January 18, 2008
Posted: January 18th, 2008 09:55 AM ET
Huckabee is campaigning in South Carolina ahead of Saturday's primary there.
Huckabee is campaigning in South Carolina ahead of Saturday's primary there.

WASHINGTON (CNN) - Republican Mike Huckabee is taking heat from some members of the gay community over recent comments that appeared to equate gay marriage with bestiality.

In an interview with the religious Web site beliefnet.com, Huckabee pushes back on recent critics who have called some of his positions "radical."

"I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal," he said in the interview, published on the Web site Wednesday. "Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again."

David Smith of the Human Rights Campaign told CNN Huckabee's comments make clear the former Arkansas governor stance is "out of the mainstream of American thought."

"I think he's equating a loving marriage between two people of the same sex with some form of bestiality," he said. " I think that's really out of the mainstream of American thought, and most people will find that offensive."

Huckabee has previously come under fire for past comments on homosexuality. In his 1998 book "Kids Who Kill," the onetime Baptist minister seemed to link homosexuality with sexually deviant and criminal behavior.

"It is now difficult to keep track of the vast array of publicly endorsed and institutionally supported aberrations - from homosexuality and pedophilia to sadomasochism and necrophilia," he wrote.

Responding to that passage, Huckabee said on ‘Meet the Press’ last month he was not linking the three, but rather pointing out all are deviations from the "traditional concept of sexual behavior."

Huckabee's campaign told CNN the candidate is not equating gay marriage with bestiality, but rather he simply saying that he believes marriage should be between a man and a woman. The campaign also said gay rights groups are trying to pick a fight.

Related: Huckabee touts conservative views to woo Carolina voters

– CNN’s Brian Todd contributed to this report

Filed under: Mike Huckabee


candice   February 2nd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Mike Huckabee is a strong leader, he won't be bullied by views contrary to the truth. May He satnd strong and may God bless him for it.

shasta   February 2nd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

I believe that his comments were distasteful and hurtful to many gay americans. We in this day and age have over come discrimination against many different races and religions. I feel that not allowing someone to marry based on personal beliefs in discrimination and can not be tolerated. If you agree or disagree who are you to say someone can not marry the one they love. If it is merely based on religion then why is polgamy not allowed. In the bible it takes about Abraham and his two wives. If it talks about two spouses and is no longer accetable then why is same sex marriage so outrageous. Everyone knows someone who is gay. How would you feel if your son daughter mother sister wasn't allowed to marry someone they loved just because it isn't the norm. If we just allowed what majority ruled than America would be a lot different and wouldn't be a free country. I stronger believe that they are human and should have the same right to marriage as anyone else. They work and support this country just like anyone else. They are doctors, lawyers, politicians, and many other workers in our community. I just don't see what their marriage and love affairs have to do with everyone else. My marriage doesn't effect my neighbors or anyone else for that matter. Why would theirs?

kay   January 30th, 2008 2:17 am ET

I didn't realize that you agreed with Mike also... but I still feel my point about changing the definition of marriage is logical... I agree with the point that you made that marriage is not just for the purpose of procreation. But in your statement that children are slightly more likely to become gay themselves if they are brought up by same sex parents just supports my point even more... my point again being that CHANGING the traditional definition of marriage to mean 'any' combination will say to all future generations that it is ok and natural for these alternative choices... and it's NOT natural in the sense that it is not the way NATURE (God) intended... so the human race would reproduce and not eventually die out. If future generations start believing that these other choices are just as natural (as the traditional one man and one woman choice that has sustained our species) and more and more people start choosing these alternative lifestyles it would decrease the human population to the point where the human species is threatened. And if you add some lethal untreatable virus to the scenario then 'poof' we could be gone just like that... it might sound far fetched and this theory could take many many years to come to fruition BUT it could happen!!! What I'm trying to say is that to give the stamp of approval to alternative unions as being equal with the traditional institution of marriage...to promote alternative choices... is a threat to our survival! Establishing the instituion of same sex UNIONS for the purpose of equal treatment under the law would not be as destructive as trying to insist that it is the same as the institution of marriage. Heterosexuals have a right to claim the institution of marriage as their own!! Possesion is 9/10 of the law as they say. With all that being said I, as a Christian am not condoning homosexuality but our free will that God gave us lets us make these choices if we want and I agree that it should not be illegal if it is a personal choice that does not threaten the well being of others.

ryk   January 30th, 2008 12:18 am ET

I have read the bible several times. I know it well. Well enough to know it is a load of hooey. I would say the person who believes in the big invisible fairy tail is way farther out in left field than I am. You are entitled to believe in whatever floats your boat and I will defend your right to do so. I however, having thoroughly researched the subject, choose not to.

DeRenda   January 29th, 2008 11:22 pm ET

ryk read the Bible, let the Lord lead you to Him, because you my friend are way out in left field without a mitt.

ryk   January 29th, 2008 10:03 pm ET

Regarding your argument about Huckabees statement being correct I agree I said so in my earlier post. However I question your logic that it would be bad for society. Homosexuals are not as a rule sterile. They can and do procreate, and raise children. If as we probably both agree marriage is the best enviroment to raise children then we should let gay couples marry. You might say that they can not reproduce with one another, but so what. If a single mother or divorced, or widowed mother, wishes to remarry a man to help raise her children we let her (although your bible would not). So what difference would it make if she married a woman to the same end. You may say that children do poorly in homes with two parents of the same gender. This has not been proven in fact the only thing that has been even close to proven is that they are very slightly more likely to be gay themselves (and much less likely to be anti-gay). However even if a two mother home were less ideal than a mother father home I submit that it would be better than a single mother family. So allowing gay marriage is best for the children.
Furthermore biological procreation is not the only reason for marriage. Many infertile couples marry for love, company or stability. My mother in law who is 60 just married a man aged 70. They are not likely to be having children soon, does that invalidate their marriage. I thought not.

kay   January 28th, 2008 11:56 pm ET

As to your last statement… it sounds like it comes from a person who is very uncomfortable with the idea of being at the mercy of someone else which is very understandable but refusing to believe it won't change the probable reality that we ARE at His mercy. And there is nothing in the Bible to substantiate your view of God in that way. I personally have never viewed God that way. Often I will look at nature and all the good things of this world and I know that they are from God and show His love for us and when I see the bad things of this world I know that they are not from God. He created this world ( and all the beautiful things in it ) and then created us and gave us our free will. The bad things of this world are the result of our free will. The natural disasters are the result of the cause and affect in nature but also the result of our affects on the environment . Our free will gives us the choice to help those in need (resulting from those disasters or other tragedies) or to not help and it is from those choices that we will be judged.

kay   January 28th, 2008 11:40 pm ET

Ryk, I'm not saying that our illogical existence is proof of God's existence ( although it's good enouph for me) , I'm saying how can people fairly demand proof when our very own existence defies logic. You put your faith in science and you want scientific proof of God even though the existence of the universe has no scientific merit. It seems kind of hypocritical to me.

And I agree with Mike Huckabee that if the definition of marriage is changed it will just open the door to endless scenarios… common sense says that at some point boundries have to be established or the end results could be harmful or disasterous. Changing the institution of marriage to include combinations other than a man and a woman discourages procreation; Children would grow up believing that these alternative choices are ok and ultimately it could actually threaten the survival of human existence. I would say that that is harmful. I believe that everyone should be treated equally by the government so civil unions with the same benefits of married couples would seem to be a fair solution but leave the traditional institution of marriage which promotes biological procreation alone.

ryk   January 28th, 2008 10:35 pm ET

When I see a painting I say there must be a painter because I know what a painting is I have seen people paint pictures, I have painted pictures, I understand pictures. Paintings can be understood through direct experience. When I see a carbon atom however I do not see a creator I see a fundamental building block of nature. It does not follow to me that someone must have made it. It is absolutely fine that in your eyes anything that exists must have been created, many people feel that way. However your belief that it is so does not make it so. I can show you a painter, can you show me a god.

ryk   January 28th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

Your "argument" if it can be called that makes no sense. If nothing comes from nothing then where did your god come from. If your argument is that god is "transendant" as you say and did come form nothing or always existed, then the same exact statement can be made about the universe and avoid the middleman in the process. If God does exist he either always existed or he came from nothing. If that is the case it is just as resonable to say the universe always existed. Or the universe came from nothing. It is also much more sensible. There are no arguments in favor of the existence of a creator that could not also be used for the existence of a universe without a creator.
So I ask you, if God is the first cause. What caused God?

SAMSONSLION   January 28th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

So, you ask yourself – is there a creator, God? Science has shown that the Universe had a "beginning", a starting point. They tend to call it "a big bang", but there is something else Science has shown us, and that is that "out of nothing, nothing comes" (in fact if there was ever a time when "Nothing" existed, then "nothing" would exist today. ) and that things at rest tend to stay at rest. So, what made "nothing", on a particular tuesday afternoon, explode into everything?

For every effect, there has to be a cause. At the risk of infinite regression, there has to be a "FIRST CAUSE" . For there to be a material, imminent universe to exist, there had to be a transendant, immaterial first cause.

I worship the Transcendent Uncaused Immaterial First cause of the Material Universe.

We celebrate His birthday every Dec. 25th

SAMSONSLION   January 28th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

The fool has said in his heart, "there is no God".

When you see a painting, how do you know there was a painter?

well, the painting itself is proof there had to be a painter. You couldnt ask for better proof that there was a painter than the painting itself. You dont need to be a rocket scientist to understand, you just need eyes that see and a brain that works. It goes like this " painting...duh...painter" I call it the "duh" principle.

When you see a building, how do you know there was a builder? Again, you couldnt ask for better proof that there was a builder than the building itself.

The same hold true for watch- watch maker, automobile-automobile maker, t.v.-t.v. maker, micro wave oven – micro wave oven manufacturer. Anything with design and purpose has a designer and creator.

When you look at Creation – how do you know there was a Creator ? ... Duh

DeRenda   January 28th, 2008 11:29 am ET

To All of You(who refuse the Truth)..................your lack of moral integrity is not Huckabee's fault nor problem. Each of you whether you believe in Jesus or not WILL stand before Him either for rewards or judgment. I am an American (Texan, that is), yet spent the first ten years living in Iran, and they don't even condone homosexuality. Man and woman, should be self-explanatory! Most Americans amaze me with their complete ignorance of a great many issues, as well as their deluded mindset as to being something they are not. Study to show thyself approved.......thus saith The LORD. Today is the day of Salvation..........

DeRenda   January 28th, 2008 10:55 am ET

To All of You..............your lack of moral integrity is not Huckabee's fault nor problem. Each of you whether you believe in Jesus or not WILL stand before Him either for rewards or judgment. I am an American (Texan, that is), yet spent the first ten years living in Iran, and they don't even condone homosexuality. Man and woman, should be self-explanatory! Most Americans amaze me with their complete ignorance of a great many issues. Study to show thyself approved.....thus saith The LORD.

saved by grace   January 27th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

A scant ant rant simply proves the Biblical truth that man is born a depraved sinner whos only hope is in the perfect, vicarious, atoning death of Jesus Christ. JOHN 3:36

DFN   January 26th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Boy we have come a long way baby. In 1961 every state in the Union had a law against homosexuals. It is refreshing that someone has stood up for what he believes and is not swayed by others. Homosexuality is perverse and as our country becomes more perverse we are not any better. What comes next...bestiality, pedophilia? Our country is not in good shape and it will not get any better the more we turn from God.

Ryk   January 25th, 2008 12:36 am ET

ay thank you for clarifying your point. I agree that the vastness of the universe seems to defy logic. I have been boggled by that many times. However it is still not proof of God. The Idea that god has existed without beginning or end is no more logical than the idea that the universe has existed without beginning or end. Occams razor states that the simplest answer is usually correct. An eternal universe is simpler than an eternal God who created an eternal universe therefore it is more likely to be correct. I admit that this is a philosophical case not a scientific one. There is not yet enough scientific knowledge to explain the origin of the universe or to prove God.
I also admit that the Idea of an eternal universe doesn't satisfy me any better than the Idea of an eternal God. Beginnings and endings, birth and death, are fundamental to how I see the world and I hope in my lifetime a beginning to the universe can be proven.
You are correct that it all comes down to what we want to believe. That being true, belief being a choice, it is unreasonable to make laws based on belief. Many people don't believe in God, Many more believe in a wide array of different gods. Even among those who believe in the same Gods there is no agreement on what that God wants. Religion therefore is a poor basis for laws. Laws should be based on simple fairness and ethics. I understand that fairness and ethics are also arbitrary concepts, however they are ones that can be agreed on without forcing people to change their belief in God.
Fair laws would allow people absolute freedom to do as they please as long as they don't harm or deny freedom to their fellow citizens. For example Gay Marriage harms no one, except perhaps those involved, therefore it should be legal. Theft, Murder, Kidnapping etc. do harm others or deprive them of freedom therefore they should be illegal.
As to your final question what do I want to believe? I want to believe that there is order in nature, that everything has a cause, and everything causes an effect. I want to believe that everything that seems wrong or unfair in the world are caused by physical, psychological and sociological forces. What I don't want to believe is that everything is just a big ant farm for a cosmic maniac performing experiments for his own amusement.

BRANDY   January 24th, 2008 2:56 am ET

ALL I HAVE TO SAY ON THE MATTER IS .......PEOPLE ARE FREE TO DO OR CHOOSE WHOMEVER THEY WANT TO CHOOSE BUT IF YOU BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST AND READ THE BIBLE IT TELLS YOU .....A HOMOSEXUAL WILL NOT ENTER THE GATES OF HEAVEN.NO MATTER HOW ANY ONE WANTS TO TRY AND TWIST IT TO FIT THEIR LIFE .........THE WORD IS THE WORD!!!!IF YOU WANT TO SPEND ETERNITY BURNING IN HELL TO PLEASE YOURSELF IN THE SHORT TIME WE ARE HERE ON EARTH....THEN I GUESS THAT IS YOU!!!I MYSELF WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND HOW A MAN CAN BE ATTRACTED TO A MAN OR A WOMAN TO A WOMAN KNOWING WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS.

kay   January 24th, 2008 1:56 am ET

Ryk, when I say that existence isn't logical I'm not talking about the 'process' of existence I'm talking about the 'birth' of existence. Even if the evolution theory was correct the question still remains.... where did that first cell, that everything evolved from, come from? Our reason and logic tells us there has to be a beginning and end to everything... infinity is not logical. When you look at outer space and you start to think about where it eventually ends and when it does end what is after that... nothing? Ok then what does that nothing look like and when does that nothing end and then what is after that? ... it's mind boggling and completely defies any logical or rational explanation. And I know that that also brings up the question ... well, who made God? And who made the one who made God and so on and so on...
But your response, again, completely ignores this point, you talk about evolution and how life ON EARTH began but if your faith is in science you must have thought about how ALL of existence came to be. Science is based on logic.... science (sometimes) explains why things work the way they do, the process of things, but there is NO logical scientific explanation for how the ORIGINAL process came to be. I defy anyone to come up with anything that can even begin to answer this question. To explain the logic of existence. Really, the only closest thing we have to a logical explanation is a supreme being – GOD. You say that you want proof and that is generally a very reasonable request but have you ever tried to look at things from our Creator's point of view?
According to the Bible we were created to love and worship Him. With all of His capabilities, He certainly would be able to make 'or program' us to love and worship Him but where is the value in that? If you could MAKE someone love you it just wouldn't be the same. Of course I do know a few people who would be perfectly content if people loved and worshiped them whether it was sincere or not, just as long as they did. But our Creator wants us to genuinely seek Him and love Him. So He gave us just enouph proof while still leaving room for us to use our free will to seek Him and put our faith in Him. And there are also plenty of 'outs' if we choose, in our hearts, not to believe in Him. Some of the stories in the Bible do seem outrageous and hard to believe but then all you have to do is look at everything around you and again, our existence and that is also outrageous and hard to believe but .... we are here and that can't be denied. The answer to His existence is right in front of us and we can take the 'easy' way and choose not to believe or we can be honest with ourselves (and Him) and choose to believe. For each one of us it really comes down to.... what do you WANT to believe?.....

MJR53   January 23rd, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Does anyone other than me see the dichotomy of a person characterizing Huckabee as a "bigoted idiot" and then asking "why can't we stop the hate?"

Alex Lord   January 23rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

I can't believe that Huckabee mentioned homosexuality and necrophilia in the same sentence... as "aberrations". You know what's really funny? How Huckabee is trying to "appear diverse". He went to Ebenezer Church in ATL, GA this previous Monday, yet he has the nerve to go and preach such nonsense? Last time I checked, the White House didn't have a cross on it's roof, so I don't think Huckabee will find himself at home.

Ryk   January 22nd, 2008 12:37 am ET

Kay the only evidence you offer that existence is no logical is that you say so. It is perfectly logical to me. I am well aware of the flaws in Darwins theory of evolution, it is weak in areas. The process of life evolving in an organized manner is however well documented by biology. Saying that something fails to make sense to you is "Scientific proof" that it must have been made by God is no more sensible than the ancient greeks believing the sun was the god Apollo driving his chariot across the sky. They failed to understand that the sun was a giant ball of nuclear fusion that we orbit around therefore they said that it must be a god. None of us understand exactly how life developed on earth and many people say "God did it." That is not science it is superstition. Scientific theory is by definition a supposition that can be measured tested and proven or more frequently disproven. God does not meet this criteria. I have heard many excellent and persuasive arguments supporting the existence of God many of which have made me question my disbelief. All of these arguments have been based in the realm of philosophy not science. I have studied the "science of intelligent design and it is anything other than scientific. After you wade through the facts presented the case studies the arguments saying they could not be accidents all you have left is the statement "Since we don't understand it God must have done it." Nothing measurable or testable or proveable. Therefore not science. Intelligent design involves a great deal of scientific knowledge but it is not a scientific theory.
I am not concerned that I don't and probably never will understand how this world came to be. It is enough to know that it can be examined with science and science has shown that it is possible for life to have been created through natural process. Belief that this is so does require faith, but it is faith in something I can see and evaluate and judge worthy or unworthy. A belief in something I can measure against my own logic and reason. I find this faith more real, satisfying and productive than "God did it."
I am relieved and happy that your logic and reason tells you that my invisible friend does not exist. My logic and reason tells me that your invisible friend doesn't exist either. It is not I who lacks humility. I claim no certainty about my understanding of the world. Those who lack humility are the people who say "God did it." and deny that any other option has merit.

kay   January 22nd, 2008 12:33 am ET

Another 'intellectual' poster up above further proving my point.... you can have all the education in the world and still lack logic and common sense... I've witnessed it time and time again. Arrogance plus ignorance AND lacking logic and common sense – what a combination...

kay   January 21st, 2008 7:28 pm ET

Ryk,
You are proving my point right off the bat by implying that the "civilized" world is on the right track and the "primitive & ingnorant" people of the third world have it wrong. With there being no proof either way as you said... it seems that you're the one who is insulting now.
You do have a "real understanding" of science and therefore our existence? You completely ignored the main SCIENTIFIC point of my post. You say there is no proof but how can you argue that WE are not the proof? Like I said, existence of any kind is not logical! You just can't argue with that. You can't deny that everything around you including your mortal human body that science will never fully be able to explain or understand says that there is a Supreme Being. So people like you say.. "well I want MORE / BETTER proof than that"... you are saying that you want your creator to reveal Himself on YOUR terms. You (atheists) clearly lack humility, you are just not willing to accept your proper place in the BIG picture. So, I'm sorry but that, to me, is where the arrogance comes in. There seems to be a very fine line between civilized educated people and their arrogance. Common sense and logic are not exclusive to educated people.. God gave this to all of us, even the people of the third world. And it's my common sense and logic that tells me that your invisible friend doesn't exist.

Ryk   January 21st, 2008 6:42 pm ET

One thing that I find interesting is that almost every discussion involving gay marriage or gay anything eventually turns to religion. They often start out about public health, marriage laws, tradition, whatever but in the end the main argument is "God doesn't like it."
I enjoy discussing religion so that is fine but from a legal standpoint it demonstrates that there are no valid secular arguments against gay marriage.
From a personal standpoint I also find it funny that I always end up defending gay marriage. I am not gay in fact I am a little bit homophobic. While I have known a few gay people socially my current circle of friends is resoundingly heterosexual. I have no vested interest at all in supporting gay marriage. I do care about logic and fairness however so I always end up on the pro gay side of the argument.
I would love to hear a non religious non moralistic argument against gay marriage that holds up under scrutiny but so far I have yet to find it.

Andrew Rhodes   January 21st, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Cynthia, Doh! I THINK it was you who mentioned that point about criminals in jail getting married in another article. And like a dope, I completely forgot about it! But it IS an outstanding point. Don't quit repeating it. Remind us every chance you get so the rest of us will eventually remember it and bring it up too. :)

Andrew

Ryk   January 21st, 2008 5:55 pm ET

whatthe
I have read the flying spaghetti monster and I really enjoy it. Another good one is the church of the invisible pink unicorn (How do you know it is pink, because it said so.

Conrad   January 21st, 2008 4:24 pm ET

Thanks, Ryk. I see your point. I am an athiest and really do not like the term "marraige" to begin with BECAUSE of it's religious connotation. I think really what we want is equal right, not for the church to recognize us as "married." Thanks, Ruk for your thoughts!

Eitan   January 21st, 2008 3:57 pm ET

The Irony here is that the decline of the US will not come about due to gay marriage or what the religious fanatics call sexual sins, but in great part due to ignorance (rejection of science and technology based on religious grounds, coupled with our sorry educational system), blind, irrational adherance to exclusionist and elitist Evangelical religious systems (us vs. sinners, us vs. the Muslims, us vs. immoral Europe, etc. etc.), and a lack of true compassion and concern for our fellow countrymen, be they of a different religion, ethnicity, race, or sexual orientation (FORGET Christian compassion, whos greatest fruits were the Crusades, Inquisition, and subjugation of indiginous people). Jesus must be turning in his grave over what's been done in his good name.

Ryk   January 21st, 2008 3:33 pm ET

Andrew
I got your message this time and I don't disagree. The logistics of such changes would be massive. The point However is that marriage is a religious rite. By sanctioning it, the government either sanctions it according to religious belief (one man one woman) which would violate the constitution. Or makes it a secular contract. As a secular contract there is no rational basis for one man one woman or any other restriction based on religion. That is the message I was trying to convey. Although I would like to see marriage become a private/church function I understand it is not likely to happen

whatthe   January 21st, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Ryk – I agree with you. Google the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It is the invisible friend approach used to debunk Creationism being taught as SCIENCE in Kansas. Brilliant!

Conrad   January 21st, 2008 2:12 pm ET

I think many have no clue just how powerful the gay's in America are. Car companies, travel companies etc....are catering to use because typically, we have more money that heterosexual couples. Most of us do not have children and a large portion of us are college educated and make a decent living. We have "disposable incomes" and I think that large corporations are just seeing this. I am curious how many of the "christians" on this blog have very little education and perhaps...I'm going to say it...live in a trailer in the south. Many liberals who CAN think outside the box are are college educated as opposed to the christian bible belt who are not so spohisticated and for lack of a better word....."trailer trash." I think they need to seperate formally educated commentators and the uneducated in this blog. I guess if we did that, we wouldn't have much of a debate.

Ryk   January 21st, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Kay is funny. In her rant about God and why people should believe she demonstrated exactly why religion is failing in the civilized world and expanding in the third world.
She starts off by insulting people who want proof before they believe in something and then rants about the horrible things that will happen to all those stupid bad people who don't believe. That kind of logic works on the primitive and the ignorant. People who have no real understanding of science are content with believing "God said" or "God did" because it is easy. No thinking required just believe. Civilized people however eventually get around to asking, "exactly who is this God, why cant we see him or prove he exists." and without a good answer they just stop listening. In the west two different things have happened. One group of people have chosen to just stop believing. If there is no evidence of God there is no good reason to do what the priests say. Another group continues to practice religion but treats it like a philosophy, changing it around, taking it out of context, making it say whatever makes them happy. Since God doesn't object or correct them it must be OK.
Kay mocks people for demanding proof. But without a standard of proof we would have to believe anything. If I say "My invisible friend created the world and says you have to send me money and do what I say." Do you want proof? Do you question?
Of course you do. So why shouldn't we question God and Demand proof. God may exist. I can not prove that he does not any more than you can prove he does. However you can't prove my invisible friend doesn't exist either.

Cynthia   January 21st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Hmmmm, I see no one cared to address the issue of convicted murderers marrying, courtesy of the American taxpayers. Oppressive "moralists" always seem to find their own petards a bit uncomfortable when hoisted on them.

I have every sympathy for the gay community with this issue. The names my husband and I have been called for marrying with no intention of having children wouldn't pass CNN's censors.

Andrew Rhodes   January 21st, 2008 10:26 am ET

Ryk, I've tried to post a pretty straightforward response, but apparently some combination in the comment, punctuation or something, is preventing it from being posted.

While it would make sense to choose an "all or none" path, the shock to the legal and social design we've had for so long would be too great. Think of all the changes required to eliminate the inclusion of marriage in certain procedures (taxes for example) and you'll see the problem. It would require several smaller steps to get to not recognizing Legal marriage at all or even to set up a system that includes multiple spouses beyond the current two.

Let's see if this one works. :/

Andrew

Andrew Rhodes   January 21st, 2008 8:40 am ET

Quantumfoam, the problem with such an idea is that ANYONE can make an argument as to why just about ANYTHING can be a threat to Public Safety. We already experience the "everything that is good is bad for you" philosophy. It's been happening for decades, if not longer. Various individuals can come up with excuse after excuse to determine that something is bad for the rest of the world.

As to the "common good", the problem with that argument would be the same as "community standards". Originally set forth as a "feel good" policy, it has now become the cry of everyone who thinks that something, no matter how innocent, must be "pornography" or "obscene" or "harmful to children". Rest assured, if someone can think up an argument, rational or irrational, logical or illogical, they will make it and encourage others to make it as well. We've seen it used in a variety of ways against a variety of media, from books to movies to editorials.

Andrew

kay   January 20th, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Christopher of WI... you are the fool for your narrow minded views about God's existence. Your are obviously one of those sophisticated, all knowing, proof demanding intellectuals ( with your coveted high IQ no doubt ) that will fight to the bitter end in spite of everything that is in PLAIN SIGHT. Your ego, pride, errogance, lack of humility and the inconveinience to your lifestyle won't allow you to believe that there is someone that you will have to answer to. NEWSFLASH... you WILL have to answer to your Creator!! He has made it CLEAR that He exists and you, using your free will that He gave you, have chosen to ignore this. You think you are in control? You think that you will have the last word on what happens to you?...well, my mortal brother. ... you are OWNED whether you like it or not... You need scientific proof in order to believe.... no you DEMAND scientific proof... who do you think you are??? I'll tell you ... you are a created being along with everyone else on this Earth and your existence along with existence in general of anyone or anything is NOT LOGICAL! If you have any intelligence whatsoever you have to know that that is true... our existence is NOT logical. You can't get more scientific than that!! Yet we ARE here!! And you self proclaimed intellectuals STILL demand scientific proof?? Get over yourselves, humble yourselves and acknowledge the obvious... that your minuscule little brains are not going to get the answers that you are demanding....and this life you have is NOT on your terms... deal with it or pay the consequences!

quantumfoam   January 20th, 2008 6:02 pm ET

In any discussions about personal behavior, there should be some ground rules of inquiry. !. Is the behavior a threat to public safety? 2. Is the behavior a threat to public health. 3. Is the behavior a threat to the common good. If any of these questions are answered in the affirmative then the behavior must be outlawed. if all answers to the questions are in the negative then bug off. I rest my case.

vernon johns   January 20th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

There seems to be an inherent problem with marriage. When you allow two consenting adults of the opposite sex to get married, you’re opening the door to where two men are going to want to exchange vows. And if the men are doing it, you know the women are next. Now we are heading down the road where soon a man is going to want to marry a dog and a few doors down from there a woman wants to marry a horse and a little farther down the road dogs and horses are going to want to get married. And, as technology progresses, logically, some man or woman is going to want to marry a robot and then the robots are going to want to marry dogs and God knows what will be at the fork in the road. Let’s stop this insanity and just abolish the sanctioned union between two loving consenting beings of all races, colors, shapes, genus, species and phylum.

Ryk   January 20th, 2008 11:43 am ET

The logical solution to the marriage question is to not have government recognize marriage at all. It is a religious institution and needs no legal recognition. Laws can be made dealing with child custody and support that do not involve marriage, in fact such laws already exist. Contracts can be made dealing with division of assets, medical power of attorney ect. Gay couples already use such contracts. Tax and other benefits for marriage can be eliminated.
Marriage would then be a matter of religious practice. Churches could decide who they wished to marry and set any rules they wanted. People who value religion would feel just as bound by their faith as they would by the law. Non religious people could perform whatever ceremony they wanted and call themselves married. There would be no redefining marriage because there would be no definition. Individuals and churches could cheerfully claim that only members of their faith are really married because it wouldn't matter what they thought to anyone else.
If marriage is once more a religious rite then the government will no longer have any control over it or reason to control it.

Seeker   January 20th, 2008 10:48 am ET

If you let same sex mariges happen then the rest of the things mentioned will come forth also. Same sex couples can't reproduce without the opposite sex. Wake up America and read the fine print.

The word "Religion" is not found in the Bible so please stop using a term that does not apply.

There is no school to make homosexuals straight. This is something God has to work out with them in their heart. Jesus told the adultress woman the same thing we should be telling everyone in America (not just gays) go and sin no more.

Wake Up People!

Andrew Rhodes   January 20th, 2008 8:43 am ET

Tolerance or acceptance: Doesn't matter. It doesn't violate ANYONE'S Rights for two (or more) individuals to be Legally Married.

You are entitled to your opinions and/or beliefs. Whoopie. Good for you. BUT, when you try to dictate that others MUST follow YOUR beliefs because you BELIEVE your's is superior to everyone else's, that's where the problem lies.

One individual's Rights end where another individual's Rights begin. You are free to worship in your home with your family. You are free to worship in an organized manner in a church or temple or other structure that you come together with whatever like-minded individuals you choose to converse with. You are free to believe whatever you choose to believe. HOWEVER, you may NOT violate the Rights of others by attempting to "educate" THEIR children in beliefs that they feel is inappropriate for their OWN children. You no more have the Right to "educate" a child in YOUR beliefs WITHOUT the child's Parent's permission that someone has the Right to expose your child rated R movies.

Your personal view of what is moral or immoral doesn't matter. ANYONE can spout religious dogma from whatever religious text they want to pull from. They can interpret it however they choose. Doesn't matter. Not every citizens has the exact same beliefs. Indeed, it is rather silly to scream the religion "Christian" as there are a multitude of beliefs that fall under the "Christian" religion. And a multitude of beliefs under each of those as well. To claim everyone who is a "Christian" MUST believe exactly the same thing regarding each issue out there is as ignorant as assuming that every single American MUST either be Democrat or Republican since they are usually the only ones recognized by the media. Only on very rare occassions are "Independant Parties" or even total Independants recognized or even allow to actually Publically participate in debates or other functions.

Again, the Law SHOULD be neutral, as granted by the US Constitution under the First Amendment (as I mentioned in yesterday's post and in a post that preceeded that one but, despite being filled with nothing but FACTS, appears to have vanished). The US Constitution recognizes ONLY the Human species as being capable of consent. Therefore, the reference to animal love or marrying animals is misinformation and deceit. And the question of Rights for children vs adults is a whole other issue, let alone regarding marriage (though you will note that various states do recognize marriage to "children").

The argument about "normality" is the same as "moral". Just another word to dictate to others one's personal religious beliefs. (Again, note the difference between "expressing one's OPINION" and "Dictating that others conform to one's belief".)

Also note the misleading information spread about disease, lesser life span, and even suicides, among others. Disease is, in fact, spread due to a lack of proper education. It should be noted that proper education was denied by the "morally superior" who felt such education was "inappropriate" to be taught. Indeed, the "morally superior" actaully spread MISINFORMATION about what caused various diseases, hence disease spread. Another example was the Black Plague where the "morally superior" thought it was punishment from God and blamed cats, believed to be tools of the devil. In killing off the cats, the Black Plague spread even further because the cats would have controlled the situation by eliminating the rats and their fleas which actually spread the disease.

Suicide of course is caused by the verbal, mental, physical, and/or sexual abuse by the "morally superior" against those they believe to be "morally inferior". The "morally superior" knowing and intentionally created a hostile environment, beating down (sometimes mentally and verbally, sometimes physically and sexually) those they deem "immoral". As with abuse in general, the victims sometimes commit suicide, sometimes become victims for life, sometimes rise above it and live with it, sometimes become abusers themselves. Just because the "morrally superior" are too cowardly to admit their own part in what happens to victims, doesn't mean they DIDN'T have a part in it. We have seen a great many students, as well as adults, driven to suicide by abusers as well as showing where authority figures ignored the abuse taking place because of their own "moral supeeriority". It is not a new thing by any means.

And no one lives forever. But tying a lower life span to a sexual orientation is as ignorant as trying to tie it to having select relgiious beliefs. But certainly, we can see in the previous two instances just a fraction of the reasons why some individuals live less than their full life span. And it isn't BECAUSE they are homosexual. It's because of the immorality of the "morally superior" who abuse those who are homosexual. There is a difference.

Andrew

P.S. The contents of this post are FAR less offensive than some of the post previously made by others condemning individuals in the name of their own personal God. Indeed, the post I first made back on the 18th was not in violation of any comment policy. The use of "you" or "your" is a generic term referring to all those that the comment is referencing, not one specific individual, unless specifically named. So unless the site is more interested in sensationalism rather than FACTS, there is no reason to turn this post down. It has, after all, been posted elsewhere, as has the one on the 19th. Unfortunately, I expected more ethics from this site so I didn't copy the first one which was on the 18th, which vanished. But rest assured, it is no less FACTUAL than the one on the 19th or this one.

Todd   January 19th, 2008 11:30 pm ET

God started the Institution of Marriage,so why would gays want that so bad seeing as how he "doesnt exist"??...hmmm...makes ya think doesnt it?...its all in the Bible kids.....dust it off and read it

Todd   January 19th, 2008 11:26 pm ET

Chris...God loves everyone equally,even homosexuals,that doesnt mean he condones their behavior ,in fact he calls it an "abomination"(look that word up),theres also the fact that even believers fall into Sin(which separates us from God),but we arent under the law(of moses) anymore,we are under grace through our faith in Jesus Christ,but theres a difference between sinning and "practicing sin" ie: continuining in and justifying what you do because you cant control yourself with no concience about it whatsoever,so you either hate God or try to deny his existance because you dont want to be accountable to anyone for your own selfish desires,you need to get real with yourself and then find out who God really is..cause you will face him someday......i suggest you have Jesus standing by your side when you do

CW   January 19th, 2008 10:55 pm ET

Christopher,

I see that you are spouting off about how great science is. Science will save the planet – Right? Let's all put our faith in science. This is the same science that tells us that something is good for us one year and then the next year tell us that the same thing will kill us. Talk about being fickle.

I see that you want proof that God exists. There is no proof so why don't you just wait and see?

While you are waiting, I'll ask a better question that you can work on to keep you busy. Do you have proof positive that God does not exist?

Todd   January 19th, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Hey Chris,let me ask you a question first......have you ever even read the "new" testament? do you know who Jesus really is?maybe you wouldnt be asking me such stupid questions if you had,Galatians 5:16-25 is pretty clear,so if you have a problem with what i said,take it up with God,he's the one you will answer to,whether you believe in him or not

Steven in Charleston, SC   January 19th, 2008 10:15 pm ET

Frank,

Just to be clear, when you say that 90% of Americans view the gay lifestyle as "disgusting" and an "abomination" you are not stating fact, you are projecting your own biases onto people who do not share your opinions. Here are some ~actual~ facts:

80%+ of Americans support the passage of ENDA;

70%+ of Americans support the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and allowing our gay and lesbian soldiers to serve their country openly and honestly; and

65%+ of Americans believe gay and lesbian couples should have their relationships respected and acknowledged, they just disagree on what those relationships should be called.

So you see, Frank, most of America has accepted and embraced their gay and lesbian family members, friends, and neighbors. Please don't insult these good people by projecting your fear and intolerance onto them.

frank5057   January 19th, 2008 8:48 pm ET

Christopher, I take that back, Johnson brought us an escalation of the Viet Nam war that cost this country over 58,000 lives, two of which were old friends of mine, he also sucked the Social Security system dry to finance Viet Nam.

DHALL   January 19th, 2008 8:29 pm ET

I do not support Mike Huckabee for president, but completely agree with him
on this subject. Homosexuality or "gay" is NOT a normal, natural, organic identity.
It is certainly not a God-given identity. Why would God and/or nature go to all the trouble of creating/developing creatures obviously designed for sexual procreation but have an alleged 10% do the opposite.
No one is stopping self identified "gays" from pursuing thier sexual satisfaction,
but they in turn have no business what-so-ever demanding acceptance, approval and promotion of thier sexual PROCLIVITY.
To take Mike Huckabee's paradigm another step; should we abolish the age of consent?
The burden of proof that "gay" is an actual biological identity is on "gays" and thier supporters.

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 8:18 pm ET

Christopher, this isn't a spelling contest, I barely graduated high school, but, anytime you want to compare balance sheets let me know.

Balance away Frank I read 5 newspapers daily and have followed very closely politics since Reagan. I have a firm grasp of the hypocrites on the right. I am a college graduate and hold a degree in architecture. BTW I minored in religion and enjoyed addition course studies in political science. Give it your best shot.
Sorry to hear your heterosexual parents did such a bad job of raising you. Education is the basis for everything. Sorry you missed out.
I have no intention of voting for Hillary unless she is the nominee. Wisconsin gets to do the cross over voting. Not to worry democrats in WI are voting Huckabee so the moron gets a center stage and the whole world will be laughing. I think your side of the aisle has done quite enough damage to our country. Why not sit this one out. We don't need another "born again" cheerleader, cokehead booze hound in the oval office.

frank5057   January 19th, 2008 8:01 pm ET

Christopher, this isn't a spelling contest, I barely graduated high school, but, anytime you want to compare balance sheets let me know.

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 7:58 pm ET

lesbain, transgender, tranvestite
One more thing Frank..."lesbain" is spelled lesbian and I'm sure you can use Ann Coulter's name when you say transgender (nice Adam's apple) and are you referring to Rudy when you say "tranvestite" (correct spelling – transvestite)? See that No Child Left Behind thing cheerleader Bush came up with sure did make you smarter.

Dustin   January 19th, 2008 7:53 pm ET

I think Mike Huckabee is doing a great job. America needs a revival and a spiritual awaking. America also need a president who will stand up for Jesus Christ. Gov. Huckabee is the man. Come Feb 5th, Here in Georgia I will cast my vote for him. Go Huckabee!!!!!!!!!!!!

frank5057   January 19th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

Drew, the gay, lesbain, transgender, tranvestite radicals are trying to teach children to learn about how to be one of these groups. They are "FORCING" a lifestyle down the throats that 90% of MAINSTREAM AMERICA FINDS DISGUSTING AND AN ABOMINATION TO ALL PEOPLE OF CHRISTIAN FAITH. ME PERSONALLY, I COULD CARE LESS WHAT KIND OF A LIFESTYLE SOMEONE LEADS UNTIL IT STARTS TO AFFECT ME, MY CHILDREN AND GRAND-CHILDREN AND SOCIETY AS A WHOLE. THEN I WILL FIGHT TO PRESERVE WHAT GOD CREATED, A LIFESTYLE THAT WAS BROUGHT FORTH BY GOD FOR ONE PURPOSE TO PRO-CREATE THE HUMAN RACE. GOD SAID "HATE WHAT IS EVIL, HOLD ON TO WHAT IS GOOD"

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

I can't quite understand those individuals that make comments about what is going on in another person's thinking process. From what I just read concerning Mr. Huckabee, a large group of contributers to this site have no knowledge of where we are headed as a nation, or even care for that matter. I base that upon 66 years of 'people observation.' Stupidity is based in the denial that God does exist.

Science needs facts. Where is your proof positive that god exists? Man wrote the bible so no proof there. Without science at age 66 you would have already died. Without science many heterosexual couples would not be able to conceive, the list goes on and on. Stupidity is rejecting science and embracing something on blind faith. People that fear death have blind faith in hopes that there is something after this. Good luck with that one.

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

But what do we know? We're so ignorant, we've never managed to achieve the same H.I.V. epidemics as those sophisticates along the coasts.

Do you ever check your facts? The majority of new HIV cases are happening in southern states among heterosexual blacks. But I'm sure you would still choose to believe it's god's punishment for homosexuality. Of course if your beloved Ronnie Reagan (the recessionist) had done something about HIV earlier we wouldn't be in this mess.

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 7:06 pm ET

The inconvenient truth is, a large majority of Americans want to preserve the definition of marriage as an institution between a man and a woman. If these journalists were to spend even 5 minutes outside of New York and L.A., maybe they wouldn't find Huckabee's views so "controvertial". After all, how can a view be "controvertial" when it's shared by an overwhelming majority of Americans?

People used to think the world was flat, a majority I believe. Science took care of that one as well. Progressive believe in science not witch craft. Although if you wish to practice witch craft go for it, Karl Rove has been doing it for years.

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

If there was a passage in the holy bible that approved of homosexual behavior, would anybody guess as to what activist group in this country would be very supportive of Christianity? Guess who. You are absolutely correct. I'll try to come up with a more difficult question later.

I think you are wrong! I believe in science not a book of fairy tales written by man, than translated over and over to reflect their bigoted dark ages thinking. Try again!

If Huckatrailpark told you to jump off a bridge because he believed god said so, would you?

Welcome to 2008, come into the light! Again and again science has proven your book to be full of crap!

Drew   January 19th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

James – "The people on this blog who think most Americans are going to endorse sexual perversion as a good to their children are deluded."

I believe in teaching our children to accept people for who they are. By denying homosexuals the same rights as others, and by discriminating against them, we are teaching our children to not accept people, hatred, and to judge people. How is that a "Christian" moral? I was raised to love somebody for who they are; not deem them as a lesser mortal because of who THEY WERE BORN TO BE.

"And indeed homosexuals are doing themselves a great disfavor by trying to force everyone to agree with them (through speech codes, insults, and through the government)."

They aren't trying to force people to agree with them. Where are you getting this stuff from? They are trying to obtain the same legal rights that other loving, caring couples have through the government. I frankly don't think they care what an ignorant, judgmental fake Christian cares about them. And who are they insulting? I have seen very, very few homosexuals make insulting comments to people who disapprove of them. Typically, I see people who hold consider themselves "Christians" to insult gays – by calling them names, by denying them rights, by saying they "choose their lifestyle", by saying God "hates gays", by blaming 9/11 of them (the ever beloved Jerry Falwell). I saw one "Christian" cry when Brokeback Mountain came to our hometown – because she thought it was demoralizing to society and would harm our children. Give me a break. You're the ones who are harming the youth of this country.

quantumfoam   January 19th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

If there was a passage in the holy bible that approved of homosexual behavior, would anybody guess as to what activist group in this country would be very supportive of Christianity? Guess who. You are absolutely correct. I'll try to come up with a more difficult question later.

Joel , Ohio   January 19th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

God never created a religion;man invented that idea! God has always wanted a relationship with mankind. A lot of people do not believe in GOD! I am so glad God still believes in and loves ALL people.

Jeremy   January 19th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

If those on the Left take offense at an equation of homosexuality and bestiality, then aren't they being bigoted and small-minded toward the bestiality people?

The inconvenient truth is, a large majority of Americans want to preserve the definition of marriage as an institution between a man and a woman. If these journalists were to spend even 5 minutes outside of New York and L.A., maybe they wouldn't find Huckabee's views so "controvertial". After all, how can a view be "controvertial" when it's shared by an overwhelming majority of Americans?

But what do we know? We're so ignorant, we've never managed to achieve the same H.I.V. epidemics as those sophisticates along the coasts.

Tom Fisk   January 19th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

I can't quite understand those individuals that make comments about what is going on in another person's thinking process. From what I just read concerning Mr. Huckabee, a large group of contributers to this site have no knowledge of where we are headed as a nation, or even care for that matter. I base that upon 66 years of 'people observation.' Stupidity is based in the denial that God does exist.

Paul   January 19th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

It's really amazing how defensive and insulting the secular liberals get when somebody disagrees with them. I thought they are for "open-mindedness", "toleration", and diversity"? Apparently they have redefined those terms to mean something other than what most Americans understand them to mean. Hypocrites!
The fact is that the vast majority of cultures, religions and tribes who have ever existed have frowned on homosexual behavior. Are they all wrong? The libs can't blame Jerry Falwell for that. Wake-up, the defintion of "freedom" being advanced the liberal secularists is actually lawlessness and is leading to the breakdown of our society.

well said!

whatthe   January 19th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

Hey Steve Lyons – do not forget about believing in the Flying Spaghetti Monster!! LOL! I love your comments! "Adult Santa Claus fairy tale crap" – describes religion to a tee!

the andychrist   January 19th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

CHRISTIANITY IS STUPID! ORGANIZED RELIGION IS WORTHLESS!
GIVE UP, YOU MINDLESS MORONS!!
MAYBE IF YOU DIDN'T LIVE YOUR LIVES OUT OF A FAIRY TALE FULL OF MIRACLES AND MONSTERS YOU'D FIGURE OUT HOW LITTLE ANY OF THIS BICKERING ACTUALLY MATTERS!
KILL YOURSELVES, FOR THE GOOD OF THE GENE POOL...

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

Listen to God – not to your reproductive organs, Christopher.

James

As Kathy Griffin would say Jesus can suck it! She was raised Catholic. Kathy for President! Poor James sooooo obsessed with my John Thomas! Come out Come out James.

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 6:09 pm ET

People with immoral lifestyles are unfortunately just as passionate about twisting, denying and destroying absolute truth (to support said lifestyles), as authentic Christians (like Mike Huckabee) are about standing up for the morals and beliefs that this country was founded on.

And so say the Muslims in their theocracy. You Huckatrailpark supporters would be a hit in Iran. They have the same extreme radical hate you have in your black little hearts. Remember hate the haters not the person.

DNW   January 19th, 2008 6:08 pm ET

I guess all I can say to you all is this:

"They kept demanding an answer, so he stood up again and said, “All right, but let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!”
John 8:7

THAT INCLUDES THE ENTIRE GOP PARTY

Joey   January 19th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

Ryk what you say is true about abortion and immigration.. my point was simply that Mr Huckabee will have no decison making ability in policy for the next administration ... so... thats why i said this discussion is stupid.. I also must say stupid was a wrong term what i should have said was this conversation is simply irrevelent ...please forgive me

Joey

Joel , Ohio   January 19th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

The point most human beings miss is that each person seems to try to create God in our image. Like it or not ; every man or woman was created by God in His image to live by His rules. He sent Jesus to show us it can be done!
However He allows us to choose where we want to spent eternity . We can choose
short term of maybe 100 years if were lucky or forever if we accept His way.
His , is a KINGDOM not a DEMOCRACY. Mike Huckabee merely says what he believes. The choice is still ours as it should be!

Ryk   January 19th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Joey commented that this is a stupid debate because Huckabee will not be the nominee. I disagree it matters precisely because this issue along with abortion and immigration are the only things republicans are talking about. Except for Ron Paul there are no real differences between the candidates. It's all about God,God,911,911,immigrants and a little bit about guns and taxes. They all say the same things about the same things. The republican nominee will be the one who can out God the rest of them. So exposing or defending Huckabee will send a message to the other candidates about how the debate will be framed and influence their positions regardless of who actually wins.
On the democrat side it's basically about what would be cooler a woman president or a black one, because the Democrats are even more lockstep on the issues than the Republicans.

Grant Devereaux   January 19th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

This is indeed sad. Mr. Huckabee, who had appeared to be a moderate Christian conservative is as wildly anti-gay as Ted Haggard and Larry Craig. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much!

romneyflipflopper   January 19th, 2008 5:37 pm ET

GO HUCK!!!

Rick   January 19th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

I wouldn't be surprised if this is calculated to get some people to support him. That's the saddest part about this.

Mark   January 19th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

God & Government go hand in hand. Check back with how we built this country.
Marriage is between a man and a woman. Period, no debating or denying it. If you believe in God and the Bible then you also know this to be true. It is wrong and should not be allowed.

Carly   January 19th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

Where exactly can I find this "definition of marriage" that Huckabee refers to?

CW   January 19th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

And for those of you posting God hates gays messages.

God sent His very own – only begotten – to redeem us all – even those who judge – the general population in ignorance.

How about this:

WHO ARE YOU TO SORT OUT WHO IS

AND WHO ISN'T IN THE GOOD GRACE OF CHRIST

OR WHO SHOULD OR SHOULDN'T BE TOGETHER AS FAMILY –

JUDGE NOT – LEST YE BE JUDGED.

Attacking people in the name of Jesus is just as bad as attacking people for believing in Jesus. HYPOCRITES.

How dare you invoke the name of my Holy Father against my family and friends and their loving homes.

Persecuting others in the name of Jesus – is just as bad – as any other sin in and of itself. How dare you. To mock my Christ – who gave His life to pay for all of this.

JESUS CAST OUT DEMONS – HEALED LEPERS – AND ROAMED IN A GROUP OF RADICALS –

TO SAVE THE VERY KIND OF PEOPLE BEING USED AS POLITICAL PAWNS AND TAKING HITS FROM ALLEGED CHRISTIANS.

It was the Government of Jesus' time that hung him – and the chosen people who did it.

How dare you judge in the name of the Prince of Peace.

Josh   January 19th, 2008 5:25 pm ET

I've got to disagree with earlier posters. Mainstream America *is* mostly comprised of bigots.

Bryan   January 19th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

People with immoral lifestyles are unfortunately just as passionate about twisting, denying and destroying absolute truth (to support said lifestyles), as authentic Christians (like Mike Huckabee) are about standing up for the morals and beliefs that this country was founded on.

James   January 19th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

I tried twice to give you an honest answer, Chrisopher, but the CNN censor would not allow it.

I'm off – CNN doesn't allow an honest discussion.

That's why it's in the shape it is.

Just more PC.

There are SOOOOOOOOO many other places to go now to have honest discussions.

Listen to God – not to your reproductive organs, Christopher.

James

Bryan   January 19th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

SHOCKING! SHOCKING I SAY!

I can't believe Mr. Huckabee's blatant display of moral character!

What is happening to this country? How could *anybody* support
a man like Mr. Huckabee who considers unborn babies to be
human beings, and who (rightly) supports that marriage should
*remain* a traditional institution between one man and one woman?!

And to think he made mention of pedophelia and beastiality being
immoral as well – who does he think he is?!

I'm SHOCKED by how SHOCKINGLY SHOCKING this is!!!

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Sadly, the last thing most homosexuals ever want to hear about is a loving God – who says no to the repudiation of ones manhood or womanhood, and to the abuse of ones body.

James

Do you know of a "loving god" James? Yours thus far sounds pretty judgmental and vengeful. How am I abusing my body, and what concern is it of yours? That sounds pretty gay to me James! Do you eat shrimp or pork or wear clothing made of multiple kinds of fabric? Sins James! If you haven't figured it out yet I've been pointing out the religious rights' hypocries and those who push their moral agenda on everyone else. WWJD. I don't recall Jesus every speaking a word about homosexuality. Do you James? Perhaps you need to do some more cherry picking from your big book of fairy tales. I only hate the haters not the person (funny how a double edge sword works). As you were probably home "schooled" let me know if I'm going to fast for you.

DNW   January 19th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Wow you people will never get it.

Joey   January 19th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

doesn't any one else think that all this is stupid..... at the end of the day....Mr Huckabee will not be the nominee.. the ultra conservative right has been wounded.. they are not as influential as many think...

The nominee will most likely be either McCain or Romney but wait...... in Nevada...look who finishing in second...... Ron Paul with 13% ..hmmmm interesting......... I personally believe the inappropriate comments made are no more than political words that will not translate in a positive result todays election forum.....

joey

James   January 19th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

"because your holier than thou attitude and the constant forcing of your beliefs down everyone else's throats gets old very fast! "

--

Come now, Christopher, you needn't be so hysterical.

I'm not forcing anything down your throat (and I don't want to!!!!).

You're completely free to believe whatever you want.

James

James   January 19th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Oh – and by the way – Christopher,

God IS referred to in the most direct of ways in the Declaration of Independence.

(I'm sure homosexuals and the ACLU will be trying to declare the Declaration of Independence unConstitutional. They'll interpret our country out of existence!)

James

James   January 19th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

"Did you find it or not smart guy?"

--

Sadly, the last thing most homosexuals ever want to hear about is a loving God – who says no to the repudiation of ones manhood or womanhood, and to the abuse of ones body.

James

James   January 19th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Hey folks – the CNN censor is actually allowing a little over 1/2 of my posts to get through.

I never thought CNN could be so politically incorrect!

James

Jason Storms   January 19th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

It's really amazing how defensive and insulting the secular liberals get when somebody disagrees with them. I thought they are for "open-mindedness", "toleration", and diversity"? Apparently they have redefined those terms to mean something other than what most Americans understand them to mean. Hypocrites!
The fact is that the vast majority of cultures, religions and tribes who have ever existed have frowned on homosexual behavior. Are they all wrong? The libs can't blame Jerry Falwell for that. Wake-up, the defintion of "freedom" being advanced the liberal secularists is actually lawlessness and is leading to the breakdown of our society.

James   January 19th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

"We are smarter than you..."

--

Whatever you want to believe, Christopher.

I'm homosexual, you're smarter than I am, and you have more disposable income (oooooooohhhhh!!). Blah-blah-blah.

Another mark of liberals (and homosexuals in particular) is the delusions they create for themselves.

James

Ian   January 19th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

As a gay man, I hope Huckabee gets the Republican nomination. Then, surely, any Democrat who goes up against the moron will get the Presidency.

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

Of course they do, Christopher. That's one of their little ninny tactics the Gaystapo uses for frightening away those who disagree with them.

Like that matters!

You can believe I'm a sodomite, Christopher, if that makes you feel oh-so-much better.

It doesn't change the truth of anything I've said, however.

Nor does you're wanting to believe that upset me. You can believe whatever you want.

James

"Ninny tactics"? Wow how incredibly masculine of you. I only believe in science and not fairy tales like cotton candy cloud heaven where they serve you bagels with cream cheese and spy on the living. Sounds more like witch craft to me.
I love how you leap right for the "sodomite" phrase...slow down James not all gay men are interested in penetration. I would suggest you actually meet an out of the closet gay man and have a conversation (you may have to travel north for this part). I promise if you're as ugly on the outside as you are on the inside he won't be interested in you. We don't bite and believe it or not almost none of have sex in public restrooms like Larry Craig or have interest in little boys. We leave that to the priests and Mark Foley.

Jody   January 19th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Here's the deal; Look at the mess in the middle-east, you see the outward evidences of politics mixed with religion. Do we really want to go there? We as a people need to stick to the law of the land, the constitution, and leave our moral issues in our hearts, home, church. Who are country is and will continue to be will be determined my our moral conscience as a socienty.

On another note I personally feel Mitt Romney has the right direction when coming to personal choice. He states is personal view, but understands that it is the will of the people that determines the course of the country, not Washington. As anyone grows in knowledge and wisdom it is common for us to change our views and opinions, but for some reason when Mitt does it, it is label "flip-flopping."

Common sense just isn't common any longer, eh?

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

I really, really believe you, Christopher.

James

Did you find it or not smart guy?

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

I think the gay community should copyright the word marriage so you can't have it anymore James. Then who would be crying? We are smarter than you and have more disposable income to screw with your head. No pun intended I assure you. You sound just awful. Was your mother the same one from the movie Carrie? BTW why are there so many porn stores in the bible belt?

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Christianity is actually a masculine religion – where the truth about what is right and good comes first – no matter whether feelings are hurt. The feelings aren't hurt on purpose, but feelings don't stand in the way of the truth.

Wow James you are an idiot. Jesus never cried? His followers never cried when he was crucified? And people wonder why they served up the Christians to the Lions. It's because your holier than thou attitude and the constant forcing of your beliefs down everyone else's throats gets old very fast! This kind of belief system is embraced in Iran and other Muslim countries. God, guns and gays.
What a shame that you blindly base your truthiness on a book translated over and over, written by men, men that drank wine all day and had some of those diseases you are so fond of. Blind faith without free will is a sin and so is judging other people. That's your god's job, he is going to be so mad at you!

James   January 19th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

"Please find the word God in the Constitution. It's not there, not there anywhere. We want to keep that way."

--

I really, really believe you, Christopher.

James

James   January 19th, 2008 4:11 pm ET

"You know what they say James…those that protest too much must be gay."

--

Of course they do, Christopher. That's one of their little ninny tactics the Gaystapo uses for frightening away those who disagree with them.

Like that matters!

You can believe I'm a sodomite, Christopher, if that makes you feel oh-so-much better.

It doesn't change the truth of anything I've said, however.

Nor does you're wanting to believe that upset me. You can believe whatever you want.

James

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 4:07 pm ET

Mike Huckabee is absolutely right…..the problem with all you dumbed down liberal whiners is that you dont believe in any absolute truth,everything is relative to you,even morality,if you cant understand the logic of Mr. Huckabee's statement,maybe you should reach down,grasp your ears firmly and pull,you just might be able to remove your head from your ass..i cant believe how stupid this country has become…..stupidity?…or spiritual blindless?..or both,you better wake up America before you flush our heritage right down the toilet

Todd do you eat shrimp or pork? Do you wear clothes made of different forms of fabric? Did you have sex before marriage? Did you ever lust in your heart? Or do you just cherry pick the things that make you fearful that someone might find out that you actually have homosexual tendencies!?!

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

James seems to be very obsessed with homosexuals. You know what they say James...those that protest too much must be gay. Perhaps you should realize that gays have to take a stand against narrow minded folks as yourself. The church attacks us, right wing politicians attack us and many of very hateful bigots even kill us because preachers like Huckatrailerpark endorses this hate on a national stage. You keep your church out of politics and we will keep our sex lives out of your church. Many gays are for civil unions as we want nothing to do with places that worship false gods. Please find the word God in the Constitution. It's not there, not there anywhere. We want to keep that way.

James   January 19th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Indeed, liberalism and political correctness are basically feminine (or homosexualized) – where anything that hurts another's feelings (why even the truth!) must be bad. ("You bad bad boy. You hurt my delicate feelings...!).

And liberal reactions to anything unpolitically correct are usually hysterical flaming fits or teary appeals to call what is depraved (abortion, homoanal sodomy) good.

Christianity is actually a masculine religion – where the truth about what is right and good comes first – no matter whether feelings are hurt. The feelings aren't hurt on purpose, but feelings don't stand in the way of the truth.

Political correctness drains both love and truth from society (and damages ALL our young ones).

The people on this blog who think most Americans are going to endorse sexual perversion as a good to their children are deluded.

And indeed homosexuals are doing themselves a great disfavor by trying to force everyone to agree with them (through speech codes, insults, and through the government).

They are just going to get everyone to like them even less than they do already.

James

Joey   January 19th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

I thought Jerry Falwell passed away... "bestiality" huh... Mr Huckabee.. both my husband and I are amazed that you feel you needed to say such things in order to obtain the support of the extreme right. I pray to my god that you are not that unfeeling and and that prejudice and scared of true equality... you disappoint me..as a human....

Joey

Todd   January 19th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

Mike Huckabee is absolutely right.....the problem with all you dumbed down liberal whiners is that you dont believe in any absolute truth,everything is relative to you,even morality,if you cant understand the logic of Mr. Huckabee's statement,maybe you should reach down,grasp your ears firmly and pull,you just might be able to remove your head from your ass..i cant believe how stupid this country has become.....stupidity?...or spiritual blindless?..or both,you better wake up America before you flush our heritage right down the toilet

James   January 19th, 2008 3:44 pm ET

There are a whole lotta folks on this blog who have completely confused the feeling of love with actual love (wanting what is best for the other).

Christianity is about actual love for each other – not for endorsing whatever our 'feelings' tell us we want (like that snuffing out a baby's life is good, or that a man's sodomizing another man's butt is good, or that telling a truth that hurts another's feelings is bad [PC morality]).

Indeed, most all liberals base their conflicting and harmful moral notions on their feelings (which are usually hysterical as well).

James

JD   January 19th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

Amazing what happens when somebody decides they want to follow the beliefs of the Bible in public I wonder what position Billy Graham would tout. Bash, bash, bash. If America does not agree with those same beliefs, then vote for somebody else. Gov. Huckabee is stating HIS beliefs. Whether anybody agrees or not, let the votes fall where they may.

James   January 19th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

"After reading some of the blogs I realised how grateful I am there is no Christian conservative right here in the U.K"

--

But whyyyyyyy?

Many masters love their dogs, and their dogs obviously love them.

If they want to get jiggy bestiality-wise, then why shouldn't we call that 'marriage' too?

Many moms love their sons and vice versa, and sometimes they get into incest. That must be marriage too!

Many men love two women who each love the man.

Why that should be marriage too!?

Seriously folks – the United States risks becoming a country where we no longer have a word for the life-long joining of man and woman who together bring new human life into this world.

How stupid can we get?

There's no way in the entire universe that I'll ever call two men who sodomize each other 'marriage.'

Homosexuals can pick some other name of their choosing for what they do to each other.

James

mike   January 19th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Well, this is an interesting subject. Christians believe what they will. They are steadily loosing ground in this country and I really think they can't handle loss of control. It is time for them to step aside anyways and let other beliefs in. God loves us all. Read all the books of the bible not just what King James (who liked the company of men himself as well) allowed into his version of God's word...there are many books not allowed in. Tell a christian that Christ was married to Mary M...watch out. :) God is about love...it is ok to be gay or whatever you were born to be..Huck-a-be-gone-soon anyways. :)

Christopher, Madison, WI   January 19th, 2008 3:35 pm ET

Jack January 19, 2008 11:15 am ET

Dear Baby Jesus:

Please let the Huckster win the Rep nomination.

Amen

Yes amen to that brother. Let's make sure we get this freak show on center stage where the entire country and world can see just what the southern United States is able to produce! Here we go God, Guns and Gays. Again the Repukes have no actual answers or direction just Dark Ages thinking. Remember if you can't win on issues attack your fellow American! More scare tactics. Don't you rednecks have the ability to be embarrassed? Sorry I forgot about Britney Spears...southern white trailer park trash just like Huckatrailerpark!

Drew   January 19th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

"All those has some form of love. I would not deny. But IT IS NOT MARRIAGE YOU SICK PEOPLE"

Says who? Your Church? I'm sorry, but we all HAVE THE RIGHT not to abide by your religious views.

Drew   January 19th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

I think this shows Huckabee's true colors. We need a president who respects all races, not one that claims to be a Christian but shows hatred and judgment to such groups of people. Then again, I don't respect any better behavior from these "born agains".

