January 20, 2008
Posted: 08:20 PM ET
Obama is striking back at Bill Clinton
Obama is striking back at Bill Clinton

MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina (CNN) — More tit-for-tat on the campaign trail – only this time, it’s between Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.

After losing the caucus tally in Nevada, the Obama campaign took aim at Bill Clinton and the comments he made during his many campaign stops in that state on behalf of his wife, Hillary Clinton.

Now the Illinois senator himself is taking on the former president, telling Good Morning America that he feels as if he’s running against both Clintons.

In the interview, Obama reportedly says that the former president has been misrepresenting both “my record of opposition to the war in Iraq” and “our approach to organizing in Las Vegas,” as the controversy over Saturday’s Nevada caucus vote continues to grow.

Obama campaign senior adviser David Axelrod did not back away from the remarks after they became public Sunday night, telling CNN the Clintons “have a good cop, bad cop thing going” in which “he comes with a negative message she stays positive.”

Axelrod accuses the former President of “doing slash and burn stuff,” and slams the Clinton campaign, saying “there’s a philosophy of saying and doing anything it takes.”

“It’s very clear that Bill Clinton is playing fast and loose with the facts,” says Axelrod, and unbecoming of a former president: “It’s been a little crass, as someone who supported him and respects him, I think it’s disappointing.”

And Axelrod vows Obama will continue to hit back. “As long as he’s out there, we aren’t going to let him distort the record,” he says. “We’ll aggressively challenge him when he misrepresents the facts.”

He also calls on the former president to stop distorting Obama's record. “If he wants to help his wife, just be honest — don’t parse words, don’t truncate quotes to make your case.”

The ABC interview with Obama has yet to air, but the Clinton camp is already fighting back.

“We understand Sen. Obama is frustrated by his loss in Nevada, but the facts are the facts,” said campaign spokesperson Phil Singer. “President Clinton is a huge asset to our campaign and will continue talking to the American people.”

The new brawl comes as the battle between the two camps over the Nevada vote shows no signs of abating, with both sides accusing the other of voter intimidation.

On Sunday, Obama’s Nevada State Director David Cohen said there had been a “clear-cut disenfranchising” of voters in the state because of actions by Clinton supporters, and the campaign's general counsel, Bob Bauer, said they were asking the state and national party to investigate.

Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson called the allegations “absurd” and “laughable,” and spokesman Phil Singer responded charged that “Sen. Obama’s allies in Nevada engaged in strong arm tactics and intimidation against our supporters.”

Singer also repeated former President Clinton’s charge that the senator’s record on the war had been “inconsistent.”

–CNN's Jessica Yellin

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


simon   January 20th, 2008 9:07 pm ET

I must admitt if this country don't allow themself to change the direction that we are heading in, then we are all doomed. Karl rove and libby, George bush rule must end, not with Clintons bush clintons,bush but real change.

DJ   January 20th, 2008 9:07 pm ET

Obama and his camp can not handle defeat after hyping the union's endorsement. He wasn't even gracious enough to remain in the state to speak to his supporters there.

June (California Voter)   January 20th, 2008 9:07 pm ET

I'm voting for Hillary but he,Bill shouldn't be on her coattails when she is running,just as when he was running they had her get off his coattails.

Jackson   January 20th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Wasn't it just a few years ago to the day, that President Clinton admitted to lying under oath?

Jack

Tom Davie   January 20th, 2008 9:10 pm ET

dear senator Obama:

For a guy who claims to be very smart (and you are) you are making some serious mistakes now.

Choosing to INGORE obvious racist spanish ads by the very union that endorsed you is fine and all, but when the THIRD PARTY edwards complains , you should have SAID SOMETHING.

Its apparently ok to PIN the lawsuit on the Clintons, but someone ignore the racist ads ??? Lol.

Citing RONALD REAGAN is fine and all, but NOT in a democratic race in which you are claiming to UNITE the democratic party and PROMOTE the democratic party.

. Im sure John Kerry flipped over in his chair after he had pledged his endorsement and you came out with that FLAP.

Even though you lived thru the clinton years, and have personally known Hillary for a long time now, it never DAWNED on you that Billl Clinton would be a MAJOR force in Hillarys campaign ????

Its ok for candidates to use their wives, but ONLY under the technicality that they werent PRESIDENT for 8 years.

I guess i overlooked that RULE.

So, with everyone with 1/2 a brain knowing you KNOW all this, all this COMPLAINING means is your butt is sore from the WHIPPING you are taking.

They are 'ganging up ' on poor Obama

What did you expect? You are trying to DEFEAT HIS WIFE for christs sakes.

LOL.

Sharon in FL   January 20th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Whine, whine, whine. That's all Obama does. He did cocaine and whines because people bring it up. He flip-flops on his Iraq war views and blames Bill Clinton because Bill correctly points out that Obama is a flip-flopper. Because the majority of us don't believe Obama's god-like view of himself, he whines about being criticized. Grow up, Obama. Quit whining. And give us all a break.

Newt   January 20th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Black people dont care about Dr. Martin Luther King. all they care about is BET and KMEL. who promote ignorace. its a shame im sure that this was not part of his dream. so much promiscous behavior in our neighborhoods are hurting generations to come. its time to wake up black people and not tolerate media glorification of gangsters,pimps and hos. why doesnt the media promote positive black people. They must be used to the maximum for monetory purpose.

charlotte   January 20th, 2008 9:13 pm ET

Bill Clintons' campaign was often refered to a two for the price of one. Why should now be different. People thought Hillary was too involved in Bills campaign. Two very intelligent people tend to evoke that kind of thinking.

Cicilia   January 20th, 2008 9:13 pm ET

I must say how well I understood martin luther king day holiday, and how sad I call myself American, how sad this country has bad and sad history. I wonder who authored all is America.

Daniel   January 20th, 2008 9:13 pm ET

I once had respect for Bill Clinton. Now, because of the lows that he has sunk to, I have no more respect for him.

What kind of President will Hillary Clinton be if she has to resort to these dirty tactics to win?

In short, they are trying to "strong arm" their way back into the Whitehouse, and also trying to scare us into voting for them.

It is very sad and depressing to see two people who had the respect of so many thousands of people, lose that respect. All the Clintons can do is attack, attack, lie, distort, spin, lie some more, misquote, distort, attack, attack, attack.

I am with Obama, the true choice of hope!

Daniel Peebles

Tevel   January 20th, 2008 9:14 pm ET

If Bill Clinton is going to be SO central, SO integral to Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaigning, it is reasonable to think that he will involve himself directly in her goverance, in moving her agenda foward against adversaries. That's too bad. We need to move beyond the Clinton mindset for many reasons — for example, the attachment to a narrative of persecution — and Hillary has not shown enough distance between herself and Bill to argue that she is the one do it. They are melding into one. Neverthless, Barack Obama needs to rise up to this, I hope that he can make his case. He has been treated unfairly, true. But that was to be expected.

Jack   January 20th, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Obama should be careful. Clinton's have a way of disposing of troublemakers who talk too much or know too much. Just ask Vince Foster's widow if he really committed suicide and who moved the body to Ft Marcy Park. Arkancide was very popular when the Clinton Mafia controlled Arkansas.

hg   January 20th, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Michelle Obama is free to campaign for you so Hillary could say…"I feel like I am running against both Obamas"
Tsk Tsk…its getting depressing in your campaign Barrack…do something

charlotte   January 20th, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Hillary is a strong leader, committed to this country, committed to her marriage for better or worse. It takes a lot of strength to make it through the rough spots of life. Too many people throw in the towel and quit. She has shown me strengh and character. I think Obama is a fine young man. I think he has a lot to learn. If he could have answered last on his weaknesses, in his own words, "I would have known how to play the game." We can not wait for someone to figure out, there isn't a pea under any of the three walnut shells. We need someone who can hit the ground running, knows how to play dodge ball, knows it isn't going to be a cake walk, knows it will be an uphill battle and has the intestinal fortitude to get it done. That is Hillary Clinton!

Ben   January 20th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Fluff reporting of obama from CNN while they put the important things for today down we have to go digging to look for them. Tired with our media.

Geny   January 20th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Thats because you are!! Hillary Clinton is so lame that she needs Bill to come to the rescue all the time!! I dont understand how people are TOO BLIND to see her little game! She can't even RUN for president without Bill's help, and this makes her qualified? I don't think so. I think it's a shame that Bill is bullying Obama like that, but then again I'm sure Hillary is pressuring him to do it.

