<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too good looking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-357723</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-357723</guid>
		<description>Good looking is everything.  Bill Clinton and GW Bush both are better-looking than their opponents.  And they won.

It will be Mitt Romney VS Barack Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good looking is everything.  Bill Clinton and GW Bush both are better-looking than their opponents.  And they won.</p>
<p>It will be Mitt Romney VS Barack Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-333041</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-333041</guid>
		<description>I agree -- report the news!

Mitt Romney is the one candidate most capable of handling the economic crisis this country is facing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree - report the news!</p>
<p>Mitt Romney is the one candidate most capable of handling the economic crisis this country is facing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-295168</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-295168</guid>
		<description>Not only is this candiate smart looking. But maybe as you watch him in the White House you guys will learn how to honor your wifes. Maybe you will catch a glimpes of how close families should be. There won&#039;t be any interns in the chambers after hours.  The way he took the Salt Lake Olympics from scandal to success was impressive.  Maybe with his Mormon upbringings there will be a renewal of respect towards women and children in our country. The guy is intelligent, motivated. Education, hard work, industry will be encouraged.  Might just be what this country needs at this time. There will not be any proselyting for the LDS Church coming from the White House. I&#039;m convinced that people who love this country, their families. and all that is good and clean and wholesome will benefit from his time spent as president</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is this candiate smart looking. But maybe as you watch him in the White House you guys will learn how to honor your wifes. Maybe you will catch a glimpes of how close families should be. There won't be any interns in the chambers after hours.  The way he took the Salt Lake Olympics from scandal to success was impressive.  Maybe with his Mormon upbringings there will be a renewal of respect towards women and children in our country. The guy is intelligent, motivated. Education, hard work, industry will be encouraged.  Might just be what this country needs at this time. There will not be any proselyting for the LDS Church coming from the White House. I'm convinced that people who love this country, their families. and all that is good and clean and wholesome will benefit from his time spent as president</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From The North</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272898</link>
		<dc:creator>From The North</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272898</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, Mitt Romney hasn&#039;t got a monopoly on  campaign flip-flopping, mud slinging and pandering. I&#039;d be very surprised if there&#039;s a candidate out there who hasn&#039;t done any of the above. 

But he certainly has a monopoly where his good looks are concerned! And I&#039;m sure being handsome and wealthy he&#039;s lived life to the fullest and I certainly don&#039;t begrudge him that. 

You have to give credit where it&#039;s due. Mitt is a Great Speaker and Orator. He defines his personal blueprint for Change in a simplistic manner that all can understand and digest without maalox . 