Huckabee, please learn something about homosexuality. When two people love each other, it shouldn't be anyone's business but their own. They're not harming you, they're not going to "devalue" your marriage, they're not going to "harm" the children of this country. It's going to prove to everyone that this country wants to move forward, and doesn't discriminate against certain groups of people. Gay people are loving, caring couples, and they deserve the same rights as everyone else. I don't care you if your "God" tells you that it's wrong, Mr. Huckabee – it's not the same God I worship. I worship a loving, caring, forgiving God – not one of hatred and judgment. If you don't want to marry gay people in your Baptist Church, then don't. No one is making you currently marry a couple you don't want to. And, frankly, I don't see why a couple would want a blessing from a homophobic jerk, Mr. Huckabee.

Marriage may be a "religious institution", but we aren't fighting to get your approval. We don't want it. We want the legal benefits that every other loving couple can have.

And we're not "opening the door" for change. We know that a marriage between a man and a dog is absurd. (a) The dog cannot sign the contract, and (b) It should be between two consenting people who know what they are engaging in, and (c) It would be cheating the benefits that come with a marriage. We know that more than two people in a marriage license is absurd because of the cheating legal benefits that would come with it.

James   January 19th, 2008 3:25 pm ET

"After reading some of the blogs I realised how grateful I am there is no Christian conservative right here in the U.K"

-

Well, the U.K. is a country where a man (Elton John) makes pederastic videos about homolusting after stripping Cub Scouts, and then:

gets knighted!

James

James   January 19th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

I can see that the CNN censor on this blog won't allow:

– mention of what homosexuals do AND

– the statement that children deserve mothers and fathers.

No wonder CNN is sinking.

James

Freddie   January 19th, 2008 3:20 pm ET

After reading some of the blogs I realised how grateful I am there is no Christian conservative right here in the U.K

James   January 19th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

"The Homosexual Community has gotten a lot of mileage out of a totally false concept. That being that disagreeing with a group's behavior or beliefs equates with hatred. "

-

Indeed, Earl.

The "you disagree with me so you must be consumed with hate" Gaystapo tactic is now sooooooooooooo old and idiotic and dimwitted.

Most people just roll their eyes.

James

Ryk   January 19th, 2008 3:01 pm ET

Did Huckabee intend to equate gay marriage with bestiality or pedophilia? Judging by his positions and attitudes I would say yes. His statement however does not automatically mean that. From a legal standpoint there is very little difference. The standard limiting marriage to a man and a woman is an arbitrary one it exists because we as a people have decided it should. Bestiality and pedophilia are no different. While we can argue that homosexuality harms no one and pedophilia for instance does these are still arbitrary standards. At this time most people believe that adult sex with children is always harmful. Most of us can not imagine a time where 40% to 60% of the population would advocate it and 10% or more would practice it. Fifty years ago no one would have imagined these things about homosexuality and even Fifteen years ago it would have seemed absurd. Public perception of homosexuality changed. Whether you like it or not public perception of pedophilia and bestiality could also change. The legalization of gay marriage will set the standard that any behavior is acceptable as long as enough people like it. I don't say this as an argument against gay marriage, which I support, I am simply pointing out that Huckabee's statement is not in and of itself bigoted. In fact it is probably correct.

Not Mainstream   January 19th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

He simply point out that you can not re-define marriage. Guy can love guy. Girl can love girl. Hey woman can love dog. But it is not simply a marriage. All those has some form of love. I would not deny. But IT IS NOT MARRIAGE YOU SICK PEOPLE

seal   January 19th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

huck has proven his intolerance to religion, now his intolerance to homosexual, how do we expect him to be tolerant to other countries? he has proven he cannot. he is not trustworthy.

Abdul Olufowobi   January 19th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

I'm not shocked about mike huckabee comment that should be right thing to do in the first place but refused to comment on that topic before "IOWA" election using that as weapon to win south carolina now will back fire on him later. Anyways, never like him because he switched positions alot it's so early showing all this characters probably in his mind he thought we're stupid using preacher idealogy to win election as a front runner we shall see...

DNW   January 19th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Alright listen up, you all have really made me have a laugh of a lifetime. Don't you understand that we can NOT really call ourselves the "United States" if every single citizen doesn't have equal rights? We all have the right to feel about religion, homosexuality, politics, and whatever the hell else, HOW WE WANT TO, but we do NOT have the right to tell ANYONE that they can't have the same rights as anyone else because we don't like how they are living their lives, and that includes making AND passing any laws that will keep ANYONE from doing what they want to do. I say let people marry who they want, let people have abortions, (you may not know the reason behind their decision, AND IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS), I say LET THEM DO IT, because in the end, are YOU going to be responsible for another person's choice? How about YOU make sure YOU are living your life right instead of trying to run someone's life because that is exactly what this SO-CALLED GOP idiot is trying to do. LETS HAVE AN CLINTON/OBAMA TICKET SO WE CAN SEND THE GOP CRYING TO THEIR WIVES!!!!!!!!!!!

Earl Clopton   January 19th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

The Homosexual Community has gotten a lot of mileage out of a totally false concept. That being that disagreeing with a group's behavior or beliefs equates with hatred. This concept has no validity. It' only purpose is to deny those of a contrary view an opportunity to voice their views. This is a very common Liberal tactic that is often used when they have no effective answer to an opposing view. This tactic is closely related to the one Al Gore and the Global Warmers use when they claim, " The debate is over." In a democracy the debate is never over. The tatic is used here to stifle disent. It is totally dishonest to equate disagreement with hate.

The Anti-James   January 19th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

James:

Your freakyfecalphobia seems to have consumed your wit.

Keep your children very close to you. Keep them off of the web. Do not let them have IM, email or a mobile phone. Do not let them attend college, and if you must, make sure they stay near home. Otherwise your children will ultimately reject the kind of bile you spew. It's very hard to keep your kids in the dark ages.

I have four kids. They attend schools where many kids have gay or lesbian parents. It's all fine. It's all good. No disease. No poopie. Plenty of love.

Peace.

bible   January 19th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

I think homosexual behavior is wrong, but also object to promiscuous or extramerital heterosexual behavior. Bestiality is also wrong. What connections between all of the above may or may not exist people can work out for themselves, but my reading suggests all three have behaviors have been frowned down upon from above.

Austin, TX   January 19th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Animal Lover: Bestiality and gay marriage are completely two different things as far as love goes. In one, one partner has no choice to be involved, whereas, in the latter, both persons have made a decision TOGETHER. It really saddens me that we have so many people in this country who use slippery slopes for their arguments and who are so ill-educated when America is SUPPOSED to be a front-runner.

Steven in Charleston, SC   January 19th, 2008 2:10 pm ET

To all of you proclaiming to know God's will, I ask "how do you know?"

Here are the facts:

There is absolutely no objective proof that there is a God.

If there is a God, there is absolutely no objective proof that he/she/it in any way resembles the Judeo-Christian vision of God.

If there is a God, and he ~does~ resemble the American "version" of such, there is absolutely no objective proof that the Bible is his inspired word.

If there is a God, he resembles the American "version" of such, and the Bible IS his inspired word, there is absolutely no objective proof that we - mere mortals that we are - have interpreted it correctly.

And if there is a God, he resembles the American "version" of such, the Bible IS his inpsired word, and if we have interpreted it correctly, there is absolutely no objective proof that he intended every law and rule to stand forever.

These are a LOT of "ifs." Now, if you can make all of these philosophical leaps, then that is fine for you. But not all of us can. And to suggest that it is ok for you to impose your beliefs on everyone, and to actually WRITE THEM INTO LAW, in the face of so much incertainty, is the height of arrogance.

Brad   January 19th, 2008 2:09 pm ET

I find it intellectually dishonest of these so-called Christians to always claim the word of their God as infallible when use the King James "version" of the Bible. For one, the King James version is the most poorly translated of all of the texts that we refer to as the bible. Secondly, the bible is a construct of man, not God, although we hear the later. If I am not mistaken, and according to even most versions, the new testament means a new covenant as revealed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ, one that supersedes the previous covenant. In reading even several versions of the bible, Jesus was silent on this issue, It was Paul, an anti-roman, who seems to talk about this. Love your God with all your heart and mind, and treat your fellows humans with the respect. love and dignity that everyone deserves. Jesus was directly asked this and this is how he responded.

These so-called Christians are nothing more than people who have a political agenda who want to control our country by their false perceptions. It sounds like the beginnings of the Islamist ideologues that want to run their countries by what they perceive their God has said. Can anyone else see this?

James   January 19th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

I laud Mike Huckabee for standing against being forced to call something marriage which is not and can never be.

Homosexuals can call their depraved activities and their feelings for each other anything they want – except marriage. THAT word means the life-long joining of male and female, who from that joining can create new human life.

What homosexuals do is altogether something different. (REALLY different.)

Teaching our children that the two are the same is another form of child abuse.

James

Roy   January 19th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

If the bigot Huckabee wants to be President, he will have to acknowledge the fact that the Consitution of the United States supersedes his twisted neochristian cherry picking of Scriptures.

Steven in Charleston, SC   January 19th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Mike,

You are correct in asserting that you have the right to believe whatever you wish.

You are correct in asserting that we should respect your right to believe in the Bible, even if we disagree.

And you are correct that you have the right to share your beliefs with those in which you come in contact.

The ~problem~ comes when you try to legislate your beliefs, and force ME to live MY life according to your belief system.

James   January 19th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

My goodness.

The 'tolerance police' of course are always the very least tolerant people there are.

They insist that you believe that every horrific and depraved behavior (abortion, homoanal sodomy, etc. etc.) is good.

That's not tolerance; that's intolerance.

Real tolerance accepts that people honestly disagree about things – including about the morality of acts and behaviors.

The Gaystapo tolerance police are not for real tolerance; they are for insisting that everyone agree with them. They are always trying to get to kids, to normalize horrific and deviant behaviors to them. That's child abuse.

There's no way anyone's gonna get me to teach my children that fecal and diseased sexual acts between two males is good, what God designed our bodies for (in love), or good for the people who engage in them (when they are obviously not).

James

Chad   January 19th, 2008 1:29 pm ET

For those trying to throw the Bible into this with our pseudo-accurate rhetoric...you CLEARLY have never read the Bible or studied religion for that matter...read through Leveticus in its entireity (the book often quoted) and you'll see that not only is homosexuality an "abomination" but so is wearing two different types of fabric at the same time... would you like to continue to be selective about what passages you choose to live your lives by and which you ignore?

Austin, TX   January 19th, 2008 1:23 pm ET

WOW...so hatred and bigotry is moral...who knew? I agree with you, Jane.

Linda   January 19th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

You are not "entitled" to a lot in life but you are "entitled to your own opinion".
That includes EVERYONE – NOT JUST THOSE YOU AGREE WITH.
I have read the Bible all the way through many times in many translations and I believe most people don't have a clue what God's word says on most moral issues especially homosexuality and abortion and the death penalty.
After reading Romans 1 I don't see how anyone can believe God approves the behavior or those who approve of the behavior.

My opinion, which I am entitled to, is that God's word is the standard for everything I do and extends to those I vote for.

Mike Huckabee might not be perfect, but he is lines up with God's word more than all the others put together.

He has my vote. But I at least have the sense to respect the opinion of others who don't like him and won't vote for him. Our country needs to try to be more "respectfully correct" instead of "politically correct".

Every human should be treated "respectfully" no matter how different they are.

mdjtcadi@yahoo.com   January 19th, 2008 1:05 pm ET

HI again, folks:

Eleanor:

Hi.

You seem to be angry at the notion that Christians are "shoving" their religion down people's throats.

Your feelings, sentiments are shared by a lot of people. I think, though, what you seem to be saying is that Christians should not have the right to express their opinions or share their faith with people who aren't Christians.

I am a public school teacher. In the past 20 years, our society has embraced and aggressively promoted the notion of "tolerance." Aas a school teacher I have been encouraged to attend staff development activities about tolerance so that I could be better equipped to pass that value on to my students.

What I have found though about this brand of "tolerance" is this: All forms of religion, philosophy, sexual orientation and cultural values are to be tolerated and celebrated for their representation of a rich cultural diversity.

We are expected to value other people's beliefs, posture ourselves in a way that allows for understanding and acceptance of other people regardless of what they think or do...even if we don't agree with them.

Unless, of course, we bring the Bible and Jesus Christ into the conversation.

Today, if we do disagree, it is automatically labeled intolerant...or, as it has appeared many times in this discussion, bigoted.

Historically, the right to dissent and debate a controversial issue was valued as a democratic principle.

I am a Christian, as I have previously mentioned. And I believe that the Bible, in its entirety, is the revealed word of God. Of greatest importance, He reveals who He is in that book. Part of that revelation includes His position on many issues important to man. One of those issues is homosexuality. According to Him, it is sin...and it will be judged....unless people who practice that lifestyle repent and accept Christ as their savior and lord.

That is what He has to say about Himself and that particular issue. As a Christian, I absolutely believe it. And I am going to share my beliefs with other people.

Now if this is how you define the word "shove" then I am led to believe, perhaps, that you think I, and others like me, ought to be censored and kept from practicing and talking about our beliefs. The reason I say practice is because as a Christian I am commanded to share my faith...in humility, accurately, honestly and in love.

I also mentioned earlier, that thousands of Christians worldwide(fortunately not in this country, yet) are being killed for the faith I have just described. I am concerned that some day that sort of repression will occur here in the home of the brave and the land of the "free."

I find it really interesting that MIke Huckabee's comments about homosexuality have sparked such a fierce debate. I think that it is a validation of the point that I made earlier about what happens to a society that tolerates sexual immorality. I think the issue is criticxal. I think that our nation is in a moral crisis, and I think that if we as a people don't repent, then we like Rome, will fall into extinction.

That's my opinion. Grace and peace to you,

Mike

Chaya E.   January 19th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Just because a large proportion of people have been brainwashed over the years to accept homosexuality, doesn't make it acceptable. Whether it is a gene that is deformed or a choice based on a dysfunctional past or the result of wanting to be 'in,' it is not normal! But at least in the U.S. homosexuals aren't hung like in Iran. So, they can thank G-d they are living in the U.S.

bub   January 19th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Richard, FL – your 1o Commandments and working on Sunday simply shows your ignorance. The Seventh day is Saturday, not Sunday....another raging loon!

James   January 19th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

My goodness Jane, what an infantile diatribe.

Not condoning behavior that repudiates the design of our bodies, and leads to death, sickness, disease and shortened lives, is love, not hate.

Not wanting our children to be exposed to the notion that such behavior is good, healthy, natural or Godly is love (for our children), not hate.

Homosexuals can do whatever they want to each other.

They just can't make everyone say it's good, or force everyone to teach their children that.

James

quantumfoam   January 19th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

People who are saying that homosexuality is equal to a normal heterosexual lifestyle are out of their mind. I ask anyone that thinks that it is in anyway comparable to a normal healthy lifestyle, look up the statistics . Compare the average age of death, the incidence of anal diseases,suicide rate,bathroom stall sex, full blown aids and new virulent bacterium and diseases directly related to the homosexual lifestyle. Don't take my word for it, go to your favorite search engine and do your research. When you discover the truth, you will be labeled homophobic and other choice names favored by the extremely radical heterophobic screwballs on the left. Good luck and don;t' forget you will also be considered a fool that is outside Americas' mainstream of thought.

bub   January 19th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

One more thought. If God exists (and he does) then homo stuff is just plain wrong as all religions teach.
A lot of homos scream the Bible is interpreted wrongly. How does "a man will not lie with a man and a woman will not lie with a woman", amungst many other similar passage, get misinterpreted?
If God does not exist then science dictates that this behavior is abnormal. Two or 3 percent are homos.
Science (and perhaps God) has so far dealt with these people; diseases spreading like wildfire. So, it appears to me that science and/or God are dealing with this situation adaquately.

Keneth K. Kline   January 19th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

He's got my vote!

lyn   January 19th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

It's sad that so many people don't understand the authority of God's word. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, 'Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be DECEIVED, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.' This is why the first sermon Christ preached was on repentance. We claim to be a Christian nation, yet are ignorant to God's word and ways. It is out of love and concern for the lost soul's destination that we speak God's truth; not hate, as ill-informed people keep screaming. I lived a homosexual life for 15 years, then, by God's grace, I was humbled, turned away from that life, and turned to the One who died for me and could help me, Jesus Christ. God instituted marriage to be between a man and a woman {Genesis 2:24}. I pray those who claim to believe in God get familiar with who He is by reading His word.

DJK...NEW YORK CITY,NY   January 19th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

WHAT A SURPRISE!!!!! This is the same person that thinks aids patients should be put into a camp....I am also surprised that CNN actually reported this story they have been having a love fest with huckabee(thats all we need is to send a "president huckabee" to a meeting discussing foreign relations....we would be the laughing stock for another 4 years)

Funny these evangelicals spend a lot of time hating everyone.....and trying to somehow say that this is what Jesus would do......if this is what he would approve of good riddens to him too.

rjn   January 19th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Check this out!!!

Monday, November 14, 2005
Time Magazine Names Huckabee One Of Nation's Best Governors
Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, who is also chairman of the National Governor's Association, was named one of America's five best governor's in the latest edition of Time magazine. Only one other Republican is on the list (Guinn, Nevada).

"... Like Clinton," Time says, "Huckabee has approached his state's troubles with energy and innovation, and he has enjoyed some successes. Most notably, he created ARKids First, which offers health insurance to poor children and has helped reduced the percentage of uninsured Arkansans under 18 to 9% in 2003-04, compared with 12% for the nation and 21% for neighboring Texas.

Since he became Governor in July 1996, welfare rolls have declined by nearly half, and last year the state's economy grew 4.4%, beating the national average of 4.2%. But Huckabee, 50, is a good Governor, not just for what he has done but also for who he has become, personally and politically. He is literally half the man he used to be, having lost 110 lbs. after learning in 2002 that he has diabetes and suffering chest pains a year later. He now exercises with martial regularity. More important, but less noted, has been Huckabee's political transformation. In his early years as Lieutenant Governor and then in the top job, he offered little more than anti-Clinton resentment and capering populism."

"Huckabee is now a mature, consensus-building conservative who earns praise from fellow Evangelicals and, occasionally, liberal Democrats."

For the rest of the Time article, click HERE.

Kevin Topeka, KS   January 19th, 2008 11:56 am ET

First and foremost, I AM NOT A HUCKABEE SUPPORTER. However, I do not believe homosexual relationships are morally wrong. I don't care!!! To each his own. I do not, however, believe the definition of "marriage" should be changed to include these relationships. Civil unions are available for those who chose to publicly announce their love. The only reason to call it a "marriage" would be to include folks in the benefits given those who choose to marry. I also do not compare bestiality to the idea that some can find a loving relationship with a member of the same sex. However, if enough dog lovers got together and had a study made that proved they were genetically predisposed to love their pets, would we be forced to allow them to marry also? If so, then I will marry my Schnauser. That will allow me to claim "Married Filing Jointly". Kibbles and chew toys are a whole lot less expensive than fur coats and Mercedes.

tone   January 19th, 2008 11:55 am ET

"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it."(Matthew 7:13-14)

master of the obvious   January 19th, 2008 11:52 am ET

i have an idea: how about all the people that like what Huck says vote for him and all of the people that don't like what Huck says vote for someone else?

That being said, I am sick of listening to people say that Huckabee is trying to take away gay rights. What is he trying to take away? He is trying to keep the law the same, that marriage is between man and woman.
The last i checked, homosexuals don't have to sit at the back of the bus, they have the same public schools, they have the use drinking fountains. This is not an issue of equal rights, because you already have equal rights.

Just because a man says that marriage is between a man and a woman has nothing to do with equal rights. If you are a homosexual man, you still have the same right I do to marry a woman. I am not denying that you truly love your partner. I'm not saying that you don't have the right to love another man. I'm just saying that you or I or anyone else in America is not allowed to marry someone of the same sex.

James M.   January 19th, 2008 11:50 am ET

I am main stream AMERICA and i agree with Mr. Huckabee. It is a fact , the same BIBLE that teaches homosexualality is an abomination teaches that bestuality is also an abomination. LEVITICUS 18:22, 23. The wicked may change a lot of things, but they will never be able to change the WORD OF THE LIVING GOD WHOSE NAME IS " JESUS ". It is not allah,it is JESUS. He is alive and well and is coming back soon, not as a lamb but as a Lion. He is KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. This crowd that supports these homosexuals and baby killers will HE judge. Then will we see how brazen these wicked really are. Go Huckabee. Don!t wilt under the onslaught of these people and the news media, because mainstream AMERICA is with you. I am a baptist preacher and I am praying for you, You do not have to apologize for your convictions,GOD wouldn"t. AMERICA PLEASE READ PROVERBS 29:2.

Mo, San Jose, CA   January 19th, 2008 11:48 am ET

If he believes in God so much, why doesnt he focus on what was said in the Bible, ie. loving, caring, and honesty. correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought Jesus didn't mention anything about homosexuality.

Mike   January 19th, 2008 11:32 am ET

He's right. If you allow gay marriage on the grounds that 1. they're consenting adults, and 2. they love each other, that logic could be used to argue for polygamy or other miscellaneous marriages.

David   January 19th, 2008 11:32 am ET

"Beam me up Scotty, there is no intelligent life down here." It is embarrassing when people like Huckabee and Obama are running for POTUS. Wake up America, research voting records, due a little leg work and read.

Matt   January 19th, 2008 11:30 am ET

Pick a fight?! Us? What is WRONG with him?

Gay rights groups have been fighting for decades against intolerance and bigotry, not out of a want for confrontation but out of necessity to protect our civil rights. From people like him.

Huckabee is hopefully about to lose his steam. Conservatives I've talked to already don't like his tax plan and I'm sure most moderates will find his positions on social issues too extreme to support.

Jeffrey   January 19th, 2008 11:27 am ET

I don't want him to be my preacher or president. Intolerance and bigotry and ramming down personal beliefs and agendas is why people are so sick and angry.

Jack   January 19th, 2008 11:15 am ET

Dear Baby Jesus:

Please let the Huckster win the Rep nomination.

Amen

Boris Hirsi   January 19th, 2008 11:12 am ET

Well, if Huckabee equates my 15 year relationship with a man marrying an animal, maybe we shoud put his torture-and-kill-animals-for -fun son in trial for manslaughter.

It is actually outright scary how fascist like Huckabee has such a following. But I think that in thge long run it is just healthy wake up call to all Americans to see what Christianists are willing to do to this country.

John, Sacramento, CA   January 19th, 2008 10:31 am ET

He's right you know. Pretty soon dogs will be having sex with men out on the streets. Chimpmunks will be having sex with racoons, and it will all signal the apocalypse. The Lord your God will punish all the homosexual heathens and cleanse them from the earth. The USA is beginning to go down the path of Sodom and Gommorah and the Lord you God shall rain fire and brimstone down upon the earth to see that things are made right. Throw yourselves down before his divine mercy you sinners and beg for his forgiveness.
In all seriousness, Huckabee should be applauded for understanding how and when to use the Slippery Slope fallacy to rally Southern Evangelicals.

j williamson   January 19th, 2008 10:27 am ET

Great! Another intellectually challenged Republican president – eight years of Huckabee will surely do this country in. Good luck everyone!

Mark Doland   January 19th, 2008 10:20 am ET

Mike Huckabee is the only candidate on either side who is standing up for what HE believes in. He is not a candidate whose opinion is influenced by popular thought. His principles are set in stone. This is what differs him from the rest of the candidates and will win him the nomination, because he don't have to wake up every morning and wonder what will guide him today. He has already made a commitment to be guided by the word of God, sure and firm, for it is the ultimate source of truth. He the right to have his speech heard as well. If you don't like what he says, it has probably offended you and you should look at why and change that area of your life. This is what truth seekers really do.

Dan Sarazen   January 19th, 2008 9:52 am ET

Does anybody actually think that this will hurt him during the GOP Primary? The neo-cons eat this stuff up.

Ann   January 19th, 2008 9:52 am ET

God bless him for not being afraid to speak the truth.

John Miller, Springfield, MO   January 19th, 2008 9:43 am ET

It's not about "Special Rights", it's about Equal Rights! The constitution is there to limit the government and protect liberties. Period! Separate but equal IS not equal! A "ban" on any one class of citizen is not what the Constitution is about. Scared of Gay Marriage? Then change the legal definition from Marriage to Civil Union across the board and let the religious fanatics claim "marriage" as their religious, but not legally recognized, union. Too far? Then deal with gay marriage on an equal footing as "straight" marriage. God is a God of love. Our country is so messed up because the conservative right wing has usurped the reigns of government, the very thing our forefathers fought to prevent! Freedom of religion is not only about freedom to worship what ever version of the Christian God you choose, it is about worshiping what ever Deity you choose! I am a gay christian. My god doesn't hate me. My God does not hate any of his children, no matter what their religious or political affiliation.

David   January 19th, 2008 9:39 am ET

The fact of the matter is that Marriage, and the benefits associated with it, is a privilege – not a right. Mike Huckabee's point is that marriage needs to be defined and if it isn't, it leaves the opportunity for anyone and anything to be married. He is not equating homosexuality with bestiality.

The second point is that people attack a man like Huckabee for his religion and that it influences his policies. The fact of the matter is, we all have a religion that affects what we think should be done. Even if you are an atheist, you are religious. We all have beliefs that influence our decisions. We all have beliefs about what is right and what is wrong. If we had a president who lied to the American people on a daily basis, promoted slavery, and said women couldn't vote – you would say that is wrong. And playing devil's advocate, I could say to you "Keep your religious views out of politics." But you would say that is ludicrous. We all know that slavery is morally wrong, that women should have a right to vote and are created equal. But we disagree that homosexuality is wrong. Some say it is and some say it isn't. But we shouldn't attack someone for their convictions and how they would affect their policies, because if we were president – we would have convictions that would affect our decisions too.

jdcma   January 19th, 2008 9:38 am ET

Are we electing a President or a Pope? Where does this guy (and the right-wingnuts) get off imposing their religious vews on the rest of this country? This guy is a fascist, pure and simple.

Chuck Rhodes   January 19th, 2008 9:36 am ET

I too am mainstream America. How come so many religious folks believe that if one is not filled with bigotry and hatred we are not mainstream. I have a graduate degree, professional position, children and grandchildren and I am an active Christian, attending church weekly and involved with the church. I serve a God who is inclusive.

There are so many issues – health care, the wars, environment, economic crisis. I do not want a President whose major platform is based on 'moral' issues of exclusion and hatred.

Susan   January 19th, 2008 9:30 am ET

Lets just leave the whole issue of marriage up to the States. How did the use of the Constitution get so confobulated????? If anyone has not noticed "Mainstream America" is currently deciding IN EACH STATE if gay marriage should be allowed or not.

Jane   January 19th, 2008 9:28 am ET

I am sick to death of constantly being reminded that I live in the same country with bigoted idiots like Huckabee. Why can we not stop the hate? When are people going to wake up and realize that that kind of hate and prejudice and bigotry is immoral? STOP HATING YOUR FELLOW AMERICANS!!!!

Tim   January 19th, 2008 9:21 am ET

Time and time again people jump to their wildest conclusions when someone says something they disapprove of. Mr. Huckabee is right. Each time the door is opened to allow what were once commonsense principles to be changed, the envelope is pushed further and further. That is all he said. Get over it. And no, as a Republican, he's not getting my vote. Fred Thompson, the only conservative in the race is!

LV   January 19th, 2008 9:11 am ET

Mike Huckabee is speaking his mind. It may offend others, but he is just speaking his Christian faith. Even Jesus pointed out wrong of others, but still loved them by dieing on the cross for them. You can honestly point out the errors of others and still care about them. It's like this: a child does something wrong, gets punished for it, but his parents still love him and would do anything for him.

Derecks friend   January 19th, 2008 9:09 am ET

Dereck Brown said:
"As a gay man, I find it "offensive" that some people think that it is their business to dictate to others what is normal, moral, and offensive. If someone doesn't like or agree with something, that is their problem to deal with internally. "

You're right Dereck. Who is Huckabee to say that "bestiality" is wrong??? There is nothing wrong with an honest, loving, close and physical relationship between man and "beast." Sammy, my dog AND lover is wagging his tail in agreement. Those narrow minded bigots make me so mad I could spit!!!!

INFIDEL   January 19th, 2008 9:06 am ET

"I think he's equating a loving marriage between two people of the same sex with some form of bestiality," he said. " I think that's really out of the mainstream of American thought, and most people will find that offensive."

ORLY? ROFLMAO

JFK   January 19th, 2008 8:54 am ET

That is just plain wrong! This is 2008 and any candidate that speaks and thinks that way is frankly dangerous! Pandering to the ignorant and small minded is not going to win the election. There is no way I am voting for a man that has to wear his religion on his sleeve either. That's a personal belief that he can have and I by no means care what he believes, but any candidate that has to use religion to get votes is just plain pathetic.

Instead of pandering to the neocons, how about actually dealing with major issues in this country. Whether gays get married or not is no one else's business. It has no impact on your marriage or anyone elses. It also does not devalue any straight marriage, if you think it does, then you probably have other issues going on. And if this country spends that much time pursuing divisive issues, it will be our downfall. This kind of rhetoric is what divides and not unites our country. We should be educating our kids, handling our security, and making sure our economy is healthy.

Brad from Canada   January 19th, 2008 8:40 am ET

Hey Observer, News flash for you. America is great in some ways but is far from perfect. You act like America invented democracy guess what? You did not. The biggest problem with America is its full or religious fanatics that are way too full of themselves. And please don't take this comment as a Canadian bashing Americans.
I like America and most Americans I have met.

Stylite   January 19th, 2008 8:23 am ET

It's amazing how much many people don't understand about the country and society we live in. There is nothing wrong with legislating **morality**. That's what we do every day. Is it wrong to kill? Is it wrong to steal? Those are moral issues that we codify into law.

It's also a fallacy to get into doesn't hurt or affect anybody arguments. Most things that people do or don't do affect those people around them. History shows there are many negative effects to successful societies when long-held morals are cast aside.

There are many negative effects to our society and country of not restricting marriage to a man and a woman. My interpretation of what Huckabee said is that any "tolerant" person wanting to require something to be legal or illegal (like marry) is simply imposing their own morals on the rest of us. The majority disagrees with that definition of marriage and therefore, we should restrict it to a man and a woman.

Andrew Rhodes   January 19th, 2008 7:59 am ET

We continue to hear misinformation, lies, and deceit in the name of personal religious beliefs. Quite frankly, I could easily use these acts to topple the religious bases throughout the US by acting in the same manner. By stigmatizing those who of like minds in the religious community and then saying that the rest of the religious community must be seen in the same manner.

But unlike the Tin-Pot-Dictator-Wannabes, while I will keep my own child from the obscene, bigotry teaching, hate mongering, abuser educating belief systems, as it is the Right of EVERY Parent to decide what is or is not appropriate for their OWN children, I will not begin such a campaign to "protect the children" from such as it is equally the Right of a Parent to expose their children to such things.

We clearly see the desire for a Theocratic Dictatorship to be set in the United States by a great many, however.

The argument of "majority rules" is one sign of that. Where "majority rules" is clearly based on violations of the United States Constitution (as the SOLE argument is that it would require the US government to give SOLE Legal superiority and recognition to specific religions and religious beliefs). It is also slanted in that not EVERY adult American citizen is not polled. The partial statistical base can easily be manipulated by location, method, and other factors.

Another clear piece of evidence is the argument that homosexuality is a "choice". To what relevance is it whether it is or not? The answer is simple: Those making the argument clearly believe that it is THEIR Right to dictate to others how they should be or not. Thereby once again violating the Constitutional Rights of others, as it would mean the government would give Legal superiority and recognition to a single religion and religious belief.

Another clear piece of evidence is the attempt to spread the issue wider so as to blur the FACTS to justify the dictates of others. Under Law, the ONLY species governed and protected by the US Constitution are Humans. The deciet that a Human could Legally (as opposed to relgiously) be married to any other species or inanimate object is merely for the purpose of downplaying the relevance of the existing US Constitution on the matter. Likewise, in trying to insert children into the matter, the speaker fails to point out that (a) Children's Rights in a variety of Legal issues, including Marriage, are inconsistant and, quite frankly, still in flux. Look at various Laws from state to state as well as Federal. Therefore, logically, we cannot include children in this specific argument because there is no clarity where children fit in Legally overall. So, it comes down to two (for now) adults becoming Legally Married. And, again, we come to the issue of Violation of US citizen's Rights under the US Constitution as above.

The FACT is that YOUR religion is YOUR religion. The US Constitution PROHIBITS the government from recognizing any one religion over others. Since not EVERY SINGLE US CITIZEN share the exact same religious beliefs, and since not every religion shares the same beliefs, then denying the Legal Right to marry based on a religious belief is a clear violation of the US Constitution. And, as noted many times, the marriage of two (for now) individuals, no matter WHO they are, does not violate YOUR Legal Rights whatsoever. Indeed, the marriage of two individuals has no bearing on anyone else's lives whatsoever.

This evidence, among others, shows that there are many in the United States that wish to turn this country, Legally, into a Theocratic Dictatorship. What makes it even more interesting is that they are too cowardly to admit such a desire directly, even though the individual pieces of evidence, as noted above, are willingly spoken by them time and time again.

Andrew

Tim Mobley   January 19th, 2008 7:46 am ET

Huckabee's social positions are based on the "TRUTH" of the infallible and timeless Word of God. He has just as much right to speak freely as any other American. America is looking more and more like Sodom and Gomorrah. It's truly a sign of the times when Gay's are celebrated for coming out of the closet and Christian's are told to get in the closet. I know it's a worn out expression, but God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. God said be fruitful and multiply. Two men can't do this and two women can't do this. Huckabee is emphasizing that the only God ordained intimate relationship is between a man and a woman who are married; anything else is wrong! If you don't stand for what you believe, then you shouldn't stand at all. Go Mike Go!

charlotte   January 19th, 2008 7:21 am ET

The observer posted twice and worth reading twice. What two concenting adults choose to do in their bedrooms is their business. However, to force it on me, as A-okay is another. I think civil unions are okay. When two people love each other and are committed to one other, they should have rights to make decisions, inheirt estates, etc. I personally believe a marriage is between a man and a woman. Let God judge people," judge not lest you be judged."

Rocco, Wellington, FL   January 19th, 2008 7:01 am ET

Huckabee is just like the rest of the Neo Con's his mind works under a predetermined conditions that he knows what "Normal" is and that the Government should preach the word of God.

Our government is not that way, it is not how Americans want to live. We have laws in this nation that we all live by and wether the 2 guys next door are gay it is no ones business as long as they follow the laws of this nation. If God doesn't like it he will have the final judgement. So why don't these NeoCon's crawl back in the hole they came from and leave the rest of of US allow.

Loring Ivanick   January 19th, 2008 6:50 am ET

Anyone proposing any domino effect theory, which is what Huck is doing here, should be forced to prove it, or at least logically set forth the steps by which the dominoes will fall one by one. Australia did not become communist just because Vietnam did for a while, as the domino effect rooters told us during the Vietnam War would happen. Equally invalid is a mere assertion that allowing gay marriage would lead to Fred Freaky marrying his goldfish, or, for that matter, that stricter controls on handguns would lead to a ban on deer hunting. And on the other side of the political coin, there is no proof that invading Iraq leads automatically to attacking Iran. If the president chooses to attack Iran, it is not because it was inevitable once the first shoe dropped, but because he chose to make two immoral and senseless blunders instead of just one and the citizenry through their elected representatives let him do so. He, and those representatives should be held responsible, not some domino theory.

Ky J   January 19th, 2008 6:46 am ET

Finally, a good republican who is not afraid to call gays what they are...sick and perverted. He gets my vote!

Court Jester   January 19th, 2008 6:44 am ET

The "gay" bias of this reporter is clear. His characterization that Huckabee's comments "seemed to link homosexuality with sexually deviant behavior" ignores that the controversy is essentially about WHETHER homosexuality IS deviant behavior. The implicit assumption by the reporter that it is NOT is a fundamental violation of journalistic ethics. This story is not journalism, it is devious pro-homosexual advocacy.

D   January 19th, 2008 6:26 am ET

Whos GOD said this? I think believing hearsay that was written a few hundred years after the supposed incident is stretching reality just a bit .....The only thing that was written BY GOD , supposedly , was the 10 COMMANDMENTS ... And if im not mistaken ....they are as follows ..
I am the Lord your God
You shall have no other gods before me
You shall not make for yourself an idol
You shall not make wrongful use of the name of your God
Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy
Honor your Father and Mother
You shall not murder
You shall not commit adultery
You shall not steal
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor
You shall not covet your neighbor's house
You shall not covet your neighbor's wife

He who is without sin ... Let him throw the first stone ....

tobias   January 19th, 2008 6:05 am ET

well said, winnie..

if these bigots were truely christian they would follow the message of jesus who reached out to the people who were NOT the majority !
Love thy neighbour.. there is no "but" if you haven't noticed.. it's even love thy enemy !.. again no exceptions. end of discussion.

tobias   January 19th, 2008 6:01 am ET

Reading this as a European I find it quite scary how many people in America think the same as Huckabee and with how much hatred a lot of them seem to be filled... This wants to be the beacon of freedom yet it judges people on their sexuality ? I hate all this talk about America being the best country of the world, the country of the free and equal.. and then this.. arrogant and ignorant are the only words coming to my mind. In Britain people like Elton John and Graham Norton are national icons. Spain, one of the most catholic countries in Europe legalized gay marriage. It's hipocracy that fuels anti-american-sentiment. Anyone looking from the outside must think that this is a religiously-fundamentalist country.. and therefore dangerous – because it preaches one thing (bringing freedom to everyone) but then does the opposite (being intolerant and acting only out of own interest).

I have lived in America and learned to love it for its opportunities and inspiration.. but it scares me !!!

Eli   January 19th, 2008 4:59 am ET

It is ironic that Huckabee is running on his religion, when just about three weeks ago he slipped an anti-Mormon comment into an interview with a New York Times magazine reporter (obviously trying to leverage religion against Mitt Romney.)

I'm not a fan of either of them, but In other words, the Gospel according to Huck is that his religion is a reason to vote for him, but anybody else's religion is a weakness to be exploited.

Chryssta   January 19th, 2008 4:23 am ET

I don't remember which comment said it, but Evolution is a farce. God made each and every one of us Himself. He is the one who decides how we are born, and what we are born to do, and how we are born to live. Only God can decide what our beginning will be. It is our choice for what our end will be.

HOWEVER! That is not to say that some of us are not born gay. Many Americans are born missing vital genetic keys in their DNA that makes them straight. Many more have a hormone imbalance. And fewer others have no natural hormones to speak of, and therefore have to rely on pills to tell them how to grow. These people are NATURALLY born bi. This is not a choice they make, but a decision God makes for them. How the bi people grow up is left to society. Once in awhile though, someone is born fully gay. It's not evolution, or sin that does this, but instead, it's the way they are born.

And something else. What is this guy thinking when he states that basically "just because you're gay, doesn't mean you have to live the gay life"??? Am I the only one that read it that way? How can you expect a gay man or woman to simply not love anyone just because you don't agree, Huckabee? I mean, seriously?

Everyone has the God given right to love and be loved by someone. Who are you to decide who they should love? Last time I checked you weren't God. I'd know if you were, because I don't recall ever speaking to you when I'm feeling lonely, or need someone to talk to. I speak to God for that. You Mike Huckabee, you're just a sad little man with a god complex.

Sally   January 19th, 2008 3:32 am ET

Everyone posting here came from one man and one woman.

So shut up. Unless you hate your own parents.

P P Hernandez, Sunset, Republic of Louisiana   January 19th, 2008 3:10 am ET

I have heard of Homorsexuals, but people don't really do that do they? Come on that's just sick.

N Doehler   January 19th, 2008 3:02 am ET

Solomon had a thousand wives. Was he a liberal?

J   January 19th, 2008 3:02 am ET

Sodomites and their supporters are amongst the most sanctimonious self-righteous small-minded amoral and intolerant of people, who are so pre-occupied with their addictive behaviour, that they refuse to acknowledge its destructive perverse and deadening influence in their lives and on society in general. Do yourself and us all a favour, open your eyes to the muck you are wallowing in, and seek help.

EntertainMeDontBoreMe   January 19th, 2008 2:57 am ET

Hucklety Bucklety sat on a wall...
Hucklety Bucklety had a great fall.
God and His angels are taking great pains -
But still they can't mend our poor Hucklety's brains.

Teddy   January 19th, 2008 2:32 am ET

Way to go brother Huckabee! Tell the truth like it is to the whole Country. They need to hear the truth, we sure don't get it from the news media. And some of the responders on this news story prove that the truth has to be told. Some people think anything goes to day. But some day the USA will have to pay the price for this immoral behavior accepted by the liberals in our Country. God help us all when that day comes. And it might be sooner than we all think. Give your life to Jesus Christ the Son of God while you still have time left. May God continue to bless the USA despite all the nasty and immoral things that go on here. There is still hope, hope in Christ. Amen!

Michael V   January 19th, 2008 1:53 am ET

Why?
Why would I want to support a candidate who discriminates against its own citizens of the United States?
"A house divided against itself will fall"
Dont discriminate = Educate

Jerry   January 19th, 2008 1:46 am ET

Just when I thought Huckabee couldn't go and do anything dumber, he does something like this........ And totally redeems himself!!!

Has anyone seen a candidate self destruct worse than this? Maybe Howard Dean 8 years ago but I still think Huckabee will be the whipping boy in SNL skits for years to come.

If anyone wants to judge the sexual preference of others then feel free to cast the first stone. Where is this man's advisor's?

issa   January 19th, 2008 1:45 am ET

I'd rather vote for someone who is courageous and honest enough to speak his mind and stand by what he believes. Most Politicians will lie and will tell you what they think you want to hear in order to get elected but deep down inside they know that they don't agree with gay marriage. I don't believe Huckabee hates gays. He is however against gay marriage. Don't hate him for being honest. He's still free to speak his mind.

Independent and will vote for Huckabee!

jcd5150   January 19th, 2008 1:04 am ET

Excuse me, David's ignorance had my brain working faster than my hands,
s/b
See, that's why this country is SCREWED up!

Truth   January 19th, 2008 1:03 am ET

It's well documented that all straight men have secret sexual longings for their young daughters. Mike Huckabee's logic would most certainly support this tenet. Because men are slaves to their primal male urges, it follows Huckster Philosophy that if all gay men are pedophiles because it is part of their nature, then all straight men have to be lusting after all young girls, including their own daughters. It's a fact of life. There are no gray areas. There is only the Truth. Welcome to Huckabee's America!

Tim Calhoun '08, Moreno Valley, CA   January 19th, 2008 1:00 am ET

This guy is a consummate politican. The first couple times I heard him, I was almost taken in by his veneer of soft spoken eloquence, easy charm and witty one-liners. But all that is disguising an extremely theocratic right wing agenda that his hip bass player image can't hide.

Huckabee has also said that AIDS patients should be quarantined and homosexuals present a significant health risk. When confronted with these comments a while back he refused to distance himself from them.

Anyone who says the Constitution needs to be amended to be in accordance with God's word (which has been debated by theologians for centuries) needs to be kept away from the Oval Office at all costs.

issa   January 19th, 2008 12:55 am ET

<>

Exactly! The media is so bias!!!

James Brown ( Independent )   January 19th, 2008 12:10 am ET

Huckabee is the only Republican i would vote for , i like his ideas.

S R Morrison   January 18th, 2008 11:06 pm ET

As a non-American, watching your election process, hopefully, for America, (and the world) "mainstream America" has more gays and lesbians than bigots. The gays by nature of their lives appear more open minded, progressive, informed and for the most part tolerant of others (racially, spiritually, culturally). Bigots well, they want to force their minority opinions, myopic views and lack of compassion on all, to protect their narrow diminishing world. If it is not a reflection of the America during the Eisenhower administration, "it ain't Red, White and Blue".

On a side note:
Wouldn't it be wonderful to watch democracy in action if, by convention time2 or 3 or even 4 candidates still had a shot at the big race for each party, the conventions would be conventions not coronations

Irvin Baxter   January 18th, 2008 10:50 pm ET

Amendments against same-sex marriage were on 7 or 8 ballots during the 2004 elections. They were approved 100 percent of the time by large margins. Those who think Gov. Huckabee will hurt himself by standing against gay marriage are not being honest. The candidates that don't take this stance are the ones who will sustain damage.

Steve, Cedar Rapids, Iowa   January 18th, 2008 10:42 pm ET

I am tired of these holier than thou people trying to tell others how to live. Remember these are statements from a mna who's pary has always crowed about being the party of less government and less inference in people's lives. What a bunch of hyprocrites!

randy   January 18th, 2008 10:36 pm ET

i can be a very understanding citizen BUT not when i read some of the comments above. we all can vote once and that's it. we all have to make choices good or bad ones. then we are responsible for them. how glad i am that men can make bad choices, with eternal consequences, then be forgiven by GOD.

Cody   January 18th, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Huckabee, there are a lot of things that I disagree with you on, but I admire the fact that you aren't dancing around the issue. It is nice to know where a canidate stands on an issue.

WAKE UP   January 18th, 2008 10:18 pm ET

I think it is pretty clear that everyone should marry people of opposite sex. I mean just think about it. Can a man and a man reproduce? let me guess DUH!!!! NO!!! gay marriage is not right, after all, GOD CREATED ADAM AND EVE, NOT ADAM AND STEEVE. Gay marriage is taking the disrespect towards God and Humanity itself to a whole another level. If things happen to be the way they are, thats how they are supposed to be, so if you are born man, your supposed to be man and reproduce with another woman. I'm not a scientist or anything but you can only reproduce with a person of the opposite sex. Plus this country is already too spoiled with so many rights, adding another outrageous right to the society is just going to make it worst. Also, it is disconfortable to be around homosexuals, why??? because it's not human, its like two irratinal idiots trying to figure out how life should be. So where society going to be with fewer reproduction of babies. everything has a purpose and the purpose of a male and a female is to love and reproduce, so why don't you people make use of your purpose.

randy   January 18th, 2008 10:04 pm ET

in the begining GOD created man(adam) and woman(eve).

if you are a believer in CHRIST JESUS, then you also must believe that HE came as our sacrfice to save us from our sins. if you believe that then you must also believe the rest of the bible too.

Mr. Huckabee I will vote for you and pray for the souls of all Americans regardless of their disregaurd for your christian beliefs.

NoHuck   January 18th, 2008 10:01 pm ET

No special rights for the homosexuals! Marriage = 1 man and 1 woman only.

A Homosexual has the same rights as everyone esle, to marry a member of the opposite sex. But this does not limit their rights as an American. Keeping the government out of the bed room doesnt mean you have to allow Fred and Bill to register at Macys.

That being said, Huckabee if a fool. You can make your point about whats wrong and right for the country as a whole without offending a large portion of the population. The man is a tax and spend-liberal-prolife-big government-flipflop-pandering-facist. I find him slightly more dangerous to our future than Obama or Clinton. He has broke every ethics rules as governor of Arkansas, flipflop almost daily on issues, and has ben a horrible father to his own kids. I can not trust a man whose 17 year old son hung a dog from a tree and shot it with a rifle. He did this infront of a dozed 11-13year olds. Mike Huckabee had the investigator fired.

I will vote for ANY rebulican over Obama and Clinton in Nov except Huck. He is unacceptable. I will actually leave the republican party, I dislike him that much.
Duncan Hunter is my #1, Mitt Romney #2, Fred Thompson#3, Rudy#4, John McAmesty#5 ......Huck, NEVER.

Val Davydov, MA   January 18th, 2008 9:58 pm ET

It is very a sensitive subject to discuss (if not one of the most sensitive of our times) and yet we have to learn to respect and appreciate each other views without calling names and getting angry. This issues is dividing America in very dramatic way – I wish we never had to discuss it, but it is facing us and we should try to have a dialogue about it in most humane and compassionate manner.

I am not a Huckabee supporter at all (far from it actually), but I too believe that Mainstream America supports sanctity of marriage as union between one man and one woman.

Bo   January 18th, 2008 9:54 pm ET

i would think that normal, moderate christians would be embarassed by this guy and his statements of hatred. someone quoted an interesting passage from the bible to justify hatred against gays:

"Corinthians 6:9-10 – "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God." "

so anyone's who's ever cheated, stole something, gotten drunk, slandered someone, like huckabee himself has just done, or been greedy is going to hell and should have a constitutional amendment banning them from getting married?
GREAT! WHAT'S NEXT?!

and i highly doubt that this passage is correct – the word homosexual did not exist then and in fact, the bible only addresses male homosexuality, so lesbians aren't committing any sin and are still going to heaven so, according to the word of god, they can still get married. Yey!

Slim   January 18th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

um, correct me if i'm wrong, but no one wants to change the defintion of marriage. they just want the same rights as straight couples – i don't think gays care how it's defined as long as it's deifintion isn't used against them to deny them equal rights, which is exactly what huck plans to do.

what a backward pandering wierdo.

Steven in Charleston, SC   January 18th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

To MVDietrich:

First, the ~majority~ doesn't agree with Mr. Huckabee:

***80%+ of Americans support the passage of ENDA

***70%+ of Americans support the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and allowing our gay and lesbian soldiers to serve honesty and openly

***65%+ of Americans believe that gay and lesbian couples should have their relationships respected and acknowledged

Second, you are correct that if everyone on the planet were gay, procreation would become difficult. However it is also true that if every single person on the planet DID procreate to their maximum ability, we would overpopulate the planet to the point of its destruction. So, you see, both straight AND gay are necessary to the success of the planet.

winnie   January 18th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

This is America and there is no place for prejudice toward any law abiding citizen. There are bigger fish to fry in this election then to attack or ridicule someone on sexual orientation. Love thy neighbor- we don't choose our neighbor, but can open our hearts and minds to differences.

David, Gilbert Arizona   January 18th, 2008 9:03 pm ET

Ask the majority of married men that hit on me to explain how gay people keep being born every year.

The Observer   January 18th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

Mr. Richard (Modest European Observer):

Do not be too dismayed with the contents of some of the posts on this blog. What appears to have happened is a complete misinterpretation of just what Governor Huckabee in fact said.

As is not too unseldom in this country of YouTubettes, instant messengers, cyberphonetic acronyms, persons whose entire education seems to have been derived from Wikipedia or Google, and many who have obviously flawed keyboards, Huckabee's words have been misquoted, misread, misunderstood, or just plain taken out of the context of his whole statement, and readers are extrapolating via ad hominem to equating same sex marriage to infer causal bestiality. Obviously a hot topic, and guaranteed to rile the natives.

As is not too infrequently, especially during our hallowed primary season, passions flare, tempers are lost, and some of the most non-sequitur exhibitions of logic obtain.

What would alarm me more would be absolute apathy. It is healthy for the body politic to express their views so that their beliefs can crystallize prior to casting their votes. It is also good to test one's beliefs and convictions before an entire country to see if they make sense, and to receive feedback should they be incongruent. Unfortunately, some comments are rants. There are also some exceptional analyses provided, and some most pithy comments of the highest drollery. It is indeed a spectacle to behold.

As I stated earlier: "...We have forgotten the one thing that makes us the strongest nation in the world- we are Americans, and we are unique amongst all people on the globe. When pressed, our collective strength rests in our diversity coupled with unity of purpose. We can achieve what no other country can. We are still the best. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and so on, but first Americans."

Calm yourself, my astute friend, all is well in America, and there is nothing that a good election won't calm.

Another Humble Observer

Chris DC   January 18th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Jeffrey (to Jim, TLC, and even Susan from Atlanta)

Very well put. This is how the country will fall – with incessant and unnecessary bickering, divisive issues that distracts the country to fight the REAL problems – poverty, terrorism, ignorance, bigotry, illiteracy and lack of family values.

What we need in this country is Civility, Respect, Diversity and freedom of Choice. Why would we elect a Leader that oozes with hatred instead of uniting us all?

The Observer   January 18th, 2008 8:51 pm ET

Blind:

Same here. You have to admit this blog has garnered a great deal of messages. I think the are behind in their posting. Hope so.

Steven in Charleston, SC   January 18th, 2008 8:47 pm ET

Chad,

You pose the question: "Who decides what is right and wrong?"

It's a fair question. And the answer is complicated by the fact that we (the citizens of this great nation) adhere to different religions, philosophies, and moral codes, and I think most people agree we need the freedom to do so.

So how about this.......how about we decide, as a nation, that unless your choices are seriously and severely infringing upon the rights of another, that you get to decide for YOURSELF what is right and wrong for YOUR life? And that the rest of us will respect and honor your decision, even if we don't agree with it? Does that philosophy not honor our nation's promise of "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness?"

Respecting the committment the two guys next door have made to each other takes nothing away from you. But making them adhere to your moral code takes EVERYTHING away from them.

David, Gilbert Arizona   January 18th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

I guess the CNN moderator had decided it's okay for the religious right wing to bash gay people but God forbid someone show just how hypocritical the entire argument is. The moderator probably eats bacon and doesn't want to admit it's against Biblical law.

mvdietrich   January 18th, 2008 8:24 pm ET

Make everyone on the planet homosexual then ask the next generation how it went?

mvdietrich   January 18th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

If a view is held by a majority how can it be considered radical?

blind   January 18th, 2008 8:13 pm ET

What is going on with CNN? For the second time this week my comments have been "moderated" and deleted. No cursing, slander, anger, just educated and valid points or debate like all the others here. What gives? This is a joke!

John Michael Meredith   January 18th, 2008 7:51 pm ET

This is in response to Brittany from TN. How dare you compare homosexuality to pedophilia? There is no link or comparison drawn remotely between the two. If one would take regard for current statistics you would notice that 3/4 male pedophiles do NOT consider themselves homosexual. More than likely, they have been married, had girlfriends, etc. Moreover, these comments are a pure example of cafeteria christians. You pick and choose what you want to use and follow. I most often hear that its the Old Testament, therefore, you are not to "follow' its guidelines as seriously. However, you seem to think its okay to criticize others. I totally agree with Frank. God Bless!

The Observer   January 18th, 2008 7:47 pm ET

Mr. Richard (Modest European Observer):

Do not be too dismayed with the contents of some of the posts on this blog. What appears to have happened is a complete misinterpretation of just what Governor Huckabee in fact said.

As is not too unseldom in this country of YouTubettes, instant messengers, cyberphonetic acronyms, persons whose entire education seems to have been derived from Wikipedia or Google, and many who have obviously flawed keyboards, Huckabee's words have been misquoted, misread, misunderstood, or just plain taken out of the context of his whole statement, and readers are extrapolating via ad hominem to equating same sex marriage to infer causal bestiality. Obviously a hot topic, and guaranteed to rile the natives.

As is not too infrequent, especially during our hallowed primary season, passions flare, tempers are lost, and some of the most non-sequitur exhibitions of logic obtain.

What would alarm me more would be absolute apathy. It is healthy for the body politic to express their views so that their beliefs can crystallize prior to casting their votes. It is also good to test one's beliefs and convictions before an entire country to see if they make sense, and to receive feedback should they be incongruent. Unfortunately, some comments are rants. There are also some exceptional analyses provided, and some most pithy comments of the highest drollery. It is indeed a spectacle to behold.

As I stated earlier: "...We have forgotten the one thing that makes us the strongest nation in the world- we are Americans, and we are unique amongst all people on the globe. When pressed, our collective strength rests in our diversity coupled with unity of purpose. We can achieve what no other country can. We are still the best. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and so on, but first Americans."

Calm yourself, my astute friend, all is well in America, and there is nothing that a good election won't calm.

Another Humble Observer

Joe   January 18th, 2008 7:45 pm ET

Roy B Says that : "The fruits of a heterosexual relationship are children, taxpayers, soldiers, etc"

Homosexuals are also the fruit of a heterosexual relationship...It takes 2 straights to make a gay!!!! So by his logic we homosexuals ARE ok!! Hey thanks Roy.

.

nathan   January 18th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

This guy is totally killing his chances. America will not accept this type of discriminatory slandering of human rights.

Coexist   January 18th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

What is sad is that probably the majority of the people stating that the idea of gays getting married is "immoral" according to the Bible have probably been "immoral" themselves at some point...pre-marital sex, divorce, lustful, greedy...whatever...the list could go on and on.

And for those taking the bible literally, word for word...

How about Leviticus 19:28...Gotten a tattoo lately?
"Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves. I am the Lord."

How about Exodus 31:15...ever work on a Sunday?
"For 6 days, work is to be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of rest, holy to the Lord. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must be put to death."

Well if you have sinned...do you follow the bible literally as stated in Matthews 5:29-30:
"If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell."

This is another list that could go on and on...the point is that the Bible is not meant as a literal interpretation. It was written thousands of years ago and I think it is fair to say that times have changed just slightly. I certainly don't want a president that will rule the country I live in according to the text from thousands of years ago. Gays being able to marry will hurt no one. I am a straight woman that has no desire to have kids. Does that mean I am not allowed to get married...since the argument tends to be that the point of marriage is to procreate?

Samuel   January 18th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

I feel that Mr. Huckabee's comments were taken out of context. I do not feel that is what he meant. People are just trying to make up a story just to pick a fight with him. I am a christian and I believe what the bible says. You should leave your mother and father and cling to your wife! Also as Christians were are called to love and also to expalin inteligently what God's word is saying. No matter what you say or how you feel, God is still right about marriage. I want a man or woman running for political office to stand on morals and principles and tell the truth. This is still a country founded under one God (the Christian God and the bible).

Larry / Covington, Louisiana   January 18th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

A few facts, for those of you ready to dismiss and disrespect Christianity and then presume to take the liberty to define Biblical principles even though you lack knowledge and understanding:

(1) This nation was founded by individuals well-versed in Christianity, and by individuals who largely acknowledged a personal belief in God and a profound respect for Him.

(2) God’s guidance and blessings were sought.

(3) God was not shunned.

(4) Prayer was routinely exercised in public and political settings—strongly suggesting therefore that matters of faith were not to be relegated only to strictly religious settings.

(5) There was no religious test for holding or denying office.

(6) There was to be no state-sponsored or mandated religion.

(7) This nation—it’s government—was not considered an evangelical tool.

Okay?

Jay   January 18th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

I guess you gotta tone down the anti-Huckabee comments otherwise the CNN moderators will nix your opinions. Even without profanity, so I guess we know where they stand.

The point is this guy is trying to play God buy restricting our God given free will.

The constitution has always been to protect our rights while this candidate will use it to take away our rights.

I've said it before and I'll say it again I as a man have no right to tell a woman what she can and can't do with her body. If God does not like it then they will have to face it then end. It is not Mike Huckabee's place to choose when, where and how we use our free will.

That's the whole idea behind free will. God gave it to us to see what we would do with it. Right, wrong or indifferent you can't play God and decide for others.

LAguy   January 18th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

For a while Ole Huck was apparently pulling a fast one by making himself appear not to be a Christian Right Wing Nut. Looks like he's starting to slip, both mentally and politically. The only thing I'm angry about is that he did it so soon. I knew it was inevitable but hoped it wouldn't come out until it was too late and he was the Repub nominee and then the Dems would have had an easy ride in November. Now he has no chance when he goes nationwide on February. Oh well, there's always Romney.

Prayu   January 18th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

To be honest, I don't give a flying foozle what the Bible says. And our Constitution supports that right, as well as the right to not have laws based on a religion forced upon me.

If Huckabee personally believes that abortion and gay marriage are wrong... then that's fine. However, to want to make it illegal through an Amendment because of what the Bible says? That is not just wrong, but it is a distortion and betrayal of the beliefs of our Founding Fathers.

jdcma   January 18th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

Concerned Therapist   January 18th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

I find it ironic for a group of people to gang up on a minority such as LGBT folks. What makes them so threatening to you? Would you hate your mother or father if they came out to you as being LGBT? Are you afraid they will ruin your "Sanctity of Marriage"? Sorry to burst your bubble but you guys have done it for yourself. Over 50% of FIRST marriages end up divorce and it only increases for each preceeding marriage... Ohh.. And the Catholics out there.... Are you having sex outside of marriage or having sex for pleasure and not for procreation... STOP pointing your fingers unless they are clean. I would reread that bible you hold so strongly too. We are all allowed our opinions but it is amendments like the one against LGBT people that reminds me of NAZI germany.. Oh yea, you forget Hitler the guy who thought jews, blacks, lgbt are subhuman.

Nancye, Gaithersburg MD   January 18th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

Richard:
Bravo! I'm in 100% agreement with you! America is sooooo far behind many European countries, it's pretty sad in my opinion. Thank you for your wonderfully written comment!

Hopefully one day the people of this country will come to their senses & stop the hate towards gay people in the name of christianity. Seperate Church and State!

Chad   January 18th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

I am not a Huckabee supporter. But, I have to say I totally agree with him. If we need to be "open-minded" enough to allow people of the same sex to get married, then maybe we should be "open-minded" enough to allow people to marry whoever or whatever they want and how many of that they want. I guess the bottom line is, who gets to decide what is totallay repulsive? And, who gets to decide what we should be open-minded to and what we should shun? And, who gets to decide when something is just prejudice and stereotype or when something is just flat-out sinful? Who is to say for the world what is right or what is wrong? Is God? Because, I think He did answer this question in the Bible. So, the easy thing for people who don't like that scenario is to not believe in God. So, then, what all-powerful, all-wise person is to tell us what is right and wrong? Can a person say for the world what is right and what is wrong? Should we abdicate our own free will and conscience, our own ability to discern right from wrong, to another human being-another person of flesh and blood-someone as capable of being wrong as you or me? This is foolishness. There is a God. He loves us all despite our sins and our weaknesses. But, I think He made it clear in the Bible that homosexuality is a sin. Therefore, as Huckabee pointed out, it is wrong for a man to marry a man similaryly as it is wrong for a man to marry a dog. And, one last question: why is homosexuality ok, but polygamy is so disgusting? I mean, it's not like most people are monogamous today anyway. I think they're both wrong. But, I just wonder, who decides what is right and wrong? I think it is time for our country to re-think our values. Huckabee is right on the money this time.

jdcma   January 18th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

This guy is a NAZI. If he is elected, I'm moving to the UK because this country will have lost its mind.

Terry, El Paso, TX   January 18th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Rob Hunter JR – "I don't have anything against the gays but If same sex marriages were o.k. or if the idea that two of the same gender could be together romantically was o.k. then they should be able to procreate, right? "

That seems a little silly to me Rob. I married my second wife when we were both a bit over the hill. I had had a vasectomy and she was menopausal. There is no chance for us to have children. We always thought our marriage was legal because we have a certificate of marriage from the state of New Mexico, not because she is fertile.

If you think that God hates gay sex play, then let God enforce His rules Himself. He should not need you to pick up the slack for Him.

Now everybody in America who believes in one of our many many religious faiths believes that his group is the only group that knows the truth. But, no two of them can agree on the interpretation of a single verse in the Bible.

There are more verses in the Bible that condemn the eating of pork than condemn male-to-male sex play. Before we pass an amendment to the Constitution that condemns gay marriage, I propose one that would condemn the eating of pigs. Why do you think Hurricane Katrina damaged the pork-eating South? Now I'm not making this up. I'm just telling you what the Bible says. Let me also point out that there is NO verse in the Bible condemning lesbianism, so you should have no objection to two women getting married, should you?