PEOPLE YOU MUST REALIZE THIS CAMPAIGN IS ALL ABOUT HER! Her ego to be first woman president! She does not care about the American people, do your research and see all the things she has done and what she did to Stan Lee (creator of Spiderman, Fantastic 4, Hulk, and X-Men) and Peter Paul. Do your research before voting for this witch!
How can you trust someone who staged questions at a university speech? She's decieving and capable of anything to get what she wants!
Don't make America worse by voting for her!! I'd rather vote for a republican than her!! DO YOUR RESEARCH!!!

The only sincere candidate that can bring real change and speaks from his heart is Obama!

OBAMA 2008!!

kobe   January 20th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

lol!!this is crazy,sure sounds like a david and goliath fight!!only the goliath this time will win!!what suprises me though,is that for all their strong hold on the establishment,they still struggling to beat this guy with a funny name,tells me one thing,the clintons ain't going back to the white house,lol not under my watch!!Romney let's go!!

wale azeez   January 20th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

duh!!! he's just realizing bill's a natural pathetic liar!!!! If he continues to be weak fail to slash and burn them in retaliation….he might just be handing over the white house to the republicans….!!!

Greg OH   January 20th, 2008 9:19 pm ET

According to most Hillary supporters, he really is since most want a 3rd term for Bill.

Amy   January 20th, 2008 9:19 pm ET

Obama's inconsistency on Iraq war is already know, with or without Bill pointing to it. The problems with the Culinary union endorsement and voters' intimidation are also known.. so what else? get used with this Mr. Obama. Bill Clinton is the husband of you opponent. Michelle Obama is allowed to be out there campaigning and using non-stop the race card and 'its out time' , etc. Be a man Mr Obama, you lost a bit, perhaps will win again. This is called competition. How was at Harvard? not like that? or you always got free ride..

Dawn   January 20th, 2008 9:19 pm ET

I saw this on ABC and they gave the Clinton camp's response as well. The spokesperson (can't remember which one) gave a statement that turned Obama's words back on him. Remember a few weeks ago when Obama was asked about the Clinton's complaining about something and he said, "I understand the Clinton campaign is frustrated…" Well, that's what the Clinton camp said today. "I understand the Obama campaign is frustrated". Too funny.

Obama, and Edwards for that matter, started hitting Hillary because the media said they needed to. Obama is the one who brought Bill Clinton into this when he used quotes from Bill during his '92 run. Now he doesn't want Bill to have a say? It was fine when Obama was riding high, now not so much huh?

I don't think Obama really needs to get into a pissin' match with Bill Clinton.

Greg OH   January 20th, 2008 9:19 pm ET

And yes, polls showed in NH 56% voted for Hilllary for that reason (bill 3rd term,)

Clinton   January 20th, 2008 9:19 pm ET

About time. I hope Barack calls her out on both his and John edwards account in the middle of the debate….this woman should be jailed. Bill has a long list of lying for personal reasons.

As an independent I will vote republican before Hillary.

Ada   January 20th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Please, someone tell me who is running against Obama, Hillary or Bill? I thought the so called democratic countries do not allow a president to run for more than two terms. America is portraying a bad example to third world countries that are fighting for democracy.

BeCo   January 20th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

If I'm not mistaken I think I have seen several instances of coverage of Michelle Obama's individual campaign efforts on behalf of her husband. What's the difference? The fact that Hillary's spouse happens to be a former president just means that she enjoys a rare advantage. How typically cynical of a liberal democrat to cry foul over the very situation they have begged and pleaded for…………..gender equality………..for decades.

Reminds me of a little boy whining on the playground because someone else got the best swing or teeter totter.

Ray   January 20th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Awww. Poor Noam. If he cant take it now, he will never make it if he were to win the nomination. He is nothing but a cry baby!!!!! Grow a pair!!!

Bill said that he was against the war but he keeps voting to fund the war. That's TRUE RIGHT? Stop playing the victim. You sure did nothing to stop the commercial in Nevada about Hillary not caring about Latinos.

Poor Poor NObama!!!

Hillary 08!!!!

Ray   January 20th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Sorry..Poor NObama it should have said….

pam Eugene OR   January 20th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Good for you Barack. The Clintons' do not have an honest bone in their collective bodies. They play hard ball and they play very dirty. I admire you so much for standing up to the Clinton machine. It is not easy to do that and stay positive. Please don't let them drag you down into the mud with them like the pigs they are.
We need you Barack to lead us out of the Bush/Clinton darkness. We are not stupid and most of us can see what they are doing and it stinks to high heaven. We are behind you and will never vote for a Clinton…no matter what. I will vote independent or cross party lines before I ever give that lying, cheating, vile woman my vote. Stay strong Barack and please ask Edwards to be your VP.
Let's dump Hillary right now!

Connie, Richmond, CA   January 20th, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Hillary could not run without Bill. So, yes, Barack, you are running against them both. It's amazing that you've done so well because Bill and Hillary will do ANYTHING to win, including the most disgusting, unthinkable things that you can think of.

One day, we may have a female candidate like yourself: self-made, strong, and confident. Until then, we've got Hillary. And Bill.

And until then, this woman (me) is voting for you.

Jim Bremer   January 20th, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Barack Hussein Obama is finally realizing that everyone won't treat him with kid gloves.

And the message of hope without substance is wearing thin.

michaelinphilly   January 20th, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Bill Clinton is a disgrace and I voted for him twice. He is ruining his legacy running around blathering…..

jason   January 20th, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Bill Clinton needs to step back and let Hillary stand on her own. Whats going to happen when Hillary gets the Presidency and has to deal with the President of Pakistan, Iran, and Russia, will she be needing Bill to back her up? President can only serve 8 years. Bill was a good president, but his time as ended. Please step down. Even George W. Bush didn't really on his daddy this much.

Matt   January 20th, 2008 9:24 pm ET

1. Boo hoo

2. If Obama can't handle two Clintons, how can he be expected to handle the agressive governments of Russia, North Korea, Iran, and China, to name only a few.

Judy   January 20th, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Hmm, interesting. Obama wasn't complaining about Bill Clinton when he thought he was winning. Sound familiar? That is what both Obama and Edwards accused Hillary Clinton of when she took them to task about change being more than a word, it takes experience to make it happen. Also, when Bill Clinton stated early on in the Nevada caucus process that he thought there were irregularities and strong arm union tactics taking place, Obama said something to the effect that gee, he's getting a bit worked up. Well, now the shoe is on the other foot and look who is crying foul. Quite frankly, I'm finding the Obama camp to be incredibly devisive regardless of their giving lip service to unifying America. When Obama is questioned about his limited record, it's racist or unfair. When Obama doesn't win, there must have been something wrong with the vote. When Clinton is continuously lambasted, that's politics. When she does win, well it's not really a win, it doesn't mean anything, or she just eked out a win. There is definitely a double standard taking place in this process and the media.

We and the media need to step back and put this election process in perspective. Had it been two white men competing against each other, the demographics of Nevada, NH and Iowa would have been working class, white collar workers, age groups, etc. Now, when analyzing the competition between Clinton and Obama it is described as women, whites, men, blacks, browns, etc. The media is trying to make this into a gender vs. race election and we the people are falling for it.

We need to take back the election process from the media. Look at the issues, the experience of each candidate and their past records. Then make a decision. For full disclosure, I support Clinton because of her record and experience and ongoing support of those issues that are important to me.

Joojo   January 20th, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Whinning baby…………………………………Go Hill

I work   January 20th, 2008 9:26 pm ET

I know you don't want REAL issues to get in the way of the "girl power" crap that is propelling Hillary's campaign, but;

Lets start at the beginning. Hillary headed the Young Republicans at Wellesley College and was a self described Goldwater girl.

Hillary Clinton served on Wal-Mart's board of directors for six years. She was paid $1,500 for each meeting she attended and accumulated at least $100,000 in Wal-Mart stock.

She was a senior Partner at the Rose Law Firm and all her associates went to prison.

Hillary Clinton takes credit for the last Clinton Administration when touting her experience advantage over Senator Obama and Edwards.