I think Mitt Romney is a Wysiwig kind of guy. (What you see is what you get) There won&#039;t be any surprises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Mitt Romney hasn't got a monopoly on  campaign flip-flopping, mud slinging and pandering. I'd be very surprised if there's a candidate out there who hasn't done any of the above. </p>
<p>But he certainly has a monopoly where his good looks are concerned! And I'm sure being handsome and wealthy he's lived life to the fullest and I certainly don't begrudge him that. </p>
<p>You have to give credit where it's due. Mitt is a Great Speaker and Orator. He defines his personal blueprint for Change in a simplistic manner that all can understand and digest without maalox . </p>
<p>I think Mitt Romney is a Wysiwig kind of guy. (What you see is what you get) There won't be any surprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Mark</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272723</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272723</guid>
		<description>good looking guys on the Debate floor, don&#039;t forget Wolf,  Fell in love with him in 1990 watching him in Bagdad.... what a stud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good looking guys on the Debate floor, don't forget Wolf,  Fell in love with him in 1990 watching him in Bagdad.... what a stud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272722</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272722</guid>
		<description>Mitt Romney is a corporate snake who loves free trade and sending American jobs to china. Who cares what he looks like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney is a corporate snake who loves free trade and sending American jobs to china. Who cares what he looks like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272589</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272589</guid>
		<description>I heard that if Rudy Guiliani is elected president our taxes will drop like a rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that if Rudy Guiliani is elected president our taxes will drop like a rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj huntington ny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272578</link>
		<dc:creator>aj huntington ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272578</guid>
		<description>Lets&#039; see.. we&#039;ve had some good looking Presidents --- Martin Sheen , Michael Douglas-- wait , that&#039;s holly wood , not real life? Well, Mitt Romney shouldn&#039;t be judged by his looks, but by the content of his record and past wins in serving the public</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets' see.. we've had some good looking Presidents - Martin Sheen , Michael Douglas&#8211; wait , that's holly wood , not real life? Well, Mitt Romney shouldn't be judged by his looks, but by the content of his record and past wins in serving the public</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather R - Denver CO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272569</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather R - Denver CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272569</guid>
		<description>Mitt looks like the guy they sent from Central Casting when the call came in for a &quot;guy that looks like a Presidential candidate&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt looks like the guy they sent from Central Casting when the call came in for a "guy that looks like a Presidential candidate"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272489</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272489</guid>
		<description>Can we please get John Edwards to drop out of this race so OBAMA can wip Billary’s ass. She is stopping the Nevada people from causing for OBAMA with a lawsuit. Taking trying to take their civil right to caucus away WE NEED TO START THIS MOVEMENT NOW....PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we please get John Edwards to drop out of this race so OBAMA can wip Billary’s ass. She is stopping the Nevada people from causing for OBAMA with a lawsuit. Taking trying to take their civil right to caucus away WE NEED TO START THIS MOVEMENT NOW....PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD.........</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamwalsh columbus ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272415</link>
		<dc:creator>williamwalsh columbus ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272415</guid>
		<description>its like being back in high school, please tell me no one really said this . 
and if romney is good looking maby we would nt even have to vote george cloony was to run, its to much for one mind as small as mine to figure it out,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its like being back in high school, please tell me no one really said this .<br />
and if romney is good looking maby we would nt even have to vote george cloony was to run, its to much for one mind as small as mine to figure it out,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halcyon24</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272385</link>
		<dc:creator>halcyon24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272385</guid>
		<description>ANDERSON COOPER!!  WWWaaaahhoooo !!!  Yes, now he&#039;s good lookin&#039;.   Just love the premature gray! Oh, and his ethics, why can&#039;t we all just write him in...

Mitt&#039;s a nice looking guy

Bill was REAL good lookin&#039; until the &#039;ML incident&#039; and then he aged about 20 years in the blink of an eye.... 

Edwards is to girly for me.  Same with Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANDERSON COOPER!!  WWWaaaahhoooo !!!  Yes, now he's good lookin'.   Just love the premature gray! Oh, and his ethics, why can't we all just write him in...</p>
<p>Mitt's a nice looking guy</p>
<p>Bill was REAL good lookin' until the 'ML incident' and then he aged about 20 years in the blink of an eye.... </p>
<p>Edwards is to girly for me.  Same with Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim, Dallas, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272364</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim, Dallas, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272364</guid>
		<description>It would be plain silly to argue the point that Romney is not good looking.  I  have been telling my Republican friends that if we end up having to have a Republican in office, why not one that is at least pleasant to look at. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be plain silly to argue the point that Romney is not good looking.  I  have been telling my Republican friends that if we end up having to have a Republican in office, why not one that is at least pleasant to look at. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt, Belton,TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272325</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt, Belton,TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272325</guid>
		<description>Reminds me a lot of slick willie and the way he treats women...........well, maybe they&#039;re actually kin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me a lot of slick willie and the way he treats women...........well, maybe they're actually kin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PH NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272266</link>
		<dc:creator>PH NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272266</guid>
		<description>Mitt Romney looks creepy, over-dyed and goofy.
His sons are NOT good-looking at all, as their deformed looking mouths look like their mother&#039;s mouth( big ugly looking mouth and teeth hanging out).
Mrs. R&#039;s genes uglied the boys up.
John Edwards is the best looking candidate.
Cindy McCain is the most gorgeous wife !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney looks creepy, over-dyed and goofy.<br />
His sons are NOT good-looking at all, as their deformed looking mouths look like their mother's mouth( big ugly looking mouth and teeth hanging out).<br />
Mrs. R's genes uglied the boys up.<br />
John Edwards is the best looking candidate.<br />
Cindy McCain is the most gorgeous wife !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel lanore</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272235</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel lanore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272235</guid>
		<description>What do you call a really really good looking man on the floor of the Republican Presidential Debate:  

A.  a visitor
B.  Call a Doctor because you are hallucinating
C.  Mitt Romney
*
C.  is the answer,  ( Anderson Cooper is a good second... hard to call that one)

To the &quot; Call The Fire Dept &quot; post.... you made me laugh so hard....

thanks I needed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you call a really really good looking man on the floor of the Republican Presidential Debate:  </p>
<p>A.  a visitor<br />
B.  Call a Doctor because you are hallucinating<br />
C.  Mitt Romney<br />
*<br />
C.  is the answer,  ( Anderson Cooper is a good second... hard to call that one)</p>
<p>To the " Call The Fire Dept " post.... you made me laugh so hard....</p>
<p>thanks I needed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredLarons, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272181</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredLarons, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272181</guid>
		<description>Not attracted to him at all!!! (Of course I&#039;m a man and secretly envy his good looks)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not attracted to him at all!!! (Of course I'm a man and secretly envy his good looks)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh Brother</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272160</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh Brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272160</guid>
		<description>Who cares!!!!!! we&#039;re not going to marry him!!!!! Remember the important thing, he is a Republican.  And we all know what they&#039;ve DONE to this country in the last 8 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares!!!!!! we're not going to marry him!!!!! Remember the important thing, he is a Republican.  And we all know what they've DONE to this country in the last 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Seattle, WA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272114</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Seattle, WA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272114</guid>
		<description>On looks alone, I&#039;d have to go with Dennis Kucinich.  He&#039;s absolutely adorable!  Plus his wife is a total hottie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On looks alone, I'd have to go with Dennis Kucinich.  He's absolutely adorable!  Plus his wife is a total hottie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thena</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272092</link>
		<dc:creator>Thena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272092</guid>
		<description>He looks artificial and posed, just like his platform.  Too dolled up, way too metrosexual and NOT manly enougly.   Can&#039;t tell the difference between him and his wife!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He looks artificial and posed, just like his platform.  Too dolled up, way too metrosexual and NOT manly enougly.   Can't tell the difference between him and his wife!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272062</link>
		<dc:creator>John G, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272062</guid>
		<description>Now that she has reported on non-news news...let&#039;s all rate Jeanne Moos&#039;s looks!  Your looks aren&#039;t relevant to your work, you say? POINT MADE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that she has reported on non-news news...let's all rate Jeanne Moos's looks!  Your looks aren't relevant to your work, you say? POINT MADE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Houston, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272052</link>
		<dc:creator>J Houston, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272052</guid>
		<description>Chris said:

&quot;In today&#039;s society does he really think that spewiing his &quot;marriage before children&quot; rhetoric is really feasible? What about those who have no desire to be married? Is hesuggesting that we not bear children?&quot;

Yes! Absolutely do not have children outside of marriage! Whatever world you seem to think you live in, you&#039;re wrong. Kids before marriage is still looked down upon by most. The place for children is within a healthy family. Don&#039;t be a selfish fool and put anything less than the best out their for any child! You owe it to them and yourself. It&#039;s despicable that you can actually say something like that and think you&#039;re justified. Quit drinking the koolaid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris said:</p>
<p>"In today's society does he really think that spewiing his "marriage before children" rhetoric is really feasible? What about those who have no desire to be married? Is hesuggesting that we not bear children?"</p>
<p>Yes! Absolutely do not have children outside of marriage! Whatever world you seem to think you live in, you're wrong. Kids before marriage is still looked down upon by most. The place for children is within a healthy family. Don't be a selfish fool and put anything less than the best out their for any child! You owe it to them and yourself. It's despicable that you can actually say something like that and think you're justified. Quit drinking the koolaid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisha</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272005</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-272005</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;we are not voting on looks…&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

...Then why are we even talking about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"we are not voting on looks…"</i></p>
<p>...Then why are we even talking about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisha</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271996</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271996</guid>
		<description>Hey, CNN -- your political ticker is a joke.  You&#039;re destroying what&#039;s left of the political discourse in this country.  Stop.

No, seriously, stop.  Like, now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, CNN - your political ticker is a joke.  You're destroying what's left of the political discourse in this country.  Stop.</p>
<p>No, seriously, stop.  Like, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ann</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271926</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271926</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think he is good looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think he is good looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271913</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271913</guid>
		<description>Truth be told, the only reason he&#039;s having any trouble in the Rep primaries is because many voters are bigotted against his religion, and the media hates this guy. Heaven forbid we should actually have a candidate who has a stabile family life and has no ethical skeletons in his closet. Yes, he makes many in America, including some of the very candidates he&#039;s running against, look bad on an ethical and moral level because he&#039;s a straight-shooter.

As for his supposed flip-flopping on abortion, his position in MA was that he would support the current law as a duely instituted law of the land decided by the Supreme Court. (What&#039;s remarkable about that?) He has never said or written that he personally supports abortion. 

All Huckabee has to run on is schtick (Chuck Norris, witty responses, bass playing, etc.) and his Southern support base. McCain is at least highly qualified, but he&#039;s already played the DC game for so long that I&#039;d like to give Mitt a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth be told, the only reason he's having any trouble in the Rep primaries is because many voters are bigotted against his religion, and the media hates this guy. Heaven forbid we should actually have a candidate who has a stabile family life and has no ethical skeletons in his closet. Yes, he makes many in America, including some of the very candidates he's running against, look bad on an ethical and moral level because he's a straight-shooter.</p>
<p>As for his supposed flip-flopping on abortion, his position in MA was that he would support the current law as a duely instituted law of the land decided by the Supreme Court. (What's remarkable about that?) He has never said or written that he personally supports abortion. </p>
<p>All Huckabee has to run on is schtick (Chuck Norris, witty responses, bass playing, etc.) and his Southern support base. McCain is at least highly qualified, but he's already played the DC game for so long that I'd like to give Mitt a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srichard</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271902</link>
		<dc:creator>srichard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271902</guid>
		<description>This is an utterly ridiculous conversation. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an utterly ridiculous conversation. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271888</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271888</guid>
		<description>Why is this being discussed? (actually, reading these comments made me smile) Hillary&#039;s the hottest. She wins. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this being discussed? (actually, reading these comments made me smile) Hillary's the hottest. She wins. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Independent Texan American</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271878</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Independent Texan American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271878</guid>
		<description>So he&#039;s Presidential and statesmanly in APPEARANCE in addition to intelligence and experience :) ...GO MITT!!!! WOOO HOOO!!! :) 

Romney/Thompson in 2008!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So he's Presidential and statesmanly in APPEARANCE in addition to intelligence and experience <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ...GO MITT!!!! WOOO HOOO!!! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Romney/Thompson in 2008!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David...Nevada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271877</link>
		<dc:creator>David...Nevada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271877</guid>
		<description>Mitt  not only looks presidential but likewise has the resume&#039; to back it up... McCain should be out looking at &quot;shady pines&quot; and some other retirement communities he could spread his war memories around in... since thats all we ever hear from him..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt  not only looks presidential but likewise has the resume' to back it up... McCain should be out looking at "shady pines" and some other retirement communities he could spread his war memories around in... since thats all we ever hear from him..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo ann scott</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271849</link>
		<dc:creator>jo ann scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271849</guid>
		<description>what does looks have to do with it, OBAMA,EDWARD are both very handsome men, but we are not voting on looks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what does looks have to do with it, OBAMA,EDWARD are both very handsome men, but we are not voting on looks...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve, Lyons, CO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271803</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve, Lyons, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271803</guid>
		<description>What a farce the Ticker has become.

Who gives a CRAP about Romney&#039;s looks? You people are fools.

In the meantime, President Criminal is trying to start a war with Iran. How about making that a Ticker item, or are you trying not to embarrass our Worst. President. Ever.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a farce the Ticker has become.</p>
<p>Who gives a CRAP about Romney's looks? You people are fools.</p>
<p>In the meantime, President Criminal is trying to start a war with Iran. How about making that a Ticker item, or are you trying not to embarrass our Worst. President. Ever.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary, Michigan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary, Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271782</guid>
		<description>Good looking is in the eye of the beholder!  For what it&#039;s worth, I don&#039;t think he&#039;s too good looking. I think he&#039;s too perfect looking--reminds me of the Manchurian candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good looking is in the eye of the beholder!  For what it's worth, I don't think he's too good looking. I think he's too perfect looking&#8211;reminds me of the Manchurian candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271771</guid>
		<description>Too good looking?  How about too &#039;positionally flexible&#039; over the years?  How about too slick?  I like what the guy says now, but it doesn&#039;t match very well with what he&#039;s done.

I think it&#039;s time we get away from politicians and start voting for straight-talking leaders; Thompson in the GOP and Obama for the Dems.  Unfortunately, I believe that would leave us with &#039;feel-good&#039; Obama; his naivety would likely be disasteorus on the global stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too good looking?  How about too 'positionally flexible' over the years?  How about too slick?  I like what the guy says now, but it doesn't match very well with what he's done.</p>
<p>I think it's time we get away from politicians and start voting for straight-talking leaders; Thompson in the GOP and Obama for the Dems.  Unfortunately, I believe that would leave us with 'feel-good' Obama; his naivety would likely be disasteorus on the global stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271768</guid>
		<description>Considering the fact he is running against: Frankenstein, Elmer Fudd, and one of the chipmunks...  I would have to say Romney does stick out.

Although, his good values, and message stick out too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the fact he is running against: Frankenstein, Elmer Fudd, and one of the chipmunks...  I would have to say Romney does stick out.</p>
<p>Although, his good values, and message stick out too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan ~ Longview, WA.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271767</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan ~ Longview, WA.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271767</guid>
		<description>Looks shouldn&#039;t figure into the election.

Substance does.

Can there be any doubt that Ron Paul is who this country needs?  A man of the utmost integrity and a man of humility.  But most importantly, a man with the right ideas – of tolerance, of love, of freedom, and – of course – of the people.

Ron Paul is in the thick of this race.  Almost 30,000 proud Americans already have cast their ballots for Ron Paul in both Iowa and New Hampshire:

1.      Romney       103,755    30%
2.      McCain         102,361    29%
3.      Huckabee      66,876    19%
4.      Paul                29,648      9%
5.      Giuliani           24,151      7%
6.      Thompson     18,712      5%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks shouldn't figure into the election.</p>
<p>Substance does.</p>
<p>Can there be any doubt that Ron Paul is who this country needs?  A man of the utmost integrity and a man of humility.  But most importantly, a man with the right ideas – of tolerance, of love, of freedom, and – of course – of the people.</p>
<p>Ron Paul is in the thick of this race.  Almost 30,000 proud Americans already have cast their ballots for Ron Paul in both Iowa and New Hampshire:</p>
<p>1.      Romney       103,755    30%<br />
2.      McCain         102,361    29%<br />
3.      Huckabee      66,876    19%<br />
4.      Paul                29,648      9%<br />
5.      Giuliani           24,151      7%<br />
6.      Thompson     18,712      5%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emelia</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271763</link>
		<dc:creator>Emelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271763</guid>
		<description>Looking &quot;presidential&quot; would give Mitt the only advantage over the current occupier of the White House</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking "presidential" would give Mitt the only advantage over the current occupier of the White House</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santosh-Phila</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271731</link>
		<dc:creator>Santosh-Phila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271731</guid>
		<description>Probably the most handsome President we&#039;ve had recently is George H. W. Bush. He continues to be attractive even at his current age 84.

Presidents Reagan, Clinton and G. W. Bush were all very attractive in their younger age. Actually probably the last unattractive President was Pres. Nixon.

However the only one that got elected purely on looks was JFK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the most handsome President we've had recently is George H. W. Bush. He continues to be attractive even at his current age 84.</p>
<p>Presidents Reagan, Clinton and G. W. Bush were all very attractive in their younger age. Actually probably the last unattractive President was Pres. Nixon.</p>
<p>However the only one that got elected purely on looks was JFK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott, Madison, WI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271716</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott, Madison, WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271716</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s the male, Republican version of Hillary Clinton!  Willing to say and and do anything to be elected.   If either of them reinvents themselves or changes their positions according to the polls or political winds many more times, they may morph into the first hermaphrodite candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's the male, Republican version of Hillary Clinton!  Willing to say and and do anything to be elected.   If either of them reinvents themselves or changes their positions according to the polls or political winds many more times, they may morph into the first hermaphrodite candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271689</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271689</guid>
		<description>For those of us who scratched our heads trying to figure out how he got elected governor in MA, his looks are the least of his problems.:P

He&#039;s one of those wolves in sheep clothing.  Republican that talks middle of the road, but is really far more right than he seems on the surface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of us who scratched our heads trying to figure out how he got elected governor in MA, his looks are the least of his problems.:P</p>
<p>He's one of those wolves in sheep clothing.  Republican that talks middle of the road, but is really far more right than he seems on the surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271687</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271687</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take 10 of the Mitt&#039;s Romney thongs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll take 10 of the Mitt's Romney thongs...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. B. Bailey</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271672</link>
		<dc:creator>C. B. Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271672</guid>
		<description>Give me a break!! Good looking? To Whom?  Take a look at John Edwards, Bill Clinton now that&#039;s good looking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break!! Good looking? To Whom?  Take a look at John Edwards, Bill Clinton now that's good looking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doro, USA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271633</link>
		<dc:creator>doro, USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271633</guid>
		<description>Jeanne Moos,  when was the last time you&#039;ve had your eyes checked, girl?  His close up is as scary as his politics :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeanne Moos,  when was the last time you've had your eyes checked, girl?  His close up is as scary as his politics <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271569</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271569</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s ahead with the delegate count...McCain is 3rd right now. Let&#039;s see what todays vote brings.  He&#039;s what we need, that is for sure... looks or no looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's ahead with the delegate count...McCain is 3rd right now. Let's see what todays vote brings.  He's what we need, that is for sure... looks or no looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pam Eugene OR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271567</link>
		<dc:creator>pam Eugene OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271567</guid>
		<description>I think you are confusing well groomed with attractive. Not that it matters...I will vote on the issues. But silly me, I have to agree that Fred Thompson is too good looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are confusing well groomed with attractive. Not that it matters...I will vote on the issues. But silly me, I have to agree that Fred Thompson is too good looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert M. Reidy N.Y.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271535</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert M. Reidy N.Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271535</guid>
		<description>The guy in the background seems to be checking him out !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy in the background seems to be checking him out !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig in Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271492</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271492</guid>
		<description>As a blond I cannot vote for someone tall, dark and handsome!  

I am sure he has some flaws we can&#039;t see....but I can&#039;t think of any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a blond I cannot vote for someone tall, dark and handsome!  </p>
<p>I am sure he has some flaws we can't see....but I can't think of any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HUH?</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271480</link>
		<dc:creator>HUH?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271480</guid>
		<description>In what alternate universe is Mitt Romney considered &quot;good looking&quot;, let alone &quot;too good looking&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what alternate universe is Mitt Romney considered "good looking", let alone "too good looking"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheridan, Grand Rapids, MI</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271478</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheridan, Grand Rapids, MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271478</guid>
		<description>Jeebus on a fricking&#039; pogo stick - I didn&#039;t think CNN&#039;s political coverage could become any shallower, but I was obviously mistaken. I&#039;m no fan of Mitt Romney&#039;s, but this is pathetic.

If this is the best that the &quot;best political team on television&quot; can produce, why don&#039;t you guys just quit pretending, fire your current staff, and hire the presenters of &quot;Entertainment Tonight&quot; and the TV Guide channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeebus on a fricking' pogo stick &#8211; I didn't think CNN's political coverage could become any shallower, but I was obviously mistaken. I'm no fan of Mitt Romney's, but this is pathetic.</p>
<p>If this is the best that the "best political team on television" can produce, why don't you guys just quit pretending, fire your current staff, and hire the presenters of "Entertainment Tonight" and the TV Guide channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rico</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271473</link>
		<dc:creator>rico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/15/too-good-looking/#comment-271473</guid>
		<description>This is truly great political discussion! I learned so much more about the candidates and the issues because of this incredibly insightful topic. After all attractiveness is half the battle.&quot; From the first moment I.............&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is truly great political discussion! I learned so much more about the candidates and the issues because of this incredibly insightful topic. After all attractiveness is half the battle." From the first moment I............."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