I figure if two law abiding adult Americans wish to engage in a lawful activity in the privacy of their home, who are we to say no? If we're going to start passing laws telling people how to behave in their own homes, then I propose an law which says that every overweight man is forbidden to watch sports on TV and must spend that time exercising at a gym instead. Tit for tat, it seems to me.

If two a

Kevin   January 18th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

MAM said – "I am an independent moderate who lives in a small community where just about every day another house is up for sale either because the family cannot make the mortgage payments any more or the senior couple living there cannot afford the ever-increasing taxes. Where the jobs that are available for parents to raise their families are in the retail sector and are for minimum wage. Where those of us who do have health care still have to wait to find out if it is okay to get the test or the treatment. Where our men and women in the military are coming back suffering from PTSD or have lost their legs or a part of their skull and brain. So lowest on my list is to care whether the law-abiding adults in the house next to mine who are in a loving relationship are of the same sex and if they want to get married…let's let them…I bet it would help with the property and school taxes. Talk to me about real across the board lobbying reform in Washington DC so my vote and voice can actually count and improving diplomatic relations so there is no more US cowboy diplomacy and stopping the flow of US company jobs to other countries so college-educated people arent folding sweaters for a living at the local Old Navy…and don't even pretend to be someone who can be the president for all the citizens of the US if you want to deny freedom to some of our citizens."

YES MAM!

Frank   January 18th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

There they go again! The Christians are picking and choosing a few pages or a couple of paragraphs from the bible to substantiate their hatred and stupidity. How can they sit in church and hear what Jesus had to "say" about love and kindness, and then spit their acidic words and deeds against anyone who disagree with them. Gays are born from supposedly straight fathers and mothers. What makes a gay person gay? Seems it comes from the parents, maybe.

Blind   January 18th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

The Bible explicitly states that this is wrong! Clear as day, PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT RACE shouldn't be allowed to marry. ("They have taken some of their daughters as wives for themselves and their sons, and have mingled the holy race with the peoples around them. And the leaders and officials have led the way in this unfaithfulness." Ezra 9:10-12) It is an abomination! People, read your Bible and absorb its infallible truths! I don't get why Americans are so resistant to letting us show them the light. Life is so much better when you don't question logic. Thinking too much gets way to confusing! Let's let Huckabee tell us how it's done. I mean, he's done such a great job running Arkansas and raising his great family and all. God wants us all the be exactly the same (nevermind the incredible diversity in nature he created). Now that I think about it, maybe God wants us all to be communist. Then we'd truly all be the same and think the same! How grand!

Of course I'm being sarcastic. Sadly, many of the comments are just as or more logically absurd as this one. The Bible/Christianity has been used for centuries to deny minorities (women, blacks, etc) majority rights. What's the difference now? Hopefully just one of you will get the point.

Tannim   January 18th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

One last detail: homosexual behavior is normal and common in all animals in nature, including the human animal. Human are the only animals that have this morality thing that at times goes against the norms of the nature that God created.

Rob Hunter JR   January 18th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

I don't have anything against the gays but If same sex marriages were o.k. or if the idea that two of the same gender could be together romantically was o.k. then they should be able to procreate, right? But they can't. One of the most beautiful things you can do with someone that you love is to be able to create life. You can't do that in any same sex situation. Therefore they should not be able to get married either. Whatever you do behind close doors is your business but stop trying to institutionalize your out of the norm lifestyle. Huckabee didn't make the rules, GOD DID!!!!!!!! You can't hold that against Hucakbee.

Richard   January 18th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

As a European, I am just an modest observer, but when it comes to these kind of debates, I wonder how some of the people here still dare to say they defend the US values and religion.

I read the term abomination and references to sexual practices that are qualified with words I don't want to repeat....and then I see the values of private life and liberty fading away.

I see the expression (notice the verb) "I don't believe in gay marriage", and I see the neutrality of politics versus religion fading even further away in the US...

I hear people insulting over fellow american citizens for their nature (not even mentioning the debate over marriage, which is another issue), and I see the very first line of the human rights declaration ignored.

How come an analysis of the Bible in details accept such hate, which should be incompatible with real religious people? How come some people be extremist enough, to feel their own personal belief is to infringe liberty of other citizens?

Mr. Huckabee doesn't scare me, but some of his ideas of moral values (namely hate) seam more and more widespread among republicans (by that, in no way, I refer to the economic or political ideas of the party, which I totally respect).

The bottom line is I am scared. I would not like the US to become a christian country – which doesn't mean that the US should forget its christian origins – which would led to a religious war, instead of a – justified or not – political war against islamic countries.
It goes even further, I am afraid that the US and Europe may have less and less in common. On a continent where very religious peoples have (in their majority) no problem with abortion and gay marriage (Spain, Belgium...), people are failing more and more to understand what's happening over the atlantic.

Some people here may feel their hate is a rightful fight for moral values, and may answer to my comment that Europe is decadent; I see however no decadence in respecting the people next door, and in allowing the freedom to live happily. In any case, and in my modest opinion, I am becoming more and more proud not to be an American.... freedom is there, on the good old continent, only.

Don't get me wrong, this is very sad, and I sincerely hope the majority of Americans will prove me wrong!

Joeley Reno, Nevada   January 18th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Huckabee is a looser and will never be anything but a looser.

His holier than thou BS does not resonate on Main Street America and he will soon again be a preacher man spewing hate and divisive puke to those who choose to listen instead of a candidate for President

This guy makes George Bush look like the second comming!

Huckabee will soon be Huckabye-bye.

Looser Looser Looser.

Diane   January 18th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Religious zealots are every bit as dangerous when they're American as when they're Iraqi or Saudi Arabian... do we want his righteous little finger on the button?

Diane   January 18th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

Gomer Pyle.
We're just moving past a president who doesn't read. Do we really need a president who thinks the earth is 6,000 years old?

Robert Burns   January 18th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

I don't see "Huckleberry" any more equating gay marriage with bestiality than with marriage of "a man and three women". Let's be fair when we disagree.

Capt Lou, Jersey   January 18th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

Absolute brillance, Greg

Minnah   January 18th, 2008 6:10 pm ET

Huckabee seems like such a warm-hearted man and his opinions are very reasonable and healthy.

John G, New York, NY   January 18th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

Adam,

You have brilliantly presented the TRULY classic conservative viewpoint: 1) That government should stay out of regulating our personal lives and 2) That, unless we are ready to start codifying every religion into our laws – we need to dispassioantely afford everyone civil rights regardless of religious bias.

Unfortunately, far too many so-called conservatives are ready to embrace the first of the two principles in order to ensure their freedom to act out in a discriminatory fashion without repercussions. They forget that true conservatives also believe that the preservation of individual civil liberties, absent of imposing religious beliefs through the law, is also essential.

I don't share your views entirely, however – as a classic liberal I also think that there is a role for government to actively play in improving the lives of its citizens – via education, housing, healthcare, environmental protection, fair treatment in the workplace, etc.

That having been said, however, if I were in Congress...I'd enjoy having you across the aisle. Perhaps you are one of the growing crowd of Obama Republicans!

jm24   January 18th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

Phenom – Why would he want to go to a third world country ?? Most third world countries approve of same sex marriages, along with a host of other crazy ideas. That's why we like America!! Maybe you should go to the third world countries if you want to fit in. And take as many of your 'friends' with ya as possible!

Brian   January 18th, 2008 5:45 pm ET

Tracey, Bush is THAT radical. We are the laughing stock of the world, and he is our leader... god help us.

Kucinich 2008

Chris, Jacksonville   January 18th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

Jason, NYC

Thank you being so thorough and making sense.

A rare breed on these boards.

Kennedy Country   January 18th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

This man is a nut. He's entitled to his religious beliefs, what he is NOT entitled to do, is impose them on others.

He needs to worry about his jailbird kids and not worry about what 2 cosenting adults do.

There's nothing more hypocritical than a holier than thow bigot.

Vignesh   January 18th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Freedom of speech doesn't pick and choose. It applies EVERY WHERE all of the time. Estill has every right to state what he believes in as well as Huckabee. If you don't like it, deal with it. Its America. People do not need to be 100% political correct all of the time, freedom of speech means you are allowed to deviate from what people call "Politically Correct". So basically they have the right to say that, that is their opinion, and it is THEIR RIGHT! to state it. Now electing a person for president is quite a different matter, but freedom of speech defines our society.

If freedom of speech was not a part of our society don't you think that this "Gay" argument would not even have come up? Because during strong moments of the church they probably would have banned any pro gay speech.

So deal with it. Freedom of speech comes with the good and the bad.

Not to mention all of these reporters twist quotes to fit their opinions.

Tracey   January 18th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Wow...I'm a democrat and will likely never, ever vote for a Republican but I actually liked Mike Huckabee....until now...he is just a bit too radical. I know Bush is Christian (And so am I for that matter) but he's not this radical. People FLOCKED to the polls so that he would lock up gays and ban abortion, neither of which were a concern to him once he got in office. (He's too busy hunting down those "crazy terrorists" over there yonder) But Huckabee might actually get in office and spend more time worried about his religious agenda than real issues. Scary.

CitizenJ   January 18th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

Marriage is not a revocable priviledge. It is a right. And every human possesses that right, no matter if you are homosexual or not.

So God loves everyone.....unless you are gay. He also doesn't like murderers and theives, but we let them get married. Why don't we amend the constitution to restrict their marriage rights as well?

James Kennedy   January 18th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Huckabee's telling the truth, which is why I support him. A lot of others are as well, given his recent rise in the polls.

nessajennings   January 18th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

TO RICH:
The 'discriminating' in marriages that would draw a parallel to beastiality and homosexual unions... well, I could just cut on you for being pretty ridiculous and ignorant, but instead I'll say this:
When is the last time you heard a sheep go to a courthouse and tell them he wants rights to marry his farmer? Oh wait – Animals are not of the mental capacity to give consent let alone express the wishes fulfill the social commitment of marriage. Neither can kids. Neither can those in impaired comprehensive states and mentally handicapped.
That's why it is not the same. Two women in love, ready to support each other financially and emotionally, and spend the next 60 years together? Love is beautiful, and we are not to judge it.

What Huckabee said doesnt even matter, if you don't agree don't vote for him and do everything in your power to get someone to win. That's all you can do.

Ken, Dallas, TX   January 18th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Aren't we losing the distinction between allowing Huckabee to speak his views and allowing those views to rule the nation? Scripture does not support the idea that the civil law should be derived scripture; Christ himself says: "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and render unto God that which is God's." Here we find scriptural support, not for using the Bible as a template from which to rewrite the Constitution, but for separation of Church and State.

Whether or not Huckabee "equated" homosexuality with pedophilia, necrophilia, and bestiality, he clearly, openly, and insistently associates them together, and declares them "aberrations." It seems a quibble to debate whether or not classifying these subjects together is or is not "equating" them. If it looks like a skunk, walks like a skunk, and smells like a skunk, does it really need closer examination to find out whether or not it's really a skunk?

One more minor item: to those radical right-wing hypocrites who declare themselves to be "mainstream America," I, too, am "mainstream America," and you offend me by trying to make "mainstream America" into a badge of bigotry and shame.

I wonder sometimes how we came to this. American Christianity used to be our greatest proponents of liberalism, asserting that we should come together as a community and act in the name of Christian charity. Where are Christian charity and forbearance now that church leaders have decided forbearance is only for people who agree with them? Has American Christianity become apostate as a body, or is only the church hierocracy apostate?

If Huckabee gets his way, I don't think we'll be able to call ourselves a democracy any more.

Sean   January 18th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Thank you for so many of you proving Mr. Huckabee's point. For starters if we don't use the Bible as a guideline for morality, then what do we use? Our feelings? Because that is what most of you are suggesting. What if a murderer, who no doubt was born that way, didn't get to "choose" who they loved or hated, so they killed someone. Would you be so bigoted to not accept his feelings? Secondly what I think he is saying is that if we accept one change in marriage it will not be long until some minority stands up and says I want to marry my dog or my neighbor's 8 year old.

In response to some of the posts, To JIM ROB you are way off on most of your conclusions, read the whole Bible not just a verse here and there, and secondly we are under the N.T. now, not the old. To the poster who said they didn't want heteosexuality forced down their throats, how do you and your parents get along? To the poster who referenced Nazi Germany, please read your history books this is not even close. No one is suggesting killing people for the homosexual ways, they just don't want them to have the same marriage rights as heterosexuals, which is given tax breaks, and many other privileges. To the many who said God does not hate homosexuals. You are right he does not, and neither do I, and I don't think we can say the Mike Huckabee does either. We hate the sin of homosexuality, the perversion of a blessing that is supposed to be between a man and a woman as God designed it. It is the sin we hate, not the person.

Samara   January 18th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

All views dealing with homosexuality ultimately come down to the question of whether two human beings that love each other should be allowed to do so without being labeled as deviant or sinful. It wasn't so long ago that interracial marriages were "sinful". Although I know that Huckabee and his followers aren't going to change their opinion, they are getting older and will someday die out, leaving the younger generation to clear the air of hatred.
Although I can't imagine Huckabee ever becoming president, I know it certainly wouldn't change the way that I feel about my relationships with men OR women.

Jason NYC   January 18th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Hey Bill P. I looked it up. The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment (the first part) prohibits the establishment of a national religion by Congress or the preference of one religion over another, or religion over non-religion. While you would be correct in saying the actual phrase “separation of church and state” is not present in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, the concept is apparent in the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause. The Supreme Court has quoted this concept in many of it’s opinions.

You may want to look those up.

Phenom   January 18th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!!!!

HE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT OF POLITICS...WHAT A JOKE

I DO ENJOY MAKING FUN OF HIM...WOW, HE SHOULD BE IN BIG LOVE...WHAT A MORON...I HONESTLY CANT BELIEVE THEIR ARE STILL PEOPLE LIKE HIM LEFT IN THE WORLD...GO TO AFGHANISTAN OR SOME 3RD WORLD COUNTRY....ANYONE WHO SUPPORTS THIS FREAK SHOULD BE ASHAMED AND SPIT ON

Bob from Buffalo   January 18th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

To the religious zealots who believe this country to be a Christian theocracy founded upon biblical law, I beg of you to read a little American history. Do you think it was an accident that "God" is not once mentioned in our great Constitution. Do you know what the religious beliefs of Madison and Jefferson were?
The Treaty of Tripoli, signed in 1797, approved by Pres. J. Adams and ratified by the sentate stated "As the Government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." Let us look to the free exercise clause and establishment clause of the first amendment, as well as the 14th amendment, and your belief of a theocracy fall apart.
Thomas Jefferson, in1802, "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state."
Madison, in 1819, "The civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability, and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people, have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the State."
Pres. T. Roosevelt, "To discriminate against a thoroughly upright citizen because he belongs to some particular church, or because, like Abraham Lincoln, he has not avowed his allegiance to any church, is an outrage against that liberty of conscience which is one of the foundations of American life."
And JFK, "It is my firm belief that there should be separation of church and state in the United States–that is, that both church and state should be free to operate, without interference from each other in their respective areas of jurisdiction. We live in a liberal, democratic society which embraces wide varieties of belief and disbelief. There is no doubt in my mind that the pluralism which has developed under our Constitution, providing as it does a framework within which diverse opinions can exist side by side and by their interaction enrich the whole, is the most ideal system yet devised by man. I cannot conceive of a set of circumstances which would lead me to a different conclusion."

From our founding fathers, henceforth, we have never been a Christian nation. God bless the separation of church and state!

Brian - Ohio   January 18th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Does defining marriage in the constitution or not will fix the mortgage crisis, the economic debacle, will end the war in Iraq, will provide affordable health care to the millions of americans that don't have it???? I don't think so. Then why debating this issue as important for this election when there are so many important problems to solve in this country?

majoriot   January 18th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

If linking homosexuality with bestiality was not his intent, then why the reference?

The man is oboviously homophobic, his belief based on his adherence to certain religious doctrine.

Look closely, and you can see where the real problem is.

Nathan in Cali   January 18th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Since when is simply having a different opinion enough to label someone as a bigot? I agree that homosexuality is not "normal" sexual behavior, and I don't need religion to tell me that. Just look at the body parts. It is not natural or normal for men to be with men, women with women, adults with children, or people with animals. And just because you and I may disagree does not make either of us any less a citizen or any less protected by our nation's laws, nor does it make either of us a bigot or a pervert.

Isn't it interesting in a nation whose people supposedly pride themselves in being free to express themselves and free to speak what they believe, we have a whole segment of our society who does not want to hear opposing views. They label people as bigots, racists, backwards, snakes, closeminded, etc, just because they express a different view. I'm concerned that the left-wing liberals, who cry out for freedom of speech (so long as what you say is acceptable to them), will eventually push through a law that will censor what citizens can say by labeling opinions they disagree with as "hate speech." This is one of many reasons not to elect liberals to Congress or the Presicency.

Personally, I applaud Huckabee for speaking openly and honestly, and I hope that gay marriage is never accepted in this nation. Not because of some religious ideology, but because marriage is an traditional institution and I do not believe we should open the door to changing the definition of marriage to suit whatever lifestyle might be in fashion at the time. That's not to say that homosexuals should not be offered every protection under the law that any other citizen is offered, but we don't need to change the definition of marriage to accomplish that. Civil unions are just as effective.

So please, stop all the name calling and accept the fact that we live in a nation where people have different views on many topics, and just because someone expresses a different view does not make them a bigot. Also, please stop twisting people's words to make it appear that they said something which they clearly did not. Huckabee never equated homosexuality to bestiality, and shame on you for saying that he did. Just read his entire quote and you will see he clearly did not make any such assertion. Maybe this kind of misrepresentation is simply an indictment against our education system, because it appears that some folks simply cannot follow a logical thought from point A to point B without getting lost along the way.

Finally, I share Huckabee's views, and you will not find one person on this earth (regardless of race or religion) who would even think to call me a bigot – although I'm sure many of you close minded liberals certainly will, and shame on you if you do!

mike c.   January 18th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Dear Observer,

I appreciate your breath of integrity...and amen.

Mike

Steve   January 18th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Is there a law or regulation in existence that some one hasn't tried to bend or change to their needs? Homosexuality today and bestiality tomorrow seems like a natural progression.

West Palm Beach   January 18th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

Not to answer FOR Ft. Myers, but it's not about a calendar, it's about a day. Noted above, more than our answer, but Jesus's answer to the exact question when posed by the Pharisees. They wanted to Kill Him for "working" on the Sabbath as well. Jesus's answer: John 7:23Now if a child can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing the whole man on the Sabbath?" You get the idea.

Death for lawbreaking was just a smokescreen to smoke out someone they didn't agree with – Son of God. Not a new argument at all.

Jacob   January 18th, 2008 4:16 pm ET

Why don't we just keep it simple? As an American, I should have the right to marry whoever I choose to. If a straight man/woman can marry any woman/man from around the world that they want to, then a gay man/woman should be able to do the same thing. It's called being an American.

Javier, Fort Worth TX   January 18th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

I wrote a cogent response to the ethical implications of homosexuality, and I would like to know why the moderator allows Christians to be accused of all types of horrors but didn't post my response?

Bill P Charlotte, NC   January 18th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

I get a laugh at all the people rallying behind 'seperation of Church and state.' Have any of you read the actual text in the Constitution? It was set up as freedom from government applying laws restricting religions, not keeping religion out of government. Look it up.

Christina-Dalton-Westfall   January 18th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

AMEN Doug...wonderful comment!

Michael Wesson   January 18th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

It's unfortunate that a presidential candidate who tells the truth has to get so much bad publicity for standing up for what is right.

America needs to have God back in charge. Huckabee is as close as we're going to get.

Sam the man   January 18th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

I don't care for Huckabee. I find him to be a religious bigot who plays dirty politics to win instead of saying what he thinks...
BUT...I think this was taken out of context. It seems clear to me that Huckabee is refering to his concern that loosening the definition of marriage to include homosexual relationships is part of a general decline in appreciation for the sanctity of marriage.

Barb   January 18th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

Huckabee is right.
If you give people an inch, they want a mile.

InBoise   January 18th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

the notion that Huck was equating homosexuality to beastiality is totally false. Huck was saying that once you change the definition of marriage to include two men or two women you're opening a can of worms and making it very easy for those nuts who are beastists to look at the new definition and say hey we're in love i deserve to be married to this bear.

by the way with over 80% of americans being christian i'm guessing that homosexuality is not widely acceptable in the states

Adam   January 18th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

I don't understand what he is thinking, in fact i don't understand the problem here with two people of the same sex getting married. SO WHAT!!! We teach our children that marriage is between two people who are in love...that is the point Love, not what sex the partners are. This kind of thinking reeks of hate, and misunderstanding...

MDMurphyLA   January 18th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

I am not sure what scares me more, the idea of Huckabee as President, or some of the comments I have read in here.

Huckabee lost me when he said that all Americans with AIDS and HIV should be quarantined. That was in 1992 when we knew full well that it could not be spread through casual contact.

Huckabee is not just a bigot, he believes in ethnic and religious cleansing all in honor of his supposedly loving God.

Fred   January 18th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

Since we are so into challenging peopels religious beliefs...why don't we challenge what Obama believes? Why don't we ask him about his church. I'm a white guy who loves America...can I belong to his church? Answers to those questions ought to be asked and he should have to explain why he believes the way he does.

Jimmy   January 18th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Romney is not about having 4 wives and anyone that says so is clueless. Hope it makes you feel good to say things that are not true in hoping that it will push your own agenda.

JImmy

Animal Lover...   January 18th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I don't understand why people who are gay care if someone compares what they do to beastiality...both are just LOVE...right? You can't argue that either are a part of the natural life cycle, neither produces a child...so if it's okay to go against what's natural (not arguing here one way or the other) then why shouldn't it be accepted for a man and his dog (who share great affection) be accepted into society as long as what they do is in private. If one argues for one, they should in reality be arguing for both – after all aren't we all just fighting for acceptance of whatever we want to do?

Animal Lover

Kit   January 18th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

What happened to freedom of speech cnn? There is nothing wrong with this post. It questions beliefs so what... Just goes to show you how Mccain, Romney and Huckabee got to the top... Cnn is too busy trying to make them look good and make the other candidates look bad...
To all the people using God as their reason to agree with Huckabee: What proof do you have that God exists? Can you see him? No. Have you ever seen him? No. What proof do you have that he wasn't just a powerful man from the age he was born in? What proof do you have that the bible isn't a fictional writing by people way back when it was first written just meant to entertain? There is NO proof. How do we know there is God, when before nothing existed? How can he exist if NOTHING existed? All we have is our beliefs but saying one belief is false because you don't believe is wrong. Everyone has their own beliefs. We shouldn't try to force our beliefs on others. And honestly to me the people up here that use God as a reason to punish those different are completely insane. But I'm not here to judge. But I will gladly state my opinions.

steve   January 18th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Greg,

The study you quote was biased, and could not be reproduced. If a scientific fact is made it must be able to be reproduced. You may want to choose a different on then the (LeVay S (1991). There are better studies out there that are not as easy to defeat.

Common Sense   January 18th, 2008 3:26 pm ET

For Richard from Florida: "One of the Ten Commandments says that no one should work on Sundays. The Bible says ANYONE working on a Sunday should be put to death."

Technically, it says:

"Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy. For six days you shall labor and do all your work. But the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any work—you, your son or your daughter, your male or female slave, your livestock, or the alien resident in your towns. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but rested the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and consecrated it." Exodus 20:8-11

The Sabbath would then be Saturday, not Sunday. However, even if it were Sunday, the 10 Commandments were part of the old law, which were replaced by the coming of Jesus (hence the separation of the Old and New Testaments in the Bible being identified by the birth of Christ). So, for Christians, it's not an issue. It would only be an issue for Jews, since the Torah only covers the first 5 books of the Bible, and therefore the New Law brought forth by the birth of Jesus doesn't pertain to their beliefs.

Mk   January 18th, 2008 3:25 pm ET

Is this the same guy who doesn't think anyone should tell anyone what to do?
You know the guy. The one who is running around threatening people with flag pole insertion if the dare tell "his state" what to do?

I think we are all best served by keeping the preacher in the church and letting people who don't live to judge others run for office.

I am sick of being told what is right and what is wrong by people who think they are "god on earth"

Bryce   January 18th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

Dear Surealist from fort Meyers,
So, am I correct in stating that the reason you don't want to stone all the people who HAVE to work on sunday is because of a calendrical technicality.... Based on a pagan calendar?

Rich   January 18th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

No matter how you feel about homosexuality, i.e. whether it is "normal" or not, Huckabee does have a valid point. If you can argue that no one should discriminate against two men or two woman being married, then you also can't discriminate between one man and two woman, etc. You could make the exact same argument for these types of "marriages" being normal as you could for any with only two human beings in them. If the gender of the people involved is not the critical factor, then why should the number of people involved be?

Whether it is marriage or any other types of social "norms", we all seem to confuse "freedom" with the right to do whatever we please. So where do we draw the line? And if religion isn't allowed to guide us, as stated by some of the idiots who have posted here, then who or what does? CNN? The Democratic Party?

Wasn't there a really big flood long ago to wipe out this kind of thing?

Judi A. Nickels   January 18th, 2008 3:20 pm ET

It amazes me people who follow a God who, if the stories are to be believed, drowned everyone including presumably innocent children and fetuses while saving only Noah and his family, and was not aware enough to keep track of his promise to not flood the earth again that he put up a rainbow, or the same one who killed those in Sodom and Gomorrah for relations with visiting angels, or lacked the capability to create an Adam and Eve that he didn't feel he had to setup to be kicked out of the Garden of Eden, etc. etc., can buy into some of the prejudices displayed.

It was not that long ago these very same churches supported segregation based on this same Bible.

And don't even let me get started on their position on unwed mothers. What about taking a position on the unwed fathers?

not confused   January 18th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

just a heads up, the government regulates civil unions. marriage is a covenant between a man and a woman. the reason the government is confused calling same sex unions with marriage is because they assumed that they had a right to say what a marriage is. this is because for the longest time, anyone that had the religious ceremony also had the legal ceremony. now you do not have to have the religious ceremony because it is socially and legally acceptable. but do not get warm fuzzies in your heart saying you are married when you only had a legal ceremony to get you into a civil union. if you did not want the religious ceremony, why claim you performed it? remember, marriage is a religious definition, not legal.

issa   January 18th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

it takes courage to be able to stand up and say this in America nowadays, and this is why I respect Mike Huckabee and will vote for him.
I don't hate gays and in fact i am friends with a few gay men but i don't agree with their lifestyle.

emanuel   January 18th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

answer for Richard, FL :

my friend, Sabbath was established in the Old Testament, and what you say about the death for those who work on Sunday (actually was Saturday) is a part of the Law (of Moses). The Law was for the jewish people, so the christians no longer have to obey the law – we are not longer under the law. More, the are verses in N ew Testament that canel the Sabbath.
homosexuality, on the other hand, is still seen as a sin in New Testament (see Romans, corinthians)

I hope you are satisfied with the answer from a christian

ameilia   January 18th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

hiltz006:

You say you want to marry 4 women? Then vote for Romney! That is what his religion is all about...well that and becoming a god yourself.

The Observer   January 18th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Well, if this blog isn't a reflection of the serious divisions within this country I don't know what is. The diversity of viewpoints is, however, a healthy indication of the political involvement of many groups with as many viewpoints. This is good, from one perspective, but does not argue well for a united country.

I recall with both sadness and pride this country's response to 9/11. We were one then, outraged at the egregious attack upon us, our values, and our spirits. Almost every house and vehicle in this nation displayed the American flag, and we were one with our president.

This country was founded by and still is a nation of individuals. We seem to have lost the tolerance of our founders, and the very principles upon which this country was built.

It is troubling that people around this great country will seize upon a politician's words, distort them, and then use them as a baseball bat against those with whom they disagree.

I think that each one of us must carefully weigh just how we want this country to be, and then cast our vote for the candidate that best matches our beliefs. That is what really makes this country great- the ability to hold diverse views, worship as we please, select the person we want to be with, and elect the leaders of our choice.

Let us not become too vitriolic in our assessment of our candidates. It serves no purpose. You will get the opportunity to choose as you please.

We have forgotten the one thing that makes us the strongest nation in the world- we are Americans, and we are unique amongst all people on the globe. When pressed, our collective strength rests in our diversity coupled with unity of purpose. We can achieve what no other country can. We are still the best. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and so on, but first Americans.

I can't wait to vote. All this talk is stimulating, but when the curtain is drawn, I will get my chance to show by action, not blog, what I believe in.

I am a republican, and I support Mr. Huckabee. You may not agree with me, but that's OK. I probably don't agree with you. That's OK.

As Yakov Smirnoff the comedian has stated: "What a country!"

wes   January 18th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Why do so many republicans support a war and say "Kill, kill, kill!" to protect america, but they won't accept someone's right to love whomever they choose?

If you go up to heaven (haha) what do you think God would say to you? "I'm so glad Wes that you oppose gay marriage, that's great. Now, you did support killing thousands of people...aww..but you are sorry for that...Saddle up partner, you're comin' into heaven...woohoo."

Christianity...what a great religion. One could commit murder, go to jail, repent and find God...and they would be more accepted than a gay man/woman? I think a lot of people just fear freedom...the thought of being on their own...that's why they turn to religion...we have to have a purpose and beliefs that the majority favor

Shawn, Takoma Park, MD   January 18th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Israel A. wrote: "God destroyed Sodom because of its great sins. Homosexuality was one of the prominent ones. God hates it and He destroyed Sodom for it…"
______________

Good grief. I pity the brainwashed fools who take an ancient work of fiction literally. It's truly pathetic! Do you also believe the Earth revolves around the sun and is only a few thousand years old? LOL.. It's hilarious in its stupidity. Write more crazy things, PLEASE!

Jim Rob   January 18th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

The Bible promotes rape, murder, animal sacrifice, animal mutilation, incest, nationalism, slavery, and genocide. Let's not forget revenge and torture. Maybe you moral high horses should find more credible dogma to base your useless purpose-less little pathetic lives.

Wanna go through those one at a time?

Rape: God orders troops to slay every man and child of a neighboring nation but the troops can keep the women/daughters for themselves.

Murder: God orders Satan to kill Jobe's family member just to test his faith

Animal sacrifice and mutilation: in the same book (Leviticus) that opposes homosexuality, god commands us to kill and mutilate animals for his never ending thirst for blood

Incest: how the hell else did Adam and Eve's children reproduce? Also, Noah, God's chosen drunkard exposes himself to his daughters after the flood – what a model citezen.

Nationalism: this whole Isreal is god's land – no different than any other religion having a claim that their god needs dirt, money, and a starship. Yeah yeah my book's right and the rest are all wrong – if you knuckle draggers would read more than one religious text you'd notice they all say the same thing.

Slavery: the only thing mentioned is just not to beat your slaves; Jesus didn't say it was morally wrong to own and abuse other humans

Genocide: well, in case you might have missed it, God tried to destroy the entire population, save for a drunkard and his family, just for the sake of revenge. Funny that this god didn't realize that some animals reproduce asexually and don't require pairs to continue their existence. This all begs the question though: how did Noah get two penguins on the ark when they weren't even discovered until the mid 1800s?!

DBJ   January 18th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

John Adams:
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." –October 11, 1798

david a   January 18th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

-This comment just shows just how ignorant and unprepaired Huckabee is to win the presidency. I will absolutely not have a president who says that I am equated with beastiality because I would like equal rights.
-And on top of that who how does it affect the sanctity of any marriage by me marrying someone else? Massachusets has one of the lowest divorce rates in the country and guess what!? They allow gay marriage, go figure.
-This isnt the fact of marriage it is the fact of equality and freedom. "All men are created equal", why arent we treated that way.
-Huckabee represents ignorance in the 21st century, and I will not vote for that.
-God doesnt run are country, he may influence it but doesnt run it.

Brooke   January 18th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

First, I'm appalled that this is what all of you have decided to get fired up about considering all of the "real" problems in our country. Second, and this from a Reverend:

"I propose a challenge that was once presented to me: If homosexuality is genetic, then the homosexual cannot be condemned anymore than I could be for being blonde. If it is a choice, then heterosexuality must also be choice. The challenge provided to me was to try, for just one day, to choose to be sexually attracted to another man–I did not need to act on it, simply try to choose to feel attracted. I was unable to do so. Over a decade later, I am still a straight man. If I cannot choose my sexuality, how can I condemn someone else who cannot choose theirs?"

Genius! Thanks, Rev. I heart gay people and straight people. Love is the answer.

Brad   January 18th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

If you want to live in a religious state, move to Iran, but there's no room for it here.

nessajennings   January 18th, 2008 3:04 pm ET

Many people have made outstanding points regarding how small minded Huckabee's words have been. To Estil and all the other 'maintstreamers' that condone Huckabees words... Those rallying against you are not saying Huckabee is wrong in your religious beliefs, as he seems line up rather accurately as I'd picture most mainstream Christians too.
However this isn't a Bible pageant, and whether Christians want to admit it or not there are hundreds of sects and ideologies that comprise our country. I have no problem with him being Christian, but I have a problem with hatred and ignorance as they generally go hand in hand.
To suggest bestiality and homosexuality are anything alike proves you are mal-educated. Also, to suggest that heterosexual couples are any purer in their 'sexual deviance' than homosexuals just proves that Huckabee and his believers see the world through naive rose-colored glasses.
Lastly, Christians, you are not being persecuted, stop acting like it. Your beliefs and numbers dominate this landscape. If you wish to do yourself a favor, embrace love and understanding, and try voting for the best candidate for the presidency; not the best Christian. If you don't understand the difference, you shouldn't be voting at all. Even if Huckabee makes it into the general election, its not likely he will win anyway.

Cheers & God Bless

Linda   January 18th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

I have an answer for Richard, FL. When Jesus died on the cross some things changed. Most importantly, we who believe are now under Grace not the law. If you don't understand Grace, I challange you to read the Bible and ask God to give you the wisdom to understand it.

emanuel   January 18th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

I'm not an american, I live in Europe, Romania, so I watch the campaign from an outside perspective.
I don't understand one thing : why are peple so mad on what Huckebee have said ? what's so outrageous ?
I mean, some people believe that homosexuality is ok and natural
some people believe that it is not ok, and unnatural
America is a free country, so everybody can think what he wants. nobody force you to believe that homosexuality is unnatural, but why should I be forced to say that is ok, if I don't think so ?
You have the right to say that is ok, we have the right to say that is not ok.
I am an evanghelical christian, so I believe homosoexuality is a sin, but I don't think we (the christians) should enforce our views on others. But I do think we can express our oppinions, just like everybody else.

regarding his statement, I think he is right. If we accept that 2 men or two women can marry each other, then why should we stop here ? Why wouldn't I be allowed to marry my sister ? or my dog ? or my chair ?
where should we draw the line ? and if we think that institution of marriage was defined as between a man and a woman in europe for 2000 years and in USA for 200 years, I think that's where we should stop.

btw, I like Huckabee, I hope he will be the next president, also he is a little too soft on foreign policy (I wouldn't mind neither with Thompson, McCain, or Romney).

ps, sorry for my english – I'm not an english speaker

Fred   January 18th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

I think some of you nice folk,who crawled out of water,like Darwin said,really have a problem. The earth was created by God(Jesus) and he also created man and woman, after creating all of the other plants,animals,and the other things of the Earth. If one were to believe putting,men and men,women and women,and men and beast, and women and beast together, that is sick as those people who rape 6 month old babies. All this is perversion,like in Sodom and Gomorah. No rightousness, then everything will be destroyed especially those who do these abrient practices. If you don't think there isn't any God, stand on a rock(which God already created) then start creating all the foundations(earth,plants,animals,
people,and all of the other creations you see)oh by the way,no equipment,and no help,(not that it matters)you will not be able to do anything except your body functions, you know(popo,and pepe).That is what the scientists also do because they,are using materials, God has already created!!! So all of you santamonious
folk should do what God says in the Bible. I know the Bible is just a book that was written thousands of years ago (wake up smell the roses)get your butts in gear and do the things needed to be done. What if all the things in the Bible are true,
you won't be given a second chance.The poop chute isn't pro life,.you know the rest,neither is woman and woman,nor human and animal. Darwin isn't going to help either, he was just full of Hot Air!!!

Jared   January 18th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

@Richard, FL:

I am unfamiliar with any verse that instructs that death is the punishment for breaking the Sabbath, do you mind providing the reference?

Chris, South Carolina   January 18th, 2008 2:54 pm ET

OK, before someone points out the fact that I can't spell, I should have typed, "Rafi, NY NY, Excellent question, and excellent point!

There we go.

Pam Holt Los Angeles, CA   January 18th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

He wrote a book called "Kids that Kill"?

Was he writing about his son that murdered an innocent stray dog by tying him up and slitting his throat? Does he tell how he covered it up as governor, and how to this day he still sees nothing wrong with it? Is he aware that most murderers (esp. serial killers) start out killing animals before they kill people? If he hadn't covered it up, he could have gotten his son the help he needed because the boy is disturbed, as his father clearly is.

Now, how can this Huckabee treat Americans that happen to be gay unequal like this? He is 100% COMPLETELY UNpatriotic and UNAmerican!

Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate besides Gravel that is evolved enough to know how fundamentally wrong it is for one American to have more rights than other because of the sexual orientation you were born with.

Those that use religious reasons for their opposition to gay marriage need to remember something our forefathers were smart enough to come up with, and that's called "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE".

People like him and those that hatefully agree with his warped views make me want to cry for our poor country.

Richard, FL   January 18th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

"The bible doesn't say you don't work on Sunday's…it says the last day of the week will be the sabbath…and earthly toils, etc…won't be pursued–I don't know the details..but here is your answer…..

Technically speaking the Sabbath, according to the Bible would be Saturday because Sunday (according to the modern calendar of days) is the first day of the week.
---------------------------------–
That's fine. So make it Saturday or whatever day of the week you want.

CHRISTIANS, PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION!

pepe   January 18th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

Susan:

Since you are taking the Bible literally:

Matthew 7:2-5 declares, "For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, Let me take the speck out of your eye when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."

Are you human? Are you a sinner? If Jesus die for your sins you are set. Live and let live…. Worry about your soul and I worry about mine. STOP JUDGING.

Mario   January 18th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

Richard, I'll answer your question. What does it matter, this has nothing to do with politics.

Being put to death doesn't have to mean physical death, it could mean a spiritual death on the day of rest. Will these people always be spiritually alive. Yoyu have to ask your self. Some people have to work on sundays, others choose to work on this day. They aren't getting ahead chances are, so why work so long? It's a spritual death for them.

Go Mitt!

Juanito   January 18th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

What does Huck know about bestiality and when did he know it? After all, he is from Arkansas, ain't he?

JJ   January 18th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

Richard, FL:

Actually, the sabbath to which you are referring is on Saturday.

Generally, Christians believe they are under grace, not the "law" – that Christ fulfilled the law for them through His sinless life.

as for me:

I personally believe that Jesus Christ is the only path to my salvation. His death and resurrection provides atonement for my sins. I do NOT call myself a Christian. I do not practice homosexualilty, I also will not condemn others who practice it for whatever reason. They – all of us – will have to answer for our lives individually. I teach my children that we should treat all individuals with respect and dignity. If a homosexual is honest and moral, then they are a good person and should be treaded as such. I cannot see their soul, no more than they can hear what I believe God speaks to mine.

I also believe that Jesus was accused of dining with publicans and sinners. What I personally believe about homosexuality is between me and my God. yes, I believe it is morally wrong. But I also believe that If Jesus were walking among us today as he did 2000 years ago he would be seen in public going to lunch with homosexuals and ministering to their needs, whatever they may be.

For the Christians to bow beat homosexuals or any other person for not living up to what they believe as moral and righteous is exactly what the pharisees did back in the day. If Jesus condemned anyone, he regularly condemned that religous group – a group who held the Law (10 commandments) as the ultimate authority.

Remember, most of the Christians are a very vocal, but small minority.

Susan S, Alberta   January 18th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

What is wrong with a little animal loving?

Gavin   January 18th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

WOW....AND I ACTUALLY ENJOYED HUCKABEE ON THE LENO SHOW

...BUT NOW, I snapped back into reality and realized he is AN EXTREMIST DIVIDER CATERING TO THE ULTRA RIGHT WING....

DANGEROUS!

So much for Mike Huckabee and Barry Obama being populists-they are more of the same and will both lose.

Josh Landreth   January 18th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

This argument makes me sad. The anti-Huckabee people do not understand that a true Christian would not view the sin of a homosexual any different than their own sin. I cannot answer for him, but i believe this to be true of Huck's beliefs. That does not mean that Huck thinks thinks of a homosexual as inferior, that they should not have the same rights as other humans, but just that marriage is between a man and a woman. simple as that.

As a Christian, i'll make the point that the Bible clearly states that truth cannot be known to those that will not accept, through faith, the love that Jesus so freely wants to give. Without accepting this love, it is impossible to see the truth, homosexuality is sin. It is no different than my sin, for which i am forgiven, but none the less, it is sin. I agree with Huckabee that marriage is for a man and a woman. But, that does not make me ignorant, hateful, non-accepting, judgemental, or the like. It just means that I think I'll shake your hand in the street, help you change a tire on the side of the road, show you love in any way I know how. but, still stand firm on what i believe to be true.

Jeff   January 18th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

Can't people read...he said, "once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again."

He didn't say homosexuality = bestiality.

His point is clearly that if we open the definition of marriage up to include homosexuality, then other groups will argue that they should be included in the definition as well..."so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal,"

Basically, he's saying, "Leave traditional marriage the way it is," otherwise it'll be degraded to the point where it's ridiculous and pointless.

Marriage b/w a man and woman has important traditional and societal roots, so there's nothing wrong with Huckabee or anyone else expressing their concern that if we mess with the concept of marriage, we'll be tinkering with a fundamentally essential and healthy unit of or society - the traditional family.

Also, has anyone ever noticed that gay couples can't pro-create together? Anyone ever noticed that 'marriage' is a religious concept and that religious people regard it as sacred? I'm glad that there are politicians defending the traditional concept of marriage for what it is. I think some people just want to mess with the definition of marriage because they don't like religion, and they don't like conservatives.

They want to destroy something religious people value so they can basically laugh at us and give us the bird. It all comes down to intolerance for religion; not the other way as the media sometimes try to portray.

Egbert Schwump   January 18th, 2008 2:43 pm ET

Richard, FL ... I believe you are probably a MORON, yet I will offer a brief response to your ignorance.

Jesus Christ ushered mankind into the age of GRACE and out from under the unbearable weight of the LAW. In other words, we are forgiven through His unmerited grace and are no longer subject to the condemnation of the law.

For the record:
ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God.
ALL sin separates man from God, i.e. all sin is equal.
There is only ONE name under Heaven by which man can be saved – Jesus.
No man cometh unto the Father but by Me (Jesus)

There is ONE required process by which we receive His forgiveness.

One must admit they are sinners in need of His forgiveness. They must confess Jesus Christ as Lord and accept Him as their personal savior.

Hope this helps.

West Palm Beach   January 18th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

This man should not be president, run a daycare....
Response: seems to be all the same thing, these days, doesn't it?

Chuck, Pittsburgh   January 18th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Huckabee is an ignorant nobody. He is doing more harm to christianity than anyone in the last 20 years except for the real kooks in Kansas. GET RELIGION OUT OF POLITICS. OUT OF SCHOOLS. OUT OF EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

pim   January 18th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Weird alien comments. For me reading this is like looking back in time. I mean into the middle ages. Of Europa of course, because you guys don't have that history. It seems to me that everybody but you Americans know that gays are normal people, the bible is a compilation of poetry, myth and sermons, evolution is scientific and gods don't exist. Get real. Or live in isolation. Okay, but then don't try to rule the world.
Pim Gillissen, Netherlands.

Surrealist, Fort Myers, FL   January 18th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

The bible doesn't say you don't work on Sunday's...it says the last day of the week will be the sabbath...and earthly toils, etc...won't be pursued–I don't know the details..but here is your answer.....

Technically speaking the Sabbath, according to the Bible would be Saturday because Sunday (according to the modern calendar of days) is the first day of the week.

Matthew, Indianapolis Indiana   January 18th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

I find his comments ignorant; it is okay to go on television and marry someone for a million dollars or to marry and divorce after a week times. I ask you Mr Huckabee where is your sanctity of marriage comments concerning that? The truth is he has no business in politics; nor does anyone with those types of views. The constitution was designed to protect freedom not to impose restrictions based upon someones religious beliefs. More and more young Americans are becoming involved in politics. It will not be long before a lot of these stone age ideas start to work out of the system. It is people like Mr Huckabee that perpetrate the hatred, discrimination, and violence in todays society. These are the same people who believe the earth is only 10,000 years old and that humans walked with the dinosaurs!!!!
We can not allow another mistake in the White House! Our planet is in major distress as well as our country and we can not afford to repeat the actions of the past 7yrs. These aging politicians will not be here in 20-30yrs to see the mess and distruction that they have caused.

When Religion Ruled The World They Called It The Dark Ages!

Chris, South Carolina   January 18th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Believe what you want, we are all capable (assumption here) of making our choices. If you are a strong person, you won't let the private lives of others affect you in any way (e.g., destroy the sanctitiy of marriage). Remember God did give us minds of our own.

If you are truly Christian, then you should know that judgement is reserved for God alone. Live you're life how you see fit and don't get caught up judging others.

Richard, FL   January 18th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

CHRISTIANS, how about an answer?? You haven't hesitated to put in dozens and dozens of responses, so WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER THIS?

One of the Ten Commandments says that no one should work on Sundays. The Bible says ANYONE working on a Sunday should be put to death.

Why aren't you as loudly supporting death to Sunday workers as you are picking on homosexuals? IS THERE A SINGLE CHRISTIAN WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS or is the obvious answer that you don't believe the WHOLE BIBLE and only pick and choose what you like?

So what is it? Death to Sunday workers or are you all just HYPOCRITES? How about an answer?

CHRISTIANS, PLEASE ANSWER.

jason roberts,pa   January 18th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

it seems the christians are not going to stop till they transform everyone to there way of thinking which makes them no better then the jihad nuts in the middle east a time to fight back will come the next civil war is upon us people

Chris in MA   January 18th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

WOW!!! "Marriage exists for fertility" – What about those who can't have kids? Under your twisted logic, they shouldn't be able to get married. Do you also think that we should breed like rabbits regardless of our ability to provide for the children? Do you believe that a heterosexual couple who does not plan on having children should be denied marriage? Lots of people reproduce without marriage, as well as get married without reproducing. How many loving, caring homosexual couples have you talked with regarding their family unit? If a wife-beating, drunk, deadbeat father can have the priviledge of getting married – (by the state or any religious group that accepts them) then why shouldn't two loving people of the same gender be afforded that same priviledge? This country was founded on tolorance and acceptance. Sadly, throughtout our history, people have protested change. First it was non-Protestants, then African-Americans, then Women, now Homosexuals and Lesbians, Immigrants and Muslims! When will people stop fearing what they don't understand? We need a president who is willing to step out and seek to understand those who are different from himself.

Rafi, NY NY   January 18th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

mike c.:

"The real problem, I think, is that Christians, who believe that the Bible is 'the' word of God, have a set of standards that is absolute in nature. And because of this, they have a standard they uncompromisingly use to determine how they will participate in society."

I've been wanting to ask a question about this idea, because I've heard it before. I'm genuinely curious, not trying to bash this belief.

You're saying that Christians are essentially commanded to live their lives by the word of the Bible, including government - in other words, elected officials who are Christians answer to God first, and their constituents second.

Isn't what you're describing a theocracy? And doesn't that suggest that fundamental Christianity is incompatible with democracy, as the laws of the Bible are not democratically voted on?

Israel A.   January 18th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

God destroyed Sodom because of its great sins. Homosexuality was one of the prominent ones. God hates it and He destroyed Sodom for it...
Mike Huckabee has every right to stand against homosexuality. I wish every presidential runner was against 100%.

PJ, New York   January 18th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Susan, Atlanta, GA... you are probably one that takes EVERYTHING in the bible literally, you poor thing. You use the bible as a life manual. You probably believe the earth is only 6,000 years old too and that it's not round, right?

Z, St. Louis   January 18th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Was that a suit of multiple fabrics he was wearing? Isn't that a stoning offense
in his fairy tale book? I bet that heathen eats pork and and shellfish too!!

Your silly fairy story means nothing to a whole lot of people in this country.
There is NO, NONE,ZERO,ZIP,NADA proof from the time this person named jesus
supposedly lived that he/it ever existed. Despite the "miracles" and sermons and
all the other stuff, there is not one record or account from that time found. The
closest things found so far are at least 60 (thats more than an average lifespan at
that time) to 100 years after the fact..For someone supposedly so great, you would
think someone would have written or made some record and that those records
would have been important (considering who this person was) and would have
been kept and valued.But no, nothing..Then a few hundred years later, a group of
people gather together and decide to make a book. They compile all these
differing stories, edit them to fit the doctrien THEY decided was going to be the doctirne and call it the bible..Excluded parts, adding things, etc..This whole thing is sole a human made concoction, just like every other religious text.Compilations of fables and someones "morality" ideals with the Deus Ex Machina portion
to make in interesting and explain the unknown..The bible is no more divine
than Green Eggs and Ham..

NR   January 18th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

The Bible is a great work of fiction put together by man to defend their prejudices by blaming God. "I don't hate the gays, God does" I don't want to worship a God that would ever think that way.

Christian fanatics, or Christian fascists, are just as dangerous as Islamic fanatics and do just as much damage to Christianity and Hamas does to Islam, only they have secular governments keeping them in line; governments people like Huckabee seek to destroy.

My opinion and I'm entitled to it

JDG   January 18th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

As a gay man I would rather my loving relationship be foolishly and ignorantly equated with bestiality than be a bigot. This is downright cultish mentality and I am utterly appalled that people can comment on here saying that God believes that discrimination should be institutionalized. It is severely disgraceful that I live in a country where people justify sheer hate and fear with religion. Huckabee's statement is NOT mainstream. It is NOT moral. It is nothing but a political tactic to pull on evangelical heartstrings. After the civil rights movement, those who were formerly empowered by their own bigotry were shamed. Just wait...as soon as gay people gain equal civil rights, which will be soon, you will all be so ashamed that for years you have empowered yourself via blind hatred and transparent stupidity. STOP HATING others and deal with yourself.

harold   January 18th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

Why dosen't Huck stick to his own sex matters? He has no solutiion to real problems in this country and he is trying to round up the ultra's out there who look under the bed at night before going to bed.That is what he is after ..the votes..so he can get the nomination...We welocome him in his efforts...

Jason NYC   January 18th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Jim: First you say, “The facts are that everytime the topic of legalizing homosexual marriage is presented … it is rejected by a very wide, wide, margin.”

Then you say, “Data is great, but it can made to tell virtually any story you want it to tell, its all in how the data is presented.”

So, should we accept your interpretation of the facts regarding the legalizing of homosexual marriage or should we assume you used those facts to tell virtually any story you want to tell?

Then you play the victim card by saying everytime you turn on the TV you have the homosexual lifestyle forced upon you and your family. Seems the obvious answer is that you can turn the TV off in those instances. It sounds like you and your family could use the extra time in educating yourselves. And, is your family bond so weak that you are threatened by something you see or hear on TV? How is it that TV in your household has a much greater influence on your family than you?

You then erroneously state that "separation of church and state" language does not exist in the Constitution. While you would be correct in saying the actual phrase “separation of church and state” is not present, the concept is apparent in the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause. The Supreme Court has quoted this concept in many of it’s opinions.

Also, you wrongly assume that the US Constitution and other documents were influenced by the bible. "The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion," states the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli. This document was ratified by Congress without much debate or contention and stands today as a reminder of the founding fathers' intentions. While many of the founding fathers were one type of Christian or another, several of the founding fathers considered themselves to be deists or held beliefs very similar to that of traditional Deists, including Jefferson, Paine and Ethan Allen.

The fact is, the documents you referenced are notable for their lack of religious citation, not for the few instances in which it occurred. If the founders had religious underpinnings in mind, one would think that these documents and the political record (notes of the constitutional convention – especially Madison's, and in The Federalist Papers) would have numerous mentions of biblical passages or verses. That is not the case.

The influences for the Consitution came from English Common Law, which had as its antecedents Roman Law, Saxon Law, and the Danelaw, none of which were based either on the Bible or on Christianity in any of its forms. Locke, Montesquieu, the Iroquois Confederation and the Articles of Confederation served as important influences.

You go on to say that, “what legitimacy is there in a scientific study performed by human beings – who by nature are not objective – using formulas and theories written by these same non-objective human beings.” Scientists are some of the most objective people on the planet. The scientific method gathers observable, empirical and measurable evidence and subjects this evidence to experimentation to predict dependability. The very basic expectations are that the process is objective and subject to scrutiny by other scientists. You don’t believe the evidence and conclusions these scientists provide therefore you fall back on an interpretation from a dubious source; the bible.

Joe: Why are you so threatened by what two people do in the privacy of their own home? Are you so insecure in your masculinity that you feel threatened by homosexuals?

K. Smith Minneapolis,MN   January 18th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

How many so called "religeous" leaders have molested kids and been caught using illegal drugs, yet continue to tell others how to live. Live and let live.

DBJ   January 18th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Steve, Lyons, CO ---– dude. I have known you for a long time. Why let childhood memories cloud your mentality still to this day. Why are you making threats to people who have the same amount as freedom as you do. God loves "GAY" people, just not the act of homosexuality,

Jen Cedar Falls, IA   January 18th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Susan from Atlanta, GA;
The Bible also says an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and many more hideous mind-controlling ideals.
Your type is so brain washed and blindfolded to the real world that most of us just pity you anymore.

D   January 18th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

couldnt be said any better!!!!!

Ben Simmons January 18, 2008 12:47 pm ET

What aggravates me about this whole business is the way in which the Conservative Christian community has hijacked Christianity itself and turned it from a religion of tolerance, peace, grace and love into a weapon of social inequity. Christian Conservatives refer to themselves as "Christians", as if every other believer in the divinity of Jesus Christ adopts some model of the religion whereby homosexuals are social deviants deserving of society's merciless condemnation. If heterosexuals are the true stewards of the institution of marriage, why have more than half of married heterosexuals trashed their own wedding vows and ended their marriages? Why do they sign pre-nuptial agreements, mocking the word of both the Lord and the law by making arrangements for the future failure of their marriage? Get off your high horse, "Christian" Conservatives. Your hypocrisy far outweighs your logic.

W M Los Angeles California   January 18th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

What a baffoon! Hopefully this country will not again elect a primate to the highest office of the land just because he appears to be human with some level of intelligence.

We have suffered set backs long enough in this country with thinking like his. We are already the laughing stock of the civilized world as it is. Even some third world countries have enacted legislation which allows members of the same sex to have their chosen partners be legally recognized with the same rights allowed those of the opposite sex which choose to marry. And it marriage is so sanctified then why is the divorce rate over 50 percent? All one has to do is watch the Jerry Springer show to see what makes up much of this country.

Off soap box now!

Noon   January 18th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Susan,

When you read the bible all the way through, as you suggest doing, please notice what else is listed in Leviticus as perversion.... either everything in that list is bad or none of it is necessarily bad. Worn a cotton blend shirt, eaten shellfish lately?

And as Elena pointed out, the bible has been tranlsated many times and actually bible scholars don't think the bible meant to condemn homosexuality originally.

Joseph Meyers   January 18th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

If this earth and all life on earth is here because of some cosmic accident (Big-bang or whatever other explanation one might have for the existance of human life on planet earth) then life on earth and the physical universe around us is all there is and we are not accountable to anyone except ourselves.

But - IF we human are part of a huge creation project by a supernatural Being we call, "God", and IF that supernatural Being requires certain things from His Creation (especially the human race) in order to please Him

And - IF "God" or whatever you want to call Him holds the power of life and death, of continuation or total destruction over us, don't you think it makes sense to at least listen to what He wants and why He wants it?

If a Space Alien were to show up in a huge space station that circled the earth like a satellite or moon and if that Space Alien (God) were to inform us that there are certain rules He expects us to obey or He will destroy us, don't you think it might be wise to at least listen to Him, and consider what and why He has certain expectations?

Let's look at this matter of morality a different way: When one buys a new automobile, a new watch or a new piece of electronic equipment and receives an owners manual with the purchase, would it make sense to ignore the discription of the manufacturer as to who we can safely operate what we have purchased?
Wouldn't it be stupid to say, "I will put the oil in the gas tank and the gas in the crankcase if I want! After all I paid for the car and I can do what I want with it. If I bought a watch that is not water proof but insisted on keeping my new time piece that is not waterproof submerged in a sink full of water (just because I paid for it and it is mine and I will do whatever I jolly well please to do with it); wouldn't my rebellion against the owner's manual be not only stupid but destructive?

And so, if the Space Alien (God) tells us that homosexuality is destructive to our human spirit and human psyche and destructive to human society as a whole, isn't it stupid on our part to rebel against the owner's manual (the Bible)? God isn't trying to be bossy!! He just created us and human society to function in a healthy way (like gas in the gas tank instead of the oil crankcase) so that we can be happy, well adjusted and successful (fulfilling our God-given destinies).

The Owners Manual (Bible) is very clear about homosexuality, fornication, adultery and other deviant (contrary to the way the Creator made us to operate - like the new car or new electronic equipment) forms of behavior. If you don't like the way you were created, just keep in mind that God didn't ask your opinion when He created you. You and I live under His authority and He didn't seek our counsel before He created humans and human society to function in a certain manner.

Have a nice day - and a nice eternity (eternal existence in Heaven rather than Hell).

Pastor Joseph

Shawn, Takoma Park, MD   January 18th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Susan, Atlanta, GA wrote: "God says in the Bible that homosexuality is perversion and worthy of death (Leviticus and Romans chapter 1). That is never going to change, no matter how indignant homosexuals become."
__________

The views of ancient Middle Easterners (people wrote the Bible, by the way) are not relevant to discussions about equal rights for US citizens in the 21st-century USA. Nothing you can say will change that. We do not live in a Theocracy and the Bible is not, and will never be, the law. The fact that you think your fellow citizens who happen to be gay should be put to death is shared by another group of religious extremists. They're called the Taliban. We're not interested, thanks.

Sarah   January 18th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

This isn't a judgmental question or any sort of veiled rebuke of Christian or conservative beliefs–I really, honestly would appreciate a serious answer.

**What is wrong with homosexuality?**

I truly want to understand where everyone is coming from. Can someone please explain it?

hiltz006   January 18th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

thank you for being liberal CNN

i appreciate it when you block my remarks because they are conservative

i posted this:

"typical liberal media
The gay community is trying to push their agenda down our throats.
If a man and a man can get married, then let me marry 4 women!
Simply put, the gays want the word "normal" removed from our vocabulary, and don't want anything to be kept sacred."

and it is awaiting moderation?

I see far worse things posted with name calling but you block mine!

i think the conservative community can see through your one-sidedness

you're doing a great job of continuing the polarization of our country!

Dennis   January 18th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

One: Huckabee did not say that homosexuality and bestiality were the same. He was just showing the progression. Two: If mainstream America embraces something outrageous, for example, people who are shorter than five feet tall, should be given some special designation, would that make it right. No. Sometimes it seems that the people who advocate for somethings just happen to have the loudest voices, but it does not make them right. I think a vast majority embrace heterosexuality. Three: Everybody has a right to their opinion, not mine, but to theirs. Everybody, including myself, has the right to be wrong. Four: Huckabee has a point. When we start screwing around with definitions, whether it be marriage, torture, punishment, discipline, or whatever, we are opening a can of worms. When there is no consistency, it becomes problematic. I am not for gay rights, black rights, women's rights, or whatever rights. I am for Human Rights. Everybody has the right to be treated as human beings and all the rights that accompany the designation as being a member of that set group. That would lump people from every category together ranging from people that are conservative, liberal, black, brown, white, and every other shade. I don't care if they are pink with purple stripes. But everybody has a right to their opinion. Some people think certain lifestyles are inherently wrong, including myself. But everybody has a right to be wrong.

LA, CA   January 18th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

An ostracize offshoot of Mr. Romey's faith are the only ones practicing "traditional marriage."

Romney 08

Eleanor   January 18th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

"Susan, Atlanta, GA January 18, 2008 1:23 pm ET

God says in the Bible that homosexuality is perversion and worthy of death (Leviticus and Romans chapter 1). That is never going to change, no matter how indignant homosexuals become. They can be forgiven by God if they repent (truly admit their sin and change their ways), but God will never say it's OK. Doubt it? Just read the Bible all the way through, and you will see that fornication, adultery, homosexuality and beastiallity are all horrible sins in the eyes of God."

First of all, it doesn't matter what your "Bible" says. You have no right to shove your mythology down the throats of anyone else. If you chose to live by that mythology, good for you. But this is NOT a reglious state. The United States of America is a SECULAR state. It was founded because the puritans of England were fleeing what they considered to be religious persecution. The modern puritans in this country will not now impose religious persecution on others, or the rest of the country.

Here's a clue for you dear, not everyone in this country is a) christian, or b) obliged to read, believe, observe, or practice what you mythology preaches. Live by what makes you personally happy, and leave others alone to live their lives.

Trey   January 18th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Why is everyone yelling at Huckabee?

The Gay Marriage lost by an 80% margin in SC. If anything, he rallies the Christian right to him from McCain.

Moreover, the only people who get offended about any anti gay or other "politically incorrect" comments are the liberals. They are not going to vote for him anyway. Need any proof - take a look at how good Rudy is doing with his pro gay policies in the Republican primary.

Win Win for Huckabee

MJR53   January 18th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

The name-calling in this line is laughable. Anyone who has word one to say against homosexuality, no matter how innocuous, is a homophobe. Anyone who has one positive word to say for homosexuality is a queer.

The right leaning writers claim to represent the mainstream while the left leaning writers say the right has no claim to the mainstream. By definition, the mainstream exists between the poles, folks.

Some of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were indeed "Deists" as were some of the signers of the Constitution. A greater number were avowed Christians who together used their Christian-based morality along with their education in rhetoric, the classics and history to mold the founding documents into what they viewed as a utopian government, limited at the federal level with increasing strength as you peeled down to the people. We wind up with founding documents that guarantee us a Constitutional Republic, if, as Franklin said, we can keep it.

Believing in God, Jesus Christ and voting doesn't make one a theocrat.

Not believing in God or any other higher power doesn't make one a bad person.

What makes believers and non-believers bad is their intolerance of each other's point of view and resorting to name calling and condescension in an attempt to make a point. When a non believer indicts all of Christianity for the sins of a few badly behave Christians, that non-believer is guilty of the intolerance he condemns. By the same standard, when the Christian reaches into obtuse corners of Scripture and extract from context a condemnation of one with a differing opinion, they violate Christ's command to Love our neighbors as ourselves.

Thomas Jefferson did indeed refer to a separation of church and state in a private letter. Jefferson also referred to the joy of the charming Negress, Ms. Hemmings, in other correspondence. Neither reference had the force of law.

I've always made the point that if the courts held there was such a separation of church and state, it merely echoed Jesus Christ's exhortation to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and to God that which is God's. The language of the First Amendment is clear in NOT calling for anything other than separate sphere's of influence, however. "Congress shall make no law respecting establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." That language limits Congress, the Government...not the people. The people are empowered by that language as they should be by any amendment to the Constitution.

Final point, in my mind's eye, Governor Huckabee is an empty suit. However, this morning he did make a good point in saying that were it not for an amended Constitution, African-Americans would not be considered human. It took the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to remove the shameful 3/5ths of a man provision as pertained to slaves from 1789 to 1865. It was a well-reasoned point.

Rafi, NY NY   January 18th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

TJS:

"What happened to the rest of our rights. My rights to turn on my tv and not have homosexual lifestyles crammed down my throat. ... Everyone has to live with their own choice but I don't want to be subjected daily to your choice."

What about everyone else's right not to be subjected to your beliefs, and have Christianity shoved down their throats?

n   January 18th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

huckabee is so wrong people sould be who they want to be and no one sould vote for him cuz hes wrong.-

ameilia   January 18th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

The Bible also speaks to another grave injury to the institution of marriage: DIVORCE.

Luke 16:18: "Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery."

Gay marriage is the target that so many people focus on, yet gays comprise so little of our population (I think 3%). However, divorcees, the true cancer of america, compose over 50% of the population.

HUCK, do what is right stand up for marriage in EVERY WAY! OUTLAW DIVORCE! How can we say that marriage is a sacred institution when people (and not just hollywood) marry for a few months or years? Then divorce because they "don't think they are in love anymore" or "it just wasn't what they wanted". We need to make marriage the sacred institution it is supposed to be if anyone is to take it seriously.

Katy, TX   January 18th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

See, comments like these give me more hope that we can finally get a Democrat back in the White House. Good job Huckahasbeen!!!

Michael in MA   January 18th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Also, one more thought on Christianity, Huckabee and politics...

(And remember, I'm a Christian myself)

I think too many of us Christians hear that Huckleberry was a Baptist minister and we latch onto him. Why? Just because he happens to have an M-Div? Huckleberry, I have no doubt, is a good man who truly loves the Lord. I don't question that, nor should anyone question another man's heart condition. But, to blindly back Huck for President, just because you happen to share the same church background...that's silly.

Don't be fooled by Huck, don't get sweet-talked by Romney and don't be lulled to sleep by the ancient McCain........Fred Thompson is the only realist who tells it how it is.

And by the way, anyone who calls themself a Christian, yet claims to hate homosexuals and stands in judgment on them......needs to take a serious look in the mirror. Jesus died for all of us...murderers, rapists, homosexuals, heterosexuals....and guess what? He loves me just as much as he loves the agnostics and the homosexuals. Again, God hates the sin, loves the sinner.

AJA   January 18th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Way to go Mike Huckabee for saying it how it really is! Don't allow the distorted minds of the minority to allow those of us with morals to be bullied into thinking that if we disagree with their actions, that we are not somehow discriminating against them.

It is true, everyone is equal. Equally responsible for doing right or wrong. Equally value as a human being, and equally sad when they can not live up to a life of standards and values that support the whole human race.

I can see how it would be difficult for homosexuality would be a difficult cross to bare. But when we start saying it is acceptable to behave however you "feel" – and that others should be tolerant of that behavior no matter what is a step in the direction of animal behavior. Humans have the unique quality of rising above how they feel at any given moment. They can stop themselves from acting on anger, jealously, neediness, greed, lust, and yes, sexual impulses. We have to power to choose, therefore we have the responsibility to choose RIGHT, and the ability to make choices that effect all of humanity. Once we formally decide that it is perfectly OK to act on homosexuality, then YES, we open the door to it being OK to act on other "perfectly natural" feelings – Like those who somehow got mixed up along the way, whether before birth or after, but just somehow feel attracted to children – or just somehow feel the need to satisfy a sexual urge with an animal.

Gay marriage may not be bestiality, but accepting it is officially taking a step in the direction of giving up our ability to choose, and instead becoming like animals – simply acting on what ever impulse suits us at the time. So go ahead and kick and scream and through around as much political jargon and claim "discrimination" and "intollerance" all you want! It still will never make it right.

And one last thing! If you demand tolerance, then I demand tolerance of my right to choose a life of morality, values, work ethics and my right to fight for a nation who upholds those standards!!!

Nancye   January 18th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Huckabee is BIGOT. I hope he makes it on the ballot, cuz us democrats will stomp on that idiot bible-banger. Equality for all, not just the "christians". Next thing you know, he'll be suggesting that christianity be the National Religion! How pathetic!

Eleanor   January 18th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

This is a typical ploy used many times previously by many other homophobes on the radical religious right to try say that if gay marriage is legalized that it will lead to legalized marriage between humans and animals. It's as ludicrous as it is ridiculous, but that doesn't seem to prevent a whole range of fearful people from "believing" it...or at least using the assertion as a potential wedge tool, just as the radical relgious right has done in many previous political campaigns. It has no basis in any sort of truth, and is utterly despicable! It, and Mr. Huckabee should be roundly criticized for trying it yet again. You're a disgrace, Mr. Huckabee. A disgrace!

Jason, VA   January 18th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 says all that is needed to be said about same sex marriage. So far, every state that has had a Constitutional amendment on the ballot to make it law that marriage is to be between a man and a woman, it has passed. That should say something about what the “Main stream American” sees as right and wrong. This country was founded by Christians on Christian beliefs. If you look at anything good out there you can find its roots in Christianity. Child Labor Laws, Women’s Rights, Equal Rights, etc. All have roots in Christianity. I am proud of Mike Huckabee for sticking to what he believes in and a President without Christian values would be a President without a good base for moral values. The basis for moral values is the Bible. On a side note, Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards all believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman. In my opinion if these three believed that same sex relationships were ok they would also believe same sex marriage is ok. So this is not just a “Right Winged” radical concept. I urge anyone who hasn’t done so to pick up a Bible and find the salvation that Jesus Christ has given us if you just accept him. Do this before it is too late. God Bless.

Shawn, Takoma Park, MD   January 18th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Solomon wrote: "Let the states continue to decide and we will all see that most of America is against gay marriage anyway. Huckabee should just leave the topic alone.

We should really be concerned about the over 1 million murders allowed in this country every year in the name of "a Woman's right to choose"."

Whether "most Americans" (and shrinking) oppose gay marrige is irrelevant. "Most Americans" opposed interracial marriages when they weren't allowed. Does that mean they were right? Of course not. Besides, in a Democratic society (ever heard of it), the majorty does not vote on the civil rights of minority groups. Minority groups are *supposed* to be protected from the "tyranny of the majority" as de Tocqueville described it.

That "most Americans" also favor a woman's right to choose is also irrelevant. What is relevant is that in a free society, women should not and CAN not be forced by the government to give birth against their will. Banning abortion does not prevent abortion. It just kills women, and frankly, like gay marriage, it's none of your business unless you're gay or pregnant.

Twan   January 18th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

I am a homosexual conservative republican who agrees with what Huck said. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Fun is between a man and a man and a woman and a woman.

Cephas   January 18th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

One more comment on a slightly different vain:

Many Democratic Candidates have GLBT Steering groups working as part of their campaigns – Like Hillary Clinton.

Folks, this simply shouldn't be. Any such candidate should be laughed off the political stage. They obviously care more about their socially acceptablity/politically correct posture than for doing what is best for society and the country. There motivations and intentions as President will be at best duplicitous from the very beginning.

The minute a candidate gives any special intrest group of this nature such a level of input into their campaign it should be a warning sign to the rest of us not to even consider that person.

Morten   January 18th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

I must say that you Americans (sorry for the generalization) are looking more and more like most countries in the middle east. Religion is dictating your political debate, and your country. As an European (Sweden) married to an American, I can only say that I'm happy to live here and not in my wifes country. We have our fair share of "radical believers", but you would refer to them as mainstream. It's is also sad that so many in a country, that believes it self to be the moral and democratic leader of the world, not can be more open-minded, democratic and seem to have such a low moral. Needless to say, but I do hope that whoever wins the election will put more money into education. Knowledge is the only cure for irrational thinking. If you don't believe me, read all the studies concluding that the number of atheists increases while the number of religious people decreases with education and knowledge (this is true for Americans as well as in all other countries).

Kind regards,
Morten

P.S. English is not my first language, so you have to excuse any spelling and/or other language mistakes.

Adam   January 18th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

On another note, I love how these Religious Right False Conservatives love to claim that they know 100% that homosexual urges are a choice and not genetic. They have no proof other than that their god told them. The same way their god told them in the past that black people were of an inferior species, women are the inferior gender, the Earth is the center of the universe, creationism trumps evolution, and that people who possess and speak of knowledge outside of the accepted religious truths of god are witches (possessing supernatural power) and deserve to be burn at the stake. All topics of a scientific nature that those of Religious background have been 100% sure they knew were correct. And yet we now look back and see how absurd and above all wrong these beliefs were. Some day religious people will learn that believing things simply because their “God” (more correctly their pastor and some books that were written by men) tell them to believe without any proof is a grave error. Until then we have to but up with their abundant ignorance.

Randy   January 18th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Hi Jim,

I enjoyed reading your comment. I had one problem with it though, do you honestly believe that what is written in the bible is entirely true and that there are no falsities to it? It is common knowledge even to this day that history has usually been reshaped by those that had power over others..i.e...literature including the bible. I'm sure at one point the stories within were accurate to what you say God wanted for man, but because we are only human I don't believe in this day and age much of what is written in the bible can be coined as fact.

Case in point, there are widely known scriptures that the Roman Catholic Church has discredited on the basis that it tells people that you can find your way to God by looking inside yourself. God can't be found in some institution surround by walls of rock or gold but that God is all around us we just have to look.

The reason I mention this is well, if the Cathloic Church can rewrite the bible to as it sees fit, others can and have done the same.

~R

Holly   January 18th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

and also why would us GLBT people CHOOSE to be gay?

think about………do you think that us homosexual folks would CHOOSE to force ourselves to live in secrecy? do you think that we would CHOOSE to have to deal with biggots like you that have no back up on any of your answers?

DO YOU THINK THAT SOMEONE WOULD CHOOSE TO BE AN OUTCAST AND A MINORITY TO SOCIETY?

do you think someone would CHOOSE to have to live or lead a double life for fear of coming out to people they are close to?

do you think people would CHOOSE to be gay so they could possibly be disowned or mistreated by their parent figures that use to love them when they thought they were straight?

I COULD GO ON AND ON.

get some real back up on your information … and yes i agree with several of you that i don't want your heterosexuality shoved down my throat either. if it doesn't personally affect you, then why is it such a big deal?

you're basing your facts upon religious beliefs. and when really religion has been around since the beginning of time. you listen and place your beliefs into a book that was written (supposedly) millions of years ago.

have you even met a GLBT person? i bet not.

have you even talked to a gay person……probably not either.

and supposedly according to some of your religous beliefs……if we're the ones going to hell then what are you so worried about?

i lived in the "closet" having to live a double life until i came out to my parents. they love me for me. i have been there along with all other fellow GLBT people around the US and they know how hard it is to fight to come out and be PROUD of who you are.

just like another commenter said………

we are out of our closets and we are not going to back down for pretentious biggots like you…… we are going to ALL FIGHT TOGETHER for our equality. we will not subside and we will not abandon our rights.

Amanda   January 18th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

LLoyd from canada...

YOU TELL ME HOW HOMOSEXUALITY IS IMPOSED ON YOU. TELL ME. How does me having a wife have anything to do with your marriage?

And remember people, heterosexual marriages are the ones with all the problems. Why dont you fix your own institution rather than discriminating against others.

Also, you say you are being condemned as bigots.

YOU ARE doing everything you can to stop the happiness and equality of other individuals. NOW YOU TELL ME THAT IS NOT BIGOTRY!

Bernardo   January 18th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

No special rights for the gays! Marriage = 1 man and 1 woman only.

RJ from SC   January 18th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

I voted for Huckabee in the South Carolina primary because the Republican Party will get what it deserves. They've been pandering to the religious right for years now they should finally get what's coming to them – a candidate who's absolutely unelectable and who symbolizes perfectly the virulent and hateful message of today's "Conservative Christians," who are without a doubt the clearest danger to freedom and liberty in the world today.

Attacks by the Establishment   January 18th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Part of getting this country back to its Christian principles prior to 1960s is recognizing that a man and a woman constitute a marriage! Ron Paul knows this to be true but he will let the States decide these issues and move on to getting the central government out of our lives, out of debt, out of wars, out of every corner of society except what is Constitutional!

"I have fought against the people of the North because I believed they were seeking to wrest from the South its dearest rights. But I have never cherished toward them bitter or vindictive feelings, and have never seen the day when I did not pray for them." General Robert E. Lee

You said General, the yankees need more prayer today than ever before. It would help us here in Dixie if the yankees would stay North of the Mason-Dixon Line and keep their immoral behavior up there with them!

Michael in MA   January 18th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Huckabee is not fit to be President. He's weak and dances around issues more often than not. Just because he's clever and witty, and speaks with poise and composure...don't be fooled. Check his record. It's more liberal than he lets on.

Latest polls show that Fred Thompson is still on the rise in South Carolina. In fourth place now, but Romney has dropped two percentage points, and Fred has jumped up two percentage points. With an enormous 19% still undecided.

South Carolinians can turn the tides here and shake this race up.

Fred Thompson is the only true conservative. And if you're leaning right, consider Fred. fred08.com

Also, Hillary has no experience. And come to think of it, neither does Obama. Why are we not hearing more about this?

Adam   January 18th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Let me start off by saying I am a straight male who is a true conservative. And by that I mean I believe in small government in every aspect of the term, which includes staying out of people’s lives when it comes to their personal beliefs and following the Constitution no matter what. Having said that, I look at this debate and I see that it is really such an absurd thing. Being a scholar of law and a constitutionalist lets look at gay marriage strictly from a legal standpoint leaving God where he belongs, far far away.

What benefits are granted to a married couple:

1. Tax Breaks
2. Coverage under spouses health insurance
3. Next of kin rights in legal and medical situations
4. Protection from testifying against their spouse
5. The right to adopt a child as a couple

I ask you solely based on legal standing why should a gay couple not be granted these rights? There is no answer you can give other than God says it is wrong. No were in the above list does it mention God. As a matter of fact not god of any faith has any standing in the United States legal realm.

Corey   January 18th, 2008 1:29 pm ET

This shows just the idea behind Huckabee's theocracy. He's going to throw Democracy out the window and force Christian laws on everyone. Freedom of religion? Not in Huckabee's America.

john   January 18th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

I feel the commits made by Mr. Huckabee are the words of a man that has his head on straight. He is in line with mainstream .

Corey Sinnott   January 18th, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Why does our government support marriage in the first place? It is, most commonly but not exclusively, a Christian tradition. If America is truly a state seperate from religion, then why are marriage licenses released? I suggest that my government offers a union certificate for any two adults who wish to pool their resources in economic benefit. This way, you can find your marriage at your local church and find your economic union certificate at your local courthouse. Problem solved.

Neal   January 18th, 2008 1:27 pm ET

What did Mike Huckabee say about values and the role of parenting when his 17 son hung a dog from a tree and shot it? And then as the Gov of the state fired the people that investigated his son. Just another shadey ex-gov from Hope, Ark.

Richard   January 18th, 2008 1:26 pm ET

I do not intend to allow radical Christians to tell me how tolive my life. Christians should keep their noses in the Bible and out of our lives.

Cephas   January 18th, 2008 1:26 pm ET

The Huckster is not wrong to support the traditional family unit as well as the sexual proclivities that are a part of that. They are woven deep within the fabric of our society and social structure. Not to mention the fact that they are a significant part of the religious underpinnings of that social structure. Encouragement of civil unions will not help strenghten that structure or the human race.

However, his musings on the topic stray far outside the scope of normally accepted thought. Individuals are individuals with rights and priviledges that can't be ignored in this country. In fact they deserve to be respected.

But to be above board here, in my opinion, banning gay marriage does not harm those rights. Individual rights are unaffected by such a decision.

Nevertheless, the Huckster's rantings on the subject are simply a peak at the radical views he holds and are held by a large percentage of Evangelicals.

I don't believe that the the Huckster sees all Americans as equal. And if that is true he doesn't deserve to be President.

If we nominate him, the democrats will be dancing in the street – they've already said as much. The general election will be a cake walk for them. The same is true for McCain, Rudy and Ron Paul too.

Intrigued&Awed   January 18th, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Opinion (based on fact): The President of the United States is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the governmental complex.

Therefore, for the expediency of governmental action, religion should take NO PART in decisions regarding secular matters.

Also, the Chief Executive Officer simply signs bills into law...he doesn't actually MAKE the law- he/she is an advisor/auditor who must make sure the law functions in the capacity it was written for and also is supposed to veto it if it has large issues that should never have been in the law in the first place. (commonly known as pork barrelling etc.- that is why we have an Ethics commission)

Fact: All citizens of the United States of America are entitled to

-protection FROM religion and protection FOR religion clauses in the Constitution.

People are free to practice whatever religions they choose, and even MULTIPLE religions...but they are not free to force others to practice theirs.
Forcing others to practice a religion is, for me, subjugation/coercion. It is a form of imprisonment/thought control if the person has no desire to practice that religion or already practices a competing form.

Jason NYC   January 18th, 2008 1:24 pm ET

People marry for many reasons, but usually one or more of the following: legal, social and economic stability; the formation of a family unit; procreation and the education and nurturing of children; legitimizing sexual relations; public declaration of love; or to obtain citizenship.

In no way does one need to be married to reproduce. Conversely, married couples are not requried to reproduce. To say marriage exists for fertility is absurd. CJ is correct by saying, throughout history, marriage existed as a legal means of transferring property from parents to progeny, and a means of establishing social or business ties between families.

John C: Explain to me again how employers subsidizing health benefits for non family members undermines the traditional family. Do you believe that offering benefits to domestic partners somehow affects your family?

Susan, Atlanta, GA   January 18th, 2008 1:23 pm ET

God says in the Bible that homosexuality is perversion and worthy of death (Leviticus and Romans chapter 1). That is never going to change, no matter how indignant homosexuals become. They can be forgiven by God if they repent (truly admit their sin and change their ways), but God will never say it's OK. Doubt it? Just read the Bible all the way through, and you will see that fornication, adultery, homosexuality and beastiallity are all horrible sins in the eyes of God.

Harrison, NC   January 18th, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Good grief! The religious fanatics are attempting to define WHO constitutes a "family!" A good review of ANY of the history textbooks should negate any of such foolishness! The issue of marriage is a religious one; if you and your group define it, good for you! You do not, however, have any influence over how I and my family define marriage or family. There is no governmental interest in marriage.

By the way, holding certificates from a college or university in no way removes the bias, the bigotry, or lack of information on many, many topics. Even within your own degreed "family," there is substantial disagreement! STICK to the topic!

Greg   January 18th, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Mike. You bigoted stone-age troglodyte. Why can't you read a science book instead of the Bible? Stop pushing this stupid, backward moral pabulum.

A 1991 study of homosexuality (LeVay S (1991). A difference in hypothalamic structure between homosexual and heterosexual men. Science 253:1034-1037) provided strong evidence that homosexuality is a natural condition that stems from a lower-than-average cell count in the third interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus. For unscientific shoeless Galilee-stomping ex-preachers like you, this means that homosexuality is, for many gay individuals, hardwired into the part of the brain that regulates, among other things, sexual desire and attraction. This calls into direct - and it does not get more direct than this - question the idea of (a) an omniscient God and (b) an omnibenevolent, or all-good, God for the following reasons.

A) An all-knowing God, who claims in Genesis that humans should go forth and multiply (implying reproduction; for us, sexual reproduction, though it would not matter), would not have made this condition in nature (it implies a contradiction).
B) An all-good God would not have, upon creating this condition himself, punished its recipient by blaming it on 'lifestyle choice' (that type of blame would be neither logically valid nor would it reflect a structure of moral goodness).

Suck on that, Suckabee.

On a more humorous note, the Genesis command to maintain 'dominion over the beasts of the Earth' does not explicitly prohibit marrying them. Remember, the Levitical law says 'don't lie with beasts.' Mike, my wife, the transvestite horse, says hi.

JS   January 18th, 2008 1:20 pm ET

So "GOD agrees with Huckabee. After all God said it first, and the God of Abraham CAN NOT lie."

hmmm ... no ... an Israelite priest, a man, CLAIMED God said it. I think we can all agree that a man CAN LIE, or at least make mistakes. Anyway, isn't the explict prohibitiion of homosexualty in the same book of the bible that say you can't eat pork or have sex with your wife during her period.

On the other hand, I wish people would stop quoting Jefferson. History buffs, check it out, Jefferson authored a criminal code for Virginia which criminalized sodomy.

wes   January 18th, 2008 1:20 pm ET

I agree with Ron Paul, it's not government issue, it's a religious issue. Therefore, the presidential candidates should not even be discussing it. The only reason it's brought up is so Huck can tap into the evangelicals- the most close-minded people in our society.

ABB   January 18th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

for all you "self-righteous" right wingers, does the name "Ted Haggard" (or any of the other numbers of "conservative christians" that have been exposed for their hypocrisies) mean anything to you? The last thing that this country needs now is more intolerance!
.Huckabee has NO business being the next president...he continues to demonstrate that.
And, please don't pretend to speak for "the majority" , or "mainstream" America. How would you know what their beliefs are? You certainly don't speak for most people that I'm familiar with.

Plankton   January 18th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Dave: Marriage is the government's business because it involves so many rights most people never think about, such as power of attorney, inheritance of property, tax breaks. Those are not things a church can give you.

Joaquin: So, since my husband had a vasectomy, we're not married anymore? I guess it doesn't matter that we love each other or that we want to be together or anything like that. Wow...that might be the dumbest thing I've heard today.

MP   January 18th, 2008 1:18 pm ET

Does this also mean that he is comparing gay marriage to polygamy? And that he is comparing gay marriage to polyandry?

He is simply saying that once we change the definition of marriage to fit one social group, what will stop us from changing it to conform to the next social group's whim and desire?

Quit reading things into statements that don't exist, just because you are looking for some reason to be offended and lash out.

Brian   January 18th, 2008 1:18 pm ET

Huckabee, although he won't get my vote, is talking about MARRIAGE. Marriage has always been between a MAN and a WOMAN. Homosexuals can Marry the same as heterosexuals...they'd just have to MARRY someone of the opposite sex. They just haven't been able to change what the definition of marriage is...which is what they want to do.

They choose to live this 'ALTERNATIVE' lifestyle. Yes it is a choice. I'm an alcoholic...my genes show I am predisposed to be one and yep, I am when I choose to drink. When I see alcohol...boy it looks good and I really want to...But I choose not to drink at all.

The person who said you can't choose who you Love, how stupid a thought. People do it all the time....DIVORCE, DATING, MARRIAGE...ETC..

In regards to 'Maintstream America'...I can't say myself what Mainstream America thinks. I do know that many states have started to pass Constitutional ammendments and varios Referendums protecting the definition of MARRIAGE. It would seem to me that most Americans do not want to change that definition.

Jeremiah   January 18th, 2008 1:17 pm ET

"For the world's wisdom is foolishness with God."

Chris DC   January 18th, 2008 1:17 pm ET

To the responses that think Huckster's comments were fine, this is the problem with LACK of education in this country. Homosexuality is not a mental disorder, nor a disease – (DSM IV – Psychiatry) which had been reported for decades now.

To be citizens of the allegedly most powerful country in the world, it's tragic to think that a simple act of loving another person could be so visceral, so divisive, so volatile.

So, MIND your own business – Jim; Estill, go back to the cave – NOT mainstream at all...

mike c.   January 18th, 2008 1:16 pm ET

Hi guys.

200 Responses. Statistically, I wouldn't call your responses to Mr. Huckabee's comments a fair sample of American opinion about Homosexuality. But it is a start.

Whenever I hear a news story that includes some sort of poll, I seem to hear a sample in the 1,200 range...or so. So as samples go, this discussion needs a little more work...at least according to the apparent standards of the press.

I believe our country is coming apart at the seams. Perhaps using other civilizations, such as the Roman Empire, as examples of what hapapens to a society that decides to allow moral corruption to become the norm would be a useful way of illustrating what I mean.

Historians like to say that Rome "fell" sometime around 476 A. D. Really what hapened was that at that point Rome had reached a point of "unrecognizability." Due to moral decay which continuned unabated for at least 500 years, Rome, as a society, simply became a hollow shell that was eventually swept away.

An obvious component of the moral decay I speak of us was the existence of rampant sexual immorality that included rampant homosexuality. As the Roman empire ground down to extinction, its people were given to a lust for violence and sexual gratification of all sorts.

Rome didn't fall because of Barbarian Invasions. It fell because of its internal rottenness which rendered it incapable of effective government and effective self defense.

Again, foundational to this incapacity, was Rome's moral decay. And a glaring symptom of this moral decay, was its sexual debauchery. Homosexuality was a glaring example of that debauchery.

In my opinion, what I've just described of Rome then describes the United States today.

Several of you have condemned Christians for being bigoted and fanatical in their views about homosexuality. Some of you even equated "biblical" Christianity with fascism and warned that what happened under Hitler could happen again if Christians were allowed to participate in government.

The real problem, I think, is that Christians, who believe that the Bible is "the" word of God, have a set of standards that is absolute in nature. And because of this, they have a standard they uncompromisingly use to determine how they will participate in society.

And so, when it comes to interacting with issues like:

abortion, homosexuality, pornography, sex outside of marriage, etc. They say, "no, that is against God's word, we will not agree to it, and, because we live in a country that gurantees freedom of speech, we will speak out against these sorts of things."

Part of the problem lies in the reality that the US is a pluralistic nation. 200 of you expressed your opinion about Mr. Huckabee. All of those opinions were different in some way. You could do that because you were "free" to do that.

But there are some of you out there who actually believe that, while you have a right to your opinion, and the right to express it, Christians who believe in the God of the Bible and who believe that the Bible is the one, and only, word of God, should be muzzled.

That attitude is is evidenced by the various efforts that have been made to pass laws making it illegal under hate-crime legislation to be critical of a person's "sexual orientation."

The mere fact that some of you make the leap in comparing biblical Christianity with Naziism, demonstrates breathtaking ignorance that gives license to perpetrate the very same repression endured by Christians under Nero and Jews under Hitler.

I think that some day, those of us who are Christians, who believe that the Bible is God's word, His only word, are going to face the same persecution here in the US that our predecessors did in Rome. Today, in other parts of the world, tens fo thousands of Christians are being murdered for their faith.

Two more points, and then I will close this little ditty.

First, one of you said that the most important part of Jesus Christ's ministry was the sermon on the mount. I disagree. It is true that everything that He did while here on earth was important. His mission though was to die on the cross of calvary as a sacrifice to atone for the sins of the world. He was the lamb of God whose blood was shed to satisfy God's demand for justice in the face of "OUR" sin.

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life."

If we acknowledge that God is a god of love, then, we must also acknowledge that He is a god of holiness, righteousness and justice, as well a god of mercy, grace and love. Therefore, His love is a holy love that faithfully satisfies His demand for justice in the face of our sin. His love has been administered in a way that reflects both His mercy as well as His demand for justice. And that administration of just love was realized in what Christ did for all of us when He died our death on the cross...because of God's love for us.

Second:

Christians live under the authority of the Bible because its author is God...not because a man or group of men have endowed it with authority. There is a God, whether we want Him to exist or not. And He is Lord of all His creation...not just certain specialized compartments of that creation in which He is allowed to participate in deference to any country's competing religious/social value system...or legislation.

In other words, just because someone says that there should be a separation of church and state, shouldn't expect God to actually honor that "rule."

Well, that's my opinion.

Mike

Solomon   January 18th, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Let the states continue to decide and we will all see that most of America is against gay marriage anyway. Huckabee should just leave the topic alone.

We should really be concerned about the over 1 million murders allowed in this country every year in the name of "a Woman's right to choose".

Not to mention, I'd be more concerned about the possibility that Huckabee is like Bush, in that he's socially conservative and a flaming liberal on economic issues.

PJ, New York   January 18th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Mike Huckabee is a religious freak! I have nothing against people being religious... I'm Christian myself. However, I don't wear my religion on my sleeve. I don't understand why these people like Huckabee continue to push these issues. Nobody is telling him or his other fanatic followers they have to marry/love someone of the same sex! So I just wish all these fanatics would just live their own lives and stop pushing their radical opinions/beliefs down our throats. My brother is gay and he is not considered 'abnormal' in my family. I find it offensive for Huckabee or anyone else with his view to call my brother abnormal!! Most of the people who talk like this, with so much hate, are the one's with the problem. They really need to become more educated!!

2 Cents More   January 18th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

gods and religions are for the weak!!

homosexuality is for those that can't obtain or sustain a Hetero relationship.

Both are the makings of DOOM for mankind.

I think I want to become an Alien. At least they are much more advanced and have overcome the weaknesses of a constraining social environment that dwells upon 'what can you give me' and 'this is how i want it to be' mentalities.

Most Humans are pathetic, meaning less organisms. Nothing more!

What?   January 18th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

I do not agree with same sex marriage, as I feel it presents many great difficulties to the children of such unions, but I do agree that basic legal benefits of unions should be available to all. I also believe that if that is your choice, fine. It just does not happen to be my choice.

As for me, I practice live and let live. I do not demand that you accept my lifestyle, my politics, my faith, my sexual persuasion, or my beliefs and morals. But I demand the freedom to do so, and I will fight to preserve that right.

Mr. Huckabee is allowed to state his beliefs. I think what he said has been blown out of perspective. If you don't like what he says, don't vote for him. You have that right as an American. In this text-message society I think many react to the printed text without carefully considering just what exactly has been stated. What many respondents to this blog have intimated is not quite at all what he said. The ad hominem here is that they perceived he said that the gay lifestyle will lead to bestiality. He said nothing of the sort. He said basically what is to prevent further interpretation of the law to accommodate even the most bizarre definitions of marriage. That's all. No more, no less. A perfectly cogent thought.

BamaMAMA   January 18th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Hilarious! You people need to Chillax! I think Huckabee is right on!

Olya , Tampa, FL   January 18th, 2008 1:12 pm ET

to all Joes, Jims, and etc, who think that ..two men sodomizing each other is not normal and should have no place in our society...
If you find it wrong, do not do it..But do not tell other people how to live their lives, who to love and care for.
Huckabee disturbs me. As a scientist and a PhD candidate, I find it scary that people will make an intelligent decision to vote for him...
Kids Who Kill...well, I wonder what deviations made his overweight (gluttony, remember, religious folks) son to torture and kill an innocent dog...

TR   January 18th, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Huckabee might be very surprised at the number of conservatives who would fight to the death to prevent tampering with the constitution. It is one thing that draws liberals and conservatives together against him. I say keep up, Huckabee, you're very far behind the times. Most people say "Keep your religion out of my government!"

Democrats = for the common   January 18th, 2008 1:11 pm ET

African Americans got their equal rights during the 60's and 70's. When will it take place for the homosexuals? Aren't they US citizens too?

1 more thing. Republicans are prejudice against gays for wanting a constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage. Last time I checked the constitution gave people rights and freedoms, not taking them away.

jenny   January 18th, 2008 1:10 pm ET

If marriage is strictly a religious institution, then why can we marry in a civil ceremony in a courthouse? Aetheists get married all the time- wonder how they managed to do it?

The point is that marriage is a right that should be available to all who want it, not just the religious or straight. Government has over-stepped its bounds by declaring itselft to be a regulator of that institution. A government that begins to selectively hand out certain rights to certain groups is no longer a government of the people. We've witnessed the failings of religion-backed governments before and they do not work (anyone remember the Taliban?). Huckabee is dangerous to our precious, and often hard-won, rights in this country.

If you're religious, great. But don't think everyone else has to be, or worse, that this country has to be.

For all those who think the "gay" lifestyle is being shoved down their throats- please. What it is is this country finally acknowledging the existance of homosexuals and an increasing comfort level with that lifestyle.

With all the things to be afraid of these days (nuclear war, terrorists, bird flu, inflation, Paris Hilton), I think we should lovingly embrace two people who truly love one another, genders aside. Frankly, this world needs more love and for those of you trying to put others down for loving someone of the same sex- for shame.

leo, Oakland CA   January 18th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Religion and Politics serve the same function....to control the population. It's all a bunch of mumbo jumbo superstitious crap. If you don't belive EVERY WORD the bible says then you are a hypocrite and a sinner per your own gospel. If you DO believe every word the bible says then you are going to hell because there is no way you can possibly live up to it's requirements on us mere mortals, unless of course you already beat your wife for speaking out of turn and sacrifice your children to avert gods rage and cover your doorstep in sheeps blood. Poor sheep, what did they ever do to anyone?

The religious right is the most idiotic group of people I have ever come accross. Most of them don't even know the true history of christianity, they are mere vessels spouting what they are told to spew at church. I feel sorry for each and every one of them. How can you hear God speaking if you are too busy spreading hate?

I'm anti-religion and proud of it.

Amanda   January 18th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Sometimes I wonder If people like Denny...
...who wrote, "For this one statement he made, I agree with him, and even more important, GOD agrees with Huckabee. After all God said it first, and the God of Abraham CAN NOT lie."

even understand how utterly CRAZY they sound when they write things like this. It is CRAZY! WAKE UP PEOPLE! God? Huckabee? Abraham?! What the hell are you talking about? Lets focus on reality and stop plugging your beliefs in MAGIC.

Mark in PA   January 18th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Huckabee is a clasic Baptist preacher people...are you really suprised by what he says?

God does not hate people...but he is often disappointed in their actions.

People who have opinions that are not you're own are not necessarily a "bigot" or "homophobic."

Is what Huckabee said really wrong? Think about it people...He is Right. Gay marriage will open up the flood gates.

Gays should not be condemned for who they are. However, what they do is not natural. It is selfish and wrong.

If you disagree with me, that's okay...but you are wrong.

Do you want to debate whether gay marriage should be legal? Email me at depquarm@gmail.com (dequarm at gmail dot come)

Eric Crawford   January 18th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Good for Mike!! And he is out of "mainstream American thought." Mainstream America has become so politically correct not to offend anyone, even at the expense of truth that it will eventually be the downfall of a once great country. Huckabee is the only candidate with the guts to tell it like it is. America was founded on Christian principles
and the Bible. We no longer live by the Constitution. Men are comfortable now in what once were traditional women roles and vice versa. The country is greedy, impatient, pornographic, and violent. And it is only going to get worse. We were once one of the most feared and respected countries in the world. Now the country is 900 trillion dollars in debt, allowing illegal immigrants to enter the country daily in droves., and allowing people to get away with murder. Prisons are over crowded because of serial killers being taken care of while they appeal and appeal and appeal. The economy is in shambles due, in part, to greedy corporations, and deceitful CEOs. There are no consequences anymore for criminal behavior. Go Mike and keep telling the truth!!!!

Anneliese   January 18th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Joaquin – So, because I'm unable to have children, *I* should also have no right to get married? And my widowed grandmother who's long past child-bearing age, she shouldn't be allowed to get married? Is that what you're saying?

Holly   January 18th, 2008 1:08 pm ET

i think it's absolutely outrageous to depict GLBT people wrong for wanting the right to marry their partners. How would heterosexual people feel if the shoe was on the other foot where they couldn't get married because they were straight. Being gay has been proved that it even has occurred in animals for many years now.

i grew up with a great family of two parents and a sister. i was raised as any normal kid was raised in a nice house, parents who were involved in my life, went through high school and then to one of the top ten design colleges in the country and now have my BFA. nothing was abnormal but i wasn't attracted to men since a very early on age. my father was never abusive…hell, my dad is the best father in the world. i am a proud lesbian and the whole point of being married is to have equal rights.

isn't the whole concept of marriage to be that you found someone who makes you all around happy, who loves you eternally for who you are, who supports you in everything you do, who you laugh with and want to grow old with?

essentially that is WHY you marry someone.… and if you marry a person just to marry them then you've got the wrong concept of what marriage is. if marriage is suppose to be so "sacred" like the protesters against gay marriage want you to believe, then why is it okay for a man and a woman to get married only to get divorced two months later? the whole reason of WHY you get married to someone is lost within the heterosexual world. if you notice too, the separation rates amongst straight couples is extremely high whereas if you look at gay relationship, theirs end up lasting longer because they know what the true meaning of marriage/partnership is. and half the time it's the protesters and all of the anti-gay people who haven't even known one gay individual in their life so how can you make an argument about something when you haven't even experienced a GLBT person first hand?

i don't understand why the american public is so animate about not making this equal? if it doesn't have to do directly with you, then what is the problem. the GLBT community isn't asking you to marry someone of the same sex. we just want equal rights like everyone else. it's kind of like they are taking their noses and sticking it where it doesn't really need to belong. no one is forcing anyone to do anything. if you're not gay, that's okay. marry your wife that is fine. we just want equal opportunity. we are all people too with feelings of joy, happiness, anger, etc. it's no different. just because i'm gay doesn't mean i'm a child molester or that i like animals. i mean, i have a cat and she's my cat…that's it. i am helping my partner raise two amazing sons as well. and if being gay supposedly makes you a criminal i find that hard to believe and a bunch of bs personally.

so instead of opening your mouth and saying things that aren't relevant and talking about things you don't even know………sit down, experience a gay community, research how gay couples interact and their relationship time, etc. all of that before you start running your mouth about something that is completely foreign to you.

THE PROUD LESBIAN OF COLUMBUS, OH

Dan   January 18th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

So here's my question. One of the first commentors mentioned common law marriage. If we legalize homosexual marriage, then are two heterosexual people of the same gender that live together considered married under common law?

And that leads to Huckabee's point–what about 3 people living together? What about a man and his dog? Are they considered married after 7 years? If you start arbitrarily defining things, then what is considered "outrageous" today may not be outrageous tomorrow, so you move the line again to a new arbitrary point.

Niki   January 18th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

The whole concept of separation of church and state is to protect Americans from Huckabee's (or anyone's) personal religioius views. Huckabee can personally condone gay marriage all he wants, but it should appear nowhere on his political agenda. What's actually more radical – changing the definition of marriage or altering the very foundation of our constitution?

Also, although it has a very deep personal/spiritual meaning, the basic fact is, marriage is a form of contract. In short, contracts can legally be entered into by consenting adults. As animals do not fit into this category, I think we can all relax. In my opinion, Huckabee is a ranting embarrassment to our country.

JOE   January 18th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

GO GO Mike, I’m a Democrat but if win the primary I will vote for you, I believe gay marriage is one of the must immoral thing I could ever see in my life. I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman. If they don’t give the life to Jesus they will burn in Hell with Satan

Mike   January 18th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

While his comments may have been viewed as extreme by many of you ultra politically correct leftists, he is not completely wrong. While at first glance, the notion of marriage between a man and animal will surely sound ridiculous, and ALL of you would (or at least all of you SHOULD) regard it as plain wrong, it is relativiely parallel to the union of two men in that it deviates from the tradition and meaning of marriage. What is so different between marrying 2 men and a man with an animal? Neither can procreate, and both can claim they love each other JUST as much as any man and woman can. Just visit any animal rights/animal advocacy group (nutcases IMO) and you will see they may as well call them human. I see no reason for the affore mentioned activists to start rallying for the rights of people to marry their animals. What is so different from gay/lesbian rights groups pushing for changes in the law and animal activists asking for the same thing? So please, what is the difference between a gay couple, and man/animal marrying? I'm hesitant to say that both are morally wrong because of the onslaught of people who would tell me that religion should be kept to one self. Well newsflash, morality does not necessarilly have to mean a particular religious denomination. It can be viewed as the basic tenets of right and wrong, which although most of us can agree upon, the current state of our society has grossly put such principles aside in the attempts of satisfying our own hedonistic desires.

David, Gilbert Arizona   January 18th, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Ray – "...So do rapists, pedophiles and child pornographers. Should we respect their views?"

Last time I checked, Ray, rape and pedophilia were against the law. Why? Because it does not consist of CONSENTING adults. See the difference there? Homosexual relations between same sex couples is based on a consenting agreement. No one is being forced into the situation.

For all of you who say homosexuality is a choice then you must also agree that heterosexuality is a choice, that you wake up every morning and make the conscious decision to be hetersexual in that particular moment. The mindset is obsurd.

And lastly, how can people make the argument that homosexuality is being "forced down your throat" or that you should not be subject to the issue when you turn on the television? Last time I browsed my cable network there were 12 distinct channels showing strictly religious based materials. Using your same argument those religious channels should also be eliminated for the simple reason I should not be "forced" to be subject to that type of input. Or is it more so that I must endure the religious freedoms but the religious should not endure the secular? So much for equality in this nation. And this is what we are trying to "help" the people of Iraq become? Seems to me they already had this mindset under the Saddam regime.

JDG   January 18th, 2008 1:05 pm ET

As a gay man I would rather my loving relationship be foolishly and ignorantly equated with bestiality than be a disgusting bigot. This is downright cultish mentality and I am utterly appalled that people can comment on here saying that God believes that discrimination should be institutionalized. It is severely disgraceful that I live in a country where people justify sheer hate and fear with religion. Huckabee's statement is NOT mainstream. It is NOT moral. It is nothing but a political tactic to pull on evangelical heartstrings. After the civil rights movement, those who were formerly empowered by their own bigotry were shamed. Just wait...as soon as gay people gain equal civil rights, which will be soon, you will all be so ashamed that for years you have empowered yourself via blind hatred and transparent stupidity. STOP HATING others and deal with yourself.

TR   January 18th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Mr. Huckabee is correct despite the whining from the anything goes, socialist-leaning 'rights groups'. For example, a local media personality who is openly gay, became upset during a radio talk show. This fellow is very community-oriented and he described being upset after learning the Red Cross refused his attempt to donate blood. He continued to assert that the Red Cross should accept his blood since, despite being gay, he led a monogomous life style. He ignores the health risks associated with the gay lifestyle He and these 'rights groups' are dead wrong and have no defense, so they whine and label the truth as bigoted, insensitive, intolerant and hostile.

Elena   January 18th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Denny,

God said a lot of things in the bible – like don't mix the materials in your shirt, like there should be no divorce, like stoning would be appropriate, like it's ok to wipe out lots of children in a great flood because their parents were bad. Either we take the whole bible literally, or we take the whole bible as a group of stories. WE can't pick and choose which parts we want to take literally.

And you should know, the bible has been TRANSLATED many times over the years and was only written down many years after Jesus died. Unless you are fluent in Amharic, you don't know what was originalyl written. In fact, bible scholars now think that homosexuality wasn't really what the bible was referring to originally – the translations have garbled up the original meanings as times changed. DId you know that many of the original church leaders were homosexuals, for the first thousand years? That the Popes actualy issued edicts talking about how it was OK? Then the times changed, the bible changed, and apparently that means God changed his mind too.

Please educate yourself and get the facts straight.

RT   January 18th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Homosexuality is an abnormal sexual behavior no different than the other abnormal sexual behaviors Mr Huckabee references. Just because gay and lesbian organizations have been successful at bombarding society with propaganda and have gained more of the uninformed publics' support does not change that fact.

Lets completely take the religious and moral argument out of the conversation. The primary purpose of sex is the procreation and continuation of the species. These deviant behaviors (homosexuality, beastiality, etc....) detract from this primary purpose. It doesn't matter if these people have bad wiring that causes this abnormal behavior. It is what it is.

I am sure some will say I am some kind of uninformed biggot or a hatemonger (just as they have already taken shots at people of differing opinions here). I don't hate or want to harm these misfunctioning individuals. I have personal and professional relationships with many gay and lesbian individuals. What they do in a private setting is not my business but shoving it in my face and saying that I must condone this behavior is not acceptable. The majority of this country (thats right the majority) doesn't see this behavior as acceptable or desirable. The question Huckabee is asking is where is the line of acceptability that has been blurred by the lobbying and propaganda of the Homosexual left. There is nothing "radical" about his statement. Homosexual lobbying and propaganda have erased that line. When the limits of society are not clear – anything goes.

Bill, Albany, NY   January 18th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

I find it amusing on those who use religious justification to deny homosexuals rights. Lets take note that those same people including those on this board were spouting the same religious excuses to deny rights to blacks, latinos, asians and arabs. Am I shocked that an evangelical christian hates something that has no affect on them personal? No I am not. To be honest can anyone tell the difference between a PC liberal and a Social Conservative/Evangelical? Because I really cant. Look what he said about the Confederate Flag, and at the same time the partisans complain about other nations flags being flown here while they are dead silent on the Confederate one thats double standard 101. Hey you want to fly that flag be my guest you are covered under freedom of expression but Im sorry a Federal or State Building should fly only one flag and that is the US flag.

K.C   January 18th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

I agree with him 100%. Everyone else says what they want to, well, he has the same right. He didn't need a 'parade' to get his point across..

Mark in PA   January 18th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

I don't like Huckabee. That being said...I agree with what he said. Marriage is between 1 MAN and 1 WOMAN. Why is that so hard for people to understand? Any suggestion that homosexual marriage should be legal is against public policy, contrary to legal precedent, and immoral.
I am tired of GLBT people who label people who oppose their point of view as "homophobic." It is ridiculous.

Alison, Boston, MA   January 18th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Adam and Steve have been able to get married in my home state of MA for years now. I have yet to see any Wedding or Engagement announcements for Adam and Fido. Methinks Mr Huckabee and all the other bigots who try to claim that marriage between two people of the same sex = marriage between a man and his dog are full of it.

Mike, Omaha, NE   January 18th, 2008 1:00 pm ET

For all those who oppose gay marriage and think Huckabee is correct on this issue, I hope you have a gay son or daughter and then we will see what your opinion is. You are truly being selfish and ignorant. The United States should not base its laws off a book that was written thousands of years ago. And the fact that a 'majority' of people oppose it only shows how backwards our country can be, and why most other countries laugh at us on a regular basis.

Larry / Covington, Louisiana   January 18th, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Dangle a little pink flag in front of you, and the hatred erupts. Not the presumed hatred of those who have come to grips with their own sin and their recognition of their needing forgiveness, but the hatred of those who say how dare anyone–even God–tell them what to do and tell them what is or is not acceptable behavior. Each of us will give account. Some of us rely on God's provisions for forgiveness. Some presume such notions are quaint, naive, and foolish. Both are placing their eternal future on the line. One side will be wrong.

ll   January 18th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

to Denny...SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!!!!!

Shawn, Takoma Park, MD   January 18th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Joaquín Redondo wrote: "The organs for reproduction of the human species are there for fertility. That is the basic nature of the case. Marriage exists for fertility."
___________

So couples who can't or don't want children shouldn't be allowed to marry according to your standards? Besides, ever heard of adoption? There are tens of thousands of children wasting away in the system because oh-so-righteous, "natural" heterosexuals abused and abandoned them.

Bernardo   January 18th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

I will definately support a leader that has the backbone to stand up to this vocal minority of militant homosexuals that demand special rights for gays.

John C   January 18th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

I am an environmentalist and an environmental scientist with a PhD. I am also a Christian and strongly agree with Jim, except that I don't want my employer to be paying for health benefits for non-family members. Employer-provided health care is heavily subsidized by the employer. Personally, I don't want to see employers (especially my employer) subsidizing the undermining of the traditional family.

Preston   January 18th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

The comments made by Mike Huckabee are dead on and I commend the man for standing by his beliefs and not wavering just because someone wants to take what he says and twist it around to make him look like he is saying something he is not. He is as right as the day is long, when he refers to changing it for one thing, then you have to change it for another.
Marriage is between a man and a woman and the fact that this country once believed in and was founded on Christian beliefs and is no longer is very saddening. This country no longer respects Christian beliefs and rights but is willing to respect every other religious belief and right in the country.
Again I commend Huckabee for his beliefs, sticking by them and honestly believe that his running for President and being successful is the Lord Almighty giving this country one more chance to fix what is wrong with it.

pim   January 18th, 2008 12:57 pm ET

I guess I was censored by CNN and thrown out. So I'll try to make my statement again, because I think is it very important for the world outside America (which is big) who will become the next president.
As we watch CNN in the Netherlands and as we have access to CNN on the internet, I should be allowed to comment on anything, including articles in the CNN site.
So again, I repeat, in my opinion there is no difference between Huckabee and the Taliban. They are both very narrow minded and orthodox religious zealots. They don't accept evolution and the origin of species. The homo sapies is one species. There are differences, but not as a species. So they represent the entire range between homosexuals and heterosexuals. Marriage is a legal, secular institution. It is a protection by law for two people who want to live together.
Gay marriage has nothing to do with religion. Gay marriage should be a legal right for everybody. It is legalized, accepted and considered normal and above all, civilized in most European countries.
I am at the age of 65 now and I would highly appreciate if CNN would allow little space for a voice from the socalled old world.
Pim Gillissen, Netherlands

John Miller, Springfield, MO   January 18th, 2008 12:56 pm ET

I love this candid look at Gay Marriage. Just something to think about.

The Top Ten Reasons Why Gay Marriage is Wrong

1. Homosexuality is not natural. Real people always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.

2. Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.

3. Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.

4. Heterosexual marriage has been around a long time and hasn’t changed at all; women are still property, blacks still aren’t supposed to marry whites.

5. Straight marriage will be less meaningful if homosexual marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Brittany Spears’ 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.

6. Heterosexual marriages are valid because they produce children. Homosexual couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn’t be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren’t full yet, and the world needs more children.

7. Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.

8. Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That’s why we have only one religion in North America.

9. Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That’s why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.

10. Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven’t adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.

Ryan, Los Angeles California   January 18th, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Uhhh ohhh!! Time to rev up those evangelicals again!! Let's talk about gays gays gays!!! Those "evil" gays!! wooohooooo!!!

Next up…abortion!!!! This song and dance (unfortunately) never gets old with this narrow-minded demographic.

Can we move on to real issues that actually affect more than 2% of the population people?

Steven   January 18th, 2008 12:56 pm ET

To Joe from San Francisco,

"It is not what enters into the mouth that defiles the man, but what proceeds out of the mouth, this defiles the man." Matthew 15:11. You should read the entire Bible before taking things out of context from the Old Testament.

andre   January 18th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Mike Hukabee is right. God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. Gay marriage should be banned in the United states. The bible says 'the truth will make u free. case closed

SP   January 18th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

"Huckabee has previously come under fire for past comments on homosexuality. In his 1998 book "Kids Who Kill," the onetime Baptist minister seemed to link homosexuality with sexually deviant and criminal behavior."

Well he certainly has a point. Criminal behavior is often observed...in people who commit hate crimes against homosexuals. What a nutcase.

Shawn, Takoma Park, MD   January 18th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

milton wrote: "God doesn't tell anyone to oppose homosexuals (individuals) but rather the act. And some believe individuals can't "choose" their preference. I disagree. Even a drug-abuser, for example, which we know by science and by, yes, you guessed it, STUDIES, indicate that one is predispositioned to be a substance abuser. That individual still makes a choice. But that doesn't mean they're to be shunned or hated. Only to be identified with. And helped in anyway society can help them."
________________

You speak for God? Well, that's quite something. Gay people don't need to be "helped". Gay people deserve to be equal citizens in this country. Period. The views of ancient Middle Easterners are totally irrelevant.

The True   January 18th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

I stand behind you. Changing the law would be wrong and subject to change again later in the future. I find the polls they use to gauge mainstream American to be misleading. More than 50% of mainstream American (who do not have the media at their door or a microphone in their hand) does stand behind keeping the law as it is. If its not broke don't fix it!

Joaquín Redondo   January 18th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

The organs for reproduction of the human species are there for fertility. That is the basic nature of the case. Marriage exists for fertility. Sterile use of the organs of reproduction is not equal to fertile use. The term "marriage" refers to reproduction. To equate fertility with sterility is a logical absurdity. No amount of political manipulation through votes will ever turn real sterility into real fertility.
In addition, language is not the fundamental reality. The analogical term "is" can be used to affirm the reality of a mental concept or the reality of something existing in front of us. Fertility is not the same as sterility.

Shawn, Takoma Park, MD   January 18th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Disgusting! The pathetic thing is, there are a lot of idiots in this country who would actually agree with Suckabee's hideous and ignorant views regarding equality for all US citizens in "the Land of the Free". What a joke that is.

Bryan   January 18th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

All you bible thumpers make me want to puke! Did you just hear that sound? That was the door closing on Huckleberry's campaign and political future.

Scott   January 18th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Thinking like Denny's scares me to no end. We can't have someone like that running our country.

dave ks MO   January 18th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Marriage is a term that should be banned from govrment usage. It's a religious item, and belongs in a church, not a public building. This is a prime example of the mess you get by combining religous beliefs, and goverment.

In the eyes of the govt you have people living together, or not. weather in the eyes of a religion they are married, should not even be an issue.

People dont list "baptism, barmitzvahs, or circumsicion" on goverment forms. 'marriage should just be one more of those items that we dont.

Brian   January 18th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

I am in full support of Mr. Huckabee's comments. We must get back to fundamental values in this country. If we do not we are doomed to failure. this country was founded on some very basic beliefs and we have let the far left pollute our system.

CJ   January 18th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Huckabee's views on gay marriage are predictable, if somewhat backward. The truly disturbing aspect of this quote is his insistence that we must amend the constitution to conform with his religious beliefs. Thomas Jefferson must be spinning in his grave!

As for the quote from his 1998 book, will someone please explain to me how pedophilia, sadomasochism, and necrophilia are "publicly endorsed and institutionally supported"? What on earth is he talking about?

Furthermore, the "sacred" institution of marriage has been, in nearly all cultures throughout most of recorded history, primarily a legal means of transferring property from parents to progeny, and a means of establishing social or business ties between families. This is not a radical opinion, it is easily ascertained fact that can be verified with minimal historical research. The notion of mutual romantic love has never really entered into the equation until very recently, so please stop using the 'sanctity card' in your arguments.

Jackson   January 18th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Huckabee ... is a dinosaur!

Tony   January 18th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

One has to be completely and udderly ignorant to have read all of these comments and still can truthfully say that Huckabee was equating bestiality with homosexual sexually behavior.

Maybe someone of you didn't read any of the comments or maybe didn't even read the story.

The quote was, "I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal,". No where in that quote does it say anything like, "homosexual sexual relations are equal to bestiality."

If this did say something like that, I would agree with the fact that that comment was wrong. The comment obviously and easily understandably stated Huckabee's position on same-sex marriage as against the laws enforced in the United States.

Ignorance is not a virtue people.

Ben Simmons   January 18th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

What aggravates me about this whole business is the way in which the Conservative Christian community has hijacked Christianity itself and turned it from a religion of tolerance, peace, grace and love into a weapon of social inequity. Christian Conservatives refer to themselves as "Christians", as if every other believer in the divinity of Jesus Christ adopts some model of the religion whereby homosexuals are social deviants deserving of society's merciless condemnation. If heterosexuals are the true stewards of the institution of marriage, why have more than half of married heterosexuals trashed their own wedding vows and ended their marriages? Why do they sign pre-nuptial agreements, mocking the word of both the Lord and the law by making arrangements for the future failure of their marriage? Get off your high horse, "Christian" Conservatives. Your hypocrisy far outweighs your logic.

Kimber   January 18th, 2008 12:46 pm ET

"it's a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God."
"What we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than trying to change God's standards so it lines up with some contemporary view of how we treat each other and how we treat the family."
~Mike Huckabee

What happened to not making a law that favors one religion over another?
Not everyone in America is a Christian, what happened to America being a great big melting pot. Not so much anymore eh?

Bob   January 18th, 2008 12:46 pm ET

Huckabee endorsed marriage between a man and a pole in his comments about the Confederate flag, so he's not THAT closed-minded.

Seriously, though, I don't think the government should be involved in marriage at all. That's ultimately what this is about, isn't it? Whether gay people can have tax breaks and a nice shiny marriage certificate like straight people do? If the government would stop sticking its nose into the marriage business, this whole issue would be moot.

If you'd like to express your support for the government getting out of marriage and any number of other places it is meddling, vote Ron Paul!

chuck   January 18th, 2008 12:46 pm ET

resurrection.

remember, that Jesus DID submit to baptism...

Jack Paulsen   January 18th, 2008 12:46 pm ET

Huckabee clearly disregards separation of Church and State. As a homosexual man, I have no objection with electing a minister president, however Huckabee has already demonstrated that his political direction will be directly influenced by his religion.

If we as Americans are all entitled to our own religious freedoms, then why can we not marry (as human beings), regardless of sexual orientation? What effect would my marriage to a man have on any other American citizen? Yes, others may not agree with it based on their own religious beliefs, but should I really be stopped if it doesn't infringe on their own freedoms?

There are many traditions and beliefs from various religions that I do not personally subscribe to. For example, in the faith of Islam, the tradition is not to consume alcohol. Although most Americans don't subscribe to this tradition, alcohol is part of our everyday life. Would it be fair for Muslims to ban alcohol consumption for all, based on their own specific beliefs... no.

The American people will speak on election day, and I'm confident that we will choose a leader who represents freedom for all, and it's not looking like Huckabee is that dynamic leader we're looking for.

Melissa   January 18th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

Also, about the Christianity thing – gays can be Christian. Liek I said... it's not like being gay hinders anything. Yes, this nation was based upon freedom – of religion, speech, and actions – as long as you don't cause harm to others. So let me get this straight... I can be straight and agnostic. They can be gay and Christian... so let them. Freedom of religion. Gays aren't hurting anyone by being gay. And Christianity may be the only religion acceptable to Christians, but it's not the only religion. Open your eyes, your ears and your hearts. My best friend is a priest... known him since I was 14. I – am, and always have been agnostic. Hate me for it, but at least you aren't loving me for just saying I'm Christian and not acting like a Christian like 99 percent of those who dub themselves believers. In my opinion, if you're a firefighter, you do what a firefighter does, and a doctor does what a doctor does. So if you say you're Christian, do what a Christian is supposed to do and open your hearts to the way people are and stop CONDEMNING them for what they aren't. Maturity people. It's happening. And hopefully, someday – so will intelligence.

Das   January 18th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

This guys thoughts reflect his own projections and his ignorance is just beyond belief.
He's clearly inferring a relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia and bestiality. He just doesn't have the guts to own what he thinks.

How long will it be until we hear about him in a airport bathroom?

Wendy   January 18th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

As a lesbian who was in a heterosexual marriage for 8 years I can tell you that once you try to live a life as a different sexual orientation it is NOT normal! For me heterosexuality is NOT normal, that's not how God made me and millions of others since the beginning of time. I was miserable, my husband was miserable, and we divorced after having two sons, so that changed their life too. If gays and lesbians could marry each other in the first place there would be a lot less divorce and trauma on children. When a gay or a lesbian say they "were born that way" BELIEVE them!

Sue, Greensboro, NC   January 18th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

I can't understand why Huckabee hasn't gotten his teeth fixed.

dave ks MO   January 18th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Seperate Marriage and goverment – period. Marriage is a religous domain, not the goverments.

Thats what happens when you mix the two – confusion and problems.

Get married in the eye of your chosen religion – take a legal living partner from the goverment. Taxes would be the same for single, married, and people with living partner(s). Morale judgements then are back in the hand of the religion, not the state. Gay people live together with or without that peice of paper – so what s the difference.

Marriage should be struck from the wording of the US goverment. People dont list if they are baptized, barmitzvahed, or circimcised on goverment forms, marriage should be in the same group.

Mike in IL   January 18th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

The Bible that I try to live by the best I can states clearly that a marriage is to be between a man and a woman. I am sick of the media and the so called "politically correct" faction of people trying to say that a Christians view of life is somehow a form of biggotry. I do also realize that many Christian people are also part of the problem by not "practicing what they preach". It's time for the Christian values that this country was founded on to again prevail in America. As one great American once said. "Don't forget about your greatest American right of all – your right to leave"

Harrison   January 18th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Huckabee is using his tried-and-true method of behavior – FOOT in MOUTH! It takes only minutes of reviewing his positions on ANYTHING AFFECTING THIS NATION to discover – he has NO CLUE! If the Republican Party needed a comedian to lighten up the campaign, they have one in Huckabee! What a very, very silly man!

SpinyNorman   January 18th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

If you think your squeamishness should overrule someone else's civil rights, you need to take a long, hard look in the mirror, because you are selfish and arrogant.

George Garrett Manhattan, Illinois   January 18th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

How would you characterize gay marriage within any sense of reality? Trying to wrap deviant and disgusting behavior in the Civil Rights issue is baloney.

NCW   January 18th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

I think after reading most of the comments posted here I fear that the slow erosion of traditional family values is producing an inverted moral fiber. It seems that many have been flying upside down for so long they’re starting to believe they’re right side up.

John G, New York, NY   January 18th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

Separation of Church and State really is at the heart of this issue...and here's why.

A couple can get married in either a civil setting (Justice of the Peace, etc.) or through a church. Currently, BOTH the civil authorities AND the religious authorities (ministers) are legally licensed by the state to certify the marriage. Both methods of marriage are recognized as vallid by the state.

This means that we have extended the authority to grant a legal civil status (marriage) to church officials.

Since the vast majority of marriages are performed by churches, its reasonable that the religious qualifications for marriage (i.e. hetreosexuality) are so passionately asserted in the debate.

The best option is to simply separate the two. Churches should be able to sanction whoever they want as being "married" in the eyes of the church. However, we need to reserve the legal status of "civil union" to be maintained by officials of the state who are not obliged to uphold religious standards.

In other words...conservative churches should be able to "marry" (religiously) anyone they wish to sanction using their own beliefs. At the same time, those who do not meet the criteria set by conservative churches should not be denied civil liberties that are granted by the government.

Leviticus 18:22   January 18th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

Sex is meant for reproduction. Homosexuality is a selfish abomination.

Marcia   January 18th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

You mean I can't marry my cat?

Tonia   January 18th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

Way to stand for morality! I totally agree! My voice is being heard through Mike Huckabee!

tuhle   January 18th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

I laugh at how members of the Republican party have a stance of hate and bigotry can hide behind the word of "GOD". The most hilarious thing is, it's mostly "born-again" Christians that spout the most offensive, evil words at others.

lily   January 18th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

Good for him! It's about time someone in the public eye stopped this 'politically correct' crap and said what the silent majority of people really feel. This is a guy I could vote for!! I wish him good luck!!

Kevin   January 18th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

The problem is the use of religion to explain why homosexuality is not normal. The truth is religion can not be proven, therefore it is of no use to explain why homosexuality is abnormal. So lets deal with science. There are lots of abnormal people born everyday, club feet, blind, deaf, ms, and the list goes on. It would be great if we can find a cure for all of them, but we most likely never will. So why is homosexuality abnormal? Simple they can not reproduce within their own group, it takes one part female and one part male to make a new human. It is just that simple. Making up words like homophobia just to play the I'm rubber your glue game just does not cut it, "We're normal but you have a mental disorder if you don't agree with us".

Linda Davis   January 18th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

The "Huckster" is definitely out of the mainstream. I am a New Testament Christian who believes marriage should be only between a man and a woman. This is the concept laid out in the Bible. Homosexuality is a sin and condemned by God in his word.

I disagree with Mike Huckabee on most everything and am an avid Democrat. However, I agree with his take on marriage. Problem is, he is not running for pastor of the United States, he is running for president. He should be allowed to have his views, as is every other citizen, but will not be elected if he insists on making his aversion to gay marriage as one of his main platforms.

Freddy   January 18th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

Huckabee is not stupid. His camp says gays are picking a fight because they misunderstood his comments. Why does Huckabee's camp say this? Because by equating homosexuality with bestiality, he is appealing to the still very large number of ignorant, conversative christians in this country. By appealing to them, they will vote him into office just as they voted in George Bush. So then we'll have another naive president voted in by ignorant, convservative christians. After the election, they can all laugh "Hucka! Hucka! Hucka! " as the country deteriorates even more and the world keeps on laughing at us and our new president.

Deanna   January 18th, 2008 12:35 pm ET

I applaud Huckabee for standing by his beliefs and not changing them to fit everyone else. Our country was founded by people of faith with morals and needs to be run by someone with both. It seems a corrupt society wants to be run by such and is scared by "Jesus" talk, we should be more afraid of lingo like, "lesbian", "emo", "goth", yet we embrace these, especially our children. When this country goes to hell let nobody honestly wonder how we got there. I am voting for Huckabee and am not ashamed to say so.

Lloyd in Canada   January 18th, 2008 12:35 pm ET

Huckabee is correct. Mainstream "world" has had homosexuality thrown at and imposed on us. The "liberal" world believes their's is the only world but they are wrong. The MAJORITY of the world is anti-gay but we are being condemned as bigots for speaking our minds.

Cullen Kehoe   January 18th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

I agree with Huckabee. In a democracy, the citizens get to choose the way they want to govern themselves. If the the majority of the citizens feel that gay marriage is wrong, then they have the right to not legitimize it. And if they favor a candidate that endorses their view, they have the right to support him without being labelled a bigot.

If you feel that someone is doing something to harm himself or herself, then it is your duty to not to endorse it and make it legitimate.

Julie Los Angeles, California   January 18th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

This is the reason voters need to get out and opt for Obama or Hilary. Huckabee is a scary scary person. After what we have been through for 8 years hasn't the country learned any lessons. I am also tired of the ignorant religious right who use religion to hide their own shortcomings. Shame on Huckabee.

jeff   January 18th, 2008 12:33 pm ET

And the same state (Arkansas, for you less intellectually challenged) produced your beloved Clinton. The quote was obviously taken out of context. When read in its entirety, it makes perfect sense. No wonder FOX gets the most ratings.

Nancy in NY   January 18th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

The Huckster is a stupid fool and anyone who listens to him is obviously weak-minded.

Josh Maloney, Oakland, CA   January 18th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Do we really want to elect a Leader who makes comments like this? Regardless of one's view on what marriage is, these are inappropriate comments. John Edwards believes marriage is between a man and a woman but we sure don't hear him making comments like that of Huckabee.

sly   January 18th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Huckabee wasn't wrong in what he believes, for everyone knows that the definition of "Marriage" is a union of a man and a woman. Changing the definition opens up avenues for any crazy doctrine and that's the point he was making. However, it's going to burn him. Even IF he were to become the GOP nominee I don't see him winning any states north of the Mason Dixon line and West of the Rockies........

Pam, Long Beach, CA   January 18th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

WOW! What a bunch of mean-spirited, stupid, backward people. Christians? I am very grateful that I have grown up along all kinds of different people. Your "Christian" remarks make me wish that us rational, nice, decent people who don't hate people because of their sexual preference, or race, or religion didn't have to live in the same country. You people are horrible and mean and hateful. You are so self-rightous, based on ignorance and stupidity. You all belong on the Jerry Springer show.

Jim   January 18th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

I can't blame Huckabee. Gay marriage is allowed in other countries and last year, a woman in England (I believe) married a dolphin!!!!!!

God   January 18th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

If someone does not believe all people are created equal, then they do not support the constitution and are traitors. That's what huckabee is doing. Should a traitor be president? No.

Larry Snow   January 18th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

To Joe in San Francisco. Murder has been around longer than homosexuality. Does God approve of that? Are we to get used to that? I believe not. We are not to judge and by explaining what God has said in his word is not judging. It is simply stating what God is going to judge in the end. Homosexuality is wrong, no more no less than adultery or gossip. Sin is sin no matter how we want to massage it. Remember, God loves the sinner but he does not condone the sin. The reliqious people you frown upon for the most part do the same or at least they should.
Larry Snow

Steph   January 18th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

I love you Mike Huckabee. YOU'RE AWESOME!!!!

Go, Mike! Go! Preach it, brother!!

Jeremiah 7:19, But am I the one they are provoking? declares the LORD. Are they not rather harming themselves, to their own shame?

J.R..   January 18th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

My partner and I have been together as a couple for 24 years and I can say we have never had sex with any animal. Are we missing out on something?

Cable King Pittsburgh PA   January 18th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

Nice to know that the United States of Bigotry is alive and well. Would somebody please rap these neandrathals upside the head and let them know that this is 2008?

WHATEVER HAPENED TO"MINDING YOUR OWN BUSINESS " ?

SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S ENOUGH MESSED UP IN THEIR OWN LIVES TO KEEP 'EM BUSY FOREVER.

OH, AND BY THE WAY – ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID – AND DON'T FORGET THAT IRAQ WAR THING EITHER.

JUST BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU'RE BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE MEANS THAT YOU ARE NOT – BETTER YOU SPEND YOUR TIME CONTEMPLATING YOUR BELLY BUTTON LINT.

Betty Nester Draper, VA   January 18th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Way to go, Mr Huckabee! Gays go back in the closet! You ARE the minority!

Roger Robeson   January 18th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

I'm a Democrat but I admire Huckabee for taking a stand against gay marrage and all the other degenerates of this country.

Melissa   January 18th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

I have many gay and bisexual friends and I believe that marraige is nothing more than a piece of paper. While I agree that marraige between a man and a woman is the definition of marraige, I also believe that a person cannot help but fall in love with who they are meant to be with. I don't think the definition of marraige should change, no. But it's not bestiality. Let's get real people.
We are all human. Yes, this may upset some, but most of the straight people go after gay people like they're trying to ruin "our" world. Well kids, it's not just a "straight" world. Get used to it.
It's also not a disability to be gay – I watched trading spouses one time, and a woman actually used that – she said being gay was one woman's disability.
People are cruel. People are stupid. People are ignorant. Try and put yourself in their shoes.
If I were gay, I wouldn't want people to judge me.
I realize it's probably hard to explain things to your children about why there are two women or two men married. Or even more difficult, if two same sex parents have to explain why their family is different from others. It's definitely not easy on the children but I believe a loving family means "TWO PEOPLE raising THEIR CHILDREN (adopted or whatever) to the best of THEIR ABILITIES."
I'm straight. I'm engaged. I'm happy and I've never been gay or bisexual. But let's wise up here people.
Our world is changing everyday. And everyone would be so much happier if we all could just accept each other for who we are instead of trying to judge and speak badly of them.
Thanks.

Domingo   January 18th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Huckabee was simply saying that when you open the door, you are inviting even the most unsavory of guests....

Debi   January 18th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

I sincerely hope this person does NOT get the nomination for his party. I am straight but still find his comments and book bizarre. Hopefully this is not the caliber man we want leading our already troubled country. Our country's problems are not related to straight vs gay, but many, many other very important issues. What about separation of church and state?

Mike   January 18th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Those agreeing with Huckabee on this and Huckabee himself need to be reminded that our Constitution does not allow us to have a state sponsored religion and thus an "official" moral doctrine. If they don't like this, perhaps they can move to a country like Iran, where there is no separation of church and state, or North Korea, where those who don't agree with conventional ideology are persecuted and made into political prisoners.

Steve Banny Toccoa Ga   January 18th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

I am a republican and would not vote for Huckabee based on some the policies he promoted for Arkansas. I do agree with him that homosexuality is unnatural. Do what you want in your bedroom- it is a freedom, just don't try to convince me that it is natural or that it should be put on the same level as marriage.

Ryan   January 18th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

I agree 100% with Mr. Huckabee's statements, and homosexual marriages should not be allowed. We need someone in the White House that isn't afraid to speak his mind about what he believes in, and I think that man is Mike Huckabee!

PGG   January 18th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

It scares me terribly that these people proliferate our country. Should we all wear the Scarlett Letter if we do not play by their rules? I am humiliated for our country that, we so modern and new a country...are so very puritanical in our beliefs. I'm terrified of having a religious zealot, be it HuckaShucks or RomneyRoom, come to lead our counntry.

Anonymous   January 18th, 2008 12:22 pm ET

I agree 100% with Mr. Huckabee.I am not in the political race, so I do not need to be politically correct.I do believe any sexual aberration and deviation is worst that bestiality.Will we defend the so called 'sexual preference' to give way to to rights for pedophilia, sadomasochism and necrophilia ill people?

Steve   January 18th, 2008 12:21 pm ET

I don’t get why supposed educated people like Mike cant grasp it’s about 2 CONSISTING ADULTS!!!! What does the Christian right think is going to happen when gay PEOPLE can get married? Gay people are going to start breaking into straight peoples homes and dancing on the kitchen table during Christmas dinner singing “hahahahah we are gay”???!!!!?!?!?!
Find a new cause the anti gay cause is old and tiresome!

Steve from Maine   January 18th, 2008 12:21 pm ET

Huck is right!

terry   January 18th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

Huckabee is a fool. Of course, the vast majority of straight men want to be married to two, three, four, or five women at the same time. Hasn't any straight guy here had any lesbian four way fantasies where he comes in as the sole d-? Come on, don't lie!

Brandon   January 18th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

Homosexuality is perverse, unnatural, ABSOLUTELY NOT a legitimate issue such as civil and ethnic rights, and should not be endorsed or tolerated by the government. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. The Bible makes this very clear. All of you who point the fingers at Christians for refusing to tolerate homosexuality need to realize that it is God who says it's wrong, and for very good reason. It's just a result of a sinful, rebellious society who has chosen to follow their carnal lusts rather than pursure a relationship with Christ, which forces us to acknowledge our sin and repent from it.

Oh, and don't quote things like "the Bible says men can't have long hair." Laws such as that fell under the law of Moses in the Old Testament of the Bible, and God used those laws to point out our human inability to be righteous without being in a right relationship with him. Later, in the new covenenant, Christ fulfilled that law and made it very clear that we are no longer bound by things such as that. There is a lot of study that needs to go into the discussion of Christians "choosing what they want" out of the Bible. The entire Bible IS correct and without error, and also needs to be studied in its proper context from Genesis through Revelation.

Bill   January 18th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Trust me. Huckabee's pondering is NOT "out of the mainstream of American thought" as Mr. Smith and CNN would have you believe.

Robert   January 18th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

For everyone out there that keep saying you Chritians, Chistians are not the only religions that don't tolerate homosexuality,besteality etc. try the Muslim community you would have your head cut off.

Mills   January 18th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

there is no story here – totally taken out of context.

Walt   January 18th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

Joe said "If God didn't want homosexuals, homosexuality would of never happened. But unfortunately, homosexuality has been around since the beginning of time. It's apart of nature, so get used to it."

That could be the most ridiculous thing i have read on here.

That logic says that Gods wants us to accept murder and many other things that are wrong and say its human nature so its ok.

Wow.

Jon   January 18th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

To Ray-

I seriously hope you are not comparing homosexuals to child pornagraphers or rapists. Those people hurt others in order to satisfy themselves. They are criminals. Homosexuals are not criminals, and hurt no one else. The genes that they were given BY GOD have made them the way they are, because God wanted them that way. To preach hatred of these people who simply want the same benefits of married men and women is bigoted and hateful. Do you really think that is the kind of actions that your God would want you to take? The bible says "love thy neighbor as thyself." There is no, "unless they are homosexual" thrown in there.

anne   January 18th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

wasn't all that long ago that black and white couldn't marry. Oh that darned "slippery slope"! BTW all these posts just reinforce my belief that we need a president that will unite us based on true Christian morals...the ones about loving your fellow men and finding the middle ground so that we can ALL live in peace. Obama08!!

Larry Snow   January 18th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

Mr. Huckabee is 100% correct on his comment. Mr. Smith is 100% wrong. I believe if Mr. Smith took a survey, he'd find that mainstream America realizes and endorses marriage to be one man one woman, just as God intended.
If all America should decide it's ok for homosexual marriages to be OK, then 100% of the people will be wrong because God does not amend his word.
Let us pray for sound political leaders who stand on the principles that God intends us to stand on and not be swayed by the likes of Mr. Smith and other liberal advocates.
Larry Snow

Adrienne   January 18th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

(Huckabee is correct… Two men sodomizing each other is not normal and should have no place in our society.)

This is what we battle against. When folks say that gays and lesbians have no place in society, take them literally. This goes far beyond gay marriage and I do not, on the whole, believe that gay marriage opponents are or will be content to stop with gay marriage. If they continue to win on that, then they will next try to make sure that civil unions aren't legal. Then they will try to make it so that employers cannot offer domestic partner benefits to employees. Then they will try to make it so that you can fire an employee for being (or appearing to be) gay or lesbian.

When someone says that they feel that people 'X' have no place in society, one should take that person very, very, seriously.

Cheers
A

Susan   January 18th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

Let your opinion of Mike Huck's beliefs be heard when you DON"T vote for him in November. He is a joke who is not a nice guy. He's a hater.

Rudy Abbott   January 18th, 2008 12:12 pm ET

David wishes the mainstream America would agree with his position. This is simply not true. Mainstream America is just what it is. We just don't know until this whole thing is put up for debate. In the meantime, Mr. David should keep this thoughts to himself.

Trey   January 18th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

"Let me tell you something, Jim: I don't want your heterosexual "normal" relationships shoved down my throat ever time I turn on the TV!"

Caroline, Truer words have never been written
I'm sick of people saying I parade it in front of them by holding hands or a hug when every day everywhere I see people of different sexes doing it

James Izzard   January 18th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

I am going to write this is the nicest way possible in hopes that CNN will not delete it.

Mike Huckabee as gone beyond insulting women, gays, and blacks in the last week. Offensive stuff. How would you like your love to be compared to animal sex? Told you should be subserviant? That it is okay to have a symbol of slavery?

HOWEVER, yesterday I watched CNN run the SAME bit about the Clinton/Obama NON issue of race over..and over...and over. In addition to the clip of Bill Clinton standing up for himself with the press.

Now the every growing lack of respect for our government includes the press.

Patrick   January 18th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

I think what Huckabee said was out of line, but to say that he was "equating" homosexual relationships to bestiality is ignorant. In his slippery slope argument, bestiality is farther down the slope than homosexuality. A bad comment, but the word "equate" doesn't belong in the comment's criticism.

Mark Hurt   January 18th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

The claim is ludicrious that Huckabee's claim is beyond the pale. His position is the same as Pope Benedict, Billy Graham, and thousands of other well-respected world and national leaders. One can argue against it, but it is supported by hundreds of years of law and tradition, and the doctrine of nearly all Christian churches. While one can disagree with Huckabee on this issue, to say that his stance is not within the range of legitimate debate is simply wrong.

When one side has the losing argument, it is understandable when that side attempts to forbid any argument on the subject That is what the homosexual lobby has tried to do for years, with some success.

whee   January 18th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

Treaty of Tripoli – 1797 – signed by President John Adams.

Notice the first sentence – we are NOT a nation founded on Christianity. period.

And I would like to add some other quotes from our founding fathers, on the topic of religion:

“The clergy converted the simple teachings of Jesus into an engine for enslaving mankind ... to filch wealth and power to themselves. [They], in fact, constitute the real Anti-Christ.” – Thomas Jefferson

“Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon than the Word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind.” -Thomas Paine

“When a Religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and God does not take care to support it so that its Professors are obliged to call for help of the Civil Power, it is a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.” – Benjamin Franklin from a letter to Richard Price, October 9, 1780

midwest christian   January 18th, 2008 12:09 pm ET

RAY,

The difference between law abiding homosexuals and "rapists, pedophiles and child pornographers" is just that..they are not breaking any laws, nor doing any harm to anyone.

duh...

get a life hater

Jesus taught about love and acceptance

Ibjoyful   January 18th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

I'm proud of you, Mike Huckabee! Tell it like it is, because it's about time someone took a stand for conservative Christians. Keep up the good work. You have my vote.

Freedom for all   January 18th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

To everyone agreeing with him, you realise America is the land of the FREE right? Which means people have FREEDOM?

With the same kind of mentality some of you guys are showing there would never have been a civil rights movement and we would still be stuck in the 1800s.

Times change and you have to go with them. I'm straight but there is nothing wrong with same gender marriage, the constitution says everyone has the right, liberty and pursuit of happyness, if you want to move to a country that doesn't have homosexuals why not move to Iran?

Tom, Cville, VA   January 18th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

The truth will come out, and here it is about Huckabee. He's a narrow-minded, rightwing, theocratic extremist masquerading as an aw-shucks Gomer Pyle nice guy. Don't believe the hype!

Saddam Hussein, Hell   January 18th, 2008 11:59 am ET

I don't see any gay people here in hell, but I see a lot of Hypocrites.

Ryan   January 18th, 2008 11:59 am ET

Ray: "You wrote that homosexuals are part of the community and they pay taxes, etc. So do rapists, pedophiles and child pornographers. Should we respect their views? Am I a bigot if I don't allow that in my house? Am I repressing someone's views if I support legislation that punishes such criminals? Should there be an amendment allowing that sort of behavior?"

This is a pretty ignorant comment considering that all of the criminal activity you use in your argument is based on violent, forceful, criminal acts that are unwillingly forced upon an individual victim. I don't possibly see how these things have anything to do with what's being discussed here. Use some common sense when you're making your case, otherwise you end up sounding childish and without any real argumentative foundation.

Bill   January 18th, 2008 11:59 am ET

meant to say...

"open your minds and open your hearts.......then and ONLY then...."

Typos aren't a sin, thankfully, otherwise most of you would try to banish me to hell w/"those heathen" homosexuals.

Carolyn   January 18th, 2008 11:57 am ET

I think Jim is correct in every thing he said in his comment. That does not make me "ignorant".

Lucas   January 18th, 2008 11:57 am ET

After reading about 50 comments from both sides on this article I am sitting here amazed at how the supporters of gay rights are still using the same old tired, worn out and invalid arguments to support their view. I know it can be hard to come up with new arguments to defend your view, but after 30+ years one would think you could come up with some new cliches and buzzwords.

Huckabee is speaking the plain truth about what he believes. All of the other major candidates are lying to one degree or the other. You can accept a truth that you don't want to hear, or fall for a lie that makes you feel better.

Ryan   January 18th, 2008 11:57 am ET

What i find most humorous is the fact that his people think gay rights groups are just trying to pick a fight, nitpicking is what they believe them to be doing. How out of touch are these people?

EJones   January 18th, 2008 11:57 am ET

At least we finally have a candidate with the "you know what" to stand up say what America needs to hear and know. Changing the definition of marriage is the key to opening the door to any "God knows what" activity under the sun. Although I disagree with Hucka regarding the SC flag, I applaud him for having the "you know what" to say that changing the definition of marriage is radically wrong.

emJ

Ryan   January 18th, 2008 11:56 am ET

Good for Huckabee. The only honest person in the race. At least with him, you know where he stands. Instead we have to make believe that the other candidates have real positions when you can see the transparancy of thier rhetoric. I wish out media would do it's job. They should all be forced to watch "Good Night and Good Luck".

Lillian   January 18th, 2008 11:56 am ET

As much as I don't care for Huckabee he has a right to his opinion on Gays. Hillary got a earmark for 330 million dollars of our tax dollars for Gays. And I didn't like that either,
He's is correct the bible is against Gays, each to his own opinon , he has a right to his

Jenny, Paxton, MA   January 18th, 2008 11:56 am ET

Stupid, and thereby inevitably arrogant and judgemental, people SHOULD NOT be allowed to vote, period!!!!!!!!!!!
those who do NOT believe in equality, those who are intent to impose their unqualified "belief" on the others, do NOT deserve eqiality. anyone with an ounce of brain who live outside this dumb country understands this simple principle instinctively if not intellectually.

Ryan   January 18th, 2008 11:54 am ET

the bigger issue here, I think, is the fact that topics such as this only serve the purpose of further dividing this country. In all reality, this sort of subject has no real merit in the lives of everyday people or in the grand scheme of politics or the nation. I, personally, have no problem with homosexuality, and it's pretty clear that most people who do to this extreme, are not very secure in their own sexuality. In reality, how much does this issue affect heterosexuals on a daily basis? I'd be willing to bet over half of the interaction the heterosexual population has with this issue is through the news and politics. Are people afraid they will be "infected" with some sort of homosexual virus? Sure, it may not fit the lifestyle you live, but just because it's not for you, I don't understand the personal vendetta people have against something that doesn't even affect them.

As far as the Christianity arguments against it are concerned, I agree that religion has no place as a foundation for national legislature. I myself am a Christian and think that faith is an important part of daily life, but there's a difference between blind faith and faith, the former being based on the inability to admit that the Bible has faults in it (as it was written by man, it is INHERENTLY subject to errors and faults). That being said, it's arrogant and ignorant to base arguments on a book without acknowledging that it is not the end-all be-all of life.

In retrospect, homosexual-phobia is really just another avenue towards ethnic profiling and racism. Now that it's become socially unacceptable to be racist towards minorities in public, we've found another group to focus ignorance and hatred upon. The US already has enough xenophobia and isolationism inherent in the population; if we ever want peace in this nation, we cannot allow such insignificant issues such as this to tear apart US citizens.

In addition, if you're concerned with this issue being an undue influence on your children, do your research; homosexuality has been classified as a genetic condition by scientists. As a parent, it's also your responsibility to monitor what your child is exposed to on television and the media. If you don't like what's on the television, change the channel or turn it off. No one's forcing you or your family to watch what you deem offensive. That's called freedom. Luck you.

Steve Gilmore, Huntersville NC   January 18th, 2008 11:53 am ET

My thoughts are that you love the sinner but hate the sin. We have a lot of stone casting that is going on here. The same people that are blasting homosexuals are probably drunkards or adulterers or any one of the many other sins that are confronted every day. One is not worse than the others in God's eyes. I've read the Ten Commandments many times and have yet to see anything on homosexuality. It is mentioned several times in the bible as being against God's will but it didn't make it into his top ten. Love all of your fellow man that were created in God's image. Cleanse your mind of evil thoughts and fill your heart with the Spirit. We all are imperfect and God knows it. Help those in need and treat them as your equal and also find it your heart to forgive as God has forgiven you for everything that you have done and every sin you will commit in the future. Through his Son Jesus Christ.

Lev Klinemann, CA   January 18th, 2008 11:53 am ET

J-MAN

actually majority of people don't care if people are gay, and even in the latest polls majority seem to be OK with gay marriage

pollingreport.com

Check it out, plus the young people today are growing up believeing that being gay is OK (which it is), they may not vote today, as younger people dont, usually, but in 20-25 years....

Ian Webster   January 18th, 2008 11:53 am ET

Joe

January 17, 2008 11:29 pm ET

"Huckabee is correct… Two men sodomizing each other is not normal and should have no place in our society."

Um, Joe, I'm missing how that affects your own life?

Huck is Right!

January 18, 2008 11:36 am ET

"Marriage is one woman – one man. No more, no less!"

Oh, ok, so two people then.

Dawn   January 18th, 2008 11:52 am ET

Its so sad to see candidates playing the "Jesus Card" ! Religion should not be apart of an election....whatever happened to addressing real issues!

Joe, Kansas City   January 18th, 2008 11:52 am ET

Wes: You're right, I won't judge those that commit murder, kidnap, rape, or steal from the local store. It's not my place. Sorry dude, you're being judged everyday. If you were secure about yourself, you wouldn't care.

Val Davydov, MA   January 18th, 2008 11:52 am ET

It is very a sensitive subject to discuss (if not one of the most sensitive of our times) and yet we have to learn to respect and appreciate each other views without calling names and getting angry. This issues is dividing America in very dramatic way – I wish we never had to discuss it, but it is facing us and we should try to have a dialogue about it in most humane and compassionate manner.

I am not Huckabee's supporter at all (far from it actually), but I too believe that Mainstream America supports sanctity of marriage as union between one man and one woman.

ed rummel   January 18th, 2008 11:52 am ET

I hope and pray for mike"s continuing courage,and for americans to know that if we don"t take a stand , that God"s blessings will be taken away.That is a scary, horrible future.....wake up...God have mercy on us

SH   January 18th, 2008 11:51 am ET

What a moron. Think before you speak...
America,

Please don't make another 4 yr. (or longer) mistake.

Joe Lee   January 18th, 2008 11:51 am ET

John: The difference between an evangelical fundi and a Islamic fundi? The evangelical fundi tells you that you're wrong and you are going to hell, then you get to ignore him and walk away; the Islamic fundi tells you that you're wrong and you are going to hell, then blows you up and (in his view) sends you there.

Dan, NJ   January 18th, 2008 11:50 am ET

I am not a Huckabee supporter by any stretch (and believe everyone is entitled to equal rights), but he comments are really being misinterpreted here. All he really said was marriage is one man and one woman. Its not a gay bashing comment or hateful statement and many Americans believe it. Indeed, Bush and many Reps. have been saying it for years.

And truthfully, if you're gay, were you going to vote for him anyway?

DONNA   January 18th, 2008 11:50 am ET

HE'S SUCH A CREEP. IT AMAZES ME PEOPLE DON'T SEE THROUGH HIS HOLIER THAN THOU ATTITUDE. I THINK HE MAY HAVE POINTY EARS....

Arcy   January 18th, 2008 11:49 am ET

The "heat" that Huckabee is taking on this is nothing compared to the HEAT that will be felt by those who practice homosexuality. God says in His word that this is so. You can believe the sky is brown if you want to but if you open your eyes you will see it is blue. It doesn't matter if you keep telling yourself it's not.

Carol   January 18th, 2008 11:49 am ET

Huckabee's views will take this country back to the dark ages-not to mention how very unChristian some of his views really are!!!!!!! He needs to go back to the pulpit somewhere, not be President to this country!!

MO. hick   January 18th, 2008 11:48 am ET

well said A christian
I think its funny that every one keeps calling themselves main stream america. but who really is main stream america.
but on the topic of gays The bible says that they are a abomination. and this is why christians dont support gay marrige. but personally i could care less if they get married by some other religion. personaly i think same sex marige is discusting.

CYNTHIA   January 18th, 2008 11:47 am ET

I'd like to address this comment to JIM:

you state that the founders of this country followed the principles of God....well was it a principle of God's doctrine to own slaves and committ genocide of innocent people? because that's what they did and that's what this country was founded on–the sweat of slaves and theft of land.

but maybe you read a different history book.

Mitchel Ahern, Swampscott MA   January 18th, 2008 11:47 am ET

I *love* that line "rebuke with a pure heart and loving motives". Remember folks, as you do god's smiting for him, do it with love in your heart. Dang, that's nearly as duplicitous as "hate the sin, love the sinner."

PGG   January 18th, 2008 11:47 am ET

Merrian's Webster:

Word: Marriage

1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage b: the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock c: the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage2: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities3: an intimate or close union

Bill Smith   January 18th, 2008 11:46 am ET

Huckster is not the right person for the job, but this persons comments are ludicrous. America is not as stupid as the media portrays us.

Darth Vadik, CA   January 18th, 2008 11:45 am ET

For all the "RELIGIOUS PEOPLE ARE MORAL" crap that we hear every day, religios peolpe seem to be very intolerant...

...by the way, there is a difference between religious people and people who believe in a higher power...

...if you don't get what I'm saying, don't worry about it...

Claire, Austin, TX   January 18th, 2008 11:45 am ET

This is exactly the same talk people who were against interracial marriage used in the 60s.

We can call them bigots, but what do we call ourselves?

Tim Highton   January 18th, 2008 11:43 am ET

Oh my... here we go again...

of all of things to talk about.. of all the things for a presidential candidate to go and campaign on... he chooses gays again...

my goodness... we have war, poverty, environment, education, health care, crime, immigration... all of these real issues, but no, we get dragged back into the hate the gays... leave them alone for crying out loud !!!!!

Dave C - NJ   January 18th, 2008 11:43 am ET

West Palm, you proved my point.

How do you KNOW God said that?

You don't really. Sure your mom and dad and preacher tells you He did. The Bible says that (along with a lot of other nonsence...want a list of nonsence from the Bible?)

But how do you really know?

newz4i   January 18th, 2008 11:42 am ET

Huckabee uses hate for a seat in the White House ? ? ? ?

This country needs a leader who has learned how to respect all Americans ... a uniter, not a divider.

When Huckabee and his evangelical followers have a need to preach their religion, they should do it in the privacy of their pews ... not out of the Oval office.

Joe, San Francisco, CA   January 18th, 2008 11:42 am ET

Haha, to those who point to the bible that being gay is an "abomination" did you also know that the bible says eating shrimp is an abomination?

Silly Christians, always picking and choosing what they like out of the bible and completely throwing out the rest as if it doesn't matter. You can't pick and choose, you have to believe the bible in its entirety.

It's just so sad that the one big rule of religion is "Love thy neighbor" and to not judge. But here you Christians are judging away, as if you're doing God a favor. There's a reason God gave free will, and there's a reason why God said to not judge and just freakin' love eachother. So because you judge, you are going to Hell.

Religions cause segregation, religions cause wars, religions cause people to judge and smite. How dare you. I can't wait until religion is rid of. Then intelligent, non judgmental, accepting individuals can flourish and we can eventually be the "free" country the founding fathers meant it to be. But to those who are religious and aren't judgmental people who accept homosexuals for who they are, God bless you.

If God didn't want homosexuals, homosexuality would of never happened. But unfortunately, homosexuality has been around since the beginning of time. It's apart of nature, so get used to it.

corky   January 18th, 2008 11:42 am ET

why is it that people are afraid that 2 people of the same sex are going to have the same rights as they do? Gay people aren't trying to get anything "special". All they want is what is granted to all heterosexual people in the country. Why is that such a bad thing? This issue has nothing to do with God. Marriage between a man and woman have nothing to do with God. A legal marriage in this country requires a liscense issued by the govt. It requires no man of the cloth, no vows, no ceremony, and no church. Marriage is a legal entity not a religious one. What are we so afraid of? I sure wish the fear mongers and the haters would quit making this issue religious. Religion does not apply.

Steve   January 18th, 2008 11:41 am ET

I'm sure the nutjob liberals will have their panties in a ruffle over this one!

I don't necessarily support Huckabee, but I agree with him here. Homosexuality is aberrant, whether it's a lifestyle decision made by choice or genetics. Pedophilia and bestiality can be argued to be genetically ingrained too, like many other serial criminal behaviors. Whether it’s learned behavior, or you’re “born with it” doesn’t make it right or natural. The liberal media has forced gayness down the American public's thoughts for the last decade; enough is enough! I’m tired of this ‘gay rights’ crap. “gay rights” isn’t any more a “Civil Right” than “rapist rights” or “child molester rights.” Really, what these pervs choose to screw in the bedroom is their business, but will they stop parading it around, throwing it in everybody’s faces, and demanding to demean an ancient institution (marriage) by associating it with their aberrant, unnatural perversion????? A line needs to be drawn, and the line here is the fact that a marriage is one man and one woman. Period. As soon as you let gays call themselves married, what’s next? Can I marry my dog? Or a dead relative? My roommate? Myself? Give me a break….

Observer   January 18th, 2008 11:41 am ET

Mike Huckabee is just like Larry Craig. The more they profess to be appalled by homosexuality the more they are just commenting on how unhappy they are with who they really are. I feel sorry for people like Huckabee. He professes to be a christian, but he is really just a frightened hater. Let's pray he doesn't end up in a position of national power.

Steve   January 18th, 2008 11:40 am ET

I do think there are a lot of folks in this country who share Mike Huckabee's thoughts. Friendships have been ended over this subject. It mystifies me why this should be an issue when there are so many crucial items that need to be discussed, like the war and the economy. Hopefully, there will be a candidate out there who we can support and be proud of on an international stage as the world is clearly watching.

Brian Buffett   January 18th, 2008 11:38 am ET

David Smith it was God who linked homosexuality with bestiality. Leviticus
Chapter 18 I am the LORD 22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; such a thing is an abomination. 23 You shall not have carnal relations with an animal, defiling yourself with it; nor shall a woman set herself in front of an animal to mate with it; such things are abhorrent.

ANDREW COLTON   January 18th, 2008 11:38 am ET

This just proves how OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY Mike Huckabee is. Just another ultra conservative right wing idiot & we sure don't need another one of those in the White House for the next 4 years. George W. Bush and his ultra conservative BS. Good Riddance to George W. Bush.
How DARE Mike Huckabee put him self on a platform and make a comment like that ! I though he was "Love you Neighbour as your Self" and a minister. Just another 2 faced Republican. Wake up and smell the coffee Mike Huckabee it's 2008.

I am gay and I knew I was Gay in 2nd grade > God made me this way and I am tire of checking the Box on my Tax form as SINGLE. I have been with my partner for 8+ years and we deserve the same benefits and tax breaks as married people. Mike Huckabee your out of touch with the 21st Century , please just go away !

Johnny   January 18th, 2008 11:38 am ET

Ok, Rene you are rediculous. Homosexuality isn't normal. For example, from a strictly anatomical standpoint, it serves no normal function in nature in that there can't even be reproduction. A man and a woman makes 100% perfect sense on the other hand in terms of just a round peg in a round whole idea, as compared to a square peg in a round whole that doesn't fit not matter how you try.

pam Eugene OR   January 18th, 2008 11:37 am ET

Truly amazing! Who knew so many of you existed. For Gods sake people have some common sense. This man is very dangerous. Please vote him out quickly. Any other Republican is 10 X better than this fruit cake.

Anonymous   January 18th, 2008 11:37 am ET

but three lines down it says that if your offspring talk back, to take them behind your house and stone them to death, we don't do that now do we?
the bible can only be taken as people read it and people like to read selections.

David Brasfield   January 18th, 2008 11:37 am ET

I think it is time that people like David Smith stop quoting what mainstream Americans will be offended by and listen to the mainstream instead.
He does not speak for me and many other Americans and I support Mike Huckabees comments and he should not back down if that is his true convictions.

Gwen Boucher   January 18th, 2008 11:37 am ET

Yes, and he confirms that Christians shall be known for their ignorance.

Boston guy   January 18th, 2008 11:36 am ET

All these comments saying that being gay is a sin.

What about not paying your 10 % tithes on your gross income? Do all "Christians" do this? It says in the bible that if you don't then it's stealing from God. Isn't stealing a sin??

So, the old lady who only gets $500 in SS each month if she doesn't pay that $50 then she is going to hell??

How about the lady with 4 kids and no husband, has a part time job and she doesn't pay that 10% on what she makes, She's going to hell?? That's what the bible says.

A sin is a sin according to what a "Christian" believes.

Aparently, no one is going to heaven. That's hard to believe myself. Maybe it's just the gay's going to hell???

John   January 18th, 2008 11:36 am ET

By the way, heterosexuals are sucking as far as honoring marriage goes, at least in celebrity culture. Look at Jamie Lynn Spears. Now, I can either condemn her for having a baby out of wedlock or I could say that I condemn the practice of sex between teens but care for her as a person. I choose the latter. I do not choose to support it. By the way, publications should really stop coverage on the Spears family because it is nauseating and is not news rather than gossip. I should never have to know the Jamie Lynn example. I have my life and I choose to know real news like people dying in Kenya.

Joe, Kansas City   January 18th, 2008 11:36 am ET

It is typical that homosexuals would handle Huckabee's comments like this .. his point is so simple. Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman. That's marriage. Just as a "door" is something that you can open and that delineates a pathway between two rooms. Whatever you call it between two homosexuals, don't call it "marriage." Call it a sofa.

I also find it entertaining when homosexuals say that they were "born" that way tp explain their conduct .. well, people are born without limbs. People are born with varying skin color. Either way, they can't change it by doing or not doing anything. Homesexuality is defined by conduct, by what you do. What you do is a choice, just like the alcoholic who takes a drink. Many say alcoholism is a disease. So to accept the "born that way" argument, homosexuality is thus a disease .. a strange quirk in the mind that makes one be attracted to the same sex (or, as with an alcoholic, to "have to drink") .. to not function the way a normal mind would. The "cure" for the disease is abstinence.

But, as we know, most homosexuals can't help themselves, or don't want to. They simply want society to accept their "behavior." In many ways, society has. But what homosexuals really want is affirmation .. for society to say "it's ok." They'll never get that.

wes   January 18th, 2008 11:36 am ET

Man, if there are so many interpretations of this statement from Huckabee, I wonder how many liberties and personal views shaped the way "god's words" were written down in the bible.

Just let me burn in hell, and stop preaching about it. ITS NOT YOUR PLACE TO JUDGE!!

Huck is Right!   January 18th, 2008 11:36 am ET

Marriage is one woman – one man. No more, no less!

PGG   January 18th, 2008 11:36 am ET

What really irks me, is that there is this ideology out there that children of homosexual parents will become criminals. How absolutely hilarious for its stupidity. How about getting a team of people to walk into every prison in America and ask each prisoner what the sexual choice of his or her parents are. HmmmmI guess we all know that the most vast majority, if not at least 98%, I'm willing to bet, are HETEROSEXUAL!!!

I find it so enjoyable to know how very many gays and lesbians are PHD's, Doctors, Lawyers, Dentists, politicians, and brilliant celebrity musicians.

So, to all those barbarian savage-like "good christians", and I don't capitalize this, who smile in public and come across so gentle and Godly, you are all terrible phony and could truly care less about humanity, if it doesn't fall into your own comfort zone.

If you're not comfortable with what is on TV or in the movies or magazines, DON'T READ or WATCH IT!!!! This IS a free and Democratic country, and you will NEVER EVER get rid of anyone at all because you don't like how they live. And guess what? I can't get rid of YOU. But I live with it. And you know what???? I don't call the newspapers and my Rabbi to complain about all of your movies, books and other opinions.

MEANING?: Live your life......stimulate your mind with something other than what other human beings are doing. We all live here, every color, every religion, every sexual pursuation. it is ALL OUR PLANET!!! Get it??? You don't own this planet earth. WE ALL DO.

GET A LIFE! beyond endless complaining day and night.

Johnny   January 18th, 2008 11:35 am ET

I commend Huckabee for standing up for his position. He is also right, when you open the door to change the idea of marriage in one route, that just makes it that much easier to send it a different direction as well.

PGG   January 18th, 2008 11:35 am ET

What really irks me, is that there is this ideology out there that children of homosexual parents will become criminals. How absolutely hilarious for its stupidity. How about getting a team of people to walk into every prison in America and ask each prisoner what the sexual choice of his or her parents are. HmmmmI guess we all know that the most vast majority, if not at least 98%, I'm willing to bet, are HETEROSEXUAL!!!

I find it so enjoyable to know how very many gays and lesbians are PHD's, Doctors, Lawyers, Dentists, politicians, and brilliant celebrity musicians.

So, to all those barbarian savage-like "good christians", and I don't capitalize this, who smile in public and come across so gentle and Godly, you are all terrible phony and could truly care less about humanity, if it doesn't fall into your own comfort zone.

If you're not comfortable with what is on TV or in the movies or magazines, DON'T READ or WATCH IT!!!! This IS a free and Democratic country, and you will NEVER EVER get rid of anyone at all because you don't like how they live. And guess what? I can't get rid of YOU. But I live with it. And you know what???? I don't call the newspapers and my Rabbi to complain about all of your movies, books and other opinions.

MEANING?: Live your life......stimulate your mind with something other than what other human beings are doing. We all live here, every color, every religion, every sexual pursuation. it is ALL OUR POLANET!!! Get it??? You don't own this planet earth. WE ALL DO.

GET A LIFE! beyond endless complaining day and night.

Quinn   January 18th, 2008 11:35 am ET

I think the critics are reading too much into his statement. I didn't get the idea that he was degrading a certain group of people. Only to say that if we chanfe the law, it may lead to perverted people twisting it to fit their untasteful lifetstyles. I don't care if man and man want to marry, or woman and woman, I just don't want some pervert to twist the law by attempting to make underage marriage and marriage to animals legal in the crossfire. I totally understood his comment.

Democrat!

Conrad   January 18th, 2008 11:35 am ET

I was reading the other responses and I must agree. Religion is something used at times by these so-called "christians." The bible is nothing more than a book that should be called "convenient theries for you." It's all BS. It is sad that people cannot think for themselves. This is much much more than a gay issue, it is an ignorance issue. Many American's are like a herd of sheep simply following the leader. I totally agree it is a crutch for ignorant, angry people to feel better about themselves and an EASY out in a debated conversation by stating "the bible says...." That is a "just cuz" answer and is fluff.

Ray   January 18th, 2008 11:34 am ET

D Mills Garland TX,

You wrote that homosexuals are part of the community and they pay taxes, etc. So do rapists, pedophiles and child pornographers. Should we respect their views? Am I a bigot if I don't allow that in my house? Am I repressing someone's views if I support legislation that punishes such criminals? Should there be an amendment allowing that sort of behavior?

Jeff, Chicago, IL   January 18th, 2008 11:34 am ET

As a gay man in a loving, committed relationship (with a Commitment Ceremony planned for the spring!!), I just want to say Thanks to all of our straight allies who speak out against this ignorance and bigotry. Since we are a minority, you are our hope for equality in this democracy.

Unfortunately, I'm not so convinced that Huckabee and the anti-gay comments here aren't the mainstream of American belief. It seems that those beliefs do, deplorably, remain the consensus of a huge faction of the American people.

And so all that means is that we have a long fight ahead. If you believe that marriage should be a legal option for any two consenting adults, make your voice heard now! It is not the time to become complacent in this fight.

This is war, and the first battle is to elect a Pres in 2008 that will fight to get ENDA on the books, scrap DOMA, scrap DADT, and allow Massachusetts marriages to be recognized coast-to-coast.

Then we'll be getting somewhere.

Lots of work, people! Thanks again for fighting with us. And remember, despite all they say, God is actually on our side.

wilson   January 18th, 2008 11:33 am ET

Huckabee is right on this one. Homosexuality is the same as bestiality.

Eeeeer!?   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

Huckabee is such a cad.

The whole equal marriage thing is about protecting the rights of a LOVING COUPLE.
So I'm not sure why beastiality comes to Huckabee's mind. It's kinda sick. Normal people don't even think of that stuff, let alone make reference to it on a presidential campaign trail. Perhaps it's something thats often on his mind, obviously as it's not his first public disclosure of the topic.

Just for the record – Equality for Gays is no different than equality for Blacks or Women! No one is talking about equality for dogs. That would be like saying (back in the day) that segregation shouldn't be stopped, because the 'run-away-train' of law changes would lead to livestock having the right to ride on the bus, vote and use the same washrooms as, all the other folks.

Last time I took the bus there were no donkeys riding along.
Perhaps where Huckabee comes from they do...?

Christopher Lawrence   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

Many Christians forget one thing.
That faith is not fact and that their opinion is nothing more than that... an OPINION .
Why is it that these people insist on imposing their way of life, their opinions and their rules on the rest of the world?
This is nothing more than gross intollerence on their part and quite un-Christ like, not to mention, it is un-American.

Red Wolf   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

Jesus's life and death were about forgiveness. Christians should realize that we are alll sinners and should not cast stones. Gay behavior should be forgiven. They should still be included in our prayers and in our churches. We should not hate gays. However that does not mean we should give the gay life style normalancy, approval , or credence under the law.

Packer   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

You all are homophobes.
We are the mainstream
We are the DNC
Obama supports all rights
Hickabee is a racist and a homophobe
and so are you if you don't agree

Oh Boy   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

I love how so many "supporters" on here are so quick to bash Estill as a bigot and offensive and not mainstream, etc. However, don't you have to love and adore and accept Estill and her opinions, or don't you become exactly what you are calling her? There is no room for Estill in your box, right? You folks are sad really.

Let's face the facts the government recognizes man/woman marriage because the USA like any other country rely on reproduction to sustain life. It really is that simple.

I personally do not care if you as a man/woman want to have a loving relationship with ____(insert anything...and I mean ANYTHING), please go ahead, you are free to do so. I personally will not judge you. However, that does not mean that it is in the long term best interest of the country, and that does not mean that our Government should encourage it.

Now some may argue that "what about a man who is infertile, should he not be allowed to marry"...Ok that is a stupid argument for a variety of reasons, but please be my guest if that is the best you can do.

Gobama   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

Ha ha!

If Huckabee's thinking (correct) on the condoning and promoting deviant behaviors could be truly 'outside of mainstream American thought', (which is not true) then mainstream American thought is very very sick indeed.

Behaviors that arises as a result of a sick mind-brain or from forced perverted 'training' (usually during childhood) are never going to be condoned/promoted by any society that would be healthy.

A Lesbian   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

Why is that the "right wingers" are so obessed with controlling everyone ele's lives? Until you live word by word by the bible – the so called word of G-d - then SHUT UP. You know nothing about me, my struggles, my life. You don't know about the countless hours of community involvement, they money I give nor how I take care of my elderly neighbors and my parents. You know NOTHING about me. Yet you continue to discriminate and call me names. I have a lot of friends who are Christian who love me and support me and want me to have the same protections and rights they have. They don't judge me and call me names. The accept me because they are true Christians. NOT hate spewing, self righteous hypocrites like I see responding here.

Marriage was created by the gov't. Lets make that clear. I really feel sorry for all of you who so blantly think you're so much better because you're "straight". We should be celebrating each others joys and helping one another.

Huckabee won't be elected – this I know - so that's a comfort.

Nat   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

You bet I find Huckabees beliefs and comments inappropriate and outrageous! He's so far out of touch with main stream American. Most American's want freedom of choice wether that choice is over one's own body, over who you can love or what religion you choose to believe in. A loving relationship between any two adults has nothing to do with bestiality or child molestation! I will not vote for any candidate that will descriminate against another American in the way that he does! For the past 8 years this country has become America the unfree and I'm sick to death of it! Huckabee was quoted as saying "I think the radical view is to say that we're going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal," he said in the interview, published on the Web site Wednesday. "Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again."

Ray   January 18th, 2008 11:32 am ET

I agree with Mike Huckabee. If we allow same sex couples to marry, should we allow a man with two wives to marry? If they love each other, do we need to respect that marriage? Should we allow siblings to marry? Parent and child relationships? If you look at the argument of the homosexuals, this logic applies. They say, if two people love each other, that should be the only thing that matters. Are there side effects or abnormalities between these relationships, yes. Will there be abnormalities if same sex couples marry and are allowed to call themselves husband and husband or wife and wife?

Mike   January 18th, 2008 11:31 am ET

Mike may be rather polarizing on his comments about gay marriage, but I do not think his comments were at all wrong. What we really need to keep in mind here is that God did not say that living a homosexual lifestlye was a sin because He wanted to keep people from pleasure or from being who they really are, He said it because in the end, living that lifestyle will not be fulfilling and God has something so much better for your/their/my life than that. God loves us and knows what is best for us, and if that means denying sexual desires that we have and seeking His help to restore the sexuality that He gave us when we were created, then it will be worth it!

IM4ULORD   January 18th, 2008 11:31 am ET

GOD,
We pray the hate will stop. We pray for those who know whats right, but refuse to abide out of selfish desire. We pray for those who don't know you and believe. We ask that You send Your Holy Spirit upon them so that their eyes may be open to Your glory and love. We pray that all can love the sinner but reject the sin. Finnaly that Your will, Father, will be done. We ask this in Your name, through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with You, one God in heaven forever and ever. Amen

Keith   January 18th, 2008 11:31 am ET

Imagine no religion
John Lennon

Daniel Rowe   January 18th, 2008 11:31 am ET

In the United States of America do we not have a right to FREE SPEECH? Yes we do. Mr. Huckabee should be no different than any other American. He should have the right to speak what he AND I believe is VERY WRONG. When did it become ok to be gay? Has this country fallen so far morally that we will accept any type of behavior just to appease and get along. You don't have to be a Christian to know that people are not born with homosexual tendencies it is a choice just as we choose where we work or what we eat. I think many of the people that have commented here are correct that what someone does behind closed doors is none of anyone's business, however I am also sick and tired of hearing homesexuals express how they should have equal rights to married couples. If you don't want it to be anyone else's business quit complaining about the lack of equality and KEEP THE RELATIONSHIPS BEHIND COSED DOORS. In other words STAY IN THE CLOSET, don't just stay in the closet lock the door and quit shoving your sick ideals down our heterosexual throats. Just like the bumper sticker says MARRIAGE = MAN + WOMAN.

John   January 18th, 2008 11:31 am ET

so many people quote the Bill of Rights, so many people quote the Bible, yet so few people have read them, and even fewer understand them, so sad!!

Jim M   January 18th, 2008 11:31 am ET

I like Mike Huckabee and feel he would what whats best for Americas MAJORITY and get rid of the "minority rule and special rules for themselves"

Wake up America!

Kim   January 18th, 2008 11:31 am ET

I am sorry, I try to love everyone as God would. I am not perfect. And I have homosexual friends, But the Bible reads "marriage is defined as 1 man and 1 women". I understand homosexuals are among us, but that does not make it right. I think it is good Huckabee stands up and says the truth in what he belives in, and I think God is proud of him as well. We are not here to judge, God will judge all of us. And I agree that homosexual is a choice, not somthing you are born with. God made us perfect from birth, and the evil of man made us sinners. Good for Huckabee for standing up for what he belives in. Gay marriage should not be allowed in America.

Sean   January 18th, 2008 11:30 am ET

I can't help but find it surprising that some people in this society so earnestly fail to see past their own discriminatory, bigoted beliefs in order to support this "candidate" (that term is used very loosely). For all of you who think that gay marriage is so wrong, how would you feel if your own son or daughter were gay? I know most of you would probably just as soon take them out back and nail them to a cross, but really stop and think about it. Would you deny your own child the right to have their relationship recognized just the same as the relationship between you and your spouse? If you would answer this question in the affirmative (for those of you sheltered people who don't konw such big words, that means "yes") then I would seriously have to question your own moral fiber. It's clear that we still have a long, long way to go before every American citizen may truly be viewed as equal.

You should really watch what you say because you never know who around you may be gay. It could be your lawyer, investment banker, dentist, preacher (gasp!!!!!), doctor, teacher, etc. Homosexuality is a part of life. Get used to it.

Eitan   January 18th, 2008 11:30 am ET

to the person who "claims" to be "GOD"....um, I'm not sure, but I think that counts as taking the Lords name "in vain." I can just tell you're going to love the punishment for that sin that's prescribed in the Bible......

PR, Dallas, Tx   January 18th, 2008 11:30 am ET

I personally don't condone Homosexuality. In the other hand, how can I impose my beliefs on other people?
We marvel how Muslim Countries force their religion on their citizens, are we to do the same?
Another point, what value does performing Christian acts have, if they are to be done with "a gun to the head" I say we must conduct out lives according to the Tenets we profess, try and encourage others to follow these beliefs, and let God do the judging.

Jerry Orlando   January 18th, 2008 11:30 am ET

to a christian,

god loves me no matter who i am. god loves all homosexuality which is why jesus died on the cross for our sins..

Andrew   January 18th, 2008 11:29 am ET

I'm really amazed by all of the hot tempers that are flying over all of this.

There are several things that seem to be out of balance here. First, why do we think that we deserve any civil rights? Isn't entitlement to civil rights just someone else's opinion which nobody else should have to care about? NO, that's not the case, and why not? It's because we are all built to conform to a transcendent Authority – the one who created us. We were created in His image. This goes way beyond politics. Is it possible that we have a very deluded concept of the use of our freedom, and instead of using it for what it is really designed for, we, as a society have completely lost our compass on what life is about?

So what is freedom about? If it's just about me being able to do what I want without restriction, what is the logical ending point of that? It's chaos and a society full of narcissistic people who are just out to find the next thing that will make them happy and feel good. That's about where we are as a society. Freedom is about so much more than this, and we have sold ourselves way short as a society.

Mainstream societey cannot be our judge of what is acceptable. If that were the case, maybe it will be popular in 100 years to canabalize those who have close minded views. It sounds crazy, but if you are not navigataing life from a moral compass, what determines right and wrong?

John   January 18th, 2008 11:29 am ET

boy, you guys in the USA always blow everything out of proportion God this, God that, the COnstitution this, the Bill of Rights that, patriotism this, patriotism that, Bible this, Bible that.....

sensible solutions to problems would be good....

about Gay people: funny how they can't reproduce but there are more and more out there.
People who only base their principles on a Bible and a God who wanted to stone people to death if they would work on the sabbath have absolutly no credibility, and that goes for Huckab...boy, sometimes I can't see the difference between an evangelist fundi and an islamic fundi....

AR Graham   January 18th, 2008 11:28 am ET

Hucabee's right on...once you change the definition of marriage to something other than between a man and a woman then the door is open for it to be changed to suit anyone....maybe someone would like to marry a beach ball....God help us...

John   January 18th, 2008 11:28 am ET

I do not personally see how gays could affect marriage or be equated to nonconsensual sexual acts so I can't say that I am against gay marriage. If they want to get married, let them get married. I might add that I am a little selfish in saying so because homosexuals have a tendency of hitting on a few guys whom I discuss the issue with. I mean instances of being hit on though I would prefer not to go gay-bashing and say that it's a trend. If they marry, then I can pursue my heterosexual lifestyle without more homosexual men being tempted to hit on me. I would say that my religious views are not in sink with homosexuality though I can not play judge or jury. I can only say that homosexuals are people too and that I should care for them because they were made in the image of God. Governor Huckabee has a right to his views but hopefully (but I bet it's not happening!) he will see the wisdom of not banning homosexuality.

Like I say, homosexuals do not impact the divorce rate (last I heard it was 50%), do not influence the significant sales of Playboy or Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition, do not vastly contribute to the rape of women, (at least homosexual men; I can't say the same for lesbians. I just do not know that much about lesbians.) and do not hit on women to the extent of heterosexual guys. Closeted gays (including that pesky Republican senator from Idaho) are more problematic but still they comprise a small portion of idiocy as compared to hedonistic, heterosexual men and dirty, old men.

Josh   January 18th, 2008 11:28 am ET

I take offense to the use of the picture attached to this story. That picture is from the rally yesterday in Clemson, SC. As a student at Clemson who was at the rally, there were no comments at all regarding gays or anything of the like. Using that picture is a reflection on my school and myself, and is essentially slanderous and false. Please remove it.

Conrad   January 18th, 2008 11:28 am ET

I mean really....an animal? The difference is 2 consenting adults. I cannot believe that people STILL CANNOT differentiate church and state. Aside from being 'anti-gay" do we really want someone SO irrational and closed minded in such a position of responsibility...I think not. HILLARY 08!!!

j johns, Niagara, Ontario   January 18th, 2008 11:28 am ET

Reading some of these crass and ignorant comments makes me know I did the right thing when I left the US for Canada – I could no longer stand the right-wing propaganda machine re gays in America. (WHAT ELSE can they talk about – their stellar record?) So this is how they make all the real issues go away Iraq, economy, scandal,etc., etc., go away – an old trick, but one that usually works for them. A pathetic bunch to be sure. If you like the divisive tactics of Bush/Cheney, you'll love Huckabee.

Casey, Minneapolis, MN   January 18th, 2008 11:28 am ET

God didn't create marriage. I don't understand why people post comments that aren't even factual.

This is scary. Learn history.

Jerry   January 18th, 2008 11:27 am ET

How can you say that homosexuality is wrong and not natural. Scientist have found that homosexuality is caused while a person is still in their mothers stomach. if you don't believe me you need to pick up the latest psychology text book. people who throw religion around with in politics shouldn't because we as people do not believe in the same things. and yes his comment he made specifically links homosexuality with bestiality. people need to keep their mouth shuts and not open it or talk about thing that have no clue about. Mike if your president the world is over!

For Peace   January 18th, 2008 11:26 am ET

It's amazing how far behind the US is in terms of social matters. I wonder if the US will ever be a nation where racism, sexual preference, or religious belief isn't a major topic. Why is homosexuality wrong? Why isn't believing in God wrong? Respect people. Can we respect each others belief's without thinking our own is the only golden way to live life?

sunblessed   January 18th, 2008 11:26 am ET

It is SCARY that so many Americans still have such ignorant views about marriage, family, and love.

When will our society stop hiding behind the Bible to support our bigotry? Americans used the Bible and religion to justify the enslavement of blacks, the oppression of women, and now the hatred of gay people.

NEWSFLASH:

The Bible was written by human beings. Not EVERYTHING in the Bible is inspired by a higher power or even is even good for our society. The Bible says that if a man rapes a female servant he must marry her. Do you honestly think that verse was inspired by God? Can we use some common sense please? The Bible reflects the time it was written in-thousands and thousands of years ago.

Read the book in context. Today we should not be pointing at the Bible to justify the hatred of gay citizens no more than we should be forcing rape victims to marry their rapists. There is a certain part of the population who is ready to read the Bible as important history, with a lot of knowledge to be gained, without following every word in it blindly. However, the other half of the population is holding us back.

Rosanne   January 18th, 2008 11:25 am ET

Huckabee applauds "family values" but only families like his have value. He applauds life liberty and the pursuit of happiness but only lives like his, liberty to choose as he chooses and pursuit of happiness like his is worth protecting. He applauds small government but would lower the constitution to indelibly address small intrusive issues like same sex unions instead of leaving that to the states. He applauds Judeo-Christian Values when congregations of Jews and Christians do now and always have held differing values. Oh – he means HIS Judeo-Christian values. (Isn't that a bit like a Western Sharia law?) He applauds diversity... NOT!!!

I'd say get the government completely out of the marriage business and have the civil authorities grant only civil unions which would include all rights and privleges now understood as marriage. Grant them to same sex and traditional heterosexual couples. Then there'd be less ado about this. The word "Marriage" would belong to the churches who could then affirm a union by elevating it with recognition as sacrament.

Mark   January 18th, 2008 11:24 am ET

Mike is spot-on. Read your Bible in Genesis 18 and 19 how God feels about homosexuality and the judgement He passes on to those who continue in that lifestyle and do not repent. That passage of Scripture was around long before Mike was- he is only the messenger.

If the views stated in this blog are a true slice of America, God help us and please have mercy on us.

baxter, austin, tx   January 18th, 2008 11:24 am ET

i dont understand why the gays make a big deal of this. some of these people go on like being gay is the most important part of their lives and that is narrow and rediculous. Why would you want anyone having a legal right to 50 percent of your assets if it didnt work out?? there are much more important issues than this gay marriage thing that we should be concerned about. hope i didnt offend.

C_fel   January 18th, 2008 11:23 am ET

It's really sad to think that people can be so narrow minded.
Anyway, most of the world is heterosexual with a narrow percentage being homosexual. Very few homosexuals have children. The vast majority of murderers, pedophiles, rapists, and social deviants are born of heterosexual people.

Please use your logic and not your emotions when making rationalizations.

I'm one of the few homosexual women who have had children. My son just enlisted in the Marines this week. So much for Huckabee's theories.

Have a nice day!

stan   January 18th, 2008 11:22 am ET

marriage is not about sex, it is simply combining incomes to save on paying for 2 residences...

Hukabee is more radical than Osama Bin Laden

Scott   January 18th, 2008 11:21 am ET

If Huckabee's view of marriage is so out of the mainstream of America's thought, than the laws would have been changed. Perhaps, David Smith is the person who ought examine how his beliefs match up with the mainstream of America's thought since he is representative of the minority.

Darth Vadik, CA   January 18th, 2008 11:20 am ET

The only beast in this story is Huckabee.

demwit   January 18th, 2008 11:19 am ET

OMG!

The next thing you know, he'll be saying that the unbelievers are going to hell... Where do they get this nonsense??

West Palm Beach   January 18th, 2008 11:18 am ET

Dave C – not because of legalistic views of the Bible. NOT because the Bible says so in terms of personal relationship with rules, laws and regulations (sound familiar -like some sort of government set up?). Because God designed human relationship, HIMSELF from the beginning, to be the way HE wanted us to live with Him and with each other. If there is no question in this whole debate of living in relationship with God – much bigger issue than your personal sex partner, so temporary! – then no other reason will matter. That's one – God. That's all – not legalism that destroys itself (by the way, keep reading: Christ came to "fulfill the law, not to abolish it" as many STILL mis-read. We can aboolish it ourselves – right, we don't need God's help in that!
Try again.

Mike   January 18th, 2008 11:18 am ET

It is always a concern to me and those that truly are believers and hear and see comments from those that stand behind religion touting outragous hurtful comments such as Mr. Huckabee's. I was always taught that God was all loving and cannot imagine God ever speaking any of those works. You really should not have a microphone with the garbage that come's spouting out of your mouth. Wow I have some great babtists friends and I have never heard anything like that from them ever!

Very Sad,

Mike

Joe Idaho   January 18th, 2008 11:18 am ET

By the way: I'm an African American Democrat!

serious   January 18th, 2008 11:18 am ET

Go Huckabee..... men marrying men and women marrying woman is not acceptable under God's eys. Homosexuality is a deviant behavior. Actually perverted in its nature and corrupting Americans. Thats one Good thing I can say about Muslims – they do not tolerate homosexuality.

Common Sense   January 18th, 2008 11:18 am ET

For Aimee: "This is not the person I would want as my president… if he is not tolerant of American citizens would he be tolerant of people around the world?"

Nothing in his discussion is he being intolerant of American citizens. He is discussing the legality of changing the definition of marriage. This is part of the problem with the debate. People seem to jump to conclusions when someone discusses the legal aspect.

Craig   January 18th, 2008 11:17 am ET

Let's base all our laws on the bible. Bring back slavery! Incest will be cool again! No more ham (or any pork products)! Seriously – if you're going to base your opinions of homosexuality on the bible, you better read Leviticus closely and see what else it says. After all non-marital sex is also a sin yet we allow non-virgins to marry all the time. Tattoos are an abomination yet we let tattoo wearers get married. Lets be consistent folks!

Kitosoma   January 18th, 2008 11:17 am ET

How disgusting you people can be.

Being Barred from marrying the person you love?

How would that feel to you?

Homosexuality =/= Bestiality.

Brian   January 18th, 2008 11:17 am ET

Mainstream?!? No, no, no. Mainstream is recognizing there are more than middle class, protestant, white citizens in America. Mainstream is literally one's own opinion based on their belief . Shame on you Huckabee!!! I'm not even gay, but to heck with any president that does not stand for every American citizen!!!!!!!! These recent anti-gay comments will ring a very loud, unpleasant tone across the country. Not a good move on his part.....simply fantastic for the rest of the candidates. I'm waiting to hear what he might say next? Jews are of Satan? Blacks are the root of all crime in America? Jeez. People like Huckabee make me sick.

Paul   January 18th, 2008 11:17 am ET

Just another religious right wing primitive. Thank God, America will outlive these bigots!

Sunny   January 18th, 2008 11:16 am ET

Huckabee obviously does not share the same Christian belief's that I do. It is a shame that he uses the name of Christianity to condemn people who are different than him. I believe that judgement is up to God, not us. Thank goodness we were not all made from the same mold. Say what you will, but the gay community will exist whether you want it to or not. Christianity should not be used as a weapon; it should be used to bring us together. Christ didnt hang out with the mainstream people, he spent his time with those who were outcasts from society. We all deserve the same respect as human beings. Mr. Huckabee, I would make a bet that you have gay family members, you just may not know it. I was born gay. I do not believe that God makes mistakes, and therefore I believe that He made me who I am. You cant pick and choose things out of the bible to use to condemn people. The bible says that divorce is a sin, yet the Christians get divorced everyday in this country and you dont lash out at them. We are all sinners, Mr. Huckabee, even you. Didnt Christ die for our sins? It is sad that you obviously did not understand Christ's purpose. You do not represent me as an American, as a Christian, or the Christian faith.

Kathy   January 18th, 2008 11:16 am ET

The comments from the so-called "Christians" make me ashamed to be one. You are making Christianity synonymous with BIOGTRY!!! Ever hear of "Love thy neighbor as thyself'??????
And this IS NOT a Christian country...we were founded on FREEDOM OF RELIGION!!!

baxter, austin, tx   January 18th, 2008 11:16 am ET

i dont understand why gay people have to always cry about this. is being gay the most important part of their lives? seems to me you wouldnt want marriage. that way no one is zapping you for 50 percent when it dont work out. there are so many more important issues that affect us all regardless or race or sexual orientation. i think we should all concentrate on issues of importrance. hope not to offend anyone, God bless.

James, Osceola, Arkansas   January 18th, 2008 11:15 am ET

Why is it the Liberals can say what they want, but if a Conservative says something, everyone wants an apology....Myself, I think that gay marriage is wrong....But I do not hate gays...I agree that if this is allowed to be changed then if someone comes along and wants to marry their cow, then when enough people will agree with this we can get a new law in order that says its ok...And then we can start issuing codoms to kindergardeners, and pretty soon anything our minds can come up with, then we can make a law to pass it...Its America, I have a right to my opinions, and I will not apologize for what I believe in...And keep in mind, if a law is every passed that says we can marry animals, (and its not out of the question), then that will open up new jobs...Because you wouldn't want to marry a cow if she didn't have a wedding dress....!!!!! Has the world gone nuts?

Randy   January 18th, 2008 11:14 am ET

David Smith's comment about Mike Huckabee being "out of the mainstream of American thought" is just another fancy lie to distort the real facts.

Ted M.   January 18th, 2008 11:14 am ET

You've got to be kidding me? It is 2008 right? Where do they find such out of touch people to run our country? Really is this man the best that the American population can come up with when it comes to leadership? Aren't there MUCH more pressing issues to worry about than what legal adults do with themselves? Just a shame and a microcosm of the greater disconnect with the issues that effect America and mankind in general. Some like to call it "minding your own business". I wonder if the economy turns it's nose up at gay money?

Tim   January 18th, 2008 11:13 am ET

I would disagree that mainstream America has accepted same sex marriage. I would think that this is supported by the 19 states that have banned same-sex marriages by adding amendments to their state constitutions.

jay   January 18th, 2008 11:13 am ET

It is annoying that each candidate must kiss up for each group to win elections, there is no place for honest president in US, he must be a hypocrite – lying to please every group to win.

That's the main problem with democracy: worthless ignorant vote value equals expert's vote value; you might be a 50 years old father and your immature 21 years old son negates your vote by voting to the opposite candidate just because he is imitating his other immature friends who liked the looks of the candidate and have no idea what he stands for.

Common Sense   January 18th, 2008 11:12 am ET

For Annie: "Full legal and civil rights for ALL citizens is the most important issue in this country."

Gay individuals do have all the civil rights that every US citizen has. Marriage is not a right, but rather a legal arrangement. Just as not all companies can become corporations, or colleges to become universities, not all consenting couples (straight or gay) can marry.

Walt   January 18th, 2008 11:11 am ET

Mike believes that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice. To call him a Bigot is not accurate. There are people out there that think some people are born pedophiles. If you call that wrong are you a bigot? Of course not. Mike made a valid point once you change the definition of marriage it can be changed again. He didnt say that homosexuality = beastiality. He say that changing it could progress to that.

Fact: if homosexuality were normal behavior all of the controversy wouldnt exist.

hectoracuna   January 18th, 2008 11:11 am ET

CNN doesn't want you to go elsewhere for news. They have rejected every post pointing to the Arizona primary because they have nobody covering the stare.

Google these subjects my friends and find out what's happening in the Arizona Primary. If you think this election is historical, you haven't been to Arizona!

Project White House 08

Candidate Sean CF Murphy

"Thank you for your support citizens"

Brent   January 18th, 2008 11:10 am ET

People that are gay are wonderful people, and should be loved and treated with respect and dignity.

Gay sex is wrong. Gay marriage is wrong, and the constitution should be amended.

I appeal to all of you to think about this:

Humans weren't created to have sex with the same sex. That's why our body parts are the way they are. I can say this with absolute love and acceptance in my heart for every gay person I have ever met.

I pray that these presidential candidates would take their stand on a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage (which John McCain has already opposed, so I won't vote for him).

If Jesus were here today, he would definitely love the people, and condemn the act. All of us that aren't doing both should be ashamed, myself included.

Lorenz, Queens, NY   January 18th, 2008 11:09 am ET

Just say no to theocracy

Susan   January 18th, 2008 11:08 am ET

I a Christian is in Agreement with the poster "Pagan" above....Only sheep would vote for Huckabee....It is not fitting in this country of ours to spout religiosity in a presidential election...........I am appalled and disgusted........What planet are you Huckabilly supporters on anyway? Others on this thread.....keep telling us posters who disagree with Huckabees comments to read the Bible and I have read it cover to cover and find that Huckabee is preaching loudly from the street corners, Hatred & Bigotry...........Go Home and crawl back under your rock where you came from Huckabee.......What you spout Huckabee is shameful.................Who gives you authority to make these claims in the name of Christ.........did he give you permission..............somehow? How arrogant...........and full of himself........He does not exhibit Christian Like Behavior......SHAMEFUL............Do you really think that God has given you the authority to take this nation back for Christ...........Are you crazy.....Most consider it SICK!

Vince   January 18th, 2008 11:07 am ET

Once again read the whole item, not just the parts you want to read. Marriage and the normalcy of relations between and man and a woman are mainstream issue sand I bet if you ask most of the country would side with Mike.

Nuff said

sabrina Styza   January 18th, 2008 11:06 am ET

I find this staement disgraceful to mankind and ignorant. I find it even more disheartening that other citizens can agree with these statements, as you are justifiying that one citizen has rank or predience over another. Do we not all have the right to love, be in a loving marriage. What right do you have to judge. Are you all telling me that God wanted to segerate and punish being for loving one another. It is these thoughts that are evil and should be religiously persecuted.

Jerry Kolb   January 18th, 2008 11:04 am ET

I think David Smith is the one who is out of the mainstream in the USA

james ny, ny   January 18th, 2008 11:04 am ET

CNN please get unbiased writers. Please fire this loser Martin. His fat face is so annoying. He may have educated himself however this guy is racist that is how he comes across whenever he opens his big fat mouth.

KC   January 18th, 2008 11:04 am ET

I am Mainstream America and Mike is right. This is exactly what the Bible teaches.

Dan, Lexington, KY   January 18th, 2008 11:04 am ET

Why is it that left-wing thinkers always lash out at any suggestion that homosexuality might not be a good thing? Why can't they interact rationally with the actual arguments made by people like Huckabee instead of dismissing them as ignorant?

Becky, NH.   January 18th, 2008 11:03 am ET

I don't care who you are or what your color is. You Americans have NO RIGHT to tell me how to live my life with MY WIFE! You are not my parents! I will live the way I want to. The next time you want to talk down the Gay Community, look at yourself first. If you are so perfect THEN GO WALK ON WATER!!!

Sandra   January 18th, 2008 11:02 am ET

Huckabee's right. Where will the line be drawn? It won't be? Next thing, some woman may want to marry her dog or a man might want to marry his cat. Totally ridiculous and unstoppable.
Something I will never condone is moral issues becoming political issues. The Gays should have stayed in the closet, abortion should not have been made legal and censorship should not have been taken away.

Cat   January 18th, 2008 11:01 am ET

I thought one of the main reasons that the US was created was for religious freedom. Well, what about my freedom to be agnostic? Maybe I don't want some insane religious crazy man running the country?

It is one thing to disagree with homosexuality, but its another thing to call it "wrong" when there have been plenty of studies that show that homosexuality is something you are born with, not something you decide.

While I'm not religious, I know that I do not believe in Huckabee's and some of the other people's "God." The "God" that Huckabee supports is full of hate. Even though I'm not religious, I know that the God that is spoken of in the Bible is not full of hate.

Well Huckabee thinks women are beneath men, and that the only people who deserve happiness and freedom are rich religious conservatives. What a shame. We need a compassionate democrat running this country!

...totally moving to France!

sindi   January 18th, 2008 11:01 am ET

I'm proud of huckabee! It's about time someone took a stand for conservative Christians. It's true! Homosexuality is an abomination in the sight of God. What those offended are not understanding is that you can love the sinner and hate the sin. That's what I think huckabee is trying to portray. To stand back and not take a stand against homosexuality is to say that he doesn't care about their spiritual well being. If everyone stays in a feel good mindstate and doesn't consider the penalty of sin, it will be a very sad day for those on judgement day. Maybe if a few more people would take a stand against such things, society would shift their focus back to the Lord Jesus Christ. That's what this country needs. I'm very proud of him.

J-MAN   January 18th, 2008 11:01 am ET

Is it really intolerance when most of the majority is against it?

J Houston, TX   January 18th, 2008 11:00 am ET

By the way, if you believe in evolutionary theory, you cannot possibly believe homomsexuality is something you are "born with." Traits that inherently reduce your chance of passing on genes are inherently removed from the gene pool.

Marriage exists to create the family entity. You lose that purpose in a homosexual marriage, and adoption outside of a family structure is equally improper. Children learn from their environment, and things that are not biologically proper are obviously not how children should be raised. 50% of children are now born out of wedlock. That's a pattern that needs to change. You cannot be giving the rights of "married couples" to those who can't have children (Biology says it's impossible, get over it). Next thing you're going to be working around nature to allow homosexuals to have children, and that is wrong.

Homosexuals CAN get married. They can get married in lots of religion's ceremonies. They cannot file a joint tax return, mark "married" on legal documents, etc. You can still set your "significant other" as your benefactor.

"'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…'

I do believe that in all ways, shapes, and forms that calls for the seperation of church and state. I would suggest that the next time you try to make any baseless claims, try to make the so-called source of your claim a little harder to actually research."

No that says you can't create a State Church like "The Church of England" or abolish a Church. It does not say you may not interact with religion, discuss religion, or fund religion. It says you may not "establish or prohibit" religion. It has been RECENTLY interpretted to mean "separation," but it was not that way for 150 years.

"to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them"

"that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights"

"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence"

Zack   January 18th, 2008 10:59 am ET

Huckabee is right! Marriage is between a man and woman. Nothing can change that. If you're gay, do whatever you want in private. But I don't want to see is in public and I deffinitly don't want to see two men or two women walking out of a church.

Randy   January 18th, 2008 10:59 am ET

He just got my vote. Homosexuality is an abomination and has no place in America.

A Christian   January 18th, 2008 10:59 am ET

If you say that you are a Christian, you know that God does not like homosexuality because it is an unnatural relationship. Marriage was created by God to procreate the earth. I am not going to say that some people can't be born with some imbalance that causes these certain emotions, but like all sin we are to overcome it with prayer, repentance, and fasting. To the Christians who are sending negative messages.... yes homosexuality is wrong, but rebuke with a pure heart and loving motives. Don't rebuke in hate and anger.

Roy B   January 18th, 2008 10:58 am ET

I find it appealing that someone finally recognizes that homosexuality is indeed as unnatural as sex with an animal. There is nothing natural about it and its fruits are disease and destruction. The fruits of a heterosexual relationship are children, taxpayers, soldiers, etc. Homosexuality gets paraded around on TV as though it was normal, but only because it has shock value and hence commercial interest. The fact is that is it clearly abnormal by any measure. I'm guessing this is why it is also considered an abomination by God. This might actually sway my vote toward Mr. Huckabee.

vince   January 18th, 2008 10:58 am ET

Mianstream America is against homosexual marriage. Why do you think that, the majority of the time, it continuously gets voted down? Because the public knows it is abnormal. Mainstream America is not against homosexuals, just homosexual marriage. Try not to confuse the two. A person can dislike baseball. Does that mean he dislikes baseball players? No, notat all. I dislike homosexuality, but i dont have a problem with homosexuals.

mzietan   January 18th, 2008 10:58 am ET

THIS ARTICLE AND HUCKABEE'S COMMENTS – OFFENSIVE! – SHOULD GET WIDER PRESS. IF PEOPLE READ THIS THEY WOULD KNOW WHAT KIND OF PERSON HE REALLY IS – AND THE VIEW HE WOULD REPRESS UPON AMERICANS – AND THEY'D MOVE AWAY FROM HIM.

NEXT.

brook   January 18th, 2008 10:58 am ET

One of these days someone will elect a muslim, buddhist, or hindu president into office, knowingly or unknowingly, and all of a sudden, Sepearation of Church and State will become very important to radical Christians. They will be begging for it. It's there for a reason, people. Be glad you have it because one day your president may NOT be of your same faith.

Becky   January 18th, 2008 10:56 am ET

Hmm seems that some people need to go back to history class because last time I checked this country was NOT founded on the principles of Christianity but rather on the freedom of religion.

Futhermore for a religion that is supposed to preach tolerance, the majority (please note not ALL) of Christians I encounter are some of the most intolerant and judgemental people I've ever met.

Personally I think Huckabee is nuts. His stance on gay marriage is pretty ignorant. It's only a matter of time before some sort of civil unions are legalized as more and more Americans (and they definitely are ) learn acceptance.

Paul, New York   January 18th, 2008 10:55 am ET

These views are generally had by people with very narrow, primitive mind sets. They lack all creativity, innovation, empathy. This man would set us back to the middle ages. Luckily this man will not become president because of his limited views.

Nick   January 18th, 2008 10:55 am ET

Uhh . . .Steve, your little rant sounds very personal.

You try and speak up for the equality of gays and whatnot then turn around and call christianity a cult. How very . . .predjudice, of you.

I'm not a republican and have no plans on voting for Mike Huckabee but his comments are not the angry words of a bigot, or fascist as some here have said. What he said does have its merit. What happens when a man who truly and dearly loves his pet dog and wants to marry it? Or a Woman who wants to marry a little boy? Should they have that right? Or maybe three men should be able to marry one woman at the same time? Huckabee is sounding out a logical question.

For all you homsexuals who may take offense to my rant, know that I have no hateful feelings towards your community but if you were to happen to think otherwise, I would hardly care. Thanks

Don, Rochester, NY   January 18th, 2008 10:54 am ET

Wow! The ignorance on here is downright scary!

Estill Richardson, you are not "Mainstream America" ...sorry, not even close.

Thomas, you say 7-12% of Americans are homosexual and therefore not many Amercians must "believe in" homosexuality! Thomas, homosexuality is real and I'm pretty sure most people "believe in it." LOL If you mean support and understand it, that's about half the country. First it was women, then it was racial, now it's this. It's called CIVIL RIGHTS!

...and stop with the bible. Separation of Church and State. Read Leviticus through and through. You'll be surprised at what is considered an abomination. (if you believe one, you have to believe them all!!)

stacy g   January 18th, 2008 10:54 am ET

I'm African-American and personally I will not be voting for Huckabee, but I have to agree with his stance on gay marriage. It is just plain wrong for gays to be marrying each other!

VAN HOOF PHILIPPE, BELGIUM   January 18th, 2008 10:54 am ET

Every one is entitled to his own opignion not matter how poor, narrowminded,insulting, ect. it is.
But when you say this in public and even running for president candidate this kind of inflammatory comments should be prosecuted because it can put people against eachother for no justified reason and it can lead to violence against minority groups.
So Mike Huckabee is absolutely the wrong man in the wrong place at the wrong time and is an embarrassent to all good, decent, intelligent Americans
And the rest of the world is not waiting for such a man to be in charge of the USA because with this kind of ideas you can absolutely not be one the world leaders.

Brandon   January 18th, 2008 10:54 am ET

TJS:
"I am tired of gay rights. What happened to the rest of our rights. My rights to turn on my tv and not have homosexual lifestyles crammed down my throat."

We should really take up a collection so we can either buy you a remote control or a television that has more than one channel.

John:
"Huckabee is right; what he is saying is once we change the definition, it will be changed again."

Well, I guess we should've thought of that several decades ago when we changed it from "A marriage is between a man and woman of the same race" or back when marriage was done, not out of love, but as more of a business arrangement. I guess that whole slippery slope began when we started changing what marriage was about a while back. It's a shame we didn't have the foresight to keep it identical to the way it was in the 1700s.

Thomas:
"What % of people in the world are homosexual? Answer about 7-12% depending on which report you read. So with that I would say that most Americans do not believe in homosexuality."

Seriously? Your proof that people "do not believe in homosexuality" is that they aren't homosexual? That's ludicrous. I'm not gay, but I have no problem with homosexuality. I'm also not a woman, a minority, handicapped, etc., but I still "believe" in them.

Andrew James Riemer   January 18th, 2008 10:52 am ET

To be a nitpicker:

While science suggests (the data is far from conclusive proof) that homosexuality has a basis in biology (much in the same way that alcoholism has a basis in biology), it does not mean that people are born homosexual (just as people are not born alcoholics). It is more likely that a biological predisposition toward homosexuality, influenced by other sociological factors, leads individuals to identify with a homosexual identity rather than a heterosexual one.

greenthumb   January 18th, 2008 10:51 am ET

What hatred! Without a doubt, this person should not be president!

TLC FAN   January 18th, 2008 10:50 am ET

and p.s. – speaking of the racial problems this country endured.... what you can't help is your skin color – what you CAN help is your choice of a mate.... you are not born this way... you don't come here being gay... you CHOOSE to be that way. You are not born evil... just like Adam and Eve.... you choose to do wrong. Anything less is just a lame excuse for your wrongdoing.

Jonah, Boston MA   January 18th, 2008 10:50 am ET

Perhaps I shouldn't have dilluted the strength of my earlier comment by making a confrontational atheist statement at the end. The truth is, I would be making the same argument if I was religious because I believe so strongly in American democracy. However, the fact that I am an atheist and an outspoken critic of every facet of religion makes theocratic political discourse all the more infuriating to me.

David, Boca Raton   January 18th, 2008 10:50 am ET

Where did Huckabee equate the two? The brain of the liberal is a funny and precarious thing. He simply stated that if you change the law once to accomodate one group of people, who are definitely a glowing minority in this country, then you establish an undesirable precedent that few can argue against.

Further you can disagree with another individual's lifestyle yet respect the human being. Of course it takes a bit more intellectual discipline to live like that , something alot of liberals are not capable of doing.

Carl   January 18th, 2008 10:48 am ET

Wait ... Christians ... this is the group of people that still depict their saviour as a white man right? This is the group that picks and chooses which verses they will follow depending on what appeals to them most right? This is the group who's book tells them to give up their earthly belongings but most don't right? What can you expect from a group that is so dishonest and hypocritical? Aren't they still reading from a book translated in the 1600's? Aren't they still working on getting the branch out of everyone elses eye versus the log in their own?

Joe Lee   January 18th, 2008 10:48 am ET

Whatever happened to 'United We Stand, Divided We Fall'? 'Wacko, nutjob liberals'; 'religious right', 'stupid, inbred hicks'; 'heathen progressives'. Apparently what makes you wrong today is that you don't agree with the person who says you are wrong. As long as the Fed (represented by the two major parties) can keep We The People divided, they will retain their power. When We The People decide to stand up for each other despite our differences and unite as We The People of the UNITED States of America, then we can have our country back. When America becomes more important that party or ideology, then we can have our country back. When we can UNITE and look at all the possible candidates and see ones that have ideas that may work to fix things despite whether we agree with them or not, then we can have our country back. When we do away with this inane primary system that gives us one Republicrat and one Demolican to vote for instead of having all the qualified choices, then we can have our country back. When we decides that despite our differences and despite the fact that you may fix things differently than I would but that your goal IS to fix things, then we can have our country back.

JJ   January 18th, 2008 10:48 am ET

Although I won't vote for him, I actually agree with him on this matter....The media wants America to think mainstream Americans don't think this way....But in reality, the majority of Americans do agree.

Pagan   January 18th, 2008 10:48 am ET

Huckabee is a freak. Only sheep will vote for him. Sheep being those who cannot think for themselves and need the crutch of religion and a Baptist minister to carry them through.

Walt, Belton, TX   January 18th, 2008 10:48 am ET

The more I'm reading here, the more I agree with Huckabee.

Red Wolf   January 18th, 2008 10:47 am ET

Main stream America still believes that homosexuality is deviant behavior. Those who don;t agree are just trying to sway opinion.

Mauricio   January 18th, 2008 10:47 am ET

I find it funny that David Smith took issue with the bestiality part of the comment and not the pedophile part.

Does this mean that he endorses a man marrying a child?

Glenda   January 18th, 2008 10:47 am ET

Don't worry, everybody, we only have a week or two more of Huckabee anyway, as he will be dropping out of the race due to a lack of organization and funding for Super Tuesday states.

Scott from Freehold   January 18th, 2008 10:47 am ET

Sadly, Huckabee is playing to his audience with remarks such as equating gay marriage to bestiality, as well as trying to change our Constitution to be some sort of Christian document. Our country has a large swath of people, mostly in southern states, who agree with this backward, 18th Century bigotry, because many of them remain locked hopelessly in that era.

Leader   January 18th, 2008 10:47 am ET

Good for him!
It is a sinful act & is not natural!!!!!!!!!!

Laurel   January 18th, 2008 10:46 am ET

I think the marriage between 2 adult consenting citizens of the United States who are not married to someone already or closely related should always be legal.

And that's what gay marriage advocates are asking for. 2 adult citizens who will be living together and becoming a family–do they get the same rights regardless of gender? And the same protections?

Also, is there any place where gay marriage has lead to bestiality, like he's intimating? Such an idiot...he's just using the stock arguments.

And pedophilia? Most pedophiles are guys preying on little girls–sorry to burst your bubble Huck. And since many are the girls fathers or step-fathers, I don't think we should allow straight marriage since it could lead to child abuse. Or maybe we're all adult enough to know that sexual orientation isn't something that is necessarily abusive either way.

sara jenkins   January 18th, 2008 10:46 am ET

He needs to focus on his animal killing son and not the peaceful gay community.

TLC FAN   January 18th, 2008 10:45 am ET

TLC, I agree with you completely. The Bible does in fact TELL you who to fall in love with! Ya know... the reason the gays, et al...are fighting so hard for their "RIGHTS" and standing up for what they know deep down is wrong.. is because it IS wrong. Christians are directed to take a stand while we are living... but no matter if the wicked prevail through this battle, they WON'T prevail in the end. God will – and HE makes the rules, NOT US. There is no room in that closet for me and my family! I have my faith, therefore, I don't wonder what to believe each morning when I get up.

Patty D.   January 18th, 2008 10:45 am ET

This is just what Huckabee wants people to talk about. His socialistic views and somewhat liberal policies rub against the very people he is trying to court.

Dave C - NJ   January 18th, 2008 10:45 am ET

To all of the preachers on here telling us gays are WRONG and NOT NORMAL.

Give us one reason why. Just one.

Because of the bible? That argument can be dismantled two seconds. The bible also says you can be stoned if you touch the skin of a pig or cutting your hair above the ear.

So please, give us one reason. I dare you.

Tom   January 18th, 2008 10:45 am ET

Huckabee represents the ignorant, the small-minded and the misinformed.
He knows nothing about God and is anything but mainstream.

Chris, Denver CO   January 18th, 2008 10:45 am ET

Please, no more theocratic nut-job presidents! I beg of you!

Matt, Chicago   January 18th, 2008 10:45 am ET

Hey Jesus Freaks: This country is NOT founded on 'God's' law. Read a book other than the Bible and you'll learn something. For instance, Thomas Jefferson was an excellent writer. Ever heard of him?
Also, I can find a line in the Bible to rationalize any belief/hatred. Doesn't make it right. Who knew that being Christian equated to being intolerant. Also, some of you Bible-beaters need to do some research regarding the literary history of the Bible. The gospels were written (for the most part), hundreds of years after Christ lived. It's the beliefs/agenda of the writers – not the will of 'god.' (George Washington never chopped down a cherry tree)
Take your holier than thou attitudes + shove it. Or maybe that's just it – lots of 'Larry Craigs' and 'Ted Haggards' posting today. Your hatred and ignorance is disgusting.

Andrew James Riemer   January 18th, 2008 10:44 am ET

A NOTE ON TOLERANCE:

Once upon a time, tolerance was viewed as "I will respect your right to have a differing viewpoint, even if you are wrong"

In American thought today, however, it appears that tolerance is seen as "all viewpoints are equally valid" or "all viewpoints are valid, except for those with whic I disagree."

I admire Mr. Huckabee for being willing to stand by his convictions, even when others believe he is wrong. If we are a tolerant society, we will allow him to espouse this point of view, even if we disagree. In the end, the presidential election will demonstrate whether more Americans side with him or against him.

Kevin   January 18th, 2008 10:44 am ET

"For this one statement he made, I agree with him, and even more important, GOD agrees with Huckabee. After all God said it first, and the God of Abraham CAN NOT lie."

Wow, thanks Denny for that ignorant statement. You are a fine representation of why politics and religion shouldn't be mixed.

Dillon Burroughs   January 18th, 2008 10:43 am ET

The accusation misses the point. Huckabee is simply saying that to change the definition of marriage opens the door to numerous changes. This is not the same as equating homosexuality with beastiality.

Dave   January 18th, 2008 10:43 am ET

None of this surprises me, not after seeing Huckabee on CNN this morning. He was talking about changing the Constitution, how it was easier to change the Constitution than the Word of God.

To support his point he made a curious and, to me, disturbing comment. He was pointing out that changing the Constitution was why we now have several things that we didn't before, saying that it was 'why we believe African-Americans are people'. That's a paraphrase, but it's close.

Me, I think of African-Americans as people _because_ they're people, not because someone changed the Constitution.

Perhaps he meant that we have a changed Constitution because people are people, and no one is a slave, and the Constitution should reflect that. But if you follow that line of thought (which would better support his point and would not seem racist), then he is also implying that the Constitution should be changed because the Word of God is the truth and the Constitution should reflect that. Well, I take exception to anyone else defining, for me, what the Word of God is. Maybe Huckabee thinks he knows what it is, but I don't think he knows what it is. And I think it's more than a bit presumptious of him to think that I, an American citizen, want him or anyone else putting their ideas of what God wants into our Constitution.

Jonah, Boston MA   January 18th, 2008 10:43 am ET

I'm really getting tired of Christians claiming to be an oppressed minority, simply because they're upset that we don't live in a theocracy. Christians: NO ONE IS ATTEMPTING TO LIMIT YOUR RIGHTS. Outlawing prayer in school does not mean your kid can't pray in school; it means the state-run school cannot force prayer on all of its students. Legalizing gay marriage does not mean that you can't get married, or that you have to turn gay and get married, or that you are no longer allowed to hate gay people; it means gay people can enjoy the same rights as you do. Outlawing the display of the ten commandments in courtrooms does not mean you cannot follow the ten commandments on your own; it means that the secular court cannot imply that it uses religion to determine justice. These are all examples of the unconstitutionality of the government promoting the beliefs, traditions, or symbology of a particular set of religions, or using those beliefs, traditions, and symbology to shape government policy. It doesn't infringe on your religious freedom. On the contrary, it stops YOU and your peers from infringing on the religious freedom of others.

For instance–although in my opinion it makes you a disgusting bigot, you are perfectly within your rights to believe that homosexuality is an abomination. However, this religious belief cannot be used to prohibit homosexuals from participating in the secular institution of marriage. If your church doesn't want to do it, fine–well, not fine exactly, but it's allowed.

In regards to the question of whether or not homosexuality is a choice, the answer should be, "who cares." This is only a question that sick right-wing Christians use to justify their bigotted theocratic politics. Maybe it is a choice, and maybe it isn't. What difference does it make? What would be so wrong with someone choosing to be homosexual? A non-criminal choice that has no ill effects on anyone else cannot disqualify someone from enjoying their full rights as an American citizen, including marriage and its benefits.

And by the way, no one is "shoving their lifestyle down your throat." They are simply living their life in public, because there is no reason to be ashamed of it. To those who complain about turning on the TV everyday only to be confronted with homosexuality, I wonder what shows you could possibly be watching. Unless you're watching The Wire, The L-Word, or Bravo (the channel), I can't figure out how this is such a problem for you. And if you are watching these programs, here's a crazy idea: don't watch them anymore!

Finally, CB posted:

"God has condemed the act of homosexuality. If you disagree with Huckabees comments, then you are saying God is wrong. In the end, you are either with God … or against God. Which are you?"

CB, I am happy to say that, in this case, I am against God. And by "God," of course, I mean the fictional character that appears in that really popular book you like to read.

wes   January 18th, 2008 10:42 am ET

GOD: (scroll up to see God's answer). Hilarioius! But no.

MediaJunkie, Washington, DC   January 18th, 2008 10:42 am ET

Actually Huckabuck, the only person trying to change the definition of marriage is you. There is no definition of marriage in the constitution, but you want to put one in there.

John Bond   January 18th, 2008 10:42 am ET

Mr. huckabee we are all American and should all be the same keep your hate in side of you and think more on what is good for all of us. John Bond and Bill Gibson togither 24 years and open and proud.

Paul Thompson   January 18th, 2008 10:42 am ET

What is perversion? Is everything and anything ...ok? We as society need to have some definition. Now, I've read that some believe the agenda is to take the next step and that will be adult/child relationships. I know I was hit on by many homosexual men when I was younger than 18....so to say this stuff doesn't happen is absurd.

Black Christian   January 18th, 2008 10:41 am ET

God bless brother Mike Huckabee. Stand for your faith regardless of what people think. It is not what American thinks, but what God thinks. I am glad we have a Christian running for President. It is not about race or sex but about returning America back to its root – Godly Country. "In God we Trust".

God bless America. I am Black and you are my brother in Christ.

I am praying for you.

Sam Ahmad   January 18th, 2008 10:41 am ET

Religion is a big pile of stinking S and those religious people are rotten maggots who like to suck under it and expect the whole world to suck with them. Shame on you and your centuries old thoughts.

Ashamed of some people...   January 18th, 2008 10:41 am ET

God is taken out of our schools... no prayers... no pledge of allegiance... we worry about disciplining our children for fear of being accused of child abuse. These are the things we should worry about!!!! But no... some people want to worry more about two people loving each other... wanting to be happy and sharing their lives together. We can't have God in our schools but someones religious beliefs about what THEY think marriage and love is about can be thrown in our faces??? Tisk-tisk... what is really important here??

Richard, FL   January 18th, 2008 10:40 am ET

CHRISTIANS, how about an answer??

One of the Ten Commandments says that no one should work on Sundays. The Bible says ANYONE working on a Sunday should be put to death.

Why aren't you as loudly supporting death to Sunday workers as you are picking on homosexuals? IS THERE A SINGLE CHRISTIAN WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS or is the obvious answer that you don't believe the WHOLE BIBLE and only pick and choose what you like?

So what is it? Death to Sunday workers or are you all just HYPOCRITES? How about an answer?

IM4ULORD   January 18th, 2008 10:39 am ET

Well stated Mike. You didn't try to group all the non marriage categories as meaning the same thing. You merely stated that to change the definition of marriage, would open the door to interpretation, which is NOT what our heavenly Father will accept. The Christians in this country are tied of being put down and told we are radicals, when in fact the anti Christian people in this country are the ones destroying its integrity and morals. Time is NOW for prayer. We need to get on our knees and pray for help from our Almighty Father, that we may covey His love and return this once great nation, back to that status once again. Be gone satan. Leave this country, for GOD will prevail. May God bless our country and return peace.

Mike Birmingham, AL   January 18th, 2008 10:38 am ET

***WARNING MIKE HUCKABEE...WARNING***

It's always funny seeing a Republican's prejudice slip out. Now we get to watch the Conservative damage control – Faux News, Limbaugh, Coulter and the rest not trying to cover it up, but attacking the critics and denying the need for an apology.

It's almost like clockwork!

West Palm Beach   January 18th, 2008 10:38 am ET

By the way, we all have many freedoms in this country – we just don't know what to do with what we have. That remains a continual lesson for us all. If you don't agree with one nation under God, then try one that isn't under God. There are many to choose from, as I'm being educated on this site.

wes   January 18th, 2008 10:38 am ET

Homophobes grow up. Accept people for what they are.

Why do you judge? Let God decide.

b13   January 18th, 2008 10:37 am ET

Anyone with half a brain can see that his comment is not equating homosexuality with bestiality. David Smith obviously is lacking even THAT much grey matter.

sarah   January 18th, 2008 10:37 am ET

Oh, and Denny......God is not voting nor is God running for president.

Mark   January 18th, 2008 10:36 am ET

I can't stand it when someone say's "I think" in front of something and it gets reported like a fact. All he said is if you change it once then it'll keep getting changed. Read clearly without any animosity and you will see the truth.

daniel   January 18th, 2008 10:36 am ET

What is clear from these postings is that there is a link between homophobia and bad grammar, spelling and punctuation.

Mack   January 18th, 2008 10:34 am ET

If you believe in what he says, then go to church with him and cast some stones and past judgement. But please oh please, don't vote for him.

He will do or say something prior to the election that brings out his true colors and he will not have a chance to even secure running mate status.

West Palm Beach   January 18th, 2008 10:33 am ET

Breathe. Read. Read the sanctioned documents of the Bible, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights in our country. Read each other. All very seperate issues, but at the same time intermingled as our society. Mainstream did not dictate Scripture – God did – thousands of years before the US was in existance and to relate to humanity as a whole, not our self-centered goverment. By history alone, not to mention the fact that it is purely the possession of God Himself, not ours, and His Revelation has to how He desires for us to live as humans (far above just living as Americans) – please take it from that viewpoint – not the viewpoint of a preacher, politician, mine, or frankly, any other human's interpretation. Take it from God Himself – that's the whole point – is to live in relationship with Him. We are all guilty of judging others – case in point: everytime that you tell me that I am hateful and judgemental – you judge and condemn me with your opinion for my judgemental and condemning opinion – vicious cycle. The reference for that is "judge not lest ye be judged" – that's what happens with no resolution. So, we can stop that now: Any human being has no right to judge you or hate you or disrespect you – just as every other human being has no right to bring the same upon my head – why? because we all have our own issues – here's the kicker – with God Himself and HIS WORD, so much more than each other. By the way – look up the reason and origin of Scripture before you start to "tell me about it" – 1. origin is "inspired by the Holy Spirit of God" – if you don't have a relationship with God to have revelation of His Word – you have it backwards and it will just turn into another "fight about who is right" and the point of Scripture is completely lost. Start with the Author, not the reader. 2. Scripture is to: "be prepared in season and out of season (means sometimes it will be favorable, sometimes not with "mainstream anybody"); correct, rebuke and encourage" – as to one's relationship with God, not a how-to manual on the formation of a government (that is called a theocracy, and yes, that is NOT what we want. When one speaks f Scripture, they don't speak of government rule, they take the absolute Words fo God Himself and emplore for each life to humble themselves before God and live according to His decrees. If you choose to do so, then you do. If you don't, then don't. Choices have consequences on others, but the end choice is between you and God alone – no one else.

Our individual lives forming societies and nations. Much talk of nations in relationship to God refers to Israel's relationship to God – very interesting reading for those who want to make a true comparison on that scale. By the way, please read all about Jesus and the whole picture before assuming you have Him "all understood." The reason for Christ's crucifixion, as one pointed out within the same sentence, was for individual salvation from all these wrongs in each our lives – my personal judgemental ways included – not about a political rally: that was just the temporary staging for this eternal impact, not the cause. As with everything about God – Scripture is so much more if we'd look at being about God, not just serving me and what I want to know or believe. I know that a lot of these are passionate and long, but if you want to know the Truth – read about it yourself and understand that it's for you and God – so much more than fading governments. Please don't pin your personal hopes on a politician.

America was not built on "popular vote." The point of the Supreme Court is to hold to the Constitution (which is flexible to an extent), but not for our government to change and conform to the "signs of the times." Not how we operate here as a Nation. If you don't agree with our Constitution, then vote in someone else who doesn't agree. It's that simple. But, when I meet you in the grocery store – make you a deal – you respect me and I'll respect you – without insults of being "wrong" and "backwards". Thanks.

Concerned   January 18th, 2008 10:33 am ET

I think the "gay community" should SHUT UP!!!

American   January 18th, 2008 10:33 am ET

Joe, San Francisco, CA January 18, 2008 2:04 am ET

TLC you talk about freedom but then you want to shove gays back in the closet and deny their rights as any other human being in this country. How is that freedom?

It figures that you are from California. When he said shove them back in the closet, he meant back to CA where they belong.

Rachel   January 18th, 2008 10:33 am ET

This man is a freak and a zealot. He has no business trying to run this country.

TJS   January 18th, 2008 10:32 am ET

Comparing homosexuality to divorce is crazy. Hence, how could they get divorced when they are not legally married. I know many gays that have changed partners numerous times. If they had been "legally" married this would equate to a divorce. And to people that say they are "smarter" because they are gay, where and when was that ever proven. I think making a statement like that shows your stupidity. I know several people with genius mentality and they are not gay. I believe we should all be treated equally. But that does not mean any group should have special rights. Just because we don't agree with anyones lifestyle we should not hate them. That includes Christians. I don't see many so called Christians saying they hate gays but cannot say the same the other way around.

Chris   January 18th, 2008 10:32 am ET

Ok for all you people who say that this is protected by the Bill of Rights (pursuit of life, liberty and happiness). Will this is for you. What if the only thing that makes me happy is conducting genocide or something to that effect? Will you people defend my right to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness? I think not. So I went to the extreme here but most of you have been doing that since you can blog. I really don’t care if you are pitching for the opposite team, but leave me alone and stop putting it up right in my face. I thought these people wanted the same thing, just to be left alone. Well I tell you, you will not be left alone until you stop shoving this into people’s life and making them acknowledge that you are this way. Leave me alone and I will leave you alone.

Bill P Charlotte, NC   January 18th, 2008 10:31 am ET

Jon S in Ann Arbor says, 'I'm sure there is not a single word in the Bible, or that ever came out of Christ's mouth, if he were a real person, that would support such hateful views.'

Jon,
How sure are you really?
Leviticus 18:22 – 'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.'

Leviticus 20:13 – 'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.'

These are God's laws given to Moses in the Old Testament. Christ came and died for our sins. He took our place and suffered the death we deserve under God's laws. We, as Christians, live our lives according to the New Testament teachings of Christ. He did say 'Then neither do I condemn you. Go now and leave your life of sin.' – John 8:11. He is accepting of all and spent his time among sinners and those that the religious leaders condemned. However, he insturcted them to give up their sinful lives. He does not accept sin, but forgives it and we as followers need to refrain from sin or accepting it.

Anyone not accepting of homosexuallity is labeled a bigot, a nut job, intollerant, homophobe, hate monger, etc. I tell you I fear no man or his laws. I fear God. The fact that people cannot accept my views and label me is oppression. Mike Huckabee is entitled to say anything he wants under the right to free speach. Just because people disagree with it does not make it wrong. When did deviant behavior become the norm and being a Christian become the exception?

That's my opinion and the ACLU used to protect that.

AJ   January 18th, 2008 10:30 am ET

I am a Christian and agree fully with what Huckabee said. After all, didn't God punish the citizens of Sodom and Gammora for being "sexually deviant criminals"?

Arturo   January 18th, 2008 10:29 am ET

Finally this guy is starting to show his true colors. The last thing we need is an uneducated theocrat behind the wheel of our nation.

roger, conway sc   January 18th, 2008 10:29 am ET

This nation does not need a Baptist Preacher as president, during his campaign speeches here in SC he sounds like he is in church preaching from the pulpit & the extremest conservatives here love it...I am a Democrat and this really bothers me if it is not the gay issue, it is the flag or abortion this man needs to go back to Ark...they seem to like this kind of junk...

phil texas   January 18th, 2008 10:29 am ET

TJS
GOD BLESS YOU
I'M WITH YOU 100%

THE 1960's WERE BAD FOR THIS COUNTRY

Milton, Harrisburg, PA   January 18th, 2008 10:29 am ET

The constitution states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;.."

So, as an atheist, why should someone else's religious beliefs about what marriage is be dictated by our government? This seems to violate the 1st amendment doesn't it? The 1st amendment also includes freedom FROM religion doesn't it?

I'm really tired of some of these posts that dole out the line, "We were founded as a Christian Nation". We most certainly were not. Learn your history. Read the Treaty of Tripoli where it explicitly states that "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;..." It was unanimously passed by the Senate.

By the way, Arkansas allows marriage for adolescents under the age of 18. I'm surprised Huckabee didn't advocate repealing this law since it seems to encourage pedophilia.

Iowa Lady   January 18th, 2008 10:29 am ET

I totally agree with Huckabee and alot of the comments. Homosexuality is not natural or is it normal. If it were natural then why has their been spreads of disease because of it, and why can't children be created in that type of relationship? It's not what was planned for our society. God destroyed cities because of these lifestyles!

What Huckabee is saying is that if we redefine what a marraige is then we open the door for other "definitions" of it...when does it stop? I love how they only got offended by the bestiality comment...what about the others he references...does that not make you mad???? THey are all distortions of the family unity.

I think Huckabee is great...even if he doesn't win the presidential bid – I"m proud that he's not afraid to say what he believes and worry about stepping on the toes of our politically correct society. He's got strength of character and conviction...when's the last time we could say that about ANYBODY in politics?!?

GO HUCK!!!

Joe Lee   January 18th, 2008 10:28 am ET

Yes, there is a separation of church and state. The first amendment makes this clear. The established government must keep its hands out of the business of established religion. "Congress shall make no law...".... didn't do a thing to stop individual conscience; didn't mean that a candidate for office couldn't take his religious views, which are part of who they are, into account when he is viewing an issue. At the time, didn't even mean the states couldn't establish a religion if they chose to. The whole point of the Bill of Rights was to LIMIT the power of the FEDERAL goverment and leave those powers to the states and most importantly to the people, people who have the right and the ability to have individual consciences. I completely agree.. the federal government has no business defining marriage... the states do. That way, if the state I live in defines it in a way that I disagree with, I am free to move to another state where they define it in away that I agree with. The same goes with most moral issues (abortion, gay rights, etc). That is what has gotten wrong with this country... everyone believes everyone who disagrees with them is 'stupid' or just plain wrong. We now believe the one federal government makes all the rules and then half of us are mad no matter what the decision is. That is why the wise founding fathers wanted to limit the fed... too bad we have fogotten that.

themadscientist   January 18th, 2008 10:28 am ET

Hey! Did you hear about the new research results of homosexual genes?

Theres new research out on a gene called "genderblind," or GB. And altering levels of glutamate change the strength of nerve cell junctions, called synapses, which play a key role in human and animal behavior. Researchers found that all male fruit flies with a mutation in their GB gene courted other males. "It was very dramatic," "The GB mutant males treated other males exactly the same way normal male flies would treat a female."

The researchers genetically altered synapse strength, independent of GB. They also gave flies drugs to alter synapse strength. As predicted, they were able to turn fly homosexuality on and off, within hours. "It was amazing. I never thought we'd be able to do that sort of thing, because sexual orientation is supposed to be hard-wired," "This fundamentally changes how we think about this behavior."

Wow!! Could it be that there will be a pill for that in the future???

Bud   January 18th, 2008 10:28 am ET

I am a happily married conservative and I see nothing wrong with gay unions or marriage. No one is asking for churches to recognize homosexual marriage just that gays have the same inheritance rights, tax status and other rights married couple do. I don't see how we say marriage is so sacred when Britany Spears can get married for 2 days, Pam Anderson can get married every Tuesday. My marriage is sacred to me but allowing other loving people to marry who just happen to be gay doesn't weaken my marriage as only I can do that. And this slippery slope argument that the Huckster makes is insulting to gays and many other people.

Simon Morganstern   January 18th, 2008 10:25 am ET

This is a mountain out of a molehill. If you read Mr. Huckabee's original comments this article is inflammatory and incorrectly spinning the issue at hand.

Regardless, I will continue to support Obama in '08, but this kind of devisive media tactic is shameful.

Chris, Jacksonville   January 18th, 2008 10:25 am ET

Canada and some European nations have allowed homosexuals to marry for years now. Somehow, their countries have not fallen apart. In fact it could be argued that they are thriving.

The fear-mongering and bigotry of Huckabee and these so-called Christians is just sad and ignorant.

I am straight, it did not choose it...... I have gay friends, co-workers and a member of my family (kinda like those crazy radicals Dick Cheney and Newt Gingrich to name a few) who is gay....they did not chose to be that way either.

Frankly it none of your business and should NEVER be the government's business as to the relationship of two consenting adults.

I thought we valued freedom here.

Apparantly not the "religious" right.

Will   January 18th, 2008 10:21 am ET

Well said, JJ.

With regard to those who are upset by talk homosexuality and gay rights being brought into your homes and "crammed down your throats," I'm sure the racists who had to live through the civil rights movement would be able to identify with you. These were also 'decent Godfearing people' who were constantly affronted with similarly radical and disturbing notions of equality which seemed to rail against what they were brought up to believe. And oh my, look what happened: most of them came to accept that perhaps this country really is supposed to be about equality and that perhaps allowing libery and justice for all might not be such an awful thing.

Personally, I would have hoped for a different set of predacessors (such as those fighting FOR rights rather than against them) but hey- to each his own.

I'm speaking as a homosexual. I'm also speaking as a Christian. Now many of you might not believe that is possible, but that's between God and me- not you. I wish I could understand how, for so many, Christianity became less about love and tolerance, and more about reactionary indignance and taking a moral high ground (i.e. hypocracy, because our faith teaches that none of us has the right to cast the first stone).
The real shame is that because of the way so many use the Christian message to berate, degrade and isolate, you turn the 'Good News' into a barrier and only accomplish driving others farther away from God. Maybe I missed something in Sunday School, but I always thought Christ spoke AGAINST doing that.
To non-Christians: we don't ALL think like so many who have posted bigoted comments here- but, as is the usual case, the moderate voices by nature are, unfortunately, also the quiet ones.

Steve   January 18th, 2008 10:21 am ET

I love that "FORCED UPON MY FAMILY" people like you and your thinking are really hypocritical its alright though to force your religion on me right? Every year I have to see the manger sitting on public lands, you have nothing to hide behind except your bigotry and that my friend is a fact. Most of you people supporting Lord Jesus Huckabee probably don't even know the origins of your bible don't even know how it came to be. Because of one passage written by someone 2 thousand years ago without any knowledge whatsoever and people cling to this like it was written from "GOD" himself.

Well, isn't funny that it says "MAN SHALL NOT LIE WITH MAN AS WITH WOMAN" the reason this idiot put it in was because of Rome and ancient Greece where it was NORMAL until the cult of christianity was formed.

What will happen one day when your child comes to you and says: "Dad, I am gay" most likley you will turn your back on him or her or worst yet send her to a phsyc thinking that there is something wrong with them when it is you that should see a shrink....

CW, S. Carolina   January 18th, 2008 10:21 am ET

Just what we don't need...another extremist in the White House.

John Appa, Boston, MA   January 18th, 2008 10:20 am ET

Who ever is "offended" by this comment – GET A LIFE!!
He wasn't equating homosexuality with beastiality! He was commenting on when will it end at? You see this with nambla and other organizations that are taking it to the next step. This is what Mike as talking about. We have gone from a society with a conscience to a society where anything goes.

People LOVE to read more into his words or make his words mean something other than what they really mean. There will ALWAYS be cry babies out there. Yes, Thank GOD for our First Amendment right, but a lot of people now a days should just shut up and grow up.

Tim in Fort Worth   January 18th, 2008 10:20 am ET

The bible says that a man lying with another man is an abomination to God. This country was founded on Christian beliefs, with Christian influence in its constitution. If you don't have God's rules to live by as the basis of what is wrong and what is right, then who's laws are you following? Then you get into following whatever makes you feel good do it kind of mentality.

Huckabee is standing for what is right on this topic and I'm for that.

Mark   January 18th, 2008 10:20 am ET

People can be so dense. I am not a Huckabee supporter, but he is not "equating" gay marriage with beastiality. He's just saying that once we abandon the traditional definition of marriage, it could become a slippery slope.

A Lesbian   January 18th, 2008 10:19 am ET

The fact that any of you feel that you have the right to even tell somebody like myself HOW or HOW NOT to live my own life is a joke. I suppose you prefer I ignore something that has been with me since I was born and marry a man, have kids, blah, blah, blah....

How is LYING a better alternative? People like Huckabee need to wake up and realize that we are all HUMAN BEINGS and have the right to live our lives in whatever fashion we choose, so long as we are not hurting anyone else while doing so.

SICKENING

Steve   January 18th, 2008 10:18 am ET

Huckabee is a fundamentalist.....do you expect him to say something different? The American people have awakened to the hatefulness that these people spread under veil of "Christianity". It shows that Huckabee and many of his followers are ignorant, uneducated minions who do not use the capacity to reason that God gave them. I am sick of people stating that these people are Christians when NOTHING could be further from the truth. What ever happened to Christ's commandment of "love thy neighbor as thyself"? Once again, fundamentalists only use biblical quotes that suit their warped, hate-spreading ideals. Enough is enough!

keep your dogma off my government   January 18th, 2008 10:18 am ET

Here we go again! Another politician whipping the religious right nut jobs into a frenzy over gay rights.

Karen   January 18th, 2008 10:16 am ET

Did anyone else see Tony Perkins speak out for Huckabee? He agreed that making two religious amendments to the Constitution is the correct route. When Tony was asked which other commandments should be the religious law of the country, he lost his composure and stated ALL commandments as Constitutional law would be better than an 'evolutionist' passing healthcare. Apparently the religious right is not only unabashedly homophobic and sexist. Now they have a new dirty word... evolutionist. The religious right makes me very uncomfortable when their whole so-called values platform which revolves around an obsession with what's going on in people's 'swim suit zones.' It's just icky.

Just a Little Understanding   January 18th, 2008 10:15 am ET

Like the majority of Americans, I feel that "marriage" is a religious institution and is between one man and one woman. However, it's way past time that "Civil Unions" become recognized nationwide. We had the first statute here in Vermont and with all the hue and cry, anti-gay bashing by mostly out of staters, and the guts of Howard Dean, years later no one thinks about it much. The world didn't come to an end, God did not come down and strike us dead and all the "doom" predicted by the gay bashers didn't happen.

Those in a long term relationship of whatever orientation deserve the basic human rights that we recognize in this country. I would remind Mike Huckabee, as a man of the cloth, to remember "judge not, lest ye be judged". He brings a lot to the table and this comment diminishes his other stands. Let's put this kind of bigotry behind us.

Mark Ferbet, Kansas City Missouri   January 18th, 2008 10:14 am ET

John wrote:

"The leadership of our Country is too important to play political games."

What do you call the Current Administration? All our politicians are doing is playing political games, and yet, we Americans, keep electing the same idiots over and over again, into office, so we can pay them, to play political games.

As to the topic at hand... Huckabee has a tendency to put both his feet in his mouth... he did this regarding Pakistan, he's done it regarding his Religion, and he'll continue to do it.

Mikeisaloser   January 18th, 2008 10:12 am ET

Mr. Huckabee seems to be somewhat limited in his mental capacity to even understand what marriage is about. Perhaps his lack of mental development link him back to the ages of Chromagnum man – do we want that as president? Quit wasting your time Mr. Huckabee, your useless ideas and satanic beliefs are not welcome in this Country.

Third time I have tried to post!   January 18th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Okay... So as an educated person who has attended graduate school, don't you find it ironic how America was ORIGINALLY built on slavery.. IE: The white man then/as they do now feel like they have the RIGHT to limit another human beings life... Does he think slavery is alright? Do the African Americans against gay marriage think they have the room to talk? I am not racist but a realist. If we want to start imposing those restrictions on ones freedom, those of color (including myself) are SUBHUMAN... Next time you speak up it might be best if you had at least a High School education so you are not so ignorant... And another thing, when did GOD give anyone the right to condem another human being?

David, Gilbert Arizona   January 18th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Huckabee is using what is called the "slippery slope" argument, or one inwhich one event puts into motion a number of other events. The argument is typically not based on any real factual data. It is based more on assumption and opinion. Because of its nature, the slippery slope argument is a poor debate technique. It is better suited for stump speeches where no immediate redress can be offered.

Huckabee is also employing the use of a straw man. Instead of arguing the issue based on face value, that adult gay men and women wish to be legally married, Huckabee distracts the audience with the use of a straw man, that adults wish to marry children and animals. Huckabee is using a straw man because it is easier to argue the inherent problems with children and animals than it is to argue the actual issue, gay adult relationships. It is very much like the magician's slight of hand where the audience is distracted so the magician can perform his trick without having the gimmick revealed.

By law, two adults can legally consent to sexual relations. It is illegal for any adult to engage in sexual relations with a child or an animal. Specifically, an animal cannot consent to the relationship. In most cases neither can a child. Huckabee knows this full well. That is why he is using the straw man.

Huckabee has definitely set himself up to be the fool by using such transparent debate techniques. Unfortunately only 30% of United States citizens have an education level above a high school diploma and most likely will be easily swayed by Huckabee's inability to address the actual issue.

BARRY BUTLER   January 18th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Mr. Huckabee is NOT out of the mainstream of America as he espouses the truth that, in the eyes of God, marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman – PERIOD. All who see it different than God can argue their case when they stand before Him as we all will appear before Him. Mr. Huckabee simply shares that ALL other forms of marriage are wrong.

sonny   January 18th, 2008 10:09 am ET

Denny, my Faith tells me that Jesus of Nazareth attributed every word he spoke as coming from the Loving Father. When the homosexual Centurion asked Jesus to heal his "servant", Jesus did what the Father told him to do–he healed the servant. Anyone who claims to be a follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ should take their cue on social, economic & political issues from the Four Gospels. Tough task, but that's the challenge to find the Kingdom of God here on Earth & in the next life.

Carmela Amador   January 18th, 2008 10:08 am ET

Mr. Huckabee and campaign,

Mr. Huckabee's recent comments on gay relationships are not only offensive, but make one question, just how small is the box he lives in? Mr. Huckabee has stated in the below article that living a gay life is like 'committing bestiality'.

I am but one voice to express just how wrong these comments are and encourage the members to the gay community to also contact Mr. Huckabee's campaign to communicate the gravity of what he, as a US Presidential candidate, has said. Regardless of any apologies he may offer, it is clear who he is and what he believes.

To Mr. Huckabee and his campaign, how can you hope to win a campaign that you just lost? Why wake up every day and go to a job that is menaingless, since your candidate just voted himself off the ballot?

Sincerely,

Carmela A

Steve   January 18th, 2008 10:06 am ET

NO its not out of the normal of sexual behavior!!! Homosexuality has been around since man first fell from the trees. Its is practiced in all forms in nature. In the empires that were Rome and ancient Greece it WAS the norm for males to take male partners and vice versa. I for one am sick and tired of these bible thumping idiots preaching to the rest of the country worst of all was his comments on changing the constitution of the United States to fit in with "GODS" plan. Our forefathers must be rolling in their graves.

Its these religious bible thumping morons that are the sick ones, pandering to a crowd of bigots hiding behind a religion sounds like Osama has some competion AMERICA IS NOT NOW NOR WILL IT EVER BE A THEOCRACY!!!!! GET OVER IT....

gb   January 18th, 2008 10:06 am ET

Rick Santorum made a similar comment here in PA and then lost his next election 60-40. If Huckleberry Finn is the nominee, he will lose this state hands down.

Mike   January 18th, 2008 10:05 am ET

What's even scarier than Mike Huckabee are the people on this site who are more extreme than him.

Dave   January 18th, 2008 10:05 am ET

Y'know, there's already a country that was run using the plans Huckabee envisions for the United States. That country's called Afghanistan, and things didn't work out so well there. In fact, we were at war with them last time I checked.

If there is a god, may he save us from his followers...

sean   January 18th, 2008 10:04 am ET

Mike Huckabee is a treat to our nation. His whole campaign is wrong.

Jen   January 18th, 2008 10:03 am ET

Jesus (if he exists and is the son of God) must be so angry with all these people flying their hate flags in his name! what are these people so afraid of? They might "catch" being gay? My relationship with my boyfriend does not effect anyone's lives but our own – nor would it if I were a lesbian or her were gay. What happens behind closed doors is no one's business. I have many wonderful friends who are homosexual and there is no reason in the world for them to be denied any right that I have simply because I am a woman who is in love with a man and they are not. Love is love. All this hate is taking our country in a horrible direction!!!

Lou   January 18th, 2008 10:03 am ET

Huckawanabee should not be talking against bestiality in South Carolina...he might loose that important segment of voters.... by the way marriage biggest treat is not gays, Baptists have the highest divorce rate of any Christian denomination, and are more likely to get a divorce than atheists and agnostics, according to a national survey.

The survey conducted by Barna Research Group in Ventura, Calif., found that 29 percent of all adult Baptists have been through a divorce. Among Christian groups, only those who attend non-denominational Protestant churches were more likely to be divorced, with a 34 percent divorce rate and it goes up to 50% and is all "strait" people.... Mike please it worked on the last election but I do not think it will work this time arround…

JS, Texas   January 18th, 2008 10:01 am ET

This makes me love the governor even more. We need a strong President who will take a stand against the gross immorality that sodomites perpetrate in our land.

Andrew, Atlanta, GA   January 18th, 2008 10:00 am ET

Make that "women's suffrage was being debated...." Of course, thankfully, we have women's suffrage now – no thanks to people like Huckabee I'm sure.

Kirby K   January 18th, 2008 10:00 am ET

Mainstream America is NOT pro-homosexual nor does it believe in gay marriage. IF that were true all the states would have passed pro-homosexual marriage laws. Only those few states with obvious liberal leanings have even seriously discussed it. David Smith is way out of step with who Mainstream America is and what they think. Sorry Dave, better check it out!

Cynthia   January 18th, 2008 9:59 am ET

Loving, responsible, tax-paying, law-abiding couples that happen to be gay can't get married, but people like Richard Ramirez (The Night Stalker) can and did in 1996. Now there's an admirable upstanding example of morality – avowed Satanist, on death row in California for 13 counts of murder, 5 attempted murders and 11 sexual assaults, but by gosh, he's heterosexual! That makes everything hunky-dory, so let's give this fine young man a wedding on the taxpayer's dime!

Until all the moral watchdogs crack down on situations like this regarding marriage, they're talking out of their hypocritical nethers.

Eric   January 18th, 2008 9:59 am ET

Jim Wrote -

"You recurrently cite the non-existent "separation of church and state" language in the constitution as a means to tell Christians to shut up and keep their noses out of government. Yet you apparently haven't taken the time to read the document and what it actually says because it in no way, shape, or form calls for a "separation of church and state""

Jim I have read the constitution...I have the important part below for your convienence.

Amendment I, US Constitution

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

I do believe that in all ways, shapes, and forms that calls for the seperation of church and state. I would suggest that the next time you try to make any baseless claims, try to make the so-called source of your claim a little harder to actually research.

Aimee   January 18th, 2008 9:58 am ET

Wow – is he for real? This is not the person I would want as my president... if he is not tolerant of American citizens would he be tolerant of people around the world?

John   January 18th, 2008 9:58 am ET

Huckabee is right; what he is saying is once we change the definition, it will be changed again. This is an absurd comparison, the only people comparing gay marriage to beastiality is the critics themselves – come on, people – get your head out of the partisan politics cloud and read what he said. Stop making issues out of things that are not. If you could actually look at this with an open mind, you would realize that a Republican could never get away with making a similar accusation. The leadership of our Country is too important to play political games.

John   January 18th, 2008 9:58 am ET

This is only a diversion. He is basically saying. Hey don’t look at my credentials, look at those two gays trying to get married! Come on voters; prove you are smarter than that. And no, not everyone wants him back in Arkansas.

Andrew, Atlanta, GA   January 18th, 2008 9:58 am ET

This guy is CRAZY....

Yes, Mr. Huckabee. Glad you weren't around when women's suffrage was around. Your argument would have been "once you let women vote, then you open the door to let animals vote, then trees, then rocks."

Annie   January 18th, 2008 9:56 am ET

People are posting that there are more important things to worry about in this country then gay rights. They mention the war, the economy, healthcare, etc.

I disagree that there are more important issues then gay rights. Full legal and civil rights for ALL citizens is the most important issue in this country. If we don't have "liberty and justice for all", we are not a democracy.

The basic idea of rights for all must come first before all other problems can be addressed.

From the Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness".

Is the USA a democracy yet? No.

Alicia   January 18th, 2008 9:55 am ET

I just have to laugh and laugh when people start up their lectures on how allowing homosexuals to legally marry will ruin this so-called 'sanctity of marriage.' Especially considering that at age 28, I can think of at least 3 couples my age that have already divorced. But, I guess that's alright since they entered into a heterosexual marriage.

Why on earth should we be so concerned about what happens in other people's personal lives, especially if it's consensual? How someone can throw a relationship between two human beings into the same category as a 'relationship' between a person and a goat, let's say, is beyond me!

And I'm Christian! Of course, I'm Catholic and according to some denominations, I might as well be thrown into that group as well!

Thomas   January 18th, 2008 9:55 am ET

What % of people in the world are homosexual? Answer about 7-12% depending on which report you read. So with that I would say that most Americans do not believe in homosexuality.

Religion: Just because God believes that homosexuality is wrong dosent mean that he hates them. Thus, just because I believe its wrong dosent mean that I hate them. As a Christian I do believe in the seperation of church and state. I dont want some crazy Christian leader telling my how to worship and what to believe.

Hucks statement. I believe what he was trying to say is that if you dont put in writing what marriage is. then its open to interpertation. Now most of us on here are logical sane people, but some crazy people will say well if men can merry men and women can merry men then why cant I marry my dog. I love him or her and thats my right. I believe that he is not being a bigot.

Just because some people believe in certain things dosent make them a bigot. I dont believe in homosexuality, but why does that make me a bigot. So, while his comments may not be politically correct my question is why should they be? Why should a select few be able to voice their opinion, but when the majority few is said our government, media, and citizens get so offended?

Katy Hill Prescott Az.   January 18th, 2008 9:54 am ET

Huckabee will not represent all Americans any more than Bush does and that's the point. This is the UNTED states of America not the CHRISTIAN states of America. We do not need another faith based presidency.

Jeanelle   January 18th, 2008 9:54 am ET

Mainstream America has nothing to do with religious beliefs. Homosexuals have freedom of choice, but that does not mean that Christians or anyone else has to agree with their choice. As long as we do not commit any acts of violence against them, it is well within our rights to state what our Bible has to say on the issue. We love people but that love does not always equate with agreement and I look forward to the day when the so called 82% of American Christians stand for what they believe in and not let "mainstream America" tell them what is politically correct.

Tony, Tulsa, OK   January 18th, 2008 9:53 am ET

I'm gay, and I'm shocked by the amount of so-called Christians on here acting like redneck bigots. You do realize you're becoming increasingly irrelevant in the modern world, don't you? Gay people are not going anywhere. And if you feel threatened because we no longer hide in the shadows and we *gasp* show up on television every now and then, then I guess that's your problem isn't it? We're human beings, entitled to every single right you're entitled to. It's always the supposedly macho Christian good ole boys who seem most queasy over people being different. Interesting. I think you guys are the weak ones. It takes a lot of strength to be gay in America, especially where I live. But we prosper, we make more money than you people do, and we are smarter. So I don't feel threatened by the likes of so-called Christians who are obsessed with us and our "lifestyle." But you obviously feel threatened by us. Maybe you should learn to have some of that Christian compassion I hear so much of rather than use your religion to divide us.

Vicki   January 18th, 2008 9:52 am ET

I think David Smith is deluding himself – he's the one who's opinion is "out of the mainstream of American thought". The key word in that phrase is "thought". Mainstream American "thinks" homosexuality is a deviation from normal sexual behavior both from a religious and scientific perspective. They are just afraid to "speak" it because radicals like David Smith will, in their judgmental opinions, attempt to spin the statement to make it seem that there is some sort of "hatred" of certain people. This is so not the case.

CB   January 18th, 2008 9:52 am ET

Huckabee is being condemed because of his comments. God has condemed the act of homosexuality. If you disagree with Huckabees comments, then you are saying God is wrong. In the end, you are either with God ... or against God. Which are you?

Jules   January 18th, 2008 9:51 am ET

Mr. Huckabee as well as several comment posters just re-enforce my feelings on society. We use a book written in the Middle East over a thousand years ago as the basis for our morals. When are we going to stop hiding behind an invisible being and start using some common sense in our life decisions.

Trust me, a being capable of creating this vast Universe isn't really that concerned with the activities of your daily life.

Anthony   January 18th, 2008 9:51 am ET

Huckabee is just preaching to his choir. Inbred, uneducated, southern bigots they may be but they are his choir nonetheless. It's about time the spot light is put on these sub-humans and drive them back under the rock from where they came from. Isolating one pathetic example such as Huck is missing the point.

paul burgess   January 18th, 2008 9:51 am ET

dave smith of human rights is WRONG! There is still a majority of the population in this country who believe that marrage is a union of ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN and nothing else. Granted this majority is lead by an older generation but then look at the youth of our country and one can see that there are very few that any values

Jim   January 18th, 2008 9:50 am ET

It's funny how people will scream and rant about homosexuals and make all sorts of unsupported accusations like they are statements of fact. Then they try to justify it because "it's just their opinion". Well, that may be your opinion, but many enlightened people hold the opinion that homophobes and anti-gay bigots are backwards fools who want to impose their insane world-views on everyone else. You already have the right to persecute people in your churches, now you want that right extended to the public sphere.

Chantel in SC   January 18th, 2008 9:49 am ET

AMEN Jim!!!! Your post was a bit long but I read the whole thing and agree with EVERY word. I like Huckabee but have made my decision to vote for McCain on Saturday. That being said I would still stand up with Huckabee on 90% of his beliefs.

My step daughter and her girlfriend recently moved in with my husband and myself. They are 18 and 19 years old and are all involved with the homosexual life style. I love the girls for who they are. Would do most anything for them that I can. BUT I detest the lifestyle they practice and make no efforts to hide my dislike. I remain a God fearing Christian and pray daily that one day they turn from this and move on with their life. I can't make that decision for them though. But I trust MY GOD to be there when they are ready.

Donald Michigan   January 18th, 2008 9:49 am ET

I agree with "william" above comment. I believe Huckabee ranks right up their with Lincoln, Kennedy & Martin Luther. Some great people willing to make a stand for what right morally. Hopefully he won't end up with the same outcome as they did. He is a man with scruples as all great leaders are! Don't be so hard on him just because of one opinion. Same sex marriages wouldn't even have been thought of a 100 years or more ago. Times are changing but some things shouldn't change. Now that's my opinion.

David Meyer   January 18th, 2008 9:48 am ET

The leaders of this country should realize that all of the worlds problems; i.e. global warming, species extinction, famine, polution, deforstation, and terrorism are linked to over population. Therefore, we need to find ways to reverse the population growth, and one of the ways is to cater to homosexuality.

I am heterosexual

Ron in CT   January 18th, 2008 9:47 am ET

What a vile little man. Let's hope America keeps him in Arkansas, where he belongs.

Kat   January 18th, 2008 9:47 am ET

Wow so after reading the comments on here. as a christian, I am appalled by your attitudes! How dare you attack another individual. It isn't hurting you. They aren't having gay sex on your couch in your house so get off your high horse. Fact is all you bible raving idiots God said love thy neighbor as thy self. Not love thy neighbor only if they are straight God fearing christians!!!! Look at your all! This is why people avoid christianity! People like you make our religion undesierable! Get off your high horse and start living by His word if you are going to proclaim yourself christians!!!

Butch Dillon   January 18th, 2008 9:47 am ET

"It is now difficult to keep track of the vast array of publicly endorsed and institutionally supported aberrations — from homosexuality and pedophilia to sadomasochism and necrophilia,"......................Mike Huckabee

Zounds Batman!!! Is this the evangelicals' next offering to the throne here in the American kingdom of the lord? It's time to shed our tights and break out some biblical robes. And whatever you do Batman, don't tell them what we do to the bad guys we catch.

thebigot   January 18th, 2008 9:45 am ET

WE WILL NOT TOLERATE ANYONE THAT DOES NOT SHARE OUR VIEWS!!.

sam weatherford   January 18th, 2008 9:45 am ET

Maybe the country will see at some point the petty, vindictive and small, person the Huckster really is. Get his hillbilly family in the White House and it will be worse for our status around the world than junior. He likes his perks and will enjoy all the trappings of being king.

Larry   January 18th, 2008 9:45 am ET

I do not think that the comment is comparing Gay unions to bestiality. It is simply saying that once I do not think that the comment is comparing gay unions to bestiality. It is simply saying that once marriage is change to other then a union between a man and a woman, then marriage is opened to any definition or interpretation. marriage is change to other then a union to a man and a woman, then marriage is opened to any difinition

Eric   January 18th, 2008 9:45 am ET

I saw a couple of posts claiming that in recent studies homosexuality is proven NOT to be a choice. I am a science professor, and I can assure you that not one study has offered any proof that people are born gay. This is a lie used to push an agenda.

Diane   January 18th, 2008 9:45 am ET

We can thank the religious right for electing Bush, the "pro-lifer" who has killed tens, if not hundreds of thousands (there were even a few fetuses in there, I'm sure). Those voters are responsible for those deaths. Huckabee is more of the same. If they vote Huckabee in, it will be Bush II. We cannot afford any more incompetence. All the evangelicals care about are social issues (and I thought the right wanted government out of our lives), when we have too many other non-social issues that are melting down because they haven't been dealt with by our "born-againer" good ol' "pro-lifer" in the white house.

Rob V   January 18th, 2008 9:44 am ET

Oh and please, no matter what you think of gays in general, cant everyone jsut stop trying to force thier religious morality on people. marriage is not areligious thing. you dont have to go to a church to marry, you have to get a license from the state. leave religion out of it and if you think that gays are going to go to h*ll because of how we were created, then fine, let us. its our lives not yours. i for one wish this whole topic would just go away so we can start focusing on more improtant things instead of something that is such a non issue

Mike   January 18th, 2008 9:44 am ET

It sure is fun to misrepresent what someone is saying but to actually believe that he was "equating a loving marriage between two people of the same sex with some form of bestiality" is to completely ignore what he actually said.

We as a society owe it to ourselves and our children to place reality and rational thought above the primal emotional response. If one disagrees with what is said have the courage and intelligence to respond to the statement. We will all move forward when we can initiate a dialog without the emotional spin and not so hidden agenda. Besides this approach only leaves one looking foolish and bitter while ultimately undermining their message. A message that could possibly change the world had it only been delivered intelligently.

fred   January 18th, 2008 9:43 am ET

That shows how out of touch the liberal left and gays are with American views. That was obvious a chain statement where Huckabee was trying to show the road In which allowing everybody change the marriage definition. No Insult is intended. However it is obvious that Huckabee view gayiety as being perverse and that you can take to issue, right or wrong. However, alot of gays just don't get that their behavior makes alot of our skin crawl. I think this is the case here.

Independent in IA   January 18th, 2008 9:43 am ET

Yet another indication of his intent to force religious theocracy on the people of this nation.

Perhaps he should convert to Islam. He'd be right at home in Iran or Pakistan. I'm quite sure they would embrace his views enthusiastically.

Tad   January 18th, 2008 9:43 am ET

Defining marriage: a man and a woman IS NOT = Homophobia!
Therefore Huckabee is not a homophob'!

For every freedom has its CONSEQUENCES; therefore there is NO TOTALLY FREE FREEDOM! How do we then define a defiant behavior if being defiant is regarded an expression of freedom?!

There IS middle-ground! For values shape our common sense; our common sense shape our individual judgment; but the the way the policy effect other individuals is the middle-ground for talks; talks for a common purpose; that would shape the issued policies later on. That's why we have representatives to represent our different ideas! There is no way that a president could carry all the values of each person since a lot of them contradict each other.

CW, Columbia, SC   January 18th, 2008 9:43 am ET

SEPARATION of CHURCH and STATE!

These people harp on the gay marriage issue and it is just foolish. Their argument is purely emotional. I have still not figured out how a gay, married couple is going to destroy the sanctity of my marriage. If it does, then I am extremely weak and paranoid. Huckabee and his people would probably rather leave kids in orphanages than let gay couples marry and adopt kids who need homes.

Hey Mike, I think Jesus would want us to focus more on being good stewards of the planet. We do have a looming environmental crisis you know.

Dennis   January 18th, 2008 9:41 am ET

What good traits of Jesus do the hateful, greedy, intolerant and selfish Republicans have? What hypocrites they all are. Anyway, God didn't write those religious books of the few authors (government, people or churches made all that up to force society to become a certain way and to guess how the world was created). It's all obvious fantasy. Any god who created the world billions of years ago to then evolve (yes evolution has been proven true so that debunks the creationism junk) on it's own would have put everything directly into the genes. The masses rational thinking without corruption by books determines what seems right and is right. No god would put this into the minds of the few when he could put it into the evolving genes of everyone. And being gay seems to not be normal of course because of statistics and common sense but we are not to judge badly normal differences (as long as we are not being harmed) and hate people who are gay and to say that our hate is good and that any religion is right when none of us are any god (what right do we even have to play god to pick any irrational religion that was just handed to us by our parents by tradition, over Science) and when Science, logic and common sense shows religion is just fantasy. Gays people might not even believe your stupid religion. Who makes you god to determine that some faith is more to be believed that proven Science? Science and common sense shows if there was a god he just started this billions of years ago.. and left all if us to get along. REligion ruined all of this though to divide everyone..

JoeBrown   January 18th, 2008 9:41 am ET

Huckabee is just showing why he's just another right wing nutjob. Isn't his 15 seconds up yet?

Daniel, TX   January 18th, 2008 9:41 am ET

The Bible always has, and always will preach loving each and every person. Those who truely seek to follow the Word, like myself, should never distort it to justify hating someone else. That being said, it certainly does not justify loving every action of every person. People are not born forced to be gay, its simply not true. People are born with a inclination towards being gay, just as may are born with the tendency to become alcoholics, murders, rapists, child molesters and criminals. If you don't believe this, go ahead and read some actual science papers...not media reports of them. Just because someone is born feeling like they should do something doesn't make it justifiable in any sense. Also, just because someone you know who is probably a very upstanding person has decided to embrace homosexuality, and most of them are otherwise upstanding individuals who don't mean any harm to anyone, doesn't mean the act itself is ok. Marriage was originated by the church, and has been sanctioned by the state. If gays wish to live together, the state has no right to deny them this and nor does anyone else, but it also has no right to turn a Christian institution into a justification of a sinful act. Give them equal right to be sure, but don't slant marriage for political gains, What Mike is saying is that the state has no right to change a Christian institution, hence he actually supports the separation of church and state.

God   January 18th, 2008 9:39 am ET

I agree with Mr. Huckabee 100%.

Rob V   January 18th, 2008 9:39 am ET

Seems the bottom line isnt wether or not he is okay with homosexuality but wether he has enough respect to allow homosexuals to live life the way they were born to live it and he obviously doesnt. this is just another example along with his comments on hiv, of his small mindeness and the bigotry he continues to express

Sam   January 18th, 2008 9:39 am ET

1) All of you who say he doesn't respect "every person in America"....He's close-minded....he's a bigot.....blah blah blah, you are being hypocritical. You are displaying your close mindedness or biggotry against his conservative views. Actually take the higher road, as you suggest that you do, and accept him for his beliefs, as misinterpreted as his remarks were.
2) He wasn't equating homosexuality to beastiality. He was only saying that once we change the definition of marriage to include homosexuality we are opening up a pandoras box in a sense. We leave ourselves unprotected from that definition morphing into any number of scenarios...man and child, brothers, man and animal, man and cartoon, man and self.....
3) I don't care for Huckabee but my personal feelings for him aren't blinding me to what he is actually saying. You liberals are constantly trying to paint the conservatives as biggots and haters of all non-white, rich guys and it is getting old. Mainstream America (liberals and conservatives alike) wants the same thing, happiness, prosperity, good health, peace, charity for the poor, etc. We just believe in getting there in different ways so accept those differences and let the majority opinion rule.

Will   January 18th, 2008 9:38 am ET

"You cite "scientific studies that have shown that homosexuality is not chosen but that it is hereditary, but what legitimacy is there in a scientific study performed by human beings – who by nature are not objective – using formulas and theories written by these same non-objective human beings. Data is great, but it can made to tell virtually any story you want it to tell, its all in how the data is presented. "

That is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. The Bible which you love so dearly was written by humans.

Ignorance.

Paulo   January 18th, 2008 9:38 am ET

I wonder if this is the kind of person America wants to be its leader. He is obviously a draconian thinking man who would most likely take this country back to medieval times.

Con   January 18th, 2008 9:38 am ET

I'm in support of Huckabee's views. Marriage should be between and man and a woman only. This should never change. Countries that have allowed same-sex marriage, have deteriorated after doing so. Keep our morals strong and we'll have a stronger country.

Carolyn   January 18th, 2008 9:38 am ET

It's ridiculous how many people pick and choose what parts of the bible to mix with government. Homosexual behavior isn't any more condemned than glutony or eating shellfish in the Bible, yet so many people act as if 1/4 of the Bible is about this "sin"

When Huckabee talks about changing the definition of marriage, I wonder how he feels about interacial marriage since it only became legal in the past 40 years...was that a slippery slope to bestiality as well?

It's easy for the majority to deny the rights of a minority, and history proves that.

Lucy Wilson   January 18th, 2008 9:37 am ET

After reading all the comments, and carefully considering each; after hearing Governor Huckabee speak and researching his stance on the issues, I have made my decision. Mike Huckabee has my vote.

Melissa   January 18th, 2008 9:36 am ET

Thank you Jim for stating your opinion without name calling etc. I agree with you on most of your post. It seems to me those that are for gay marriage end up resorting to name calling, saying those against are not educated, etc.

To Chris- you said "Look, our Founding Fathers United States wanted our government to be based on the bible they would have specifically said so. If they wanted our government policy to be based on the 10 Commandments they would have specifically said so. If they wanted the documents that they drafted to be specifically Christian……they would have specifically SAID so."
There is a major flaw in this logic, with it we wouldn’t need a court system because the founding fathers would have thought about everything when they drafted the Constitution and included it.

As for those saying "mainstream" is for gay marriage... if that is the case, why have 33 states BANNED it (that would be 66%) and only 7 allow some legal rights? That was as of mid 2007. If you are passionate about something, go vote!

jgarth   January 18th, 2008 9:36 am ET

No more mullahs in American politics, please.

Clint M.--Kentucky   January 18th, 2008 9:36 am ET

Let Huckabee continue to make a fool of himself with his biggotry and ignorant commentsIII The foolish Republican party has made its own bed and now they're going to have to lay in it (Iraq war/poor economy, corruption, etc). Its almost unfashionable-bad etiquette to be a Republican these days...they're being shunned and looked down upon by most of the general population. So go right on ahead Huckabee... open mouth -insert foot. Like taking candy from a baby this election.

Jim in Orlando, FL   January 18th, 2008 9:34 am ET

With so many real problems to fix, it is disheartening to see politicians spend so much time, and people their efforts arguing, whether homosexuality is "normal". Its real enough to those who are gay. The debate should be solely the extent to which two people of any sex can enter into a legally defined union, whether a "marriage" or "civil union" (I favor the latter), and the legally defined status it will have. Ultimately, it is a complex states rights issue.

Jack Smith   January 18th, 2008 9:34 am ET

The problem is the use of the religious term "marraige" in the laws in the first place, because it mixed church and state. If we took that term out of the law, inserting 'civil union' and let the churches marry people the contraversy would go away. Then civil unions could be recognized for legal purposes and people could choose chuches that agree with their personal moral values.

Vote4Hillary   January 18th, 2008 9:32 am ET

Huckabee is pandering to the fears of Christians just like Bush did. It's pathetic.

Ryan, NC   January 18th, 2008 9:32 am ET

My advice to people, who don’t like gay marriage, is: Don't get one.

Huckabee's "slippery slope" argument makes no sense. The fact is, life exists on a slippery slope. When we legalized interracial marriage not too long ago, did people make this same argument - you bet they did.

We have serious problems in this country ranging from the Iraq War to the economy. Gay baiting politics will have no place in this year’s elections.

Dave C - NJ   January 18th, 2008 9:31 am ET

Deviant and destructive to what Mike?

What does it destroy exactly?

Deviant based on what?

Your right about one thing, you are entitled to your opinion. Even though you have no facts ot back it up.

Larry   January 18th, 2008 9:31 am ET

I totally agree with Mike Huckabee's comment.

RickK   January 18th, 2008 9:31 am ET

Mike is correct and you are not. Mainstream America? I think not!
America was not founded on gays! And gays are not allowed according to the bible!
Mike H is right, most people find gay marriages repulsive and two guys... well it might as well be a guy and a sheep!
We need someone like Mike to speak up and bring back America to the wholesome values that founded this country. Not the sick garbage that outr broken justice system is allowing to go on today.
I think half the senators and justice system are gay sickos.
You find this offensive? too bad . It's my God given right and freedom of speech to speak my mind. But this will probably be deemed inappropriate and offensive.
Hence, the media only prints what it wants to print!

j-dog   January 18th, 2008 9:31 am ET

America is certainly a great country that allows the freedom of each to espouse an opinion on any and every subject available. I am part of a percentage of American citizens that believes in and attempts to practice God's word... notice I say attempt as we all fall vastly short of the perfect son, Jesus. Do I believe that homosexuality is genetic, hereditary or whatever? No I do not and I certainly do believe it is a choice. With that said, I will not allow myself to hate my fellow brother and sister by villainizing any acts that I might personally find immoral in nature. We can all certainly live our lives together in the greatest country on God's green earth and those that believe in God can be judged on that day when it comes. On that day, each of us will need to ask forgiveness for the wrong we have done. God will see the sincerity in our hearts, as well as our love for him and he will either allow us to pass into heaven or to be condemned to hell for eternity. God will be the only judge and jury for all of us. Until that time, May God Bless All of My Brothers and Sisters.

a vote for jesus is a vote for huckabee   January 18th, 2008 9:31 am ET

PS: I'm surprised most of the morons on this site can even read well enough to respond to what is written on this site.

Torie   January 18th, 2008 9:31 am ET

I just went back and read some of the other comments and yes I am a Christian. I do know that I sin but I also know that no one is born gay. Yes...God loves people who say they are gay but until they change their ways they are not going to heaven. This country needs someone like Huckabee in the White House to straighten up this country.

Mike   January 18th, 2008 9:31 am ET

to Huck and the other invisible man theorists, a quote from Ozzy;
"tell me I'm a sinner, I got news for you,
I spoke to god this morning,
and he don't like you"

a vote for jesus is a vote for huckabee   January 18th, 2008 9:29 am ET

Anyone who votes for Huckabilly deserves what this idiot gives them. Think our country is in trouble now? Well vote for him and see where we go. I can't believe people even support him on the platform of "Christianity". Notice the air quotes. This man is disgusting and disgusting to the term Christianity. What happened to judge not lest ye be judged? Separation of church and state was established for a reason.

Patrick, Mpls MN   January 18th, 2008 9:28 am ET

Seriously, do we forget that the most vocal people against homosexuality are the same people who are often found trolling public bathroom stalls for the gay sex the find so offensive? Or picking up gay, meth-dealing prostitutes to enjoy both "sins". The hypocritical nature of the right, and more accurately the christian right never ceases to amaze me. Don't hide from what you are Mike Huckabee.

Nancy L PA   January 18th, 2008 9:27 am ET

Does anybody see the real struggle here? For Christians and non-believers alike, the struggle is not what we believe about homosexuality, it's what we believe about the Bible. I have more respect for those who reject the Word of God outright and in totality than I do with the so-called Christians and church-goers today who pick and choose what parts they like (apparently the true parts) and reject those they call offensive (the wrong or "out-dated" parts). If the Bible is the Word of God, and God is who He says He is, accept it all, like it or not. We would gladly have a preacher bless our weddings or pray over a deceased loved one with words of comfort from the Bible, but when it comes down to standards and precepts in the Bible we can't live with, we dismiss the Word as out-dated, non-progressive, or even bigoted to name just a few "main-stream" labels. Are we that afraid to take an honest look at ourselves and determine what we really believe?

Molly   January 18th, 2008 9:27 am ET

Another example of the media twisting words. Huckabee was saying if we change the legal definition of marriage to something other than between a man and a woman, then it will be open to be changed again to suit some other minority's definition of marriage. I agree with him, and I think the majority of the American people agree with him. There have only been three or four states that have actually voted for homosexuals to have legal marriage rights. The rest of the states that voted on it voted against it by a pretty wide margin.

chad   January 18th, 2008 9:27 am ET

This article and the "enlightened" responses of the masses is the very reason that there may still be a chance for a republican to win this election.

You guys can want it all you want, but when the rubber meets the road, mainstream America values the institution of marriage in its traditional sense between a man and a woman.

We shouldn't judge, we shouldn't cast stones, we shouldn't be biggots....I agree, but at some point rational thought has to slap eutopian idealists in the face.

Perhaps Mr. Huckabee decided to do the slapping.

Joe Lee   January 18th, 2008 9:26 am ET

No, he's not equating homosexuality with bestiality... he's pointing out the slippery slope that gay marriage leads to. Fourty years ago, right or wrong, homosexuality was 'really out of the mainstream of American thought'. He is pointing out that is we redefine marriage now, some years down the road when someone comes along and says they have the right to marry a sheep, precedent will have been set. What is 'out of the mainstream now' may be 'in the mainstream' later if we always allow the measuring rod to move.

Mike   January 18th, 2008 9:26 am ET

Denny:
"For this one statement he made, I agree with him, and even more important, GOD agrees with Huckabee. After all God said it first, and the God of Abraham CAN NOT lie"
I assume you know this for a fact as you have a conversation (2 way) every day, right? There are definetly 2 United States of America.

RADA   January 18th, 2008 9:26 am ET

Jim- You moron... the TV has many channels and if you have cable or satellite you have even more to choose from. Nobody makes watch anything. Change the dial and let the rest of us watch what we want. There is pandering by Christian preachers everyday on my TV and I choose not to watch it.

When I hear or read from someone like you so full of it and how you interpret the bible or the constitution to fill your agenda makes me hurl. You want to impose your Morals on the rest of us and hide behind the “I am a Christian” Please take time and read about history… about the inquisitions, the holocaust and the real reason why this country was founded. Read about religious persecution and stop been so ignorant and live out of politics. Politics are dirty and GOD should be kept out of it.

In my experience people that sounds like you in about 80% of the times is that they are closet cases trying to hide their reality. Have your self check and perhaps you can go into one of those church clinics that claim that can “cure” homosexuality.

Torie   January 18th, 2008 9:25 am ET

Huckabee has beliefs same as mine. A woman and a woman or a man and a man should not be aloud to marry one another. I think that it is pathetic that anyone would say that they should. I do not want my children to grow up in a world that is acceptable to this. I will teach them what is right and wrong and that is definatly wrong.

MARRIAGE SHOULD BE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN!!!! GO HUCKABEE!!!

SR-TX   January 18th, 2008 9:25 am ET

In the beginning, God said "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him." And he created WOMAN, not another man! Hello liberals! You either believe God or you don't.

Eric   January 18th, 2008 9:25 am ET

I proprose a program to get middle americans out of their respective states for the first time so they can realize there is a world out there beyond their cornfields and mega churches. It is funny to see how insular some of these people are in their thoughts and beliefs. Why is it always the people who have never even been out of their state that claim they know what mainstream America is all about and that America is better than any other country in this world? Wouldn't another perspective give you a better understanding?

Chris   January 18th, 2008 9:25 am ET

And he is also taking heat for his fried squirrel comment in sc. I am born and raised here and I can say without a doubt that he lost plenty of voted in sc because of the stereotypong comment.

Andrew   January 18th, 2008 9:24 am ET

LOL. What about a woman and a leprechaun? :) I mean if we allow a woman to marry a leprechaun, wouldn't it a be hypocritical to say that we don't allow other magical or fairy tale unions?

Jon S. Ann Arbor, Michigan   January 18th, 2008 9:24 am ET

Holy frickasolee. Man, are the homophobes here something. And you call yourselves Christians? It's amazing that you stick to form, saying "I'm not a bigot, I'm a Christian" then in the next breathe, you spew bigotry. I'm sure there is not a single word in the Bible, or that ever came out of Christ's mouth, if he were a real person, that would support such hateful views.

Why do right-wingers worry so much about gay marriage? How exactly does this threaten our nation? I'm much more concerned about gun fanatics, who seem to think having more guns makes us safer. Huh? We have more guns than any other nation and far, far more gun homicides, suicides, and related gun issues than any nation. No rocket science, there.

And no, our founding fathers were not espousing a Christian nation. You do not seem to know the history of Jefferson, et. al, very well.

Dave L - OK   January 18th, 2008 9:24 am ET

Reaction to Huckabee's comments are ridiculous. To put it a different way, imagine the debate was over changing the colors of the flag. He's saying if we change it to purple, it could be changed to orange or green later too, because once it's been changed it loses some of the permanence that was there. But saying that doesn't 'make' orange equal purple.

I would also say that to call acceptance of same sex marriage part of mainstream American thought is the biggest stretch in this story. If it's so mainstream, why is it having so many problems becoming legal. People holding onto their values may not lash out in the media against it, but they quietly vote against it. Popular media and Hollywood may be all for it, but I do not recall electing them to be the 'mainstream' of American thought.

Dave, MI   January 18th, 2008 9:23 am ET

Does anyone else find the irony of those who say that those who are homosexual are 'born that way'? Have you ever stopped to think about the fact that if homosexuality were genetic, it would largely disappear in one generation? There is much more at work than genetics here.

Also, a note about the separation of church and state which was made earlier. While I agree that there needs to be separation, people should not point to the Constitution as evidence; it *never* says that in there. You need to look at later correspondence between early leaders to find that phrase.

Mike   January 18th, 2008 9:23 am ET

Give the gays an inch and they will take a mile.
Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Anything else is deviant, destructive behavior.
My opinion and I'm entilted to it.

David in Chicago   January 18th, 2008 9:22 am ET

Huckabee is right on this one...I'm going to have to listen to him now and determine if we agree on other items. Being gay is still not normal or acceptable with everyone, regardless of how much they want it to be.

pf   January 18th, 2008 9:21 am ET

If Huckabee gets elected, I'm moving out the country-to Arkansas!

Hal   January 18th, 2008 9:21 am ET

I am also mainstream America and I don't like gay marriage; however, it is not up to the government or me to define an individuals choice or dicate what a persons moral decisions must be under any circumstance. I believe the Bible also says not to judge another man, that is the job of God. I get the impression that Huckabee is not only running for president but also for the job of God.

Brad. P   January 18th, 2008 9:19 am ET

I believe that what Huckabee stands for is a great idea. The traditional should stay that way, knowing how the country grew on its christian prinicples, and fear of an almighty God, I believe we should stop allowing those in the judicial court to make decisions based on their views and opinions and make decisions only on what is stated in the constitution. Gay marriage is in my opinion, and surely in the opinions of our founding fathers, an abomination to this nation.

Dewi   January 18th, 2008 9:16 am ET

The homosexual agenda is pushing forward in full force... They call him radical when just 20-30 years ago the majority felt the way that Huckabee is standing on. Let God be true and every man a liar. Homosexuality is an abomination, Read Romans Chapter 1 and you'll see what God has to say on that.

Irene, Clearwater, FL   January 18th, 2008 9:16 am ET

>>>It is an abomination that only the liberal "demycraps" in this country support, it is a symptom of a greater malady infecting our society, a malady that people like Obama, "Billary" and Pelosi support and will jam down our throats if we let them,

As a registered Repub for over twenty-five years, I find this statement completely ludicrous.

I fully support the rights of homosexuals to marry/make unions. Two consenting adults who are taxpayers and citizens of this country deserve the same rights and freedoms as any other citizen. Anything less establishes a 'second-class'.

Of course, I'm also in favor of a woman's right to choose what she does with her body, and I'm not a Christian, either.

I really miss my old Republican party where we wanted less government intrusion in our lives, and smaller government and fiscal responsibility. I know that's twenty years gone, but I really wish you religiously driven zealots would give the rest of us our party back.

(And no, I can't go Independant because then I have no voice in local elections or primaries in my state.) (And I just can't bring myself to go Democrat either.)

D'Berry   January 18th, 2008 9:16 am ET

Mike Huckabee is one of the few with enough courage to say what alot of people continue to believe.
Don't be still, Mike.

Frank, Waverly, NY   January 18th, 2008 9:16 am ET

Gay marriage is wrong! God Bless Huckabee for standing up against this!

Rhea   January 18th, 2008 9:11 am ET

Huckabee will really be a step forward (NOT!) for this country. What world is this guy living in!?

Sarah   January 18th, 2008 9:10 am ET

I agree with the poster who wonders why homosexuality is so threatening to right-wing Christians. Does homosexual behavior hurt you somehow? Does it affect your quality of life? Does it have any measurable negative impact on your community? Why is it any of your business? If you don't like it, don't engage in it. I can't see why behavior that poses no danger to non-practitioners should be so reviled.

And on the topic of gay marriage, I think that many of its more ardent opposers may have lost sight of what "marriage" means in this case. Homosexuals are not asking to come to your church and have your priest or minister perform your religion's sacred rites on them. They are simply asking for *legal* recognition of their union, with the rights and privileges derived therefrom. These rights and privileges have to do with taxation, health coverage, etc.–purely legal concepts having nothing to do with religion. No one wants to threaten your religion or your way of life–this is an equal rights issue, not a religious one.

dr thinkabout it   January 18th, 2008 9:08 am ET

There are so many nations in the world that now allow gay marriage that there is abundant proof that gay marriage only strengthens a society. Its the US not...say Canada...in which the economy is tanking and who is killing innocent civilians for oil? its the US who maintains its ignorant Christian EXCUSES to discriminate against people just because they don't like or don't understand them.

One thing Christians hate above all else is facts. Facts like.... its better to teach sex ed and encourage condom use than it is to preach abstinence and see pregnancy rise and diseases increase.

The facts are that there is no danger to society here....no one has ever been injured by a gay marriage...no one has ever converted to being gay because gay marriage was available and they though it would be easier to marry a man than a woman.... and even if the Bible says its wrong (which not all believers in the Bible agree with) there is no justification to inflict that bias on the society as a whole. I would ask Christians be kind to others, and let consenting adults do whatever makes them happy and doesn't hurt anyone. Your desire to be part of the "in crowd" should be channeled elsewhere.

Jerry Oldham   January 18th, 2008 9:02 am ET

Huckabee's comment is NOT out of the Mainstream America. It is out of the Mainstream Liberal views. This country needs to have it's values reenforced and we need to make them public and quit setting back and letting the radical liberal views be imposed on all of us. If the Whaco's want to do "their thing" then concentrate in one area preferably isloated form the general population and prctice their beliefs. I suggest an island in the far south Pacific....

Susan   January 18th, 2008 8:56 am ET

I am a Democrat with Conservative views...and although I have personal mixed feelings about the Gay Marriage Issues....I think that Huckabees comments regarding Homosexuality, Confederate Flag, Constitutional Amendment (to be more in keeping with God's Word etc) are extremely FRIGHTENING......I consider myself a Christian, but this is one man who MAKES CHRISTIANS HAVE A BAD NAME....THIS MAN IS A DANGER TO OUR NATIONS CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTIES....AND SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE ..............JUST LISTEN TO THIS MAN SPOUT HIS RELIGIOSITY ALL OVER THIS NATION ..........HE HAS AN AGENDA...........AND ONE AGENDA ONLY...WHICH IS TO .......WHAT DID HE SAY?...........BRING THIS NATION BACK TO CHRIST..............WAKE UP ALL OF YOU WHO CARE ABOUT CIVIL LIBERTIES BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rev. Roger Girtman, ULC   January 18th, 2008 8:54 am ET

Who defines marriage? How has it changed? I say marriage is defined as a religious institution. As a religious institution, only the vessels of that institution may determine to whom it applies... certainly not the legislature, who is forbidden from passing laws regarding religion in any effect, positive or negative; not the President, who is bount to enforce the laws passed by the legislature. Huckabee, if he were President, could not enforce the positions he supports as they would not and could not become constitutionally enforcable laws.

Also, one must remember that Christianity is not the only religion–otherwise this would not be an issue. If Jim's faith says "no gay marriage", then Jim cannot get married to a man within his faith. However, if Bob's faith says "if you love, then you may marry" Jim's church cannot prevent Bob from getting married to a man. This is what we refer to as "Free Exercise of Religion".

I propose a challenge that was once presented to me: If homosexuality is genetic, then the homosexual cannot be condemned anymore than I could be for being blonde. If it is a choice, then heterosexuality must also be choice. The challenge provided to me was to try, for just one day, to choose to be sexually attracted to another man–I did not need to act on it, simply try to choose to feel attracted. I was unable to do so. Over a decade later, I am still a straight man. If I cannot choose my sexuality, how can I condemn someone else who cannot choose theirs?

Kit   January 18th, 2008 8:53 am ET

One more reason to be sickened by this man. I am sickened and appalled that people want to JUDGE others morals and beliefs based on their own beliefs. I am not religious. But I can tell you I seem to remember a commandment "Thou shalt not judge". But hey maybe I'm wrong. But this man and the people who support him is exactly what is wrong with this country.

Greg   January 18th, 2008 8:49 am ET

I am proud of Mike for standing for what is right unlike most of our mainstream politicians that are too weak on this issue.

I just saw a few weeks ago a story and photo of a man in India, getting married to a dog (you can probably google it), he was getting married to the dog became he felt it would remove a curse from him due to his past cruelty to dogs (I suppose he beat them). I know the dog is man's best friend but that's a bit much.

Being from Arkansas, I'm not sure where the previous responder was going on this, there are laws in the state against both bestiality and sodomy -

Once again you guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill...

OPEN YOUR MIND   January 18th, 2008 8:49 am ET

Huckabee is a close minded bigot-who the hell votes for this guy? I guess we will just all have to become bible thumpers if this preacher gets into office. And Mr. Religious should follow the biggest doctrine of all only God can judge-who the hell is this man and where on earth did he come from?

jimbo   January 18th, 2008 8:48 am ET

Huckabee is a "one-state wonder." Maybe those back woods hicks in Iowa think he is wonderful but the rest of us think he's a country bumpkin who has absolutely no foreign policy knowledge or experience at all. He cannot even answer a question on foreign policy without sounding like an idiot,. His ideas concerning gays are archaic and he expects women to be subservient to me. He does not represent main stream America. He should go back to being the Baptist minister that he claims to be. He is not suitable to be President.

Ray   January 18th, 2008 8:41 am ET

I HATE YOU SO MUCH MIKE!!!!!!

Dave C - NJ   January 18th, 2008 8:34 am ET

Also the Huck's point is that if you can allow gays to marry, then what's next? Let anyone marry anything or anyone.

I see his point but t's still ignorant and bigoted to associate one with the other.

Besides Huck, what about consent? Children and animals can't consent. Hence your argument is out.

AnnAloha, PA   January 18th, 2008 8:31 am ET

If marraige is such a sacred institution, then why aren't any of the candidates demmanding laws that will prosecute anyone that has an affair outside of their wedlock, and the person that is invovled also? Prosecute all invovled, period!!!
I feel this would make each couple think longer and harder about marraige and in turn we'll probably see a decline in divorce.(Prevention is the Key)
This would also discourage all sleazy singles from trying to break marraiges up and keep them away.
1-5 years for Adultery(All involved) 1st offense
That'll shake up these so called finger pointers.

Dave C - NJ   January 18th, 2008 8:30 am ET

I love the "Christian" calling people queer. What a scumbag.

Here's a few notes for the religious kooks:

Gays don't hurt you. Leave them alone. Doesn't your bible teach you to treat people nicely?

People are born with gender differences all the time...hermaphrodites, transsexuals, so why is it such a shock that someone can be born a homosexual? Also who would "choose" to join a group that has historically been shunned? Also, did YOU choose your sexuality?

This county was NOT founded on religious principals. Who wrote the text books in the south? Did they skip separation of church and state? Yes the founders were christian but they were ESCAPING religious rule.

How do any of you know what GOD wants? Did he visit you in the parking lot of WalMart? The bible was written 2000 years ago by people that threw rocks at the moon. I believe in God but don't believe in the bible, a MAN made publication.

God save us from his followers.

Tom, Boston MA   January 18th, 2008 8:23 am ET

hey, you self-styled christians. God made homosexuals and bi-sexuals as well as hetero-sexuals in his / her own image, the Bible says.

Steven   January 18th, 2008 8:07 am ET

This country no longer has any morals. Any behavior is fine and if you don't like what I do it means you are a bigot or discriminating against me. This once beautiful, respected decent country is nothing more then a cesspool of immorality all in the name of personal freedom. America, once the world leader is now the world laughing stock!

mytwocents   January 18th, 2008 8:01 am ET

There's some discussion above regarding either being born gay or choosing to be gay so here's my two cents worth regarding marriage. I have TWO gay siblings both in their 40s and neither one has EVER been in a serious relationship with someone for more than 6 months tops in their entire dating lives. I am close with each and know many of their friends. They are ALL this way, there is no seriousness regarding relationships with any of them. If given the opportunity to marry, the divorce rate among homosexuals would be staggering! There are very, very few gay couples that live their lives out with one partner. I'm not against the idea but I worry about the aftermath. One of my siblings has a child (while in the closet!) and once he came out, she was no longer part of his life PERIOD. He does not want that reminder and it is tearing the child apart. Is it hereditary? They say so, but then again, half of what they say is a lie so I don't know. How can I say this about them?? Because it's the God's honest truth and they could care less about anyone other than themselves. I'm frankly sick of the whole situation. My entire family bends over backwards for them only to be taken advantage of both emotionally and monetarily. Would I vote to legalize?? HELL NO

Jeremiah   January 18th, 2008 7:47 am ET

I second Ashley's commits. Love is all that should matter. I would like to add that religion has no place in government. There is a reason we have a separation between church and state. Everyone has a right to believe what they believe; they have the right to pursue happiness; and most of all, we were all equal under the constitution. Therefore, just because same-sex marriage makes some people uncomfortable, why should that interfere with a homosexual's beliefs, happiness and equality? No homosexual is intentionally interfering with a heterosexual's happiness. Why do some heterosexuals have a need to interfere with the happiness of homosexuals? Lastly, gay marriage is legal in South Africa. SOUTH AFRICA! Nothing against South Africa but which country–US or South Africa–is more developed now?

Elizabeth Watson   January 18th, 2008 7:45 am ET

What about Huckabee's comment to John Roberts this morning: "The Constitutioin was meant [designed? --I don't remember the exact word here] to be amended. That is why African-Americans are considered to be people..." WHAT!!!

I am seriously worried about the separation of church and state with this guy around. What about freedom of religion? I always thought that meant the freedom to not only choose your religion, but also to choose no religion.

Publius   January 18th, 2008 7:36 am ET

There is no God.

Mike T   January 18th, 2008 7:26 am ET

Let's see, we have a war in Iraq, millions of jobs being outsourced, millions of people coming over our border illegally every year, the dow has lost over 1,000 points in less than 2 weeks, kids don't have healthcare, and the topic de jour is once again gay marriage? That "divide and conquer" strategy works great, doesn't it?

Woman, Pittsburgh, PA   January 18th, 2008 7:25 am ET

To all of you hateful "Christians" out there: On Judgement Day, you will discover that YOU are the ones whom the Lord won't recognize when you cry "Lord Lord."

Most young women know that there are sexual predators out there. Most women are molested at least once before the age of 18. I was. By heterosexual men. If I reasoned as illogically as many homophobes do as to why gays should be persecuted, I would have concluded long ago that all heterosexual men must surely be child molesters. After all, I've never been approached or threatened by a lesbian, and no gay man has ever tried to hurt me. I can't say the same for straight men.

Matthew   January 18th, 2008 7:24 am ET

Wow, what a shock – a Baptist minister turns out to be a homophobic nutcase. Next you'll be telling us he has no foreign policy qualifications...

AJ; Montpelier, VT   January 18th, 2008 7:21 am ET

Denny, Estill and Ragdoll who think that is OK to be hate filled and bigoted are the ones out of the mainstream. And Ragdoll, we equate your type of "christianity" with fanaticism it is true. Perhaps if "chrisitans" like you would stop cherry picking sections of the Bible to justify your hate, many may not cringe when hearing the word "christian."
And TLC – if only we were so lucky to have chrisitans shoved in the closet. The world would be a better place.

This is American and it takes all kinds, but why do we have to listen to their ignorant, hate filled, bigoted rants?

TJS   January 18th, 2008 7:15 am ET

I am tired of gay rights. What happened to the rest of our rights. My rights to turn on my tv and not have homosexual lifestyles crammed down my throat. I do not believe we are born "gay" maybe with tendencies,but it is a choice. I am not prochoice of any form. Does anyone see where our country has gone with all this seperation of church and state? the shape of our schools, workplaces, etc.? I believe it is time to have a person that is "God fearing" and walks the walk in office. Not some big talker that doesn't come close to what they preach as we have now. I don't know who you consider "mainstream" but from all polls I have seen there are more "religious" in American that non-believers. So I wish the majority would get out and vote that way. Take our country back from politicians who change beliefs for the "highest bidder" and make their choices by the "highest power". I am sure you will tag me as a "fanactic" but if you only knew, way off base here. Just tired of the mess of our country, and I believe this is the "change" we all need.Everyone has to live with their own choice but I don't want to be subjected daily to your choice.

VIC   January 18th, 2008 7:12 am ET

I LOVE YOU SO MUCH MIKE !!!!!!!

Jen   January 18th, 2008 6:39 am ET

Every time I think Huckabee seems like a nice guy he goes and says something like this to remind me why I'm a Democrat.

Alice Newman Center Harbor NH   January 18th, 2008 6:17 am ET

Thanks to fred fonebone for adding one of the most intelligent points to this discussion.

What if Preacher Mike goes off on one of these mindless rants when dealing with international issues (although he's ignored those so far) ? Remember his linking Jesus and Satan when speaking against the Morman religion?

With man/women marriage divorce rates at over 50%, 1.2 million abortions and 5 children tossed to the death in the past week, I don't see marriage as a real beacon of hope or much to write home about.

If you don't want a gay marriage – you don't have to have one. The party of personal responsibility sure doesn't mind telling everyone else what to do in their bedroom.

Bjorn   January 18th, 2008 6:14 am ET

We're not the richest, not the biggest, not the most powerfull nation in the world. We don't pretend bringing freedom to the world. But in Belgium we have full gay marriage laws. Freedom to the world starts in your own backyard.

Gabe   January 18th, 2008 6:13 am ET

This shows that we have no business judging other people, and that Mike's error to realize that may have cost him some political and personal standing. Whatever has happened to compassion for other people, I don't know, and Huckabee doesn't seem to realize that his God is maybe not the same as other people's Gods. Will two people of the same sex marrying or commiting to each other destroy the world? I think not, and besides, what harm are we doing by letting these people have relationships with each other? From the way some make it out to be, these people could be making nuclear weapons in their basements. Come on Mike, what has happened to compassion?

wwwest   January 18th, 2008 5:38 am ET

God don't make no trash.

Born gay. So what?

Loving another human being is wrong?

Boy, you so-called Christians here sound like the most un-loving people I have ever seen.

Seems like you guys have forgotten Jesus' biggest lesson of all.

Love one another.

ps I don't think he said anything about gays...

Stimbot   January 18th, 2008 5:35 am ET

It's good campaign strategy. You need to show a certain level of ignorance to win South Carolina.

Tammi   January 18th, 2008 4:40 am ET

JIM, thanks and I could not agree more!

George Lonen   January 18th, 2008 4:31 am ET

I totally support Huckabee. I( am glad he is standing for the truth. May God reward him him.

Tom   January 18th, 2008 4:30 am ET

For all the hatred between those on the far right and far left the fact of the matter is that homosexuality is if anything a flaw in the genetic code. If it wasn't then homosexuals wouldn't need medical intervention to reproduce. It is a flaw that is becoming more prevelant thanks to mankind stepping in playing the part of god or mother nature.

You can call me a hater or whatever but it doesn't change the fact that it is still a mutation that basically makes it so for all intents and purposes it would tend not to be passed on too offspring if not for science.

Chris   January 18th, 2008 4:17 am ET

I am so glad im not living in America right now, I live in South Africa & even with all our problems here our government has the mentality to not discriminate against human nature. Church & State are not confused, I can walk down the street and never fear being treated differently from any other person by the police or anyone else. I love America, I love the Ideals. I respect that conservatives do not want to change their way of life. I fail to understand though, why they believe a loving god is going to accept their judgement and hatred for others. I cannot believe in a god that would accept that.
Most gays are leaving conservatives alone, why cant most conservatives leave gays alone! I pray the worlds next most powerful man is a democrat, or McCain.

Richard   January 18th, 2008 4:09 am ET

Mike is the only republican i like.

Sal Fladabosco   January 18th, 2008 3:58 am ET

Good day everyone,

We hear from Christians all the time that 'the separation of church and state is not in the Constitution, which is correct, but one never hears from them where the phrase came from. It came from a letter sent by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association, a minority at the time in Connecticut.

Here is a quote:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state."

To which I add – if you want the government to base it's laws and practices on religion, would you accept Moslem laws? What about Wiccans? Satanists?

What people mean when they want no separation of church and state is that they want THEIR religion to rule – the exact opposite of the will of the founding fathers.

Jefferson, Washington and Franklin were freethinkers, not religionists, and to say they based the new country on Christianity is simply wrong.

hpg   January 18th, 2008 3:40 am ET

I totally agree with Huckabee. I always vote.

Marsha, Portland, OR   January 18th, 2008 3:25 am ET

Jim – I find your argument on separation of church and state very interesting.

First, in response to your statement that there is no distinction between "church and state" in the constitution. You are right, of course, that those words, per se, are not written into the constitution. However, if you have taken any beginning Con Law course, then you should know that this interpretation came from Thomas Jefferson, one of those founding fathers that you cited later in your argument as having been persecuted for religious beliefs (or were we just speaking pilgrims!)etc. Jefferson, however in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in January 1, 1802 stated that the first amendments language of " that there shall be no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." was the "building [of] a wall of separation between church and state."

This is where the clarification of separation of church and state originated from. Thomas Jefferson himself. Given that Jefferson himself clarified the intent of the First Amendement, I am inclined to trust his interpretation, more than all the religious bodies in the U.S. who have endeavored to challenge that this was not the "founding fathers" intent, afterwards. How do you know? Jefferson, plainly, stated otherwise.

As for the rest of your argument. I very much appreciate the end of it and thank you that you feel that my son would be entitled to have two mothers that should be entitled to have the rights that a married couple have purely based that we are human beings like the rest of the world *gasp* "human! Oh no! What's that?" -Sorry – I forgot – we aren't human – we're "lesbians" some alien form here on planet United States who are something other than the "majority."

If it makes you feel any better, I too feel that you should be entitled to love your wife, and I think that when she is sick and in the hospital you should be allowed to visit her without anyone telling you that you have no right to, and I think you should be allowed to adopt children or have children, without people questioning whether you are proper parents or accusing you of being a child molester. I also think that you should be allowed to file taxes together! And you should be allowed to inherit each others money when you die without filing tons of paperwork. In fact, I believe it's okay for you to do all this even though you're heterosexual. Because I think there's nothing wrong with that. I just don't think that you should be allowed to get married, because well....I don't know what you look like...what color are you? are you disabled? do you have anything else wrong with you? have you ever "chosen" to do anything bad smoke? (Based on your argument) I don't think people who have "chosen" to smoke should be allowed to get married.... Any medical diseases...no one with medical diseases can get married either I think. See...how did that feel? The beauty of America is that no one is in the "majority" Jim.

JJ   January 18th, 2008 3:25 am ET

Hello fellow human beings!

I'd like to take a moment to reflect on tonight's rabble-rousing. First off, the so called CHRISTian evangelicals need to re-read the bible, again, no, not the part was passed down by campfire stories and written 4000 years ago,.. the part that was written by interpretations of people who once knew of someone who was once aligned with the teachings of Jesus Christ. Once you have thoroughly gone through that and have truly understood and absorbed what the christian churches of modern history have been spouting as the "word of God" i want you to rip a page out of that book, wipe your bum with it, place the page back in the book and toss said book out the window. Now you have added your own piece of crap to a long line of others who have inserted their own pieces of crap into a book that has become so twisted and used to justify evil, it no longer even resembles or stands for the original teachings. Now, once you have all settled down and gotten every "cuss" word out of your system that you have been hurling at what i have said, we can begin a real discussion. If for one moment you think, in your heart of hearts, that Jesus Christ, the saviour of ALL mankind, is going to say OR affirm YOUR belief that treating another human being differently because of differences in preferences, is the right thing to do, I've got an apple that i want you to taste.
That being said, this notion of the "mainstream" and "majority" doing what is "right" for all others in america or the world is absurd. Do any of us see what is wrong with this assumption? Hmmmm let's take a look-see at how Jesus arrived at his "situation" one Friday very long ago.......I do believe "majorities", "mob-rule", "mainstream politics" and " 30 silver pieces" had SOMETHING to do with it. Sounds like a modern day, good-ole, political rally to me. ALL sides are guilty of participating and therein lies OUR sin. The Son of Man did not suffer, die, get buried, Rise again, to cleanse us of our sins, for us to go do it again in the same fashion. This is not some sort of recurring nightmare that we have to live in. WE were supposed to MOVE ON, remember the teachings, love, forgive, turn the other cheek, give and never forget the sacrifice. These are messages and teachings of hope and progress. That is what this grand "judgement" that everyone is so wrapped up in will be about. It will be about how you loved, you gave, you remembered, you forgave. It will not be about petty differences and who won what battle, and who said what, when. It will be about how you have made life better for your fellow man. If what you believe and how you act, impedes the progress of the happiness and well being of another human being, take a step back, and evaluate if this is how you'd like to be "seen" compared to God's only son. Who do you think you will be judged against? He OR She already sent us who WE should be acting like , if we wish to get into His Or Hers Good graces.

Peace ~ JJ

jeff   January 18th, 2008 3:24 am ET

You people need to get a grip on reality. Mike has never said he doesn't respect every citizen and FYI, mainstream America does NOT believe homosexuality is normal. It is the secular progressive movement that is trying so hard to normalize homosexuality. Mike Huckabee believes every human being is created equal as stated in the Bible. Homosexuality is wrong because it goes against Judeo-Christian principles, the same principles that tell us murder or theft is wrong. This country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, however, being a homosexual doesn't make you any less of a person because we are all sinners. This is not a seperation of church and state issue, it is a natural law issue.

David   January 18th, 2008 3:12 am ET

Also, its funny to me that these "Christians" use the ten commandments as a banner for how this country should be run. But I am pretty sure that as a Christian the framework of the Sermon on the Mount should take precedence over the ten commandments. In which he tells us that the new and most important commandment is to love your neighbor as yourself. I am pretty sure there is a huge lack of that in this country. There is an amazing book that everyone should read called "Why the Christian Right is Wrong" by Dr. Robin Allen who is a minister in Oklahoma City. It is an incredible book and he is truly one of the few real Christian leaders in this country.

David   January 18th, 2008 2:55 am ET

Sinclair Lewis once said, "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." His words are utterly prophetic for the sad times that we live in today. As a Christian i have seen the beauty of the faith I love hijacked by people who claim Christianity but whose actions are utterly unchristian. Instead of preaching that God is Love, and that Jesus who may not have been the first liberal, He was the most important. He taught us to love our neighbor, to turn the other cheek, and in my opinion the most important part of his ministry, the Sermon on the Mount. The fact that Huckabee is talking about his "Christian ideology", yet comparing an act with two consenting adults who are in love with acts of sicking evil, demonizing a population just because he is willing to tap into peoples fear of what they dont understand, all for his own agenda. There is nothing more unchristian to me than that. I am a gay man, and I know that Jesus loves me, and by grace alone, I am saved. And the Christian Right can try to tell me I am sick, or demonized. Thats fine, because I know who I am. I know God knows who I am and who I love, and I believe in my heart the He loves me. And though it pains me to say so, he loves Huckabee too however misguided he is. I believe this has gone on long enough though, and It is time to take this amazing faith and our beautiful country back!

Steve   January 18th, 2008 2:32 am ET

"We can’t pray in our schools, but you can be gay in our schools."

Wow, just wow. Do you guys actually read what you type? "Can't pray in school" my behind! Last time I checked, NO ONE was stopping a student from sitting down at their desk and praying before or after class. What the religious right wants is mandated student prayer in public school, which are government funded institutions. I guess the "moment of reflection" every morning in a lot of schools just isn't enough. It HAS to be a moment of prayer sanctioned by the school!

Christians need to stop acting like they're some oppressed minority in this country. When was the last time someone stopped you from going to church? When was the last time someone stopped you from putting a nativity scene or christian flag up in your yard? Not ever last time I checked. The religious right can complain all they want that our country is taking god and Jesus out of the holiday season when in reality the 25th of December wasn't even a Christian holiday to begin with thousands of years ago and they themselves help fuel the "comercialized holiday" that Xmas has become in this country. And of course "Happy Holidays" is another thing they hate since it's taken the place of "Merry Christmas" in a lot of stores and public places. But yeah, screw Hanukkah and all the other relgious holidays that take place at the end of the year! They don't matter! [/sarcasm] Last time I checked, no one has stopped you from wishing anyone a Merry Xmas either.

You want to know one major reason why our country has been successful over the last 230+ years? Because we've been a secular nation that has tolerated all creeds or no creeds. No one has EVER stopped Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any other relgion being able to practice their faith in this country. But that doesn't give the other side of the coin the right to shove their particular branch of faith down the throats of everyone else.

Tommy   January 18th, 2008 2:23 am ET

I am appalled that a presidential candidate would have the audacity to say this however; I can’t say that I am surprised. Being a preacher and a "true Christian conservative" of course those are his views but to go on record saying it is suicide in the race for independents. Also, it shows how backwoods Huckabee is; proving that he truly is unelectable. If he were to be elected, no progress would be made in the country because he will constantly live in the past and not conform to the changing social climate of our nation.

A.J.   January 18th, 2008 2:22 am ET

I find Hucakabee's homophobic remarks absolutely appalling. It is one thing to be opposed to gay marriage, but to be so crude and blatantly disrespectful to so many of our own citizens? America's original citizens left their homeland because of oppression from the church. Our country was founded with the belief that their should be a separation between church and state. Mike Huckabee clearly does not respect this seperation.

chris   January 18th, 2008 2:18 am ET

Everyone of these supporters of homosexuality and defending the right of homosexuals to redefine marriage between man and a woman is definitely not in touch with this nations founding history as it relates to the family and definately not our constitution; moreso, our creator. Anyone that denies that our founding fathers in drafting our constitution was influenced by Judao-Christioan values, is a lie and the truth is not in them. Our pledge of allegiance, our currency ("in God we trust"), our Justice System, the Supreme Court, the American culture; all, rightly so, influenced by Judao-Christian values. America, since winning it's independence have been known as a Christian nation. The morality of our more than 230 year history has been based on Judao-Christian values. However, in the last 35 plus years, these values have seriously been challenged by non-Christians. Somehow, they want America to believe that this nation has gotten it wrong for over 200 plus years. They want us to believe that these values that has been ingrained in this American culture is out dated and God got it wrong when he made woman for man. They want us to believe now that believing in a living God that very much work in the affairs of his creation 24/7 (including human government), is more of philosophy than reality. The Holy scriptures that influenced our founding fathers, our constitution, morality; make us deal with something immorality doesn't want to deal with. Sin! What is sin? Disobedience to God. The influence of these values in our government made this nation look at its moral conscious. The powers that be in this nation, as well as around the world, now is trying to seize the moment to operate the affairs of mankind without its creator. Their are those that will point to the findings of modern science as proof that homosexuality is not learned, that its genetic. That same science has reports that refute it. Who's report are you going to believe? I have proudly served my country for more than 25 years now in the United States Navy. I have put my life on the line for both homosexuals and heterosexuals; both criminals and law abiding citizens, for Christians, Muslims, and Atheists. I have sacrificed for the freedom of all provided by our constitution. "We hold these truths to be self -evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator...

In this nation, that creator is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The Holy Scriptures in which we call the bible, that contain 66 books and we believe is the word and truth from our creator; is the basis for which we establish the basis of marriage in this nation. Government didn't establish the institution of marriage, God did. I don't have anything personal against homosexuals, what one choose to do in his bedroom is his or her business. It is the sin (the act – the disobedience to God) that I don't condone and the attempt to change my nations constitution that I have a problem with. So much so, I'm willing to die for it. That's one of the many reasons I continue to wear this uniform.

Tony   January 18th, 2008 2:16 am ET

Huckaboo is just showing the true right wing in this country. A little more right and they could become the new American Taliban!!!!

Kaitlin   January 18th, 2008 2:12 am ET

I believe that religion has no place in politics.

Our country was founded by people who were Christians, but they did NOT make this a Christian nation. We are NOT a Christian nation. One of our founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson, was a supporter of separation of church and state, he thought it was necessary for the country.

It doesn't matter what our country was founded on anyway. Things have changed and things will continue to change. When this country was founded, slavery was acceptable. But is it now? NO. We made a change for the better. So, just because our country may have been founded by Christians, does not mean we are a Christian country and have to follow Christian beliefs. We were given the right to pick our own religion from the very beginning and separation of church and state came early on too. Things have CHANGED. Things will CONTINUE TO CHANGE.

We all have the right to practice the religion of our choice – that is great! BUT I do not think it is okay to ban gay marriage because of religious beliefs. What if one does not share those same religious beliefs? What about the people who do not have religious beliefs? We are not a religious country, so why make national decisions based on religious beliefs?

You may disagree with gay marriage, that is your choice, but you shouldn't go around telling others what to do because YOUR God, YOUR religion said so.

The odds are if you are against gay marriage you are heterosexual, so what does it matter to you if homosexuals can get married? How much will that impact your life? How much does heterosexual marriage of others impact your life?

If homosexuals can't get married, should we ban heterosexual marriage too then?
Then heterosexuals and homosexuals can just have their relationships. No need to worry about people of different sexual preferences getting married then. No worries about divorce either.

Why can't everyone be entitled to the right of marriage? Why deprive others of the rights we have?

Because the Bible said so, is not a good reason when it comes to a political issue. And this really shouldn't even be a political issue – it is about human rights. We should all be entitled to the same rights – no matter what sex, race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation we are.

Just because you might believe gay marriage is wrong, doesn't mean everyone else has to have the same belief, or should follow your belief. If you don't believe in gay marriage, fine, that is your belief – so then you don't have to participate in it. You don't have to attend gay marriages, you don't have to be a part of them.

You cannot enforce your religious beliefs on everyone in the country. Your religion is not my religion. No one should be affected by your religious beliefs, except for yourself.

If you don't believe in gay marriage, then you don't have to support it, but you can't stop it from happening.

Logan, Huntington, West Virginia   January 18th, 2008 2:10 am ET

What do you expect from a Southern preacher?

To TLC: Oh and this nation was not founded on "Christian Values." It was founded on basic human values that Christianity adopted. If you want to teach the Ten Commandments then you better teach the teachings of other major religions. You cannot be selective. You cannot promote or oppress any religion in this nation, it's in the Constitution, read it. And are you saying gay children shouldn't be allowed in public schools?

Since when are the Christians being shoved in a "closet?" It's not like every presidential candidate is a Christian and make up over 70% of population.

Gay marriage is not going to be some slippery slope that leads to rampant beastiality across the nation. The gays are not going to bring down the USA, it's ignorance like that of Mr. Huckabee that will.

Jake, California   January 18th, 2008 2:05 am ET

Totally agree with Huck...this whole gay thing is just prevalent in America and I don't know about Europe but most part of the world don't have this sort of problem. It is a wrong sexual orientation and people should try to find solutions to it.

I have been attending SCIENTOLOGY AND DIANETICS semiars and they offer some pretty good explanations on why people go gay. They also say that they can tune people's thinking to start being straight in sexual orientation.

The best help for our gay friends is not to let them do each other but rather get them to start thinking like the rest of us–straight!

Joe, San Francisco, CA   January 18th, 2008 2:04 am ET

TLC you talk about freedom but then you want to shove gays back in the closet and deny their rights as any other human being in this country. How is that freedom?

Iwis   January 18th, 2008 2:00 am ET

It is true, Romans 1 defines some of the nature of homosexuality and other behaviors, and their causes. I would encourage readers of this comment to check out this Book and Chapter of the New Testament. For Christians, this chapter sheds light on how we should view homosexuality, in true love for those who embrace this life. We bear the burden of sharing the love and truth of Christ to the world. For those who are not Christians, this Chapter will also be beneficial, to understand some of what they hear Christians talk about whenever they mention homosexuality and other issues.

Joe, San Francisco, CA   January 18th, 2008 1:58 am ET

To those that think this country was founded on Christianity, please educate yourself in history and what the founding fathers stood for. Otherwise you are looking like idiots to those of us who are educated in how this country was born and those responsible for it.

WHITE HOMOSEXUAL   January 18th, 2008 1:51 am ET

THE (WHALES) WHITE HOMOSEXUAL AND LIBERAL ELITES, have almost 100% turnout to vote for gay friendly candidates so Hillary will have lots of support and Romney will have none.
We have plenty of reports to who will spin it our way. So get use to gay marriage
when 5% of people show up it means the gay 2% = 40% of the vote.

Chris in Silicon Valley   January 18th, 2008 1:47 am ET

PS – This whole thing would be a non-issue if government was completely out of marriage. There is no constitutional authority for the federal government to recognize or grant marriage.

Chris in Silicon Valley   January 18th, 2008 1:44 am ET

As usual, there is some grandstanding here. Huckabee didn't really EQUATE homosexuality w/ bestiality, etc. He illustrated a progression. That may be offensive to some, but they should ask themselves why.

That is, all the arguments used over the years by homosexuals to convince heterosexuals that their lifestyle is not abberrant could be used by those who practice the things Mr. Huckabee described, in a similar conversation to convince a homosexual, could they not? In other words, to use the same logic, who are we to judge? Doesn't the fact that homosexuals find this comparison offensive really show they are not tolerant... that they think their lifestyle is morally superior to another? Why the distinction? Why the outrage? If they believe all they have told us over the years, why wouldn't they be proud to join arms with some of the other groups Mr. Huckabee mentioned and press for similar recognition? How is this not bigotry?

I have long thought, if we can define a marriage between 2 consenting adults of the same sex, there is equal logic for defining marriages between, for instance, 1 man and 3 women, providing all were consenting adults. Why one and not the other?

I challenge anyone to give me a compelling reason why the former is OK and the latter is not.

John Wesley   January 18th, 2008 1:42 am ET

You can call it anything you want, same sex, gay, lesbian, homosexuality or alternative lifestyle. The fact is, what we called it when I was a kid and people were not concerned about political correctness still pertains, they are QUEER.

It is an abomination that only the liberal "demycraps" in this country support, it is a symptom of a greater malady infecting our society, a malady that people like Obama, "Billary" and Pelosi support and will jam down our throats if we let them, If it takes the words of someone like Mr Huckabee to start the worm turning back to the time in this country when God, guts, guns, and hard work were the norm instead of something to be reviled them I for one am all for it.

Robert   January 18th, 2008 1:41 am ET

Because an animal can clearly sign a marriage certificate.

I'll offend mainstream American thought by saying that I want the right to marry. End of story.

Founding Father   January 18th, 2008 1:23 am ET

Joe: "Huckabee is correct… Two men sodomizing each other is not normal and should have no place in our society."

Learn something about the Constitution of the United States and the history of the Supreme Court and you'll discover that personal liberty and privacy are explicitly protected in this country. What people do behind closed doors is up to them and your judgments about whether it is "normal" are completely irrelevant in the eyes of the LAW.

You are free to believe what you like about the morality of certain sexual acts but when you say any private action between two people "has no place in our society" you are simply WRONG according to the Constitution. Learn what it means to be an AMERICAN because your current beliefs have no place in this country.

Dan Bray Orlando FL   January 18th, 2008 1:15 am ET

1st Point: I hope Huckabee gets the GOP nomination. That way, Obama, Clinton or Bloomberg (if he runs) will certainly win the presidency.

2nd Point: Our country's founding fathers (many agnostic and atheist) created the principle of separating church from state; contrary to what most Christians think.

Max   January 18th, 2008 1:14 am ET

We changed the laws so that people of different colors can get married, and WE WILL CHANGE THEM AGAIN. Thank God!!

Dave   January 18th, 2008 1:12 am ET

Mike,

I know this is a stretch for you but the reason that they didn't put the 10 commandments in the constitution, or mention Christ, or God is because that would be mandating a religion, which would be exactly opposite of the desire to have FREEDOM of religion. That doesn't change the principles that are the basis for the Consitution, Declaration of Independence, etc.

And, I don't know why you have to resort to name calling. Can't you just state your opinion without insulting people? Jim has an opinion, he wrote it out thoughtfully, and you just have to respond with the hate? Stop the hate, dude. Have a drink or something before you start typing, maybe even a couple of deep breaths, or a walk...something.

Apalled   January 18th, 2008 1:09 am ET

The comments of some people on here are absolutely apalling. the fact that a candidate would spew such nonsense is completely out of line. This nation was not EVER meant to be governed with Christianity in mind. Many of the founding fathers were actually deists, or influenced by the idea of Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton,and Thomas Paine. Deism is definitely NOT Christianity. I think the problem many people have with making gay marriage legal is that marriage is a term with heavy religious significance and which was adopted by governments to describe a very old ritual. at this point, whether or not its called marriage is beside the point. if people are too small minded to redefine marriage as anything other than the incredibly narrow minded view of " a man and a woman", the government should at least establish the idea of civil unions in which gay couples can receive the same rights as married couples without "tarnishing" the rosy rosy view of marriage that so many Christians harbor.

its sad that it has to be so difficult. I notice many of those who are against gay marriage have very little to say about the incredibly high divorce rate among heterosexual couples – how does the ability to continuously marry and divorce whomever you please at all preserve the so-called "sanctity" of the union? its ridiculous.

Carole   January 18th, 2008 1:09 am ET

This is the very reason we don't need this 'man of God' running this country. He is just like most Baptist preachers. He is ignorant and wants to push his beliefs onto everyone. I believe judgement is to be left in Gods hands. Not this judgemental 'man'!!! What a joke he is!! Along with his organized religion!! Why don't you go back to the pulpit and preach YOUR hate from there???

HILLARY 2008

Larry, Columbus, Ohio   January 18th, 2008 1:04 am ET

By the way, I am NOT a supporter of Huckabee. I won't vote for him if he's the candidate...I simply have great concerns about anyone who truly believes the Earth was created 5,000 years ago (I exaggerate), and I find Baptists to be among THE most judgmental people out there. An infinitely long, infinitely painful punishment for a "crime" committed in a finite lifetime? Makes no sense to me, and God is way smarter and compassionate than me.

And I don't believe Jim was saying that God and Jesus had to be sprinkled throughout our framing documents...I think he was saying the Founding Fathers believed in God and didn't intend for the state to be divorced completely from those beliefs, but further wanted to ensure that people were free to have different views of God. Maybe that's not what you were trying to say, Jim, but it's what I read.

Anyway, again, good post Jim, and GREAT thought on the benefits thing! I wish someone would pick up on that and run with it. I don't know how the economics would work out but I have to believe it wouldn't be too bad...

Sam   January 18th, 2008 12:56 am ET

I've heard the world "majority" a lot in these posts. Do you people actually believe that just because the majority of Americans oppose gay marriage that automatically seals the deal? The thing I find so blatantly ignorant about Christians is your mentality to pick and choose what parts of the Bible to condemn and condone. Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the Bible speak against divorce just as it does homosexuality? Why don’t you speak out as loudly against divorce as you do homosexuality? Why don’t we amend the Constitution to allow divorce only on the grounds of adultery? If we are going to use religion as a basis to deny homosexuals equals rights then let’s also deny equal rights to everyone who sins against God’s word. Homosexuals are tax paying productive American citizens and they deserve the same rights as you, me, and everyone else.

Pravda   January 18th, 2008 12:55 am ET

Thanks to people like Huckabee we are going back to the middle ages.

Larry, Columbus, Ohio   January 18th, 2008 12:55 am ET

Jim:

While you got flamed by others for your comments, I think they were reacting emotionally and did not really understand what you were saying. I agree completely with your comments and perspective, and the reaction that you're getting with the "flame" comments are simply those of the vocal minority, as you've described. I didn't find your comments hateful or resentful or homophobic in the least; I read them as a person who, while accepting of other lifestyles, doesn't want it rammed down our throats for the sake of political correctness. Understand this, people...what is abnormal is ALWAYS relative to what the majority of people in a particular group think. Jim is correct about the reaction of the public to the concept of gay marriage; the vast majority of people simply don't support it. I know that's hard for some of you to accept, but it shouldn't be hard to understand.

As for your health insurance comment (why can't someone pay for health insurance of another, even if they're not a family member) I think that's an incredibly creative, interesting and provocative question that got lost among all the flames generated from others. You raise a really interesting point and my guess is that a great deal of people that are currently uninsured COULD in fact be insured if the conditions around granting of that insurance were loosened.

Anyway, Jim, great and thoughtful post. You said what you thought, respected others' rights to their opinions, and got flamed by people who are probably nowhere NEAR as open-minded as you...don't sweat it.

Anonymous   January 18th, 2008 12:54 am ET

Jim:

While you got flamed by others for your comments, I think they were reacting emotionally and did not really understand what you were saying. I agree completely with your comments and perspective, and the reaction that you're getting with the "flame" comments are simply those of the vocal minority, as you've described. I didn't find your comments hateful or resentful or homophobic in the least; I read them as a person who, while accepting of other lifestyles, doesn't want it rammed down our throats for the sake of political correctness. Understand this, people...what is abnormal is ALWAYS relative to what the majority of people in a particular group think. Jim is correct about the reaction of the public to the concept of gay marriage; the vast majority of people simply don't support it. I know that's hard for some of you to accept, but it shouldn't be hard to understand.

As for your health insurance comment (why can't someone pay for health insurance of another, even if they're not a family member) I think that's an incredibly creative, interesting and provocative question that got lost among all the flames generated from others. You raise a really interesting point and my guess is that a great deal of people that are currently uninsured COULD in fact be insured if the conditions around granting of that insurance were loosened.

Anyway, Jim, great and thoughtful post. You said what you thought, respected others' rights to their opinions, and got flamed by people who are probably nowhere NEAR as open-minded as you...don't sweat it.

Anonymous   January 18th, 2008 12:54 am ET

Thanks to people like Huckabee we are going back to the middle ages.

Richard, West Palm Beach, FL   January 18th, 2008 12:52 am ET

"This is America if you can’t live with it; there are a lot of other nice countries you can choose from. It is bible that marriage should be between one man and one woman. God made those rules, and I for one don’t want to go before “Him” on judgment day and have to explain to “Him” why I took a part in changing it. "
------------------------------
One of the Ten Commandments says that no one should work on Sundays and the Bible says the penalty is death. Until some Christian advocates death for people working on Sundays, then they are just HYPOCRITES about homosexuality and only pick out the parts of the Bible that they agree with. So what is it....death for Sunday workers or HYPOCRISY?

Mary R.   January 18th, 2008 12:50 am ET

Sean Hannity is out to destroy Huckabee in anyway he can. His show is so dirty. He elevates Thompson knowing that he can take votes from Huckabee. He shows only the first segment of the Romney video where he argues with the reporter. This show is not fair and balanced,

you   January 18th, 2008 12:49 am ET

Hey Jim,
your words:
"I accept that not everyone is a Christian, nor do they necessarily believe in God. Once again, that's what is great about the USA – each person is entitled to believe whatever they choose."
How bout letting consenting adults marry each other if they want?

BTW i turned away from Christianity because of hateful idiots like the Huckster

Bots, Seattle   January 18th, 2008 12:44 am ET

I completely agree with Gov. Huckabee. The vocal minority believe they can change what God has ordained. Yes we're all equal but not the same. We all came into this world the same way, conceived by a man and a woman. Not one person, especially you homosexuals came into this world by conceived by two other men. Accept it, you're not normal. You're perverted and the word "queer" is a good fit. Gov. Huckabee's views are not just necessarily religious beliefs, but he expresses what is the natural order. Two men kissing or having some sort of perverted relationship is about as unnatural as a person jumping off a building and flapping his arms because he believes he's a bird! The result is catastrophe. And just because you don't beleive in God doesn't mean He does not exist, He does and he still loves all of us, but that doesn't mean he condones acts that are against His created natural order.

James Brown ( Independent )   January 18th, 2008 12:43 am ET

I am for Obama , but if Clinton was to make it to the General Election , i would vote for Huckabee to keep Clinton out of the White House.

Huckabee is the only Republican i would even think about voting for.

Steve, Lyons, CO   January 18th, 2008 12:43 am ET

"I know that Christianity may not be the “world’s” religion, but Christianity is what this country was founded on."

Wrong. This country was founded on religious freedom. Learn your country's history. It was NOT founded on anti-science brainwashed medieval superstition. It's not my fault you have no real life.

"This is America if you can’t live with it; there are a lot of other nice countries you can choose from."

The first time someone likes you tries to impose your religious beliefs on me, including within MY Constitution, you will die. It's called treason, and I'll have no mercy on you. The tree of liberty needs to be replenished with the blood of patriots and crazed theocratic fascists every once in a while.

The Constitution is clear: practice whatever religion you prefer; it will NOT be recognized politically. It sure as hell will never appear in the Constitution.

Get it? Your right to believe in adult Santa Claus fairy tale crap ends at MY Constitution.

the next generation   January 18th, 2008 12:39 am ET

i am 17. this presidential election will be the first that i particapate in.
as my generation inherits the burden and privilage of America,
it is my sincere and fervent hope that God's love will be able to heal the gaping divides in this Great nation.
God bless.

steve   January 18th, 2008 12:38 am ET

Hey TLC, ever hear of "separation of church and....(fill in the blank if you have)". Redneck.

steve   January 18th, 2008 12:36 am ET

haha denny

bukky, baltimore MD   January 18th, 2008 12:33 am ET

I beg you PLEASE nominate Huckabee... I would like to burst in laughter as the Dems wipe the floor with him... Seriously its like this guy has never left Arkansas. He can't deal with diversity of any kind in this country... what will he do when he actually as to leave the country and visit different nations...?

Bill   January 18th, 2008 12:29 am ET

I find it both insulting and appalling that certain individuals, such as one David Smith of the Human Rights campaign, would take it upon himself or herself to try single-handedly defining for the rest of us what does or does not fall "out of the mainstream of American thought."

I am unsure of what dictionary he used when looking up "mainstream," but there is a very obvious reason why "gay rights" bills are consistently defeated across the country: the Majority of Americans are against such laws.

Clearly, Mainstream America disagrees with you, Mr. Smith.

And frankly, I'm fed up with this "political correctness" garbage that liberals use as a crutch. The mere idea of "political correctness" is a cancer within our political framework, which guarantees freedom of speech. Yes, I have an opinion: I am against laws that would legalize gay marriage. That view just so happens to align with the majority, a.k.a. Mainstream America. I am sorry you disagree with it, but you must face a harsh reality: you are part of a small but annoyingly vocal minority. However, the majority will simply not be marginalized.

For those liberal readers who would attempt to label me, considering many liberals attempt to marginalize the majority opinion, note that I do consider myself a Christian, though given the rarity with which I attend church, I certainly would not be evangelical or fundamentalist. I am also young (early thirties); I work in a very progressive industry with progressive-minded individuals; and I was educated at a university known for its liberal policies. I offer this only to illustrate that our difference in perspective is neither a matter of generation nor of "the times."

Anonymous   January 18th, 2008 12:23 am ET

I find it both insulting and appalling that certain individuals, such as one David Smith of the Human Rights campaign, would take it upon himself or herself to try single-handedly defining for the rest of us what does or does not fall "out of the mainstream of American thought."

I am unsure of what dictionary he used when looking up "mainstream," but there is a very obvious reason why "gay rights" bills are consistently defeated across the country: the Majority of Americans are against such laws.

Clearly, Mainstream America disagrees with you, Mr. Smith.

And frankly, I'm fed up with this "political correctness" garbage that liberals use as a crutch. The mere idea of "political correctness" is a cancer within our political framework, which guarantees freedom of speech. Yes, I have an opinion: I am against laws that would legalize gay marriage. That view just so happens to align with the majority, a.k.a. Mainstream America. I am sorry you disagree with it, but you must face a harsh reality: you are part of a small but annoyingly vocal minority. However, the majority will simply not be marginalized.

For those liberal readers who would attempt to label me, considering many liberals attempt to marginalize the majority opinion, note that I do consider myself a Christian, though given the rarity with which I attend church, I certainly would not be evangelical or fundamentalist. I am also young (early thirties); I work in a very progressive industry with progressive-minded individuals; and I was educated at a university known for its liberal policies. I offer this only to illustrate that our difference in perspective is neither a matter of generation nor of "the times."

Timbo   January 18th, 2008 12:23 am ET

Huck is absolutely right! If you allow the definition of marriage to change, then what right do you have to then LIMIT the change to include 2 men and 2 women but no further. Either the definition can be changed or it cannot. If it CAN change, then why could it NOT be a man and a Cadillac, or a woman and a Siamese cat? The definition is either constant or it is not. That's Huck's point and he's right on! The fact that most American's haven't figured that out yet, or are foolish enough to somehow be offended by the truth doesn't take away the veracity of the comment!

john   January 18th, 2008 12:20 am ET

Homosexuality has been in existence as long as sex. Huckabee
will pass away some day. Thank God.

Emma, MN   January 18th, 2008 12:18 am ET

I read the quote a couple of times through so that it would sink in. All three times, Huckabee came across as a fanatical homophobic. No one willing chooses to be gay. I don't know ANYONE who would choose to be discriminated against daily because of who they love. The best any of us can do is to welcome people of all sexual orientations, races, abilities, and sexes into our religions, communities, and daily life.

But now we have a presidential candidate who claims that homosexuality is "unnatural" . But he is also a follower of God, who he believes created the universe and everything in it. And because God created one and all, why would he choose to allow two people of the same sex to love each other if it is so "immoral", "unnatural", and "wrong"?

Tim   January 18th, 2008 12:09 am ET

God does not hate people.

Tim   January 18th, 2008 12:07 am ET

What a pig.

Steven   January 18th, 2008 12:06 am ET

"...for, between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference- so wide, that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked."
"He who is the religious advocate of marriage robs whole millions of its sacred influence, and leave them to the ravages of wholesale pollution."
" They attend with Pharisaical strictness to the outward forms of religion, and at the same time neglect the weightier matters of the law, judgement, mercy, and faith. They are represented as professing to love God whom they have not seen, whilst they hate their brother whom they have seen. They love the heathen on the other side of the globe...while they despise and totally neglect the heathen at their own doors."

From "The Narrative" by Fredrick Douglas. While this was about slavery, it rings true today about religion vs homosexuality. The hypocrisy of the religious only make them look more ignorant.

OBAMA MAMA Twin Cities, MN   January 18th, 2008 12:06 am ET

Come on now!!! Was anyone REALLY suprised that he said this! This man also said in 1992 (?) that people with AIDS (that means children TOO) should be isolated from the rest of society. BTW he recently said he stands by those statements. If the Rep what Huck as their man more power to them. It will just make Obamas victory easier. Personaly, I think he needs a good-old-fashioned roundhouse kick to the head from his buddy Chuck Norris!!

Obama 08

Tanner   January 18th, 2008 12:02 am ET

Romney has the qualities we need in our president after so much sleeze (Clinton) and poor decision making (Bush)!

I clearly agree with Romney on the issue of pardons. Let the Judges Judge and the Governors Govern! Who was running Arkansas while Huckabee was pouring over 1000+ legal cases? Or was he not researching those life and death cases? Maybe he had a score to settle for someone supporting those criminals...this is bad judgement. Legal work is much better suited for attorneys and judges…it is the law by the way, not theology. If you want to be cleared of past crimes, TAKE YOUR CASE TO A JUDGE!

Governors should be Governing! Romney did just that!

Murry   January 17th, 2008 11:55 pm ET

Huckabee's anti-gay statements are appalling. These have no place in government. We don't live in Iran. Maybe Huckabee should move to Iran. Their president says they don't have gays.

TLC   January 17th, 2008 11:54 pm ET

I know that Christianity may not be the “world’s” religion, but Christianity is what this country was founded on. This is America if you can’t live with it; there are a lot of other nice countries you can choose from. It is bible that marriage should be between one man and one woman. God made those rules, and I for one don’t want to go before “Him” on judgment day and have to explain to “Him” why I took a part in changing it. And again if you don’t believe in God or if God is not a part of your religion, well it is ours, ours being America. What is left of it anyway, and that is what Mike Huckabee is fighting for. The America that used to be free and now gay rights have more rights then Christian rights. We can’t pray in our schools, but you can be gay in our schools. We can’t have the Ten Commandments hanging in our court rooms or our schools, but you can teach our children about gay couples without our knowing it. I just don’t understand how gay marriage has become so much more important to us then teaching our children things like what is on the Ten Commandments. Sounds to me like the Christian’s are being shoved in the closet since the gays have come out of there closet. I don’t believe the gay people are going anywhere, but just like you don’t want to go back in your closet I refuse to be shoved in one.

TLC   January 17th, 2008 11:53 pm ET

I know that Christianity may not be the “world’s” religion, but Christianity is what this country was founded on. This is America if you can’t live with it; there are a lot of other nice countries you can choose from. It is bible that marriage should be between one man and one woman. God made those rules, and I for one don’t want to go before “Him” on judgment day and have to explain to “Him” why I took a part in changing it. And again if you don’t believe in God or if God is not a part of your religion, well it is ours, ours being America. What is left of it anyway, and that is what Mike Huckabee is fighting for. The America that used to be free and now gay rights have more rights then Christian rights. We can’t pray in our schools, but you can be gay in our schools. We can’t have the Ten Commandments hanging in our court rooms or our schools, but you can teach our children about gay marriage without our knowing it. I just don’t understand how gay marriage has become so much more important to us then teaching our children things like what is on the Ten Commandments. Sounds to me like the Christian’s are being shoved in the closet since the gays have come out of there closet. I don’t believe the gay people are going anywhere, but just like you don’t want to go back in your closet I refuse to be shoved in one.

Steven   January 17th, 2008 11:53 pm ET

I believe Mainstream America would be defined as a majority. and Americans have shown that they are opposed to gay marriage two-to-one. You call us haters, but yet you insist we crawl under a rock and state that you hate us shoving our lifestyle in your face. It sounds like you have plenty of hate for the both of us and most of the lifestyle shoving is being done by your side. No one has said you can't have your relationship. You claim tolerance, but are intolerant yourselves. Who is the real bigot here?

william   January 17th, 2008 11:49 pm ET

Huckabee would be the best president this nations ever seen.

rob   January 17th, 2008 11:49 pm ET

You CNN moderators hate to see an anti-gay comment don't you ? You nutless wonders.

Carol   January 17th, 2008 11:48 pm ET

The more Mike Huckabee talks the more votes he loses.....how long will this campaign go on?

Adam   January 17th, 2008 11:39 pm ET

Huckabee is a fool and a bigot, but he certainly did not equate gay marriage with beastiality. He did however say that gay marriage was a step toward the direction of sex with an animal.

On an editorial note; marriage, as regulated by the United States of American, is a SECULAR institution. That means that Christianity has nothing to do with legal marriage. Should premarital sex be outlawed by government? That's what the Bible would claim. Your churches don't have to allow gay marriage, but the SECULAR government of the United States does. It should be called marriage. Not gay marriage, just marriage.

mike kaplan   January 17th, 2008 11:39 pm ET

Oh, I missed something, Jim- where in the world do you get the idea that the founders based our constitution on "the principles of the Bible and their own Faith in God"? THEY MOST CERTAINLY DID NOT.

History has shown us time and time again that Christianity is quite compatible with monarchy, and just about any form of government. Our form of representative government, "of the people, by the people" – how exactly do you get that from Christianity? (Hint- you can't).

And the ten commandments? Why weren't they enshrined in the Constitution if that's what the founders wanted? They could easily have put them in if that's what they wanted. Where is the part in the constitution about keeping the Sabbath day? Where is the part in the Constitution about not taking the lord's name in vain? Where is the part in the Constitution about not making unto me any graven image? Where is the part in the Constitution about honoring thy father and mother? (Hint- NOWHERE!)

I have a little quiz for you- HOW MANY TIMES IS THE WORD GOD MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION? (hint- not once). HOW MANY TIMES IS THE WORD "CHRIST" MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION? (hint- not once).

The founders were learned men, who wrote very clearly and said what they meant. If they had intended this country to be founded on Biblical principles, why in the world wouldn't they say so? They did NOT say so.

Chris, Jacksonville   January 17th, 2008 11:35 pm ET

Jim,

What is your beef? White , Christian males are the only people who have held any real elective power in this country. You are hardly some oppressed minority.

Look, our Founding Fathers United States wanted our government to be based on the bible they would have specifically said so. If they wanted our government policy to be based on the 10 Commandments they would have specifically said so. If they wanted the documents that they drafted to be specifically Christian......they would have specifically SAID so. They had that opportunity.

They specifically chose not to. Wonder why.

Our government officials like that judge you notated in Alabama are not to endorse any religion while carrying out thier duties. I wonder if that judge were a Muslim and insisted that a giant Koran be displayed in his courtroom, or a Buddhist judge displaying a massive Buddha in his would you be so supportive?

I am guessing not so much.

Look the facts are that there have been homosexuals in every corner of this globe since the dawn of recorded time. Do you honestly believe they all simply chose that? Did you "choose" to be straight? I know I did not.

Would anyone choose to be treated like dirt and ostricized?!? I think not.

With regards to our founding fathers, you do realize that they would all be unelectable today.

They were way, WAY too liberal.

John   January 17th, 2008 11:34 pm ET

I guess people will say almost anything to get votes nowadays

AJ, Iowa City, IA   January 17th, 2008 11:33 pm ET

Biggot!

True colors people! His comments were directed at the Mormon religion, which did away with polygomy over 100 years ago! He is just trying to smear his biggest rival and do what all preachers do best as spread fear and deception!

What a joke! This man should not be president, run a daycare, or come within 500 yard of me!

Joe   January 17th, 2008 11:29 pm ET

Huckabee is correct... Two men sodomizing each other is not normal and should have no place in our society.

mike kaplan   January 17th, 2008 11:29 pm ET

Jim (above), you're a moron.

Mainstream America, I'm happy to say, is more and more accepting of homosexuality, and more and more people are realizing that it is a perfectly normal lifestyle.....for homosexuals, that is. Just as it is totally normal for you to be heterosexual, it is totally normal for some people to have the same kinds of feelings for people of the same sex as you apparently do for the opposite sex.

I continue to be baffled why people like you are so threatened by homosexuality. No one can make you or your children gay- homosexuals are born that way, and it does NO ONE any good to force them to live in shame and secrecy. I hope for your children's sake that none of them are gay, because if they are, they'll have to deal with their father's ignorance and bigotry.

As for your overly long American history lesson, you need to go back to school, Jim. 200 years of legal precedent has recognized the separation of church and state- it is anything but "nonexistent". No one says that your beliefs can't animate your politics. But just as Huckabee is free to bring his beliefs to his campaign, the rest of us are equally free to bring OUR belief that he is an ignorant, backwards bigot.

Walt, Belton, TX   January 17th, 2008 11:25 pm ET

I personally don't believe anyone has to accept behavior that they consider deviant as being normal just because it is accepted by someone else. What may hold water in San Francisco does not necessarily hold water in most other parts of the country, thank God!

whatsitToyou   January 17th, 2008 11:13 pm ET

Wow not a good week for the Huckster, I think his days of running are limited what with this comment, which was twisted, but people don't care they will hear it and it will turn a lot of people against him! and then his take the pole and tell them what to do with it comment..It shows that he is to emotional, bye Hucky!

Amike   January 17th, 2008 11:12 pm ET

"I believe that Mainstream America for the most part agree with my thoughts."

Don't we all.

Caroline   January 17th, 2008 11:11 pm ET

And by the way...

"Furthermore, what I find appalling is that the views of the vocal minority in this country that support homosexual lifestyle and marriage are being forced upon my family and I almost every time I turn on my TV. The mainstream of America do not want to see this on the TV or in the media every time we turn around! "

Let me tell you something, Jim: I don't want your heterosexual "normal" relationships shoved down my throat ever time I turn on the TV! And please... if it's such a minority that supports gay rights than clearly that isn't an issue for you.

If you're so upset, move to Texas. It's full of religious lunatics like you down here, you'd fit in perfectly. Actually, on a second thought, please don't. To rephrase that: there are plenty enough of you crazy religious bigots down here... we don't need any more.

Tony   January 17th, 2008 11:07 pm ET

Estill, If Mainstream America believes "I am better than you", what was the point in fighting Dictatorships exactly???

fred fonebone   January 17th, 2008 11:06 pm ET

The Old Testament, aka "the word of God," lists numerous patriarchs, prophets and personalities who have multiple wives. Polygamy was the norm. And yet, the Huckster and his ilk prattle on about the evils of "redefining marriage." Hate to break it to you, Mike, it's been redefined countless times as society progresses beyond Iron Age standards of so-called morality. Welcome to the United States of America, where laws are written by human beings, not jumbo superdaddies up in the sky.

robert   January 17th, 2008 11:06 pm ET

One of these days, but most likely not in our lifetimes, people will look back and wonder what the heck we were thinking by treating good people like they're inferior only because they don't conform to "normal" society standards.

Caroline   January 17th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

That makes me sick. What's worse is that it is the mainstream opinion in America, though I strongly disagree with it. And "Ragdoll," Christians often do have "fanatic" ideas actually. It's a real problem... this is what happens when religion controls a country. It won't be long before all chaos breaks out–America is becoming no better than Nazi-era Germany.

aj   January 17th, 2008 11:04 pm ET

today's young people are growing more and more accepting of differences, and they are the future. this country will keep working toward total equality and if huckabee is elected, he will only stall that process. it's only a matter of time before everyone is truly equal.

Hamster, Utah   January 17th, 2008 11:03 pm ET

Denny,
Not YOUR god, HUCKABEE's god, nor anyone ELSE's god belongs in things that effect ME.

Seekster   January 17th, 2008 11:03 pm ET

Dont agree with Huckabee on everything but I agree with him here.

USFBull82   January 17th, 2008 11:00 pm ET

Regardless of what a person thinks of same-sex marriage, it is clearly evident that Huckabee uses religion to make decisions when it comes to government. It is important to have a separation of church and state. Without it, you have a theocracy. Iran is a theocracy. That is not how I want my country run.

stunnedsilence   January 17th, 2008 10:59 pm ET

Everything that comes from huckabee's mouth is calculated, and aimed at his demographic. Pray his goofy platform doesn't get on the ticket, or it's the dems for 8 long years.

Jim   January 17th, 2008 10:55 pm ET

You all need to take a moment and educate yourselves on facts. The facts are that everytime the topic of legalizing homosexual marriage is presented to the people of the United States on a national, state, or local ballot it is rejected by a very wide, wide, margin. So, in looking at the facts – it seems pretty clear to me that mainstream thinking in the USA seems to be more in line with Gov. Huckabee than with the vocal minority who support homosexual lifestyle and marriage.

Furthermore, what I find appalling is that the views of the vocal minority in this country that support homosexual lifestyle and marriage are being forced upon my family and I almost every time I turn on my TV. The mainstream of America do not want to see this on the TV or in the media every time we turn around! But we – the majority and mainstream America – are constantly instructed by the vocal minority to be silent because we might offend someone with our "radical beliefs".

You recurrently cite the non-existent "separation of church and state" language in the constitution as a means to tell Christians to shut up and keep their noses out of government. Yet you apparently haven't taken the time to read the document and what it actually says because it in no way, shape, or form calls for a "separation of church and state" – it does call for the "freedom" of religion such that the government can not mandate any one religion that the people must accept and practice. Keep in mind, the men who drafted that document and founded our country did so because they were fleeing England and the King – who did mandate that the doctrine of the church of England was the only religion and that everyone had to accept and practice it. Also, why would they call for separation of church and state – in the manner that many in this country interpret it, intending to keep any religious thinking and values out of government altogether – while at the same time build the foundation of this nation and it's charter documents (the constitution and declaration of independence, the federalist papers, etc) specifically on the principles of the Bible and their very own Faith in God? If you actually take the time to read the writings of those who fled England to come to the new world, those who fought for our independence from England, those who founded our great nation, those who drafted our charter documents, you will find that they were indeed a people who not only acknowledged and believed in God, but also lived there lives very much by His principles. Like it or not, this nation was indeed founded on Godly principles – the God of the Holy Bible! So please, stop trying to shut the voice of the majority (mainstream) of this nation out because you don't like what they are saying – you won't stop talking either – nor should you have to, that's what is so great about the USA!

You cite "scientific studies that have shown that homosexuality is not chosen but that it is hereditary, but what legitimacy is there in a scientific study performed by human beings – who by nature are not objective – using formulas and theories written by these same non-objective human beings. Data is great, but it can made to tell virtually any story you want it to tell, its all in how the data is presented.

I accept that not everyone is a Christian, nor do they necessarily believe in God. Once again, that's what is great about the USA – each person is entitled to believe whatever they choose. The constitution says we are a free people, that we have the freedom of speech, yet ever time someone who professes to be a Christian enters the public scene – specifically in any type of government capacity, they forced to be silent and/or are mocked, called a freak, idiot, fool, bigot, or fanatic simply because they believe differently than the vocal minority. One example is of the judge from Alabama who was forced to remove the Ten Commandments from his office and courthouse because someone was offended and called him for being in violation of the separation of church and state – which doesn't exist.

As a Christian, I am certainly against changing the institution of marriage to include two men or two women. Having said that, if you choose to live your life that way – that's up to you. If you choose to live with another individual of the same gender and call yourself a couple, that's up to you. Ultimately, when I hear the arguments in favor of homosexual marriage, the primary issues tend to center on being treated with equality to heterosexual couples – equality in benefits, hospital visitations, inheritance of assets, tax advantages, etc. Personally, I think health benefits from through an employer or not and many of these other items should be allowed regardless of the relationship being hetero-or homosexual, married or not. If a person wants to pay a higher premium out of their own paycheck to provide health insurance to a friend, neighbor, relative, boyfriend, or girlfriend – why shouldn't they be able to?? If you designate someone as the heir of your assets, they should get it, if you specify on a power of attorney document that a specific person is making your decisions – and do so with sound mind – that should not be in question – period!

ashley   January 17th, 2008 10:48 pm ET

In times like these, and in a country like ours, one would expect our citizens to be well educated. Apparently, not only are some ignorant, but also cruel and vindictive. People are allowed to make many life style choices for themselves, such as whether to smoke or drink, get married or stay single, to have children or not, to go to college. But, you can't choose who you love. And as long as you really love them and want to commit yourself to one person why should anyone deny you that? It should be between you and that one other person, it has nothing to do with the rest of the country. How is it going to hurt them? Yes, some christians may think homosexuality is wrong, but are they the ones supposedly going to hell for someone else being a homosexual? I think not.

Ben Dickens   January 17th, 2008 10:46 pm ET

Huckabuck won't let homosexuals into his marriage club because they might destroy it with the inroads the gays make to pedophilia and beastiality...is he serious? This has to be a joke.
The only threat to the institution of marriage, dearest Michael Huckabee, is the ever increasing divorce rate; and that is the fault of heterosexuals.
You are a fool and America will not tolerate your arcane and oppressive crusade.
Ben

steve   January 17th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Denny, God can not lie, but Republicans sure can. (by the way God didn't write the bible, Humans did)

christy   January 17th, 2008 10:32 pm ET

The real President of this country is the media because people are too lazy and dumb to weed through the lies and find the truth. We instantly believe everything the media puts in front of us. Don't believe everything you read or see.... find the real truth and facts for yourself. The media leads us through stages of emotions making us feel scared, unprotected, mad, out of control, etc... The media is the snake in the grass and the media is what starts most lies when they run out of bad things to talk about they make up some crap.

Mark, Iowa   January 17th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Homosexuals are about 1 or 2 percent of the population. Mainstream? Hardly.

David, Oregon City   January 17th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Rene:
You are correct, it would not be normal for my body, but good luck with yours!

barbara   January 17th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

Did I get this right ? that being gay along with bestiality are in the same realm? Well, its not in my opinion. Being gay is a person's choice, bestiality is coming from a deranged mind – its so sick and whoever engages in this needs to see a phyco for sure. I believe Huckabee is going over the edge slightly, and he needs to re-check his thoughts about this subject.

Guchi - Vegas   January 17th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

To better understand us Christian is to look at what the heart of our beliefs is and what does it says about the topic- The Bible:

Leviticus 20:13 – "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Leviticus 18:22 – "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Also, we are taught not to judge and NOT to hate but to understand.

Val Davydov, MA   January 17th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

It is very sensitive subject to discuss (if not one of the most sensitive of our times) and yet we have to learn to respect and appreciate each other views without calling names and getting angry. This issues is dividing America in very dramatic way – I wish we never had to discuss it, but it is here and we should learn to discuss it in most humane and compassionate manner.

I am not Huck's supporter at all (far from it actually), but I too believe that Mainstream America supports sanctity of marriage as union between one man and one woman.

Brittany, TN   January 17th, 2008 10:05 pm ET

Mr. Huckabee's statement did not equate homosexuality with bestiality (hence the author's wording of "appeared"), it simply was exploring what could become of the institution of marriage if not defined as something. The definition has historically been between a man and a woman and, since this has been challenged, marriage must be defined more clearly. We must draw the line of defining marriage somehow. Homosexuals may want it drawn at 2 men or women. Polygamists may want it drawn at 12 people. Pedophile's may want marriage allowed down to age 12. And so on.

Simply, the traditional definition of marriage has been challenged and so now it must more thoroughly defined. This is not from hatred of homosexuals, polygamists or pedophiles or denying that these relationships are not real or important to those involved in them, it is rather seeking to define the institution of marriage. Christians, if following the lead of Christ, do not hate others, but do despise sin, whether it be sexual or other.

I laude Mr. Huckabee for taking a firm stand on his beliefs and seeking to define marriage as between a man and a woman, which has repeatedly been demonstrated to be in agreement with mainstream America at this time.

nate, NYC   January 17th, 2008 10:04 pm ET

Q: What do Christian Evangelicals and the Taliban have in common?

A: Everything.

AC   January 17th, 2008 10:03 pm ET

I agree with Gov. Huckabee.
The danger is not defining what marriage is, but defining what it is not.
Someone needs to speak up.
Go Mike!

Professorbri   January 17th, 2008 10:03 pm ET

We don't have to argue about whether Huckabee thinks gay relationships and bestiality are cousins. We CAN agree that people like him with big smiles and folksy talk are dangerous if they try to make us comfortable with our prejudices. Mike Huckabee's comment and demeanor do just such.

Chris, Jacksonville   January 17th, 2008 10:01 pm ET

Good luck in November, Mike.

It'll be you and a few thousand rednecks.

Kim, Dallas, TX   January 17th, 2008 9:58 pm ET

Huckabee, you give religion a bad name. The church I go to teaches tolerance and respect. What does yours teach judgment and persecution?

Johnny   January 17th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Sometimes, you are not going to please every crowd. It is a difficult job to be President of the US. To be all things to all people. It is a challenge that few face. However, it is important to be honest with your faith in front of the public. The Gospel offend people. The Truth offends people...and it is perfectly ok to do so.

matthew North Carolina   January 17th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

I think it should be left up to the states to decide these highly controversial subjects (gay rights and abortion). Let the federal govn't let the states vote on these issues. Say every state did vote on a yes or no gay marriage amendment. My guess would be possibly only four or five states actually passing a yes vote. 4 OUT OF 50 to me, does not sound like mainstream.

Joe   January 17th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Marrige is a religious sacrament in my faith. I was married by my a church. The state conferred the legal privleges as a result of my marrige in a church. The state should not marry anyone. That is church business. But the state should grant legal rights to any two people who jointly agree to share those rights and privelges. Like so many issues so called gay marrige is not a either a for or against issue. It has many facets and positions in the middle.

Scott, Milwaukee, WI   January 17th, 2008 9:40 pm ET

Mike Huckabee sho has a purdy mouth.

Joe from NC   January 17th, 2008 9:35 pm ET

Has anybody actually read the four biblical passages that supposedly condem homosexuality? Two of them are pretty vague (Genesis 12 and Romans 3 I think), one only condems homosexuals in newer versions of the bible( 1 Corinthians 5 give or take a chapter), and the last passage does say Two men "lying together" are condemed (leviticus 17 or 19) but that same book condems people who eat pork and shrimp and people who wear clothes made of different fabrics.

Mark   January 17th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

The Constitution of the US is supposed to protect Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens...not just for fanatical right-wingers who seem to be the first ones to complain and spew hypocrisy.

milton   January 17th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

The "act" is wrong. Not the individual. That of homosexuality. That's just my belief. God doesn't tell anyone to oppose homosexuals (individuals) but rather the act. And some believe individuals can't "choose" their preference. I disagree. Even a drug-abuser, for example, which we know by science and by, yes, you guessed it, STUDIES, indicate that one is predispositioned to be a substance abuser. That individual still makes a choice. But that doesn't mean they're to be shunned or hated. Only to be identified with. And helped in anyway society can help them.

jon.   January 17th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

Nowaday in America every nonsense is mainstream. America is totally corrupted and sick.

David   January 17th, 2008 9:29 pm ET

The biggest threat to marriage is divorce, but no Christians are rallying behind a ban on that are they!? They don't care about 'the sanctity' of marriage or the fundamentalist rightists would have erased the right to divorce long ago. Nope, the pious and self righteous aren't about to give that little perk up. Government has no place denying adults the right to legally marry. Proof that real conservatism is truly dead.

H8s Huckabee   January 17th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Huckabee is a very disturbed man, whose only knowledge is about the bible and Jesus. There's no way he would ever get voted in as President of the US. His views on the gay community make George Bush look like Barney Frank.

George   January 17th, 2008 9:27 pm ET

What is "offensive" is the blatant incoherence of you people and the liberal media to take a quote and turn it into something that paints Huckabee as intolerant when that's not what he said.

Read the quote, people. Don't just fall into the liberal media's trap.

If you disagree with his political view on traditional marriage, that's one thing, but no need to attack the man's faith or his character.

GRANT, EVERETT   January 17th, 2008 9:24 pm ET

THE HUCKSTER IS AN IDIOT.

Joe, San Francisco, CA   January 17th, 2008 9:24 pm ET

If an atheist can marry in a court, why can't other two people marry whether they're gay or straight? I'm not religious, I have no plans to marry through a church or religions eyes...so what's the big deal that I'm gay and want to marry my boyfriend of 5 years? I'm not asking for religions to accept me, I'm asking for my country to accept me.

And yes, majority of America has become more acceptable, and the younger generations are the most accepting, knowing it isn't a choice and they are just the same as every other person. When I hear stories of gay couples winning "Best Couple" or "Prom kings" etc in Highschool dances and Yearbooks, you know the younger generation is going to change the face of America in the next 10-20 years.

And sorry, I don't see how comparing two PEOPLE wanting to marry is the same as one person wanting to marry an animal.

What ignorance.

Tiffany   January 17th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

You obviously don't know the definition of a bigot. Christians believe homosexuality is wrong, not the people engaging in it. And if someone is hateful or hurtful to the gay and lesbian community for their sexual activities, that would institute bigotry. God is love, and the problem with so many "Religious" people, is that they hate the person. Hate is just an equal sin as homosexuality. That is my belief. I love everyone, or try to at least, Jesus was about love and giving. If Christians wavered in their beliefs you would call us weak and fake, or easily broken. Say things like "hypocrite!" What i don't understand is how religions like Buddhism, Muslim, Wiccan and such gather more respect. Many Americans even fear insulting Muslim. What is any different with our faith? Because you personally think it is stupid? I think many religions are stupid, but I would never disrespect them. You're the bigots here

Carrie   January 17th, 2008 9:19 pm ET

As president, Huckabee would scare me. He is very judgemental. I agree that the president should respect every citizen. We need a president to unite us, not devide us. What is so wrong with two people, who love each other and are the same sex? Who is he to judge whether this is wrong or not? My god loves everyone!

John Viel   January 17th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Hey, moderator. It sure appears to me that you are screening out any comments from "mainstream americans".

curtis   January 17th, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Is there any hate group he won't pander to?

Bill Culver, Covington,LA   January 17th, 2008 9:14 pm ET

I am not a fan of the hucklbee and would never vote for him, but I am 100% in agreement with his comment. Call me bigot if you wish, it may be appropiate, but who cares? I shall not change.

Ed P   January 17th, 2008 9:12 pm ET

It makes me incredibly sad to hear comments like the one from Huckabee and the reaction by Estill above. It really erodes my confidence in the goodness of humanity in this country when I hear what is essentially hate mongering. When we start making anti gay comments and laws we are eroding the foundation of what this country was founded on. Freedom. Should we maybe put all the gay people in jail or make it illegal for a particular relegious group to marry or practice their faith? Ever heard of the constitution? Freedom of religion, seperation of church and state?
I am a strong Christian and as such I practice openness and love towards my neighbors be they gay, straight, christian, muslim, jew, black, brown, white or anything else. Estill I hope, and pray that you are not mainstream America.

Luke   January 17th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Never underestimate the morons of America. They voted for George Bush, they'll probably vote for someone like Mike Huckabee.

Morons like their president as ill informed and bigoted as they are.

Chris, Jacksonville   January 17th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

I am a part of mainstream America. I have gay friends and co-workers and a gay person in my family.

You know like those radicals, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich and Barry Goldwater.

Huckabee and his ilk are nothing more than hateful, ignorant, buffoons.

Some Christian!!

Trang, Fremont, CA   January 17th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Huckabee, I think you are a decent guy, but I think you should learn to love all mankind. Homosexuals are God's children too. God is Love, not Hatred.

someone   January 17th, 2008 9:08 pm ET

Estill, I find your limited mindset offensive.

Nate   January 17th, 2008 9:07 pm ET

I think David Smith is stretching. Mike Huckabee is not comparing homosexuality to bestiality. If you go read the entire interview you'll get a much different picture. He is essentially just saying the definition of marriage is a man and a woman. He then basically says if you start changing the definition where does it stop? Obviously he's not actually saying homosexuality equals bestiality, he's just using escalating deviations from the definition of marriage to prove the point. It's obvious CNN is currently picking and choosing to put up things about Huckabee they think will have a negative impact. I just turned on CNN on TV too, and guess what they were speaking negatively about Huckabee. There seems to be some bias going on here.

Hoang Phan   January 17th, 2008 9:07 pm ET

Regardless of what our background, ethnic, socio-economic level might be, it's difficult for me to understand why anyone would oppose two loving human beings wanting to make a commitment to be faithful to each other. To say because God tells me to oppose them just seems so disappointingly naive. Perhaps we (this includes Mike) should focus more on fixing the real moral crises of our times such as poverty, teen pregnancy, and abuse. Oh, let's not forget divorce (straight marriages). That should be enough for awhile.

Tim, Minnesota   January 17th, 2008 9:06 pm ET

fascist

Ben   January 17th, 2008 9:06 pm ET

It's my understanding that the Bejing conference that Hillary went to DID try to define about 100 different "sexual preferences," some among more than two partners. For all I know, they may have had one involving four calling birds, three french hens, two turtle doves, and a partridge in a pear tree.

I think it's reasonable for us to mandate the preservation of the traditional family unit, if only because it's the most basic building block of society. As Huck says, we're not against anything. We're FOR traditional marriage.

Jeff, NC   January 17th, 2008 9:05 pm ET

Hmm, I thought we separated church and state? The last thing this country needs is another president to carry on religious wars.

Put me aboard Hill Force One any day. Experience over pandering anyday.

Roger from MA   January 17th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

So, basically, we have Huckabee stating that he doesn't want "Yankee agitators" coming down south and telling South Carolinians that they can't fly their treason flag over their capitol building.

Three posts later, we then read about how he'd use his power as US President to impose his brand of morality on more liberal states.

Isn't this guy incredible?

Craig   January 17th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

Well, I would bet Huckabee's latest comments were not intended to attract media attention this time around.

It will be entertaining to see how the media treats Huckabee's latest statements.
Late shows should have a hay day with this material. It was just a matter of time that Huckabee would burn out.

Dave   January 17th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

Recent studies have clearly shown that homosexuality is not chosen, and mainstream America understands that and also understands that homosexuality is not "offensive". Juan is absolutely spot on with his comment; we are not bigots.

D Mills Garland, Tx   January 17th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

Estill, mentalities like yours and Huckabee's are dangerous and detrimental to our society. The gay community is here regardless if you like it or not. Contributors to their communities, mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, sons and daughters, tax payers, trendsetters and in many cases role models. Go back under the rock you crawled out from because we "refuse" to go back into our closets.

hal   January 17th, 2008 9:01 pm ET

Hey Estill Richardson – you are proud to be MAINSTREAM??.....wow how sad.....forget all individual identity or preferrence.....No room outside the box for you?? You must be real fun at a party!!

Chris   January 17th, 2008 9:01 pm ET

Huckabee talks as if the definition of marriage has always been the same, which is just not true. Anyone remember back when interracial marriae was illegal? Or how about divorce, didn't it change the definition of marriage? And let's not even talk about back when marital rape was legal. But then again, I'm sure Huckabee leans conservative on all these issues...

Gary   January 17th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

It baffles me that the people who support homosexuality are allowed to claim themselves as main stream. Homosexuality is not the norm for relationship and thus can not be considered mainstream. Comments like David Smith's serve only to polarize any conversations concerning homosexuality and show that often those supporting homosexuality only try to shout down others that disagree with them.

Ivan, Chicago, Illinois   January 17th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Huckabee's call to amend the U.S. Constitution to follow the laws in the New Testiment, he is in fact indorsing turning America into a Theocray.

Thomas Wells   January 17th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

I agree with Huckabee on this issue. I think most people do not agree with the Human Rights campaign. Why is being gay a human right anyhow? That doesn't even make sense.

I still think Ron Paul is better than Huckabee so I'm voting for Mel Gibsons Braveheart, but the pastor is right about gay marraige.

Matt   January 17th, 2008 8:56 pm ET

I don't think Huckabee's comments were in any way offensive. Someone is trying attack him for a simple statement. If anyone was offended by the former governor, to bad. Everyone has the right to express their opinions, that is the greatness of America. Democracy is not about trying to be political correct its about speaking for what one believes in.

Quentin   January 17th, 2008 8:56 pm ET

Whatever these Presidental candidates say, I just wish they won't apologize later.

They should stand up for what they believe. Mike should say what he really believes, Mitt, everybody. Even the Democrats.

During these primaries, these Republicans are very strongly anti-immigration, anti-abortion, pro-war. During the real Primaries, will they be as strong about their views when in Vermont, CA, NY, WA?

I hope they will not be cowards and compromise, and I say the same for the Democrats, when they go to the South. Anti-guns? Pro-immigration? JUST SAY IT!

Matt Jennings   January 17th, 2008 8:53 pm ET

Despite the media's image of Huckabee as a tolerant Christian, an evangelical different from the likes of Pat "pray for Supreme Court Justices to die" Robertson, it's becoming more and more apparent that Mike Huckabee is a snake in the grass who's every bit the bigot.

Frank   January 17th, 2008 8:53 pm ET

Sounds like another bigot to me.
This guy would get destroyed in a general election with the Democrats. I really doubt he could even get the majority of the Republican vote. The Democrats are cheering this guy on because they realize how easy it would be to beat him.
Yeah, the die hard evangelicals which may represent 30% of the vote would support him, but no one else would.

toni- Houston, Tx   January 17th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

They are not Mike Huckabee's word, they are God's Words

steve wilmington   January 17th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

Huckabee reminds me of Tom Cruise...strange rants, no one has control of the wheel...he also mentioned putting squirrels in popcorn poppers in college. The guy is a little off.

Steve R   January 17th, 2008 8:49 pm ET

I find this kind of mentality just the kind we do NOT need running this country. Acceptance, love and respect are more needed now than at any time I can remember in my life in this country. I wonder how Huck would feel about people saying that speaking in tongues is disgusting, fraudulent and close to lying? Though I don't feel that way, there are many that do. I don't like the idea that this country is a theocracy, exactly what Huck is pushing for with statements like this. Huck, Jesus would embrace a loving marriage of any two people - love is all that matters.

Justin   January 17th, 2008 8:47 pm ET

I am a normal, average american citizen living in Arizona. I have never thought of homosexuals as deviant and think America should get on the boat with progress. I am mainstream america..and there is nothing offensive about people who want to love each other. That business about opening the door to bestiality is nonsense..and underminds the intelligence of "mainstream" america.

Ragdoll   January 17th, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Another thing, Juan, you'd be surprised at what truly is Mainstream. Anymore, people are afraid to voice their true opinions about the situation for the mere fact that Christians are made to look like fanatics. I believe that Mainstream America for the most part agree with my thoughts.

Ragdoll   January 17th, 2008 8:44 pm ET

You know, more and more it seems that the only ones that are not allowed the constitutional right of free speech are Christians who live their lifes according to what the Bible says. The very moment that we say we do not agree with gay lifestyle then we are automatically called bigots. Well, I for one, am proud to say that I am a bigot then. The whole problem with your argument though is that just because I do not agree with your lifestyle and I believe that it is morally wrong, I am not going to treat you badly. I do not believe that I have to partake in your lifestyle choices. Just because I do not like your lifestyle does not mean that I do not like you. You may very well be a nice person but I do not have to condone what I perceive to be immoral decisions. Bigotry usually accompanies hatred. Just because one does not agree with you doesn't mean we hate you.

Duncan, Richmond, VA   January 17th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

Sorry Juan, but Mainstream America is not for redefining Marriage. Most of these issues would not be a problem is the gay community would accept civil unions, but they refuse too.

If you think that Mainstream America is ready to redefine marriage, then your living with your head in the sand.

David, Oregon City   January 17th, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Is someone asking Governor Huckabee to change his religion to match thier lifestyle? Yes or No!
Go Huckabee!

Rene   January 17th, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Hey, you need to get some education, to say that homosexuality is not normal is a clear sign of backward mentality.

Don't vote for hate   January 17th, 2008 8:37 pm ET

Preach on, Brother Mike!! Preach your way right out of the race. Do it now. For the sake of humanity.

angelo   January 17th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

Mainstream doesn't believe in gay marriage!!! Go Huckabee!!!

Tevin, Raleigh NC   January 17th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

Estill, you may be a part of mainstream America, but you are in no way mainstream America. Huckabee once again has shown his bigotry. It's one thing to have the religious belief that gay marriage is wrong and it's another to insult the very humanity of those who believe otherwise by equating them with animals!

Kirsten, F'burg, Virginia   January 17th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

Hey Juan, if mainstream Americans were not so-called "bigots", they wouldn't have overwhelmingly passed the marriage amendment acts

Mike Orlando, FL   January 17th, 2008 8:32 pm ET

That's just sick. What is wrong with this man?

How can you be the President of the United States and not even respect every citizen?

Jay Smith   January 17th, 2008 8:31 pm ET

Last time I checked you could get married just by going to down to the courthouse, no religion needed. That is our separation of church and state working for us. Religion started marriage but the government is the one who makes it legal. And it seems to me that a lot of people are saying what there religion tells them to say, that same sex marriage is wrong. Well if it is wrong why can the government say a women and myself living in the same household for seven years that we are now considered married. You will not find that in any religion. The government didn’t make that rule using religion, so why use religion when it comes to same sex marriage? Religion doesn’t tell who and whom not to fall in love with and neither does the government. If I want to spend the rest of my life with some one and we both have the mental capability to make sound decions then who has the right to tell me we can’t? No one. That’s a right that comes with freedom. Like it or not that is the way it should be.

John Viel   January 17th, 2008 8:29 pm ET

Juan, you can let the liberal media and our liberal public education system fool you into believing that most Americans are accepting of homosexuality. We are forced to tolerate that and many other immoralities. Mainstream America is far more moral than you give us credit for.

shannon   January 17th, 2008 8:27 pm ET

Anyone who says she "is mainstream America" automatically reveals her small mindedness. Which is exactly where bigotry stems from.

MAM   January 17th, 2008 8:26 pm ET

I am an independent moderate who lives in a small community where just about every day another house is up for sale either because the family cannot make the mortgage payments any more or the senior couple living there cannot afford the ever-increasing taxes. Where the jobs that are available for parents to raise their families are in the retail sector and are for minimum wage. Where those of us who do have health care still have to wait to find out if it is okay to get the test or the treatment. Where our men and women in the military are coming back suffering from PTSD or have lost their legs or a part of their skull and brain. So lowest on my list is to care whether the law-abiding adults in the house next to mine who are in a loving relationship are of the same sex and if they want to get married...let's let them...I bet it would help with the property and school taxes. Talk to me about real across the board lobbying reform in Washington DC so my vote and voice can actually count and improving diplomatic relations so there is no more US cowboy diplomacy and stopping the flow of US company jobs to other countries so college-educated people arent folding sweaters for a living at the local Old Navy...and don't even pretend to be someone who can be the president for all the citizens of the US if you want to deny freedom to some of our citizens.

kevin   January 17th, 2008 8:23 pm ET

What is normal? Is Britney Spears normal? Is George Bush normal? Is Roger Clemens normal? Is Estill Richardson normal?

Estill...get to know ten gay men and women...and then come back here and let us know what you think. Ignorance is bliss, and in your ignorance is dangerous.

Simon Thompson   January 17th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

Estill-

If you share the beliefs of Huckabee, than you share the beliefs of someone who has flip-flopped on countless issues, and is impossible to trust.

I know for a fact that America, since atleast half of this country has to have some sort of intelligence, does not link homosexuality and bestiality. Homosexuality occurs between people that are often born loving the same gender. How can you call this wrong, when lots of people have no choice in the matter, and must suffer from the ridicule from Americans such as you?

Bestiality, inversely, is an extremely perverse, only sexual, relationship between two different species. How can you even compare the two, that's what I'm wondering?

But please, vote for Mike Huckabee. It is obvious that if he does win the nomination, than all of his lies, his 1,033 pardons, his inappropriate words regarding a variety of issues from suicide to concentration camps to women graciously submitting to their husbands, will be exposed. There is no possible chance that he would win when matched up against the likes of Obama or Clinton.

Simon

Robert   January 17th, 2008 8:18 pm ET

RE:Estill Richardson

Homosexuality may be offensive to you, but that doesn't mean that it's not normal. Religious zealots with no idea of how the real world operates in the 21st century are offensive to me, and sadly in the USA today, this is normal.

Dereck Brown   January 17th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

As a gay man, I find it "offensive" that some people think that it is their business to dictate to others what is normal, moral, and offensive. If someone doesn't like or agree with something, that is their problem to deal with internally. It is such a sad day when America, wich claims to be the "leader of the free world" is still far behind other countries when it comes to respect for others and this issue is one of them. I am a moral individual. I go to church. I have had a long term, committed, loving relationship for 9 years now. David Smith is right! And the likes of the fundamentalist/extreme Huckabee will never get into the Whitehouse – This is America, not 1930s Germany.

B   January 17th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

Hey Estill,
Apparently you're not mainstream America. Why does Huckabee believe women should be submissive to their husbands? Did you know it's 2008? Women's rights were established long ago. Nor does he believe in evolution. I wonder what will happen to the NIH? Guess Americans won't be able to research all the diseases God has bestowed on us. Regarding homosexuality, whether it's normal or not, many homosexuals have loving relationships that are healthier than straight marriages.

Jon Frechin   January 17th, 2008 8:14 pm ET

Whether or not you or mainstream America believes homosexuality to be a moral issue it certainly is not a federal issue. Mike Huckabee is a joke that somehow got the Religious Right on his side. He will not be the president and will likely run as the ivce president to War mongor Mccain. If anything, the gay marriage issue should be a state issue.

Doug   January 17th, 2008 8:14 pm ET

Mr. Huckabee, please SIT DOWN!!!

You are embarrassing yourself.

If we want religion, we will go to church.

Chris   January 17th, 2008 8:14 pm ET

Estill, you actually believe evolution is a farce or that homosexuality is the work of the devil?

Huckabee supporters honestly scare me.

Juan   January 17th, 2008 8:13 pm ET

Hey Estill, how dare you call your Mainstream America! And yet you call gay relationships "offensive"? Mainstream America is not comprised of bigots.

Illinois Andy   January 17th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

Haha, trust me, you're not Mainstream America if you're even thinking about voting for Huckabee.

Chris, Bethesda, Maryland   January 17th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

"I am mainstream America?" Pretty broad statement don't you think?

George   January 17th, 2008 7:58 pm ET

Okay, here we go again with the liberal media's absolutely distorting something Huckabee said.

Read the quote – read the actual quote – and tell me if he said homosexual relationships is the same thing as a man and an animal. That is taking it from Point A to Point C without going through Point B!

The fact is that, in some states, probably Arkansas if you want to know the truth, bestiality was not illegal up until recent years. That's why he feels the need to include that as an additional way that the definition of traditional marriage could be changed.

Estill Richardson   January 17th, 2008 7:56 pm ET

David Smith is wrong to think that mainstream American believes that homosexuality is normal. It is not normal, it is offensive; but not as offensive as David Smith suggesting that he knows what mainstream america may think or believe! I am Mainstream America.

I may or may not vote for Huckabee, I don't know yet; but I do know that Huckabee's beliefs are similiar to mine.

Denny   January 17th, 2008 7:53 pm ET

For this one statement he made, I agree with him, and even more important, GOD agrees with Huckabee. After all God said it first, and the God of Abraham CAN NOT lie.

MC- Atlanta,GA   January 17th, 2008 7:51 pm ET

this kind of thinking has no business in public – let alone the white house. Shame on you Mike – shame shame shame.

Manny   January 17th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

This is why he has the best shot among the republicans. He is honest, realistic with the moralfabric of society, and does not politic (take both oposing sides) his way on issues

Daniel   January 17th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

What a "Nice Guy" remarks!!!
Can he talk about real issues?

Doug   January 17th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

Mr. Huckabee, please SIT DOWN!

You are embarrassing yourself.

If we want religion, we will go to church.

Gorbashov, Long Beach, Ca.   January 17th, 2008 7:46 pm ET

WOW!

As a Progressive Democrat and Edwards supporter I will not be voting for Mr. Huckabee, but for months I've been telling people not to discount his campaign, and sure enough it has caught fire with the 'fire and brimstone' base of the Republican party.

BUT..................

Has he lost his mind?

Van Buren   January 17th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

This man has got to have more skeletons in his closet than any candidate alive. Come'on smoking gun, what the heck are you waiting for!

Phil Memphis, TN   January 17th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

OMG, he is finally doing it to himself. He is who i thought he was, and is now starting to prove it. Phew, for a while there I thought he might have had an outside chance. Glad to see he has taken the last few days as an opportunity to self-destruct.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@CNNPolitics: RT @CNNsotu: A house divided...a light-hearted article about Carville and Matalin's partisan pen choices on SOTU. http://bit.ly/7JICNw
Updated: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:03:44 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Washington Wizards owner Abe Pollin was a great man. He died at 86. He really helped build up the nation's capital. My deep condolences.
Updated: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:51:03 -0800
@CNNPolitics: RT @WolfBlitzerCNN: Shakira's new album is "She Wolf." With that title shouldn't I invite her to join me in The SitRoom? She Wolf & He Wolf.
Updated: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:28:52 -0800
@CNNPolitics: Follow @HambypCNN for all the latest Sanford impeachment news.
Updated: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:00:18 -0800
@cnnsotu: A house divided...a light-hearted article about Carville and Matalin's partisan pen choices on SOTU: http://bit.ly/7JICNw
Updated: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:42:49 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP