a story saying the reports of Richardson dropping out are not true. Apparently, an insider had said he might “suspend, not end” his campaign soon, meaning he would halt active campaigning but not officially drop out.

Either way... It's just a matter of time. :( Question is: Who will he endorse? The Clintons whom he worked under? I sure hope not.

Tom Davie   January 9th, 2008 8:27 pm ET

Thankyou Bill for your patriotic contributions. We all appreciate your duty to our country. You certainly won my respect.

Paul   January 9th, 2008 8:26 pm ET

C'mon this guy in Saturday night's debate wanted to negotiate with the Soviet Union. Someone in his camp surely told him that the Soviet Union no longer exists...what an idiot.

Mary, Michigan   January 9th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Personally, I was disappointed in his campaign. He clearly has the most experience and I was eager to listen to what he had to say and to learn more about him.

However, he never seemed comfortable–especially debating. I became uncomfortable for him when watching him.

Seems to be a good person.

a little sad   January 9th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Mr Richardson -

I am very sorry to see you leave. However, you will continue to do a terrific job for the people of New Mexico. Hopefully whoever has the general nod for pres will recognize a great VP candidate.

Tee   January 9th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Richdard is a part of the Status-Quo, please be very afraid.

Mike, New Braunfels, TX   January 9th, 2008 8:24 pm ET

It's unfortunate, but the Presidency is more than just having good qualifications and experience. The President is the face of America to the world. I like Richardson...he is a good man, is extremely qualified, and has great experience. Sadly, he may lack some of the charisma, looks, and speaking ability that some of his collegues have. Another unfortunate truth is that he could perhaps have benefited from the same thing that Huckabee has benefited from....his weight loss. Although in reality, it shouldn't affect his ability to be President, when stacked up to his lean and mean competitors, it put him at a disadvantage.

Jason, Chicago, IL   January 9th, 2008 8:23 pm ET

Not Edwards!

Rich In Seattle   January 9th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

He was only in it in hopes of getting a VP node. Did you see how much he sucked up to Hillary in the last debate.

RYAN 3000   January 9th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

What a shame. Shame. Shame. Shame. Shame. Shame for Bill Richardson.

Desiree   January 9th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

It's very sad that he's leaving the race. it's sad that some people feel experience is a bad thing because he would have made a good president.

Arthur, Immokalee, Florida   January 9th, 2008 8:21 pm ET

Adios Governor Richardson!

With the decision of Biden, Dodd, and now Governor Richardson, it is clear that experience and popularity in Washington is not really playing a serious role in the 2008 presidential. Is that a surprise? Is this the first time? Well, the answer to both of these questions is simply no.

Anyway, when was the last experience really weighted that much in any election? I think I would need a long ride back to history. It seems like Hillary Clinton has finally realized it considering the fact that even in her winning speech last night she did not use that word at all. It is true that running for president is applying for a job but it is so far away from being formal. In other words it is very much harder to pass a simple job interview than winning even the presidential.

Jane   January 9th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

I love this man. Bill Richardson is a man of integrity, deep concern and commitment. I admire him for what he has contributed, and he would make a fine president. The democrats should be proud of the men and women who serve the party. They are a fine group of people and they make me proud to be a democrat. My gratitude goes out to all of them. Thank You!

Fred   January 9th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

It's a real loss for the country. Unfortunately the news media share a large part of the blame by focusing and hyping only the top two candidates that they made into celebrities. Doing that sold a lot more ads and air time than finding the best candidate.

Bob   January 9th, 2008 8:19 pm ET

I heard that he is going to endorse Mike Gravel

MJ   January 9th, 2008 8:18 pm ET

Bill Richardson doesnt deserve to be President. I respectfully submit that if a person doesnt have enough discipline to take care of their body, they dont deserve to be charged with taking care of the country.

He is not photogenic and obese. These are choices he has made.

If he was younger looking, because he is Latino it would be a three person race.

I know it all sounds shallow and sad but it's true.

People like attractive and he is not.

Welcome to America.

MJ

deroy   January 9th, 2008 8:18 pm ET

bill richardson quote from democrat debates.

"HUMAN RIGHTS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES".

seems like he should be running for president of "HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL" and at the same time moving to switzerland.

Bubba, Sunnyvale, CA   January 9th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

Amen. The debates will be far less annoying now.

Tom Dedham, Mass   January 9th, 2008 8:16 pm ET

Even as a Conservative leaner, it bothers me to no end that the three MOST QUALIFIED PEOPLE in this race for the Democratic side are are out because they didn't get the FREE rub from the media, the backing of the elites or just the deserved look see.

Hillarity can TALK about experience all "she" wants too, these three talked it and walked it. They all FORGOT more than she knows.

Any of the Republicans would be smart and do the country a favor by having a Biden, Dodd or Richardson in their cabinet.

Maybe a move like that would start really CHANGING THIS COUNTRY and breaking the partisanship that is killing ALL of us.

Craig, NJ   January 9th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

Hang in until 2/5/08 so I can vote for you in NJ primary!