Lets list the important ones:

N.A.F.T.A. and the W.T.O. - Clinton passed these disastrous trade deals that have destroyed our middle class and sent our good paying blue-collar jobs away.

H1B Visa. - Clinton permitted U.S. corporations to import 300,000 high skilled foreign workers per year to replace Americans, to the benefit of a few superrich contributors. That’s 10 times the number even Bush allowed in.

Ballistic Missile Technology to China. – Clinton reversed a State Department ban to allow just one company to do it. A company headed by the largest contributor to Bill Clintons reelection campaign, Bernard Schwartz.

The Clintons directly led to the Republican takeovers of the Presidency and both Houses of Congress with their shenanigans.

The Clinton's take credit for the Internet boom that started in 1995 and went bust in 2000. That boom increased income tax money paid to the Government. We had a short-term balanced budget. That was a fluke the Clintons had nothing to do with.

And now Hillary has Terry McAuliffe running her campaign. Court documents show this sleazy guy walked away with millions of I.B.E.W. Union pension money. McAuliffe also ended up with several million dollars from the Global Crossing fiasco that left thousands of honest peoples life savings gone.

You don’t believe me? Please don't take my word for it. Google it.
Our duty as voters is to educate the uninformed and the naive, also known as the Hillary supporter.

I hope every Obama and Edwards supporter will copy my post and e-mail it to all their contacts. Lets shine some light on Hillary.
Hillary is bought and paid for by the big business insiders.
A vote for Hillary is NOT a vote for change!!!

cathy   January 20th, 2008 9:26 pm ET

He is right……
Is Obama running against one or two Clintons. I can't tell from day to day. Who's runnning Bill or Hillary? We need to be very cautious of another DYNASTY! Haven't we learned yet?
The clintons will tell you whatever you want to hear and IF they get back into office they will say it wasn't their fault that they couldn't do anything the promised they would and continue business as usual. Her answer would be similar to this current statement "I voted for it but I hoped it wouldn't pass" If you don't think so vote for her and then blame yourself when the times get worse!

Dave C - NJ   January 20th, 2008 9:27 pm ET

Obama is correct, both Clintons are campaigning. Which makes sense because if it were not for Bill, we never would have heard of Hillary, so why not use him.

Hillary supporters are all banking on her presidency being an extension of Bill's…which is BS folks. I loved Bill, but it's 2008…stick a fork in him, he's done.

MICHAEL   January 20th, 2008 9:27 pm ET

I personally find it reprehensible that a former President has turned into little more than a partisan hack and a political attack dog. The aggressive, no-holds-barred campaigning style of the Clintons proves Obama's point: the political system in America is broken, and another 4-8 years of divisive partisanship will do America- and the world- no good. Unfortunately, the Democratic base seems so intent on re-living its "Clinton glory days" that it is allowing Hillary's campaign to sully a visionary who has the capacity to unite the country at a time when it needs it most. As an independent voter, I would be proud to support Barack Obama, but I would rather stay home in November than vote for Hillary Clinton. And I'm not the only one who feels that way.

Rick, El Paso, Texas   January 20th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Obama is running against both Clintons. I hope someone at CNN will have the guts to report the implications of this story. Imagine the situation if the Clintons get elected: President Hillary Clinton will be sleeping with the former President, a man who dishonored himself in the White House and in the end caused tremendous harm to the credibility of this country. Bush has harmed the US more than any other President. This country and the world are not ready for a Clinton/Clinton/?VicePresident White House.

Obama 08   January 20th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Obama's right. For example, "Meet the Press" clearly documented that both of the Clinton's held Ronald Regan in high esteem. Read the transcript!

Clinton needs to stand on her own two feet and win this campaign. Will Bill get mad at members of Congress if they give her a hard time?; Will he take on world leaders who don't agree? Who would want to be VP or serve in her cabinet?

Ssdly she may win the nomination mainly through support of the old Democratic guard and older voters. She will leave behind a divided party and Bill Clinton's reputation in shreds.

Time for a change!

tina ny, ny   January 20th, 2008 9:29 pm ET

well Obama your wife is running her mouth too. Only difference is that your wife doesn't have much to show in comparison to Clinton. So stop being a baby.

mike   January 20th, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Good, about time, also hire some lawyers to go to precincts in s.c. to quash any intimaidation that clinton supporters may try…

Tracy   January 20th, 2008 9:30 pm ET

They must be growing desperate!!

Linoq   January 20th, 2008 9:30 pm ET

At least the Clinton's spin and the Republican Style tactics will train Obama for the presidential run. America needs Obama, this is one in a lifetime opportunity.

Obama for President 08
Hillary for Chief of Staff
Edwards for Attorney General

Scott, Madison, WI   January 20th, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Clintons lie? Distort facts? Bait the issues? Indignant finger pointing? Tell me something I didn't know.

They are the birth parents of divisive, petty politics and personal destruction. All under the guise of "feeling your pain". They also learned well from the Bush playbook and take pages out of Dirty Politics 101and use the same dirty tricks to elevate their scummy selves to political royalty.

Take them on with honesty and integrity because they won't recognize the first thing about either of those qualities.

matthew   January 20th, 2008 9:30 pm ET

So much for Obama's message of change.

He sounds like the rest of the politicians to me.

Hillary 08!

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL   January 20th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

Is Sen. Obama for real? this is getting absurd! Sen. Obama's record is very thin at best, Sen. Clinton's campaign is obviously working, and I'm sorry but it is his record the one that is up to scrutiny, you have something on Sen. Clinton's record then bring it! this is a race for the nomination of the Democratic party and you'd better be prepared! Sen. Clinton has had a number of mis-truths and attacks on her personally, but her record speaks for itself and the voters and beginning to notice, so welcome to the American process of picking a president Sen. obama, the road will be bumpy from now until the convention so fasten your seatbelts, if you don't think you can cut it I suggest you resign your efforts. DEFEND YOUR RECORD, EXPLAIN TO THE VOTERS WHY YOU VOTED OVER 120 TIMES PRESENT sometimes in very important issues… Also explain how you've serve your constituents by having one of the worst attendance records in the senate?

Please Stop   January 20th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

My Husband entered our son into a tennis tournament despite my objections. I didn’t think he was up to it. Did I root for his opponents to win so that I could use it against my Husband in a future disagreement?

Of course not, we BOTH love our son. We are a family and we stand together, supporting each other even when we disagree.

I’ve used that analogy to explain why I am very disappointed with the Democrats who publicly trashed our military’s chances in the war when the going got tough. They did it only for shallow partisan reasons.

Now that our brave soldiers seem to be winning the war, these same Democrats are talking down the economy for the very same reason.

Yes the economy is slowing, but it is NOT in a recession. These comments frighten people into holding back on spending money and increase the chance we will enter a recession. It’s called “consumer confidence”. It’s an economic indicator that directly effects the direction our economy goes in. This will hurt all of our families.

We are ALL Americans. Stop trying to bring the country down just for your own personal gain.

You should be ashamed of yourselves. Please talk about why your ideas are better, instead of trying to create misery.

Case   January 20th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

Bill Clinton is a former President therefore everything he says has historical weight. For him to "play politics" on behalf of his wife is simply irresponsible. Of course he has the right to help her as any supporter, but he has crossed the line with his "fast and loose" accusations several times over. Someone should have called the Clinton's on this much earlier. I wonder if Hillary realizes that her husband will be largely credited by history for "getting her" elected,but maybe thats not even a concern her.

dosa   January 20th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Clinton waited until she was running for the democratic nomination before she even tried ACTING like a democrat…on ANY of the issues.

That is why I am not voting for her.

Mauri   January 20th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Isn't it amazing how supporters for each respective side will see things so differently? Early on in Hillary's campaign, she was criticized for Bill's going out and speaking in her behalf. They said he would have a negative effect on her campaign efforts. Didn't happen. Then it was said, even more strongly, that having Bill speak for her is unfair, given he is the former president, intimating that his status as ex-president and that he should keep his mouth shut.

Then came the inevitable confrontation that Senator Obama is making in this story that he's competing against both Hillary AND Bill. Now, finally getting to the facts, Bill Clinton IS the ex-president, but he also happens to be her spouse. One has ask that, under these circumstances, should Hillary be required to nix her spouse as a speaker for her candidacy. If the answer is yes, then should Michelle Obama be sidelined? Should Elizabeth Edwards be muzzled? Should Laura Bush be told to shut up, etc. etc.? Ah, the contemplations involved in presidential politics. 'Taint fair, I say! So does Obama. Who is writing the rules anyway????

Carrie   January 20th, 2008 9:34 pm ET

I admire Obama for his class against the trailer trash Clintons. Atleast we know Bill's role will be fighting and doing the dirty work. Hillary Clinton is such a strong woman! Ha! A strong woman can fight her own battles.

Obama 08!

Anthony   January 20th, 2008 9:34 pm ET

Democrats will be stupid to nominate Hillary. Period. But they will sure do anyways unfortunately. That woman is just too fake, but people will always be stupid for sure. But this is America people: we will sure vote her in, and later scream! and shout!, and cause her out! aka: Bush's two terms.
I ask. Who is then the problem one? We!! I don’t know why people always chooses self denial over common sense. Such a shame.

Mary   January 20th, 2008 9:35 pm ET

Dosa, if you think Hillary is a democrat, think again.
She even was a republican student president in wesley college. They are too wealthy to lead me. I am looking for someone who will level with me. We have all seen how far Clintons can go or do to go back to the white house, from being fake and lying to trying to tear down Obama.
I am voting for a change and I am voting Obama

Jason King   January 20th, 2008 9:36 pm ET

Bill Clinton, playing fast and loose with the facts? It couldn't be!

elana   January 20th, 2008 9:36 pm ET

go obama- you are exactly right. The bad cop, good cop is a brililant analogy. I used to LOVE Bill Clinton and now I am repulsed by him. He needs to let Hillary fight her own battles. Obama- hang in there- I just know we can pull this off!!!!!! YES WE CAN

Amos   January 20th, 2008 9:36 pm ET

I do not think it is a big deal Sen. Clinton is trying to dig dirt about her rival Sen. Obama. This makes Obama looks like a Saint. Someone pointed out that you do not need to dig dirt about Hillary Clinton because her dirt is all over the place. I was surprised to read cover up of the mysterious death of Vince Foster by Mrs. Clinton. Not only this the report went on to detail her involvment in the White Water scam and also her role in helping her brother to take large sums of my in exchange for presidential purdon of some of the worst criminals.
After reading about Sen. Clinton, I was surprise to read that she is trying to dig dirt about Obama. Mrs. Clinton was given a pass because the focus was on President Clinton. When the Republican search light turns on her it will be very ulgly. This may explain the reason why most Conservatives are very excited about the possibility that she might win her party nomination. This is going to be bad for America because the last thing we need is what we went through in the 1990’s.

Mrs. America   January 20th, 2008 9:37 pm ET

I thought Obama was seen to have the advantage in Nevada by getting the caucuses in the casinos. Sounds like Obama boohooing where, by delegate count, he didn't even lose. So what's the fuss. Hillary has Bill out there and Barack has Michelle. Maybe one day Barack will be out there stumping for Michelle. You never know.

Patrick   January 20th, 2008 9:38 pm ET

Here we go again with the Clintons. This is why I am not for business as usual

TJ   January 20th, 2008 9:38 pm ET

I agree witht the comment on "Running Against Both Clintons". I too once had respect and admiration for Bill Clinton. His "Fairy Tale" remarks along with others have turned me against theClinton campaign. Bill's comments give the impression that a person of Obama's background should never even have "The Audacity to Hope" that he could even be considered to be electable as President of the United States. Although he apologized for the remarks, I feel it was not genuine. It looks as though the Clintons want to win by any means necessary even if that means lying, cheating, and trying to spread fear into the hearts of many in order to erase their Hope in someone who has the ability to bring people together.

Clintons, you have had your turn, let someone else have a shot at it!

Cristina   January 20th, 2008 9:41 pm ET

I don't believe this kind of campaigning is demeaning his ability in the public's eyes to defend his issues. I have heard the case set against Obama's support for the war and it is consistent with his voting record. I have not heard his professional response to the Senator Clinton's professional broaching of his voting record and his management style.

I certainly believe a President should be organized and that this quality is one of the hallmarks of a great leader. I also believe that his voting record cannot be disputed, nor can his words.

He has made very strong accusations against Senator Clinton and Senator Clinton has replied with professionalism. Obama has also ridiculed her and made fun of her openly before the Nevada Caucus.

As for former President Clinton campaigning on behalf of his wife, I don't know which is worse - her wife telling people that she still shops at Target and she won't let him run in 8 years because they will be different people, or a former President delineating Obama's voting record.

I have yet to hear Obama's professional response to that other than that he's being confronted.

Former President Clinton has every right to campaign on behalf of his wife. Just as his wife can campaign in churches and give speeches.

ed   January 20th, 2008 9:42 pm ET

IT IS INTERESTING THAT BILL CLINTON HAS INJECTED HIMSELF SO DEEP INTO THIS CAMPAIGN, HE, HILLARY AND ANY OF THEIR SUPPORTERS SHOULD TAKE A STEP BACK AND REVIEW THE CLINTONS OWN PAST, THERE ARE JUST TOO MANY ILLEGAL AND DEVISIVE ISSUES WITH THE TWO OF THEM. I VOTED FOR RONALD REAGAN, AND BILL CLINTON FOR THE SAME REASONS I AM GOING TO VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA, AND THAT IS THEY ALL BROUGHT A SENSE OF EXCITEMENT THAT AMERICA "WE CAN". AS A COLLEGE EDUCATED AMERICAN AS WELL AS A MILITARY VETERAN, I THINK AMERICA WOULD BE WISE TO TAKE A STEP BACK AND REVIEW OUR ISSUES TODAY. ASK YOURSELF WHICH CANDIDATE WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO WORK WITH.
DO WE REALLY NEED SUCH A DEVISIVE FIGURE AS HILLARY CLINTON IN THE WHITE HOUSE AT THIS TIME IN AMERICA. GEORGE WASHINGTON IN HIS GREAT WISDOM, STATED IN HIS FAREWELL ADDRESS WARNING TO AMERICA ABOUT THE PROBLEMS OF POLITICAL PARTIES. "THEY ARE DEVISIVE, AND BRING OUT THE WORST IN HUMAN QUALITIES, SELFISHNESS, BACK BITING, UNAMERICAN ALLIANCES AS WELL AS GREED.

Nita   January 20th, 2008 9:42 pm ET

Whatever! What Michelle can go on the campaign road for you - and she says alot . Get over it. Cry me a river. Obama was a sore loser last night. Everyone is talking about how he handled his defeat. Just like how he handled to debate straight out of Iowa. Bill is just doing what the other spouses are doing. Showing support of his spouse.

Cristina   January 20th, 2008 9:44 pm ET

Correction

I believe this kind of campaign is demeaning his ability in the public's eyes to defend his issues forthrightly and accurately. I have heard the case set against Obama's support for the war and it is consistent with his voting record. I have not heard his professional response to the Senator Clinton's professional broaching of his voting record and his management style.

I certainly believe a President should be organized and that this quality is one of the hallmarks of a great leader. I also believe that his voting record cannot be disputed, nor can his words on the Senate floor.

He has made very strong accusations against Senator Clinton and Senator Clinton has replied with professionalism. Obama has also ridiculed her and made fun of her openly before the Nevada Caucus.

As for former President Clinton campaigning on behalf of his wife, I don't know which is worse - her wife telling people that she still shops at Target and she won't let him run in 8 years because they will be different people, or a former President delineating Obama's voting record and calling Obama on his falsely fabricating his voting record for the masses.

I have yet to hear Obama's professional response to that other than that he's being confronted.

Former President Clinton has every right to campaign on behalf of his wife. Just as Obama's wife can campaign in churches and give speeches.

joe schmo   January 20th, 2008 9:46 pm ET

Hillary Clinton keeps saying that she is ready to be President on day one. She can't even run for office without using her husband as a heavy whenever anybody does not agree with what she says. Is her husband going to have to back up every decision that she makes, if she is President? This is supposed to be an office ran by one person–not a wrestling tag team. Please, wake up America—anybody but Hillary!!!!!

Peter   January 20th, 2008 9:46 pm ET

Does anyone REALLY believe that a sleazy politician with cash to burn will bring anything good to this country? Say NO to HC in 2008.
Obama 08!

bob white   January 20th, 2008 9:46 pm ET

Obama…funny how you have no problem with Oprah Winfrey and everyone else politicizing the Clintons. But now that you're losing, it's not fair eh?

Richie   January 20th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

I saw this before. This pressure must be huge for Obama from the Clintons. With all their lies who would vote for them anyway?

David, California   January 20th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Senator Obama is a sore loser. He only wines and complains. I never hear any specifics about the issues, only negative, negative and more negative.

If he is going to run for president, than he better start talking issues if he wants to win.

Ezzy   January 20th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

The Clinton's also have their internet director on Dailykos trying to further prove that Bill Clinton isn't lying. This Clinton camp is simply pathetic…and they continue to get away with it! This man is someone that looked in a camera in the 1990's and told us that "I did not have sexual relationships with that woman" and "it depends on what your definition of the word is, is." Once a liar and a cheat, always a liar and a cheat…And I bring this up because this shows GREAT character flaws on Mr. Clinton's part–not to mention Hillary continues to allow this behaviour while pandering to woman with her poor me tactics. You bet their using good cop vs. bad cop and guess what America, many people are falling for it. Scary isn't it?

Good-grief, this is so sad. When are we going to do better than this America? When are we going to get this thing right? Hillary Clinton is not what is best for this country in 2008…she cannot and will not unite both parties. We will once again be divided. Can't we just turn the page and move on in a new direction? I don't care who you are for as long as it isn't the Clinton's.

Richard   January 20th, 2008 9:48 pm ET

Obama.. Clinton.. doesent matter. I will be voting for one of them before I ever vote republican again.

Jarratt Willis, Nacogdoches Texas   January 20th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

BECAUSE YOU ARE!!!

Former President Clinton may be an asset in THE CAMPAIGN, but what will his final role be should Hillary Clinton assume the office of presidency?

Not a single word has been said confirming the presence of Bill Clinton in the White House at a PROFESSIONAL level. Everything has just been hearsay. Nothing has been concrete about his possible involvement.

It has been said time and time again, and it will continue to be said; Bill Clinton is not running for President, Hillary is! This nation needs to stop judging character and performance based upon familial association and get down to the facts.

How dangerous was it, in retrospect, for the people of America to have based George W's aptitude for office off of his fathers performance?

Can we really afford to do the same thing here? Hillary has already had plenty of time in the White House-she had her time to reform healthcare AND SHE FAILED. Even when she had a democratic Congress and White House backing her up. And even as a two-term senator of New York, you must consider the fact the she ascended to office riding the same swell of anti-terrorism/anti-republican sentiment that her colleagues rode in on last year.

What has she accomplished as Senator anyway, under her own strength, independant from Bill Clinton anyway? Think about it.

Scott   January 20th, 2008 9:50 pm ET

What facts?

Oh yeah, these…

Obama voted present rather than vote up or down while in the State Senate.

Zero experience dealing with foreign leaders

A healthcare plan that leaves 15 million people uninsured

Wants to meet with rogue leaders who have supported groups that want to harm American civilians and military personal.

Oh yeah, those facts…

I'm sticking with Hillary.

Karen P   January 20th, 2008 9:50 pm ET

It's ABOUT TIME someone asked Bill Clinton to back off. Really now, Bill has not acted at all like a former president at all. Total lack of class as usual. Any tiny speck of respect that was left from his presidency is gone. If Hillary can't control Bill now, just imagine getting Bill back in the White House! Bill, as a former Democratic President has absolutely NO business putting down other Democrats. He should stay out of sight and keep quiet or he will divide the Democratic Party for good. Hillary should have been able to do her own campaigning in New Hampshire instead of reminders about Bill's friends. We don't need the Clinton duo AGAIN!

As far as I'm concerned, the husband/wife team already had 2 terms in the White House…to me it's unconstitutional that they would be a duo there again. (women didn't vote or hold office when the Constitution was written). So if we have Bill exerting influence on Hillary like Hillary exerted influence when Bill was President, we are in big trouble.

The Clinton tactics are becoming so absurd. I support Obama, not Clinton, and I'm a 58 year old white female. So much for women and the Hillary vote…NOT ME!

john   January 20th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

I'd advise people to tune into Rush limbaugh tomorrow morning on this. He
knows more than anybody the lengths the Clintons would go to get back into
the White House. She and her husband have an insatiable lust for power and
would stop at nothing to win. Gender and race politics is just another tool
for them. She and he stoop to conquer. How sad.

Ally   January 20th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

That what was I thought the election is all about. Say no to " HillyBilly "!

RK   January 20th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

You left out the media and sarrogates who are really there to destroy you and squeeze all hopes from you. Keep hope alive. Dr. king never gave up….

brooklyn   January 20th, 2008 9:52 pm ET

I liked Bill Clinton, but lately extremely disappointing and certainly unbecoming. Go Obama.

John Adkisson   January 20th, 2008 9:52 pm ET

Bill Clinton is squandering his hard earned status as an elder statesman when he attacks with obviously false facts. I say "obviously" because he often refers to comments by Obama which are shown on the news and clearly different than his characterization.

For example, when Obama said that Democrats needed to become the party of new ideas again because they had ceded that role to Republicans for fifteen years — Clinton claimed that Obama said the Republicans had the "best ideas." This and so many other instances of dishonest spin are transparently false and far beneath his status in American politics. he also looks as though he is losing his temper and losing the campaign.

Yes, Mr. Clinton seems desparate which, in turn, convinces me that he regards this as a election for his own third term. I am so relieved Obama is not just sitting back and absorbing this scorched earth strategy by the Clintons. The country needs him.

Ex-Clinton Supporter   January 20th, 2008 9:53 pm ET

Mr. Clinton, as a former president of the United States, has been an embarrassment.
He ought to be able to campaign for his wife, Sen. Clinton, without bashing Sen. Obama.

Mr. Clinton is doing a disservice to the office of the President. He also isn't helping the Democratic Party. We want a new way of doing business in Washington. We want a government that respects all of us as Americans. What Mr. Clinton is doing isn't helping. He is really sad…

Gary Werner   January 20th, 2008 9:54 pm ET

I have been following this extremely exciting presidential primary on the Democratic side - mostly - as well as I could. I am freshly invigorated with what appears to be a new spin on American politics - all under Obama's coined theme of "Change." I'm sure all of us have noticed how at least a couple of his contenders have "borrowed" that theme and made it a core part of their own campaigns. Even Hillary says she has been fighting for change for 35 years. OKaaaaay. Where is it?

I too had high regard for Bill Clinton (can't say I did so much for his wife though - though I must admit that in the midst of his personal scandal, it must have taken a lot of BALLS for her to stand by the man - probably because she calculated her intent way ahead of time…), and even with all of his flaws combined with his uncanny methods for wiggling around and passed them, I thought he was a great president - and we all know - a very charming person. However, I now find myself viewing him and the campaign tactics he uses for his wife's benefits with a growing feeling of distasteful disdain. His charm is turning to harm. And now that Obama comes out with it (…feeling as if he is running against two Clintons), it has just confirmed in my own political heart that yes, the Clinton's are playing dirty pool in this great contest.

You know what Obama? Keep playing. Put some more of that english on the ball and don't be afraid to go on the offensive and win! From what I feel and what I hear out there in my own run-of-the-mill life, you are a very classy, smart, and respectable man who still manages to hold onto idealisms that all too many find easy to discard in the face of old, entrenched, and outdated practices that currently define American government. You appear to have an "American Heart" that resounds with vigor from your transfromed perpsective - embracing the inspiring dynamism that will help us get out of the rut we have been finding ourselves in for far too long. Shout it from the rooftops!

THE PEOPLE NEED THEIR VOICE AGAIN IN GOVERNMENT - not only to be listened to and understood, but I sense that we also need someone up there in the White House who we feel we can relate to as well as be related to. You are the first person I have seen in many years who radiates with that relate-ability. I saw it a long time ago when you ran for the Senate. Stand strong for what you believe in, and you will find the power of the people - which has been gruesomely absent for many, many years - will stand strong with you. Please know that the fight is for you - for the future of your family - for the future of all of us - for the future of America!

I am SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO for you Obama. The best to you and yours.

Gary Werner
Chicago, IL

Charles Good Springfield, Illinois   January 20th, 2008 9:55 pm ET

It doesn't appear that Senator Obama can handle the rough and tumble of big league presidential politics. He should return to the Senate, continue to learn and grow, and leave the tough job of leading the country to Senator Clinton. She is tough, experienced, and ready to lead. His time will come. Her time is now. The country needs her.

Oklahoma_Pol   January 20th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

There are a number of truths here.

Barrack Obama is running against Bill Clinton and Hillary will soon be a quilty bystander to the destruction of Obama's chances.

She will then play GOOD COP and try to make nice and secure Obama's support in the general election.

Bill will then over shadow who ever the the Vice Presidential candidate is and Hillary will soon be defending Bills actions in the White House instead of her own agenda.

Hopefully the democrats will continue this primary fight til May

DAVID   January 20th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

HEY OBAMA,

If you cant deal with the criticism now, how can you deal it with when the republicans come after…
your true colors are showing

Tom   January 20th, 2008 9:58 pm ET

I am not condoning any kind of negative campaigning on the part of the Obama or Clinton camps, but when you have the audacity to try and convince the country that the Clintons don't support the legacy or message of Martin Luther King Jr., I am not interested in hearing your condemnation of negative campaigning. End of story.

May the best Democrat win (this one hopes it is Hillary), and may our party make it out in one piece.

Tom
New York, NY

Christina from TN   January 20th, 2008 9:59 pm ET

No time for whining now Mr. Obama! No one ever said this would be easy.

Jason   January 20th, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Sounds like Obama is complaining again, seems that is all he has been doing lately.

Donna   January 20th, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Quit the whinning. I see his wife on the campaign trail all the time and what about Oprah.
Give me a break.

Gobama   January 20th, 2008 10:01 pm ET

NO CLINTON 3rd TERM!
STATUS QUO MUST GO!

The Clintons defile the Oval Office to destroy their own White House legacy and their 'marriage'.

The Clintons undermined the US Presidency, prevent the election of Al Gore, cause the election of bush, the destroyer, start an UNPROVOKED war, sacrifice thousands of American lives and limbs, emptied the National Treasury, weakened the dollar and destroy the US economy. . . . .

Do Americans want another round of crass Clinton undermining of the US Presidency and defilement of the Oval Office?

S.A.Alagarsamy   January 20th, 2008 10:02 pm ET

This is unfair . Mr Clinton must save his Image as Past President of America.
Let Honesty takes place
My forecast is Obama will be a clear winner .
alagarsamy

Danny Campbell   January 20th, 2008 10:02 pm ET

Obama is not ready to be President. First, he calls into question the Clinton's life-long support of human rights, then he praises Reagan over Clinton. And, he expects them (and voters) to not respond?

I was highly impressed with him before he refused to denouce the Culinery Workers' Union's disgusting radio ad against Hillary (when he accused Edwards of the same thing in Iowa). He is coming across as a hypocrite and does not seem ready to be President. This primary season is "soft ball" compared to what the general election will throw at the Democratic nominee. Hillary is far more 'tested' and ready for that battle.

Hillary 08 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AJ   January 20th, 2008 10:02 pm ET

This is because he IS running against both of them. But this could be an opportunity.
If Obama can win a debate against the former president, and do it with more class and more "presidentially", he could elevate himself as looking ready to take all comers.
This is his first test, if he can handle Bill, convincingly and in command, he is ready to be President. The odds are stacked against him, but then again, they have been all his life.
At the very least, a STERN rebuke by Obama, will be a nice little reality check Bill needs.
Until Al gore and Ted Kennedy come with endorsements, it really is 2 against 1. Unless Edwards comes in and takes some shots as well. As someone not being attacked, his rebuke would have alot of credibilty. Heck, even Republicans feel it's unfair for Obama to fight against 2 Clintons at once, so it's no illusion what's happening. It's sad that Hillary can't even run her own campaign or sell herself, Bill has do do everything for her.
Independents and Republicans, your help at the ballot would be welcome.
Obama/Edwards 08.

Danny Campbell   January 20th, 2008 10:04 pm ET

P.S. I would like to see him as VP with Clinton though

marie   January 20th, 2008 10:04 pm ET

we all know Bill Clinton's record. He doesn't care what he says or does as long as he gets what he wants. Who's running for president, Bill or Hillary? A vote for her is a vote for him. Bill is using Hillary so that he can be president again.

abigi   January 20th, 2008 10:05 pm ET

It looks like Obama is feeling the heat.A democrat who sees Reagan as his mentor is very disturbing.

Obama is going to lose south carolina too.

Some black people have already been disappointed with obama's comments.

Maurice Ojow   January 20th, 2008 10:05 pm ET

Bill Clinton's behavior is unbecoming. He should let Hillary campaign for herself. As things stand today, it looks like it is Bill Clinton who is going to rule America again. If Hillary cannot support her own campaign and get voters to vote, how is she going to run the White House? American should wake up and know that she does not have what it takes to lead. If a leader is supposed to be at the forefront, then she is not one. Her husband is the one calling the shots now.

PJ, New York   January 20th, 2008 10:05 pm ET

Boo hoo, poor Obama! If he can't take the pressure from Bill Clinton, I can't wait to see him when the Republican's get a hold of him, should he win the DEM nomination of course. The Republican's will not be as nice to him as Bill has been, they will eat him alive. Let's also not forget his free ride on the media train. The news media has been VERY good to him, only reporting positive stories about him.

Mary, Iowa voter   January 20th, 2008 10:06 pm ET

If one listens to the entire context of anything that has been said, the conclusion will be clear; Clintons have a passing familiarity with the truth, while Obama's honor for the former POTUS has previously restrained his comments.

I can't understand why Iowans are accused of being "sexist" for not voting for Senator Clinton. Maybe it's just because we saw more of the two of them and how they interact with their campaign staff and voters, and we KNOW what will will be getting. I'm a feminist. Every other feminist I know has fallen away from Senator Clinton.

BIG JIM , nashville, tn   January 20th, 2008 10:06 pm ET

WELL, MR. OBAMA YOU ARE RUNNING AGAINST TWO, HOWEVER YOU HAVE THE MEDIA RUNNING FOR YOU. SO IT ALL BALANCES OUT.

Robert J Sutton   January 20th, 2008 10:06 pm ET

I am really glad that Obama has decided to say something about this. I noticed this campaign tactic back in New Hampshire after Obama won the Iowa caucus. President Bill Clinton became increasingly agitated and began to make slanderous statements that were far from the truth. It's a widely used, and unfortunately, a widely successful campaign tactic. Attack your opponent. It doesn't have to be true, as long as it's distasteful. This tactic is particularly effective because of the impact it has on voters. By launching tactless attacks, you turn voters off, disenfranchising them from the process. This is not the first time we have seen this tactic. The Clinton campaign used it with overwhelming success when Bill was contending for the Democratic nomination in 91 - 92.

The fact of the matter is, Obama is fighting a battle on multiple fronts. Bill campaigns in California while Hillary campaigns in Nevada, and then they switch. There's nothing wrong or illegal about that, but I think it speaks greatly to Obama's ability to run one hell of a campaign. Obama can't be in two places at once, he does not have a former President backing his campaign, nor does he have the entrenched party ties that Hillary has, yet he has put on a very competitive campaign.

I have always been a big fan of Bill. There were some policies I did not agree with (NAFTA), but for the most part I think he did a good job. But I am tired of the Bush and Clinton dynasties. We live in America, not the UK. Just because someone belongs to a family does not entitle them to the "throne".

Me, I'm supporting Obama this time around. Sorry Hillary.

Obama '08

Gordo   January 20th, 2008 10:06 pm ET

Poor Obama-wama, wonder if he knows what it will be like when it is:

1 Rove
2 Buchanans
3 Bushes
4 Reagans
5 Mcains
and half a dozen Swift Boaters?

wow   January 20th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

Billary's tenacity is almost scary. By any means necessary…

Jose Card - Independent   January 20th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

It's not AS IF Obama is running against both Clintons.
Obama is running against both Clintons.

Bill Clinton knows exactly what not to do as a former president.
He is very desperate to return to the White House.
We just don't know why he is so desperate.
I could not bear seeing his angry face in public.
He is running this race as if it's life or death.
This is getting creepy.

Mark   January 20th, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Dear Obama,
At times you will face many challenges against many more people than just the Clintons. You have to be strong enough to handle this and not complain. This is a prime example of your inexperience. Stop whining and get off your high horse. You are yesterday's news.
Sincerely,
A Non-Obama Supporter

Nicky, Phoenix, AZ   January 20th, 2008 10:09 pm ET

Wah Wah Wah…..Obama needs to stop whining and blaming eveyone else for his losses…..

He lost Nevada, own up to it - stop being an arrogant SOB…..Just say "I lost Nevada, but we're moving on to South CArolina…."….Geez…it's his arrogance and his "I'm owed it" approach that I can't stand…

Steve b   January 20th, 2008 10:09 pm ET

NAFTA, CAFTA are steps toward the North American Union and the elimination of the United States of America as a nation.

The steps that have been taken regarding globalization and the yielding of the USA leadership position in manufacturing, technology, and “you name it” is appalling. Just look at the tragic status of the USA Dollar on the world scale.

I believe that the USA as we know it is in jeopardy, and most presidential candidates are ducking the big issues.

Surprisingly, it’s Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul who are actually representing the positions of the majority

Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA   January 20th, 2008 10:10 pm ET

As all lawyers know, it's easy to impeach the credibility of a perjurer, and Bubba is no exception. I won't vote for Hillary, who simply hasn't yet been convicted of lying, and I'm unlikely to vote for Obama, but if he calls out the Clintons as the truthbenders they truly are, I might ignore his thin experience.

Eddie   January 20th, 2008 10:10 pm ET

Obama's speech at Ebenezer Baptist Church was brillant, inspiring!

While the Clintons want divisions, Obama is talking about Unity!

Clinton is not elecatable in the general election! Do you get it?!?

Aren't we not tired of Clinton/Bush dynasties?!?!? Do you remember Clinton consolidation of the Media or NAFTA?!?

Open your eyes please!

Obama 2008!

joe   January 20th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

unfortunately for senator obama, he has crossed the kill zone of the clintons. like them or not, the clintons are effective politicians willing to use every opening and seemingly not squemish about the tactics they must use. the clintons are determined to win the democratic nomination, and it seems to the exlcusion of all things.

mr. obama needs to continue with his progressive and positive message, but not hold back to correct the clintons with their misrepresentations, misquoting, and outright fabrication of facts. it would serve him well to simply repeat his statements, even if he has to replay an actual video clip so that people can judge for themselves. if he chooses to brawl with this team, mr. obama will be left bruised, bloody and possibly beaten. he needs to recognize the clintons' achilles heel, their almost single mindedness in acccomplishing a goal and their seeming inability to ever consider the possiblity that they could be in the wrong. if he remains above the fray, he can hope that the voters will begin to see the clintons for all their strenghts and faults, and possibly turn away from them.

for democarts the choice they have is to back a candidate who can actually create the counterpoint of the regan democrat and activate the growingly large independent block vs. a candidate who can mobilize the opposition to mount a full on counter attack and dishearten those already sick of the political process. democrats cannot be lulled into a false sense that the white house is for them to win, despite any and all attempts by the republicans to hold on to it. democrats have the opportunity to easily win, but this is unlikely or will be a hard fought battle unless they can energize all parts of their electorate and entice independents and moderate republicans to join them.

mr. obama will need some courage to emulate dr. king or any other number of leaders who advocated a non-violent response towards those who are willing to inflict injury upon them. he needs to continue to hold onto hope that democrats and americans in general are ready to vote based on hope, rather than driven by their fears. he needs to continue to believe that americans are capable of giving themselves that which they sacrifice so dearly to provide for others, a real sense that things can get better if people can come together.

ray in vegas   January 20th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

Anyone paying attention knows Obama’s always advised his supporters to lay off the race card and focus on issues. they attack him, using prominent black figures, and when he clarifies his positions, or if others get outraged at the dirty tricks, he gets accused of race-baiting. Hillary suggested "you may think you're a dreamer and inspirational, but i'm presidential (LBJ) and you're not". His response? "that was ill-advised and unfortunate". Yet he gets accused of race-baiting!

When the unions endorsed Obama, the Clinton supporters tried to shut down the casino precincts in Vegas 2 days later. When the judge laughed them out of court, Bill interferes with our vote in Vegas by showing up at several precincts on the strip, demanding entrance, and dragging along his massive security detail, creating a HUGE disruption. Many caucusers were so star struck that they either didn't bother to caucus, or decided to caucus for Hillary.

At my precinct voter cards suddenly disappeared. We discovered Hillary people had taken them! When we asked for some back, they’d been all marked for Clinton. We demanded they disregard the cards, insisting on a hand count. Our chair was a known Hillary fan – she saw the dirty tricks and almost called the cops because some Hillary supporters were rude and aggressive - she got scared. She said - i volunteered many hours and was here for Clinton but i’m so disgusted i'm raising my hand for Obama!

If Hillary is so loved and respected, why does she play dirty? Why does she need to recruit slime like Bob Johnson to take out a hit on him? How hypocritical! The crap on BET is degrading to women and glorifies thug culture, including drug use and crime. Bob Johnson has become a billionaire by exploiting black people, pushing filth to vulnerable youth while Obama was working in troubled communities of Chicago.

The Clintons are dirty. They'll stop at nothing to get back into the White House. They don’t care about anybody or anything except power. You think Bill Clinton is doing this because he actually loves his wife? Wake up, America!

tony   January 20th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

Hillary trash-talked "oil companies" and "drug companies" in New Hampshire. But guess whose campaign raises the most cash from them?

David   January 20th, 2008 10:13 pm ET

Is there a bigger phony in politics? How about Clintons?

Laura   January 20th, 2008 10:13 pm ET

I don't want a cry baby for a president.

Brian   January 20th, 2008 10:13 pm ET

January 20, 2008 10:13 pm

Obama campaign senior adviser David Axelrod did not back away from the remarks after they became public Sunday night, telling CNN the Clintons “have a good cop, bad cop thing going” in which “he comes with a negative message she stays positive.”

Oh that's just wonderful! LOL . They are now taking headlines from CNN. I just love it! I'm laughing so much that my stomach hurts.

In the interview, Obama reportedly says that the former president has been misrepresenting both “my record of opposition to the war in Iraq” and “our approach to organizing in Las Vegas,” as the controversy over Saturday’s Nevada caucus vote continues to grow.

What record???The fact that you didn't vote 113/383 times? In 2 years? We already know that.
Yeah, I opposed the war too. Guess what, I didn't get to hear what was said in the Senate to be able to decide one way or the other and neither did you. You didn't have a vote on the war. You were not in the Senate yet. With your record it would probably have been "Present".

Your getting worse everyday.

Sen. Obama this is no way to win an election. You sound childish and whiny…She won and Bill saying bad things about me. Oh give me a break.

LA   January 20th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Obama seems to be whining again and his team didn't put negitive ads on the radio stations in Nevada. Just a reminder…it's poitics big boy and they didn't pull the race card.

Michigan   January 20th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Sen. Obama is running against both the Clintons. Both their mugs are on the air constantly and getting much more air time than any of the other candidates. Their whining, crying and accusations are incessant. I think Sen. Obama is courageous for withstand ing the Clinton sleaze machine.

I'm not a fan of George Bush but at least he didn't have his dad out there on the constant attach against GW's competitors.

I heard Clinton praising Sen. Obama at her endorsement speech from Rev. Butts and her credibility is so shot with me I didn't believe anything she said was sincere.

The Clintons are nauseating and I'm a Democrat. If Hillary wins the nomination this Democrat who will vote Republican. The Clinton's in the White House again - I pray not.

Magliovelli, Menlo Park CA   January 20th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Obama is correct. Bill Clinton has become a wannabe attack dog a la Dick Cheney.

Seth(Kentucky)   January 20th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

I think Edwards and Obama are in race against two Clintons . This is rather unfortunate moment in Politics. I would say Clintons are running dictatorship in democratic party. When the Nevada caucus debate was going on, Bill Clinton was in LA at the same time speaking to group of people. How can anyone compete against them in fair and justified manner?

Mirta   January 20th, 2008 10:15 pm ET

"Oh, I feel like the whole world is picking on me…"

If this BHO can't handle criticism from the opposition, if elected President, how does he expect to sit down with Iran, N. Korea and Syria and solve issues?

I think he is whiney, inexperienced as a politician and getting scared *wink*

john   January 20th, 2008 10:15 pm ET

The amount of money Clinton’s campaign has raised from pharmaceutical (drug) companies, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. This is more than any other candidate (including Republicans) has raised.

natouche   January 20th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

CNN, I'm really disappointed that you didn't post my earlier message.

When Bill Clinton was a presidentiel candidate, Oprah was campaigning for him and he was always on her shows. Now that Oprah is backing OBAMA, it become's a race issue and she is portrayed as the devil.

Oprah gave lots of money like many other americans for Clinton's campaigns but don't blame people for not backing Hillary this time around. The Clintons had their time, now you guys need change, a person capable of changing the image of America on the international scene.

Whenever CNN posts an article about a celebrity backing OBAMA, the lashing starts. So all the black people who helped Bill Clinton get elected are now evils because they are not backing his wife? Are they racists because they are backing OBAMA who is half white, half black. What about the blacks who back John Edwards???

If the race was between John Edwards and Hillary, it wouldn't be the same, IT JUST HAPPENED THAT SHE IS UP AGAINST A CANDIDATE WHOM SHE DIDN'T EXPECT TO DO SO WELL.

Hillay Clinton is NOT Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton is NOT Bill Clinton.

Vote for the best candidate.

Vote for Hillary if you think that she will do a good Job for the American people not because she is Bill Clinton's wife.

Vote for OBAMA because you believe and feel that he can change the state of the Systeme, bring the Americans together.

Vote for John Edwards because you think that he can do something.

GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT, inform yourself, read, read, read, because an informed person is a free person. Read about what OBAMA has done and is offering. Because if you don't know him, educate yourself and find out about him. You all already know John Edwards and Hillary Clinton so educate yourself and be a free individual.

You are all democrates so how can you hate OBAMA so much?

You guys are not very United at the Moment.

David, SC   January 20th, 2008 10:17 pm ET

CNN, congrats on being the new fox news. This photograph of Obama, with his hands in the air, as if he is being arrested by the police, I'm sure is purely by accident. The caption under the photograph says "Obama strikes back at Bill Clinton." Such a strong phrase used there: He strikes back.

Well if the caption says he's striking back, why do you show him with his hands in the air, as if he has a gun pointed at him? What are you trying to suggest by juxtapositioning that strong caption, with that particular image.

You already know what it is, even if the general public isn't slick enough to get it at a concious level.

Guilty as sin CCN. Actually, that should be your new slogan. CNN: The guiltiest political team on television. CNN: The most biased team on television.Do any of you journalist have any morals anymore. lol. And what;s even more hilarious, is that some people actually beleive that you are for Obama. LOL. Good job, Fox 2.

Oh, lord, save us all.

Now let's see if you guys have enough nerve to post this.

John K   January 20th, 2008 10:17 pm ET

It's about time Obama. Bill had his runs for president and he should now get lost. If his wife can't fight for herself, then she doesn't deserve the nomination.

Whenever there is a crucial event on the horizon, you will see Bill come out with some piece of crap to throw out there. He knows that it will be reported whether its true or not - see the culinary worker story. If he claims that he is not making it up, thats the clue.

Don't take anything lying down from these people. If they are nice you play nice, if not a sharp kick to the groin and then back to your message.

bob   January 20th, 2008 10:17 pm ET

sounds like Obama is beginning to get desparate

bennessa   January 20th, 2008 10:20 pm ET

“You know the former president, who I think all of us have a lot of regard for,has no shame, he has no shame

Drew   January 20th, 2008 10:21 pm ET

“Wake up folks, we’re going in the wrong direction, let’s get an experienced person in the white house like Hillary ! Amen ! ”

Wow. Just becuase her husband was president does not give her experience. Same with Bush Jr., just becuase daddy was president does not mean you are experienced. We need someone to give us a clean slate, and Obama seems like the best choice

anon middle america   January 20th, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Is this Obama's new direction? His message of hope and change didn't work in NV which is rough and tumble and Las Vegas which is over the top in glitz and techno innovation? Guess you can't fool the hucksters who make a living by schilling the customers ;)

Obama should give his handlers and hacks the heave ho and start over again by going back to being himself. BUT his staff is living in lalaland if they think the united Republican attack machine is going to play pat-a-cake (and now everyone can accuse us of spreading fear and panic - but anyone who has watched presidential politics long enough knows better). So please stop feeding the guileless followers the notion that it's going to be a stroll in the park… or that the path will be steep. The strategy of whining that the other side isn't playing nice isn't going to cut it… suck it up and be a man.

Chaunda   January 20th, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Get over it Obama. Your wife has had her say. Nobody is trying to stop her. If you want to blame someone blame the media who follows Clinton like he is a runaway slave. They do not have cover everything he says, they choose to.

natouche   January 20th, 2008 10:22 pm ET

It's really, because Bill Clinton is not respecting himself. When I think that Obama voted for Clinton and probably campaigned for him. It makes you wonder who isrunning for the nomination Bill or Hillary. Bill Clinton wants a 3rd mandate at any cost. Hope everyone sees it now. This is supposed to be the democratic party.
Good luck Obama. They didn't see you coming, once a friend, now the enemy.

S, WI   January 20th, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Well, you are running against both Clintons and Democrats.
I think you still have a shot at nomination if switch parties to republican.
Or how about pairing up with Bloomberg?

Don   January 20th, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Whatever happened to the e-mails that Hillary said she would release from Bill's library so everybody could see her "experience".

The last time it was an issue was the Philadelphia debate.

Obama would be wise to push for answers.

a little sad   January 20th, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Michelle Obama launches attack on Clinton
By Toby Harnden in Las Vegas
Last Updated: 9:25am GMT 19/01/2008

"Michelle Obama, who could become America’s first black First Lady, has launched a scathing attack on her husband’s opponent Hillary Clinton, stating she represents "the same old thing over and over again".

Whereas Barack Obama preaches a message of hope and transcending differences that is more kumbaya than combative, his wife, like him a lawyer and a Harvard graduate, did not hesitate to take his main opponent on in an appearance at a Las Vegas."

What is Obama's complaint - that his spouse does not have the same crediblity that Clinton's spouse does?"

Illinois Indie   January 20th, 2008 10:23 pm ET

And the countdown beings for the destruction of the Democratic Party, and who will be to be blame for it? There is so much internal hatred going on that rallying those that were the targets of the other sides hatred will be hard to do.

natouche   January 20th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

It's really sad, because Bill Clinton is not respecting himself. When I think that Obama voted for Clinton and probably campaigned for him. It makes you wonder who isrunning for the nomination Bill or Hillary. Bill Clinton wants a 3rd mandate at any cost. Hope everyone sees it now. This is supposed to be the democratic party.
Good luck Obama. They didn't see you coming, once a friend, now the enemy.

Sam   January 20th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Few weeks back in NBC Meet The Press Obama indicated that his Spouse can do better in debates as compared to Hilary Clinton's Spouse. May be this is time Obama get some help from his Spouse :)

Cindy   January 20th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Pot and Kettle?

I agree Barack and it actually reminds me of someone — none other than your wife Michelle who never misses an opportunity to race bait in front of largely black audiences (while using incorrect grammar in a manner I find demeaning, I might add) "Ain't no white folks in Iowa."

Mel   January 20th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Can you see?

If Hillary Clinton goes without Bill Clinton, would she survive in New Hampshire? Certainly NOT!.

If Hillary Clinton goes without Bill Clinton, would she survive in Nevada? No!.

If Hillary Clinton goes without Bill Clinton on SUPER TUESDAY - February 5th, HILLARY CLINTON WILL NOT SURVIVE!

If you really want Hillary Clinton to run this country, she has to stop use Clinton and prove herself to us!

Thank you

Hillary's watcher

Illinois Indie   January 20th, 2008 10:25 pm ET

And the countdown beings for the destruction of the Democratic Party, and who will be blame for it? There is so much internal hatred going on that it will be hard to get those who were hit hard against the other side to come together as a "family"

Jimmy, Oklahoma Feb. 5th   January 20th, 2008 10:26 pm ET

He claims to be ready for the Republican machine. The Clintons are treating him like he is a little bay and the media is treating him like he is a baby. C'mon this guy is to weak to be President.

Senator Clinton for President of the