Gobama   January 9th, 2008 8:14 pm ET

Bye bye, Bill!. .
Good luck. . .

Unlike the other Bill, the SHILL Clinton, you know when to quit!
Not foul your nest
And NOT RUIN A WHITE HOUSE LEGACY with "the other woman's" stain, which initiated the destructive decline in the US Presidency!

Jimmy   January 9th, 2008 8:13 pm ET

CNN I see this as a mass communication major. Alot of us feel you are doing a terrible job.. It is clear to America that you will attack Senator Clinton even if she hick ups. Loss of credability for CNN. Boo CNN

A byuss News service

Carol   January 9th, 2008 8:11 pm ET

As a New Mexican, my reaction to this news was "oh, no!" Richardson is a great mediator, a great negotiator, and a governor who has done great things for his state. No, he doesn't have "star" power or a limitless supply of money, but he has the ability, knowledge, and experience we need. I'm sorry he's forced to drop out - but the nation's loss is New Mexico's gain. And who knows, maybe he'll fit somewhere in the next president's scheme of things.

Carrie   January 9th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

carol

Well said!

Richardson would make a good VP candidate.

JFD   January 9th, 2008 8:09 pm ET

overdue

Axel, California   January 9th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

A few others should drop out as well, as they too don't stand a chance of winning. On both sides...

Kyle Indianapolis, Indiana   January 9th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

This is too bad, Bill Richardson has the MOST and the BEST experience to be President.

Shannon, Charlottesville, Virginia   January 9th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

he would have made a fine president, but this is the right thing to do–he has no chance, and this will give more time for the other candidates to get their message out. i hope he will serve in the next administration under a democratic president. despite our differences, as americans we can all get behind a president who stands for the people and not corporations.

Tom   January 9th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

He's quitting too early!

Spencer   January 9th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

Bill will make an excellent VP in my opinion. Someone with international experience who can locate Pakistan on a map.

Khandker Ahmedul Haque   January 9th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

Former Senator Jhon Edwards should drop and support Senator Barak Obama because he is guy who can bring change in America and in the whole world in a newer and positive direction of development and piece in all issues. Sen. Barak Obama could be called as new JFK. Well, Jhon Edward is a great American too, nice person, nice human being.

God bless America, God bless Barak Obama.

John   January 9th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

It is time to endorse Obama, Bill.

BILL Schenectady,N.Y.   January 9th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

I think Mr. Bloomberg should look carefully at the NH primary. According to the number of voters reported compared against the total population of NH, virtually every registered voyer came out to vote.If this is any indication of the nationwide response to this upcoming election this will be the first time in 60 years that the entire voter population came out to vote.That means that the voters will be able to tell the pundits and so called analysts to finally get lost and stop trying to influence the outcome by their way too early predictions.This is not a highschool popularity contest. The voters are thoroughly able to consider the issues and select the candidate who is best able to address them without any help from the media. Just report the results.If you are offended by this, contact your congressman or senator and then you will better understand why the people are responding in this way.

regards,

Jim in Orlando, FL   January 9th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

He fought he good fight. He may be very qualified to BE President, but as the game is played, not very qualified to RUN FOR President. He is still eminently qualified as a Cabinet Member, or possibly a VP, if the offer is there.

Sandi   January 9th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

What a shame! I can understand his reasoning, however. He was a good, strong candidate but unfortunately he just never caught on with the candidates. The next President would be wise to snatch up this guy for a cabinet position. He is definitely a productive, intelligent politician.

Matt   January 9th, 2008 8:04 pm ET

Richardson for VP!

John Seattle, WA   January 9th, 2008 8:04 pm ET

My guess is he will support Hillary–though I wish he wouldn't. He was Clinton's Sec'y of Energy and was always the one whining "can't we all just get along" whenever others started to attack Hillary's positions. I'm sure Hillary (and Bill) are waiting with open arms.

Bill   January 9th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

Sad the only qualified Democrat leaves the race.

J. Williams   January 9th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

Apparently he didn't play dirty enough.

Sandi   January 9th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

Our local news in Albuquerque has checked with his campaign manager, and the AP story is incorrect, according to him. Bill Richardson is still in it!

Benton Nelson, Indianapolis, IN   January 9th, 2008 8:02 pm ET

wonder who he might donate what little cash he has left to

scott in nyc   January 9th, 2008 8:02 pm ET

i'm sorry to see governor richardson step out of race. i liked his honesty and frankness. he would make a great running mate for hilary – what a ticket!

you liberal hippy obama lovers need to realize that experience DOES MATTER! hilary has always fought for new yorkers during her two terms and i am proud to have her as our senator! you can not turn around a recession with "hope".

La'Kitgum, Concorde, NH   January 9th, 2008 8:02 pm ET

There is room for Richardson in Hillary's presidency. Nevada will obviously go for Clinton as Culinary employees vote individually in droves for her.

The truth is coming out. Starting NH, Americans are beginning to understand that in politics, endogenous is more important than exogenous – that reality and fact are more important than rhetoric and body language or charisma without substance. Americans are beginning to understand that Hillary stands for what the President of the USA should be and not Obama with his empty promises. Obama's leadership leaves a lot more questions to be answered but foremost, how can he be an agent of change without experience? How can he change what he does not know? How can he change what he does not have? Experience in economy, healthcare and security are all in Hillary's bag and Hillary can change them for the good of all America. Obama has a bag of experience but it is empty. He has nothing to change.

My prayers and Best wishes to Hillary and I urge all Americans (black, white, oriental, hispanic) to support Clinton because they will never regret their votes. We did it in NH. NH understands that it is issues, not body language, which stands out in this campaign and Hillary is all about issues. Listen to her carefully instead of cheering at her and you will understand just like the people of NH did – the issues matter.

Eric, California   January 9th, 2008 7:57 pm ET

About time. Who will he endorse with his 5 percent?

John Edwards 2008!

Ed,Ellenville,New York   January 9th, 2008 7:56 pm ET

He was a great mediator. Like every other qualified intelligent candidate he couldn't appeal to the lowest common denominator. This nation's voters are too wrapped up in emotional garbage instead of hard-nosed substantive policy. Luckily,he's a democrat and the next president as a democrat will always have him to go to for advice.

caywen   January 9th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

MSNBC has a story saying the reports of him dropping out are completely false.

Chris, Orlando FL   January 9th, 2008 7:52 pm ET

That's a real shame. Governor Richardson would make an excellent VP candidate, however, and that option should remain open with the campaigns of his former rivals.

My hope is that Richardson will throw his support behind Senator Clinton. A Clinton/Richardson ticket would do wonders for the country.

Khandker Ahmedul Haque   January 9th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

I think, it is a wise decision made by him. But it must not be influnced by Form. President Bill Clinton, so that Hilary Clinton can get his vote and then she will pride him in a good position if she is elected.

Thanks.

Thomas Wells   January 9th, 2008 7:46 pm ET

It is a sad deal. Why do you people vote for the others? I just can't understand if you are influenced by the media or if you really are ignorant.

andy   January 9th, 2008 7:44 pm ET

You did good bill! I hope you will endorse Mrs. Clinton most latinos I know in california are starting to ? next time Bill next Time !!

Spanish-language newspaper in Las Vegas endorses Clinton

By: KATHLEEN HENNESSEY – Associated Press

LAS VEGAS - A prominent Spanish language newspaper in southern Nevada plans to endorse Hillary Rodham Clinton for president, the publisher said Thursday.

El Mundo publisher Eddie Escobedo says the endorsement will appear in Friday's edition of the 35,500-circulation, free weekly.

El Mundo is the oldest and most politically engaged Spanish paper in Nevada, where Hispanics make up nearly 25 percent of the population but a far smaller portion of the electorate. The group will be closely watched in Nevada Democrats' Jan. 19 presidential caucus.

Escobedo, who said he feels "a loyalty to the Clintons," had previously announced his personal support for the New York senator. A vote by the paper's editorial staff was 4-2 for Clinton over New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, he said.

Escobedo described the choice not to endorse Richardson as difficult. The governor and former U.N. ambassador grew up in Mexico, often campaigns in Spanish and has aggressively tried to organize supporters in Las Vegas' Hispanic community.

"We went along with Clinton because of her background," he said, citing her years as first lady of Arkansas and the U.S., and extensive travel. "She knows the people, she could negotiate any deal."

Brian   January 9th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

It is a shame that this great candidate has to drop out. He is better than Hillary, Obama, Edwards, or any of the Republicans. Richardson '12

carol   January 9th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

I am sorry to see Governor Richardson leave the campaign for the presidency. I don't understand why such a great American is overlooked. It seems like accomplished and experienced leaders are overlooked. Not only Richardson, but Biden and Dodd! It is such a shame. I hope the next president is a democrat and he or she puts these men to work in government positions where their talents can be best used to bring us together as Americans and to return our country to a respectful position in the world.

Walt, Belton, TX   January 9th, 2008 7:38 pm ET

Definitely the most qualified on the left bank. Now they're left with someone who occasionally slept with a guy who thought he knew what he was doing, but didn't.

Tim, Cincinnati OH   January 9th, 2008 7:37 pm ET

That's a shame. He's a good man who would have made a good President. Unfortunately, he ran in a year when his opponents are "celebrities."

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
hambypCNN: @AP_Ken_Thomas excellent duane spencer reference. let's try to work in lee scruggs, too, before the season ends.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:14:50 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Shocking - what's happening in Baghdad. Five terror attacks. More than 100 killed and 400 injured amid fears the violence will increase.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:08:29 -0800
hambypCNN: Kaine vs. Steele on Situation Room today in 6P hour.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:55:02 -0800
@edhenrycnn: My colleague Dan Lothian and I show what's it's like on the road with the President - http://bit.ly/7XSU53 #cnn
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:09:21 -0800
hambypCNN: Big game for the Hoyas tonight against Butler @ 7PM. @moelleithee, @mikemadden and @karentravers will be watching, and you should too.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:04:26 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP